HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Packet 09-04-1980P1ym "nth Park and Re,crea.tion. Advisory Commission
Regular Meeting of September 4, 1980
Plymouth City Center Council, Chambers
Time: 7:30 p.m
AGENDA
1.1 Calt to, Order
2. Approval, of Minutes
3. Visitor Presentation
a. Athletic Association Representatives
b. Others
c.. Rick and Jane
4. Report on Past Council Actions
5. Unfinished Business
a.Play-field Update
b. 1981 Budge°t
c, Prudential Development Update
i, d.` Shiloh and. Gleanloch. Update
e. LtAWCON Grant Update:
f4 Green.tiee 'West and PRAC
g. P.I.P.Update
h Proposed Trait Paving Projects
i. Comprehensive Park Plan
6., New Business,
a New Plats
b., Park User Policies
c.
Z.. Commission. Presentation
8 Staff Communications
9. Adjournment
M
Minutes of the Regular meeting of the Plymouth Park and Recreation
Advisory Commission, August 14, 198
Membersp resent:`;ice, Brass, Edwards, Chesebrough, Mullant and
Dvorak
Members absent: Threinen.
Others present: Blank, Bu cwh" Thorsston, and Dick Knutson of why' McCombs -Knutson, Inc.
1., CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rice called the meeting to order at. ?:3.0 p.m.. in the
Plymouth City Center Council Chambers.:
2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Steve Chesebrough made a motion to approve the minutes which was
seconded by Alan Brass.: Vote taken: all ayes.
3., VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Rick discussed his Fall programs which include 4 -Man Football,
3 -Man Basketball, 5 -Man Basketball, and youth wrestling instruction.
Jane handed out an information sheet comparing program participation:
between 1979 and 1930. Play Pals: had lower participation this year
than last, and there seems to be no explanation for this, Ilan
Brass said that Aerobic Dance its very popular in his area of Plymouth.
Dick Knutson,of McCombs -Knutson shared site plans; of the Prudential.
Development with the Commission. This complex°will be located on
the northeast corner of Highways 55 and 494. He asked the Commission.
if they anticipate any problems with Mr.Knutson's plan to incorpor
ate trails at this site. The Commission had no comment at this time.
Eric said that he would be reviewing the plans following their
submission to the Planning Commission. and tiie City Council;. Mr..
Knutson requested that he be placed on the PRAC agenda again in
September.`
4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTIONS
a_ Schedulinc procedures: Council took rote of scheduling pro-
cedures on playfields adjacent to residences, but made no action
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. PYyfield Update: : Grading has been done at all sites, utili.
ties installed, footings for shelters area: in. Tennis courts have
been completed at Oakwood and Plymouth Jr. High. Everything is
on schedule and.gong well. Ridgemount site plans have been
approved by the athletic associations and.school districts.
Zachary playfield site has been condemned. Chairman Rice suggested
a ribbon cutting ceremony for publicity purposes., but no action
was taken.
b., 1981 Budget Update:. Eric shared' Recreation budget book with
Commissioni Painted out fee. and tax supported programs Budget
book has been presented to City Council. Chairman Rice asked, if
some commissioners might be present at the. August 19th Council
meeting when the Recreation program budget would be presented,.
Several commissioners said they would, try to attend.
Minutes ofthe August 14 PRAC, Meeting
Page. 2
c;. C.I.P. Update: No new
is
action-
d.
ction,
d. Shiloh and Gleanloch Parks Upda e: Neither project has been
aooeP,-The seeding atShiloh needs to be redone. Alan Brass
mentioned that activity at Shiloh is increasing.
e. Park P._la.n U... Pdate Eric is reviewing this with the. Planning
Department and has visited with one consulting firm. Alan Brass,
and Steve Ch:esebrough.were appointed as a sub -committee
Q- to interview consultants after initial screening by staff is
completed.
f. Greentree West and PRAC Meeting Update Greentree West was
sent anion to view the P .I.P but they haven't responded
as of yet.
product should be ready in ag. P.I.P. Update• The finished
month.
b NEW BUSINESS' ..
a. New Plats Prudential plan viewed at this meeting and the
Carlson Company project. Carlson will be developing some of thein
o<< recreation facilities as well as paying City, park, fees.
r
b. PRAC Educational. Retreat: commission, discussed the retreat
and.ZleciZad to: attend an MRPA function in November to get ideas:
and to become better informed. It was decided that a PMC retreat
date would be determined following attendance at the RPA meeting
c. Letter from: Alan Brass: Eric has visited Alan's neighbor
hood an view: existing trails there, The Commission discussed
improving the existing trails with some short inter --connecting
trails. This, will, be on. October's agenda.
COMNiTSSION PRE...FNTry, TION
John Mullan, mentioned his concern over amount of traffic mingling
with, hikers along West Medicine Lake Drive.
8. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Eric will, be meeting with the Hennepin County Park Reserve District
staff on September 15 to review a proposed plan for, a trail around
Medicine. Lake.
9 ADJOURNMENT
Alan Brass made a motion to adjourn which was seconded by John
Mullan. The meeting was: then adjourned at 8:30p.m..
p Metropolitan Council,
AUG 19 300 MetroSquare Building
moo d Seventh Sheet and Robert Siteet
N Sant Paul, Minnesoi a 55101.
Telephone (612) 241-6453
A 1980 Office of the Chairman
TO: F.Y. LAWCONILCMR APPLICANTS
RE. F.Y. 1981 LAWCONfLCMR Preliminary Grant Applications
i Metropolitan Council Referral File NO3..8257-1 and 2, 8250-1,
8259-1, 8301-1 thru 8314-1, 8318-1 thru 8352-1, and
8356-1 thru.8366-1
At its meeting on July 24, 1980, the Metropolitan.Council cor.
sidered the F.Y. 1981 LAWCONILCMR preliminary grant applications.
This considera4ion was based on a report of the Physical Develop-
ment Committee, Referral. Report No. 80-162. A copy of this
report is attached..
Theattached reportcontains the recommendations and four tables
listing the ranking of the: applications. The applications have
been divided into four planning areas, plus boat launch projects
for ranking and funding purposes.
Attachment A - Fully Developed Areas
Attachment B - Area of Planned Urbanization
Attachment C - Freestanding Growth Centers
Attachment D - Rural Area and Boat Launch Projects
You will note that Reco=endations 14 through 16 relate to specific
ggrant applications as do the footnotes on the four ranking tables.
Be sure to check these carefully to see if they relate to your
application.
If you have any questions regarding this report and the ranking of
grants, please contact Anne Stefferud of the Metropolitan. Counci.1.
staff at 291-6360.
WV"T&
CP WAM Sincerely,
CM ON=
macwM0,9 T METROPCLITAN COUNCIL
f*Va IIIIOWN ;"!
invom Ovum
ADMINUAVA cwt v` ......
FM Charles R. Weaver
AM avow " - Chairman
0 14
CRW: emp
Attachment
act Arne Stefferuds Metropolitan Council Staff
w
Amended to refieCt
Council action taken
7/24/80,
M
rot Release: July 24f 1984
Bus. Item H-14
4:Q0 P.M.
METROPOLITAN, , COUNCIL
Suite 300 Metro Square Building Saint P`a a, Minnesota 55101
REPORT OF THE PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
TQ: Metropolitan Council
DATE: July let 19$0
RE;: Review Of FY.198°1 LAWC.ON/LCMR Grant. Applications
The Physical Development Committee will act on the MetropolitanCommissionrecommendationsregardingFiscalParksandOpenSpace
Year 19$1 Land and Mater Conservation (LAWCON) and Legislative
Cormaiss; on on Minpesota Resources (LCMR) grants on July 24. A
the. chairperson will be, given at the July 24verbalreportfrom.
Metropolitan Council meeting.
Marcia Bennett
Chairperson
MBfA,S'
Taken, 7Z24, Council Action
Attached is a revised report: of the Physical Development Committee
which was adopted by theR.Committee on 7/24j80. The Council
adopted the recommendations and ranking tables' contained in the
report,.
r
jay ..
A
Y,,Y., 1981.LAWCON approved.
by PDC and Council on
July 24, 1980.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL.
Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Fault Minnesota 55101
t-
TO: Physical Development Comittee.
FROK: Metropolitan.Parks and Open Space Coamission
DATE: July 23, 1980'
SUBJECT: Review of FY 181 LAWCONJLCMR Park Grant Applications
At its July 21 meeting the Metropolitan Parks and Open Sp&ze
Cosission completed its review of Fiscal Year 1981 Land; and
Water Conservation (LAiiICON) and Legislative Ccxmission on
Minnesota Resources (LCMR) park grant applications. Staff
reports on this matter were distributed to you at the July 17
Physical Developient Committee meeting. The Comission.approved
the final ranking of applications as shown on Attachments A
through D. Other Cowmission recowmndations were approved on.
1 July 7 and forwarded to you for discussion at the July 17
Physical Development Committee meeting.
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Physical. Development Committee recommend to the
Metropolitan Council:
1. That funds armilable (after a,maximum of 15 percent of
available: funds are used for qualified boat launch
projects) will be allocated by planning, area based on:
Fully Developed
Areas of Planned Urbanization .... 34%
Freestanding Growth Centers...... hi
Rural Areas...,, 6% (Max. $100,000)
The 15 percent allocation process for lake access funds
will be used for FY'81 applications. This allocation pro-
cess will be reviewed end evaluated prior to any decision
regarding its use in future years.)
2. That housing performance be applied as one-third weight on
the final staff rankings.
t
2
3.: That there be a grant maximum of $200000 in the Fully
Developed Areas, $150.o00 in tbe.Are,as of Planned Urbaniza-
tion, and $50,000 in.the Freestanding Growth Centers and
Rural Areas. 2n any planning area, the grant maximum may be
doubled if all.qualified projects in that area are funded,
prior to redistribution of unused funds to other planning
areas in accord with Recommendation No.; 6 below.
s,; That, recognising the need for flexibility in administering,
the grants. State Planning Agency has the di.scretion:of
awarding approximately ten percent in excess of the grant
maximum; and. that the State: Planning Agency report annually
to the Commission as to the impact of the grant maximum
limitation and exceptions needed.
S. That there be a limit of one grant per community in all
areas except,the bully Developed Area, with the exception
noted in Recommendation. No. 10 below.,
6. That in the event any policy planning area has unused funds
after all quality projects (over 60 percent) are funded, the
excess, shall be redistributed to the other planning; areas in
proportion to the; 'Policy Area Allocation. Percentaj;es (No. 1
above),
1. That the recommended project review criteria shown an
Table H, Attachment 1 (June 16 memorandum)., serve as the.
basis for the recreational criteria ranking.
8. That the recreation criteria be applied to all projects
sponsored by communities,in the Fully Developed Area, Area
of Planned urbanization, and Freestanding Growth Centers.
9. That applications which meet the general guidelines for boat
launches on the lakes identified on Table, A', Attachment 1
June 16 aemorandun), would be given priority for funding as
follows;
A* From the amount (not to exceed 15 percent of total
available grant funds) taken "off the top" prior to
allocation of funds to planning areas in accord with
Recomaln-dation No. 1 above.
b., if additional, funds beyond this 15 percent are needed
in order to fund `all, qualified boat launch projects,
these funds cull be taken from the planning areas in
which the quaLified boat launch projects are located in
proportion to the total project cost of the qualified
boat launch projects located in each planning area.
10. That a,comtunity with a boat launch project ranked for
funding also be eligible for an additional project grant.
u
I I
I I
3
ll. That the following xetropolLtan De.v lopment Framework
criteria be appli*d:
a. All applications from, Rural Centers will be considered
active and passive).
b. In thosepants of the Mural Service Area outside of
Rural. Centers, only applications for passive recreation
wily be considered.
co in setting prioiittes among quality, projects from Rural.
Centers, the proposed'- Freestanding Growth Canters will
be g ven priority over applications from other Rural
Centers when demonstrated needs are similar or greater
in the proposed Freestanding Growth Center.
d., applications from Rural Town Centers would be ranked
i with considered applications from communities outside
of the :Rural Town Centers or the basis of recreational
project review criteria.
12,. That. projects located in the Rural: Area but sponsored by a
Freestanding Growth Center or a community in the Area of. i Planned Urbanization be ranked in the sponsor community's
planning area. Funding criteria in Recommendation 11 shall
be applied.
13. That ]attachments h through D be recommended to State
Planning Agency to serve as the basis for allocating ,FY 1981
LaWCON/LCMR funds.
14. That., based on the Coo rative Program for Providingupic
Access Sites on Metro ;tan Area Lakes, that the portion of
Hound's app cat on (Role- o. - on. Lake Minnetonka for
a boat launch including parking lot be recommended to the
Minnesota:Department of Natural Resources for funding. The
application by the City of Wayzata (Ref. No 8258-1) should
t not be recommended to DNR for. funding.
15. That the Minnesota State Planning Agency require the.
following of the LAWCON/LCMR grant contracts for lake access:
a. That development and operation of the access facilities
be. consistent with the guidelines of the Cooperative
Program for Providing Public Access Sites on Metro li-
an Area La es.
b. That the -minimusparking.capacity of the boat launch
facilities be as follows.,
Lake Ann (#8343-.1) - six car/trailer spaces
2) Burandt's Lake (8364-1) - seven car/trailer space3
w' c. That the Burandt's Lake facility be developed and in
operation by October 1902
4
di. That the Lake, Ann facility be developed and in opera-
tion within one year, of acquisition of the site.
to develop- 15. That the City of Wacona be reminded that, prior
sent of any facilities other than the boat launch at the
Hurandt's Lake site, it must annex the aite to within the
city limits in accordance with prior Council actions con-
cerning sacoa a's Comprehensive Sewer Plan and in accord-,
ance, also, with our understanding of the City's intentions.
glliott.Perovich
Chairman
Ml12 r
Att.
r
t
t
v
Jolt
R Metropoli.tan.Council,`recreation ranking
r MIN Metropolitan Council housing and recreation ranking
EPA State Planning Agency ranking
01 - 'Yes" deans project not 60 percent quality threshold. "No" means project.
did not meet 60 percent quality threshold
nal. Cowbined. SPA, and, MC/8 ranking
t TOtal. pro jlCt COst,
4,
Attachment A
PY 181 LAWCONaCMR GRANT RANKINGSFINAL
PALLY DEVELOPED AREA Grant Maximum: _$200,000)
Ref.
Sponsor Project No. IE/R MC/H S. n 608 rival Cost
troo , klyn Center Central Park 8308-1 1 3 2 Yes 1 399,900
Paul Margaret Recrto
Center 8357-1 2_ 1 5 Yes 2 187,000
olusbia Rgts Sullivan Lake
Park 8326-1. 5 8 1 Yes 3 258,200
3rr idly Fridley Comm.
Park 8323-1 7 8 4 Yes 4 298,425
klichfield Pairwood/Monroe 8350-1 4 4 9 Yes 5 530,000
t. Paul No. End Comm.
Center 8358- 1 10 7 6 Yes 6 285,000
ft. Paul Gr`iggs,Rec. Ctr. 8356-1 9 6 8 Yes 7 242,000
So. St. Paul. Airport,
Playfield 8339-1 12 12 3 Yes 9 355,000
tpls. Park Bd. Kenwood.Park 8336-1 3 2 14 Yes 9 598,000
rpi a. Park Bd. Kenny Park 8328-1 6 4 12' Yes 9 400,000
Robbinsdale Park,Site West 8371.-1 13 15 7 Yes 11 147,000
I Vs. Park Bd. Morris Park 8335-1 10 10 13 Yes 12 570,000
pls. Park Bd. Columbia Pk. 8329-1 16 13 11 No 133,000
ichfi/ld' Rich; Acres Pk. 8349-1. 15 14 10 Yes 13 50,000
Pk. Bass Lake Park 8327-1 11 16 Yes 14' 45,5.00Rt.,Louis
oseville Langton Lake 8251-1 14 16 15 Yes 15 153,OOA
Seville Central Park 8257-2 Unranked. as project, is not.eligible:
i under LCMR policy.
t. Paul- Swede Hollow Pk. 8359-1 Unranked as previous grants have not
been used on this site.
Jolt
R Metropoli.tan.Council,`recreation ranking
r MIN Metropolitan Council housing and recreation ranking
EPA State Planning Agency ranking
01 - 'Yes" deans project not 60 percent quality threshold. "No" means project.
did not meet 60 percent quality threshold
nal. Cowbined. SPA, and, MC/8 ranking
t TOtal. pro jlCt COst,
4,
Attachment 8
lINAL FY °81 LAWCON/LCMR GRANT RANKINGS
ARZk OF PLA NZD URBANIZATION Grant Maximow 8150,0:00)
CostSino,_ r; PrO •c t, Re_ f .moo. MC/R I r• SPA 601; Fina
vPlymouth E. Medicine Lake 8331-1 2 1 8 Yes 1 194,65Q'
Apple Valley Farquar Lake 8325-1, 4 4 6 Yes 2 97r720
Edtn Prairie Miller Park 8259-1 15 10 3 Yes 3 523000
Woodbury Carver Lake Park 8321-1 8 13 1 Yes 4 180,000;
Eagan Rahn Park 8338-1 6 4 11 Yes 5 195_000
Mound Mound Day Park. 8344-1 16 9 7 Yes 6 99,327
Champlin Norah River Pk. 8324-1 13 17+ 2 Yes 7 48,800
Long Lake Nelson Lake Pk. 8313-1 14 15 5 Yes 8 75,000
Shoreview Commons Park. 8309-1 3 11 10 Yes 9 233,928
Lino Lakes Country Lakes Pk.8365-1 7 19 4 Yes 10 148,950
Blaine Eastside, Park 8351-1 3 3 20 Yes.. 11 801000
Excelsior Commons Park 8342-1 5 2 21 Yes 12 50,000
Maple Grove Rice Lake -Fish 8360-1 1 6 18 Yes 13 145,125'
Lake Trail
Little Canada Spooner Park 8332-1 10 11 16' Yes 14 55,00:0:
Coon Rapids; Pheasant Ridge 83.48-1 19 15 14 Yes 15 34,850
Park
White Bear Lk. Matoska Park' 8333-1 18 18 12 Yes 16 57.328
Chanhassen: Randy Herman 8347-1 21 22 15; No 110000
Field
Minnetonka Minnetonka 83.45-1 24 20 22 No 187,400
Athletic Field
at. Paul Park Hastings Park 8320-1 23 21 24 No 31,000
Nounds View silver View Park 8330-1, Project: not ranked due to compli-
cations in amending previous grants
for this site.
Wayzata Wayzata Bay Park. 8258-1 Project not ranked because boat
launch development guidelines: cannot
be met.
ParkDuplicateapplicationsnoteligibleforfundingare: Blaine-Lochness
8352-1), Long Lake -Patch Property (8313-1), Maple Grove -Cedar island
alementary School Playfield (8361-1) White Bear Lake-Podvin Ark (8334-11h,
and Woodbury -Tamarack Nature Center (8322-1)
See Hey on Attachment A l for table bonding definitions.
Attachment C
ry '81 LAWCON GRANT RANKINGS
1rRR'ESTAND NG GRONTB CENTERS Grant Maximum: 50,000)
Ref`.
nsor Project No. HC/R IrC/H SPA 60= Final Cost
arnington Rambling Rivsr 8307-1 1 1 2 Yes 1 44,745
Park,
Shakopee O'Dowd Lake: 8301-1 6 6 1 Yea 2 130000
Orchard Lake 8304-1 3 5 4 Yes 3 55,305takeville
Beach
Rosemount Erickson Park 8318-1 4 2 7' Yes 4 117,81.5.
Laconia Cedar Point: Pk. 8363-1 5 7 3 Yes 5 68,000
rior Lake Athletic Complex 8310-1 7 e 8 Yes 6 70,000`
f
oka Sunny Acres Pk. 8362-1, 8 9 9 No 89,932
duplicate applications not, eligible for funding are: Lakeville West Park Site,
5306-1) , and Shakopee-JEJ Park 8302
too Rey on Attachment A for table heading definitions.
c
1
Attachment D
PY 41 LAWCONatM MtANT RA KINGS'
RURAL AREA Grant Maximum: 50.000)
Ref.
SDoasor Pro ect No. M/R M/R SPA 601 Final Cost
Loretto Loretto Ath. 8319=1 1 2 3 NA 1 135,000
Park
East, Bethel John Anderson 8303-1 4 4 1 NA 2 17,500
Park
Centerville Centerville Park 8346-1 5.5 6 2 Nei 3 17,000
Rogers Triangle Park 8366-1 3 1 8 NA 4 29,8.00
Carver Boat Launch 8314--1 2 3 6 NA 5 60,000
Trail
Mayer Park Acq. i Dev. 8305-1 7- 5 5 NA 6 33,250
Medina Hunter Comm. Pk. 8337-1 5.5 8 4 NA 7 30,000 t
Elko Elko Park 8340-1 8 7 9 NA 8 25,000
Now Market New Market Pk. 8341-1 9 9 7 NA 9: 1011000
NA -Not applied
See Key on attachment A for table heading definitions.:
BOAT LAUNL*B. ??ROJRCT3'
Top Priority Rankings
Waconia-Burandt!s Lake (8364--1), Cost. $62.400
Chanhassen -Lake Ann (8343-1), Cost: $150,000'
a