HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-15-1981Page A6
April 19,,1961
The regul 3r of tfie Plymouth Planning rids c a l B pd r- order
in the Cu.nciln&aabers of theout ity (Jenter at 3400 Plymot th Roulovard
V?3 % u, Commissioners $.5re, ..yub, Larson; F .ITry : S
S and Steigerviald
ha 3. asr fABSENT: x r er a rron
STAFr PRESENT: C -on Su y Dee pmekk ol. rd i l i tr lirBlairT i 4emeE a tnj
Planning o r r D'ar r Anderson
ffAll IGS
This item w introduced by staff who reviewed the l ELWV14ANN r R
Staff report. my. Eel winch r rrrr of Qu Inc.. was QU '' HOMES, , *
frresen r raresen rr he r inner,, FR DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AMZNOMENT SITE
Chairman Vasiliou inquired whether Out l tit A,, Sagamiore Addition N AND GCMDITIMIAL
was buildable. Staff responded that it was. Chairwoman Visili u USE PWIT (8 1004)
inquired hoot ng this project could be contfrrrr d under the 1963
ordinance provisions. Staff stated that this was somLthinq that
should be addressed by themmissio t The CommurityUnit ,Project
provisions of that ordinancewere reviewed.
Comaissioner Pauba inquired how this project would n,,omply w
e existing ordinance. Staff responded that it compliesin all
respects her than density. C mmissioner Pauba inquired hoot rr.any
Cormniiurdty Unit Projects there are still pending in fre Ky. Staff
stated that there are several that have been started but are not
yet completed. Staff stated thatIagamore has a covenanton it
tying all the lots together and stated that it would be similar t
a planned oast development under today's ordinance. Commissioner
Pauba asked hot, many units -wcoild be possible under today's ordinance
and staff respondedd 350 units could be allowed,
Chairwoman Vasiliou stated that she feels that this project shottld
be rev r seed under today's ordinance.
Xr. Del Frisch unn representing Qaality lfoiilesawed the Platininc,
Commission a randertng of the buildings hi fr erre proposed H
a -k d that items a and h under #26 in the tr ir ` Memorandum
bre eliminated as thyy have no control over those; they do not
Quin them nrow. Chairwrranssillor tstated that the Planning
CotmOssion tan, i,,Iclude; the Intitioner*s observdtion,in their
r comm d t, i on to the City Council. Mr,, Wischmacin showed the.
Planning mmi i plans, that the Homeowners Board of Di rectors
h(ul reviewed and signed.
86.
p an i ng Cowlission Minutes
Ari
Page 8
Chairwuxi.,in Vasiliou declared 'Che publichearing Dean.
Fred n} , 10440 County Road , reviewed Lire history of r
r n anc na oncepts with access to -Zachary Lane at both the
north and south ends of the Sagamore project. He cotrgientedon the
traffic it=rainn and stated that the existing sitiation is very
ba 'and now they. areM Ot-i the addition of +14..ore buitildings
Which will make it worse. He asked that the City do something
out getting the road constructed as it was riginall proposed,
Ho stated no ob'Jections to` she project.
Jerry Krieger, 12515 - 47th Avenuefalofkth,, realtor,, i nqui red about
66i n t i wool incorporated into the t'lest"i n
Terraceace proposa . He suggestedthe Planning Con.,mission address
the future Oudot A, noting the Westglen Terrace developer's
consultant had once vievied this as not econoraitally feasible.
Chain topman Vasiliou de.-.1ared the public hearing closed.
Staff stated that there will be no direct access to existing.
County Road 9 after neer Cointy Road 9 is built,, and the a amor
project i t access onto i thono or h t r n :ane. N
deco ion has yet been made as to whether Ord Avenue North will
extend west to Zachary Lane. Staff commented as to the feasibility
of developing Oudot A, and stated that it was probably a factor
of economic a ilii sty rather than the buildability of the land.
MOTION by Commissioner 14ire, seconded by Commissioner Steigemiald
to take action on; this t° tion this evening
lotion tarried on a Roll Call vote, six ages.
MOTION her Commissioner Wire-, seconded by Commissioner Pauba toCrecommendapprovaloftheGeneralDevelopmentPlanAmendment, f Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Quality donee Inc.
4stibiect to the following corditionst
Qxii i ante w1th the City.Engineer's, MemorandumV
2. Compliance with provisions of Development Contract -229
relative to submittal of financial guarantee for tomple-
tion, of required trail on the north, portion of Outlot
and the north portion of Lot 0`-A said Crail construction
occur with construction of thepublic street as deter-
mined
o or -
in d by the City Council.
3. Co.ipliance with Development Contract A-229 as to completion
of all col on open space improvements including submittIft1 of
financial guarantee for any improvements riot so col tad*
Submittal of required financial guarantee for site improve-
ments
mp ove-
t et`! s on Lots 5 and 6 termed for 24 months.
1
j
i
4i nutes
Ari ", 1931
page "a
5. C rapt 1. ance, w4th City Code (*ia as, to fire panes and
IN re hydrants.
6. Approval includes variance or side yard setbacks on 8,,,lildinq
to consideration of the yin (velopm ent cha'racteri sties
f the Sagamore project and in considerationion a etre r:itrrirrurr
T
7. Amnrolifil for amendments to the overall General bevel p rift Plan
originally approved as s Community n tf Project as based on a
t;iaximum numher of units of 408 dwelling its.
8, Petitioner shall inform the City,, to writing, at lease: annually
as to the s!1*-)tqs of the project: throij9h m- - ation. Othorwise,
the City rtay elect to reconsider the project in terms of current
ordinance re(Ituirements before any additional construction is
OTIM by Commissioner Larson, seconded by 0m"wissioner Stulberg
amend the motion to delete the condi i as r ea r -.ended in the
staff report an r bi t -u he frr = ri rnq r,)ndition AS."
A. Approval of the General 'Developmenta Ariendment, Site Plan
and Condifi,nal Use Pernit is u current ;ordinance
standards#
ChaMqc,,,iar Vasiliou stelae that she felt the project oar b
i rri she; an, tr s teas a viae to accomp is a a Spat
th a this a i n would not affect + approved rrsi y which has.
been estahlished at 408 units.
Cha'rwomarr ria i iopt called for a vote on the a{errena,pien
M ion carried on a Roll Call vote, six ayes.
Chaff mi arr Vasiliou cal 'for a, vote. on the main mesion a
Dace ase.
Mation carried on a Roll Call. vote, SIX ayes"
Commissioner 111rrL- stated wished the Kin e reflect the
I t is "ern regarding the deletion of items a and
in itpra #26 of Ai"he Engineer'SMomorandum was,red f)Y thq
This r tr r was r nt; rod er s"Caff who reviewed 'the April 3, 1981 NORMAN JARINES FOR
staff re, ort. hat rrs,l arra a t r u °r nqui re(I -D ie t z the t rai is WESTUM DEVELOPERS,
for all the ort')jects on 1;he age.Ida this evening had been reviewed INC. - RPM PRE -
by the Park arra' flocreation Advisorymmis on. Staff responded LIMINARY LAN
rroutinely revrThatreParksr . iews rr rt t G AND CONDI-
he commission and r ar? n recommendations ib ed r~rpon the adopted
Planning Cori a ss 1'k AW as
April 15t 11931
Nage39
Trail Corridor Pi an. IN USE RMI
Cha rwani Vase i d r d r nb i s hears n. " r k- 81
Mr. Pet i sho , McCombs -Knutson Asan at s,Inc. was present
representing the ion rs. lie reviewred the proposal and stated
rexare asking r 25 foot setbacks because of the physical
coas r tts of the property, 1..1te satated thoj feel the access on % -.o,,
Aveniuo North will nog cause a problem,, but they would like to
ep it as shown. He stated the rc,*nded trail la.calion was not
dc5lrable for this project and had a negative in.pact or tura site
layout on the north We.
Mir. Nor.mar Jarnas,, 'ratitioner, stated he had no comments at this
venneth W. Oita, 2425 l°l ` nu Grove ane, ` iotr r, stated i, had
n ,,airs at this f.,r.
r r seers 251; *- rr tea Aveiiue or fir, r al r' s td r
Mr d o lrr n s at this
Ken Weestrand. r pr -; lj Quality K)i`ies, stated n r ' with tete
r access to erre edit* zre inquired wh t r the proposed s kt r
s r a " for the level o rrr n. o f i
Saga -more. 'Mr. Rishop Fosp-,)nded that the service cul be sufficient
for the development of erea,, tand, noted, trailway_ n the south side
of 45th Avenue could ha-Veha-Van impact upon Outlet A of Sagamore, too.
hir,ioman `basil ibu closed tura public hearing.
Chairwoman asi i d inquired Vietr the proposed location of the
trail ti. ioul d further ns : n the adjacent properties. Staff
r s 'nd d that the trail corridir Mould be. dedicated, and setbacks
Join d to froivu the new riqht-of-v ay l i ., Mscussion ensued regard-
ing
r -
r the location of the trail.
Chainioman Vasiliou discussed the proposed buildllnq setbacks e,id the
physical constraints on the property,
Commissioner Wiro stated concerns with the transition between this
developiv4ient and the proposed develGp ient to the east. Mr. Bishop
stated that the transition would be addressed by the petitioner for
the project o the east ,Backford ,;t ro - He discussed the proposed
berme n , hufferingbufferingand screening. Staff' shoed a9-taphic showing
the : sight lines froTV this development to' the east.
Further discussing nsv d regarding the building setbacks proposed
along the east boundary and from the public streets. The
one nsus of tirol ann R n om. mi ss on was that the setbacks should
he feet from public streets as required per ordinance criteria.
oinmissi ner Stei genial d stated he prefers a Mni' is 35 feet along
the 'east boundary as well*
Planni (1*0111"ISSIOT1 t. 11
Page 911-1
derry Kr-ieger stated that there are existing gees along cast
lr,'-v llqa which -1 ,'- pr v d s s"an. $ rirgi AL. stated that
wi I I Lie Ithe track, of the quadririiniurai ;s which wille s d
to the east v! ew and pri vacy wl I be extol lent I the Rockford Square
d {gel pkle t- should rrr l cause, any problemsems for Ithis devaloprnena.
Staff4td t= t- there were t-wo, issues the f,`Ianninq,
I + Public street v ri sateink- -0
setback sidearldthe25 ,`1 $ eye w `7 .y ¢ j
ga
y
preques",
ryg $r
fi i mit @sS Sc #E f:aL.d 8 8 .. &a$ #aE E $ v1i- $+ $ E Xii kliiLnc Y e i etae i s. The
question is Whether this will1 '.r, sufficient area to providethe .
desired screening. Staff the differences between residential
versus (such as the i&tetra Cor -.parry office building) and
resrd nCI l versus - u-ses (such as the,ftckford Square proposal)
hay; rw rt n Vasiliou inquired when PRAC re g i erred she Trail Corridor
P n i tori : r w s dee€ a really necessary., Staff
responder tail was Per the Corridor Use Plan, but location on
either side of 45th Avenue was a project design decision.
err We st rand stated that the trail could be better locates., on the
other side 'north o been ,Irt r der . g .:r r --and
they ars willing to const:rv,, reir_r it d portion thera if the
City can gem rr ;eAss r;; right--of-way from that Quarter.
41.101110411 W,88a StF Y a Ssf B Larson, 4x Y i e7 .
ry e .` tJ 4 o a 141ire to
prefer action on. this nstition for R Ptt' l _ '4 1' U
4R`e 01% 1 .n and ond: ti _ :`dal -sePermit r *°fees ti yve— ti e 3 s prs o
r d s i n with fere 'Following direction:
1. Show the rcorridor allotig the south side of 45th Avenue
ar ordi nen seg. requirements.
3. No private, drivewky access surto 45th Avenue forth.
4. Provision for sr bStd ti buffering on the east side of the
developm-ftent, coordinated. with the proposed cotmaercial
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, six ,ayes.
1rri r er#r was introduced staff who reviewed the- Apr, 1 1981 r`„
staff report. Commissioner Wire inquired w t'he sbop1,)in9 seater NORMAN P. dARt"Ir
south of County, RoV 9 should eater inter this prowsed develop- t IM NY$
m n . Staff commented ha when the plans r this area were NIGENERAL
approved the Four Seasons Shopping Crater was riot built. ` i s OEVE.'LOPMENT PLAN
approval proceeded that development,annthe types of rises that were A?lEINDME G8 FOR
approved for tnis development now i st in the Four Seasons Kropp ROCKFORD QU Rx
i ng, Center. Comm ss ion r r re stated that, there v _ always been 33 10 131
shopping seaters p rrrr d r~ ars c r' c. two -s
Api-i 1 15, 9t:
Page 9
ar. .. -Rival Sathi e. athrLi-Bergqui st Inc. reviewed the., pr po a t yin
s iLltu"boy feltthis ;vvotlonie n g1to €- tallared to asnq that
tirenof in ne rour spasons type lie stated they
tai=e a different mi r t now t:1han wh rl this conmltwas originally
proposed. They have a different., concept' an tile Four Seasons and
It -his develop,,tent jails not look ' like a "rip shopping center. It
will N"-, easior ,t) screen the narking lots 1 is done in this
Mr. Sathmd c ,! e staff dei cir . iin state that r earth $
clt: elopr ent to the wes they A ncur'" that th cite r at
ingu one with i ni tial pr j t e-; c l ,. f eel
ghat the screening shotil dbe done with the plat and not. withh h
fIndividual site Man a proaL
He cov?ma(.nted on the trail t-grttaai,!d stated that tbeyhave less
impact frOm this because it is an easement and not c edicated ri tt t-
a o it will not Jfect the !Otbacks. Ile questioned
conditiar, #2 in the- stat
r 4- be trail along Na an ' ane f.-);-, unt odd o 45th Av,nue
Stiaff s> a e( that: she) trawl tt r lrl located al rt Na Iran
Lena w t:h a 20 foot easeintant on the west sipie.,
Me, Sathre discussed -6he proposed uses 'Jor tho Rockford Square
tle stated that there is a need for a Class 11 rest-
aurant on onto of tete sites in thefuture, and lie wouldlike see
thlt Chdlijed in the xercoir ndati n* C ha i rw., orawa V s 111 o a stated'
that a Clpss 11 could be allowed by a conditional use permit. Mr.
Sathre lt: t tete bowl i t alley site would be thefir zt
to b deet tri kind r i "c 7 the staff reportw-11 cause
pr l%;s with construction. He requestedto that it be chta ged so
that no rrc%cuparic permits e issued i al-
t t r t` t 1'Vs tonna Wire stated that tie, fools rt
centers o v r v tipll and do riot arise problems. The residential
f evelo- ment, nurth of County Road 9 will need services Wsdevelop-
ftiont can provideide and rte feels it will be very vial.Ae five., years,
r tt,q now. e ha'. a vowlinq alley and service S tion
r l quire =end coral use permits whi h were not considere°t - t th the
earlier ge-P ral devOopment pflan when the land was rezoned. He
stated that residents living Horth of T"tounty toad 9 would frequent
this p li coater rather ars crus; rqunty Road 9 to go to the
Four Seasons.
a rth oman Vasiliou coln"WInted that many smaller Centers comprisexd
of arate buildings are nold remodeling to be under one rood`. She
inquired whythe petitioners ftxl that s tla %aate buildings were inGre,
lade. Mr. athre, res'ponded that th,7 property has "Dee- on the.
market a long time and this is seen as a tray to feasiblydevelop
it. The owners tiant a unified project and the site plan for she
bowling alley, will be very attractim
Plannin.9 CormAission § iu
Apri 1 15,193
age 92
Chairwoman Vasiliou declared tyre public hearing openo
Dan L d br 288$ Regent Avenue 'owner of adjacent land east o
inquired about the pondi.nq ares on the Lest side of
Nathan Lane ana whether filling will be required to develop the
property which will reduce the water storage iStaff
stated that any filling will comply with the Storm Drainage Plan
and will b analyzed by 's consul t; n naevi n 4 i
prior to any construction being done. Mr. Sathre stated that they
carp only fill it to, a point and it will not alter the storage
capability of the pond.
Jerrarr , 1.2515 - 47th Avenue North stated that he i
r and is working w-itththe wn rs of the property to the east
of Nathan Lane. He reviewed sib uses that wind be put on
this land, and stated that` site development tan be controlled by
b Planning Co.wission,and City Counciland they fan control the
uses bye sales.
Chairwoman 'nasi l u declared Public ar closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire,,, seconded by Coinmissioner Pauba to take
action on Vr :s petition this ev ni rig'
Mot i carried on a Rolf Call vote, six ayes'
Commissioner $telgerwald commented that the Rel i ng alley structure
MOTION by Commissioner i r , seeconded by Commissioner Larson to
deny the requist of John McKellip and Norman James. for Preliminary
Plat and Zoning Generall l n: Amendment because' it was
uid d and zoned as a shopping ent r and the revised GoneraT
Developm,ent Plea profosed has several conditional uses.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION, by Chairwomanwoman si seconded b _ , ssi r
Stiegerwald to defer for redesign to show all the proposed uses'
under one roof on the east side of Nathan Lane, with no direction
stipulated as to possibly conditional ass*
Cor.unissioner Vire and Commissioner Larson withdrew the o and
second
0-1scussion ensued r rd1r1 the design the r s l and' to
proposed uses. Commissioner 1'r stated concern wl he
number rd1diss, and b essentialshopping dr
uses should be available on the north side of County Road 9 as
well as on the south side. He stated bowling i ys are not
typitally located in shopping centers.
Chairwoman Vasiliou stated individual conditional uses could b
evaluated on their merits as proposed.
1-11anning comMi n V"I brutes
April 15,.,1-981
Page 93
MOTION by Car.rissioner Vire to amend the maiin, motion to include
y i -
U .. sa W I*k Y 074
E111 Lr
Ual:
i, -m.
Ift»
l
Motiop failed for lack of a second.
Chairwoman u called for a vote on the Motion defer
Motion carried on a Roll Call vota, five ayes % Commissioner Wie,
opposed#
The mteetii 4 recessed at 14:2? P.M4 and resumed at 9* -35.M*
This hero t_tas introduced by staff who r i n d the. April q* 1981 NORIVIAN d RNS/
staff report. Mr. Peter toishop,,. McCov* Knutson : i Inc. RNDEVELOPERS
requested direction on the trail locaticn as referenced i n condi- WE ' 11NMN-
i n.414 n the staff report. Staff ommen.ted that they will have IUMS - U % M N-
AC address the trail location for all the proposed developments Y PAPA 14CN-
in this arela, in conjunction with the two previous peVtion .. MENT .-6.98)
r. Bishop discussed the density for the proposal and reviewed the
history of the original density approval in 1971. He discussed the
pondinq areas and stated they still have sufficient area to warrant
h density they are requesting. Discussion ensued regarding the
ponding ar-ia and the dep0 y-
hin-iumr: iiu stated that nothing has changed since the
o r nal r ren Commissioner Wire, noted r vi ourCommission
and Council actions regarding the itaaxionuri number (if units.
Chairvioman Vasiliou declared the public hearing open.
Tom Tackaberxii, 4660 Orleans Lani-, stated he lives on Lot in the
Xaf.RW 'fiFails subdivision, and has concerns about l ml income Hous rig
lowering propr y. a ufA,. in Nathan Trails. He stated m ore expensiv
units would be better this -area.
No #f3an a 74e 3 ), F Sd`nor,, stated hat they, r proposing underground
parking rather than the above ground parktiq which was originally
proposed; ;his enhances the site 1:,yoit and should he considerea.
Duane G. l nnj, 10015 - 465th Av nu No- h-, r rr sd a d ffiniinn
fi &fh TIftiffifingCommission as what constitutes low moderateod
income housing. Staffrs ontl d that Ws is usually federally
sibs di : d ficusing.
Chairwoman Vasi l i ou declared the publir. hearing closed.
P1 TNby Commissioner i - , seconded by, Commissioner IN uh to take
action on this petition this evaning.
April 15, 19-31
Page 9
Motion carried. on a Roll Call vote, six ayes.
OTION byo a iss over Wim, seconded by Chairvioman Vasiliou to
rocori en d approval for ' es en ;Developer, Inc. for Preliminary
Plat/Plan for "Wet en onda mi; s" RP L.! 77-1 subject to the
following conditions*
Co- rays e,: TT\¢ri s r U 3
project.
2. Development tai t'N' n Outlot 3 shall be subject to final R U
site plan and platting requirqments and development density
shall not in any case` exceed 400 units.
3. 'ransition area between the site and the single family dwellings
o the north shall be at a ntWhl.um vildth and be accomplished f Xr
extension if she 'waterway in order to m-ake a dike between the two
ponds asr ; o -ass
4. The location of the trail within this development shall be as
ree eded aid ereaton Advisory omiso and
as" by the City Council.
5. Building,, parking and driveway, set"icks shall he per ordinance
mininum - requirements*
A. Compliar.1ce vtith, City Park Dedication Policy in effect at the time
of final platting with credit given for deeded trail and
Improvements per that policy.
7. Final plan design shall, ineotp ra e required fire lanes with
proposed internal pathway system to provide circulation arovnd
the buildings.
S. Appropriate aomeowner assoc-flat-ion agreements and r stri C ve
covenants as appvoved by the (Aty Attorney shall f".'lad prior
to issuance of permits for hale I and shall apply to the entire
development assuring r'ojjokt integrity among all lots regardless
of 'staging.
9. Final plan submittal shall include deta led phasing proposal to
include ' revi e the City Engi neer as. o the timing ° cds, °i e-
tion of the entire internal street _system to insure proper
cir lary
104 Final plan subtaittal shall detail proposed common area improve-
ments the use and maintenance of which shall' be detailed in the
approved homeowner association agreements and restrictive
cov&nants. Each Proposed phase shall include the minimum
ordinance parkin requ red for each buil di nq i n time ;n, . l
phase.
arra- erg ?` s o n Hetes
April g
page 1'i
Fi nal p Ian shall include details to proposed rash disposal
facilities r City ordinancerequirements.
2 Final plan shy include any proposed monuraent or structural
Cor".issioner t4li r stated that he feels the underground park ng
warrants' more -density because it Creates' more open ql,Jce on the
plat and i; is an affirmative designtorr .
f4otion carried, Call vote, pix yps*
h' i i,i u y staff who reviewed the April 8, 19S11 MAONEY CONSTRUCTION
staff report. Mr. Jerre Hauer, McCombs -Knutson Associ ateµ., Inc. COMPANY - REZONING
was present oepresenting Magney Constructionp ry. Mrs Hauer AND OREL INUINARY
renewed' she general Development Plan with regard to possible PLAT FOR "MAGNEY
access for the twoexception parcels. could access DT't (810 2)
from,. 27th Avenue North d not access frori Fernbrook..ane if they
were one site. He stated that the petitioner was gig to
provide n ingress and egress easetment for the south parcel from
within h development n a temporary basis until the parcels are
developed with other t-haq single family homes.
Chairwoman Vasiliou declaredh ublihearing open.
T-ota Snauffer, 5224 Maddox, pane, stated. he represented Magney
ns r Wc Coanpa _ -and a.ie that the proposed layout
would pryZvi an ell,jlt,iar access -dor seiri trucks coming into the
development. noted a new site development one flock north
had access onto FernbrookLane. Staff commented that the property,
to the nr"fir has a temporaryaccess onto Fernbrook Lane until the
rose on the gest side is completed. Mr. Snouffer staters they
feel they should be able to have the access where It suits :them
be and since they will have to hear the cost of the ns ruc-
tioni, they don't feel1 thea should r ovi access,to the n h or-
i rig site for future industrial use.
J Marvin earwig,, 2,645 Fcrnbrook Lane, stated they own the
d a t t,iar ' ori the north, and they cannot`afford to develop
their land i t conjunction with 11 1 s proposal.` 'hey access to
r brook Cerra from thex st r, ; public easement, and h
prqposed development would l irfr nate that thus reducing the value
of their.land. Chairwoman Vasiliou stated that access to Fern -
brook Lane will li,111ited. Staff staf.,.ed that if a 'common, access
canni- be resolved h ween tl,,e owners now, the City shoals retain
tile existing ubl is easement until a satisfactory join access
easepient' car. he developed.
ugeno Berthlaume, 5625 Lake Street Heights 'Drive, stated that, he
1""10 as ` n assessments an the corner exception parcel and
he has paid commercial rates for sewer and water to the property.
95-
Planning otissn V3nrrs
Apr ' 1981
e stated
I
that now this develkopment will n h value of
r i s property.
Discussion ensued regarding thepossible development of the two
adjacent angels, ei various, means of providing accessfor thera.
Jerry Hauer considering whether tyre exception parcels
could develop n p n€ err " or ont ' --as wieanWT resod, V I,
the access questions.
Chairwomanwo ai i u declared the puthlic hearing closed..
ITION by Commissioner` u h r seconded by mi r Stelgerwald
to take actiun on this petition this evening.
Nllq, t i on rried on a Roll Call vote, six ayes
MOT ION by C",inissioner Stulherg, seconded by h i rwoman Vasiliou to
recd *,tend denial of the r r s , of Miagney Construction Company for
Orel Iim.inaryplat arra rezoning approval because the proposal Is virtu_
13 rid lck ng the d scam parcels and is not a total development.
Dis ssi n onsued regarding access the adjacent ar°or rt--
n berg and Chairwoman Vasiliou Withdrew the
Iti n and second*
C,TI) by, C. C4 i s s 1 o-ner La rss o n seconded by lcowmins4oner naba to
reco,,,.riend approvalthe prelfiminary plat and rezoning request for
Magney Construction Company sub4ect to the following conditioni:
I. Compliance ,,O k the CityEngineer's IMieitiorandum.
2. Rezoning to be finalized w h filing of frost plat.
3. Provision for trail and satIsfaction of park dedication
requirelments shall he`made at the temp of development.
4. The existing City roadv ay easementto the property shall not
ht: vacatted until a permanent joint access agreemert between
this proper-Ity and the p oper the r h -,'or perpetual
access from Fernbrook kine is provided and ap.iroved by the
City.
Motion carrieJ on a Roll Call tint -Ii-4 ayes.
Commissioner Ste1jerwa7d commentedg r at he would like to see
w,o curb cots onto Fernbrook Lane for separate access for the
proposed building o the south the exception parcels, as well,
s at the eas y -an --s mil r to that proposed.
f
annio.1 . mi ss lora Mi mates,
pr '" +uF 'rf 1 a
Page 97
5+. w.nvw.+. Y.=*9N-+s. w..v.:..xxxxiwucr
The r -ending of the April 1981 staff report wa waived. . r. LOWRY HILLSCONST C-
r Barr and Mrs. Dorothy "sena e^ a Lowry A l ra COMPANY - FINAL
tion company t -ie present. Mr. Barr stated he had no commentsPLAN" FOR " UN -100
reardi the staff report. SHORES 2ND ADDUONII
31
MOTION b comm. i er Pauba, seconded by Comissioner steigerviald
to recommend approval of the final plat for "Oakwood Shores 2no
Addit-ion" for _ urry Hills Construrtion 'Coivpany subjectto the
i1. Compl ance i the , Eng i neer` s at this
r 6 o lett.
2. Payment of Pare Dedication Fees in accordance i current
City o in effect at the time of filingthe 44nal Plat
for 16, single family dwelling lots*
x.qi ante with X*"*ity Council Policy Resolutionl- 79-80
regards ubdivisi€ ns containing or
adjacerat to stoml mite
drainage facilities, Specifically, the grading and dr,.inage
plans to be prepared and submitted in accordance wi+n reqnv're-
itlents for final plat approval sial required to Jem ris t -a .e
a t flat ultimate levelopment of theplat as pr w Sed will not
result insurface drainage Pr ble'11S for t1 ;,t qtr adjacent
properties, ars bthat any required drainage outfoll to the
Pike Lake h r l i e or flood plain includes eonsideration
energy r r a+ i n structures bra might be necessary to pre-
clude serious er r on anti, siltation consequences.
Nor ri+
kyd'
irrsrqg}
q p
mi to a until final plati fried with
gg
b kl d G f9 County,*
Motion carried, Roll Call vote, six ayes
MINUTES
itissiorter Pauha, seconded by Comriissioner Wire toMOTIONbyComM APPROVAL OF MARCH
J rr r .. March 148, x.018 and the far , A !
Planning ^ommisslon meetings as t . i i 1981 NI
UAMISSIOU MINUTES
Motion carried on a Rell Call vote, six ayes.
97-