HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 02-01-1978PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
February 1, 1978
A regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was calledto order by
Chairman Davenport at 7.-30 p.m, :n th.e Council Chambers of the Public; Works
Building, 14900 -23rd Avenue North.
MEMBERS PRESENT; Chairman Davenport, Commissioners Barron, Schneider,
Threinen, Vasiliou
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Erickson, Stewart
STAFF' PRESENT Charles Dill.erud, Kate Marx
A imaorrnfastarmerryernroo, 29 Preliminary Plat/Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for preliminary plat and RPUD 77-5 preliminary
plan approvals for "Cimarron .East," aroject proposed for 206 dwelling units {188
attached and 17 detached single family) on 46 acres and three industrial lots on a
total' of 11 acres, all located at the southwest corner of 21st Avenue North and
Fernbrook Lane. Staff .made recommendations and observations regarding the proposal
to the Commission per the Staff report of January 25, 1978..
Commissioner Threinen questioned if the cul' -de -sac on Niagara Lane were to be
constructed, if 'it was also the intent that it eliminate any traffic to the south
here as well as on Minnesota Lane. Staff stated that this was the intent.
Commissioner Threinen questioned whether this would allow adequate access to the
cemetery and asked Staff what the benefits would be if the cul-de-sac were to
be constructed, Staff indicated that the benefits would be a reduction of maintenance
of a portion of street the City did not need and that the residences to the .north had
adequate access Via 21st Avenue north, The street, in addition, served no important
circulation purposes.
Commissioner Schneider questioned wbethl-r i., :sok; l d be necessary to remove existing
vegetation in order to make Cross -sect Ln A operational, the berm located at the
southwest corner of the project -rear the d-eveway. Rick.Sathre, representing
petitioner, stated that this would, be, true, 'Mr. Sat re added at the neighbors
in thearea had been contacted by petitioner, and that none of the neighbors
indicated a particular preference for the ,berm as opposed to the relocation of
the drivvgq 4ay/alleyway southward,. Should the alleyway in its current location.
br, developed', it was proposed ftrPther south. than currently located, and that, the
alleyway in its current location become integrated with the natural plantings of
the area. The new alleyway would. not be blacktopped.
Commissioner Schneider questioned' whether it would be possible to build a bean
within the existing alleyway in order to further buffer the residents from the
project. It was pointed out that .any berm that would be built in the old al l eywayy
would not be high enough to serve as screening and it would also potentially cause
PLANNING COMISSION MINUTES -2- February 1, 1978
a hazard dor those using the alleyway in that its location would en aurage drifting
of snow into the alleyway.
Commissioner Schneider asked if the industrial buildings would be limited to a
height of 20 feet as wa; previously discussed. Mr. Sathre stated that it would
be.preferred that the petitioners be allowed to build within the limiations of the
Zoning Ordinance,
Chairman Davenport ooened the meeting to cowents and questions from mev,ber s o `
the audience.
Rebert Ford, 1730 Ithaca Lane, questioned the maximum height of the light industrial
structures proposed by petitioner. He asked that they be restricted to 20-25 feet.
Max Smith, 14192 County Road 6s stated that he felt the trees in the area could be
eliminated for the sake of a relocated alleway in that the majority of the trees
were either elms or brush type of growth. Commissioner Threinen asked Mr. Smith
if he would prefer the al l eway relocated. Mr. Smith responded that he would like
it relocated and that he felt it would not be newessary to construct a berm.
Commissioner Th•neinen questioned the manner in which petitioner would discourage
use of the '"old" alleyway by people after the new one was constructed. Petitioner
stated that gradin, of some nature could be incorporated to discourage such usage.
Earl Bancroft, 14415 -18th. Avenue North, stated that he recalled that 20 food: be ght
mitationsfor the industrial district had already been discussed at previous
meetings and that. he felt it should ,be maintained as a maximum for the industrial
buildings. He added that most of the industrial bu;ldings in t.- area were 20
feet or less. Mr. Bancroft also indicated that he was concerned that headlights
from the proposed project not be shining into windows of the existing and proposed
single family homes in the: ares Petitioner responded tf:at the 3-4 foot berms
proposed for the area between the patio homes and the single family homes would be
adequate to take • care of this.
Les Raskob, 14016 County Road 6, asked how far east the alleyway would be extended..
Petitioner responded that it would be extended to serve Lot 8 He added that he
would like to have the alleyway placed closer to the residents who would be using
it and that he would prefer the berm not be built.
Don Han_see, 1855 Niagara Lane, stated that he objected'to the cul-de-sac being ;built:
atthe end of "t*,l d" Niagara Lane. There would be, in his opinion, greater pi-obl ems
created with the cv1-de-sac when funerals were taking place in terms of blocking the
only available circulation. Mr. Hanson asked what would happen to the utilities that
were c.urrerntly in place in "Old" Niagara Lane.if it were vacated. Staff indicated
that the City would maintain the easements,
Frank Hatcher, 14325 -17th Avenue North, stated that he, too, was against thL cul -de --.sac
being built at the .end of "Old" Niagara Lane. He stated that he agreed with Mr.
Hanson as to the type of problems this would create.
Commissioner Threinen questioned the final disposition of the property south of County
Road 6, petitioner stated that this would be deeded to the City for Park Dedication
purposes..
x
PLANIN H 'COMMISSION MINUTES: -3 February 1, 1978
Chairman Davenport closed the public ,hearing at 8:20 p.m.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Vasiliou that
the Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0y0) (Allin favor)
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Schneider
that the Planning Corxiss",;)-n make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Centurion Company for preliminary plat, RPUD Conditional
Use, ,Permit and rezoning from R-3 (Multiple Family Residence District) to T-1
Planned Industrial District) of Lots 86-88 of "Cimarron East" all be approved
per plans dated January 13, 1978 and subject to the following conditions:
1. The initial final plat submission shall include a concurrent consolidation
of Outl.ot A;with Plat 43728, Parcel 3530,
Setback:;: on all single family dwelling Lots shall be 50 -feet front and 15
feet sfi, e
3. Section 8 berms shown by cross sections between 79th Avenue North and proposed
single family units on 18th Avenue North be a minimum of 4 feet in height plus
plantings.
4. All "attached" structures fronting lgth Avenue North shall maintain a .50 foot
front setback.
5. Park Dedication shall consist of
a. Payment of fees -in -lieu on the 1-1 sites with building permits,
b. Dedication of Plat 43728, Parcel 3535.
c, Payment of fees -in -lieu of $30,750.
6 Compliance nth the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum regarding
this project.
T. The southwest property driveway be allowed in lieu of a berm, said drive
to be located within the south 25 feet of the 75 foot setback of the patio
ho -me units. Said driveway shall r).an from Niagara Lane to Lot 8 of Rath's
First Addition. Access to the existing drive shall be discouraged by construction
by the 'petitioner of a small berm or by posts,
The Commission discussed the proposed building heights of the industrial sites at
the northeast corner of the project.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Comrpl8sioner Vasiliou
that the following condition be added: "8. Lots 85-88, the Industrial ;ots, be
limited to a height maximum of 24 feet."
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0=0) (All in favor)
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner
Threinen that the following condition be. added. "9. The cul--de-sac located at
the southwest corner of the project on the preliminary plat drawings be del'eted"
PLANNINi COMMISSION MINUTES -4- February 1, 1978
The Commission noted that their reasoning for eliminating the cul-de-sac stemmed
from the comments of the residents of the area with respect to funerals at the
cemetery,
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED5-0-0 A11 in favor
The Commission then voted on the main motion as twice a<,ended.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor)
Preliminary Plat/General
A480 Construction 80 Development Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for preliminary plat approval of an industrial
plat located at the southeast corner or 23rd Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane, pro-
posed for four industrial lots on 15.1 acres. Staff made recommendaitons and obser-
vations regarding the proposal to the Commission per the Staff report of January
26, 1978.:
Commissioner Threinen stated that it was the intent of the City that Chesire Lane
be constructed to take pressure off Fernbrook Lane for internal circulation of the
development that would take place in the area. He questioned petitioner as to why
they felt it should not be built. Rick Sathre, petitioner's engineer, stated
that the main objection to: the construction of Cheshire Lane was the location of
the NSP tower and easement in the area. Construction of Cheshire Lane around the
tower would involve so much land as..to prohibit building on one of the lots proposed
for the development without substantial variances. In addition, if Cheshire Lane
would be routed to connect with County Road 6, it would serve a much greater value
to the circulation of the adjacent industrial development; however, it was currently
designed not to intersect with County Road 6.
Chairrn Davenport closed the public hearing at 8;55 p.m.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported .by Commissioner Barron that
the Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting.
MOTIONCARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor)'
MOTION was ,=Wade by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Schneider that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Volp Construction for preliminary plat approval of the Volp
Development Addition, located at the southeast corner of 23rd Avenue North and
Fernbrook Lane, consisting of four industrial hots, be ap-roved, subject to the
following Conditions;
1. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum regarding
this project.
Private driveway access to Fernbrook Lane shall be prohibited,
B. A 50 foot easement 'for right-of-way purposes for Cheshire Lane shall be
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES .5-, February 1 1978
incorporated into the plat,
Commissioner Threinen stated that he felt the immediate value of Cheshire Lane was
probably insignificant, however, the value of Cheshire Lane fo the future was
quite high in terms of aiding in traffic circulation for the ard'a. He added that
whatever pressure could be taken off :Fernbrook.Lane wouldaccommodate a better
flow of traffic for the area.
The other members of the Commission concurred.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (Ali in favor)
A-780 Vo1p Construction for DILA-78O Site Plan
Consistent with prior Planning Commission and City Council direction and concurrent
with the preliminary plat of the Volp Development Addition, petitioner had submitted
an amenCed site Rolan for the proposed industrial building located at the southeast
corner of Fernbrook Lane and 23rd Avenue North. Staff made recommendations and
observations regarding the proposal to the Commission per the Staff report of
January 27 1978.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Barron that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council.-
That
ouncil;
That the request of Volp Construction (for DPI) for site plan approval of ;truc-
tore proposed to be located at the southeast corner of Pernbrook Lane and 23rd
Avenue North, per plans dated December 12, 1977, be approved subject to the
following cc. 'itions
1, Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum.
2, Building permit shall be withheld until approval and execution df the final plat
and development contract for the Volp Development Addition.
3. Payment of Park Dedication°fees-in-lie.0 of $1,292 (2.58 acres X $500 per acre).
4, Outside storage of waste, waste containers, equipment and materials shall be
prohibited,
5. Site improvements security per Zoning Ordinance requirementsfor completion
within 12 months
6. Pin Oaks indicated on the landscape plan be eliminated and substituted with
Green Ash or a comparable species oftree.
MOTION CARRIED (S -O -O) (All in favor)
PLANNING CGMMISSTON MINUTES 6- February 1, 1978
6 rno MTT -e--F—A--6-67 Fi n al 'Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for final plat approval .of Palmer Creek
Estates 3rd Addition, located at the northeast corner of Larch Lane and 49Th
Avenue Borth, and consisting of 20 single family lots and three outlots. Staff
made recommendations and observations regarding the plat per the Staff report
of January 27, 1978.
MOTION was made, by Commissioner Vasiliou supported by Commissioner Barron that
the ,Planning Commdssion make the following recommendation to the City Council .
That the request of Arnold Palmer for final plat approval of Palmer Creek, Estates
3rd Addition, located at the northeast corner of Larch Lane and 49th Avenue North
be approved subject to the following conditions;
1 Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum regarding
this project.
2 Dedication of Outlots A .and B and payment of pro --rated fees -in -lieu Park
Dedication fee of $1,240.
MTTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor)
A489 is-Wic -789 Site Plan
Staff presented the request of Ric-Wic Investment for approval of a site plan to
construct a 26,004 square foot structure proposed to be located on 28th Avenue Notth
between Fernbrook and Niagara Lanes.. The proposed tenant was a glass distributor.
Staff made reco=endations and observations regarding the proposal per the Staff
report of January 27, 1978.
Of major importance to the site was a recommendation by Staff that the site be
redesigned to have a joint driveway with the property to the north due to the natur:
of the street the sites wouid be fronting.
Bernard Herman, petitioner's architect, stated that the petttioner objected to the
joint rivE situation due to the uncertainties involved', i.e. not knowing the
tenant who would be sharing the drive. In addition, he stated that petitioner was
concerned about the request for additional landscaping in the rear of the site in
that it fell within an area planned for snow storage in the winter which would kill
any landscape stook planted in the area:
E Lichten, President of Minneapolis Glass Company, stated that they would be pro-
posing a 20year lease arrangement for the property and he explained his .operation in
greater detail to the Commission', Mr. Licten indicated that he had ten employees
and that no retail operations were proposed at this location.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supporter by Commissioner V4sillou that
the, Planning Commission male the follawing recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Ric-Wic Investment for site plan approval of 26,004 square foot
i
PANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7- February 1, 1978
structure proposed to be located on 28th Avenue Porth between Fernbrook and
Niagara Lanes per plans Staff dated January 26, 1978, be approved subject to
the following conditions.
1t Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum.
2, Outside storage of waste, waste containers, materials and equipment shall
be prohibited
3. Payment of Park Dedication fees-in-lieu of $1,000.
4a Site improvements: security for completion within 12 months per Zoning
Ordinance requirements,
S. Addition of 1'5 2-1/21' cal-*pher ornamental deciduous or comparable type tree
to be distributed along the north, south and east setback areas..
6. Redesign for joint curb cut with Lot 6 (Rauenhorst), on the westerly
proposed curb cut.
Upon further discussion of the landscaping requested, it was decided by the
Commission that petitioner could place the additional trees requested in such
a manner as to avoid any damage to them by snow removal plans for the property.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Chairman Davenport supported by Commissioner Schneider
to add the following condition: "7. Any retail or showroom use shall be prohibited
from this site."
NOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0-0)` (All in favor)
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All. in favor)
A-790 Rauenhorst Corporation A-790 Site Plan
Staff ;presented petitioner's request for site plan approval of an office/warehouse
structure of 56,100 square feet 'proposed to be located at 28th Avenue North south
Highway 55 and west Fernbrook Lane. Staff made recommendations and observations
regarding the proposal per the Staff report of January 26, 1978.
William Tobin,, representing Rauenhorst Corporation, stated that 10 per cent of the
structure would be used for office space and the rest as distribution space. A
berm would be located in the northwest coy,,,--, f the site concealing most of the
parking and truck maneuvering.
The Commission discussed the landscape plan with Mr. Tobin. It was determined that
do!ihle the 'number of 'landscape stock would be required but that petitioner could
his own discretion at placing the trees on the lot.
PLANNIN COMMISSION MINUTES -8- February 1, 1978
140TION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported. by Chairman Davenport that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Rauenhorst Corporation for site plan approval of an office/
warehouse structure of 56,100 square feet proposed to be located at 28th Avenue
North south of Highway 55 and west of Fernbrook Lane per plans dated January 20,
1978 be approved subject to the approval of Circle Star Business Center 3rd Addition
and the following conditions:
I. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum.
2. Payment of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of $2,190 (4..38 acres X $500) .
3. Redesign to effect a joint driveway with the site plan adjoining to the east
Ric-Wic on lot 7)',
4.. Landscaping within the north, east and south setbacks shall be doubled in
quantity,
5. Site improvements shall be secured for completion within 12 months per Zoning
Ordinance requirements,
6. Outdoor storage of waste, wastF containers, materials or equipment shall be
prohibited.
7 Redesign to eliminate driveway intrusion into the north 25 feet of the Highway
55 setback area (northeast corner),
8. 43 parking spaces be created to the west with a three -space variance to be
allowed from Policy Resolution #75.-206.
MOTIO14 TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner
Threinen that the following be added as a ronditions "9. The berm currently
located at the northwest corner of the lot be maintained and established
at an elevation of 974 feet per the grading and utility plans dated January
18, 1978.'
K3TION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0-0) (.All ir: favor)
It was po'nted out that, with respect to the joint curb cut proposed for Rauenhorst
and Ric-Wic that with development of the property to the west, pot?ntial1,v four
curb cuts would be introduced to 28th Avenue North within 225 feet and ghat this
was a dango,ous traffic situation to create if it could be avoided.
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor)
PLANNING COMMISSION 14INUTLS -9- February 1, 1978
A-7-91 All en Hatfield -791 Site Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for site plan approval of an officelwarehouse
structure of 17,160 square feet proposed to be located at the southwest corner ofLancasterLane (vacated) and 10th Avenue North,. Staff made recommendations and
observations regarding the site plan per the Staff report of January
277,
1978.
The Coimilssion discussed the height restriction proposed for the storage area.
Mr. Hatfield indicated that 90% of the time he would be in compliance with the
regvest; however, when shipments would arrive, it was possible that the storage
would be as high as 8 feet for several days;
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Barron that
the Planning Commission Make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Allen Hatfield for site plan approval of an officelwarehouse
structure of 17,160 square feet proposed to be located at the southwest corner
of Lancaster mane (vacated) and 10th Avenue North be approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's` memorandum regarding.
this project.
2. Provision of site improvements security for completion within 12 months.
3. Payment of Park Dedication fees-in-lieu of .$727 (1.45 X $500/acre).
4 Outdoor storage shall be limited to the rear of the structure and shtill
have a height limitation of 6 feet.
5. Project sign shall be set back 5 feet on the site and height shall not
exceed 6 feet.
6. Arborvitae plantings be deleted and substituted with pine trees on 20 foot
centers, 6 feet tall, 2-1/2" calipher:
Mr. Hatfield stated that the 6 foot requirement on storage height would not be
workable, that he would prefer 8 feet.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Barron supported by Commissioner Vasiliou
to change conditazan #4 'to read '. .a height limitation of 8 feet."
GTION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0=-0) (All in favor
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _10 February 1, 1978
A"453 Fi ft, Fi ye Properties -453 Conditional Use Permit
Staff presentedpetitioner's request for .e conditional use permit to operate
a sales/service business for vacuum cleaners proposed to be located within the
west 1,404 square feet ofthe Wheel Center 'Building. Staff made recommendations
and observations regarding the request per the Staff report of January 27 1978.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Barron that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
ghat the request of Fifty -Five Properties for conditional use permit approval to
operate a sales/service-business for vacuum cleaners proposed to be located
within the west 1,400 square feet of the Wheel Center Building be approved
subject to the following conditions
1. No signs other than those as designated for the Wheel Center building.
2 Permit shall be for a period cf 12 months.
Chairman Davenport indicated concern that petitioner was ;not present to further
explain the ,request and suggested that a deferral action would appropriate in view
of questions regarding parking not yet answered.
Commissioner Schneider stated that he, too, would like to discuss the parking
situation with the petitioner and would be interested if sales meetings would;
be held on site of the 25 sales people attached to the facility.
MOTION T4 DEFER was made by Commissioner Th;reinen supported by Commissioner Schtaeider
any. further consideration of the request of Fifty -Five Properties for a conditional
use permit for the operation of a sales/service business for vacuum cleaners, until
such time as petitioner could be present to answer questions about the use.
MOTION TO DEFER CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor)
A-65ene 'Pau lson A-552 Conditional Use Permit
Staff presented the request of petitioner for a conditional use permit for a used
cap` sales business in a B--3 (Service Business District,) zone, proposed at 11318
Highway 55. David Robinson was present to represent the petitioner.
Chairman Davenport asked Mr. Robinson if he had the authority to bind Mr. Paulson
to any City requirements for the operation. Mr. Robinson responded that he did
Chairman Davenport asked Mr. Robinson if a. trucking operation was taking place
from the site. Mr. Robinson stated that the trucks were being stored on the site
due to the plug in facilities that were available and that the trucks were phoned
their- routes for the day from another location. It was the determination of the
CommissicA that the operation was indded a trucking dispatch business.
Mr. Robinson stated that as soon as weather would permit, the trucks would be
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -11`- February 1, 1978
moved to anothe r 1 ovation, but at the present time facilities were not available
at the other location for plug in use, The trucks would be move to Hedberg Sand & Gravel.
Referring to Council Resolution ##76.227, Commissioner Schneider questioned Mr.
Robinson with respect to the report from the building inspectors dated January13, 1978. He asked, in particular, why equipment had been added to the facility.
Commissioner Schneider stated that it was his recollection that the only equipment
on the site at the time of the previous conditional use "trmit was that involved
for the car wash facility itself--no welding equipment was on the site. Mr. Robinson
stated that the equipment could be removed, Mr. Robinson added that the building
had been stripped of any car wash equipment also, that the building w&s merely a shell.
Commissioner Schneider questioned whether vehicles were parked in the service
drive right-of-way. Mr, Robinson responded that they were not and would not be
in the future.
Commissioner 1lasiliou asked Mr. Robinson what the primary business of the operation
was. Mr, Robinson stated that cars were reconditioned and sold at the site.
Commissioner Schreider questioned what type of repairs and reconditioning would be
handled at the site. Mr, Robinson responded that they would, perhaps, overhaul
a carbureator but ,could not attempt to overhaul a transmission at the site. He added
that currently the garage space was used for storage of trucks now during :I,- ;.cid
weather and that a "car kit" was being assembled in the other end of the building,
Chairman Davenport stated that he felt strongly ;:
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -12- February 1, 1978
place in the service drive right-of-way 4) the petitioner had not been "issued
a dealer's 1icanse by the City of Plymouth to operate a used car sales business from
the site. He stated that he felt there were sufficient grounds for denial of the
conditional use permit based upon the violations.
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS
December 7, 1977
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Chairman Davenport that
the minutes of the December 7, 1977 Planning -Commission meeting be approved as
written .
MOTION CARRIED (3-0--2) (Commissioners Vasiliou and
Barron abstained)
December 21 1977
N was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Chairman Davenport that
the minutes of the December 21, 1977 Planning Commission meeting be approved as
written.
MOTION CARRIED (4-0-1) (Commissioner Barron
abstained),
January 4, 1978,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Chairman ,Davenport that
the minutes of the January 4, 1978 Planning Commission meeting be approved as
written.
MOTION CARRIED (4-0-1) (Cossiover Barron
abstained)
January 18, 1978<
Commissioner Schneider noted several corrections to the Zachary Hills RPUD 77--61
A-778), portion of the minutes as well as that,portion dealing with°Rauenhorst''s
amended General Development Plan (A-403).
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Chairman Davenport that
the minutes of the January 18, 1978 Planning Commission meeting be approved as
amended.
MOTION; CARRIED (4R-0-1) (Commissioner Barron
abstaitned)
Reports of Officers, Boards. and Commissions
The Planning Commission indicated their desires to schedule several work meetings
in the near future to consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to deal with
senior citizen housing and to set design criteria to aide Staff and developers
PLANNI 1G COMMISSION 'MINUTES -1.3-- February 1, 1978
with transition areas in LA --1 guided RPUD circumstances.
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made. by Co:mniiss ones Threinen supported by Commissaoner
Savron#
Chairman Davenport adjourned the meeting at 12.1`5 a. -m,
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION February 22, 1978`
David J. Davenport, Chairman
Plymouth Planning Qmmission
Lt Q
Charles E. Di 11 eru Secretary