HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 01-18-1978PLANNING C011MIS5IOtr
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNOESOTA
January 18, 1978
A regular meet`ing of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order by Vice
Chairman Schneider at 7.-30 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Public Works
Building, 14900 -23rd Avenue North.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Davenport (arrived at 8:10 p.m.), Commissioners
Erickson, Schneider, Stewart, Thro-inen:, and Vasil'ou
STAFF PRESENT: Charles Dillerud and Kate Marx
T-778 Marvin H. Anderson Construction RPUD 77-6 Concept Plan
Revised
Staff presented the revised Concept Plan of ."Zachary Hills" as proposed by petitioner
for Commission review. Unit count had been dimi'shed to 253 units as per Commission
direction and had been distributed amcngst the unit types as follows: 110 townhouse
units, III single family detached units and 32 duplex units (16 structures). Staff
made recommendations regarding the revised Concept Plan per the Staff report of
January 13, 1978.
Commissioner Threinen questioned petitioner as to staging of the project. Fred Haas,,
representing Marvin H. Anderson Construction, stated that their intent was to start
both the single family and townhouse units at the same time, beginning at the north
portion of the project and progressing south.
Donald Volness, 4915 Yorktown Lane, questioned how high 'the townhouse units would be.
1a '- in. Grant, President .of Marvin H. Anderson Construction, stated that the units
were o' twotypes ---one split entry was approximately 12 feet in height white the split
lever townhome Was approximately 16 feet in height.
Richard Graber, 483E Yorktown Lane, stated he was concerned that traffic from this
area wnuT`d become a problem once the project became inhabited. He stated that he
felt access to County Road g was already difficult witKout this added population and
no arternativ- routings out of the neighborhood. Staff explained that 49th Avenue
North was intended to be a thoroughfare street, eventually routing directly east to
County F.oad 18. This would aid to alleviate the traffic prpblems for the area.
Fred Haas stated that they had found that due to the type of people buying townhomes
that townhome projects created less traffic than single family neighborhoods also.
Mr. R. Glemming, 4900 Yorktown Lane, asked petiti ger to explain further why townhouse
projects created less traffic than single family neighborhoods. Mr. Haas stated
that the type of owner of the townhome units was generally one without children, either
older couples Whose children were all grown or single individuals °or couples without
children. This proved to mean less traffic in the neighborhoods because teenagers
were not using cars in the neighborhood, and in general the population per unit is
less than that for single famiry residential neighborhoods. Staff added that
national averages indicated that ten trips per day were made from single family
PLA14NING C:CWIr-15ION MEETING MINUTES --2- January 18; 1978
9
residences wheras 5-7 trips per day were made from townhouse units,
James Fitgerald, 5000 Zachary Lane, stated that he felt the area should remian
single amt y and that the townhouses should not be allowed, fie stated that the City
plans indicated that it had always been for single family use and that he had relied
upon these plans when deciding to build his home in the area. Mr. Fitzgerald added
that many of .his neighbors felt the same way, that single family and lOwnhouse
units should not b mixed. They did not want the townhouses next to them .any more
than the peopole on the north end of the prniect wanted the townhouses next to them
as was proposed at first by Marvin H. Andersen.
Mr. Fitzgerald .also point d out that he fejt, the naming of tete thoroughfare street
as It Avenue North" would be confusing in that 49th Avenue North was not completely
straight. There would be addresses south of 49th Avenue North o« 50th Avenue
North which would cause confusion to anyone trying to find ;an address.
Artbur Popehn, 4935 Yorktown Lane, asked what the difference was between single
amity and townhouse units in generat`ng revenue for the City. Staff indicated that
the difference was not measurable particularly when considered withthetact that
the townhouse projects provide for themselves some of the services that the City would
otherwise provide; for example, snowplowing, interior park type amenities, etc.
Mr. Popehn asked if petitioners felt the building of the townhouses would make
Plymouth a "better place to live." Mr. Grant stated that by building a development
involving both townhouses and single family dwellings, that they were making an
investment in the community. They were planning to sell both types of units and
would not, themselves, be interested in bvilding either single family units or
townhouse units that would not ue attractWe or which would detract from the neighbor
hood surrounding them. Mr. Grant added that they are generally involved in a
neighborhood for at least six to ten years.:
Chairman Davenport asked petitioner what his reasons were for including the duplex units
with the single family resr'ential and townhouse units. Mr. Grant stated that their
intent was to provide an additional housing type. Chairman Davenport stated that he
did not feel this was necessarily an appropriate use in that duplexes automatically
included rental of at least one-half of the unit if not both sections. He stated
that he did not feel this would be in order in an area surrounded by owned units due
to the transient nature of the neighborhood that this would introduce. ter. Grant
stated that one of the places where this type of situation worked very well was in
the City of Edina.
Mr. R. Glemming asked if the towhouse streets were private.. Staff responded that they
were. ter. Glemming asked if this meant that police and fire protection were not
provided in that case or if they indeed had the right to enter the p-operty. Staff
responded that the police could respond to calls made for the area and use the
private streets of the townhouse property much as the driveways were used for public
streets.. However, they would not be patrolling on a regular basis.
Vice Chairman Schneider closed the public hearing at 8:50 p.m.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Vasilou that the
Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1) (Chairman Davenport abstained)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES January 18, 7978
Vice chairman Schneider turned the chair oarer to Chairman ;Davenport.
Commissioner Stewart stepped down for discussion of the following itom
A- aryey c 17e be- A-786 Revised Preliminary Plat
Staff presented the revised preliminary plat of petitioner indicating that the
following changes had been, made: 1) approximately five acres of the former Lot 1,
Block 1 had been designated Outlot A (the westerly most acreage) and petitioner had
submitted potential layout schemes yielding between six and ten single family detachedlotsforthisarea; 2; Lot 2, Block 2 had been redesigned per the Planning Commissiondirection; and 3) Forestview Lane had been redesigned so that the cul-de-sac stopped
well short of the parcel to the south, thereby appearing to landlock the parcel.
Staff pointed out that petitioner had proposed a private easement to allow access
between the property under, consideration and the parcel to the south.
Chairman Davenport questioned petitioner relative to Outlot A. He stated that per,
the Staff report, petitioner had indicated that he did not desire to plat the lots
for the single family development at this time, but that petitioners would accept
R-lA .zoning for Outlot A. Chairman Davenport asked Mr. Schiebe if this was indeed
true. Mr. Schiebe stated that he was not in a position to say at this time. He.
added, that he felt they were committing to more than they possibly could at this time
with respect to the planning of the balance of the land.
Mr. Albrecht, 4,545 North Shore Drive, one of the owners of the property, stated that
they did nod want to do anything with Outlot A at this time. Commissioner Threinen
questioned whether they would be willing to at least zone the property for single family
residential development for the protection of the neighborhood to the west and south
Mr. Albrecht stated that he felt there was protection for the residents in the Land
Use Guide Plan as adopted which had the area guided LA -1.
The Commission concurred that there would be no problem with development of the
cul-de-sac of Forestvi'ew Cane as proposed at this time as long as it was understood'
that at the time that tot 3 was developed, that the road would be put through and
that the -costs for the construction would be shared appropriately by both property on
the north and the owners of the property to the south. Petitioners stated that this
was understood.
Tony Norris, 1020 Kirkwood Lane, stated that he felt the property .;Could all regain
residential and none of it should become commercial or industrial. H:e added that
he did not feel this would be, acceptable.
Ri-.hard D. Brown, 1100 Kirkwood Lane, stated that he supported Mr. Norris's positionnMal., Hle commented that the City should not be looking to break up the residential
area with commercial development.
Joseph Friedman, 1010 Ives Lane, stated that he did not see how the proposal of the
Schiebes would benefit the City or the existing residential neighborhood, He added
that he was against anything but resi-dential being built on the property.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINV ES -4 January 18, 1978
Georgina Friedman, 1010 Ives :, stated that she did not feel any transition was
accomplished with the project 43 proposed,- She stated that she felt that would be
the least that should be done by the Schiebes
Al Hohbein, 1020 Ives Lane, stated that he objected strenuously to any business
development being introduced to the neighborhood. He commented that he felt the
only-obvious use for the property would residential.
Bernice Hohbein, 1020 Ives Lane, stated that she was strictly opposed to this type of
e5elopment,the :business development. She added that she did not fecl it would be
appropria,t to have a business development amongst the residential uses surrounding it.
Van Kardashian, 1.015 Ives Lane, stated that he felt it was apparent that the owners of
the property were nibbling away bit by bit at the property, adding a small bit
of business development here, arid, then extending it further and further until it would
encroach upon the residential neighborhood without the nieghborhood being able to
do anything about it.. He stated that he felt it would only be fair for the owners
of the property to show exactly what they intended to do with the property as a whole
so that the neighborhood could be guaranteed what they would be living with.
Commissioner Threinen stated that the neighborhood could petition a change in the Guide.
Plan if they wished; Staff explainedthe procedures for so doing.
Vali Kardashiart, 1015 Ives Lane, questioned how the Lane, Ose Guide Paan was developed.
The Commission explained the process to her.
James Ja odzinski, 1160 Heritage Lane, spoke in favor of the proposal as he did not9ppp
feel that 'Limited Business was a "bad" neighbor. It was rather a quiet use and a
good neighbor for residential,
Chairman Daversport closed the public hearing at 10:25 p.m.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Vasiliou, supported by Commissioner Threinen that the
Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting,
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-778 Marvin H. Anderson A-778 RPUD 77-6 Concept flan-Revised
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider, supported by Chairman Davenport that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Marvin H. Anderson Construction for Concept Plan approval ;of
revised RPUD 77=6 known as Zachary [fills located south of the Soo Line Tracks,
west of Zachary Lane and east of Schmidt Lake, proposed for 253 units and per plans
dated January 1978, be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Preliminary plat shall reflect trail corridors per the Trail System Plan.
2: Public street alignments shall be coordinated with those of Deerwood Meadows
plat to the south.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES _5w January 1:8, 1978
3. All street names shallcoincide with the City Street Naming System.
4 All lots adjoining the Soo nine Tracks shall be 18,.500 sq ft. minimumI
ncluding the 50 ft. trail corridor along the Soo Line Tracks within the
square footage.
a,. No duplex lots shall adjoin the Soo tine Tracks,
6. Redesign for elimination of the townhouse units,
Commissioner Schneider stated that he felt the townhouse units did not fit into the
surrounding;neighborhood and particularly that the transition proposed between the
existing neighborhood and the proposed townhouse units was not adequate for three
reasons,: 1) the site waslong and narrow, 2) treeless, and 3) the topography did
not 'lend itself to townhouses. Commissioner Schneider pointed out that with the project
developed as proposed, there would be ;more multiple units on this LA -1 guided site,
at several spot locations, than there woul-1 be single family units. With respect to the
elimination of the duplex units along the;)o Line Tracks, Commissioner Schneider
stated that there was also a lack of transition in this area as the land to the north
was at a higher elevation than the proposed location of the duplex units..
Commissioner Threinen stated that he disagreed with the proposed condition to eliminate
the townhouse units; he added that he felt the transition was well done on most of the
site with the possible exception of the .northeast cornier of the townhouse units where
additional landscaping and the shifting of the units would accomplish a more complete
transition, Commissioner Threinen asked petitioners if it would be possible to include
cross-section drawings of the property on the east of the project to show how the berming
and landscaping would ;buffer the residents to the east from the townhouse project. Mr.
Grant stated that these would be proesented with the preliminary pkat. Commissioner
Threinen stated that it would be preferred that the landscaping do as much as possible
to "hide" the units from the existing residents to the east, not just screen them. The
Commission concurred. Petitioners indicated that they understood the request.
With respect to the duplex units, Chairman Davenport stated that he felt the units
should be eliminated altogether from the site due to the transient resident this would
introduce into an owner -occupant neighborhood. He added that he felt the location of
the duplex units along the Soo Line Tracks would' be inappropriate due to the exposure
of many moire units to the trains crossing the tracks during any day..
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Chairman Davenport, supproted by Commissioner Schneider to
change condition #5 to read: "Duplex units be eliminated and replaced with single family
dwellings."
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (4-2-0) (Commissioners Stewart and Threinen against)
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Erickson, supported by Commissioner Th`einer
to change condition #.6 to read:: "The number of townhouse units be reduced to 100 and
buffer along Zachary Lane: be increased to completely screen townhouse units from the
existing residents on the east side of Zachary Lane. In addition, preliminary plat shall
reflect a street plan that precludes direct westerly access from the townhouse complex
to Schmidt Lake Woods to the west.
air}
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINOTES- -6- January 18, 1978
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (Commissioner Schneider
against)
The Commission again pointed out to petitioner that the landscaping should be
adequate to '"hide," not only screen the townhouse units from the property to the
east. The buffer was expected to be more than a "space" transition, it was expected
to increase the elevation of the property via berming or whatever means would be
necessary to "hide" the units.
The Commission then voted on the main motion as twice amended,
MOTION CARRIED (5-l`0.1 (Commissioner Schneider
against)
Commissioner Stewart stepped down for discussion on this item
A-786 Harvey Schi ebe -786 Preliminary Plat
MOTION TO DEFER was made by Commissioner Threinen suppported by Commissioner Erickson
further consideration of the petition of Harvey Schiebe for preliminary plat and
rezoning of property located south of Highway 55 at Fcrestyiew Lane until such
time as a public hearing could be held on the Land Use Gulde Plan designation for
the area which would include a clear delineation of the transition area intended
bo'tween the LA -1 area and the CL area.
Commissioner Threinen stated that he fsi= this action would give the existing
residential neighborhood a concrete idea as to how the property would be developed.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by `Chairman Davenport
to defer action on the proposed preliminary plat of Harvey Schiebe for preliminary
plat and rezoning of property located soNth of Highway 55 at 1=orestview Lane until.
such time as a General Development Plan could be presented to the City for all lands
west of Forestview Lane,
Commissioner Erickson stated that the development plan should identify the R-lA
area and the usage of the space within Lot 1, Block 1`of the project.. Petitioner
stated that he understood..
The Commission then voted on the substitute motion to defer.
SUBSTITUTE POTION TO DEFEP CARRIED (4-0--1) (Commissioner Vasilou abstained)
ATS$` 'resa ent l partments r, -Leonard '.A-148 Revised Site Plan
Staff presented the revised site plan of petitioner for an apartment building to
be located on the east side of South Shore Drive at ll=th Avenue North (extended:).
It was pointed out that the following changes had been made based on Planning
Commission direction at the meeting of November 16, 1977: 1) structure elevations
had been altered to allow access ramps to the underground parking to ;be at a 5% gr:Ade
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -7- January 18, 1978
or less; 2) landscape plan .had been properly fabled; 3) the driveway circulation
plan had been altered to eliminate private drives within the Sa nth Shore Drive right-
of-way—two one-way and one two-way curb cuts had been substituted; and 4) off-street
at -grade parking had been shown. Staff made recommendations regarding the revised pro-
posal of petitioner per the Staff report of January 13, 1978.
Commissioner Erickson stated that he felt it would be more appropriate for the
driveways to intersect South Shore Drive at right angles.
Bob Scribner, representing AMLAC homeowners` association stated that, on behalf of
the association, that he would urge the City to upgrade South Shore Drive as soon
as possible as well as 10th Avenue North to a'Jleviate the traffic problems in this area.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Erickson that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of President Apartments/Dr. Leonard for site plan approval of
the revised proposal for an apartment complex to be located on the east side of
South Shore Drive at llth Avenue North (extended)., per plans dated January 4, 19/8,
be approvedsubject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum.,
2. Removal of all diseased elm trees,
1, Removal of all -existing structure:', or the site.
4, Design of project grades to accommodate: gravity.sewer service exclusively,
5. Payment of cash fees -in -lieu Park Dedication fee of $7,200.
6. Dedication of right-of-way by easement to -a total of 40 feet from centerline of
South Store Drip(,. ,
7. Compliance with tiie requirements of Bassetts Creek Watershed 'Comiri ssi on,
Provision to the City of performance security per Zoning Ordinance requirements
to cover both. at -grade and underground site improvements.
9. Outdoor storage of waste and waste containers shall be prohibited and reference
thereto on the site plain is hereby deleted.
10, Green .Asn trees indicated on the site plan shall be of at Jeast.2 1/2" ealipher.
11. Twenty additional Green Ash trees shall be planted within the boulevard frontage
of the site.
12. All ste areas disturbed during construction shall be sodded up to the edge of
the existing South Shore Drive pavement. '
1.3. Driveways intersecting South Share: Drive shall do so at right angles.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETW- WNUTES -8- January 18, 1978
0
AND FURTHER, that all above conditions shall be accomplished, all fees paid, a
building permit issued and structural work, commenced by June 1, 1978 or this action
shall become null and void,
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-0) (All in favor)
A-798 James 8_8 Site Plan and 'Gonditional
Use Permit
Staff presented petitioner's request for site plan and conditional use permit approval
of a structure proposed to be located at the southeast corner of Highway 55 South
Service Drive and Forestvi,,wLane. The proposed use was as a multi -tenant office
building of 38,820 square feet. Staff made recommendations regarding the site plan
per the Staff report of January 13, 1978.
Commissioner Threinen questioned petitioner as to the ultimate height of the
structure. Mr. Jagodzinski stated tinat the height of the building, including the
exterior facing, would be about 14 feet.
Commissioner Erickson stated that the truck docking facilities provided were in
excess of what would be necessary for a B-1 district, He added that he would prefer
to see the truck docks limited to one and the remainder of the area redesigned for
parking purposes.
Mrs. Kardashian, 1015 Ives Lane asked if this was not an assembly operation. Mr.
Jagodzinski stated that sR-1cial orders of many types of the items they sold would
be on hand and may require assembly depending on what special features were ordered.
Petitioner pointed out that the sales staff he employed did their own assembly;
no additional personnel were needed for this work.
Mrs. Friedman, 1010 Ives Lane, asked if there would be warehousing taking place in
the building. Petitioner responded that there would be storage of the component
ports but that the main use was by no means warehousing. He added that approximately
30-40% of the structure would be allocated toward storage use of the components
while the remainder of the building would be for office, showroom and conference uses.
Mr. Hohbein, 1020 Ives Lane, stated that hedidnot want any business use in his back
yard, no matter how passive it would be.
Commissioner Erickson questioned whether the use proposed would be more appropriate
in an industrial district,
Commissioner Vastlou questioned petitioner as to whether he needed all the truck
docks shown on the site plan, Petitioner stated that only one would be necessary,
Mrs, Kardashian, 1015 Ives Lane stated that the petitioner could make no guarantees
to theaneighborhood as to what uses would be allowedin the structure along with his.
She stated that she felt these uses should be determined so the neighborhood would
know what they were facing.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -9- January 18, 1978
MOTION! was; made by Commissioner Stewart supported by Commissioner Vasi l ou that
the.Pl anning Commission make the following recommendation 'to the City Council:
That the request of James Jagodzinski for site plan approval of a multi --tenant
office structure of 38,820 square feet proposed to be located at the southeast
corner of Highway 55 South Service Drive and Forestview Lane be approved subject
to the following conditions:
1. Approvaland execution of the final plat and development contract for at least
Lot 1, Block 2, Schiebe's Business Park including all public improvements to
Forestview Lane.
2. Outside storage of waste and waste containers shall be prohibited.
3. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum regarding`
this project.:
4. Payment ;of Park Dedication fees-in-liew of $1,630:
5 Any occupancies shall be consistent with uses allowed in the B-1 District.
6. Building be limited to one service dock only and that the parking area
be redesigned to serve as parking.
iMOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner
Stewart that the following condition be added to the main motion: "That the
landscape plan be altered to include 10 trees on the west property line, half
deciduous (sugar maple) and half coniferous,"
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (6-0-0) (All in favor)
The Commission there voted on the train motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (4-2'-0) (CHairman Davenport and
Commissioner Schneider against)
Chairman Davenport and Commissioner Schneider stated they were against as they did not
feel the use was appropriate for a B-1 zoning district.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Stewart that the
P1 arming Commission °make; the following recommendation to the City Council
Thai, the request of James Jagodzinski for a conditional use permit to operate his
business proposed to be located at thb southeast corner of Highway 55 .South Service
Drive and Forestview Lane be granted as an office use with merchandising services.
MOTION CARRIED (4-2-0) (Chairman .Davenport and
Commissioner Schneider against)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -10- January 18, 1978
A-781 Vantage Companies+A-781 Amended Site Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for an amended site plan for officelwarehotise.
structures proposed o be located at the southwest corner of Water Tower Circle and
Xenium Lane. Adjustments were made to the revised plan per Planning Commission direction
with respect to both location and number of parking spaces, The site plan had been
shifted westerly, parking introduced on the Xenium Lane side, and a total of 169 parking
spaces shown. Staff made recommendation regarding the plan as amended per the Staff
report of January 13, 1978,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Erickson that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of Vantage Companies for site plan approval of office/warehouse
structures proposed to be located at the southwest corner of Water Tower Circle
and Xenium Lane, per plans dated January 10, 1978, be approved subject to the fol-
lowing conditions
1. Compliance with provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum on this project.
2. provision of site plan performance security per Zoning Ordinance standards
for a period of 18 mouths.
3. Payment of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of $2,450,
4. Outdoor storage of waste and ..ste containers shall be prohibited.
5. Parking on the east side of the property shall be constructed on an "as
needed" basis to be determined by tYle City of Plymouth.
FURTHER, that a variance be granted from Council Policy Resolution #75-206 to allow
169 parking spaces instead of the 213 spaces required.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION 'CARRIED
T-_403 Rauenhorst Corporation A-403 Amended General Development
Plan and Pn_I'iminary Plat
Staff presented the revised General Development Plan and preliminary plat of petitioner
for the Circle Star Business Center 3rd Addition located at the southwest corner of
Fernhrook Lane and Highway 55
Along with the General Deve:.inmrnt Plan and in support of it, the petitioner presented
a traffic study indicating the iiiapact of the uses V;•oposed upon the roadways in the
area.. hick Wolsfeld,, of 'Bather, Ringrose and Wolsfeld, representing petitioner,
explained the traffic study in detail, assuring the Commission thit the worst possible
conditions were taking into consideration when reviewing the traffic on Fernbrook Lane
and Highway 55 intersection.
M.011ON was madeby Commissioner Threinena supported by Commi si o'ner Vasiliou than the
Planning Commission make the folloiwng recommendation to the City Council-
PLA.#MING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -11- January 18, 1978
That the request of Rauenhorst Corporation for an amended preliminary plat for
Circle: Star Business Center 3rd Addition, located at the southwest corner of Highway
55 .and Fernbrook Lane per plans dated January 13, 1978, be approved subject to the
following conditions.
1, Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum, particularly
with ;respect to a future median cut and turn lanes in Fernbrook Lane.
2. Specific and recordable quit claim by petitioner for any and all access rights
on all Highway 55 frontage,
MOTION CARRIED (6-0.0) (All in favor)
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commission4r Stewart that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Rauen4orv4 Corporation for an amen ed General Deveyopment Plan
for Circle Star Business Center 3rd Addition, located at the southwest corner of
Highway 55 ao Fernbrook Lane per plans dated January la, 1978, be appy owed subject
to the f611dwing conditions;
1. No imp3ied or specific approvals are hereby granted with respect to any required
conditional use permits or quantitative site characteristics per the zoning
Ordinance.
2,. Thia one-way :ori vate curb chit serving Lot 2 shall be deleted.
MU"M*i "ARMED 6-0-0) (All infavor)
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
MOTION Was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Comimissione,r Erickson that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council.;
That the name of "49th Avenue North" be changed between County Road 18 and the:
west ,border of the City to alleviate the address assignment problem and confLision
caused by its meandered route through the City,
MOTION CARRIED (6-0.0) (All in favor)
Joint Meeting With City Council
The Covaission discussed their upcoming meeting with the City Council to be hel d
tJanuary 26, 1978, It was the consensus of the Commission that the following items
l would be of importance for discussion with the Council at that meeting: 1) adoption
of Ordinance provisions for senior citizen housing; 2) study and adoption of an
Industrtal Planned Unit Development, 3) potential need for and adoption of a
Conservancy District ord..inance; and 4) explanation for the final zoning class ficatron
PLANNING COMMUS1014 ME47ING MMUTES January 18, 1978
assigned V,) various parcels within the City which varied from the Land Use Guide Plan.
MOTION TO ADJOURN was trade by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner
Vasilou. Chairman venport adjourned the meeting at 2,00 am,
At PROVED BY PLANNING COMMIS' l' & February 1, 1978
David J. Dave port, Chairman
Plymouth Planning Commission
r
C r es. Dill er ecretay