Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-05-1973PLANNING COMMISSION VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA December 5, 1973 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order byChairmanKroskin. at 71--135 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the Public Works Building, 12900 23rd Avenue North. MEMBERS PRESENT-. Chairman Kroskin, Commissioners Hagen, Threinen, Erickson, Stewart., and Majka MEMBERS ABSENT; Commissioner Johnson STAFF PRESENT., Martin Overhiser, Milt Dale, Georgia Rehbein A-525 Herb ,Mason Preliminary Plat HERB MASON Public Hearing opened, 7.35 p.m., Public Hearing Planner Dale explained that the subject site is located Just south of County Road 18 and east of Vicksburg Lane, with the south property line the boundary line between Plymouth and Minnetonka. He stated that the petitioner desires to sub-, divide the 9 acre parcel into 12 single family lots, Planner Dale indicated that Staff has; reviewed the proposal and has met with the petitioner. Staff feels the proposal involves several constrai nts, a primary problem being access onto County Road 15, and has recommended that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the plan proposed by the petitioner. Staff would suggest another type of platting with a cul de sac off proposed Ranchview Lane extended. Rick Sathre of McCombs -Knutson Associates, representing the petitioner, explained a map showing lot arrangements involving a cul de sac street and a letter clarifying Mr. Mason's proposal,. Dick Knutson, McCombs -Knutson, stated that the return on Mr. Mason's investment would be less utilizing the 15 lot arrangment proposed by Staff because of the high cost of the cul de sacs. He added that he would recommend that common driveways be made a condition of the approval and that the plat be approved as submitted with that condition. He stated further that the Staff proposed arrangement would necessitate extending utilities from County Road 15 and this would be costly. He stated that the petitioner has requested that the proposal be approved` or denied, then submitted to the Council Commissioner Threinen questioned when Minnetonka plans to construct Ranchview extended. and when Plymouth will put its stub in. Planner Overhiser answered that the street extension will perhaps occur with development of the property to the south, with; street right of way acquired at the time of the subdivision development. Chairman Kroskin asked if Staff has reviewed the lot arrangement submitted earlier in the day, Planner Overhiser answered that the proposed layout Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 1973 with all the lots fronting on county Road It had been reviewed, but Staff believes this arrangement is not the best way to plat because lots on the east end of the site (7 through, 12) are very large andtheremaybefuturerequesttosubdividethebackpartsofthelots. Commissioner Threinen stated that this is exactly what occurred, onCountyRoad24, and added that providing Village services to this area would be extremely difficult after, Subdivision., Commissioner Threinen questioned if the intent is to create 12 lots and liSore joint drives. Mr. Knutson responded his is the intent. Claltlmln Kroslin q,,estioned future status, of County Road 15. PlannerOverhiserstatedthattheGoals, Objectives, and Criteria state that no private drives onto thoroughfares should be permitted, and although County Road 15 would technically be a collector street, the aim should be, 0 limit if possible the private drives off County Road 16. Public Hearing closed, 7.,50 p. 1m. Hearing Closed MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Commissioner MOTIONHagen, that action be taken on this request at. the present meeting. TO -ACT/ Motion carried unanimously. Carried Chairman Kroskin asked for a Staff opinion on this request, Planner Overhiser stated that initially,, the consulting engineers were informed that the first proposal of 12 lots, all fronting on 15, was not the best way to plat the property and they did consider another alternative in creating a cul de sac off 15, thereby creating 15 lots. He stated that economic factors are a prime consideration of the petitioner., but added that economy shouldbe a minor point in approving a plat of this area. He pointed out that ultimate, deve1c,,,,)ment or the property to the east and. south should be considered. He indicated' that the Staff sketch or the alternative proposed by the developer is, in his opinion, the best way to plat the property regardless of the, economics, Commissioner Hagen questioned how this property was treated when sewer and water was provided around County Road 6. He indicated his concern that we may be adding additional water and sewer pipes to create three or four- additional lots. Commissioner Threinen cited Chapter VII of the Subdivision Ordinance Which states: "In order to safeguard the best interest of the Village of Plymouth and to assist the subdivider in harmonizinghisinterestwiththoseoftheatlarge, this Ordinance is adoptedill (Section 2.,01, page 153) He stated he does not believe this plat in the best interest of the Village. MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Chairman MOTION TOKroskin,that the request of Herb Mason for Preliminary Plat RECOMMEND approval based on the letter and sketch dated November 30, 1973 DENIAL/ be recommended for denial based on criteria set forth in Goals, Objectives, and Criteria: m) Eliminate unsafe private access (driveways) to thoroughfares." (Page 9; Goal:Security, Objective 3, Criteria 3, Item m) fie stated that although County Road 15 is not a thoroughfare, it is an extremely busy street, Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 6, 1973 Commissioner Erickson questioned if development is being restricted on this property, pointing out that the most dangerous situation occuringonCountyRoad15isthepointatwhichtheroadcurves. Commissioner Threinen, reminded the Commission that the petitioner has asked for either approval or denial, not variations to the proposal. Commissioner Erickson stated that the Staff proposal does not change the reality of a number of lots fronting on County Road 15, Commissioner Threinen stated, that a major concern of Staff is the possibility of large lots intended for future subdivision. He stated that this potentia" -.rrolem does not harmonize with the future plans of the Village, Chairman Kroskin questioned if there were not other alternatives to the Staff proposal.. Commissioner Stewart stated he believed that the Staff proposal may be the best way to plat the land using a cul de sac and would not really demand the extension of Ranchview. Planner Overhiser stated a condition could be made that right of way for Ranchview not be required until such time as development occurs. POTION to recommend denial carried unanimously. Carried f—A-S2-41 balawin Chevy -Diet _=A-524 BALDWIN CHEVROLET Planner Dale explained that the petitioner proposes to Rezoning, R-0devpl-.-F a new and used car dealership in the 10 acre to B-3 R-0 area located 1,000 feet off County Road 9 and directly west. of County Road 18. Staff recommends granting the rezoning request (if the General Development Plan is revised) subject to five conditions, Commissioner Threinen questioned why the area is prod od for rezoning to D-3 instead of B-2, when the Ordinance requires a onditional Use Permit for auto sales in the B-3 District and not it -k',.he B-2 District. Planner Overhiser stated that the B-2 District is intended to be a retail shopping center district, while the intent of the B-3 District is to consist of service type establishments that might be located adjacent to retail centers. He added that the subject area is not guided as "CH Highway Service" on the Guide Plan, but is adjacent to i CH area. Chairman Kroskin asked the petitioners to introduce themselves: Mr. 6 Robert Baldwin and Don Baldwin, Mr. Bodlow of Baldwin Chevrolet, and Mr. Jean Paul Budinger, architect. Mr. Bud,inger stated that the five conditions outlined by Staff are agreeable to them and utilities will be available to the subject site. Co,amissioner Hagen stated chat the proposal does not comply with theGuidePlan, but rather proposes Oat the Guide Plan be changed. He questioned if there were any salient reasons why the Guide Plan should be changed or if any tangible benefits to the community could be provided by this business. Planner Dale stated that although the proposal is not actually in. the CH area on the Guide Plan, it is adjacent to an, area so guided on the Guide Plan. He added that he assumed that the problem was that the adjacent land was not available for sale when the petitioner was purchasing land, Commissioner Hagen stated that in terms of planning this reasoning is unsound. Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 5, 1973 Mr. Robert. Baldwin stated that for this type of business, a location adjacent to the County Road 18 service road is required. The adjacent parcel, which would follow the Guide, Plan, was in multiple ownership and negotiations were carried on individually with the owners, However, Mr. Baldwin continued, this parcel contained slews, streams, and drainage problems would have been severe. He stated that the business would be an asset to the co;Mmunity and added that the integrity of the company isbeyondreproach, Chairman Kroskin stated his concern that the area not become like the area along Highway 12, with several dealerships clustered along thehighway, each surrounded by acres of cars, Mr. Baldwin responded that this proposal would be a GM franchise, and no Chevrolet dealer can locate within five miles of another. He added that they have no intention of having acres and acres of cars, but that area for 500 cars to be stored on the site will be sufficient for their purposes. Thomas Berg, President of the Middle East Homeowners Association, submitted a petition containing 97 signatures of persons opposed to this development. He stated that their description of this development would involve the words noisy, brightly lighted, sprawling, clustered, congested, with a carnival like atmosphere. He stated that traffic problems would be created. He added that since the vast majority of the area would be blacktopped or covered with buildings, there would be surface drainage problems. He cautioned on the possibility of theft and vandalism and the fact that this dealership will attract others. He stated that the people in this. neighborhood propose the utilization cf a limited access roadway withScompatibledevelopment, but added that this proposal is not compatible. Chairman Kroskin stated that the opposition outlined in the petition is broader than just the proposed auto dealership, Mr. Berg stated that the people surround'i'ng the proposed dealership and residents in the area to the south have definite ideas about use of the area; they feel the Guide Plan should be updated. Chairman Kro..kin stated that they are, in essence, suggesting a moratorium on zoning, Mr. Budinger stated. that tieyy intend to develop only the east half of the property at present, but the requirements had stipulated that any future development rust be outlined. He stated that the back half of the property is guided for a commercial use and an office type use could ultimately be housed on this portion of the site rather than new and used car storage as orig°inally drawn on the map, Planner Dale stated that the whole site should be shown as it will ultimately be developed. Commissioner Erickson asked if it would not be possible to rezone five acres of the parcel now and five acres at a later date. Commissioner Hagen pointed out that the Ford dealership is now north on 18 and the theory that dealerships tend to cluster together is perhaps correct, Public Hearing closed, 8;21 p.m. Hearing Closed MOTION' was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO Stewart, that action be taken on this proposal at the present meeting. ACTT Motion carried 5-1, with Chairman Kroskin opposed because, of his belief that the proposal could use more work. MOTION was made by Commissi ner Threinen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TOStewart, that the request of Baldwin Chevrolet for rezoning from RECOMMEND DENIAL/ Planning Commission Minutes -- December 5, 1" RKQ to B-3 be recommended for denial based on the following reasons: 1) The area is guided ",CL Limited Business and the Baldwin proposal does not meet the criteria for such a land use guiding. It is the intent of the existiu°g Zoning Ordinance that B--3 uses are not to be located adjacent to residential' properties zknd that outdoor business shall not be conducted in front., side, and rear yards near the LA-3 District. (Section 13, Subdivisi,,)It 5, Paragraph 3) 3') 1f the entire site should be usead, the grading proposed and the 70 blacktopping could create future problems with runoff zr excess of that estimated by the Village, In the Stora Drainage Plan. Commissioner Hagen pointed out that the storm sewer in the area of the proposed interchange was designed using volumes established by the Village consultant in the area and is part of the ponding provided in the inter- change, He stated further that the Village has agreed not to overload these volumes. Commissioner Stew<rt stated he concurred: with Commissioner Hagen; that the Guide Plan designates areas to be used for highway service, and rezoning a parcel of land teat. does not fit into the Guide Plan will be inviting the prdbl,m of too many establishments of this nature, Chairman Kroskin commented that at the time the Guide Plan was adopted, the lines were discussed as being flexible and meant 'within this region'. He stated he would not concur that if a use does not fit exactly within the lines, it cannot be permitred. Commissioner Threinen stated that it was the consensus also that areas in thoseregions should be high density, and: if this is adhered to, the dealership use should be located in the extreme south end of the Highway Service area:, not the north end. Commissioner Hagen stated that he would not object to varying from the Guide Plan a little, but. 50% to 75% is excessive. He added that if the Guide °tan is going to cha°nge that much, it will have to be adjusted, and the decision will have to be made if that much highway service is really desirable. Chairman Kroskin wondered what sort of change in tete area would be considered,. Commissioner Hagen indicated that the market would dictate this, Planner Overhi.ser stated that the second page. of the Staff keport explains the Staffs thinkingthat theandh CH area on the Gude Plan is about 30 acres, with the proposal to increase the area by 10 acres (5 acres if only the east half of the site were considered). Commissioner Threinen stated that a precedent should not be set with regard to changing the Guide Plan, and that economics alone should not guide the decisions of the Planning Commission. He questioned if this develop- ment would really be a benefit to the community, Motion to recommend denial carried unanimously. Motions Carried A 462 Association of free Lutheran Conor ations A-462 ASSOC. FREE LUTHERAN Public Hearing opened, 8#22 p.m. CONGRE TIONS Public Hearing Rezoning R--4 Rick Sathre of McCombs-Knutson, representing the petitioner, to R-1 disttribu,ted a let,er from Pastor Snipstea;d stating that since Planning Commission Minutes Decem'ber 5, 1973 no assurance was being offered by the Village, that a Conditional Use Permit would be granted, to allow them to develop their campus along the lines of the General Development Plan, they would oppose the rezoning of the property at this time. Chairman Kroskin, statedth Lt there is some misunderstanding; that Staff's recommendation had been, to grant a Conditional. Use Permit, Public Hearing closed, 8:25 p.m. Hearing Closed MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO Stewart, that the request be tabled unt=il the misunderstanding DEFER/ is resolved, Motion carried unanimously, Carried Planner Overhiser stated he would, contact Pastors Strand and Snipstead. Schaper Manufa.cturin2 SCHAPER MFG Planner Dale introduced the proposal, explaining Site Plan Review that the intent is to construct a warehouse/light manufacturing building which will eventually employ Conditional' Use 30persons on this site located on the SE corner of Xenium Permit Lane and Water Tower Circle. Staff recommends approval of thio request subject to four conditions. He stated that John Roby from Schaper is present to answer any questions for the Planning Commissinn, Commissioner Stewart questioned where the water in the holding pond discharges. Mr. Roby provided the Commission with information on how this process works, assuring them that fic glass particles will enter the Village sanitary sewer system, the pond is adequate to hold the amount of glass stored in it, Is, cleaned three to four times per year, and there is no chance it the pond will overflow due to excessive surface runoff. H indicated that they are presently working with engineers to try to eliminate the, need for this holding, pond, and when this is accomplished, this area on the west border of the site could be used for additional parking. Chairman Kroskin questioned where access to this parking would occur. Planner Dale responded that access would be through the loading area. Ch-irman Kroskin stated he did not believe this access would be very desirable, Planner Dale answered the site on which the holding pond is now located would be the only site available for future parking, but added that the maximum number of employees will be 30 and the Site Plan contains 44 parking spaces. Commissioner Hagen questioned if the parking 'meets setback requirements of 50 feet from the street right of way. Planner Overhiser answered yes. Commissioner Hagen questioned if the 50 required feet on the east/west portion of the site is met. Planner Overhiser answered, yes, but added that part of th-6 drive area of the parking lot is within the setback a.rea, which is permitted. MOTION was made by Commissioner Stewart, supported by Commissioner MOTION To Erickson, that the request of Schaper Manufacturing Companyj Inc. RECOMMEND for approval of a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to perform APPROVAL/ light manufacturing and suL-assembly of fiberglass products at its site at the southeast corner of Xenium Lane and Water Tower Circle be recommended for apprc,,AiJsubject to the following conditions: Planning Commission Minutes -7- December 5, 1973 1) That a performance bond for lands(aping. improvements be placed with the. Village prior to Building Permit approvaland that a more. complete landscaping plan be submitted to the Director or Planning and. Community Development for approval. 2) That the park dedication requirements recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission lie made a part of this recommendation, i,e. with Staff recommending a cash contribution of $1 ,415 for 2.8.3 acres, 3) That all storage of garbage and waste materials be within the building. 4) That no holding pond particles be allowed to drain into the V111 age's sani tary sewer Wstem. Motion carried;, all ayes, Motion Carried T377 B. W. & Leo Harris Company B. W. & LBO HARRIS CO. Chairman Kroskin stepped down from all discussion and voting. General Development Planner Dale explO ned that the petitioner proposes to use this Plan/CUP site at the northwest corner of I-494 and Highway 55 for a Ramada Inn and restaurant facility, office building ,financial center, and service station. Planner Overhiser added that the petitioner is before the Planning Commission at this point for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Business Development based on a General Development Plan, He stated that Staff is recommending that the General Development Plan submitted be revised taking into consideration the six comments expressed in a November 26, 1973 letter from Staff to the petitioner, Commissioner Threinen questioned why Staff would suggest traffic be handled as they had, Planner Overhiser responded that the motel site is very tight as far as the relationship between buildings and site area. He stated that the motel site should be extended to have some frontage on Harbor Lane, thus creating overflow parking as well as access to Harbor Lane. He added that while the Staff proposal may seeminconvenient, people going into the Radisson development have to travel 1,300 feet past the site and south on Xenium Lane, then have to double back on a frontage road set back 300 feet from Highway 55. Commissioner Hagen suggested an opening at Ferebrook Lane, moving the access point north to a line between the proposod' financial center and Ramada Inn site, He added he does not believe the proposed plan to be workable because the area involved is too small; he stated he believes they perhaps cannot justify having a Ramada Inn of that size on the site involved, Planner Overhiser stated Staff is unsure how the Ramada proposal will look in final form. It was gvest4oned if there, are any firm plans on the State-planned in:terchange at 494 and 55. Planner Overhiser stated that the latest plan shows a 3-tier interchange which would require 200 feet alQ-,,,g the south side of this property, but no firm commitment has been made by the State as of yet, Ray Harris introduced Prank Harris, his brother, Mr. Frank Burg Consulting 5ngin.eer and Mr. Richard Podolske, Traffic Consultant, Mr, Harris stated Planning Commission Minutes -8- December 5, 1973 that his company owns a total of 40 acres, only 17 of which are being proposed for development at this time. He outlined the history of this land., stating that at or,,-- time they only ret,:'ned 9 acres as a result : State Highway Department urchase,, ;rid other dedications. He adder ghat they have bought bac and reassembled this 40 acre parcel of r-,nd, Mr. Podolske, Traffic consultant, stated that the proposed access onto Fernbrook will generate 2 c,a.rs per minute in the peak hour. He stated that there will be a direct,`onal: signal on 55 and Fernbrook Lane, plus cars being stored on the site before; coming out. He added that this is not unreasonable for southbound/outbound traffic. He indicated that i; an ideal situation, there should be no access onto a public street_, but on a major arterial street, some points must be compromised, Mr. Harris stated. that alternatives for access have been presented. to the Ramada people, but they want access off Fernbrook, not Harbor Lane or anywhere eI'!se. He continued that the Ramada Inn is the only intended user of this accessess pont and any developmentnorth will use Harbor Lane extended. Mr. Podolske stated that the problem in essence is whether or not this type of land use in this location is desired. Planner Overhiser stated that the Village of Plymouth would be compromisingtheCoals, Objectives, and Criteria which prohibit any private drives off thoroughfares if the 'In Only' drive is permitted' from: Fernbrook Lane. He added further that the Goals of the Village should be applied wherever possible when planning new streets and new lots. Commissioner Stewart stated that the most important objective is to get the people into the site, they can be directed out by way of signs onto the cul de sac_. He believed this would be the safest method and would avoid confusion. With regard to the Staff proposal of a fifty footparkingsetback area from all streets to be kept free of parking but used; for drives where necessary, fir. Harris stated that the Ordinance requirements have been met with regard to site coverage and setbacks. He stated that the Ramada people are not willing to buy more land to conform to requirements beyond' the Ordinance, Mr, Frank Burg stated that if the request for a fifty footsetbackwere adhered to,, it would necessitate adding one more acre onto the parcel. Commissioner Hagen responded that planning a development to be aesthetically pleasing offers the greatest advantage to the occupier of t.h- land. He stated that the development as proposed has too much blacktopping and an effort has to be made to make these large areas more sightly. He added that the Commis-sion is asking for some consideration o,f measures that othe,s in the area have taken in this regard. It was noted that the 20 foot tiarking setback is minimum requirement and that other developments in the area have maintained the 50 foot setback. After a lengthy discussion on parking, it was agreed that when the petitioner comes in for Site Plan approval, all the .required parking stalls need not be shown but areas for parking expansion should' be shown, where the Ordinance requirements can be met. Commissioner Threinen added that if the development will be a joint use, a variance could be granted for parking. Planning Commission Minutes -9- December a, 1973 MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen,`supported by Commissioner MOTION TO Stewart, that the request of B. W. and Leo Harris Company for a DEFER Planned Business Development Conditional Use Permit based on a General Development Plan be deferred until such time as the petitioner and Staff have had a change to work out differences with regard to access and; parking and setback requirements. MOTION carried 5-•0-1, with Chairman Kroskin abstaining. Carried So as to provide the petitioner with some direction, Commissioner Hagen polled the Commission on paints suggested by Staff for revisions to the General Development Plan With regard. to access, the Commission would suggest an exit from the site onto a cul de sac and other routes available other than Fernbrook Lane. The site would be entered at an In Only' entrance at least 200 feet north of Highway 55. With regard to the fifty foot parking setback suggested by Staff,, the Commission concurs. A--277 Lorraine H. Beam A-277 LORRAINE BEAM Commissioner Stewart asked the petitioner if any alterations Dog Grooming had been made to the building in which this occupation is Home Occupation being performed. Mrs. Beam answered no. MOTION was made: by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO SMajk.a, that the request of Lorraine H. Beam for a Conditional Use RECOMMEND Permit. to operate a dog grooming business at her home at 11624 APPROVAL/ Highway 65 be recommended for approval for a period of one year and that no part time or full time employees be retained by the petitioner. MOTIONcarried, six ayes. Carried A-526 LandTech Corporation A-: 26 LANDTECH CORP The petitioner requests a Conditional: Use Permit to operate Montessori School a Montessori School in "The Place" apartments located In "apartment at the southwest corner of Pilgrim and Lancaster Lanes, Gormpiex Marsh Everson, petitioner, stated that the LandTech Corporation controls an apartment complex across the street, and wondered; if children from this complex could not etroll in the school also. Planner Overhiser responded that the intent of the Ordinance as passed by the Council had been that only children from the apartments complex in which .the school is, located be enrolled: MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO Hagen, that the request of LandTech Corporation for a Conditional RECOMMEND Use Permit too perate a Montessori Sch=iol in an apartment complex APPROVAL/ be recommended for approval subject: to the fallowing conditions.: flThat no outdoor sigh be permitted. That only persons residing in "The Place," apartment complex be admitted to the school. B) That. the Conditional Use Permit be granted for one year and be subjoct to annual review. Planning Commission Minutes December S, 1973 MOTION carried unanimously. Motion Carried 7A-.5271 Graybow-fels Company 5 - 21 GRAYBOW-DANIELS Planner Overhiser introduced the proposal, explaining that Site Plan. the petitioner Wishes approval of a temporary storage building onthe site at 9700 13th Avenue Nor0. He indicated that since the Staff Report was Writtent the Staff has become concerned over whether or not the building will actually be temporary and willcomedownatacertaindate. He stated that Gray bow -Daniels is negotiating with Ryerson Steel to the west along 13th Avenue and will ultimatoly be expanding their facility to the west. Commissioner Threinen pointed out that according to the Building Code Advisory Cori.mission, this sort of structure is technicallynotabuilding. Mr. John Sukalo, Graybow-Daniels, stated that a structure which exists across the street from them is the. type of structure they hope to put up, He stated, that if they must comply with the three conditions outlined by Staff, he did not believe they would pursue the matter. 0 He added that the building they propose is 40' X 721, 14 feet high, of colored metal, and not intended for any use outside of storage. He stated that they do plan on expanding theNr facility within the next two to four years. Commissioner, Ericksen stated that the reason for requiring an increase of parking spaces is that parking is inadequate now and a Site Plan, approval cannot be granted unless' parking and screening is brought up to Ordinance requirements. Planner Overhiser stated that the prime consideration should be the intent; if any employees are going to be, housed in this building; the State Building Code will not permit it. Commissioner Hagen, pointed out that there is a parking problem on the existing site. Planner Overhiser indicated that there was an evident parking problem at the time of field inspection, with parking being done in areas now shown on the original Site Plan as parking areas approved 1968-69). Planner Overhise- stated that the condition requiring fire lanes and fire hydrants could be omitted until a major exoansion occurs, however,, he added that the conditions requiring screening and additional parking are necessary. MOTION was ie by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner Erickson,MOTION that the r,,Aest of Graybow-Daniels Company for Site Plan review approval TO of a proposed detached metal building on their existing site be RECOMMEND recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: APPROVAL/ 1) That an increase of 25 parking spaces be provided and no parking setback variances be granted, with all parking areas to be paved and drainage plans approved by the Village Engineer. 2) That the yard storage area be screened with plantings and/or some other screening device other than the present chain link fence with plans to be approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development prior to issuance of a Building Permit.. Planning Commission: Minutes -11K December 5, 1973 U 3') That the building be of a temporary nature only, with a gime limit set, MOTION carried, S-1, with Commissioner Threinen opposed because of Motion his opposition to the erection of this sort of building, Carried Mr. Sukal o stated he was not sure they would pursue the proposal any further, A- 5a1Roanoke Properti es; Tris. A-523 ROANOKE PROPERTIES MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Consolidation & Commissioner Erickson, that the request of Roanoke Division of Platted Properties, Inc, for the rearrangement of Lots 39 Lots through 42 of Morrison's Lake View Addition be MOTION TO DIRECT/ incorporated into a preliminary plat to be submitted to the Planning Commission at a public hearing as required by Ordinance. MOTION carried, six ayes. Motion Carried A-203I Control Data Corporation ]A-203-1 CONTROL DATA MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supportedby Site Plan Commissioner Stewart, that the request of Control Review Data Corporation for Site Plar approval of a 14' X 14' MOTION TO addition as shown on plans dated 11--20-73 be recommended RECOMMEND APPROVAL/ for approval MOTION carried, six ayes. Motion Carried' A-508 Ratdon Daniels A-508 RALDON DANIELS MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen,- supported by Site Plan/CUP Commissioner Stewart, that the request of Raldon Daniels for approval of a Site Plan dated november 21, MOTION TO RECOMMEND 1973 for a building addition to the facility located APPROVAL/ at 3425 County Road 18 and a Conditional Use Permit to operate a sporting goods store be recommended for approval subject to the following: conditions- 1) onditionsc17Thattheparkingareaberevisedinsuchamannerthat there be a green strip provided adjacent to the front property line to concorm with that of the pizza parlor on the north and 15 foot side and rear yards be maintained.. 2) That a landscaping plan for the yard areas be submitted' subject to Staff approval. 3) That all signs adhere to Zoning Ordinance regulations and be subject to Staff approval. 4)' That the exterior facade of the addition conform to the existing building facade in material and coloration. 5) That no outside storage be allowed Planning Commission Minutes 12- December 5, 1973 1 Commissioner Stewart asked that emphasis be placed on the landscapingofthisparcel. MOTION to, recommend approval carried 5-1, with Commissioner Erickson helleving, that if the petitioner would eliminate the nen-conforming residence, he would not have to add on, Carried FA -35-21 Northwestern Bell - Central Telephone, Office Facilityf—AT5-52-1 NW BELL Planner Overhiser provided background on this proposal, stating that an attempt is being made to recognize the Council's intent, of issuing a Conditional Use Permit for this facility, He Subdivision continued that theproblem lies in the fact that Northwes,tern Bell does not hold clear title to Parcel A., MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner Stewart, that in view of the previous actions by the Council approving the siting of the office at the 'northeast corner of County Road 9 and Fernbroolk Lane,,- the request of Northwestern Bell a --id Robert and Oorothy 80,,thiauznie for a Subdivision Variance to create Parcels A and bo recommended to the Village Council for approval subject to the followting conditions-, 10 That 43.5 feet of right of way alonf, Fernbrrok Lane be dedicated to the Village for stroet and ntility purposes. MOTION !*0 RECOMMEND APPROVAL/ 2) That 66 feet of right of way foj^ st,-eet and utility purposes be dedicated along the sout'll side of tile Northwestern Bell Rarcel A (61 feet of right of wcy over West 231 feet). 5) That the street right of way requirements for Parcel B be met at the time the parcel is developed for any other use. 4) That the park dedication requirements be a cash contribution to the Park Dedication Fund subject to Park Commission concurrence, Commissioner Hagen added that he realized that Northwestern Bell has no control over point number three, but this 'point serves as future assurance to the Planning Commission, MOTION carried, all ayes. Motion Carried AM4U5NW Bell - ULniS. Rth Off 1 ce Addn =A-406 NW BELL After, revivi,-ing the p'ropnsed Northwaster t, Bell Final. Final Plat Plat, it was moved by Commissioner Hagen, supported by MOTION TO, Commissioner Stewart, that the Chairman 'e dire}t!-ed to AUTHORIZE sign the hard shells for the "Northweston'r, Bell/Rlymovth SIGNATURE/ Office Addition" after the Village Cothcil has approved of it, Motion carried. Carried It was decided that the regular Planning Commission meetir- would be held on January.9 and 23. for January Planning Commission Minutes -13- geeembelk 5, 1973 MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen,, supported by_ Commissioner 11.7_75 Hagen,, that the Planning Commission M.i nutes o hoYember 7' 1973, Minutes be approved as printed Motion carried, Adjourn, 71:50 p.m Reg Kroskit, Chairman Plymouth Planning Commission Mlarti n W. Overh ser, Secretary APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION December 19, 1973