Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 07-28-1982PLANNING CO MM150H HNITE CITY OF PLYMOUTH JULY 26, 198 The regularly s hedui ed meeting of the Plymouth, Fianna naCommission 'Was called to order in the Pym ut!, City Center7:30 P.M. by Chairwoman Vasi jou,, WWRS PRS Chai worn n Vasilj,Cdr xnissitrr rs Wire, Ma nus, 8t lberc , 5tei erwald, , Plufka and P"auba STAFF PRESENT.- Community Development D.,rectur Blair Tr' ere Community Development Coordinator Sara McCann, Associate Planner Al Cottiri ham City Engineer Fred Moore KINUTES, MOTION by Commissioner Wire, se csnded by Cir is iener tui berg to approve the Minutes of ju y 14, 1982 meeting as sub- mitted. Vote 7 Ares, MOTION carried. PUBLIC HEARING ChaimOmdrt Vasi,i.lou stated that item 4.8$' Proposed Capital Improvements Proqram 19 -- 1987" and Staged Crowth Plea l Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, would be da cup ed as the last Item on the ageoda. l Cha.irian Vdsillou introduced the First petiticr and CHURai OF THE requested that staff' review. the uiy 21,, 1962 staff report; EPIPHANY/CONDITIONAL Staff + that theP propes,al involves ars amendment to USE PEW11T, ,AMENOWNT THE GENERALanapprovedGeneralDevelopmentPlanandarequestfora Conditional Use Permit and Site Pian for the development DEWL T-WHY PLAN FOR DRAKELANDo a cnurch. Should the Planning Commission deet the proposal BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL CENTER" appropriate the property will be platted. Staff" comoared the AND SITE PLAN (82 36) rel estate taxes generated from typical, of flee/com- mereiai uses versus residential uses, -taff explained that the Ordinance does comprehend churches as a <conditional use in the commercial distr.1 Chairwoman asiiitu opened ;the public .hearing. Page 195 Planning Commission Minutes 3uly 26, 198? Or, Robert Hoover, 2020. Or laDrive) representative for she Church o1. the Epiphany, explain that the church has worked hard in securing a site 1his site its approximately five miles from the existing church, which has been sold, at 5th Avenue and Boone Avenue. A total of eight sites in the City Of Plymouth ; were considered on the basis of similar ameni- ties to the existing site., Dr. Hoover explained h -,t ;an Invitation tc art informal meeting was circulated to the property owners* Five neighboring residents attended the meeting. It was explained this the petitioner Is aware of the value difference between commercial and a residential property. Or. Hoover stated that there are many variables to be con- sidered such as the number afunits and their value which. would be allowed as ;,omp red to the assessed value of com- mercial property. Gar. Hoover explained that the key issue to discuss Is the land use itself.; The petitioner believes that the uide- lin s are met, and that the proposed use is an extension of a resideafal area which provides a' buffer betwe(.,i the rest - denial and,commercial uses. Commissioner paua inquired where the other sites were located and why they were not dee fined to be suitable. Or. Hoover explained that ;they considered the size; utility availability access, drive time for -nureh members; and, consideration of where the membership , lives. Dr. "cover stated that sites located` at 42nd Avent4e and Nathan Lane, 42nd Avenue and Zachary lane, 5U6 Avenue and Nathan` lane, and Bass hake Road and Nathan .:ane were considered. Mark L.utter n, 4660 Orleans lane, stated that he attended the infdrr.)al m etlnq and was impressed with the proposed building; Mr. Lu Lerman stated he believed the building was aesthetically pleasing and would be better than office use 11atthislocation. I Robert Trill, re{resntinMiles Montes, 47-0 Nathan Lane explained that he also lives across the street from the prosect development. Mr. 'frill ecmmenteu that, i=rom z0 J.- to 5-030 P.M., traffle is generated 'root the ,miles Homes facility.. Mr. Trill commented that if the church decided to operate a, Day Care facility, it was the desire sof Mmes Homes that the petitioner be aware of the current traffic situation. Page 196 Planning CP=mlsslon Minutes July 28, Istu Ken Schuster, 4740 Orleans Ldt,,el explained thi t he dgreed with Mr. Luttermaii and bellevesthat thO proposal would serve as a buffer. Mr.; cur stag he preferred thetrafficthatwouldbegeneratedfromtheproposedchurch rather than that of all office buil,din asdeldyj 4720 Orleans Lane, explained that he reviewed ir10p0s-1 at the City Center at:d did net agree with thesal. Mr. Fideldy stated he h!nks there Is a Limited Wit of business and industrial z_lned property compared tomeantofresidotiailand. Th,,, proposal provides mini_ mum landscaping, ter. Fideldy expressed concerti about the maintenance of the existing ponds net area.= h irwom,in Vasiliou explained that: the pond would be owned by the developer and therefore, woulO be their responsibil- I ty for mainternarlcew ,also, It was explained that the Cityenforceslandscapestandardstoprovidel.andscapinq screen-- Jack Holmes,, 830 Fawn Pond, Elk River, MN, representative for Vanman Construction Compa ay, explained than, the companyhasconstructedseveralchurchesInres:ldential. ares. Typica,ll.y$ such development encounters difficulties because the -residentialareas find the evening use and trafficis gen- erated by a church 'Acompatible. Therefore, it was deter mined that this would be ain appropriate location and wou d serve a*,,a buffer between the residential area and c - merdl al area. Chairwoman Vasillou inquired if the existing church operates a nursery school. Or- Hoover explained that' a nurseryschool. would operate nyxrnin s only. Chairwoman Vasi,liou closed the 'Public 'arin . Commissioner Pauba inquired, if the City currently has anychurchesincommercial. zones. ' Staff explained that there are some churches In the future Restricted Development; District, and the remainder are In the gyp- * `-ntial 'zones. Staff oommented that some of these churches re; near imer- ciai di strictsj and that the property if zoned today mayhavebeenzoneddifferently- Commissioner iffe ently- ommissi ner Paubd inquired if the existing churches are o comparable size. Staff explained' that the m,inimu.,n size required by the Doing Ordinance for "other uses" Is three acres. Staff noted the key concerns for consider, tton are availability for adequate parklntg, and future expansion. Patle Ianning Commission Minutes auly 28, 182 Commissioner $tulbere confirmed that the petitioner accepted the recommended conditions of aper. oval Chairwoman a l t ou called for a VOTE, 5 A es, CommissionersPabaandMagnus, f4ay. MOTION carries. NIEW SINESS Chairwoman Vasillou Introduced the petition for a Proal Plat R r' SWESfor19singlefarilylotslocatedinthesouthwestquadrant of Pin view Lane and future County Road 15, north FIWL _ rl:v of Lake Wobegoner Review of the staff report dated July Zo,, was 'waived. Chairwoman Vasiliou recognized Mr. GregFrank, MoCor bs-Knutson, who represented petitioner. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg.. seconded'by Commissioner RhCOMMENDATION HPaubatorecommendapprovaloftheFinalPlatforklund- wedlund Custom Homes, Inc. for "Humphrey stat s" subject to the conditions recoMrgended In tke July 20, 1982 staff MOTION carried, 7 Ayes, OLD 13USINESS Chairwoman Vasillou explained that Information was delivertAi 0"N CLIFF` FORtoherhomeofferingaddlt,ional *Information for consider- ANNA ROCCEM lH aticwr Of th'Is petition. The Commissioners also received the LOT DIVISION ANDinformation* It was explained that Mr. Cli ft's Intent was VARIANCE (81066)' to show the considered alternate designs. Chairwoman Vasil- you rioted that theplan suggested st of i was not submit- ted. The staff report dated July 12, 1982 was reviewed by staff, originalThe proposal was explained and t was reviewed that the Planning Commission r commended denial of the proposal. During the CoMmission's deliberation there was discussion of possible redesr n to consolidate the proposed number of curb cuts and eli:rriate the requested v rl ands for Ion size and dividing the property by means other than platting. After the Comm sslOn°s meet*ng, the petitaoner's rep:,-sentative ask,4d for a deferral of processing the application for review by the City Council, due to the fact that the repre- sentative would. be out of the country for a lenge!--, of time. Upon his return, the; petitioner met with staff ' to review alternate designs At this time, the petltloner asked for reconsideration by the Planning Commission of a revised proposal. Page 199 Planning Commission Minutes July , 1982 Staff expt lned If the Commission determines thea there are adequate grounds for the requested variance for a Lot ivi..s- Ion and lot widths, the Commission should reconsider and rescind the ,last action and formulate a new recommendation. If the Commission Is of the 'same deter: i.nat'on - as on the original proposal, a reaffirmation of the fast action should be forwarded. Chairwoman Vasillou explained that Mr. ClIft requested that she identify a plan that would be appropriate, Chairwomen Va$iliou stated that she explained doing this would be inop- prd r? ate, as a recommendation should be forwarded by thefullCommissionballedontheproposalandcons,a rat Ion of the variance guidelines. Mr. < ,lift explained that the materials delivered to the Com- mission were identical to those submitted to the staff and reviewed with the Development Review Committee. There wrere four different ideas sugqested, .and 1t appeared to him that In order to meet the Ordinance r gvir ,lents, the property Would have to be divided In two lots, rather thatt three. The petitioner believes that there are valid reasons for the variance regoests, and mr.` 11f- identified that the ropes - ed three lots meet the minimum lot 'size requirement, two of the three .lots require variances from the minimum width requirements, and,, thi; number ` of drives propose ' onto 36th Avenue North has been reduced from three to two. f Commissioner Wire inquired if there were existing trees on the sit -e. Mr. Clift explained there are some Boxelde. Commissioner plufka inquired what the width of proposed "'Lot A would be. It was explained that .it Is a maximum of 55 feet. Commissioner Wire 'stated he understood the traffic concern for 36th Avenue North, however, there are several existing, curb cats. Chairwoman Vasillou commented that the fact that there are some existing curb cuts does not paean that more wouid e worthwhile. Commissioner Wire pointed out that if their division would have been proposed some 20 years ago, there would be three existing drives. Commis- sioner Plufka suggested that the drive access to proposed Lot A be located as far west as possible to keep sufficient distance between It and the existing driver He explained that he was stall concerned that,the proposal was to divide the property ;by metes and bounds rather than platinoO Page- 200 Planning Commission M not s MOTION by CommIssloner Wire, seconded by Commis,51oner Plurka RECON ifUBARtoreconsiderthePunningCommission's action on this petition taken at the January Z7, 1982 ' 27, 19$Z, ACTION mee,,tjnq T# es. Commissioners Stulberq and Magnus, Nay. MOTION carried P- 3TION by COMOISsIoner Wire, , s000ra od by CoMmlsslotier PDif a RECOMMENDATION Crecommendapproval -f the proposed Dot Y,Ion and ariarrc; s + r Anna m, tin, sir cot to the:` Condit Ions stated It' the July 1 , 1982 staff report with the followingadditions: Condition No. 7 to road- "Approval of lot width vari ances for Parcels and 8 to allow 85 -ft. wide, lotfroritace"; Condition No. 8 to road-. "Tho division of these lot s wi l l be oreatvd by, platting Vm —tioe rt ". ondi t Ion to road r I v t ho our trt poi it*y to allow the pro- posed drives onto .6th Avenue No th (item 12 of bEngineer's Memo) - directing that the drip ti.) 'Parcel A Is to be located at the we t, tl side". MOTION par i d ;m I I ssIoners Stulberq, Pauba, and asiil ou voted fray. Staff confirmed that, If the City Couruqj tonoorr d wit theI.411nin orcmIssion's recommendation, 4 Joint application for a pr limindr and final plat would be processed, offoot- iv ly C nssidrin his action to be, Preliminary approval. lbe COMMIs61011 agreed. Commissioner tuff rr explained that be voted against the Motion because, he behaves the Cmnmission Is rf,-der;1qn1ng the application which" B inappropriate. The petitioner o pllal,ti- ed during the original consideration ; that they did notdesiretoplatthepropertyduetothecos*., The Cortrmi$5i1un recessed from :36 P.M. to 9.-46 P.M RECESS fpo;-i reconverting,- Chairwoman Vasllzou explained the Commis- slon would now hold the Public Ng arinq scheduled, to discos the proposed Capital Improvement*, Program 198 - 1987, and Staged Growth Plan} Amendment to the City Comprehensive dant PLO -IC BARING Chairwoman V sliloo explained that idd3.tlonal information was delivered to the -Commission from hick prior, WestwoodPlanning4 :ngineerin it was explained that staff did not receive this:,information., therefore, noue-tions should be asked of staff concerning this information and It s.rioul.d be considered as. additional input for the COMmlll..slotils delib r- Page 20, 11 Plenning Commissi-op. Minutes 1ul y al 1 Stdff explalned,the, Commj-Onshould formally act of, the apital Improvementsoverents p c ram and the Staged Growth Plan asseparateitems. City Engineer Madre- explained that tffe Staged Growth Plan is based on the 4101pated popui txcr through`1990. The apitaiImprovementsProgram (CIS') Schedules the anticipated pudic Jmprcv met whi , might he Completed within a 5 -year planflirig time frame, , 4n Important part of thp. rjP is thetensibnOfsanitarysewertoundevelopedproperties. Staff r eommends, based on the proposed Staged Gro,,ith plan, that the pr v10u-$lY proposed extensions for sanitary severbedeleted, except for at) extenslcr, tO the SkylineHills area. The staff recommended CIP 'thee makes the necessary adjustments tc e sucfate water main and ;street improvements. Oummissioner Wire discussed the sewer capacity w t;4 EjIgineerMooresandclarifiedthatthesystem, has a capacity of8-M111101) gall on Per dad, Engineer Moore explained that the system is designed for dull saturation for all .land and that sewers are designed for a life of Approximately 10 years hair Orad" Vdslliou opened the pudic Hearing n the StagGrowthPlatt ar • Ldurent V8 South Fuller, Laurent Building, Shakopee. M, and `Mrs Laurent7 explained that they wished to 4ef rtheircmon ,,: until later in the meeting. Frank tarsen, Garlar Properties, stated that they ourrentlyhavearsappro4dprelimirai°y pli: Cdr 25, acres at the south west cornu of Coonty Boal 9 And Vicksburg Lane, This prop- erty Is excluded by the Staged Craeh Plan for developme-,r prier to 1990. Mr. Larsen e pta,ined he underst nds that approximately 3,16 ,4agesareproposedfordevelopment,, and the Garlar Proper- ties site of 25 acres is 6110 of one percent of this area. This is not, $1(rtifidant area lf size, or number of homes. flurrently it is Antic gated ghat O acres f the site would develop with h..mes, and 5 acres would be devoted for a church use for a density of, 3.3 units per acre.. Mr. Ldrssti stated that it is not necessary to extend sewer trunk under Vicksburg L,ine as this has already been acccom lisRed. page p`l.dAnInc Commission Minutes gu.y x:141 1982 Mr ar ert reviewed that as a'condition of approval for the pr l.im nary plat, Garlar Pro e tl s agreed to extend trunk utilities abross the site. Vicksburg Lane, is parte of the City's %nor rnorth;'south streets which is adjacent to the Pi operty. Mr. Larse r ,stated be thought `iee City wt,,;uld be short sig tit d not tr, take advantage of the In-place pub Improvement,-: and Permit d velopmrent of this area. The development of ret-i:dent,lal :land u.--,.-s In the " ov,'c vr$4 Plymouth" area will in turn spur commercl al cfevc, Opmetit. Mr. Larsen, requested that the Comm as on and City Council consider including this area in the tagt!d Growth Plan James W. 3041ristonj. representing 5J. ' 'rxrov s & Boas Co. , 10000 Highway 55 West, Inquired as to tW status of the staff prepared m,apdant fyinp :h proposed Staged _ ;w fIaf. S. . Groves has .land ; n the Curti .a area, and property at the n(-rthwest q%jddrant of Highw y 55 and CountyRoad18. Mr# bast r, e pressed Concerti that she de °isi .ns being m lde todaycould become' regrett bl.e within the next f Ive nears espclaly tburrer, poor economy tures around, It was soggested, that the Planning Commission con- sider challenging the Staged '' rovtn Plan if it is to be Trost in stone". } Mr. Johnston O<Amenti4d on developfng the "Infill areas" and siggos-ted ret4lolog a "r $er• l capacity to "low for de el-, OPMent of r guid l areas without limiting sewage flowo- to the rate of previously guided land uses. Additional com- ments were offered suggesting that if the •Jars as "east in stone" the V'I y will experience a "scramble" for capacities by 40v topers. Mr.' 3oh€asto explained he wok*-;d offer additional c mm rets when tte CiP vas dliscussed by the Commission Cbdirwomart Vasillou inquired if the Staged Growth Plop cart be reviewed and -imended in the future. St3ff explained that the map can be reviewed, but must be submitted to the Mttro- pol.i tan Council as part of the Or, prehensive ;Plant. current- ly the Comprehensive Plan has formally been approved subject to a condition that a Staqed Growth Plat, F=>r the City be sobmitted and be committed to by the City. Staff explained the proposed plan and the amendment proc-dor s* In, order to dorsider developing an area I&Atified, as post- 1990,i-e-, outside the proposed City Urban Service Area A)1 4 "trade,, would have to made -with o . rrrent servlee- f able property to assure the acreage and sewz,Oe flow wda kept within the assigned limits Planning Commission Minutes holy 282 1982 Staff does not anticipate a "Scramble" for developable area through the decade, in terfas of actual development rather than speculation, given the lards amount of laird already serviced and/or assessed and capable of being serviced with, - out extension of trua% sewers. t was explained that the Metropolitan Council requiresa firm pian, map and narrative, from the City as to flow growth will. be regulated through 1990- with Imp) through the Capital Improvement Program iP), and regulation through monitoring actual deve opftnt and sewage flows, Chairwoman VasilJoij loquired whether the hound ry for the developable area can, be adjusted, Staff explained that the City can make adjustments to the proposed CUSA lilies prior to adoption of the plank and, the Citi can propose' subse- quent amendments w the %prehensive Dian at any time Wiioh must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council., The Me ropol- itartCouncil's odno rn is the City's total growth acreage and sewage flow and not speei fie lines, ,lo(.,t lon Staff noted the proposed criteria, in the staff report, which had been developed In response to Council direction. chairwoman Vasillou Inquired about the Harrison Hills i3evel __ opr ent, arrd hoer pant of the total site could be within the de-ve-lopinq area, and the remainder outside. Staff explained that the north area of the property Is developable prior to 1990 when lateral connection is made to the Pike fake Inter- ceptor tv the east. Staff explained the process of a' devel- oper's request as It relates, to the CIP peocess, and indicated it will be op to the Harrison Hills :developers, Planning Commission and City Courell, to determine the avallability' of sever at the time of final play: and execution of Development Contracts, i.e., actual, not speculated drivel privnt. The Commission and staff discussed the tiring of the trunk sewer extension with the Pie `Lake Interceptor to serve the f1arri son Hills project. Engineer Moore explained. that the £°roposed Staged Growth Plan should have a built -In buffer or reserve with the anticipated oapaotie Commissioner Pl fka requested a cler°ifie tl.on of the area to he developed post -1990. Engineer Moore exolz i ned; this meant that there would not be .an. trun:,: sanitary sewer, extensions to these properties-. The C'omm.lss f jn discussed the esi.r - bi.l.ity or es°tabVshlrig a reserve capacity at this time. Chairwoman V sillou commented that the Influence of other governmental bodl r s Is unfortunate for the City as It loses some of Its own planning p'erogatfv s. Page 204 Plan"Ing COMMIStion, 1 mutes my 26, 1962 Commissioner t lgerwald confirmed that the controlled growth pian al9plies to those properties which are flow served or which can, be served as inOl by Cotured, areas on the steady map prepared by staff COM41issioner Wire ,indicated the City must consider the actual development fri all areas by virtue of the number ofBuilding Permits being issued, AtO riot Just colored are -as on, a Map* Dick Kr.ier, Westwood Planning raalneer. ng, 7415 Wayzata Blvd., explained that he thcuht taffy 7,t4s approaching theIssuederacasebycaseanalysis. Mr. KrIer further explained' that after reading the staff r6port he believes that staff has reached a reasonable position, and "comprc- Mise" position with th;e M trop litar, Council. Mr, Kri r Inqulr€4 how the City would determine and regulate trade -of . iii.scusslcn ensued of how the City of ` Biobm- Ingtort addressed a transportation concern. It was sugoested that there are rather means to control growth rather than, limiting sewer availability. It was suggested water onsdr- vaticn measures ' through Ordln4i! oes were another way to reduce ,:,ewage flog, He commented on the suggested criteria in the staff report, and re mend d the City consider mire data. cry 't he i of 11.1 meas to determine now much Of this area will actuallydevelop,; The Clay should consider specific reeds for serviceable prop rty$ and identify where lateralral e t nsions can be made#_ With regard to a "first come first served" basis - it may be appropriate•, however the City will need a Policy for enforcing such a program., fir. XrIer suggested that the City can proposo amendments vo the, Urban Service Area boundary, = and that atrendments can b reviewed and approved by bite f etropcl;itan Council within a shop ter time and more frequently than the City's annual. C1Prev:iew In summary, Mr. 1(r1 r Indicated he concurred with the staff's proposal with the ad'd,;d policies, 1.) Lateral exten l n into new area tensic s on a first 4 m- f in serve basis per estbl i shed criterla and, 3. evel'- opir g means for perldic amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. p,l nni,rrg Commission Minutes idly 280 1982 h lrwbmdn Vasillou InquirtA about Mfr. Kr,i is eomment that a7lt'ndm nt, s could )e accomplIshed within t rt days. HexhiredthathisrequestisfortheCitytoconsider amendr t:ts t) the Capital .i prrav m rtts Program (Cif') more than on(:e, a year during the annual re v.iev pr n st,, h rm Goldberg, Ltindgren Brothers Constmalon Company, Inquired what other iu% r bart commkinitlefs are being impact dIt, a se m.iL r fashion. Staff explainpdthat Eden Prairie, Woodbury, Maple Grove, Brooklyn Bark, have developed staged growth pldjs". Howevtetr, direct comparlsons are not; !>Impl 46 41,E of the communitleii have differences and unlgar : sitda- tions; for.of ergInquired i.f the, requirements for limit- nlimit- ng 9r1UWth appli W in most a e the second tier suburbs. Staff confirmed that this was true because in the first tier suburban communities staged growth is `: not ' an16e. It was further nfirt that the fa- t t tt rr ar °mur i i s ars < raft ll ited in sewage' Poacity. Mr. Go,ldberg inquired what will happen when the C!' ty reaches a Set capacity d t rmir: d by the Metropolitan Counr:ils> staff exp iii d that dev 1. pmenl would have- to halt it that time, or the capacity allowed would have to b ir e, :_. nd It was explained that URD City Is, currently wur i ng with the M tro- pol tdn Waste control Commission, Ort modifying and expandingthesewercapacity, h ;rm Coldberg 1, Om merited that the staged growth requirement Is a, r) V )d of, limit rig the r wtt of second tit suburban Communities and encouragifig growth In the Inner city and first ring .suburban ommunitjes by the Metropolitan Council. Rick -Mur ray, 8-l" Land Company, explalned tilat a preliminaryPlathasbeenapprovedforpropertytobe+ v lop d by 13hand`omp.,jr y, At this time staff Is reviewing a formal application for the final plats Approximately crus-half of the proposed development site i s classified as a developable aro4 with the r mai intg half, classified as Post-1990 Staff confirmed that the, division of dey' OPment area IR, based upon the drainage vwdstricts. fire Murray inquired i f 8-T Land Company would have tO pursue approval of an amend- merit th ou gh the f=f r pOiit,a "o nrfi , Engineer Moore explained this wi g l depend upon the `City Council. Is decislonsforapprovingaStagedGrowthPlan, and recelvIng approvalforthe ` final plan and plat. If approved, the City would seek atr amendment to the City Sewer Plan, Mr. Murrayrequestedth; ,Ir entire site be included lrt the CUSA. pdg Pl nning Commission Minutesnotes uy Chairwoman Vasinou stated that she felt very strongly about Including those applications urrertly in the process. Dick Nowling, ttorney- 7900 Xerxes AVenutt South$ represent - Ing Hewitt Peterson, :e pl inej that, upon initial review of dry staged growth` pubs, fir. Nowlin's client was nottRE-Z i.y Included" within t hf; developable areas. The now submitted Staged Growth Plait which Is recommended by stafftotallylnclddpthePetersonpropertyfordevelopmentprior to 1990- Mr, Nowlin explained this development proposal has been In process for some Ime-, and In their opinion iscod'l:tent with the 1980 Comprehensive Plan,. To exclude - this area as developable wouid be Incoiisj.%tent with the City's Capital Improvements Program and Land` Use Guide Plan. Mr. Nowlin sated It 1. s his opinion that staff is approach - Ina the issue Pcorrectly by ,asking for additional developablelat)d. Mi, Nowlin - O:vfa n ed that, the process to amend an adopted plan will cumbersom and discussed the ; possi- bility of trade-offs on a dnp=w o -one basis. Mr. Newlin stated he shared Mk, Krlerls concerns of the staff suggested ,policy criteria and Indicated the Cityshouldretainmoreflexibilityandutilizeepositivepolicies for achieving desired goals for development. it was i.r di- dated that suggestions wn-Id be formally pr fared and for- warded to the City for possible,pallel es. Mr. NL 111, stated that the Met opolitan ` Council has control Of h sewage flow only and expressed concern about usirnq sewer capacities to determine ,land use planning. The etrd- polita r Council establishes limits for sewage flow, but should not determine which, land is Included n the develop - Ing areas. The issue to be discussed is how much cost will be Incurred by the City, or will it stimulate premature development, Staff explained the way in whI h the Staged Growth Plan Map was prepared land which has already been assessed should be of higher priority. the Staged Growth Plan Map is anflobjectivellrepresentation ` of Mose areas The decision of whether unassessed properties should be included as a deyel- opable property is a poliley decision for the Planning Com- missionmi.ss on rid City Council to make. The sey#sitzve issue is whether trunk sewer extensions are required to st rve lard. Paye Pldlinifig, commission, tinut s, July 2, 1982 Chairwoman gas l *ot I ,4ulred Ludt the proposed delay fo r the last4liation, of d trafflic si-qnal at,Vlcksburg Lant ind Hlghwdy 55. Engineer Hoore explIned`'that the project was not warzanted at this t mt.based oft the tatu's criteria. A was ` paltd -ed out that project Idem no. 15., traffic s 19na at Niagara Une and Highway 55 was prioritilzed as a nui6er ne pr Oji- t twy the stat- I,-- theeX stir tra *C. Dick KrIer, Westwuod PlannffqIn , i.x a ed as to f status of the onst dY t n and ; r ns n of West dl- ne Lake Road. City'Engineer Mourn explaltied that this PN#ojeot Is Identified as a subm tt-d p tf.tlott by th( d v per. Staff s riot nd Inclusion e, tf prdjrt as part of this p upas d pr,) r m.ngirieer more explained t t of the test, p t bola received, staff is recommendinq im-Ausion, of, one project. The City's policies for, Includinq projc is requested r explained anO s,,.usr.ed. it Is st Is ripinion that the proposed Improvement for Weft Lake a-1 is premature. f c•uss .nn ensued dnd Oa rwomaxi Vas 1iuil stated that It rie ap rupt ,ate: for the Commtssjon to cm-ment on the .4uests for Including public I pr v -rants in areas where de =)pmen might not occor in the CIP period, rato r, the "teal' -*Di record -develop fir' Council review. Rein HO de= 4235r broo Esus, expressed. uncerft about Items 77 and 30t and the reed for traffic se na . Engineer Moore expialned status of this area. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg seconded by Cmmissloner Pau ra Ito recommend approval of the proposed , -,e*ta mpru - ments Program (CIP) for ;streets. V"i ,, 7 Aves. MOTION carried: l "'OhiMtOA, S. 3 Groves & Sen$ Company, stated he wqs WATER disdppointeo end opposed to the deletion of project Item nos. 9 and 11. Cliairwoman Vasfljou Inquir,A when the prop- erty was purchased by S. 3. troves & awns Cnmpanv fir. of stexplained the pr pert; was purchased lit, 1966. rr r Larsen Identified chat proposed project nQ involved tha property be addr ssed earlier. It was Indicated that thu developer had ant ai pat A i rjst'a f q the utility t r uin lire; themselves. Commissioner Stulberg inquIred If the Commission racommends Char s to the Staged Crutch Plan, will the Capjt di Improve - Mittss Program auL'omatically need revising. City Engineer oore explained It would depend uporr the type of improvement Involved. ved. The Impravements nurrently being d souss-ed are major eater ;tines. Page 14111 -tin Commission _ lau e l 198 1C rM Goldbergy Lundc1ren Brothers ConstruCtIORCG,;,-, 'Inquired If the development of the property awned by the City of Is dependent upas the Capital Improvementsi u r am in t a v have riot petitioned for water. City, EAgInver Moore eonflrmm, It i ,,, pot, MOTIONommi .i0rler Stulbergy seizosided 'by '' r i loner Wire to recommend approval of the pry a ed capital mprave ments Program for watvr, VOTE,, 7 A es,, NOTION rri eri,:. icxrtrr ,. J. Groves & Sons Co., expressed opposition to the deleuon of ,project item nos, 4 and 5 and suggested coos d r , a CO -t sharing, proqram wlzit.,i the Metropolitan SMITARY SEW. 1 ow-tc l to upgrade the existing interceptor to address problems with ptmpinp edpdcity, MOTION b oMmI sioner Pl u ' a secondedd ml (.ytendd 4 k14.7. fi R K;a:F, Klq! recommend approval of the prapesed Capital Program for sanitary sewer, > VOTE, 7 Ayes, pY- vr e 1I by Commifs- sJoner wI'°e1, seconded by Commissioner Ma rais t re$mn€ approval of the proposed Capital ImprovementsProgram °am `or .. ST SEWER storm sewer. 7 Ayes,. MOTION carrtedi, litE ia-ee Moore e Plattlea that the proposed cN!,nges have t!eta recom r approval by , the Parks ars creation PARKS ntnded7yvisaryA. MOTIOR rOMmiSsl n `oinm ssjon,rMyer., spec{.¢nd yd b rpy psy ` t n.v 4r A lY u F # ec om 4,s n 4R 'prS€ C` .& i# f the proposeded ;..Capital Improvements Program for park development , and acquisition, VOTE, 7 Ayes, MOTION carried, I)TI N by Ctiairwomat. Vasllloujsena ded . by Commissioner Lu er to reoom aerid approval of the proposed CapitalImprfj'vemerl.ts Pr grdm forbut-t dire ., 'VOTE, 7 Ayes. MOTION B ILDI cr teary 1..aurent 11 o, Fuller Laurent Building, Shakopee, skated that sine tNit p opeet may be Include -a' - In the developable area, they Intent to petit ort the City as listed as Pet.tlen it no, 5 for the extension of utilli' le , K Pas: 110 n QAap{ '& y ltiM,$R'+-A s'4 dt Y"E 4 i4Xi.w VdSlliou rtNuestKi 1110rmat:ion Idwifying .anydatrspatdproposal, rurrent applications; or known d - op vnt requests that exist for each off,.the prr rit z d areas. The !,formation should be presented as an Inventory ; 0401049 dOreage, submitted applications for prlzminar PlattWithin the last twenty-four months submittedli- MR= for site plans within the last twelvcnths,rd n_ t rfiedt on of inquiriesie for development, edr q proposerfordv . pr- rat, anti, f the number Of acres f undeveloped land ail this the "blue" (assessed and t serviced! areas on the ProvosedProvosStaged Growth Plat, map. po" receipt of this ,information, the Fplaorling Commission will thea develop a recommendation for' location of a CityraFiServiceArta,,, O. M . toiler pluf a stated that than map which will identifythvdelpdhlearearepresentstheeastcriteriafor de vel p nt, and: t, pori rr-,,Ce apt Of the requested information, additional criteria can U; lKn p d to ld e_ntjfy those tar eds where deve. ps int oarl copmence. f q rank tarsen loquired abou, the thirty wren doloated for park in the "Downton Ply- 'h" area and whether they are I t tasidared developable Zr ra rrM r Pbore explained f At3 Lam, p4rks and :. wedf 4nuai t r weree o includedyciudd ade.opahl, _ proVerty or as a nlatt,d flow. t MOTION day" C mmrss n r Rulberg seconded by Commissioner Wire to d ft'r dOtiOn On the Proposed Staged Growthn a lth DEFER ACTION Odirectiontt) staff to prepare ars VventOry of the colored STAMD GROWTH FPILAAAN r# era ren areas on the st4dy asap as to size of areas IOCNDHENTar'd as to which sites hm developments wh1oh have been approved within the past tr nt --oar nonths for plats and UD's, and within the vast 12 months for site pans, and, fir she %10" dreen jountification or the sizc of Ira j r - undeveloped parcels. The purpose of this information is to o isid r possible ad aastmants kv the proposed CUSA line. Staff state that this information sh,a d be available for the meeting on uqu$,.t_ 2.5. VOTLt, 7 Ayes*, a f ION oarri ed . MOTION h , Comms sslo er Plufka, ,seconded by Commissioner mire to :oaatinuetiePublic hKaring on the Staged Growth Para. GT) 7 Ayes. MOTION oarrltd. h a t r ad purr;ed at 11,k p.m., AD30URNMENT CITY OF PLYMOU141 Piuvsuant to dap calland notwite th-areof*a OF tho City of Mynauthl, Vlinneso-,Ia, was heli day of The following members. fo T Mab . introduced the following Resolution, and vd its rdp RESOLUTION4. F PERUMUT AND SIT' A FOR D . ROBERT` H F . FOR: F THL EPI' h `i' LVCAT AT THL SOUTHEASTO F F NATIRAIN LAE AND MMEL ROAD (820365 WAEREAS, Dr. Robert Hoover for Church of the Epiphany has requested approval of a: , conditional uso permit and s,ite,plan for "Drakeland aslues i and Technical ars located at the s ea corner Nathan Lane and Hamel Road, and, WHEREASu the Planningvni sin has reviewed said r t a d ly called public a and r nmen s its rpr va , FR F,, BE IT HEER EW RESOINED t the of the City of Plymouth, s Chat i t should and hroh` does approve the request of Dr. Robert Hoover for h r h of the Epiphany for a conditiol"Ial use permit and site p` aA for "Drakeland nisi=gess and Technical Cera,"r" located at the southeast corner of a #h4 Lang °1,, Ha;70 Road subject the following conditions- Comaliance with City Engineer's 14emorandum. 2. Fay --z a : of park dedication fees -gin -'lieu ofJad a i n in accordance wih C,edication policy in effect the time of filing the Firtai plat, 3. Compliance wilth Volicy ResolutionNo. *179-80 regarding minimum floor ellevations for nev, structures on sites aGjacent to or c n a.i a y Duan srr err drainage. facility. 4. Submissiono red. -tired financial guarzntep for'completion of site improve- ments mpr ve- mems termed for4' months S. Any signage sheill be in, p i ante wi n the Orth Banca approval6. n, susubsequent k W} naase s ys 4 f expz' 9 s are s j i r d reviews and waste7. All and waste containers steep be stored within enclostireidentified on staff dated,,and stamped approved pleas.. t x,. Y OF PLYMOUTH r U r t due and notice ' i r meati c the Citi Of City of Plymnoutho s ., 4ay Of A she following members ears present-..—. tm6uc d the f6l'towning Resolution and moved its G. RESOLUTION 82- APPROVINGFINAL. PLAT AND DEVELOPMENTCOINTRACT FOR "WHPHREY ESTATES:' FOR ECKLU, 01"*fig , Ecklund-Swer"llund C6stoiii Home, Inc. has requested approval of the final plat o., "Humphrey Estates",, a platfor nineteen lots,, southeast quadrant of i v` i, Lena anJ Fulk-ureCounty Road 15`(6th Avenue Norte) on theliorih side of Lake Wobegone and a development Contractm-fore; and WHEREAS,, the Planning Commission has, reviewed said request acid recomum ds itrS approval and WHEREASt City staff has prenared, a.development contract covers e i;*pr - n s;related to said l ; 01.4 THERErORE-IT !1RBYRESOLVED b the CityCoonit of the City of Plymouth, inn soca ha it should and hereby- duets approve the request of Eckl d- wed un0 us s Hoye , Inc * r fi I ll t approve $ ` p lla rtiY n `dots, at the southeast quadrant of Pineview Lane and Future County R ai ` 1 5 (6th Avenue North) on the norch side of take tab u ; FURTHER, that 'the Development Contract for s id plat be approved and that thQ Mayor and Citj Manager be authorl-led to execute the Development Contract on behalf the thy motion for -adoption of the f 5,ig, Resolutlon was duly, seen&d by. and p4 n vote bei taken thereon,, i 6 vwi F void in Iavor r V# t d s bs in le-e N esa gi s d r d dui pa sed ffed a NIM tOMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS - 1 0M ` SETTING CONDNIONS PRIOR TO. HILING LOT DIVISON FORMR VHUREAS, the City CowicIl has approved a Lot Divisjon for Anja Roggemann by R s lk t jonNo NOW, THERE ORL, OL IT HEREB" PESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCYL Of TH' CITY OF PLYM60"141, IXUN EAS'Ythat 1 1101.1 r y does direct the fs ,U.wj nth Jndltlons prioro filaq of : Lot ' DIN Islon` With Hennepin count t C,Tplllaiwe with the City ; inner*s Memorandum. S'ri,ydrd setback v ri lces ate ran or Ilsled. Vi e. fedication fees -la- l u of dedication prior to Issuance f !d ear Permlt I accordance with City Policy Irt effect; at the tires of 8jlldislq issuance. 4. No 111allding Permft tt be Issued' until the Lot Divisionit w til ennelli n, County. 5. Submittal of all neceessary util*t- easem',Ats Prior to filing Lot Division ut s!E n of City Attorney approved recordable,- -4ocumeri-ts' . the shared g of drivewkv access to 36th Avenue K, rt for Parcels B an PLANN1W 1 OR Y 8, 1962 - RECOMMENDATION C APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR A 1KREAS. Apna 11099011drin, 10610 36th Avenue North, has requestedi a division of unplat-te,,. 11- propt'rty within the Cfty of p, v outh, N -it THLREFORE, BE. IT HEREBYRESSO VE THE CITYURCI Off' THE CI i"j"1" Ri(;JT "# that. should 'and hereo does a «prod the to o x h and th City Lina ehe authorized V), 'make the necessary sped al assessment corrections baseduponpocwhen ;the dIvI lon is ar roved by Hentlep h County. EXISTING The South Z43 feet of ` tho# West 295 rciet ' Of the Southeast quarter of theguthavestquarterofSection13, Township 1181, Kane, 22. To be divided Into: Parcel Con, eac n t the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the SouthwestQuarterofSection13, L, 11,31 R. 22. Thence on an assumed bearingof Wirthdegrees3minutessccnd- East along the West line of the said southeastquarterofthesouthwestquarteratstdnceor40.00 feet to the point ofhe111ingl* th inee North 0 degree* 53 minutes 52 seconds East along the said Festline, a distance of 2 .on feet$- thence South 9 dk rees 33 m1nutes 11 seconds Eastfidst, ace of 125.00 f -et thence South 34 decrees 53 minutes 07 seconds West3sinceof -r0'-3 feet # - henc Bout' decrees 3 minutes seconds 'fast adlstazceof13t44.00 fe t thence North $5, degrees 33 minutes IJ seconds West adistanceof, J5.00 feet to the Poing of linnin . 00ifflencl ng at ;re southwest corner of the Soutfieast Quarter of the c tx hwestuirterofSection13, T 18, R.22. Thence on an_ assured ;bearlInq of '*,hdegrees33n1pots52secondsEastalongewest e of the paid cautheasf. quarter of the outhwest qua ter 'a distance of 243.00 feet-. thence- South sqd -trees 35 minutes 11 seconds past a distance of 125.00 feet to the point obtlining. Thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 11 seconds a distance of 100.f0feet, thence :South 2 &-g ees m1nutes. 15 seconds West a distance- of 216.97feet; thence North 89 degrees, 33 r4n t°es 11 ser-onds West a distance of 65.00 feet. thence North'0 decrees 53 m ndttn. 52 seconds 'Fast a distance of 134.00 'feetthenceNorthdegrees53minutes € 1 seconds East a distance of $0.13 feet to thepointofhegining Parcel 0MWWI, ng at the southwest corner of the ,southeast Quarter Of the ,e bout +estQuarterofSection13,, T. 118, R. 2Z. Thence on an assumed barn of Horth Cdecrees3m1nutes. 5?` seconds East along the west line of the said - o-itheasquarterofthesouthwestLtareradistanceof2.43.00 feet; th nce 'South 8decrees33minutes11seconds 'East' a distance 225-00 feet to tb. point ofbtrilnIng. Theoce South degrees 33 minutes 11 seconds -t a distance of 70..0reetthenceSouth0decrees5aminutes52secondsLastadistanceo20x.00 feethpuceNrthdecrees3minutes1€ second- West a distance of 145x00 feet. thence North ZI decrees 07 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 216.97 feet totbfupointofheglnnc. CITY GYM40LIT14 ur part to due call and notice thA.reof, a meeting of the City r.ounciloftheCityofPytrouth, Minnesota, was Gael r following members were present . introduced the following Resolution and moved its COMMCN A I RESOLUTION 82 - SETTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO FILING OF FINAL PLAT FOR "HUMPHREY ESTATES" FOR ND -SW U HOME,INC. (8202 4) WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the final plat and development con',ract or " u phre s ` tesll as requested' by cklu d- edlund Custom Home, Ind. 1, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City Of l y o th , Minnesota, that it should and hereby does direct the following prior to recordingofsaidplat: I. CV=Pliance with ty's Engineer Vlemoranduw. 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -bleu of dedication in accordance it CityPolicyineffectatthetimeofi` ng the Final Plat., 3. No Building Permits shall be issued until municipal sewer and eater are Physically available to the sites. Removal of af,k dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. emu al of any existing structures at the developer's expense. k°'lance with policy Resolution No. 9-8 regarding minimum floor elev tion<3 structures in subdivisions adjacent to or 'containing aky cpen sto, m Tainage facilites. 7. hu yard setback variances are granted or implied. S. Submittal of required utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Engineer;prior tofiling of the *tn l Plat. g. No Building permits to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded With Hennepin; County. The mo ti do for adaption of the foregoing Resolution was duly recon d by and upon vote being taken thereont the fo11owiF9Votedinavorthroe : e a len voted against or bstined hereupol: the Rest utirr decl arod du',t se arsopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Cite -1 f the City f P ymo h$, Minnesota, . was e th """ day of is The following members were present: h fwd members werehsent introduced the following Resolution and moved its RC0M AT I N RESOLUTION NO. 82 - APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR "DRAKELAND BUSINESS AND TECHNICAL. CEHT R` REQUESTEDR. ROBERT HOOVER FOR CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NAIHAN A ANE AND HAMEL ROAD (82036) WHEREAS Dr. Ro-a t Hoover for Church of the EpiphaV has requested approval of an amendment to the General Development Plan for "Drakeland Business and Technic Center" located at the southeast corner,of Nathan' Lane and Hayne t Road; and, WHEREAS, the'Plann;ng Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recorrmiends its approval t WOW; THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota,, that it should and hereby dues approve the request of Dr.Robert Hoover for Chun h of tt Epiphany, for an amendment to the General` Development Plan for r k l and Business and Techni cal Center" located - t the sou+heast corner of Nat ban Lane and Hemel Head subject to the following condi o -s 1. Compliance with the Development Contract foil, St, Paul <Co Dani es for, I'Draland 3usiness and Technical entry dated April 4t 1980 a Compliance with Resolution k,,. -224 he mots on for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was dole scan d by d upon vete being taken thereon,, the fo loving VOR d 1n M67 thereof': he following uctd against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passe an sdoptedkl