HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 04-18-1919MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 18, 1995
A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Tierney at
7:12 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., on April 18,
1995.
PRESENT: Mayor Tierney; Councilmembers Lymangood, Granath, and Anderson.
Councilmember Wold arrived at 7:30 p.m.
ABSENT: Councilmembers Edson and Helliwell.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Johnson, Assistant Manager Lueckert, Public Works
Director Moore, Community Development Director Hurlburt, Public Safety Director
Gerdes, Finance Director Hahn, Park Director Blank, Assistant Finance Director
Jacobson, Risk Management Coordinator Pemberton, Forestry Technician Lara Gens,
Financial Analyst Helgeson, City Attorney Knutson, and City Clerk Ahrens.
ITEM 3 FORUM
No one appeared for the Forum.
ITEM 4-A PRESENTATION BY NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN
SERVICES COUNCIL
Patty Wilder, Executive Director of Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council,
presented the results of their 1993-1994 Phone Survey.
Councilmember Wold arrived at 7:30 p.m.
ITEM 4-B PROCLAMATION OF ARBOR DAY
Forestry Technician Gens invited residents to participate in Arbor Day activities at
Plymouth Creek Elementary School.
Mayor Tierney proclaimed May 17 as Arbor Day and presented the proclamation
to Carol Bryant, Principal of Plymouth Creek Elementary School.
ITEM 4-C PROCLAMATION OF SCHOOL-AGE CHILD CARE DAY
Mayor Tierney proclaimed April 26 as School -Age Child Care Day and presented
the proclamation to Candice Ellis, Gleason Lake Home Base Program.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 2
ITEM 5 APPROVE AGENDA
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to approve the agenda reversing the order of Items 8-A and 8-B.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6 CONSENT AGENDA
Item 6-J was removed from the Consent Agenda.
Manager Johnson noted that Items 6-A and 6-D have been amended. The changes
were reviewed, and these items were not removed from the Consent Agenda.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-A APPROVE MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to approve the minutes of the March 21 regular meeting as amended,
April 4 regular meeting as amended, April 10 special meeting, and April 10 Board
of Review meeting.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-B APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-251 APPROVING
DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING APRIL 7, 1995.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-C APPROVE D.A.R.E. COMMUNITY SIGNS
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to approve the installation of community signs to support the D.A.R.E.
Program.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 3
ITEM 6-D SET COMMUNITY/WARD MEETING
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-252 ESTABLISHING MAY 8 AS
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING FOR COMMUNITY/WARD MEETING.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-E CONTRACT FOR UTILITY BILLING FORMS
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-253 AWARDING THE CONTRACT
FOR THE UTILITY BILL PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES TO
LASER IMAGES.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-F APPROVE OPEN SPACE/TRAILS INFORMATION MATERIAL
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-254 APPROVING CONCEPTUAL
DESIGN OF OPEN SPACE/TRAILS INFORMATION MATERIAL.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-G PURCHASE OF WHEEL LOADER WITH SNOWPLOW-
MOTION
NOWPLOW-
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-255 APPROVAL OF ONE WHEEL
LOADER WITH SNOW PLOW AND SNOW WING.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 6-H ORDER PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT, PROJECT 502
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-256 AUTHORIZING
PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT, PEONY
LANE FROM HIGHWAY 55 TO NORTH ACCESS TO WAYZATA HIGH
SCHOOL, CITY PROJECT NO. 502.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 4
ITEM 6-I AWARD OF PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE
MOTION was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-257 AWARDING THE CONTRACT
FOR INSURANCE FOR THE 1995/1996 INSURANCE PROGRAM.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 64 CANCEL PUBLIC HEARING ON DELINQUENT ALARM PERMIT
FEES ASSESSMENT
Councilmember Lymangood requested that the City Attorney comment on the
public hearing on assessments for delinquent alarm permit fees.
Attorney Knutson explained that the City can legally assess fire alarms - but not
police alarms. He recommended that the previously scheduled public hearing be
canceled.
Councilmember Anderson asked the amount past due on police alarms and what
will be done to collect the fees.
Finance Director Hahn stated that 38 of the 39 total past due alarm permit fees are
for police alarms, totaling about $3,600.
Public Safety Director Gerdes stated that a final notice will be sent to each owner
giving them an opportunity to respond. If there is no response, the City will
proceed with the filing of a misdemeanor complaint for failure to pay those fines.
He said that staff and the City Attorney are working on a legislative proposal for
the next session to add police alarms to the statute provision allowing assessments
for past due fire alarm fees.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-258 CANCELLATION OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 18, 1995, FOR
ASSESSMENT OF PAST DUE FIRE AND FALSE POLICE ALARM
PERMIT FEES.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 7-A 1995 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Public Works Director Moore stated that on March 21, 1995, a public
improvement hearing was held for the 1995 Street Reconstruction Program. At
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 5
the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council ordered the improvement. It was
realized that the property owners along Ranchview Lane from 6th Avenue North
to 7th Avenue North had not been notified of the improvement hearing. These
additional property owners have now received proper notification of the proposed
public improvement. He stated the estimated project cost for Ranchview Lane
from 6th Avenue to 7th Avenue is $74,207. The proposed estimated assessment
rates are $936 per lot for street reconstruction, $31.80 per front foot for concrete
curb and gutter, widening and storm sewer, and $8 per front foot for concrete curb
and gutter only. He recommended that Ranchview Lane from 6th Avenue to 7th
Avenue be added to the 1995 Street Reconstruction Program.
Mayor Tierney opened the public improvement hearing at 7:55 p.m. on Project
No. 501, Ranchview Lane from 6th Avenue to 7th Avenue.
Don Staufnecker, 15510 6th Avenue North, said his property has evergreens that
are six to seven feet from the boulevard. These trees have been in place about 20
years and were installed as a street border and buffer between neighbors.
Public Works Director Moore said the detailed plans for the project are not
completed, and staff will contact the property owner to discuss the trees. If the
trees are on private property, they won't be removed.
Eric Michelsen, 620 Ranchview Lane, asked about assessments relating to
driveway access. He said that his garage is off of 6th Avenue North; however, he
uses a second driveway off of Ranchview Lane because it is convenient. He stated
that his estimated assessment with the driveway on Ranchview Lane is about
4,400, compared to $1,800-$2,200 for his neighbors without Ranchview access.
Public Works Director Moore stated that if the access is removed from Ranchview
Lane, Mr. Michelsen would only be assessed for concrete curb and gutter along
Ranchview Lane. There would be an assessment sometime in the future for the
street reconstruction of 6th Avenue. Staff will contact Mr. Michelsen to discuss
the options.
Miles Lindberger, 15505 6th Avenue North, stated his lot is identical to the lot
across the street, but the assessments differ. His neighbor to the south has a
similar situation.
Director Moore stated that Mr. Lindberger will be contacted to discuss the
estimated assessment.
Mayor Tierney closed the hearing at 8:10 p.m.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 6
MOTION was made by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by Councilmember
Wold, to table consideration of the 1995 Street Reconstruction Program,
Ranchview Lane - 6th Avenue North to 7th Avenue North, Project 501, to May 2.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 8-B ADOPTION OF SIDEWALK ORDINANCE
MOTION was made by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt ORDINANCE 95-22 AMENDING CHAPTER V AND
CHAPTER VIII OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING
SIDEWALKS.
Mayor Tierney stated she has no objection to sections 1 and 2 of the proposed
ordinance, but has concerns about the sidewalk maintenance provisions. She said
this ordinance would require residents to clear snow and ice from their abutting
sidewalks, which they have not been previously required to do. She believes
affected residents should be notified, and the Council should consider the
maintenance issue at a study session.
MOTION to amend was made by Mayor Tierney to delete Section 3 of the
proposed ordinance relating to sidewalk maintenance.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Granath stated he shares the Mayor's concerns about the sidewalk
maintenance. He asked if it is standard throughout the metro area to require
property owners to maintain abutting sidewalks. He also asked about the penalty
provision.
Manager Johnson said it is standard procedure, particularly in developed
communities.
Attorney Knutson said it is a common provision to require property owners to
remove snow and ice from their abutting sidewalk. He said the proposed penalty
is a petty misdemeanor. In other cities, a misdemeanor penalty or special
assessment process is used.
Mayor Tierney stated the maintenance issue also involves fairness. The City
doesn't require sidewalk on both sides of the street, so in many situations only the
property owners on one side of the street would be required to remove snow and
ice.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 7
Councilmember Granath said that since this is a new policy, efforts could be made
to educate the public about it before the first snowfall.
Councilmember Anderson agreed that the City has several months in which to
notify affected residents of the new ordinance. He said there are many families
with children in the City and this is needed for safety reasons.
Mayor Tierney stated she would like to delay action on the ordinance until notice
has been given that the ordinance is being considered.
Manager Johnson said that only those sidewalks not on the City's trail and
sidewalk plan would be affected - estimated at about 10 blocks or so, and 150
properties.
Mayor Tierney asked about responsibility for repair of sidewalks.
Public Works Director Moore said that other cities have required property owners
to repair abutting sidewalks. In Plymouth, most sidewalks were installed as part of
a planned unit development when they are not part of the City's sidewalk and trail
plan.
Community Development Director Hurlburt said that some sidewalks installed in
planned unit developments are installed in the right-of-way and maintenance would
be the responsibility of the abutting owner. In other situations, the sidewalk abuts
an outlot and the homeowner association would be responsible.
MOTION to amend was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Anderson, to change Section 4 of the proposed ordinance to read:
Sections 1 and 2 of this ordinance are effective immediately following passage.
Section 3 of this ordinance is effective June 1, 1995.
Councilmember Lymangood noted that this provision will give adequate time for
notification.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Main motion as amended carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to direct staff to make best efforts to notify property owners affected by
this ordinance, as well as the usual notice in the newspapers, cable, and Plymouth
News.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 8
ITEM 8-A WESTON CORPORATION (94093)
Community Development Director Hurlburt described the request of Weston,
Hilloway Corp., and Moen Leuer Construction for Nanterre (94093). The
applicant is requesting to rezone 48.7 acres of this site from FRD (Future
Restricted Development) to R -IA (Low Density Residence District). The request
also includes a RPUD Concept Plan, RPUD Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional
Use Permit for an 83 -unit residential subdivision. The RPUD would be located on
48.7 acres south of Schmidt Lake Road. The applicant is also requesting approval
of a Sketch Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow grading to occur on the
portion of the site located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area
MUSA) north of Schmidt Lake Road. The Sketch Plan shows 75 dwelling units
on 31 acres. The entire project consists of 79.7 acres and would include 158
dwelling units on 31 acres. She said that the applicant is balancing grading on
both halves of the site, even though a portion is outside of the MUSA.
Discussions were held on adding the area north of Schmidt Lake Road to the
MUSA, but staff does not recommend considering this until the planning for
northwest Plymouth is completed.
Community Development Director Hurlburt said that two issues were identified
since the Planning Commission meeting. The water tower was originally planned
to be on high ground in the middle of the planned development. Staff and the
developer have agreed on moving the tower to a lower site just north of Schmidt
Lake Road extended and just west of Vicksburg Lane. The costs will be more for
a tower at the lower site because the water tower will have be higher to get the
needed height for the proper water pressure. This issue appears to be resolved by
the developer agreeing to an assessment to be placed on the development which
will become operative when the area north of Schmidt Lake Road is developed.
Director Hurlburt said that Hollydale Golf Course, the abutting property to the
south, has also indicated that they oppose the development until better drainage
measures are required. She stated that the rate of runoff to the adjoining
properties cannot increase as the result of the development. About 1/3 of the
drainage from the subject parcel is toward Hollydale Golf Course. A condition has
been added to the proposed approving resolution requiring the developer to hold
the City harmless with respect to any damages sustained or costs incurred resulting
from plat approval and development. Another condition provides that the PUD
Final Plans shall include fencing adjacent to the Hollydale Golf Course to limit
access to the Golf Course.
Councilmember Granath stated he has some concern with any approvals for the
area outside of the MUSA. He is concerned that even a Sketch Plan approval
could obligate the City to a concept for that area.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 9
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that approval of a Sketch Plan
would not obligate the City to a specific concept for that area, probably only that it
would be residential in nature. She stated that the conditional use permit to allow
grading outside of the MUSA does not allow for sewer service.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the Deziels', owners of the golf course, have
indicated that the water level is elevated at Hollydale now. He asked if there will
be increased flow of water to the golf course property that will change its natural
condition.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that the rate of runoff would
not increase.
Public Works Director Moore explained that the City's storm drainage plan
requires that the rate of runoff must not be increased from pre -development
conditions to post -development conditions. There will be more water, but it will
not drain at a greater rate. The water is put into holding ponds and released at a
rate no greater than pre -development.
Councilmember Anderson asked about the drainage toward the golf course.
Public Works Director Moore stated that the water has always naturally drained
through the golf course. The Deziels' have installed drain tiles and created ponds
to dry up areas that were previously wet. The area at the southerly edge of the
golf course used to be a wetland, until it was converted into a fairway. He said
that about 1/3 of the proposed development would drain southerly, through the
Autumn Hills development, and through to the golf course.
Councilmember Lymangood asked if the holding requirements for the NURP
ponds could be amended to address the drainage concern.
Public Works Director Moore said the NURP ponds relate only to the water
quality treatment. In this situation, the rate of water runoff would be controlled by
a variable rate outlet that can handle small or large rainfalls. The developer is
required to analyze a low event and two high events to determine the outlet rate.
A 100 year rainfall is the recognized maximum standard.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that the detailed engineering
design information will be available by the time of final plat consideration.
Councilmember Anderson stated that final plat approval is ministerial in nature.
He has concerns about pending litigation relating to this issue, even if there is a
hold harmless agreement, relating to drainage issues.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 10
Bill Deziel, 4540 Holly Lane, represented Hollydale Golf Course. He said that the
abutting Autumn Hills development does not have an adequate buffer for drainage
water. The amount of water has increased since that development, and water
comes directly onto the golf course without stopping. The pond for Autumn Hills
is full. He said that the drainage ditch should be improved so that the City
maintain it and ensure that the golf course is not flooded.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that some of these issues relate
to general drainage in the area, are beyond the scope of the applications before the
Council, and are not directly related to this plat.
Manager Johnson stated that Mr. Deziel's reference to a drainage ditch was
discussed early this year in conjunction with the Council's approval for the cleaning
of Plymouth Creek. The City does not have an easement for the ditch area
referenced by Mr. Deziel; however, the Council previously directed staff to study
this work for next winter.
Public Works Director Moore stated that in order to comply with the wetland rules
and regulations, that existing ditch/culvert should not be lowered. If lowered, it
could dry up the entire wetland complex in the area. He said that Mr. Deziel
believes that the ditch needs to be cleaned, but staff believes it is adequately
draining. He stated that the drainage is a concern and perhaps should be referred
to the City Attorney. The historical impacts and prior conditions need to be
considered, for example, what have the golf course owners done to the wetlands,
and is the ditch a natural waterway.
City Attorney Knutson stated that normally when a preliminary plat is approved, it
locks the Council into approving the final plat if conditions are met. He suggested
that the Council could consider adding another condition requiring approval of a
drainage plan that satisfies the City's concern that drainage will not damage
abutting property.
MOTION was made by Mayor Tierney, seconded by Councilmember Lymangood,
to add Condition 24 to the draft resolution as outlined by the City Attorney.
Councilmember Granath suggested that perhaps the abutting property owners may
be able to work out some of the drainage problems without City involvement. He
noted that there is litigation potential, and perhaps more discussion should take
place before Council action. He also has reservations about approving anything
beyond the MUSA. Even if an approval does not legally commit the City, the
Council may be incrementally determining what the area will be outside of the
MUSA. He will not support the development proposal this evening.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 11
Councilmember Lymangood noted that approval of this item requires a 5/7 vote.
Richard Bloom represented Weston Corporation. He requested that this item be
tabled until the full Council is present. He said that the developer has been aware
of the drainage concerns for years and has responded to the Deziels' concerns. He
suggested that the developer could work with the Deziels' engineer, rather than
attorney. Mr. Bloom noted that the proposed development site is the receiver of
the water drainage from the northerly portion of the Hollydale Golf Course. The
proposed development would also create more wetlands than currently exist. He
said the golf course has the majority of drainage problems on the southerly corner
abutting the Autumn Hills development. The developer is proposing to divert in
another direction some of the drainage from the Nanterre development that would
normally go into the Autumn Hills development. There are two small wetlands in
the area south of Schmidt Lake Road that the new development will not disturb.
The developer is in the process of developing detailed plans to establish a definitive
plan with respect to drainage. Barr Engineering assisted with this issue, and they
could discuss the drainage issues with the Deziels' engineer.
Councilmember Lymangood asked if some of the extra fill is being moved in order
to direct the drainage away from the golf course?
Mr. Bloom responded that the southeast area of the site currently drains southerly
into Autumn Hills development and then to Hollydale. After grading, the drainage
will flow northerly and away from Hollydale. He said that grading is proposed
outside of the MUSA in order to balance the grading and to mass grade the entire
site. Otherwise, a large amount of fill would have to be brought into the site in the
future for development causing disruption to the neighborhood.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to table consideration of this issue until staff and the developer have
met with an engineering representative of the Deziels', with a report to come back
to the Council in a timely manner.
Councilmember Granath again expressed concern about the Sketch Plan
application for the area outside of the MUSA.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that staff requested some type
of concept plan because the developer was requesting permission to mass grade.
She said it is important that the grading be done at one time for the water tower
site, Schmidt Lake Road, and grading and drainage of the preliminary plat portion.
She said the sketch plan does not obligate the City to anything other than possible
future residential development north of the site.
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 12
Councilmember Lymangood stated that Condition 17 of the proposed resolution
addresses this issue by indicating that the sketch plan approval is for informational
purposes only.
Mr. Deziel expressed concern that the City does not have an easement to clean out
the ditch running to the culvert under County Road 9. He said that unless the City
has an easement so that the ditch can be cleaned, he will be opposed to every
future development that would impact the golf course.
Manager Johnson said staff will begin work on the issue of whether the City
should acquire a public easement of the ditch area.
Motion to table carried, five ayes.
ITEM 9-A WATER QUALITY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Manager Johnson presented the report of the Water Quality Task Force. He noted
the recommendations of the Task Force relating to public education efforts, a
sump pump inspection program, and an ordinance to regulate the amount of
phosphorous used by commercial fertilizer applicators in the City. He said the goal
of the sump pump inspection program would be to minimize the amount of sump
pump water being deposited into the sanitary sewer system for the City and the
Metropolitan Council. This, in turn, is projected to save the City significant
treatment costs and forestall overloading of regional sewage treatment facilities.
Finance Director Hahn described the proposed sump pump inspection program.
He said that for the last 10 to 15 years, there has been a 5-10 percent increase in
sewer treatment rates each year. Therefore, significant savings could be achieved
by reducing the amount of waste water requiring treatment.
Scott Helgeson, Financial Analyst, stated that clear water inflow and infiltration
into the sanitary sewer system is the reason for the variances in the City's monthly
flow to the Metropolitan Council for treatment. Theoretically, there should be flat
flow amount each month. He has projected that the City is paying at least
400,000 in excessive charges per year, based on the minimum charges. He
believes about $500,000 could be saved annually by implementing an inspection
program. Reports from other cities have indicated highly successful inspection
program results.
He stated it would cost approximately $250,000 to inspect all the homes in the
City. Staff is proposing to begin the program by inspecting 1,000 homes during
the summer of 1995, targeting the six areas of the City with highest ground water
level. He stated that about 5 percent of the homeowners in Plymouth are running
Regular Council Meeting
April 18, 1995
Page 13
their sump pump into the sanitary sewer. This is costing each property owner in
the City about $30 per year in sanitary sewer surcharges.
Councilmember Wold supported the inspection program. He believes the staffs
estimated cost savings are conservative.
Councilmember Granath asked how the initial 1,000 homes will be selected.
Financial Analyst Helgeson responded that there are about 750 homes in high
water areas that probably contribute the majority of the problem. If 1,000 homes
are inspected this summer, the City will realize an immediate impact.
Councilmember Anderson thanked the Water Quality Task Force for bringing this
issue forward for Council action. He suggested the use of students to conduct the
program this summer.
Councilmember Lymangood suggested that the Task Force could be directed to
develop a firm recommendation on a sump pump inspection program within the
next 30 days.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by Councilmember
Wold, to accept the report of the Water Quality Task Force; to direct that an
ordinance be prepared for Council consideration regulating the use of phosphorous
by commercial fertilizer applicators; and to extend the Water Quality Task Force
for an additional 30 days to provide time to study and recommend a complete
sump pump inspection program.
Motion carried, five ayes.
ITEM 9-B OPPOSE SENATE FILE 1570 - PROPERTY TAX FREEZE
MOTION was made by Councilmember Anderson, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 95-259 OPPOSING SENATE FILE
1570 --PROPERTY TAX FREEZE.
Motion carried, four ayes; Granath nay.
MOTION was made by Mayor Tierney, seconded by Councilmember Lymangood, to
adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Laurie F. Ahrens
City Clerk