Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 2012-284CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2012-284 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR MICHLITSCH BUILDERS, INC. FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 12015 28TH AVENUE AND 12025 28TH AVENUE (2012031 WHEREAS, Michlitsch Builders, Inc. has requested approval of a variance to allow a new home to be constricted within the bluff for the two properties located at 12015 28t1' Avenue and 12025 28th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as follows: 12015 28th Avenue: Lot 9, Block 1, Chippewa Trails -1 Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 12025 28th Avenue: Lot 10, Block 1, Chippewa Trails -1 Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Michlitsch Builders, Inc. for a variance to allow a new home to be constricted within the bluff for the two properties located at 12015 28t1' Avenue and 12025 28t1' Avenue, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The requested variance is hereby approved, in accordance with the revised plans received by the City on August 8, 2012, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance is approved, based on the finding that all applicable variance standards would be met. Specifically, a. The variance and resulting constriction would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, and would be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. Resolution 2012-284 (2012031) Page 2 b. The applicant has demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance, because: 1. The proposal would allow the properties to be used in a reasonable manner; 2. the request is due to circumstances not created by the landowner; and 3. the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. c. The requested variance is not based solely upon economic considerations, but rather, is required in order to use the properties in the manner they were intended to be used. d. The variance and resulting constriction would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. e. The variance and resulting constriction would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it increase traffic congestion or the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. f. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address the practical difficulties. The proposed homes would comply with all other city regulations. 3. A building permit is required for each lot prior to constriction of the respective home. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit for either lot, the plan shall be revised as follows: a. Indicate a 12 -inch HDPE (high-density polyethylene) storm sewer pipe from the filtration basin to the existing catch basin on 28th Avenue, and indicate the pipe as a private utility. b. Provide applicable city details dated March 2012 for all work being done. c. The applicant shall import an adequate soil planting bed, as required by the city's Water Resources Manager, to ensure proper operation of the filtration basin. Indicate soil type and thickness on the detail. 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit for either lot, evidence must be provided that the constriction would meet the requirements of Section R403.1.7 of the International Residential Code (IRC) pertaining to specific requirements for foundations on or near steep slopes. 6. The variance shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has substantially started constriction of the project, or unless the applicant, with the consent of property owner, has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 21030.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. Approved this 18th day of September, 2012. Resolution 2012-284 (2012031) Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on September 18, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk