HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-30-1980cite ' of rlyl`zklaflhi
rho # X 42 onC R sc-A is ca i 4 r
n
P e ce sorb 'r q,,' r"llis t r "
Staff ' ntrc ced he iter and reviewedthe staff port date January , 1980"
Petitioner is s ekinq i r is -on 0" the PPUD Concept* ."Ilan which was Ary
rCouncil €33 densit
u"4 -,s per acre 1- s * tine i .925 dwelling units which qxcluded that portion of
bel tht ri,dned h-miredi Pear l e aCi re. T U i
ppr cv- Included the ass,r nment , as, omt ed. by t re 'ommiss , bonus
rt-vircle,ftp" project size.
Petitioner is requesting additional bonus points based on the ordinance criteria
for vari ety of housing and 4,For affimative design eOforts to, allow265 wr g
units vthich, is ('Tensity of 4 unit's r acre" requirirm, a notal OF honorsmints'.'
r ot least three additional p i s
Chcairworon Vasl-17*Ma stated that a Public infornratiomAT hearing had lbeen stheduled
and turas neighboring prpz ge r~ had been not i - the, rt is a r n v s
open. . She recognized Mr. rt "' tr r n:a r d fi r+ `s i '
pt ion r's ;)la n r, Mr. Uhan introduced the petitioner and the itio r'
arch i 4t
fir., t1han presented aerial photos ardother graphicscs i project and commented'
s to the efforts to develop the project areundthe existirl topography.kind v4 t -
n s noting particularly the presmation of trees and other i i e areas on
the site. were r s need shawinq the original proposal; the project
reprPsenting the numlo r off` vaits approved by the Citi Council; -md the- proposed
revision saki.. it -i 40, t s at, a densityunits n r (.,e. Mgr,
Ukan stated the petitioner telt a v ri of housing units 'leen<Provided .epee
desion effovlts, had been 't. which would allow for at least 3 addi
i nal bonus points*
i
Commissioner Larson arrived.
Curt ki s 5440 Balsam Lane.representing the Executive Complitter of the F a, ss
Lake to r rr Association,, stlated that he was attending as in olhsrver since
the Association a general neer; with density and hl s st neutral
features. Ile stated at this tine there was no objecti,m 1rspecific . pp -oval of
the project and furthercom.ient would he retsiarvMf for tie prel irOnary pl at stag,:
J' a,1 fie 3V,
rT t s ecid" "t ,a na . ` asto, the tk f' of units prklrosO('X1ai'-0!'i,;.g
4-!'T in the , t l al threeT Via, `A.: , -1 and 4 unit bnlg l i qs -F (i -t;krt
1 Sn $ f+4 Y. S tm 2zAl $ qiZ. * , S7 h 't a{ vF,a q C ha s, e t 'gyp,} YC
f t
ire g- n . r.r yew of (£
fit,lerwI p ir-i ' flesivmmid f )rQjr he4-ire, romserotviats in the
excert -tr uct' l VVuld a ' OMv for ° s V,1e futf4re, for
4 4 ar enomw i k ; ,
i.Yo-k4's` &'Y 6 31,i taffiaffic i3 Mi\$Yavl es; -,e 4fl ullv 5 Lei...
no rthwa,,,t w,akiran,"' Of *e Site aM StclteJ' lat there Appeared to e merit in
consi erinq in ea,,tinu.1iti 7,,,xit. only onto County Road 1-0. P r. Ulan sl*ated tl,0
W41-4onpr coneurred anO feltfait ar leas+ an exit Ne a i m Oruro r$ t
ssT kr r flllreinmm, also stated t r t thased upon information, pr v d ;t
t i t i toner, it seemw' tChv pperf- ; ; r' tow stage in the northeast cua -
ra t was i -'titre in trr-S o the res oll the Fast of +
a0.
Discussion ensued regarding the status othe surrounding Property especially t
tho skmlth and Southeast
114 property to the s Nrr ti asto te an exist r ; access as t from Zachary Lane
acr ess this property -) his prorerty. Ile stated that fie had ccervi,,, wit. -.h. wit.-.h.t l
prod accqss design and, felt that the p Iayout of the ae
a,113 co0d be
3X.:tr
5415 A Zachary Darts, stated he had no o1hjections to the proposal
at noted the `-Ports of the petitioner 'ro scr ,r the dtivelor£lent from his
kv'r- ha avis h e _ ° omW s amnitect discussed,fr har the design of the proposed
um,um,ts ars, t r! layout -' he pre c w-lth respect to various constraints on the
site.
si one r "hreinen,, secoCommilssiorltw Larson to close the
heuri-ifj and, act - the pet-Ition at thisi,eeti q.;
8q 1 1i CAF-, 1• :yd
t r -a -viewed the r i ance bonus cel c-rla ald the applicatiotit of the criteria
other similar RPU 's recentivrecentrevievimd.
seg=ended by. Commissioner Stelgerwald to recon 4
a-pprove.1 of trl `,-O s d RPI oneept Man su...mitted 118j Fletlers Prop fir s a he
wr it, corner -` County Road 101 and Zachary Lane subj-1ct to the folloviing
conditions:
Completion of the Environmental ss ss rr, Worksheet process.
Stasing of veltvn r sal be in accordance -ith utilityavailability a
approvzd by the :r.
w s ., .. :. +w =... • " *'°r»'rte +d0.,.c:», w .:
mta Of
Lai ti Ni ,.. ru.kr : a i,.' 4_ x € __ tt ,id s mar .L !— s.4
it r 'tipi* tT "i v, the +$,s%t4 $ mi r k 1 ,-ori eM' e q v4,17 to ' 10, r o e
10,, 111 'r ga # frm7 tte v v Ic shall fir. 1. 1 01st
x£`"37 5 T ^A -.y !a ro c s^ * z m„ f. x x, '£°°` +« R h1 1y t } { xs .p k..• . P .% ,.., ,. . : ,,. y. ti: E., :`S v'.w < .. r°k w `i ". F'. t«.v '.= E #.a..&Fn i
k
Ionus . o nt ret- Criteria for t b v, s0zv,f them o t * I NNnws voint
irlott! Via! r" l " '] Vim: E
t +y yy, -
k-.
4.' , .r
p
pO
M
am ow or R "'si i F of A iint "v firreov, a £'wmmt tots of N-
4 ". ' o k
f
ee ' >
g,: s,.ry +, °« * 'g ytgy+u^e "fig +'{; `y ' tp'aey'y +stat,ir I s «$ Ieis ti.' U c 5` :" t dC d n .. U .a f' i. +i A h • ,*Y .a.nd .€3ikG w ` '..:. n #ee -
c' a- a no, 4 thoasst portion of the site shallredesirTn
s,
ni+4.f'4t}+y ``rei r. Cop- s'`.3' "` " „ ?.'` t. '""'.,.#• ' 'R n 'k` y "'; '"@^y g y"`Y `3}.*q3,..
x? :€. 62Sa.E x 4:`r e.. in ±,. E# ,x,;,;F:. .@. , %« t?.C1wi r : $-,:.* im ,.C «wai ` he fi ¢,. .@. a
n an 0ancer nkat natural site characteri. - Ics WRIS evident sore
vartety of hous'.10 typps was also, evident- access to County Poad 10 fir t 410
ar exit Only should.imProve traffic' Acid tion in the area especially considering;
c , s n _ ,.,z.x
V of " ell APro-F P . if a _. fa l ane- n . phase r€ € y a
T ; _
i u,!1c road is to enter the project frol,,I the east.
ironnisr-fon er r i e. ;zilso corivvnted that the project estahl i ethe msidential
Ovm-4, ),, of he area and, also develops, v l able, site in an estaMishedv o -
i area wftre WtAlities are r will be ova.` a .
mimes;over ?drror statedthat he did not, aqrca with the assignment of a density
u Pw iIRt, fir variety housingv apparent to a
prospective u(;e was wi w: would be two, three or four units,il d-
im''. also s,-atnd that it wu- not clear that additional affirmative do i
lefforts beyond the € r # ; a been o `khan Chang i r } certbuild-
V,
N Incations and adding to the nu-nber of units. He s t a"*s that he felt a density
Commss vt , r Vice stz 4w. 4 itiR L w S.a. ki,4 .:
rk.
F (tti " 9 r 3
d '
t Y e
Mf r , andt s# ed Vick. petitioner. .+v "' 4*,. e "
preserve ti tree tF a A Mr, resp ` a' f '
f, i§ e s c i P, ffol r -1 res ervc t h e lreo- stands-hot south area but that tbe sta',
t? ' commenteda `
that a iversity of ousi e wnot -Tear t that wouldconsider m
points i error< inc designs v e proposes sick as eerthe,
housing On a few of the Unitso,
Pvfef discussion a " m , ommissioners Larson, TH'e':nen and Parrom
intent of theordinance v is respect o variety i° houqinq tapes,
r ;;
s s§x '4 ffiad t a.'3 :.k'*°y.'.a +.moi?
F
kR
c
F
aa
1:s"•cr> CAk R y .`,i ; ' i.:: `'*,s$'?t'#'*. .`°..''S "5. to `r e, ir! *b- rc: n
R
Vie'' w, r : . r i, _ . sd x a. S•`s v .a w b. " C.3
ri'?R'3 rS'7.a> •q r,'
r*.
s #
rA"° *& °aid» v > "1 `#<*VC,%,+V -t '4 P- to..ts ""Cel'`" acre,
R,` '
ky , As« i izr ,t i'q a "`t E s, sa. F Chex e #< s; , $
1 ti ',w.<<' i N u,ssio e,,1.%ed reeza din the v,Nripty ofho-Using, tvires,.
91iatz ', f & °Yn` NiAI* Y t` fi$ Y C r I s 4 k"4"tr'` r '*%Y- 4 s"2aq t- -,-A Y## n°`"ie } 4'`Z 'e 'aiR 's.'€ . ^•,«(' 'a•
y
r.
gv --yew^"`'
tj g
yyaw
µby
xr 4 ff1`,
5:.+
4F_-I 8 L. n
o
ie
4 %
4
P FN y a 9 g i ig F n C
9 F. TM 3" y
4
DRi e a pt4• saw re o a C -a Tt asv 4
contc,f rod n- r a a, ak.. .. x. c; r r'd :. de's n (. L i '
b' ;, n ,J standl-trd desion vreaul`rernt t tbon an addiltit a point can he
afYx
e.• 4..i ik•.:x. L,a' hi.`i*M-z types, wv$ic.-i would d.€ .:.fi kce46v ktL 4.Af 4 w9«G 4. •erts Cut
a rro!l co-Vcrrlkted t1hat such' ne-cy desijin 0 -forts would Cq1 l '7
unfts as a variety
Cor, ' Va rr n statM his, reason `poi" the mofi off: i-, at not !iuch affirmative
MSMI ettort 11.1as evidentand a't the Vrirzary chaorkes have hepn in the nturl%er
nit's O rearrangeriont o h *tn,`ts. lConnissioner Tl-reinen staredthan he di -
agre 'd ai,d thathe 1!ad walkod , t wi3Oi the developer and believed such efforts
tllaffi -TLn
W,It T jar FAT.UT,rooUnissioner
i r
0 trtj n a l ou teen cox # ° , vote the O notion a encs men with
t e iter 0
The r retrop recessed ar.a and resumed ,
4 ,
Staff bria-fly reviewed the staff report dated January 231, 1500 and Chairwoman
Vasliliou MlA'Agntt . Sheman Goldberg who represented the petitioner.
jj
for Queensland
u Narth suhiect, to the following coni i s
Sign location in accordancewith the approved sire plan.
a -
1
t"j +pt K a a
r*`s f 4, , 'kms -* r,PM>
R. L C s#zk..Y.
st m k_
g. ^[a . a ,, ,
x- * ".,4 '. .a.'.q
k board "w,rs ,', 2" thick, ft"'. k S to he ronl. est into wik) anvi not to exceed
6- to r 'e t In area,-
mat
rt a'
mat 4,here he,, ed covenant for iki mit € tenan e over '" r} ,r?,C` vis` n
jh Attorney- Prior,t
6 That thtere should he an oasetrenllt for this sign Lot .., !a
g' £ zr xf g, Y A *:,` r, $ i } 1 r4 - + - to ' a € , w ,'
E, ,g. h r.i * . s r :ecft r € r Ula esign,
e rT a
aux.#kbc:+e,vMtww:4:u.+Ym.mnu+A'++aw.au.M.e-aYw.+.u.rvawvuH.vat'r.t..c+ms+xm*4aA'k..mA,M!+Nntt+qua:s,.akar[w+,mXc^*Hr:n:"»e'.wp.W^.»3'h,r*.A,tl'N>'m+ywsas..Y+a wr4ssl4rvsq M,'yv#r ".'.apvau,.xi.Hauw'++rww'Mw»ewe:•..Yvw+nM'rMt-nt:ma+n4sss,z
Final Ozt
S*` a introduced t i tpim reviewed vlan x cr, ` ' P '?`-'=' `" '
x++"'..z f h -' 4^ 4- he x+. %P a1 k $ .«k v"s*1 F tom. ' .,.i r -
n .. a e _ . s " 'a :` f. a c - raise =,>, gs .:.y e € y
gc a play; -cst-,e i she spring of 1971), 1,ut that the ' oineer' 'Al xorandull,,7
or ire final rite: terrect-ly indicatmAd the trail easementsents cal led fo ,n, the
Corridor lkse la-* - Staff revievied -`die 97 eer''s dem r nduri anti i`, ated that the
peltiti er bad fzNxi,-,ressed concern rrt providinq for such e semen s in industrial
Area, d rar -jlarly in this ease along he Soo Line` ra kv.
ti
Ir. Pick 41thre of VWoo s Km s rr Assoc iates who re rosonted the refit;. ger surfed
e 'rsroganln ices, 21rr rer's se 4,
e essarrkr drain-itip, amd utillity e ser4,en s which included . n rn lines as
well as the perimeter Tot lines. Ile 'stated the periboner does not theliove all
these e sene€r s would necessary and that since the indus-trial lots might b
consolidated or divided in the future therehyresulting in an ad ius sent of + e
dot lines, i iiou re er ' cis rr least t i
Staffrk spde -prat the easerent re rhes~aeras cited i the Engineer's Memorandum
reflected., the s0division code requirements for such e se ens and were not, onigre
to this su*Odivislom Mr. Sat ire responded at to the extent the easements re
required y ,rdinance, the petitioner was suggesting a varla4ce
f-. r OIs,) Staf Concern about Q i n the Friginerr' s V.,g- $
r3 _ rr , e -! v ve
kt compliance. W h the it s Corridor ase Plan for a tross-corim.unity and col eet r.
rail alonq Natban Lane and south of the Soo Line Railroad. He stated that +
tPotitioner does net -reel trail corridors are appropriate In an industrial district,,
but ra hey; should be developed only in residential , re, i. the also noted thatthe
nice lwfirdware property at the corner of Mlathan Lane and 414til Akron tt North, w"ich
s not heing included in this plat, ovins Lots 6 & 7 ars obtaining the easements
could propose a hardship on the petittioner since that site isid been developed.
Mr. Sathre also noted that there is a very wide drainage iq.d pon,ling r i
northeast corner of the s-.:di i s err and it was questionable uthenther tra, coultj
fie s.9'3 operl QY leped it -twat tire.
Phair4pPer a l R ¢5 recoynizen PaulW + `!4, k3'd '. av ,. or Cis# rep 4`n.'i $,ani: vra}
ni d . r a -e li)e!n nyr He *@ atO t >t' h r t ,4 tan
xa .,,. *'4x3 .3i:,; a tai. .: g r# • % gat `i ss C"`- ., ..''a>. I 4.$,'."a$a$ `;,'B TsaT i "i . ,.''a+; t k, ±$:a _
It hr
stated that therewere t4ree basic concerns relative to the rail. corridors: the
twcy ownership the lane coWd create difficulty in obtaining the`'*10 goer from, the
Vnited fliar"Iware Propertyadjac I *,,.athnn tane and ther, rondini, ra_ in she
northeast corner prosonted difficulties in trail location amd construction; he
aced them was philotrorhical prohlen with hc"rvin mr-catiopal trails, hnnig a
i-adustrial real= especially ons 'l ring possffle attraction of trefficthro
induStrial areas IIMO! v*uld Oftenbe vacant at the times whentrail Usage Muld
Ie hi uas On rft tir a ior ca€r WV7 tCty i vlpi
ens fer developers havinq to irprove trails once the land i ranted fy av rlt
or dedication, it being the 70iti nor' do that this its",n itobicy
f1r;lIssioner 7breinen stated that the trail alonq the Soo Line RaiIro ad-rx-
of-way is on both i tes of a railroad trackage and is ki ro - fir? vnity trail
including the horse trail. He noted that it t rc nnects whi 1,t %low
Iore at 49th Avenue onceonti nue the ;ie t Were hCity has clo-!,ained suh,
a i l easements west of 7achary Lane for the ultim.ate development o this
trais rot",
aioY 49 "
hfi.-`. tten al -so. stated that ;e,It the Park and fr i o
A vs(`Y ovssTori t7prover consider arendiments to the Corrieor
Use Flimand e further- holed that considering the experiencethe petitioner's
origin er in the City tfiere should be no lack of knowledge of the trail system.
1r. Sathre stated that the :) +#ones- apreed that the ratter of trails in this
area should he reviewed the cart andreit Advisory Connission prior to
Cita Council review of the plat so to mininize any tief treerr id r4za rr of
this matter. . Discussion the ppssible scheduling of the item before
Parks and c°reatiorvisory Cormissfon reefing„ and staff indicated this
would investiqatO with the intent to rinimizearra delay for this petition.
Mr. Shackman noted that it was the petitioner4s concern that the final platting
f this area `be t, Onated with the public improoverientproject scheduled. in. the
coming year.
MnTIVIDfIl,by Conmissionerinen, seconded by Conmissiorer Larson to reccim.M.Ond
approval of t% 4 final plat Or Ryan ,Business Center Ar Plyrouth Industriol
Associates at tho northvmst quadrant of 49th Avenue %rth and Nathan n
subject the following condi "' n a
Compliance with the City Fnoineer's Mem r andtxr with t*ti th
relativi to iter #31 the natter should herevievied by the Park and
Recreationion A 5gs r $ Commission prior, to City Council deliheration of the
final plata
Flovisions for trail location per City Policy alongNathan Lane and South
of the too Line Railroad along tete northerly boundqqy. of this plat.
I. Internal railroad trackage shall he limited tthe north` sideof Lot 2, the
east side of Lots 3 and. and to the viest side of Lot ;*
r x»x e*srs"Y mza "°,^.. a.,s',m.z x d.. y that 2. .> Councilr... ., "" h _r°'„1 inputdf10 _ F
2 is . ..tv
and Wreat it Adv7snry ossent f til On vv;ch a major issuc.
All in Favor
Revised r L errs
wl
his iter,; as ` ntrod"ce f'r staff W reviewed e Jantiarlt T, 100 staffport.
It was noted that i Rol; hasr ginal ly been scheduled. e for em!'' r , 1979
f sideferred because the petitioner us unahle to attendthat ree nq.
Staff rlain that the u r inviNed cid adjustmn n f the
shopping :o er with al jq jreqate size of the ir rl inthe ar" r
less than originallyinlapproved. Staf=f i e that the petitioner. had prepared
sign criteria 10-4104 ums to he ` `ovied all prospective tenants.
Chairvscman Vsi - ire o;p i zed !,,v Fisher representingtrar Properties who
on the proposed sign criteria.
nuring a brief discussion staff noted that correspondence w!l been received from
AreVican Qvily insuranco,r spe tve Henan in t a sboppinq center who wished
o have a sign which deviated fron the proposed criteria. Kai Fisher indicated
that that type of request was all the :',ore reason to est !,I sh the criteria which
vtould he uniform0y applied, for all enan,"s.
It tons the concenses of the erm!Jss that t,')eues I 'erican Family
Insurance did not constitute a- sis for amending the criteria and the natter
should be referrcd to the petitioner :dor resolution once the criteria was
dop l*
nrr--,°rssi ne- Threr err commented as to the original intent for adproving a sign
trey *peat of the shapping center. Cornis`oner Vire recalleo that the intent of
the sign approval was to peovide for identificition of the cerr .ter as a whole or
f individual tenant areas, but was not to provide adverbsir V an uncontrolled'
shion. r7ommissioner Vilre also stated concern with the criteria with respect to
iter, 6 of the exterior sign criteria.
M M Commissioner 1.4fre to reconmend pprivalf the amended sign plain and
sign cr4teria snhmitted by i rearm Properties `' r she Four Seasons Shopping Center
s ly e r to the conditions recommended in the staff report with the provision that
iter nom 6 of the exterior siert criteria he deleted relative to ascenders and
descenders
The n-otion dies for lack of a second..
1 ` N, byColter ss n r Parron, seconded * k s i i°?r'h nen, to; recommend
p proW of the amended sign plans and siren criteria her Metrarm
Properties for the Your Seasons Shopping Center srrh ,to:the following
cont 1 Pns:
i
i
10,00
VLSI! not i e{ 4,00 mr? toot, and no additional ;vE n za.,id untrtince
sh-all ! Wevstp .
witi-tenant siqns shall' per:nIttodf only in areas; in.,lim-ed On the
e% --a i n tpl an,5, i.e., located over the entrancesto the interior i!all
as represented on r hht D of the sQjr, riteria staff dated'
3. T ? location ad configuration of all signs spa 1 n accordance wi `r
the g" criteria staff dated .e.4w1/79, with the ddC,.dt
a 'v r? WONGRed Signs" as iter $10: nere shall h a d
t signs i.e., those 'containing ''veble; and r nova! ger all
n a s+;initialed,
ani
ca t . OnS for sign ped } x 4 `` shall the wm rx agent for
tile h 8 '3 ? centerer " e i 3 k la ' aa . ;: with icrura*
MOTIt AR IR Irk Knissioner ° i re Opposed
due to concerns as reflected
Site Plan Amendment
St.ff introduced the ` ten and reviewed the WWIIII 2 98 staff report relative to
c d -nk f 011ty under construction at the north;gest corner of Pilgrim
Lannd Lanca Lane*
Staff o Ferg slides of the houldor ni located t downtown staditrn site
k and slides of the proposed site.
k
h rwr°an Vsil °e rr ecrk r zed r. Scot", gs . vector Public Pel a ns: for
the First fti na Park of #! n a; o i s, Ai Vso showed slides and presented a
revised s to plan. r,- M.r i n r ,)duce.. ; f an, the cn tractor who woule move
she houlden. Mori.,Pouan c mvente as to_ _,_ irocetlures Otich, would used to
r rfsp r t the hoarder and to placet on tin si.lana r -materials were
Cnr,ifssloner Threinen slated concern vri h bc en s of t4he trailer and in.'s
ability to maneuver around City street co-,.,, :a -r; ar 11so11scommented that the
extreme ei could present problems as i lity str*c sts and curb. Mr* Soulmiant,
re:,ponded that all precautionary measures a , ! or avoid
Extensive discussion ens ed based upon a r a4 yew of the submitted site plan and
it was noted that the boulder would be locat A close to the 15 fcot trail ease- s
rent on the east side of the site. AN ye- commented that it was anticipated
that the boulder might settle to an extent of encroaching upon the trail ease-
ment approximately I font, and that the petitioner would seek permission' to do
so. A stated that; the boulderR could be incorporated with the trail corridorr
as art astc feature*
In response to a question by Wrwiisrioner SteigervId, A. Meyer, explained w
the petitioner selected this site as opposed any other site for the houl ler.
E'. ATM '. iia{# xt $'piikjj. K'i.S h%t
sg`` %
xr %C' k. Ys>.4C.c viL.B a ialt },.. Zt
i p2'r, nwa f the s0te plan : x? '' ? ,f y". the t a h 1 h n"Ir, x i'' art _ a
r 1hwess °pr y 1.ane ' ` 1r, ! ane, x a < ancastor a t,,per a 4s. do ._tai S< ,, €, k 5. vteJ ,e "( s
Sun-Ject t the f0l7,nV:4nq Conditions..
4a t
r`
w'. 4 # .:9 the i'ds`s`.° boner e,
tndt C, u`%£ @,o the rk 1P
rY ii,eiba a u.x t.c;.e in .a$,, S.sok„'' .s 4-
x';:,"
k.ned 1_.
p+"{,y,.:j
lr'±`yti'
i«i`
1,,' yy..,,
W4+w^hi f4AA.... i "h:i ..E M LL•. >. .f 6..'4.jY Mkt 4F. § +'aii"'Fu"4. `.. 'kr iai@ 4e4 Ya, AtotF }' y(,`y. e repair
i4
a' k! Fst'r t*p,, } " '„dY,'1,a ue tpy.
Min i'F"A' r`Sf`
i $
a
a result of transportinqand l a iq 4,ld—j -
rxr rK to r 1 a 1 the hojilder (,,n, t :<, ` , s- yap , h
City for E s c -trot) y the Cfa f !'rzillflng Official ami the CityF-m-gineer
0. :
i # 4'X filo k'syi l # Tsr t ' l w + lki 3 c;r R d Ile M t: + T ' pw n to O ossigrate
Cne- 4. 3 a.. 6`.., as y xa , s for
6
ae c a M a f, x xi- u- .ka ,' -e° Cormissi ' !". r As fired
m
cg' +m e'r sit,io# mm€Y t an
the of Zon'nq .djurtas a t IF'or- the, coming
Larson as the Corr"ission r pre sentat I ve on hPo ark ,,I ovp Zoninq
Or IAPP.
PAPT IO",I CAP:f` IFe w w ! t om' F`C Ri or
For-zv"' eti the firstr:eo i f +a o,-tN a 7:00, PO4;varicu loalyS fires
ou, '41 ip rewlitcer!; nd e Joint rceting, with the City 4'ouncil to include the Soard
There being no further business, Chairwvmar Vasiltiu, adjol"t-nied the
w