HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-13-1981e
MaY 13, 1,9191
The regul,`t meeting f the Pllym.outhPlanni-q. Commission was called to order in
the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard,at
05 - I . by Chairwoman Vasa lour
14111 F ZIESE T: Chairwoman Vas' rr -, Co!'ittOlssioners Wire, Pauba, Larson,,
Stulberg and ,irwad
MENMRS ABSENT- Commissioner SarronF
AFF R ,1 '; Comnunity Development Director 314ir "r m r ,.;r l y
Development Coordinator Sara MlcConn and Planning Se%4#retary
G
Barbara Anderson
i
j
MINUTES
G
10rlfflbyo.m. mi n r -, seconded by Coemniissioner Wire O ININUTES
approve lk-he- IMiinutes- of the Appril 15, 1,981, Anril V, 1931 and i -OR PLANNING
April 29,08'!ni nCorm-ni i n meets n rrr i n COMMISSION FOR APRIL
to the April 29, 19681 M i notes noting that m i 7 n r SteigerwaTd 1-511 1931, APRIL 2,
was absent from that meeting. 1981 AND APRIL ,
1981 MEETINGS
Motionc-Zrried or, a Roll Call vote, six ages, C er
1Z "IA IA mkvf SP'iXSA .`. A -the At'.V*';-1 1 N'! 'qtt+moi°." n t4Vv'ti9.".. L
n Ss. •",4,3 B R>d•*Y'k<T idF+'W_j [6ii'.-'r r aT C+'Bfir¢ t j . x
PUBLIC HEARINGS
This item was introduced Chairwoman Vas i lowho requested
l
NEW HORIZON
revise of the May 8, 19RI staff report. Coimnissioner Larson, ENTERPRISES,INC*
inquired whether staff had received any comments from other CONDITIONAL USE
temente in theFour Seasons Office Building relative to the PERMIT (810-41)
proposed use. Staff tespondedrespondednegatively but stated that
had heard fron ad'Jacent, property oviners.
hai r woo,., n Va-siliou inquired whr all the tenants in the
building had been notified,, Kind 'Mr. Ted Tinker from Metran,
Properties responded affirmatively.
Chairlaoman 'nasi i re declared the public hearing open.
P ?eat, 4230 Nathan Lane North,,, stated that she lives in. one
f Thi homes which abut the site and she eepresented seven of
ton homeowaers. She comitented that theyhad an understand'ing
4ith Howard Dahl9rea,, i s consultant, at the tivla the
property was rezoned to permith office building that i
viou d be used for office purposes only. She stated that they
hlv been p1eased with what they., see there now. She expressed
zk TI n s o mli
ionAMMMay19811.
page
4
concerns relative to the trafffic, parking,and noisefactors
She st ed that dla,v care centers have, i during the I.,)eak
hours th d arly vmmrnin and. late afternoon) which twin
coincide rite traffic times for the shopping center across tyre
at nd the rr s a tc t ' '
bad been informed that- t -he day tare center would care for
appy-t t y 1400 children Ohich would generate substantial
ailow Ouring those periods,
She at that t ve park'nq would not be sufficient toinodl t
ogiltnfm Irl& rt
be parkin j 4cross or on the strt which would at pedestrian
traffic a r* ',,,* cat 4 Lane. She -noted the c a mon dr! vewiky,
access t'veen tyre hanndthe proposed day care facility ;ad
stated tart tiiis vionldalso cruse proble,kis with people using,
the bank to going to work- and trying to get in andout.
She d s er s witernoise and stated that they had
been i r ri t r t r a r r e outside n oroups of
14 to Off; she i q _ rb nrt the times wheft, tire- ` "ler* would-
e outside. She commented about the Latchkey Program,and asked
ow the Oildren wzuld get to the Pilgrim Lane Elwr rrt arv SOr
and hack to the ft renter. She stated ' he had concerns
relative to the G t, t r r° of 1,at ur i f children,
and their at wit'i the . ,°norm oIF traff=ichick vioW'd b
zt .
15 Lafayette-, ,Ilqtitionk:-tl stated that New Horizon
rrt-rZ,r have 10 day care centers currently operating, some
in cori,,,.wrcially z r e.r eas' Trey have se-IOUed tills, site
because a1hut a residential neighborhoodi aild titere is not
forge attlou rt of wimitiercial or industrial t r` off i , in the r *
She stated that the h9urs of operation, o wow 51 .M1. to
6:00 !4 for five days a week only., She statad that thoy have
nev r~ ad aqv problem's with safety for the chiieren taxicar('
for as Vie pamntq have to bring tyre child into the fhq carte
center and sign tri in and brand ter directly to the -i- t h
The pr rersed at , tyre int' of t t, q when the parentsent
Ste 'S*,dtod thnt the nv, , :r-..,srw-bo " ' of staff a-1, w Cil it, in
the r il d'I tj vioult.1 Pie V5 f -ii would take less than tern- 20
spaces at ' atty ow t rmo. 'ire a l eo commented that childrenren
Sho hN$ M * t4ms ML.iy would, VW ke
r r 9 r -e .g "."he ichoolo bussing that y r. pick the
trate tq stl w the door and retumthvi. after cs k Thk,`y
Want have the program if they catmot tmake these arrangements
4w 9
1y
4
a
4d a =3
aq ti 3"
a r 4 gy p:g * v SEI mR gg s nq ro q iiieV or viso"
t $
a a
3, . ,.. " • ° , < gra [i_, c,I ga 'a, r a = _' t
tsr Cz f
pproxfroatejy 4P, to 50 p
u `s a "# "+c S F , g ^^ y r b e', " tACh 'e 'gra -i ',t '6 . xS ;. b x . 54 a a c , I ?" b t
In
of or 'IV ;for avim xi ately a halfours for each rr P,.
CumI over * x f -e I'Moired c ?zjl','. tho fence aroundun h,. play
tea het af- they feela , i .£y
StI N -Ad ' i hey p ar-pcIsos. i g ou #fir f
wac"dkS for reeninT, but tease don't 1 St,, cine OtnO'3
ns41q . ,firge playtr and fIipvr wiI I be enc Iose . pknn
o atb pL_'-"'v1,grovvv1 quipme f, wiil he storedinslide the center,
not in, a seIaratu ild'
She -#: ed that r thcr i i*centers were o t d in res idea i al
areas and were not considerEW to be too int-eint-ense or problematical
s
n a non-residential Sitethosoareas. rz r T
Si i na} a * '"1ffi'*i`E""'pyg"
3i' Martineau, 427 Qikcr Lilne, commented ort the rezln
residential Tice fourmlClensit'y o'. if
or
s, ,* A4 th4,, si j intended o !',-ii an office park and was nov
intendedefor a ase OF t4is nature..Hetlthat they had
a rrrxb MI.r4. ' g "' g ra on ; l iram
that this 1 io ld be 'Che only Purposp for this buildintj and, now
il,'h e dery care center which a, conditional iise is proposed. t e
r rr glia rr rr r r -an o r
respon-sible. sir'. Mlar inea rqutr i whother 'a xw t i rop r o
hf,-At givon tip tny, least the building tv av alfficv V*O-
Mr. Tinker "c' 'a 4 dai fat h ire still trying o leo? a it
thLV, foemlJjOrjZon jter' ISOS is a
4
tj
hey wi I ' I Zvi n -five pe -M rr
F thebuilding ' o lease after the day carcenter i ).
Vasili.ou inquired a-bi' the observation that the
real estate office used 25 parl"'ing spacos. Pam Peat Stated
t h tit she had r rr rt umber o cars every day i '
had hm;, aware of theday cera center proposal tind they were
occupiel when realtors, go outtour the rouse sites.
a t r r on inquiredwhether there was
x a i q r the sO t e, now. S4, af f respondv-d aft" i ri t i vely and
rovievied the parking requirevvats rioting that the center should
MY , }
Pale 131
xS 7 61'8 t -,. { k es"„un+kt r. A a$` ;y Alii$ { Orson'
n Lart that they a 4y r at sitest n pa gnou h ar.
gthelydeterminedh, this s the bost, location for their
ConAssioner Wire nquir- d almu the impact the d
center n rdin she leasing of reri girder ,, ,, building.
Mr. Tinkor respondedthat it should ocause a prolalem because
Ote day c4re center would have a separate entrance and
the design of the building is well ui ted for this purp
onvission r Wire inquired about the chain link fence and the.
screening between Vie day care center and the jdcent residential 1
p r pu
Ilel asf ed whother the fence would have a`negative
1
ryi+!,
mpa t
responded
yXw ovalue,
al u
that
the $
7$}
qi
ldi ng
y
for
yothe
ry, gCYw
tenants. fir.
inke $ tcP WF *5# $ .e `£1 if4k 53 they 4„'RV not s"'sw vM thereY'> L :r4 {uS ...Y
K
negative imp
Cornissicmer Larson suggested the basic ques-tion is vihether
this is an appropriate location for this useg
r n 50 Nathan Lan Jnr h, stated that his licensed
day cera pr idor dnd his, restflence abutsthis site tie
used to the day gars center hecause the rumber of chi I'dren
is too large and the noise would be toogreat. :to stated that
if the niarket is there it should be done on a l erc ale;
1100 children is ton manly hie commented that the building would
have o'modified to accaltioda the use, os the bathrooms are
in the cornon areas now,
Glory Pq9q, 4050 Nathan earns North, stoted concerns Aout the
n nlhe cl:ain link fence She s,°atedthtctt more ub- n il
screening such as concretebloc; fencinj wow.wou.d help rodroduce the
noise factor. Sic stated that they operate a child rens facility
in their r ye and she is aware< the noise pr hems ,- Otain
link fencing would not he sufficientMa nn a any noise
generated. She stated t4at Ahon the property tias rezoned they
opted for the l ark i rr she t at ' if she had been
aware that a usu each as a day care neater might be proposek.,
in the future she would have asked "or a fence instead.
S! -%e oA rm *n ed that the -majority of the children would be arriOng
t the illy carte center betwoen 7:15 and 8:30 A.A. and the
trafficrobl e ass would be extreme. She, expressed on r
regaS6din ,she privacy : '&.$fi jace`[m. Besid $,a al properties.
I au t coinmented that they wool k. prefcc r to have Sol, eonein
he building rt Wi rer Ulan have it At € ptµ however they are
posed to this use because the, feel they `erre being askedto
bail out the developer and the use is too intense for this
location. She stated that fir. Dah1gren had said ririv-icy gni
aesthetics ha e n important to the developer at the time
the mni g; slow the alost important tiring is to I ease the
space. She staters that chain link fencing is ugly and provi
no screening f r o r rr i
131 PSI
9Loren .Pa an u-'- lt' abotit VitreFire, Code miens n-t'
havl%i art of play area located in
thes
parking urea*
Staff a"Cd that have r iewe the -plansand there; a '. i
r i:, for cimergency ve-mleaccess.
i
Sue ccmr,ented that rav would have a cotmiercial kitchen
o` the, r g .) so th t! would' x i N. r + d E`'y. pip for 9d'' }iot
y!-'
e takingd'd ,sd4' & *"d ,,. ti7`CF RS '# xi',s'4A 2 xrf k%fi k:+. :e F.r 5r't 8 5 5 1.r t.. *,+ws#:G W& 6 R i
meals; instead wou d be prepared and served in the center.
She stated that ty could have riore than 100 children under
the State Statutcs nef be licensed, o ver.hl e"Y
that 'n -s 1Thr,-muiximum n mb r for the location and the
r a 'a a rwr a. n Vas i i i i* wbether the; i dnu
a id t1s. Dunkley they
have v u t Nlu r r r nt re , jardinq, the site- issuance I
the license --Pi i'le later after they have received zoning
approval.
haintoma aril i public hearinct
to- K. ai n n this petitivon this evening.
Ml to rr carried on a Roll Call vote, six ayes*
amissinner auba inquired whether the nditi, nal use permit
9 a+¢¢ i` } ,j+ {y}$ $[yg $ `} ¢„x y `# { y ¢{¢_'{ P$i¢"{.;( ,9 '#
gam, ¢'
j lit), Rx&,££ ak'k 1u+ reve}l-,ed, & p oSeek 4S iso i"a.+ SA` .ie4 Xt Sr fR bn 4... is n Lwe .tiF4flM6
rraTtlirmy.
mis a n r Larson , .1ted that there is a need for this service
NA this site is quest i n,'i l ..miss i n r Wi ragreed*
MV)"TION 4y Co;tmissioner Paubal seconded by Commissioner "dare to
rec.ommeind (Jenial of theconditional use permit., reqnemit for Plew
N ri z n Enterprises, Inc. for a (lay care center in the Four
Season) Office ria in n the basis that the use is too
intense for the site; traffic congestion is likely; tin the
number of stridents is too many.
nr ami s s i n r Pdub nmm,aen ha!,1 the use shouldTort
intensityuse cited In L r In i napproving the office
4k # $ ng.
II
v oticn carried on a Roll mall vote, six ayes.
om:*Ol inn r rauba comnented that there is a need for this
service.,however this is not the proper location for this use,
as it is too intense*
This item was introduced ky Chaimonan Vasili n# Reading of PEACE 1.UTHC i1N
the M *, ,17 report was waived., Mervin Stark was CHURCH - COINDITIONAL
present r,-.,pro senta nq 't".he petitioner,, Mr- r Aat d he had USE e T -833)
132-
i
Page, hv.
tt{
to comi, _its, regarding the st-aff report.
i
Cha i rwor-tan Vasiliou declared the public hearing open. No erre
was present who wished tospeak; Chairwoman 'Vi i u closed the
t
public r r g.
f
4- MKITION by Commissioner Jlr r, seconded by Commi sion r Piuba too
take action on this petition this evening.
r:I
Mbtlo r carried rr a Roll Udall k, , six : s°: .
i
11
MOTION' t4Commissioner dire,n10'ormnissioner pauba to a
r c ryd approval ne conditional use periait request for
Peace uran Church b to the following conditions; .
I. `there shall be no storageMr d the accessory r d n
2. The permit i issued 14 « rrr r r
of hfacility and shall not bo t r Z rr r
The p rime t, is subjectto all pµal i al) codes, regulations t` '
i PY' 5'S ._ 3'k Lt r L? ' "' S 4 +1 ['A 3 1. "" k § 6t S k4 f$ nordinancesand i%latlio Th.-. e s' al b r el r revocation.
1 4.
The pemait shall be renewed in one (1) year to assure coripliance
wt ter the condi 4C; ions., a
t
o rri d n i Rollarr got , T' x Callams 1
I
This
item wa introduced J C` i rwoma r VasiliouA Ferre 11olderness MISSION HILLS PARK andSherm
Goldberg were present n behalf of the rMlission Hills FIC= T14 ARMER31 Vark
Eighth Partnership. UD CONCEPT PLA"'I 1
N fiX a
rwovi asi iexplained the Duma# 1980 staff r a rC MISSION HILLS PMR would
apply, aW she declared thenuhl i hearing Dean. STH AU" (80027 Mr.
kd \+n+i7r e++7R.,+'S.a t##i91A they have die,Y>,k "m, i.t the discussions . they
held with the adjacent property owner in the summiary state- ment
which had been,submitted. Re stated thatthey did calcula- tions
on the lot sizes and the average lot size is 19,015 square
feet, the smallest lot is 10,500 square feet. He stated ire
tra*l location has been revised and.+hevt, aralha
vcno problems with the Engineer0s Memorandum. Discussion
ensued reg r ing i ter; 1.,'4.ire the Jerre , 1980 staff report.
Staff reviewodthe June 5, 1980 Engineer's Memorandum and
stated that,item torr regardinq access to the east boundary is
one thepetitioner has. disagreed greevii h, since some redesign vi
rr ,l required now that the adjacent site cannot be obtained.
Page 134
Thotnas rDeiil- I Ist Avenue North,, stated he had no
a ;a i" the i 'inquired 3
Adjacent property* Sta,"f responded that if was currentiv
zoned MID and was quided LA -1.
Comms Tones Paubu inquired whether ey wuld replat Lots 7,
and 9 of i Hi: Park- 7th Addition. Mr. Hol demes
responded that that 1111at had been filed and was completean
therewould be no phy0cal connection between that plat and tW °; one
fielderness s: ted thatv have 33 lotsHoer and have
celarae a lot because of the relocated trail corridor.
Staff commented that thero, was a variance involved becausethis
pro'J,
Lect:
was less than acres n size and density bonus poi
Should t ; the pet r #) requested r n
p ndeducted r o this pr
Chairwoman Vi i l sou closed the public gearing 1
1
IM`I ' by Coral'Ossioner hi re, seconded by Con*ission.lberc I
toltake action on Wlz petition this evening.
j Mation carriers on a Roll Call voter six aYes. j
TION by Commissioner t%i re,,, seconded by ChainiornanVasiliou
r f-'Iission HillsPark Eightf Partnership for "Missioni Hills Park
flih Addition" dsii " subject t ;, e T o1 lowing conditions:
Compliance with she Cilty Engineer'sMemorandum,with the
excelytion of items 5 end 6.
variance shall be granted for the 18.5 acre PUD because
the area is surrourdedplanned unit developments and
tills Js all ei*
3. Anproved derlsit'v shall oe 33 I penile -t of tiny
bonus points.
T;ie concept plan, shall bo revised to iaclude integration
the part%! Shp west, for area planning purpases.
S* D(!tailed landscape plans shill. be submitted to include
buffer treatment along n y Road 9 and design on ponding
and Dean space areas.
6. Provision shall be made for a 30 foot trail rrid r
through the southeist,portion of the site for eventual
connection to the trail corridor along Zachary
Motion carried on a Roll Call :)te, six ayes.
134-
M' 1931r" 3
ice 3 " ols " a+ -n r"'7:. 11-I'P.' f "t n' w t °
aT4'
n :"4.' .-I it fey* K,sT3§:5 n sL Jea S 9117 a i V& 19 V. -Ns. ;x8€ dtia 5 -W 6p RXf* xs €x'W— atx i:t s,;a fey*
ait.; f tho petition for Tennant Company until the
petitioner had arrIvo,14
NEW BUSINESS
1
Ir
This !'Item was introduced by Chairwoman Vas l i lk. Reading of
I
r
BANNERENGINEERING
the May 71 1981 staff report twas waived. M Ton, Lodney was COMPANY - SITE PLAN
prqsent representing Banner Engineering Company,, and he stated AMENDMENT ANU
he had no mments regarding the staff report. VARISANCES (A-311)
Staff stated that the petitioner has requested permission to
have teriporary parking on the street from the Pol'ce nenartment,
until the site in.proven.ents have been -arppt d and this had
been approved.
MOTION y Chairivi-ortan Vasiliou, seconded ty C'otimissioner
Steigerwald to recommend a pprova h site plan amendment
nrr gin ring Company subject o ther
gant(esty
gE ^
ay q
pv
Compliance with the City Engineer's Me rand rr.
Consolidation f the two parcels into a single parcel.
3. Submittal of ordinancerequired financial guarantee
assure mmpletion of approved site finprovements termed
for 24 raontrts*
4 Approval cori epi a yard setback variances as indicated
ort the submitted plans dated May* 1981.
Approval conrt carp a s temporary parking in the Phase 11
area upon completion of the base grading with the und r-
s,,and rrr that the satire siteis to be paved per approveJ
plan by-Decen.ber 1, 1981; also, temoorary on -street park-
ing may he allowed subject to approval by the Police Depart-
mentduring the parking lot constr,!ction.
lotion, carried on a Roll Call vote six ayes.
This item, was introduced Cha f rwoman Vasiliou, Mahe wa i v d CITY OF PLYMOUTH
reading of the May , 1981 staff report. Staff stated that S30DIVISION VARIANCE
7^s is a housekeeping sten for purposes o assembling a 0 DIVIDE AND CON -
land a giisition package for the Zachary Lane ommuni IDATE UNPLATTED
Pa rk LAND(31024)
MWIONI by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by f3ommissione r
Steigmiald to recommend r val of the request the Cit,
of Wer t r for ubd v sion variance to divide and consolidate
135-
Planni-na CommissiontMi gut's
1 OL
UkIt q.tp"-+.p', I "r @.'fig g$ s.:.` +y.f"¢ .,R y K
Fi LB TA 4jYis-,. : A S4FY n"RX .`T t3Sw M7 .ia'`i +.:b 'S+76TTFs^ 46fir { AI.
Yn.
4 CY$p+^t S $ 6..k ..
package for the Zachary, Lane Community 'ark.
Motion carried on a Poll Callvote, six ayes..
The meeting r ectass d at 8..3,E P"kM. and resumed a P*M.
This i't'em- was introducedodd ,M n4 arr Vasiliou who welcomed TENTENNANT COMPANY
the Tennant, Company to Plpouth. Staff r x a r AND USE E PLAN
gaff report. AMNO MENS` AND MPUD
O C Y1 PLAN (81010
111r. Miar rar Kellogg of than Tennant Company introduced Mr. Peter
Jarvis of MI, Inc. , Mr. Al r Thorson of Tennant Company,fir.
Jonathan Stoll OF Tennant Company and MIr. Larry Laukka.
Mr. Peter Jarvis gave a presentation on the proposal
land use q uiday am enIn and the MPO concept parr- "e.
stated gnat a summary of thtv detailed traffic andlysis has
been agr iI also s cg sp * s es c al 'F,k tragi s v aw.., sc,
mi a draft Environmental AssessmentW ra"sit e~". to staff
for review.
Staff i rui t e ahout their r oscte c employee densities. MrIl
Jarvis responded gnat they anti(Apate 1,400 office employees
Oth he first Phan; and I em.pl e per 830 square l ee.t in -AIC"fie
manufacturing and 1.5 per 1,000 sq'4are feet in he research
facility. U re ately they anticipate , 00 to 3,000 in the ,
office and 300 to 400 in the research air development area*
col i s m.ner Larson, inquired abovt th i nature of the overall
rtanuf6cturinq use anti, the uil di r` in the northwest corner° of
r site. Mr. Martin Kellogg responded that they manufacture
6 r sweeping W,11:e and the aianufacturing is essentially
s qe etal work ,, rad a fabricating, as storage
which is all internally (lonne. The building in the northwest
c)rner may b .,atelite plant but it is conjectural at this'
stage if -1-he proVD.5al. Cormiissioner Larson stagy he is
oncer aid Pth 1r ° s r a l ra of the e rronmce'r and the internal
access.. He ;'nquired what hwork shifts woul Mr. Karl
respouded that.the first sniff mould be 70percent of the
employees and the second shift would have -30 percent. They have
no pians for z thirdat r time rr ntly have
staggered shifts and lex i a hours and they plan to continue
his in the future.
orti i s Quer Larson inquired whether they would need a testing
ground for their equipment. &fir. V'arvis stated that the parking
l of s might be used in addt4tion to the plant floors.
Planning ss -. notes
Page
Coastinissioner Larson,n uir about tranqeskion with
Ph s d" ig I s GtVQIS &d I T.
Phase I and they, anticipate a signal; at she intersection on
nunty Roaa 10 in the future.
Comr-lis"Sioner Rai1ba inquired about the manner of shipping their
equipment. '`fir. Kellogg responded that it will be by, trucking,
both for incoming materials and for shipping the finished
products out Commissioner Pauba inquired how often trucks
would be entering and l ung the site. Mr. 'A"ellogg stated
that they do not have a typical warehousing r distributio,3
operation and stated tears is not a large volume of shipping
i avo I ved.
Chairwoman Vasi declared the public hearing open,
11r. ard Mrs,- Paul Magnus, 6201 Orleans .ane, Maple Grave,
qui red W vie they wouldd v free their home, which
rats the municipal boundary and overlooks this site* Mr
Ja rvis responded that n s gbecause
the building height and the topography, but they will be 100
feet from the boundary, there will be screening and there"
re wtisting.trees which All be retained. He i 11ust. rated th
location of the landscaping and the screening.
1r. Dave Peterson,, 5240 Cottonwood, stated that he represented
TFie-1—WFisonHiN d t nt the southeast cornea of
R ach ted that they like
the project and are in favor of i;'he requested the Planning
Commission to give specific direct*fors to set a specific route
r location for the trunk line (Pike Lake Interceptor) which
they- are anxious to see installed as soon as possible.
Vr, Jarvis stated that this is their intent*.
Larry ., 7101 York, ciiind that the City Council tid
not extend the trunkuntil they had filed a plat and
everyone is anxious to have it installed. They are looking a
198? or 1983 for install'ation with the first phase of construc-
tion.
Chairwoman p si i closed the public hearing.
MOTION by CorrqissionerLarson, seconded by Commissioner Wire to
talo action on this petition this evening.
Commissioner Steigerviald cornnented that he felt the Commission
should take separate action on the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment
and on p', Plan aslrecommende4 by staff.
MOMIN 'by :mission r; Steigerviald, seconded #, 'Commissioner
Panus to recommend aprpoval of the Land Use Guide Plan' Amend-,,
ment by requidingthe west 12.7acres Planned Industrial (111)
Planning ss ,--n minutes
May 5,, 1981
Page 138
aiid the easterly 76 acres wu d be guidedunited Business
o be combined the CL inwithexistingarea the southeast
corner) .
Motion carried on a Poll call vote, six ayes.
MOTION by Cormnissioner Larson, seconded, by Commissioner
Seierrwad to recon%end approval of the MPUD Concept Plan for
Tennant Comnany, subject to the following conditions
I. Compliance with the<City Engineer's Memorandum..
2. Phasing and devt,,lopment scheduledshall be in accordance with
the approved Capital Improvements Plan approved by the City
Council.
S. Compliance with City Park Dedication PolityAn effect t time
of fi l i q of final plat and development of sites- determination
of appropriate park dedication shall be inclusive of dedication
of land: in the northwest area for the Hennepin County Park;
prior to preliminary, p at`in , petitioner should coordinate
with the Park Department and the Paisk and Recreation Advisory.
Commission as to appropriate City trail corridor alignment
mind des* fin.
4. Prior to final platting petitioner shall complete the required
Environmental Assessment Worksheet review process,
S. Preliminary pians shall include landscaping and buffering
treatment along , the north o€ildary with Maple Group' including
cross through sections of the area to be developed
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote six ayes.
Commissioner Vire cmmiiented that the reduction of residential
guided land area should he noted and he recommends that they
look at the overall City Land Use #nventory at a future meeting.
Commissioner Larson noted bis general -concerns with the project;
specifically traffic and the servicing of the office building*
The meeting recessed at .5P.M. and resumed at 104-05 P.M.
OLD BUSINESS
i
Conoli ss i (In Mli t eq
i
A
Thi s m was introduced hy Chairwoman
r ev!Lw d, . -ta 8-% 1981t-repgr". Staff noted, ha4C Exhi Init JAWIES Mirl
1 rias thriginalsulbmi tar and Exhibit 8 was the new submtit ROCKFORD Qt,1A E" -
F ver Planning -w issi direction iv the g April.
xx
PLAT '
15, 1981. i i;A,'i Fi ' 2'*5 ink y
nrr ggg yg
FS
ryE yy}}ppraar {{((
x'AgA
y
rirStaffstated that the location the trail for the r area
X1tl"Ck FS}8 ;$ ENO EN `11013
been r v ek on "Ma y
12
12 i n --hey &. flthan
I t should be located on the tiest stde of Nathan Lane, and on
the south side of 45th Avenin North. A nlimnnary landscaping
plan has been subinitted, shoviing the proposeds a s a i n
twas e shopping
try
and the tow s s to the Viest.
ihers srr a play sInapetitioner
irection. per Planning Cormilssion direction.
arJ'-iY wYkF{wi.E E48u t4'Pre kbYe'm.& thLrcwere any statutesMair
ttir, residential develop- relative . it
nts. Staff respondedthat the statutes only dealt with the
distance to churches nd schools.
fir. John !_ F.' i petitioner, stated, _ e had in s rela l,ive
to the say renort. Mr. Rick Sathre, consultant for the
petitioner,, reviewedewe the, orIgInall plan, subtni ted with s pa alte
buildings and the n ta proposal illustrating a unified bullding
on the west side of Nathan Lane. 14e review the 1r°a sitlon
the townhouses, to the west and this siand , howe
bui rr i on, the site.
v,r r ssi r a rson inqured whether conlstruction of the project
wtuld he phasod. Mr. Satilre responded a i ai4'J vel , t e first
ysitetoeve ;,.* would the southwest corner of the property
end they have no other development in line at this tittie. As
i, a t i rr are It%
mI
r as s , sites ga r 1 r
Pi ab I e.
hairvm:ian Vase iou stated that toi was not a public hearing;
howtever, she stated she would recognize a spoksperson fron,the
zeas present.
Mar. -:David Burke, 1"T'220. 'Nathan ii North, bLr+1k Sa. t ,« Planning
Cormnis i rr for hearing them. He stated he haat d4scussed this
ptuposal witli the neig A , and they were pres.nt. They are
not omPosedo sheur re:i Zoning as a shopping centers for
rs property-, they are opposed to liquorsales ars u!"
prrmi a it sales that would t0ose at a reasonable hot1r.
They art not opposed r ra adquarx r u s such as
gross )roposed by the Tennant Company, Miles Hom c,".'urt M
e +p : r,A l but they are opposed to a bowlirg :alley with a
liquor 1;cense.
Mr. Burkerime"te on the traffic proble.ms which would
generated at thefi ers u of Nathan Lane and Count Roa<i
Noy 13, 1981
Page 140
and; stated that the late closing hours concerned He
Stated that there i no Bathe"''. ota s' ' n i T'1301010; that ha
Vt..y L.`: +:,'7 v+'94.+.= Stl=s?n.s ra. +e MxE,d' r,P St s'trA :3 G.. R ,;,'xx x:xr a U4A .^ BxGA
liquor se located so closeto residences. iry co-.zimented
that if clectronic qames wore installed in the howling
there could be other prohleis with, -nun people. t1a also
commented that fast food places'amend to multiply, andone
s allowed, aeon there will others and the, -y, dot want to
see the area Covelop in this manner. "cstiated that the
residents are Aso concerned about the screening this -rea
fro the residential neighborh d o r is . County Roadd
hi r srix-t err V s l i ort referrcd to penrltted and condi4--Ninal rises
in this zoning district. Mr. Ourke stated tint thqy
va)'r ke to see the h howling allegy' ved further to the north
away 'rvn the r,=identi l area and he feel this c mrpre
wh ° , might he retched with the developer.
r. Bill` M r i n -ea , 427; (,,)uaker Lano North, inqu red what the
r r rr 10TATOO the south of this project. iMlr. thr
responded that there will be a green strip between tete hi h. qty
whinh will he h rmed and landscaped. They have not done a site
S;n and he stated could not: address h -a epiir-::re
Nfinit at this time4 fie commeAted that the building
W ;=vation are h$ h r than the roae and probably cannot be
sc uenod btm the parkingin lots .$ iuld he. 'Discussion en d
relarding the site plans and aesthetics.
4.r. Nord an stated the Inzation of the bi-nallinij alle;' was a
major concerti of the residents. Mr. Sathre stated that
traffic generation .;gas a tial S concern and there shook,'
traffic signal installed at than, intersection when it w,
by the County to he ti rr an d* Ie feels that the uses
not he Ws uss d at this time as Ae petition is for Marc , minaxrbit
plat and not for arty s ci f ic s,t l pfa s
Chaff rlwn Vasiliott state ` fhatt the Commission is we I I awa re
of the concerns of Via rt -.s dors s and theissue of site glans
o d he addressed at a future meeting Ythen the petitioner
ro r rned with individual site plan (aipproval requists.
Mr. John MIcKeRlip coitrmntedthat they are inte.rested in creating
it good developinent and are inxious to have a project that will
enhance the area.
C m—mi ss ion r Wire i t qui red why h r, was shown a phased
project when ` he Corinission had directed a unified pro -, tt
Mir. Sathre responded that the ultimate development would r a one
building arra the phasing is likely as !;.,.Hrrs nese are intarested
in moving, intocr ;he Wilding. i sates i d rrs regarding
phasing off, %no developmentversus the 'intont of tete ;j., s
direction* Commissioners Pauba and Steigerwald and Cliairwoman
Vasiliou commented they had not been,concerned with construrtifir
Pla,nnirwk3 cold si n 'Minutes
ay
nN, IMa
Page 4 1
t
pry i. Commissioner Wire pm rented that he was not ;aware of
any UnMede 3iopi 4lt tenter i rs 1 11 1aeuththat had been li-l4i
phases. CuTaissiorter Larson agreed.
Cz i s 7o r Wire observed that Orsi 2 73-18 which rezoned
the land addressod hemming and landscaping in e northwest,
and south sides of the land on the west side of Nathan Lane.
Chairwoman Vasiii u explained that the Commissionwas considering
the r i,inirairT plat and general developmentelan only; site
tans attdconi i l use p m:}'#ifs weld be considerels
petitions were submitted.
MOTION by Cornissioner Oteigerwald, seconded by Corton e si n r
auba tu reconend dpproval o; the prelim-iplat and, zoning
gni- l dei# .. pm plan amendmett. for John MlcKi d flor{; a
P. ernes for "R tord Squareo as shown ion E Iti bt 8 subject
o the fol l tar-: ng conditions:
1. C.m rnine with the City En 'n x 's Me.ra riruiu .
2. Perk dedication pGlicy requirements, to be satisfiedwith
individual sit, ki l p_ :; to include 29? foot. trail
easement, along the northth sir the property gest of
t r rr bane and a 2G foct trail easemeat along the fir
side of Nathan eine.
yid in thepri afortapproved Q the City Attorne.v
with the title to the , property or reference by future
prospective developers.
4. Detailed transition pians, inclading la ds aping,yair 1,
and other approvqd featureo. shall e submitted with the
final plat for that area Owen the coimercial area and
the adjacent residential de lolw s to the crest, ncrth anti
south. Said plan shall be coordinated with, the resi(,'antial
development to the west and shall be fullyipiplementM as
mart of the plat development contract notwithstanding
the staging of actual ' site plan d l pt k
5. All restaurants or i the proposed developrient,x t i l be
Class i re5taurants and shall he so designated she
apprdnera-development, a .
6. The final num r of curb cuts onto Nathan mane shall be a
function final' site plan approval; all property within
the preliminary plat on both sites of 'Pathan Lane shall be
included in the final l a l
No building permits to he issued until final plat is filed'
a j :o'" gni k» i r rr H nute
VD Y 11. PSI
Page 144,
C4Al diseased r ,' trees on he property . removedrr
9. Compliance with City polirq regarding u v s i ons an
qevojopr*Onts adjacent to or contiiniiq storn water holding
facilities.
CommissiowmwStoigeirwald gave direction the- ntoner to
ubw a dotailed traffinstudy yith the ffnal tO ShOW
specific -rash storage facilities within the building, Staff
st1qgp%te(1 th-at the City should prepare the traffic analy'sis
with ire costs borne by the piti i ner ..
MOTION Ny Wmi s r rrt rY Larswn, ; nded Commissioner etre to
add Condition P10 as followS.
their eri at the IN* of plan approval!
Larson Mated he erne M rt r r i
conditional pertrifts in t1hi p E p*r tl and he iviould like `to
rr ;this con if neialhorheodconcerns.
clairwan Vasiliou tell A for a votoin We amie rdment.
Motion carried on a Rol Ca -1 t , Six '!*
M,otion carrieda 110. `t yeti*, f,ve ayes, Comr;iissioner
t3re Opposed.
orrissioner Wire AV ed he wpp c, ", lu;ased On the fatt that
they are not WWI at a Unified 4eve'Of'--nt hut 0 sPlit
hat wi i . occur. w sever# iy-,-, and w l ,
have h x r cortrary to or iginej ;planning for
the area.
Chairwoman Visiliou dbucssed the future iaeeti nU rates of the
regardingdi y date of Asil in Plymouth, and staff warected
to check tl,e date and if therevias a conflict to chdtlq,( OW
Planning P,,.-1-viission datO to A ` previous ' 4. The
other Woo wre approv9d thip,oy i scion€ r as listed.. They