HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-18-1974PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
December 18, 1974
A regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order byActing .Chairman Hagen at 7:35 p.m.. in the Council Chambers of the Public Wiorks
Building, 14900 - 23rd Avenue North.
M548ERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Hagen, Commissioners. Schneider, Davenport,
Erickson, Stewart and Threinen,
MEMBERS A, BSE T: Chairman Xroskin,.
STAFF PRESENT Charles Dillerud, Milton bale, Randall Thoreson and Agatha
Mortenson
OTHERS PRESENT; Tom. Duntley, Y.A.A.C, Representative
AcGIng Chairman Hagen opened the public hearing at 7:35 p m.
A --SOI CITY OF PLYMOUTH A-601 Rezon ;nq from I --I to B--1
Staff presented the proposal for rezoning of certain lands in the southeast
quadrant of Highway 66 and Annapolis Lane -Lo Xenium ' 7,e, indicating streets and
utilities are in and the land is ready for level opmec) F
Staff noted the zoning of the Uncle John's property to 8-3 in 1969 that had come
to light after the notice of pubic hearing had been published and recommended
omission of this parcel from the requested action. A corrected legal description
of the area City requested to be. rezoned was give€
guidance,
to the Commissioners for
A letter received late Wednesday, December 18, 1974, from Oscar P. Jones, owner
of a parcel of land included in the requested rezoning, who is ,jpposedto the
rezoning, was presented to the Commissioners.
John Sebo-3d., Carlson Companies, Inc., owners of some of the land involved, stated
they concurred with Staff .nd were in favor of the requestedrezoning.
Clarence Pr'11man, Attorney 'nor Murphy oil Co., 4600 iirt
79 :
h Street, owner of a
parcelof land involved in the requested rezoning expressed their opposition to
the rezoning.- He explained the background and problems they have had in either
developing their land or attracting a buyer for the property., Ile recounted the
disadvantages this rezoning would create for them, hoth as to types of usage to
which this land could be put as well as the additional land required for setback.
They have been stealing with a fast food drive --in type operation for this parcel,
f which in their opinion would be compatible with the I_l District but is not allowed
in a B-1 District. They do not intend to use the parcel for a gas station. Mr.
Gillman claimed the previous owner maintained the land was zoned "commercial" when
they bought it near the end of Ajoust, 1867.: The zoning would have been checked
PLANNING CM41SSION MEETING -MINUTES Oecember 18, 1974
and if found not as presented, some reference would have been made to it in the
contract, Mr. Dillman did not know if the company was made aware of the proposed
rezoning when the Zoning Ordinance was adopted, but Mr, Overhiser had explained
the service usage as one way they could approach the matter as long as the major
portion of the business would come from the Industrial Park. He stated they hadintendedtogeneratesomebusinessfromthehighwayaswell. Mr. Dillman explainedthatwhenthepropertywasdivided, Murphy 0i'l gained possession of the east half, closest to Xenium.
MOTION was made by Coaissioner Stewart supported by Commissioner Erickson that
the planning Commission take action on the request )f the City of Plymw,;th for
Rezoning from 1-1 (Planned Industrial) to B_l (Limited Business) Oistrict for a
Planned Business Development located at the southeast corner of Highway 55 andAnnapolisLane, after the close of the Public Hearing.
MOTION CARRIEDAll in favor CARRIED
A-4 9 jUSEPH E. PAZARDAK 7-499 Preliminary Plat - 'Medicine
Lake Industrial Park"
Public Hearing on this item was opened at 8:00 p.m.
Staf," presented the proposal for a developmonf on 14.5 acres located adjacent.
the Bassett's Creek Flood Plain area in an I- Zone near 10th and Nathan Lane.
The site plan of one of the three lots was presented to the Commissioners at their
last meeting but was deferred until the Preliminary Plat could tae presented for
approval. The Bassett's Creek Flood Control Commission had been given a copy oftheplat. Their findings were presented to the Commission. Staff recommended
approval of the plat.
Bob Scribner, 2015 No. Lancaster Lane, representing Association of Medicine Lake
Av,ea Citizens:, was concerned about the construction of 10th Avenge Borth and NathanLane, how soon would they be done, and would they help alleviate the traffic problem
now existing in this area. Staff explained streets would not be constructed beyond
the first building at this time but would be done when adjoining property istdeveloped. Mr. Scribner also asked about the possibility of stop lights at that intersection. Mr. Scribner stated they were only concerned, about auto traffic as trucks are unable
to go this way due to the narrow road and small bridge. But if this development did
increase the auto traffic, they would be opposed to it.
With twc--thirds of the plat in marshland, discussion centered around the affects of
fill and opinions of Bassett's Creek Flood Ccntrol Commission and Dept. of Natural
Resources. Also tih,- requirements for ponding with so :much land potentially being
covered with asphalts were brought out.
Park dedication was also brought up but Staff reminded the Commissioners that this
was usually taken care of at the time the site plan: is presented and when actual
development is forthcoming.
PLANINTI,G CC VISSION rFTING MINUTES December 18, 1974
tPIOTI;1 1 was made by Commissioner T seinen supported by Commissioner Stewart that
the Plann nq Co€mission take action on the request oy Joseph F. Pazandak for
approval of a Preliminary Plat of "I'ledicine Lake Industrial Park" consisting of14.5 acres located at 111th Avenue North and Nathan Lame.,
MOTIOR CARRIED All in favor CARRIED
The Public Hearing teas closed at 8:30 p.m.
A C1 CITY OF PLY9CtO A-66T Rezoning from I to #1-•
MOTION was made by Commissio-,fr Stewart supported by Commissioner Davenport that
the Planning Commission make she following recommendation to the City Council
That the request of the City of Plyr,.outh to rezone a portion of 'Crags A and BR.L.S. 11.33, Section 22 Hennepin County, be rezoned from I.1. (Planned Industrialto8_1 (Limited ?asii?ess) be approved.
Considerable discussion centered around the foilotrring
1. The teed for rezoning the entire area at this time to conform to the Lard UseGuidePlanwhich, if approved, would create problems for some of the landowners,
2.. If the Carlson Property only was rezoned, would this constitute spot zoning.
3i The possible uses to which the land could be utilized under the 1-1 and the
B-1 700ings,
4. Relationship of the various proposed or possible uses to the nearby highwaysindustrialparkandRadissonPlymouth.
S, intent of the City In designating this area Limited Business in the adopted
Land Use Guide elan,
MOTION to AMEND MAIN MOTION was made by Corm ssi over Stewart to rezone the areau
to B-1 except the area east and north of the service drive of Parcel R.L.S. 68.
MOTION to AMEND FAILED for lack of a second FAILED
MAIN MOTION CARRIED (5-1-0) (Commissioner Stewart opposing) CARRIED,
4 ig jUSFP1i F. PA AE gA A-4 ?g Preliminary Plat. -t "Medicine
Lake Industrial "nark"
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Commissioner Davenport that
the Planning Coronission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Joseph E. PaA andak for approval of a Preliminary Plat datedNovember22, 1974 be approved subject to the following conditions:
PL NOING Ct RRISSION MEETING MINUTES - 4 - December 18, 1:974
1. Lot 3, Block I be designated as outlot .and process initiated to effect
combination with Parcel 1151, 43736 (Minneapolis Auto Auction propertytothenorth).
2, Utility easements as recommended by tLa C tty Engineer be made a part of this
recommendation.
3. Recommendations of the Bassett`s Creek Flood Control Comission be a part of
this recommendation.
There wa,5 no Further discussion on this request,
MOTTOR CARRIED All in favor CARRIED
This concluded action on the Public Hearing items at 8;35 p.m
New Business.
A-501 C RL.SON COMPANIES, INC. A -5C1. Conditional Use Permit
Staff presented the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Business
Development near the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Annapolis Lane, which i;
in an area the Planning Commission earlier in the evening had approved the
recommendation to rezone to B-1< Petitioner had previously requested a Conditional.
Use Permit to allow an off -sale liquor store in an 1-1 District. This was with-
drawn in favor of requesting the area to be rezone-` to B-1 in conformance with the
Land Use Guide Plait and a Planned Business Development be presented, consisting of
two lots, a smaller one for the proposed liquor store with the larger parcel "Co
be used for an office building. The advantages of this approach versus the con-
cerns 0 the previous requests were reviewed by Staff. Staff recommended approval
Discussion centered around the advantages to the City and to the developer of a
Planned Business Development as proposed. Considerable discussion surrounded the
question of whether the liquor store was a secondary use in the proposed Planned
Business Develo,...ient since the proposed office building was not scheduled for con-
struction until some time in the f °`etre; or whether the liquor store was the primary
use with the Planned Business. Development used as a trade-off to obtain approval of
a liquor store in a zone where it would otherwise not be permitted (B-1) or was
questionable (1«1),
Richard Enroth and John Sebold, both of Carlson Companies, Inc,, represented the
petitiondr, state, qty distend to construct the office building and felt this
was the best possible use of that land: although the tinting of construction of the
office buildinq would depend on the intensity of development in that area.
Staff state{ the plan as proposed does meet: the requirements.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Cormissioner Stewart that
the Planning Camp.<i s s i on make the following reoonunendati on to the City Council:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MVIUTES December 18, 1074
That the request of Carlson Companies, Inc. for approval of a Conditional Use Permit
for a Planned Business Development to be located at the southeast corner of Highway55andAnnapolisLanebe, denied for the foil wing reasons
I. At this paint in time the liquor store would not be a secondary use;
2, A firm and substantial primary use has not been presentei.
Doth Commissioners stated they were not opposed to the Planned Business Development
concept,; but felt the liquor store was in effect the primary use, not a secondaryuse, and the Planned Business Development was proposed as a means to establish the
liquor store where it would not otherwise be allowed.,
Commissioners Threinen and Davenport spoke in opposition to the motion, stated
they felt the primary use was the office building,,
IMOTION FAILED (3-3-30) (Commissioners T"hreinen, Davenport and
fla en opposing) 7gp q) FAILED
POTION was made by Commissioner Hagen supported by Cotnmis3ioner Thre nen that the
Planning Commission viake the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Carlson Comianies, Inc. for approval of a Planned Business
Development to be located at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and AnnapolisLanebeapproved, subject to the followinq conditions
I Planned, Business Dev-Jopment a1proval only upon zoning of the parcel D-
Limited Business).
2 No deviation from proposed uses or layout configurations without Planned
Business }evelo.ment amendment approval by the City,
3.Plat ned Business Development action shall not: constitute Site Plan Approval,
approval of any variances that may be required, or lot division.
Commission,;r Hagen stated that while he agreed the liquor store belongs in a B-3Zone, as pointed out by Commissioners Erickson and Stewart, the planned use and
its relationship to the good of the community is what should be considered during
planning.
Commissioner Erickson stated his opinion was that there are other areas in the
City which could accomodate the liquor store in a Dw3 Zone, and as such, there
we -e two points of tonsideration of this request: 1 -- the use in terms of the
Piece of property, 2 - in teras of the Planned Business Development, is the liquor
store the primary use since th; office building is not scheduled for construction,
or is it the secondary use as presented.
MOTION EAIL,ED ('Commissioners Erickson, Stewart: and
Schneider opposing) FAILED
i
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 6 December 18, 197
New Business continued at q: 5 p.m,
A-,604 fi5it MER BROTHF'i-SSC._ A-604 Site Plan
Staff presented the, request which had !,-en presented to the Planning Commissionapproximatelyamonthearlier* and was deferred ur4il the Preliminary Plat for thedevelopmentinwhishthisproposalislocatedhadbeenapproved. Commissioners
had also regvisted a report from Bassett's Creek Flood Control Commission surround
Ing these proposals. Staff had contacted them and their written report and verbal
explanation was relayed to the Commissioners.. Staff explained that the five
deficiences listed in their previous report have now been resolved; to Staff`s satis-
faction. Staff now recommends approval of the Site Plan with the conditions as
listed in their previous report, altering Condition Ro, 6 to read "bio signs be
allowed until approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council'.
Verb Margolis, 8421 Westmoreland Fare, represented the petitioners and was avail-
e to a?nsw-er any questions about the proposal, Mr. Margolis explained that
there wou % be no parking on the south side towards 10"..`r Avenue,there are overhead
doors which would allow the trucks to drive in or back into the building for load- incd and unloading, The semis would be unable to maneuver if parking was allowedinthatarea, The 60 foot curb cut was designed for the convenience of the semis.
14r. Margolis stated the small vans that come and go during the day would use the
loading and unloading dock on the west side of the building, and the smaller curb
cut would be sufficient for their use.,
Commissioners were concerned about truck loading. outside and parking ,,)n the south
side of the building that might occur, even though there were mope p6rking spaces
than Ordinance required and plans were to have the trucks load and unload inside
the building.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Stewart that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendations to the City Council:
That the request of Minter Brothers, Inc. for' approval of a Site Plan dated:
November 22, 1974 be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1 Recommendations of the City Engineer and Bassett's Creek Flood Control Cowlission
relative to stormy drainage be a part of this recommendation
All storage of waste, garbage and materials be within the building,
8. A landscape and; drainage bond be posted with the City prior to issuance of a
building permit,
4. ` Recommendations of the Staff relative to placement of fire Lanes and fire
hydrants be a part of this recommendation.
5. Recommendations of the Parks and .R creation Advis,ry Commission be made a
part of this recommendation, ie. a zash contribution would amount to
1,415.00 ($500'x 2,83 acres),,
6, No signs be allowed until, approved by the Planning. Commission and the City Council.
PLANNING 0*11SSION MEETING MINUTES .. 7 December 18 1974
MOS"Ips! to, MIEND was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Commissioner
Stewart to add the following.'
7. There be no truck loading or parking within the 50 foot setback on the south
side of the building,
AMENDME 1T CARRIED All In favor CARRIED
MAN MOTION CARRIED All, in favor CARRIED
Tne meeting was recessed at 'id reconvened at 9:30 p.m
T--663 CHURN OF JESUS CHRIST SAINTS A -5Q3 Lot Division
Staff presented the request for a ivision. Parcel"A" r would be used for con-
struction of a church facility, whi iv Parcel 135", -which contains a house and a
iguest house, would remain residential. The church would not be constructed at
this 'Gime, possibly not for two years. Staff recommended approval, subject to the
conditions given in their report.
Warren V, Bigelow, Jr., 9808 Wayzata Boulevard,, was present in the audience and
represented the petitioner. He asked for clarifi,ation of the two conditions in
Staffs report. Acting Chairman Hagen explained the land requested in Condition
No. 1 would be used as a boulevard now until the need arises to widen the road,
and this dedication is customarily asked for at the time the land is divided or
platted. As for Condition No. 2, Staff explained the formula developed for the
establishment of a Park Dedication Fund, the various methods used to determine the
amount of pane dedication fee and/or land in conformance with the adopted Lard Use
Guide Plan, and explained that this is requested whenever laud is divided, platted
or developed.
Cordon C.01sen, 1533 Pennsylvania Avenue North, Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter -Day Saints, qu: tioned Condition No. 3 of Staff's report. They have a
buyer for the one parcel with the house, the sale to be consummated with the grant -
Ing of the lot division, The buyer intends to use the back section for a garden
plat. When the church does bui4d on the other porion and should find it needs:
some Of the land for playg=round, etc,, the buyer is willing to deed whatever land
is necessary from that ba4:k section to the church. He was opposed to Condition No.3.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Stewart supported by Commissionor Hagen that the
Planning Commission make the following recommendat4on to the Cita Council
That the request of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints for the
division of unplatted property now known as Parcel 7440, Plate 4.3733 be approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of 7 feet of additional might -of -way easement along Vicksburg
Lane.
PLANNING COtrik IS53 ,01 MEFx"N*INU ES - 8 December 18, 1474
fNa park dedication or fees in lieu be
went on Parcel "A".
required on Parcel "D, or until develop
3.. A street frontage waiver of 5feet be granted on Parcel ,g y
MOTION to AMEND was made by Comissiover Threinen supported by Commissioner Daven- port that Condition No, 3 be omitted,
CoMmissionei Threinen stated the Subdivision Regulations require too lot width to
be 1.10 feet and petitioner has presented no apparent hardship on which to base his
14equest for a variance to 105 feet
f", 45 iDMN CARRIEO (5-1-0) (Commissioner Stewart opposing) CARRIED
MAIN MOTION CARRIED All in favor CARRI89
A-54 RD RT 0S7MAt1 A-564 Renewal' Conditional Use Permit
Staff presented this request for renewal of a Conditional Use permit. Staff has
contacted the neighbors to the north and northeast, found no problems. In view
of the ommtissioners concerns last year as to whether this opef ation fits the
category of a "home occupation", City Attorney Lefler was contacted and he stated
he would find no problem in granting the renewal and there noir Mould be a legislative i
precedent set due to prior approval. Commissioner Threinen expres.10 the opinion
that this was still a manufacturing operation and not a service operation.;
Commissioner Threinen stated he has passed his place many times and has found
nothing objectionable. His only objection was that this operation did not fit the
definition of a "home occupation" as given in the Zoning Ordinance in his opinTon.
Robert E. Ostman,, 4825 Vicksburg 'Lane, was present, and stated the operation is in
his_ga).—age, which is lame enough to also park his car inside. He also has a. van,
Commissioner Stewart noted that the neer proposed Zoning Ordinance carries a stronghomeoccupationdefinition. He questioned as to whether this permit would be
renewed under the new ordinance and stated he would oppose any action to grant it
under a grandfather clause.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Connissioner Schneider that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council;
That the request of Robert E Ostman,for a Conditional Use Permit to orcrite a
small toolmaker's shop in his garage at 4825 Vicksburg Lane be approved 'r one
year subject to the following conditions.
1, No outside storage of waste and/or materials,
PL.ARNINO COMMISSION MEETING MUTES g - Decereber 18, 1P74
2 The operation of the: toolmaking shop be limited to the petitioner with no.
additional +ttployt es permitted,
3. No signs be .permitted.
MOTION CARRIED (4-2-0) (Commissioners Threinen and Stewart
opposing) CARRIED
Commissioners Threinen and Stewart stated they opposed the motion because this
operation does not fit the definition of "home occupation".
Aw566 ' STE-EN6LRSTRUCTURES, 1K A-560 Site Plans
Staff presented this petition which is for approval of two site plans. On
December 16, 1974 City Council approved a division of this parcel into two lots.
Staff was concerned about the second access gest of Fe'rnbrook Lane as it lies
very close to the property line. A problem could be created in the future if a
new owner decided to put up a fence on his property along this line. Staff recom-
mends redesigning this so there would be 20 feet on each side of the property line
with no median between,
Richard W. Anderson, 3131 Fe:-nbrook Lane, represented the petitioner, stated 40
feet 20 feet on each side) Mould be much better from their standpoint. They
were proposing commercial use for the structures and 40 feet would be better for j
tire trucks
i
Commissioner Erickson questioned the parking allowed within the 15 foot setback on
the north side. Staff pointed out that the line was not on a.public street and
therefore the 15 foot setback was not required, and when the property to the north IIsdeveloped, .entry would probably come from the north side of that property.
Commissionerswereconcerned about the green strip; should it 'remain by the building
for aesthetic value or at the property bine with the parking up against the building,
or be sprit up putting 15 feet at the property line with the; balance by the building.
Mr. Anderson stated their opinion was that it looked better to have the green strip
against the building to soften the structure but would be willing to move it to the
property line with the parking against the building if that is what the City wanted.. He stated for economic reasons, they preferred not to pplit up the area of the green
strip as had been suggested by the Commissioners.
Commissioner Stewart questioned the siren plan, noting that the previous approval
called for no sign:. Mr. Anderson stated they did present a plan but Staff objected
to it, Staff reported the only sign plan presented was for one on the building butitwasovertheOrdinanrpicgui.,ements as noted in Staff's report. Petitioner
should hav-_ been aware of the sign ra cluirements as it is listed on the instruction
sheet Gnat accompanies the blank application fora. After several comments, Commissioner
Threinen suggested that ifapproval of the Site Plan was granted, a condition could
PLANOING COMMISSION MEETING 14INUTES - 10 December 18, 1974
be added that would stipulate no signs until approved 4v the Planning CommissionandtheCityCouncil.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Schneider supported bt; Commissioner Stewart that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council:
That the request of Steenberg Structures, Inc. for approval of two site plansdatedDecember, 4, 1974 be approved, subject to the following conditions
1. The recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission be a part
of this. recommendation. A cash payment to the Park Dedication: Fund would
amount to $3,200 {6.40 acres x $500 per, acre},
2. All storage of waste, garbage and materials be within the building.
3. A landscape bond be posted and completion date established prior to a build-
ing permit being issued,
4. Any users of the buildings requiring a Conditional Use Permit make applica-
tion to the City prior to occupancy. Users of either building requiringmoreparkingthanisprovidedoneithersiteshouldnotbegranteda
Condi ti onai Use Pernii t for their operation
O5= No variances be allowed for front yard setbacks for parking.
6. The recommendations of the Staff relative to fire hydrants and fire lanes be
a part of this recommendation
7. That the second access west of Fernbrook be either 15 feet or 20 feet on
either side of the property line, depending on the petitioner's request.
S. No signs be permitted until approved by the Planning Commission and the CityCouncil,
g That the green space that is just north of the building be moved to the north
property line and not decreased in size.
MOTION CARRIED All in favor CARRIED
O E"GEiE iliCl< A-605 Lot Division
Staff presented this request for a division cf 1.87 acre parcel from the larger
34.66 acre parcel. During the review of this request, it came to light that the
legal description at Hennepin County did not coincide with the legal description
given by the petitioner, Staff explained the discrepancies that existed and with
the aid of a peat indicated ghat action would be needed to correct this discrepancy
so the request if granted could actually be made. The requested rights-of-way andthereasonsfortherequestwerereviewed, Staff did not recommend asking for ease- ment for the trail aeftss Parcel "B" until such time as Parcel "B" is presented fordevelopment,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - 11 - December 10 1974
Acting Chairman Hagen asked permission to abstain from active comments and voting
on this request as his firm is actively engaged in a nearby development.
Bruce Thom son, Attorney -at -Law, renresented the petitioner, stated he thought Mr.
ickok bought the land about 15 months ago from the Hansons. This land contained
a substantial house on the one parcel and the balance in agricultural land. When
Mr. Hickok boutght the land, it was with the agreement that Mrs. Hanson could live
there for three years. Mr. Thompson recapped the history since Cir. Hanson passed
away, leading up to -the-request to divide the land to separate the house from the
largo parcel. He also recapped their efforts with Hennepin County Highway Depart-
ment to determine the alignment of County Road 61 in that area to no avail. He
stated Mr. Hickok is willing to dedicate the necessary right-of-way but objects to
doing so until the exact alignment of County Road 61 is determined.
Commissioners explained to fir. Thompson that this was the general policy of the
City of Plymouth to request any necessary right-of-way at the time the lot is
either divided or platted.
Several comments were made by Mr. Thompson and the Commissioners surrounding their
experiences with and observations of the County as attempts have been made to
determine what the alignment will be. The City Engineer has been in touch with
the County regularly.
lir. Thompson offered to present the City with a letter of intent. to dedicate the
necessary right-of-way along the north of the parcel or whatever will be required
when the alignment has been settled. Thi- document would be binding even if the
property is sold before the alignment is settled. Commissioner Threinen thought
this was a fair trade-off.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Erickson supported by Cummissioner Davenport that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation, to the City Council.
That the request of Mendota Inc. for the division: of unplatt d property now known
as Parcel 550, Plat 43702 be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That an agreement be entered into between the City of Plymouth and Mendota,
Inc. to dedica c: the right-of-way along Parcels. 5000, 9000, 5500, and 5500
of 10 feet along County Road 1.0 when that line has been determined, and 27
feet along Parcel 5000, and 54 feet along Parcels 6500 and 3000. Also the 30
foot right-of-way easement along the south side of Parcel "A" be dedicated.
2. The barn now located on parts of Parcel "A" and "B" be removed..
3. Ae .-° tance of the residence's drainfield and septic system for Parcel "A" be
mad: by the City's Building Inspection Department.
4 Access to County Road 10 be det.ied upon completion of 60th Avenue North along
Parcel "A"s south boundary line..
PLANNING COMMISSION METING MINUTES, - 12 December 18,, 1974
MOTION to. AMEND was made by Commissioner Schneider supported by Coxin.,4 s oner
Davenport that the following be added;
5. The barn now located on Parcels "A„ and "'B" be removed by August 1 1975.
AMFF104ENT CARRIED (5-0-1) (Commissioner Nagen abstaining) CARRIED
MAIN MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1) (Commissioner, Hagen abstaining) CARRIED
MOTION was made by Commissioner Stewart supported by Commissioner Threinen that
the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council;
That prior to the division of Parcel 550, Plat 437021 as requested by Mendota
Inc., the following action be taken;
1. That portion of Parcel 5500, Plate 43702 lying south of County road 47 and
10 be combined with that portion of Parcel 6500, Plate 43702 Tying south
of County Road 47 and 1.0.;
2' That portion of Parcel 5500, Plat 43702 lying north of County Road 47 be com->
beined w"'Uh that portion of ParLel 5500, Plat 43702 lying north of County
Roads 47 and 10.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1) (Commissioner Hagen abstaining) CARRIED
1
i
stew Business was concluded at 11.,05 p.m
Old Business,
None,
Peoorts of Officers, Boards and Committees,
Commissioner Stewart stated he had a conflict with both the Planning Commission
Meeting and the M.T.C. Advisory Board for the Northeast Corridor scheduled to
Meet. on January 8, 1:975. It was suggested he attend the M.T.C. Meeting as he is
the appointed representative for the City of Plymouth.
a
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 4, 1974 were `presented
for approval
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissioner Erickson that
the miatutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 4 1974 be approved as
presented,
140TION CARRIED (5--0-1.) (Commissioner Stewart abstaining) CARRIED
PLANNING CQMMISS ItiECT xNr MINUTES 13 December 18., 1974
The informal complaint received in connection with the request of Hettye J4 PacygaetasbroughtupsCo'amissioner, Hagen stated any tomplaint5 should be given to the
Staff in time for the Staff ac- present them to the Commissioners, where possible,
The minutes of the Planning 'ommission Meeting of November 20, 1974 were presentedforapproval.
Cot issioner Stewart ,suggested that: Bob Baldwin. was not. President of Baldwin
Chevrolet. Commissioners then expressed the feeling they would like to have the
Staff check into the possibility that the Council Had made some kind of suggestior,
agreement, or committnment to Baldwin Chevrolet that they locate where they are nowproposingafacility, as there had been rumors and also a quote in the Plymouth Sura
regarding this situation.
MATIOU was made by Comissioner Stewart supported by Commissioner Schneider that
the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 20, 1974 be approved
as corrected.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-10) (Commissioner Erickson abstaining)' CARRIED
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen supported by Commissiioner Davenport that
the meeting be adjourned.
li The meeting was adjourned at 11*-15 pita.
I _
Approved' by Planning Commission
Regg Kt Qs%in, Chairman
Pl'ywLtth Planningommission
Charles, Dillerud, Secretary