HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 02-07-1973PLANNING COMMISSION'
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
February 1, 1973
4*
re ul ar meeting cf the Planning Commission was called to order by Vice
Chairman Kroskin at 7:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Dsublic Works
Building on Wednesday, February 7, 1973,
MEMBERS PkES NT. Chairman Wahl (arrived 8:01EO, Commissioners Reg
Kroski n, Bob Johnson., Del E -i ckson, Jim Th,-ei n n,
and Warren Chapman
MEMBERS ABSUIT:r Commissioner Fran Hagen
STAFF PRESENT: Martin Overhi ser, Georgia Rehbein
A-449 Walton Ford WALTON FORD
Planner Overivi ser introduced the rezo-ning request, stating Rezoning
that the property involved is located at the southwest 'orner R-0 to B-3
of County Roads 10 and 18 In the northeast portion of she
Vi 1 l age, He indicated tf:at Mr. Wal ton's proposed use would
be a new end used car.dealarship and the pe Niti ;;er has sub-
mitted a General Development. Plan shoeing how property would
be developed Ifrezoning Frere to occur. Mr. Overhiser added
that if rezoning did occur, then preliminary and final platting
and site plan review wouldalso have to be accomplished.
he ,P`ublic Hearing opened at 7045 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING
Charles Walcon, the petitioner, stated that two concerns were proponents
brought out in his di scussi ores with Staff: Unavailability of
water and sewer in this area, with these services not scheduled
for completion fr)r five to ten years, and the proposed acce,:s
With regard to ul"lity services, Mr. Walton stated that the dealer-
ship will not' e., ect to react maximum size and capacity for several
years; thus, with 40 employees, the weter and sewer demands would
not be great.. He added that he believed the drainage and sewer
circulation of the deal,ers,hi p would be more efficient than those of
the plant at :the bottom of the hill, whi'ch is now operating sufficiently
with one system for 40 employees. Mr. Walton stated further that it
is vital that the dealership have efficient sewage and disposal, there-,
fore, it, is not unlikely that the Ford Company would provide both
holding tanks Arid a drain field so that in the event: the drain fields
became overworked, the holding tanks could be pumped out at regular
intervals by a company - a project which is :not relatively costly.
Another, alternative, the petitioner pointed' out, is the possibility
of New Hope running a sewage line under County Road 18 which the
dealership could 4tti lize. He indicated, however, "..at he did not
find this as desirable as other possibilities,
s for the roadAa1, Mr. Walton explained that a rear ingress will be:
vii ab. e off of Bass Lake Road which is 7,000 feet from the inter-
section (west on Bass Lake Road) and thi. would provide a roadway
into and through the 10.5 acre parcel. He indicated that this roadway
would then meet with a cul de sac service area. The petitioner pointed
Planning, Commission 'Minut"e's FebNx'ary 7, 197
out that the County has prohibited any access to Bass Lake Road until
the Astleford property on the west (100 to 200 feet west of the Vlalton
roperty line) is developed. He added that the Counplty ans a div,i's ion
f Bass Lake Road at this point with barriers-, however,, the barriei,
will -Open at this point 1,0001, West of ramps or 100-2001 west of the
Walton property, thus providin,9 a normal ingress and egress point.
Mr. Walton assured, the Commissia,,q that he would be developing, an
attractive business conforming with stringent Ford specifications,
He indicated that a year ago he and the Ford Motor Company had
cx(*ed the 44ealerOip on Broadway because of the d teriora.tion of
the neighborhood: and, after expending much time and money in, a site
survey, the Ford Company chose the Maple Grove -New Hope -Plymouth
area as a prime location. He summarized by Stating that as a busines5-
man he would be unwise to pursue locating at this site if the problems
could not be resolved.
Commissioner Threinen questioned Mr. Walton as to whether he planned
to begin buildin9before the construction at the -Uounty Road 18 inter-
change was completed if he obtained Approval. Mr. Walton answered
that hopefully the dealership could be projected for completion at
the same time as the construction now underway at the County Road 18
location.
Commissioner Erickson pointed out that by cutting 2,0 feet off the hill
on this parcel, a good buffer between the residential west and the
industrial uses and tighway to the east would be destroyed. Mr. Walton
aintai-ned that the proposed dealership would be adjacent to a shopping
enter site and that excavating that hill would not expose the back
end of the dealership, but 'rather bring the site down to the level of
the property behind it. He added that the reason for cutting down the
hill was not t6 make the dealership more visible from County Road 18,
but to make it possible to develop and. . that it would be impossible
to build a road from a cul de sac up the hill as it now exists. Mr.
Walton indica",-id that the prime objective was to excavate and .make useable
not only his 10.5 acre portion, but the, balance of the 30 acre parcel
as well.
Chairman Wahl eNpressed concern -that a major grading plan was projected
with the Commission reviewi,ng, only a plan for tin acres of the total
area to be covered.
Commissioner Kroskin questioned Staff as to the safety of the access
discussed. Planner Overhiser answered that until such time as the
other ingress/egress develops from Bass Lake Road, there would only
be one street to this location - the frontage road of IS - and if
some, blockage occurred' on this street due to an emergency, getting
to this location could be delayed, Mr. Overhiser added that this would
perhaps be the only consideration from the Village standpoint of safety.
Chairman Wahl questioned if Staff had reviewed drainage patterns for
the :area. Planner Overhiser answered that the major course runs along
the northwest of the property and. crosses Bass Lake Road, then drains
ortheast to Shir-0e Creek,
Mr. Astleford, owner of the balance of the 30 acre parcel from which
the dealership parcel is being taken, indicated that he would estimate
Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 7, 1973
130,000 yards of earth woald be moved during the excavation, Chairman
Wahl poiPted out that on the proposed dealership parcel, one-half of
Whee total 10.5 acres would be paved, plus parking apd storage; where
water will run off remains unknown. Planner Overhiser statedthat
the water would go northwest into the creek area, but indicated ':hat
this channel is now limited and holding pumps would be necessary for
storm runoff. He added that Mr. Walton is prepared to install the
required pumps.
Planner Overhiser, answering the question of when the access road to
the west of the interchange is expected to be available, stated that
this depends on the balance of the property. Ile stated that the Countyhasdesignatedwherethiswilloccurandaddedthattheremainderof
the property to the gest of the site has to be developed and the service
road must be brought through this property or, Mr. Astleford and Mr.
Walton could develop that street on their own.
The ,Public Hearing closed, 8:16 p.m. HEARING
CLOSED
MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION T0_
Threinen to act on the Walton proposal at the present meeting. ACT/FAILED
Motion failed 3--3, Commissioners Kroskin, Wahl, and Erickson
voting against.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, secondee by Commissioner MOTION/
Johnson, to ask the petitioners to supply a grading plan and drainage
Wtacredy for the entire 3O parcel. Motion failed 3-3, Commissioner FAILED
pman stating that he believed it unfair to require the petitioners
to spend a great deal of money on a grading plan for an area for
which the sewer plan is still under review by the Metropolitan Sewer
Board. He edded further that he regarded the proposal as premature
in this area and contrary to the Council resolution on limiting urban
development.
A-3751Williams Woods A-375 WILLIAMS WOODS
Planner pverhiser explained that the property proposed for Preliminary Plat
replatting is located on the east side of Pinetree Pond south
of Messiah Methodist Church and is also bounded on the east
by the Ken Schiebe property and on the south by Kimborly Lane.
He added that the Council' approved a concept plan for this site
six to eight months ago that provided for three duplexes on the
site the present petitioner is now requesting approval of three
single family lots rather than the originally approved duplexes.
Mr. Overhiser added that Bill Williams has sold his house: and
proposes to build a new home on the southernmost lot. Staff
recommends approval of the request subject to four conditions:
1) A cul de sac be developed and paid for by the developer
at the southeast corner of lot 3 to serve lots l through 3;
2) That the best solution to providing utilities for the site
is through Schlebe's Oakwood Addition; however, if this i
not feasible, then utilities can be connected to Peony
Lane and 13th Avenue at the developer's expense and Surge
pumps then be installed in the basements of the homes;
Plannin I9Commission Mi mites -4- February 7, 1973
3) That Kimberly Lane (30 feet) to the south of subject parcel
Is not deemed to be required for public st,eet purposes, but
is to, be, retained for utility purposes;
4) That setback variances If required be obtained from the Board
of Zoning Adjustment: &':ter the Final Plat and Development
Contract is submitted and approved.
Planner, Overhi ser added that all of the Schiebe, property traffic would
flow to the north and east by way of State Highway 101 and County Road 6.
The Public [fearing opened at 828 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING
Kurt HelTberg questioned how the land would be divided into three
lots, pointing out that the topography creates the possibility of
the lots becoming very narrow as they approach Messiah Methodist.
Mr. Hellberg then reviewed the preliminary plat.
Allen Luedecke, 17.805 13th, Avenue, stressed that access should not
be provided. to Peony Lane -,nd 13th Avenue North for the apartments
to be built at Schiebe's Oakwood.,
Myron L. Christopherson, 12,45 Peony lane, indicated that as a Proponents
homeowner directly south of this proposal, he ryas in favor of
approving the request,
Gorden Ottum, 17810 13th Avenue North, stated he believed this the
best proposal surrounding property owners could possibly be confronted
ith.
Chairman Wahl called for a hand vote. Eight persons indicated thRy
were in favor of the proposal; none were in opposition.,
Tile Public Hearing closed at 8:32, p.m. HEARING CLOSED
MOTION was made by Commissioner Kroskin, seconded by Commissioner
Erickson, to act on the proposal at the pre -sent meeting. Motion
carried, six ayes.
MOTION. was made ley Commissic;ijer Kroskin, seconded by Commissioner
Chapman, to reCLmmend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Williams
Woods subject to the four conditions outlined by Staff. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION TO,
ACT/CARRIED
MOTION TO
RECOMMEND
APPROVAL/
CARRIED
Dreyfus - AMBER WOODS A-379 DREYFUS - AMBER
WOODS
Planner Qverhiser introduced the proposal, explaining that
a Preliminary Plat for t4is development had been approved Revised
by Planning Commission and Council and the Final Plat and Preliminary
Development. Contract was scheduled. fit Zouncil action on. Plat
November 6, 1972 - but at this phase, the developer withdrew
his request because of certain conditions and improvements
4 equ'` red for approval. Mr. Overhiser indicated that the
et;I*,ioners had wished to do, more soil investigation; on the
end of the property before entering into Contract.
Sin, -i that titre, they have revised tbeir plat and have resubmitted
Planning f.fQAmwiasâ˘ion Kinutes February 7, 1973
it for approval. In this plan, the: northern portion would not be
developed (18,9 acresl and this is the area thrw Vill-.age has proposed
Ior a drainage pond area. (13 acres). Mr. Overhiser addedthat the
evised preliminary peat does now show 143 lots on the 80 acre parcel.
Staff recommends that the preliminary plat as revised be approved and
the Public Works memo of January 29, 1973 be taken into account in
drafting the Development Contract. Planner Overhiser added further
that Staff recommends that the developers be permitted to donate 2.4
acres of trail as a portion of the required park donation and the
balance of the six acres required parkland be donated in cash, He
indicated the Park Commission has reviewed the former Preliminary
Plat and stated that their` only requirement would be a trail in
order to provide pedestrian circulation up to the Greenwood School
site;
The Public Hearing opened at 8:42 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING
Dan ,Nordby, Director of Planning & Special Projects for Dreyfus, Proponents
outlined the changes proposed in this preliminary plat as
opposed to the original proposal
Don :Ringrose, engineer representing Dreyfus, explained the storm
sewer provided for in the "bubbles" of the east -west collector
street. Commissioner Kroskin questioned Staff if it was reasonable
to, run a collector across a proposed east --west street. Planner Over-
hiser answered that there is no Village policy prohibiting residential
lots fronting on a collector stre,:t however, Staff had indicated to
reyfus that the lots .should be limited because that street will
arry more traffic than the rest of the residential stye Oats . He
added that Dreyfus had reduced the number of lots fronting the
street to. nine.
C,hai rman Wahl questioned how the east -west street fits in with the
adjoining property. It was answered that the street would rUn west
to Medina and east to State Highway 101 one lot depth north of the
Hughes Addition. The distance between the north edge of the Hughes
Addition and the, south edge of the proposed' street would be approximately
230 feet.
Planner Overhiser was asked if he believed the hal; cul de sacs to
be safe from a traffic standpoint. He indicated he believed they
would' be as their provided a 50-60 foot area in which to back around,
Mr, Nordbv stated' that a 179.5 acre area will drain into a pond area.
He indicated that Drey x u s is .being requested to allow 13 acres of
their parcel to be used to drain the. 179.6 acres area and is also
being required to donate 10% parkland or cash. Planner Overhiser
clarified that 10% of the space required was to be private, 10%
public, He indicated that Staff recommends that Dreyfus not be
required to donate .an 8..4 acre park, but be given credit for the
2}6 acre trail and pay the cash Value of the difference, or 5.8
acres
fter some discussion on calculations, thePublicHearing closed. HEARING
at 9:02 p.m CLOSED
Chairman Wahl declared that since some of the crit-4cal problems
Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 7, 1973
were unresolved - particularly acreage cal culati-ons and whether or
not the read cap go through at the west, he believed the matter
howl be deferred al, this time.
MOTION was made, by Commissioner Ghapman, seconded by Commisioner MOTIO'K TO
Kroskin, to refer this proposal to Committee4 and direct Staff REFER TO
to provide Input with regard to the collector street to the COMMITTEE/
West and more 'specific details on open space.5, park area, and CARR1J_'D
minimum and maximum lot sizes. Motion carried unanimously.
A-451 Patr,ecia Donnelly Home Oc_tu4tjon PATRECIA DONNELLY.
Plan,ner tverhiser Introduced the propasal and explained Bea4ty Shop
past policy with regard.to granting conditional use permits Home
for the benefit of new Commission membcws. Occuption
Since Ms i Donnelly was oot present to answer questions on her
proposal, Chairman Wahl -asked if anyone present had any objections
to theproposed use.
John Wire, 4130 Quaker Lane Worth, stated that he was opposed. fle
indicated that there are 28 children between the scooter and bicycle
age in this immediate area and he objects to any increase in traffic.
He stated that two years ago a child was killed on 40th Avenue North.
ichal"d Brunfelt- stated he lives directly a -cross the street from the
roposed use. He indicztnd that he has two small -children and it is
not unusual for 16 children below the age of ten and 8 below the age
of 4 to be in his yard durl'ng one day. He stated that if any parking
occurred on their side of the street because of this home occopation,
it woo create a hazardous situation. He added further that the
driveway to the proposed use is steep and cars coming out would have
limited visibility. He summarized by stating he bel7,eved the petition
should be denied.
Commissioner Kroskin questioned Mr. Brunfelt if the trail behind 'his
property was used by neighborhood children as he had stated, that there
were no sidewalks in the area. Mr. Brunfeltanswered that the trail
is used.,
MOTION was made hy Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO
Johnson, to recommend dental of the proposed beauty shop home RECOMMEND
occupation due to, the -hazards It would create for occupants of DENIAL./
a,n already densely, populated area wth a steep street., grade, and
Commissioner Threinen added that th,18 proposal is clearly
in violation of Objective #3 under Security, whicb states-, "Enact
and maintain policies and ordinances. to assure the safety and health
of the individual". (Pale 8,'Goals,, Objectives, and Criteria). Motion
to recommend dental carried unanimotAsly. CARRIED
7 -453L thern Holdinq - WheANot
Planner Overhiser introduced the proposal and stated that
WHEEL CENTER,-
Northern Hold ing)
I
Planning Oommiss1'on Minutes 7 February a, 1973
JJ
1
Staff has. -determined that the following variances would be required
assuming that a ° public street right of way of 30 feet is granted to
he ;rill age along the sough side of the property):
Site Flan
1) Setback variance of 30 feet from the required 50 feet for Revikiw
the parking area on the south side of the b.,ilding;
2) Parking variance of 60 feet from the required 75 foot
setback in the rear, yard area abutting the residential
district on the north side of the property,
3) 8ui l di ng setback variance of 12 feet from the required
75 foot rear yard setback area;,
4) Parking variance of 8 spaces required under the Ordinance
requirement of 46 spaces;
541 Setback variance in order to permit business sign in the
required front yard area
6) Setback variance to permit storage in the required 75
foot -rear yard setback area (proposed storage to be
located 5 feet from the property line in the northeast
corner of the lot).
Planner Overhser stated that Staff recommends Site Plan be recommended
for approval subject to the following conditions.
1) That variances one through four above be approved;
2) That the storage area ise enclosed with a solid fence
and be located at least. ten feet from all property
lines;
3) That landscaping and berming be provided along the north
property line to screen the parking and storage area from
the residential district to the north
fl4 That the identification sign belocated on the building;
5 That the existing billboards on the southwest corner of
the 'property be removed.
Planner Overhiser indicated that the petitioner is requesting CUP$
permits to operate a bicycle store and service center (Wheel
Goods Corporation, west portitn of the building)and a center
for snowmobiles and motor bikes with service department (Village
Sports, Inc. - east portion of the building). The other two
uses have not been identified as yet.
Planner Overhiser was questioned. how high the storage fence would be.
He answered that it should be 8 feet and cited an excerpt from the
Ordinance prohibiting open storage in any district visible from a
residential area (Section 17, Subdivision 4, Paragraph 4). Commissioner
Chapman questioned whether a two-story building with storage und.ernea.th.
would be feasible. Gary Freund, the petitioner, indicated that putting
a basement under this building would be impossible as the soil is poor
and the water table is 31 to 4 feet below grade elevation. Commissioner
Chapman :fated he believed the use to be extremely heavy for such a
small pieca of land:
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTIOV TO
4khapman, to defer action on the proposed site plan until the work DEFER'/
eeting of February 14 1973. Motion carried 5-0-1, Chairman Wahl CARRIED
abstaining.
The petitioner pointed out that the Kleven Floor Company will be
a warehouse with facilities for two to three persons, The
Bergerson-Caswell facility will house 15 employees.
Com,rai ss i oner Kroskin stated he believed that the Councilresolutio,7
Wn limiting urban development states Council intent, but that the
ommission, in order not to impede development, should use judgment
in recomoending approval or disapproval of proposals. He indicated
that in the case of the 55 Company, a small number of employees
would have to be pruvided for and -added that a real problem would
exist if the petitioner were proposing an extremely heavy use. He
stated he did not believe a precedent would be set unless a substantial
development were approved contrary to the Council resolution.
Planner Overhisetk pointed out that I-1 use exists west of the subject
area and an 1-2 area surrounded by an I. -I area exists on Fernbrook Lane,
No 1,,.1 District 'is permitted on a parcel of land less than twenty acres;
howeverthis can be waived where the proposed district abuts or adjoins
an 1-1 Planned Industrial or an 1-2 General Industri,al District.
The Commission was concerned about a possible ownership change that
could cause a change in use on the subject parcel. Mr. Caswell stated
that Ne and his -partners also own 50 acres north of the railroad tracks
and although no plans have formalized for the area, he indicated it
would be to their advanta.ge to keep the area south of the tracks
attractive,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO
Erickson, to recommend that the Council change this area from an RECOMMEND
R-0 designation to 1-1, realizing that the east half of the APPROVAL
4 roperty might be considered at a later date, for a change from0-1 to 1-2. He added that he believed Staff should obtain a legal
opinion as to the necessity of holding a public hearing as the original
public hearing was for an 1-2 industrial use rather than I-1.
llotiop, carried 5"l, with. Commissioner Threinen 'opposed as he believed CARRIED
this clearly a case of spot Zoning and contrary to the Goals, Objectives,
and Criteria of the Village,
Planning, Commission, Minutes February, 7, 1973
Zoning Ordinance' Amendment Re Day Care Centers and Nursery Schools
was made by CommisNioner Kr6skin, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO0MOTION
6hn-son, to defer action on this matter until the work meeting DEFER/
of February 14, flotion carried 4-2, with. Commissioners Threinen CARRIED'
and Erickson Qrposkid.
434 55 Com p a n'A- 4341 55 COMPANY
MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO
Chapman, to take this proposal from the table. Motion carried TAKE FROM
unanimously. TABLE
CARRIED
Commissi;m,r rbapman questioned how this propcsal would fit in with
the Councils Meso lution on liI -miting development where sewer and tezoning
water, Are lvnavailable. Planner Overhiser answered that the burden, R -O to 1-2
is upon t-',ij petitioner to demonstrate that sewage and drainage
problems cai Abe handled by him without providing an undue burden
on the in providing utilities or services as well as pro-
tecting the natural resources,
The petitioner pointed out that the Kleven Floor Company will be
a warehouse with facilities for two to three persons, The
Bergerson-Caswell facility will house 15 employees.
Com,rai ss i oner Kroskin stated he believed that the Councilresolutio,7
Wn limiting urban development states Council intent, but that the
ommission, in order not to impede development, should use judgment
in recomoending approval or disapproval of proposals. He indicated
that in the case of the 55 Company, a small number of employees
would have to be pruvided for and -added that a real problem would
exist if the petitioner were proposing an extremely heavy use. He
stated he did not believe a precedent would be set unless a substantial
development were approved contrary to the Council resolution.
Planner Overhisetk pointed out that I-1 use exists west of the subject
area and an 1-2 area surrounded by an I. -I area exists on Fernbrook Lane,
No 1,,.1 District 'is permitted on a parcel of land less than twenty acres;
howeverthis can be waived where the proposed district abuts or adjoins
an 1-1 Planned Industrial or an 1-2 General Industri,al District.
The Commission was concerned about a possible ownership change that
could cause a change in use on the subject parcel. Mr. Caswell stated
that Ne and his -partners also own 50 acres north of the railroad tracks
and although no plans have formalized for the area, he indicated it
would be to their advanta.ge to keep the area south of the tracks
attractive,
MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO
Erickson, to recommend that the Council change this area from an RECOMMEND
R-0 designation to 1-1, realizing that the east half of the APPROVAL
4 roperty might be considered at a later date, for a change from0-1 to 1-2. He added that he believed Staff should obtain a legal
opinion as to the necessity of holding a public hearing as the original
public hearing was for an 1-2 industrial use rather than I-1.
llotiop, carried 5"l, with. Commissioner Threinen 'opposed as he believed CARRIED
this clearly a case of spot Zoning and contrary to the Goals, Objectives,
and Criteria of the Village,
Planning Commission Minutes -9 February 7, 1973
1' mouth B&Oti s t ChurchJA -321 PLYMOUTH BAPTIST
CHURCH
annex ver"Iser explained that he had had a meeting with
astor Terrey and his attorney, t4ir. Ray, at which an agreement
had been reached that the lot at the southeast corner of the property
would be subdivided, for a building lot and the Church would g -ant
additional right of way easement. Following the meeting, Pastor
Terrey sent a letter to Staff which stated the following conditions:
1) A firm commitment i'n the form of a resolution by the
Village Council that they will allow the Church in the
future to have tf,,e exi-sting carport enclosed fur an
additional room,,
2) That the Village will give an entrance/exit from the
existing parking area onto 47th Avenue North;
3) That the subdivision of the lot at the corner of the
road at the top of the hill will be granted for a
building lot;
4) That County Road 61, being a, county road, will not
therefore require; assessments for the road itself.
Planner Overhiser indicated that during the meeting, a tentative agreement
was reacbed on condition #3, but added that the other three points were
not discussed. He stated that as fa,r as condition #rl', the c,r_,rport would
have to meet the State Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance. With
regard to condition #2, a driveway exists at that location now, and
the Village would not cut that off since it is a local street. As for
londition #4, Planner Overhiser stated it is impossible to say that the
11age will, never assess the Church for County Road 61, as State Law
ictates that for each project, everyone is -equally assessed that is,
equally benefit-Ced.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Kroskin, seconded. by Commissioner MOTION,
Chapman, to recommend that the dividing line between parcels 2030
and 2045 (proposed Parcel A) be eliminated with the understanding
that a 60 fooi easement from the center line of future County Road 61
be provided and that Parcel B as designated on the proposed conse1idation
of 12-29-72 be approved. Motion carried unanimously. CARRIED
R 293 Frederickson Addition FREDERICKSON
Planner Overhiser explained that the Development Contract for
ADDITION,
this Additiob has yet to be prepared, but th4at the Final, Plat
is in agreement with the approved Preliminary Plat.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Yroskin, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO
Threinen, that the Chairman be authorized to sign the Final Plat, AUTHORIZE
Motion carried with six aye-!,, SIGNATURE/
CARRIED
Aftof Drains in Conirn ercial and Industrial Areas
Mr. Sherman Gzldberg, Village Engineer, was on hand to answer any questions
the Commissioners had on Village policy requiring roof drains in industrial
and commercial areas - for example, the recent Lake Street and Litton
I
Rlannilig. Commission Minutes February 7, 1973
proposals. Discussion 'determined that each case should be viewed
f`f erently as to ,practi cal: `ty :and availability of storm sewers
e Village Council has directed the VI l l age Staff to study this
rIobl:eml.
MOTION was made by Com.missi.oner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTIONOr
Johnson, to hiq,hly commend former Commissioners Keeley :and Roth COMMENDATION/
for their fine Sobs as Planning Commissioners and direct Staff 'CARRIED
to prepare for;nal Resolutions
Land Use Guide Plan Schedule of Upcoming Me>atings
The following schedule Was reviewed and agreed upon
February 14 - Work weeti ng, 7:30
Public Works 'Building
February 21' - Regular meeting, 7;30'
February 24 r Saturday morning tour
7 a.m. meet at Country
Kitchen on Highway 55
MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman,seconded by Commissioner 1-17-73
Threinein, that the Minutes of the 1-17-7,3 Commission meeting be Minutes
approved.. Motion carded, all ayes.
MOTION to adjourn, 10:58 p.m.
James O. Wahl , Chairman
Plymouth Planning Commission
a}
APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Feb. 21, 1973
Martin W. Overhiser, Secretary'