Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-27-1982Pare Planning Commis ion t4inute,$ dituar onalInethefutureroleoftheAdultCorrectcon- Fi l ity and its impact on the City and In ju'rictiontherewith to encourage legislation to address the effect of determ-na uIdelImes On the -class of offetAd r in arcerated at the ACS', 3. x mine the Issues of ha ar'dous waste and solid waste and the commun ty U pa:t of the proposal to site a hazardous waste facility at the Anchor Industries :location. 4 Conclude our exe,;iination of the P.Jannino Commission reeommer do t lops with r`es pest to amending the City's Zoning Ordinances in respect of outside storage, minimum lc SiZes, etc., and `mx)re timely prods_ sing of dhy ;recon m ndat tons su muted by the City's advisor commissions I response to Council directives. j Acquire a sate for senior citizen housing In Down- town Plymouth and promote the development of own- town PlyMouth f,'OPsistent with the General Develop- meet Plan submitted by the developers and approved by the City. Chairwoman Vasiliou thanked C uncrlmember Threinen and stated the Commission is looking forward to the Joint meeting of the Council and Planning Commrss ott where these iters may he further discusa,.'d and these items will be scheduled fir Commission work and study sessions,,, PUBLIC HEAR Chairwoman Vasiliou introduced the first item can the agenda PLYHOUTHIHILLS and asked staff to review the appl catiDn. 4TH ADDITION" Staff reviewed the January 211, 1982 staff report stating REVISED RRIJAD PLM/PLAT that Notice has been publishee In the legal newspaper and CONDITIgNAUSE property ownel% within 500 feet have been n tifled. P MIT MD Chairwoman Vas, llou asked for questions from. the- heCommission. REZONINC, (61073) Commission.Commissioner Steigerwald questioned the source of the 20 units per acre density ceiling- staff s=tated that the C mprehen Ivo Plan allows for a density range that could qc to 20 units par acre In the LA-4 Guiding classification. Staff also stated that. the City Council has established higher densities for residential areas in the Downtown Plymouth area. Page Planning Commission 14,1nutqs om is loner Magnus had questions relative to the internal read s stent acrd st iff showed the current approved plan. 014 rveMdt, Vasiliou I roduced the representatives for *h16appliat!Ort. Mr. Dick lKnut-son comb-Knutsow t Associates, A tha the density has been set as close to units acre as, po sibl?, notinq that the par : to, the north 11ttle l l$ ;density and the parcel to the east Is 4.0 units per -.cre, so that it has opinion that fo,4this pc&ocularthe criteria has herr met, ate stated that several plans have been submitted and this plan is a m0dif kation of the road system shower on original plans. Ir. : page 11 Planning Commission minute's 3anuary 27 t 1982 Chairwoman V4sill.ou asks if #.t looks as though comrj;erotal development, %ill be held up until ries .dentlal housin . Isbuilt? fir. Fxdtik Larsen stated that -staff has assite(ih Irrr it' all analysis of residential hous-rig proposed aril existing within areas around ,Downtown Plymouth so, ghat ,this Informa tion Is AVai dole to commercial .al developers., He stated there'' arse commercial developers wild are intendlnq t develop lit Ownto rs Plymouth, when the residential area.:. are Actual1 underway. Staff rioted that Tipton Corporation IS Proposing 122 townhouse$;and that Toma,k is ready to o ahead with their development. Mr. Mark Rdvich representing " omark" was present, and OMMIs iort r RdgnUS asked how Many stories heir buildln s would have. Mr. Ravich stated they would be --storybuildings, dnd would be condominiums rather than apdrtments.' ht- purchase price of these tv 4its' Is proposed to be In the low 0',s and high $60,s* Commissioner pa nus asked about type and number- of ar'ages proposed. Mr. avlohtat d- the=re would be €aside stalls plus ori urid rround Parking, 9ara9t for each building. Commissioner Magnus .jsked about access onto Counter Road from this proposed development. Mr. Ravilch, stated that thud did riot; show access Onto County Road 9 though they once had anticipated a right -In -right -out dein oMissio er Magnus asked staff about the entrances and ; exits, and whether there will be adequate ingress and egress 'without without traffic "hangwdpsO., Staff"' rioted the traf`* ic dellrreators` and tura .lames ora Plymouth Boulevard,. Extensive discussion ensued regarding the proposed part -handle" from the elderly site to the trail corridor. Commissioner padba stated that the comments made by, the dt ,eloper giving the reasons for leavinct the "p,4 -handle", as part of the proposed elderlY housing site seen reasondbie Commissioner Plufka suggested the special creeds of elderlyhousing: were conducive to an "ex -c lusl.ve corridor"- and the recreational needs of younger residents right. riot be compatibleible with elderly residents. Staff Mated that from a p1drinino standpoint easements for a trail along, a common property line proud be preferred considering c0rrcernz.egardain liability and maintenance; it is doubtful ' actu use of the 'trail will be "exclusive" to residents of Only one deve,l ipment:. Pair"u lefulln Commission Minutes January Z-7 1982 The Intent of the entre o tlot )elnq a PUD, no with tandin various owne-,4hip I is to have open space and . internal oC rC,ation for the entire nel hborhood. 'St a also stated that at the final plat stage the Citi€ ` Council will determine hat Improvements are needed in he trail corridor and who will be responsible for the construction and mtAlatenante recommendations from the Commission can be made thee. Mr. Knutson stated a ments for trails would be encumbrdnees upon the adjooent Homeowner's. Association) and since eas-ements voui. d b difficult to get from dja entonerthepattedcorridorwaspreferred*' Mr. Larsen stated the intent of a platted eorrido, vas t dceomm date futdr=.. residents ' f the elderly develop v -, he suggested the " r, --hath " could be ars outlot. hL. stated cid accesis, to the corridor was desired since i tpr veme-nt contemplated a bridge crossinq over Plymouth Creek. Mr. Ra icb stated he, supported a platted corridor and did not want easements and responsibility for maintenance; he stated the condominiums woula have their own access to the or trail. Commis loner Stelgerwald tat:sd that easements would be appropriate to asz.Su e access until the proposed elderlyhousingsiteIsactuallyevelope Commissioner Magnus, questioned who would be responsible for building the bridge and trails. Buff stated that the improvements for the entire trail system in residential outlots are determined bPark Redicat Policy prev ous approval fur Downtown l mouth In a .previous development where a bridge was needed, the City Council credited construction of the bridge to the developer against the Park Dedication eq i.rem is Commissioner atelq r ald pc,inted out the staff recommendation that a bus pull. -over be implemented and asked if tele petitioner agreed. Mr. Knutson stated that he does rpt see the need for the bus pull -over at this time and fee-isfee-is it could be detrimental to traffic flow. if It is put ins i s should be idjacent to the proposed elderly housing situ but t%iq he feels should be decided in the future, page Planning issi nMinutes hairw r art Vdsiliou concurs it staff and Feels it shouldbeprowidedfor' at this time. Cormissioner flagnus also r urred Staff stated thatx while the timing could' be deferred, : the etre l.4 n Trdoslt AuthOi has design, standards and Itshouldbeshownonplanks <that developer,,, are aware thiswillbeplannedfor. staff also pointed out tht IUD criteria for the suitability of the proposed elderlysiteinvoludeavailabilityoffacilititiesformasstransit. Chairwoman Vdslliou stated that I t Should be noted to bringhisfOrVYdrdwithfurtherplans, and ai . %ed staff to hetdesignInformation `. yfrom th etr :cinsl :. orris.- re 'ative t th.i w.- items. Mark Revioh stated that as a developer,,, he does not wanttodealwiththe ` entire burden of t e trail, : system IOV ementswith his firPhase It his contention that the engineering could be drone' at this time tr) plan out thesetrails $0 that the Park 0edication can be d tt.rr fined for ail adjacent developers, but he does not rant to "frout- nd" ` surotherdevelopments. M if by Coiraoissioner Ste,tge wald, seconded ommissionerPabereommendlnaPPre-Ya , for the Revised V 'D Preliminarylan,/Plat., Conditional Use Permit, andzonln for Plymouth Rids 4th Addition"' located northeast of PlymouthBoulevardand37th, Avenue North subject to t!ie foljowin nditions* I- COMP11drice with the Engineer's Memorandum, the final Plat /plan include provisions for the l e - as Per the Master Sidewalk Plan; bs Pull -over adjacent to the elderly si.tet and -art 'inter to pedes- trian circuldtiOn Plan Offering access to the trail 3. Removal of all dead or dying trees from -the propertyattheownerisexpense. 4. Rezoning shall be flnlallzedwith Ming of the FinalPlat. 5. . aymeat of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with the DedichtiOfl Policy In effect otheUmeoff1llntheFinalPlat 14 anrr rrc Corwnilsslon Minutes 3,nitw ry 27.. 1982, 0. omplidnoo with City Council Policy Resolution No. 78-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures In subdivisions or cin sites adjacent to, or containing afay open storm water drainaqe facilities. u No bu idinq permits t issued until thefinal Plat is fil d and recorded with nnepin County.' 6. Compliance with Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance r - g rding the filina of covenants and other documents qov rn nq control and maintenance of common areas,, in- cluding utility and frail easements UStru t. on of the public trail improvements Includingcobstruotionofabridoein , 000rdanoe with City statrdards shall be completed concurrently wiLh develop- ment of adjacent sites 10. Maximum density for the entire D shall not exceed the Comprehensive Pian LA-4 maximum density of 20 units ger LMt tso" questioned the intent of the density require ent, and suggested the mdAi um should relate to each i e. Discussion, ensued and it was oonclo ed that this was the intent with the option available for the Council to consider a higher density on the ' elderly site when development , pians are reviewed. Ro.ti Cali vote, 6 ayes. MOTION carried. Chairwoman `asiliou called a 5 minute recess and reconvened the meeting at, 9.03 P.M. airwom an asiiiou introduced the next ite h under ubii.o WALLACEFREE SITE PLS MDfledringStreadingofthe' anu ry 16, 1,081 staff report was CONDITIONAL USEWaivePERMIT Commissioner Magnus questioned item no. 5 in the staff A' CARE tiR report relative to landscaping. end screening and whether the play yard could h& e art impact If left open vi.suajy to its neighbors. Staff explained the landscaping }plan and noted that the east and south developments will be commercial, and on the north a combinatiotr Of plantings should provide good visual break to the residential area Page 16 Planning Commission Minutes 34nudry 27, 1982 11. Submission of required financial guarantees for ceMplet.tcll Of t o site improvemerts termed for months. 1 Appropriate legal documents to be submitted for re - view and approval by the i,.; attorney ,prc0din for stared access and parking facilities. 13. Fire lane slgnas e shall ht installed per the Fire Marshalls recommendation prior to occupancy of the "Day Care Center".. 14. Building shall he sprin lered per Ordinance No. Roll. Call Vote, 6 ales. MOTION carried. W BUSINESS WALLACEPREEWM Chairwomen Vasillou in,. -educed the first .item under New SITE PLAN Business- reading of the 3anuary 18, 1962 staff report was WILLOW -CROV " waived. She recognized ;,r. Reese who represented the S PIS CENTER" petitioner, 8{ 0.54) NOTION by Commissioner paubay seconded by Commissioner Magnus to recommend approval for Wallace Freeman for Site Plan for the "Wil log y Grove Shopping Center" Located northeast of Nathan lane grad Betty Crocker Drive subject to the following conditions: I. GOmpl ditce with the CityEngineer's Memorandum. payment of 'ark Dedication fees-lin-lieu of dedi- cation pollicy if) effect at the time of building permit issuance. 3. Appropriate l,eg41 documents specifying that no outside storage or outside trash disposal facll- ities are permitted on the site, and that the tenants shall vtll.i e the ;.internal trash compactor, and facilities, shall he submitted,for review by the City Attorney and filed as a covenant on the property.. u r,slon of required financial quarantee for completionof the site improvements termed for Months.. Page l° p yt y m opy QQ"gguyyyy 3,anuary 27, 1962 5. All signage shall comply with tie petitioner's sign program. S. Appropriate Cross easements $hall be suLvitted grid approved by the C"Itty Attorney for the use of shored access and parking faoil. tles:. 7. The fire ine siqriafe stall be in tailed zr Com- pliance wiZvi tete ire Marshal Is reoommendattort prior, to a.,upaney of the shopp 114 center.. All rooftop equipment to be screened -Prost publt view. 4 All exterior lighting shall bi,. shielded. Zell Call Votet 6 a o esu MOTION carried. D. sous lor, ensued reqarding curb outs onto etty Crocker Drive,, dnd staff related the consideration and tcrms of this Matter per tete Final Plat approval. FOD EWINEER04 nairwot rt Vasil -ou tn't-rodl. ce=d the net i tem; r ad i ng o tete RATION- atiudry 191 1952 staff report was waived. She recognized SITE PLAN 4r Hary Kaiser representing tete pet tiorter. Brief dis- A,670 u s ion' nsue-d . U104iON d,v'Commissioner Stulberq, seconded by Commissioner Pauba to rxommend approval for Food Engineering Corporation TOr 4 Batt Part amendmetit. subject to the fo.l Lwin conditions-* I. Compliance with the Engineer's, Memorandum. 2. Submission of required firtancial guarantee for Completion of site Improvements termed fGr Z4 -months. S. Any landscaping removed as part of the e p<ltl- s. to oe x - placed In kind to a comparable area gonhsite. 4. Defe kral of the construction of three parkinq spaces ble approved "int it deemed necessary based on land ava.il4billt . Page 18 Planning Commission Ml,ivates January ` 196? Vote, 6 ayes. MOTION carried. Chairwudmara Vdsiiiou int oduced the next item ort the agenda, ARM H MNthereadingofthe -inuar 19 2' staff report was LOT'IVT ION waived VAR1WCES (6jo,66) Commissioner Pauba asked if there was information on rootord which would show how this ",:w dealt with during *ne de elo atent of "Meadowlain states"' tafc stated that there was n; record available on that subJect) other than tte s atus of the parcel as an Chairwoman Vasil iou intro used Mfr. John Clift, 36 Wi.nnetka Avenue South, epresenti.r-g tha, petitioner, stated he is conoerried that the Cl does riot have the. full history tori this propertywhich would, help the ommisslo j to be ter understand this petition, n, e stated that the Roq gemann, family homesteaded the land In this area, dnO the n titin ear is the widow of tea founder of the Village". He stated that uniqueness". is filet a strated by the fact that the land is surrounded by deieelopment and thus options as to accoss are limited. Mr. Clift described the survey and proposed division. He ex lairied that the petitioner,$ home Is tieing. repaired at this time and that the tai 4slon resultinq in two lots, as suggested b; staff, would be a waste of the lana, a loss of taxes, and a loss of potent>al income for the petitioner. Chairwoman Vasiliou stated that staff is not reacting negativelY Or unsympathetically to the petitioner, but they must evaluate the application against the Comprehensive pian and the Zoning Ordinance to provide the information to the P14W11119 Commission and City Council.. Commissiorre,. Na nus asked Mr. Clift if shared driveways could be considered by the petitioner* Mr. Clift stated he didn't feel this was feasible, and that it is reasonable to txsk for the driveways onto they street. He rioted the to ation of the existing driveway and that residential Lots Would not penerdite much tri; file. COmMiss over pauba stated that he cannot support the additional curb cuts onto 36th Avenue North.' i R011 Call 'este. 6 Ares. MOTION harried Planning Commission Minutes arruary27, 1962 ha, rwo an Vasiliou introduced the next Item; reading of the RICHARD DEIEL 3anuary le,1982, staff report was waived. She recognized FINAL PLAT . the petitioner. OW RIDGE" 61035Commissioner 'llufka asked about the "hole" betryeen Lot 7, Blocq and Lot It Mlook 3 created by the extension of Out. of A. Staff reviewed the final plat and not,?d the differe ice with the general. development Ba an where, the petitioner was anti iPiA 1119 that a strut connection between 46th Avenge and 47th Avenue might not be needed when Oudot A Is replatted err the future. Staff stated the road connrct ion would be necessary in the future for proper traffic o1rcul.ation for the entire plat. The General Developmient Pian proposes creation of two substandard outlots on either side of the road, the right-of_way for which would, be dedicated with the final plat of Outlot A and not now xte# sive discus niort ensued ;and Commissioner Plufka asked about the required right-of-way dimensions. Staff stated the right-of-way should be -ft. wide, and the "gap" shown Is 90 -ft. wile. i4r.. De iel stated he pre0erred to keep his ,options open for possible street accesses for Qutlot A from the north and from Vicksburg Lane, rather than from the south. commissioner Pl.ufka stated that the future street right-of-way should be provided now. Mr. Dez el stated they developed the east cul-de-sac of 47th Avenue North based upon City policies to keep Intersectioni onto major, .roads such as ick5burg Lane to a minimum. He said he hoped to pursue this 3i the future when Gut:ot A -is platted. Staff stated. that City Council directed that any connection to Vicksburg Larne should be alctiq the north boundary of the plat, shared wl.tb the lard to the north, and not at 47th Avenin As Indicated. Staff advised that the petitioner could retain his possible optionsby retaining control of Lots 1 and 7, so that, if the connecting aright. -way were vacated; in the future, the l- is could be replattt.* ;1th that laird to create three lots., Staff Mated recommendation no. 12 should be changed to reflect t%. Commission's finding that the ioh -of-way should be platted nowj with Lots l and 7 being; wLderied. gage 2 Planning Commis -lorr Minutes 3anuary 27, 1982 Vote, 6 Ayes, MOTION carried. oalrwoman 1--lasiliou Introduced t -h 1-st A im on the agenda; a$ N CORPORATION reading of the 3anuary 22, 198Z staff report was waived. FINAL ;PLAT It SPICER DIVISION) was no -:ed that no orie was present from Dana Corporation 81054) to represent this petition. -(hal.rwoa' arsVa$41, iou stated the ommiss,lerr does not appy plate .zt when a petitioner does not attend ajid questioned whether action should be deferred.. Star f verlfled the petitionerover was notified, Mr. Tori Bt rgqu!..t Sathare--Bergquls , stated h 'is a oonsu,„att the petitioner and oculd answer questions the Commissioner's may have on this Item. Staff exp dined . th recommended disposition ofthe lowland shown as Outlot 8. the City initi dJlY scgge;ted she land be legally tied to the mail parcel, btt the petitioner objected because of the swamp and questiona` e. use of the ,land, at all. The City accepted open space from the adjacent plat to the south, and gutlot B could be deeded to the Cita and combined with that land for natural open space and drainage. Ol rl by CommIssio.!er Pauba, seconded by Commissioner tulberg re-on.mendinq approval for Darr. Corporation for Final Plat for "Spacer Division" ` located, In the southwest Corner of Vicksburg lane and Highway 55 subject to the following Conditlons* I. Compliance with the Engineer's Memorant m. r> a of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense No bull -ding permits shall ' be issued until, mur-j , cipal sewer and water are Physically available to the site. A 30 -ft. ids easement shall be provided along the west side Vicksburg lane, and 4utlot A shall be df.eded to the City for trail purposes. Compliance with City Council Policy Resolution No. 79r-80, regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures and subdivisions, or on sites ad-aCent to,, or containing an.y open' storm water, drainage facility,