HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 06-02-1971V II• `1M or- PMtQ(Il H
1)"NiUlic Ct MISSION
June 2 1971
zJje meeting of the Planning Coitm4ssion was called to order by Chairman K'a111 at a p.m.
on -m& 21 1,971: in the Council Ur=bexs of the Village Public Works 13uilding.
PRESIa'W: Cabman Wahl, Commissioners June, Kroskin, Keeley and Neils
ABSI.W: Coimu ssloners Polloc -, Chapman,. Egan,. Roth and Planner Bergly
A-313 Plymouth I-fil.ls _ Eduard. Woody, - Rozoning R-0to R-3
M
A coimti.ttee report was given by Chairman Wahl on the above petition. A-31.5 RIZINING
REWEST - 1VMDX
Motion made by, Commissioner June, second by Conniissioner Neils, that PLYMMI HILLS
the Planning Co:mission reconnnend denial of the 11,Oody petition on the R-0 T4 R-3
basis that the density for the area both on existing plan and recom-
wended guide plan is too great. rbtioa Passed all in favor of denial. MOTION
A 315 Conditional Use Permit - Betty Krause
Chairman Wahl stated that this request should not have come before A-315
tho ContUlissior becaiuse it was not an appropriate request for a con- M"MITIC`RL USE PEP
ditional use permit under &,4 totm "home occupation." BLITY MUSE
A-295 - Circle Star - Gary Freund
Coum issloz er .Neils gave a -report on density for the area.. (Attached A--295 , CIRCLE STAT:
in rdnute book, as Pahibit A) . Uiairnaan Mhl stated that Circle Star
has complied Ath the Flaming Cmmnission''s requests.
Re wort on Density
Motion made by Commissioner June, second. by Commissioner Neils, that DMNSITY MOTION
the Council be informed that it is the policy, of the Planning Com-
mission,
om
mission that, future density calculations for areas guided more than
one density use a proportionate method of open space ciensi:ty allow-
wtces . 'Motion; passed all in favor.
The legality of this motion is to be cYieck:ed with .Attorney Lefler
before it is officially passed on to, the Council.
Mot on to approve the minutes of 'May 12, 1971. passed all in favor. MNUMS APPROVED
N",ft3t oil to adjourn passed all in favor. beting adjourned at 11:30 p.Ai.
MEEK -
a ,
PbA.N I"M O'NUISMN11 i+ SIMtiKIDMI 0/2/71
SPECIAL CtiM11;"l ER RUORM
4
PROJEOT: Par2x%sLatta Api=twents
P]iZR: Circle Star Preferred Develapxs
PURPOSE OF, COM 11;`P t't R. To make an indepoodent evaluation. of Guide Plan intent
AS to concept; and speca.fi.call.y density
A "dace,-+xa3,ue" intarpretatioa ,of the Central -Guide Plan was made for the area
involved, without 'regard to the petition. The land use map of the guide plan
wras superimposed to scale on the (3<ave;loper°s site plan zap, and boundaries drawn`
as average straight line segments to produce a hyp.)thetxcai ,, bdi,vision plat,
The purpose of this hypothetical plat was to enable discrete identification of
net parcel areas for each land use. T IR -3 and R-4 Legul,aticns were used 'or
medium and high density parcels to determine the number of permitted dwelling
units per acre, The results are summarized as follows:
USE NET ARRA UNITS/ACRE UNITS
Single 1! amity 6.5 Y 2 14
1
Medium Density 26.8 10.1 271
High Density 9.9 1"V. 6 liti
Publ t, Open Space 3.3.5 p
56.7 acres 8.1 avg. 459 units
An integral part of the Opatral Area Plant,, along with the land use map,, is .an
indicst4i,on that dedication only in excess of the :3.0% minimum should be used an
computing allocable density; that indium and high density is defined as 8 to 10
and 14 to 20 unitsis per ante, that the parpoge of medium and high density in
such, Iocati,otts is to px•ay.lde a transitai.on hetwaea industrial and single family
uses; that green open space: in goch locations is to provide e buffer between
higher density <ittd single faatily uses as Wall as to. continue the central linear
Park sysi cm,
t
I
Exhibit A
Page 2K
The computation of total units allowed vos made independent of faetors related
to acc;uisition of the open space. klanncr Berg;ly, presented a similar nalculaLiox
of 450 units compared v th 459 units computed by this committee.
At; issue "here is not the compatenoa of the Planner, but rattier a questi on' of
wbetber, the Village indeed has a policy :for opc" pace dedication anis whether
approval of pctitionO_rs last proposal of 678 uwl IS consistent with that
policy and the representations of the guide plan
The Villi' e appeaa:s b> have adopted a policy on this, and the ordinance authority
to enforce it seems to be available.
Petitioner: effectively is requesting concurre-at approval of platting, zari.np K
unit~ project conditional use per unit and pvel.iz nary site plan approval.
A
Village has the authority to require 10% dedicatio x in platting; lead use relation-
ships are an appropriate Judgement factor in zoning decisions; and: judgement cin
density and site plan may be used la relation to preventing adverse
effects an adjacent properties, and: set. forth as condit=ions of a .:unit projectxoect
conditional use p, rmit
An example of such an, approach migiit be as ;rollouts
DENSITY UNITS
USE NET AREA. B2. GROSS AREA 10% CREDIT CREDIT
Single family 5.5 8.5 ..9- 1.1 2
Medium Density 26.8 35.2 3.5 4.5 49
High :Density 9.913:0 1.3 1..8 37
Yank 13«5 0
56.'X acres 56.7 acres 5.7 7.6 88 unite
G. Neils
J'4 Roth