Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 08-25-1982Page 240 Planning Commission m1ifI u t.es dgus t , '1 The proposed ae ndm nt s would ai . ow manufactured homes in, the R-2 and R-3 ZoningDistricts as a conditlon,11 use, $*mi. iar to `s1119le fermi) detachtd dwellings. There wcuid be two tYPes of manufactured homes (Class I andess The difference between the two c ss .is the i—illowable widrch Of the vn t. Class T would reguit - 411 manufa4',f:ur1Yd homes be a i"imuM of ZZ fett in wilth, and a Class "I 'manufactured home could be less than 22 feet in width. In a Manufactured Nome Park, why.ch is now allowed as a ondit.onai use in the and R-3 districts, Class T and/or Class 11 Manufactured ifomes would De allowed. The amendment als{) provide current definitions Cons-Ist nt ti.th State 1-dws and re u ations. Procedural requirements ani design standards for Manufactur- ed Rome Par€; developmentsents ire aiscn, provided. Staff expLained that a Pcblia Hearliw Hotide has been published in, the legal; t ,Iwspaper :and that Mr. ane Holderef'ss# Presleeitt of tf-c; Piyfuth Development Council was notified. 3 wa missloner Plufka Inquired if a Manufactured Home Parr was feasible. irt; the R-2 Zoninq District., Staff concurred that de've opmvnit would be constrained given land and dev lopf nt costs; however, er. lth a large enough park,, it may be 'viable. Staff" noted that mai fa tured home interests have indicated that the land e onomt s and the requirement to onneet to urban utilities have b-Mt det rreitts to widespread location Of';manufactured home 'In urban ares. hairw ar asi,llou closed the Public Hearing, I-1011ON by Commissioner Paub l seconded by Commissioner Pl f" a to take: action at thus time. 5;Ayes* Commissioners agnus and Stelgerwald absent. MOTION carried. OT11H by Commis-sioner Paubaseconded b Commissioner Stvibertd to recommend approva)l of the proposed Zoning RECOMMENDATION AOr,fflnanee Amendments regarding Manufactured H+,usjng as VOTE su iii.tt d. 5 Ayes. Commissioners Magnus and Ste. erwald absent.. MDTj,ON carried. Page 241 Planning Commission Minutes August 2% 1982 HEW BUSINESS: LIESCINC. FOR halrw an aslliou introduuced the request submitted by LID INV SITE PLAN MDLesc¢o, Inc. for LTD lavestments for a Site Plan ani !-'trlanoe VARIANCE (82047) for art office/warehouse facility. chalrw,L,an Vas111 u observed that no orue-was present to represent the petitioner on this request. f m r.ssioner , Plufka, seoondeRA by Commissioner MOTION TO DEFERtlberqtotableconeyvt,(it ion of this Item until the end VOTE of the me trnq* 5 Ayes. g als-toners Magnus and telgerwdld abse,-,t. MOTION carried# ftalr vorr t a Ydsiliou int-rodue d the .equest submitted by FOXCLOV Pk'f ' RTIEoglovePropertiesforUpsher-Smith f,abQratorles, Inc, for FOR UPSHER-SMITH LAS a Site Plan Amendment and Variance fo,t,rie expansion of the SITE PLAN AMENOWNT exlstlnq f40111ty 19 ated at 14905 ZJrd Avenue North. The AND VARIANCE (A-696) proposal calls for an appro 1 ate f, 0 sq, ft. addition. Reading of the August 16, -1982 stafff r°eport ; was waived. Chairwom,,21n i, as rl Ion introductal Don Must ad, Architect and representatrv. for the pet loner. Mr. Hustad stated theydidnothaveanyquestionsonthe51,af f report. Commissioner Wire Inquired why area for the required Parking per, the Zoning Ordinance could not be provided. ' Mr. Mustad expla.itted that the petitioner did try to design a plan that would comply with the Ordinance requirements and the current application represents the best pian for the owners" needs, The plan calls for 96, parking spaces: which provides ,Ix arxdrtional, spaces for the proposed building usage. f, requested variance involves the required proof-of-parkleg Plan. Cmmissioner Wire inquired if the petitiorter would be willing to limit the current :and future use of the bullo.4 -1q cons ideri nq the parking variance request. Ken Evenstadl, psher- mith Laboratories, Inc., stated. *. uit If the lender for the project agrees with placing a covenant on the property, the petitioner would concur. CWmIssioner Plufka inquired why the fire lane was proposed to dead end's Mr. Hustad stated that the petit loner 'would comply with the .st.aff's recommendation for fire lane location. Commissioner P.lufka stated that the issue before the Commission rs to determine If future uses can be Irr;rted to those which would not require any additional parking, page 2, Plan rirg Commission Minutes August 2 , 1962 Staff stated that telephone contact had been made with fir. RDavid tloner; arid, he LTD IWESTWNTS eXPI-Aas of 505 P.M.,he was notified that file SITE FLAN AND project and application would not be pursued. Thlerefore., hairw0mart VdSiIllOu MANE (820,47) removed this item from the agenda at the architect,14 request and state - that the Petitioner reserves the right to return to tie l.annir Co miss on for oomid r- ation. It was recommntded that staff contact the pet <t' ioner in order to determine if the application would be formallywithdrera. OLD BUSIWSS- h i rwoman Vas it l ou introduced the continued ; review and STAMD CROWTH PLAN hearing oft the proposed Staged Growth Plant and Amendment w AWNDWNT TO THE the City's Comprehensive Plan t was requested that staffCITYIS COMPRENENSIVF- provide a review of this topic so that those; persons in PLAN attendance at this hearing who did not R)tt nd the first hearinq would have a full understanding or the Issue. Staff expJaIned the Information forwarded to the Planning ommissiort in the staff report dated August 20, 1962 as corrected and mvised August 23, 1982» Staff stat ci that ,,-st sprig after many months,, the City was Informed by theetropol tan C aunc that the, itv's second effort to provide .a 1990 Growth Plant was not fully, responsive to the Metropolitan Council concerns. It was indicated that. the Plan was not definitive enough as to growth areas through_ the yeas 1990. The specific require- ments for a Staged Growth ele nt in the Comprehensive Plan wase a condition of the etro olitart 'endorsement of the Plat: it May. estate law requires tett tf;e City adopt the Plan complying with conditions, within nine months. Staff has been working on the Plan In close coordination with Metro- olitan Council staff, and f -aa been guided by direction from the City Council., and by input from the City Council and by Input from the Commission during the hearings. The Metropolitan Council, staff has Indicated that they are undertaking planning measures to resolve the capacity Problems wh -h are at the heart of thf Staged Growth Plant. Page- 245 Planning ommission Minutes August Z5, ' ` Trade-offs" would only occur with the post -1990 areas i the City feels, thane is merit to extend a trunk sewer to the: property. Upon that decision,, a comparable area within the Pr"'POSOd growtharea or committed area %vould have to b d.ietc d""i, and designated "post --1990: ", The trunk sewer xt r s orx and Plan amendment would have, -to be. approved bytheMetropolitanCouncil,. Chairwoman Vaslijou asked how a potential buyer would be notified that ert,airt pop rte is 'lot developable before 1999* Staff explained that the post -19 t, aroma would b similar to the current Rural , rake Area. pot ntle devel- opers/buyers, usually verb, fvon* tig arid guldIng, information and utility availability. Chairwoman Vasll'lou opened the public Rearfng. Sohn Worrall, Vi Pay Planning *.*Omjssl rlfirlutes August , err resPOr se to rpt from Mr. : ae son, that trrraWar Of V 'ssituation prior to the plarrirt 1 nq comm!ss I on Meting, Chairwomatt Vasilloij suggested that eve . *with- In, the community Join the p ym u hv lopme q Council in Order to Uifo w-t f such z t(; s. David Craint 50,0 F °est),Ieky Lane, stated that his con -ern s that the Alle ro e i t.,in .j;j j jis l: ° rs vp I n he l r b urd.0. fir* Crams stated' hat the concept to e enforced s u rea lst and djr us t those who have planned around the existing,f S boundary. t was Indicated that the Cita of Plymouth Is very capable of moriltorinq dere opment b a first eume,, f rpt served" basis. hairuoman Vdsltlou expressed ono r n that the City iRwithMdnyManyotheremnt s for. development and with limited de e4opa 1e areas in. the City, Plymouth may 10SVI some Of this developmcnt. 099 r Rot he t Pr,)9rammeO Land Co. 6440 Flyinq Ci to d fir# stand that he has communicated with the City about sorvic- Ifig their property with sewers.Mr. Rotherequested, that that part of his: property, in the post-1990 area be Included within the CUSS area, and that devel, pmt!it occur arr a "first s i come, , first served" basis, It as t It0z' cat d that develop- 1 men-- plans were based or), the current MUSA bndrrdaiv. 1 f ray a t rtx 7415 y.z„rta Blvd, 1, st,ted that he represents Proavdmmed, a .4, d Co. , and wl shed to pro it de reasons for the request to include their property i t Mn the CEPSA boundary. Mr. ` Hagea stated that their property carr be served without the extension of trunk sewer lines, and. that the proposal calls for providing moderate I qac came housing near large Mpl yment centers, and that the roads anti Improvements would bre Installed without rtquiring City bondin . fr Ragen e ommented that a Iot of the designated developable” areas In, the City would not be developed becausp of marginal land. The Metropolitan Council 1s not particularly concernel wi i, the location of the developing pr,up rt , but the actual sewaqe flow ca ulat.inns umm ssiarrer P of a requested that when Mrs dgen's cunwnts are discussed and responded to, that it be clarified if Programmedmed .and Co. propetrty In nl e.s more than one. seer di strit`, 247 AU, 3111. 11111 --ton- Charlton ' j esu, Highwa 5 statedthat'it, desired t expand on the letter whirl, was seat tthePIC011"1119 Cmmlssion "members, #rte 3ohnston expladnedthatCharltonopavlesowqstwoparcelsoflandwiis -h areldlenti^i °d as post -1990 areas'. They are concernO because tot date there has been no discussion or proposal for a - rpt c tl4 er ey pian for the POst-1990 areas;. thattheCityshouldbegineffortstodaywiththeMetropolitan udreci,i to resolve the current capacity problems; that those areas iassi i% as developable art -as are not "home freje,, a -s . J. Groves CiAaparq, has approval for a requiding appil" cation whit;; projects a 255% increasein the sewage flowswfa.ich was not approved; ands.. the, Chari.urt comparli s wi P, fliall"ifig Commission Minutes August , 1982 to lissuggeste'd th t thi6 C! t meet examine .xatloftPOII*Ie$ andsI i i private mitment fromdevelopers. The City should de tormlra or achieve a., greater em l lbi In allowitiq areas to develop, 'hlNfshoulddtrraint—, how many- acrps the tetr l z Carr Council will al J ow to be developed pr for to 1990; div l cep a tatervrit which firmly states the City will not o d thedt-fin d a ac ; andy further regi e "'developable" aredti, which should not, or would riot need, e ineludedAs` juch' lam as Possible should be included In the "develop- able" areas, so as to avoid under -Including lane[ end mialmiz- 1 rad "ke imPdct Of ,fIeCtinq further developable areas. Criteria should be st a ajlsh d for shifting bur n they defined devolopable classifleation which 'soul be l l_ b.l . and the .t hou d resolve the duvr nt o pat-,ltyproblem. Chairwoman gas i l ;l ori inquired how Mr. Nowlin would I suqqe.st City resolve the situation of p eCulativeloud purhs- Bks? Mr. Nowlin, stated ' he dial arbt know how such suroluslandsavailable, The ah lrr Commission r o d from 9.-50 to 10-10 p.M,. R EP, E SS Sta ` f r v1&Y d the maps and graphics, which were attached 'ter REX1.10WENEDtheAugust20,E 19521 staff report. Darrell Bdraett, North Central Lighweight Agg-egatCo., 637? Pheasant 'ou t,, Ldina, stated that ,he Is opposed` to the Pro os d CUSAlies and recom ends that the City state to etroPolltarr Couriell that we would abide by the defined a ao;l ty and ; otherwise lot d c -l. o ment occur' Mr* Barnett stated fie thinks lWiting jdae, ' 4 Post -1990 would remove and eliminate enough tax baso that the City could afford to pur- sue a Idsuit with N tro lltaij Council. Staff` reviewed Attachment to. I o h. d us4` , 1 staff ert a" August t 198; Chairw rr;art Va l i tr requested, resPortse to thr qui rt * lit r port Y 'to Mr. f z rall' Inquiry Wh titer the USA line mJY bV, sblfte, stiff exrAalned that a "trade-off" would hdW to occur fear .t hose areas Which Cannote serviced h - out true sewer terrsi n. fir. r roll Ina lr d f latTral .sines old - t nd d from Downtown pl rtctcrtPr tottNtorthtmrlalMfldletlCeyetrproperty..oOtt r ir OM pllttc d tha the apt rn, Y tats Program s baso orttheCOMP 'then iv e Sewer Plan arta ; Involves the of tr rt ,r ltte but nor, ter ekx lines. The ,tetanal er lines ars not extended or reviewed until d v lnpme tt proposals are received. st 11iieer, Moore = p aVjtr ,d further that the onitary sewer plant rtpr#,.-sents the, most eeonomical system for extendinqrttoprdpe-rtn udinp cOnstMetionj, malritenance,, operation). Thi t : er plan could b han d,' but ` it rld b realized that chair e would r tr t i addit ion l iu!A In response to 01 ral l' i n to ry about tate ign i f l a race or tete year 1990,- staff e plaltt d that the l ct slat_ . n requires th t the Comprehensive Plan ,forecast by decades,, vitid I th t the f,-tr OP01l an Council Capital Improvelrents Proqrzw plans through to the yedr` 1990 for improvements to the existintsystem. Staffpl,alt"t d that a, guarantee oot be made for solutlorts to the tjnq cdpdclty problems - however, hOeitwillworkwiththt.° Metropolitan "n rr 11 toward that goal. v. Worrell ; confirmed that the pr°euetrt 'Capital Improvements Pro rum for f4etropollitart Council does 11 not Include sct t ri to tile, i isting capacity problem. it ig f utat d t1rat it i ant Icip t:, d the next ('apital ,l tprtry mwnts Program will. Lligineer Htore explained that the Met- politan Waste On tro l Commissilon develops a recommendation, for sewer Improvemeots wnii0i must be approved by tete Metropolitan Counell. ChdirwOPP, it VaslHou r vlewcd c.twtnt. submitted r. Ceorge ac n, girt David gain. Staff explained that, the property owned by Programmed LandCo., doe4 if"Wlve two sewer districts. b 250 Planning Commission f4inutes, August 25, 19$2 Engineer Mo-uvs sed the se%vrf I to I W. 4c a . do Itlest lift 1 st t i m end oris tau tIon of the i Creek Interceptor. W-40usslon continued obout the preparation of s coat plan to make. availablt, restricted lased for developwnt. It was suggested that some property ow-lers1 t volunteer that th 4r land e rk7,v d f`r r the p t rtt * or Oan-101tted arses. Engineer MOOre owmented that It would be difficult to legallyr.l develop mwi t of, land, which has been s -Sensed forsewer rcef it. JimJohnston, h rlt mpacal s, s gg est d hc, the address criterle and a contingency parr for possible "trade- off", s ;. `,i t o s «' airwk..att V-Asillou asked what would be rong with ,JettIg gr wt h, o Qur as,, p tit ops are submitted., and at the t i n*Y that t t s wy ge vapacitis reached, then development would F u s ng r{ -ir Moore exp'tain d that the extension of trunk x r Ix nes to it sped fL» parcel can "open upft many acres of dfog- imp' * t i t r ira tx,, the Charlton Ccs, land c- s t of the freeway. would Ii volve over 500 acres. It Was, plalit d thdt the t4etropolitan Cowlellseeks specl fIc defined growth areas- the flows will also be monitored. Commissioner Plufka stated that It I's not t -he PlannInq Cn- dssls p r,i vv to gcaesti rithe leggy: propriety of the Mtrupo ; - v, Council. ThePlanning Commission has beer, requ " tile Cit, !:'Ounell to sofas Id r and, to res nd t : h Pl n.h lk rwomVasiliou o seri d that the Comm*crcatrd;a a: on the appropriateness of the Met- 1 tort Counei l s requirements. Ttze Planning COW16sIon continued discussinq that concept of letting, the market determine the de,,,eloping areas. Dick KrIerf Westwood Planning and , q1n r1n , discussed the date utilized bV the Metropolitan ai l review ra ,and preparing the s v aqc, a a jtI. It was, explained that the data used a pre- 1980 Centus.data based o ry data developed I n 197 8. ge l rinl r'1gO-mt- . s ion Minutes August 251, i In aetualit ,. gr vo.ir rate iaa been less than that p o- suggested the City confront the etrci olitan COMCH on the correctness oftheir data which' 4 ,,art Impact off the sewage Ba a i tv Fran Rgen stated that since tbC data was incorrect, fie thot,4ht the ietr politan Counc*l would allow a larger area to develop In order to reach VX! City's defined capacity Staff noted that the 1980 Comprehensiveplan p- tjet d I 11lat On 3 i O , and N, actual=:pktlat ion mall d was i For i the projected population wa:i 331,900, and the 1982 Metrojx)litan Council wimatd was 13,920. St, af cwMent d that a recalculation of the data could be regoe t- d, however, the fetropolItart Couticil would rtlquire that the same anal a s d tijro g ao t theMetropolitan egloo, and not (ast for Piy o t, aim Johnston lr qulreg€ %hat the results would be of the n flow an infiltration stogy City Lngincer Moore explained that the sanitary sewer d' n assimes corrections have been made arere will be Identified in the inflow and Infiltration study. d I rly, o ars Vas i lion ei osed the Pub I ie Kari r1q MOTION b- Commissioner Wire, seconded by Cmimissioraer Pluf a to take action on this item.. 6 Ayes* Commissioner teig r- wald ab ent* K)TION arri d. Commissioner is eommetted that as of the last Planning aassion discussion o this 1 --sue, be thought it would be most appropriate to allow development to the MUSA boundary. ow vers upon further co tsidi!'r tion, the Planninq Commission rust make a reasonable choice of possible approaches. Com- mis i.oner Wire sugqestosuggestthe Commission recommend adoption of Option 'A' as '*Indicated in the staff report. MOTIOU by Coivillssioner Ware, seconded by- CaMmissioner Ploi`ka to recommend adoption, of Option 'A', ani th three oat orles as Indicated in the staff` report; Including a ",ccMmItted growth areall- a potential growth and i of ' l l area - and a ost i s is area or thePotential roti ,a -e ,. staff should, prepare a policy to prevent the capture and holding of sewage oap,,.oi.tiet. by ;providing that capacity would. be, "a sigrr d" up(, ri approvial,of deN l prem plans and e ecut i.on of devi l opment cojitract,s or issuance , of perati t s. For tete post -1990 area, staff should prepare a policy andinformationfor "trod -offs", atrend r ots to the flan Pct Planning Commission Iminut es oust 25,, 196Z Chair, cmarr Vas lu requested staff read Option 'A' theAugust . C staffreport, In VIZ's entiretyr tho$t, F Commissioner Plufka , n u r ed how. marry acres are represented 00, the submitted map in the green areal Staff indicatedZ135Zacreswhlharecoloredgreento *hoer those areaswhichh4Vebeenassessedorhaved;:sessments pending ' for trunk tiewer ben r t j but w lf do riot have lateral service. He expressed ccr: ern t>hat out c 1150^acres Identified as pcteritial growth" areas, only 916 acres could jay dcv loped because. 585 Of those acres would be considered and Aiel cpabsincethepdst-1 Q scrN cc arca acreage is 585a esless t' t et t the trc c11 t n C unci l says i t should e. Hesurestdthanthegreenareasbeas11ptent* 41 growth" rather that' Availability of , lateral servUc could be one Of the c ltcr a to consider for`c,alua- tin developmentproposals InvolvirV land In the Upotcntzalgrowth" wth`£ category. ummiss over Wire stated that the gr=een areas were assessed and the orange (whit) areas were. riot. He stated the Citymust .t have a Platt to ` address this issue and t hendiIca- tions to meet the needs of the developing community couldconsidered. Commissioner Plu ka stated that the und clocdlardshouldbe- treated 'the same as much as Possible$ and his suggestion to put the green and saran (%hate) land in the same category was an effort toward equa lity, Commi ss io tier Stulberg Indicated he could vot support OptionA' as modified because the Metropolitan ^ounoll has framed the City into this position* He, stated he thought the CityLhouldasdevelopmentreccurs. He. stated further concern - about Implementing "trade-offs" Chairwoman Vasillou agreed. She objected to, the t opoll- ati Council, requirement. The de'clopment community as af;,ee enterprise has l`unctioned well and should continue todusea. She stated her recommendation was no reflection on the work accomplished by s1taff. Cbmrli ssacner Stulberq. concurred. Ccmmissiorter r' of a stated that:. the City must have a purr = n carder to function In the ureal. world" The City Coun111requestedthe "best shot" from the Planning Commission,, He stated the Clay Council mint determine hcrw, to hest dial with policy ;issue of the direction given` by the Met,opoljtarjCouncil. I Page 253 P alln cIg Commission minutes August: Z5,, Chairwoman Vasillou stated that the City Council has direct- ed the Planning Commission to consider the land use issues , a dleave the Political decisions them,, and $he stated that tile current Pr Ocess works well acid should eontinue. MOTION by Ccmm1 sii)xivr Plufka seconded by Commissioner WiretoAMENDTHEVAINRITIONto: remove the green area MOTION TO Nfromthe "committed" category and rec ass , fyi t aspoterl- t14 growth" area (orange/white)-- and, incurrate`' byreferencetherecommendedsixseecriteriawith :theindicationonteatthey, are not 'exclusive and can be d fl ed* further,, that the Planning commission feels the Stagedowth, Plan is contrary to good pjan-jjfjq.and lys: o t happroachtodevelopmeqjt. City Engineer Macre staged the jtj as presented, the "Poten- tial rcwth" area would require "minor", amendmerlt, as devel- pmettt were considered and approved; w$ this add rIncludedevelOPme.nts, involving land whichhas beery absessed Commissioner Magnus Inquired about Attachment No. I rt thestaffreportwhichIndicatedendin+ dev iO r e ts, in thegreenarea. Staff state approximately 1,020 of the 21352acreswereaffected. Ommissloner Magnan suggested thatperhapsonlyaportioncthegreenaromaberel,assifi- Staff responded that to dui that a decision viould Ild've to bemadeastowhichacreswere "Oom-m tted" and Mich weren't.. Recause of the assessment status, Staff does not recommendreclassify* n arty of the green colored acres, Rxtenslvediscussionensued. Commissioner Pauba stated he felt he was acting under duressoftheMetropoiztartCouncil,. VOTE earl the NOTION TO At ND THE MAIN MOTION. 4 -Ayes. Com- mis ,fcner Stulberg and Chairwoman as11jou Nay. Comi s cn r VOTE i iSteerwaidabsent,. MOTION carred. VOTE on the MAIN MOTION AS }NCE. AMENDED. 4 Ayes. `ummis- 40 er Stulberg andha rwumat a cu Nays Commissionerer MOTIONterwadabsent. Staff stated this ' wo ul-d be placed before the Counci I onSeptemberZO,,and staff Intencied to coati°nue discusslo tjsWithMetrOPQIftanCODU11staff, noting ;the planning Commis- sion n'n ern . ADJOURNMENT, 11 #0 P.M.