Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-09-1980IPL A Ni 1%t ON44 ISSI ki City !"bwmowt-h January 9, 11980 1 regular ?-.eetfir(i of the Myymou l nn n r epi $On Vr,14 cal, Ceriit at 24Z,` ly.17-11outh Soulevard. X 1-OFZ 3 Ifs t ala e y' gWWgpp jV! s-11 4 "" { a yy$ 'p$2 F X,1 -t El" Y W F:w Z'1'C 43' 1j# ?" piyr #(n ^Sy, Is6 9YaTC, ir`Si Wka`.Yon-r dT e£y`.$ &SmrY and t Aigerwald.. UTUR ABSENT Cert issinner Larson., (Chairman sent vacant) u'x d :, ". 4. tw s } b 0 i R W R` b '4. kk€\i t Director LY t air Y 3'i:0.r lr i' S'y r"•, R mid Pevelopment Corin or Mary Ray, Planning Secretary Barbara Anderson. e nd .s... y# `[. nalsYY se g.. -.n. y. 1Kawe WgSr'a++Y.S'.M'.wYwuS:aRxvA+Ss. +}.. r .',*.q agenda* Ilte first on efe. erre tintil later in the mee inn,. as no, one vias presert r presenting the c e i n r iftional Use, Perr I is iter was introduced by staff who reviewed the J nus ry 41, 198D staff report 1; # x r; -S. "e r ren in the petitioner,, inquired e nen condition 2 in the staff report. Staff explained that this itrmt utas carried foriard from wie t.4 one resolution rev n he original conditional use per t i- N'Is Knutson to have an office buildinq in an industrial district. Ms. Karnes Oso stated that they hauAne office of approximatelyM square feet on the upper level to rent,,and then they be ful 1 l ,N Nv Onimissioner Threinen,, secon&d by Coranissioner sire to recommend approval of corlitional use .emit to office four fires in the McCorbs Knutson 1)Wild n subject to the following conditions: I. The pemrit is issued to 4.the petitioner acting, on behalf of each of the four tenants and shall not be tr4osferable to any other tenants. 2 'the er iis suhjeclt. to all applicable codes., ordinanms and regulations and violation sere fs ` 1, be grounds for revocation for any use or uses in violation* w The oiler ton of the nodding spe io re r ondit on use o oe 000 toles,, shall e dor one ,dear,, whi I time a serva ons of the Capacity is site < o support the uses in terris of parking, and raff is generation will be reviewed. ase and tiasto containers shall be sired within the structure. Construction of the :easement office configuraltion must comply With current State Building Code requireentst . i y All in Favor mns Zreb rMm s feta:,,.baw#"r W: ^sy. aAm.ire.§r-*beww'-1k+wrv+ut1%'-++z+fi+Yaks'nesWe+iwNmxmaai^eae;.sHe '{! 'r^waYekn':MwrLA'w M..'MN wn ,Myw+kSetFYb ass+.aaix Melbin#^sus°SWurr.*:' tt.tn3F.weacSWW@wmk.w : p ;.r ve V r pq f S, f l# 7 Condit a I !Js Nary ! z Renewal vs0.w•.+ntxm for Electro L u x FaI e s Ms fte,-a I oal t f wh reviewed t Januaryj P a` report. Th, s being renewal, rid since there w r t no .,*roblems caused 1w 11.1ze, conditional ase, tt,,were was no further discuss o '19 s petite . V e i'hairperson Vs it ou recognized Mr. Rhues Janmes, owner of i vd nq. a# 4" d Ps t E Par on, 4ecc wied i," :l ssione, Ct Ole , to t'4+mmen t rovtl of the conlitional use permit re w,1 Qr rlec.tro 'LuxSales at 11120 h wa y 1;6"v.1 !"enter Puildinql subject to the followinq, o sieins er than those s designated ` r the Wheel Center Bul ldi n 4- All waste, and waste steal surd w1 hsort ur . fo r§p u U I on itR ns of t xT "h ' W per. clo `t* !}?'{ 4.S;^LY yY^'d' i'4'1P4 2 .Yic"e'g $hi T$C theSE.,.3 no ,w Fps.' 6 g. Y6A'xtt i$' tiT: I. B lx4ai$$ $ 4 fi. 'i+.r' WYg Sf n.'R Tip ib4. Se: K.t i. ka bconditions violation said permit M Pay, result in revoca of said permit.. ilie per.ilt is issued to the petitioner/tenant as operator he facility and shall not be transferable. 4 01 MOTION CARPIED All to Favor a r tT ConditionalUse Permit Renewal or Rackaged Furniture, Carpet This item was Introduced by staff Wio r vi ev-ied the January 5R, 1980 staff report. Brace this renewal of a conditional use and there have been no problepis during the east year,, there no discussion, MOTION by Commissioner P -t -,00n, seconded by Cormnissioner Steigerwald to recorinend approval of the condift.1anal apse perm.it renewal for Packagedr€ iter A Carpet fompany located 11121) Highway 55 in the Wheel Centeru d g' subject to the following conditions.- 1.The permit. is issued to she petitioner/tenant as operator of the facility and shall not be transferable. 2 The permit s sag e all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and violation thereof shad be grounds for revocation. There shalll e no outside display, sales *- storage of merclandise or I related rnater4,als. ; i tAl 4. All signage shall not exceed requir*lonts; nk' additional siqns;), Includinq AOL, In e v e ri 11 t t e 0, C;. L All a5$.. r' con+.-Iipere stiAll Nin, zfPNV*_ad wi+lliA nA NA .%A L5 &nLi r°sa 6. Site shall' intainod in a sanitary manner. 5-0-,q A] I in Favor J 4. 70014, erm - o This Item was, i itroduced !v staff who reviet-m-d the Jams ary 4, 19PI staff report, ion onsued regarding whether the free standing, sign needed a variance. Aiscus;: ks I a Vice. Chairperson Vasiliou recoqnized Scott PUtton of First N tional Hank who, introduced Vern Vx from Meltram. r. Uilcox stated that he had reviewed this 11 '!Linbor- w I t h Al K -eck, the City Puilding Official, arrd. they had reached. the etermzination that no variances were involvedmsincethissi', w s deteined tona be, a "free st-andiag" business sign. rather than a "pylon" sigm, MOTIP'Nt by Com-nissiones` Threinen, seeco.-ded by Commissioner Parron to recommend approval of the signs for the First Mahon al Rank of Minneapolis building located at the northwe of t _rstquadrantheintersectionofLancasto Lane and Pil9rim4 Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. Signage located Jnr L accordance with the approved site plan. Directional sitins shall not be illur'Inated. Installation zf '*71, signs shall oe in accordance, with applicable regula- tio-s and requirer.tiarts , per Zoning Ordtoance* Cormssioner Ulre raised the question albout whether the petitioner had been directed to install a d,,rectional Sign right turn at ch e exit onto Pilgrim Lane. The petitioner responded that they had angled the driveway so as to inhibit patrons from, maPing that turn,- however, they wishAJ to r to install a sign to see if one was really necessary, r If the angled drive w ficieat to control the traffic flow. M01TIM CARRIED 5-0-0 All in Favor nc . Conditional Ilse Permit This tterav wMch was deferred at the beginning 0 the meeting, was introduced by staf*ft who revel ied the January ?, 1980 r report. Thl's Item is a public hearing and neighboring property owners have been notified.* Vice Chairperson Vasiliou, I'ared the public hearing open. Vice Chairperson Vasiliou recognized Mr. Hans 'Hagen who was present representing Ban Con, Inc. Mr. Hagen stated Oat the sales office would be there from, 3-5 years.. and that with, then real estate was movingthey, felt that seven park- ing stalls would be sufficient to handle the traffic that the develolpinent would generate, and that there would also Wparking on Upland Lane*. The berviting that was required would be done next spring. kit UTF s _ 2 _ _ :,. - J-a-oa #y q, 100` is'cu pia ns'ned regarding s 9naa i e a e ordinance sne0ficsreva'"ding, Abklk acerl n f Signs Unplattedted an . ll€aer disp"I'-tyed the graphics of he i ^c ' m A 1-. A.. i R ¢., J. ._: Atr y- ' @ft to 2V 3 8+ sr dkn W!'Y fit, anDnp cajv for fog' processing. lice Chairman Vasiliou r couni e Ar. Jlim Guddahl4465 Ali '. urc ,jne1 raj present both as arcer rl,-' owner and repressenting the Vicksburg t!ameowner s Aia- t . tir., Ciudd'aM ln a red al -,out the placerent ofplacerthe development sign, as his tprowert-y is located viest of the Amhurst development. Re was concerned about the Ienqthof ire the sin would be located on the development and Nle°. Pager responded that it would p , the rt ronument as soon as, possible.. Mr. I°fie 11 his concerns regarding te speed Tinits on "icksburg Lane and that the new develorment would, increase the traffic floe. 4e also inquired out the landscla-Ping on she qr` reg' r of the dl pm and the amount of s reerrland .1huflFering that would installed between the development and the neighIvring roper concern r Vicksburg ane retest lin t ithin, the development.Ifasked to he re -notified when the si"In' pettition was reviewed v the Planning Co. mr,Iss r later in the lli sc s icn ensued req rdlinq the issues raised ky Mr.fluddah7. Commissioner hreinen saes that the speedingr€r er, existed now., and felt that Pan Con s eeld no e made res si 'e Icor an existing condition. Corimissioner t°lir , roque a l a i -an A an f the A h ' lt tden t. ?fir . n ' thatt fie had concern regarding the performance quavahtee and felt that the Commission shou')d establish an amount and he specific regardinq the improvements `* e ered by the quarantee. Staff explained that this is usually done with staff,, Msec upon estimated costs o she improvements« off cited tine ordinance provisions for rfir}r ante' guarantees and Mated the net should provide a cost eqtirate for the improvements specified. taff also cited ordinance requirements regarding screening of parkirg areas from all adjacent residential : roper i . Vice 41_'hairperson Vasiliou closed the pohlic hearing.' s0TIMM by ComMissioner Threin n., seconded by COM.Missioqer Wire to act on this petition this evening. PAPTION CARTIM 5-0-0'in Favor OTO N Commissioner Barron seconded mi ssio er Threinen to r-nornmend approval of the re eds an Cora, Inc. for a conditional use permit for a real estate sales office for AL horst located or Lot 21 Block , MAurst Addil. n subject to the follouling conditions. - I. ornuons.- Development of the property including ar ng or ,o 1, Rlock 1, Amhurst Addition, cNnslstent with the submitted site plan. Z All waste and arse containers shall be stored within the structureo AdUbL .` e proposed parking area be paved per ordinance s an dards. 4. Any sitInage shall conform with, the City Ordinance standards. M iM$ir'A XY ^ }'!` 1n` * & 4"'" f4 R i d px (. + NY. ^f: Lp.. .. e `-u_ K¢6 h. +b Y , i, .k -_` _ $$i • Y 6.b .e % 3. 'k#' '7j.. mac, 'f $ t $ t *', Na >'"NS a s -^ V rsa e, . er x " o ° off; s TMa ,. re o e as tto a l ow r ':die inst-allation of a hasement and oo rz o i n o a LAP R .1. N 10,N,hy e - i s i Threinen, seconded by C-mss i on St. e i gerwald to the f ot: 4 " 4,Vq Cw di4-4" ,a 6. To re vnen the Cite* Council that Vi stn&qi Lane Iv posted `NP PARKING" the east side, ce o this el<i eft eall estate sign on the north sIde of 46th Avenue west of east o Vicksburg Lane, on the west side of the h -first developinent, s ec to ordinance size yid set s standards* v ensued . z gee i i is o i er t. -Po e. 4 Vice Chairmen Vasiliou For vote on the amendment. 5-0-0. 0 in Favor Vice chai_,,nIn,%ilioleclfor a vote on the rain fnotion is ogee amended, MIT '11 All in Favoi Staff 410ormed Mr. 14aien .-hal ,Ians for the perm anent Inonument, sign could be submitted for apprcvai alone c,7e in ooO -:tion with i6lhe find Plat, for the second addition. k mow, _• n. Yus em Pieo o nj iff g er 'Conditional Use Perm.it. Renewal eq*µ+ -+ xnmcs.+.. V ria ees1;& Amended Site Plan his item was introduced by. staff whory iewed the January,1980 staff report. Cliff Frazer was present as the petitirner. Staff revio-wed the variances request- ed by the petitioner for the Cmmiian. taff explained gest,- per Comnission direction, the nunher of variances was reduced only with the proposed plan which does not provide fullord,H naoce parking. The "proof of parkinin " elan which does show full parking, has essen, ii My tbc wine varlancvs which could be reduced or eliminated only if the size of the proposed hU1111dii;gaddition were reduced. MOTION' by Commissioner *Tlreine , seconded omi*Os ione ire to recommend approval of the vers nl-es, amended site, plans,, and "proof of parking plen" h staff A teed nt. r , 1980, `dor -,tst-om, Rie Company -*Cliff Frazer located at 3435. Kilmer Lanae sty°° ee o the folio€ Non o s Cor*gypli nce with the City Engineer's .4e- r ndua, 210 All, _ti s t_ e anji waste co vers shall ho £ +ored within, the structure 3. Mo Pdtside storage of materials, products or equiient.,, 4. t:oo ion and design of fare hydrants and fire i -zr in accordance with the Fire Chief; recianendations and City tFAl I AV"d's k g ti' 3 9'ti- A-A ggg... TREE(+' , Pit k.'<aµ" a R i. t' h Na1Q u$'^Xr R. •W 1f 'L.$b`.9. y. } Site developmeptinaccordance wi the s i "ed, sire an dated V"anu r 10SO and proof of p rkiml plar al,so lated. January 10 IP. Landscape plan to reflect the plantino ofplantheSugarap . aA "reen A;-,-h at a 2' 1ince diameter and. tlhe` r - Spruce, at a 6, foot height •p, yam, Q 1*he site Prfoma ce guarantee shall he tomed for 24 oonth's., gtq Ya v` r T (. Y 1 `7¢ 1 inFavor x1#b'#M-.a,.p+- ,.'raluA'iJ ;vF^... a. :. #W•...--i+WFW le,'+b ' the et i ti Q re essed at r:11 pi.o. and re-,u.Ie t ,4,201 p.m. wi'tavx4u r * na.* ia.. SYat...eevrK3for h Planninganing Cms ' fororVh wM,& w yaxk- G. c:ea+r r (,aT 1980were disctissed. The ri:uer meeting dates will e as follotqs,. danuawy 9,, January 310, 19MI February 1.3, 1990 t'e r ar IT, *1980 a Ma rc h 26, Staff indicated additional study sessions -would ba needed to review and complete the draft m rehe si e Plan_ Update. was the concensus that such, meetings shoul d al so he Ved esdt evening-. Ty ' m issiever Parrom.. seconded by Commissioner Stei erwaM to approve the i n.¢ es of the meetingi :December V., 19714. t,t rTp' 'L —0-05x. All in Favor tM?.TIO t-. t;OI #-. ! i, Li$i`re Parron.,seconded by.Commissioner SG i \w1 153 ld a4s'. Ci ?"3 +E. 1G iw. , t1he r1nut,, 1z of the meeting of December 19, 1P79. IOTT s , Ar" 1F11- M as V t,.° 83.+t S r . r 7 e Tu'. V s l iou altistained due to absence from that meeting* F:_.+ aw-briyd'++tx, paSd`+s 0.r..§a Ei Cvite:i ja ew.:;ae.xww. fnrxi+ Staff intro('ticed the next item which was continued discussion of the landscape criteria in revievi of Policy Draft 111. Staff cemented on the January 4, 1980 p re,..i t Pl ; i n i a t h ?t the. ek w. o„mSi sio n had Lv i vvie the first teku ra-t s at the, S. Staff ma4red "hat the third dra-11"t ref"OpCtO chaws snogesiZed ,4 K Ctrr” l , n and rmposed by staff for editor" ail sous' s o east €§ reg arOin Iten 54-1111, parking ° x; directed research further the sl7e of thei n uParking landscare island since 20 squarc, 'fees wo!flti see to be reasonaMe that 300 scuare feed which includles aisle r h r discus tc., centereel on Item il-'W, un&r rou d sprinkler ztems. I t was sug s that a a conal r it nent m r m used p ikley xis if such systems were proposed would dequate, motive andencouragement to developers who eight he inclined to *ast l l smh e, ems . I t wa s the sus oT MOTTO,,,,, y, "., -mm ¢ sl reinen, secondee by Comitsionerwald, to re eirmer tie City Cmncil, adoption of the Policy on Landscaping Criteria per revised Draft III an(i further publiarinqbefore the Ccrmurnission as a means of adopting applicabler r a as foetal ordinance requirements. 1TICN NV Comm*ss-.ner R r ' or.,, seconded by `Commissioner Uir , to mmend she ro,ti o n by 41 Y" f., cti ng i e Ire n n, of 111t f. m 9, 1x r e 9rt-din g under -round sprinkler systems and to renur-ter a0i 1'thmr items. MD -TION, CARRIED All in F-,-.vor 14A1OIL, Staff . arc that , kit Councill directed the preparation of a poCic resolution Whi Old not require ftrinal public hearing and Onli ch once adopted hyo she `_' !"`y Council ;Ol be p as part of the Cite Code as a supple- in,ent to ithp Zonina Ordhence. Staff stated that if the Corm.issiished to have lurt`rer np fr _im Lite uii' i , this would h related to the Cov=41 which rifght elect to div,ect a formil hr i ky thr, -Commission as a policy reeff ut i .. Staff conmentel t h; a nuizber of, zoning orid-V-4ince artendnents were Wag prepared and scheduled for a pvhlic hearing in February., and that perhaps appli,.,ahle sections of the policy could f, e Clo - ed i+i h hose and could he considered at tha sietle general hearing.Nanwhile, he more administrativee t- of +he POLJ'QV" such as these listing required information or, pians, could he adopted as policyand i e x ee`- Further distession ens4ed and ecce Chairpersoll Vasil iou stated that While tiie Commission wanted to ht the criteria formally adopted as mn as passible, it would be appropriete to have the benefit of a public hearinq whether in the context of ordinance amendments r not,, She stated that - Shpn. fo :t t i nl requirements were adrdin-strative in nature and represented a forrial listinV the det # needed to prt,,wperly evaluate 'andscape plans. She s es -2d that staff relate these to developers as ar o,` the site plan review process. Vice Chairperson Vasiliou called for a vete on the m In motion as once' amended, MOTION CARRIED- All in fa •,rer I Pi t " TVI kWI z,Tvt In other business, C "rM ssi ner Threin stwi:ed that he had, a nuv?her of i r Conm"itssion, consi ion: oevie of a s s -f bones Points r Vargous dc,401 p- r nt- proposals; per ion eta s review, ii itis e ',jnc i .3 _ Jk. # 1 3. 4 Y t' Y b t tinned fuz d v l rei ' S s and any 010 tide c;, ed s alml icat i ons are processed; I i se: Of exi st ' "M major non, con fo, rM,,rig uses around theCit- whch w ll : thefTmissi r. ft eva7uatinq PM.Posals which may he sutmittedtonstitutint expansion or enlarger nt j lh s ; and, she adoption of a Commission policy to. permit; a Cowmissic-neradd aq, iters on a divan .agenda at r beginning -t-i q the 4.1dr s ank that suchitems w not e resolved t that X . .. ..he d raised. for mnitg There being no furtherusln ss before the Corumissiont the rieeting was adjourned