HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 04-30-1980t.ww"t 1@$'$r.°'k
April 30. 1900
t?.."all' fiYrS of the 2»p si's ykty° 48i $ice Z$9+4 ia "'
7... ,F ... '"' -. .
Yn ! s F -. R .. s as B a ed cry B,rs csz,., z,:&. t
N) P. 4.1 ahairkfLaz n vas l ou in ho >o$ W il' Ma m ers `=` tile P'yp th City
inte"t 000' Pl Minn'h rk3jM
MPa
b
a
E P f"t£ S, = V T +. € , "a fie+ o ka.. s,"a, *`aunt s1," w »> . `,`« 5 4e,» n *,j n .lj § &
STAFF PREF-17; "t Director MYree mz r ,, Urrmnitvelop-
Ment '." lay, Planning Se : ry Viarhara Andiersor.
and PI x
r Con4 ,"on Conditional Us Pe ttt
Th reading of the Apai l 19.„d st -a f f retport was waived there was no, one
present Minev, than the petitilner. NO. Wilte' Ortman explained that t1hey w;entad
to place a wind Sensor On another tower and that in order for their experiments to
be accurate it must be at the awy level as the first tower. In rFe e to
E quost on fron Chairwa itan Wiliouthe length of time the t wa r woulde needed.
he stated that he re—r t Would be 11 an orgaingbasis and this would be all
he aqui vent that would needed.
Wmissir Larson. in-qnuired 4out *why thewind. sensor could not be installed o the
roof, ,n im# did n'*n have tne,weightproblem and the roof cou"Id Structurally
an i F M rima Y` stated that they pr 3” k' "fik. .4 2 e:.. t t or or, Y+oe.c_et-* mat.
w cxxx. c;c-a xa tz zran a ca4w, Fla xe oto €& a.._. 5z i :6s€ S3C u a;k t 5a
that roof mounting could present support problems. Ummissioner Pauba inquired why
tho rind sensor could not )e on the existing tower, and 011r,. 0rtman responded r the
lades the ra r~ would, interfere with t.
Chatirworianr r vehy the ftrl,ce required as a condition of approval
r the first tower was not yet installed, and Mir, Ortman stated, that it bras not het
been installed c r thilt wr waiting unci` the second tower was approved and up
before putting p the fenze. C'n=vnssiorter Steigerwald stated! thathe was very
or d about childrenclimbing the ow r ulth nothing in the way securitj measures
to deter n to inquired abort how the fence could be installed without blocking
the sidewalk. 144 Ortmarr stated that ControlData had no with installing
the fence as requireck bort Felt that Ar safety reasons thqy could perhaps elimirmte
the Once and remove steps to the tower. When people are up on the tower ut rkin
it the fence would prosent a safety hazard u rjoNe 0, 1 from the tower and ]and
on it. Comrnissioner Steiqqerstated that the fence should be, places around the
Uwer, which presents ars attractive challengehi rerr and there is nothing to
prevent their trying to climb it. He stated that he could sapport ton:verting a couple
p ri gpace 'kway to facilitate installing the Vence. 11r r responded
that they we look at doing that.
Mr. D rr of Control Data stated that they, feel the tower tAth bracingsafer and.
anYone"'that can climh the tower would also be able to climbany, fence they might
mstruct. HKe stated that the petitioners and the sensor vendor, Jacobs p ny is
opposed to fencing for safety reasons (workers the roger* could fall and got hurt
by e fiance)
7..AprilwR
1. -
moi"%`2 r"r p ": t wv Po#e r Cr" pa.y <`! :i gh vt a ge towers, mre.r c-R°nad
7;*iios ro S g w s%1sstated3tod thatG4 h i g au t?2. that thatthe tuviw3r wos
44can be gQ. k stated that fence i evld 1i#-Ned,i..8
t",er, "ad stated '`'.u':. 4RC}'. felt M. fence, a.rmou" :.. he 4s .w G,3 .+a ax, aE x•a St a.:±.t°"a 3 R'F u ff statedr„azr that ate, s.., " . r,,,y sEim.. S.: •.sV g+r. r n `
n
hairwo,,„2 v s” i " stated that mile €fired i°err of the City C ,,mcil regarding, the-
erciag of the first tower had not been compliedwith am"', th et i e sw
r e,"est i n j is s9cend tev r.t sc"ss on ensued regarding the tyre t oiw rs
ho
y:i € closed,, : id uUt e Uz psio€ :owhe pulblic hearing'.
y. f!yva Larson, r 5 y s„ fiery, ,* '1t g y "R q, *.,» C fmn Y s`sion ,+"t`. .La on, .n#'a` corz ""n. lr",wr". orm k ione Pauba ir..o act r this
petition this evening,,
CARRIED 5-0-0 All in Favor
i)T1 a tt,) QnnjsQyjejr Pauba,, s ,. TQ)y Commissioner La say r ; rmenol approval
of the _ ent to the conditional use permit, Or QUM Data to instill a; sewn
tower for a utind sensor sbject to the f-ain ri i t ons:
ct to
violation troshall be groundsforrvc .
24 Effective: m s rs shall be; taken to prevent: pub0c interference, such as
installation of a security fence arcurd beth the zxistinq and proposed
towers.
3. Construction to be ip?r app'Nicable building codes*
Safety in operation be reviewed N o year after installation regarding
functional anddesign say.
1'01*10N I%V. Cormaissioner Larserq seconded Q Coevilssioner Pauba to amend condition
to include that the fence shall'' installed concurrent with corstruction and
completion of the,second tower.
Chairwoman Va siliou called for a voce, upon the xzietldinq notlon.
MOTION CARRIED Ormissioner Wire Abstained
rwat-parr Vrasiliou called for a vote upon the main motion as encs amended.
ar1 O rD Commissioner Wire Abstained
r din, r-- kind, RreZ ii -nary
Tat for Yes -Grit
Staff introduced the iten with a brief revise of the April 26, 1980 staff report.
Chairwoman ra s l ion recognized air. John M from the Minnetinka Planning Commission
who was present. to hear thepresentation for the Plyaouth Cotrxiission on Carlson
Center.
g.April 30. 198'
yeaexp" a ned the 'i z)I'c hearing process Mrd she read a l t -..,e "`
dated ! 7',0 r.i Geri Schmidt and Douglas 0,16riep, w had just Seen received wt
intia the file.
muti,
and en-,Qred it
iaKru-tson Assoc tes prior to opening t e p- i r ;,. 9 . Mr. Dick
UtSojj
o` `a `' -m'an Associatesw and d t a l i the r ' k
Itf- John Sebolds , d Dale Kennedy, repr n the petitioner, and Mr., Dan Wiski
r 'loner's consultantancro rend° nanc"I g.
MA. -Megluntd gave a briof history of thearea, arra reviewed the planning for rqajor
a =rrYouiq out area in c" . stated teat icipa d ` r' fang
4 have discussed by Many public agencies including federal and state*
Ile :a d that these interchanges are not the result thiproposal* t Jute
their kUoi to work, -wF gbo-t "*fty untils (Plymouth an 1-111nneto £$.authoriZed
she federal Uovermen't in nettinggrass interchanges. They are now, prep -ori
T"inn i ng arra de,VNO-Vinaent reppo s which will be submitted to both -cities Involved.
v.. -4 Wt E spoke one the issue tax increment fin -arcing, and explained how the
pr?cess works. fle stated that one of the purposes w development was to
is i c needs ``,'r.iffic problems) and proposed d -,pert needs. The limited
Of
fez sible financing tool. He explaineathe prograim and stated that the first
Brae Vias to have an aconomic develot .,, pro a a, +.he arra now r a d
and the second step is to estahlish a tax increiment finance base. This includes
consideration ub a ul-!iMrr of land, estimates of costs, sources of revenue
and assessed valves of the project at the beginning and the, en& IMe City
jst make findings including w, loan, theproject can rvn,, with a imaximom of ten years
it p-od by the statutes arra the bases for the program, such as discouragermient of
rela i rr. increased emplorment, and enhanmment and r e ra i the tax base.
fie forred, to tie firm of. Gold=en r° who has been hired by Carlson, Coi,,ipanies a
a consultant to studythe develoivient patterns in theTwinrr i t s area and to do a
market analysis ttcA
Fite Knutson described she proposal and explained the w-nr u graphics* H
discussed the topography and grading of the existing site, and stated they intended to
preserve as, wany, of the existing natural site cfv racteristics as possi-re
utilities to r h pro. *could b ' from ray a ,a . # water * rr
r a -m bathd q ii . stated the Department of Ratural '`esources has Bret with
thera and tbey, will be storing water on she proper=ty. He stated that proper access to
the propertj,must be thereprior to development. he reviewed the quQlinq and zoning
for the property for both cities and rade reference to sht add ndut'of Aprils'1'1,9830
tri r a(l bn distributed to the Planning a i i rr rs.
Ha, showed a traffic generation. impact study which had been developed a i rthat day'l,
and distributed conies t the Planning Commission. He stated this had been gamer ,N:,
in response questions by staff and UnDnissioner Barron at the earlier Dean for
presentation* He stated the petitioner recognizes proper access must be provided
prior to d velop ent.
fie reviewed tyre overall development plans for both cities and discussed th:q tPaffic
flow, He briefly discussed , d the r sol, and stated i wo d rov d good wh irrinq
r the nd s r i l areas. alsor, ;-Qn d that r~ s n midi ym i mold
AMMIMIN
Clv
abeut, 80 welI ing it and, that tha, pr peos"al comeprehended r4 unil -s "fi n
but did have about 600 dw.e rig allits in Naftnetonka.
f; hn Valle r ` t * s r As ate, prese ted j traffic
f -w 'un a s H! st- he y rater ,: iit, I 49 n t Comnty
he completed y The Hlighway 12' and Parkers Lake Road interchange is 1prokjfectedl
or a c .:ip letter date ef Stated the bridge At the County Read 15--1-494
irrt r l mai:a W lanes, and road airy t brio a it
lanes. discussed peak our pa- city versus d; t4e peak hour traffic would bf--
extyinded. over a greater period bout the volwne should be less. He stated Oat a four -
lane bril(I.We at the 11-4941/Count Road 15 interchange would be necessary, n about the
year t`!000. H } s vuted a graphic to the Planning CoTumission which presented
kine Sttudiesu
overview the proposed , , a "his had ,-,: .
PM— arced that day; the data was, run the p rev I us daj.
D; : ns Knutson 41%ssocfates further redewed the overall °dei° -
ncx
Kra and the quiding of the area. Nfe discussedthe traffic floe which upuld bo
Urev rs d" by the elikmination the residentialgaidtmg. l; compnented properly
designated ndustria ! s tc s would provide buffering to enhance the peace and
tranquility" for the area.
Staff further reviewed the April 25, 1980 staff report. Staff
agave
a brie summary* of
thA 1. Sie— i t ems `arnf n arwvt; t t k 4x3a ¥. fssi x u 4 t T a' U •-Ita#w cw s rV a I• krsed: €. sf i 1.1" f, 1,C4 &t , 1evo: 'off#
land involved in the gr a: rezonir4,, whic1h is dependent upon the reggiding
slue; and the preliminary platting of the pr. r t .
ahalrw,,-ian Vasilioud cca #gid the pub"I is hearing t1p .
M -r. Harald Bak G'.1 . -= s *-Lane
k n- whc,,ther Miers would be a
rffer zone next to County Road, U how will Traffic be handled aria coati -Oiled, a
Junei bane andv=est; erre expressed erns regi:rding cars entering and leaving the
sloe. Dick Nnu re ponded stat4nq that existing, trees would be kept as much
and they would vadditional, buffering and screening -added to proviAean,
101 screen around the d v pr.- Mr. !Heglund resporded to for. a 's traffic
r ry stab rig that people dof.'t want to use tiie, residential streets to get w
thccy argoing; in tratel studies pqopiv, preferred the shortestst route and time a
major factor in their choice of routes-, thereftre they tend to use thoroughfares
rather than residentialrpt street.,--.
Mr,* Ralph Bennett 165 No. Kingsview Lane,, asked if County Road 15 would b
Widened to 4 lr;s and stated that he objects to the industrial arw next t,l the
residential area on n s %,w Lane. P1r. fleg"tund responded that the portion
ty Road that would be widened ares would be fronwhere County. Road
1.5 is notr downnottoIfthwav1-'>- this wrd runa thr e h 'Carlson Center"; not the
existing County Road 15 as it appears on the inaps a isime*
Mr. James P. Bremer, 302- 'Zinnia Lane asked: about County Road 61 and i * ex nsl'n4
He sated that his neighborb9od riculd be isolated fran the other residential' areas and
11 e is CO!npletelysurround industrial develwaent. The speed limit i sa r ady
being exceedad in thisarea and is not enfarithe police. Vie asked about the
nose barriers, noting there vitere none in Plymouth.- and what liould buffer his property
froat noise? lie stated that he felt that Carlson Companies had inferred than this
level ont ru s a ra` aProd at r nro rsntat arr
this ear*
ckt-,nut`..on o ,,,NC : b , ui Assoc ate stated I- at theyhadnever erred that
Jrwal, is
b g s '
40-- "' .{ },-
y p ? g c*r ag °x p t
s .:>` ,'. "
a •
iEff.,
t `
C
a
i:ef!
R'a k:».,r. --`,, C tri,
n. i& e` , b i*Kx with 5,: i,a m 4 3x (increased' ''` 4.'. -'. 5..:e a v` Y tY a w &fiPa r;°
He shotwed cr s -recti ns of irJustrial developnent and proposed berming to illustrate
LIhA :screen s i g proposed wil.,h this, development,
V6rflyn xlo rd n, 1.35.2 County Read 15 sated she had ",ived tears for iatany dears.
She stated that the traffic patterns as proposedd will ih,,Ipv ct heavily on theop
in the resident -;.,al areas. She asked if County Road 15 was ever Qoina,be relocated
end what would thy; effect of she d velop t the rad location. She stated
111 -hat she fell they, did not `rw interchange at 1-494 arzd County Road 16. She
also, recalled +he OrIgir"'al guldeelan, hearings and nActedll
the neighborhood had
strongly eridorsed the LA -2 quidifing on hwe*1irwoma a i u st-atAd that; the
planninq Cwpnission could not, respond to her quesition regarding County Road 15 as they
have no risd n over county roans. Mr. Hglud responded zs to possible control
asures the City could itnitiate.
late tv!achula, 13830 County Road 'IS statee.,- that "" his questions naiad been answtered.
Russ Nahor$ , 414BerkshireLane, inquiredAUS t { dur k preparatory
activities ( grading, etc.) and oxprtssed concern regarding the track traffic
t.yEten igep. s x y*yai $t } a` 2a xs• x«g is & tx.gye ac
ca ¢ i sa 'S:%s i' w S e, s 'UP €['%# IIS H riNNI I ell about s 831.., C& $::rr In
of the industrial from the ' adjacent ial property,, stating tears was, mons
theree wa. there is also no buffering between theresidential pr r y and the
commercial property aaid he stated cc.icerns about looking at a gas station or
restaurant across +-lie street. fromi house. He also stated those uses viould
crea"Ca a heavy traffic flow. Also, this develojrrient blocks WS hoes fromm., the
schoofs -r, there ,, and he feels there needs to be more r -sic 'impact study done
before ny approvals are granted. He also inquirEJ about the envirow.ental assessment
process, and-wth r r.itizens could petition the state for an, impact s ,ent.
Dick Knutsoo stated that the proposed berms and bufferit,,g would be done initially
so thatst.4,eeninqa d be provided for those residential nel a r d ds d a n
the proposed development. Mr. Nahorniak responded that his ra was on a hill, and
it Loud heve to be a very high bem to provide screening for his Nate. Dict. Knutsan
stated that tears would probably be no actual building developmnt of thesite for-
years,, but sass grading would be undertaken a soda as , possible, perhaps l r this
year. Staffmra ra d as to Stale EnvironmentaT Quality Act Regulations.
r David yqren., 420 Berkshire Lane, commented that the proposed LA -2 area was not
specifically shown on the map with their notice of public hearing,, this area is one o
big concern. fie stated that they have depended mean the d r de an
ugh re Plans and asked wiether the 'proposed pgvid ng was part of the Vletro Land
dnni g Act process* Staff responded that Mymouth is in the process of updating
the Comprehensive Plan and if this project is approved, i will e included i n the
plan' submitted to the Metro Ouncil. Staff also responded that no development
would occur until the CityCouncil approves this r o f wh n th may also involve
contingent a rove other agencies, Mr., Rygren stated that the dravi rag on the
map does not include hair neighborhood; he also 4tated, that Carlson Companies
represented the project as being 4a pr ved" at their neighborhood meeting. He
stated that 11VIetropolitan Council doesn't bau any sieges for the existing traffic
problems from R dgadale Shopping, Center, and Plymouth Road and Highway 12 ger
presenting realproblems now. e stated baa hes rats a
approving this develonment so more problems arena' l treated because the City and
April 'S a#_Rf
per didn t , reasearch, this proposal hout-4 k -g Ili 'ispt;ted the to
that tr, ffjc iripglet of the prorosed, development, vm--,u d be "Iess" than existing
r» ram ; a; €) ff I, ".l yl, f
uuing
C't c t H. Vi
statedd bcx Md _ etitio with about 60, signaitureswhich viould 11 ke to present
the, P"agt?ms curtwhIch was orposed to this developi-sent
Chiairwo,rii,`r Vasiliou stated again t rat" the plans wpr a " t pr nt" of intended ease
and intended dates; the timing may not be at all accurate, and there is riuch to be
eons fore argy construction begins; both cities have r traffic concerns.
Mr. J. D. }} t las, 14407 County Road 1.1.5 inquired about the zening and quiding in
regards to his property. Stlaff reopanded that his property is quid'ad partially
CL V itd
business) and - The Guide Plan suggests that, they, are separated a corridor
which the City leas anticipated would be a road Ouch as Carlson Parkway., Mr. Powlas
noted his lard was not art of the preliminary plat, ,het, t -I shoi
inane Ms home.
Jean s S ntma # 13510 County Road 1.5 asked about the northern ry t County Road 15
per- Thoroughfare Guide Plan timing., Coiwrlss ner Steigerviald read a letter faun the
Hennepin, County Departt ent, of Transportion regarding possible aunixcipal jurisdiction
of County Road 15. fie stated that the City Council has not acted upon this proposal
in any wal as of this time.
Jim Well,805 N" .n sview, Lane stated that this was a complex development and, e<
felt more stddv of traffic is needed to avoid making the same mistakes as were made
w the Ridgedale d ve op -hent lie st ted that he sees parallels with the County
Road 15 development. He stated that fie did not understand the trip generation chart
nom` s Zxt t Vat a ane road leading t a iane r d e iwould e a Ito tl n e tt
for traffic and cause real profs He stated an, enviroirlental 14tip act study soul
be required for the area, He also askedwhetherBarton- s man had been involved wi
the Hi ghivay/1111)a ut h Road/Ridgedaledevelopment., Mr. Reglund responded that the
develornnent precedes recommended traffic improvements ' due to financing and interstate
highway planning delays.
Mr. Rays 15014 County Road 15 asked about the effect of Parkers Lake Road and the
sidewalk and hicycle paters along County Road 4r. HoagTund stated that the
impact on Parkees Lake Road should " e negligible, was doubtful it would be used
as a major access oro egress from the development. staff cotmaented that the impact
there needed further study; staff commented upon the trail plans along County Road 15.'
Jean Graf, 318 Kerman Circle, Minnetonka, referred to the reap with the roads as
proposed. She stated that she would like to see ati EAI done because it should
have been done a lopq time ago. She state that as proposed,, Plymouth Road would
o through her garden and she against i t being moved.
Richard M., Gunderson., 13427 - Ist `Avenue florth, asked about the traffic situation
and possible alternatives to proposed County Road 61. fir* Reglund responded that`
this is only a study and the repomendations reflect adopted City County and State
plans
yar d Bakke, 815 * K n sv ew Lanes spoke a second tine asking abort the zoning
of the Kingsview Lane/Carlson Parkway area.
harworan Vasiliou closed the public hearing.
m>Ya+l cRkYi`5R.^hy5*'A i.$:'C..w. 'mss NM A*'t.S 'S
5% istz'§a4..
r.R-1 000f,-,inu recessed a P.M. and res z1e 3 K
oigerwald, secordled by Commissioner Larson to defer -theMIC13NthyCoru,-Ak ter Sl;
request of Ca rl son O wu a n- 1 es for re-qu 4, 4111' nug rezoning and preli: y tplat approval
for °ls Center"" di er3r`#
Wyare and adWitt i anal, .,or detailed traffic impact i onli,t
Outlined In the Ajaril 25, 1980 staff report and in the Agri c1e:-;1,o by
Prepare anti st;bmit more detalled study of thee L, p o i i t especiallyy
with resp eco to xt i n res iderr sol elorr she wei and rlr ,,
Respond to general issues'rai d at the nearing by the Commission,
41 Arid dirc-cf-ing staffrenotify all neighboring propertyowners when the item i
rascheduled on a future agenda so they can observp 'tire pruceedi Ings t floting the
publit fhear-*ng is closed and
perr she staff and Ommission tirne to review! thp inforr ation and to fully12_11161]yZe the;issues ra sec Ny the request and at the l b is hearina,
Chairwoman Vasiliou stated Chit they would allow nett, issues to be addressed uthen th,,s
returned the Planning Commission- however Vio Comumission would not entertain
a repetition of comments, on she issues that had been presented duringn this meeting.
s `+e/ + f- hp . iAs4 "ttin petitioner tl "- at severalUti.a a XMI t € f; T s r. 1 L€ r` T WN L Tiarea-;
particularlyCounty Road 1115 and Hr* rrt , .end o the east side -494, consider
possible revision of the Berkshire Lane "' .t :•" to avoid the residential area. He
stated he was not convinced that the proposed :" b ntion x " approach is better than
a Planned '.n*t Development-. and would like, the petitioner to address O,urtherr 1411hy
PUDcouldn't used.
Conn,issioner''Larson sated` concern abut the traffic "count study" and would likri,. to
see that bre revieried as to accuracy a in more detail than presented i s evening.
Staff stated that the V %dd received a copy of the Mlinnetonka staff report and that
Minnatonka had retained r* dames Benshoof of Westwood Planning and Engineering a
atraffic ass s, "evaluating s rasa
V1,0 ONO CARRIED 5-0-0 A71in Favor
Joseph, vanuckel T800271, Site Plan
The reading f the April 21, 1980 aff report was waived,, and Community Developaent
Coordinator Mary Ray explained the a tn ent of the driveway and the "`proof of
parking.". The pet goner was present and stated he had no questions regarding the
staff report,,, Staff statedd that the landscape plan is in -ur w"Ith the exceptitin
being the diameter of erre' f the species which should lanced, a inch
dairi-
nr *
ggS iN
pjpr vf e r ue,,t by Jose,01 Vanrlockell for site pan approval for an offlk'
c — oa - :xan,.n'Y xastnea #a'it Fff 4 e:,,T&dY.d3%t iF b
fiance w t.:h the City Engineer's .Noai or n ,
Pant of park e zion fees in 1 dedication in an ariount deteyTained
according to the verified acreage and the dedication poTicy in effect at the
iglu of building permit i s an o.
As el wasteato coma n r s all stored tai the s rt.'tur and n
outside storage 'is vein, ikted.
4. Compliance wi-th she Cite dol icy end, Cite 'k'O'Ode with respect', i hydrants
nd' fire lanes.
and drain -Ing design of the site in co'n1pliance with City CouncilCurbing
6. An,,y z gns shall conform with the City Ordinancca.,
mite performance financial guarantee shall termed for 24 months..
g- g nCplistaiigdelomen
containing adjacent to storm water holding facilities4.
g A revised landscape plan shill be submitted,reflect the minimmum, requirements,
specifically plantinipi
10* The arrangement of the intersection of the private drive at the south end of the
proposed loading area shall be revised in a manner with u an offset aligg"lient,
of the private drive with the loading area, and located apprw'mat'aly 15 feet
From, the east property line,
MOTION CARRIM 5-0-0 All in Favor
Tr.
Readingofp ' 1980 f report s r only she p aer ears IApril
pr em * They stated they had no questiGns regarding the staff report at this time.
Staff requesl-ed a list of names ef tense members of the Troy, land Company Partnership
for the record (Tim Guddal, Dick Oohi, Luther Forge, Mary arson.. Bill fli
i' -' far l 1611.5 h Avenue Nr inquired as to item 12 in the staff report,
and also wi #°the o s gn of theroad they are required to Install per he Engineer's
meF r m- Staff advised T i to discuss that matter~ viith theCity Engineering
staff. He alse e m ned as to ordinance and policy variaoce criteria,
Exten-1ve 4iscussion Onsuel regarding the intent of Policy Resolution No. 75-664,1
nj staff stated there appears to bea conflict with the expectation, for planning
purposes, that qr%th in the unserviced areas can and should be restricted. versus
the reality, per petitions such as this,, of the . r o provide r a. rural 1 i "
style*
N NG COMMISSION 4INUTHS
M T I I, by g am ` rn ., - m ri
rwa seronded ' 'N'Irc tc e ,t ad
approval3, 1Nbd sion 4 . pile City Code
requested the ` Troy LandCOWany to allow issuance of building pemits fnr lots
not abating a publicstreet Subject hfollowing on d ii na
Cv.npl lancewith the City Engineer's Memoranddun.
Appronpriate infom,,ation subraitted reflecting the ability of soils to ai
3. Paymnent of park -dedication fees in Iiieu of dedicationi, accordance tifth
he )ark dediCatlonpolicy. and subdivision code in effect at the m
4. Appropriate porpetual ar - ss swnen ,' as approved „ the (Ity A n '
providing pvfit as . maccess to the prorosed par 4 s to an approved
i'.,tersection with li'roy Lane shall be filed pi ior to issuance of build
pp i t s
S. Granting of she wivers does not necessarily constitute ar va the
Citi* of the aliqm3ent of the access easement with respect to possible future
publica tva dedication, nor inIc behalf the City any setas
for traintenance.
6. 'No building perratilts to be issued until the subdivision is filed with Henne
County.
Appropriate doctores shall be filed,all parcelsindicating t
coyijumtion with this vision,, conceptual docuients have been placed or, file
with the City for future reference.o, variances are granted implied with,
respect to futurefa-t of the said lots.
TTION by Com, issionerW.im, seconded by, Commissionerfogr wa am ond the main
pion tAth the addition of then Planning C' ¢ ssion, that per Pol icy.
75=664(3), the proposal will not cause an unreassonablo burden upon the
s . uth p ° x,i services and utilities aus a e r• s impact
Upon thenatural viro n .- and that the variance a of the City Code have
NXION CARRIED All in F4vor
Jim Guddal inquired as to Ilse #3 in the staff recommetidation regardingpark`
dedication; staff c i ted the subdivision code requirements. *;tr. Guddal al so
qu s. o e -n #4 in the Engineer's Pleuro, as to the , ° in the propos roadgesedthe
petitionertontlact, the City Engineerprior g clarify
u ri r -discussion ei-sued as to M 13 i n the Engineer's f as to, otlttinq,-
versus s , and, ud division.
MUTON by CommissionerStelgerwald, seconded `by Commissioner M re to amend the main
a ` e Engineer's, Mem awfrom Condition 1.
a. re %INA 40 Qril 30, Wo
Chairwvvan wed }
L vor
Chairwoman Vasiltou calledr 3 vote cut the mai 7-ati na as tuttutico xviend d.
MOTION CARRIED 4-1-0 Pausla 01i:vsed
b
y; s #.
bb
a..* tier %x.+,a 4r aed xaba xr while, '4a '4.,. " ;ise% k,: lkn jcYw.' : s3G&tis" f'az v?f forl, s"
he was opposed 4 this proposal because he Felt thas it was be:` aturai at ' y
lead to other developnort which urould also be prEmz.-ture.
d t sei=ded - by Pauba to approvethe
rrtinutes of the 1pril gig. 1980 etig.
NV t')NI CARRUP All in Flivor
ySteigerwald,,cef ; Ammissioner Pauba to approve the
ra eater of the . , 16, 1980 n" ee nq*
t,10T 10l ICA RR ZZ P Cotmnissioner i 11thstained
Thera being no further business before- the ri g the 'neeting was adjourned- at
1100 P.M*
IN YZAT . IN
N A
PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
4 7wx mhk €
a.'wx*,m Mta7 d+d Sw# S:=. aww..:;' '. 4k.iW'Y .ssria 44 M 4wRdry t+Maonqy.
paW' Pl ti -y.a w.fr..a IDr„ mtk . H !' Y4i6tik+A,'w%`R§K
i?r f d.,` 4 &.,SK•
4r
hr 4 en n MW:,
y; `}, e j, "¢ '
QKMc ! gnorthYuir'rvM1# Mx Y }y *,
sia A'£' a4' '+srt.i..
t 9"`k'# .w 4 W*-. vA• ,`4.1 *
T 49ri.Tw.. '.. %": mmitiexi. «'.a.. m-e..w+Ci"4 ary wi..:4et d;a a;w: tir $ xd
a'rtalr c }u l C- ^€» a' :^er. `x+. ° ar+-'s''a :#* and
4 rWL.."w^i.+.w is .w.,'R.% i£ ke..A.3:% y,L" ni..z a.,.. vx.#n`in 43 `T Rw4s+ $.apw c. The
tri#'-.k+r +r *Mi do."'t `" w^rr K= '$' 'sw. r ' •' ' the s k,w.+tir y4as.» be, n it * soh o€ +x. ,m.5tsk, s5+s" s Ce: . 6."+•*+n"i,.. o +F. ao l . at fade i:r
a
r"'S"
ie
oi
a+t .fir".. t y =,';,zz rd for t" t:';, .. i
S ..:. .'
C t.'4"k',! s-, we..-T<"i'edAhastiiu 's..a'e a. `. ti^,r t- b . : P +
Feed nl south of, r` S tre «
ii °
r ^r@ .. Aa' i,. afike F w,: t'si lit -ifN. '4
dp.-%r 4 Y;' Ae1'tw' o..F '1 lMh +mt 4*KA`MYi.fi. e .fC sb. #4+tw.^ +h+t" riM W 4'4•ir 4 .a i!'
y
5. R's'M r ..'k'*f- whw4 ' r lr.z x"p 4 °S } `$""#kky, 4 0 n,My*P i /.' land t. ms ., ,. . w,..a tea... ww& 6.*s:.'b ,._ ra i+. E*C:,n..ti;...r. .,w.* plans, +`Cf$ iat aa,`n"d T..s `c.c 'a.... f #.w° w a d .k.. .,k+wA&
W * t pq- #, q.n rn A s qs 't'p9 —e+3:rt `ly,''} * ^p -g^ y { must w givenb' 4r: v3... m , --" ; v, w y 'S uka+& Vii+
a g!'!-+.'", {kv iii. , , al thei`t,$ %a i.,t +& Mfr` fib%*. J:6#' %i44.m' +d. `ba* Ww1d +i. .`A. 4k4 .1e$# §.ts l 1x'K. 1;a}.Fa4
5'
8Ya.',$.`k ,b.:G kM *v' A. iY ,. ":. h'3 k rm,4r.' o43.fi s
p'y y +yip[", , on .w 'a,i uth Rood
A gas C;na ed ergs on Plynouth. Road o the chlldxen
CMro46e to and from Sunset HIM r$Sve*SAio
F-lzrnou-th Roata
retie tr!.anleyole, aafety lane both the east axid west
sides of F T ua
Tot" .. a Ild i"# t.,+N ai 'Ma'sy. yFX Lw rad
for tliu'nal. polizoe #, hiddetAtz '. ed
t *zA Y^- "°E,W iY it;. K7 tin l''b'a "i - , .al F $.aea3pk.+ w*iY Y a',
v..§
Lt
C.m.-
u
4, +.'- "aq A. E.'+
erg4
A+W.+.Y,,*,zrs#+pre-sant9
varoa•'{
a.*.f
gR
g yg.;y meg,„,
van ,
yt*' -a# tit tv.§r*-Uj'i+ 4,e '#.a U7n is 4:.+'"Y3a+iASe. ti4 Na—,,-,,k"9 Fd Rt p.,F's'saz zt 4t,,,, .t a X 4t --n
it''ms'7 tY_t_ iet s ai.-=1+U-U'-,,e
iiry
A l il,” ' F 'b `R si"'+i. oh-I
ll
alt# by the 4"a ,%-t%- ho will oadi , uycdyga. Y.R.. F.•' h`< #h. M 1aur 4
1µ
M'
is'
y+
ii.^$.
e.4${
7Km
p$
qY°
y ,r
W '!
Q.{''
81rya..;.
hamim:C 'w:.aG yPr uW'C-R'M 4i L*'i iar iota a#. i-5 W'.a-0.}
1'
o it } "A 'yl x X '"'J '4a*Y., + f tI $' ?±`[a S`4 rw +, >[ k":5+' ,`4 y °4 zone Sir't^. y Limitudki{.,"'4 mow`«% 'k#s ';.ii Lr, 's b,..kve s.+.,u &dei. `tdrw i eCw x.$a1t- wig 7as'f,; k.` N. w-`8a. "e.§ 'R,m` ...L L Fvee
w.
y ^
Y.,ns t.:. &aa 411 da. vw.{w 1wv 'ls.%.. ... +.+.:UTMM Sw q*in:+ f
Dk`.- ' :
1,i cF. a6Xao.4r V?e a+n`,z il- . roads,
4*g + #e 't 'n,rt+}gg St u.K d.4 ° , a d .i.?!' ",d.tCat'v d .r. o.,,w..+ =.' 7%: >d nh az Ply- ou tSd4' '4.^Y ia4T bJ'..fn
w.
April P. 190
e
the MY of en
a^d , s i' * Y, MOM Sill '• `.'k. N N dFUNit ... ..,' Y cnwith 4artZhu 'd+w . x,..'v'- sz a a'n .tL .iw safety .a ', ±
5. +,lr.`.k 5.
pps.,
ty.. '" I -, r. % se A R #'s thexatm. ... A. c.. .. G,. W:. L .j 6.,'6x u. S.ww..
pDt..`
tz, k"t * l r "%,,'p.. A `a r A 7 9nw ` S a 4 s } t^%'y. it` byi..S°s w 4< . ..&.i.` , i:e :' y .+s<.; '.P +»'m 3cvw Y. 'i+ u&
t i;. the s.„ m'e.5a atry of o mtheW' Won wn a.o must travel W from
Sill 300001 n_'
t+s
et
wYhnLn>«r"k w*a s a+v* . :,,.=w"at ca 4 W" a. *,`S, . ti?u >< 00Yw .. R
k$r:1 b`~• ni i
mN b 4 W ^Yw
ss^. w., ,+. the v4a -.l,M •.sx Xs & v venter.
xm
Mootks4
aiW4EReru4nq
roynY ;
G"aak'.t.5."e4 tii9 aF+T++%w kA`'1Vhool
Trails W3 o G, on
3# wry /.e.ex b"kX School3o4 +AW h R`+fib ,+la.
I`!F On HCHIN
v :fx tea, c 3, rwaT `-1+M1.n Aq
1
1mC;'iS x, is'i#v3'b
3
i
3
i