HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 11-16-1977PLANNING .COMMISSION'
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
November 15, 1977
A regular meeting of'the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Davenport at 7:80 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Public Works Building,
149QO--23rd Avenue North.
MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Davenport, Commissioners Erickson, Hoyt, Schneider and
Threinen
MEMBERS ABSENT: CommissIoner Stewart
STAFF PRESENT: Charles E. Dillerud and irate Marx
I
A-705 Clifford Otten A-705 Preliminary Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for preliminary plat approval of "Cedar View
Estates," a residential plat proposed for development of ;nine single family dwelling
lots located at the southeast corner of Ranchview Lane and County Road 15. The
technical. problems with the plat, i.e. lot size variances and access considerations
were pointed out by Staff.
commissioner Threinen stated that the exception lot owned by Mr. Reber would potentially
require access to the rear portion of the lot for a future lot division action. He
questioned whether the proposed street alignment would prohibit such access thereby
landlocking the rear portion of the lot owned by Mr. Weber. Staff stated that a "half"
right=of-way existed for Ranchview Lane south of County Road 15 to the City limits.
At such time as Mr. Weber would. consider divisio:i of the property, it would be possible
to access the lot from the Ranchview Lane..: right-of-way, which may be required to be
improved at that time.
Mr. Otten stated that the reason he did not access Lot 7 to the c.:l-de-sac was that
thelof would have required variances to do so. The Commission asked Mr. Oaten why
his street: had been changed from the concept he had shown the Commission during their
consideration of a previous lot division. Mr. Otten stated this was done to take
advantage of the shortestrouting for the storm drainage pipe in place to the north.
There were no comments or questions from members of the audience regarding the plat..
Chairman Davenport closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Corrnissioner Erickson that
the Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MINUTES -2- November 16,'1977
A-774 Loscheider Construction,_, Inc.. ;A-774 Preliminary Plat
Staff presented petitioner's. request for preliminary plat approval of "Ridgecrest
Addition" and a conditional use permit for a Subdivision Unit Project for 45 single
family residential dwelling lots to be located in the northeast quadrant of Quaker
Lane and 29th avenue North. A recommendation for approval was proposed by Staff
subject to the: conditions as listed in the Staff report of November 9, 1977.
Commissioner Threinen asked how the improvements to Orleans Lane to the south would
be handled, if the entire burden for payment of the assessments would be for the
owners of lots in Block 4 of the proposed development. Staff explained that it was
petitioner's intention to petition the City for a Public Improvements project for
this area in which case the assessments would be spread amongst all parties receiving
benefit from the improvements.
The Commission discussed the possibility of a temporary turn -:around for the east end
of 29th Avenue North until such time as the roadway would be continued and not be a
dead. end. Staff stated that it may be necessary in that case to prohibit building
upon the lots concerned until such time as the turn -around would no longer be necessary.
Alan Stensrud 3051 Quaker Lane, stated he was not in Tavor of the proposed develop
anent as currently planned. He indicated that his property, at the northwest corner of
the proposed plat, would be •Facing the back yards of several homes as the project
was currently proposed:
Commissioner Threinen pointed out to Fir, Stensrud that the Planning Commission had
required the developers of the Timber Creek plat to route Pilgrim Lane to miss his
property per his request at that time.
Chairman davenport suggested that a joint platting of the two properties maybe the
best solution for the problem presented by Mr. Stensrud He added that Mr. Stensrud
would not have to build at this time, however,
Ooe Marciniak, 2805 Quaker Lanes indicated that the improvement of Quaker Lane would
Na difficult task in that the geography of the land and the traffic already in
the area would create problems. Staff pointed out that the widening of Quaker Lane
would not be to create a thoroughfare street, but merely to bring the street to
City standards of 32 ft.. wide face-to-face with concrete curb and gutter. Mr.
Marciniak suggested that a realignment of the streets of the plat be given consideration
in order to minimize the impact upon: Quaker Lane. He also pointed out that the widen-
ing of Quaker Lane would eliminate much of the landscaping currently on his lot as
well as place the front of his home much closer to the roadway than it is currently.
Margaret Hanson, 8232 -30th Avenue North, questioned whether this plat would provide
access to her proporty to the east of the proposed plat. It was determined that the
Hanson property would, receive direct access from 29th Avenue North.
PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING MINUTES -3- November 16, 1,977
Mrs. Carol Peterson, 10135 -29th Avenue North, questioned whether the existing residencesintheareawouI "e subject to improvement assessment for street, sewer and water
because of this plat. Staff explained the assessment process to Mrs. Hanson. It
was pointed out that this area would receive street improvements in the future-, regard --
less of the development of this property.
Claes Svensson, 2935 Quaker Lane, stated concern for the water level in the area.
He expl ai ed that the previous levels had been very high and indicated tl,atle felt
development of the property to the northeast would drastically affect this 6.uation..
Staff pointed bat that the Engineer's memorandum dealt with this matter and indicated:
how the probinm of the water would be dealt with to avoid inundation of the 'lands
to the west, Mr. Hill, representing Mr. Loscheider; indicated that the property also`
received drainage from the north and east of the plat boundaries.
IChairman Davenport closed the public hearing at 8;50 p.m.
i MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Threnen that the
Planning Commission take action on this item at this meeting,
MOTION CARRIED (5--0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
7b Cliffor Otten 7703 Preliminary Plat
MOTION wa` made L*;, rntys ssioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Threinen that the
Planning 14uilssion make the following recommendation to the City Council:
TWt.. the request of Clifford Otten for preliminary ,plat approval of "Cedar
View Estates", a plat proposed for residential single family development of
nine lots, located at the southeast corner of Ranchview Lane and County Road 15
be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Final plat shall reflect redesign to preclude direct driveway access to
County Road 15
2. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum.
3._ Park Dedication :shall be fees -in -lieu not to exceed $150 per lot.
46 No specific dimensional variances are hereby approved,
5. Street name shall be "Quantico Lane."
MOTION TO AMEND was madebyCommissioner Threineli supported by Commissioner Schneider
th4t.#1 be changed to read- "Final 'plat shall reflect redesign to dirfect access of all
lots onto Quan.tico Lane with no area variances allowed fcr lot sizes." Further, that
4 ea, tinge to read:" -No specific dimensional variances are hereby approved except
as b 1#1 above.
PLANNING CW1S,$ION MEETING MINUTES -4 november 16, 1977
Commissioner Threinen explained that his intention was that the minimum lot size
remain at 18,50'0 sq. ft., and, that should this necessitate frontage variances for width
at structure, setback, the plat shall still be acceptable,
MOTION TO .AMEND CARRIED (5--0-0) (A11 in favor) MOTION. TO AMEND CARRIED
MOTION TO DEFER was ,made by Commissioner Threinen supporter' by Commissioner Schneider
any further consideration of the Otten plat, "Cedar !View Estates," until such. time
as the Plann,ig Commission could review the redesigned plat per their direction=
MOTION TO DEFLR CARRIED (S_O-O) (All in, favor) MOTION TO DEFER CARRIED
A-774 Loscheider Constrt'ction A-774 Preliminary Plat
MOTION TO DEFER was made by Commissioner T.h.,eeinen supported by Commissioner Erickson
further consideration of the Loscheider Construction proposed, plat of "Ridgecrest
Addition" and conditional use permit for a Subdivision Unit Project for 45 single
family dwelling lots located in the northeast quadrant of 29th Avenue North and Quake
Lane:, to allow petitioner to accomplish the following.
I. Meeting with Mr. Alan Stensrud, property owner immediately to the northwest
of the proposal to jointly plan the area in order to obtain the best lotting
and access situations for loth parties.
2. More thorough indication of ponding and design of Lot 11, Block 3, and Lot 1,
Block 4 to be in conformance with the requirements of the City Engineer's memo-
randum, item #6.
3. Design of the cul-de-sac at the east end of 29th Avenue North per the Engi'aeer's
wemoY andum.
4 Indication of where ponding will take place for the project.:
5. Consideration of the Staff-recotanen,ded conditions per the Staff report of Novem-
C
MOTION TO DEFER CARRIED (5-0-0) 011 in favor) MOTION TO DEFER CARRIED
Chairman Davenport declared a five-minute recess at 9:15 p.m. the meeting was recon-
vened at 9:20 p.m.,
A-148 President Apartments & Dr. Leonard A-148 Site Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for site plan approval ''of a 48 -unit multiple
residential structure to be located on the east side of South Shore Drive at 11th
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -5 November 16, 1977
Avenue. North (extended). Recorrmendations regarding the proposal were made by
Staff per the Staff report of November 10, 1977. Of.major importance, Staff pointed
out that the proposed curb cut and interior circulation plan did not appear to be
in the best public interest considering the collector status of South Shore Drive.
It was suggested that the curb cuts should be reduced to 25 ft. in width and the
intersections of driveways with South Shore Drive should be at right angles.
Commissioner Threinen questioned whether the entire project would have to be set back,
to the east, to accommodate the design changes suggested. Staff indicated that this
may not be necessary.
l Chairman Davenport asked petitioner if it was his intent to meet the current Zoning
Ordinance requirements and deadline prior to change in the zoning snap. Petitioner,
Dr. Leonard, indicated that this was his intent as well as wishing to begin the project
t in Spring.
It was made evident to the petitioner that at such time as the June 1, 1978 deadline
for initiation of the project had been reached and the project had not been initiated,
I that the new ordinance and map would become in full force and effect and make null'
and void any previous plans for tno property.Petitioner indicated that he understood
this provision.
Commissioner Erickson stated he was concerned with the grades of the property in
terms of access to the garage units.
CommISsioner Threinen questioned the feasibility of placing the off-street visitor
parking at the rear of the building from an engineering point of view.. Staff stated
that this would have to be reviewed' by the City Engineer, but that it would likely be
possible:
David 8uzelle 10222 South Shore Drive, stated concern for the additional traffic
such a development would have on South Shore Drive, He stated that he felt the
traffic problems on South Shore Drive were already too great and could not withstand
the additional traffic. Mr. Buzzelle asked the Commission to consider this problem..
Bob Scribner, 2015 Lancaster Jane, President of AMLAC, the neighborhood homeowners'
association, also expressed concern for the South Shore Drive problem on behalf` of
the Association, He stated that the City had promised that 10th Avenue North would
be a solution to the problem once it was built; however, it has not been built nor
did it appear as though it would be built in the near future. He stated that the
traffic problems of the South Shore Drive area placed a terrific burden on the bomes
in the area.
MOTION TO DEFER was made by Commissioner Thre nen supported by Commissioner Schneider
any further consideration of the President Apartments/Dr. Leonard request for site
plan approval of a 46 -unit multiple residential structure proposed to be located on
the east side of South Shore Drive at 11th Avenue North (extended) per plans Staff
dated November 10, 1977 to allow petitioner to accomplish the following
1. Redesign of access to South Shore Drive to avoid driveways within the City
easement
PLANNING 'COP1MISSION' MEETING MINUTES -6- November 16, 1977
Z; A detailed landscape plan to be provided to the City for review by the Planning
Commission and City Council._
3. Consideration ;of the Staff -recommended conditions per the Staff report of Novem-
ber 10, 1977..
hO=N TO DEFER CARRIED (5-0-0) (:All in favor) MOTION TO DEFER CARRIED
MOTION was made by Commissioner Tbreinen supported by Chairman Davenport that the
Planning Con;mission make the following recomr endation to the City Council:
That the City reassess the Capital improvements Program to possibly include
improvement of South Shore Drive south of the railroad tracks from Highway 55.
Commissioner Threinen stated that his intent in making the motion was to point out
to the Council that development of the area around South Shore Drive is currently
taking place and will continue to take place regardless of the building,of 10th
Avenue North.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTIONCARRIED
Commissioner Hoyt asked if it would not be possible to look at alternative methods
of control of the area: for a short-term period unti` suci, time as 10th Avenue
North would be built, i.e. stop signs, etc.
A-775 Street Vacation A-775
At the request of the, City Council, the Commission was asked to review the request
for vacation of Lancaster Lane between 8th and 10th Avenues North, The vacation of
the street was petitioned by all the adjoining property owenrs to Lancaster tune at
that location. Staff pointed out that the area was currently in transition from
earlier residential platting and street design to the more recent Planned Industrial
Guid;i.ng and I-1. zoning.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Threnen that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the requested vacation of Lancaster Lane between 8th and 10th Avenues
North, per tine request of the adjacent property owners to Lancaster Lane at
that location, be approved as petitioned.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All ian favor) MOTION CARRIED
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ..,7- November 16, 1977
A-513 A11 -State Internationa3, Inc. A-515 Conditional Use Permit
Staff presented petitioner's request for a conditional use permit to operate a small
appliance sales and service store at County Road 18 Service Road north of 34th Avenue
North (old Kawasaki Sales Building) A recommendation of approva'i was proposed by
Staff subject to the conditions as "listed in the Staff report of November 10, 1977.
Comissioner Schneider asked petitioner, Ron Christianson, to explain the nature of
his business to the 'Commission. Mr. Christianson explained the operation to the
Commission.
Commissioner Erickson asked what percentage of the building would be used for retail
sales. Mr. Christianson stated that it wouldbe approximately 5OZ.
Commissioner Schneider asked how many employees would be operating from the site.
Mr. Christianson stated that 12 persons, including the sales staff, would be operating
from the site
Commissioner Hoyt asked how many of the 12 would be in the building on a regular
basis during business hours. Mr. Christianson responded that four employees would
be in the building during business hours.
Commissioner Hoyt asked what small appliances would be sold from the site. Mr.
Christianson stated that the operation would be expanding from vacuum cleaners and
small televisions to microwaves, food processors, blenders, etc,
The Commission discussed with Mr. Christianson the problem with the trafficking of
semi -trucks in the area. Mr. Christianson stated that he did not feel tris t,ould be
an obstacle, that they had worked out a way in which the semi-truc;s could make
deliveries without interfering with the operation.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Threinen that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of All -State International, Ino. for a conditional use permit
to operate a small appliance sales and services business to be located on. County
Road 18 Service Road north of 34th Avenue North at 3405 County Road 19 be approved
s„x, to the following conditions;
1. Signs shat', be limited to the type, size and location now existing on the
site
2. Outside storage of inventory, waste or, waste containers shall be prohibited,
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIER
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. -8- November 16 1,977
A-746 Metroquip_ George A. Jacksoaj746 Lot Division
Staff-Mented petitioner's request for lot division of unplatted property located
on the east side of F"ernbrook Lane at 23rd Avenue North. It was pointed out that this
divisionwas ane of the conditions of Resolution #77-345, a site plan for Metroqu'ip
to occupy one of the proposed parcels. A recommendation for approval was proposed
by Staff r:xbjec:t to the conditions as listed in the Staff report of November 9 1977.
MOTION was tirade byCommissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Hoyt that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to; the City Council:
That the request of George A. Jackson (Metroquip) for lot division of unplatted
property located on the east side of Fernbrook Lane at 23rd Avenue North,
Plat 43727, Parcel 3500, per plans dated November 2 1977, be approved subject
to the following conditions.
1. Written easement for 7 ft. additional right-of-way (to a total of 40 ft;
from centerline) along the entire Fernbrook Lane frontage of Parcels A
and B.
2. Written easement for street and ut liiy purposes over the southerly 30 ft.`
of Parcel B.
MOT!o)a CARRIED (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-773 Vantage Companies A-773 Site Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for site plan and conditional use permit approvals
for an office/warehouse rental project consisting of four structures to be rented
as officte/warehouse uses and one structure to operate as a rental office on .a 12-acre
sit}' located between Berkshire Lane,, Industrial Park Boulevard and Annapolis Lane.
Staff pointed out that the major concern with the project was the requested variance
to the requirednumber of parking spaces per Council policy Resolution #75-r06.
Mr. Tom Loftus, Vantage Companies, explained that the historic experience of Vantage
indicated that the parking needs for such a project were much less than the require-
ments imposed by Council policy Resolution #75-206.
Commissioner Hoyt asked petitioner how the staging of the project was planned. Mr.
Loftus indicated that the project would be completed all at once.
The 'Commission discussed the project in terms of policy Resolution 7#75-206 in detail
with Mr. ;Loftus.
MOTION was made by Cotnnissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Erickson, that the
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Wig- November 16 1977
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That, the request of Vantage Companies for a conditional use permit and site
plan approval of West Park 11, an office/warerouse rental project consisting of
four structures to be rented as office/warehouse arses and one structure to operate
as a rental office on a 12 -acne site located between Berkshire Lane, Industrial
Park Boulevard and Annapolis Lane, per plans dated September 6, 1977, be approved
subject the following conditions:
I. 'Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer's memorandum,.
2. Outside storage of waste and waste oortainers shall be prohibited,.
3. Copy size of the two "Project Signs" not , shall be limited; to 1,000 sq. ft.
per sign (approximately 16 ft,. X 28 ft.,
4. Payment of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of $6,280.
5. The siztj of the aggregate buildings be diminished by an amount appropriate
to bring the site in conformance with Council policy Resolution #75-206..
It was the unanimous opinion of the Commission that the recommendation to reduce
building size was to bring the project into compliance with Coulficil policy Resolution
75-206 and Section 17, Subdivision 2 of the City of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, which,
in the Commission opinion does not permit the granting of a variance to off --street
parking per petitioner's request. However, if the Council can, justify the granting of
a variance to permit the site as proposed by petitioner with 419 parking spaces; the
Commission would not be opposed to the granting of such a variance.
MOTION CARRIED' (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-186 Brauer & Associates Chowen Investment).A-186 Site Plan
Staff presented petitioner's request for site plan approval of an apartment complex
proposed to be located at the tip of the little peninsula of Medicine Lake and at
109 units, Staff pointed out several items of concern including: 1) Of the 12.11
acres petitioner indicated to be the site for the project, five acres consisted of
that segment in the center of the peninsula that was, in 1969, reserved for "public
use That reservation was rescinded by the City Council in 1975 involving the project
on the south end of the peninsula so that the five acres would be included with the
southerly project. Staff submitted that the five -acre parcel was not a part of this
project; 2) The site guiding current was LA -2 with pending proposals to rezone to
R-3 per recent Planning Commission recommendations to the Council concerning the
Zoning Map (August 24, 1977). The entire site, including the five acres noted above
was currently zoned R-4. Staff made recommendations .regarding the project subject to
conditions as listed in the Staff report of November 10, 1977
Commissioner Threinen asked petitioner, Al Herman, whether during previous Council
PLANNING COM14ISSION_MEETING MINUTES _10- November 16, 1977
actions on the project, the five acres had been assumed for other than the southerly
portion of the project. Mr. Herman stated that they had not.
It was made evident to. the petitioner that at such time as the dune 1, 1978 deadline
for initiation of the project had been reached and the project had not been initiated,
that the new ordinance and map would become in full force and effect and make .null and
void any previous plans for the property. Petitioner indicated that he understood
the significance of this provision.
Commissioner Hoyt asked petitioner if it was his intention to rent or sell the units.
Mr. Herman responded that the units would be sold in the price range of $75-200,000.
Commissioner Erickson questioned whether the project was 'too close to the shore per
shorel'and regulations. Staff responded that the City had not yet adopted the Shoreland
Ordinance, that it would be acted upon by the city within the near future. Therefore,
no shoreland regulations were involved for the project at this time:
MOTION was made by Commissioenr Threinen supported by Commissioner Schneider that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council.-
That
ouncil.
That the request of Brauer and Associates (Chowen Investment) for site plan
approval of Sunrise Point, an apartment complex proposed to be located at the
tip of the little peninsula of Medicine Lake be approved at 109 units on 12.11'
acres or 91 units per acres based on the determination by petitioner and the City
as to the correct acreage availab"e for the Sunrise Point site and subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with the provisions of the City Engineer'smemorandum,
2. Compliance with the specifications of the Bassetts Creek Watershed Commission.
3. Completion of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet process
4. Off-street parking shall be consistent with Section 17, Subdivision 2, para-
graph 14c of the Zoning Ordinance,
Project sign shall be per specifications of Section 17, Subdivision 1, para-
graph l.0 at the County Road 1#154 access to the project.
6. Developer shall supply proof of perpetual easement for access to the project
site from County Road #154.
7. Medicine Lake access shall be governed by Condition #10 of Council Resolution
76-584.
8. Outdoor storage of weste and waste containers shall be prohibited.
9. Park Dedication shall be by fees -in -lieu of $150 per approved unit.
10. There shall be no outside storage of watercraft.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -1'1- Novemb-r 16, 1977_
I. No boat launching by motorized vehicles .shall be allowed on the site.
12. All private streets :tithin the project shall be 32 ft. in width and of 9 ton
capacity.
13. Provision to the City of performance security per Zoning Ordinance requirements
to cover both at -grade and undergrou,,d site improvements.
AND FURTHER, that all above conditions shall be accomplished, all fees paid, a building
permit issued and structural work commenced by June 1, 1978 or this action shall become
null and void
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Threinen
to e..!d a co7idi ti ora #14 to read as follows: "The landscape plan shall have specifica-
tions
pecifica-
tions as follows as 'to species size. deciduous trees shall be 2 2__" calipher, coni-
ferous trees shall be 6 ft. in height and ornamentaltrees shall be balled and burlapped."
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0KO) (All in favor) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
MOTION TO R*7',D was made by Chairman Davenport supported by Commissioner Threinen to
add a condition #15 to read as follows: "The site amenities as provided on the site
plan per the Environmental Assessment Worksheet be provided,"
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (5-0-0) (Ali in favor) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
The Cormnission then- voted on the main inotion a: twice amended.
MOTION CARRIED (4-1-0) (Commissioner Erickson against) MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Erickson stated he wasagainst as he felt it was inappropriate for the
buildings to be located so close to the shore of Medicine Lake
A-755 Lur, gren Bros. Construction, Inc. A-755 Preliminary Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for review of the preliminary alai for the
Wind Ridge on Bass Lake" (formerly "Cricket Hills") with respect to a request
received by petitioner from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources dealing
with construction of a dike across the, large marsh to create a fish rearing area and
sale of Lots 1-3, Block I to the DNR for a public boat access to Bass Lake. Peti-
tioner expressed reluctance to proceed with such an agreement without City approval
and asked fora recommendation from the Planning Commission and City Council.
The Commission discussed the matter in detail with petitioner.
It was represented by Commissioner Schneider that the concern of the homeowners' associa-
tions in the aria was that any agreement made between the City, DNR and Lundgren Bros.
PLANNINGCOMMISSION MEETING. MINUTES 12 November '16, 1977
be binding upon all 'parties involved.
Peter Pflaum, representing Lundgren Bros-., suggested an agreement with DNR wherein
they would sell Lots 1--3, Block 1 to DNR only if the City specifically approved of
a public access, at that location. A site plan for such access would thereby be
applied for by DNR, rather than .Lundgren Bross
MOTION was .made by Commissioner Threinen suprnorted by ;Commissioner Erickson that the
Planning Commission,make the following recommendation to the City Council
That Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. be allowed to proceed with their pre-
liminary plat for "Wind Ridge on Bass Labe" leaving the public access matter to
be decided by the City as a separate issue with Minnesota Department. of Natural
Resources as the "petitioner" on a. site plan for such access
MOTION CARRIED (4-0-1) (Chairman Davenport abstained) MO'T'ION CARRIED
A-766 Minneapolis Workhouse Property A-766 RPUD Concept Plan
Staff asked the Commission for direction as to specific areas for reduction of the
density of the project per their action of Octoberr 19, 1977..The Commission indicated
those areas to be reduced in general to arrive at the final density of 1,654 with
the bonus of 300 units in area #9 should low -moderate income housing be provided,
Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 24, 1977
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Erickson that the
minutes of the special meeting of the Planning Commission of August 24, 1977 be
approved as written,
MOTI,ON CARRIED` (5-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
NOTION TO ADOOORN was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Schneider.
Chairman Davenport adjourned the meeting at 1:455 a.m.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; MINUTES -13- November 16, 1977
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION QEember 12, 1977
David J. Davenport, Chairman
Plymouth Planning Commission
C artes E. Di1lerud, Secretary