HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-23-1982PLqINING ' COMMISSION HIWTES
VITY OF;PLY T
A regular meeting or the Plymouth Planning, Commission was
caned to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERSPRESENT Chriirwoma Vas *110u, Commissioners
i r Magnu , Stulberg, Pl u f a and
Pu.
HEMUE6 S : Commissioner Stelgerwald
STAFF PRESENT* Communitynit Dev lopm nti,r for
Blair ' rem r
COmmunitY Development oordinator
Sara -M Conn
MINUTE
MOTION Commissioner Magnus, secondd by Commissioner
Plufka to approve the Minutes of the -tine 91 19 meeting as
submitted. All voted 1i f4vOr, except Commissioner Pauha
who abstained.
PUBLIC HEAD
Chairwoman Va illou introduced the first item for public
He4rlr t -she explain d that there TEXTUAL AMENDMENTS
were Iwo draft amel-Talm-ents
proposed', one which proposes Ordinance standards for theZONIM
TO THE PLYMOUTH
ORDINANCEdevelop,wp=nt of Hizardous Waste Processing ", c<i, iti,o x the
ether proposes appi,i 3tion requirements for Planned Unit
Developments and Conventional Site plans regarding paymentfdelinquenttaxes.
I Th, first amendment was reviewed by staff and it was N 4zARDt US WAST
e plained that a copy of the pollution Control Agency FACILITIES" Regulations had been, obtained from the State and Chad been
copied for the Comm-* sionl Information.
staff plain d that State law provides that requirempnts
such as those proposed are subject to review by thePollu-
tion Control. Agency and that, following Planning Commission
review, the draft Ordinance
I
would be, f,;?nt to the Andy
prior to City t° un il consideration.
Staff, then reviewed the 3une 18, 1982 memorandum re.qjr6ingHazardousWasteFacilityDevelopmentStandarns.
164
Page 165,
Plannirig Commission Minutes
June 23, 1982
Chairwoman Vasiliou, announced that a Puhl c Hear nq had been
scheduled and she recognized Mr. David Craln, 50ore t-
vl w Late. ter. Crain complimented the City for Its develop-
ment of the draft Ordinance and asked whether subsequent
policies which might be adopted to Implement the Ordinance
standards would also be subject to review by the tPollutlonControl. Agency. He stated that his primary concern was
relative to the publip, safety aspects,, he sug gested that
specific "a guage should be provided, for semi-annual or
annual training of public and private emergency personnel; he also stated that PI-ovislon should be made for specific
notice to alert neighboring property owners, in the -case of
an emergency.
Reward -Hunt, 17205 CountyRoad 47: stated the cmiss.lor's
efforts represented a good start and there were two areas
that should be addressed in the proposed acqui t ions,
Firsts relative to run-off water from the site, and distance
Of the facility from natural drainage ways, the minimum
disItancoshould be 100u feet regardless of whether the
drainage way or holding area was classified as a "protected
water" under State regulations. Second, the research done
by the neighborhood group, CLEAN, I entlfletii 1 problm
situation with lack of rapid clears -up of accidents. He
stated that time was critical and that performance quaran-
tees should coo r that possibil" e s qge;ted that a
minimum time should be established, of 48 hours, for
example.
Discussion ensued regarding` the status' of th,,., State este
Management Board site selection procedures.
Carol Brownell, 3060 ;Rosewood Lane ex rens-d concern that
the City, a, well as neighboring, cities were not fully
equi?ped to cope with; accidents at such facIllties and that
special training and equipment would be required. She
I stated concern especially with "spina,, and cited other
Instances throughout the country where phi„, had been a
problem. She also asked that the Comrission carefully
consider the requirements for alert and evacuation in the
case of accidents.
Following further discussion, Chairwoman a!i ljou closed the
Public Hearing.
Page
Pliltining CoMmission minutes
ane Z3, 19,6z
MOTION by Commissioner Fire, secon0ed by Commissione- Maonus.
to take action on this item tnni bt. MOTION o •inani-
moody.
Staff r jlp nd d tG the cone rn . Raq rdinq public safetyitvAswasugi-j t d that p ra .*aph 2- f ) covered evac-
uation plans and emergency traini )r plans for employees and
City public safety personnel Also, item 4-p addresses
maintenance of approved;emerqc-acy training programs and
evakaton plans.
t
ten i (i discussion ensued, and Ommissioner Pl f aix,ges-
ted that paragraph (2); ) should b , modified to 'r
Initial and continuing emer-grney training* ter.' Crain uq-
st di that reference hnul also be mads to the 'training of
emergency p r nn 1. of th j ati w mighttit be involved
with the "tY Of Pl,ymOUth th "Ough the mutual aid agreement's.
It was also recommended thag. paragraph -p` b amended: o r -
f r r at l aast em.' -anni, al. updatling of emergency p ogram
and plans.
Commissioner Stulberg re--ommended that reference to initial
and continuing trainin(-, be clarified by p ifi0 reference
toapplication of tragi ,in upon initial hiring, a well a
continuing training for long-term empiy.
Regarding Mr. Crain' ul°-Iq stion about the training of adja-
cent communities, Commissioner Wiry; noted that parav ph Q)
d) addressed opnrdinatAon plans witti applicable publi ,
safety and health carp a;jenclles. Discussion ensured and If',-
was-s -recommended that refl.,-rence be made ' to s rr ondi nq com-
mtinities in both this Item, as well as p ragrap.a -p. StafO
suggested the I t m might include reference to "area" <a , n -
1,
Regarding evacuation ead notification ,concerns, staff 511q-
gested that the rdiran e should refer to the development
and maintenance of axe emergency plan, bort that the details
of that plan should be left to review and approval by the
P blfc Safety Depar"- nt based upon the specific nature of
the prop d f jcjljty. Discussion ensued. and Ms. Brownell
stated concern that other agencies may not be fully coordin-
ated or knowledgeable abort emergency procedures, lir`. Hunt
stated that evacuation plans need to account for ootb air
and ground basad emergency i.mpao
Page 31,67
Pl nnlnq Commission Minutes
un fx 23 , 19
Chairwoman Vasillou commentedthat evacuation was not sprays
n ("essary, and that eventually cable television m:l ht be
able to provide a so{,roe of information in the case of such
emergencies. Staff COMM-nted that the Intent gas not to
defer emergency procedures to of he ° agencies, but rather to
leave the details and Implementation of an emerqency plan up
to the City Public Safety authorities.
Staff, suggested that paragraph 4 could have an added Itsrf
which s ecifi ally addresses the maintenance of 4pprovd
emergency plans, I.neluding alertinq and evacuation.
Regardinq the for such aeil.itae from drainaqe
areas and other water bodies, staff noted the proposed
Ordinance calls for a 1,000 ft - ml- mum setback. .
Extensive disco sion ensued regarding the eon"rn ab,aut
rapid clean-up tim j and it was suggested that; para ra hs
f () (b)and f), as well, as paragraph -f -2)
a dress, thin- It was recommend -,d that, paragraph 4 have an
added Item I ' dealing wzt x e `fe ;tive clean-up measures tea
be instituted within 48 hours. Commissioner Wire noted that
paragraph 4-e addressed submittal, of maintenance of perfor-
mance agreements and finanvial guarantees, and that the pol-
icies
l-
lol s t be ado ked implementing that requirement should
pe fl l ly' addr the ` need for a clean-up guarantee.
ommissioni;r Plufka agreed, and stated that provision` should
be mace; fair prompt _lean'up and for assumption of .he Oean-
up by the City using the 'guarantee funds if stops are not
undertaken iv.thl.n a certain time.
Mr. Hunt reiterated his concern that a specific, amount of
time should be establishedy he stated that this could be
done wenn the City Council. acts on the petition setting
conditions of approval..
r
Regarding the states of equipment and training, staff
explained that this is covered in the proposed draft. Also,
rega)ding standards For emergency protection systems within
the str ctur:-, the e l5tl g Uniform Buildinq Code ,and Nnl-
farm ire Code cover those' Items
Staff recommended that paragraph 4-1 be amended to delete
the wards :plans fore so that the requi event would be
el.ear"y for two independent emergency access/escape routes.
MOTION by Commissioner Wise, seconded by Commissioner Stul-- RMHHENOATION A
berg to recommend approval of proposed Amendment No. l corp- AND VOTE
sisting of Or.4nance requirements related to development of
ala ardous Waste Disposal Facilities subject` to the dlfl-
ations directed Involving Sections -f ( 1' (b), o (d),
and 4-e, 11 , q and r. MOTION pa*sed unanimously
Page 170
Plannintj Commission Minutes
une V87
Staff sdggested that the needs which should be a0dr ssed b
vossible al nerative . to the proposed .language is elude flag.
ging the delinquencies "u front"$0 that the s- tuai.on was
known as a development was being donsi erect ti ` appropriate
eases,uie, payment of any delinquencies with the e e-
outIon of the Development. n ac.,tor, require the limina- 1
tion of delinquencies prior to
they
Issuance of any BuidingPermits.,
3
With regard to the latter possibilityt staff explaired
existing provisions of the ubdivlsioh Code which require I
that delinquent special assessments on platted lots should
be paid prior to issuance of: Building Permits. The City
Manager will be informingthe Council that those provisions
will be routinely nfo. eed by the Bui.idinq Inspection
Department effective August 1.
During further discussion, the developers indicated the
existing code provisions were not a problem, but the
proposed requirement should be changed.'
Staff suggested brat alternative language be developed for
amendMents to the appropriate codes or Ordinances- which
would require payment of delinquent taxes and assessments at
a definite later; point in time. A. certification could be
required at the application date, stating whether t -tern arm
delinquencies, a c there uou.lo be a statement by the devel-
oper and/err owner required at that time that the delinquen-
cies would be paid prior to development.
In further discussion, C rairwoman Vasx,.l.iou and Commissioners
Magnus and Pauba agreed that an alternative approach such as
that suggested by staff would be more feasible.
Chairwoman Vasiliou closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire RECOMMENDATION
to take action on this item at this meeting. MOTION passers;
all in favor.
NOTION by Commissioner A.lufka, ;seconded by Commissioner Wire
to defer recommendation on the proposed amendments, and to
refer the matter to staff for further review and changes as
outlined daring the discussion.
Chairwoman Vasillou stated that, given the number of pendinq
petitions that would be coming beforz the Comml°slan, as
well as other scheduled business, this item probably would
not return to the Commis$jon until August..
Page ll
Planning Commission Minutes
lune 23, 19,8?-
o missloner Stulberg suggested, that the Commission could
forward the item to the Council at this time with the recom-
mendatlon for denial* he stated that, as suggested by Mr. Lau at there may not be 'a need for any additlonel regula-
tion or language.
CoMmIss oner Plurka stated that , that would be another
alternative, he preferred a deferral, at this time because
the options outllned;appeared to be reasonable. He agreed
that OrdinancQs were not needed for the sake of having, Ordinances. Commissioner Wine concurred, but stated ghat it
would be beneficial to have public comment on the issue,
Chairwoman Vasiliou explained that the Plymouth Development
Council. had _-a meeting scheduled for mlid-July and if the re-
vised language could be developed, it could be ,referred to
that body for discussion also before the planning Commission
considered It.
She asked the developers present to convey the Commission's
observations and direction to the Development Council.
Chairwoman V'asillou called for a Vote. MOTION passed, all VOTEinfavor..
NEW BUSINESS
hairwoman V sil ou introduced the next item of bush=ess and 30,%M GOLDMAN
recd nixed fir. Glen Burnett of lo .p Construction dmpan y. 51T f'LANIVAKANCReadingofthedune11, 1982 staff report was waived. 800,58)
Mr. Gurnett commented on the staff report and stag that
the client had indicated , the trail hti•! not been installed
because Mr. Goldman :had preferred to wait untrl the full
City tram connecting to this segment was Completed. Staff
commented that the installation or the trail was one of the
approved site improvements, and that the pendant financial
guarantee covered that improvement. Staff thea reviewed the
varlawes involved with the petition.
Commissioner Stulb--rg inquired as to why; the landscapinq had
not been installed per the approved plans. Mr, Burnett
stated that he had not been aware of any deficiencies or,
non-compliance until this plan had been reviewed by staff. Staff indicated that the status of landscaping a -s reported
in the staf ` report was based :upon the petitiotzer',s surveyofnowex.st'nq trees, and that the variation from the
approved plans for the first phase was In the size of the
trees.
Page 172
Planning Co.mmission Minutes
une 23, 1952
Staff is not suggesting that those trees be ' Substituted- but
il. staff did b ve it was 4 nificant to report the states of
the work
t,ff also cxplained tale circumstances of the use of
adjacent property, x or ,f .ire lane purposes,,
WSUON by Commissioner a,x e, seconded by Commis->icner Pl.uf a REE :' NDA IO?j atorecommendapprovalOfthe ,Site Plan- Amendment and ari- VOTE.
ance for 30seph Goldman for a building addition at 2550NiagaraLanesubjecttotherecommendationInthestaff
report; condit.iOn nu- S to specify the 4-12t. rear yard
setback variance MO11,011 passed, all voted in favor.
Chairwoman V siliou Introduced the next item of business and LARRY LAUKKA.
recstafognized . nized Mr. Larry La . Reading :of the une '1 , 1982 A AASS( ASSOCIATES
report vli a waived. PUD FIWL PLNf, /PLAN
Mr. Lauk a stated be tad no questions or comments re Cardin
AND SITE PLAN
WEST TfTflthestaff ,report ADDITION (A-145)
Commissioner Wire expressed concern with Item no, 22 of theEngineer's Memorandum which addressed required changes
which would have to be made to the t ubmitted .plans. He
stated there appe , ed to be concerns with the t€l i pend
and questioned whWher the plans would be significantlycry4anedwillhoutCommi,$Ion review. Staff explained: that the
concerns noted in the igineer's Memorandum had been addres-
sed by the petitioner, and were being called out s ec f -
callY to assure approprit to revised plans were submitted. ;
Chairwoman Vasillou recognized Mr. Frank Burg, the petition#-
i
er's consulting engineer,. who stated that he was nc-t- .sere
whether there was additional change+ required beyond those
already discussed with staff and he noted that anumber* had
alread.V been made. He commented on the design of the hold-
ing pond.
Staff commented on the various engineerinq concerns regard-
ing the need for eager ent which had been discussed at the
Development Review Committee with the Petitioner's engineer. f
f
i
Page
Pial ging Commission t4inaes
Jute 23, 1982
NOT104 bV COMMISSIO-rierber I secondt3d by Commissioner RFCOMWNDATIONMagnustorecommendapprovaloftheRPUDFinalPla--/Plan ;for VOTEWestRidgeFifthAddition" for Laukka, & Associates PU76- subject to the mmendatIo In the staff re port.
MUTION Passed, all In favor.
Chairwomanan asil.iou introduced the next Iters and readin.j tir GARY Rt? RtheJune ,, 1962 staff report was ,-J ved . She recognized FINAL PLAT FOR
the petitioner and a brief discussion ensued. ARMSTRONG Rio
Commissioner Wire expressed concern that the En xneer's
80011
Memorandum at Item 22 refers to required changes which ars°
to be submitted and be particularly stated concern wit' Item
hie refers to a problem with the design of the storm
drainage system.. fie suggested that in the, last sentence in
Item no. -d the ward "shouLd" ought to be substituted with
the word "shall". He alsoexpressed concern about Rem ? -e
and stated that _ he would prefer to have detailed graphics
showingId status of these items.,
Chairwoman asil*ou state that the d tax s of storm
ra .nage deslgl and related maters are reviewed at the
preliminary plat stage, and she reviewed the history of this
aWicat *On'which has passed through several dif ferent
developers® She i-,Ajoated that the Final plat was found to
be consistent with the preliminary plat approval.
Staff stated that in this case, because of the substantial
time that transpired since the, preliminary plat approval, it
would have been appropriate to have the site grading draw- ings resubmitted for Comms ssion review. the concerns
expressed in the ng nee-r's Memorandum have been discussea "
with the petitioner or with his consultants at the Develop- ment Review Committee.
NOTION by Commissioner Paubal seconded by Commissioner RECOMWNDATION DPlufatorecommendapprovaloftheFinalPlatforGary
ohweder for "Armstrong Ridge', subject to the recommenda.
t ors and conditions contained in the staff report with the
moodifiroat on to condition number Ir that the list sentence
of Item -d in the Zngineer's Memorandum should be amended
0 read as follows: "The bottom of the pond shall be sloped
toward the out-let." MOTION passed;. all voted T.n favorw
AHENWHENT NO. 9 CONVO
a, A description of the proposed use and of its conformance with the Conditional
Vse Permit standards as, set forth in Section 9, Subdivision At and with the
standards as set forth in this Subdivision.
legal descripti the site, including nn pi "County Property Idem - f1cation Numbers)
o. A map ihowing. the site and all property ` within 11004 "feet of the boundaries
of the site,
d The names and addresses on self-adhesive mailing labels of the owner
of record of all property within 1,004 feet of the boundaries of the site as
the same appear on the records of the Hennepin County auditor. The certified
list from the County shall be submitted:.
e A ocmplete site plan, as described in Section III to include the followwi,no
data:
4 Site and Environmental Characteristics for the property arid, land within
1,000 ft. of the Site.
a.) Existing Vegetation.
b. Hydrology/Hydraulics; seasonal high water table-, and proximity to
aqvifer(s).
ic.) Phys,lograohy, and `topography, and slopes Q foot Intervals).
d.) Existing land uses.
e Microo.limat;e (a description of wind impact ,upon terrain and
slopes) ,
Transportation
a A route plan to and from site inoludinq hours of use.
b ¢)ad, and rail (on and cuff -site) security, and turnaround time.
e,) Method of construction and financing of road or other transporta-
tion facilites, if applicable.
3.) city utilities. t
a. Availability of City sanitary sewer and water.
bar Method of utility constructian and financing, if applicable.
Building resign and peelal Equlpment,
a.Floor plan layout for all levels identifying use and occupancy
of all def led areas and roans.
b.) Location, and description of equipment utilized in handlina, proces-
sing and containment of hazardous wastes:.
A.
RDH7E N
biji ding VeslVn and Special Equipjaivnt Cont'd
Des rip ion of automatic ut - oWn system and controls, ifppl *
td. Des ription of standby power and fuel sources and supplies.
Oe.) Eajipment inspection and replacement plans.
Location aro; description 0 any proposed accessory equipment exter-
nal to the b i ldl gig.
Devel ment and Operation Schedule w
0-A.) Schedele of site development and building 'construction. fib.) Si.hedule ,f commencement of operation.
f,. Uesoription of F -Ility Management and 'Operations, .incudin ,,taut
not limited to V -e following:
Operation of Facility.
Ar
ta.) A description of the process (Incineration, chemical
processingi and/gar transfer and storaoe).
b.) flan for fia'ndling ruptures, spills, and the like (on-site
and enroute to and from site for roadways and railroads).
Houi.s of operatioa.
d.) Number of empl,oyf es (total and at maximum shift).
e. ) e " Site maintenance plan.
U#) Operations monitoring plan (standards, procedures, personnel
and Ithe like) .
Emergency Preparedness Plans.
a. List of available e-*Peyen oy equipment withth {cg4on identified. pl{ifkwRk
b.) Evacckition,and emergency alert: plan for the facility and fo>* the
surrounding area.
COmergency training plan for facility employees at time of initial
hiring and during continued employment, and$ for public safety
unities, personnel of the City and area comm which provide support
services through Mutual. Aid Agreements.
W.) Coordination plans with applicable area public safety and health
care agencies.
fie. Waste containment plan.
4. Developmuat Standards and Performance Criteria.
The and operation of a - hazardous waste faci l.i: ty shall be subject to
the app; • %able following special standards and criteria,
a. Pollution Control Agency (PCA) Permit(s),.
b. Federal EtnviZonmental Protection Agency (PA) PermitW.
Department of`Natural Resources (DMR) Permit(s).
d. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (A) a' ad Environmental Impact Statement'
l . . ) j; if required.
L. Submittal and ziintenance of performance aqr' ements and financial guarantees
as required by this Ordinance and City Council policy and conditions'.
The performance agreements and supporting financial guarantees shall,
at a mini:mumt carver the following: completion of required site improve-
ments- emergency clean-up and correction activities specifying a mini.r_u,
time for the ;commencement of such activities by the operator, after which
the City mav .initiate and complete appropriate clean-up ,and corrective
activities, ands closure and post-olosure activities.
f. Compliance xi.th approved monitoring and reporting procedures.
q. Conditional Use permit renewal requirements.
h. Utilization of principal arterial roadways for access routes.
I. Two indei;endent emergency access/escape routes through other than
residential areas.
Minimum 1X0 ft. setback to storm eater holdinq areas, natural drainage
facilities, and wetlands.
k. All storm water run-off shall be held in on-site pcndinq prior to release
into natural drai.n:age w y.
o outside storage of oateri.al.s, con a =ers; or trash disposal facilities.
m. ill adi or unloading of h,,lzardous waste materials within bull.dinos.
n. Compliance with applic ;ole policies and vegulations relating to development,
operation and closure/ lonversi.on'.
o. Current inventory of ha;7ardous waste materials, by type and l,ocati,ong pasted
at main entrance of site.
p. Maintenance and continued implementation of approved emergency training pro-
qram for all employees at the time of initial hlring,, and during continued
employment; the training program shall be reviewed at least semi-annually; as
to whether they are current in terms of' sate} -of -the -art emergency. procedures
and techniques) training programs shale also e maintained and Implemented
for public safety personnel of the City and of area communities who provide
supplemental services to the City by Mutual Aid Agreements.
g. Maintenance of approved emergency prepIaredness plans to include provisions
for alerting applicable agencies and area property owners, and provisions
for emergency evacuation of the facility and of the surrounding area.
r.. Required :emergency r 1 . _Upand corrective -operations shall r ;t -V
undertaken and completed; the City Council may establish, as 4 condition
of the permit, a specific reasonable time frame 'for the commencement and
coMp ,eticn of such activities; n the event of noncompliance, the City may
initiate appropriate procedures as .set forth in performance agreements and
financial guarantees to initiate and complete the required work at the
operator's expense.
5. General Regulations
a. Rules and Regulations;
The Planning Commission and City Council may from time to time amend or vary:
the application and review procedures and the quantity and type of cocuments
to be presented,
b. Plan Changes
The Zoning AdmIna Yrntor .may authorize minor charges In the location, place-
ment and height of structures after the Final Site Plan has been adopted;
however, any change in use and any major change shall be made only after
public hearing by ,the Tanning om fission and approval by the City Council.
The Atoning Administrator shall determine what coostitutes a major change,.
pjc.
STs Plans: CertificationCert,ification of .f lans4
All architectural and engineering plans shall be designed and certified by a
professional, architect or engineer registered ,in the State of Minnesota. The
site plans may be prepared by a;professional site planner, but must be cert.-
fied;by a registered engineer or architect*
Review.- eview:
ZfIfthe development is not progressing reasonably well, acoording to schedule,
the owner may be required to submit a statement to the Zoning Administrator
setting forth the reasons for the lack of progress. If the Council finds
that the development has not occurred a cordinj to the established develop- ev lop-
scheduleschedule or is not otherwise reasonable in the view of the Coun the
Council, may revoke the Conditional Use permit and all development shall deasr-
unt.il a revised schedule is approved
e. Withdrawal
the application f ; nous Waste Facility Conditional Us_ Permit may be
withdrawnby the a ; :i ani t any time during the approval process.
f. iscel.laneous
ign t parking facilities and any other previsions not sped ficall v di sbs s-
sed in this Section shall be governed by regulations contained els when in
this Ordinance or in other applicable ordinances, laws, or regulations.
lNgNT NO. I CONTID
6. Enforcement,
The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for assuring that Hazardous 'Waste. Facllities authorized by the City Council arein compliance wit,'), conditions
assigned by the permit, this -Ordinance and City Codes, and other applicable
regulations. Enforcement ,shall be as set forth in Subdivision A of this Section.'
i. Review and Renewal.
Hazardous Waste Facilities which have been authorized by the City Council are
subject to periodic review by the Zoning Adr.inistrator. Those permits wbich'
specify periods of review and renewal as a condition of the permit shall be
administered in the manner set forth in; Subdivision A of this Section.
8. Peuocatit.M.
The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may dIct: the
revocation of any Hazardous Waste Facility Conditional Use Perxii.t for cause,
upon determination that the authorized conditional use is not in conformance
with the conditions of the permit, or .is in continued violation of this Ordin---
ipanoe, City Codes, and other applicable regulations, as set' forth in Subdiv-
ision A of this Section,
9. permit Amendment.
Persons to whom Conditional Use Permits for Hazardous Waste Facilities have been
Issued may propose amendments to the permit at any time subject to the require-
ments and procedures for permit amendment as set forth in Subdivision A of this
Section..
Expiration.,
a. Perm-ts which have been issued under the provisions of this Section shall
expire without further action by the Planning Commission ar the City; Council, , unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year
of the date the Conditional Use Permit is issued; or, unless before the
expiration of the one year period, the applicant shall apply for an exten-
sion thereof by completing and submit,".Ing a request for extension, including
the renewal fee as set forth in the City Cade.
br. In .any instance, where an existing and established Hazardous Waste 'Facility
is abandoned or closed for, a period of six months, the Conditional Use Per
mit related thereto shall expire six months' following the date of abandon-
ment or closure as determined by the Zonl -Administrator.
o. In the Case of abandonment or closure, the terms of required agreements re-
lated to closure and postel.osore, Inl,luding related financial guarantees,
sball be Implemented and enforced in accordance with applicable policies
I4I
h
codes, and regulations as directed by the City Council,
PLANNING COMMISSION RimOW-NDATIONS FOR 3UW 231, 198
SETTING NI l NREGARDING AND TO B. K`J PRIOR TO FILING OF FINAL PLAI FORRIDGE: LSTATE.5 FIFTH D ION" H 7.5-3 Ot a RASSOCIATE ' '1; 5
WHEREAS, the,C'*tY Council has, approved the Final Plat/P Ian and Development Contract forWestBldgsestatesFifthAd ,'t on" RPUD 78 3 as requested by Larry Laukka, Latikka andAssociates;
I1 W, H RIL , OF, IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cliff' OF PLYMOUTH, 1,41UNLSOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the followinq pri,r to r?4'ord.nc, said plat.
I. Compliance wit i Lnqlneerls l morandti ,
Removal of all dead or dyinq trees from the property atthe owner's expense,
3. COMPIld"ce with the City Council Policy Resolution No. -80 r ar In mini-
mum lo r elevations for new structures In subdivisions nr on sites adjao nttorcontaininganyopenstormuatrralnaf ( il.ty
4. Hom n;ar Association documents shall be approved by the City Attorney.
Payment of park dedication fees -I --ll u o.f dedicationin ccor n with
Dedication Po.licN In effect at the tj el of filing the Final Plat..
Compliancewithction 9 of the Zonl nq Ordinance provisions for PUDI
Final glans and Plats, a
7-. No Building permits, shall be .l a u until m n icipal sewer and water are
physically available to the; site.
NO u l.d n Permit to b Issve ntll the Final plat is fjjPd and recorded
with Hennepin County.
9. S bmasszon of required inancial guarantee and site performanceanc weement
prior to issuance .of Hu l in 4 permit$.
10, Proposed 41st Avenue shall: be named 42nd Avenue North.
PLMNING COMMISSION 'ARKOMMENDATIONS FOR 3UW 231, 19
SETTING CONDITIONS RECAMING AflD TO BE WT PRIOR TO FILIfIG. OF FINAL PLAT FOR GA,RvRORELRFOR4ARMTRORIDGE" ( 8001 )
WHERLASt
Armstrong
the City Council has approved t'he Proal Plat and Development Contract forRidge" as Garyrequestedy Rehwede -,
NOW# THEREFOR ,, BE IT HEREBY RL OL I a BY THE CITYCOUNCjL F
THE CITY P :PLYMQ1jTHjMINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does dieeet the f011owitiq prior to re ordinq ofsaidplat:
I. i
Cowpliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum with the ame, dint toItem -d to read "The bottom of the pond shall be sloped toward the l
outlet.
2. Building setbacks shall he in accordance with minimum Ordinene
e uiremen s$ for all lots.
3. No driveway access shall he permitted onto 36th Avenue North with
the exception of Proposed Lot 1.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication for sixteen
lets in acenrd nee with current Park Dedloation Poiicy in ec eet
at the time of filing of Final Plat.
No Building Permits to be issued until municiVal utilities are
physically available to the property,
6. Compliance with City Council: Resolutiono,, 79-80 ve ardinqsub-
divisions containing or adjacent to storm water holding areas.,
N Removal or demolition of all existing structures not in conformance
with City Ordinance standards with the except*nn of the existing
single Tamil;- dwellings on proposed Lots I and 45.
8. Removal of all dead or diseased trees at the owner's expense.
Width variances, granted for Lets 5, 10, 11, 13 and 14,