The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Minutes 08-20-1969PUWI*NC Cwassiov Mmus, PT_'*Yk1OUTa, mm8SCTA Special Meeting August 202 1969 A Special 1b%.etin of the: -Planning Omnission was called to order by Chairman Egan at 8t1C p.m. Present: Ghmn. Egan and Commissioners, Chapman, Hedtke and Plaamer Bergly, Commissioner Poll.Ock arrived at 8..45 p,m OTA) BUSINESS ChOm. ligan presented the :rezoning request by referri 5 to the minutes - ltE7,ON[NG of the Rtigular 11eetitg of July sq* 1969 of the ]C-1anming Ccuva ssibrx in i IS T. 1L&GER JR. which action had been deferred. lie also .road a letter from Com, hsfner28TH &Arg, N0 AND tt., ting his views on the xeMztming in question., Conn. 'Hedtke concurred VMST MEDICINE 1AY2 v'3 ,h Xr, liafuerls Vi.eiqa and Com,. 'Chapman then gave ;tome: of his views Rotxli the One of the land. in this area. A discussion was then had oa hoer the rezoniaig Would fait in with the Guide Plan,* the thoroughfares and ;traffic patterna around the proposed sit: ,' the size and density of the project. A.CTIONr DEFERRED avid the setbacks. Another discussion followed as to whether there could TO 1,1TGUST 27, 1969 he -3 zoning in with, R-1 zoning and what happens to other request that come in :dor it-3 zoning in, the same area. ` Chufti. r4gan, explained that a vote could not he taken at present hecausa a quorum way not present,, The meeting was then recea sed until Commissioner Pollock arrived and was reconvened at 9:10 p.m. with a quorum. Dick Knutson appeared for Citywide Buil ,dery . He presented a RE: C'ITYVIDE BUILDERS revised si tc, plan zhow„ng, the: parts of the gevno-es that would he VZY. RD.. 18 & 34TH exposed. Ile explained Low the garage area could be: camouflaged by .AVBN'taly lazaelscaying. Water service was discussed to the area. There was also a discussion as to the auxiliary buildings on the south side of the plat. ACTION: ' APPROVED LANDSCAPEPLANS kWTION to recommend approval of the revised site plan except the 53 unit_ TO BE f'XaIXiAL7C2 i)) building, and the related parking in the southeast corner,} Motion, seconded, In the discussion on the motiorc Com. Pollock requested Mr. Knutson that a 4..:,v:i1ed andsca,pea plan be i eluded in they final site plan prior: to sub- mission to the Council for the Planner's consideration and review. Motion passed by %u mLnous aye: vote The Planner's :study for Section. l.2 was they presented by Planner Bergly. RE: PLANNER'S STUDY He expl.ai-a.ed the location of the study and the contour of the land in SECTION 12 the area. Basic considerations of land use should be discussed first.; He shored a very general plan of land use in the early stagers of this study. A lengthy discussion was -held which included: the location of various land to are-s the ovAership of the various parcels of land with in they area: the: variety of ways the thoroughfares could go through the area.; the school site and its access and tha bus drop-off sites and the contour of the land in general. Chma. Egan then asked the various oEgners present for some of their ideas and opinions on the study. Mr. dames 'EIS Parker and Mr. Ken Weestrand of Metro Development were concerned about where to put the street. on the property they, hayo and, ars: developing and how they, could work with other o aners nd with the Village as to its placement. Mr.. Harold Kindseth, another property Wvner, gave his views on the layout of the streets. r Planning Coomissior. Minotes, 7/301,69r trm arry De*.iel appeared for the petitioner. Chma. i;gaa read a RE r PLYMMITH VOODS ca=uxiicaLiOn -f om M * Normaa Osterbee, &txag Engineer of the t..ITSD LIMID, INC. lli,<away Depar meat:. Mr, Bergly presented a plan itn some possi- bilities for axleviatixtg the tr4ff4c problem at the ,aeeess point. ACTON. ?tRP`MUD TODiscussion. on ifae problems of access. This property has no access 001MITTM ToLM&0j}" bzt the developer has an easement across sore property to gain ACCESS PONT access to Wry.. $$., The site plan was looked at with questions about the blacktop and parking and trees and density. A_ disc,ussioa was had can the time schedule. It was decided to continue to work towards an access site place by the joint parties and at the same time that we acknowledge tothouStat.: that we are, at least giving some consideration to this thing. There rias ti -ten, tore lengthy discussion oa the site plan and access. The propoaal was referred to cornmi:ttee until the aaacess 'point is reso ved. it. Dice nutsora appeared for the petitioner and presented a revised M CITXWIMZ BUILDERS site plan and explained it, A discussion a had on the garages CTY RD, a8 & 3 iTEi and 110w, you rotal:i disguise them.4? so the layout of same of the buildings to the. plea. The Comission then discussed the access ACTIO:: DRPR RSD TOeaandetrafficpattarn. 6/2:0/69 Chinn. 1«ga;x told of his discussion with Sid Bader for Mr. 2olla e Rr. 2OLLIR BAz2ATZ Baratz turd it: was understood that if the petitioner did not got 36TH AVE.NO.& CTY, 18 30 acres for multiples they would not be interested. ; So t,re item is dropped: as of -now. ACTION: DROPPED In regard to the Project of .Metro Development Corporation property ice. HETRO DgVILPMW at 10612 A County Road No. 9, it was noted that the. planner's , 10612 A CTy.RD. #9 report" of the area would be presented at the Special Meeting ofAugtx,,tt 20, 1969, ACTIN -DEMI D 8/ 20/69 NEW BUSINESS MOTION' to reconlmead approval of a conditional use permit for a RS: SIGN - MRVIN Period of two years for Heruln S,, Kl4t;tee, Eliz Creek Golf Course. R. ==Tq wl Crim M16tion seconders and passed by unant„nous aye vote. ACTIO. APPROVED. A petition by Paul's Woodcraft for an additions to the existing RR PAWS WOODCUPT building was made. Discussion was had on: the kind of business NE14 ADDITION run in the buiL-4ing and arra project was sent; back to Mr. Kaman for information in regard ' to the- 1-1 zoning in which the building ACTION; TO MI . iC.A D is rather 'than: the 1--2 which information the C=missioa had received. The meeting was adjourned at l SO az m Respectfully submitted, Chmn. Planning Conmussion - Attestk i See rQtary. Planning Commissiot' Mi:a}utes - Special. Meeting; - .August 20.; 1969. Pap 2. NC" IOX to recoamend approval that we allOV the developer to terminate PX MS TRO DEVELOPMENT road Construction. at Station 6+50 of its North property line because of 10612 C' . R%) 9 a need for further study on utilities and the future road to she West and also to ellmitate the intersection in the Northeast corner of the ACTION'; APPROVED Ptoperty and, provide a curve stead. Motion seconded. Discussion MIUD SITE PLAN OU the motion.. MoLion passed by three aye vote with Come. Chapman abstain-ing Mr, Pred Mengelkoch, another property owrner in Section 12 study, discussed with the Comm s£On the action which was Laken in tha Motion above, The meeting was duly adjourned at ll,.00 p.m. Respectfully submitted Attest,: 1 Secretary i TO n Chairman pl.yrioUth. Pl,ezax ina. Co=ission tib ect; RX",01MG R-O OR H-,1 PROP H-3 OR 'R-4 CH MDICnM LAM, recent request presented to the plamling Commissiv by'lansIi ;en for rezoning of land:; t: a tete great aide of Medicine S I„e 1at28thAve. Aio to a1lca>r construction of 3 To*,M Houses met Irith considerable oppositi n from, aroused citizens. One of the objectora made a. statement which dezerves close acrutixiy. e said in effeot that if we (the p. ,) gx~anted Mr. Hagen's rezoning reque3t he would make a similar rezoning request for big property (which lies to the north of the Ragen asp,uired property) If we zbou d. grant Hagen's rezortLzg request, we vill be establishing a preeedel t which would make it dikfiev?.kt to be fair and cow4stent A-Ahea dealing vrith .future similar re guests front land owners (and home oam.era) on Medicine Lake I recon end that vre deny all rezoning requests not ;pecjfjQal3ydesignatedforrezoninginacomprehensiveplan. tkek Fred H. Rafner MMMMOMMLAMMMMMM Tot Ed Egan Plymouth. Planning Commission 8/14/69 ub eat ; CNT11u PAM LAM ON t%DI CW, LAM 1,11TROUT USS OF F614DS One of h^ beau :gays of acquiring lake shore ark land on Medleine Lake is to negotiate with a developer ;ranting certain reasonable and beneficial concessions or variances in exchange for the €ionauion of shoreline (si :ficient fnr bike path%) bridal, paths, foot paths as a mid i .wum) along Meal cine Lake. Whenever any develo ex presents a preliminary plat to the Pl.arining Connazsion wtio'n involves Medicine Lake Shoreline, the Planning Commisslozx should: attempt at least to acquire withoat enars;e" that, portion of the Calan which parallel. the lake shore. 7 Aa should be cleared "as a, policy" with the Para. Co.=ission Respectfully submitted, Y y 0 cut99 , E Fred H. H afner i