HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 05-19-1976PLANNING COMMISSION'
CITYOF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
May 19, 1976'
A regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to -order by Chairman
Kroskin at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Public Works Building, 14900 -23rd
Avenue North.
MEMBERS PRESENT Chairman Kroskin:, Commissioners :Davenport, Erickson, Hagen,
Schneider, Stewart and Threinen
STAFF .PRESENT. Charles Cillerud, Milt Dake, Randy Thoreson and Kate Nara
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Vetter, YAAC RepresQntative; Gerry Neils, Council Representative
to the Planning Commissiot7
A-669 City of Pl mouth Stand i e Water Reservoir A-669 Conditional Use Permits
and Site Plan
Chairman Kroski n opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m,
Staff presented the request of the City of Plymouth for a conditional use pErml t ,:o
locate a standpipe water reservoir approximately at the northeast corner of County
Road 6 and Ferndale Road on the property of William F. Driscoll, a conditional use
permit for excessive height in an R-1 Zoning District and a site plan far the water
reservoir. The conditional use permit for the location of the standpipe water reser-
voir in an R-1 Zoning District was being petitioned responsive to Section 7, Subdivi-
sion 3, paragraph 2 while the excessive height conditionaluse permit request was
being petitioned responsive to Section 17, Subdivision 4, paragraph 1, c(2) of
the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance.
Staff reviewed the background of the Water Distribution Plan approved by the City
ouncil duly 24, 1972 and its correlation to the proposals before the Commission
for review at this time.
Staff also explained that the reason for the timing of the request was that there
are problems with water pressure and supply tin the southwest portion of the City
at this time, particularly with respect to fire safety.
Recent history of the proposal involved three City Council meetings at which the
matter was discussed, as well as background and study of any alternative sites,
alternative types of reservoirs and costsinvolved for each.
It was also stated by Staff that any alternative site would be inconsistent with the
resent Cit ' dpyGuidePGolapsanMould; therefore:, require a guide plan change..
James G. Willis, City Manager for the City of Plymouth, representing the City as
petitioner, stated that, most impor'antly, -the location and construction of the
standpipe water reservoir at this location would be an orderly and timely response
to the Comprehensive Plans of the City. Also, in terms of economies, effeciencies
VTNG COMMISSION KETING MINUTES _2- May 19* 1976
of operation and greatest benefit to all the ci'tizens of Plymouth, this site, SP -3
as a location, for a s andpipe water reservoir, is the best site.
Commissioner Davenport asked Mr. Willis how the fire flow situation would be affected
by the standpipe water reservoir proposed. Mr. Willis responded that the Board of Fire
Underwriters, by which the fire safety of the City is rated, determines the amount of
water required to meet fire demands for the City. The question asked by the Board
is if there, is suffici-ent water storage to meet the fire needs during a high demand
period. The engineers have calculated what the static and residual'pressures, are
of various storage facilities as well as the size of pipe needed to use the system
during this type of demand. In this case, t" to be constructed,
as well as the location of the storage propo5liquirements in the most
efficient iqanner available 'to the citizens.
Chairman Kroskin asked Mr. Willis what the ca- ik_ ie proposed.standpipe water
reservoir would be. Mr. Willis responded that its' .ity would be one million
gallons, compared with Zachary Lane, which holds two iiiiii1ion gallons, the storage
in the Minneapolis Industrial Park and near the Public Works Garage which hold one
million gallons each and the Lancaster Lane tower which holds 500,000 gallons.
Commissioner Threirien asked if there was a safety problem nokq for the lands surrounding
the proposed reservoir. Mr., Willis responded that there have been pressure problems
in the Shiloh, Hadley Hills, Imperial Hills plats and the surrounding property owners
outside those plats. Commissioner Threinen asked if this was a safety factor. Mr.
Willis stated that he felt it was. Commissioner Hagen stated that with low water
pressure there definitely would be a safety problem.
Commissioner Schneider questioned Mr, Willis with 'respect to the height of the proposed
reservoir and the reason for it. Mr. Willi's responded that all the water reservoirs
in the City must have the same static high water level in order for the system to work.
This would be thelowest in height of the reservoirs, now in existence or proposed.
Tile other reservoirs in the City range between 130-150 ft. in height. This is to
match the static high water level of 1,030 feet.
Commissioner Davenport asked Mr, Willis about the economic considerations.. Mr.
Willis indicated.that of the th.ree types of reservoirs available, elevated, standpipe
and ground reservoir, the standpipe was. considered the most feasible for this site.
An elevated reservoir is not feasible, from an engineering point of view. The
static high water level of the reservoir would be too high. A ground reservoir would
need to be constructed to be approximately 75 ft. in diameter and 35 ft. in height
if it were above ground. If a ground reservoir were buried,. it would involve
Qonstruction costs of 50-75% mare than. that of a standpipe reservoir as well as two
to three times the annual operating cost because of booster pumps and mechanical
equipment involved. Also, there would be a danger of contamination of the water as
well as inability to detect leaks if the reservoir were buried. In addition, the
maintenance costs of such, a reservoir for its booster pumps and other mechanical
equipment would be much greater ".44an any maintenance required for the standpipe
Commissioner Davenport asked Mr. Willis what the useful life of a standpipe water
reservoir would be. Mr, Willis responded that it would not be less tha,50 years.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING M NUT -3- May 19, 1976
Commissioner Davenport asked Mr. Willis if, from an aesthetic ;point of view, this
would be the least offensive site compared to any other site in the City. Mr. Willis
responded that he could not answer that question as his opinion may not be sharec
by the surrounding pt-ooerty owners. He stated that he felt it was the best site for
the particular structure proposed, coosidering engineering requirements and costs,
Corixissioner Davenport questioned whetner there would be a commercial or industrial
site which would meet the needs for the southwest portion of the City. Mr. Willis
responded that the only site close enough would be the corner of County Road 6 and
Highway 101. To locate a water reservoir there would involve changing to an elevated
water reservoir and would involve the resizing of the lines. This would mean sub-
stantial increases in the cost of the project.
Chairman Kroski o tnopened he public hearing to comments and questions fromthe members
of the audience.
Mr. W.E. Ogden, 1505 Xanthus Lane, read a prepared statement in opposition to
the location of the proposed standpipe water reservoir. Said; statement is attached
and hereby made a part of these minutes.
Mr. William F. Driscoll, 1430 Alvarado Lane, read a prepared statement in opposition
to the locatian of theproposed standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is
attached ani' hereby made a part of these minutes.
Mr, John Davis, Troy Lane, stated that he was against the location of the standpipe
reservoir on the Driscoll property because of its adverse affect on the environmental
and visual aspects of to property and surrounding property. He stated that he was
in favor of a buried ground reservoir.
vir. Worth Bruntien,. 1705 Hunter Drive, Medina, a member of the iMedina Planning Con s
sion, stated that ' -he felt the water reservoir wouldinfringe upon the integrity of
the residential area.
Mr. H. H. Porter, 1605 Xanthus Lane, read a prepared statement in opposition to the
location of the proposed standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is attached and
hereby made a part of these minutes;
Mr. David L. Mullen, 1635 Troy Lane, read_a prepared statement in opposition to
the location of the proposed standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is attached
and hereby made a past of these minutes.
Mrs. Ruth Ault, 18805 County Road 6, had a prepared statement in opposition to the
location of the proposed standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is attached and
hereby made apart of these minutes.
Ms. N_. Hardenbergh, 18025 -12th Avenue North, stated that if the reservoir were placed
at County Road 6 and'Highway 101, it would be most visible to her and the surrounding
residents. She further stated that she did not feel it belonged in any residential
district but rather in a commercial or industrial district.
Mr, M. L. aorgen, 1500 Xanthus Lane, had a prepared statement in opposition to the
location ` of the proposed standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is attached and
hereby made a part of these minutes.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -4- May 19, 1976
Mr. Carroll A_,Jackley, 1535 Xanthus. Lane, read a prepared statement in opposition16-1—h6 location of the standpipe water reservoir. Said statement is attached and
hereby made a part of these minutes.
i
Ms. Elizabeth Lon fellow, 1325 Urbandale lane,stated that she was against the location
proposed for the standpipe reservoir acid that she felt it should be placed in a
commercial area.
Mr. Phillip Johnson, 1645 Xanthus Lane, stated that he felt in view of long-range
considerations, an underground reservoir ought to be considered.
As a matter of record, several more letters and/or statements were received by thePlanningCommissionbefore, during and after the Planning Commission meeting withrespecttothisissue. All such statements are attached; and hereby made an official
part of these minutes. All exhibits presented shall also became part of the official
record.
Chairman Kroskin closed the public hearing at 9;15 p.m. and declared a five-minute
recess.
The meeting .ias called back to order at 9':20 p.,m.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Threinen that
the Planning Commission act on this item at this meeting.
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-600 Meadow Lawn Estates Fifth Addition A-600 Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit
for Subdivision Unit
Project
Chairman Kros.Hn opened the public hearing on this item at 9:25 p.m
Staff presented petitioner's request for a conditional use permit for a Subdivision
Unit Project and preliminary palt approval of "Meadow Lawn Estates Fifth Addition"
located at the northeast corner of Zachary Lane and 39th Avenue North. It was pointed
out by Staff that the Subdivision Unit Project requirements as per the Zoning Ordinancehadbeenfull; complied with, also) the Thoroughfare Guide Plan was being maintainedasitconcernedthisplat.
Staff explained that the open space requirements were being handled differentlyforthisSUPrequest. It was proposed that 10% of the total land, i.e. the pond:
at the northwo.t portion of the platy make up half ofthe requirement for open space
while a cash conation. would be required for the rest.
Staff was recommending Planning Commission approval subject to the seven conditions
as listed in the Staff report of May 14, 1976.`
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -5- May 19, 1976
Commissioner Hagen questioned whether the design of the streets would 'ave any adverse
affect on th,, property to the south.. Staff stated that there were Seve-al alternatives
for the prc i,,ty to the south and that the street alignment of this plat should not
cause any P,,.flems for that land.
Commissioner Schneider stated that he did not feel it would be appropriate to qualify
the pond as open space since it would only be accessable by four of the 53 lots of
the plat. He stated that possibly this particular plat did not lend itself to the
Subdivision Unit Project ordinance.
Chairman, Kroskin opened the public hearing to comments from members of the audience.
Mr. Tom Berg, President of the Lost Lake Homeowners' Association, 3820 Trenton
Lane stated that he felt 39th Avenue North as. proposed would cause problems, for
children from a traffic hazard point of view; it should not be so straight. Also,
he stated that he felt the ponding arta would be better split amongst the smaller
lots and not as an unusable open space.
Mr. Al Clausnitzer, 10705 -40th Avenue North, stated that, speaking for several of the
property owners in the area, they had a vew concerns. 1) The jagged property lines
at the northwest end of the plat abutting 40th Avenue North, In effect, one present
lot would have three new lots abutting its rear property line. 2) The outlot for
she Pond seemed senseless. They felt it would be best divided up to make all the
lots larger. 3) Most of the lots surrounding the proposed, plat are larger., nearly
half -acre lots. The proposed lots should be the same size. 4) They, too, felt
39th Avenue North should not be so free-flowing encouraging fast traffic.
Chairman Kro,.ikin closed the public hearing at 10:15 p.m.
MOTION was rrade by Commissioner Stewart supported by Commissioner Threinen that the
Planning Corimission act on this item at this meeting.
MOTION CARPED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-669 Cjty of Plymouth Standpipe Water Reservoir A-669 Conditlohal Use Permits
and Site Plan
Convissioner Davenport stated that he didnot feel he could justify a more expensive
sysl--m for the reservoir when it would cost the rest of Plymouth so much additional
moray to install and construct.
MO'1ON was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Coitmissioner Stewart that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council, -
That the request of the City of Plymouth for a conditional use permit to locate
a standpipe water reservoir on Plat 43730, Parcel 1820, owned by William F.
Driscoll, be approved'.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Hagen suppurted by Commissioner Erickson
PLAN14ING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -6- May 19, 1976
to add the following reasons:
L The proposed use of the site for a standpipe water reservoir is necessaryinordertoprovidepublichealth, safety and, convenience of the citizens
of the City; and,
2. Any detriment to persons residing in the area would not out -weigh the
necessity for and the importance of the use proposed for the genera''
welfare of the citizens of Plymouth.
Commissioner Threinen stated that he did not feel the City should change the Water
istribution Plan or its intent to fulfill the City's Goals Objectives and Criteria,
specifically, Goal C Objective 3, Criteria 39 to provide"a suitable and po tabl e
water supply distribution systems'._ He further stated that he did not feel the loca-
tion should be changed to County Road 6 and Highway 101 since this would merelydisplacetheproblemratherthansolveit., Also, he stated that he felt by the
information given that the need was now for the project based upon the problems with
water pressure :and safety for the surrounding residents and proposed developments for
the 4rea.
Voting then took place on the motion to amend.
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (7--0-0) (All in favor) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
V00,9 then took place on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
MOTION was made by Commic sioner Hagen supported by Commissioner Schneider that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of the City of Plymouth for a conditional; use permit to exceed
the height allowance for an R-1 district for a standpipe water reservoir located
at the northeast corner of County Road 6 and Ferndale Road be approved based
on the-=ollowing reasons:
1. The proposed excessive height of a standpipe water reservoir is necessaryinordertoprovi6epublichealth, safety and convenience of the citizens
of t1ne City; and,
2. Any detriment to persons residing in the area would not out -weigh the
necessity for and the importance: of the use proposed and its exceesive
height for the general welfare of the citizens of Plymouth
The Commission discussed various other communities where ground reservoirs had been
fea-0ible and considered the question of how other communities seemingly could afford
to build such facilities
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
The Commission then discussed the site plan for the standpipe water reservoir.
PLANNING COMMISSION'' MEETING MINUTES -7 May 19, 7976
Commissioner Erickson stated that 50 ft. setbacks were required for other types of
public structures in an R-1 Zoning 'District; however, the site of the standpipe
water reservoir did not have 50 ft. setbacks on two sides. He felt the 50 ft',
setbacks should be maintained: on the site.
MOTION was made by Conmiissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Stewart that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of the City of Plymouth for site plan approval of site SP-3
for a standpipe water reservoir at the nit rtheast corner of County Road 6 and
Ferndale Road dated May, 14, 1976 be approved as submitted.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Davenport
that the landscape plan for the standpipe water reservoir be submitted to the Planning
Commission for their review prior to construction and after a reasonable time period.
and effort on behalf of the City would be made to discuss the landscaping for the
site with surrounding property owners.
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION TO ADDEND CARRIED
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1=0) (Commissioner Erickson against) MOTICN CARRIED
Commissioner Erickson stated that he was against the motion because he felt the
50 ft. setbacks should be maintained on all sides of the structure.
1PLANNINGCOMMISSIONMEETINGMINUTES -7 May 19, 1976
That the request of the City of Plymouth for site plant approval of site SP -3
for a standpipe water reservoir at the northeast corner of County Road 6 and
Ferndale Road dated May 14, 1976 be approved as submitted.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Davenport
that the landscape plan for the standpipe water reservoir be submitted to the Planning
Commission for their review prior to construction and after a reasonable time period
and effort on behalf of the City would be made to discuss the landsraping for the site
with the surrounding property owners.
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (7--0-0) (All in favor) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1-0) (Commissioner Erickson against) MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Erickson stated that he was against the motion because he felt the
50 ;Ft. setbacks should be maintained on all sides of the structure.
A-600 Mea ow lawn Estates Fifth Addition A-600 Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit
for Subdivision Unit
Project
MOTION was made: by Commissioner Davenport supported by Commissioner Threinen that.
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co. for a preliminary plat
approval and a conditional use permit for a Subdivision Unit Project be denied
based upon the following reasons:
1. The proposed Subdivision Unit Project is not responsive to Section 7,
Subdivision 7, paragraph 2e, whereby 10% of the land is to be dedicated
for open space or other municipal use. This land is not accessible
by more than four lots of the proposed subdivision.
2. 39th Avenue North should be realigned within the plat to reflect a more
indirect routing to Zachary Lane;
3. Questions as to the proposed circulation for 38th Avenue North and 40th
Avenue North as they would be affected by this plat need to be answered
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING MINUTES =8- Vit,' 19, 1976
A-338 Mission Ridge Second Addition A-338 Final Plat
Staff explained petitioner's request for final plat approval of Mission Ridge Second
Addition. Staff noted that the final plat as submitted was in general conformance
with the preliminary plat and that tbanges requested by the Commission and Council
at that time had been incorporated into the plat. The final plat was recommended
for approval by the Planning Commission subject to six conditions as listed in the
Staff report of May 14, 1976,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen supported by Commissioner Erickson that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Lundgren Bros. for final plat approval of Missio;t Ridge
Second Addition be granted subject to the following conditions:
1. A cash payment to the Park Dedication Fund of $2,900.
2. The upnrading of 36tF Avenue North along t;la entire plat to C1+y Engineering
Depart :,t standards.
3. That a common driveway be designed to service Lots l7 and 18, Block 2
from 36th Avenue North. No building permits be issued on these lots unless
such plat is provided.
4. The undeveloped area of Outlot A be used for a density credit for the more
densely proposed development (Mission Farms RPUD) to the north and west.
5. Engineering recommendations be included as per memorandum.from the Lity
Engineer dated May 12, 1976
6; Lobs 10 and 19, Block 2 not be allowed access to 36th Avenue north.
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION' CARRIED
A-609 Sas Lake Highlands A-609 Final Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for a final plat of Bass Lake: Highlands for
Eugene Hickok. Staff noted that the final plat was in general conformance with the
preliminary plat as submitted to the City; also, the changes as suggested by the
Commission and Council had been incorporated into the plat. Staff recommended approval
of the final plat subject to several conditions as listed in the Staff report of May 11,
1976,
MOTION was made by ,Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Threinen that
the Ploning Commission make the fallowing recommendation to the City Council'.
PLANNING. COMMISSION MEETING. MINUTES -9- May 19, 1076
That the request of Eugene Hickok f9r final plat approval of Bass Lake Highlands
be granted subject to the following canditions
1. No building permits be issued until public sewer and water is available
to the site
2. Requests be incorporated &3 per the City Engineering Department Memorandum
of May 7, 1976.
3. OotloT. A be deeded to the Cite for County Road 61 right-of-way.
4. Petitioner pay a Park DzlkM ation fee e-,ju-Zling $8,400 payable to the City
of Plymouth at the tllme the development cotitract is executed,
5. No shoreline alterations be allowed below the high watermark of 90e.2 ft.
6. No access be allowed 'to Pineview Lane for Lots 17-24, Block 2 Lot 26., Block 3,
no .access to County Road 47 be allowed for Lots 7, 8, g and 16, Block 2;
and no access to County Road 10 be allowed for Lot 1, Block I.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0_1) (Commissi'aner Gagen abstained) MOTION CARRIED
A-670 F.E.C., Inc. A-670 Site Plan and Conditional
Use Permit
Staff presented petitioner`s request for a site plan approval and a conditional use
permit for a food processing and handling equipment manufacturer. The site is a
portion of the Metro Industrial .Park and, as proposed, is consistent with actions
cal cn for the plat in the past.
Staff rec)mmended )val of both requests subject to the conditions: as listed in
the Staff report of ;y 14, 1976..
MOTION was made by Cor-nissioner Hagen supported by Commissioner Erickson that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council-,
That the regttmst of :F.E.CT, Inc, for site plan approval and a conditional
use permit t6r a food processing and handling equipment manufacturing operation
to be 'located at the southwest corner of Niagara Lane and 28th Avepue North
be granteTJ subject to the following conditions:
I. fisting of a 150%, 18 month landscape and drainage bond prior to issuance
of building permits.
Z. Petitioner pay a park dedication fee equal to $500 per acre ($500 X
7.3 acres = $3,650)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES -10- May 19, 1976
3. Engineering recommendations be incorporated into the site as per the City
Engineer.
4. Incorporation of additional fire, hydrants and a fire lane as recommended
by the City Fire Chief.
MOTION TO AMEND was grade by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Schneider
toadd condition #5 to read, "No outdoor storage other than the dumpster which shall'
be adequately screened.
MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in -Favor) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
The Commission then voted on the main motion as amended,
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favors MOTION. CARRIED
The Commission stated they would like to see the sign plan for the site prior to
any approval of signage for the use;
9-634 Plass Lake Oaks A-634 Final Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for final plat approval of Bass Lake Oaks
located at the northeast side of Bass Lake. The changes suggested by the Commission
and Council had been incorporated into the plat. Also, petitioner had lessened
the number of lots to five rather than six as proposed in the preliminary plat stage.
Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions as listed in the Staff report
of May 14, 1976.
The Commission discussed the elevation differences between the service drive proposed
for the plat and County Road 10. They asked that special consideration be given to
this situation at the time of drawing of the development contract and construction.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Davenport that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Dorothy Follese for final plat approval of Bass Lake Oaks
be granted subject to the following conditions;
1.. The, dedication of 22 ft. of right-of-way to accommodate the service drive
alone County Road 10
24 A park dedication fee of $150 per lot, i..e. $750, be paid to the City of
Plymouth.
3. Final_ plat approval be subject to a land transfer with the owner of Asplund's
Oakwood Shores.
PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING MINUTES I1 May 19, 1975
4 The construction of a service road fronting Lots 1-5 and Lots 7 and 8 of
Asplund's Oakwood Shores, This roadway to be constructed to City Engineering,
Department standards and to be -included as part of the final plat's develop-
ment contract.
5. No building permits be issued until such time as sewer and water are avail-
able to the site.
6. One access to County Road 10 at the west end of the plat with a cul-de-sac
for said access to be located on Lots 6 and 7 of Asplund's Oakwood Shores.
7, A 10 ft. wide drainage easement along the east side of Lot l and the west
side of Lot 2.
8. A 10 ft, wide written easement for utility, snow storage and drainage pur-
poses be provided along the front of the lots.
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
A-657 Asplund s -Oakwo6d Shores A-657 Final Plat
Staff presented petitioner's request for final plat approval of Asplund's Oakwood
Shores. The changes from the time of preliminary plat were explained. Staff refommended
approval' subject to the conditions as listed' in the Staff rel'ort of May 14, 1976.
The Commission discussed Outlot A and its usefullness to the potential property owners
asac..
1war,
s to the: lake. The Landis mostly marsh andnot useful as lecke access,
MOTION was made by Coninissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Threinen that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Randy Asplund for final plat approval of Asplund's Oakwood
Shores be granted subject to the following conditions
I. The dedication of 22 ft. of right-of-way to accommodate the service drive
along County Road 10
2.; Park Dedication Fee of $150 per lot to be paid to the City of Plymouth.
3. Fina[ plat approval to be subject to land transfer with the owner of
Bass Lake Oaks,
4., Purchase of the outlet along Deerwood Lane by petitioner to provide access
to 57th Avenue (forth
5. A 10 ft.. wide drainage easement along the west side of Lot 6 and the east
side of Lut 7.
6, iso building permits be issued unci' such time as sewer and water are
a'vai'lable to the plat.
PLANNING COMMISSAIZ MEETING, MINUTES -12- May 19, 1976
7. Outlot A be eliminated and a 15 ft., continuous drainage easement be substituted
alonig the extended south line of Lots 10, 11 and 15, Block 1.,
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Davenport
that a condition #8 be added to read. "Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 14 have, driveway
access to 57th Avenue North only."
MOTION, TO AMEND CARRIED (6-0-1) (Commissioner Stewart abstained) MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
Voting then took ;lace on the main motion as amended.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1) (Commissioner Stewart abstained) MOTION CARRIED
MOTION TO RECONSIDER was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner
Threinen the previous motion.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1) (Commissioner Stewart,abstained) MOTION CARRIED
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Threinen
to add the fallowing condition to the eight conditions of the previous motion: "A
written 10 ft. utility, snow storage and drainage easement be provided along the lot
lines of Lots 6, 7 and 8."
SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1) (Commissioner Stewart abstained) SUBSTITUTE MOTION
CARRIED
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
The Commission discussed the June meeting schedule. It was decided that the June
meetings would be held June 9 and June 16, 'i976.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 5, 1976
Commissioner Erickson pointed out that page five of the minutes concerning the
Kustom Die item (A-576). and his motion to amend should read 11 . . . 45 ft. Front
yard parking setback and a required 15 ft. setback for the rear yard."
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner Threinen that the
minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 5, 1976 be approved as corrected.
I
PLANNING COMMISSION: MEETING MINUTES -13- May 19, 1976
MOTION CARRIED (7-0-0) (All in favor) MOTION CARRIED
MOTION, TO ADJOURN was made by Commissioner Threinen suppor by Commissioner Stewart-.
Chairman Kroskin adjourned the meeting at 12:25 p.m.
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION June 9, 1976
Reg Kroskin, Chairman
Plymouth Planning Commission
AJ
Ch Ies E. Dilleruda Secretary
I