HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 07-11-1973PLANNING COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH', MINNESOTA
JULY 11, 1973
A regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission was called to order by slice Chairman Kroskin
at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Public Works Building on Wednesday, July 11, 1973.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Kroskin, Commissio;ters Erickson, Flagon and Johnsen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Wahl and Commi'ssione3^ Threinen
STAFF PRESENT; Martin Overhiser, Milton Dale, Sherman Goldberg and Debbie Berthiaume
11A4631 ttnnesota imi Stora e - MINNESOTA MINI -STORAGES INC.
Vice Chairman Kroskin opened the Public Hearing.. Amendment to Section 15,,
Subdivision 3 of the Zoning
Planner Overhi.ser explained the purpose of the Public Hearing. Ordinance
He noted that the proposed caretaker type resi deiice was not
allowed by the Village Zoning Ordinance
Mr. Hubbard, representing Minnesota Mini -Storage, explained that PROPONENT
their request was for the providing of a "caretaker security
system. It would be strictly a one. -bedroom to limit it.to a
single person, husband -wife situation, no family. He pointed
out that this would reduce vandalism (the caretakers facility)
thus it would be a benefit to the Village as securitty surveil-
lance by the pol ice wool d be considerably less. He also noted
that lower insurance claims would be achieved due to this care- aretakertakerfacility's security.. Vie Chairman Kroskin questioned if
it would provide security at night. Mr Hubbard stated that it
would definitely be as the caretaker would be living on the
premises; he would be the manager as well as the caretaker. In
addition to security reasons, Mr. Hubbard noted that the appear- ppear-
ofofthe facility would be kept tidy.
There being no other persons to speak, Vice Chairman Kroskin
closed the. Public Hearing.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO ACT
Johnson and unanimously approved to act on the request at that;
meeting.
The Planning Commission further discussed the request and the
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Vice Chairman
Kroskin to recommend approval of the amendment to Section 15,
Subdivision 3 of the Village Zoning Ordinance by the addition of
the following, MOTION TO AMEND
ORDINANCE
4. Residential structures and related residentialuses
necessary for security 4nd safety reasons in relation
to a principle use."'
Planning Commission Minutes -2_ duly 11, 1973
OTION was farther made by Commissioner Hagen,, suppo;,ted by Vice MOTION TO RECOMMEND
Chairman Kroskin that a Conditional Use Permit be granted by the APPROVAL/MARRIED
Village Council for a residentYal use on the east end of the
south structure of Minnesota Mini -Storage and be limited to a
one bedroom facility.
MOTION carried 4-0.
Golden Hours Day Care Centers Inc. I A-4829 'OLDEN' HOURS DAY CARE CTR,
Planner Overhiser introduced and explained the purpose of Amendment to Section 10, Sub -
the peti toner's request to amend the zoning ordinance to division 3 of the Village Zoningpermitdaycarecentersinapartmentbuildings, Ordinance
Mrs, Golden and Mrs Merrill representing Golden Hour: Luy
Care Center were present. sirs. Merrill stated that they had PROPONENTS
established this type of center in Egan Township. She stated
that with this type of service available to the tenants it would
encourage apartment rental in the complex where the center was
located and in adjoining complexes as well. Vice Chairman Kroskin
questioned if it would tend to attract pe;ple with families. Ws
Merrill stated that it would.
Mrs. Merrill and Mrs. Golden stated that they were concerned with
One phrase in the proposed amendment, i.e. "primarily for the use
f ;persons residing therein.," They felt the proposed amendment
should not be restrictive. They stated that they are licensed, by
the state and are required to take children in provided they have
an opening. Therefore, they feel it advisable to eliminate the
word "Primarily".
Commissioner Hagen explained 'that by using the word "primarily" they
are simply requiring that the majority of people which they serve be
living in the complex.
Vice Chairman Kroskin questioned if there was not enough families in the
area 'to support their day care center, would they then solicit children
from the area beyond? Mrs. Merrill stated that they would not. Their
main concern is serving the apartment complex where the center is located,
These being no other persons to speak, Vice Chairman Kroskin closed the
Public Hearing.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner MOTION TO ACT
Erickson to act on the request at that meeting.
MOTION carried 3-1 with Vice Chaiman Kroskin opposed,
After further discussion it was requested that the Staff find out: what the
areaarea will be like, how many families they will be taking care of, what the
will look like, etc. It was noted that from a functional use it
Planning Commission Minutes 3_ July 11, 1973
ould be worthwhile if the primary amoun,.. of children are from the apartment
complex and what the reaction wouldbe of other people in the apartment j
complex to the day care center.
MOTION was made by `Commissioner Oohnson, supported by Commissioner Hagen: to MOTION TO RECOMMENDdeferactionuntilsuchtimeasmoreinformationonthistypeofbusinessDEFER/CARRIEDisacquired.
MOTION carried 4-0.
a dears Equity Ganpany! A- 6 BUILDERS EgUITY COMPANY
Planner Overhiser introduced and explained this request. He Rezoning from R-0 to B-2notedthatthenewlyadoptedLand. Use Guide Plan, (July 2, 1973)
favored that a shopping center be placed there. The area in question
is located north of County Road 9 and west of County Road 1.8. Mr.
Harvey Swenson explained the basic information on the plans of the
proposed shopping center,
Commissioner Erickson questioned how many square feet was to be in
future commercial use, Mr. Swenson stated that there would be 4,33 acres.
Planner Overhiser then explained that in a rezoning request, the zoning
ordinance requires that a general plan be submitted showing the general
location of the buildings, the general location, of the parking, how the
roperty would; be platted, and the location of the streets and trails, etc,
if the: property were to be rezoned by the Village Council based upon this
General Development Plan the petitioner would then have to come back before
the Planning Commission with a detailed site plan showing the precise location
of the buildings, parking, landscaping, signs, etc. They would also have to
present a preliminary and, final plat of the property showing dedicated streets
and'trailwkvs to the Village.
Several persons were in attendance to speak in opposition to the proposed
rezoning, they were.: Bob Flecher, Ted Braggans, Harry Hendrickson, John Wire,
E, R. Hedding, Gary Wolseth, Clarence Peterson, Larry Boardman and Mr. Golberg. In brief, the following points were brought up:
1. An increase in 'traffic generated by the proposed shopping center would
imperil lives and safety of present residents._
2. There is already a shopping celtter located at 42nd Avenue and 36th
Street in New Hopa and it was questioned if there was a need for
another shopping center;
3, A B--2 zoning district already exists at County Road 18 and County Road 9
with nothing happening there
4. No market survey exists to Justify the feasibility of this proposed
shopping center.
Planning Conmiss.ion Minutes -4- July 111 1973
5, The "buffer zone" on the plans seemed to consist of a gas
station which would not be an adequate buffer.
6, The original zoning of R -O (Open Residence District) should
be maintained.* otherwise the valuations of single family homes
in the area would be seriously affected.
7. The development of a shopping center may result in serious
ecological problems, ie.,surface wager drainage, changes in
existing water tables, lowering of water level of Lost Lame
and destruction of natural wild life habitats.
8. An adequate supply of parking may not be made available on the
site which may ,force the, citizens of Plymouth to:solve petitioner's
parking problems at some later date:
9. Inadequate notice of the proposed rezoningwas given to property
owners in the area
10. The proposed shopping center is located too close to the 'inter-
section of Cour..vy Road 18 and County Road 9.
Fred Mengeloch spoke in favor of the proposed shopping center with one
reservation that the east/west roadway be moved north 100 feet to save. the
main bulk of the woods on the property to the west.
WTn response to those: opposed to the rezoning due to its proximity to County
oad 18, Mr. Swenson stated that the site would be locaied some distance
from the interchange, i.e-. about 11000 feet,
In regards to economic feasibility, Mr. Swenson stated that they have a
feasibility study in process which has been completed for one of their
major tenants:. This tenant also completed their own feasibility study.
The tenant is a Triple "A" National Credit Tenant,
Commissioner Hagen questioned if the petitioner has any contracts signed or any
such firm corrkmitments with any tenants, Mr. Swenson, stated that they do have
options out for leases; however, V4Liy cannot commit themselves until they know
if they can build the shopping center.
Mr, Golberg, speaking in: opposition to the rezoning,; requested that the Planning
Commission Chairman ask the proponent if the option, was a letter of intent or
some other document. Mice Cha;rmao Kroskin stated that it is not the responsibility
of the Planning Comm ssion to ask this type of question as the Planning Commission
does not make that determination. It is only their responsibility to hear out the
request and give their recommendation to the Council as it pertains to planning
considerations. However, Vice Chairman Kroskin asked Mr. Swenson if he wanted to
answer Mr. Golberg's question. Mr. Swenson stated that he would present to the
Planning Commission the option letter ana any conversations with tenants at this
point, hcwever,he could not make such information public at this time.
OMr. Wolseth, speaking against the .proposal, noted that in response to Mr.. Swenson's
nswer that the reason that the road could not be brought in from the north and from
Planning Commission Minutes _5_ July 11, 1973
the east was because .of the tieed for a ponding` area in that location. Qr. Wolseth added that the Barr Engineering report on this area did
otpreclude the possibility of bridging this ponding area and he
wondered why this possibility was not consideree.
The public hearing was then closed.
Commissioner Hagen, supported _by Co zissioner Johnson moved to MOTION TO RECOMMEND
defer action on this request in light of the considerable concerns DEFER/CARRIED`
raised by residents until August 1 1973 at 7;30 p.m. This would
permit the Planning Commission additional time to study petitioner's
request.
MOTION carried 4-0.
Plymouth Plaza AssociatesPLYMOUTH PLAZA ASSOCIATES
Planner Overhiser introduced this request and stated that the Rezoning Request From
request was to rezone the industrial and R-4 area to a shopping I-1 and R-4 to
center to develop a'community size shopping center. The area B--1 and B--2
concerned is located at the northeast corner of Vicksburg Lane
and Highway 55 which consists of 80 acres. The earlier guide
plan had shown a community type shopping` center which is the next
size larger than a neighborhood shopping center, and this would
be a shopping center to serve the whole community. The Council
Wheen adopting the Land Use Guide Plan on duly 2, 1973 removed
designation for the Community SUIDpi ng Center from the Guide
Phan and replaced it with: the following footnote.
A Community Shopping Center area will.be encouraged in the
central portion of the Village on a site meeting accepted
location criteria, and when determined the land uses in that
area. will be revised."
Based on the Council's action the Staff recommendation on this
request is that the Planning Commission recommend to the Village
Council that this rezoning be deferred and that the Village
establish a sch3dule for reviewing proposals for a community shop-
ping center. It is known by the Village Council, Planning Commission
and staff that there are three or four or even. more different groups,
property owners, or developers who would like to build a downtown
shopping center.
The proponent, Plymouth Plaza Associates has requested deferral
I
after a meeting with the Planner on the: afternoon of 7-11-73)
assuming, that the Planning Commission was going to take the staff
recommendation to the Council' that, a schedule_.be set up and they
did not want to be reviewed prior to other proposal,) being submitted,
After closing the Public. Hearing, it was moved by Commissioner' Hagen, MOTION TO ACT
upported'by Commissioner Johnson, and unanimously approved that the
equest be acted upon at that meeting.
Following; further discussion Cormnissioi.er Erickson, supported by
Commissioner Johnson, moved that action on the request of Plymouth
Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 11, 1973
laza Associates for rezoning from 1-1 and R-4 to `-1 and G-2 be
deferred and: that. the Village Cou.noil establish the following
schedule for reviewing proposals to develop a community shopping
center.`
I. That by November 1, 1973 that all interested groups MOTION TO SET SCHEDULE
submit a General Developim'-,nt Plan showing how they
propose to develop a community shopping center ,ind/or
public buildings such as the Village Hall and library,
2, Ey dune 1, 1974 a decision be made as to where the
Village would favor the development of a, community
shopping center andtor public buildings such as a`
Village Hall and library.
V10TION carried 4--0.
ectrtc air & Construction Company IA-4ELFCTRIC REPAIR &
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Planner Overhiser introduced this request and noted that it was
a request to change zoning from 1_1 to 1-2 to permit the Rezoning Request
construction of a contractors offices and yards. From. 1-1. to I--2
Mr. Donald Cole, President and Manager of Electric Repair and
construction and. Frank Dvoratt on behalf of Electric Repair and PROPONENTS
onstruction were present. Mr, Ovoratt made a few preliminary
comments in light of the request arid the Staff recommendation
He felt the reruest has to be considered in light of the business
which would be conducted on this, particular parcel. The petitioner
felt that the use was of an I-1 character although the Ordinance
stated that it was Gin 1-2 use. He stated that there would be a
minimal a:tnount of traffic generated as the bulk of trucks would be
left on t5ie job site, taken home by employees and then taken directly
back to the job site, The only traffic would be the 14 administrative
personnel that come to the facility on a daily basis and approximately
seven deliveries a }week for job materials.
in regards to the,: ff report:,. Mr. Dvoratt statwd that they are aware
of the recent Land - Use Guide Plan which suggested that this area
should be developed in Medium High Density Residential as opposed to
the present industrial zoning.. He submitted to the Planning Commission
that this is the tyjpof business that would be conducted within
the: building and the type of screening that could be provided would be
more amenable to the adjoining residential area than the proposed
Medium High Density would be There would be less traffic flow and
noise, Mr. Dvoratt stated that the building would be approximately
14,000 square feet with the majority of the materials contained inside.
Commissioner Hagen questioned the Planner as to the location of the site
in relation to 'the company, that, is making the s,ptic tanks and silos.
ir, Cole stated that itis directly north of the septic tank manufacturer.
Planring ;Commission Minutes -7- duly 11, 1973
Vice Chairman Kroskin questioned the operation of the site which says
warehouse", Mr, Cole stated that there are 14,000 square feet which would
consist of 4,000 square feet of oftice and 10,000 square feet double deck ware: house, The building will be 20 to 22 feet high and it will have some overheaddoors. He stated that there will be estkmators, officers, the people who do thebiddingforprojects,, bookkeepers and secretaries for a: total of 14 persons,
Mr. Cole stated that they require a minimum amount of sewage; about as much as a
fMily of four. They will haat electrically, They have no objection to the gravel
road', the trucks hauling from Northwest Aggregate, the odor nor the swamp to thenorth.
CommissionerErickson questioned to what extent they would be using the outside
yardfor storage, Mr. Coe noted that the company owns 18 'over the road transports"
three of which are in the yard, one auger truck in the winter, and a tractor or two.
Ninety five per cent of the materials will be under cover.
After closing the publichearing, MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported MOTION TO
by Commissioner Erickson. to recommend denial to the Village Council of this requgst RECOMMEND
for the following reasons. DENIAL/
1, The rezoning request: is contrary to several basic tenets of the Goals,
CARRIED
Objectives and Criteria as relates to Goal A; Suitable Housing and
Environment, Objective 3, Criteria 8., Goal C, Security, Objective #?,
Criteria 1.4.
2. The proposed change is contrary to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan
adopted duly 2, 1973.
3 The area proposed for change is not presently serviced by sewer and water.
MOTION carried 4-0,
2t Paul A Laurence Company A-74 21 PAUL A. LAURi+NCE CO'.
Planner Overhiser introduced' and explained this request He stated Preliminary plat
that the major concern was that the utilities to serve this area will Approval
have to be divided to o in two directions (per report of Sherman Gold-
berg, Village Engineer . The southern part of the plat, basically south of
the pond area, can be drained to the south to 36th Avenue. The northern lots
Will have to be drained to the north and then to the west at such time as sewer
is available in that area. He stated that this is a preliminary plat and,
following a preliminary plat the petitioner would have to come in for final platting,`
and it is conceivable that they might final plat the southern part of it that could
be served with sewer at this gime and withhold the final platting of the north part
until sever is available,
Mr, Chuck Wind'en, representing Paul A, Laurence Company, discussed briefly that the PROPONENT
width of the lots, with the major portions 951', 105' and the corner lots 116'. The
lots will accomodate a house of about 75' including garages,.
Mr; Windon questioned the procedures of the park dedication requirement. Planner
woverhiser briefly explained its procedures. He noted that the Staff recommendation
or Outlot A was that it was not really required but they would probably want drainage
easements. However, in Outlot 8 it would 1-e considered to be needed for park dedication
as it is desirable for the overall standpoint for the trails and park system. The
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission must also review this matter.
Planning Commission Minutes _g_ July 11, 1973
ommissioner Hagen noted that there was a big delegation of people
who attended this meeting for an earlier request and that this
latter request also concerned their area. He requested to know if
the homeowners had been notified of this.. Planner Overhiser stated
that each homeowner received a notice for the meeting if they were:
within 400`. It was suggested that in the future that the address
of the property in question be placed on the agenda in orderto relate
the exact location to the area.
Sherman Goldberg, Village Engineer, noted than until we are able to
serve the, north part this area could not be developed. There may be
additional assessments die on the property.
Commissioner Hagen stated that the two corner lots 1 and 6 were in
the ordinance requiring,30 feet rear yard and back and 10 feet on the
side. He questioned if these lots were going to need a variance.
fir. Windon noted his point and stated that they plan to meet the
minimum requirements. He requested that they please .note that this 'is
a preliminary plat
Vice: Chairman Kroskin closed the Public Nearing
Commissioner Hagen., supported by Commissioner Erickson, moved and it MOTION TO ACT
was unanimously approved to take action on the request at this meeting.
Commissioner Hagen, supported by Vice Chairman Kronkin, recommended that
he Council approve Paul A. Laurence Company's: request for preliminary
plat approval and Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions.::
1. That utility and drainage easements of six feet along side and MOTION TO RECOMMEND
rear l`ine6 and ten feet along street 'ROW be shown on the final APPROVAL/CARRIED
plat- for each lot,
2. That the recommendations of the Village Engineer be incorporated
in final platting.
3. That the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Commission
be incorporated as part of this recommendation.
MOTION carried 4-0
V-486 Ro ne Ke 1 er IA -4 RODNEY" KELLER
Planner Overhiser introduced and discussed the request of Preliminary Plat Approva'
Rodney Keller whose land is the property surrounded by Chelsea
Woods and fronts cin County Road f. There is presently a dwell%g
on the Northern part of the parcel and that is proposed to be one
of the lots and then there would be two smaller lots developed in
front of the existing dwelling. The: Staff in reviewing the pre-
liminary plat that was, submitted has recommended the followingOonditlons:
1. That petitioner provide $150 per new lot created to
satisfy park dedication requirements for a total of $300,
Planning Commission Minutes -g- July 11, 1973
2. That petitioner grant 27 feet of R%J on County Road 6.
3, That utility easements be shown: on final plat as required
by Village Engineer.
4 Revising Lot 2's frontage width from 110' to 100' and
Lot #3 from 1201 to 130'
MOTION carried: 4-0:
ar a Verson - DARLA OUVERSON
Planner Overhiser introduced and explained petitioner's Conditional Use Permit For A Nome
request to have a bridal shop in her home at. 710 Orchid Occupation Bridal:. ShopLane.
The proponent, Darla Ouverson was not present at the
meeting, Following brief discussion Commissioner Hagen moved
to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a
bridal shop to be approved for one year. However, after
further discussion the motion failed for lack of a second,
Commissioner Erickson, supported by Commissioner Hagen, MOTION TO RECOMMEND
moved to defer action on the request of Darla Ouverson until DEFER/CARRIED
such time as she was present and could answer several questions
relating to her request.
01OTION carried 4-0.
0 A bent C. Ne son A- ALBERT' C, 'NELSON
Planner Overhiser introduced and briefly explained Division of unplatted
this request. On the north parcel there is an existing property
farmhouse on the west side. On parcel ii is anew dwelling
that has just been constructed.
Mr., Melvin .Bachman, speaking on behalf of Albert C. Nelson
stated that his property (parcel A) would contain approximately
two acres which is what he wanted as he wants no one to build
in front of hirr t He mentioned that he had a: variance for one
acre when he bought the house.
Commissioner Erickson, supported by Commissioner Johnson moved MOTION TO RECOMMEND
that the following recommendation be presented: to the Village: APPROVAL/.CARRIED
Council,
Recommend that the request of Albert C. Nelson to divide off
portion of Parcel 1640 and add it to existing Parcel :1545, subject
to 27' of an additional right of way being dedicated to the Village
for County Road 47, a proposed Village thoroughfare street,
0MOTION carried 4-0.
Planning Cot ission Minutes -1 - July 11, 1973
h T14 DIVISION BIJI.I.DTNGFV04901__-MammotF C v s on Bu ldittg G rlson C r s A 49
Planner Ov=rtiser introduced this request aW stated that a new Site Plan Review
revised plan was submitted for staff review- the, afternoon of
July 11j 1973. The changes were explained to the Planning Commissi-bn.
Mr. Jack Weith and John Sebold for Carlson Companies and Hank
Bierwirth of Mammoth reviewed and discussed with the Planning
Commission the four following conditions, three of which were
satisfied, with #3 being changed
1 That parking kithin the required front yard be con-
sidered nort-conforming parking. -SATISFIES
2, That one entrance from County Road, 6 be closed., -SATISFIED
3. That additional parking sufficient to satisfy zoning ordinance
requirements, i.e., 83 additional spaces, be provided. - 'CHANGED
4 That adjoining parcel 3627 be consoli'datedwith parcel 3610
to form one parcel. -SATISFIED
Cornissioner Hagen, supported by Vice Chairman; Kroskin, moved to MOTION TO RECOMMEND
recommend approval of Mammoth Industries site plan review being APPROVAL/CARRIED'
subject to the above four conditions with number 3 being changed
o the following;
3.. That 269 spaces be acceptable although it is 53 spaces
short of the ordinance requirement but could be provided
in the vacant area to the north.
MOTION carried 4-0.
9-4511 Floya B. 0 s.on 1 FL, ,tD B. OLSON
Vice Chairman Kroskin noted that action on this request had Rezoning from R-1 to B--1
been deferred untilsuch time as the guide plan had been
reviewed and approved by the Village Council in order to
determine what this. area .°could be. guided, Planner Overhiser
indicated that the area is guided for the proposed B-1 zoning.
Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner Johnson, moved MOTION TO RECOMMEND.
that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the zoning APPROVAL/CARRIED
from R--1 to B-1,
Vice. Chairman Kroskin asked for further discussion. Commissioner
Hagen added that thea area can always be expanded larger as Long as
it is in conformance with the guide plait.
Chairman KroskiP V'-stioned the Planner of the disadvantagesVice
f approving this zoning now. Planner Overhiser stated Dat rather
than Just consider one small 1:0t it woolGt be safer to (teal Lith the
entire B-1 district and say this is goinc to be the office district.
He assumed with th-e rezoning there would ,be other houses coming in
Planning Commission Minutes -:11- July 11, 1973
o -r a conversion to offices and the property to the west may be
rought in as a proposal for rezoning at a later date..
Vice Chairman Kroskin questioned Mr. ,01son as to iris timing, The
petitioner's lease expires August 1, 1973. It was noted by Planner
Overhi ser that for a modification of an existing structure for an
office the Village requires, a sit, 'Aan before allowing; the petitioner
to occupy the structu-tie.
Commissioner Hagen, supported b)1 Commissioner Johnson moved to amend
his motion to approve making the 24niling request subject to site plan
review by the Planning Commitsi on.:
MOTION carried 4-0
a r c soAddi on JA1293 FRED RTGKSON ADDITION
Planner dverhiser explained the purpose was to authorize the Final Plat
Planning Commission to sign the hard shells for this final plat
in accordance with the preliminary plat approved in April of 1971.
Following; discussion by the Planning Commission, motion was made
byCommissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner Johnson to authorize.
the Planning Commission Chairman to sign the hard shells for the final
l at of Frederickson Ad tti on,
MOTION carried 4-0.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Hagen, supported by Commissioner Johnson
to approve of the PlanningCommission minutes of June 6, 1973 with the 6-6-73
following addition to page 2, A-467 Belmar Builders, paragraph 1: MINUTES APPROVED
The Planner stated that if the Planning Commission had sufficient
reason to believe that the motel would be ojectionable to the
development of the area they could recommend denial.
MOTION carried uhanimously.
MOTION to adjourn, 11:50 p.m.
MWOdah Ren Kroskin, Vice Chairman
Plymouth Planning Commission
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION + y'
August 1, 1973 Martin W. Overhispr,, Secretary
3