HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 10-03-1973PLANNING COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH MINNESOTA
October 3, 1973
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order
by Chairman Kroskin at 7:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Public Works Building, 14900 23rd Avenue North.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Krosk n, Commissioners Thre'inen, Hagen,
Erickson, Stewart, and ,Majka (arrived approximately
8:00 Pm.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Johnson
i
STAFF PRESENT- Martin Overhiser, Milt Dale, Georgia Rehbein
A-449 Walton Ford & M. G.. Astl eford A-449 WAI.TON FORD
M. G ASTLEi=TRD
Planner Dale introduced the request, explaining
that; the site location is at the southwest corner Public Hearing
of County Road 10 and 18. He stated that Staff is
recommending that the Walton site plan be approved Preliminary Plat
subJect to four conditions. Site Plan
Mr. Bob Orth reviewed the preliminary plat and site
CUP for Auto Agency
plan drawing with the Planning Commission. He stated
that the proposed plat will require one. entrance off
Bass Lake Road matching the existing; exit on the north
side of County Read 10 and another -entrance at the end
of the turn around,
Commissioner Threi'nen asked when the auto agency is proposed
to be implemented. Mr. Orth answered that they hoped to get
the bl acktoppi ng in. yet this fall, He added that the Walton
site plan indicates extensive blacktop area and a large area
that will be seeded and sodded, with a 50' setback on the,
north and sough.
Commissioner Hagen questioned how the side of the proposal on
which the parking lot and building are located compares in elevati-on:
with the highway ramp. Dave Anderson of Consulting Engineers,
representing Mi, G Astleford, answered the elevation is 900" at
this point and added that the building will set 16' above the
midpoint of this off ramp. Commissioner Erickson asked how cars
would be brought down to the outdoor show area. Mr. Orth answered
that in, the future there would" be only one level
Commissioner Threinen questioned where the non -conforming sign
would be on the site plan. Mr. Orth indicated that the site
plan oiap had been changed as requested by Staff. He added that
scm,e shrubs and a ro.w of parking has been deleted, so the area to
be blacktopped will be smaller. He added that two fire hydrants,
also requested by Staiff, had been added. He assured. the Commission
that the basic theme remains the same.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 3,, 1973
Commissioner Hagen pointed out that the seeding line only goes to
a point 200 feet from ti)e west line and. asked if the grade had
been changed, as the map does not show existing contours. Dave
Anderson replied that the contours depicted are proposed, and the
map indicates how the contours will be when the grading is completed;
Cor, ssioner Hagen stated that if the topsoil is stripped off, dirt
wii_. be blown off the site: Mr. Anderson stated that a silt baoin
had been constructed at the northwest cornea of the property to
collect any silting action caused by rain,
Commissioner Threinen questioned the amount of grading already
completed'. Mr. Anderson answered that the site itself is approximately
90% complete. Commissioner Bagen asked if a permit was issued for
earth moving, Planner Overhiser stated that a permit of this type
does not need to come before the Planning Commission. He stated
that no f,tition had been; initiated for water and sewer, but added
that thia will be dealt with when the final plat and development
contract are under consideration, Commissioner Hagen stated ha.t
if this is the case, the petitioner undertook grading at his own
risk, Planner Overhiser responded that the petitioner has no
assurance that the Village will approve of either the preliminary
plat or the site plan. Commissioner Threinen stated that there is
not much more left to do on the site,, Mr. Anderson stated that there
is more cutting to do on the back portion of the site, and more work
needs to be dons along the west side of the property,
Planner Overhiser stated that the grading permit was issued two to
three months ago through the Building Department under the provisions
of the State Building Cocke, He added that the permit was issued
after review by the Village Engineer and the Hennepin County Highway
Department. Commissioner Hagen stated he did not believe adequate
consideration had been given to the ecology in the area.
Chairman Kroskin pointed out that Council approval had been contingent
upon the drainagee and sewage problem being resolved. He asked that
either Staff or the petitioner explain how and where the drainage
and sewage would be handled. Planner Overhiser answered that the
drainage has been checked by the Village Engineer and the Hennepin
County Highway Department because drainage does bi,eak and flow to
the northwest and southeast, eventually ending up in Shingle Creek
moving southeast to County Road 18 and finally reaching the county
drainage system, Therefore, Planner Overhiser, maintained that the
drainage scheme as it relates to site grading was carefully reviewed
before it was approved. He added that in the report prepared by
the petitioner's consulting engineers and submitted with rezoning,
it was believed that a drain field. and septic tank would be sufficient,
but holding tanks were to be put in as an extra precaution if it
was believed necessary. Mr. Orth added that the sanitary system
would, ,consist of two tanks, drain field, and distribution boxes --
with floor drains in the building itself. Commissioner Threinen
asked where the drain field would be, noting that if drainage were
to flow down the southeast bank, there is a holding pond at the
bottom of this bank, Mr. Orth pointed out where the ponding`area
exists, indicating that no problem should result as there is 70`'
to work with. Chairman Kroskin asked where the holding tanks will
be. Planner Overhiser stated that the petitioner originally proposed
a septic system, and asked Mr. Orth if holding tanks were now being
proposed. Mr, Orth replied that two septic tanks and a drain -field
are being proposed, but no holding tanks for sewage effluentunless
Aecees$ary
Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 3, 1973
Commtssicner Threinen pointed out that a considerable number of
distillates will be swept down the drain from washing cars, etc.
and wondered where these distillates would go. Mr. Orth answered
they would go into a separate tank with a baffle and would be, along
with other oils,, skimmed off and pumped out to be hauled away.He6
stressed that nothing from this baffle would enter the septic system.
Chairman Kroskin questioned if Staff had had a chance to compare
the latest site plan map with the map used in writing the StaffReport. Planner Dale answered no.
Mr. Dave Anderson) representing M. G. Xstleford, reviewed the
proposed plan for the overall development of this plat --of
which the Walton Ford proposal is a part, He stated that on
the grai'ndg plan itself, an earlier question had been raised,
regarding the drainage coming into the large culvert pt,,,t in
by Hennepin County under Bass Lake Road,, He stated that at
this time they cannot determine any development in this area,
which it presently owned by Hennepin County. Mr. Astleford
anticipates that as soon as the County is finished, he will
be able to receive title back for this property, at which time
he would incorporate it into the entire plan. Presently, he
added, there exist two enlarged -type holding ponds. He stated
that one of these is not finished -and the plans will have to
be discussed with Staff. Commissioner Threinen asked if holding
ponds will be incorporated into the creek that flows out of the
lower end of Bass Lake. Mr. Anderson indicated that thea creek
would remain, with the only course being altered the western one--
an.d he added they hope to retain the vegetation throughout. He
stated that the east/west portion of the site is naturally high,
almost a bluff, and it is planned to grade this area in order to
retain a larger lot that could be used as a building site. Commissioner
Erickson questioned how the proposed contours tie iri with existing
contours in the creek area. Mr. Anderson responded that the area
will be filled with a 4-1 slope to prevent erosion, and by regrading
the contours, the area will, be blended in to the natural contours
of the creek banks.
Public Hearing closed, 8:12 p.m. Hearing Closed
Planner Dale indicated that the site plan map does seem to
conform with that submitted earlier except no distinction
has been made as to types of use for parking lots,. He added
that no designation is made as to whicharking areas will be
for customer parking (60 spaces required and which will, be for
employee parking, Mr. Walton assured the Commission that adequate
parki,og wC be provided, but added that if the Commission desires
specific locations Of employee/customer parking, this can be done.
Chairman Kroskin state that enough space exists to enlarge any
parking area if this becomes necessary. Commissioner Hagen added
that the parkiyig provided is well over the Ordinance requirement.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO
Maika, to act on this proposal at the present meeting. Motion ACT/
carried, 5-1, with Commissioner Threinen opposed because of his CARRIED
conviction that nothing had been resolved with regard to traffic
circulation and utility service since the February 14, 1973 meeting
of the Comiitittee of the Whole at which this proposal was recommended
for denial until t'hese items were resolved. He added that neither
Planning Commission Minutes -4- October 3, 1973
County Road 10 nor County Road 18 are completed and they may
not be completed by fall, He added that it is entirely possible
that the service road will not be completed by fall eith.er. With
regard to the sewer program, he stated that the petitioner has
submitted no petition for sewer or water and added that he hopes
this is anticipated because the type of sewage treatment being
proposed is conjecture at best.
Planner Overhiser explained that the petitioner's consulting engineers
believe that the percolacion and soil is adequate to accommodate a
private disposal system and before the Building Department would
issue a permit for this type of system, the; petitioner would have to
submit the results of additional tests in the area.. Commissioner
Threinen asked if the Village Fire Department is approving of a
separate distillate holding tank under the building Planner Overhiser
answered that the hire Department would review that as part of the
building plans.
Commissioner Hagen wondered if theetitioner will install the L-shaped
street (Revere Lane and 55th Avenue prior to opening the facility.
Planner Overhiser responded that this would be part of the final plat
and development contract approval as to when and where the street will
be constructed, Commissioner Hagen stated that a site plan without
provision for a street would be inadvisable.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO
Majka, that the request of Walton Ford for approval of a Site Plan RECOMMEND
for 14 acres at County Road 10 and County Road 18 and a Conditional APPROVAL/
Use Permit to operate a Ford New and Used Car Agency be recommended
for approval subject to the following conditions.
1) That the holding pond areas northwest of the site and at
the southeast portion of the site be subject to the (Walton
approval ofthe Village Engineer with the drainage and Ford)
landscaping bond to be held by the Village and subject
to Staff approval of an adequate sanitary and floor drain
water treatment for a holding system.
2) That the park dedication requirements as recommended by
the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission be made part
of this recommendation.
3) That three fire hydrants, as proposed' by the Village Fire
Chief, be located as shown on the attached Site Plan dated
9-8-73,
4) That the issuance of a Building Permit for the proposed
buildings be withheld until such time as a development
contract be entered into for the platted streets of Revere
Lane and 55th Avenue (referring to the revised site plan,
drown 9-27-73, received 10-3-73),
Motion carried, 5--1, with Commissioner Threinen opposed because of CARRIED
his belief that any development of this property prior to completion
of County Roads 10 and 18 constitutes a critical situation.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO
Threinen, that the request of M. G, Astleford- Company, Inc. for RECOMMEND
Preliminary Plat approval for proposed Bass take Plaza be recommended APPROVAL/
for approval subject to the following conditions:
Astl eford)
Planning Commission Minute -s ,,g,.. Octob-- 3, 1973
1) That dry water and sewer pipes be constructed as part of
the public improvements prior to the surfacing of the
streets,
Z) That the park dedication requirements as recommended by
the marks and Recreation Advisory Commission be made part
of this recommendation.
Motion carried, 6 ayes, CARRIED
A-467 BelMar Bui 1 dens, Inc; A-467 BELM'AR
Planner Dale indicated that the site location of this Office Bldgs #44
proposal is at the northwest quadrant of N;ghway 55, and #5
slightly west of Fernbrook Lane.. The request is for Site Plan
site plan approvalof two office buildings on a site
that had been approved on a general: development. plan.
Presently under construction in this area is Cyrano's
restaurant,
Staff recommends approval of this request subject to several
conditions. Planner Dale added that there is a common driveway
easement to be shared by both office buildings and a rearrangement
of lot lines. He explained further that the office buildings *Form
a nor h/south and east/west alignment and surveys have been submitted
to create 'two parcels.
Planner Dake added that: both lots are sufficient in size and there
is ample parking provided for each building. Chairman Kroskin
pointed out that there are no soil borings on these parcels as of
this date.. Planner Dale stated that the petitioner does not intend
constructing office #5 at this time, but has supplied borin<.Is for
office #4. He added that borings will have tea be submitted before.
a Building Permit will be issued for binding' r5.
Commissioner Erickson stated that the alignment of the entrance
drive is not at a right angle to harbor Lane. John Belgarde,
representing BelMar, stated that they wishes to keep the area to
a maximum in the area northwes of the entrance and also wanted: to
align it with the area within their access easement between the
two buildings,
Commissioner Threinen asked for clarification of tie letter from
BelMar requesting that the motel not be deleted as the Council had
requested. Planner Overhiser responded that the Staff had asked
the petitioner how these two office buildings would be: related to
future office buildings in the area, adding that BelMar had been
asked' to redraft their general development plan in conformance with
the Council Resolution. He stated that the, question of the motel
must be answered before; building #5 is considered.
MOTION was trade by Commissioner Erickson, supported by Commissioner MOTION T4
Stewart, that the request of BelMar Builders, Inc. for Site Plan RECOMMEND
approval of Office Buildings #4 and #5 as shown on a Site Plan APPROVAL/
dated July 26, 1973 be recommended for approval subject to the
following cornditions
Planning Cowi,4sion Minutes -6- October 3, 1973
1) That a perforaance bond for landscaping 4nd drainage improvements
be placed with the. 'Village prior to Duildirg Permit approval.
2) That: the recommendations of the .Eire Chief in regard to
additional fire hydrants and the establishment of 20 foot wide
fire lanes at all buildirg entrances and exits be made a
condition to Village approval..
3) That the park dedication requirements recommended by the Parks
and Recreation Advisory Commission be made part of this
recommendation;
4) That a pedestrian/bicycle paved gay be construrte i along theNorthsideoftheOffice #4 site and the South :3i(?,e of Harbor
Lane.
MOTION was made by Commissioner hrickson, suppol°ted by Commissioner
Majka, that another condition be added MOTION TO
5) That the laxidscaping plan dated August 22, 19'73 be made
AMEND
part of the approval
AMENDMENT carried unanimously. CARRIED
ORIGINAL MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION
CARRIED
A-497 Willard .U. Budnick A-457 WILLARD BUDNICK
Planner Dale explained that the petitioner wishes to subdivide Division of
his existing parcel: on Mrd Avenue just offOrchard Vane into Unplatted
two lots, He added that the new lot would be 110' wide, which Property
conforms with the Ordinance, ,Staff recommends approval subject
to two conditions,
Commissioner Threinen wondered if the proposal by American
Universal is included in the 30 foot street right of way required
for this proposal., as the proposed Nest Tonka Estates adjoins
the subject property. Planner Overhiser stated this right of
way was also to be dedicated by American Universal.
Commissioner Majka questioned the status of the ponding in the area,,
as discussion of 'West Tonka Estates had centered around thas aspect,
Planner Overhiser responded some filling would occur, but would be
coordinated with the grading of -the proposed West Tonka Estates.
MOTION was wade by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO
Brick: on that the request of 'Willard H. Buanick for a division of RECOMNIE?JD
unplatted property as indicated on a plat of survey dated 8-23-73 APPROVAL
be recommended for approval subject of the following conditions
1) That street right of way (30 feet), and utility and drainage
easements as required by the Village Engineer be deeded to
the Village.
Ple-nning Commission Minutes _7Octi'.i,er 3,, 1973
2) That petitioner provide $150 to the park dedication fund, to
satisfy the Village Orditiance requirement for he new lot
created.
A-511 J. Gruman Steel Company A-SlI J. Gruman Stee:
Planner Dale introduced the proposal, stating that the site location Site P;
is in. the 1-1 district just off County Road 18 between the County
Road and Medicine take. He indicated that the petitioner wishes to
build a 21,000 sq. ft. paint shop addition to the existing plant
and, -a 500 foot long crane runway aiong tlie west side of the buildlpg.
Commissioner Stewart -asked how far the runway will extend beyond the
building. Mr.Grumananswered that there would be 67 feet from the
building to the pater.
Commissioner Threinen stated that at this time the crane is on a
flatbed. Mr. Gruman -responded that the bay is needed to support
the crane, adding that this is the manner in which steel is normally
handled—in an open bay clear of interference with a crane running
on a rail the length of the runway. He stated that they have sixx
electrically powered cranes in the existing facility.
Mr. Gruman stated that they wish to build the, same type of building,
He explained that the crane support will be the beginning of anoth-er
bay.
Commissioner Hagen pointed out, that this is an open storage area on
the site and wondered where the screening is. Commissioner Steward
explained that there is very little of the site that can be seen
from Medicine Lake Road except the space between this facility and
Schaper Manufacturing, and much of this area is hidden by a berm.
Commissioner Threinen pointed out that yard storage presently exists
there now. Chairman Xroskin wondered if there would, be a wall on the
west side. Mr, Cruman answered that this ivall would not be erected
until thrc }s are erected even with bay #1 of the, old building.
MOTION was made by Conud-ssioner Threinen, supported by Commissioner i\IOTION TC
Stewart, that the request of J. Gruman Steel Company for site plan REC%ZIBNE
approval (dated September 4, 1973) be recommended for approval APPROVAL
subject to the following conditions.:
1) That the Council consolidate into one parcel those existing
parcels on which the existing plant building is located,,
i.e. parcels 5100 and 3040 north of 13th Avenue.
2) That the recommendations of the Village Fire Chief as
relates -to establishment of fire lanes and fire hydrant
locati4)ns be made a part of this reconmendatitn.
3) That all pa -Acing areas be of a pair I Surface material, with
75 spaces added, and that acIdition"I parking space be
reserved (although not developed) on the site to satisfy
OrdinanceToqui-rements.
4) That all outdoor storage be screened subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning & Community Development.
I
Planning Commission Minutes October 3, 1973
S) That the petitioner's _industrial operation he subject to
the performance standards as established for the I-1 ZoningDistrict (See Section 15, Subdivision 8, Paragraph 2,
Zoning, Ord inane e .
Mr. Gruman stated that perhaps a mesh fence with vines could be
arranged. He mentioned that some laudscaping and possibly some
earth berming will be done as a park is being deeloped by the
Village on a part of the land adjoining the subject property.
Commissioner Thrainen stated that the section of the performance
standards in I-1 districts mentioned in condition #S deals :pith
paint odors, and these should be complied with.
MOTION carried unanimously. CARRIED
Hk ANDERSONA-177 Marvin H. Anderson A-177 MARVIN
Planner Dale stated that the petitioner wishes to locate an office in
the basement of a model, home in the Meadowlawn Estates 4th Addition CUP Sales
development located on 36th Avenue north of Armstrong High School, Office &
Parking
Commissioner Erickson pointed out that, the parking lot takes up
Lot
more area thann shown on the neap, and will have to be at back to
to comply with setback requirements,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported b Commissioner MOTIONION TOStewart, that the request of Marvin H. Anderson Construction: Company RECOMMEND' for a Conditional Use Permit for temporarya sales office and
temporary parking lot in an R--1 District (Lots S & 6, Block n.,
APPROVAL
Meadow Lawn Estates, 4th Addition) be approved subject to the
following coditions
1) That the office and parking lot use be terminated when85 (60 of 70 lots) of the development is completed.
2) That the parking lot area maintain the front, side, and
rear yaW as required in a R-1 district.
MOTION carried, unanimously. CARRIED
BILLA-302 Arne Hill A-302 ARNE
Planner Dale introduced the proposal, indicating, that the
petitioner wishes to establish an auto repair garage on 36th Avenue
and Kilmer Lane,
fir, Hill explained that he buys cars from Chicago and wholesalesthem. He indicated that the office building on the site will be
purchased by him also. He stated `hat he did not anticipate ever: having more than twelve to fourteen cars on the site, and these are
sold in Minneapolis within a two week period.
Planning Commission Minutes October 3, 1973
Commissioner Stewtvt questioned how far back the., east propertylinegoes. Commissioner Hageix stated that the property line ends20feetbehindthegarage. He added that the only prospect.. for
an entryway to the property would beatthe northwest corner.
Commissioner Hagen pointed out that the Ordinance specifies th-t the
front yard, setback be 50. feet and that there 1,,,a no parking in anyrequiredyardarea, but the Staff has established only a 15 foot
no parking area along all property lines. Planner Ovexhiser
stated that Section 17 Subdivision 2 Item 4D specifies that
in the B-3 District no parking or loading space shall. be located
w* thin 15 feet of any property line Commissioner Threinen
tated that a parking setback in this particular area is a mute
question when one considers the existing development,
With regard to signing, sir. Hill stated that the sign would have to
be on the southwest corner of the property on a Wooden diagram
facing the north/south direction in order to be visible,.
Mr. Hill stated 'that his intent is primarily that of a service
garage not car refurbishing. He stated that he very seldom
purchases a car that needs extensive worl. Chairman Kroskin
wondered what percentage of the proposed business would be
wholesale, and what percentage would be retail. Mr. Hill
answered 80S wholesale, 20% retail. He added that in the last
sixty days,, he has retailed four cars out of one hundred.
Commissioner Thre Renminted out that this is a tough traffic
corner because of the apartment complexes on either side, He
stated that the proximity to the Kilmer Lane/36th Avenue intersection
and the, freeway four -lane remp could pose a real problem. fir. Hill
stated that the traffic his business would create would be negligible..
Commissioner Threinen maintained that he would like to see a circulation
study of this ar^a. Commissioner Threinen suggested this matter be
deferred until an o;?inion could be obtained from the attorney Frith
regard to parking setbacks. He added that no traffic study map is
available, Planner Overhiser stated that there are some traffic
counts available,
Commissioner Hagen maintained that an inconsistency exists inOrdinanceenforcement; if a 501 front yard is -required of Walton
Ford, then it does not seem right that a 13F setback is required
in this proposal, Planner Overhiser explained that in an
undeveloped area, no, front yard setbacks have been established,
and the staff stated that a 50" frontyard parking setback is
desirable in the development of new areas,
MOTION' was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by Commissioner
Hagen, that the request of Arne Allan Hill fora Conditional Use MOTICN TO
Permit to operate a used car lot in a B-3 district be recommended RhCO-%IFXD
for denial because of the potential, safety hazard that would be DENIAL
created in an already congested area.: He added that the Goals,
Objectives, and Criteria of the grillage state that the health,
safety, and welfare of individuals -in this case, the people in the
apartment complexes -is to be maint-ined.
Planning. Commission; Minutes October 3, 1973
Commissioner Erickson stated: that in granting a conditional use
permit, the Planning Commission can review the situation after a.
one year period and revoke the permit at this time if problems
have become apparent, Commissioners Hagen and Threi,.nen stated
that revoking the permit would be difficult once it is issued.
Commissioner Hagen stressed that this is not, the proper location
for a used: car lot. Commissioner Erickson replied: that: the use
would be of a wholesaling nature. Commissioner Hagen replied that
the proposal should then be relocated in an industrial area,
NOTION carried, 4-2, with Commissioners Erickson and Majka CARRIED
opposed. Commissioner Erickson stated that traffic problems
would be just cause: to revoke the permit and added that the
Proposed itse itself is not detrimental to the area.
MIP M171I INDUSTRIAL
Planner Dale stated that the site location is at the
PARK (Carlson Co.)
southeast quadrant of Industral Park Eoul.evard and. East
Center Circle in the MIF Industral development. lie Site Plan
indicated that this plan, in comparison with the plan Revision
approved by the Council on July 0, 1970, is not significantlydifferent. Ile stated that the northern portion of the site
aas already been developed and thea now propose three buildings
rather than. the originally appy uved ±u-,tr.
Commissioner Erickson questioned the mi.ni.mini setback distance
between two structures. Planner Dale answered 45 feet and
50 feet respectively. Commissioner Erickson then asked the
setback distance on the building proposed on the southwest
corner. Planner Dale answered 22 feet with a railroad
track right of spay existing there.
MOTION' was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO
Erickson that the request of Carlson Compani.e,, for approval of a RECOMEND
revision to the Site Plan for the MIP Mini-Industrial Park :APPROVAL
dated September 24, 1973) be recommended for approval subject
to the following conditions;
1) That the recommendations of the Fire Cheif shown on the Site
Plan regarding fire lands and the placement of fire hydrants
be made a part of this recommendation
2) That the recommendations of the Village Engineer relative
to d:rai,.iage and utility easements bo made a part of this'
recommendation.
3) That a 50 foot front yard setback for parking be maintained.
4) That a landscaping plan with some tree materials be subit,itted
subject to Staff approval.
S) That a sum of $4,350 (i.e. 8.7 acres of newly developed land
X $500) oe required to satisftie Village's1ages .rk dedxcat ` on oli cyy6) That all parcels within the M ni,Parke consoliatd into
one parcel.
MOTION carried unanimously.. CARRIED
Planning Commission Minutes October 3, 1973
A-196 Ed Keller A-196 EDWARD KELLER
Planner Dale introduced, the request and explained that Mr. Division of
Keller wishes to divide ;his property located just: north of Unplatted
Gleason Lake on County Road 5 into three parcels. property
Commissioner Threinen. questioned -why proposed Parcel C was
only a1 OO' feet st ck off to the side. 4r. T' 11er answered
that the person who yawns proposed Parcel A al ;ants Parcel
C
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, supported by MOTION TO
Commissioner Stewart, that the request of Edward Harvey RECOMMEND
Keller for a division of unplatted property as indicated APPROVAL
on a plat of sury-ey dated September 20, 1973, be approved j
subject to the fallowing , conditions
1) That Parcels A and C be kept intact as one lot,
2) That 271 of right of way be deeded to the Village
along that portion of the property fronting on
County Road 6-
3) 3)That street and park requirements for Parcels A & C
Parcel A) be met at the time the property is platted.
MOTION' carried, six ayes CARRIED
General Discussion
1.) Village practice of noticing property owners of Proposals
before the Planning Commission was reviewed. After discussion,
it was decided that as much is being done as possible, but, it
was suggested that a: larger rezoning sign painted in bright
colors be posted on property proposed for rezoning.
2) Commissioner Hagen stated that a resident on County Road 9
and. Zachary Lane is keeping a lion for a pet.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threnen, supported by Chairman 9-19-73
Kroskin that the Planning Commission Minutes of September 19, Minutes
1973 be approved as printed. Motion carried.
MOTION to adjourn, 10:47 p.m
APPROVED By PLANNING CONZITSSZON October~ 17, 1973
Reg Kroskin, Chairman
P ymo hP n'Ag C mmission
C11 .
Martin If. Overhiser, Secretary