HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 08-31-2004 SpecialAgenda
City of Plymouth
Special City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
7:00 p.m.
City Hall Lunchroom (lower level)
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
1. Call to Order
2. Discuss proposed 2004 budget and tax levies
3. Adjourn
DATE: August 26, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
SUBJECT: Budget Study Sessions
Attached is information responding to questions that arose at the first budget study
session on August 23. On August 31, the Council is scheduled to discuss the General
Fund budget and other Fund budgets.
Attachments from August 23rd Budget Study Session
1. Limited Market value
2. S. Paul Street Utilities
3. Proposed Water Resources Rate increases
4. Street reconstruction assessments
5. City tax on various value homes
6. Medicine Lake Surface Water fees
7. Recreation Programs
DATE: August 25, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Dale HahnrFinance Director
SUBJECT: Limited Market Value on vacant Land
Councilmember Hewitt asked about the large amount of limited market value on
vacant land and how it will phase out. -Vacant land has a large amount of limited
market value because vacant land has inflated in value considerably faster than other
property types. Nancy Bye, City Assessor, has stated that most all of the vacant land in
Northwest Plymouth has limited market value. The limited market value is being phased
out with a 15% increase in 2005 up to a maximum of 25% of the difference between
limited market value and full market value. In 2006, the phase out percentage will be
15% up to a maximum of 33% of the difference between limited market value and full
market value, and in 2007, the phase out will be 15% up to a maximum of 50% of the
difference between limited market value and full market value. For 2008, all properties
will be taxed at full market value.
DATE: August 25, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Dale Hahn!"Finance Director
SUBJECT: St. Paul Street Utilities
Mayor Johnson asked what is the St. Paul street utility and how does it work -St.
Paul has maintenance assessments for street sweeping, trimming, snow plowing,
sidewalk maintenance, and are now looking at street lighting. Most are called right of
way assessments and levied based upon front footage. They send out proposed
assessment notices in the Fall, let everyone know how much their assessments are going
to be, and hold a public hearing to adopt the assessments. Property owners can pay them
before November and avoid being assessed on their taxes next year. The street
maintenance assessments have been in place since the 70's, and they have been adding
additional items over time. They just started the snow plowing, trimming and sidewalk
maintenance in 2003, and are planning the street lighting for 2005 @ the rate of $.38 per
front foot.
The initial setup required a lot of time to determine front footage and street type (Brick,
concrete, blacktop, gravel), but isn't that difficult to add additional items later. The
street maintenance assessments are based upon the surface type and front footage.
Mayor Kelly's 2005 Proposed Saint Paul City Budget:
Streetlight
Maintenance
Assessment
What is it? The proposed streetlight maintenance assessment will cover the costs of operating and
maintaining the standard lighting system along the city's rights of way. Expenses included in
the assessment will include electricity, materials and labor for replacing bulbs and
maintaining and repairing light poles.
Maintenance assessments for public lighting systems are already in widespread use in other
cities, including some in Ramsey County. Saint Paul would join Mounds View, New Brighton,
North St. Paul and Shoreview among communities that already use this method to pay for
their streetlights.
Why is Costs to operate the streetlight system are currently funded out of the City's general fund,
the Mayor which is supported largely by property taxes and state Local Government Aid (LGA)
proposing payments. With LGA dropping by $3.2 million in 2005 due to state cutbacks, a substitute
a streetlight
revenue source needs to be found to maintain streetiighting. Compared to the altematives, a
maintenance assessment has several advantages:
maintenance
assessment? it's a fair way to pay for lighting. A maintenance assessment spreads the
costs of the lighting system more evenly across more properties—including many that
are exempt from property taxes but benefit equally from well -lit streets and sidewalks.
The streetlight maintenance assessment will add from $15 to $19 per year to the bill on
a typical home—versus an average increase of $26 to $32 if the same amount had to
be raised with the property tax levy.
Costs will be predictable. Because the assessment is based on streetfrontage,
citizens' bills will not fluctuate uncontrollably from year to year due to rising market
values. Proposed rates for Saint Paul are comparable to those in suburban areas.
Service will be reliable. The maintenance assessment will ensure adequate
resources for maintenance and upkeep of the city's public lighting infrastructure. And
because the assessments will be unaffected by any future LGA cuts, Saint Paul will
never again face the risk of streetlights being shut off to save money during a state
budget crisis—as they were in 1982.
HOW will Beginning in fall 2005, the current Right of Way Maintenance Assessment rate will be
it Work? increased to cover streetlight maintenance costs. As with the existing maintenance
assessment, charges may be paid in the fall of 2005, or they can be allowed to roll forward
and be billed on the 2006 property tax statement.
For more information on the budget, visit http://www.ci.stpautmn.us/mayorlObudget
DATE: August 26, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Mike Ko , Financial Analyst
SUBJECT: Proposed Water Resources Rate Increases
The rate increases utilized in the 2005 Water Resources budget proposal are the same as
those utilized in the Surface Water Taskforce report. They are as follows:
Year Rate Percent Increase
Current 3.25 N/A
2005 3.71 14.15%
2006 4.02 8.36%
2007 4.33 7.71%
2008 4.66 7.62%
2009 5.00 7.30%
DATE: August 25, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Dale Hahn' Finance Director
SUBJECT: Street Reconstruction
Mayor Johnson asked if Plymouth could assess for more than 30% of the cost of
street reconstruction -I spoke with Roger Knutson, and he said we can assess whatever
will stand up in court. He didn't think much over 30-40% would be defensible. I have
attached a survey that Chanhassen completed back in 2002 of what other cities are
assessing. After completion of the survey, Chanhassen set their assessment rate at
40%.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Page I of 9
Yes No (general fund) Yes (area, connection No specific policy. Yes (area, No specific policy. If minor, 100% to developer/property owner. Assessed only once. Andover
and lateral charges) If minor, typically connection and typically paid from If part of a larger system a storm Minor repairs and
paid from lateral charges) maintenance funds. drainage area charge may be routine replacement is
maintenance developed and applied to cover the funded from
funds. trunk costs. On state -aid routes maintenance funds.
MSA funds will fund storm sewer No specific policy on
improvements. Any costs over and replacement of curb
above are typically assessed. and gutter.
Bloomington Based on land use as Not addressed. Assessed on the Not addressed. Assessed on Not addressed. One-half of the cost of storm sewers 100%
follows: adjusted front foot the adjusted is assessed directly to the
1) Single-family and two- basis. Only that front foot basis. properties in an area, with the
family land use as based property within 150 Only that remaining half paid out of General
on the City Assessor's feet of the street right- property within Obligation funds.
records at a rate equal to of -way is considered 150 feet of the
25% of that year's cost on served by and street right -of -
residential street pavement assessed for sanitary way is
reconstruction projects, sewer and water considered
with the remaining 75% laterals. All other served by and
paid from city-wide general property — more assessed for
property taxes. distant than 150 feet sanitary sewer
2) All other land uses at a from the street right- and water
rate equal to 50% of that of -way may be subject laterals. All
years cost on residential to "connection other property
street pavement charges" or future more distant
reconstruction projects, assessments. than 150 feet
with the remaining 50% from the street
paid from city-wide general right-of-way
property taxes. may be subject
3) Any streets not eligible to "connection
for surfacing reconstruction charges" or
under the Pavement future
Management Program assessments.
shall be assessed at a rate
equal to 70% of the cost of
the surfacing.
Brooklyn 70% of total project costs Funded by the general 100% Funded by the 100% Funded by the sanitary 100% 100%
Park assessed to benefiting fund street maintenance water public utility sewer public utility operating Maintenance funded by the storm
properties. The remaining budget. operating and and reserve funds. sewer public utility fund operating
30% will be absorbed by reserve funds. budget.
the city. Assessment rates
are established annually by
Council resolution.
Page I of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Champlin 50% Not addressed 1W% 50% 100% 50% 100%
Crookston Crookston reduces the 100% 100% None (property 100% None (property owners pay a Included in street construction. 7152!ided—in reetcosttobeassessedbyownerspayamonthlyO/M charge).
contributing $35 per monthly O/M
abutting foot of benefited charge).
property, and then
assesses the balance on a
front footage or side street
footage basis. In the case
of a side street benefit, we
spread the cost to be
assessed 1/2 way to the
next platted street Aside
street benefit rate is
calculated by dividing the
cost to be assessed by the
total front footage
measured perpendicular
usually, depending on the
plat layout) away from the
improved side street. It
doesn't matter if your
property is on
the comer and is adjacent
to 50 percent of the
improved street, or if you
live 250 feet away from the
improved street on the
interior of the block
adjacent to the
improvement. Both pay the
same rate per foot which is
multiplied times the front
footage of your parcel.
On a Municipal State Aid
street, property is
assessed at the flat rete of
30.00 per front foot,
re ardless of roect cost.
Edina 100% for local streets General Fund 100% Utility Fund 100% Utility Fund 100°k if with development, 100%
State Aid: $20Hoot for otherwise out of utility fund
residential and $45/foot for
commercial
Page 2 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Farmington 35% 35%? Service lines and 35% Service lines 35% 100% 100%
laterals: 100% and laterals:
Sealcoating: 50% 100/0
City pays 100% of
trunk lines. City pays 100%
of trunk lines.
Hopkins 70% of total project costs Full -depth 100% No (water utility 100% No No (funded through storm sewer 70% to benefiting
to benefiting property milling/overlay and funds) utility) property owners.
owners. Single-family pavement reclamation is
property is assessed at fully assessable as in
50% of cost of a typical reconstruction. Full -
local street for major depth mill can be any
MSA) streets. m/o greater or equal to
4" in depth.
Hutchinson 100% of direct frontage. 50% 100% (City pays for 100% city cost for 100% 100% city cost except for 100% 100%
City pays for intersections oversizing above 8" main line. services (100% assessed).
and side yards up to 130' for residential and Services 100%
take total project cost over 10" on assessed.
divided by 2 times commerciaUndustrial).
centerline footage for rate).
City also pays for
oversizing (depthMridth) on
trunk routes. State Aid
routes are assessed the
same as other routes.
Jordan 70% City Generally not assessed. 100% 70% City 100% 70% City Assessed against the benefiting 100% to abutting
30% Property owners Funded through the 30% Property 30% Property Owners parcel on an area basis benefited properties
General Fund Owners
Mahtomedi 50% 30% 100% No histo 100% None 65% 50%
Mankato 59.50/front foot for 15.00/foot includes Actual cost Not assessed — Actual cost by Not assessed — replacement Actual total cost Actual total cost
complete replacement underdrain replacement is 7% service area is 7% of monthly rate
including drainage, walks, of monthly rate structure
trees, curb and gutter structure
Maple Grove 50% - 100% of non- None 100% None 100% None 100% for new developments 100% if non -existing
existing features Included in street reconstruction
costs
Page 3 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Page 4 of 9
racemelFwaimp mgmmnyfflqAqx1iw;wpn
Oakdale Generally assess for street Overlays are assessed Projects initiated by a No (financed out of Projects No (financed out of Utility Projects initiated by property owners Not addressed.
reconstructs as the cost to on a similar approach, property owner shall Utility Reserve initiated by a Reserve Fund). shall have their participation Assume included with
remove and replace 12 per foot for single require a developer's Fund). property owner determined by land use, contributing new street
asphalt on a minimum family, $15 for multi agreement outlining shall require a area and rate of runoff. construction.
standard street in a typical family, and $18 for the method of developer's
neighborhood. Generally it commercial/industrial. assessment and the agreement
is $40 per foot up to the amount of City outlining the
minimum lot width as Overlays to postpone participation method of
required for the zoning the reconstruction of a authorized by the City assessment
district, $55 for multi -family roadway shall be Council. The City's and the amount
and $75 for assessed to the abutting share shall be of City
commercial/industrial. property owners based financed with participation
on land use. water/sewer access authorized by
Roadway reconstruction charge (WAC/SAC) the City
projects accelerated on Overlays done to assure funds. Council. The
account of utility a roadway reaches its City's share
replacement projects shall design life shall not shall be
be financed through the required abutting financed with
Utility Reserve Fund in property participation. water/sewer
proportion to the remaining access charge
design life of the street. WAC/SAC)
funds.
Page 4 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Owatonna 85% of cost (includes curb
gutter)
of cost (no curb &
utter
None 17.85 per front foot
a
None 20 per front
foot
None 07 per s7footfor08pers75% 10 per s 7No47.60 per front foot
Plymouth Assesses abutting No response No response No response No response No response No response or
benefiting property for
street reconstruction costs,
but not in excess of the
special benefit to the
property. This policy
applies to all streets that
are the responsibility of the
city. The assessment rate
for the reconstruction of
previously paved streets
shall be determined
annually by the city
council. It is the goal of
this policy that benefited
properties be assessed
30% of the cost of the
Pavement Management
Pro ram.
Prior Lake 40% or project costs 40% 100% None 100% None 100% if new, 40% if in conjunction 100% if new street,
construction plus 28% with a street reconstruction 40% if in conjunction
indirect costs with a reconstruction
Page 5 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Red Wing 25% of Typical Street None 100% assessed; All services from 100% All services from sanitary 100% assessed to property 100%
Reconstruction however, City pays for main to R.O.W. assessed. City sewer main to R.O.W. owner/developer. City will pay for
Cost Assessed to property oversizing above 8" assessed to pays for any assessed to property owner. any oversizing to serve beyond
owners. Set once a year diameter residential property owner. oversizing to City pays for main development according to Storm
by Council Resolution and above what's Must replace if serve beyond replacement. Water Master Plan.
regardless of actual needed for particular service is over 50 development.
construction cost. Currently development in Years old. No Must pay to
set at $18.00A.f. includes industrial/commercial. assessment for extend through
curb & gutter. This allows Must extend through main replacement. development.
us to communicate costs development.
upfront for property owners
which seems more
acceptable. 50% break up
to first 150 feet on comer
or double fronted lots for
second street.
Robbinsdale 100% 100% 100% No (funded 100% No (funded through sanitary No (funded through stone sewer 100%
through water sewer utility fund) utility fund)
utility fund
Roseville 100% of standard street Not addressed 100% No 100% No 100% Not addressed
Received 2 size (7 -ton, 32 -foot wide)
responses)
Page 6 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
Roseville upgraamg temporary rvot aaaressea. iuuro Assessea on a iuuio Assessea on a front -rootage
Received 2 public roadways: The front -footage basis basis with all types of land
responses) following assessment with all types of use and zoning being
formulas shall apply: land use and identically assessed.
1. On street paving zoning being
projects, at least 25% of identically Added costs for oversizing
the cost for the project to assessed. will be subtracted from the
be obtained from sources total cost before calculating
other than ad valorem Added costs for assessments.
taxes. oversizing will be
2. R-1 and R-2 property subtracted from
that is not tax-exempt shall the total cost
be assessed a minimum of before calculating
22% of the actual cost for a assessments.
7 -ton, 32 -foot wide
pavement with concrete
curb and gutter and routine
drainage.
3. R-1 and R-2 property
which is not tax-exempt
shall be assessed at a rate
of a 7 -ton, 32 -foot wide
pavement with concrete
curb and gutter and routine
drainage, even if the width
or strength is greater.
4. All tax-exempt property
regardless of zoning
classification such as, but
not limited to, schools,
churches, parks and
governmental land, to be
assessed on an
assessable footage bsis at
100% of the cost of a 7 -ton
roadway.
5. All other property not
covered in 1-4 above to be
assessed on an
assessable footage basis
at 100% of the cost for the
specific type of roadway on
which they abut, based on
the costs for that segment
of the entire project
including the roadway Page 7 f 9
25% of the cost of the improvement
divided by the number of units being
assessed.
Paul
Assessed based on the
width of the lot times the
established rate per foot
1990-$28tft; 1996-
35.50/2; 2002-$41/ft).
For single-family and
duplex residence uses, the
maximum amount of
footage to be assessed for
the frontage along any one
street for each parcel shall
be 75 feet. No
assessments for sideyards
of comer lots for single-
family and duplex
residence uses.
Same as reconstruction 1
except established rate
per foot is lower, i.e.
1998-$10/ft; 2002-
11/11. Maximum
footage to be assessed
is 75 feet.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
No assessment if 100% No assessment when done
watermain is as part of the sewer
replaced as a separation program or street
result of defects reconstruction or if the
sanitary sewer main is
replaced as a result of
defects.
No
Page 8 of 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY SURVEY RESULTS
February, 2002
1. Residential, duplex Overlay projects will be 100% assessed on a No special 100%
on a
No special assessments No special assessments will be
except for properties that levied for construction or
residential, parks and other assessed at the same per foot basis assessments
except for
assessed
per foot basis have not been previously reconstruction of storm sewer
city owned properties
subject to reconstruction
rate as reconstructed
streets for the overlay properties that assessed for these utilities systems within the City right-of-way
calculated on a case -by- as part of the Pavement
assessed at a rate of 30% project costs. Overlays have not been
case basis). Management Program. However,
of the total project cost. are used when called previously
assessed for these upgrading or increasing the size of
2. Multiple dwelling land
use properties (more than
for under the Pavement
Management Policy. utilities (calculated the storm sewer systems may
involve an area wide assessment on
duplex units) assessed at a on a case-by-case a square foot basis t all
rate of 40% of the total basis). tcontributingareasatthe City
project cost. Council's discretion. In addition,
3. Church, school and any new development or streets
other tax exempt land uses may also be subject to an
assessed at a rate of 40% assessment at the discretion of the
of the total project cost. City Council.
4. State Aid Streets:
Residential and duplex
residential properties that
have frontage on a
Municipal State Aid street
will be assessed at 75% of
the rate for the standard
residential rate. All other
properties will be assessed
at their standard rate.
75% owners 0100% 075 /o owner 100% develo er, unless outfall forP
city project75% owners 75% owners 100% developer, with
25% city 25% city city picking up 25% city developer, with 25% city
oversizing city picking up
Limited
oversizin
Same as Would be the same as
waterrnain; however, as a
Assessed on a area basis with limit
established, limit tied to ENR index. City assumes cost for None Costs for lateral
center 24 feet, remainder
is assessed except costs
equivalent (8") is
assessed on a per
assessment when
upgrade in service
waterrnain
normal burial practical matter there is no
attributable to additional connection or per occurs, that is 4' depth also upgrade possible.
street width/strength assessable foot basis; are being replaced assumed for
relative to abutting land additional assessment this has not been lateral
use. for trunk system costs done in many equivalent)
assessed per acre cases because of
limited
assessment
compared to
administration
costs.
O:pI101255G5511MMBl8U1VBY 1@Sllil.EOI'
Page 9 of 9
Not specifically
addressed. Assumed
the same as new street
construction which
follows the same
formula for new
sanitary sewer
installations.
DATE: August 25, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens City Manager
FROM: Dale Hahn, Finance Director
SUBJECT: City Tax on various valued homes
The method of calculating tax capacity on all homesteaded properties under $500,000, is
to multiply the market value by 1%. Homesteaded property values over $500,000 are
calculated at 1.25%. Therefore, the City tax on various valued homes under $500,000
goes up directly proportionate with the value increases. To demonstrate this, I have
attached 3 sample tax estimates for home values of $200,000, $300,000 and $400,000.
TAX ON AVERAGE HOME
2005
2004 Taxes on $181,000 home
Market value $181,000
1% portion= 181,000 1,810
Balance 0 0
1,810
Tax rate 23.920%
432.95
Mkt value levies:
181,000 @ 0.00346% 6.26
181,000 @ 0.00604% 10.93
Total City Tax $450.15
2005 Taxes on $200,000 home (10.5% increase)
Market value
1% portion=
Balance
Tax rate
Mkt value levies:
200,000 @
200,000 @
Total City tax
200,000
200,000 2000
0 0
2,000
23.800%
476.00
0.00312% 6.24
0.00545% 10.90
493.14
Increase over 2004 $42.99 9.55%
TAX ON AVERAGE HOME
2005
2004 Taxes on $271,500 home
Market value $271,500
1 % portion= 271,500 2,715
Balance 0 0
2,715
Tax rate 23.920%
649.43
Mkt value levies:
271,500 @ 0.00346% 9.39
271,500 @ 0.00604% 16.40
Total City Tax $675.22
2005 Taxes on $300,000 home (10.5% increase)
Market value
1 % portion=
Balance
Tax rate
Mkt value levies:
300,000 @
300,000 @
Total City tax
300,000
300,000 3000
0 0
3,000
23.800%
714.00
0.00312% 9.36
0.00545% 16.35
739.71
Increase over 2004 $64.49 9.55%
TAX ON AVERAGE HOME
2005
2004 Taxes on $362,000 home
Market value $362,000
1 % portion= 362.000 3,620
Balance 0 0
3,620
Tax rate 23.920%
Mkt value levies:
362,000 @ 0.00346% 12.53
362,000 @ 0.00604% 21.86
Total City Tax $900.29
2005 Taxes on $400,000 home (10.5% increase)
Market value
1 % portion=
Balance
Tax rate
Mkt value levies:
400,000 @
400,000 @
Total City tax
400,000
400.000 4000
0 0
4,000
23.800%
952.00
0.00312% 12.48
0.00545% 21.80
986.28
Increase over 2004 $85.99 9.55%
DATE: August 26, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Mike leo' inancial Analyst
SUBJECT: Medicine Lake Residents and the Surface Water Fee
Since 2003, City of Medicine Lake residents have been paying our surface water fee as
an annual payment from Medicine Lake to the City of Plymouth. The City of Medicine
Lake resolution outlining their commitment is attached.
Per the resolution, Medicine Lake intends to pay Plymouth at the rate of $3.25 per
month/per household through 2006. It might be possible to approach them about raising
the rate and extending the timeframe, if additional work on Medicine Lake will be done
as outlined in the new Medicine Lake Plan.
CITY OF MEDICINE LAKE
RESOLUTION NO #03-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MEDICINE LAKE APPROVING THE ADAPTATION OF THE
MEDICINE LAKE AQUATIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the Medicine Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management
Plan (MLAVMP) has been developed by the City of Plymouth Parks and
Engineering departments, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
the Three Rivers Park District, Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission, the Association of Medicine Lake Area Citizens (AMLAC),
Plymouth Environmental Quality Committee, and the City of Medicine
Lake: and,
WHEREAS, the MLAVMP is a comprehensive long term plan to
provide steady and continuous improvements to the water quality of
Medicine Lake: and,
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has provided funding for the
MLAVMP by charging Plymouth households $3.25 per month to fund the
plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has adopted the MLAVMP; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth is inviting other participants to help
plan, fund and provide representation to the MLAVMP.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Medicine Lake, of Minnesota:
A. Approve the Medicine Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management
Plan.
B. Authorize the annual commitment of funds at the same rate as
Plymouth households, $3.25 per month or $6,552 per year for
169 Medicine Lake households for fiscal years 2003 through
2006.
C. Appoint councilmember Leonard to represent the City of
Medicine Lake as the city's representative to the MLAVMP
committee.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Attest: City Clerk
Date
ti
Mary Anne Young, Mayor
DATE: August 25, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Dale Hahn, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Recreation Programs
Diane Evans, Recreation Superintendent, has provided a listing of the various recreation
programs the City provided during 2003. The listing shows the revenue and direct
expenditures associated with each, but does not include allocations for any of the
administrative costs. Even though the administrative costs are not distributed to the
programs, I believe it clearly shows which programs are tax supported and which are not.
2003 Budget Overview by Program
Program Name Program Code Receipts Expenses Net
Warming Houses '. 201.1343.001 0.00 15;346.00' _ 415,346.00
Adaptive/Mainstream 201.1341 D03 0.00 23,615.00; 423,615.00
Beaches 201.1341.007 0.00 27,615.00 27,615.00
Playground Program 201.1341.01 l 17,410.00 20,572.00' 3;162.00
Puppet Wagon 201.1341.015 0.00 6,788.00 6;788.00
Community Special Events 201.1341.022 5,948.00 13,373.00' 7,425.00
concerts, parade, chocolate, F&/
Historical Special Events' 201.1341.023 ' 11,71,9.00 10,683.00 1°,036.00
History Fest, Old Fashion chnstmas
Holiday Special Events `' 201.1341.024 1,910.00 - 1,774.00; 136.00
New Years, Mothers tea
Millennium Garden Specials 201.1341.025 13,179.00 2,774.00 10,405.00
Expo, garden tour
Parks Entertainment 201.1341.027 4,400.00 9,302.00' 4;902.00
Arts Festival 201.1341.028 2,009.00 1;497.00 512.00
Seniors Administration 201.1341.030 1,286.00 63;729.00 62,443.00
Seniors Arts & Crafts 201.1341.031 5,950.00 2,802.00 3,148.00
Senior Education 201.1341.033 7,854.00 7,813.00 41.00
Senior Fitness 201.1341.034 8,185.00 2,934.00 5,251.00
Senior Recreation 201.1341.035 11,663.00 11,030.00 633.00
Adult Soccer 201.1341.045 24,193.00 12,874.00 11,319.00
open & league
Adult Basketball 201.1341.050 17,721.00 6,906.00 10,815.00
3 -on -3, 5 man, open gym
Youth Sports Camps 201.1341.055 49,497.00 26,556.00 22,941.00
Flag football, soccer basketball camps
Lacrosse Leagues 201.1341.057 14,396.00 9,856.00 4,540.00
Football Leagues 201.1341.060 2,310.00 951.00 1,359.00
Golf Programs 201.1341.065 36,613.00 26,292.00 10,321.00
Instruction, women's & junior league
T-Ball/Baseball/Softball 1201.1341.070 19,031.00 14,373.00 4,658.00
Program Name Program Code Receipts Expenses Net
Skyhawks Camp 201.1341.075 52,918.00 41,832.00 11,086.00
Tennis Programs 201.1341.080 15,461.00 4,828.00 10,633.00
Instruction, adu/t & junior league
Broomball 201.1341.084 1 $0.00 0.00 0.00
Hockey/In-Line Skating 201.1341.085 3,952.00 3,427.00 525.00
Fall Soccer Programs 201.1341.087 46,595.00 12,387.00 34,208.00
Volleyball Leagues 201.1341.090 4,695.00 2,458.00 2,237.00
Field Rental 201.1341.095 19,450.00 0.00 19,450.00
Renta/ of fie/ds, rinks, basketball courts
Softball 201.1341.100 82,088.00 31,384.00 50,704.00
Equipment Rental 201.1341.110 0.00 0.00 0.00
Picnic kit, volleyball & net, broomba//
Pre -School Specials 201.1341.111 3,187.00 1,397.00 1,790.00
Facility Rentals 201.1341.1 12 13,615.00 405.00 13,210.00
Parkers, Bass Lake, Canoe Rack, Picnic
Jujitsu 201.1341.150 13,826.00 11,499.00 2,327.00
Tai Chi Ch'uan 201.1341.151 0.00 0.00 0.00
Youth Arts & Crafts 201.1341.153 8,768.00 645.00 8,123.00
Drawing, painting, clay, etc.
Beach Concessions 201.1341.158 5,593.00 7,987.00 2,394.00
Parkers Lake & Friday popcorn
Adult Arts 201.1341.160 1 $2,888.00 1,966.00 922.00
Drawing, painting, clay, etc.
Family Arts 201.1341.175 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clubs 201.1341.178 480.00 165.00 315.00
Bridge club, juggling club, open chess
Youth Dance 201.1341.185 19,785.00 8,845.00 10,940.00
Ba//et, Tap & danceline
Day Camps 201.1341.186 24,381.00 15,202.00 9,179.00
Drama/Performance 201.1341.190 6,305.00 3,475.00 2,830.00
Youth theater, ba//room dance, etc.
Firearm & Snowmobile Safety 201.1341.192 260.00 218.00 42.00
Body Conditioning/Yoga 201.1341.193 36,184.00 16,817.00 19,367.00
Youth Advisory Council 201.1341.195 0.00 2,763.00 2,763.00
Program Name Program Code Receipts Expenses Net
Teen Programs 201.1341.196 16,926.00 15,000.00 1,926.00
Gymnastics 201.1341.200 18,960.00 12,880.00 6,080.00
Music For Everyone 201.1341.201 18,495.00 16,460.00 2,035.00
Plymouth, Arts 201.1341.205 2,522.00 12,640.00 10,118.00
Middle School Ski Club 201.1341.208 16,348.00 14,054.00 2,294.00
Preschool Education 201.1341.213 12,189.00 9,039.00 3,150.00
Tae Kwon Do 201.1341.216 4,179.00 3,345.00 834.00
Play Pals/ Come out & Play 201.1341.223 4,956.00 2,983.00 1,973.00
Science Explorers 201.1341.225 11,301.00 9,070.00 2,231.00
Water Sports 201.1341.235 1,407.00 1,015.00 392.00
Fitness 201.1341.236 8,509.00 6,085.00 2,424.00
Safety Training 201.1341.250 6,744.00 5,289.00 1,455.00
School Age Activities 201.1341.251 12,520.00 6,106.00 6,414.00
Preschol Fitness 201.1341.254 2,698.00 1,995.00 703.00
Swimming Instruction -East 201.1341.260 25,694.00 21,482.00 4,212.00
New Programs 201.1341.290 0.00 1,394.00 1,394.00
Administration 201.1341.291 =- 488.00 116,296:00 115,808.00
Swimming Instruction -West 201.1341.360 27,372.00 18,789.00 8,583.00
School Year Swim Lessons 1201.1341.460 32,542.00 19,484.00 13,058.00
Dummy
DATE: August 27, 2004
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
I
FROM: Mike Ko , Financial Analyst
SUBJECT: 2005 —2009 CIP
Attached is a copy of the proposed 2005 — 2009 CIP spreadsheet schedules. The
spreadsheet schedules represent the individual projects, by category, and by year. Once
again, the categories utilized are: general purpose building projects, park projects, street
projects, transit projects, water quality and drainage projects, and water and sewer
projects.
I have also attached fund cashflow projections for the funding sources, with two
exceptions. The exceptions are the Utility Trunk Fund and the MSA Fund. I will make
every effort to have cashflows for these funds available at the budget study session on
9/7.
These materials should form the basis for a good discussion on our capital needs and
ability to finance them. Once input is received from the City Council, changes can be
made and the entire CIP document will be updated for presentation to the Plan
Commission on October 6t'. The CIP will then be brought back to the City Council for
final adoption in early December.
E
75
O
PLO
O
A
A
T
c
8
U
Pk
v
E N
td E
U V
V
N DQ AO
U O
0 A3 d
o
h
w3
C7 w
E O N
0
0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y o0 00 00 00 0C C0 0C 0C 0C 00 00 0o nrn
C 0 0 n n N vi O O O O
a
O O
E o oI o 0
E V1 n
C C. 1` r
U E
c
E Cleo
U
E
od
Cl
0m
c
0ar ,
a
CD
a
U
t
E
0000000
0 00
o 000000 0
d 0000
N 7 N M
Y
Ra
0
0 c
0 0
00O0
dO 001, 0 0
Y rn
a
a
c
y
0
dd
w
C
n
U
N
o
D
u
6.
C C A"
Y
A 53dV7
U cd U h M44a
C C 10U
UE° A E 03 v N u
rp o Vvywo N
aj u a.Qti
c
w
y CO O O E U U
a N Qba m O bO 7a y
N C A
id td
CL
a OHxzxxac z
L
V V
L = n Z aaaa.a La. aaan an
G
U
2
ZD
Y
rCO
cY
E;
C y
Y YE
U
N YOL
Y
r
Qcd0
N Y
y c O
o C7 w
u o
E c
E u
0 0 0 0 0 o g o o
0
0
00000000000 N
O in N r N vl O O
F' 000 in
C
Y
E
OO
C O O
E o ofELw 0o 0
0oa
u E
c
u
n o 0 0 0
U a W N N
E
cgY
o
L
C L
0Y —
c o
0
u
c
E
u a 0 0 00 O
a O O O
n
a
0 0
O
0
h
aa
e0
0 0
O 0 0
9 C O 6 O O
J O
A W O
O
N
V'i
M
vi
r
Y
a
a
N
Y
zs t7 C
C C d
W
L
Oo N
Off.
6.
c
is o ot
y O 7 U k y t
V c= 2<m 3z
0. zF.-1OFa'zz2 H
LY
d E .-• v
a Z a Cl. n a a a a c a
ZD
E
V
Pk
E
Cd0
o
C A
L
t
N O
W W
N r. 0
N Gl
y NA V W
E v
L a
U
0
0 0 0 0 C
O0 o00 00 00 0C:, 00
00 r—
E o 0 0
E
E d n N r
U E
c
d
E flda > o 0
U a
E
OLd O
L
C L
c
o
U
s
d o 000
ti
a
0
00
O O p 0 00 0O
O O O O O
A LL O m O O
Y N IT
L
a
v
5
w
u
E 13a
N Vi
o t
u c fl
CL.
z F 1 O Et
CL
0u
F
L
u du .0
L a7_ c.a.an.ca
l
4`
R
E
V
O
co M
ccO
3 A0
v
o
c V w
d
E 3
E z
0
U 0w
0 00 0 0 0
y 0
00000 00 0 C
F 00
E o 0
O e
0 til
o 0
o
0 0. N N
U E
e
d
q E 9
a > = o
U o w
E
C OdL
O
C r O
c
0
a
U
e
E
d
0 0
o 00
a =
a
0
C,o
0C 0
0
Y
a
0.
0
0
000
0 0 0
0ve
d
A w 0 0 0N 0
YV
V
a
S
w'
E
c
N
O CYUO
04
H t
Y
cn U
A
0 3 C
0. zFOFw' F
u °J
d
L 0.Z aa.aa.a
4`
E
L>'
U
A4
0
Y
0
d cow
E o
E
o Y
o 0 0 0 0
c. o000
oI o o 0o
0F o o a= v
7 Y
E C w
o a•
U E
CY
awU
E
C
C
r
C
0Y
a
o
U
c
e
0
O
0
O
Co =
crwl
o CD o" N
Y
m` a
c0
C O
C OOCO
Y
AG4 OO
O
O
1C N
a
w
c
Y
Q. C
Y J
Y CC
y
Y vR
LC-.
rl 6.•
ao`
zE-
u °J
Y
I? o
v 0. Z a a n a
E
I
U o cw
U =
0
U ooH
c
v
C
U c o
fr E V t
C
O
E
o
U U w O
00 0oyo00
CDa°o
C C 0
O
a
Np4
M 0,
e E o
E o 0
E
U E
CO
d 9
wch e
K
o
a
0 0C 0
00 0
o o
GOm
C
1
C
d
o
ZZ
o 0 0
o
F
e
uE
sol
0 0 0 0 00
NiiN0pOHO
u
ya
N
A
a
d o 0
o v
0
E o o
Q o
0
o E
E
o
c w
v
1 = Ao a
m
d
OL e"
a
a c u v
3 h2v v E
O M
o
A N U
n=+
a
rY.
0
U A y
Ou C Oo Y O U
4 cC F ;5 65 F
u du
s
M,
0v
d
9
Y
C7
Y
V
Y
pOp b
ttl OV'1
M
C
W
E oo O Y
E m c toUsad
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0 00
o o v o CL 6 6 CD C. WOOZo00
rn
L y
o0 007Y
CI O O
E E ?
O O.
0
Y 7Ihc
C
o
L iz
e. E
a
a CD
W
o0
o
o
0
0
Im
a
o o0
o
0
Y e
15 U
cn
oo c 0o
o
0
N
0o
o o ao o
o
00Wo00000
d u cl o
CD
0 0
ID
0
ID
0 IDC
o o r o 0 0
VJ G i' rn b
Ya
C o
c o CDuCloovi c
Q o
c
F
3 CD
o x
Y a U
A3E
n p oaYc
MrUacid, c ccnfa, g s
u u c>
o
o y v rL oNY
E o c r
3aooR•„
c o•22C7
AD¢ aic
u eYao v ds v u.i°c'SN U
couEicP. Cdu ztiu F
Y
01 fi ^. Do rn o— N M V vl O r
a
U
G
Q
w
u
w
0
aui
o uv
c u o
0
N N y Z
G O O
E N N
E
o s
H
t
o
m ua
m
U w a. cn
0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0
O
C. vo— 0 0 0 o v v
p h 00 N M v
F c-:rnt N
C
Eu
o 0
U E
0
u fll• si C O
a E
a
O
Q
0A
o
c
m°
o
u o
0
o
0
p
0
o 00
v
U N 10
ovo
OO vi Nc'1
o
d
0
0 0
k"
O OClNh
VJ a Oa. 10 N MNVa
Y
n
C
Cl
O
p
OO
oEon E
n Q 4d
c
D e
C
a
U
2 o v 3
w
C O y M U
N
U
NO LVUc> E Q A v
r o V Q p C
3 U 7 N M O O 8
CE Q
O> 0 2 2H
F a Ci 0M Y p h V u 48
o
o r
C. Ixuu
cu,
zcm4A A
V
az 0nc r cnvA'Av n n
a
mq
0
x
U
E
0w
u
E
o
o
E o
oU es
0 0 0 CDC. 0 CD
0 C00000n
vFvN- v
T C
E > > l O O
E t+
o
0 0
U E
0
u
v w C 0
V c
Q
0 00 00
z
c0A 0ovi
0
0vi
c o
u
c0o
o
o
n
0
0
n
vc
0
ol
M W R
C
u E o poo oo p
w ° m o 0
k'
Nya
d o0 0
E o o
c
C
v
s
N A
0
Ey mac amic
3 3 E o o q
d 00z
E U u v
d V 0 D: N
N C
0. xFc4hC/)O F
d
dE0E aN N N N N
7
a` Z 'A fn A n v) rn
F
U
0
a
U
0
c
w
o
y
E
o
E
oU
0 0 0 0 0 0000o
ovro
0
0
06
cin
h V N N^r h
y
o c
U E
0
u a ay
o
c
0 o0 00
0A
0o 0
O
w
o
Ly
in
r
o5 o0
u
E
vl o0
o00000
O
0
0yyGO
VJ Gi
Oh ONCD O
NCL
ya
00ClwyCE00
V] h rn V•
Q
c_
y
uQ
u
z>
0
y o Q Q
w o
2
c
2
c o
F y c U u u z
LyL
a E civ f%,
L
rA
P.l
U °y
c
U
5
d
79
L r
ami U
w
Cc
a0
ca .=
ao
as
U
Cd
E c u
oami o
U rx U
0 0
0 0 0
C
N
0
M
0
V•1
N N
C
O
d 00 O O
O O
O
N N
d
d
y O
e
i
aa c
a
a
Q
a
O
H
U
N
O n
N
Q
N
u
c0
ed N
Er H
ro
C xW
L
a` z c
Ld
u u
O ME Vt
a` Z F
E
L
J
N
v
c0
U
h
r
Ed
G
O
O
U c
CCC
FI o 0000 0000
N r.. t+
C
7O
eC C O O
O 0000 00
N c+ ie
Ld
LL
w
o
e
E=
c
Q
a
F
N
U y
H
a
bit
Ca a
A
JE
r czs
u C
o u
u °J
u
o E •,
a`z Ht
J
N
Ei
E
a+
U
U UU UU
y O O O
OCL
91.
CL
o O v O p
x0
VI
0
0 l
c
E X O O O b O b O
O O 0 0 0 N ai
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
0
I 0000 o 000006
F vi O NM O
M v7 o kn N CD M N N
C
O
U
o
v
d
w
w
0Clo00CDo000W00
v7 O NM O O
a
M v') C W) N O W, M N N O
L
w
ec
3
cxo
z
a
V
Q%
a
C U h
o u E a a
3 oE E 3 co
p
E
O Ca 0 v p
O y
C C UEC
o
3
f Q e0
oma
o C> y itU
Q
cdU oo 0a
0 p
F `n o
UW
c o> Q a
0
U w
E 7i
fi Ua aw[-:;UaO p
t O
o E R'p'cxfs'CGtxG:RSCG0.'
a`z= 33333333333
U
N
Ow
C C
U
U
0 0
o
FI0
0 0
N
C
O
U
O o
bA M,
O it H
o 0 0
o g o
V Ua
0
a
o
Cd
O 0
N x
w0
3
M
000M
Cd
z
d
0oo
3> E
o
I
N E
ru .. ca
a • c
ti' N M
u
o x
az 33
E
Im
U
R
t
e k
C
r L
E
o
E
a EO0a o
w
0
E i7
rn y
0o 00 00 00 00w00000
0 0
F-
0 0 0 0
c
0
d o0 0 0
R o 0 0
W
R
o
d
d
cu
s O O O O
O O O O
O O v
0.'
d
ti
vM
CNM
7
C
z
aci C G
00
y
w
C
C
U_
O
a.0.
E
toR
U C CY
Q3d
U U
Uy CN
O
V
rt 6. C ro
O
h
a`z= 3333
E
U U
a
C
C
u
0 0
w w
w
C V
G R7 R7
O b
U Q
b
C7O
O O O
R
d
w
o 0
o 0
o 0
d
a
d
N O
R
3
v
W x
as
v a
cN a
U
U
x
x
lu x
vco a a
a
E c
as a°
ate= 0
vN
u y Cd
C N L R
OL,
U W H
L O
u d N N NN
o E Ri CG G:
I4Yl
L
U U U
d
Q
L
O O Oa% C y vLLL
ydy
f0 td
T T T E E E CIS
N Nccm
O O O A A c0
d N O O ON
O OO C D C
y y y T T
N y N d d O
N vOi
C L
u LCL
LLOOO
E ,O Ll u T T T
E _y y 4 y
00 M
O OO O O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 0 O0 M
N
O O v1 O O O O O N v1
O O r- vi v1 O
In M V1 N M n V N
OC7
Y O p 0 0 00 OO OO NN
C O0 M OO p 0O 0O O O O v
L M p O p O vl O O C' O
F" O
W
C O O OO
CD
O0
u
wl 00
pO oN
L 00
u oo Mn O 00
v^ N
o0
N p 00
a O
b
L
p
V] d y O QO t7
C w m O cC0
cd b0 J 1 4 N i--1 O O
a a o a
aci X y 7
O Q
O OJCC M
E
O
3 E v
L rC bo h O O C O;
A E W FLO L a 0 C L Q
U
tio E'apa3cGvc o Z
u
c v c c
cotF; U
d
N •fl db
o••
LD U L
CoCme
t0N d• U Ou
tL G
w` cUI) aza H
Lu
E
A
J
CL
co
EE
Z d N
O O NW
co c
tu
0. 0. N
U N
U
T y
C
N
0 0 0 0 0000000
O O O O O M
O O h 00Oonrrc)
M M Wl N
7C7Ls
y O O O p O Cl
O Inrn MMMV) y4
N
o 0
oo 00
u
c
Gz
u
o
b
0
a
d
co
fQU
o
U y
N Ld
N U U n
E U
U
m r 3
R=ion
U ti
LLQ tj) a L con
aca
ca ca E
zA
a 33332
o E
az 3333
E
2
c
b
a a
R
L y L
R 0 ed
O
O O
b
d
E
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0000000000
0
0 0 0 0 0
E N M
o
7C7
Y o 0 o OC
O O O O
L O
F- o O O O
rnv
0o 00
o 0LOO
cn
00 00
o c
L O O
ce N N
0
0N
C
U
m
on v
a E
Y
U_
O
O
J
h0C
t
v
y o`u
a i j a
o fl dvE
A
Zco
a` 33a cn t-°
u
d M
N
az 333Ln"o
c
E
E
s
i.
O
it
rw
r J
e
U
O O
O
N
oho O O oo
h
O O I N
V
O O,
d O
G
O
O
O
O OCDO OC5O p
N N
a
N N
O O N
r
3 WI ro o C
a,
N
C 7 N 00
O OCl OOO OOO NN
10
a F W vMi o+ 01 n
o 00eel C
W v
00 0 0 00000o
a 7O0
rq d opo rn oc oCD Mo
W U o
rN
Co
u o o O o
O
O
O
O
p0
W Clo
N
o
M N N M N
a
o 0 0 o
C O
7 pO ON
M
V1 u" p
V M Nv1 O
Mj
M
C
O O O O O Op
p0 L d C O O O O O
d M V1 N N N
a
C4 OO O O O pp
Cl C 0 Co
A
Cl
o o
W C
N
o 0
e
c
0 o
o
1O vi
p
00
o
0o
0
0O
0
0
n
A
c
CD
E>= o 0 0 0 0
roi
cq
E wl
U E
e
poEo00
Cl
C
c >
O
p O
O O
O
COro 10b
N M
O O O O O O
CE
10
0
h
0
h
C
v
0
o
0
0dM oM Mh O oo7 v
00
Vl00 10r-
00 00 00 00
Wd
O
O0
00
0
O
kn
C
N
O 00 mC14
to 00
00 to v) v, O
N 00 10 l—
c
0000 0
t- r
M
N M
M
kn
M M M
O tNNo
00
00
0000
O00
O M
00 O t
N
R
O O
N O
Obi p
O
O0
00
0
O
kn
C
N
O 00 mC14
rnO
N 00 10 l— N
0o tz t- r 00
N M Itt kn
M M M M M
C
00
o
0000 V) O Vl
00 O t
N
R
O O N
m
Obi p
t
O O O Co O
N NNNN
f -j
M
rnO
ON
m
C o
N
R
m
t
N
U 0 ea
C N
U.
r
C
d
E co
a) O
N
O
L-
CC.
G
is Loo
Q oN
t4
U
00
o 0
Cl
0 00 00 ClCl 0Cl 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OO
0 0
Co
0
O
Cl
O
0
G
0
O
0
O
0
r r r r
sielloQ
f -j
M
0 0
O O
kn kr
en
00 tn
to t Ow M Ow
N M O
ON N
d
O1
D\
q:t M
Vl V7 V7 V7
en
CD
O O O O
n 0O0 n
N N N N
N
00
N N N N
C)
N
t
O 00NOO
00
vl NN
0 0
O O
kn kr
en q:t 00
O n O M
N M O a;
d
O D\
q:t M
v
O O O O O
NNN N N
OCl
N
d
v
c
ca 00
m
C)
N
t
H
U
O
LL
N }
C
d
0
0
L
0
N
E
Ln
o
N
G
0
U 00 0 0 0 0
O
0
O
0
O O O R O O
O O O O O O O O
It N O Oct O N O
co cfl 0 LO LO n LO o
sielloa
5
bA
O
a
O
a
PMK4
AP .x
U a
00
0
NTN
1
N
N o> r4 tnv
O
0000 O
O
r -
O
M
N
00
NMNNN
Cl
0 C C C C
O tntr) O O 00
O I 00 Itt N
m
0 0 0 0 0
s
o 00 00
C) O
N N_
CD
N
Oq1
cV }
N
tn Rd*
th00 110 ON Id,
110 ICT qzt
3
O O O O O
N N N N N
O
OON
CoCl
N
m
s
C) O
CDcV }
C
3
U-
00 0
V N
0
Cl
Q. N
0 000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C) C) W rti U-) V M N
sielloQ
4lu
C
rn0
c v a
C>
0
N
r- It
M N
N N N N N
C>
N O
M 00 M
N
m
O O N M
00 CN
N
V
ti
CD M
0 0 0 0 0
N
vi o kr) o 0
00 O N N
M kn N N N
C, C, ON
E co
V
O kn
N
N00O V
00 OM to I
tn V) r
Y
N 00 M N
D O V'1 00 Q^
00 I'D
M Itt
c
00
N qzr
N N N N N
vl n 00 ON
OO00O0O0O0
O O O O O
N N N N N
rn
00
N
OO
V ON
m
t
N
V
ti
CD M
N
LL
E co
V
C)
t4 N
Q.
d
Y
CL
00
N
OO
0
OO00O0O0O0O0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O
CD
O
L O Lc O L( O Lo
CO M N N •-
sienoQ
I:
O
OO
ON d O
O M
N00
ON
eq
coO
M G^ M
CN
N N
M 1000O00 W) N00110
O
C) tn
trj N 00 M
CF
O) ON 000
ll O M C
N N
o A
d
N
O O O O
00
p
0 o k
U
00
O N N
O
OO
ON d O
O M O^
ON
coO
C'sN W) CN
vl to
ON
m
v
O O O 110 ON
trj N 00 M 00
ll O M C
N N
o A
d
N
N
00
OHO p C
in
U
O N N
to r- M O ^ M
M N N
kn G 1- 00 ON
O O O O O
O O O O O
N N N N N
OO
ON
co
OON
m
v
C
ca o A
d
N
N
R
U
C
3
LL co
d N
d
LO00
N
0 000oOo
O O O O O O
0 O 0 0 0 0
o a O to o to
M N N 'r-
sienoQ
W
ua
C14 C14 N CN o
N 00
00 00 O
00 M M N O
M
M N N vl
NO N 110
r. N p 00
N4 01 M
VOOoOO
o I'D o k4r) o
C44 CN CN
m
00
M d M
O OOOO
C C 0 C C
t
d 1 qtzr
0 o r- 00
C) r- C`
m
l Ntnoo
U
M U1
M cr 0^
N >-
13
0 Ctr 0 0 0
W 600r- o
U-
NONNN a4
0 rl N o0
N o O
V1 tt 00 00 r-
00 M l M
M
kn 00
C) O O o O
d
NNNNN
a) OON
OD
V N
m
R
m
t
Nm
U o
N N >-
13
U-
r
d
d CO
V O
R N
a
m
L
O0N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000
O O O O O O o 0 0
000000000
o o o o o 0 o 0 o
Ln o Ln o In O in O in
V• V M cM N N
sienoQ
r=
a
oN to
rn0
r- N
0
N
00 W)
M 00 cf
ItO
00
W N O
N N
t a
O
ON
10
N N N O
cl O
m
N_ 00
00 00 Ul M
00 00 to t
In qt W) V'l to
00 00 00 00 00
O O O O O
N N N N N
11.
0 0
o
N
r- O c o 0
00
00 O
O
N
00
C oO O Oo
to 00 NtnOr.
0 0
CN M
o in
N
o
cn N N .-
O
Cl o
0000
sielloQ
N
tn r- 00 O^
M M M M M
rn0
r- N
0
N
M 00 M 00 cf
00 O M
M M t a
O
10 O
cl O
m
N_ 00
eq
N }
G
It
vltNCliO
N
N N
U
O O O O O
N N N N N
rn00
N
co0
Cl
N
a
ro
m N }
G
N
U
7
11.
r O
Cl
N
U)
00
N
OCoOOOo Ct
O O o 0 0 o O
o to o in o Ln o
cn N N .- Cl o
sielloQ
uu
bA Wn Q1 M 0 O
C N M l I T
p ON N 110 O
w .0 M O N
C3
U
p tet' V1 M
i" N M O 00 tn
00 00
06
c} ttin
hi
q
ate+
V] ,
OO O
O O O
ONOC
vl
wo
U
C> O O O O
r'
kn 0 0 0 0
OU N N It N
w
bA
ice.
C1400 10
M M O
kn
cl
Q
O 0 00
N M 00 N
G. u O N
0 N N N N N
w
kn M
00 O 00 C1 10
yam,
r- It N O Oy00ONq
0 Q'i N N N N
uu
on o Wn 00 kn O
C c1 to O\ M 110
00 m
O*, N D
U
00clO
4 O O O O NcqC14
0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO '4 N O w 0 v N
T T T T
siepoa
coO
ON
P.,
U')
OO
N