HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 06-21-1985CITY OF
PLYMOUTH+
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1985
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS......
1. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, June 24, 7:30 p.m. Special City
Council meeting in City Council Chambers.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, June 26, 7:30 p.m. The Planning
Commmission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda
attached. (M-2)
3. COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE -- Tuesday, June 25, 7:30 p.m. A meeting
of the Communications Task Force will be held in the City Council
conference room. A copy of the meeting notice and minutes from the
June 11 meeting is attached. (M-3)
4. BREAKFAST MEETING WITH SANDRA GARDEBRING -- Tuesday, June 25.
Metropolitan Council Chair Sandra Gardebring will meet with Hennepin
County municipal officials to discuss the Metro Council's priorities
for 1986. The "dutch treat" breakfast meeting will be held at the
Kopper Kettle Restaurant, 225 Central Avenue in Osseo beginning at
7:30 a.m. A copy of the meeting notice is attached. (M-4)
5. HIGHWAY 12 SERVICE CHANGES PUBLIC HEARING -- Thursday, June 27. The
Metropolitan Transit Commission will be conducting a public hearing
at 7:30 p.m. in the Ridgedale Shopping Center Community Room to
discuss proposed route and service changes associated with the
Highway 12/1-394 project.
6. CITY EMPLOYEE PICNIC -- The fifth annual City Employee Picnic will
be held Tuesday, m y 23 at the French Regional Park from 4:30
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Attached is the announcement for the picnic.
Please let Laurie know by Thursday, July 11 if you will be attend-
ing, how many will be attending from your family, and the ages of
the children attending. (M-6)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
1.1 l T LUUMIL IW UKMA TIONAL MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1985
Page 2
FOR YOUR INFORMATION....
1. PLYMOUTH METROLINK - MAY REPORT -- Show below is a table displaying
our average daily ridership for the commuter/ reverse commuter,
internal circulator and total system for each week of May. The
second table displays the year to date averages in each service area
compared with the target which we must achieve in order to have a
successful project.
MONTHLY
PLYMOUTH METROLINK
DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY WEEK BY SERVICE TYPE
MAY 1985
Total
System
SERVICE TYPE
Commuter/
Internal
Total
TAROT
288
Reverse Commuter
Circulator
System
WEEK OF:
100%
12%
5/1 - 5/5
295
38
333
5/6 - 5/12
305
35
340
5/13 - 5/19
299
35
334
5/20 - 5/26 (hol)
286
36
322
5/28 - 5/31
299
38
337
MONTH LONG
--------------
-------------
----------------
AVERAGE
298
36
334
YEAR TO DATE
Item
Commuter/
Reverse Commuter
Internal
Circulator
Total
System
YEAR TO DATE
RIDERSHIP AVERAGE
301
50
350
TAROT
288
25
313
% OVER/(UNDER)
TARGET
4.5%
100%
12%
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1985
Page 3
A number of observations are in order:
1. The internal circulator continues to be the strongest component
of the program carrying an average of 36 passengers per day in
May. The average ridership for January was 51, February - 50,
March - 56, and April - 55. The dramatic decrease in May
passengers is attributed to a drop in student usage. We expect
these figures to rebound in June.
2. The commuter/reverse commuter portion of the service averaged
298 persons per day in May. This is somewhat more than April.
Commuter/ reverse commuter averages have been 307 for January,
292 in February, 311 in March, and 295 in April.
3. Year to date averages are 301 for the commuter/reverse commuter,
50 for the internal circulator and 350 system -wide.
2. 1985 CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION -- Cable Television Northwest has
finalized its first-half 1985 construction schedule. The construc-
tion schedule determines where cable television lines will be
extended to single or multiple family units not presently served.
It does not affect the connection of dwelling units which are
already passed by cable television trunks.
At present, the company anticipates that no single family construc-
tion will take place in 1985. The projects included in the first-
half 1985 construction are: Lancaster Village - 36 units; Park
Place - 125 units; Medicine Lake Woods - 7 units; Fox Forest - 56
units; Sun Valley Mobile Homes - 20 units; Merrimac Place - 5 units;
and Shenandoah Townhomes - 219 units.
The above construction should be completed by August. At that time
the company will advise us of their plans for second -half 1985
construction.
3. MINUTES -- The following minutes are attached for your information:
a. Planning Commission, June 12, 1985. (I-3)
4. COMPARABLE WORTH UPDATE -- The attached letter from the Metropolitan
Area Management Association provides a status reort on the progress
made during May and activities planned for June with regard to the
Joint Compensation study. (I-4)
5. BOND NEWSLETTER -- A copy of the Ehlers and Associates bond
newsletter for June is attached for your information. (I-5)
6. LITIGATION -- Attached is a copy of a notice of assessment appeal
filed by Mr. John Lonke. Mr. Lonke is appealing the special
assessments adopted by the Council on June 3 with respect to Project
404, Sunrise Hills/Skyline Hills Additions. (I-6)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1985
Page 4
7. TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS - HIGHWAY 101/COUNTY ROAD 6 INTERSECTION --
Attached is a letter to the Mayor f rom Steve Saunders, Advisor to
the Oakwood School Patrol, concerning the future development of
property at the southeast and southwest corners of Highway 101 and
County Road 6 and its impact on traffic safety at this inter-
section. A copy of Fred Moore's response to Mr. Saunders is also
attached. (I-7)
8. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter to Ron Pentz, Prudential Real Estate Investment Office,
from Fred Moore, with regard to the storage of new city police
vehicles in vacant space at the Northwest Business Campus.
(I -8a)
b. Letter of appreciation to Charlie Snorek, representing Plymouth
Shopping Center Association, for their $1,000 contribution for
sponsorship of the Plymouth Puppet Playhouse this summer.
(I -8b)
c. Letter to Mary bane Binsfeld, League of Minnesota Human Rights
Commission, advising of the Council's disbandment of the
Plymouth Human Rights Commission and indicating the City will
not renew its membership to the League of Minnesota Human Rights
Commission. (I -8c)
d. Letter to Sara McConn, from Eugene Holderness, reconfirming the
plans and timetable for the final plat and final site plan
review of the Parkside Apartments project. (I -8d)
e. Letter to Theodore Latour, Latour Construction Company, from
Fred Moore, concerning the rescinding of the award of contract
to the Latour firm for construction of utility improvements for
the Schmidt's Gardens Addition. Also attached is a letter from
Fred Moore to Otto Bonestroo, concerning the City's reimburse-
ment for any claims submitted by Latour Construction Company for
expenses incurred after the award of the contract. (I -8e)
f. Letter from Udo Schulz, President, Wagner Spray Tech, in
response to the Mayor's letter of dune 4 requesting Wagner to
change their mailing address from Minneapolis to Plymouth.
(I -8f)
g. Letter to Lowell Hammer, Principal, Zachary Lane School, from
City Manager, advising of the City Council's action of dune 17
to request the MnDOT to study the speed on Zachary Lane north of
County Road 9. (I -8g)
James G. Willis
City Manager
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 1955
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on
the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
7:30 P.M.
*3. CONSENT AGENDA/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
See *5. B
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. Vantage Companies. Site Plan and Variances for a multi -tenant office/showroom
building west of Xenium Lane between 24th and 26th Avenues North (85047)
*B. Advance Machine Company. Site Plan for Phase II located at 14600 21st Avenue
North (85046)
6. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Goals Objectives and Criteria of the Comprehensive Plan
7. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 P.M.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: June 20, 1985
TO: Communications Task Force Members
FROM: Paul Steigerwald, Chair
SUBJECT JUNE 25 MEETING
This is just a reminder that our next meeting is scheduled for 7:30
P.m, June 25 in the City Council conference room at the Plymouth City
Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. I am attaching the following for
your review prior to the meeting:
1. Notes from the June 11 meeting.
2. Draft Task Force report to the City Council.
3. Inventory of current city communication efforts.
4. Position responsibility write-up for Communications Coordinator
position.
By the end of the June 25 meeting we should reach a consensus on the
contents of the above items. I will present the final report to the
Council on July 1. You are welcome to attend that meeting.
attach
Kill aW
COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE
June 11, 1985
PRESENT: Everett Klosterman, John Fogler, Paul Steiqerwald, Karen Musech,
Rich Fudge, S. Sitaraman, Dick Plufka, George Snoffner, Eric Blank, Sandy
Patterson, Frank Boyles
Rich Fudge suggested that the City could sponsor a joint communications
project with one of the large development concerns, such as Prudential,
Carlson Companies, and Tennant Company. An image piece, such as that
created by Woodbury, could easily be completed in this fashion.
Karen Musech said that, from her perspective, the major strength of Plymouth
is its diversity from urban and rural setting to residential, commercial and
industrial.
Paul Steigerwald stated that the Plymouth logo is a good visual tool, but
needs some standard slug -line to fully deliver the message.
Rich Fudge commented that image and perception are most of the battle. It
is crucial to take the obvious and find the asset value, even in what might
otherwise be considered, objectionable. For example, Plymouth is frag-
mented, but the strength of that fragmentation is the diversity -- that is
choice. Plymouth residents and businesses have a much broader range of
choice than one would have in most other communities. His primary recommen-
dation to the Council would be to build upon the community's image.
George Snoffner believes that it is a good idea to build image, but it's
equally important to look at existing residents to see what their communica-
tions needs are. Chair Steigerwald agreed with Mr. Snoffner and added that
the specific data needed/desired by residents must be identified.
Dick Plufka feels that mobile individuals moving within Plymouth or within
the metropolitan area to Plymouth have different informational needs which
may require a different vehicle.
Karen Musech suggested the City consider a pocket map for City residents.
The map could identify the choice and diversity available while at the same
time emphasizing that the City as a whole.
John Fogler felt it was a good idea to have a liaison position to pull the
community together.
Mr. Sitaraman stated that he had put together a format within which the next
committee step could be taken by utilizing the ideas already expressed by
the group. He reviewed his framework with committee members.
Everett Klosterman felt the communication must be primarily two-way and not
just one-way from City to resident or resident to City. Discussion ensued
on the scope of the group with respect to communication. There was agree-
ment that various vehicles are tailored to certain types of groups and
certain types of communication.
June 11, 1985
Page 2
M -3
The Committee asked Mr. Sitaraman questions about the framework he had put
together. Chairman Steigerwald stated that he was impressed by the frame-
work and felt that it should be incorporated as part of the report to the
Council.
Karen Musech talked about the three local newspapers. She suggested that
the City could better use them as an outlet of information. Rich Fudge
stated that the televising of City Council meetings is only marginably
successful since most people watching do not have the benefit of the back-
ground information which the City has. It's his impression that it is
virtually impossible to understand what is happening at the meeting without
a better background on the issues. There was some discussion on the possi-
bility of providing background information either during the preceding week
immediately prior to the meeting or as each item is discussed.
Rich Fudge added that there are additional uses for cable television.
Chairman Steigerwald felt that cable television could be useful in providing
advance information regarding special assessment hearings or educational
information on this subject. Everett Klosterman stated he was not sure that
the City needs more or different communication vehicles, but that the exist-
ing vehicles could be better used. He suggested, for example, that home-
owner associations could be better used to "close the feedback" loop in the
communication process.
Chairman Steigerwald believes that the comments at this meeting reenforce
the need for the communications specialist position.
Dick Plufka asked whether any of the existing materials sent out by the City
dealt with image primarily? Staff responded that there was no specific
image piece, but that an image is established through the totality of
messages provided by the public.
Chairman Steigerwald stated that he wants the report to address what is
needed to enhance our existing communication system. One major problem,
from his perspective, is no one person is responsible for the outflow of
information. Consequently, there is fragmentation in the City's commun-
ication picture to the public.
John Fogler asked, why did the City reach the conclusion that an information
liaison position would be useful. Chairman Steigerwald stated that the
Mayor and Council have been concerned about communications with the public
and the image of the community with it stakeholders. This concern has lead
to an upgrading in the City's efforts to communicate with the public. These
enhanced communication efforts require direction and planning to
harmoniously accomplish the objective. A new position primarily responsible
for achieving communications objectives will provide the coordination and
organization that the city's communications efforts require.
COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE �A _ 3
June 11, 1985
Page 3
Chairman Steigerwald recommended that a number of points should be included
in the report. They are:
1. The City currently has a number of adequate communication vehicles.
While no substantial increase in the number or types of vehicles is
necessary, more emphasis must be placed on better utilizing and
enhancing existing vehicles.
2. The City should consider the perception and image which it
generates. This suggests that more adequate monitoring be done to
match the type and subject matter of City communication to the type
of information which residents or businesses believe they should
have. Consideration must also be given to shore up areas where
people perceive the City to be less than satisfactory. Perhaps,
focus groups of residents or businesses, or a survey of some sort,
would provide additional information which would identify needed
information, types of vehicles and effectiveness of the efforts.
3. The report should consider the resources necessary to implement the
task force recommendations. These should be identified in both
personnel and non -personnel terms.
4. A strong emphasis should be placed upon the fact that the report
presents general recommendations for action. The execution of the
general recommendations will generate the detailed data needed to
implement the improved communication system.
Rich Fudge advised of the importance of identifying the in-place captive
audiences or resources which are available to enhance communications or
provide feedback to the City.
Dick Plufka suggested that the City should continue to maintain a group such
as Communications Task Force to provide data and generally assist the City
staff in identifying the type of information and vehicles which should be
used to maintain a strong communication system. He emphasized that the City
has to make greater strides in assuring that its publications have a
professional look. The package is at least as important as the contents.
Sohn Fogler agreed, stating that more time and professional image is needed
in the information brochure which is handed out to new residents. Perhaps,
additional information such as that contained in the Comprehensive Plan maps
could be provided.
Sandy Patterson observed that she has seen similar professional works from
other cities and has found them to be very effective with new homeowners.
Rich Fudge emphasized the importance that people serving on the focus group
understand that their recommendations will be considered, but there is no
guarantee they will be acted upon.
I1Vw0 Ir.%Om fVRI.0
June 11, 1985
Page 4
Chairman Steigerwald reviewed the charge provided to the task force and how
the report should address each point. He agreed that a citizens advisory
committee on communication is needed to provide details on the target,
content and frequency of information provided.
George Snoffner questioned the mechanics of the report. Chairman Steiger-
wald stated that working from the notes of the past meetings, he will draft
a report for committee review at the final meeting. The report should
include communication examples cited by the committee.
Rich Fudge stated that another important concept is that every school,
business, service group, religious organization, etc., has at least one
person responsible for communication. The City should try and tap into this
network.
John Fogler asked whether a copy of each of the City's current communication
pieces could be provided together with the agenda to task force members.
Frank Boyles suggested that an inventory of all publication and non-
publication communications be provided with the meeting agenda and that a
complete collection of all printed publications will be brought to the next
meeting for committee review.
Committee members asked that a copy of the communications specialist job
description also be provided for the next meeting. Discussion ensued on
personnel, as well as monetary resources necessary to improve the image of
publications. There was also discussion on the possibility of providing
resources to secure an ad agency which might help the new position to kick-
off the communication program and establish the necessary planning and
framework with expert support. The ad agency or communication advisory
group would help to establish the objective of the communication program and
evaluate whether objectives were periodically met.
For the next meeting committee members will receive:
1. A copy of the draft report to the Council.
2. An inventory of the City's current communications efforts.
3. A job description for the communications specialist position.
4. Notes from this meeting.
The next and last meeting is Tuesday, June 25, at 7:30 p.m.
WW
Let's Get
together
5TH ANNUAL
CITY EMPLOYEE PICNIC
TUESDAY JULY 23
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 12, 1985
The regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners
Wire, Magnus, Plufka, and Pauba,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Stulberg and Mellen
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Community Development Secretary
Grace Wineman
CONSENT AGENDA
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner
Wire to approve the May 22, 1984 Minutes as submitted.
VOTE. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Pauba abstained. MOTION
carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the first public hearing
item and asked Coordinator McConn for an overview of the
June 3, 1985 staff report.
Commissioner Plufka inquired about the 'dedicated area for
private park and the additional land for Storm Water Drain-
age. Coordinator McConn answered that there is 1.54 acres
below the High Water Elevation with 3.8 acres remaining to
be credited to park dedication and the entire parcel will be
deeded to the City. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that
the area is part of the Storm Water System up to the High
Water Elevation.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Greg Kopischke, Westwood
Planning & Engineering, representing the application. Mr.
Kopischke explained the location of Swan Lake and other
developments in the area. He explained that the land was
used agriculturally and that their topographic, grading and
drainage plans have preserved the natural terrain and vege-
tation. He discussed the access and road layout; he noted
that Outlot B is planned for parkland and Outlot A is desig-
nated for private open space; he explained that part of this
land is in the CUSA (City Urban Service Area/Staged Growth
Area); and, that they are demonstrating gravity flow sewer.
-123-
*MINUTES - MAY 229
1985
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
CORDON & EDITH
JOHNSON - COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
PRELIMINARY PLAN/
PLAT, REZONING AND
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (85027)
f
Page two
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Mr. Kopischke stated that in reference to Condition No. 13
concerning lot coverage, they are proposing the PUD with
measures to preserve the natural features of the site and
are requesting 25% lot coverage for those smaller lots
located at the center of the development and at the south-
east corner. These lots were reviewed on a plan that had
been color coded. Regarding Condition No. 14, relative to
signage, they are proposing an "entry feature" rather than
an Area Identification Sign as defined by the Ordinance.
They feel the variance request is appropriate because of the
landscaping features proposed around the sign, and that it
will consist of brick construction for footings and pil-
lars. It is their feeling that measurements should be only
for the sign lettering rather than the total structure which
will exceed the Ordinance standards.
Commissioner Magnus inquired about the berminq and screening
for Lot 1, and frontages for those lots that are above Larch
Lane. He inquired if Larch Lane would be a major collector
with heavy traffic. City Engineer Goldberg stated that
Larch Lane is a minor collector. Commissioner Magnus stated
his concern that Larch Lane traffic may impact these lots so
that more than adequate screening should be provided. Mr.
Kopischke explained the grade change along Larch Lane and
that the existing vegetation would be preserved.
Commissioner Pl.ufka noted his concerns regarding the magni-
tude of the variance request for the entrance sign at 93
sq. ft.. Mr. Kopischke re-emphasized their use of landscap-
ing around the sign, and that a reduction in size would not
accomplish the desired appearance for the entrance. Chairman
Steigerwald inquired if this were the only reason for re-
questing the variance and stated that other developments
have attractive entrance signage which meets the Ordinance
standards; he is concerned that this Variance request is for
three times what the Ordinance allows.
Chairmman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Ed McConville, 310 Larch
Place. Mr. McConville inquired who would be assessed for
the improvements to this property. Chairman Steigerwald
explained that the Planning Commission does not deal with
assessments, and this is a question that should be offered
to the City Council. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that
the improvements will be the developer's responsibility.
Mr. McConville noted that the homeowner of the adjoining
corner lot may be impacted by the roadway design and may
have to change his driveway.
Page 125
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1995
Mr. Kopischke answered that it will not involve a change to
the property owner's lot lines and the roadway will not
affect the driveway. Mr. McConville inquired about what
will be used to fill the area of the road changes. Mr.
Kopischke answered that a grass boulevard will be installed
as part of the road construction.
Mr. Mark Byington, 12801 45th Avenue North, stated he is
representing the West Medicine Lake Townhome Association and
inquired about the dedicated parkland and the plans for 45th
Avenue North.
Mr. Kopischke stated that park is proposed for Outlot B,
consisting of 5.35 acres and explained the ponding require-
ments. Coordinator McConn noted that only a portion of Swan
Lake is on this property, the major portion of the lake is
on property to the west. She noted that as development
occurs on the property to the west, additional parkland will
be dedicated. She noted that a neighborhood park is planned
for the Swan Lake area and that the "active" park area will
be to the south and west. She suggested that Mr. Byington
call Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation for fur-
ther information regarding parkland in this area. City
Engineer Goldberg stated that future improvements for 45th
Avenue North will not be borne by this development.
Dennis Westendorp, 12515 45th Avenue North, stated his con-
cerns regarding the north property boundary where the normal
line has dropped off because of a horse trail; and that
there is a barbed wire fence here that should be removed.
He stated his concerns regarding drainage (runoff) and
aesthetics of the area. Mr. Westendorp also stated his
concern about lot size.
Mr. Kopischke explained the design of the perimeter lots.
Mr. Westendorp inquired about lot sizes in adjacent and
abutting developments which were reviewed by Coordinator
McConn. Mr. Westendorp stated the Commission needs to
consider the taxes in relation to lot size.
Mr. Kopischke confirmed that he would look into the concern
regarding the fence and grade change at the property line.
Commissioner Plufka inquired about the provisions for storm
water runoff. City Engineer Goldberg confirmed that this
would be reviewed and any problems resolved when final grad-
ing plans are submitted. Mr. Westendorp reiterated the
problem of pooling water in this area and if it is not
bladed and graded correctly, there will always be severe
runoff and drainage problems.
li— E
Page 126
Planninq Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Chairman Steigerwald stated that the developer is required
to submit grading and drainage plans that are reviewed by
the City to see that there is compliance with and adherence
to erosion control and proper drainage. He stated that in
regard to concerns regarding lot size, the developer is
given the design flexibility for a Planned Unit Development,
but the Planning Commission and City Council want to see
that lot sizes are comparable to adjacent and abutting
properties.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Chairman MOTION -
Steigerwald to recommend approval for the Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Amendment for Gordon and Edith Johnson subject to the AMENDMENT
conditions as stated in the Staff Report dated June 3, 1985.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire
to recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezoning,
and Conditional Use Permit for Gordon and Edith Johnson sub-
ject to the conditions as stated in the Staff Report dated
June 3, 1985.
Commissioner Plufka, Chairman Steigerwald and Coordinator
McConn confirmed that the difference in' the plan was only
the addition of the color coding, (light green areas) show-
ing the smaller lot sizes and defining them from the periph-
ery lots.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND
Magnus, to amend Condition No. 14 to read: Variance from
the Ordinance standards for signage to install an Area
Identification Sign of 64 sq. ft. (vs 32 sq. ft.) as calcu-
lated by the Ordinance provisions.
Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Chairman Steigerwald, Nay. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
carried.
Commissioner Pauba stated it is his opinion that the
developer should be provided the options for additional lot
coverage such as 10% of the lots, as has been discussed and
recommended with other Planned Unit Developments.
Chairman Steigerwald stated that regarding Lots 2 through 4
on Block 1, the 20% lot coverage should be retained.
Page 127
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Mr. Kopischke stated that the center lots are narrower so
the corner lots can be larger; and, that the lots to the
east are larger because of the storm water ponding. Chair-
man Steigerwald confirmed that the proposal is for 20% lot
coverage on the three lots as proposed and 25% for the
interior lots.
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND
Pauba to Amend the Motion by changing Condition No. 13 to
read: Maximum lot coverage for all lots shall be the Ord-
inance standard of 20% including Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 1;
the remaining lots diagrammed on the graphic dated June 14,
1985 shall be allowed 25% lot coverage.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Wire inquired about the increased sewage flow.
City Engineer Goldberg reviewed the sewage flow data noting
that there would be an increase for one sewer district
against a decrease in another sewer district balancing out
the capacity; and, that no trunk line extension is needed.
Chairman Steigerwald confirmed with Mr. Westendorp that he
is suggesting that the fence be removed. Coordinator McConn
stated the Commission could direct that this be reflected on
the final grading plans.
MOTION by Commission Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO AMEND
to Amend the Motion by adding Condition No. 16. That the
developer remove the barbed wire fence on the northern prop-
erty line and that blading and grading be accomplished to
assure good drainage and balance of elevations.
Mr. Westendorp stated his concern regarding the trees in
this area, noting they are mostly scrub and should be remov-
ed and replaced. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that berm-
ing and screening will be done according to the Landscape
Policy.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION as Amended.
carried.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
5 Ayes. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Page 128
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the next Public Hearing for
Northland Management Corporation and requested an overview
of the June 3, 1985 Staff Report by Coordinator McConn.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Leslie Formell, repre-
senting the petitioner. Mr. Formell stated he is the Proj-
ect Coordinator and that he would answer questions from the
Commission. He stated that the Variance request is straight
forward in that the property is difficult to develop, how-
ever, they feel their plan will work well for thisproperty.
Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that Mr. Formell has read and
has no concerns regarding the staff recommendations.
Chairman Steigerwald stated he has some concern regarding
the buffering on the south side of the property and inquired
about the plans for this area. Mr. Formell stated they plan
to install berm and plant trees, and that their plan meets
the requirements of the Landscape Policy. He noted they
have only two entrances to the parking so feel this has been
well addressed. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that larger
trees will be preserved.
Commissioner Plufka inquired if they intend to use sculptur-
ed trees on the berm to provide a solid screen. Mr. Formell
stated the trees would be 3 to 4 ft. in height from the top
of the berm to insure year round screening.
Commissioner Plufka inquired about signage; confirming that
there is a directional sign only onto County Road 15; and,
the freestanding sign is located toward the Highway 55
frontage. Mr. Formell stated that the signage meets the
Ordinance requirements.
7_7 3
NORTHLAND MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION - SITE
PLAN, VARIANCE, AND
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (85030)
MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner MOTION
Pauba to recommend approval for the Site Plan, Variance, and
Conditional Use Permit for Northland Management Corporation
subject to the recommendations as stated in the June 3, 1985
staff report.
Roll Call Vote. MOTION carried.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the Conditional Use Permit McDONALD'S
Amendment for McDonald's Corporation to install a second CORPORATION
window on the west side of the building that will be an CONDITIONAL USE
ancillary use to the main drive-through window. Reading of PERMIT AMENDMENT
the June 3, 1985 staff report was waived. (85038)
Commissioner Plufka inquired if this is a new concept. Kay
Kassinger, representing McDonald's Corporation, stated this
was developed for existing restaurants and has been added,
Page 129
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
for example, to the unit at Nicollet and Lake. She stated
it alleviates the traffic congestion and has worked very
well.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire
to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit Amend-
ment for McDonald's Corporation subject to the staff recom-
mendations as stated in the June 3, 1985 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Steiqerwald introduced the request for a Home Occu-
pation Conditional Use Permit for Clifton and Georgene
Perkins at 12409 State Highway 55, reading of the June 3,
1985 staff report was waived.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Clifton Perkins who
stated he has read the staff report and will answer any
questions from the Commission. He re-emphasized his request
for a sign.
Commissioner Plufka noted his concern with the Ordinance in
that it does not address location such as at this residence,
located on Highway 55. A sign here may be appropriate,
whereas at another location it would not be appropriate. He
stated, however, that to allow signage for this location
would set an undesirable precedent. Commissioner Wire could
not support the request as the Commission in approving other
home occupations has not allowed signage.
Mr. Perkins inquired if a mail box reflecting the name of
the business could be allowed. Commissioner Wire stated it
would not be appropriate for the Commission to make a recom-
mendation on this. Mr. Perkins stated he does not want his
request for signage to interfere with the Commission's
recommendation for his Home Occupation Conditional Use
Permit. Chairman Steigerwald advised that Mr. Perkins could
address his questions on signage to the City Council.
Commissioner Wire inquired if the truck lettering part of
the business would require that vans or trucks be left out-
side waiting for pickup? Mr. Perkins stated he lettered 7
trucks/vans last year and that this is a very small portion
of his business. He does the lettering inside his garage
and the work is accomplished the same day. Commissioner
Plufka confirmed that if a truck or van were kept overnight
it would be parked inside his garage.
MOTION
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
CLIFTON & GEORGENE
PERKINS - HOME
OCCUPATION
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (85042)
Page 130
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Commissioner Plufka inquired about proper ventilation for
painting in the garage. Coordinator McConn confirmed that
the Fire Chief had approved the work space. Commissioner
Pauba inquired if Mr. Perkin's insurance company is aware of
the work done at his residence. Mr. Perkins answered
affirmatively.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka MOTION
to recommend approval of the Home Occupation Conditional Use
Permit for Clifton & Georgene Perkins subject to the staff
recommendations as stated in the June 3, 1985 staff report
and amendino Condition No. 5 to add that there shall be no
outside display, sales . . . including trucks or vehicles
brought in for lettering; and, Condition No. 8 changed so as
to read "that all on-site lettering shall be accomplished
within the garage".
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the next item, a Preliminary DON MYRON
Plat Amendment for Don Myron. He requested an overview of PRELIMINARY PLAT
the June 3, 1985 staff report by Coordinator McConn. AMENDMENT (85043)
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Don Myron who stated his
attorney, Mr. James Grathwo1,1421 E. Wayzata Blvd., would
represent the application and answer questions. Mr.
Grathwol introduced Mr. Mark Gronberg, consulting engineer.
Mr. Grathwol stated that it is Mr. Myron's opinion that the
Council's approval would not serve this property and this is
the reason the new application is being presented as a plat
for three lots, leaving the outlot (with the private drive
easements and lakeshore) for future discussion. Mr.
Grathwol noted that the adjoining property owner has access
through a private agreement and has expressed no interest in
development of his property at this time, so that postpone-
ment of discussion regarding Outlot A would serve both
parties and the City of Plymouth. He noted that all legal
requirements have been met and the 3 lot development could
be accomplished.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Bill Pribble, 17330 19th
Avenue North, adjoining property owner, who stated that the
issue is not on whether the outlot provides access; but,
Page 131
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
that proper planning for this area take into consideration
that his property is now surrounded by development. He
wants to maintain his private and peaceful home site. He
requests that the staff recommendation which reflects the
City Council action be upheld. He stated that Mr. Myron has
not adequately addressed the issue except for the price he
wants for the property; and, that Mr. Myron should accept
the Council action or a fair and equitable amount for the
land.
Mr. Grathwol stated that he has not suggested that Mr. Myron
and Mr. Pribble are unreasonable people. The fact that
there is a private easement shows that an agreement is pos-
sible. However, at this time, the City could approve aplat
which reflects the intent of right-of-way on the outlot and
gives evidence of the City's intentions.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Wire noted that generally there are no private
easements for access to parcels that are landlocked by other
development. City Engineer Goldberg noted that generally in
cases like this, there is no access at all so the City must
provide the street. Coordinator McConn confirmed that in
the case of a private easement the City has no right to use
it as a public roadway. Commissioner Wire stated that as
Mr. Pribble has no immediate development plans, perhaps the
private easement could always suffice such as in the case of
land near Black Oaks Lane.
Commissioner Plufka noted that there has been a multitude of
meetings and much discussion regarding this application,
however, this is a land planning matter and providing access
for all property is good planning. He stated that the staff
recommendation and Council action should be upheld.
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner
Magnus to recommend denial of the Preliminary Plat Amendment
for Don Myron and reaffirmation of the City Council action
of March 18, 1985.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the petition by Trammell
Crow Company, reading of the June 3, 1985 staff report was
waived.
Commissioner Wire stated that he would like assurance that
the same type of construction will be maintained and the
proposal will remain consistent with the rest of the devel-
opment in this area.
MOTION FOR DENIAL
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
TRAMMELL CROW CO.
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN
AND MPUD PLAN AMEND-
MENT, AND REZONING
(85044)
s
Page 132
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Dori Jordan, representing
Trammell Crow Company. Mr. Jordan stated that the original
concept reflected a hotel/restaurant use for the property;
however, they are requesting the amendment to continue the
uses now constructed (office/showroom/warehouse facilities)
within the Plymouth Business Center. He noted they are
sensitive to the concerns of the adjacent neighborhoods and
want to continue the good relationship. He feels they have
constructed well designed buildings which they will carry
through into this phase of their development.
Coordinator McConn suggested that the reguiding and rezoning
should be conditionalized with the execution of the Develop-
ment Contract and filing the Final Plat, such as with the
recent application made for congregate housing.
Commissioner Wire stated he is concerned about transition
and that the plan reflects development into an area of
mature trees. Mr. Jordan stated this would not be the case
as the trees are on adjacent residential land. He noted
that the staff recommendation was to reduce or eliminate the
drive aisle on the west side.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Wes Perisian, 13980 39th Avenue North, stated that there
are existing trees on the residential property, but only one
tree is left standing on the subject property. He noted
that he is in favor of the same type of bdildings, but he is
concerned about transition to the residential neighbor-
hoods. Coordinator McConn explained the phased review for
PUD's noting the next phase will be for Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit which have more detailed plans re-
garding landscaping and transition. She advised that the
property owners will be notified of this meeting date.
Ms. Donna Maus, 14130 40th Avenue North, stated that the
neighborhood agrees they would prefer a similar development
and would be opposed to a hotel site. She inquired if there
would be a written stipulation that it would be developed as
proposed. She also is concerned that 40th Avenue remain as
a cul-de-sac and that proper buffering and screening be
installed at the end of 40th Avenue.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus NOTION
to recommend approval for the Land Use Guide Plan and Mixed
Planned Unit Development Plan Amendment and Rezoning for
Trammel Crow subject to the four conditions as stated in the
June 3, 1985 staff report and adding Condition No. 5 that
Page 133
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
the reguiding and rezoning be contingent upon approval of
the MPUD Final Plan/Plat, and execution of the Development
Contract.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at 9:20 P.M. The meet-
ing reconvened at 9:30 P.M.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the Ordinance Amendments
relative to "Sports and Fitness Clubs" and opened the Public
Hearing.
Mr. David Akradi, 4801 West 81st Street, stated that as rep-
resentative for Nautilus Fitness Centers, Inc., he had been
looking at property in Plymouth that has B-1 Zoning. They
were interested in making application to construct a 2 -story
building that would contain a Nautilus Fitness Center and
offices, however, the fitness center would not be for just
the tenants of that building. He is concerned that this
would not be allowed in Plymouth, where in other areas this
would be allowed by Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Wire stated he doesn't feel that Plymouth is
much different from surrounding communities; and, Coordin-
ator McConn noted that staff research has shown that the
majority of communities of similar size and development
would not allow sports and fitness clubs in areas zoned for
office use. Some communities did allow the sports and fit-
ness centers in free standing buildings in the retail dis-
tricts by Conditional Use Permit; and, some saw merit in
allowing this use in other commercial districts rather than
pure office uses. However, it was noted that most intended
this use for retail and service districts such as the B-2
and B-3. She noted some allow the sports and fitness
centers by conditional use permit in the industrial zone so
long as it is serving the people who are employed in the
district.
Mr. Akradi reiterated that the sports and fitness club
should be allowed in the B-1 District as it would be pri-
marily used by business people in the district.
Coordinator McConn reviewed the definition of the B-1 Dis-
trict and the proposed definition which includes the para-
meters for a sports and fitness center, that would be used
by the tenants and employees of the facility only, and would
not be marketed by membership to the public. She noted the
facilities provided by Honeywell and Prudential that are
examples of sports and fitness facilities available to
employees only.
z-3
NOTION CARRIED
RECESS
ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
REGARDING "SPORTS &
FITNESS CLUBS"
_3
Page 134
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Mr. Akradi maintained that this is not the same, as these
are field sports such as soft ball, baseball and the like.
Coordinator McConn noted that the Ordinance provisions look
to traffic concerns and hours of operation within the B-1
Zoning District. Mr. Akradi stated he saw no problem with
the type of traffic generated by the sports and fitness
club, that it would be no different from the regular traffic
flow to and from an office building. The Commission main-
tained that traffic circulation is different in retail areas
than in the office limited business district. Mr. Akradi
reiterated this is the first time he has had these problems
when looking at property for the clubs; and, that he has
many clubs opening all over the United States. He noted
that the clubs cater to businessmen but that they do not
necessarily all come from the same building.
Chairman Steigerwald stated that their development of Ordin-
ance language comes from the fact that these sports and fit-
ness centers have become so popular. He stated they do not
look at Just one particular development but the overall
planning and land use. He stated that it is the Commis-
sion's feeling that this use would not fit into the B-1
classification as noted by the definition of the B-1 Zoning
District. He further stated that Mr. Akradi had not given
adequate reasons why Plymouth should consider this business
as appropriate for the B-1 District. Mr. Akradi stated he
doesn't think the City knows what they are eliminating, and
he doesn't see where the Nautilus Fitness Center as proposed
would not be appropriate for the B-1 Zoning District.
Commissioner Magnus requested an overview of Mr. Akradi's
business. Mr. Akradi explained that the Nautilus is differ-
ent from Racquet and Tennis Clubs; that it is part of an
office building with workout equipment, pool, and analysis
of the proper type of fitness program for those visiting the
facility. He noted they do not sell products, but do pro-
vide analyses that include nutrition and exercise programs.
Commissioner Plufka inquired if they were restricted on
hours of operation. Mr. Akradi stated they operate 24
hours, 7 days a week, and noted that each person would visit
approximately two hours.
Commissioner Plufka noted that the use as explained by Mr.
Akradi is a retail use and would be more appropriately
located in the B-2 and B-3 Zoning Districts.
Commissioner Pauba stated that the staff report is well
documented and staff has done a good Job on the Ordinance
amendments.
Page 135
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1985
Chairman Steigerwald thanked Mr. Akradi for his input and
comments regarding the sports and fitness clubs and closed
the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner
Plufka to recommend approval of the draft Ordinance
Amendments as submitted with the June 4, 1985 Staff Report
VOTE 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
NEW BUSINESS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Hans Hagen
Homes, Inc., reading of the June 3, 1985 staff report was
waived.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Howard Hunt,
representing the petitioner. Mr. Hunt stated he had no
comments and would answer questions from the Commission.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus
to recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit
Develoment Final Plan/Plat for Tyrell Addition subject to
the conditions as stated in the June 3, 1985 staff report.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
Coordinator McConn reviewed business items for upcoming
Planning Commission agendas.
Anl'" RNAFNT
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
= --E
MOTION
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
HANS HAGEN HOMES,INC.
RPUD FINAL PLAN/PLAT
FOR TYRELL ADDITION
(85037)
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR. JUNE 12, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR RESIDENTLA!
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR GORDON AND EDITH JOHNSON (95027)
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as
approved by the City Engineer and contingent upon Metropolitan Council revieA
and response of the Staged Growth Plan Amendment.
3. Maximum density sha'L1 be 2.0 units per acre for the land at or above the
established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan
as verified by the City Engineer. No density bonus points are assigned.
4. Draft restrictive covenants and homeowner association documents for the private
open areas shall be submitted with final plat/plan application.
5. No private drive access shall be permitted to Larch Lane; all private drives
shall be provided by internal public streets.
res/June (johnson)2
=L-3
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR DUNE 12, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR RESIDE14TIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT APPLICATION FOR GORDON AND EDITH
JOHNSON FOR SWAN LAKE HIGHLANDS (85027)
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Park dedication is satisfied with the dedication of Outlot B in accordance with
the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of filing the Final Plat.
5. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations
for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm
water drainage facility.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with filinq of the Final Plat.
S. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
9. Yard setbacks are: 35 ft. front yard; 10 ft. side yard to living area and 6 ft.
to garage; and, 20 ft. rear yard.
10. Transitional screening and berming shall be provided along the east property
line of Lot 1, Block 3.
11. Final Plat mylars shall refer to RPUD No. 85-2.
12. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants
and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final
Plat.
13. Maximum lot coverage for all lots shall be the Ordinance standard of 20116
including Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 1. Those lots diagrammed on the dune 14, 1985
graphic shall be allowed 25% lot coverage.
14. Variance from the Ordinance standards for Area Identification Sign to allow the
installation of a sign 64 sq. ft. (vs. 32 sq. ft.) per Ordinance calculations.
15. Approval is contingent upon, and subject to the required review and response by
the Metropolitan Council of the Staged Growth Plan Amendment, and the Final
Plan/Plat shall not be submitted until the Amendment is approved.
16. The developer shall remove the barbed wire fence located on the northern
property line; blading and grading shall be accomplished to assure good drainage
and balance of elevations.
res/June (johnson)3
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR OUNF 12, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MIXED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONI14G FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMP,Afdl
(85044)
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Petitioner will submit cross through -sections with preliminary plan/plat, for
views from northwest, west and southwest, demonstrating maximum screening to the
adjacent residential area.
3. Private drive access, shall be directed easterly to Annapolis Lane, no through
traffic shall be permitted from north to south.
4. Building height shall be limited to one story.
5. That the reguidinq and rezoning be contingent upon approval for the MPUD Final
Plan/Plat and execution of the Development Contract.
Z-3
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR DUNE 12, 1985 PLAN14ING COMMISSION MEETING FOR SITE PL 44,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR NORTHLAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATIO14 (85030)
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum
2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
3. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
completion of site improvements.
4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv-
als per Ordinance provisions.
5. Waiver of the location of fire lane on the north side of the building.
6. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure, and no
outside storage is permitted.
7. No Building Permit to be issued until the Lot Division/Consolidation is filed
and recorded with Hennepin County.
S. Approved Variances include: front yard setback to County Road 15 of 60 ft. vs.
75 ft. and to Highway 55 of 40 ft. vs. 50 ft.
9. Appropriate legal documents, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed
and recorded at Hennepin County, allowing for shared parking and drive areas;
also restricting the future use of the buildings to those for which Ordinance
required parking can be provided; and, specifically, the easterly site shall be
encumbered so that 29 parking stalls are available to the adjacent site which is
proposed for development.
10. The Conditional Use Permit allows a building height of 46 ft. 6 in and waive the
Ordinance maximum of 45 ft. height.
11. Six parking spaces are deferred for future construction, for the retention of
existing plantings. Should the City determine the spaces are needed, they shall
be constructed, in accordance with plans dated dune 4, 1985.
res/June (northland)l
RECOMMENDED CONDITION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DUNE 12, 1985 FOR A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR Mc DONALD'S CORPORATION FOR AN ANCILLARY DRIVE-THROUGH WINDO�4
(85038) (MPUD 85-1)
1. Compliance with Resolution No. 85-1-A
res/June (mcdonalds)1
3
RECOMMENDATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 12, 1985
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CLIFTON AND GEORGENE PERKINS FOR A HOHF
OCCUPATION AT 12409 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (85042)
1. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and Ordinances, and
violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
2. The permit .is issued to Clifton and Georgene Perkins as operators and shall not he
transferable.
3. The site shall be maintained in a sanitary manner.
4. There shall be no signage on the property relative to the use.
5. There shall be no outside display, sales, or storage of merchandise or related
materials, including trucks or vehicles brought in for lettering.
6. The permit shall be renewed in one year to assure compliance with the conditions.
7. All parking shall be off-street in designated areas which comply with the Zoning
Ordinance.
8. All on-site truck lettering shall be accomplished inside the garage.
res/June (perkins)1
�3
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR JUNE 12, 1985 PLAN14ING COMMISSION MEETING FOR DENYING
REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOH MYRON (85043)
Recommendation for denial_ of revised preliminary plat for Don Myron based upon the
following reasons:
1. The City Council approval of a preliminary plat through Resolution No. 85-1S7 is
re -affirmed.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR JUNE 12, 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR FINAL PLAN AND
FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR TYRELL ADDITION FOR HAUS HAGEN HOMfES
(85037)(PUD # 79-2)
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Park dedication requirements in accordance with City Policy have been satisfied
with previous land dedication in accordance with the Amhurst 2nd Addition
Development Contract.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for the con-
struction of municipal sewer and water, except those approved by the City Council
through Resolution No. 85-409.
4. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
5. Yard setbacks for the attached units shall be 35 ft. front yard from public roads;
12 ft. rear yard and 10 ft. side yard; single family detached units shall be 35
ft. front yard, 25 ft. rear yard, 10 ft. side yard to dwelling and 6 ft. side yard
to a garage.
6. Submittal of required utility and drainage easements as approved by the City
Engineer prior to filing the Final Plat.
7. No Building Permits to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County, except those approved by the City Council for models through
Resolution No. 85-409.
S. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association covenants and restric-
tions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat.
9. The Final Plat mylars shall contain a statement noting that the plat is part of
the approved RPUD 79-2 per Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
10. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
completion of site improvements.
11. Subsequent phases are subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance
provisions and in compliance with the approved RPUD Preliminary Plan/Plat.
res/June (tyrell)1
Metropolitan Area Management Affodation
of the Twin City Area
June 13, 1985
TO: CITY MANAGERS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS
OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING
IN JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY
FROM: William S. Joynes, Chairman
MAMA General Labor Relations Committee
SUBJECT: JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY STATUS REPORT
May Progress and Completion
1. The Police and Fire Occupational Analysis Questionnaire received final
approval by the Occupational Advisory Group and the Joint General
Labor Relations Committee. All other Occupational Analysis
Questionnaires had been approved in April.
2. All city contacts were sent a project status report and a form on
which to order Occupational Analysis Questionnaires for their
jurisdictions.
3. All Occupational Analysis Questionnaires were edited and prepared for
printing.
4. Occupational Advisory Groups for each Occupational Analysis
Questionnaire met to select tasks as candidates for anchor and
reference value tasks. This is the first step in the valuing process.
5. Definitions for the compensable factors used in valuing were reviewed
with the General Labor Relations Committee.
June Plans
1. Occupational Advisory Groups will meet to value anchor and reference
task candidates, review the valuing results, and select the tasks to
be the anchor and four reference tasks.
2. Occupational Analysis Questionnaires will be printed.
3. The Personnel Committee will meet to review the schedule for
administration and valuing.
(over)
JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY
-2- MAY STATUS REPORT
4. Training will be provided to the people from each jurisdiction who
will be responsible for proctoring the administration of the
Occupational Analysis Questionnaire in the jurisdiction. The training
will be held on June 25, 26, and 28; jurisdictions have been sent a
letter asking which day they are attending.
Occupational Analysis Questionnaires will be given to each
jurisdiction at the training session.
WSJ: hfc
e4768N-F
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612)
F I LE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc.
Please distribute to governing body members
June 1, 1985
lax exempt interest rates are trying to improve, but whenever the Bond Buyer Index drops a quarter of a
percent, the refunding issues and other offerings surface which inflate the supply. Coupled with massive
federal borrowings, the climate is not conducive to any big drops in interest rates. The Bond Buyer Index
will probably hover around 9 to 9.5%.
When do you need an independent financial advisor? Whenever a major capital improvement is being
considered, and very early. It must be recognized that even if an underwriter is involved in the private sale
of bonds, he is a principal, not a fiduciary or an agent of the issuer. He is seeking to buy bonds as cheap as
he can while your interest is in the highest price. Someone who knows the market, who does not buy bonds
and who does not provide consulting service to underwriters should be on the issuer's side.
How should advisors be paid? Well, and not on a contingent basis, at least in the preliminary stages. Is that
self-serving? Yes, but it also best serves the client. Sometimes a firm will quote a very low fiscal fee with
an eye on some other revenue source such as avenues to profitable negotiated bond sales, being appointed
registrar/paying agent, investment of bond proceeds, etc. The fiscal fee may be a minor consideration
compared with the other profits (your costs) not stated.
It pays to have a fee explicitly stated as opposed to one camouflaged as a "spread" or a "discount" or a
margin in the interest rate. Dollars expressed as percentage discounts or premiums in the marketing of
bonds, so-called "soft costs", are perhaps even more expensive than a dollar -quoted fee.
If possible, until the issuer decides to proceed with the project, the fiscal fee should not be contingent upon
the sale of the bonds. Many troubled financings are characterized by the fact that no one had any incentive
to recommend against the project. A true professional, whether an engineer, an underwriter, bond counsel
or fiscal advisor, would never recommend proceeding with an unwise project. But it must be recognized that
the incentives presented by a contingent fee predominate in favor of finding a way to do the project.
The independent financial advisor who is not dependent upon the "go", at least up to the go/no go decision,
can be the most valuable member of the team. This is especially true for revenue projects such as utilities,
electric generation, district heating, solid waste projects, tax increment projects and utility work. Any fee
that appears too good to be true, is: There may be hidden and potentially very expensive costs.
Once a project is decided upon, a contingent fee to carry out a bond sale is appropriate. It is a strong
incentive for good performance and a successful bond sale.
Looking forward to seeing you at the convention, we are all
Very truly urs
Yv
E SAND ASS I S, INC.
71 722. 7
;j�s����tixs stxx ���xxxx����xx� mx_rs�
m P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P
C! C�I ..c' . 7C . o:
^ m N N ^ m m^^^ m N P P^ m m^ P m^ m m N P m m O O P P m m^^ P P O m m P m^^^^^ m P P 5
��P --- ------------------ ---- --------P
—
O—
o $
lz
45 s
I€age£€ a£ a
<45 N P
6 0 C 0 0« o 'a o 0 0 6 6 0 E o 6 g 0
v00ci ci cyi�yci�uyu�o uci ci ci�uciu N Na'.: y<�yNa�ci� uuuys�c4 �°n y�� �uvuyf $u cyi� �yu��i ou6 466 u'i
O m P P N
O O v v... v v O v
—
i
" N o «Ty
000.9
<_
c< i c i N< c 'Will. .i5< I i<< i c 5 5 F i i .-a 2<<
c
5+gV, r,
a_ V^�i NNIf~1 v^�i —.~^p u b.~o .~^o _~ r
^ m m m P m m^
> P P P P P .Pt P P P P P P P P ,�Ppp P P P P P P .ry Pa rm P yr P� Mp P P P P P � Pp P P P P c y � P P P P o
P p p P S PD . PO P P � Pp P P P P P P P P P
7 7. �O fel fel P �D P O1� M m
----------------------------------------
1 N
O 9 — pp Qa appQ � ^ N — ^ _•
til aal- �v�yyaayCx OQss€mpm€s€ssE�
"est 1.61"s1gVsa��m`a �Eggs�"g o
6600 0 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 66 0 6 6 66 0
0NN3�ON vv wc� a 666—o muuc�uucau0cau0acauuca avc+uu0ucau ouu
Bj mmmmm mmmmmm
am.........N . mmmmmmmmmmm�mmmmmmmQ��"m„e°a
s'
C � «
LP
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
- - - - - - - - - - - - `
John Lonke, '
Appellant, ..'q
NOTICE OF
-
APPEAL, OF
V.
ASSESSMENT
City of Plymouth, a Minnesota
municipal corporation,
Respondent.
IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN LANDS
IN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR PROJECT NO. 404,
SUNRISE HILLS/SKYLINE HILLS ADDITIONS
TO: JACK PROVO, DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATOR; LAURIE HOUK,
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH; AND LeFEVERE,
LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ, HERBERT P. LEFLER III,
ITS ATTORNEYS.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the appellant herein, John
Lonke, hereby appeals to the above-named District Court from
the Special Assessment adopted by the City Council of the
City of Plymouth on June 3, 1985, with respect to Project
No. 404, Sunrise Hills/Skyline Hills Additions. Said appeal
is from the City's assessment of $44,876.67 for streets and
utilities; $5,601.60 for sewer; and $10,036.20 for water;
for a total assessment of $60,514.47, against certain real
property described as follows:
P.I.D. No. 12-118-22-31-0002
The South 210 feet of the following described tract:
the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 12, Township 118 North, Range 22 West. The
four corners of which are marked by Judicial Landmarks;
except the West 1008.60 feet thereof, according to the
U.S. Government Survey thereof.
Z �0
The nature of appellant's claim is, and the grounds for
this appeal are, that the subject property will not receive
a special benefit from the improvements being constructed;
that the amount of the assessment is grossly disproportionate
to any resulting increase in the market value of the land;
that the proportionate distribution of the improvement's
costs among property owners is unequal, illegal, and unfair;
that the assessment procedure was illegal, improper, unfair,
and irregular; and that the assessment is unfair, unreason-
able, arbitrary and capricious.
WHEREFORE, appellant prays the Court for an order
directing the City of Plymouth to reassess appellant's
property consistently with appellant's claims herein; to
award appellant his costs, disbursements, expenses, and
attorney's fees; and for such other and further relief as
the Court deems just and proper.
Dated: June / 1985
OLSON, GUNN AND SERAN, LTD.
By
old H. Sheff 100018
Attorneys for Appellant
315 Peavey Building
730 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612) 339-8846
-2-
DATE: 65 - 39
REFERRED T0:
S/F :
City of Plymouth
Attn: Mayor Davenport
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447
Dear Mayor Davenport:
may 24, 1985
Steve Saunders
Oakwood School Patrol
Advisor
550 Quantico Lane
Plymouth, xN. 55447
At last Mondays City Council Meeting I learned the
intersection of highway 101 and Cty. Ad. 6 could be
affected by a redevelopment of the southeast corner and
possible new development of the southwest corner. There
was talk of guidance and traffic patterns, etc.
I am in charge of the group of school patrols
that works this corner. I hope whoever plans this traffic
pattern considers the safety of these patrols and the
children they patrol. These children patrol one of the
most complicated intersections in the city of Plymouth,
please don't make it worse.
I offer my services to discuss with anyone the
feasibility of patrolling the corner during the planning
stages.
Thank you,
Steve Saunders
June 19, 1985
Mr. Steve Saunders CITY OF
Oakwood School Patrol PLYMOUTR
Advisor
550 Quantico Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Subject: Proposed Johnson Development
Highway 101 and County Road 6
Dear Mr. Saunders:
I wish to thank you for your letter and comments concerning any revisions to
the intersection of County Road 6 and Highway 101 as they might affect the
school crosswalks at this intersection. At the present time you are in charge
of the school patrols that provide guidance to school children crossing at this
intersection on their way to and from Oakwood School.
Any proposed changes to the intersection would include the retainage of the
existing sidewalk system and separate "walk/don't walk" pedestrian movement at
this intersection. At the present time the only changes proposed would be to
modify the access into the property at the southeast corner of this inter-
section (Herb Johnson property).
At some future date there will be further modifications on highway 101 neces-
sary to provide separate lanes for left turning vehicles. The construction of
these changes have not been scheduled by the City of Plymouth, Hennepin County
Department of Transportation or the Minnesota Department of Transportation. I
would expect that these improvements would be needed within the next five
years.
In reviewing preliminary plans for the future modification to this inter-
section, there is only one change which I believe will have effect on the
pedestrian traffic. During 1986 the Minnesota Department of Transportation is
planning to construct a "free" right turn lane at the northwest corner of the
intersection. This is the corner where the Wayzata Bank is located and the
only corner of the intersection which does not presently have a "free" right
turn. Depending on the operation of your existing school patrols this could
require an additional person at this turn lane. As I stated, Mn DOT is
proposing to make this improvement in 1986 and I would not expect it to be
completed until the 1986/1987 school year.
If you have any additional questions or wish to review any of the preliminary
plans in further detail, please contact me.
Sincerely, / ALA
J4,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
Vic: James G. Willis, City Manager (85-39)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY OF
June 17, 1985 PUMOUTR
Mr. Ron Pentz
Prudential's
Minneapolis Real Estate Investment Office
The Minneapolis City Center
3530 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth St.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Subject: Storage of City Vehicles
Dear Ron:
As we have discussed on the telephone, Prudential Insurance Company has granted
permission for the City of Plymouth to store six new police vehicles in vacant
space within one of the buildings at the Northwest Business Campus. These
vehicles will be stored until this fall when they are placed on the street for
police usage. I wish to thank you and Prudential Insurance Company for your
cooperation in providing the space for the storage of these vehicles.
While the vehicles are stored on Prudential's property all insurance respon-
sibility will belong to the City of Plymouth. This includes liability, fire,
vandalism, etc.. Prudential will not have any responsibility or liability with
regard to the vehicles. If at any time the space is leased or needed by
Prudential, the City will move the vehicles to another designated space or
remove the vehicles from the property within one working day's notice. If at
any time you desire the City to take any action with regard to the vehicles,
please contact Jim Kolstad, Public Works Superintendent, or myself.
Again, let me thank you and Prudential Insurance for providing storage space
for these new police vehicles.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Jim Willis, City Manager
Lloyd Ricker, Finance Director
Jim Kolstad, Public Works Superintendent
3400 PLY"ryC)UTH BO; ,� -- ..
-
June 18, 1985
CITY OF
PUMOUTR
Mr. Charlie Snorek
Schiebe's Hardware
11319 Highway 55
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Snorek:
On behalf of the City Council, I want to thank you again for the generosity
of the Plymouth Shopping Center Association for their $1,000 contribution
for sponsorship of the Plymouth Puppet Playhouse for this summer. The
Association's support of this activity is very tangible evidence of their
pride in Plymouth and their interest in fostering a sense of "community"
throughout Plymouth.
Thank you again on behalf of all citizens of Plymouth for your Association's
generosity.
Yours truly,
ames G. Willis
C ty Manager
JGW:Jm
cc: Mayor & City Council
Eric Blank
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
�b
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: June 11, 1985
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Plymouth Shopping Center Association Donation
A representative of the Plvmouth Shopping Center Association
will be present at the Monday night Council meeting to present
a $1,000 check to the City Council.
This contribution is going to sponsor the Plymouth Puppet Playhouse
for the summer of 1985.
We would like to have a picture taken with this representative
and Acting Mayor Schneider that will go in the Post newspaper,
not only to advertise Plymouth Shopping Center's Association,
but to promote the summer puppet playhouse program.
I will provide you with the name of the representative from the
Association prior to Monday night's meeting.
/np
June 18, 1985
0
T
CITY OF
PUMOUTR
Ms. Mary bane Binsfeld
Treasurer
League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions
1403 North 33rd Ave.
St. Cloud, MN 56301
Dear Ms. Binsfeld:
I have received a copy of your letter dated dune 10 transmitting the annual
dues statement to the City of Plymouth for membership in the League of
Minnesota Human Rights Commissions.
The City Council has disbanded the Human Rights Commission in Plymouth.
This action was taken after it was determined that the level of activity in
those areas which were the primary focus of the Human Rights Commission did
not warrant its continuation. The City continues to actively support and
participate in two human services planning boards which do seek to address a
wide range of human service type needs. Accordingly, the City will not be
renewing its membership in the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions
and you may remove our City from your list of participants.
If you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Your truly,
mes G. Willis
City Manager
OGW:Jm
cc: Mayor & City Council
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
Thec • SOTA
km-Rc HUX" FaGHTS CO&VJL Ego E SSIOW,
June 10, 1985
Dear Chairperson and LMHR Commissioners,
Enclosed please find your annual dues statement for membership in the League
of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions. 1984-1985 was a productive year for
both the League and its member commissions. The League's accomplishments this
year include:
* 1_c-ao,1e sunnnrt for e"_chan-res among member enmmi cs; one to achieve
shared community human rights objectives;
* An annual meeting which reminded all of the participants of the con-
tinuing need for human rights vigilance such as is provided by
the member commissions;
* League newsletter which informed commission members on important
matters affecting human rights in their communities;
* Legislative activity to improve education and enforcement of existing
laws.
Last year, 1984, there was a six month delay mailing out the LMHRC dues state-
ment for 1984-1985. The statement should have been sent to you in July, but it
was not sent until November due to a change of Treasurer. The payment response
was gratifying. In order to facilitate a return to the fiscal year, we request
that payment for 1985-1986 be received,by our Treasurer prior to September,
1985.
Please forward your dues as soon as possible so that the work of the League in
support of your commission and other Minnesota commissions can continue. The Mayor
of your city has received this notice.
So that LMHRC can maintain close contact with your Human Rights Commission mem-
bers, please enclose their names, current mailing addresses, and telephone
numbers with your payment.
Have you finalized your plans to attend the annual meeting at the St. Cloud
Sunwood Inn on June 21st? Plan on coming early for the Chit -Chat Friday night!
We are looking forward to meeting with you there.
Sincerely,
Mat
Mary Jane Binsfeld of m
LMHRC Treasurer
cc: Tom Beaver, President
OA" ITUMVE60TA
r ,
ANNUAL DUES S i _=�TEMENT
July 1, 198 5 - June 30, 1986
C i ty_.—�..�
* PapuiatiOil 311 616- _
Paya^1 e To: L¢3gue of Mi n-,ecota Human Bights Correii ss i cns
Mail To: 11ar;r,;anE Bi nsfE i :i
141:3 North 33rd Avenue
St. Cloud, MN 5630'i
* Based on 1G30 Census -Final Ccunt, per League of Cities.
** Durs ire asses_ed at $3.25 per 1,000 population
roundad to the nearest 1,000, but not to be less
than $35.00 nor, more than ;,:,2.5.00 per year.
►tiff. _ � `j Z -
Eugene S. Holderness
CONS�LTiNG
a
EDINA EXECUTIVE PLAZA, SUITE 203 1
--tom•— —
5200 WILLSON ROAD
EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
PONE
925-4083
June 14,1985
Ms. Sara McConn �;°Iti. f ; r
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Sara:
he
le
Thanks for artments. Theyto namedhasuss nowtplans ko
Parkside Ap
beechanged to Parsideat
Medicine Lake, from Parkview.
Sara, as I discussed, we wish to be in the ground during Augustfor
grading. We recognize that we do have preliminary plat app
roval and
therefore can apply for grading permit at any time.
We also recognize the fact that a final plat and final site plan re-
view and approval require a reappearance at the planning commission,.
You indicated that because of the extensive amount of work being con-
sidered by the planning commission that a 45 day lead time might be
required in order to get on the agenda. We will be targeting to have
materials to you as close to the end of June as possible on theThapes
that we can make the August 14th planning commission meeting.
would then allow us to have council approval sometime in late August
or very early September and then allow us building permits for found-
ation work at that time. This would tie in relatively well at our
construction schedule.
Sara, I appreciate the support and accommodation that you and Blair
have given to us on getting Parkside through the various channels and
procedures at the City.
I trust that this letter accurately reflects your understanding of our
intent and our timetables. If you have any questions or concerns re-
garding this, please let me know as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Eugene S. Holderness
ESH/mm /
Blair Tremere✓
Richard Zejdlik
Rick Sathre
cc:
ge-{
June 19, 1985 C ITY OF
PLYMOUTR
Mr. Theodore Latour
Latour Construction Company
Route 1, Box 76
Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359
Subject: Schmidt's Gardens Addition
Utility and Street Improvements
Project 427
Dear Mr. Latour:
Since you were in attendance at the June 17, 1985 Plymouth City Council meeting
you are aware that the City Council has rescinded the award of the contract to
your firm for the construction of the Utility Improvements for the Schmidt's
Gardens Addition. This was done since the award of the contract to your firm
was challenged by another bidder and the City Attorney determined that your bid
was not responsive to the specifications.
I am requesting that you return the two signed contract documents which you
received to my office. I wish to apologize on behalf of the City of Plymouth
for any inconvenience which this matter may have caused your firm in scheduling
your construction schedule. The error in your proposal, I am sure, was an over-
sight on your part and also was missed when the proposal was reviewed by our
Consulting Engineer.
Your attorney at the City Council meeting placed the City of Plymouth on notice
that you may be filing a claim for reimbursement of cost incurred after the
contract was awarded in error by the City. If you submit these claims they
should be either submitted to James G. Willis, City Manager or myself. They
will be referred to the City Attorney for his recommendation.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Herbert P. Lefler, City Attorney
Jim Olson, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc.
4 -James G. Willis, City Manager
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
611
June 11, 1985 C IT Or
PLYMOUTH+
Mr. Otto Bonestroo
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 West Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Subject: Schmidt Garden's Addition
City Project 427
Dear Otto:
As I believe you are aware, it was necessary for the City Council to rescind
the award of the contract to Latour Construction Company because of an error
which they made in their proposal for the above referenced project. I have
forwarded previous correspondence to you or Jim Olson of your firm.
You may wish to be aware that the attorney representing Latour Construction
stated at the City Council meeting that they will not fight the decision of the
City Council by court action. He further stated that they were putting the
City on notice that they would be submitting claims for expenses incurred after
the award of the contract. As I stated to you in my June 11th letter, the City
of Plymouth will be looking for reimbursement from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik
and Associates, Inc. of any costs incurred by the City because of the reaward
of this contract.
We will keep you informed of any claims submitted by Latour Construction.
If there are any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
/K, --A44
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Herbert P. Lefler, City Attorney
gimes G. Willis, City Manager
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
WAGI7ER
David J. Davenport
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
June 19, 1985
Dear Mr. Davenport,
Thank you for your letter of June 4, 1985 and for the
photostatic copy of a magazine article on Wagner Sray Tech.
We appreciate your interest and support of our company.
In your letter you suggest that Wagner Spray Tech consider
changing their mailing address from Minneapolis to Plymouth.
Unfortunately we cannot meet your request at this time.
Wagner enjoys penetration of international markets, and for
cost and confusion reasons it is not feasible for us to
replace our well-known Minneapolis address now.
Please understand that we are very pleased with our Plymouth
location, and we fully understand your concern, but
nevertheless we cannot currently comply with your request,
but may give it some long-term consideration.
Sincerely,
Wagner Spray Tech Corporation
do E. Schulz
President
USM/bmg
Wagner Spray Tech Corporation P.O. Box 9362 1770 Fernbrook Lane Telephone (612) 553-7000
Minneapolis, MN 55440 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Telex: 29-0186
June 18, 1985
Mr. Lowell Hammer
Principal
Zachary Lane Elementary School
4350 Zachary Lane No.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Hammer:
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH+
Councilmember David Crain has brought to our attention your concern with
respect to the posted speed on Zachary Lane north of County Road 9. Last
evening the City Council adopted a resolution requesting the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to study the speed on this roadway segment in
order that the posted speed question can be addressed. State law provides
that the Minnesota Department of Transportation is the agency responsible
for establishing speed limits on all roadways in the state. Accordingly, a
study by that agency is required. As soon as we have received information
from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding their findings, we
will share that information with you.
Yours truly,
Oa es G. Willis
Cit Manager
OGW:jm
cc: Mayor & City Council
Fred Moore
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
DATE:
TO:
FROM.-
SUBJECT
ROM:SUBJECT
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
June 13, 1985
James G. Willis, City Manager
Fred Moore, Director of Public Works
Subject Requests for MN Dot to Conduct Speed Studies
The City has recently received inquiries from the Principal of Zachary Lane
School with regard to the speed limit on Zachary Lane North of County Road 9.
We have also received inquiries from property owners and the Ferndale North
Home Owners Association with regard to the speed limit on Ferndale Road South
of County Road 6. The City of Plymouth does not establish speed limits but
they are established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN Dot)
after undertaking a traffic engineering study.
Following is a tabulation of the last time studies were undertaken on these
streets.
Zachary Lane - 36th Avenue to County Road 9 - 1982
Zachary Lane - County Road 9 to County Road 10 - 1978
Ferndale Road - County Road 6 to South City limits - 1977
Because of the residential growth which has taken place in these two areas it
is recommended that the City of Plymouth request Mn Dot to undertake traffic
engineering studies to ascertain the safe and reasonable speed limit on these
streets.
Attached is a resolution which is recommended for City Countil adoption.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
Attachment: Resolution
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
June 7, 1985
Jim Willis
Dave Crain
ZACHARY LANE SPEED LIMIT AND RECYCLING SEMINAR
Recently, Lowell Hammer, Principal of Zachary Lane School mentioned
he is investigating the possibility of getting the speed limit
(currently 45 mph) lowered on Zachary Lane north of Country Road 9.
He is aware that MNDOT sets speed limits and will be working with
them.
His concern is sparked by several factors which are contributing to
an increasing exposure of children to traffic on Zachary. Traffic
has increased significantly due to the growth in the area and the
heavy use of the Zachary Playfield. Apparently this spring there
have been a number of occasions when there has been heavy traffic
into the playfield at the time school has been letting out. The
rapid growth west of Zachary and south of Hamel Road leads to a
sharp increase in walkers and bikers who must cross Zachary. The
completion of the trail system south of Schmidt Lake Park will add
more to this flow.
I suggest we echo the schools concern to M14DOT and consider other
steps such as a cross walk and warning signs.
On another subject, enclosed is a brochure for a Recycling Seminar
to be conducted at the St. Paul Ramada Inn on June 19 & 20. It
looks like a very good program, particularly with our intention of
instituting a demonstration project next year. I cannot attend but
perhaps a staff person could attend some or all of the session.
HDC: ns
Enclosure