HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 07-16-1980July -cit T
ki,a ij 0 i- . ss, k:4x E § a ca. 0 a V+ ".P `w. e # n inti„
a` `tis ; < "S ar-a .. t, :' q , C ."U L.. $'i..s"t .:: `i' «'' ,. y ` t'
kt` ?
t 5fi
4.' r Center # •` ." i. "!-'+a "+
by p y j
k
qty spa;
CN a h: tim xa. 3 a yC z, *I f Boulevard a+
awhki, Larson and WN
A
Develop-
renzt Coordinatorn Mary Ray, IManning Secretaarbara Anderson,
and Engineer red Maur
Staff announced that notice of publichearing Siad been published for a proposed
v, = roar plat and rezoning foi'- Mr. John SpaetY "Lilliq NO` UU., and that
the 'hearing Ibee postponed to afuturee date.Notices the ptpane,,nent hay
to neighboring preperty o7 bs6d atLyne pvrSlenu'%y contact thebeensent
a nn -11 ng Den daft" as to. the s !e hea r l; date.
I ' l" v . VZ o i l Use PerMt
his item w. s introduced by staff who rev"I we It-hJuly , 1980 stiff report.
Choi r,,:ara 7 siliou noted that the petitioner was present,and declared the
pubblic hearinng cm't
Hugh 55130O.M101 Lane, asked how long the d i i n use perrift, i t '
i soulv be i Chairwoman Vass l ion responded ithat on new requests,, there is
asually a one year rerewal condition attached to the approval; howwer, it can be
erl" eal-lier should orableivis arise f complaiwts are made. INat, Clark stated
that there was a twe car garage on the petitioner's property and inquired where,
van was going to p4rk*- he alsofired about the r ndeliveries to the
property., as he is concerned about small children in the a and large delivery
vehicles, VIr. Haver s"ated that the parts w o# the van or in a Mini_
warehouse the';industrial park. Basically the condiio a use would be for a
office use; parts will not be stored on the premises. `
John 11 -ion, Y - 51st Avenue North, asked if th re was an ordinance against
i' S€'a `"€ being t `$ x §w••' sc. t x ` A + l *: zi tn. ': fisc, xaayp. sxr
IT
bu ss 'ahtc being parked tier d a , r o e - areas, Stof roa{
that .a rti the Cite cart post weight and truck restrictions on public streets.
I . Brion commmentedthat the weight might be` a factor regarding parking ti vehicle
in a residential district*
Stalff responded that the Ordiwince states that parkina a vehicle over tons
s prohibitedin residential districts Staff inquired of the petitioner how -IiNch
t n weighs. Mr. Ha stated would weigh approximately 10,,000 pounds
s it's a large step -size vans Mr. 8rion also expressed concerns about the children
the neighborhood and the va, bac*kinq out of the driveway. He stated there are
o s i dewalks in this area, and children are difficult see €cora a vehicles of
the size proposed.
r,
91.. aasi, c b
wecoi+
a uc Tkv a §Q. " 3 `s. a #n a„{ ”
944" a ^$n Baa tm.-, . 'U x 3.t s. .mow .,. : d _,. ..,..' 4 a
F aa'. '+ F9,." :-Ldp'. a' w"a...gz; kk a"' sl E;€,.'- fi n V`ne9'1 A Y'QN
a, i`q"II " #k,S`x'°r*ah i.. 1`e• 'fl '."e ,';"''. 3, .,fie a`. €' s *a #+ s 'a iso tx red „ ' Si ZO Ota is 'w deI v` ' . yi : af? v&d No
t" qq gap-w yti< any th a;'Ca *'s° ds' Ri : I Y ,i e. H } y ii da 4: k >x . ., `^4r^.,`s1 ki ,ie a,w & 4Ajd1 AP +.n9 12 SF"S be t5 C w4 «^ ,ar .fi ' ,% . '`' '"',`">' "^r .
a ' ' '
lar ie as a seif order was not re docks and vlac*ed on S;nall vehl'icles.
a° .,imoS;1a.+. Va l i`,,%'.w mew.Ulrw& whether"t-hepetit a a w tc pick "'ap the
s `3 is o nall day r.,akinj calls, -2= , 141- a o u d .. rsesont n. era s, inC fa m m
i
i
in Vasiliou clesed the puhlic hKiri € ct.
klvTbr'°?` o>
Pen"' i"o"n this evening,
AR R AES ALL V14 FAVOR
MOTION ,y Co rOssi ner ire, ascended by Co I s, o recomw" d denf l of
h conditional tt ; request- for iNI , Richard haver~ for f wing roason:
1 The size of th*delivery vehicles twuld be detrimentalto ghboHr - ;
The weight- of the van Niru ` d rdlinaweight standards.
etchl r"` c' aethat he sees no with she o u the
basement if Nlr. Haver viould consider parking he- van elsewhere" Discussion ensued
r#larding 'the possibility of granting a conditiemalpegfid for the office use
only, vAt the ear, QLe * I e-Whe - and, - exp made to othera-
tions than'Mr. H ' stated pbusiness
in that r'a-nner.
i ` }a'
gy s,-, a '" , 6# *`*g q. p a Ca {{, g *y, r , ITHDR WI y, Cor , W scion .,. Wti , MOND Y11THOI ik°;C V 'L# p6ukiaissi fi & ba.,
a issiomer stated he, had no objectionthe offite use, digig. Commissioner
Larsonso stated toncern whether the use was secondary thie residential ara r* of
the property.,5
by seconded by Commissioner P-auba to recommend approval
of hi Conditional Ue Permit requestoIN!r. Richard Haver subject to thefollow-
No alterations f the site to a wda th office use,
o signage relative to the conditional use permitted on the pre.-Oses.
The rermit is i yid to the petitioners for the hopeI of an Office,
fie house aWl Shallnothe e
4 The permt is subject'to all applicable crdes, reaulations,and ordinances,
and violation thereof' shall bz grounds for revocation.,
5. There shall be no outsidedisplay, sales, or storage of merchandise r slated
material
S 1 . i e ., A w
tet" >
sk. - v,0,1,11Y 16, 1190-0
AWOL sha I I ILhe for omeg.
Prior x _ 4 3 3 av—, i+ !"ham smote< "s ; vtr-n= A I 4-$a x* $* s aT 4x4 s aa+rsx , niy T sei„r '`. ^hrc xr-x cr sras.n 4s an,.. a c red s .,#rx iz 3 m w'7 + 'Ca*.,:'&r3 $'" -#, k;V V, -u S T, I i7
v-, p a=regi # vi 4' &- s lall C e7 f -v, that 9.h Premisesesiw? #nc co4e,O'E the ipro Use
k'.here slhal be ni retai ' or wholesale hage of goodson the r .
9. There s,14c:1.111 be no parking of the van or other vel'zciles related to the
r itTonal use in the driveway.
10a There shall be no. deliveries related to the condli't-ionaluse ntade to the
r s di inc e.
MOTION carrIed on a roll mall vote, seven ayes. ALL IN FAVOR
The reading of thei July 1" 19130 sta f report was waived, a riv tan Vasiliou noted
that the petitioner was present,, and declared the public* hearing open. There ras
no ona prosent.- wish o speak on this s ten.
CoruTissioner 3arron asked about the percentage of easiness whi. h i from
outside she is r . t4r.' Duggan responded that t 11 very ,, its,,they
y r primarily interested i the industrial area. i ar whether
the were a i sitime. r. gra responded that they,
were not actively soliciting accounts,
yy
they are[ planning rzie with businesses
iY. '4 Wy "g ` Z^ 1` `..ht ai i L"i '£ ^1'T x1a T.R _ ''4 ° t— M , -F— Npg.+xa V. a : +'. i. C s vn` H. i..4i .kms-, iF'F 'ios „ filz; V -VX rm4..i UTI 1+x Uf, ' f 1 (3'''4I 1"ci€ Ci F'S $I ;,. f. starting
their advertising ca pa n when eA, ar tively in business and hav the necessary
avproval from the Planning Commissionand- City Council.
Chairwoman si closed the public hearing.
N!GTION by Conmissiono Su'eigerwald,,, seconded ky Barron .-o take action
on this petition h,evening.
MMION CARR40-' -0 PLS. IN FAVOR
1 ON by Commissioner Steigerwald,, seconded by Comilnssioner Barron to r fi end
approval the request Joh Duggan for a o di pBig
Red Quick PrintCenter" the fol Ont', conditions.-
1
ni ens. -
Permit is subject to all applicable ordinances, cedes and regulations and
Violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
2. No outside storage materials, trash, or disposal facilities.
R No signs permitted without sign plan approval in accordance with ordinanceand
criteria for this building,
Expansion of the use beyond the space shown sh4ll be subject to ordinance
plan review procedares as an armendment to the permit.
IFIL ,n1saS411 *11 gg
A*.:..`.,a' -4—
5. #e et"Jl shall e for one 1 ye r a whit m it s h review -ed y 4 -the
LI. nA vsk °car sz t+ sz mx
i is G+:'i F 31W' r
M 7 a
carr x o o cis vote, Seven ayes. ALL IN FArTR
tires. constr onditional Use Pernit
The reading of the avid 2 -It 1980 staff repert ws wa _ed. "r. hair , Goldberg
fig ' €t petitioner ` ' nt d a sign 9 a, Kph o Co;zip -3 o dad a
athey would like to request approval of phis sign fcr ,he m4el Mme* 11r
Goldberg stated that the garage would not be a garage per se u nt i i lzhe home ha
been sg dda was no 'longer used as a« real estate & lles office. At that tine the
garage wog#gid be i itled.
Ie coin v ed that they also would like not ;- have to pave the air area but
stated they would Install crushed limestone and put down a coat J oil which would
be like a blaCktop surface, uless expensive. ` is save then 1having t
waste actual blacktop later when the home was sold arty:
PLANNI"I'U'i 46R ON' +:. M^R`e`z`n +^:. 1C, l.5 "}
ids
3. Me pr n sed parkin3 area shell be per ordinance standards, as approvqd 1: ` the
Engineer.
4. Signage shall be ;ger approvet. pllzan staff -dated 7-16-80 -80 and sub;pitted at this
te
Upon erminatie the f , t t p- ry g a. 1 I e r m. v
s to allow for approved future development, with the area to be restored
to its natural condtition.
MIOTION car.-ied on a roll tall vote, seven eyes. ALL IN FAVOR
0 Conditional Use Permit
The redding of the duly 10,E 1980 staff report was waived. Chaffrwv pan VAsiliou
noted that fir. Howard R. "Bob" A n Jr., was present on behalfof Holsum Baking
Company. Chairwotman, Vali iear declared 't""le public e ri gopen.
Mr. ARM reviewed the request for a conditional use permit Ter a thrift stare
outlet tend stated that it is an intergral part of the =;.,p amyls business. He
stated he bel ieyed the infomnation re ar ed no wo d :ti e afavorable
action on this request at the tAmike of site plan approval,-. he regretted he had not
been a.,ailable.at the original hearing.
Cora unity el e ert erdi a ,k Mn r Ray showed slides of the site. Co:limfissioner
pedba inquired about berg= many units of product would sold on adaily, basis.,
Mr. Alton respo rRded that they 'usoally sell about 41000 units per week at 50 cents
per unrrit" which is approximately $2,000 F--- week in revenue.a m s i air Pauba
inquired whether it would be sold to persons outside she industrial area or
persons employed the industrial area. Mr* AltoLi responded that he couldn't say
for sure who,would come into their ' stnr , but fel"' it would be mainlygoing.
h e from work who would stop
Copn,issioner Barron commented on the paragraph in the letter rom the petitioner
regarding signs, stating that' no additional signage € he necessary.. Mr.' Alton
stated that most bakeries have thrift steres and people look for then at their
locations. n s w is well n wn and people will recognize th nar:r per approved
situ earns,,, He, presented'al picture of the newest outlet ser, in Brainerd,
Minnesota so the Commission would have an idea what this one would look like,
relative to signs and layout.
r ss e ner' Wire n red about nar i n for cars ofe t- s rers r and the
entrance into the area. Mr. Altera showed the Co-mmission the location and entrancie
to the thrift store. He stated that they do not expect more than three ears a
any given time. Commissioner Wire inquired whether there were any, windows in the
area. a r. Alton responded that rere er windows,but they were draped as this
entrance was also the entrance into the office -conference ren stated they
would not have any banner signs in the thrift sere at o
rini ss ener Hetchler expressed concern about traffic coming into this industrial
area and the trucks and semis -roving on the sit#z- Mr. Alton stated that this was
a distribution coater and utero would be only one or fere trucks a day. The route
trucks leave before tete stere would open,, and they return at about 300 P*m. and
rc` 16, M
wr
30
1
or the Via,. t
ours of operation for the thrift
ore. t1r. Alton responded that they vr),.gi d like to have the stere open froc 9:00 i
tn. to 6tn. .ond y through Friday a 9:00 a . . to 5.400pm.onata daThey
t;ould be closedlonSundays.
C ,'l?'d nerbinquired as tort whether Mr. Alton thought this establishe!nent
was essential the area. t1r. Alton stated that it wasn't '€ " to, the
r, hut he felt it w d providevid service that would b useful perso3s
employed in the Mstrict. Colmnissioner Pauba steed that in considerationf the
owner beina, the pr ;ai s h opera the '-r No was worthy
an imectalanvp r evaluate theof the_use with, the 1-
District.
Chairwoman ou closed the public hearing.
NZ,"ION-byr; ss i oner lulus,, seconded uba to act on thi s pet I t ion
this evening.
M.ON CARRIED ALL IN FAVOR
Wk N, ymmissl r Barron, seconded by CoitMssioner Pauba to r :m#need approval
f a conditional use permit, for a retail outlet for bakery goods for Howard R. Alton/
Fan. -O -Gold Baking a p subject to the following Condi ion
I. she Moors, of operationshat e 8:00 a.m. to 6.-00 p.m. .14onday through''Fridayll
and 8:00 a. mu to 1:110 P434 n Saturdays,
No signs relative to the conditional use permitshall be permitted.
banners or advertising shall be displayed e premises.
The permit shall be subject to revievt and renewal six (61, nior- s.
VIOTION byChairwoiman Vasiliou,, seconded by Commissioner Hetchler to a e d Condition
91 regarding the hours of operation to 8.-M a.m. to 6.00 pm. " Monday through Friday
and 9.00 -- to 4,00 p.m. on Saturdays..
MOTION carried on a roll call vote, six ayes. vmiinr Barron Opposed
Chairwoman ail called for a vote on the main motion as once amended.
fMOTION carried on a roll call vote,: seven ayes. ALL IN FAVOR
Bhrhard d ani Project Identification Sign royal
This item was introduced by staff whe reviewed the duly 11, 1980 staff report* Mr.
in Phillips was present representing Eberhardt Company, and he introduced fir. Tom
R soy from Sign Consultants.
yChairwomanair. i nqui red the this would be for leasing purposes*
Mr. Phillips responded that this was a project identification sign, and; would only
a :,e S!:INMIESDuly 16, 100-0
the deieIop int
Staff expressed concern that the Bigg : legally established oar the project
identifica.,tion sign so that i "the future i ,ownership h t w
e legally established as he intent of the Citi Petitioner that this sign
was the project dentiflc i sign for theentire Fox 1-*,Oows deN log e - Staff
stated that the petitiorver seeped amnenable to this.
Mr. Ruvelson commented a o ordinance sign provisions in the 3-1, nd
noted she intent of the present ovines as stated in the submaitted t er
Chairw*man Vasiliou inquired as to how many identification sign--- will be wa tedffi
3ar stated that e did not want t get into the position saying
that hs is the only sign for this dei?elopment and that no ogees signs can b
installed there., he asked for clarification of staff recc-,ire da ions.
Discussion ensued regarding similar situations which have arisen i l -to prig
this particular issue 1-1appy Chef and duds and Perkins and Cricket Inn.
Comr-tissioner fluatchler inquired as to what wras the purpose of the rallroad car on
she site. Staff responded that it was originally a part o --the Fox Meadows
de elorne and i to on part of the Fox ll buildIng s$te Mr* Ph011i.ps
stated that , .Ye racquetball courts were leased as an anienity to those wtfij i eatied
office space in the Fox 'Meadows development, but they had allowed that lease to
expire and now they were availcole to anyone who wished to have a melibership.
Discussion ensued regarding the railroad car portionof the site and the ownership
of that property.
Wire inquired about the setback variance from Fernbrook Lade for the
sign. Mr. Ravel son stated that the variance was requested because the urant to put
the sign in e landscaped area rather thangoing back near the blacktopped area to
comply with the ordinance requirement of a 50 foot setback* He noted the law
profile ` of the sign..
MOTION Commissioner Barrom, sec nled- by Comraissioner Steigerwald to reco;. e d
approval of the project i e i ica sign. fog Eberhardt Company for the Fox
Pleadows development subJe the following conditions:
1, Signage installed per site plan date-stamped uune 26, 1980.
2. No sign illumination provisions.
An agreement e drafted by the owner tc the City stating the purpose of this
sign as specified by the site plan,, is to serve as. an identification sign for
the total Fox )18e d w project.
4. No setback variance from Fernbrook Lane.
VIOTION by Commissioner Wi eoseconded by Commissioner pau a to> amend the plain
Motion and Condition #4 to grant the 30 foot variance so that the sign can be
placed in the landscaped area as shown on the graphic.
Discussion ensued regarding placer-,,ent of the sign. Commissioner Barron commented
that there is, ample space to cxnply with the ordinance and they can provide land-
w MY 16t J
t:
scapia file foot, a area, fir. son _," ended that it would have
y
k e ned nearthet,ii I rt 4 €, T
Are-
U#[ , L µt t i t& n
acne ele mooted the proposed sign was . meet high and wras located n
ton of he existing
berm. Chairwoman Vasili l r a vote on the
amendment. failed on a roll call vote, three ayes. Com, issioners,Larson,
Steigerwald, Barron and Vasiliou
opposed* Chairwoman Wisiliou called for a vete an the main mn
en. T"10" carried on a o`1 ca'l vote, seven ayes. ALL EN
FAVOR The meeting recessed at 9:00 .M1. and rewied a -
MIS. RdFeat end d Site Plan/
Variance ibis iter was introduced by, staff who reviewed the duly 11, 1980 staff
report. mmun 4.ve e -n` ; Coordinator N r$t Day shovied slidesof the a ss
ff ensued rerrdinq interpretation of the ordinance regarding, detached
accessory structures in front or side yards# Staff stated that the ordinance rn ibit$
such structures and this structure fall into that
category. Chairwoman Vasi o recognized the petitioner, Mr. Jerry Jensen who was
present dtresInc.IM-r- i ia i
have representing1,0
p
nst a detached structure, bu' it could ' e a canopy r aebed to the building at
time present canopy. They, have self -serve in half of theirstations ens and it is deem
ed necessary have the cover over the pwi.ps. He stated that the effect could be
a striking imrm re e en on buldings of this vintage and they, felt these changes
needed to be
made Slides of a recently remodeled similarstation on owned by tete petitioner it,
downtown Wayzata were shorn and
discussed. ormri ss° energy Steigerwald inquired about how much room there was on the site `
o extend this canopy from the building roof* Mrd Jensen responded that there
is approximately 10- feet from, -a the building so they would have to span about 8. feet
a most nd they are willing to do that. They are in the process of having
revised plans
drawn* Staff commanted that the petition would be a variance to extem d the canopy
intothe front # ardt further than the ordinance allowance ` f 4.5
feet. Commissioner Wli to commented that the pumps are a "accessary, mise" and
the covering could be viewed as a relayed use. Staff responded that pumps
are no "structures," and what is being proposed,for consideration is a
structure, per ordinance and
definition. omm rr ss over Barron inquired about signage, and. asked If they would retain
their existing, pylon sign. Mr., Jensen responded that the pylon sign_ would stay map
but Frere will be less signage because the existing signage on tete building m: au d
WIMUISSIfYN IMUNLITES -9- July 1980
reduced to about alf' of what 0ay see 01111.
VINOTION by ComsOssiomar Barran, , s nde* by C o v i ssi neer Pauba to recoilmiend an, waT
of the ar-ended., site plan and varianlc for HolAay tati n t resp In . subject tc
the following conditions..
I. Ind canopy shall be attached to thebuilding end shall be constructed of fire-
resistart
2. Signage shall be as proposed on the rinopy and the existing pylonsign.
3. E.'Xterlor finish of the canopy and the building earth-cone colors and:
materials per Tetter` from. petitioner dated f4ay 191i 1980,
4. Variances for the grin of the canopy shall be granted rnnln that
a the setback frcm Highwayallows adequate visualeffect, and
this improves the property,, and the area.
Co:,amissioner Hetc T r expressed concern regarding the fire safety of the canopy.
Staff nnented that there would be no building permit issued .tf the design was
unsafe or failed to meet fire safety code standards. It e revielwed before j
building permits are issuelas t n design and safety standards.
MOTION wais "^ner W11m,scondd by Comlinissionert l r to amend C
to add "and of materials of adequate strength to support the snow Toad in this
T mate.'
Chairwoman s T In T T d for a vote on the a end ent.
ailed n roll call vote, two ayes, `Commissioners Larson, a a, Barret*,,
t r aT d, Barron <ind Vasiliou opposed,
Coy n-iss n r Wire coinnented that the was concerned. about ensuring that the canopy
was of adequate strength support the snow Tad in this area,; as he and seen
several that had collapsed under the w the sno- in the area sintilar to the
one proposed.. Mr* Jensen stated that the canopywouTd be constructed according to
the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Codeo
Chaim, n Vasiliou tailed f r a vote on the motion.-
MOTION"
otion.
aOT" carried on a roll call votes seven ayes* ALL IN FAVOR
Aarenc ft. n nr t aT Use Permit n al
The reading of the duly l 1980 staff report was waived. Mr. Janson wa S present
to Yquest approval of the renewal his conditional use permit* te
a TT by Chairwo;nan Vas'll inti, seconded, nut' lon r Steigerwald to recnm end
approval' of the conditional use permit for Clarence A. Janson subject to the
following conditions:
T.. petitioner be allowed o park two passenger vans only at. the residence*
aly 16, 1980
2. Perymit is subject to all applicable codes, rdi an.1 and r g,iens an
of kit in hr 'f shall be grount-Is for revocat'-ion.
3. IfIle per ssti d petitioner as " r the service and h
not be transferable,,
r"% -`710N by CmPTIA ss l o n r €lire, seconded byCorrunissioner Pauba to ped the mai l
motion add Condition 7,441 that thq condttiom.,40use per-iiper-iit be en d in two
rs
m ssil£ r aa—on commented that he was Deposed to the a#:ie d tl and lie feels
that t: re is auequate r-nonitoring without renewal period being fi'ap OSedI and i
there are problems with the use, it can come hack before themini s r review.-
Staff
evs w.
Staff stated that the City Council has directed staff to work with. the Planning
miss on to develop a policy resolutt4n speaking review of conditional use
e"'li s. Discussion ensued regarding ann f renewal's conditional use permits
Chairwoman Vasiliou called for a vote on the amendment4
MWIOMI failed on a roll call vote, two ayes* Commissioners rs n
Steigerwald,-arr n and Vasiliotat against.
Ch rwom-an Vasiliou called for a vote on the main motion.
MITION carried on a roll call -t , seven ayes. ALL 7q FAVOR
Councilmember Nails was presentat she -ting and he spoke to themm ssi n about
having a policy regarding condi bond l use permit renewals. He suggested there was
a reed to, have a continuing regulation of hone occupations, but that perhaps after
an initial permed, there t4ould he an annual administrative reveiw and renewal
approval,, withh established criteria.
a
Deve nth e an ' ariancelll pproval
The readi nq of the duly 11, 1980 s a' report eras uiai ed. €unity bevelo ent
Lordinaorr Ray shoed slides the site. Moir. dim Benson vias peasant
representing the io'r.
Mr. P-nson stated he had several questions regarding the staff report, and the first
as .e delineators in the loading dock area. He stated they have shown the total
f parking as it it were a m, anufactViring use. This is the truck and van arie v ri n .
area and i might cause nab ems put e l sheat, yrs i whereas a ;a h should
install a delineator elsewhere along the building, Staff ohss r ed that if there
were auto paminrt,. the de`s inea ors i-,tauld se ra e that function from the truck
mareu er n .
Mr. Ben --on then conmented regarding the 6 foot variance along the side of the h lid -
n dja e t 'errbroo and stated that they could shift the building ,yet
to the west to put the variance ori the other side of the building.
He stated that the 20 foot vat canoe on the west side of the building by the property
PLANnING fINUT S - July 16, 1 80
line could be refit:cam bym*vinq thea ' against the building whi would
r he varianceed feet'. He s+ate: that during the vrocess of.i,71- i
a a r reek site has acquired * r °f o dards.
lie zlso coi-men'ted regarding the possible tti,i anr i ' f parkingin o h vis 'silt
f tv _ i lr i . y ars . s o this $ anis w I imin access to
the 'teat areas and. would make, it difficult tlease thee.
Mr.. Leman inl9 tented im 97 in the Engineer's Memorandw regarding access t
the site. Hq st*ated that i f the street to the ut st of the site i s put irt jey
shouli access °r.ni the east
Regarding the eighth p:rki ng stalls in she interior parking area, staff has suggested
that they not. be &isiqnated and the retiVaner is agreeable- to thatV,
Reqa-dinq the from: yard setback along r r .ane, the 20 Moot variance .for the
front ,hard setback s alttri:)uted to the completien of the street widenipg,and the
ase ff green area t-;,thin the righ-t-of-way 41FOryard purposes* rr. Benson stated the
sitr, had fl,Nan subj7-11.- not only to right-of-way requirements along the oast but also
road dedication along the east s.,
Commissioner 'v4,ire ir1quiY*ed regarding the timetable of the project. Mr. Benson
res,,ponded that h . have been working, this project since the beginning of the
ar they missed siryear, and no f v
and summer - s ct se,-son. They don't want gem into winter construction,
ana would like to gel this processed as soon as possible*
C yniss r r WitO inquired about the m,1ance listed as item #1 in the stirff report
and wanted w how it. couldbe a enzed# Mr. Benson stated that it So mly
be ! inimized by cutting mm e size ot she bu;lding. They have a read"
feet fra.n the east and feet from the east to aid the City in correctint,
access proble.,nis and they have nail for the land. and a smaller building .id iot
be fiaia, sil,
Coy# aiss onus Barron commented that the buildinna is totally surrounded by parking;
f the parking on the east side of the building, were eliminated it wouldeliminate
reed for a variance. Mr. Benson stated that ` n a -tenant, building such
as h s eno it 110 -old makN it diffic -itlease the space if there was no access
to the front doors for each tenant. Staff commented that the installation if the
parking could be deferreduntil it was needed. Cam.missioner Barron commented that
Maybe it was time people started to expect not to park in front of their front
doors and "Ar. Benson stated that they have fun that nnost people wan't walk
s .. s and a A- that they want the identity of being tole to have their own
front door and park in front of it. `
In discussion of tae 5 foot setback;' gar a tCit was to be charged o`;vs" as
the i ion r was going to vthe buildiAg on the site.;
age € ng the variance l -t a he north }lest and west, sides of the site
adjacent to the future st IMr. Benson stated that they would move the parking
to theside of the building ani change the green strip to a fire -a rather than
agreestrip to parkiig and this would change the variance.
ieK. the y .Kyr( : 'wJi3.§3 i`.'WT. x -E and iF W* llmirary plat
in`''ky''! , fth '`"A" * '"°'` 4 cr o land !in ';t 5 3'"G'. t tom, ""i, " :.xh
age "
t el -e' pared 0 `' 1? a C cessio or f.-Ine orkilinance for this i -
i, s` o the m.. ' „. `h w ssn... to, ogre e$ the a ». r s ''ti n rg h `Ri s. AA s$ x * 9S. ,T YYnM1s ¢JA a :} Ls s' s ` vS P { Y`¢$ $ {/Yj, S..,Y h.i rve b: i$4. {. K: y+p-, i8 . . '}+k ` a4 stt ? 5. k $ '4;. fr Y Sn+k area le(* hk S W.fk V ii ., # 'R: ..T 1gk.'.
wit'll the cite*
RO(Z' 10 foot vanince for those tmirking stalls in. the interior parking,
trea- . i ui onsr*?d. regarding !vores- by rig""utrucks
Msemis,
parking
V(wtikk LyuA
ffi94swh
Ry`hhand %a'h+there 4WyejY enough area @s a$+i>$
ail ,:gyrose Vepicles. Benson th there rxmd be ergy few pAople
rk1 n ' "x 't \ 41mck r'^$ "Xecs' sss Of t a'$"'4 rte O they use. Furthert sy } r"On+ s, ai, 't lie ss.s acu."cs rv, A.i vR r c,a the n 6; i GEfi .=4: at & ifi sfi.. '.n4: $S
s onto 11-e west
trect iiiaId el fiiirttateso" 'e himse prolula St.I--ff commemed that it. would but
a' a lon o t v ems o a test is not I ik*!'y fl. -o precedeor even be Con-
Cf rrcnlwith this develozv-,zert-
t,
il r; i f, r° Ne t;on ranted that tears rer mms with the parcel to the soeth
eapardi ngi assessmentb, and the road wvd probalbly n,be n d thi is
regsolveld, so the ro_-,d pan intersect wit"i 27th Avenue North.
teinn nd d that. if there- were to be from yard setback -arces considered,,
the reduced y areas should the vmst rather than adjacent to Fernbrook Lane*
Discussion ensued riqardinq pv, of parkingversus elimination variances.
T i c s `t x i 4fitf * * S t rLsSys i 4+ yyp is r y yy+ 4
s as s sx as ci s ass, i [ arcr$ 4.w xt, ant,
4,4 ai. BeiFs"ti 6
thereare curb cuts ontn Fernbrookand they could use the south one `as a teriporary,
access and would put a covenant on the deed so therewould e no question in the
future that peri;n en C C . "o she site ries to be from the street on the west—
when that stree 'I; is installed1kinstalledStaff recomrnend that a similar consideration
would be 11PPropriate relativethe proposed V* Place access%
C'omaissioner Barron stated that the petitioner has cited only economic rea3ons for
the variances. rheas `i s too much building and parkingfor the site and he cannot
support this site elan as proposed from a sound plan4ing perspective. Mr. Benson
stated that tenant parking availability is not just to econamic consideration, and
the site had, been itipacted by street requireeaents.
Cormissioner Sarronstated the prwas the ma b r and magnitude the variances,
and the building and site shouldredesigned if parking slang the east side i
dewied essential;. thus x ube needed.
Coy y i n inquirede Whether parallel parking Jrmnbrook
Lane,, and Staff responded in the negative. sc ien ensued ri r ?ark ng
stats design, the possible elimination of designate parking enthe site and various
alternatives for redesign y with ordinance requireinents.
MIOTION by Commissioners Barront seconded by Chairwoman Vasiliou to recommendn approval
of the 'site plan for K. S. DevPlopment Co. II subject to the, following nil n
1. l"rl fiance with tht. CI ty nr*r
13
Center 4th Aldditition has been approved by the y `ouncjl ani s $ fir:
OMI'I'M. 111 lbeen executed, no Certiftc-,A eOccupancy to beissued nt!7
he fria l w NS bwm filed with tien ' p n County.
3. P nt of Park i r fees in lieupark, es t an =,aunt
Qe _e 3 +tv .x ra
the+..
s,* c t s x svaereA4 1— is x a.c %4 1 € - t,m v Sr 6 x
Vedi oP ecin effect at the time of building permit issuance,
There shall be no outsistorage oequipment r materials and all waste
zee'wdisposal shall be within the structure.
5. Loctaitton of fire hycrants end' fire l shall be per City "ode poltcy
with consideration given to abutting public streets relative to lir lees
ocatiom
6.. SuNnission of required financial guarantee for completion of aprovel,site
i r mten terined for 2
7* All s'qnage shall be within ordlinanCestandards withrespect to sizip, height
and t rr
Plantings indicated w-ithin the propesed Fernibrookin r gr - -wa "the
r` h a t' corner shall be relod adjacent to 28th Place NQrth.
9. Variances shall include a foot setback variance along the west side f
bi; and foot -,yard variance a the -nr hw corner; nthe foot
yardg
variance along tyre side of the building.
rCe-1-1114issioner Barron noted that no variance was r mm slang Fernbrook Lati
and the parking stall variance in the interior lot adjacent to the building would
be resolved iVy not designating the spaces*
O -41 by Co;,,iinissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner' Pauba to"amend the nal
notion to also grant the-20 foot yard variance shown the entire length, of the site
adjacent to FornbrookLanae,
Chairwoman called for a vote on the amendment.
MOTION FAILED on a roll call vote, two ayes. Commissioners SteigerwaId, Barron and
Vasiliou opposed, Commissioners Larson and Hatchler abstaining.
arvv)-a.arr Vasiliou ceded for a vote on the mair,motion,
maiwvl' P`ARRIE'S oil a roll call vote, six ayes* Commissioner Larson abstained,
corkraissioner Steigerviald left the table at I.* .M.
a Site I nr Ov i t'Variance
The reading, the June 30, 1980 staff reportwa waived* Chairwoman a it iou noted
that N't. Jim as s representing Centurion an and Re. M''Bond o 'Sugar-Roscoe
tea aR Erna _ #aes€
tet.
Inc. wrere present 0"",te"I'llif of the petitioner.
u,,°o"r 'W'ire 0-,- onted a lafldscape pan Cid not, pm;r to, ,e coi d a t-atd
CVISUed regarding ads a e Plan. Buff stated that 11,19, yr s s1hould bo ;:"Fied
Mr, Hawks gavehis s by.a w t they r trying with these hr I .
gand Yz- tho trees and the screening effect, &:st control and ntoise lbufferinr,
as their aes relationship to the 1-rchitecture of tie
sty"u-ctu ` s . tib' said thew had triedo zm a design thatt mbe pleasinq
a ; l'' ' ik-" landscape criteria ids` the ix)rdN .
shade tree" appear, ye Kurz, V . • e Vtaff report, d e statedidisagrees
with that. tie seated e feel that w 1 t areIS feet in heigAt,.
tlm ttyrpe of m dika height treesz theyhave proposed wille sufficient to' m fie
V a ndscape Criteria's intent.
i seated thicat, they have m- de a proaposal w4iich the, feel, is reason,;jbje and the
have taken particular care the area s idt e
the r s d Alar. offers a a ed r .
treat e t, and that, after
initial Planing if the treatment were of ed deficient, he, could plant rzot'
L111"A %msstate d- taut a : ? i c e "-.` ' nl
ii, :iii ' trees on the. s #+firs.
C a rw.'aan Vasiliou comnented Mzt the PlymouthDevelop,.ient Council has asked,
that the ' € Cormnission and City Council refine the la ds a e criteria
as they feel the minis m nwmber of Baer trees may e toi, stringent. s s
c ng criteria an ICY*
councilmlan veils discussed the intent and history of the Landscape Policy., and
explained that, while she absolute niinimma standardscould be reviewed,, the
purpose was sound and intentional, Staff observed that the Folie u d be viewed
as a quJide for evaluating the overall treatment of a site, and it was nat staff's
i0ention to be ilAcroscopic on analyzing the mrmber of treo_s*
Commissioner Wire k d i T Staffwould work with Mr# Hawks to esstablishbalance
of over -story trees for the site, and staff agreed that -this urge d be p s°
NN')T N't by Commissioner Wim, seconded y ComMissioner Pauba to recoomend- approval
af the site ass and variance for Centurion Company for tree off i ce/i,:are se
bus ldinlc 1,n the Cimarron East M.D. at the southeast corner of Ferrook,a and
t fir, Norte subject to the following conditilons,*
k' ,"Pliance with the City Engineer's 114emorandwa.
2.=arat r a landscape plan in accordance with the adopted Landscape Criteria.
Policy with incorporation of the spade trees per the staff report staff to work
with petitioner as to a balanced amount and distribution of additionalover-
story trees,
3. Payvient of Nark Dedication fees' in lieu of d d *aa in an ai,,iount determined
according the verified acreage and according to the Park Dedication Pilicy
in effect at the time of each building permit issuance*
L A N VI 1 CT! % Vis' a I x MUMS
Wthin the strurturoc: 4.. Al aste and waste col
w `u'6"7T i Ice with t t I Pol i d wst`?t C"* ion No t. °,, re, 1t .'i: ng r*v' rv'g^,n-
w.:a,,,,,, tr 'wa l+ wl ',`w*.'+e 'd.a .; ...a is..'c.' @ i A e e eti a z.aa iii svc4s =
floc- elegy° wi s in vis ci n sites -,Ntt o conta stoma
drainage, facilities.
tion off fire hyd pints and Tire lanes, Per Ci 1,1
y d wit-li submissionof
eletailed design on the site.
Co;npl ian,4e with City Councii Resolution !,'y 79-773"regarding curbing and
drainage design on the site.
8. ubnission of required financial guarentee lor comple'tion'of site iumprovevents
or each -uildinq etir d for 24 nonths*
Signage sinal [vr approvedl site plans*
ATI traffic delineators/londscape islands shall be constructed per Landscape
V'olicy and engineering and s.
11. The7 foot -setback, variance of the parking from Vie street right-of-way
shall be greed*
n d reduced rmr
not very lletibled asked that his caftVIlent be entered into the record.
sxanW a a iou called foba vote s ali li rT4
TION CD or, a rel I call vote,i ayes. ALL IN FAVOR
19-8—,l I = I -,Z-R
Staff ia,.roduced the iter and reviewed € duly 1 i01 rnemo and Paha. fed Maps
and doctoients, prepared by Citi Engineer Fred Nbor . Stiff commiented tnlat the
elemnents ofthe, Ct.P. proposal had been revieiied individ, ` by the Xmmission
duringin .l receat rinqs and Jiscussion, meetings.regardii:q the Comprehensive Plan
Update
Staff also mored that in response direction fro.m. the Planning Comviission and the
City Courocil, a development boundary jhad been prepared`as an werlay on the
Sanitary wer FlIan °T p,. This,,, upon adoption, would be used t"..o 11 0.rrm the public
and developers, of those areas of the City which would, be consideree tor~ development
and n use of the map during any -4iven year shoal prove to beeffectivepinningandgrovithmana9tmitenttool.
Extensive dtscussicti maned regarding the sanitary sewer capacities and pans
particular'y in tht portion of the City.
The Coaxmscion then revieied the C.I.P., proposal for streets w l rF stogy sewer,,
parks and buildings*
rte _. _ . _ . .-
Ile meeting adP.M.
d.§.: `
1 ;ia a$ n r 'l id1' . "''¢: "mak4a ti s +r" l ,',€'. , '•
Swa Ff noted haZ upon adoption h
kf-,
u the incorporated s an el en iintogo
tfhe Y' eA -gamffiF
M TION by RarGn,s VCn,,. signer 'Wi roo qT emy ;.m;zep approval
a
o the proposeO 1981-1981,;Capital Improv nents Program as cont,irzed in, the,
duly 1 ;10 Ci yYq$ vr' ss tNtat v ra d ;m' 6
I3,lOt,; CARRIED on a roll call vote, six ayes. ALL it! FAMOR
Staff Cornented that the pr- posed 0 - K wauld next be tonsidered by the City
Council at a public toaring and s bbs ly later this swuner wou*,dd be adopted
the Cityncil in con -Junction with the 1981 Budget*
MOTION by Convissioner Wire., seconded bby Commissioner Pauba to approve the Minutes
of the June 30., 1980 Peeting.
MOTION CARRIED 7-0-0 ALL IN FAVOR
In other business) Chairwtoman Vasiliounoted that the First meeting in August is
scheduled r Tuesday, August 12th ; s ale.'st i f the, "Music y, "
event.
M 0 T I O'N by CwmssionerHetchler, seconded by Commissioner Wire to adjourn the mteeting.
f, 1'17'10€ C A RR11 E ALL t! FAVOR
Ile meeting adP.M.