HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-01-1971AP40XV, 0 12-111-71,
PLANNING COMISSION
VILIAGE OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
December 1, 1971.
A regular vieetanB of the Planning Commission began an 7.50 'pom* without a quorum
present i a the Council Chambers of the Public 'Works Building .on Wednesday,
December 1, 1971.
IMERS PRESENT: Chsi toma Jim Wahl, Commissioners Bill Keeley, Warren Chapman,
Gerald Neils and John Roth
MEMBjERS ABSENT; Commissioners Reg Kroskin and Dale Pollock
ST&Fr PRESENT. Martaa Overh ser and Sandy Haugen
OTIMS PRESENT: Howard B. Loomis, Jr,., Clarke Erickson, Charles Poppler, Al
Xjorud, Councilman T. Terry Johnson
Planner Nerhiser read to the Planning Commission Resolutions of RESOLUTIONS.OF
Commendatlon which had been drafted for Commissioner Ed Egan and COMMENDATION?
Secretary Judy _Lilliquist.. Motion made by Comuii.ss ones Roth, EGAN & LIT1,1QUIST
second by Commissioner eelay that both Resolutions be accepted. MOTION FOR APPROVAL
Vote unanimous 4-O to pass.
Planner Overbiser read to -ehe Planning Commission his memo to the PLANNINl, COMMISSION
Village Manager relative to the relationship between the Planning RELATIONSHIPS
Commission,, Planner and Village Manager.
A quorum was present ant the meeting was called to order by Chair. MEETING
man Wab1 at 8:10 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER:
A-255 r Super Valu Stores; Inc. Site Plan Approval) A-265
SUPER VALU STORES INC.
Petition of Super Valu Stores for site Man approval prior Site flan Approval
to building permit at the location on the northwest corner
of State Highway 101 and County Road 6.. Appearing on behalf
of Super Valu Stores, Inc. was Howard B. Loomis, Jr.. and Clarke
Erickson.
Chairman Stahl questioned Super Valu represeni.atives whether they DISCUSSION
were familiar with the condition, undea- which the rezoning- was r
granted by the Village Council, that condition: being that they
provide.a right turn lane on Lbe west side of Highway 701 be
tween .the `entrances and County Road '6 and a left turn lane going
north on Highway 101 from Courcy Road 6 to the first entrance.."
Discussion also followed regarding the fact that the Planning
Commission in it's hearings had recommended that no access be
allowed frQm,the shopping center to Merrimac Sane; however, this
had itit been made a part of the Village Council resolution.
Planning Commission Minutes "2- December 1, 1971
The staff _report was presented whereby recommendation was made STAIT RECOIDENDATIONS
that the .site plan be .approved subject to eight specific cm-
ditions which -were as follows.
1. "No access to Merrimac Lane from the commercial center" NO ACCESS TO
MERRI."AC LANE
Chairman Wahl expressed concern over the fact that an
access to Merrimac Lane would probably draw truck traffic
onto Merrimac Lane past the .single family residences.
Howard Loomis felt this additional access would relieve
Highways 101 and 6 of some traffic: and that they Gould con-
trol the truck traffic from using ,the Merrimac atces.s be-
cause of the fact that the bulk of the ;ack traffic would
be their own trucks. Both Commissioners Roth and Chapman
expressed doubt that this control was possible. Councilman
Johnson related to the Planning Commission .the reasoiAng
behind the Village Council action of not closing off Merrimac
Lane and their conwera over the stacking up of traff-ic at
Highways 101 and 6.
Motion made by Commissioner Uhapman, second by Commissioner MOTION
Roth that nv access be allowed on Merrimac Lane: Motion
passed 5-0.
2, "The northern access to State Highway 101. be combined with NORTHERN ACCESS COM-
the apartment development access" BINED WITH APARTMENT'
ACCESS
Loomis indicated details have not been worked out with the
apartment developers but :that it was basically* acceptable,
Planner Overhiser confirmed that the apartment developers
have agreed to eliminate two access points by combining on.e
with Super Valu and that an additional lane would be added
to Highway 1.01 as a turning lane. Commissioner Keeley,
questioned who would pay for the extra lane. Planner Over-
hiser indicated the developer would pay for it.
Motion made by *Commissioner Neils,; second by Commissioner MOTION
Keeley to accept the staff recommendation as stated. Chair-
man Wahl added that he ,felt the petitioner should come back
to the Planning Commission with specific; plans on this item
before final. approval. So moved by Commissioner Neils
second by Commissioner Keeley. Motion passed 5-0
3. "The 7'; of right-of-way on Highway 101 be conveyed to the 7' RIGHT-OF-WAY CON-
Village for public Street purposes" VEYED TO VILLAGE
Loomis said that he was under the impression that this 7"
had already beefx deeded, but if it had not he would take
care of it,
i
Plaoa rig Commission riinute ..3-- December 1, 1971
4 "Additional traffic lades be provided on Sbate Highway 101 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC
as outlinedned in Council action ,of May 4, , 1970 LANES ON HWY. 101.
Planner Overhise ' explained in det4l to the Planning
Commission the .exact wording of the condition attached
to the granting of rezoning'. Commissioner Roth raised
the question :of why the petitioner be responsible for the
turning lane all the way south to Tiighway 6 on the- west
side, Councilman Jobi,son explained that when the Council
allowed the rezoning aad permitted a traffic generating
center to locate there, they-decided it would have to be,
the responsibility 0r that concern to provide a way for
thy; traffic to move in and out of the area,
Motion made by Commissioner Keeley, second by Commissioner MOON
Chapman, to accept items:3 and 4 as stated, Motion passed 5-0.
5.. ."Sanitary seater, water and storm sewer plans be approved by SEWER, WATER & -STORM
the Village Engineer" SEWER PLANS BE APPROVER
Commissioner Keeley az,ked that this be clarified as to
whether it was to the property line or concerned with the
total area and made a motion:, second by Commissioner Chapman MOTION
that this item be divided into two divisions:
a, Sewer and water
b. Storm sewer only
Motion passed: 5-0.
Chairman: Wahl expressed the need for a definite proposal STORM SEWER FLANS
for storm sewer for this area. Councilman Johnson stated FOR ENTIRE AREA
that this is a priority item on the agenda of projects
before the Council and •will probably be -examined in January,
197.. He recommended that the Planning Commission forward
a resolution to the Village Council for details of the entire
watershed arw and a target date be established prior to
submitting building plans. Chairman Wahl made a motion; MflTICiV
s.cond by Commissioner Chapman, that completion of the
project should not preceed the completion of the storm sewer
project for the entire area. 'Motion passed 5-0.
Lotion made by Chairman Wahl that a resolution bi' iorwarded RESOLUTION TO PILLAGE
to the Village Council, recommending strongly t :; a storm COUNCIL
sewer drainage plan for the area around 101 and.6 be imple-
mented as soon as possible. Motion seconded by Commissioner
Neils. motion passed 5-0. I
Planning Commission Minutes 14-- December 1, 1971
All parking requirements be .adhered to {ordinance: required pAi2Kztr'G REQUIREIIENI.'S
155 spaces, site plan shows 207 spaces}'.
After some discussion it was agreed to this item as
it has been mit.
7" #"A landscaping plan be submitted and approved by the LA14DSCAPYyG PLAN
Village Plan4?er and Building Tnspctor"
Motion made by CoBzissioner Neils, second b Comm ssio er MOTION
Roth that this be wade a part of the development contract.
Motion passed 5_0,
A; development contract be prepared and approved between DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
the developer and. the Village Council"
Motion made by CpAuui.ss oxer Keeley, ses=d by Commissioner - MOTION
Neils to accept this recommendation with the addition of the
plan for land8caping to the developmeat contract. Motion
passed 5-0.
Commissioner Neils asked what the Planner's recommendations were PARKING ARMWEMENT
regarding the parki,tg arrangementa and circulat',:oa around the area.
Planner Overhiser indicated lie felt the arrangement was very
adequate because or the, fact that there was only one facility
located there and only one major entry.
Motion made: by Commissioner Keeley, second by Cosnmissiosier Neils MOTION TO TA,) LE
that the site plan be tabled until the Petitioner nas had: an
o,portun.i.ty to react: to the recommendations of the Planning
Commission. Motion passed 5-0,
Councilman; T. Terry Johnson appeared to express his thanks and COUNCILMAN JOHNSON
appreciation to the members of the Planning Commission for their
help and cooperation during his term on the Village Council.
A-351 Robert A. Sckiouerle ((conditional Use Permits s`3-351
ROBERT A. SCHNUERLE
Petition of Robert A, Schnuerle for a Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit
for a mobile home sales lot at the northwest corner of State
Highway 55 and Peony Lane. Charles Poppler appeared on behalf
of the Petitlf.,ner.
Planner Overhiser e:cplai.ned to the Planning Commission that this
was ati interim use ii* that, the property was owned by Red Owl
Corporation who had future development plans. for this location.
i
Planning Co mUsion Minutes -5- December 1,, 1971
He also explained to the Planning Commission the permitted business
activities under b-4 which he and Mr. Lefler c"elt to be similar to
this business use, and he also explained the possible grounds for
denial as skated on page 88 of the zoning ordinance, The staff STAFF RECONMENDATION
recommendation was that the Conditional Use Permit be recommended
for approval subject to three conditions:
1, The permit be granted for one year only and the Petitioner
be required to apply .for another Conditional Use Permit
afte.` one year of operation
2 No sign varienc" be granted and any existing nonconforming
signs be remo d from the property,
3: Private water and sanitary system to service the office unit
be approved, by the Building Inspector.
Commissioner Keeley felt that there should be a public hearing on DISCUSSION
this to get the reaction of the other property owners in the area.
Commissioner Chapman. asked if the parking area was to be paved,
Mr,. Poppler indicated he would; do whatever was required. Commis-
sioner Neils romi,nded the Planning Commission that the office would
be a mobile unit and that the Planning Commission in the past had
set stringent standards for mobile homes - mainly that they not be
visible, fir. Poppl,er indicated that iced Owl doe„ have ;developmcnt
plans started for this area 'but that they do not have plans for
actual construction for at Least 7 or 8 years..
Motion, made by Chatrgian Wahl., second by Commissioner Keeley, that MOTION
a public hearing bkw held and that notices- be sent to all residents
in the R-1 area south of 11ighway 55 as well as all 'properties
tai.".hin. 400 feet-,. Motion passed 54Q.
Commissioner Neils commented that any time we expand the uses EXTENSION OF R Y, 55
fronting on highway 55 we ought to consider requiring an extens- SERVICE ROAD
ion of the service road running parallel to Highway 55 in order
to limit property access to Highway 55.
A-353 Al Miorud (Cordic;ional Use Permit) 353.
AZ MJORUD
Petition of Al Mjorud for a Condi tional Use Vermi.t in an. R-1 Conditional Use Permit
District for a home occupation,, in this caaE. oei;ag the service
profession of archlte-,,ture..
It was determined by t- k,j.s tioning the Petitioner that there prop- DISCiTSS I0N
ably would- be very fev, if any, people visiting him at his home
relative to this service anal that there would be no employees
other than himself..
Motion made by Commissioner Neils, second by Commissioner Keeley, MOTILIN
to recommend. approval. Motion passed 5-0,
Planning Commissioa Minutes -6- ]December 1, 1971
Commis.;i.oner Chapman asked. Planner Overhiser for his interpre- "DUST -FREE NATURE"
tation of "dust -free natu e'l required of parking lots under the:
zoning oVi-*trance and why some businesses:: are. not conforming to
this condition under Conditional U'so Permits Planner Overhiser
thought they should get fir. Kavman"s interpretation and discuss
it later..
There followeddiscussion regarding recommendations by both Chair- FORMALIZATION Or
man Wahl and Commissioner Neils that there should be .a formaliza.. ALL PERMITS & TICKLER
tion of all permits and ceztificates for signs, Conditional Use FIDS ESTABLISHED ,
Pertd ts, etc, and a tickler file maintained in the building depart-
ment on these permits for a periodic review.
Tha balance of the meeting was devoted to working on. Criteria CRITERIA
1, Access - Motion made by Keeley, second by Commr3sioner_ MOTION
Roth to accept as revised .at this meeting. Motion
passed 5-0.
2. Economic Vitali
The minutes of the November 17, 1971 meeting were amended as MINUTES OF
follows, 11-17-71 MEETING
1. Motion made by Chairman Wahl, second by Commissioner
Keeley, to amend Page 2, Item No. 3, Paragraph 4, Liner
to. read "..eras asked at least four times, but not definitely
answered..". Motion passed 5-0.
2. Motion made by Chairman Wahl, seccrcd by Commissioner
Keeley to amend Page 1, Item No. 1, Paragraph 2, last
line, from 11, . proposed. 101 & 55., 11 to ,•..9, ,24 & 55..
Motion passed 5-0,
Commissioner Roth wished to go on record as saying he had recon-
sidered his voto on the Thorough.fare Guide Plan and wanted the
record to show he wished tovote against the plan because of his
concern over the Vicksburg Lane anal Highway 55 area.
Motion made by Commissioner Roth, second by Commissioner Keeley MOTION TO.APPROVE
to approve the Minutes as amended. Motion. passed 5-0 MINUTES AS AMNDED
notion to adjourn passed all in favor. Meeting adjourned at MOTION TO ADJOURN
12:45 a.za;
Jim G. Wahl, Chairman
P1 t Plan C` issi
ar in 4. Ove se re
torte
Planning and Community Development
120671/S l
4
lip u. ccs
tr
ei µ
M
7A•
t ' 43t E .CI. A +.L
ti O 4J N G '
47
Ery Ai .I•r •:s 6. 20 G '-F +sa tl. .Y .•F
H a S rl A +rl
u J
F q ,y U w i1 G W O ++•C YS.
A iJ +H LOi " x•
J .' K
W iv uA u C, 11 "0 "1 M C
O
q U u y
to SF A .. .•+ N, q N O kra, 4n Af ''ia
lc 0
O V.:C ?
O ncdV .Il V K. 9
Cs'
AA.4 C qx
p u -'V ` 4 0-
0
t x.F Mg a'4 C 6 a
V rt•€ or-c V4JC ,II st 8 .-j 'n` q
f! +
d01 C q V
J.+ 04W ri q JJ w {,
A V
K' O Ra
tC H 7 ri V f XJ .. a l.t `"
r4 r . # y iy .% •ti7 F L 4 u.
G 45 a
i) i 5 K .:awaOuuwri u? q Y a1 w w x a .0 i' is O v ^cid 7
m rsu t axse Y,.cs+wumw aFa+9
n FU +C V 0 O y Lt p W '°V V O xJ w al u Q+ O
rj ixQ WUO
MUGY 1 . S\. M k 17 +
rt
qM}•
S M P Mu,. w'q'... 0 .'sG-..0
J4 is r zs c mA SJ
v :Q: saiuYac
soa y. 1.
1.. •
4S " j ks Q .A
O '.
4" ' "b c
ejwa
Alte G •.•a .0 ;.rK ---- 4.4 M
i O H Awu s.'3+M:« Ma K Ss SF bs7 4 t7 69 :K ? K C + M
K KO tMe s C.nuuqmi
E?
2tU
my
rte,,,
N N •^+ A tc V 9 +'X +'+ Ct ((+` .0
ai? Y P r. k
vi 0Y
ar Env w,. _. rr r 4t c .. A ,aUYLt7rauv '
t? 4 .r{ qq a
q
a u O ..a O .•4 ,.t A 4.
G i$ u S.^' '• .{ sC u: .a Y 4F ,4F t~ aj ,o v .t U C" O 0 a= " is Ht O >,
u j.A Ja G u 4 H r"' r-4 3 T 4 h5: H
9 a Rf 'SS r IS ir: 4c 'fi >a x4 a .. i `4 tt J 4 .Qufar•a
jQ cJ C? v G Ict +'( t} O .••t .,s. *h Q W q a
w
i T. rAl. • C F « 10
O 4J 0 a +1f10f 044UG
a
0 C. j, L "i G%iW A M Lu k to .;` .Y.
O V4 fJ: Xi N•p C t/} E.: aqC ` *t fiN3 t,•C: n •tat A K CS to 'VCJJtG" G V }j M
Adm V 6 ri c:. u rJ N 1F a 4a U H
O ur •
4 s
as u
YJ '4 6
ab. le'.0 O 4,.r_ rJ •«i AJ 'NI u b A a
Ck aJ j.'+ / ISe :C u C"«. "i. S4 u.d
K.
N L M A• K
@ y
F hj0U. k V e•j L' 41 M
41 4'k' H O a :a .0 .G
0
C.
Q. LS J 4J N M V. u
u
H rh
in UN
f L
O 10 21: U U
hyar,
yr..
V a1VUQ S y4
A ,• YO. 1 .tea t: E u L
G u G '1 r H t4 M1+ Kt A
C7' W w ,
C G 05 a J ? It V •Cs t% E •rr. i1 d M
a W S Ri 'jS C• ',1 •r" ' Y K
M rs li ;r S...
t i•1 it j: V u .w V n1. 1c: Yj
C' L4 O j.
l ug... g k K w C, N V ,C O O WW ;+. U U9iUweL4h1toaJUC !s C rh 4 O ihY u 4J V a V W '0, 11
A c u+T3 a k
o sJ iq .4C i V au J+ CUU Tr, esC
v
iEOt0Q4 O rl V »•
a
k
w Krj ,Ce M .0 a 6 Y a u •
O 4'++ 7+ ja. k
u 14 ,a > A. •A»rj , Sr7 :2 k '.1 u .4u14j4CPt
tt.> ,•}+ aJHLIZMf-
4
U
beF GC,".. z4 s; N •d r
a
O
MP N
d t V w ij p. i7 pG ••.. e.i,. m
NC .C: *p+
G"*.
V C A C iT A Le Y u. a t#- 41 Kt r n k M 1,4 A A u O PW .. . M .>+
r ' r: N 4 1
2. '04.,
54 «,
r .
00+i G O'
u
N Y A G. U"W -. ' O A 4. C
F" a. ik
Y) C k j 4 O .-F r3 M E9 O V+ e•j V a :
r, k C? a W •ri O a. M,
O'.
G 2- 4 k "
i C7 V T.J V, i'F 3• r EJSY i.J rt r' as is a 11.1 .•j L' E? k tC M' G
GtI M C 'a i. A!
h rrl 4 RS )t 'r6+ 'Fd (J r1 Fk SJ 4 44
M
Yy. 4i 'O K at U rk '.1 O 10i '+'41 11 N V
G. S!
7
N. N a f0 f. ri S 'L7 P V a '«Y H '^7 V H •«Y L A V O 'td ••,
yy 2". O
r
ArtgZvL i vgt
ki..
t0« ,•9t7 1.1H>
H A ` jOC4) CutK !:}'V iVj
N%
ur
aunCMu4,
1
rtl
a
t'
NV
fJ
OkCd
dWC w q u f. M t) a .,.r C S7 c} ... Lt
ar aAa rYA> a ck a;
0"
a V Es M L A N M V V y a y a K
G 4.a q«-wMr xAk
ra
M Sr r•t xz D 'C f1 O 43 sr k` Y
W
u
Y. rH Ili s'
S
L. Gt
a Ys .» ^Sd 2; ..rs tits •.i t: xr a
OU
UO rA4rrJ
W
E tsr c. Il .•. k y u W o
o r c. F 4 •cl k A' • 4J q wct
0. rc t: K a m aJ u a a Y b v
u ty C. 'L7C
L
u 3. {3 0 C' C+ >; 4. '4 q r e
4 - a .0 W C M it e. t1
it.
e.. A
y S! M i•d r Sj ,4! N
V k q .1C w J.a.a U , k 0
M 41 a. N
p
ej g
d v D O . x4O 0 u H.
dr0.. t7 H It N ei M H rJ r-f O Zt
W -
aeti r C :
3 9 i.. +
h t4 m M .r•i O dJ fh O C r7• a..•t
O M esr L i #:f is .•+ zS O a
a p G' u 'exr 7 k r.. O V +.f .,j u c
rJ uf''Y.0 H:.. xJ fi S+ uAb c
K i, .. .r a aorak63YkL
w / r a+ 1e •y :rk 3 .. 4 ?f A M +1'+ ry Sr 0.r: a R u l+ r•1 0 W k Ci LL 'U N q
in
k a4 P a
M Y" k a. U
V a er K C
C iX til f. "iY r EJ K a q c7bi3. a1.'. r••1 rG .tJ r ,-4'
ro
v: iO++ S$«..•.4 a G Ok G4'
r
L` iM lF SJ
nr Yr •.
N+ m TI Lr
N X LS
k w OJ +".
t E J
vA
to M r"'l i1: E4 IIwS G'.
G
Kw+.n .
C VW
yw . :
0+i..
0: AO a s u AJ
K
M.>± zrC '
a
cm
M44,4
k a
ra
Ko.`
AA Si :x•t ..J tl O r. q 'q 'V atr A
K3— M M SC ik >h tir 0 ++' 41. 0 U t.
e ri
kl; L ar
C ri m a 5.j w S ' 0.x Q .W w. m, i C •uc.
Gr t w.oaW taaoaT ura4u a
U .a JGb
R i7i +
bb
ra(
9 M.
414•'
t9 e' 2: M
00 4aY.S sUS
s72 O C U w C M r„•$ AO w U
Aq«, 940.4. Q Ae M ftYG 1
v u
U U. aro.RztrSw iic}n
st.
0 zOi:ao
rj q uO •~i o v a zx II w r, Ar ,., u q AJ96 0
O 4> M
a} 4iU K, ri 41 ls0
IA V ,c s+4i k
t7 vSr51VYG. all
N
rr+
G u 4^ Rr 4 C "~ NrCs4. C-
14
sS
at f9 c! 4 X .* rya 1d C(1 q yC O
r. C
36
10U
LN}
n x Aa P. Fi 4} C ••ae 4.0Ny' }s ,is S7
SJ ..•yaa ..r v a
r!
is
gn
14
It 5 A
Na
P.
x K
t•:t
0
a
rokM r AJOG
re..
O Gf b. b- 047" S O 4
y„ u a
st
LLKS
O L
N 0 •rh.+."4 C Y,{3 b0
O...
1 ,..
w OUTg O. i FaJ b a
Mgg G
U
p de G a, 0k9w q G O n U.
ya Cs .0
A u
N .« Yi Ct w r+'
nw.
x '4
aa+ }
4 q 'p Oj nJ_ p
HW :.. n " 47. O
a 21 •.z
v.a l: r, s'i 4r .• r -t a}
rJ,. r •53
O tG0 w,.. Q N O r.a.
A• riJ ti O K,7 A ^'4 f{,y O` w r- c u N D U
a 16i3 K G 1. }r'O UUVCAY tr Nd 4 tsOOCO ••t
atl
t; 4 *•+ W + Sx i.
ei
y
w tJ
a 00s
wH
2 rGt 4O uWG w G
4 U 10 f
W
Md. or.
v7 "
UK - Eii'.rr+j Y.. 1 LJ U L 9 N {; v. N ui OQ i'«' v ry O nY. F A 0 N V-4 0+J Z Cf A N q 6 i In .. r 5O3 "h 4i
uUM3.=.'w GWtl
C9 t
NyA}
0 t4
tJkOU 2 xt riVC}
tb+`..
0 L w4 -x O p... X {`^+' {} ryJ G r• i+a u' N #: G
f 4v i/ M Xi -c {a Yi1
N -H i?'1 0 1fA W r.f
III . m 4; !; ?•
e G1 G G 1:. a.r +•. hf' i r Cr N }+
r•i {.!' w
M 4t >a Ri C G p tQ vqx • a + 1i'. t
0
ri Kt b }+ iQ A q
QC
Ani H ti O U G 'rS O vHj
s a S7. 41 L/ Fc :? 4: +i .N +r} f v {. •r{ K a W J.'. O r4 w 'q 1 Cl H 4U A }
G bpi' U V? f9 V b! br0At' O V G 3 .•i u
p O 4 9Q a o
4} O.•At Ytb, y.. M i2ry R SAi 4 -0al_ N /Jtt} rl 4i
G c+ `a`
K TS +b aK N a a t7. N
q Ji : CJ r #l eL« 6 02t.•r +.t 6 w. w ti TOj a rKl.
r, '4 A6w N rt
4r
O .0 r+ u u u
ON
b N
U
0 -+.i:: a' N' 4+ ++ 4; k:. u O # 4r7 u •O .G V O 't1 + 0.G. o! C 00 u O
M • C., 1 .i ri. u ri to O b t}. ay G cJ KJrtw'r• u {) ii '4r Gr [: a """t "n O .7•'. N 4J t4M.:.v O u
N 1i t x7 s7 0a a
4 O O
r
u h L+ +i ri. tel
G w: i
1. too 0 A. A: a+ m .0 ti to
a •y:..
i
AL M,70RUD
Conditional Use Permit
Discussion and Action By Commissioners
A-353
12/1/71
A-353 Al Miorud (Condzi tional Use Permit) X-353-
AL W ORUI:
Tetiti.on of Al Mjorud for a, Conditional Use Permit in an R-1 Conditional Use Permit
District for a home oc;cupation,, in this case being the sarvice
profession of architecture.
It was determined by questioning the Petitioner that there prob- DISCUSSION
ably would be very Feta, if any, people visiting him at anis home-
relative omerelativetothisserviceandthl: there would. be no. employees
other than himself. g
i
14otion. made by Commissioner Neils, second by Commissioner Keeley, MOTTIC111
to recommend approval, Lotion passed 5-0,
i
351 Robert A. Scl nuerle Condition, Use rarmlit) - 51.1
Petition of Robert A, Schm erle',for a Conditional Use Permit
ROB; RT A. SCHNUKRLF,
Conditional Use Permit
for a mobile home sales lot at the nor thves t corner of State
Nighway 55 ;and eemy Larva. Charles Poppler appeared on behalf
P nnor Ovcrhit(:r explained to the .Plana.ng; Comiiiss%on that this
was an interim use in that the `property was ocrned by Red Owl
Corporation -06 had future developmoxo t 1)1ans for this location,
lie also explained' to tete Planning Corziiissi:on the permitted business
activWes under B-4 which he and rhe. Lefler felt to be similar to
this b+isiness use, and he also explained the z nssible ;rounds for
tenial as stated on page 88 of the zoning ordinance. The staff STAFF REC01NRT3NDATT.O1*,'
recolmitendatioa vias that the Conditional, Use Per jai t be, recommended
for approval subject to three conditions;
1. The permit be granted for one year only and the Petitioner
be required to :apply for :another Conditional Use Pexrmii
after one year of operation
2. NO sign variances be granted and any existing nonconforming
signa be removed from the property.
3. ,Private water and sanitary system to service the office unit
he approved by the J3 uilding Inspector.
Ctimmi,ssioner Keeley felt that there should be a public I^earing on DISCUSSION t
this to get the reaction of the other property owners in the .area.
Commissioner Chapman a,sRod if the parking area was to be. paved.
Mr. Doppler indicated he -would do whatever was required; Con m, * s-
sioner Npil.s reminded the Planning Commission that the office would
be a mobla unit and that the Manning Commission in the least had
set ,stringent standards for mobile Domes - inainly .that they not be
visible.. 'lir. Poppler indica:tad that Red Owl docs have development
plans started for this area; but that They do not havc plans ,for
aetu4l construction for at; ]:east 7 or 8 years,
rIot,ion trade by Chairman Va.hl, second -by Commissix)ner Keelay, that: MOTION
a public hearing, be held and that notices be sent to all residents
in t Ise fi-1 area. south of , ighway 55 as wall as all properties
within 400 feat. Motion, pa,sseu 5-0.
aa.+prwt+.M.a-.wnw.wa.w lµ.4+e-. i• •.nmf+.+w.Ur.F.iwar+.:x+.h+r. •e- k: s. +w.r.ai..reX+M:... p:+w a - :. .,..0 u.r..uw.:.
xx
EXHIBIT X
iobl c. Rearing - 1,2/x,5/71
Taylor u Playhousa Co.
NORT14 MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
3220 LOWS.YAVOINUe NORTH
MINNJEAPoLM MINNESOTA 5k;422
AM% 012 1 681,:-0616
December i4,; 197
Mr ,James Wahl, Chairman
Planning Commission
Plymouqa Village
13800 Highway 55.
Minneapolis, -Minnesota
Dear Mr Wahl.
It has been brought to my attention that Plymouth is once again.considering a
omme;oial and multiple :unit res 3dentiai development in the area of Dunkirk
Averive North where it intersects with 213th Avenue Nor(h. 1 wish to register
my strong protest to this development based principcHy on the following factors:
1) This proposal,, or essentially the some proposal, was made before the
Plymouth Planning Commission approximately two years ago and turned
down at that time. To my ,knowledge, .no new variables exist today
That should change that decision.
2) The proposed; development area is in the Primediate vicinity of a well
established single fami4y residential area (Mapledell), This area has
been in existence for/approximately fiv(years, Most of the home owners
in the area have in .emc;ess of $50,000 investee in theirproperty and a
development of this type would' obvioi:'sly depreciate the property values
in this area.
3) The project does .not have the supiport of the citizens located''in the area.
Plymouth shat+ld be proud of its integration cad clean indusfiria), ru.ltiple unit and: single
family residential areas. The Minneapolis Industriai Park is one of the finest developments
of its kind in the country rand Aymouth has. every reason to be proud of its success. Seversl
high caliber multiple dwelling units are now :being constructed in appropriate areas and
this typo of deveippment is also beneficial for all concerned. I do, however, feel that if
PET i T I O -`
r
i
Ve the e si ned, residents of Pal yraouth, request that out
concern and alara related to the re -ronin proposal sitb i ,t d by:
Playhouse Co., Inc. - R-0 to Int
Delos T.&.yl,or -- R--0 to -1, R-41 ,R=-3, R-1
be voiced by spa%eezetn: ,of the Malp eue:ll $azaeoumers Association,
We feel tb=ty, as ;property owners in the area, our property will,
be unnecessarily devalued,, and our life style seriously disrupted
by -t"1e encroac i, et t a£' o, non-sinn? e famdly housing develop ent
adjacent to the MapledPl1 Adeitiozi. Our co 3unity bas been settled
into single family hones, for over five rears, and we feel that it
would be an infringement of our ri6hts as .ho ueovners 4c have the
property in question re -zoned as anyt'.ina but R-3
We Nearby petition the Planning Coliwdssion to deny the, proposed
TO -Zoning &rd develop ent pro-posa.l
E ADDRESS
yyx+w.rru,F
Ile)
w
vllw
Ak+ 3.nraar ' ra o.+,o-i.., -.vekw>•.rrr,» .cv.-
I
h •. :. ,. _Xa' 'jj 4 f A fiy, ,.. ` ray: n SJ : a b,<..•..: '" y A• :i
t r
h
Aw-.,
Ve ,the undersigned, residents- of i' raouth requdst teat our
concern and ajar,i relit ted ,o there-zo-ain propoBnl subiftitted oy.
klayhouse- Co., !no. R-O to I-1,
De .os Taylor R-O to i-Z,, A 4o -R-3, R.-x
be voiced by :spokes!.en ;of the 11440elieA o:Aeowners Association.
is feel thaty as Property owners in the area out property w11]
be unnecessarily, devc-ed, and our life style seriously dY.srapted
by the encroachment of a non -single f lys housing; develope t
ad acel t to the Maplede l Addition. Our ca* axrsit; hes, been settled
itto single family homes for over, five pears,., and, ve feel that it
wou: d be an infringement of out ri-i4ts as ho,eowners to have the
property in question re-zoned as any nitg but A-I.
We hearty petition the Planning CoMission to deny the proposed
re-zoning and. development proposaj.
i
NAME ADD' SS
Z!-, L -
r
V
r
54
t . U t
r
We the undersigned, re,s deylts of` Plymouth, request that our
concern and 3 3"s"I S reli. -ted to tae reg Zoaing; pro,osai submitted b,
xlayhouse Co., Inc. - R--Q" to 1.1
Delos Taylor -y R -O to I IY R-4, R--3, R -I
be voiced by spokesmen of- the Maplede:Lj iiomeo, hers Association.
lie Feel that, as pxoperty ot4ners in the area,, our property wt l
be unnece saxily devalued, and otr life, -style seriously disrupted
by the encroachwent of a nnn-sin41 f jly housing development
adjacent to the Xaplede17 Addition. our co=unity has been settled
into single family hones for over five gears, and we keel that it
would be an i,-fringement of c, ur r ,hts as hoiaeowners, to have the
rroperty to question re -zoned as anything but R --1t
We hear'by petition the Planning Cotimiss on to deny the proposed
re- zoning and development proposal.
1
Nkm ,bDCRESS
ARE lif
ir h.....
oZ
OO
1
a yyiWr
P
x/ ,
J
it dd
ora
R. n
MENEM
T I T 1 0` ch
Va the un4ers gnod residents of,Plyawuthy request that our
Concert and alarm e.'Ia:ted to the ra-zoning proposal sub0aitted by:
j'layhouse Co., Inc .. R -O to 1-1
Delos Taylor R.4 -o to 1,11 f -, .•-, R--1
be voic d by sPokesmen of the Mapledell, hlomeowrier Association.
We feed that, as property ovner s in, the area., our, property Idit
be unnacessavily devzjued, and oar life st;ie se{ious y ,6jtsrupted
by the encroachment of a non--szngiet fijy housing development
ad, acent to the Mapledell Addition. Our eo. uaity has been settled
into single family h=, es for :over fave years, and azo feel that it
be 41'1 is rind e art of our ri6l4ts as ho eovniers to have the
property in question re ---zoned as anything but R-.1.
Ve hearby petition: the Pla ing OoTmiss on to denyy the propose;
re--zoting and development proposal.
XAME ADDRESS
Ai A AL--