Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPark and Recreation Advisory Commission Packet 04-17-1980I t AGENDA PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION April 17, 1980 7:,30 p.m. I. Introduction of new Park ,& Recreation Director - Eric Blank II. Approval of Minutes March 6, 1980 March 27, 1980 ItI Discussion of possible Vita Par Course Trails in community pl'ayfi el d. IV. Discussion of process for PRAC review of budget and 1981-85 Park C.I.P. V Review and approval of Community Plafflield Final Plans and. Speci f cat ons . VI. FOR YOUR INFORMATION Letter to residents of Mission Park area. Changes recommended in PIP Brochure. Status of Community Playfield project/lease agreement negotiations with school districts. MINUTES PARK b RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING March 6, 1960 A meeting of the Plymouth City Council and Park and Recreation Advisory Commission was called to order by Vice -Chairperson Threinen at 7:30p.m. on March 6, 1980 in the City Council Conference Room. Members present: Brass, Chesebrough, Mullan, Threinen, Edwards, Terry. Members absent: Rice. Others present: Mayor Hunt, Council Members Schneider and Davenport, Manager Willis, Administrative Assistant Boyles. The minutes of the: regular February 7, 1980 meeting were moved for approval by Commissioner Brass seconded by Commissioner Terry with the following corrections: 1. Page 2, approval of priorities for participation in Plymouth Athletic program be amended to show the priorities in entirety as adopted by the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. 2. The Last paragraph of page 2 be amended to show the eligibility/conduct 100 fee required by athletic teams. Minutes to also reflect that this fee will be lost for infractions of ordinances prohibiting liquor in the parks. Motion passed, 5-0, Approval of Consultant Selection Process for Timber Shores and Mission Hills Parks The Commission discussed the proposed calendar and selection process for construction and park consultant selection for Timber Shores and Mission Hills parks. Commissioner Brass expressed concern that there had been negative. aspects of the resident participation process with Shiloh and Greenloch parks. He was concerned that a more effective method would have to he found with dealing with citizen participation. Chairperson Threinen felt that the major cause of problem was the fact that people did not get involved in planning until the: final phase. Commissioner Mullan stated that. he felt it would; be necessary to have peop" ', involved early on in the process. There was some discussion regarding the most app ;,driate time to receive citizen input. Commissioner Mullan felt that citizen input should be: received only a.t concept plan time. Commissioner Edwards questioned whether citizen input should be minimized in the process. City Manager Willis commented that the City Council would probably want the entire neighborhood to be invited to participate in the planning process. Commissioner Brass commented that the procedures used for selection of a community play- field consultant had worked well. Commissioner Brass asked if cost estimates could be made by consultants in the short time frames allotted. Commissioner Mullan stated that it was his opinion that they could. MINUTES - Park 6 Recreation Advisory Commission March 6, 1980 Page 2 The Commission discussed the time schedule proposed by staff for the construction of neighborhoodparks. It was recommended that for smaller parks, citizen input could be obtained before and during the concept plan stage and that the process could be shortened by eliminating the preliminary report. Commissioner Brass questioned how best to notify residents in the surrounding area and. whether or not it would be sufficient to contact homeowner's association. representatives or mail to each address in the walki'ny neighborhood. Chairperson Threinen felt that it would be appropriate to send letters to the residents in the walking neighborhoods. Manager Willis indicated that in his opinion, one evening meeting would be necessary for receiving resident input on the concepts.. Residents would then be advised that the consultant would review the plans and make revisions for presentation to PRNC. Residents would be invited to this meeting should they desire. Chairperson Threinen asked for volunteers to the sub -committee for selecting a neighborhood park consultant. Commissioners Brass, Edwards and Mullan agreed to serve on this sub -committee to provide a recommendation for City Council action at their March 17 meeting. Review of Public Information Brochure The Commission reviewed the contents of the artwork submitted by Friendship Productions for the public information brochure. Chairperson Threinen indicated that in discussions with Chairperson Rice, she was aware that he had concerns with the wording and layout on the inside pages,._ She also indicated her own concern was that the brochure allowed for more flexibility so that it could be used over numerous years as the Plymouth park system developed. Commissioner Brass indicated that in his mind the front cover is accept- able, along with the map, but that he was concerned about the remaining elements on the back page. Chairperson Threinen named a committee including Jim Rice, frank Boyles, and herself to review the second page of the brochure and make revisions a.s appropriate for revisions in the brochure by Friendship Productions. Informal Review of Park Contained in Preliminary Plat of Amhurst ro?", Chairperson introduced this item by discussing the fact that the devepers of Amhurst have indicated'a desire to dedicate some 11 acres of land from their development for park purposes. The City Council, in reviewing Amhurst preliminry plat proposal, directed that the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission have the opportunity to review the plans prior to final platting to comment upon the appropriateness of the land to be dedicated and to comment about some of the requirements associated with the park. ommissioner Mullan expressed concern about the fact that most of the hand to be dedicated was wetlands. Manager Willis indicated that there are clearly constraints on the site especially associated with the pond running down the middle of the area. Commissioner Brass stated that he was concerned that the park was not large enough for the intensity of development in the immediate area. Manager Willis commented that originally a larger park was going to be provided through land dedications by both Pflaumwell and Ban -Con. However, it appears now that. the Pflaumwel;l will not, proceed.. Commissioner Brass questioned how important unstable lands are for park areas. Manager Willis maented that to the a ,:y!nt that tennis courts or building facilities are installed,, unstaale lands will i,,jve a constraining impact. Chairperson Threninen.asked that staff check on the advisability of tennis courts on an otherwise neighborhood facility. Commissioner Mullan pointed out that tie would not want to accept the land until the ponding and drainage questions had been worked out. L RINUTES - Park ?i Recreation Advisory Commission: March 6, 1980 Page 41 Discussion of Facility Priorities for Community Playfi.elds Chairperson Threinen announced that representatives from various athletic associations had been invited to the meeting to discuss prioritization of improvements to go on the community playfields.. The necessity for such a prio',itization is the possibility that the $2.95 million available for construction of the six parks may not be sufficient for all construction: presently anticipated. Therefore, as a "fail-safe" position it would be best to prioritize the types of items which would be constructed first and those which might be set aside for future construction in the event that financial problems arise.. Athletic association representatives asked how project cost estimates had been reached. Manager Willis responded that approximately 40% had been added on to 1918 preliminary cost estimates. He also indicated that while these estimates are the best available at this time, the athletic associations have added facilities subsequent to these estimates, consequently one cannot be absolutely certain that the funding available is sufficient. Mayor Hunt advised those present. that his; experience has shown that owing; to existing market conditions, many contractors are looking for this type of work. Comn ni ssi over Chesebrough asked whetkor or not the City will. have problems i n selling the bonds. Mayor Hunt replied that the legislature will probably adopt new legislation revising the interest maximums for bonds by the time of Plymouth bond sales. Athletic association members expressed concern that in order to get maximum use out of a field that they must be lighted. One other high priority item.was drainage and underground irrigationto insure that the sites can be maintained in the face of intense usage. The park consultant advised athletic association representatives that it was their intent, to provide quality facilities in each of these sites and in their opinion, the budget appeared to be appropriate for this purpose. Athletic association representatives indicated that they were least concerned, about the: trail systems to be included in the park and desired that all available funds be directedtowards the provision of athletic fields. They also expressed a preference for sod over seed. Some discussion washeld regarding the possibility of general lighting of the fields as opposed to lighting specific playfields within a park. The park consultant commented that general ligiiti'ng has a far greater spill-over affect and is not nearly as economical as selectively lighting, the playfields. Athletic association representatives indicated concern that they be given an opportunity to comment upon the concept plans provided by the park consultant. A meeting was. scheduled for Tuesday, March 18 for the purpose of reviewing and discussing these plans,. Presentation by Individuals Interested in Mission Park Construction Representatives for the Mission Vills area addressed the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission regarding their desires in the construction of Mission Park. The representatives indicated the following priorities for construction. 1.. Complete grading be accomplished. 2. A pick-up soccer and baseball field with back stop be provided:. 3. The area be seeded"and maintainable on a continuing basis. Representatives of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission indicated that Mission area residents would be contacted to provide additional input if the Council approves construc- tion of this park Meeting adjourned at 10:38 p.m. MINUTES PLYMOUTH PARK h RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION March 27, 1980 A special meeting of the Plymouth Park and Recreation Advisory Commission was called to order by Chairperson Rice at 7:00'a.m. on. March 27, 1980, Members present; Brass, Mullan; Threi`nen, .dwa . s, Hanson, Terry, .Rice. Members absent: Chesebrdughl Others present Fred. Moore, City Engineer/Director of Public. Works; Don Ringrose, Park Consultant, Jack Lynch, Park Consultant; Walter Joharnson, Park Consultant Frank Boyles:, Administrative Assistant. llodate on Council Actions With Regard to Mission and Timber Shores Parks Chairman Rice asked Frank Boyless to describe City Council action with regards to Mission and Timber Shores parkas. Mr. Boyles stated that the City Council had taken action at their March 24 meeting to defer construction of Mission and Timber Shores parks until 1581. The Council's major concern was that both PRAC and staff would be heavily involved in the community piayfield project for the remainder of the year and therefore unable to devote necessary concentration to neighborhood park construction. Furthermore, in the, event that additional funding is needed for community playfields, all available funding sources should he considered. Commissioner Frass asked whether it would be possible to provide some fora of temporary facility for skating at Mission park area. The Comnission requested that staff formally communicate the City Council's actions to representatives who attended the March 6 meeting as well as to homeowner association representatives. 1981:8 Capital Improvement Time Schedule It is likely that Park, and Recreation Advisory Commission will become involved in the: budgeting and capital improvement program process betv:Den Mayr 15 and June 9, if not before. Chairperson Rice expressed concern that Park and Recreation Advisory Commission prepare itself to deal with these responsibilities, and therefore requested that the capital improvement program be placed on the agenda for discussion at the April 17 meeting. Community Playfields Time Schedule The time schedule for the design -and construction of community playfields was reviewed. It was agreed that the most appropriate time for the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission to meet would be April 17 at which time they would receive the final plans and specifications for the community playfields for approval. This will make it, possible for PRACto review the final plans and specifications and make appropriate recommendation to the City Council for the April 21 meeting. MINUTES - Plymouth Park A Recreation Advisory Commission lbrch ;27. 1980 _ Page 2 Discussion and Approval of Community Playfield Concepts tion Ringrose presented the concept pian for each of the four community playfields anticipatedifor construction this year. Park and Recreation Advisory Commissioners. generally agreed with the Payouts shown on the concept plans, Some interest was expressed on the possibility of placing an exercise course on the Fernbrook La ;e facility. it was agreed that the exercise course would be separate from the playfield project,, but that construction contours would he completed in such a fashion to allow for the, exercise course., Chairperson Rice asked that Assistant Boyles invite Jim Gudall to the April 17 Park and Recreation Advisory Commission meeting to discuss 'the possibility of the -exercise course at the Fernbrook site. Walter Joha.nnson introduced the concept plan for the park shelters. He indicated that the primary purpose of the shelters is to provide warming house and sanitary facilities with very little room devoted to storage. The park shelters have been revised from having a curved rear wall to straightening the rear wall n three equal distance segments. This plan is anticipated to result in cost savings and allow for a shifting of the mechanical and sanitary facilities from the front to the back, of the Wilding. This interior configuration will allow the park attendant to be able to observe the park from the mechanical room. The Park, and Recreation AdOsory Commission approved the park shelter concepts. as presented and asked that the park consultant continue preparation of working drawings. The meeting was adjourned at 8.03 a.m. 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DA` E April 11, 19-80 TOz. Pahl;, & Recreation Advisory Commission Member 1)( FROW Frank Boyles, Administrative Assistant NO SUBJECT DISCUSSION, QF POSSIBLE: VITA PAR COURSE TRAILS IN CQMMOITY PLAYFIEOS Chairperson Rice has asked that a discussion item be placed on the April 17 agenda dealing, with the topic of` possible development of vita par course trailson community playf elds. More specifically, Mrh Rice ha.s been contacted by Mr. Jim Guddal regarding Mr. Guddal`'s interest in exploring the possibility of installing a vita par course at the Fernbrook Lane comtrunity playfield site. As a resident of Plymouth, Mr. Guddal has indicated an interest. in contacting commercial firms within the City to see if funds could be raised for the development. of a vita par course trail. Mr. Guddal has indicated that he may be unable to attend the April' 17 meeting to discuss this matter further with the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. Whether Mr. Guddal is able to attend or not, it would be appropriate for the Commission to consider at least the following questions in regard to this issue 1. Desirability - Does the Park and Recreation Commission believe that such a project is appropriate in the; Plymouth Park System? 2. Authorization if desirable, what actions and: time frames should be adopted to secure City Council approval for this proposal? 3. Magnitude Should the City consider thi's project only in; terms of construction of one vita par course or as an on-going project, which would be included i;n all parks of a certain classification within,, the City' 4. Timing If City funds are going to be used for this project, is it most appropriate for the planning phase to take place. concurrent with consideration of the capital improvement budget? S. Construction and Maintenance Costs Since the: users of the Ota par' course represents a more specific clientele than individuals using the city wide trail' system, is it appropriate for this project to be funded through contributions; in materials and labor or through city funds or some -combination of each? Based upon a discussion of these issues,. the Commission. may wish to proceed by advising the City Council of this proposal and requesting authorization and direction in pro- ceeding with this project. F9 jm DATEzz TQ: PROW, SUBJECT CITE' OF PLYMOUTH 8400 PLYMOUTH BLVD,, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441' TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 April 11 1. 980MEMO Park Recreation Advisory Commission Mems Frank Boyles,, Administrative Assistant DISCUSSION OF PROCESS FOR PRAC REVIEW OF BUDGET AND 1.981-85 PARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Attached is the timetable for adoption of the 1981 City Budget and 1.981-85 Capital Improvement Program. Commissioners will note that this time Eine calls, for Park and Recreation Advisory Commission approval of the Park portion of the C.I.P. prior to. July 16, the date upon which the Planning Commission will receive the Capital Improvement Program. At the Special' Commission Meeting; of Ma ch 27, Chairperson Rice asked that. the process of PRAC involvement in the 1981-86 Park Capital Improve- ment Program be discussed at this meeting; Since. Park and Recreatio, Director Blank will be attending the April 17 meeting, I believe it will be appropriate for Commissioners to explore with him possible strategies for approaching the 1981-85 Capital Improvement Program For information purposes,, I have included a copy of the 1.980-84 Capitai Improvement Program sections dealing with park projects.. The first page of the program includes a summary of projects, expenditures and revenues anticipated, over the five years of the Capital Improvement Program. Page 2 summarizes, park projects, anticipated over the five year pariod.. Estimated Improvement costs on a year -by -year Basi s x together with the source of funding for such improvements,,are shown on pages 8 through 7. Page 8 shows a project schedule which was prepared for the first time in 1980 for public works types projects. The City Council has specifically requested that 1981 park projects be scheduled: in a s4milar fashion.. The f;nal element of the Capital Improvement Program is a map showing the; physical locations of the improvements. anticipated for construction. With:the new Park and Recreation Director, coming on board, it may be appropriate for the Commission to schedule an orientation session in the near future. The orientation could center around the elements of the Capital Improvement: Program in hopes of establishing a procedure; which could be used in future years by the staff and Commissionin reviewing the improvement program in an effective fashion. Once the procedure is established a specific calendar could be drafted for this: purpose. Ill r CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3,400 PLYMOUTH BLVD„ PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 DATt, March 13, 1980, ME M o l TO Mayor a City Council a FROM". James G. Willis, City Manager, c SUBJECT Proposed Calendar for Adoption of 1981-85 Capital Improvement Program and 1981 City Sudgets SUMMARY': In order to meet Capital Improvement. Program planning objectives, a calendar for developing the 1981-85 CIP and 1,981 Operating Budgets has been prepared. for Council approval., i We have previously been directed by the Council to develop a schedule which will expedite the completion of the annual review of the Capital Improvement Program to provide for its adoption in September. Because: of the relationship ofthe city operating budgets to the capital: planning of the community, as well. as the. need for theCouncil's involvement in both processes;, 1 am recommending the scheduie below for 1980. This process will involve a considerable amount of Council time during the summer months, however, it should, insure that we wii'l be able to ti,are effectiviely plan our work program for the succeeding year. It sKatfl d also enh0v, us to organize ourselves for other development related activities during the summer mrnths, which are normally hectic.. The following is the schedule I am proposing for 1980; May 14; Developers deadline for, submitting proposals for proposed CIP projects. May 15 Capital outlay, employee training, and professional organization request. forms to departments from. Finance Department.. F June9 Department capital outlay, employee training, and professional requests returned to Finance Department. June 13 Staff to complete draft of 1981-85 Capital Improvement Program. June 73 City Council reviews draft of 1981-85 CIP for general content. MN -0 - Mayor b. City Ccs il! March 13, 1,980 Page June: 30 Finance, Department distrihut(as 1980 working draft budgets for department review, 4nc.,luding departmental a personnel and capital requests (1980 expenditure data through May 31 included). Finance Department prepares 1980 revenue forecasts including valuation, state aids, bevy limits and estimated_millage July 10 - 19 Finance aeparUent reviews departmental' requests with department heads and: supervisors, 44ily 18 Planning Commission receives proposed 198145 CIP. Legal notice - revenue sharing proposed use hearing published. 4 4 Jury 21 finance Department compiles 1,980 budget requests. July 28` Revenue sharing proposed use hearing - 4;00 p.m. City Council Chambers. July 24 - City Manager reviews budget requests. August:, July 30 Planning Commission acts on proposed CIP and recommends adoption to City Council, August 4 City Council sets. public hearing date for 1981.-85 Capital Improvement Program an.d City Budgets. Council receives. Capital Improvement Program from Planning Commission, for formal review. August 8' City Manager, submits proposed. 1981 budgets to City Council., August 11 City Council Budget Study Session 1 - 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers. August 18 Public hearings on: 1) 1981-85 CIP' 2) 1981 City Budgets August 19 City Council Budget Study Session 2 - 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers. September 8 City Council adopts 1981-85 CIP and 1981 City Budgets, City Council orders preliminary engineering reports: for 1981 public improvement projects. I recognize that this is anamb tious work schedule for the staff and Council, but I do believe that it represents the sort of time commitment required to meet the continued development' challenges of our community.; I recommend that it be adopted by mDtion of the Council. JGW.: jm lilaq 1484 EAPtTAL tNPRUIPMr kTi RROGRA Notes: 1 Fun decrease 2 Fu rd it, ;'ease Summarrt of ProAects Tat`!.. r b iii l4aq 1481 1982 290.00q 1483 1484 r 9 00 4o tcgQ 434.4ga r>`e s Storrs Sewer 1.784k400 8074000. 420,000 36,Q0Q 4?S.gOQ 350:,040 7li3On 275,Oor 800.P 0 3,012,000 i 253,800 C. Metter Sanitary Sewer 1,283,800 148 000 546,000 420,0Q,00 476,,Q00 1SS,000 155800----- 0 a UU rr[.. Perks lru,ildins 1 ,273,492 346 000 561 Soa 0 i i+' 0 3', 3,ti t 5 t-7 4 , Grand Total S SummarY of EYDendltures 1493 l Oat, Total F ndin _ PesK a ssesst en , un 14aq, 1 3.43.104 1481 2 (419,000 1.982 X331,000 2:i (480, 000 1 475,OQQ 1,389,000 i-- 1 8272,470 2,071 ,850iitillt,y Trunk Fun d Fund 48,250 100,000 10,000 4041600 618,400 ...-------30,044 00,044 ._...--.. 860,440 l,269,62Q34Ay ark aedicatirn NodEstattitovoty 172,000 954,620 275,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,,506 Federal General Obligation toads 42,Q00 1,28 Soo 236,O0Q 677,000 215.0740 215,0000 215,000258,122 2,135 ,400 Ad Val-orem 1,evY 1,254,400 2S8,122 0 0 0 137 000 Faad ialanre Federal Revenot Sharinu 137 000 q 3 37 3 5:,RTt 3`4D3 Grandoia1 t I RevYnues 1•_483 19x4 Total F chit and Fund rets 1960 51,872,100 1481'_! 32,579.000 1482 1'025.,000 516.000 60,000 32,810,000 1,389,000 3 8.802,150 2,071,850 eters! Assesime;Zts 98,250 100,000 404,600 0 448,250 N.S*A State/county!#ederal 78,250 30,0'40 40-1000 0 1 ,545,000 tot* sewer, Area Assessments 784,000 309,000 111,000 2001000 50,000' 260.00.0 90,000; 90.000 1,385,440 Ad valorem levy 1,004,400' 0 257,000 0 1,349,000 Mates Lateral Assessments 107000 S911000 480,000 142,000 650,000 2) (1.88,000) 1) 275,000 11 1155,005 Area Assessments Utility Trunk Fund 1 120,000 2 1355,0011) 1 . 1a 283,000 1,168,400 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Assessmentt 136,000 46,000 186,000 312,000 600,000604,000 480. 000 480 000 2,033. 400 1 33,io0 Area Assessments S64, 0S8q, 400 139. 400 r1 139,409 2j (84,404) 1 48,000 2) (270,000) 11 200,000 Utility Trunk Fund Parks Park Oadi+cation Fund Central Park 35'040 0 10,000 35,000 463.000 O 30,090 0 34,000 70,000. 570,000 220,070 Playfields. ! trra, is 3T,000 140,000 0 2'0,000 0 0 q Q 739,370 Nei4RD4rhood Pane gate/County/Fwderal 5930370 0 145,000 1.281 ,508 0 0 0 125 550 1,958,508 750,000 General Obligatian Bonds r250 125.000 25,, 000 25,,000 125,000 0 25ii.122 Ad Valorem Levy P ,00o: 258,122 0 Fund ulance 0 183,000Buildings: Federal' Revenue Sharing- 137,000 83,000 0 0 0; 0 0 0 a 0) 84.070 Stato/county/Federal Utility Trunk Fund 84,000li 42 000 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0. 3S 42 000 123;b+ General Obligation Bonds. 3 3>i f 0 2 2U,0 Grand Tota! i aim im most" 198.4"APITAL 1!lPROVINENTS PROGRJIK RARits HATER Y ammommo 1lescripi'o Year Nisriytion 190 1. Central park 19841' 1. 49th Ave. -Center of Section 12 to Nathan tn. 1180 1980 F. 3. Trails (Co. Rd. 15) Trails plarfields (Co.. Rd. 0/10' acquisition; Zachary 1K1 1980 2, 3, 1Qth Ave. -Nathan tn. west 1328 fret slst Ave. -Nathan L7. west to cul-de-sac Ln. ocquisition: development Oakwood% 1980 4. larch Ln. cul-de-sac north of Co. Rd. 9 LaCowph. rj"Wih sir. liigh. Fembraok) 1980 1980 5. 6. Weil Mb R Co. Rd. 9 -Mea No. 9 to Vicksburg Ln, 19" 1 41 commity parks 10*44orhow parks (Tiaiber Shores and; 1980 1980 7, S. lMihurst developMnt Nathan tn,-Sist to 56th Ave.; Revere in. Stith Mission Mills) and Co.. Rd. 18 1101 i. C"MI park 1981 9., 19th Axe. -Center of Section 12 to Zachary Ln. 1981 ilNT T. 8. Trail: RlaOields; 1981 10. Annapolis Ln. -Co. Rd. 9 to 34th Ave. 1981 9. coaarnity parts 1981 1981 11. 12. lass lake Rd,-Oetraood to Revere. Ln. 34th Ave., -494 to Niagara Ln. 1981 10. Iii 1_1 parks 1961 13. Zachary 1n. -53rd Ave. to CO. Rd. 10 alit 19at; 11. 12. antral Park ' Trails: 1982 1982 14., 15. Nall No. 7 Nedicirw Lake Rd. -Con Rd. 9 to 49th Ave. 191914 13. Elayfi+tlds 199 148 liar' parks 1983 16, Zachary Ln. -34th to 36th AV*. 1, 15d lrailk. 1993 19tH 17. 18. Dunkirk Ln. -Co. Rd. 24 to Co. Rd. 9 Co, Rd. 9 -Dunkirk to Vicksburg Ln. 1963 16. 00berhood parks; 1983: 19. 10th Ave., -S., Shore Qr. to 1320 feet nest of 1181 11. Trails Nathan Ln 1984 18. Neigheorhaod parks 1984 20, Well No, 8 NOW— d• me low Special Assmi+ts C.i.. EstiMtN sesTrvMW N.S.A. Camtral Plyttds NgOrhd Cowntp G.O. lb. ' Oascripthe Cost Area Lateral Total Fvnd (1) FMrd Part E Trails Parks Federal Mmds Other Unknow - - arber i t - ca - st to t -- vtra La.56th to _ West E PMKS jr. mi.; remomm 1 r,wa.ary - - 1 pelts s Shores and Mission ark •. 1. r ar p r - _ • 3 fN1H KI 5[O ci 7.743,292 1,531,101 521952.500 nject O"CrIption utititx Park Oedlcation Fwmd Stataf ants Trwk M.S.A. Camtral Plyflds Norm towtyf G.O. TotalFred (1) Fw d' Park Trails Parks Fe*rml lands Other 4 µms.-. . a a t 3. 306 000 1!1 t100 ! 19 l00 QQQ 0 1Q 000 Q utik" Y lark Dedication FwW State/ c E.. N.M Special Assessments Trtantrel Plyflds N OrAd carnty/ 9.0. meet; bw 1ptienArea lateral Tonal FredPark A Trails ?ads Federal ids Otter S2S ODO S2 OOD12taTarba" Is 864 ve MI ra - - 40 NOW and -a 5 rte.' a - - • . - + _ -: _ .. ft. 7 MOM On Late .-Co. 49th ve. -129-2202 as str ct I Paw* Wells Playfie - _ - a 4Ow 120 Om- 7101W771 F T. M R Ottagod Ln Food and gralfts9f h 361h Ay 19-afla 24 to Co. Rd._9 396,0001 300,000 r. to IJZOI West o Wathaii In. 70,60-0 SEWERSANITARY 14- sc 30 000 rl–.gTuw. 62,009 62,002 I L130$0001— 0 1120.000 215 000 1 Aw own AW, 4:k 1 T 1 1 t l i 1 11.1 1 ental paYrl s qty/ 6.0. aria irails Packs Federal iow+s e.s ®_ VF= wq rw MA MEMEMED Al L t r 1KMWw-n-T, vlwwwrw Niemen 1111 1111.9111111ii'm ogo ON jlk Ill-, i.loommompilNang a \R MN QN RN V0 0 101011111-11 I -ill 011-10 14M"0\\Nw\\N AIRNEDUMMA T P11.1111 M . 146%1910RRX1110MI301010113I VINCE 141111%11 mom" 01\0\10413010101min.l. ,T mcmen 111*11,11 Nelson ir 1 In* 0 VN AI RN A \\&A, N 13 9 2 0 t3; EXARYU&NR \01nmmill 1, 1 MOM iwilil lie 0 0N RkIN a a a If 3 0 Is a a 8 a 2 MOONS sonsommommuiR soon Emmons ammosommossams as s n ir r® wasommus 0010101010101 Essen name MENEM Cl El 7 9ME WE E NEW Evanson" Big NONE CR MEN FBrgrg 0601-188H Sol M=M445 mum mom mimmiFoim,"mnnmno monsoon aim -&game 0www;:-= a mom won muna,mon some mod 0ww.M.z@@ solve am mom g=gg NEMESES Mason Maine some NEWSMEN, mom moomme'nom NOONwonmamommom owns 0 Soong mom Rommoommommomm MEMNON s•,- 19808.0_ t.Y. 1982 CITY OF 1983 PLYMOUTI+ 1984 Mk If 111H fi f i : i !!:t ix•"` .' w' t For" + i 11 Jo AN t Ir { taw * .e: ai ` • 1 Mew—• ' T 1 J J F} rrr Mp j ! tr ci n 12A CTDCCT `zl_p - ... CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 DATE April. 11, 1980; MEMO TO. Park b Recreation Advisory Commission Members FROM:' Frank Boyles, Administrative Assistantrx\J SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY PLAYFIELDS ark consultant representatives will be present at the April 17 meeting to present and discuss aspects of the final plans and specifications which have been completed for Plymouth, Oakwood, Fernbrook, and LaCompte playfields. Since the Commission's last meeting on March 27, Paris Director Blank and Fred Moore have had the opportunity to discuss various aspects of these plans with the consultant i_n greater detail. The comments made by the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council at earlier reviews have been incorporatedinto the final plans and specifications. The park consultant has advised us that all elements of the final plans and specifica- tions should' be prepared for distribution by Tuesday, April 1.5. The final plans and specifications will consist of; 1. dimension site plan. 2. grading' plan, 3. utility plan 4 irrigation p[an. 5. building plan. 6. electrical plan. 7. detailed narrative for each of the above plans. 8. removal plan. 9 sodding and seeding plan. Park Director Blank, Fred Wre and myself will have the opportunity to review these: documents on Tuesday, April 15 with the park consultants. Following. that meeting, the dimension site plan will be delivered to Commissioners to provide the opportunity fov'• review prior to the Commission meeting. City Council approval of final plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids Is scheduled for April 21. It is therefore necessary for the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission to review the final plans and specifications, make necessary recommendtions for change and recommend the submission of the amended final plans and specifications to the City Council for their approval. Assuming Council approval is forthcoming, bids would be received until the week of May 5 through 9. Analysis of the,bids would be undertaken immediately thereafter with the recommendations submitted to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission during the week of May 12 through 16. City Council award of contract is scheduled for May 19 1980. FB : jm; a \ e. . • a, a R.•. it. 0 a t r ^J March 31, 1980 C( d ITY Mr. Robert Sorenson 11.520. 38th Avenue No Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Sorenson: The Park a.r;d Recreation Advisory Commission has askedskdthatparksI writeterthis letted ter to you. els your probably know, Timber Shores and M for improvement in 1980 by the 1 reati° nital Adv%soryoCortmission9iinterviewedenwedgpar klY,. earlier this month the Park andRe consultants for the design and construction of these two facilities. On March 24 the Commission submitted reconme 0ati;ons to the City Council requesting that thefirmofDesignConsortiumbeawardedcontractforpackconsultantservicesfor Timber Shores and Mission parks. Since the approval of the capital improvement program, I expect that YOU ,- 3ware hat a bond referendum wa.s pissed in the amount olls foS2the commillion l` etefor constru four playfields this year and two i,n 19ctionrof ion of six community playfields. This ProleGt Because of the compacted schedule81• . the City Oauncil is very concerned thatabsolutelye Park neand ReccessaryreationAAdvisory Commission and City staff are going to find tcan enemies to these facilities to insure hsituationare wherethet ies gn phase theuaily important, the Council wishes to avoid a neighborhood parks begins this year,cause ot,aconstruction iss due to adelayedCu commission preoccupation with the community playfields 1'951. The construction of Mission Hills and Timber Shores parks has therefore been deferred by the City Council until I,981 e thatatheure Ctyhat this Council ismlooking out. mes as a disappointment, I am also sure you apprciat for the interests and well being of the community as a whole. This year, the City Council will be discussing the new capital improvements program on August4. This meeting is scheduled to allow yoV sufficient opportunity to express your preferences. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions,. Yours very t uly, Frank. Boyles Administrative. Assistant FB:jm 3400 PLYMOUTH' BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH,, MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (612) 5.2800 4 b w 4 FOR Yto'-"' CITY March.31; 1980 PL l' O Mr. Robert Waschniesk. Armen Art Advertising 1117 13th Avenue North Box W. Fargo,, N.D. 58107 Dear Mr. Waschnieski Attached are the recommended changes to the "Plymouth. Public Information Brochure. I have enclosed your original camera ready artwork so that: it can be revised to reflect these changes. You will note that the changes: on the front page are, minor, including the following: 1. Use logo from lett rhead in lieu of present logo. 2. Delete the word "out" in the last Eine of the first paragraph. 3. Add the word "a" in the second paragraph between with. and spirit. On the second page, we would like to substitute the attached narrative in place of the artwork above the nap. Feel free to adjust the. narrative so that it looks appropriate within the space available. The one item that I have not been able to return to you is the revisions in the map. In discussions with the City Manager, I found that the property lines showing tht. park. properties are not accurate. It is therefore necessary for us to review the np and revise it as necessary. I understand your concern regarding the delay in receiving payment for this project. Therefore,-once you finish the work contained herein. I would recommend payment and approval for at least one-half of the balance owedto you on the brochure. Please feel free. to contact me if you have any questions.. Yours t F ank Boyles Administrative Assistant FS jm encl. A 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5541, TELEPHONE (612) 5%2800' THC PLYMOUTH PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM A Well -conceived park and recreational syste+n consists of much more than programs andandsensitivitytoleisurepatternsfacilities. Thorough planning,, sound maintenance be incorporated into the system. Below is a summary of Plymouth's Park and moist Recreation System: Several types of park facilities are planned. Users Fetes Neighborhood parks -designed for family and Support for Plymouth recreation programs is obtained through user fees to recapture programunorganizedleisureactiVitlies. 4osts. Community playfields orientedto organize± The Planning Processsportingactivitiesforallages. Community parks established to recognize The essential ingredient to the Plymouth Park and Recreation. System is short and long term planning. and enhance natural geographic characteristics.. Tra:ils built to create a transportation net- The FRAC, seven volunteers, meet monthly to establish policy recommendations for programmingworkforallsersonstoandbetweenfacilities. and, facilities. The City Council acts upon these recommendations to create city park and recreation policy. Maintenance Specialists provide maintenance to each facility City staff representatives carry out policies on a day-to-day basis and provide professionalbaseduponestablishedschedulesandobjectives. recommendations to the Council and PRAC for decision making. Recreation opportunities You, as a Plymouth resident, are part of this Plymouth provides recreation opportunities for process. Your comments to the staff, City Council and FRAC 'together with those of school all ages for intellectual, as well as physical district representatives, ath'etic. associations stimulation. and homeowner associations, playa vital and The diversity of programsrange from aerobic continuing role in planning for a;nd developing the Plymouth Park and Recreation System dance, gals getaway, teeny, tumblers, to open baskftkal l , sl imnasti cs and adult leagues. The "Master` Plan" for Plymouth"s IPark and Recreation System is shown below. Your input. is to help develop the best possible system. Contact the Park and Recreation staff atneeded 4 559-2800 to Find out how you can help. 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 8400 PLYMOUTHBLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441' TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 i DATE;MEM OAprilI1, 1980 TO; Park & Recreation Advisory Commission Members FROM: Frank Boyles,; Administrative Assistant' SUBJECT STATUS OF COMMUNITY PLAYFIELO PROJECT/LEASE AGREEMENT NEGOTIATION WITH SCHOOL DIST0,1CTS Attached is, a memorandum from Fred Moore which was submitted to the City Council at their April 7 meeting. The memorandum describes the progress which had been made to.that date regardir=g the community playfield project. Generally speaking, repre- sentatives of, the. City stPff arO park consultant have been very pleased with the progress of the project to.d,,'e. We are on schedule thus far and details are progressing as planned. At the same time the physical plans for park. development are underway, the staff has been in the process of negotiating lease agreements with school district representatives for the Plymouth Junior High and Oakwood. sites. The Building and Grounds Sub -Committee of the District 284 School Board approved the concept plan for the Oakwood. school site and lease agreement with a minor change on Tuesday, April S. The Chairman of the Building and Grounds Committee advises me that, in his opinion; the lease agreement should be approved by the entire School Board at their regular, April 14 meeting without substahtial debate. Late in, March we ran into som: problems with negotiating the agreement for the Plymouth Junior High site. The problem involved c ^nncern by teacher coaches; and physical education teachers at the Plymouth Junior sigh School that they had not been allowed to provide proper input in planning this rite. After three meetings, we were able to compromise an agreement whereby the park site would remain as shown in the concept plans except that a football field would; have to be removed to allow for the overlay small fields needed by the school to conduct daily physicail education classes. On April 1„ the School Board considered the concept site plan and lease agreement. The Board approved the site plan as recommended. The lease agreement was approved in concept, except that the Board directed the administration and city staff'to resolve differences between the desires School Board agreement and proposed City agreement. I anticipate that given approval of the Oakwood agreement by the 'Wayzata School Board and staff's ability to work. out differences on the Plymouth Junior High agreement that the agreements will be submitted to the City, Council for final approval at their April 21 meeting,. FB : jm attach 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (6i 2) 559-2800 1 F MEMO >, DATE' April: 3, 1480 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager ``yh FROM, Fred G. Moore, City EngineerV SUBJECT: Status Report on Community Playfields On March 24, 1980 the City Council approved the concept plans for four of the community playfields.The consulting; engineer is proceeding with the detailed plans: and specifications for the construction of these four fields Oakwood Elementary, Plymouth Junior High, La Compte and fernbrook Lane); and is on schedule, The consultant is to complete the final; plans and specifica- tions on or before April 18, 1980, There has been a slight revision in the concept plrn for the Plymouth Junior High site. Frank Boyles met with the junior high school Principal and several of the athletic coaches and physical education teachers on March 21. The basic result of this meeting was that the school staff felt that they had not been properly involved in the design process for the improvements and, further, that there was severe. conflict between the program of the school and the program proposed for the park recreation facilities. As a result of this initial meeting a second meeting was held on the following Friday morning including representatives from BRW, the City, the school and the athletic associations. At this time the:school outlined,in more detail its concerns and a general discussion was held on how the conflicts might be resolved.: A third meeting was then set for later that day at which BRA! was to present a revised concept: plan addressing the concerns of the school. When the revised; concept plan was reviewed Friday afternoon there was a general consensus that. the revised plan has resolved the. conflicts between activities the school felt necessary and the activities which had been programed by the City. In order to do this, the northerly proposed football field had been del'eted., There stillremains on the site three combination soccer/football fields and three softball fields; Alt of these fields are lighted. The last concern discussed with the Plymouth school officials was how the school would uti; l ize the fields in the fall of 1980. Since the turf will oe recently placed when school starts, it will not be suitable for playing in the fall' of 1980 and the school will have to refrain from using the new fields for gymnasium as wei;l as after school activities. There is a possibility of busing to alternate sites. No final' decision was reached on this issue, however it was a,consensus that it would be the least disruptive in the long run to construct on the entire site during '1980' rather than splitting the project between two construction seasons, a t Memo - James G. Willis April 3, 19$0, page Two Eric Blank; the Park and Recreation Director, and I have also met with the consultant to review general detaileddesign concepts that are to be incor- porated'in the plans. These range from the: type of top soil to the type of lighting, These could be -presented to the City Council in detail if the Council so wishes, although the items are of a technical nature and it is proposed that the City staff provide the direction to the consultants. It is recommended: to the City Council that bids be received on each, of thefourparkswithbidsbeingsubmittedonthefollowingindividualitems, A. Building B. Lighting and electrical C. Street (including tennis coursts D. Grading E., All other It is proposed that, a contractor could tie any one of the five divisions. together for all four parks by specifying a "deduct" for award of all parks. By dividingthe contracts into each park and also into five divisions, it could:be possible to have twenty differentcontractors for the overall project. If this were the case, it will probably necessitate the City having a "con- struction manager to coordinate the construction activities. The division of the contracts by this method is recommended, since it will allow more competi- tion for the work, divide the work into more categories therefore eliminating subcontractors for the main contract, and provide for faster completion, assuming proper coordination. With the design change mentioned in this memorandum it is now assumed that all design concepts are firm for the four community parks. The consultant is to present to the City staff a more detailed cost estimate the week of April 7. If, this cost estimate: exceeds the preliminary cost, a meeting of the City Council will be requested in order -that priorities can be established on the facilities to be constructed and/or the level at which the facilities should be constructed in order to reduce maintenance red Moore, P E. FGMbw IN I MEMORANDUM L_R _J NSA FtTACIC t` Nti NEEP4 a AR:,HSI GSUEi 3-8007 April 4,. I NG To Plymouth City, council From: Don Ringrose, project Manager Re, Plymouth community Playfields Program Status Report. The, following is a brief summary of the activities of the past two weeks and a statement of our current; status with respect, to the overall schedule. 1. Design Progress A. Park Shelters We. met with PRAC on Thursday, March 27th; to review the,designconcepts that the Council had previously reviewed on March; 24th. 1n addition to the circular wall concept presented. to the council, we presented a similar earth sheltered concept. plan using straight wall segments, Based upon cost, function, and Appearance, it was decided to proceed on the basis of the straight wall segment concept. Working drawings are being proposed for the first three structures at Oakwood, Plymouth, and Fernbrook. We have Just started to consider what minor remodeling might be performed. at the existing building at CaCompte. B. Concept Plans ire met with Eric Blank, Plymouth's new Director of Parks and -Recreation on March 27th to .review the concept: plans that the Council had approved on March 24th. on March 26th we met with the staff at Plymouth Junior High School to review Plymouth Park, They expressed concern about the need. to be more responsive to the, needs of the Physical Education classes. We had an extensive work,, review, and, brainstorming session on March 29th With Fred Moore, Eric Blank and our design team at:which time we: resolved many issues and design details. As: a result of those: discussions we have made several revisions to the concept plans. IKI?*R.. W4MW WOLSFUD, JWM. OAAMOR, W,, ZM UNNEftTY 1 VE 5 E MINNEAPOLI& MN sui4 F*"E GM137*474 Plymouth °City council April 4o 1980 Page' 3 Our conclusion at this point: is that we are slightly over budget on Phase I by an amount of Estimated Cost $1,7791363 Funds: Budgeted $1,747,5Qp Excess Over Budget $ 31,863,(1.2%) Based upon our current cost analysis we suggest that we provide deduct alternates in thy: -bidding documents, for up to 10of project costs. By providing the appropriate deducts we cats build In the flexibility we may nree4 if the current estimates areexceeded. I T I'. Schedule We are on schedule.. We<expect to present final plans for Phase I Parks and to set the bid date at the April 21st.Councii meeting. I is DWR nD Plymouth City Council April 4, 1980: Page 2 It. Budget Our earlier costanalysis and comments on cost were based upon "rule of thumb" type: of cost estimating, or a comparison to similar parks in: other communities. We now have had the opportunity to actually estimate quantities of work based upon, the approved concept; plans and performed a true cost estimate. Our current estimates of cost are summarized in the fallowing tabulation. Current Estimated Const. Funds Park Const. Cost (1) Available L2) Phase- I Oakwood: $ 545,450 555,000' Plymouth h 598,330' lw 580,Oo0; LaComp 16e $ 120,09E 1,34,500 Fernbrook $ $15,487 $ 478,000 Sub -Total $ 1,779,363 $ 1,747,500 Phase 11 Ridgemont Not Available $ 265,000 Zachary Not. Available $ 589,000 Sub -Total Not Available; $ 8541000 Total Not Available 21601,500 Admin. Costs, $ 348,500 (13.4%) Bond Issue $ 2,950,000 1) Does not include engineering and administrative costs., 2) Based upon the original allocation of the total bond proceeds as per March 18th, 1980 preliminary cost estimate. x 77 Plymouth Park. and. Recrea tion Commission Regular Meeting of May 1, 1980 Plymouth City Hall Council Chambers Time.- 7:.30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to order 2 Approval of minutes 3. Visitor presentation a_.. Athletic Association representatives b. Others c. Jane and Rick 4 Report on past Council actions a.: Approved;f•inal plans and specs for playfields b.. Approved sale of bonds at 7<31% interest 6. Unfinished business a. Discussion on vita courses b. Playfield - update c. C. I . P . 8.1.8 6. New business, a. New plats b., 1981 tAWGON grant application 7. Commission presentation 8. Staff presentation 9. Adjournment Minutes of the Park and Recreation. Advisory Commission, for April 17, 1980 On roll call, members James Rice, Betty Threinen, Dorothy Terry, Barbara Edwards, John Mullan and Steve Chesebrough were present. Ex -official 'member, Phyllis Hanson, was alsopreseti. Member Allen Brass was absent at this meeting. The minutes of the meeting of March.: 27, was approved with one change; the change' being that member Edwards was absent from: that meeting. The minutes of March 6, were approved, as submitted.: Item 2: City Manager, Willis, formerly introduced the new, Park and Recreation Director, Eric Blank, to Commission. Item 3: Discussion, on vita Courses. Chairman - e ha rman Rice introduced the sub,,ect by ex- plaining that he had been, contacted by Mr. e Ji.m.Guddal regarding Mr. Guddal`s interest in exploring the possibility of installing a Vita Course at the Fernbrook Lane Community Play Field Site. The Commission discussed the philosophy of having Vita. trails and where they should be located. The general con.censes was we should; probably have them; the exact location, at this time, is undetermined. The Commission does not wish to discourage citizen involvement in expanding this idea. Park Director, Blank, explained there has also been some interest from the Optomist Club i`n installing a Vita Course perhaps in the Green Tree West development. e further explained that he had met with Mr. Wafter Ohm from the Green Tree West Home Owners Association to discuss this. and other items of interest. The Green Tree Home Owners Association is, going to explore this further themselves and get back to Mr. Blank as; to whether they wish to have a Vita Course in their area. This item was then said over until the next meeting for further discussion. In the meantime, Director Blank will be sending out information with detailed information, on Vita Courses for the: Commission to review. Item 4.. Discussion of process for Park and Recreet'ion Commission review of budget for 1981, and the capital improvement program for 1981 through 1985. Chairman Rice introduced this subject by explaining the City Manager has indicated a desire; to speed up the process of developing the City Budget for 1981, and the CIP which will require the Park and Recreation Commission to put special emphasis on reviewing and working on this particular item at this time. Due to the fact that the staff was new as of this meeting, it would be impossible to go into it at any depth at this gime. Staff then indicated he felt there should be perhaps a special meeting set up to discuss this item after Mr. Blank. has had an opportunity to visit more of the park. sites within the community. The first thing that Staff would like us to do is to make a list of all of our needs in the Park system; and then, secondly, to pr_i__o___r__t__izethem so items have a first, second or third priority listing. Nex ryy"'fo work them out so items that have a first or second priority listing are completed in the first two yearsof the CLP, Items that have a second priority are completed.in,`the years three or four; and items that are a third priority are then completed in the year five or beyond. The Commission also asks.we send out a very brief review of the system plan information for their review prior to their meeting on the subject. In conclusion, it was decided we would have this as our major tope of discussion at. the May 1 Park meeting. r In the meantime, Staff is going,to review the funding sources of money that.are used for capital improvements, trying to identify exactly *here these funds are, and bring this to the next meeting. e Item S: Review and approval of Community Play Field final plans specifications, Don Ringrose opened this discussion by reviewing a memo he presentee dated April 17, 1960. A copy of that memo is enclosed for a review. Don presented a detailed look at each of the four sites that are now under process. Mr. Ringrose indicated at this time, their preliminary estimate on budget is that we are $78,863.00 over budget* and he suggested some deducts that could go toward reducing this: deficit, The. Commission felt generally that three items would most likely be considered for t a deduct. Those items were the Lacompte. Shelter Building for approximately 25,000.00; the Ferobrook 5oCke lighting for approximately $24,000.00, and the Plymouth Junior High North soft ball field lighting for approximately $269000,00, They also thought the impact of any deduction should be spread around the sites and not totally borne by one sate; and they ?klso went along with the philosophy that lights should be; removed from a single purpose field first.. Because of the great many variables involved in the bidding process, it was determined that it. would be impossible to make; concrete decisions on this matter at this particular time, so the Commission has set aside the evening of May 22, to review the actual bids on the project to mace a recommendation on necessary deducts if they are needed. It was also: generally agreed that the Lacompte Shelter Building should be bid in this first package in order to determine the costs and the feasibility of actually moving ahead with it. The plans as submitted by the architect received a conte c ensej, of approval from Staff and the Commission. The meeting was adjournedat approximately 11:00 o'clock:. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of I riTv nF PivnnnirH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, 4 MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE, 612 559-2800 DATE; May 19, 1980 MEMO TO; Park and Recreation Advisory Commission FROM; Eric Blank SUBJECT: Qhirit Sleeve Meeting, This is just a reminder for the Thursday, May 22nd special PRAC nv :ting. The meeting will take place in the, City, Gumcil Meeting rim starting at 6:30 p.m, We will work, on two things. First, we will review the P.I.P. Abse of the evening will be, spent on the 5 -year C.I.P. If you are unable to attend, please fill out: your C.Y.P. worksheets and mail them to me. Thank you.