Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 02-07-1973PLANNING COMMISSION' VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA February 1, 1973 4* re ul ar meeting cf the Planning Commission was called to order by Vice Chairman Kroskin at 7:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Dsublic Works Building on Wednesday, February 7, 1973, MEMBERS PkES NT. Chairman Wahl (arrived 8:01EO, Commissioners Reg Kroski n, Bob Johnson., Del E -i ckson, Jim Th,-ei n n, and Warren Chapman MEMBERS ABSUIT:r Commissioner Fran Hagen STAFF PRESENT: Martin Overhi ser, Georgia Rehbein A-449 Walton Ford WALTON FORD Planner Overivi ser introduced the rezo-ning request, stating Rezoning that the property involved is located at the southwest 'orner R-0 to B-3 of County Roads 10 and 18 In the northeast portion of she Vi 1 l age, He indicated tf:at Mr. Wal ton's proposed use would be a new end used car.dealarship and the pe Niti ;;er has sub- mitted a General Development. Plan shoeing how property would be developed Ifrezoning Frere to occur. Mr. Overhiser added that if rezoning did occur, then preliminary and final platting and site plan review wouldalso have to be accomplished. he ,P`ublic Hearing opened at 7045 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING Charles Walcon, the petitioner, stated that two concerns were proponents brought out in his di scussi ores with Staff: Unavailability of water and sewer in this area, with these services not scheduled for completion fr)r five to ten years, and the proposed acce,:s With regard to ul"lity services, Mr. Walton stated that the dealer- ship will not' e., ect to react maximum size and capacity for several years; thus, with 40 employees, the weter and sewer demands would not be great.. He added that he believed the drainage and sewer circulation of the deal,ers,hi p would be more efficient than those of the plant at :the bottom of the hill, whi'ch is now operating sufficiently with one system for 40 employees. Mr. Walton stated further that it is vital that the dealership have efficient sewage and disposal, there-, fore, it, is not unlikely that the Ford Company would provide both holding tanks Arid a drain field so that in the event: the drain fields became overworked, the holding tanks could be pumped out at regular intervals by a company - a project which is :not relatively costly. Another, alternative, the petitioner pointed' out, is the possibility of New Hope running a sewage line under County Road 18 which the dealership could 4tti lize. He indicated, however, "..at he did not find this as desirable as other possibilities, s for the roadAa1, Mr. Walton explained that a rear ingress will be: vii ab. e off of Bass Lake Road which is 7,000 feet from the inter- section (west on Bass Lake Road) and thi. would provide a roadway into and through the 10.5 acre parcel. He indicated that this roadway would then meet with a cul de sac service area. The petitioner pointed Planning, Commission 'Minut"e's FebNx'ary 7, 197 out that the County has prohibited any access to Bass Lake Road until the Astleford property on the west (100 to 200 feet west of the Vlalton roperty line) is developed. He added that the Counplty ans a div,i's ion f Bass Lake Road at this point with barriers-, however,, the barriei, will -Open at this point 1,0001, West of ramps or 100-2001 west of the Walton property, thus providin,9 a normal ingress and egress point. Mr. Walton assured, the Commissia,,q that he would be developing, an attractive business conforming with stringent Ford specifications, He indicated that a year ago he and the Ford Motor Company had cx(*ed the 44ealerOip on Broadway because of the d teriora.tion of the neighborhood: and, after expending much time and money in, a site survey, the Ford Company chose the Maple Grove -New Hope -Plymouth area as a prime location. He summarized by Stating that as a busines5- man he would be unwise to pursue locating at this site if the problems could not be resolved. Commissioner Threinen questioned Mr. Walton as to whether he planned to begin buildin9before the construction at the -Uounty Road 18 inter- change was completed if he obtained Approval. Mr. Walton answered that hopefully the dealership could be projected for completion at the same time as the construction now underway at the County Road 18 location. Commissioner Erickson pointed out that by cutting 2,0 feet off the hill on this parcel, a good buffer between the residential west and the industrial uses and tighway to the east would be destroyed. Mr. Walton aintai-ned that the proposed dealership would be adjacent to a shopping enter site and that excavating that hill would not expose the back end of the dealership, but 'rather bring the site down to the level of the property behind it. He added that the reason for cutting down the hill was not t6 make the dealership more visible from County Road 18, but to make it possible to develop and. . that it would be impossible to build a road from a cul de sac up the hill as it now exists. Mr. Walton indica",-id that the prime objective was to excavate and .make useable not only his 10.5 acre portion, but the, balance of the 30 acre parcel as well. Chairman Wahl eNpressed concern -that a major grading plan was projected with the Commission reviewi,ng, only a plan for tin acres of the total area to be covered. Commissioner Kroskin questioned Staff as to the safety of the access discussed. Planner Overhiser answered that until such time as the other ingress/egress develops from Bass Lake Road, there would only be one street to this location - the frontage road of IS - and if some, blockage occurred' on this street due to an emergency, getting to this location could be delayed, Mr. Overhiser added that this would perhaps be the only consideration from the Village standpoint of safety. Chairman Wahl questioned if Staff had reviewed drainage patterns for the :area. Planner Overhiser answered that the major course runs along the northwest of the property and. crosses Bass Lake Road, then drains ortheast to Shir-0e Creek, Mr. Astleford, owner of the balance of the 30 acre parcel from which the dealership parcel is being taken, indicated that he would estimate Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 7, 1973 130,000 yards of earth woald be moved during the excavation, Chairman Wahl poiPted out that on the proposed dealership parcel, one-half of Whee total 10.5 acres would be paved, plus parking apd storage; where water will run off remains unknown. Planner Overhiser statedthat the water would go northwest into the creek area, but indicated ':hat this channel is now limited and holding pumps would be necessary for storm runoff. He added that Mr. Walton is prepared to install the required pumps. Planner Overhiser, answering the question of when the access road to the west of the interchange is expected to be available, stated that this depends on the balance of the property. Ile stated that the Countyhasdesignatedwherethiswilloccurandaddedthattheremainderof the property to the gest of the site has to be developed and the service road must be brought through this property or, Mr. Astleford and Mr. Walton could develop that street on their own. The ,Public Hearing closed, 8:16 p.m. HEARING CLOSED MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION T0_ Threinen to act on the Walton proposal at the present meeting. ACT/FAILED Motion failed 3--3, Commissioners Kroskin, Wahl, and Erickson voting against. MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, secondee by Commissioner MOTION/ Johnson, to ask the petitioners to supply a grading plan and drainage Wtacredy for the entire 3O parcel. Motion failed 3-3, Commissioner FAILED pman stating that he believed it unfair to require the petitioners to spend a great deal of money on a grading plan for an area for which the sewer plan is still under review by the Metropolitan Sewer Board. He edded further that he regarded the proposal as premature in this area and contrary to the Council resolution on limiting urban development. A-3751Williams Woods A-375 WILLIAMS WOODS Planner pverhiser explained that the property proposed for Preliminary Plat replatting is located on the east side of Pinetree Pond south of Messiah Methodist Church and is also bounded on the east by the Ken Schiebe property and on the south by Kimborly Lane. He added that the Council' approved a concept plan for this site six to eight months ago that provided for three duplexes on the site the present petitioner is now requesting approval of three single family lots rather than the originally approved duplexes. Mr. Overhiser added that Bill Williams has sold his house: and proposes to build a new home on the southernmost lot. Staff recommends approval of the request subject to four conditions: 1) A cul de sac be developed and paid for by the developer at the southeast corner of lot 3 to serve lots l through 3; 2) That the best solution to providing utilities for the site is through Schlebe's Oakwood Addition; however, if this i not feasible, then utilities can be connected to Peony Lane and 13th Avenue at the developer's expense and Surge pumps then be installed in the basements of the homes; Plannin I9Commission Mi mites -4- February 7, 1973 3) That Kimberly Lane (30 feet) to the south of subject parcel Is not deemed to be required for public st,eet purposes, but is to, be, retained for utility purposes; 4) That setback variances If required be obtained from the Board of Zoning Adjustment: &':ter the Final Plat and Development Contract is submitted and approved. Planner, Overhi ser added that all of the Schiebe, property traffic would flow to the north and east by way of State Highway 101 and County Road 6. The Public [fearing opened at 828 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING Kurt HelTberg questioned how the land would be divided into three lots, pointing out that the topography creates the possibility of the lots becoming very narrow as they approach Messiah Methodist. Mr. Hellberg then reviewed the preliminary plat. Allen Luedecke, 17.805 13th, Avenue, stressed that access should not be provided. to Peony Lane -,nd 13th Avenue North for the apartments to be built at Schiebe's Oakwood., Myron L. Christopherson, 12,45 Peony lane, indicated that as a Proponents homeowner directly south of this proposal, he ryas in favor of approving the request, Gorden Ottum, 17810 13th Avenue North, stated he believed this the best proposal surrounding property owners could possibly be confronted ith. Chairman Wahl called for a hand vote. Eight persons indicated thRy were in favor of the proposal; none were in opposition., Tile Public Hearing closed at 8:32, p.m. HEARING CLOSED MOTION was made by Commissioner Kroskin, seconded by Commissioner Erickson, to act on the proposal at the pre -sent meeting. Motion carried, six ayes. MOTION. was made ley Commissic;ijer Kroskin, seconded by Commissioner Chapman, to reCLmmend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Williams Woods subject to the four conditions outlined by Staff. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION TO, ACT/CARRIED MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL/ CARRIED Dreyfus - AMBER WOODS A-379 DREYFUS - AMBER WOODS Planner Qverhiser introduced the proposal, explaining that a Preliminary Plat for t4is development had been approved Revised by Planning Commission and Council and the Final Plat and Preliminary Development. Contract was scheduled. fit Zouncil action on. Plat November 6, 1972 - but at this phase, the developer withdrew his request because of certain conditions and improvements 4 equ'` red for approval. Mr. Overhiser indicated that the et;I*,ioners had wished to do, more soil investigation; on the end of the property before entering into Contract. Sin, -i that titre, they have revised tbeir plat and have resubmitted Planning f.fQAmwias•ion Kinutes February 7, 1973 it for approval. In this plan, the: northern portion would not be developed (18,9 acresl and this is the area thrw Vill-.age has proposed Ior a drainage pond area. (13 acres). Mr. Overhiser addedthat the evised preliminary peat does now show 143 lots on the 80 acre parcel. Staff recommends that the preliminary plat as revised be approved and the Public Works memo of January 29, 1973 be taken into account in drafting the Development Contract. Planner Overhiser added further that Staff recommends that the developers be permitted to donate 2.4 acres of trail as a portion of the required park donation and the balance of the six acres required parkland be donated in cash, He indicated the Park Commission has reviewed the former Preliminary Plat and stated that their` only requirement would be a trail in order to provide pedestrian circulation up to the Greenwood School site; The Public Hearing opened at 8:42 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING Dan ,Nordby, Director of Planning & Special Projects for Dreyfus, Proponents outlined the changes proposed in this preliminary plat as opposed to the original proposal Don :Ringrose, engineer representing Dreyfus, explained the storm sewer provided for in the "bubbles" of the east -west collector street. Commissioner Kroskin questioned Staff if it was reasonable to, run a collector across a proposed east --west street. Planner Over- hiser answered that there is no Village policy prohibiting residential lots fronting on a collector stre,:t however, Staff had indicated to reyfus that the lots .should be limited because that street will arry more traffic than the rest of the residential stye Oats . He added that Dreyfus had reduced the number of lots fronting the street to. nine. C,hai rman Wahl questioned how the east -west street fits in with the adjoining property. It was answered that the street would rUn west to Medina and east to State Highway 101 one lot depth north of the Hughes Addition. The distance between the north edge of the Hughes Addition and the, south edge of the proposed' street would be approximately 230 feet. Planner Overhiser was asked if he believed the hal; cul de sacs to be safe from a traffic standpoint. He indicated he believed they would' be as their provided a 50-60 foot area in which to back around, Mr, Nordbv stated' that a 179.5 acre area will drain into a pond area. He indicated that Drey x u s is .being requested to allow 13 acres of their parcel to be used to drain the. 179.6 acres area and is also being required to donate 10% parkland or cash. Planner Overhiser clarified that 10% of the space required was to be private, 10% public, He indicated that Staff recommends that Dreyfus not be required to donate .an 8..4 acre park, but be given credit for the 2}6 acre trail and pay the cash Value of the difference, or 5.8 acres fter some discussion on calculations, thePublicHearing closed. HEARING at 9:02 p.m CLOSED Chairman Wahl declared that since some of the crit-4cal problems Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 7, 1973 were unresolved - particularly acreage cal culati-ons and whether or not the read cap go through at the west, he believed the matter howl be deferred al, this time. MOTION was made, by Commissioner Ghapman, seconded by Commisioner MOTIO'K TO Kroskin, to refer this proposal to Committee4 and direct Staff REFER TO to provide Input with regard to the collector street to the COMMITTEE/ West and more 'specific details on open space.5, park area, and CARR1J_'D minimum and maximum lot sizes. Motion carried unanimously. A-451 Patr,ecia Donnelly Home Oc_tu4tjon PATRECIA DONNELLY. Plan,ner tverhiser Introduced the propasal and explained Bea4ty Shop past policy with regard.to granting conditional use permits Home for the benefit of new Commission membcws. Occuption Since Ms i Donnelly was oot present to answer questions on her proposal, Chairman Wahl -asked if anyone present had any objections to theproposed use. John Wire, 4130 Quaker Lane Worth, stated that he was opposed. fle indicated that there are 28 children between the scooter and bicycle age in this immediate area and he objects to any increase in traffic. He stated that two years ago a child was killed on 40th Avenue North. ichal"d Brunfelt- stated he lives directly a -cross the street from the roposed use. He indicztnd that he has two small -children and it is not unusual for 16 children below the age of ten and 8 below the age of 4 to be in his yard durl'ng one day. He stated that if any parking occurred on their side of the street because of this home occopation, it woo create a hazardous situation. He added further that the driveway to the proposed use is steep and cars coming out would have limited visibility. He summarized by stating he bel7,eved the petition should be denied. Commissioner Kroskin questioned Mr. Brunfelt if the trail behind 'his property was used by neighborhood children as he had stated, that there were no sidewalks in the area. Mr. Brunfeltanswered that the trail is used., MOTION was made hy Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO Johnson, to recommend dental of the proposed beauty shop home RECOMMEND occupation due to, the -hazards It would create for occupants of DENIAL./ a,n already densely, populated area wth a steep street., grade, and Commissioner Threinen added that th,18 proposal is clearly in violation of Objective #3 under Security, whicb states-, "Enact and maintain policies and ordinances. to assure the safety and health of the individual". (Pale 8,'Goals,, Objectives, and Criteria). Motion to recommend dental carried unanimotAsly. CARRIED 7 -453L thern Holdinq - WheANot Planner Overhiser introduced the proposal and stated that WHEEL CENTER,- Northern Hold ing) I Planning Oommiss1'on Minutes 7 February a, 1973 JJ 1 Staff has. -determined that the following variances would be required assuming that a ° public street right of way of 30 feet is granted to he ;rill age along the sough side of the property): Site Flan 1) Setback variance of 30 feet from the required 50 feet for Revikiw the parking area on the south side of the b.,ilding; 2) Parking variance of 60 feet from the required 75 foot setback in the rear, yard area abutting the residential district on the north side of the property, 3) 8ui l di ng setback variance of 12 feet from the required 75 foot rear yard setback area;, 4) Parking variance of 8 spaces required under the Ordinance requirement of 46 spaces; 541 Setback variance in order to permit business sign in the required front yard area 6) Setback variance to permit storage in the required 75 foot -rear yard setback area (proposed storage to be located 5 feet from the property line in the northeast corner of the lot). Planner Overhser stated that Staff recommends Site Plan be recommended for approval subject to the following conditions. 1) That variances one through four above be approved; 2) That the storage area ise enclosed with a solid fence and be located at least. ten feet from all property lines; 3) That landscaping and berming be provided along the north property line to screen the parking and storage area from the residential district to the north fl4 That the identification sign belocated on the building; 5 That the existing billboards on the southwest corner of the 'property be removed. Planner Overhiser indicated that the petitioner is requesting CUP$ permits to operate a bicycle store and service center (Wheel Goods Corporation, west portitn of the building)and a center for snowmobiles and motor bikes with service department (Village Sports, Inc. - east portion of the building). The other two uses have not been identified as yet. Planner Overhiser was questioned. how high the storage fence would be. He answered that it should be 8 feet and cited an excerpt from the Ordinance prohibiting open storage in any district visible from a residential area (Section 17, Subdivision 4, Paragraph 4). Commissioner Chapman questioned whether a two-story building with storage und.ernea.th. would be feasible. Gary Freund, the petitioner, indicated that putting a basement under this building would be impossible as the soil is poor and the water table is 31 to 4 feet below grade elevation. Commissioner Chapman :fated he believed the use to be extremely heavy for such a small pieca of land: MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTIOV TO 4khapman, to defer action on the proposed site plan until the work DEFER'/ eeting of February 14 1973. Motion carried 5-0-1, Chairman Wahl CARRIED abstaining. The petitioner pointed out that the Kleven Floor Company will be a warehouse with facilities for two to three persons, The Bergerson-Caswell facility will house 15 employees. Com,rai ss i oner Kroskin stated he believed that the Councilresolutio,7 Wn limiting urban development states Council intent, but that the ommission, in order not to impede development, should use judgment in recomoending approval or disapproval of proposals. He indicated that in the case of the 55 Company, a small number of employees would have to be pruvided for and -added that a real problem would exist if the petitioner were proposing an extremely heavy use. He stated he did not believe a precedent would be set unless a substantial development were approved contrary to the Council resolution. Planner Overhisetk pointed out that I-1 use exists west of the subject area and an 1-2 area surrounded by an I. -I area exists on Fernbrook Lane, No 1,,.1 District 'is permitted on a parcel of land less than twenty acres; howeverthis can be waived where the proposed district abuts or adjoins an 1-1 Planned Industrial or an 1-2 General Industri,al District. The Commission was concerned about a possible ownership change that could cause a change in use on the subject parcel. Mr. Caswell stated that Ne and his -partners also own 50 acres north of the railroad tracks and although no plans have formalized for the area, he indicated it would be to their advanta.ge to keep the area south of the tracks attractive, MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO Erickson, to recommend that the Council change this area from an RECOMMEND R-0 designation to 1-1, realizing that the east half of the APPROVAL 4 roperty might be considered at a later date, for a change from0-1 to 1-2. He added that he believed Staff should obtain a legal opinion as to the necessity of holding a public hearing as the original public hearing was for an 1-2 industrial use rather than I-1. llotiop, carried 5"l, with. Commissioner Threinen 'opposed as he believed CARRIED this clearly a case of spot Zoning and contrary to the Goals, Objectives, and Criteria of the Village, Planning, Commission, Minutes February, 7, 1973 Zoning Ordinance' Amendment Re Day Care Centers and Nursery Schools was made by CommisNioner Kr6skin, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO0MOTION 6hn-son, to defer action on this matter until the work meeting DEFER/ of February 14, flotion carried 4-2, with. Commissioners Threinen CARRIED' and Erickson Qrposkid. 434 55 Com p a n'A- 4341 55 COMPANY MOTION was made by Commissioner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO Chapman, to take this proposal from the table. Motion carried TAKE FROM unanimously. TABLE CARRIED Commissi;m,r rbapman questioned how this propcsal would fit in with the Councils Meso lution on liI -miting development where sewer and tezoning water, Are lvnavailable. Planner Overhiser answered that the burden, R -O to 1-2 is upon t-',ij petitioner to demonstrate that sewage and drainage problems cai Abe handled by him without providing an undue burden on the in providing utilities or services as well as pro- tecting the natural resources, The petitioner pointed out that the Kleven Floor Company will be a warehouse with facilities for two to three persons, The Bergerson-Caswell facility will house 15 employees. Com,rai ss i oner Kroskin stated he believed that the Councilresolutio,7 Wn limiting urban development states Council intent, but that the ommission, in order not to impede development, should use judgment in recomoending approval or disapproval of proposals. He indicated that in the case of the 55 Company, a small number of employees would have to be pruvided for and -added that a real problem would exist if the petitioner were proposing an extremely heavy use. He stated he did not believe a precedent would be set unless a substantial development were approved contrary to the Council resolution. Planner Overhisetk pointed out that I-1 use exists west of the subject area and an 1-2 area surrounded by an I. -I area exists on Fernbrook Lane, No 1,,.1 District 'is permitted on a parcel of land less than twenty acres; howeverthis can be waived where the proposed district abuts or adjoins an 1-1 Planned Industrial or an 1-2 General Industri,al District. The Commission was concerned about a possible ownership change that could cause a change in use on the subject parcel. Mr. Caswell stated that Ne and his -partners also own 50 acres north of the railroad tracks and although no plans have formalized for the area, he indicated it would be to their advanta.ge to keep the area south of the tracks attractive, MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO Erickson, to recommend that the Council change this area from an RECOMMEND R-0 designation to 1-1, realizing that the east half of the APPROVAL 4 roperty might be considered at a later date, for a change from0-1 to 1-2. He added that he believed Staff should obtain a legal opinion as to the necessity of holding a public hearing as the original public hearing was for an 1-2 industrial use rather than I-1. llotiop, carried 5"l, with. Commissioner Threinen 'opposed as he believed CARRIED this clearly a case of spot Zoning and contrary to the Goals, Objectives, and Criteria of the Village, Planning Commission Minutes -9 February 7, 1973 1' mouth B&Oti s t ChurchJA -321 PLYMOUTH BAPTIST CHURCH annex ver"Iser explained that he had had a meeting with astor Terrey and his attorney, t4ir. Ray, at which an agreement had been reached that the lot at the southeast corner of the property would be subdivided, for a building lot and the Church would g -ant additional right of way easement. Following the meeting, Pastor Terrey sent a letter to Staff which stated the following conditions: 1) A firm commitment i'n the form of a resolution by the Village Council that they will allow the Church in the future to have tf,,e exi-sting carport enclosed fur an additional room,, 2) That the Village will give an entrance/exit from the existing parking area onto 47th Avenue North; 3) That the subdivision of the lot at the corner of the road at the top of the hill will be granted for a building lot; 4) That County Road 61, being a, county road, will not therefore require; assessments for the road itself. Planner Overhiser indicated that during the meeting, a tentative agreement was reacbed on condition #3, but added that the other three points were not discussed. He stated that as fa,r as condition #rl', the c,r_,rport would have to meet the State Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance. With regard to condition #2, a driveway exists at that location now, and the Village would not cut that off since it is a local street. As for londition #4, Planner Overhiser stated it is impossible to say that the 11age will, never assess the Church for County Road 61, as State Law ictates that for each project, everyone is -equally assessed that is, equally benefit-Ced. MOTION was made by Commissioner Kroskin, seconded. by Commissioner MOTION, Chapman, to recommend that the dividing line between parcels 2030 and 2045 (proposed Parcel A) be eliminated with the understanding that a 60 fooi easement from the center line of future County Road 61 be provided and that Parcel B as designated on the proposed conse1idation of 12-29-72 be approved. Motion carried unanimously. CARRIED R 293 Frederickson Addition FREDERICKSON Planner Overhiser explained that the Development Contract for ADDITION, this Additiob has yet to be prepared, but th4at the Final, Plat is in agreement with the approved Preliminary Plat. MOTION was made by Commissioner Yroskin, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO Threinen, that the Chairman be authorized to sign the Final Plat, AUTHORIZE Motion carried with six aye-!,, SIGNATURE/ CARRIED Aftof Drains in Conirn ercial and Industrial Areas Mr. Sherman Gzldberg, Village Engineer, was on hand to answer any questions the Commissioners had on Village policy requiring roof drains in industrial and commercial areas - for example, the recent Lake Street and Litton I Rlannilig. Commission Minutes February 7, 1973 proposals. Discussion 'determined that each case should be viewed f`f erently as to ,practi cal: `ty :and availability of storm sewers e Village Council has directed the VI l l age Staff to study this rIobl:eml. MOTION was made by Com.missi.oner Threinen, seconded by Commissioner MOTIONOr Johnson, to hiq,hly commend former Commissioners Keeley :and Roth COMMENDATION/ for their fine Sobs as Planning Commissioners and direct Staff 'CARRIED to prepare for;nal Resolutions Land Use Guide Plan Schedule of Upcoming Me>atings The following schedule Was reviewed and agreed upon February 14 - Work weeti ng, 7:30 Public Works 'Building February 21' - Regular meeting, 7;30' February 24 r Saturday morning tour 7 a.m. meet at Country Kitchen on Highway 55 MOTION was made by Commissioner Chapman,seconded by Commissioner 1-17-73 Threinein, that the Minutes of the 1-17-7,3 Commission meeting be Minutes approved.. Motion carded, all ayes. MOTION to adjourn, 10:58 p.m. James O. Wahl , Chairman Plymouth Planning Commission a} APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION Feb. 21, 1973 Martin W. Overhiser, Secretary'