HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 03-12-1980L
AR# # !!UN TE
City of !PtIyT'-%ou'th
Parch 19
np of the PlYrIOUVI Pliant N e si on called to order at
h%Nv tg,* gar, Visiliou in theri.!l of tfv lymouth Cit;
toat Wf,' 1,111yrouthoulev -e .
u" a and Asir(,.
S'riqff PRESrNT. Community? `Director Il `rsp red .r`a unitl' Develolvien
o wv , 'S Parb Ande s r and
Plan"` a late, Alh
a
Xv step n i n Use Perrnt Renewal
iThis item was in,4.roduced by steff whoreviewed the March 6, 1980 staff report. f
cot—I.-ented that the C,14.-veilssion should deal only with , }-issues dirrelatedectly
the nursery schn operation, and the other issues regarding this site as raised by
rirq property ovn r would be s d v$"t't. Phillip t a'" nLtt here ro
Cry€rr.6- Cor;un'Ity141,evelop7rent Coordinator Vr~v -;y shotured slides, the s"e and,
of the adjacent residential neighborho ..
Chairwoman 'nasi Torr recognized Vis. Judith Gilstere who commenteditems I the
letter from Pr. George Wilson, 71," - 14th Avenue [4°,-r h= she staged they have :r
s nude i s viIarrive ri per day, rr most them are carp pooled,
VIM w three children per car, stated that there n, about 50-60 cars
driving and )ut of the area each day. ' 1
Chairwoman r c rai -)d Mr. George Wilson who sated that they have lot of traffic
in and out of the lot wis adjacent to, their bedroom witidow. Students are brotightI
in rr rr per day, roc ss which, takes aboutminutes °'gia', p et
and s very noisy. He. also m n on the failure of the people who run the nursery
school to clean Grp the play ar2,, is bikes and trikes are left outside all the time"
also requested that the play area be secured7r i n the evening as teenagers use
the playhouse for gatherings and the yr -.r u h Police have been called several, times
because 'of disturbances in this area,
Vrs r acknowledged that the play, area Is s6imetimes cluttered with ' bikes and
Crakes, and, efforts would be made, to eliminate ",,h *
Chairwoman E s a u closedthe public ring*
After discussion, the Connission directed staff to meet with hurch officials to try
t -o resolve the other rp nts ro lems me nt i ti ned in "#Ir~. Wilson's letter.
fMOTION by C0,111missioner Wirel, seconded Commissioner Threinen to take action on this
f
petition this evening*
mo'nt CARRIED Commisiioner Steigerwald Abstained
member of the church
ae«$ A aMarch Iwa- * $' #V'
Vire,r . r.•'y u..> `,-r«.s.1! n $r;C earn eed ox? i ssi tier 7 ;r*
hN.
4-
1, car
re
y\pr 4
r4- w Church ax a to the r xr
I. The loading nr' unloadirng areae urse,y ache ff s uelent shoul to v d
1 the north. zi-ea whene it or'.ginally was awayfrom the residential sees.
i p, shall e stored and the play round area cleaned fun.
pred
Ouno,-nround rr a r(subject
ap,Prova
rte, ", steal nevied in one 1 year to assurei-V '«sacs with the
cond lons
Cd ffq Re—sr rr Conditional Use Perrft,,
Site Plan
This itQm wtr d d s,:`1 who lirielty ewe(( the Varch & 7 ?' staff report.
Commissioner`Threinen recalled that the Planning Cmnissi ondid -rniido se Uncle
JN 's Restaurant which was proposed i ,19.74 and approved by the Lity CoNni' .
Ca wan Vasiliou reeogmizedr. Donald Poupard and t1 d Paul EiaisHoward - hloren
Asso0ates. Mr. Pleis handed the ommissin'a supplement to thein deveTopl',lent sr.ar
explaining that it conte * d" "corrections" what was in the Material uponwshe
s a re s eased*
MOTION mss nor Barron,c.d 'oninissioner WNre to d ier this l f! n
for l oar staff o rx v *eW the newt information and evaluate it.,
V110T ION CARR I ED, 6-0-0 All in Favor
mision r° Threiner, comentee that the petitioner s ld foots his petition on the
site, not nn a previous resolution giving approval to another proposal many years ago,
r. Donald parks he a wk r e when Mrd
yr s zoned I-L. nre,-ent in 1977 whea the land was o to 8-1, he said the formerr
planning dir=ector) tole him that the- Uncle John's > site plan could be "administratively
chi ng,d
Staff cemented that in syers the Ordinance hidweer$ a ded s r las
the zoning the siteg. r a the current yr s do its Horns, per present
ordinance is required,
ad i nae oresReding
This item, was introduced by staff who reviewed the Mi 75, 10,1) staff report.
Com. i ssi ner l :*e inquired about w er the proppfty ownedb -T Land omva"v could
become a PUP without the land to the south wnxSean Lake Properties. Staff
r*sd s acrear*ewould i sans
stated that there s ir "'r' card",
they are ,? for ire r u; f '- 'portion' e Lake
ss r asp - n- we the si am9 y - i i - It e,
a awi theILA-3 uulard te, she V st", 1,, sl=ate staff had supgosted that Not h
ah ` chisi n - through i r e rO' , was the rpetitioners goal.
Staff responded by referring to a letter t consult -ant dated
c * r .a.ra Ea s = fat say . o ,:y„ r has not i- -'
area
V11t; A-' south. Staff does not suppost the requested quiding on Olther
property.
Chairwoman Va i °= e i zedIr. Rick h V'--Corhs KnutsonAssociates, who
presonted the rX.,un.ission with thoorough explan3tionof tbte topography of the area,
the Pronosed use of the land and the reasons for requesting the requiding at '
iVie ile shooed additional grraphyand drainage plans of the
P-11 Land Company property. fie; stated that they recognize that it.is, essential to
provide r ion In the area adjacent to a maJ n c uar (future County Road
I). Ve said that they had made ars effort to provide a transitior using the ria crag
features of the site withoutt o r y affecting the LA -1 guidedland to the east
Pe asked the Cor....ission to consider their use of she 'rattiral midge' inti.
rmiss n r Threinen inquired as- to Ti0hy they did not petition for LA -2 guiding to
the ridge line rather than the legal boundary. Mr. Sathre responded that they need
tiro density for the prnposed number of units (3.2 units/acre on B-TLard Company site).
a rc a vasilic* ,J ar the ubli hearing open.
ear. Ceorge B. awn z of Suite 423, O M rr n a a Boulevard, representing S. J. Groves
and Sons, who ovinthe lard to the deet of the P -T Land Company site, expressed concern
over the sketch h wtg a higher density in the southwest corner of the -T Land
Conpeny site. lby have purciiased the lard for future develor-,,ient ivihen municipal
utilitiesti are available, the site. tle pointed out the regional ta l° easement
stated that the sale of that land, to the Counity is nowcompleted'. Ne stator th y;'
supportthe "" Land Company*s proposal as a developer*
Mr... Rickur-ca that mmissi elected only u at portion
of the, site the ridge line that wouldeotabl . They d have economic concerns
ars ha was a censideration in requesting that the entire south 20 acre tract be
th the cost of housinq ri',trtq they forsee two alternatives,, eitherguidedLA -2. Wi I
smaller r higher densities to bring the costs wtthl reach of the M,,iddla
class eo n r*
r. IQ Stobbeof'2Paisley .ane stated that 'he is a bui'lderinh i t raout h'`
and has been constructing housingi> the S90,00(1 to $IOQI,,P00 price range. He said
the, only way: continue att that. ra'4a is to get r l Y costs down, through iwigher
density and smaller lots or smaller; homes.
Mairwoman 'Vesiliou closed the public hearing,,,
MOTION'by Commmissioner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner Barrot, to act on, this1-0 petition this evening.
VIOTION ICARRIED 6-0-0in Favor
Kik z n•-, <.'im«{ ^a -,.r' tt
y
QR
Rp ,
iA`
x . ril
I
M'^} 4 R P; fit `%' "
4•.i "$ p •5 and , ''.. T .2 F... .,% t Yi Y, ries for °'.'k,r'.
lio "
r'
re s sY,s
1. $ 4 .: bac c` ,. G .on the 4 ` +,.. `,". =3 for .+. 4. e : , A fi k # e S , r
yy g i , y3, }?t ''&""phi -' .,, 6'! v sR"`y;"rR .f t4:a 4.i-w,u.v t d'92 i,$+ ,6 G.?t"Fes, ae:
p"" property4. _ €_ Swanfir. ."ac
rpay, prepertyr is net consistont, i t this Man ;or Val C, 011-tje-,tivo 2,
Criterion I because they are boyand. the utility service arza,.
3". uf'Mitte Plans rd iitato t eq-,Oddna r` per Ver for economic r e.,*As `, tt w e
k a ectal iso d physical f"°:€.'re e t''ld lire) ld e , appropriate at such
e e r`d; r is s l n r r.,1 nnc" #, stated t wry rz ltR` n .* S.r« r f *,. c, a *. $ t:
t a.* .: -i Z. r`. ';. Ys.4 T.4.,..,a 6 3 6€' i. SC4rJ 1,r. i4y" use t: to ,;..t ta R.r ,€E' a"t C 5 1h .,k need for a
vW`ty C,,f busingng ped are persuasiveve d sKiulvd be, ccrsidPre,.,,4,' „e. c pt pi
CARRRIM, Al?n avfir
W . e'
rzF'w. usafa+
rReinke
n•.rtvnrrR•w
Peg zonf ng,onp l "
ti Use, OrT.!it
r gig $ to property at 12610-12630 Ifth Avenue
a i l i oft left the table.
c,; s hrei rx that this area "as once zoo R-2; staff explained
subject 'rr was once zoned industrial. Af or distussion toy the Co"'t"'llssion
a- zoning vr $is P-2 zonin,f4r. Z I err Reinke stated that a R-IF zoning
was, acceptable to hirl.
r xk rr Sir* declared V,* public bearing ot)ep.
PP. Revin Prico of 1410 Pineview Lane spoke representing the neighl)orho. Ho
r", rferen h, R k 's eaten of Anuary 19M. fie stated that
buffer is ed t but an attractive Offer cou -.injile family hones. !
stated that the topography of the area coald support single family homes and ot'•lt;
the hill up 15th Avenue North 'going east) and stated the traffic was verrtvheavy
t the present tine., Plyrnc r n, about increasing the trafficw r
what it is new. HI statedthat he takes issue t0th Mr.R e 's statement that
the arri e ruor attractive duplexes because r railroad trackss and
oue a
s ; they do not feel that this is justification for duplexes. He stated
themer o- norts single mil homes in the, neighborhood than duplexes; there are
two duplexes located south of this propert-y and ears are 14 single famfly residences
to the SCOW rd, some 40+ to the gest, and rarethe west., There ere a total o
B Single € 1. hiVVS Closer to Ms site than anyof the existing duplexes,, He
stated thathe did not believe that the reasons stated Q fir. Reinke are basis for
a rezoning l w twro familydwellings, and these feelings are shared y Vic
neighbors. 1"he, Submitted a Pptition WiO 70 signatures -from homeowners in, the hinedi,,
Wqaborbood of this proposat, opposing the rezoning.
Tit r'
w y# 4 S k
A w * Ur ,. .
fink
Pirev c,, Lan i n --x Y.c t +he C f tx * s r w i 3 r Sr
s t 3rI y three1 l »gal st which s:a,^i a ' ,-, a'>^'„y wf t a d '% n ! 1,2yr the Citygi" t the # v+
LL k # g'
w'S,5'..E}"''".""'.ts'4donrf d that it I 8 `'e " °. n's"S5`"'... een the, ix"$
a':" "` tracks
Nr'#. artfv— !mss of 140 ;Iakv wfir *Orth M- *8d t4at ""e with tilepet ion
s
w ed Price, sir. d erphasiJed Mn r n` tut tfiv, `- ra'" c *. c4 6 . ird
fa-ilies intlo the area with snall childiren., *Re, st,tod that, the
It'.r t C is so heavykl ( !Move six ra i ' y they have been thinkinj o; 4pl-roaching the
Nty Council '11NO4t thet' U'at o . He. I So staged that the P ' r r "ssig are
Ie t r`° a'de'' gran other s -;tin in. the area. He F-els tbat theCit sty €- cIe G w "
Plena f p ` r the 'et'* on r r the dei r ye assure cot! . a i i t '^ n }.p ,
i., '#a 'wS& nw .:'i`ir'CJs'. i Ar . ,,. 'E. s#4,. S 9'u w8
the area.
ThhiorwOtiorersaaerkOng fllltrtN r to ade, to the arin.
q >>. ouy .
I ON by r e # b Commissioner I3 al acs or, i0s,
this evenine.
MPT 1, ON CARRIM All in, Favor
y Core iso T i riseconded f Cv" S
eI*" i a I of the u Robert Reinke for requiding, rezoning and a condiltianaluse
re r;;, It Igccause it is nottonsistent with the single farm raracter of the area.
o*xaissi nee Threinln also ca -'ented that "Che City Counct t should considerdesignat-
f al ; , Avenue for local residential traffic only,, per Goad ,, t1 i .'Criterion '
notingi the use as a thoroughfareou the industrial area t;j the Y
kAkAll in Favor
he reeting recessed at 0:30M-%, and resumed at 9.-4r5 P.M.
33..44ww. 4[ ".f}. .. "
gl'
M$
yM
ek.
ya'kXi4.=
u
7'
a'+w?a,
cyp, y. +aq ;e4.g 'y [ #' j{.
l{
go.
j p
yam. {}:
M .. x i4xv,* gT`F7 'a' $ 9 44#ARS I qQa Fev f n 4'A101 k 4Y4¢ mc.'r4'aw
Tilis F ' . ' i. by t -F v:- I viewed € ar 198" gn i " t
i I `h r rten inquired r _ r i implied r of the
staff remort. Staff r
r, I
I
nded that hev are. Comcvlsslon r Steigerwaldnt
about Condition aID in- the, reportrt r i n access to the school driveway and
an=ted that he felt this t-soMdnot he theneficial to the hoineowner due to scheol
tlivit, . r Mm off respoided that Conditi#gin X10 could ho. dq1eted.,
Mr. James He% of 2810 Revere,Lane was present ardstated that setbacks have been
reduced somewhat andthat the ordinance required 110 foot width tan be provided
45 foot setback. (versus the ordinance Mnimum, 3515 This urould applyLots 4,
t 81 12, 13 and4
is
Beard r" .- vin 640. vne, i?` cvkuir alput tz,1,4e t k-yrs ofextlefrY r•,r
9.. t .y3; tee_ t._L_ l na ar t x. d a z
g"{° €* t o ` 7 I g K I
k
mpv(t the— al:Mty of uttilities to, this aret , d staff resp oi`?de t z
are ava lrlP w. 'Mr. a- p"n asked aNvt the (w-wount of INTI that would '
fo * 'iii `°`L'+ {rig' i ''c ! P $i`,,
xi nd > fra:,a i a. i't r ,. Via. ` _ c ;. r.
fITIwilt s•ire r the
C? issi nee- reire em,-ent " on theardl Loi 414 t' " `per
em-'h c e has' -en discussed. Mr, HOW responded that the owner of theexcept*
a rce , t0r. Dennis Axca7l. was p rosent, Mr. Axia stated fid wmis ni,-,s
i ithepel" boner cis to a po ;`- ( Ind exchange"ahrw-mmueliminate- the
Staff r m:omm s that Mr. Axell's 1W becore part of the t q..
C wo-r the hearing,
sMa3sY by Covlmiszsionmr S a9n--uazd}i.3oi` , by Co,. ,.i's xneVIreto dfor the
re ti`Inest e hers, for *at a Amey# for tv weeks k hat the
1ptitniarc l u rpoatif'A, into the vlat, and direction was givem
eti `'Tr r o 'en'sie r r. if she cul-de-sacs.
Ali ', 16-04 IQ In F
i Ire t a
for Lot Division
and'stated, that the utill,'k-
Y easementon, he south, side is corpleted.
rortnissioner :.a ron, seconded )yommi ssI orer Wire to mcor nen a ppr ova
of P request by Cecil Grardprey for su*hdivision variance for a lot division
variancesWN
iect to Ihe following conditions-
I. Complianct-.with the City Enginaer's Vermrandtfri,
No with ~expect to buildingsetbacks r !:reefed or irqplied,
3. Paof park dedication fees in lieu of dedicationfor one lot prior
to filing, divisimn with Pennepin County*
4. S U i')M} t t a I Of all necessary utility easementsr to, filing lot division with
Ve-nmpin. County.
MOTION CARRIED 6-0-0 111 inFv'
w?t 4,Variance fror Subdivision Cade/Policies
Readi mi of t ,arch 7.1, 198P stlaff
weJ stated that he had not beon awareof the need for a varianceran from, a City policy
err urbandevelopment, bort that he intended such a variancepart of hisu t a
2 a3 uc;v GG=ss r. y.t ,,xg fiw - • ` A a r: i 4,=- ., a. ; 's ' e *.,, x', k,. fin. i f," x: ' i yti.: ,. it 8 M.. W 4: a,. a v f".. c•, 4 :'2
kp
C.,
pp' a rct,o #..L „ .. S. q a s-y g x i a $
w '
r -, ti w,-a +. p l., X,' \.. "M `'« $ 4k xr C r +0.%. c 'F s.F i. Y ... .4'i +p F: in 5 X'i'z x o „ 'w. '+i
ret
a €;- +`" , 9 S ,. z F a . a 8"x .e, 0. * i b m . r 1' + ' . . . 4; '+.rr lz 'as
tL:to- ..3.,. ... Lh i.-_ $+ _ ,.ii v5 go . er atto tho. _i _ P c„
AS
w.. i
e ' • f ' t 7l fc ? ' , z fl,y
r
T r mayy, R ,nit,'kiF. Sji Rn i*, ;' '£ R. street.
r
SC: x,tr,,.d ,ate t4,v'ae Ciny,gr .. ra,'ar,# ind ate,`.; such ' .,x "
7;ep e
0ia... € cT"S `'r 5 a 'r'x'r"' "* °" z s a*+ Pry Y '# X a tocz : 0 { i)i s
r
F ', n i dry. lw, k'.i L, .,3 P . . '+: $$ m N #wish` 9#v„ +..3' .. S;"`," ; is k Cu j ,y . , 6+'4 . ' p ` { y
F * w 4.zi '.+ C. ' .. tA. 1
ryv. siiC`+'v..
I7a
eta V N 4Y
34'1i .L oeE+. 4... Ss v. 0, -)-ii s,4`t e'.
s;cro ,, 7hreiven, trite' it &'tas mot theintent, ; r'
t ^t.Iicy excludel a ,n a,a if w'';': t ` ' , iy. "l 'dam", ` +y; O C ° Wr, t h i", 4 a r«-. .+ «y
m. { ^" aar In 4.'', 4n3 ' v ,t.''ra.af . $F+t$w k: _'. l'4.G
i *' r ?' a°ri 4kg d Pb=u yy a k>Q , rye4fi J t m £3yay#iN3R"a a iL 54 ar4 iA.- •* g a -"' fl' ,a. ^F,"6,;:. }<F bx #... s -Aa G`t ar f, w n'eK '' X39 3.. 50;+i i.r X4:`8;. #N .ri n: +, are sF .
S tm+x Z 40 +h t @ '@ ?='s R & ,', i w g= ` ` 3 s ;*" as5 §* t l E i 5a, 6 +tsC mr 5.,r . .e '.: a ape y.. hais of •r iib ,aaneRa u by h knii a
g'° «r. - ty,~*' yb +, a*"r»at n}dfq..ffi3.x bi, i :i '( i i'd€.S
tits a
4 l ea e. f ab g ni r. y xr.q '$gra n p - a1tr+ mss; "t not u f-.' '1 w^5 ^' nz )l 'A uaw, =k"`},^g - 5....n ii 4?+fin adii fi{`_":..kY',.$ 9 i`,.. 3 :: fir :t' 4.-bi ..'at'ac u +.5 .- R:' +E.f'.--$.v x-ik
a g ;" "„ , " '' PSA' 7r5-6611' c the g l o} i conditions: [ i ? i yq14 V,''kw .k'd w, F..,::'ti 5.... 2t ts W_g:.M Rk ?-± i-
t qd ia.'wa a . +v5 k. 0 i.Y A-,v i.Y 4:>N 'S F @asp
41 with sra
r deili ,? i e ` eu _` d
o t foga ' ; ? ' a
le r- Policy it', ei'fect' at the tir,.e 1-11dint
fib°
x 'dli ng B,`""1 r i t '., 3 ";` ' " * tt a ? "t w gs c +,,; @ ll;r.: pemiS '- Y '_ k, ° nt.. i Y . , b i l fix . .. .. filed with
p "opri , 'r to acres.N42 lso en , a aper yllt i y `ney , preyigaccesshexist parcel to the apfNroved intersectior withTroy Lane
shall be filee prior to issuaNce, of a bulldimit.
1
f -ranting of the waivers does nok. necessarily constitute approval by the City of
the al iqw„ennt of tile accessa iv"'pn with _lpossi future publ is road-
y d 'd at.ion"* no i lr on behaof the City any r* + ibl'i y for m.aintenance.
Aippropriate documents ` steal lbe i e6, on, both parcels ind i that € n con-
junctionui with thisdivision, conceP1tt\,,A dotrinta been, placed on file with
hCi'Y for future reference,
All in Fa
Rosi'=s4NUe Plan
Reading of the V rh 7, 10ST -,taff eeport was wrved. Community Drme t , -ordinator
t ry Pay Oe'lvied slides of theOte.
Mr, Plan visd n of 701 Sr ire newl, owner et' Rose ConTections, Inc. stated that
lest year they hal to rent off -sits spane durinci r ,,' periods. They
have acquired n h r fire which will O%v_o he octupying the space Y have now. He
stated that they need Uie additional spat,for flexibilityit to meeth the, demands of
a i l h .tk! 't a '3"' T a4 n i t 1'.'^ ys tk 5
St
4' 1 "'k y }y • 1i{» Y +E iY?F .: ' .. }K R $u '., ",. q i.X 3F,$ 4v S .: r a
it
17
navie an incretise " 7 e-'- l ove a o f s' ifte. 7his is .a s ,- , a ;,O ari, they do
gll * ,.: `'s a'e ':§ A i-hA"s" .' n '4- ALN f'b " IY a._ ' '+ **,Y?<3'e3? ` . ` sa'*.. ,m" x*e,.. esva r. <s.
xsw C M" 6i.a -,,. 'G 2 ,1
f'on't, of 11.1he site rats er than alorm, he nor*IT nd cyst OurdartoSas rec—mended
0,13. of 'the sta"Ff relvorlt, 'Staff corcuTred witlhthis; alfter znqsppctie l of
re i .t.` f1tmm-the n bomrdam,4 rest y N --,hind i f md the trees
a» ? d , , ,` e " fi `v :, Eatq ' i g a e 3 ti t .. smProperty.' 4i " , . "a s 3also,
01 4 a l-1It `vr; hoive flit y alk i he v,,a ` yw ? x. '
C- that there i a parkAing, s ace variance of approximattely 13 spaces
tiny there is narea I'lleft iir q t a l spaces, wilthin orefinarce standards. The
mzternlates the "lature of the use and appears to -e
4 vaE%l t A'Fqu V t ilk e s ",h b4 i }din size S 3 4 utel. aR' ini *3'.0 'dal k^
ed a h sed ' n e t ion Russ today, !Mt n A
tusfh the load ? g were sold., i erg w car cr, is , . a ` ri s j k
wi `atherkssihle x, use u s the petitioner, but- ivith r1fore
p?*
Nlt'ensllve discussion ensured andi KasOan stated ; appreciated tho kern;,
i"'Irttcularly t -hat a post;ible future tbuyer viould know that the parking caps litV
was if e iti upon theuse. ki said,, n response to a tt. 8 suggestion.,:. that
y u*uld investiqatte the rossibili"C V' of a, covenant on the title as- future
notice of the.imi a , in cor'Arderation the va `i -c .
of the site plan a endm for s Inc. subject to the folloviiinq
1. Compliance ti t the City er'
4. fir° hydrant hd4 `
Policies
mesh i s o facilities shall be within the hullding and gears shall be nmt
outside s*torage of materials or pr*s
4. Landscape plans shall be aA'lend provide for additional landscaping and Yant-
i m s f it accordance withCity tamiscappe Criteria eased on Oe area of tho proposed
a d to incl ire,, Credit for oxi-sting healthy trees - at least 13 aeld a
shade trees shall bo provided and shmIl be located along the, south andwts
nrlda-ries Of' tn.Ive site.
Submittal of ordinance required site perforinance financial guarartea feared for
24 mot'N'.
Variances eu! with tnis approval shall includea 4 foot variance for buill4ng
to parking cand 143 parking spaces.
Ars
the title to the rrovorty`regarding the maxi ;F.n tose vtysus " rkin ratio.
All in F*avt r
Lot
4
t Fetti ter
piscu?sion emed on easements and assessments, and the petitioner was irfi)rfleq,that:
ease-
ments-Mr,tis IN division.
ViScOsSion ens4ed as to euildi rg possibilities; i t e r was r,,!led that an y'
sON& variances would require Nard of Zen i ng approval
iNTTIO , by Coimissioqcr Steigerwald, secondedQ Carniss er W'irc to recerinerd
approval of the request for lit divisionivariances for 6ilbert Pettit subject rhe
0110-fir-ing conditions:
1. Coy6p l i nce with the Engineer's r .
2. Paf ient of e- - ieu of Farb" Pedication prior to issuanceui di r r i
accordance with City poMcqy i e the time.
3. Ary andall additional REC (Residertial Equivalent Charges` area and/or lateia, j
chzarftes he paid priorr o building rmi.
4. Compliance &Q, (lity Policy Resolution 079-50i n e
tions for now structures sites adjacent to or containing open stom eater
facilities
US# Peveleynent of Parcel n consAstent with din standards unless waived
the 'oarPoard of Zonfi.gAdjustments,
MOTION CARRIED All in. Favi,r
Lot
Review of tiie Februaoy" WTO staff veport was waived. NO. 0111 Reed JcIas present
representing ,her husband. C'omm4issloner Threinen stated Hs concerns about the width
of the property..
Discussion ensued ` regarding the size of other lots it the area, verses the size of
the lots which would he crash should the lot division approved. Discussion of
the ordinance standards,as related to this proposal was brought up and it was felt
by them is o that the new lot would rot be buildablewith r a - if the
dot division approved.
wj' a ,, g ficuage. N . v ttw a..t
Vers Peed reqtiestvd that the pet g'z e er r ww" il ' ° hew 1),a nd could 11 reser."-
t ak the P I a nnio" Clr mi n She She fWs tfi"iAlt » a- l d" ')e
rent to this propertv to the west -4
z r °i ssOo r Parron expressed.ower i r principlep that the r a ion of a stilbstardard
corner "Vot versus a substandarcll*Rnterior lot would set aargeI`o w recedt.
pi of e - #fid for a -fit division and Variante atv the petitioner's request
A ` tmmi S i g °
rBarron,
An tr Mee ing dates were t- l shed as April 116th and, April 30th, with study meetings
on al+ r _ Comprehensive '
MOTIP`I by, ssa r Threinen, seconded by. mss r Wire to appointrmiss er
rank Alarron as their representative to the Plymouth Development Couriciland
Comr,.is-;icner Paul Steigerwald as alternate.
MOTION CARRIED All in P=eon
Commissioner hr pmsented a leas.- to the Mlayor att"kiuncing his resignation later
this spring.
There hei ng m further husi ness before the Cominission, the m. eeti ng adjourned{