Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-23-1971Jiuze 23, 1971 ocial meeting of the Plymouth planning Conte ssion i a. cad led to or e. 7:45 ' P.an, is ttae Council f hm*ers of the Public Works ilding, 14900 23rd Avenue, .Nlorth oil' n, A= Z3, 1071 by Chairman. 11ahl, PREMM, Chairman, Wahl, Oomissio4ers Xeeley, PoljodkJune 'Neils, (Tajmtank Rot and: Planner Por ly ABSEII `: C xmtdssi.oners %oskU% ind Egan: A - PrOliAlina Po aLgtipq Project A report was made, on the first stages of a study on optimum popula- A.,322 tion level, for Plymouth. Ivme r- berg y expla"Ine d the assim4)ti ons MUNINARY l PULA on whidl tile, report is based, .. Mord information is to be supplied TIOX STUDY before the Go rnti.ssion modifies the assumptions. A-320 Ban Con, bQ., dere was a 'Zoaiing Cowdttee: meeting on the pl,luti;on of Mi-tion A-320 MN Inc. ZONING Wa- ING MotioA made by Gonmissioner Ch secondsecond by Commissioner Pollock,,IOTlU t to recoi nend approval of the re otti.ng request and the gvalrting .off variances as requested below: I. S(ct ,on 10, Subdavis,i.oa 5,.Para,. 2a - front yard setback variance needed in some internal areas but. not on Vicksburg Lane, County Road 6. or Dunkirk Um. (Setback, from, Public minor street is meet for all tuAts except garages in cluster 11. Section 101 Subdivision S, Para. 3a, - side yard setback: variance needed for interna; areas. 3. Section 10, Subdivision .S, Para. 4a - rear yard setbacks variance needed for Towihouses,. 4* Section 10, Subdivision S Para. d - lot wi.dt 4 at d depth varix fico. icor all lots except lot: dept L11 detached single Family ureas, Section. 10,, Sub 4ivsiort S, Paragraph 7 lot coverages varianconeeded in Toulouse areas for indlivi dual; "lots" but not total IsPlatl'w d Secdon 10 division S, Para. 2d Private road- Ways taut constTucted, to Vill-age specs, but to i,neor's requiroments Pl.atining {:oan.ssion Mitutes - - JWe 23, 1971 7. Section 7 Subdivvislorx 7.04, para. 5, required frontage on public street. (SOS: #6); S. Section 7. Subdivision. 1.04, Fara. 6 - requxros minimum tdxclth of 3G feet at rear property line C p )lI for 1 mhouse` area, only . Amendment to 'the motion made by. Cortundss oner Nells second by XIMMUNIT TO NMOTMN C,om issioner Pollock, to recommend approval of the rooning,, conte- diti,onal use permit and-tlae. general development plan, subject. to the conditions listed below: I. Govanwits tightened up to protect tine Nrillage Proposed changes submitted to Attorney Lefler on 6/24/71=) u. Mdenimg of collector streets to have a 66 Zt . richt-of-way. 3. Mbetin engineerls specs as recommended. 4. xMaij taiaing a 35 £t. setback of the major struc- ture ,from a collector. 11aintainingS, tr c- a, 100 it. setback of the major stric- tureture from the ert,ewal thoroughfares 6. Arranging for a turnaround at the end of the lot an Block S. L Increasing t z. distance bo -wenn some of tht: struc- tures to :gid ft as specified by the Engineer, S. Providing for one additiowl, parking space per horse in the single famil) dwelling area, Vote on amendment passed all in favor. 3 i Nrr VOTE FASSW Vote on motion, as wiended passed 6-1 with CJomnissioncr doth oppostd.!NMC)N PASSED C:otnuissioner Roth stated:that for the record he imted to show he CC?MIISSIONE Z ROnI felt the plan etas a food ane, but Ire was: concerned about, how tete STAMMENI'T FOR RECORD rest of the open area north, of the Fair-Coa site would be developed ;be- cause of Ole condominiums boixig on the north.: He also thinks tmQ, spat Gananz without a Comprehensiveprehensive Guide Flan; in the area.. Discussion. and Action GomAissi5oners dune 8, 1971 11e Plowning CmWssion.'was'meeting as a Zoning Committee during this session for the Ban -con petiti,on.. Motion; Motion made by :onmiissioner Chapman, second by Caziissioner Pollock, to recoTriend approval of the rezoning request and the granting of variances as requested belo n I. Section 10, Subdivision S, Dara. a - front yard setback variance needed in some internal areas but not an t!icksburg Lane, County 6 or Lku irk sane. (Setback fronx public; minor street is met for all units except garages in cluster 11.) 2. Section 10)Suibdivsion 5) Para. Sa - side yard setbac variance needed, 3., Section 10, Subdivision 5, Vara.. 4a - side yard setback variance needed, for townhouses, 4 Section 10, Subdivision 5, Para. 6 - lot width and depth variance for all lots except lot depth in detached single family areas, S. Section 10, Svbdivi.sion s, Para. 7 - lot coverage variance needed::' in Tow&iovse .areas for individual "lots" but not total. "plat," 6. Section: 10, Subdivision 5, .para, zd... private roadways not con- j structed to Village specs, but to rTgiz tier's requirements. 7. Section 7, Subdivision 7.04, Dara. S - required frontage on public street. (see #6), S-. Section 7, Subdivision 7.,04, Para, G requires minimum width of 30 feet at rear property line, (Applies for townhouse area. only. Com, Neils : How will the utilities be handled? 1°en < All ut a i tapes will be dedicated to the Village. The utilities will be in, the street and easements will be provided. Utilities will be dedicated with easements. Sewer, water acid storm sewer will be ' a:iaintained by the Village and the Homeowners Associations will maintain the private streets. lHave you made the change in the. Covenants referred to by the `Villageiesion: Attorney? y kir 11agen, *nae change bas, been mado and can be submitted to the Village Attorney dor his opinion Goes ion Uhat type of parking arrangements have been made in the single family dwelling areas? Can you arrange for more spaces? agent if it is the feeling of the Con-nission that one .more space per singl0 fWaily dwell'is sufficient, t}e change can be anode w A-320 Discussion and Action by Cotmassiozr, rs - June 231 lgf l estion. lfiere did the Vicksburg alignment information come from? Ur. Cuningham.Received t}Lis information from Bonestroo, Amendment; Mandment to the motion made by Cormiii.ssioner Neils, second by Coinnissioner Pollock, to recommend approval of the rezoning, conditional use permit and the general, developilient plan subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Covenants tightened up to protect the Village.(Proposed clianges submitted to attorney Lefler on -6/24/71 . ) 2,. Wideniag of collector streets to have a 66 ft. right-of-way, 3. Meeting engin erIs specs as recommended. 4. MaIntaining 8 35 ft. setback of the major structure from a collector;, S. Maintaining a 100 ft. setback of the major structure from the external thoroughfares. G. Arranging for a turnaround at the enol of the lot in Block S. 7. Increasing the distance between some of the structures to 30 ft.. as specified, by the hngincer. 8. 'Providing for one additional parking space per home in: the single fw ily dwelling area. M. encknent dote: Vote on amendn-ient passed all in favor. J lotioh Vote,:: Mote on motion as. amended passed 6-1 with ComTdssioner Rout opposed. Coin. Roth.,Stated that for thy: record. he wanted to show lie felt the plan was a good one, but lie was concerned about how the rest of the open area north of the Bmi-Con site would be doveloped,,J?ecause of the condominiums being on the north.. Ile also thinks we are spot¢ zoning without a Comprehensive Guide Pian in the area.