Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Information Memorandum 04-26-1985
QV { CITY OF PUMOUTR CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM April 26, 1985 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS...... 1. JOINT COUNCIL/PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING -- Monday, April 29, 7:30 p.m. Joint y Council/Park and Recreation Advisory Commission meeting in the City Council Conference Room. 2. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING -- The City Council will meet on Monday, May 6 for its next regular meeting. 3. TOWN MEETING -- Monday, May 13, 7:00 p.m. Town Meeting for residents living north of County Road 6, east of Vicksburg Lane, south of 49th Avenue and west of I-494 including that area west of Vicksburg, north of 45th Avenue, south of 49th and east of Dunkirk Lane. A copy of the letter notifying residents of the meeting is attached. (Attach - M-3) 4. TWINWEST CHAMBER LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST -- Friday, May 3, 7:30 a.m. at the Golden Valley House, 4820 Olson Highway. 5. PLYMOUTH DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL -- The Plymouth Development Council will hold its next meeting Wednesday, May 22 at 7:30 a.m. in the City Council Conference room. A copy of the meeting notice is attached. (Attach - M-5) 6. REVISED MAY CALENDAR -- A copy of a revised May calendar of meetings and events is attached reflecting the additions of a joint Plymouth 2000 Committee/City Council meeting on May 6 at 7:00 p.m. and the May 15 Planning Commission Bus Tour. (Attach - M-6) FOR YOUR INFORMATION..... 1. CITY OF PLYMOUTH MISSION STATEMENT -- Attached is a draft mission statement prepared as part of the Strategic Planning program in which Eric Blank, Fred Moore, Dick Carlquist, Frank Boyles and I are participating. In the absence of Council direction to the contrary, I intend to place this item on the May 6 agenda for formal City Council approval. The mission statement would become part of our orientation documents, both to new residents and new city employees. (Attach - I-1) 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 C1 l Y C RWIL INFORMATION& MEMORANDUM April 26, 1985 Page 2 2. PLYMOUTH 2000 COMMITTEE -- At the April 22 meeting, Mayor Davenport asked for input for City Council members with respect to potential contact persons to be used for each issue area in the Plymouth 2000 project. Attached is a revised list of the issues containing contact persons which have been discussed by the Committee at their April 24 meeting. In order that this project may proceed, Council - members are asked to supply their suggestions for contact persons by Monday, April 29. Peter Bartling, Chair of the Plymouth 2000 Committee, would like the opportunity to discuss the direction of the committee with the Council at 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 6, prior to the regular Council meeting. (Attach - I-2) 3. DOWNTOWN PLYMOUTH - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEGISLATION -- Tuesday morning I appeared before the Senate Committee on Taxes and Tax Law as they considered our special bill which would authorize the Council to reassess special assessments against certain parcels of land in downtown Plymouth (S.F. 1414). This bill is sponsored by Senators dude and Ramstad. Following discussion the Committee voted in favor of the bill and it will now go to the Senate floor. It is anticipated that the Senate will act favorably on the bill and then refer it to the House, where it most likely will wind up in the final tax bill following a joint House/Senate conference committee. 4. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION -- On April 17 the Municipal Legislative Commission met to take positions on various issues of interest to participating communities. The Operating Committee met prior to the meeting of the Board; however, all Operating Committee recommendations were adopted by the Board. The positions adopted at the April 17 meeting are as follows: 1. Local Government Aid - The MLC went on record as supporting a 6% increase in the local government aid pot, support of the Schreiber local government aid proposal, endorsed lobbying against Minneapolis' proposal to base the formula on households rather than population, and authorized the lobbyists to negotiate for an "extra" allocation to MLC communities who are well below the formula allocation (such as Plymouth). 2. Combined Sewer Overflow -- The MLC supports the conclusion of Minneapolis, South St. Paul, and St. Paul in legislation providing for no interest 15 -year loans to alleviate combined sewage overflow problem. Interest payments to be derived from a 7� cigarette tax. 3. Comparable Worth - The MLC went on record as opposing any changes to the comparable worth statutes which would have the effect of exempting certain employee groups since such a revision will render the study valueless. In the event that exemptions are approved the entire comparable worth requirement should be rescinded. 1.1 l T LUUM.11- 11V UKMA 1 JUNAL MLMURANDUM April 26, 1985 Page 3 4. Industrial Development Revenue Bonds - Took no position on this issue as neither the Board nor Operating Committee could develop a consensus behind the Schreiber bill or the Pogemiller bill. 5. Metropolitan Governance - Received for information the report that the Reglonal Transit Board legislation will be rolled into the metropolitan governance bill which includes such topics as Metropolitan Council appointment of metropolitan commission chairs, general Metropolitan Council oversight of metropolitan commissions, and transit issues. Representative Schreiber has offered a bill which would prohibit the use of motor vehicle tax to further support light rail transit studies. 6. Solid Waste Disposal - Received a report on the Rose -Merriam bill which would give counties the power to mandate source separation by 1990. The bill received a hearing on Wednesday, April 24. Attached also for your information is a copy of the MLC's newsletter "Update" providing additional information on MLC activities. (Attach - I-4) 5. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE -- The 1985 LMC annual conference will be held Tuesday, une - Friday, dune 14 at the Radisson St. Paul Hotel. Attached for your information is the agenda for the conference as well as special conference events. If you desire to attend the conference please fill out the attached registration form and give it to Laurie Houk by May 6. (Attach - I-5) 6. MINUTES -- The following minutes are attached: a. Planning Commission, April 10, 1985 (Attach - I -6a) b. Park and Recreation Advisory Commission, April 11, 1985 (Attach - I -6b) c. Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission, March 21 and March 28, 1985. (Attach - I -6c) d. Wayzata School Board of Education Meeting, Special Meeting of April 13, 1985. (Attach - I -6d) e. Hennepin County Solid Waste Advisory Committee, February 13, February 27, March 13, March 27, and April 10, 1985 meetings. (Attach - I -6e) 7. RESIDENT FEEDBACK RESPONSE -- Attached is a letter to Mr. K. D. Hirschey, 5750 Vicksburg Lane, from the Community Development Director in response to Mr. Hirschey's resident feedback form submitted at the April 8 town meeting. (Attach - I-7) 1.11 Y lUUN1:1L IM URMA I TONAL. MEMORANDUM April 26, 1985 Page 4 8. PRESIDENT'S CITATION PROGRAM FOR PRIVATE SECTOR INITIATIVES -- Attached is a letter Mayor Davenport received from ill renzel describing President Reagan's Citation Program for Private Sector Initiatives. This new nationwide initiative will "recognize Americans whose efforts and contributions to society exemplify the spirit of voluntarism that is so important in our world today." Representative Frenzel has been asked to select one Third District recipient by May 15. If the Council would like to submit the name of any program, organization and individual in Plymouth that might qualify for the recognition that Representative Frenzel akes reference to, please let me know. (Attach - I-8) 9. ST. MARY OF THE LAKE CHURCH - St. Mary of the Lake Catholic Church will be celebrating' their 5 th Anniversary on May 5. Attached is an announcement from the Church listing the activites scheduled for the day, including a May Day parade from the old St. Mary of the Lake Church to their present church at 105 Forestview Lane. (Attach- I-9) 10. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Mayor's Correspondence: (1) Letter to Governor Perpich thanking him for his scheduled participation at the May 1 groundbreaking ceremony for CIPROCO, Inc. [Attach - I -10-a(1)] (2) Letter to Thomas K. Handy, President, Carlson Properties, Inc. regarding the construction time schedule of the Carlson Center office building. [Attach - I -10-a(2)] (3) Letter to David Latvaaho, Chair, Hennepin County Park Reserve District, regarding the April 27 tour of regional parks and also commenting on Plymouth's position with regard to the election of Park Reserve Commissioners. [Attach - I -10-a(3)] (4) Letters of congratulations to Plymouth Jaycee Community Award winners. [Attach - I -10-a(4)] (5) Letter of appreciation to Mr. Edson W. Spencer, Honeywell Inc., for invitation to reception and concert celebrating Honeywell's 100th birthday. [Attach - I -10-a(5)] (6) Letter to Donald Hauge, 15430 County Road 15, in response to Mr. Hauge's concern with future changes to County Road 15. [Attach - I -10-a(6)] (7) Letter of congratulations to William Humphrey, Mayor, City of Wayzata, on receiving the "Indian Leadership Award." (Attach - I -10-a(7)] CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM April 26, 1985 Page 5 (8) Letter of appreciation to Betty Threinen for representing Plymouth for six years on the Community Education Advisory Council for I.S.D. 284. (Attach - I -10-a(7)] b. Letter from Neal Sorenson, Mayor, City of Medicine Lake, thanking City Council for discussion at April 22 meeting and indicating he will be contacting Plymouth City Manager to arrange a meeting to discuss fire protection backup for Medicine Lake. (Attach - I -10b) c. Letter to William West, 984 Zanzibar Lane, from Public Safety Director, in response to concerns of Mr. West to Senator Ramstad concerning problems on the Luce Line. (Attach - I -10c) James G. Willis City Manager JGW:jm attach April 19, 1985 CITY OF PLYMOUTR Dear Plymouth Resident: SUBJECT: TOWN MEETING, MAY 13 Iv `— Because Plymouth is a developing community, there are many actions underway or in the planning stage which could impact upon you. In order to maintain open communication channels with residents of the community, I have sche- duled a Town Meeting for Monday, May 13 for residents of your area. In order to keep the meetings on an informal basis while dealing with specific topics of interest to you, the Town Meeting will be for residents living north of County Road 6, east of Vicksburg Lane, south of 49th Avenue and west of I-494 including that area west of Vicksburg, north of 45th Avenue, south of 49th and east of Dunkirk Lane. The Town Meeting is scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. in the Plymouth City Center. On the reverse side of this letter is a list of possible topics for discussion at the Town Meeting. If you have other matters of interest we will seek to address these also. I encourage you to Join Councilmembers Crain, Schneider, Neils, Vasiliou and myself at 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 13 at the Plymouth City Center. We are anxious to meet you and look forward to this opportunity to meeting informally to discuss matters of mutual interest. If you have any questions about the Town Meeting, please feel free to call your City Clerk, Ms. Laurie Houk at 559-2800, ext. 204. Sincerely Da id O. Davenpo Mayor DOD:Jm 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 M-3 TOWN MEETING AGENDA AREA EIGHT May 13, 1985 7:00 p.m. I. THOROUGHFARES A. County Road 6, I-494 Interchange B. Highway 55, I-494 Interchange C. Niagara Lane, County Road 6 to Highway 55 D. County Road 6, Fernbrook Lane Intersection E. County Road 9 from County Road 18 to I-494 I. PARKS A. Park and Trail System Plan B. Plymouth Creek Park C. Amhurst Area Neighborhood Park D. Parkers Lake Playfield and City Park I. HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT A. Kingsview Heights B. Amhurst C. Park Place D. Downtown Plymouth E. Parkers Lake Planned Unit Development F. Criterion MPUD - LeDale Plaza V. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Police/Fire Report B. Neighborhood Watch Program V. OTHER ITEMS A. Public Transportation feedback - Plymouth Metrolink B. City Council meetings on cable television channel 7 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 23, 1985 TO: Plymouth Development Council Members FROM: Bob Burger, President SUBJECT MEETING NOTICE The next meeting of the Plymouth Development Council will be held on Wednesday morning, May 22 at 7:30 a.m. in the Plymouth City Center Council Conference Room. The following items are scheduled for discussion, however, you may wish to bring up other items as well: 1. Plymouth's 1985-1989 Capital Improvement Program and upcoming new CIP. 2. Plymouth Engineering Standards for Public Improvements. 3. Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) - What it means to Plymouth? 4. Status of Development Council's checking account - $500 I look forward to seeing you at the May 22 meeting. c c C M cn D M Q-1 M D D M 0 M -� N �■+ rr V1 0� t0 N 0 i I m cn 0 n y� on�n n"�-inz COOZ rt ~ nx CG:c n d O H oo +,• o zoz� ��M' �• r rV� �rt H C om n O O •• 0 �. M H O W O O a W n O n O N n m m r n Cs7 H at CrJ N O CT1 H 0 0 O\ Or a,o> > M r' z cn o �. x r MOQ b o N ov o N . 44 z o z �Old r• o n � � Cd H [=7 P7 M C/1 N N o o r o >Hz zyzc o H N U'c �z�3 rnz rnz� Xoo o � w 0 •d . v M It x W N r■+ z W n O non H b n H H z n z c i c c C M cn D M Q-1 M D D M 0 M -� MISSION STATEMENT ' _ CITY OF PLYMOUTH Plymouth - "a city in a country setting" - represents a unique, complementary blend of residential, business, industrial and open space. Comprising nearly 36 square miles, Plymouth is a growing second tier suburban community of almost 40,000 persons. Our natural amenities feature numerous lakes, marshes, ponds, woodlands and hills. The community boasts a strategic geographic location in the metropolitan area and is served by a well developed regional transportation system. To enhance our desirable natural environment, the government of Plymouth provides an appropriate level of services to its residents, business community and visitors at comparatively reasonable costs. The City operates on a "lean staff philosophy" promoting performance principles coupled with merit compensation and retention of the best qualified performers. To complement personnel resources the City has adopted a philosophy of acquiring and maintaining modern, up-to-date date tools and capital equipment to accomplish city work objectives. The following objectives constitute the mission of the City of Plymouth: I. Suitable Housing and Environment - The City will promote the development of a variety of quality of ordable housing for various income levels through the development approval process and through Housing and Redevelopment Authority activity. In addition to meeting the above criteria, residential developments are to harmoniously integrate with the natural environmental qualities of the community to provide for an impression of rural living in an urban setting. II. Economic Vitality - With the assistance of periodic analysis, the City will encourage the economic vitality through a diversified economic base, balanced commerce, industry and residential population, and the availability of a broad range of employment opportunities for residents and non-residents alike. In accomplishing this goal the City will promote efficient land use and the continued development and maintenance of a solid property tax base. III. Security - The City will enact, maintain and administer policies and ordinances which assure the safety and health of the individual and preservation of property consistent with maintaining quality of life in the community and protecting the natural living environment of Plymouth. IV. Access through Municipal Infrastructure - The City will promote orderly development through advanced planning for municipal water and sewer exten- sions, storm water drainage improvements and street roadway systems. This planning will be supplemented by fiscal analysis to assess and plan for the impact of extending new while replacing existing facilities. V. Human Development - A broad range of educational and learning, leisure time opportunities and experiences will be offered for residents in cooperation with other area agencies in utilizing available municipal buildings and recreation facilities. VI. Fiscal Resources - Long range fiscal planning, as well as monitoring of current fiscal activity, will be a continuing high priority. The careful management of fiscal resources will facilitate the City's ability to attain its objectives. PLYMOUTH 2000 COMMITTEE MEETING April 24, 1985 PRESENT: Peter Bartling, Stu Lehman, Paul Ridgeway, dim Rice, Lloyd Ricker, Frank Boyles Peter Bartling stated that in order to recruit the contact persons it would be necessary to develop a packet containing a cover letter from the Mayor explaining the project and encouraging their participation. A list of materials would also be included, including all committee minutes, in order that contacts would be able to piece together the history of the project. The topic areas would also be included. Contacts would be encouraged to contact staff members to receive additional information about the project and where necessary, committee members would follow up to assure that the contacts participated. The contacts would also be advised that the issue outlines are simply base lines and that they have freedom to revise them. Frank Boyles stated that the Mayor asked Council members to provide their input on potential contact persons by April 29. He suggested that the task force leave the contact lists incomplete until that time. The Committee proceeded to review each issue page and add additional contact names. The revised sheets are attached. Jim Rice suggested that the Comprehensive Plan consultant be used as a resource in this project, together with Metropolitan Council statistics on Plymouth and the region, as well as the City's Comprehensive Plan. He suggested that a 5 -step process be used within each issue area including: 1. Identify the principal trends in the area. 2. Assess the real probability of the trend occurring. 3. Clarify the implications of the trend. 4. Value the implications of the trend; that is, do we like how it impacts. 5. Determine what can be done to change the trend to the type of trend we want to see. The Committee concurred that this was an appropriate approach. The Committee discussed the potential end product and concurred that the end products of whatever sort be the type that would sustain themselves in the future and not simply be "shelved". Jim Rice stated he was concerned that the end products be agreed to by the committee in advance. From his perspective, there are two possible out- comes. The first is a definition of the Plymouth environment and related conditions of the future. The second outcome is far more difficult and would prescribe the types of acts which could be taken to alter the outcomes to what we might most desire in the future. He stated that the time and money requirement for the second outcome would be much greater than the first. PLYMOUTH 2000 COMMITTEE MEETING April 24, 1985 Page 2 The Committee discussed the possibility of reporting to the Council at the April 29 Council/Park and Recreation Advisory Commission meeting. It was suggested that perhaps an hour could be made available before the 7:30 p.m. meeting for this purpose. Lloyd Ricker will check to see whether this date would be acceptable or whether another date be better. He will get in touch with Peter Bartling and advise accordingly. PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE I Economic Growth 1. Value Added - Manufacturing - Services 2. Internationalism - Exports - Foreign Consulting 3. Size and quality of workforce 4. Personal Income 5. Employment Rate 6. Governmental Support A) Tax Increment Financing B) Industrial Revenue Bonds C) Tax Rate D) Governmental Cooperation/Attitude about Development 7. Community Support/Attitude about Growth 8. Port Authority and Foreign Trade Zone 9. Fiscal Resources Management 10. Tax and Economic Base CONTACTS Sohn Beal - Carlson Companies Dr. Son - Norwest Bank Dan Bowen - 0ohn Morrison - MetroBank Financial Services, former Commissioner of Banking Michael Pint - MetroBank Financial Services Economic Planner for Metropolitan Council Mark Dayton Connie Lewis Barbara Bierhalter PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE II Education 1. Public Schools as Day Care Centers 2. High School Graduates # 3. School Innovations - # - Kind 4. Quality - define the term 5. Demographic's utilization for identification of future needs A) The transition to zero population growth B) The population's changing age structure C) The changing make up of families and households D) The revolution in women's participation in the labor force 6. Low fertility rate will mean a significant decline in 1990's school enrollments. 7. A demand by businesses for education in even higher technology 8. Growing competition for public funds 9. Growing competition from private school alternatives 10. Program changes/expansions (e.g. community education) 11. Governmental unit coordination to discuss long-range plans for the next fifteen years. 12. What should our role be with our schools. CONTACTS Howard Casmey - I.S.D. 284 (Wayzata) Ruth Randall - State Commissioner of Education Dr. Bill Purcell, I.S.D. 279 (Osseo) Jim/Betty Threinen Vocational Technical person Community Education person Cable television education coordinator MEA/MFT representative Extend invitation to administrative head of each I.S.D. serving Plymouth PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE III Environmental Quality 1. Natural resource availability - lakes, rivers, parks, open spaces 2. Distance from: Parks Lakes Trails Nature Centers Etc. 3. Urban Development - Redevelopment - Housing - Restoration - Recreational Areas 4. Comprehensive Land Use Planning 5. Recreational System 6. Housing 7. Transportation 8. Quality of Environment 9. Air Pollution Rating 10. Water Pollution Rating CONTACTS Bill Fraser - Polar Biologist Elliott Perovich - Regional Transit Board Bill Crawford, Minnesota Department of Transportation, District 5 CLEAN - Gay Vareka Sierra Club (Doug Dayton) Audubon Society Freshwater Bio. Institute PCA - Peter Gove or present commissioner Eric Blank Minnesota Hazardous Waste Board - Bill Kirschner, rep. of city. PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE IV Public Health & Safety 1. Mortality Rates - Infants 2. Longevity Rates - Adults 3. Ratio of Doctors, Dentists and Nurses to Population 4. Hospital Beds - per 1,000 Population S. Local Public Welfare Services and Spending 6. Police, Fire, Civil Defense CONTACTS Don Wegmiller - President, Health Central HMO's (Share, Park Nicollet, Group Health, Physician's Health) Jim Toscono - Park Nicollet New Dean of Univ. of Minnesota. Dean of Public Health Louis Cosentino Dick Carlquist Health Promotion - North Memorial, Scott Anderson, Dick Peterson Dick Strew, Family Physicians Inc. PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE V Democratic Process 1. Election Participation - Municipal - School Board - County - State - National 2. Communication Vehicles - Municipal Newspapers - Municipal Radio Stations - Cable Television 3. Political Vehicles - Political Parties A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Other - Civic Organizations A) League of Women Voters B) Plymouth Civic League 4. Political Figures with State, Regional and/or National Focus 5. Responsiveness of Municipal Governmental Appartus A) Attitude B) Availability C) Openness D) Input Solicitation E) Social Circulation 6. Sense of Community Identity 7. City Geographic Center CONTACTS Jim Brandl - Humphrey Institute Ted Kolderie - Humphrey Institute Roger Eggen - MidEast Homeowners Association Emily Ann Staples Austin Sullivan - Vice President, General Mills Bob Einsweiller Jim Ramstad Dale Clausnitzer Lon Heinitz Jean Nelson, League of Women Voters Jim Rice, Plymouth Civic League Tad Jude Bud Robb PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE VI Status of the Individual 1. Average Age 2. Family Size 3. Income Level 4. Home Ownerships 5. Credit Rating - Financial Ability 6. Savings Rate 7. Church Memberships 8. Educational Level 9. Work Record 10. Concern for Human Dignity A) Education B) Employment C) Vocational Rehabilitation D) Juvenile Delinquency E) Elderly 11. Sense of Community 12. Social Services 13. Heritage of Social Concern CONTACTS Emily Ann Staples Mike Fairborne - Weatherman Jim Threinen - Educator Jim Collvil - United Way Donna Jean Carter - I.S.D. 281 Gene Washington David Roe Social Psychologist or Demographer Marketing Research Jim McCutcheon Pastors within Plymouth Blair Barr - St. Joseph's Feminists PLYMOUTH 2000 ISSUE VII Global Issues 1. Consolidation of Governmental Units 2. Time or lack thereof of residents, both women and men 3. "0" level of interest in municipal government 4. A reason for participation A wareness I nvolvement C ommitment 5. Privatization 6. Role of local government/local school districts 7. Marketing of the City S. Regional responsibility CONTACTS Sandra Gardebring - Chair, Metropolitan Council Don Brauer - Futurist Harlan Cleveland - Humphrey Institute Jerry Sisk - Burger King Paul Stagerwald - WCCO Steve Thaxton - Vice President, Channel 11 Dr. Bill Morris Jim McClauchlen Ted Loken MUNICIPAL IL(COMMISSION LEGISLATIC7E U, D� VOL. II, No. II MLC adopts Schreiber LGA form 5 1985 `� y; At its most recent board of directors' meeting, e Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) adopted the position of supporting the local government aid (LGA) distribution formula authored by Representative Bill Schreiber (IR -Brooklyn Park), chairman of the House Tax Committee. The bill, House File 1583, introduced April 15, received MLC backing because it reduces present disparities in local government aid distributions of state funds to Minnesota cities and because it rewards efficiencies in local spending. Called the Variable Effort Local Government Aid Formula, this legislation differs from the current LGA formula in two significant respects. Under current law, the amount of aid given a city is based on the city's expenditures. Schreiber's bill would base the amount on a city's certified levy instead, and would exclude federal and state funds that cities spend but don't levy. The proposed legislation also would act as a disincentive for local spending, by implementing a sliding mill rate to determine state aid. Under current law, 10 mills are subtracted from a city's expenditure base to determine the amount a city receives in state LGA dollars. As spending increases, the 10 mill number remains the same. Under the MLC -supported legislation, the number of mills subtracted increases as local levies increase, thereby reducing local government aids as a proportion to spending as spending increases. The effect of the Variable Effort LGA formula would be to increase the amount of aid given to most suburbs and larger outstate cities, and to freeze the amount now given to Minneapolis. A provision in the bill allows all cities to receive at least their 1985 LGA allocation. Under current law, Minneapolis receives $159 per person, compared with an average of $27 per person for the 16 MLC -member cities. These LGA dollars are used by cities to reduce the property taxes of their residents. The proposed bill, which would increase the MLC figure to about $50 per person over time, is a step in the right direction toward eliminating an imbalance which has developed over the past decade, according to MLC members. The total population of MLC cities is about 530,000, or 16.5 percent of the state's MUNICIPAL LEC31SLATM COMMISSION PAGE TWO population, yet the group receives only about 5 percent of the state's total local government aid payments. Minneapolis, on the other hand, has a population of 364,000, which is less than 9 percent of the state's population, but receives about 22 percent of the state's aid. Schreiber's bill, which was introduced with a 4 percent increase in funding levels over last year, was amended to raise the funding level to 6 percent. See the accompanying chart to see the impact of that funding level. This funding level was supported by the MLC. Another amendment, which the MLC didn't support, would have allowed cities to use a per capita or a per household figure to determine their aids, whichever provided the most LGA dollars. That amendment would have mainly benefited Minneapolis at the expense of MLC members. If a $16 million increase were appropriated in local government aids next year, for example, Minneapolis would receive a $2 million increase if the formula permitted counting households. More than $125,000 of this amount would come from increases MLC cities would receive if only population were used in the formula. HOUSE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FORMULA 68 APPROPRIATION INCREASE 1985 1986 Pure 1985 1986 Pure 1 Increase Per Per Formula City LGA Proposed 8 Increase Formula From 1985 Capita Capita Per Capita (000) (000) (000) Blaine $ 1,155 $ 1,238 7.2 1 $ 1,381 20 1 $ 35.22 $ 38.74 $ 42.11 Bloomington 2,420 2,662 10.0 3,723 54 28.91 31.80 44.49 Brooklyn Park 1,781 1,959 10.0 3,248 82 36.51 40.16 66.60 Burnsville 1,427 1,570 10.0 2,789 95 37.18 40.90 72.66 Eagan 282 310 10.0 894 217 10.64 11.70 33.76 Eden Prairie 274 301 10.0 893 226 12.90 14.19 42.02 Edina 551 551 0 0 -100 12.16 12.16 0 Maple Grove 532 585 10.0 1,764 232 20.69 22.76 68.60 Maplewood 1,277 1,370 7.24 1,567 23 45.40 48.69 55.72 Minnetonka 1,583 1,725 8.97 1,071 31 38.67 42.14 50.60 Mounds View 487 536 10.0 686 41 37.88 41.67 53.34 Plymouth 346 381 10.0 1,290 273 9.34 10.28 34.82 Roseville 717 789 10.0 1,306 82 20.06 22.06 36.50 Shoreview 398 415 4.27 447 12 20.15 21.01 22.61 White Bear Lake 845 930 10.0 1,266 50 37.06 40.77 55.50 Woodbury 430 473 10.0 747 74 33.94 37.33 59.03 TOTAL $14,505 $15,795 8.881 $24,072 65.958 $27.26 $29.69 y45.25 Duluth $ 10,529 $ 11,582 10.0 1 $ 16,517 56.9 1 $120.93 $133.02 $189.72 Minneapolis 58,041 58,041 0 56,588 - 2.5 159.34 159.34 155.36 St. Paul 33,863 35,360 4.42 39,066 15.4 125.77 131.33 145.10 TOTAL $102,433 $104,983 2.491 $112,171 9.511 $142.16 $145.70 $155.67 Continued on next page MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION PAGE THREE The Senate is expected to begin deliberations on local government aids this week. At this time, it has not been determined what bill the Senate will adopt; however, Senator Doug Johnson, chairman of the Senate Tax Committee, is the chief author of the League of Minnesota Cities' proposal. The MLC chose to support Schreiber's proposal, rather than the League's, because it is less expenditure -driven and decreases the disparities that now exist on a faster schedule. In the House, Schreiber's bill passed the division of the Tax Committee, and is expected to pass out of full committee by Thursday. The full House is expected to act on this measure next week. Dedicated tax proposed for sewer overflow Interest-free loans to cities saddled with the financial problems of separating their sanitary sewers from storm sewers over the next 10-15 years are being discussed in both the House and the Senate. An additional tax on cigarettes, interestingly, is the proposed method by which to raise those loan funds. In the House, a ball is being considered to place a 6 cent tax on cigarettes, which would raise an estimated $25 million a year. Of that generated income, $5 million would be loaned to St. Paul and South St. Paul to fund sewer separation projects. (The original bill, H.F. 848, authored by Representative Don Valento [IR -Little Canada] would have included St. Paul only; the bill was amended in the Tax Committee to include South St. Paul.) The other $20 million would be used to assist cities in financing new sewer and waste water treatment projects throughout Minnesota, including Twin City suburbs. The Senate Tax Committee has passed out two separate bills --one to impose an additional 8 cent tax on cigarettes July 1, the other to provide interest-free loans to Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul for the purpose of sewer separation. It is expected that the two bills will be linked in the Senate Finance Committee. The MLC adopted the position of supporting the cigarette tax increase as a finding mechanism for the sewer separation projects for all three cities. To complete sewer separation in 15 years, which is provided in the House bill, St. Paul MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION PAGE FOUR coBtjnuedro_Ln_p_49e t ee has estimated it needs $154 million, Minneapolis has estimated it needs $52 million and South St. Paul has estimated it needs $9 million. The Senate version would allow only 10 years for completion. The MLC supports funding for all three cities because it is concerned about resolving the problem; if the problem isn't solved, according to MLC members, it will have an eventual impact on MLC cities, most probably in the form of hookup or construction moratoriums. MLC to monitor IRB legislation Because of a diversity of member opinion, the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) has decided to stay neutral on pending legislation regarding Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) allocation formulas. A bill authored by Senator Larry Pogemiller (DFL - Minneapolis) is pending in the Senate Tax Committee which would distribute the limited amount of available funds to the state's cities in basically the same method the funds were distributed last year. That method, which is based on historical use --cities that historically used more development bonds were allotted more --gives a significant portion of the state's allocation limit to MLC -member communities. (See accompanying chart.) The bill, which has passed the House Tax Committee, would implement a drastic change in the current distribution method. Authored by Representative Bill Schreiber, the legislation would place all IRB allocations on a first-come, first -serve basis, but use a priority system to determine allotment amounts. Manufacturing would be first priority, followed by pollution control facilities and lastly, commercial properties. As can be seen on the accompanying chart, in the past all cities have tended to use IRBs for commercial ventures. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS Figures in psrsntheees ledioste SMSc of Loves. 135s 135s in I -PA IRS.. Issued Se 1326 C t Ratitleess- Cl�ty 1Ynutacturkng —(—refal 2.$00, S00 (1) Al tion Slefn. S 575,000 (1)• 6 1.635.000 (2) S 2,647,632 Sloonington 1.750,000 (1) 501700,000 (11) 10,571.322 Srooklyn Park 6,080.000 (2) 26,000,000 (6) 5,037,717 Surn-ill. 0 $76,260,761 20,650.000 (6) 11,712,561 tagan 775,000 (1) 500.000 (1) 10,012,731 Wan Prsiris 7.650,000 (2) 11,765,000 (6) 3.342.3U Win. 0 6 0 lupi. Grove 2.575,000 (2) 1.650,000 (1) 1.767,262 lupla d 0 11,200.000 (7) 5.720,317 Ilinnstonk. 0 7.630,000 (1) 17.265.660 Mounds V1N 0 0 0 Figures in psrsntheees ledioste SMSc of Loves. 135s IRS's l.—ed in I -PA 2ntltleeest C t wanuf.ctu.anS --Z�.a�ercl a] Allocation P1Psioat1. 2.$00, S00 (1) 31000.008 (1) 2.367,352 Doee.illa S. 000, 000 (1) 008,500 (1) e Skor—i— 0 S 1,676.571 White Seer lake 2,701,000 (1) 5 2,516,631 lbodsury 0 2.000,000 (1) 311,313 307AL S21,300,00e 0137,210,000 $76,260,761 Duiotn S 0 i 6.300,000 (2) 6 11.016,725 KI—P.1i. 2,675,000 (2) 162,030.000 (22) 63,666,117 St. Paul 10,315,000 (6) 176,635,000 (13) 06.306.021 Figures in psrsntheees ledioste SMSc of Loves. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION PAGE FIVE MLC adopts `comparable worth' policy At its recent board of directors' meeting, the MLC adopted a policy to oppose any changes to the existing comparable worth law. Some changes bandied about at the Legislature would exclude police officers and fire fighters from the comparable worth studies. That provision could have two negative effects, according to the MLC: It would require major revisions to the study already begun, and, if excluded, would result in a flawed result which wouldn't take into effect all of a city's employees, thereby skewing the total compensation package cities must negotiate. The bill, S.F. 438, offered in the Senate by Senator Gene Merriam (DFL -Coon Rapids) to exclude police and fire was passed by the Senate Government Operations Committee on April 17. The Merriam bill was amended in committee to include all job classes as part of the study. The following language is in the Senate bill: "The arbitrator shall consider both the results of a job evaluation study and any employee objectives to the study ... A political subdivision may specify an amount of funds to be used solely to correct inequitable compensation relationships as well as an amount of funds to be used for general salary increases. The provisions of the (comparable worth law) do not diminish a political subdivision's duty to bargain in good faith." In the House, at the comparable worth bill has made it to the floor. The governor has indicated he will veto any bill that either excludes police and fire or extends the study's completion date. Coming Events Monday, April 29 MLC Operating Committee Meeting 3:00-5:00 p.m., Minnetonka City Hall Monday, May 13 MLC Operating Committee Meeting 3:00-5:00 p.m., Edina City Hall Monday, May 20 Legislative Session Adjourns MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION & $r r Update shorts Convention Center The MLC board of directors has reaffirmed its position to oppose any legislation to fund the Minneapolis Convention Center using regional tax revenues. The present bill, supported by the City of Minneapolis, uses a seven -county metro area property tax as a revenue source to guarantee bonds that must be sold to finance construction. This back-up tax violates the MLC's position and is being opposed by MLC lobbyists. Regional Parks Legislation is pending in the House Appropriations Committee as well as the Senate Finance Committee to fund regional parks in the seven -county area. The Metropolitan Council has asked the Legislature for $25 million for those purposes; that funding level was endorsed by the MLC in January. The governor's bill, however, recommends only $9.2 million. It is uncertain at this time what the final figure will be. Local Government Aids On Tuesday, April 16, Governor Rudy Perpich announced an additional $207.7 million surplus expected during the next biennium. Legislators and the executive branch currently are deciding how to spend --or return --this additional money. One proposal, which is being considered seriously, would reschedule local government aids payments so cities would receive their first payments earlier than July 15. This revenue shift, according to proponents, would assist the state and cities in smoothing out cash flow problems. -1L4J league of minnesota cities April 22, 1965 TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks �. FROM: Ann Higgins, Staff Associate RE: 1985 LMC Annual Conference Once again, you are invited to take part in the League's Annual Conference, June 11-14, in St. Paul. It is an important invitation for you and your city, and this year's theme: "Minnesota Cities Building for the Future" underlines why you will want to make plans to attend yourself and encourage councilmembers and other city employees to participate as well. It is not necessary to tell you what an extraordinary year this has already turned out to be for cities. The potential for major and disruptive changes in state and federal policies affecting cities; the uneven recovery from economic recession; the impact of the troubled farm economy on cities; the efforts of the League to seek legislative support for distribution of the Local Government Aid according to a formula and policy adopted by member cities; the advance of computer technology in the marketplace and at city hall. All these changes and those yet to come leave cities with a sense of anxious anticipation and alert to discover the ways in which to maintain and improve the quality of services and the lives of residents. Sessions scheduled for the 1985 LMC Annual Conference provide that discussion and the opportunity to explore those tools we'll need to get the job done! Take a look at just some of the topics to be covered: The Future of Local Government Finance How to be an Effective Councilmember Developing the Future of Your City Solid Waste Techology Alternatives Strategies for Reducing Hazardous �daste Emergency Management Strategies Risk Management Issues and Answers Our conference Keynote Speaker is James Wetherbe, Director of the -over- 1 B3 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227-5600 ,.I _ - ..13 Manager.+ent Information Systems Research Center at the University of Minnesota. Professor Wetherbe will offer both an entertaining and insightful look at the mysteries and marvels of information management. In a departure from earlier keynotes by commentators and experts on public administration, we're looking to this year's keynoter to provide a look at our future. Jin Wetherbe is aware and keenly interested in the importance of computer technology for cities. As a member of the Governor's Committee on Information Policies, he's had recent experience with the concerns and constraints of the issues that go hand-in-hand with the computerization of information. Charlene Shea, nationally renowned expert on motivational techniques, is going to give us all some needed tips on how to build self- confidence and positive self-awareness. Her program leads off the conference on Tuesday evening, June 11, as the Conference Kick -Off. Snowing us what we can do to become more aware of ourselves and our attitudes can give us those tools for the future, too. Attached please find the listing of some truly marvelous opportunities for delegates, spouses, and families to enjoy themselves while in the City of St. Paul. As the host, St. Paul is offering an exciting and enthralling combination of activities, including a sail down the Mississippi River, combined with a buffet lunch; City Night at the Ordway(!); a double-decker bus ride to the transformed elegance of old railrway storage and mechanical areas into the excitement of Bandana Square, along with a tour of the area compliments of the Ramsey County Historical Society. Don't miss these events! Use the attached registration form for the Family Events (not including City Night) to reserve your place! Deadline for registrations is June 1. And what could be more enjoyable to look forward to but a finale in which we get a chance to share a program with George Latimer, a former President of the League of Minnesota Cities and Immediate Past President of the National League of Cities. Mayor Latimer will be the final general session speaker for this year's conference, at 11:30 a.m., Friday, June 14. As mayor of this year's host city and the President of the Minnesota Association of Mayors, George Latimer will be sure to provide that needed perspective of past leadership and experience to an analysis of what challenges lie ahead for Minnesota cities. Be sure to join us in St. Paul this June! It promises to be one of the most enjoyable and important events of the year! Agenda Tuesday, June 11 5:00 p.m. Registration Open 7:00 p.m. Special Kick -Off Program A Guide to Positive self-awareness, Charlene Shea, consultant, assertiveness training and human relations 9:00 P.M. LMC Welcoming Reception Wednesday, June 12 9:00 a.m. Opening Session James Wetherbe, Director, Management Information Systems Research Center, Associate Professor, School of Management, University of Minnesota 10:15 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) Economic Development --Session I * Developing an overall economic development plan * Taking a coordinated approach to financing * Available financing tools (including tax increment financing) Comparable Worth * Background --legalities and basic principles * The process * Various experiences - from public safety to purchasing * Pros and cons Emergency Management --Session I * Identifying current and potential hazards in your community * Determining policy issues and planning strategies to address them 12:30 p.m. Exhibitor's Lunch 2:00 p.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) Economic Development --Session II * City's perspective * Developer's perspective * Exactions cities are requiring of developers Handicapped Access (ends at 3:30 p.m.) * Overview of the 504 legislation and its requirements * Relationship to state requirements * Compliance without breaking the budget --cost-effective alternatives Legislative Update --Overview * A summary by the League's legislative staff of the important laws affecting cities that the legislature passed during the 1985 session Emergency Management --Session II * Requirements for local government emergency plans * Metro and non -metro approaches to emergency services OVER Page 2 City Exchange * Small groups convene on a wide variety of more specialized topics * An opportunity to meet informally with colleagues to share ideas and information and help others learn from your city's experiences 4:00 p.m. Open Evening City Night Thursday, June 13 9:00 a.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) How to be an Effective Council Member --Session I * Maximizing individual effectiveness * How to research/present policy issues * How to be responsive to your public(s) Local Government Aid * Delineation of the new formula * Implications for cities Employee Right to Know * Ongoing management issues * Liabilities * Status of community right to know Solid Waste Technology and Design * Public sector issues --metro and non -metro * Environmental issues * One city's experience 10:15 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) How to be an Effective Council Member --Session II * Enhancing group effectiveness * Establishing good communications --up, down, and sideways * Council -staff relationships (including appropriate roles and responsibilities) Follow -up --the Latimer Commission * Major findings of the commission * Conclusions and recommendations * Results Legislative Update --Industrial and Mortgage Revenue Bonds * Survivability of IRBs * Alternatives for cities * Allocation of mortgage revenue bonds Recycling --Setting Up a Program for Your City * Program design --various recycling methods * Role of the community/role of the city * Financing options 11:45 a.m. Break 12:00 p.m. Mayors Association Lunch 1:30 p.m. Break 1:45 p.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) Special conference events for families Wednesday, June 12, 11:00 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Mississippi River trip and lunch The Jonathan Padelford will ensure an adults and children. The voyage will begin Snelling and will include a buffet lunch. Cost: $10.00 per person exciting trip down the Mississippi River for in downtown St. Paul and extend as far as Fort Wednesday, June 12, 6:30-9:00 p.m. Host City Night at the Ordway What better setting for the Host City Night than the new Ordway Music Theatre. Enjoy a cocktail reception while strolling through the Ordway. An entertainment program will allow you to witness first hand the thrill of the Ordway Main Theatre. Thursday, June 13, 12:00-3:00 p.m. Bandana Square lunch and tour A doubledecker bus will provide an exciting mode of transportation to Bandana Square in Energy Park. The day will begin with an enjoyable lunch followed by a tour of Bandana Square provided by the Ramsey County Historical Society, including the opportunity to see the new Children's Museum. Cost: $10.00 per person Thursday, June 13, 9:00-11:00 a.m. Enhancing your self image (for spouses) Very Important Personal Development for Very Important People New this year, this workshop offers a chance for you to spend some quality time away from the hustle and bustle of daily life and public arenas to concentrate on you. Focusing on the reality that we all want to feel lovable in our relationships and capable in our work, this workshop looks at how being the spouse of a city official can create special challenges. What can we do when feelings of inadequacy surface or we feel we don't measure up to the task at hand? This workshop will discuss some of the relevant theories involved with building self esteem, provide opportunities for participants to identify key issues and share common concerns, and explore practical responses. Workshop leader: Barbara Arney, Director of Organizational Services with the Government Training Service, has over 15 years of experience in leading personal development seminars for a variety of groups, including women's organizations, public and non-profit agencies, and private firms. Cost: $15.00 per person. (A minimum of 20 people required to hold the program.) . • . •••.• Familyeventsregistrationform Reservation for River Trip and Lunch, Wednesday, June 12 @ $10.00 = Reservation for Bandana Square Tour and Lunch, Thursday, June 13 @ $10.00 = Reservation for spouse workshop, Thursday, June 13 @ $15.00 = Total Amount Enclosed $ Make checks payable to City of Saint Paul Name Address City State Zip Phone Return by June 1 to League of Minnesota Cities, Attention: Family Program, 183 University Avenue East, Saint Paul, MN 55101 Page 3 The City Manager Form of Government * The job description --what an administrator or manager does * Pros and cons of the council-manager form of government * The shared administration option * How to change your form of government Property Tax Reform * What happened during this legislative session * How will the actions affect cities? Workers Compensation * A brief look at the past, present, and future of workers compensation * How to reduce costs * Options when employees are injured The City's Role in Hazardous Waste Reduction * The city itself as hazardous waste producer * Strategies to reduce household hazardous waste * Protecting the public sewer system * Working with the private sector * Limiting liability through risk management 3:45 p.m. Break 4:00 p.m. League Annual Meeting 5:30 p.m. Break 6:30 p.m. Reception and Banquet Friday, June 14 9:00 a.m. Concurrent Workshops (Choose one) Downtown Revitalization and Promotion * Developing a workable plan * Financing options --public and private * Marketing how to's * Case studies Liability --Survival Tips for City Officials * How to avoid being sued; risk management and loss prevention * Words to the wise in the areas of employee relations, civil rights, planning and zoning * What to do if you are sued Stormwater Policy Planning * What you need to know to make technical decisions * Financing approaches * Interjurisdictional issues * Potential liabilities Strategic Planning * What it is; why it's important * Case studies --representing various approaches * How to determine the best approach for your city * Pitfalls 11:30 a.m. Finale Brunch George Latimer, Mayor, St. Paul, NLC Immediate Past President OVER 1985 LMC Annual Conference Registration Form General Delegate Registration June 11-14, 1985 Advance registration (before June 1) ............................ $110.00 Registration at Conference ................................... $125.00 number total Registration fee includes badge, admission to all general sessions/workshops, and tickets for meal functions on the general program: Wed. and Thurs. coffee, Wed. lunch, Thurs. banquet, and Fri. brunch. This registration DOES NOT INCLUDE THE MAYORS/MINI CONFERENCE LUNCHEON. If you wish to purchase a ticket for this luncheon, you may do so in the EXTRA CONFERENCE MEAL TICKETS section below. If you are planning on having your spouse attend, that registration is complimentary but, you must purchase meal tickets for your spouse. You may do so in the EXTRA CONFERENCE MEAL TICKETS section below. If you pre -register you'll receive a postcard acknowledgement to be presented at the advance registration desk to facilitate speedy registration. City P L E A S E P R N T Delegate Title Mini -Conference Registration Thursday, June 13 Spouse Advance registration (before June 1) ............................. $50.00 Registration at Conference ..................................... 60.00 number total Mini -Conference registration fee includes badge, registration, coffee, and luncheon. If you pre -register, you will receive a postcard acknowledgement to be presented at the prepaid registration desk to facilitate speedy registration. Mini -Conference delegates who plan to attend the Thursday banquet should purchase tickets below. Registered delegates to the General Conference are welcome to attend Mini -Conference sessions and do not need to purchase special registrations. City P L E A S E P R N T Delegate Title Spouse Extra Conference Meal Tickets Order extra meal tickets below. Be sure to indicate the name of the person(s) for whom you order the tickets, or the name of the delegate who should receive the extra tickets. Spouses' complimentary registration does not include meal tickets. Order below. Mini -Conference registration does not include any meals except the Thursday luncheon. LuncheonWednesday.................................................................$7.75 for whom Mayors' Luncheon/Mini-Conference Luncheon Thursday ...................................$11.75 for whom BanquetThursday.................................................................. $18.50 for whom BrunchFriday...................................................................... $ 8.50 Number Total for whom Total Advance Registration ........................ $ Send registration and payment to Gayle Brodt, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Ave. East, St. Paul, WLN 55101 Make checks payable to: League of Minnesota Cities Minnesota Cities 12 =- Loo`,. CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 10, 1985 The regular meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners Wire, Stulherg, Magnus, Plufka, Mellen, and Pauba MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Sara McConn City Engineer Sherm Goldberg Community Development Secretary Grace Wineman Community Development Director Blair Tremere CONSENT AGENDA MINUTES MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner *MINUTES - MARCH Plufka to approve the Minutes of March 27, 1985 as 27, 1985 submitted. VOTE. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg abstained. MOTION carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Chairman Steigerwald introduced the first public hearing item and asked Coordinator McConn for an overview of the March 28, 1985 staff report. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that the options for this petition would be redesign, replatting, or denial. Coordinator McConn noted that the Commission could determine that the proposal is appropriate as submitted, or that the plat should be revised per Ordinance standards. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Dean Johnson, representing the petition. Mr. Johnson stated that many of the homeowners want to add a deck to their units, and that the Homeowner's Association has met and changed their covenants and bylaws so this can be accomplished. He noted that replatting would be very costly; that as the common ground is owned by the Homeowner's Association they have unanimously voted to change their bylaws to allow the addition of the decks; and, that this Amendment is not an unreasonable request. He noted that no utility easements would be impacted by the addition of the decks. -72- DEAN R. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO. AMENDMENTS TO THE APPROVED RPUD PLAN FOR CREEKSIDE QUADRA- MINIUM DEVELOPMENT (79018) Page 73 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Plufka inquired about the renderings showing changes to the type of unit. Mr. Johnson stated that these units will have tuck -under garages, the buildings that will have the decks have an attached garage. The unit previously constructed (that may have the addition of a deck) is 52 sq. ft. smaller. He added that the unit with the tuck -under garage is more cost effective. He went on to explain that the deck is a popular selling point. He does not want to construct all three-level units as it has been found they are not as saleable, so this change is requested. Commissioner Plufka inquired if it could be implied from the changes made by the Board for the Homeowner's Association that they are requesting to encroach on the common open area, and that the concrete pads have been put` in. Mr. Johnson answered negatively that the pads are not in place, they do not encroach; however, the deck addition would encroach into the common area. Commissioner Wire inquired if concrete would be placed under the decks as planned; Mr. Johnson answered that crushed rock would be utilized for low maintenance and the plantings would be placed as shown. Commissioner Wire confirmed that the landscaping would be provided as approved. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing and introduced Mr. Frank Freels, 15115 38th Avenue North. Mr. Freels stated he is President of the Homeowner's Association for the property owners who live on the south side of the subject property (Parkbrooke). He stated they had met with Mr. Johnson last year and it is their opinion that he is a fine builder. He inquired if the decks would be ground level or elevated. Mr. Johnson answered that the decks would be two ft. off the ground and would be typical of the usual deck construction. Mr. Freels stated that there is some concern by the residents that they may be faced with looking directly onto the decks that would include patio furniture and other items making them look "junky". He inquired about the landscaping and screening between the properties, and whether this landscaping would coincide with the work done on their properties. Chairman Steigerwald reiterated that the landscaping for the common area has been approved and will be installed. Mr. Freels commented that he is in favor of the new unit design. Page 74 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the southern borders between these two properties. Mr. Johnson stated that the the units with driveways onto 37th Avenue North have double width drives and there could be no berming placed here. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the direction the decks would face. Mr. Johnson stated the decks would be constructed facing east and west. He noted that the common area will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Commissioner Wire inquired about the types of landscaping materials. Coordinator McConn listed the plantings to be installed. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Herb Reinhard, 15625 40th ,Avenue North. Mr. Reinhard stated he is the Vice President for the Plymouth Creek Homeowner's Association. He noted that he does not live within the area of notification, but was representing the residents of Plymouth Creek who were notified. He noted that the explanations of this application have answered most of his questions and he would inform the residents in his Association. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Stulberg inquired if the issues should be addressed separately, the Commission concurred. Chairman Steigerwald noted that there is the concern of setting a precedent with the addition of decks. Commissioner Plufka commented on the letter in the packet from Jim Staller Insurance Agency, that the decks would be insured adequately; however, what happens when for whatever reason a policy would not be maintained by the unit owner. Commissioner Pauba noted that the Master Policy would cover the structure and decks, and that the individual owner could choose a Form 6 Tenant Policy that would cover personal property and a small portion of the structure, however it may not cover the deck. He noted that liability is not a problem, and there should be no worry about the insurance factor. Coordinator McConn commented that any City liability had been checked with the City Attorney's office, and it is held that the City would not be in a precarious position from a liability standpoint with the addition of these decks. Commissioner Plufka reiterated that it could be a problem for the homeowner if the plat is not redrawn to accommodate the deck construction. Page 75 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Pauba reiterated that there would be no problem with insurance; however, he is concerned about setting a precedent on constructing into the common area. Commission- er Wire noted that there had been a previous application where the homeowner built over existing easements. Coordin- ator McConn explained that application involved a structural expansion to the unit. She went on to recall the Shenandoah development where decks were added; however, in this case the lots were redefined so the entire unit was on one lot and the lots would be individually owned. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Pauba to recommend denial of that part of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment that would allow the addition of decks onto the quadraminium structures for the reason that the plat should have reflected a lot layout to accommodate the deck construction, and the development should be replatted to allow the construction of decks. Commissioner Plufka concurred, but noted that the approving Resolution calls for revision of the 1st and 2nd Addition plats, so couldn't they proceed with this recommendation. Commissioner Stulberg stated they could, however, he doesn't see that the request included an option of replatting. Commissioner Wire noted that the ideal situation would have been if the plans had been originally approved for the deck construction and the plat had covered this contingency; how- ever, he agreed with Mr. Johnson that replatting is very costly. He would not like to see a replatting that would diminish the landscaping approved. It is his opinion that the building design is good and the decks would be a plus for the units. Commissioner Stulberg noted the Commission cannot make the decision for replatting and this should be sent on to the City Council for final action as recommended. Chairman Steigerwald inquired how many buildings are constructed. Mr. Johnson stated there are 18 buildings total; 7 or 8 would have decks added; and, fourteen build- ings are left to be constructed. Chairman Steigerwald noted previous discussions about and recommendations for more lot coverage within PUD's. This makes it difficult to decide against Mr. Johnson's petition, as his development is well laid out; the purchaser would be aware of the commitment for maintenance through the Home- owner Association bylaws and covenants; and, the Homeowner's Association is in concert with Mr. Johnson's request; it is his opinion that the problem is minimal. NOTION TO DENY Page 76 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Wire noted that the decks would not be apt to create runoff and drainage problems as patios might and adding decks would provide a better unit design. Commissioner Plufka stated that the Commission is not saying that decks are bad and inquired if the Commission believes that the decks should encroach into land owned by the Home- owner's Association. The question is, should the Commission deny or approve with direction for redesign and replatting. Coordinator McConn noted that Commissioner Stulberg has cor- rectly pointed out that the petitioner does not feel that replatting is viable, so the recommendation for denial would be appropriate and the City Council will make the decision for giving direction to the petitioner. Commissioner Stulberg reiterated that he is not comfortable with decks encroaching onto commonly owned property. Commissioner Magnus inquired if Mr. Johnson would be propos- ing to add decks to units other than those noted in this proposal. Mr. Johnson answered that there is only one style of unit where the deck could be added, others would require extensive remodeling. He noted that the Homeowner's Associ- ation addressed the use of decks; the covenants were changed by the general membership by unanimous vote; and, it was determined that the decks would be for the sole use of the unit resident. Commissioner Plufka inquired if this could not be changed by future Boards of the Homeowner's Association via the same route? Commissioner Pauba concurred with Commissioner Wire and is comfortable with the knowledge that the Homeowner's Associa- tion has indicated they have covered this amendment by amending their covenants and bylaws; and, that it would seem there would be a better quality of maintenance for the entire develpment than can be looked for from the individual homeowner. Roll Call VOTE. 2 Ayes. Commissioners Wire, Mellen, Plufka, Pauba and Chairman Steigerwald, Nay. MOTION failed. VOTE - MOTION FAILED MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Chairman Steigerwald to recommend approval for the Conditional Use MOTION TO APPROVE Permit Amendment for the Residential Planned Unit Develop- ment for the addition of decks as proposed by Dean R. Johnson Construction , Inc. subject to the conditions as listed with the deletion of Condition No. 1, and renumbering. Page 77 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Wire noted that he does not want the petitioner to have to replat the property. Commissioner Plufka noted that the Homeowner's Association will require the individual homeowner to install plantings around the decks. If the development is replatted and the deck is constructed, the Homeowner's Association would install the plantings as approved on the landscape plan, but the problem remains that it is undesirable to set a precedent by having the decks over commonly owned property. It is his opinion that this should go forward with Condition No. 1 in place. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to Amend the MOTION by restoring Condition No. 1 to the draft Resolution. Commissioner Wire noted that there is no situation of choice, the landscaping is part of the common area and the landscaping would be included as approved. Mr. Johnson confirmed that if the property is not replatted, the common area will be landscaped as approved. Commis- sioner Wire reiterated that there would be better mainten- ance of the common area by the Homeowner's Association. Roll Call VOTE on the AMENDMENT to the MOTION. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Wire, Mellen and Chairman Steigerwald Nay. MOTION to AMEND carried. NOTION TO AMEND VOTE ON AMENDMENT MOTION CARRIED MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Pauba NOTION TO AMEND to AMEND the MOTION with direction that the deck alone would be within the replatted lot and the landscaping would be in the common area and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Roll Call VOTE on the AMENDMENT to the MOTION 6 Ayes. VOTE ON AMENDMENT Commissioner Mellen, Nay. MOTION carried. NOTION CARRIED Roll Call VOTE on MOTION AS TWICE AMENDED. 7 Ayes. MOTION VOTE - MAIN NOTION carried. TWICE AMENDED MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Wire stated he voted in favor as he is concern- ed about the private ownership of the deck area; and,that long term maintenance for the landscaping would be assured if provided by the Homeowner's Association. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner NOTION FOR APPROVAL Stulberg to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for the Residential Planned Unit Development for new building design as proposed by Dean R. Johnson Construction Company. Page 78 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at 8:20 P.M. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Tipton Corp- oration; reading of the March 28, 1985 staff report was waived. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Michael Sjeklocha representing Tipton Corporation. Mr. Sjeklocha commented that this application is part of the Park Place development and their ongoing management of this develop- ment. He noted that they were requested to complete the 34th Avenue right-of-way, and because of their desire to move their corporate offices into the area, they elected to purchase the property for company offices. He noted that the variance request is because the size of the lot is re- duced by granting the required right-of-way to the City. He noted that this is a commercially zoned corner, and they feel the variance request is reasonable. Commissioner Wire noted he has a concern regarding the homes to the south, noting the staff has recommended the luminaire plan as proposed. He inquired about the hours of operation and the lighting for the building. Mr. Sjeklocha stated the lighting would be low level; the business hours would be normal for office functions with occasional meetings held in the evening. Coordinator McConn noted that the sign location would be north of the most southerly access on the east side of the building, and that there would be lighting at accesses to building. Commissioner Plufka confirmed that the variance is for lot width and the setback to the drive aisle. Coordinator McConn noted that there has been contact made with the homeowners to the south; they understand the plans and do not have any concerns. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing and intro- duced Mr. hack Propsma, 3315 Minnesota Lane North. Mr. Propsma stated he is representing the Cavanaugh Homeowner's Association, and that they support Tipton's plans. He stated that Tipton has been very cooperative and it would be beneficial if all developers worked with the residents as Tipton has done. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED RECESS TIPTON CORPORATION REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, FINAL PLAT, SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE (85013) Page 79 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE Magnus to recommend approval for the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Site Plan and Variance for Tipton Corpor- ation subject to the conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by DeVries Builders, Inc. and requested Coordinator McConn give an overview of the March 28, 1985 staff report. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Sohn DeVries. Mr. DeVries stated that in reviewing the staff report he doesn't agree with the interpretation of the guidelines. He stated they have access to major collectors in that County Road 36 is nearby; that 34th and 32nd Avenues are minor arterials; that Pilgrim Lane is a minor arterial; and, there are sub- stantial roadways in and around the property. He noted the open area around the property; that there is a shopping area at 36th Avenue and County Road 18; shopping and restaurants at County Road 18 and Medicine Lake Road. He noted that the property has poor soil conditions; that it is an infill area; and, that to put a road through will require alot of fill. He stated that the original fill will need to be re- moved and replaced which will be very costly. He stated that a lower density (such as the LA -2 suggested by staff) would necessitate cutting a stand of trees for the roadway to provide for lot layout. He stated they are not interest- ed in developing the land if they cannot attain the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for LA -3 guiding. He stated there are natural buffers to adjacent property. He noted that staff did not want to commit to a specific density, however, the problem with the roadway construction makes it necessary to bring up the fact of density for developing this property. Chairman Steigerwald commented that he is aware that left over pieces of land are problematical for development. He inquired if they had considered that LA -2 guiding would allow 3 to 5 units per acre. Mr. DeVries noted that it is obvious it would be 3 units per acres unless the development were a Planned Unit Development and they do not qualify for bonus points. He noted they would need to get 5 units per acre to develop the property. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the 3 units per acre. Coordinator McConn explained the PUD provisions for bonus points to provide higher density. DeVRIES BUILDERS LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT (85018) Page 80 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Coordinator McConn, in response to Mr. DeVries initial re- marks, clarified that 36h Avenue North is a major collector, 34th Avenue and Pilgrim Lane are minor collectors, and County Road 18 is an intermediate arterial. Commissioner Pauba inquired if Mr. DeVries came back with a plan for 5 units per acre, would the City Council approve the plan? Coordinator McConn answered that within the LA-2 designation the PUD attributes and the bonus point criteria would have to be demonstrated to achieve 5 units per acre. Other development plans for PUD's and SUP's have been approved in this area as the Council has determined that it was appropriate. One approval that have included waivers from the 40 acre minimum for PUD's was the "Merry Middle- mist" development. Mr. DeVries stated he had discussed a Planned Unit Develop- ment, but there were many obstacles; the cost would be pro- hibitive without assurances of approval; and, it would be a big risk. He stated that in looking at the PUD provisions it was felt they could not achieve 5 units per acre but they do meet the criteria for the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. Chairman Steigerwald noted that approval for LA-3 guiding could open the door for 5 to 10 units per acre that would not be appropriate for this property. It was his opinion that exploring the options and perhaps taking the middle ground recommendation would make sense for developing this property. Coordinator McConn noted that, the Merry Middlemist develop- ment was first proposed as a conventional plat but the Council was not comfortable with the variances requested, so the PUD application and design flexibility was approved. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing and introduc- ed Craig Anderson, 3220 Pilgrim Lane. Mr. Anderson noted the neighborhood is zoned single family and he wants low density development. Mr. Wayne Corrigan, 3230 Pilgrim Lane, stated that he would be opposed to removal of the trees as noted by Mr. DeVries. He stated the trees are behind his property and are an attractive amenity for the neighborhood. He stated he is not specifically opposed to rezoning, but would want to retain the trees. Page 81 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Steve Homme, 3200 Pilgrim Lane, stated he concurs with Mr. Corrigan that the trees and grassland should be retained. He stated he has a road in front and behind his home, so certainly is not in favor of a road that would be to the side of his home. He stated that the guiding is not a big problem and he appreciates what Mr. DeVries is trying to do with the property. He assumes that development of the prop- erty will occur, however he does not want a roadway through the wooded area. Lamar Johnson, 9895 31st Avenue North, stated his major con- cern is the safety of the children in the neighborhood and that high density creates higher traffic levels. He noted that the neighborhood park was not meant for large numbers of people. He stated he purchased his home because of the life style it provides for his family. He is concerned that development will create noise and dirt, and that property values could be diminished by high density development. Jeff Nesheim, 3085 Pilgrim Lane, inquired about Merry Mid- dlemist development, noting that it is a single family resi- dential development. Chairman Steigerwald explained that, the lot sizes were smaller than in the typical LA-1 guided areas; and, that it was an odd piece of land requiring the flexibility afforded it by a Planned Unit Development. Mr. Nesheim stated that the density allowable for LA-3 guided property is too high and inquired about building plans. Chairman Steigerwald explained that specific build- ing plans would not be part of this application, however, LA-3 guided land could be planned with quadraminiums, duplexes, or townhouses. Mr. Neisheim commented that the traffic increase would be undesirable for this neighborhood, and noted that the shop- ping as described by Mr. DeVries are only small covenience stores and some restaurants that would not be adequate to service a high density development. Marilyn Stalheim, 3210 Pilgrim Lane, stated her concern about having a street behind her home and losing the open area and trees. She stated that development is occurring everywhere and that open areas are necessary for all neighborhoods. She noted that the playground mentioned by Mr. DeVries is a school playground, not a public play area. She stated that Plymouth has planned wisely for the communi- ty, and she doesn't want the City to lose sight of good planning for this area. Page 82 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Doug Taubman, 10000 31st Avenue North, commented his state- ments reflect the social concerns. He passed out informa- tion to the Commission that he had put together regarding crime statistics, noting that high density areas show higher crime rates. He commented on the traffic problems that could occur. He stated his concern is that Plymouth is allowing all property to be developed to its fullest and he would like retention of open space. Ellen Peterson, 3340 Pilgrim Lane, concurred with those speaking for retention of open space. She stated that drainage and lights from the playground impact her home. She stated her concern that drainage problems caused by the topography of the land to be developed could impact her residence, and is concerned about the problems discussed by Mr. DeVries regarding road construction through the proposed development. Ted H. Sauer, 3250 Pilgrim Lane, confirmed that as the prop- erty is guided now, an apartment building could be built without reguiding or rezoning, and he would not like to see a building of this magnitude constructed on the property. He stated he was in favor of Mr. DeVries retaining the trees, and that perhaps his ideas for development for the property would be appropriate. He feels a common sense ap- proach to development of this land is needed; perhaps the land cannot be developed at all and, this should be considered. Mr. DeVries stated that previously a site plan had been ap- proved for a 60 unit apartment building on the site but con- struction was never implemented. Coordinator McConn con- firmed this. Stephen Smarjesse, 10020 31st Avenue North, stated that den- sity is the primary issue, noting that there is already high density in the area with the Tiburon development. He stated that some people wish to live in multi -residential units, however, there are already enough of those available in this area. He noted that Mr. DeVries has developed some fine projects but that somehow this proposal is inconsistent those projects. Steve Thompson, 9890 31st Avenue North, stated his concern about the increase in traffic and stated the importance of retaining the trees. Mr. DeVries stated he agrees with what has been said and he wants to try to assure everyone that in undertaking develop- ment of the property he wants to retain the trees and create some open space, that these amenities also sell his product. He noted that development of this property needs Page 83 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 to be economically feasible. He commented that the units proposed would be owner occupied. Mr. DeVries explained that at the time of development he has always worked with the residents of the neighborhood and tried to keep them informed. Lamar Johnson stated that there is alot of commercial devel- opment on the north side of 34th Avenue and this could be a buffer for the neighborhood. He stated that a high density development will eliminate the buffer and this should be kept as open space because of its alignment to County Road 18 and the commercial area. He stated the residents have a right to open space and that none of them want to see condo- miniums or apartment buildings built on this property. Commissioner Plufka explained that the City does not own the land and the landowner has the right to develop under the provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance. He stated that, on hearing the background and blending that with what has been heard from the neighbors, it seems the PUD concept could work; that clustering could be an option which would in turn preserve some of the amenities for the neighbor- hood; and, the LA -2 guiding allows attached housing and gives the flexibility and development opportunity for this property. Ms. Stalheim inquired if the City would consider buying the property to leave as open space. Chairman Steigerwald advised the residents that they could take the question of the City purchasing this land before the City Council. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Wire stated he agrees with Commissioner Plufka on the need to keep development in this area compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods. He noted that a PUD Plan could be one option and he emphasized the need for transition. Chairman Steigerwald reminded the Commission that this application is for reguiding and plans for construction are not being reviewed at this time. Commissioner Wire stated that he did not want to approve a specific designation without more detailed plans. Chairman Steigerwald stated he does not want to make it difficult for the developer to make plans for this property, however, he would prefer to make a recommendation for re - guiding the property to LA -2. Page 84 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE Pauba to recommend approval for the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment to LA -2 (low medium density residential) designa- tion, and requesting that the City Council consider the highest density allowed (5 units per acre) by this designa- tion; and, that the Council give direction and guidelines concerning the density for this project. Commissioner Stulberg pointed out that a portion of the property is now guided LA -4, so that the highest density could be achieved for this area by the developer. He feels this recommendation is "putting the cart before the horse". He is also opposed to changing the guiding to LA -3, however, the developer is requesting the Amendment and has not con- ceded that the property can be developed under the LA -2 designation. It is opinion that the Commission's recommend- ation for LA -2 guiding is not appropriate. Commissioner Plufka stated the Commission must deal with the request for the LA -3 guiding and can move to recommend denial, however he would like to discuss the development proposal as a concept. It is his opinion that there are parameters without design characteristics that may indicate the direction that should be taken to make palatable use of the land. Coordinator McConn stated that the Commission's hesitation in making a recommendation for the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment seems to be based on not being able to foresee what the development proposal for this property will be; however, detailed plans are not required with this applica- tion. In some situations joint applications are considered which contain more detail. Commissioner Plufka stated that the Commission could offer design direction, but that it is not needed to make their decision tonight. Mr. DeVries stated that he has submitted his application to change the guiding to LA -3 and does not want the Commis- sion's recommendation for LA -2 guiding. He stated he would rather go back and meet with staff to see if a PUD Plan is feasible. Chairman Steigerwald noted that the Planning Commisison has concurred that LA -2 guiding is the most appropriate, and that this recommendation would move the application through for Council consideration. Mr. DeVries reiterated that his application is requesting LA -3 guiding. Commissioner Plufka noted that Mr. DeVries has the option to withdraw the application. Commissioner Pauba inquired if the petitioner should withdraw this application would new filing fees be required. Coordinator McConn answered affirmatively. Page 85 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Pauba inquired if the Commission could defer recommendation and give direction for re -design. Coordina- tor McConn inquired what would be re -designed as the request calls only for the land use designation to be changed; no specific development plans are being considered at this time. Commissioner Stulberg inquired if Mr. DeVries is the proper- ty fee owner. Coordinator McConn noted that co -signatures and a copy of the purchase agreement were required for mak- ing this application. Commissioner Wire stated he speaks against the Motion, and noted that someone other than Mr. DeVries could come back with another development proposal. Commissioner Plufka stated he is in favor of the Motion and that the Planning Commission needs a frame of reference to advise the Council of their recommendation for LA -2 guiding for this property. Coordinator McConn stated that the petitioner can discuss his application with the City Council, and the fact that he may want to investigate further the feasibility of a PUD Plan. Roll Call VOTE. 3 Ayes. Commissioners Stulberg, Magnus, VOTE - MOTION FAILS Wire, and Mellen, Nay. MOTION fails. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO DENY Wire to recommend denial for the request by DeVries Build- ers, Inc. for a Land Use Guide Plan for property located south of 34th Avenue North and west of Kilmer Lane for the reason that the request for LA -3 (high medium density resi- dential) guiding is not a proper use for this land. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO AMEND to AMEND the MOTION to add to the recommendation that, the appropriate guiding for the property is LA -2 (low medium density residential) designation; and, that the Planned Unit Development planning process may have merit in providing a method to address the concerns of increased traffic for this area; to retain the amenities within this property; and, to assure a development consistent with the adjoining neighbor- hoods. Roll Call VOTE on the MAIN MOTION as once AMENDED. 7 Ayes. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MOTION carried. Mr. Lamar Johnson stated that he does not want to see access provided from this development into the Residential area. Chairman Steigerwald stated that the City Engineers will re- view the traffic circulation and, the residents will be noticed regarding the Public Hearing where there will be a more detailed review at the time of plat proposal. Page 86 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at 9:55 P.M. NEW BUSINESS: Chairman Steigerwald reconvened the meeting and introduced the variance request. Reading of the March 28, 1985 Staff Report was waived. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Paul Hagemeister. Mr. Hagemeister reviewed his request with the Commission noting that he has met the requirement by submitting ease- ment documents allowing for the 20 ft. wide ingress and egress so that a private drive may be extended to serve both parcels. He noted that originally there was a house on Parcel B that burned and was removed. When he bought the property there would have been room to build, however to meet the required 75 ft. setback required by the Shoreland Management Regulations, this is no longer possible. He com- mented that he had met with staff and it was suggested to him that because, there would be no public street, the drive would be considered an "alley" and he would need only a 15 ft. setback on the basis of a survey that was made. Upon review of his application by the staff review committee, he was informed that a 35 ft. setback would be required and this will restrict the house design as he was planning the installation of a passive solar system for the home requir- ing it to face south. He commented that he would appreciate receiving approval for the 11 ft. variance so that he can design the house as planned. Chairman Steigerwald noted that this is not a Public Hear- ing, but is a public informational meeting and introduced Mr. Ken Peterson, 1325 Kingsview Lane, who stated that he supports staff's recommendation but asked for clarification of where the setbacks would be on Parcel B. Coordinator McConn stated that the recommendation calls for a 35 ft. front yard setback from the south edge of the private drive easement. Mr. Hagemeister stated that this could prevent constructing an attached garage and because, there is a steep drop-off on the property, he would have to build a "stilt house". He suggested that the 35 ft. setback be from the east property line. Mr. Walt Domseth, 1301 Kingsview Lane, inquired about the location of the front yard. Coordinator McConn pointed out that the Shoreland Management Regulations increase the set- back requirements from the lake; that the recommended front yard setback is from the private drive easement and she explained the setbacks for each parcel. PAUL AND LOIS HAGEMEISTER VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR PARCELS WITHOUT FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC ROAD (85015) Page 87 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 Commissioner Plufka confirmed that the south line of Govern- ment Lot 1 is not an ownership line, and not part of the subject property. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka to recommend approval of the Variance to allow the issuance of Building Permits for parcels without frontage on a public roadway; that Parcel A have a front yard setback of 24 ft. as requested with the 11 ft. variance; and that Parcel B have a 35 ft. front yard setback measured from the north property line which includes 20 ft. of the driveway easement. Mr. Ken Peterson stated he has no problem with this recom- mendation. Commissioner Plufka noted that this would pro- vide the area required to set the house away from the adja- cent lot to the east. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. OTHER BUSINESS: Chairman Steigerwald introduced the item and noted the pre- vious discussion by the Commission at the Public Hearing held February 13, 1985. Community Development Director Blair Tremere discussed the information regarding the Amend- ment and asked Commissioner Mellen about the steps taken by Honeywell regarding noise factors when installing equipment at their plant. Commissioner Mellen explained that they had studied the situation and it seemed that the noise from the fans was most noticeable when the system was either going on, or shutting down, the constant noise from the fans did not seem to be as noticeable. However, it is difficult to screen out the perceived intensity of sound generated from ignition and shut -down of equipment. Mr. Carlos Hodge, Prudential Development Company, stated he had attended the Public Hearing, and was representing those developers who attended that meeting. He stated that the Ordinance language is reasonable and his only concern is that it can satisfy the conflicting interests and does not become a major issue. Mr. Richard A. Lindell, 8433 39th Avenue North, concurred with Mr. Hodge's statements. Commissioner Wire noted that it could be subjective, but it is a means of solving some problems. Director Tremere discussed the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) standards, and noted the importance of addressing the design and standards for rooftop equipment up front when NOTION TO APPROV VOTE - MOTION CARRIED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONCERNING ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT Page 88 Planning Commission Minutes April 10, 1985 development plans are reviewed; especially if there are adjacent or abutting residential developments. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION to recommend the adoption of Ordinance Amendments concerning rooftop equipment. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Coordinator McConn discussed upcoming Planning Commission agendas and applications in process. Director Tremere explained the status of updating the Housing Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. ADJOURNMENT: 10:50 P.M. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR DEAN R. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO AMEND THE APPROVED RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR "CREEKSIDE OF PLYMOUTH" LOCATED SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 9 AND EAST OF PLYMOUTH CREEK (79018) WHEREAS, Dean R. Johnson Construction, Inc. has requested a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to amend the approved RPUD Plan for "Creekside of Plymouth" to include the construction of decks that would be located within the common open area for 84 dwelling units and a new building design for property located south of County Road 9 and east of Plymouth Creek; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Dean R. Johnson Construction, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to amend the approved RPUD Plan to allow for the construction of decks that would be located within the common open area for 84 dwelling units and a new building design for property located south of County Road 9 and east of Plymouth Creek, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the final plats for Creekside of Plymouth 1st and 2nd Additions be revised to provide adequate lot area and dimensions to accomodate the construction of the decks; that only the deck addition will be within the replatted lot; and, the landscaping will be installed in the common area and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 2. That amended Homeowner Association documents allowing for the addition of decks be filed and recorded at Hennepin County with the revised final plats. 3. The construction of the decks shall not encroach into any existing utility and drainage easements. 4. All other terms of development as identified in the Development Contracts for the Creekside of Plymouth 1st and 2nd Additions are carried forward. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TIPTON CORPORATION FOR TIPTON BUILDING (85013) WHEREAS, Tipton Corporation has requested approval for a Preliminary Plat for Tipton Building to create one parcel for the remodeling and expansion of an existing dwelling unit on .65 acres located on the southwest corner of 34th ,Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Preliminary Plat for Tipton Corporation for Tipton Building located on the southwest corner of 34th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer and water; and, until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 4. Provisions for a 20 ft. wide trail easement per Comprehensive Park Plan, as verified by the Parks and Enqineering Departments, with submittal of detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards. 5. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits in an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and ac- cording to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of issuance of Building Permit. 6. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat. 7. Approved variances are: lot size (.65 vs. 1 acre) and lot width (136 vs. 150 ft.). RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR TIPTON BUILDING FOR TIPTON CORPORATION (85013) WHEREAS, Tipton Corporation has requested approval for Final Plat for Tipton Building, a plat for one lot on .65 acres located on the southwest corner of 34th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Final Plat for Tipton Corporation for Tipton Building located southwest of 34th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR TIPTON BUILDING FOR TIPTON CORPORATION (85013) WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Final Plat for Tipton Building as requested by Tipton Corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the following to be met, prior to recording of, and related to said plat: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Provisions for a 20 -ft. wide trail easement per Comprehensive Park Plan, as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards. 3. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits in an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and according to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of issuance of Building Permit. 4. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 5. Approved Variances are: lot size (.65 vs. 1 acre) and lot width (136 vs. 150 ft.). 6. Submittal of required utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Engineer prior to filing the Final Plat. 7. No Building Permits to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 APPROVING SITE PLA14 AND VARIANCE FOR TIPT014 CORPORATION (85013) WHEREAS, Tipton Corporation has requested approval of a Site Plan and Variance for the remodeling and expansion of a dwelling unit as an office facility located on the southwest corner of 34th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Tipton Corporation for a Site Plan and Variance for the remodeling and expansion of a dwelling as an office facility located southwest of 34th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits in an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and ac- cording to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. Provisions for a 20 -ft. wide trail easement per Comprehensive Park Plan, as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards. 4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- als per Ordinance provisions. 6. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants and fire lanes, with the waiver of fire lane requirements on the west side of the structures. 7. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no outside storage is permitted. 8. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 9. Approved Variances include: rear setback to drive aisle (6 ft. vs. 15 ft.). RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 DENYING LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 34TH AVENUE AND WEST OF KILMER LANE (85018) WHEREAS, DeVries Builders, Inc. has requested approval of reclassification of Land Use Guiding for an approximate 18.7 acre parcel located south of 34th Avenue and west of Kilmer Lane from LA -1 (low density residential) and LA -4 (high density multiple residential) to LA -3 (high medium density residential); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request following a duly sche- duled public hearing and has recommended denial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the reclassification of Land Use Guid- ing for DeVries Builders, Inc. for approximately 18.7 acres located south of 34th Avenue and west of Kilmer Lane from LA -1 (low density residential) and LA -4 (high density multiple residential) to LA -3 (high medium density residential) for the fol- lowing reason: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Guide Plan locational criteria for the L.A3 designation are not satisfied. 2. The request for LA -3 (high medium density residential) designation is not a proper use for this property. 3. The appropriate guiding for the property is LA -2 (low medium density residential) designation. 4. There is merit in consideration of the Planned Unit Development planning process for this property to address the concerns of increased traffic; to retain the amenities within this property; and, to assure a development that is consistent with the adjoining neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APRIL 10, 1985 APPROVING VARIANCE FOR PAUL AND LOIS HAGEMEISTER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO RESIDENCES ON TWO PARCELS WHICH DO NOT PROVIDE ORDINANCE MINIMUM REQUIRED FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC ROAD LOCATED WEST OF KINGSVIEW LANE, GENERALLY NORTH OF 13TH ,AVENUE NORTH IN SECTION 33 (85015) WHEREAS, Paul and Lois Hagemeister have requested approval for a Variance to allow the construction of two residences on two parcels which do not provide Ordinance required frontage on a public road for property located west of Kingsview Lane and generally north of 13th Avenue North in Section 33; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve a Variance to allow the construction of two residences on two parcels which do not provide Ordinance minimum required frontage on a public road on property located west of Kingsview Lane and generally north of 13th Avenue North in Section 33, subject to the following: 1. Compliance with the Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Parcel A shall have a 24 ft. front yard setback (a variance of 11 ft.); and Parcel B shall have a 35 ft. front yard setback measured from the north property line. 3. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, appropriate legal documents on Parcels A and B, allowing for the shared driveway shall be filed and recorded at Hennepin County. 4. Submittal of all utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Engineer, prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Variances are approved to allow the construction of two residences on two parcels which do not provide Ordinance minimum required frontage on a public road on the basis that the two parcels were created when no public frontage was provided, and on the basis that it is not feasible to extend a public road westerly from Kingsview Lane. 1..- LP b. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission April 11, 1985 Page 12 Present: Chair Threinen, Commissioners Chesebrough, Edwards, LaTour, Mullan and Reed; staff Blank, Brown, Busch and Pederson Absent: Commissioner Beach 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:38 p.m. in the City Center Council Chambers by Chair Threinen. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Mullan and seconded by Commissioner Edwards to approve the minutes of the March meeting as presented. 3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS a. Athletic Associations. No athletic association representatives were present. b. Staff. Rick Busch showed a videotape of the unofficiated sports he offers and handed out winter skating statistics. He announced that 140 teams had registered for summer softball leagues. He will be meeting with athletic associations next week to discuss which facilities they wish to use this summer. Ruth Brown discussed the winter triathlon held in February at French Regional Park on the north end of Medicine Lake. She stated that some of the participants called after the event was over to indicate their satisfaction with it and to request that we continue the triathlon despite the relatively low attendance. She also indicated that she was pleased with the Channel 11 Health Fair held in March; 158 participants visited the various booths, and 33 volun- teers helped with the event. Other recent programs offered by Ruth included a Holiday Activity Day over spring break held at Plymouth Junior High and attended by 52 2nd through 6th graders, and a viewing of the film "Junglebook" with a turnout of 92 children and adults. Ruth announced that summer swimming registration begins on May 18. Three sessions of swimming will be offered this summer, instead of the usual four, and a lifeguard will be on duty during lessons this year. Play- ground in the Streets (PITS) has been restructured and will now have three stops per day, two hours each. Daily starting times will be later, thus allowing the wagon to be out longer in the day. The disc golf grand open- ing at Zachary Playfield will be June 8. The Plymouth Ccm=ity Band has three formal concerts and three mini -concerts scheduled. A summer tri- athlon will be held at Medicine Lake on August 18. Events include a 1K swim, a 10K bike and a 3.2K run. Two daycamps will be offered this summer; one at Northstar and one in conjunction with New Hope Recreation and Hennepin County Park Reserve District. Other dates to be aware of are the "Life. Be In It." Kite Fly on April 27 and the "Life. Be In It." Flea Market on May 4. 4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL AC'T'ION a. St. Mary's Church Property. Council authorized staff to begin negotiations with St. Mary's for the purchase of land for a neighborhood park. The City needs only seven acres; St. Mary's wants to sell 18, but is willing to negotiate for 11.6 acres. PRAC Minutes from April 11, 1985 Page 14 8. STAFF COMUNICATION There was no discussion on this item. 9. ADJOURNM= The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. NORTHWEST SUBURBS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ' March 21, 1985, 7:30 A.M. Brooklyn Park Studio The regular monthly meeting of the NWSCCC was called to order at 7:40 A.M. on Thursday, March 21, 1985, by Chairman Irving. Commissioners present were: Jack Umland (Brooklyn Park); Tom Aaker, Jack Irving (Crystal); Jeff Sweet (Golden Valley); Joyce LeClaire, Don Ramstad (Maple Grove); Dan Donahue (New Hope); Lawrence Sullivan (Osseo); Virgil Schneider, James Willis (Plymouth); Bill Blonigan, Walter Fehst (Robbinsdale). Commissioners absent were: William Hawes, Gerald Splinter (Brooklyn Center); Bob O'Brien (Brooklyn Park); Ray Stockman (Golden Valley); Vivian Dagnault (New Hope); Richard Setzler (Osseo). Associate Members present were: Margaret Gillespie (Hennepin County Library); Gary Nunn (School District 284); James Schurter (No. Hennepin College); William Shragg (District 279); Tom Tripet (District 281). Staff present: Greg Moore (Executive Director); John Gibbs (Attorney); Gerri Hanken (Secretary). Others Present: John Eddy, Mary Adams, Adam Walker, Jim Erickson,Todd Spoeri (Storer Cable); Gus Hauser, John Evans, Shu Wong (Hauser Communications); Cathy Wilary, Leroy Westerlund (Post Publications); Joe Kimball (Mpls Star and Tribune); Diane Christopher, Sharon Gorse. Agenda Item II, 1 & 2 - Consent Items Commissioner Willis moved, seconded by Commissioner Aaker, to approve the minutes of the Feb. 21, 1985 meeting and to approve the Treasurer's report as follows: the bill from the City of Crystal in the amount of $311.11; the attorney's bill for the month of Feb. in the amount of $644.20; the attorney's bill for the transfer of ownership in the amount of $4,441.85, and the list of expenses and disbursements. Motion carried. Agenda Item III,1 - Sale and Transfer of the Franchise Materials relevant to the sale and transfer had been delivered to the Commissioners the day previous to the meeting, and Jim Willis, Chairman of the Negotiating Committee, addressed the Commission regarding this issue. He said that members of the committee along with Executive Director Moore and Attorneys Gibbs and Herbst had been meeting frequently with representatives from Hauser Communications and Storer, and lengthy and difficult discussions were held to resolve issues that are of concern to the Com- mission. He said no vote was expected on the recommendations from the Negotiating Committee at this meeting. He said that the committee members are comfortable with their recommendation, and it represents compromise on both sides. The Executive Director was asked to explain the memorandum in order that the Commis- sioners could more fully understand its contents. He explained the major issues involved including 1) the transfer of access/LO functions and responsibilities to the CTC and how this would be funded; 2) rate increases which would include among other things a $2.00 a month increase in basic service; 3) the future construction of Home Subscriber Network; 4) the deactivation of the B cable, this cable to be constructed as a "shadow" cable to be activated at a later date if necessary; 5) technical issues; 6) enforceability, Franchise fees and tax implications; 7) Per- formance bond reduction from $500,000 to $100,000; 8) Institutional Communications -'ZL-- La C-.. Network. The matters of drops was discussed just prior to this morning's meeting and agreement was as follows: That Storer will provide the Commission $75,000 to take care of all the drops to the ICN that have been requested and not completed. That $75,000 is not limited to ICN drops. It is a settlement for those outstand- ing commitments. All drops requested, not exceeding 250 feet, will be provided free by the company. Drops in excess of 250 feet will be paid for 100% by the requesting agency, and the $75,000 would provide a pool of money to fund them. After Mr. Moore completed his explanation of the memorandum, Commissioner Willis spoke briefly regarding the public hearing that had been held on Feb. 28. He said that a number of people had spoke at that hearing in support of LO and access but that no one had appeared to testify against the rate increase. He said that the hearing had been continued a number of times and is continued again until the next meeting of this Commission. He thanked all the members of his committee as well as the others who.had worked so many hours to complete the recommendations contained in the memorandum. He said it is the desire of the committee that this memorandum be approved unanimously by the Commission at such time when it determines this is advisable. A brief question and answer period followed after which the Chairman asked if the company had any comments. Jim Erickson, attorney, said that the explanations given by Mr. Willis and Mr. Moore stated the feelings of the company as well. At this time Chairman Irving suggested that possibly a special meeting be held one week from today to act on the issue. It was the feeling of the Commission that this would be the way to proceed. Commissioner Donahue moved, seconded by Commissioner Ramstad, to call a special meeting of the Commission on March 28, 1985 at 7:30 AM at the Brooklyn Park Studio to discuss this item only. Motion carried. Commissioner Schneider moved, seconded by Commissioner Ramstad, that the special meeting be adjourned at 9:30 AM if there is not a unanimous ballot at that time. Motion carried. Commissioner Willis urged Commissioners to call any members of the committee or Staff if they had questions in order to have what information they wanted before next week's meeting. Agenda Item IV, Reports John Eddy reported that the number of subscribers is at 31,215 and that the number of signed multiple dwelling units is 19,092. He went on to say that the few com- plaints received the past month have been resolved and that the phone statistics continue to improve with a total of 410 calls being handled daily and only 16 are being abandoned. There were no other reports. There being no further business, Commissioner Willis moved, seconded by Commissioner Umland, to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 AM. �" Loc... NORTHWEST SUBURBS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES March 28, 1985, 7:30 A.M. Brooklyn Park Studio A Special meeting of the NWSCCC was held on Thursday, March 28, 1985 at 7:30 AM at the Brooklyn Park Studio. The purpose of this meeting was to consider the changes to the Franchise Ordinance that had been proposed in regard to the trans- fer of ownership including rates, LO and access, future construction of the home subscriber network, dual cable, institutional network and technical changes. Chairman Irving called the meeting to order at 7:30 AM. Commissioners present were: William Hawes, Gerald Splinter (Brooklyn Center); Jack Umland, Bob O'Brien (Brooklyn Park); Tom Aaker, Jack Irving (Crystal); Jeff Sweet (Golden Valley); Joyce LeClaize, Don Ramstad (Maple Grove); Richard Setzler, Lawrence Sullivan (Osseo); Virgil Schneider, James Willis (Plymouth); Bill Blonigan (Robbinsdale). Staff present: Greg Moore (Executive Director);John Gibbs (Attorney); Gerri Hanken (Secretary). Associate Members present: Dave Carlson (Hennepin County Library); Gary Nunn (School District 284); James Schurter (North Hennepin Community College); William Shragg (School District 279); Tom Tripet (School District 281). Others Present: John Eddy, Mary Adams, Todd Spoeri,Wayne Rankin (Storer Cable); Gus Hauser (Hauser Communications); Cathy Wilary, LeRoy Westerlund (Post Publica- tions); Joe Kimball (Star & Tribune); Jim Erickson (Storer Attorney). Chairman Irving informed the Commission that this meeting was being held to act on just the one issue concerning the transfer of ownership and changes to the Fran- chise Ordinance. The Executive Director explained that the Memorandum of .Understanding, dated March 20, 1985, that had been distributed to the Commissioners last week had been re -written by the Commission attorney because a few minor changes had been made, and he ex- plained these changes to the Commission. All Commissioners had received copies of the re -written memorandum, dated March 28, 1985. He said that this memorandum was • written in legislative form. There was also a recommended motion to be used should the Commission decide to approve the recommendation contained in the memorandum. Chairman Irving informed the Commission that he, Greg Moore, and several other Commissioners had toured the Arlington cable facility of Suburban Cablevision earlier this week. Commissioner Willis moved, seconded by Commissioner Splinter, the following,: Whereas; the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission has con- sidered the potential adverse effect of the proposed transfer between Northern Cablevision Northwest, Inc., and Suburban Cablevision Company, on Storer's cable subscribers; I move that the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission: 1. Approves the Memorandum of Understanding dated March 28, 1985, and direct staff and the Negotiating Committee to prepare ap- propriate Franchise Ordinance or contractual language to be considered at the April Commission meeting. �.- Loc.. 2. Declines to exercise its right of first refusal to purchase the cable system as set forth in Article 13 of the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Ordinance; and 3. Approves the transfer of the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications System from Northern Cablevision Northwest, Inc., to Suburban Cable- vision Company; and 4. Authorizes the affected cable companies to accomplish all necessary mortgages and other financial arrangements to effectuate the transfer; and 5. Amends the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance at its Preamble as follows: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO SUBURBAN CABLEVISION COMPANY, A MINNESOTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM IN THE CITIES COM- PRISING THE NORTHWEST SUBURBS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COM- MISSION: SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE GRANT OF FRANCHISE: PROVIDING FOR REGULATION AND USE OF THE SYSTEM: AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ITS PROVISIONS. and Section 3.:2 to read as follows: 3.12 "Grantee" shall mean Suburban Cablevision Company, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, its agents, employees, lawful successors, transferees or assignees. Motion was uanimously carried. Commissioner Willis, Chairman of the Negotiating Committee, said that it would now be necessary for the Negotiating Committee, staff and the attorney to draft the language to amend the Franchise Ordinance. Commissioner Willis moved, seconded by Commissioner Splinter, that the next Commission meeting be held on April 25, 1985 at 7:30 AM at the Brooklyn Park Studio to vote on language that will amend the Ordinance. Motion carried. Commissioner Aaker moved, seconded by Commissioner Splinter, to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 AM. =— Lp(�_ . INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284 Wayzata, Minnesota BOARD OF EDUCATION Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 A special meeting of the Board of Education of Independent Special Meeting School District No. 284 was held Saturday, April 13, 1985, at 8:00 a.m. in the Board Room of the Administration Build- ing. Chairman Kemp called the meeting to order and the following Roll Call School Board members were present: Mrs. Judith A. Betty, Mr. John C. Dettloff, Mr. Dean W. Fitch, Mr. James C. Kemp, Mr. Roman N. Lucky, and Mr. Gregg C. Miller. Member absent: Dr. Shirli M. Vioni. Others present: Roger M. Adams, Lucille M. Balombiny, Dale E. Beihoffer (Faegre & Benson), James Samples (Faegre & Benson), Steve London, Al Pertuz, Jean L. Mitchell, Martha M. Anderson, Mary Smith, Jamie Smith (WAYZATA/PLYMOUTH SAILOR), Rick Ravnholdt (Wayzata Education Association), Gary Nunn, Cynthia Runyan (WAYZATA WEEKLY NEWS), Sherry Fooshee (Wayzata West P.T.S.O.), Maureen Olson, Lois M. Kemp, Earl Jenson, J. A. Field, Jan Wicklund, Cathy Wilary (PLYMOUTH POST), Leesee Myer, Jim Hembre (Wayzata Education Association), Arlene Greenway, Lynne Puck, Liz Shoffner, Kathy Isensee (Birchview P.T.O.), Monica Carlson (Birchview Parent-Teacher Liaison Council Representative), Cindy Valenta (Wayzata West P.T.S.O.), Susan Schwalbach, Jerry Schwalbach, Shirley Koltes, and Rachel Green. RnApn ArTTnN The following motions and resolutions were acted on by the School Board: A motion was made by Mr. Dettloff and seconded by Mrs. Betty to approve waiver of the three day meeting notice. The motion was unanimously passed on a 6-0 vote. Board member Roman Lucky introduced and moved adoption of the resolution relating to the termination and nonrenewal of the teaching contract of the following named probationary teachers: Melissa Bowar, 1.0 Math Teacher at Wayzata East Junior High School Shirley Campbell, 1.0 Business Education Teacher at Wayzata Senior High School (part year) Waiver of Three Day Meeting Notice Resolution - Termina- tion & Nonrenewal of Teaching Contract - Probationary Teachers Wayzata Board of Education Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 Pamela David, 1.0 French Teacher at Wayzata West Junior High School (part year) Susan Gregor, .4 Art Teacher at Wayzata Senior High School (part year) Brian Nelson, .9 Math and Science Teacher at Wayzata East and Wayzata West Junior High Schools Cynthia Nelson, 1.0 Counselor at Wayzata Senior High School (part year) Elizabeth Overstad, 1.0 Psychologist - District Dorothy Savvas, .5 Spanish Teacher at Wayzata West Junior High School The motion for the adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by Board member John Dettloff and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Fitch, James Kemp, Roman Lucky, Gregg Miller, Judith Betty, John Dettloff; and the following voted against the same: no one. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted on an unanimous 6-0 vote. (Copy of resolution is attached to these minutes.) Board member Dean Fitch introduced and moved adoption of the resolution proposing to place on Unrequested Leave of Absence the following named teachers: Karen Banister, .4 Art and Home Economics Teacher at Wayzata East Junior High School Gloria Ely, 1.0 Home Economics Teacher at Wayzata East and Wayzata West Junior High Schools Bonnie MacKay, .8 Science Teacher at Wayzata Senior High School Mara May Topel, .4 Physical Education and Health Teacher at Wayzata East Junior High School The motion for the adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by Board member Roman Lucky and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: James Kemp, Roman Lucky, Gregg Miller, Judith Betty, John Dettloff, Dean Fitch; and the following voted against the same: no one. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted on an unanimous 6-0 vote. (Copy of resolution is attached to these minutes.) Minutes Page 2 Resolution (continued) Resolution - Proposing to Teachers on Unrequested of Absence Place Leaves A motion was made by Mr. Dettloff and seconded by Mr. Miller Closed Meeting to go into a closed attorney-client session regarding claims. The motion passed unanimously on a 6-0 vote. Chairman Kemp announced that Dale Beihoffer and James Samples of the Faegre & Benson law firm would be meeting with the Board in the closed session. Wayzata Board of Education Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 Chairman Kemp recessed the meeting at 8:23 a.m. and recon- vened the meeting at 10:38 a.m. A motion was made by Mr. Fitch and seconded by Mr. Dettloff to adopt the following: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Superintendent Shirli Vioni has been employed by the school district since July 1, 1983, under a three-year contract which expires on June 30, 1986; and WHEREAS, Questions concerning the interpretation and legality of certain provisions of the Superin- tendent's contract have been reviewed, at the request of the Board of Education, by the school district's legal counsel, the school district's auditors and the State Auditor, which reviews have found no personal wrongdoing by the Superintendent in connection with her contract or her management of the affairs of the school district; and WHEREAS, Negotiations between Superintendent Vioni and the Board of Education to resolve and clarify certain provisions of her contract have taken place at various times since the fall of 1984; and WHEREAS, The negotiations between Superintendent Vioni and the Board of Education have continuously contem- plated an amendment retroactive to July 1, 1984; and WHEREAS, No action has been taken to date by the Board of Education pending completion of negotiations to extend the Superintendent's contract for an additional period of time; and WHEREAS, The Board of Education and Superintendent Vioni have agreed that it is in the mutual best interests of the school district and the Superintendent to modify and clarify certain provisions of her contract; NOW THEREFORE, The Board of Education of Independent School District No. 284 resolves as follows: 1. The Board of Education wishes to and does hereby reaffirm that Superintendent Vioni and the Board of Education negotiated the terms of her original contract with the school district in good faith and that Superintendent Vioni has engaged in no personal wrongdoing in connection with the negotiation of her contract, the implementation of the terms of her contract, or her management of the financial and other affairs of the school district. =— L.P( Minutes Page 3 Recess Resolution - Superintendent's Contract Settlement Agreement Conditional Release Wayzata Board of Education Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 2. The Board of Education, through its represen- tative in discussions with the Superintendent concerning her contract, has offered to extend her contract for an additional year through June 30, 1987. Superintendent Vioni has advised the Board that she declines this offer at this time, but that she will reconsider it if it is extended to her again by the Board of Education after July 1, 1985. 3. The Board of Education hereby approves a modified contract for the employment of Superinten- dent Vioni through June 30, 1986, which contract has been signed by the Superintendent and submitted to the Board of Education for its approval on April 13, 1985, and authorizes and directs the officers of the Board to execute the contract on behalf of the Board. 4. The Board of Education hereby approves the Settlement Agreement and attachments which have been signed by the Superintendent and submitted to the Board of Education for its approval on April 13, 1985, and authorizes and directs the officers of the Board to execute it on behalf of the Board. A roll call vote was taken and the following voted in favor thereof: John Dettloff, Dean Fitch, James Kemp, Roman Lucky; and the following voted against the same: Gregg Miller and Judith Betty; whereupon the motion carried on a 4-2 vote. (Copies of Superintendent's Contract, Settlement Agreement and Conditional Releases are attached to the official copy of these Board minutes.) A motion was made by Mr. Lucky and seconded by Mr. Miller calling for the originals of all tapes made in the negotia- tions process related to the Superintendent's contract be kept at the offices of Faegre & Benson and only a copy of the tapes, made under the supervision of Faegre & Benson, be sent to the District and that these copies be the only ones used for public review. The motion passed unanimously on a 6-0 vote. OTHER BUSINESS Other business that came before the School Board included the following: Heard Board attorney, Dale Beihoffer of Faegre & Benson, report on the following: negotiations process regarding the Superintendent's contract and related claims; details of the amended Superintendent's contract, the Settlement Agreement, and the Conditional Release; that the Dis- trict's insurance carrier had agreed to pay fifty percent of the settlement costs and the Board's attorney fees; =—LkC� Minutes Page 4 Resolution (continued) Tapes of Negotiations related to Superin- tendent's Contract Other Business Wayzata Board of Education Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 that the settlement package carried the recommendation and endorsement, after careful evaluation and deliberation, of Faegre & Benson as attorney for the School District; that the District's insurance carrier recommended and supported the settlement agreement; that present Board members, as individuals, and former Board member, Richard Palmer, could become a party to the settlement agreement by signing the documents on or before April 22, 1985; that the settlement appeared to be the most reasonable and prudent resolution in light of potential costs of defending potential litigation and costs of possible judgments which might be awarded against the school district; and that because of the tort claims statute, the matter must be submitted to a judge of Hennepin County District Court before the settlement would take effect. - Heard Judith Betty ask Dale Beihoffer to request an extension of the April 22, 1985, timeline on her behalf. - Heard Judith Betty express difficulty on accepting the entire proposal and timing; the desirability of coming to closure on the contract issue; and that the settlement costs were too excessive. - Heard Dean Fitch comment that the agreement was in the best interest of the school district, and that it was relatively inexpensive compared with the costs of potential litigation. - Heard Gregg Miller voice concern with the combined package; philosophical problem with increasing salary to cover items that weren't tied to performance; recognized there was some question whether there was insurance coverage in all circumstances, but that the insurance carrier would cover those instances where board members acted within their scope of authority; and commended Dale Beihoffer on the excellent job he had done in putting the settlement together under difficult circumstances. - Heard James Kemp comment, as an individual and not as Board Chairman, that a great amount of time and energy had been spent by many people to reach this point; that he had done a great deal of soul searching to arrive at his vote; that with his conservative background, the dollar amounts were extremely high; that as he has stated in the past, he tries to make his vote reflect what he feels and hears from the community; and that he would not solely look at the dollar amounts, but what will help in the healing process of this community. - Heard Chairman Kemp comment that approval of the settle- ment agreement was the next step in the process; court approval of the settlement was necessary; request the assistance of all present, including the press, to help — S Minutes Page 5 Other Business (continued) Wayzata Board of Education Special Meeting - April 13, 1985 explain the process to the community; ask that all show some statesmanship, tolerance, and understanding; and that it was time to move forward on behalf of the students of the school district. Heard Dale Beihoffer comment that assuming the settlement agreement was approved by the Hennepin County Court and then implemented, the school district community would have the opportunity to wipe the slate clean as of April 13, 1985, and move forward; the settlement did not preclude the possibility of further controversy and future claims and incidences occurring after April 13, 1985; state that present School Board members, former School Board members, the Superintendent, District employees, students, resi- dents and the news media had an obligation to act in a prudent fashion so that the School District could move forward and avoid any further divisive controversy which it has faced for much too long. Heard Chairman Kemp report that Dick Anderson of the Minnesota School Boards Association had received an invitation from the Wayzata Parent-Teacher Liaison Council to attend a School Board candidates program and make a presentation on such topics as the role of a school board member, board responsibility, etc. Mr. Anderson asked if the School Board had any objections to his accepting the invitation. There was Board consensus the Mr. Anderson should accept the invitation. There being no additional business before the School Board, a motion was made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Dettloff to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously on a 6-0 vote, and the meeting stood adjourned at 11:37 a.m. LMB BRD7:47 Attachments: Resolution Relating to the Termination and Nonrenewal of the Teaching Contract of (Named) Probationay Teachers Resolution Proposing to Place (Named Teachers) on Unrequested Leave of Absence Minutes Page 6 Other Business (continued) Adjournment Minutes Third Meeting Hennepin County Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee February 13, 1985 The advisory committee was called to order at 4:30 p.m. in the meeting room of the Ridgedale Library. Attending the meeting were: Dave Winter, Senior Planner - Bennepin County Mark Banwart, Planner - Bennepin County Paul Smith, Planner - Metropolitan Council Bob Sharlin Marilynn Corcoran Doris J. Conzet Phyllis Jessen Dick Schieffer T+om Anderson David A. Rlatke, Jr. Hilmer Hartman Richard Hlavka John Wright Don Ostenson Margaret Fuller Jo Nunn Ron Dehn Clarence Oster Richard Zilka Archie Reed Susan Covnick Jahn Whitman Carol R. Johnson Bob Sharlin as acting chairman opened the meeting and asked for nominations for the position of chairman. Doris Conzet nominated Dick Schieffer and John Wright seconded the motion. The committee elected Dick Schieffer as 'chairman of the HCS MAC. Chai anon Schieffer brought the item of meeting scheduling to the floor. Alternative days and locations were discussed. Bob Sharlin made a notion to approve a meeting schedule of the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of each month from 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. in the meeting room of the Ridgedale Library. Carol R. Johnson seconded the motion. The motion passed. The next item for review and discussion was the "Possible Meeting Topics" prepared by the executive committee of the HCSWMAC. Josephine Nunn and Paul Smith recommended that the low technology waste abatement activities be covered first. Richard Hlavka and Bob Sharlin felt that since large-scale waste -to -energy facilities are already programmed, and waste -abatement activites and the recycling study would not be ready for another month, the next meeting topic should be "waste -to -energy". _--1-7 4 e—I Others added that a general outline of the solid waste master plan should be presented early on, to give a framework from which the BCSWMI+,C can work. Zhe comnuttee concurred. John Wright, and others, stated that air quality and transfer stations should be included in the waste -to -energy meetings. Don Ostenson felt environmental issues should be a major consideration throughout the plan. !Marilynn Corcoran stated that the landfill site selection process and ELS process should be included as a meeting topic later on in the schedule. M mas Anderson made a motion to approve the meeting topics with the above changes. Clarence Oster, seconded the motion. Zhe committee passed the motion. M* BCSWMAC discussed if there should be suboommittees or ad hoc groups to address specific issues during the plan preparation. Paul Smith recommended against subcommittees because they require too much time. Tentatively the the committee will use ad hoc groups in short time -frames to address specific issues when they are deemed necessary. Dave Winter suggested that the staff could prepare a set of questions to give the presenters in advance which would focus on ccamittee members' concerns. The committee agreed. Dave Winter gave a presentation which covered aspects of the current solid waste management system including : Waste quantities Waste composition Seasonal variations Collection practices Transfer stations Disposal in landfills The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. NSB:dlr 3meeting 11 :Y-- - Loe-- 4th Meeting of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee (February 27, 1985) The advisory committee was called to order at 4:33 p.m. in the meeting roan of the Ridgedale Library. Attending the meeting were: Dave Winter, Senior Planner - Hennepin County Mark S. Banwart, Planner - Hennepin County Paul Smith, Planner - Metropolitan Council Dick Schieffer Mike Pauling Ron Dehn Charles S. Thomson Marilynn Corcoran Bob Sharlin Chuck Kutter John Wright Ray Stockman Georgia Ray DeCoster Dave Klatke, Jr. Hilmer Hartman Roz Shovlin Richard J. Blavka John Whitman Susan Covnick Ron Moering Don E. Ostenson (alt. for A. William Johnson) Dave Winter presented and discussed the layout of the outline for the Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan. Dave Winter stated that the committee should provide a general direction for the master plan in assisting in developing the policies and goals. Bob Sharlin asked how the outline compared with the state mandated contents for the master plan. Dave responded, stating that the elements required by the state are included in the outline. Chairman Dick Schieffer inquired if the 1981 Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan would be useful. Dave Winter responded stating that the 1981 plan would not meet the current content requirements. Mr. Sharlin recommended that high technology activities (waste -to -energy) would be the first items within the master plan. Chairman Schieffer stated that the determination of where high tech sections be located in the plan could be determined in a final drafting of the master plan. Mr. Winter also noted that the format is consistent with the format Met Council most desires, and that the outline is not set in concrete but rather is to be frameworked to develop the plan. Luther Nelson, Director of the Department of Envirormient and Energy, gave a presentation on waste -to -energy resource recovery planning in Hennepin County and a slide presentation on waste -to -energy technologies. In 1979 Hennepin County conducted an energy market search of potential electric, steam, and processed steam users within Hennepin County. In 1980 engineering studies on various waste -to -energy technologies and feasibility of waste -to -energy implementation was investigated, with the final report on the feasibility completed in April, 1981. During 1981 and 1982 the county conducted the feasibility of small energy markets such as commercial laundries, etc. The Metropolitan Airports Commission property at the Minneapolis -St Paul International Airport was identified and the feasibility studies conducted for the development of a 100 -ton -per -day modular combustion unit. In December of 1982 MAC placed the project on hold because of other airport development commitments. During the period between July, 1982 and the spring of 1983 a city/county site -selection committee, made up of five Hennepin County commissioners and five Minneapolis aldermen identified the West Riverbank Site for a 2,000 ton -per -day RDF facility. In April, 1984 the state legislature created a law which prohibited the development of a large-scale resource recovery facility at the West Riverbank Site. However the same law also provides that notwithstanding any local ordinances, the county can develop two 1,000 ton per day facilities anywhere in the county. In the summer of 1984 Hennepin County Board of Commissioners designated the Greyhound and Pacific Street sites, and in December of 1984 initiated the condemnation proceedings to acquire the Greyhound site, and issued 134.5 million dollars in general obligation bonds, which were sold to make funds available for acquiring Greyhound site property and transfer station sites. Chairman Dick Schieffer asked why the county did not develop a resource -recovery facility in the 1970's. Mr. Nelson responded by pointing out that in the early 1970's major emphasis for solid waste disposal was the movement from open dumps to sanitary landfills, and that there was little public or political interest in alternative disposal methods. Major work toward waste -to -energy facilities has occurred since the Minnesota Waste Management Act of 1980 which specifies that alternative waste disposal practices should be developed. Hilmer Hartman asked if it would be beneficial to change the 1984 law prohibiting the West Riverbank Site. Luther Nelson stated that the county has no plans in that direction since it would mean a further time delay, and that the county's intent is in pursuing the objective of getting the facility built in the shortest possible timeframe. Luther Nelson continued his presentation by giving an overview of various waste -to -energy technologies. Slides with a narration described mass burn facilities in Westchester County in New York; Saugus, Massachusettes; Pinellas County in Florida; and in Nashville, Tennessee. Slides were shown illustrating the configuration of a typical plant. Slides on small-scale modular combustion units, describing the Red Wing, Minnesota and Pittsfield, Massachusetts, facilities were shown. 7te American invention of refuse derived fuel (RDF) facilities was presented. Slides of the Albany, New York; Akron, Ohio; Ames, Iowa; and Hamilton, Ontario facilities were shown. Chuck Kutter asked what types of track records do these types of facilities have. Luther described a couple of facilities which have failed and the reasons for their failure. It was also pointed out that the Dade County, Florida RDF plant separates many items prior to the burning of RDF. Part of the reasons for the great success of this facility are the stability of prices and the scarcity of fill material, etc. Several members asked if NSP and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's Pig's Eye facility have been looked at as possible markets. Luther replied, stating that NSP was looked at in a 1979 energy market study and subsequent studies. The Pig's Eye facility is located outside of Hennepin County. Bob Sharlin asked Paul Smith, the Metro Council planner, for an update on the policy plan. Paul stated that the changes to the draft policy plan were mailed out on February 27. He stated that the main change to the policies is that source separation would be voluntary, and the need for mandatory source separation would be based on the performance of voluntary programs. Meeting adjourned at 6:08 p.m. Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee (March 13, 1985) The advisory committee was called to order at 4:30 p.m. in meeting room A of the Ridgedale Library. Attending the meeting were: Dick Schieffer, Chairman Chuck Rutter Ron Dehn John Whitman Richard J. Hlavka John Wright Josephine Nunn Doris J. Conzet Rick Person Clarence C. Oster Ron Moening (alt. for A. Win. Johnson) Marilynn Corcoran Ray Stockman Dave Rlatke, Jr. Charles S. Thomson Mike Pauling Bob Sharlin Hilmer Hartman Thomas Anderson Alvin T. Balgaard Carol R. Johnson Richard L. Zilka, Jr. Warren Porter, Project Manager - Hennepin County Dave Winter, Senior Planner - Hennepin County Mark S. Banwart, Planner - Hennepin County Paul Smith, Planner - Metropolitan Council Mark Wollschlager, J.D., Environmental Specialist - Henningson, Durham and Richardson, Inc. Warren Porter presented and discussed the most recent concept plan as contained in County Board Resolution Number 84-10-771 which was approved October 31, 1984. (See attachment.) The plan provides for the construction of one or more resource - recovery facilities having the combined capacity of two thousand tons per day, one thousand tons per day of which will be processed at a facility located at what is called the Greyhound Site in the City of Minneapolis, and an additional one or more RDF -type -processing facilities to be located within or outside of Hennepin County, in conjuction with RDF -combustion facilities at existing power plants, at Black Dog, Wilmarth and/or Elk River. If either of the two RDF processing facilities, in combination with the Greyhound facility, does not provide the required 2000 -ton - per -day capacity, a second resource -recovery facility would be built at the Pacific Street Site located in the City of Minneapolis. Finally, the concept plan provides for up to four (4) transfer stations to be located throughout the county in order to obtain legal control of the solid waste and to direct the waste to the various resource -recovery facilities. Mr. Porter gave a presentation on transfer stations, which included the siting process used, slides of transfer stations (e.g., Seattle, Washington; Fairfax, Virginia, etc.) A discussion followed on the rationale for transfer stations in a waste -to -energy -facility system, and a summary of the status of transfer stations. Warren Porter discussed a handout entitled "Hennepin County Large Scale Energy Recovery Project - Summary of Site Selection Process and Siting Criteria For Transfer Stations and Results of Public Meetings on: Process and Criteria, Search Areas, Candidate Sites, and Preliminary Recommendations on Candidate Sites (July, 1984)" (see attachment). There are several good reasons for having transfer stations as part of a solid waste energy -recovery system: (1.) Gain control of the waste. (2.) Allot solid waste to various energy -recovery facilities. (3.) Reduce traffic volume at energy -recovery facilities. Warren Porter described the four transfer stations in Hennepin County and described the various candidate sites which are in Brooklyn Park, located near Hwy. 169 and 73rd Avenue North, Hopkins at the Department of Transportation facilities, the existing Minneapolis South Transfer Station, and a site at 96th Street and James Avenue in Bloomington. It was pointed out that Bloomington is contesting the location of a transfer station at the James Avenue location. The City of Bloomington states that the transfer station at that location would be in conflict with Bloomington economic development goals, conflicts with local business plans of using the land for expansion (corporate reserve), and they feel that with the county's new concept plan there should be rethinking of the necessity for a transfer station in Bloomington. Clarence Oster asked if the Bloomington site was large enough for a transfer station and if it would require building removal. Mr. Porter responded that the site was approximately five acres and sufficiently large for a transfer station, and that there would be need for removal of buildings. On the issue of ownership of transfer stations, they may be publically or privately operated, although Minneapolis will probably want to retain ownership of the South Transfer Station and Hennepin County the BPS Hopkins location. Chuck Rutter asked if, under the NSP portion of the concept plan, NSP intends to operate the processing and burning of RDF. Warren responded "yes", and also stated that the vendors who are responding to the Request For Proposals (RFP) for the Greyhound Site would include, as part of their bid, design, construction and operation, which would include maintenance for twenty years. Warren also stated that the tipping fee for the facility may be in the range of $40-$45 per ton. Charlie Thompson stressed the point that the difference of the existing disposal cost and what is anticipated for a waste -to -energy facility is quite a substantial difference and that the coanuttee should be cost-conscious with regard to the implications of its policy directions. Rick Person asked if the Greyhound Site RFP requires combustion of solid waste on site. Warren said yes, on-site combustion. other questions were asked about the existing time -frame for implementing the Greyhound facility, establishment of markets, and litigation that may be forthcoming from Minneapolis. Mr. Porter responded by stating that with regard to the time --frame, the responses to the RFP are due on April 23rd and that the evaluation of the responses would --be complete by late June or early July. Regarding markets for steam, we are in negotiations with the Minneapolis Energy Center, NSP and others. Warren described that the litigation from the City of Minneapolis deals with an zmmmit IQE II Btu fir• Paul Smith was asked about the current status of environmental review for the waste -to -energy facility at the Greyhound Site. Paul Smith responded by stating that the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is complete and is ready to be reviewed. Upon completion of the review they will begin the scoping work followed by the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Metropolitan Council is the responsible government unit to prepare the EW and EIS. Mark Wollschlager, Environmental Specialist with Henningson, Durham & Richardson, Inc., presented an overview of large-scale waste -to -energy siting in Hennepin County. Mark presented an historic overview of activities which have led up to the designation of the Greyhound site. Mr. Wollschlager stated the major criteria for siting a large-scale waste -to -energy facility are that the facility be placed in an industrially zoned area, close to energy markets, and close to waste generation. other considerations are site area, steam line distance and potential site acquisition costs. Furthermore, there are considerations regarding site -development issues, site ownership, capability of the streets to handle the traffic that is anticipated, possible maximum facility size, and traffic inmplications. Environmental factors include air quality (sulfur dioxide) and visible screening. Other issues include zoning, land -use plans, and proximity to housing. In summary, Mr. Wollschlager stated that the county has been involved in the siting process for four years, has held six public meetings, has had a great degree of involvement by the City of Minneapolis in the project, and there has been a great deal of investigation regarding site development, environmental, and land -use issues. Mr. Wollschlager also stated that future activities include the EIS, air-quality monitoring, air, water and solid waste permits, and the waste assurance process. Chuck Rutter asked if all of Hennepin County is going to be under waste flow control. It was stated that the county is designating flow control for the entire county. Paul Smith said that the Metropolitan Council will review the county's Waste Designation Plan on April 11th, and that they have received three exclusion requests from the designation. Meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. MSB/mvr !3/21/85 6th Meeting of the SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT (March 27, 1985) The advisory committee was called to order at 4:30 p.m. in meeting Room A of the Ridgedale Library. Attending the meeting were: Roz Shovlin Dave Rlatke, Jr. John Wright Clarence C. Oster Doris J. Conzet Marilynn Corcoran Susan Covnick Rick Person Ron Moening (alt. A. William Johnson) Dick Schieffer Don E. Ostenson Richard Zilka, Jr. Josephine D. Nunn Georgia Ray De Coster Richard J. Hlavka Charles S. Thomson Hilmer Hartman Dave Winter, Senior Planner - Hennepin County Mark S. Banwart, Planner - Hennepin County Daniel Rrivit, Planner - Metropolitan Council Jerry Powell, President - Resource Conservation Consultants David Gurney, Project Manager - Pope -Reid Associates Mark Huddleston, Envir. Health Specialist - Pope -Reid Associates Roger Laitinen, Project Engineer - Pope -Reid Associates Dick Schieffer, Chairman, opened the meeting and then turned it over to Dave Winter. Dave Winter described the events which have led to the production of the Hennepin County Comprehensive Recycling Study. Jerry Powell, President of Resource 'Conservation Consultants, Inc., described the overall methodology used in the recycling study. He stated that there were three major elements in the creation of the recycling study: (1) identify and describe possible recycling options; (2) evaluate the options; and (3) develop scenarios made up of combinations and intensities of option use. A slide show describing source -separation options was shown. The source - separation options are: (1) drop-off recycling centers; (2) buy-back recycling centers; (3) curbside collection; (4) yard -waste composting; (5) other organic composting; (6) office -paper recovery; (7) old corrugated cardboard recovery; (8) tire recycling; (9) waste -oil recovery; (10) building materials recovery; (11) plastics recycling; (12) salvaging; (13) waste reduction programs; (14) market development and procurement programs; (15) public awareness and education programs; (16) financing programs; (17) institutional programs; and (18) technical assistance programs. The various source -separation options were evaluated by the Hennepin County Recycling Study Advisory Camnittee, based on seven criteria. These criteria in ranked order are: (1) landfill abatement; (2) environmental impact; (3) reliability; (4) least cost; (5) compatibility; (6) convenience; and (7) timing. Six scenarios were developed, ranging from 1% to 40% addition waste diversion from landfills. Pope -Reid Associates estimate that 23% of gross discards are currently being recycled. The scenarios were constructed from the evaluated source -separation options in various combinations and intensities of use. (See attachment) Charlie Thompson asked if the burning of plastics in a waste -to -energy facility is a problem. Jerry Powell pointed out that a facility in New York State has been closed because of allegations of dioxin emissions from the burning of plastics, and that a lot of research is currently being conducted to determine if plastics are really a problem. The "jury is still out" regarding the plastics -burning issue. Jerry also pointed out that there are very few secondary markets for plastics, and that fiber -fill, carpet backing and Japanese exports, seen to be the only established markets. Dick Schieffer asked if back -yard composting was evaluated as a potential source -separation option. Jerry Powell responded by stating that the study addressed operational programs. However, County involvement with back -yard composting would consist of promotion and technical assistance. Dave Gurney, Pope -Reid Associates, stated that back -yard composting was most successful with homeowners who have large lots. Marilynn Corcoran asked if the impact of the winter months was considered in developing the recycling scenarios. The reply was yes. Rick Person asked if market availability had been considered in the study. Chace again the reply was yes; however, the marketing of compost may be a problem. Ron Moening posed the question, "If the assumed market prices would drop; for example, in the case of corrugated cardboard from an assumed amount of $20.00 per ton to $2.00 per ton, what would be the effect on that source -separation option?" Jerry Powell stated that the cost of the scenarios was based on average selling prices for recovered goods such as newspaper, corrugated and glass, and indicated that a program may need to be discontinued, if the market price of a recyclable dropped severely. Mr. Thomson asked to what level have the scenarios been implemented elsewhere in the country. Dave Winter asked if any counties, like Hennepin County with its 45 municipalities, managed to implement the source -separation options as described in the scenarios. Jerry Powell responded by stating that in New Jersey, with its state -mandated source -separation laws, there were a couple of counties which have reached the scenario number 2 level. Dan Rrivit asked Dave Winter haw the recycling study would fit into the County's Solid Waste Master Plan. Dave Winter responded by stating that the recycling study would serve as a focus for discussion and decisions regarding the mix of source -separation options the County would develop to meet the Metropolitan Council Policy Plan goals for the next twenty years. The meeting adjourned at 6:03 p.m. MSB:mvr MTG6 7th Meeting of the Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee (April 10, 1985) The advisory committee was called to order at 4:35 p.m. in meeting Roan A of the Ridgedale Library. Attending the meeting were: Roz Shovlin Ray Stockman Josephine Nunn Bob Sharlin Ron Dehn John Whitman Clarence Oster Richard Zilka, Jr. Susan Covnick Carl R. Johnson Charles Thomson Dick Schieffer Dave Rlatke, Jr. Doris J. Conzet Thomas Anderson Chuck Rutter Alvin Balgaard Phyllis Jessen Hilmer Hartman Don E. Ostenson Dave Winter, Senior Planner - Hennepin County Mark S. Banwart, Planner - Hennepin County Paul Smith, Environmental Planner - Metropolitan Council Brian Golob, Environmental Health Specialist - Pope -Reid Associates Dick Schieffer, Chairman, opened the meeting and introduced Brian Golob, Environmental Health Specialist with Pope -Reid Associates. Mr. Golob explained that there are three basic formats for composting: (1) backyard composting; (2) neighborhood composting; and (3) centralized composting. Backyard composting is when an individual composts his own yard waste for his own use. Neighborhood composting is when individuals living in a given area establish a small composting operation for their own neighborhood. The neighborhood composting format is highly dependent upon the availability of land in the neighborhood and cooperation of the neighbors. The main portion of the discussion pertained to centralized composting. Brian Golob described the aspects of a centralized composting operation. 1.) Determine amount of leaves to be processed. The rule of thumb is one acre of land is needed to process 3000 cubic yards of leaves. 2.) Identify composting site. Siting concerns include: - proximity to housing - surface drainage - traffic - land ownership - proximity to equipment - visual screening 3.) Site preparation. The preparation of - access road - drainage - traffic flaw - gates and fencing - signs 1 a compost site requires: 4.) Hire a monitor to supervise the site. 5.) Determine collection methods. - drop-off - organized collection 6.) Publicize the program. - brochures - news releases - public service - news letters - posters - speakers 7.) Compost site announcements (PSA) operation. construct and water the windrows aereate the windrows monitor temperatures 8.) Determine markets. - citizens - businesses - parks - public works departments There are several possible negative aspects to centralized composting, which include - vandalism,, possible insurance risks, need for additional police and fire protection, and general maintenance of the sites. Uses of compost include - gardens, lawns, potting soil, mulch, top -dressing. Brian Golob stated that, based on available research, there is no apparent need to add an inoculant (natural organisms) to speed the composting process. Chuck Rutter asked if it is necessary to compost leaves and grass together. Brian stated that, although the leaves are high in hydro -carbons and the grass is high in nitrogen, and would yield an ideal ratio for effective composting, leaves by themselves can be, and are, composted. Mr. Golob estimated that approximately 28 to 3% of the waste stream is comprised of leaves, and grass clippings comprise over 6% of the waste stream. Chuck Rutter asked if there was any truth in comments that mulching can cause turf diseases. Brian Golob responded that he has also heard those types of comments, and understands it is possible that, without proper mulching practices, there is a possibility of developing diseases of the turf. Brian Golob continued his presentation by providing the case example of Ramsey County's compost operation, which he supervised. He showed slides of the various steps in the creation of a compost site, leaf collection and publicity aspects of the operation. In Ramsey County 771 tons and 668 tons of leaves were collected in 1983 and 1984 respectively. It was estimated that in 1983 it cost $20.18 per ton for the operation of the Ramsey County compost sites. In 1984, the cost was $25.60 per ton. Brian provided information on leaf data, since it is the only city in organized leaf -collection program. principal means to collect leaves. approximately $39.90 per ton. collection, using the City of Roseville's the metropolitan area which has an Roseville uses a vacuum truck as the The cost for leaf collection is Mark Banwart briefly described Hennepin County's publicity program for the distribution of compost this spring. Hennepin County distributed 2000 brochures at the Hcme and Garden Show and an additional 5000 brochures to various special-interest groups and municipalities. News releases have been circulated to the radio and news -print media, a video public-service announcement has been distributed to the local RV stations, and many of the municipalities in the county are running articles in their community newsletters, promoting the availability of compost. 7me county's public-service announcement video was shown to the members. Several members of the committee discussed the need for centralized composting as a waste -abatement option. Same members thought that mulching would be an effective waste -abatement measure, while others thought that yard waste should be incinerated in a waste -to -energy plant, prohibited from landfills, or that special yard -waste collection should be the responsibility of the individual homeowner. Don Ostenson stated that materials from the solid -waste stream should be put to the best possible use. Others commented that the quality of the county's leaf compost needed improvement. Dick Schieffer suggested that the executive committee meet to review the activities of the oomnittee to date; and to look at the future direction of the committee, and the possible need for subcommittees to generate specific policies on waste -abatement options. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. MSB:mvr 41085 April 22, 1985 Mr. K. D. Hirschey 5750 Vicksburg Lane Plymouth, MN 55446 Dear Mr. Hirschey: CITY OF PLYMOUTFF 2L --7 Thank you for your inquiry at the recent Town Meeting regarding the current zoning and "any grandfather clauses" on land southeast of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane. That land is in the Rural Service Area and urban development will not be realized there for many years until municipal sewer and water service is available. Municipal sewer cannot be installed until metropolitan sewer interceptors are available to that area and, at this time, we frankly do not expect that to occur until after the year 2000. There are a number of 5 acre parcels along Vicksburg Lane in the southeast quadrant of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane; these parcels were created a number of years ago when the State law permitted the creation and conveyance of such parcels. Because the parcels are located along a dedicated street, such as Vicksburg Lane, or because the City Council granted a variance to allow the issuance of a Building Permit, there have been several homes developed in that area. Please understand however that the City Council has not created lots in this area, but rather have considered requests from owners of such lots for Building Permits. The State law now requires that all land divisions are subject to local subdivision regulations unless the parcels are at least 20 acres or more. Plymouth's regulations do not allow the creation of lots for urban development because of the lack of utilities. I have enclosed for your information a booklet regarding Comprehensive Planninq in the City. Please refer to the maps in that booklet, particularly the Staged Development Plan and the Land Use Guide Plan. Once you have had an opportunity to review the book, please call me if you have any further questions. Thank you for attending the Town Meeting, I am glad you enjoyed it. incere� I Blair Tremere Direcb Community Development BT/gw cc: Assistant City Manager Frank Boyles File ENC 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 A G E N D A PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING AREA 7 April 8, 1985 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor David 3. Davenport II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor David J. Davenport V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findinqs with respect to your concern. << is 'i o., NATURE OF PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: X01-,2Lti- z: n,.•vc r�•.� � ��.2r�,.ror-✓�rI Gam; SS AIA 21� C% L% $ L/Iuc.�liL,!'r. ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: K L) H R s c H -L Y ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: 5'76-p V/c►�apu�c L� PHONE NUMBER: »7 - OCC BILL FRENZEL MINNESOTA OF►IC[; Tmom DISTRICT, MINNESOTA MAYSETH CNRI51ENSEN Room 945 AASNINTON OFFICE; 812C PENN AVEE SOUTH 1X26 GNU LDNGWORTN BUILDING BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 5U31 202-225-2871 812-881-4800 ongre�5 of the Uniteb *,tate JWzr of 37N tPrt5tntatibtg Wastington, O.C. 20515 April 19, 1985 V. The Honorable David J. Davenport - h• r. :_„ 1t! Mayor 1 City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard `.: Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Dave: I am asking for your help. President Reagan has launched a new nationwide initiative --the President's Citation Program for Private Sector Initiatives --to recognize Americans whose efforts and contributions to society exemplify the spirit of voluntarism that is so important in our world today. The President has asked me to participate in this program by selecting one exemplary Private Sector Initiative in the Third Congressional District. The business, trade association, or community-based organization selected for rec- ognition will receive a Citation Program "C -Flag" which will be a symbol of the private, voluntary efforts of all of the people in our area. To illustrate the type of voluntarism that the President would like to highlight, let me give you one example. A few months ago, President Reagan devoted his Saturday radio talk to the problem of missing children. It so happened that Jim Kerrigan, Chairman of the Trailways Bus Company, heard that talk. The following Monday, Kerrigan called the White House to say that Trailways would like to help. Working with the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Trailways put to- gether a program where once a missing child was identified by local police, the youngster could ride home on a Trailways bus for free. in the first week alone, 20 children were reunited with their parents. It is this kind of commitment to the community that should be encouraged with the "C -Flag" program. 0 In selecting the Third District recipient, I would appreciate your help in identify- ing programs, organizations and individuals in your area which are worthy of rec- ognition. The White House would like our selection by May 15, 1985. Because we don't have much time, I would ask that you contact my Bloomington office (881-4600) by Monday, May 6, with your suggestions. My office will then be able to evaluate the nominations, and choose one for this recognition. It is important to remember that we are choosing only one meritorious Private Sector Initiative to symbolize the good work of many. All the candidates will be good. We will only be selecting a representative. THIS 6TATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED FISRs -2 - As a result of the President's Citation Program for Private Sector Initiatives, there are already over a thousand flags proudly being flown across the country. There are many deserving groups in our area. I appreciate your assistance in identifying possible candidates, and look forward to hearing from you. I will let you know of the final choice that will represent the Third District. Thanks again. BF:ec Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress May Day Parade Begins Year -Long 50th Anniversary Celebration On May 5th, St. Mary of the Lake, Plymouth, MN is having a year-long 50th Anniversary celebration marked by elder members providing storytelling for the parish; a May Day Parade including antique cars going from the original 1935 church to their present facility; a summer weekend of camping and spiritual events; and old-fashioned chicken dinner; festival and auction; and a weeklong fall celebration to be held in November. The present parish of St. Mary of the Lake had its real beginning in 1852. Antonine La Count, a half-breed, built a cabin on the hills overlooking the lake now known as Medicine Lake. In 1856 Eustice Francois Boucher came, and in 1858 Joseph Begin, Francis Huot, Louis Huot, Neumann and Farrington families came. These eight families constituted the settlement. In the Boucher log cabin, early in 1856, Mass was said by Father Francis Hurth, one of the twelve young seminarians brought to St. Paul by Monsignor Ravaoux, at the request of Bishop Cretin. Once each month, Father Hurth journeyed from what is now Osseo, which was then called Bottineau's Prairie and which was named Palestine by Bishop Cretin. As years went by, the Bishop wanted a Catholic church somewhere in the western suburbs of Minneapolis. Schiebe's General Store near Medicine Lake seemed to be the center of a growing community and a landmark for many years. The land was then purchased from Emma Schiebe. Ground breaking for the new St. Mary of the Lake Church was held on March 25, 1935, and the actual digging began May 1, 1935. St. Mary of the Lake Catholic Church has a very active parish community com- prised of approximately 900 families located at 105 North Forestview Lane in Plymouth. Father Jerry Kegler, Pastor of St. Mary's, stated, "The Parish Council decided that we should conduct a year-long celebration to take advantage of the seasons and events which make the celebration more memorable for past parishioners, teachers, employees, former Pastors, and current members." The May Day Parade will begin with a service at the Apostolic Lutheran Church on the corner of County Roads 15 and 73 at 2:00 and a parade to the existing church at 105 North Forestview Lane in Plymouth. A special 3:00 p.m. Liturgy is planned with a potluck supper afterwards. Former parishioners, employees and clergy are invited to attend. For further information, contact Gary J. Paradise or Bill Goldsmith, co-chairmen, at 545-1443. April 24, 1985 The Honorable Rudy Perpich Governor State of Minnesota State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Perpich: CITY OF PLYMOUTH+ =-- \ O c,., First and foremost, thank you for reserving time in your busy schedule to attend the CIPROCO, Inc. groundbreaking scheduled for Wednesday, May 1 at 2:30 p.m. We are pleased that CIPROCO has chosen Plymouth as its home. As a growing high technology company, they represent the type of business which we in Plymouth, and I am sure the State in general, desires to retain. Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend the groundbreaking because of business commitments. I will arrange to have a representative attend on behalf of the City Council. We are proud that you will be able to take part in this- inDortant_ event--, eavia j. Mayor DOD:jm cc: City Council Ronald B. Thomas 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTIt April 23, 1985 Mr. Thomas K. Handy, President Carlson Properties, Inc. 12805 State Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Tom: Both Jim Willis and I appreciated having the opportunity of meeting with you and Dale yesterday regarding the status of the proposed 420,000 square foot office building in Carlson Center. Tom, I must reiterate again my and the City Council's keen disappointment in learning that this project is again being delayed. While I recognize the scale of this project and the necessity for it to be appropriately considered within the Carlson Companies, I am somewhat concerned that after all the planning involved in the total Carlson Center develop- ment, and this site plan specifically, that someone in the Company may be having second thoughts with respect to it. Last year you will recall, the Council approved a site plan for a 330,000 square foot building on this same site. That plan was subsequently revised due to soil conditions and other factors resulting in the plan which is currently being considered. At the time we considered the original plan, we were given to understand that Carlson Properties and Carlson Companies had studied the need for office space in this area and accordingly approached the City with an amendment to the Carlson Center plan to accommodate this change. We considered and approved the plan amendment in a timely manner to accommodate your revised plans. Throughout the history of the Carlson Center, the Plymouth Council has demonstrated its ability to promptly review and consider all proposals which have been presented to it. We have further undertaken substantial public improvements, the timing of which was largely based upon the needs for those facilities as requested by Carlson. By the end of the current construction season we anticipate that all these improvements will be available for public use and thereby Plymouth will have timely met our commitments. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 -Y_- 10 a Cad Mr. Thomas R. Handy, President Carlson Properties, Inc. April 23, 1985 -Page 2 - The tax increment financing plan for Carlson Center was based upon levels of construction activity which have not yet materialized. This is particularly significant as Carlson has guaranteed the payment of principal and interest on the $7 million tax increment bond issue. Last evening the Council approved the special assessment roll for Zinnia Lane and Carlson's 3rd Addition over the unanimous opposition of the neighborhood. The.residents impacted by Carlson Center also should be able to rely on the current Development Plan and construction time table so that the disruption to their neighborhoods can finally be put to rest. I and the Council sincerely hope that the discussions with Carlson over the time schedule for the construction of this new office building will be concluded promptly and favorably from Plymouth's perspective. It is very important to us that a significant structure such as you are proposing be undertaken during this construction season. If I can personally be of any assistance to you or others within the Carlson organization with regard to expediting a decision grrlthis matter, please call me. Sir)6ergly `vid J. pavenport yor DJD: cap cc: Mr. Jim Willis z.- \00..L3�) CITY C� PLYMOUTR April 23, 1985 Mr. David Latvaaho, Chair Hennepin County Park Reserve District Board of Commissioners 3800 County Road 24 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Dear Dave: I will not be able to attend the lunch and tour of the regional parks on April 27th. Thank you for inviting me. I believe you are aware that Plymouth's position is consistent with yours in regard to the legislation that has been proposed to provide for the appointment of Park Reserve Commissioners by the Hennepin County Board. Plymouth supports an elected Board and our position has been communicated to Senators Ramstad and Jude and RepresentatiyQs S_4a er, Clausnitzer and Heap. Sin David J. Davenport Mayor DJD: cap 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTI+ April 23, 1985 Ms. Rose Klobuchar 1315 Oakview Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Rose: Congratulations on being selected Plymouth's Outstanding Educator. Your list of accomplishments are legion and because of time constraints they could only be briefly touched upon at the Awards Dinner. I wish that more people were aware of your contributions to education in District 284. There is a public preoccu- pation in the District with the Board controversy and unfortunately accomplishments by people like yourself have been ignored or overlooked in their entirety. There is much good about District 284 and you are indeed an outstanding example of the quality of the faculty in the District. In reading the words of your nominator I find out that you have made your classrooms "places of warmth, discovery and creativity" and that you have accomplished this by communicating to your students "a sense of trust and friendship that has created an atmosphere where they are free to explore and wander without stress" - how wonderful! There is nothing more important to a community than its child resources. Thank you for your role in making those resources develop to their maximum potential. Congratula Sin David J. Mayor DJD: cap :ions gain, Rose. venport 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTFh April 23, 1985 Ms. Mable Swanson 2510 Lancaster Lane Plymouth, DIN 55441 Dear Mable: Congratulations on being designated Plymouth's Outstanding Senior Citizen. This recognition follows the earlier vote by the Plymouth Senior Group designating you its Outstanding Citizen. You are certainly most deserving of this award and in reviewing your long list of accomplishments it is obvious that from your involvement on the "Care and Share Committee" to the work you have done with the Plymouth Historical Society and acting as a volunteer camera person on Cable Channel 10, you are as close to a professional volunteer as there can be. Thank you lending so contribute Sincere] David J. Mayor DJD: cap for the wonderful example you show. Thank you for much of your volunteer time to organizations that tQ_ the quality of life in the Plymouth community. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTR April 23, 1985 Ms. Angela Nelson 3630 Trenton Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Angela: 7=,-\00,OA1 Congratulations on being designated Plymouth's Outstanding Junior High Youth. Your list of accomplishments is very impressive and you are an excellent example to the other young people in Plymouth that volunteerism is indeed alive and well within our community. It is especially impressive that in spite of your work with the Community of St. Joseph's and your extracurricular school activities, you still have attained Honor Roll status for three consecutive years. Congratulations again, Angela, and thank you for all that you do to e Plymouth a special place to live. Si Da�id Mavor DJD: cap 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY C� PLYMOUTH+ April 23, 1985 Mr. Jason Stenzel 450 Quantico Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Jason: �- \ oa(A) Congratulations on being designated Plymouth's Outstanding Senior High Youth. Your list of accomplishments is very impressive. You have distinguished yourself in your school, in your church and in your community. I find it quite refreshing that you have participated on the Wayzata High School football, track and basketball teams and have completed 13 years of piano study. Jason, you are are very proud you set for the one of of you other Plymouth's "best and brightest" and and very appreciative of the example young people in our community. DJD: cap we 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTIt April 23, 1985 Mr. Donald N. Erickson 12530 Rockford Road Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Don: -:Z:.- \oo,Q.4-A ) You are most deserving of being recognized by the Plymouth Jaycee Women as Plymouth's Firefighter of the Year. No one person has probably spent more hours on Fire Department matters for which you weren't compensated than have you. Your work with the Firemen's Relief Association is especially exemplary and exemplifies your honesty and integrity. Congratulati;x4s Sincere DaviU J. Davenport Mayor DJD: cap 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY OF PLYMOUTR April 23, 1985 Mr. Dan Twaddle 2775 North Weston Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Dan: =- \ D a «� Congratulations on being selected Police Officer of the Year at the 12th Annual Community Awards Banquet on April 18th. You are in the finest tradition of our Public Safety Department and are a most deserving recipient. Thank you for your professional competence and for setting such an outstanding example for your peers within the Department and for others who would benefit from the high standards of professionalism and leadership you have consistently demonstrated during your service to tY� ity . Sincete David J Mayor DJD: cap 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 CITY OF PUMOUTR April 23, 1985 Mrs. Mitzi Witchger 16531 26th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mitzi: -=- 10 a Q-A) Congratulations on being one of the nominees for Plymouth's Outstanding Citizen. Belle and I had a chance to chat about your many efforts and the impact of your significant contri- butions to the Junior League and the other volunteer organiza- tions of which you have been a member. You are indeed an outstanding example of voluntarism in its noblest form and the closest thing to a professional volunteer that exists within our community. Thank you for all of your work with those organizations and for making the sacrifices that you have had to make from time to time. Especially thank yomaking Plymouth a better place in which to live Sinc David' J. Da Mayor DJD: cap port 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 � CITY OF PLYM0UTI+ April 23, 1985 Mr. Edson W. Spencer Honeywell, Inc. Honeywell Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55408 Dear Mr. Spencer: =.-100. Cs) My wife and I were pleased to attend the cocktail reception and Up With People Concert last Tuesday. The reception was elegant and the concert was memorable. Plymouth extends its warmest congratulations to Honeywell on its 100th birthday. We are pleased that you have chosen to locate a major research and development facility in our community, and we are looking forward to continuing the excellent relationship between Plymouth and Honeywell that currently exists._, Sincerely; David J. enport Mayor DJD: cap 34DO PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, F 'NNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITYOF PLYMOUTR April 23, 1985 Mr. Donald Hauge 15430 County Road 15 Plymouth, M 55447 Dear Mr. Hauge: 7=— \O o,. Cto) Thank you for your letter of April 9th. I believe you've received a copy of the City's letters to your neighbor, Dick Webber, that respond as best we can to Mr. Webber's concerns about County Road 15. I would further like to reassure you that you and your neighbors will be kept fully appraised of any changes in the status of County Road 15, especially ifheywould involve any contemplated widening of the roa ay .� lane.-:--� it S in cre,Yy , David J. Mayor DJD: cap enport 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 _may EY1/ CITY C� PLYMOUTR April 23, 1985 Mr. William Humphrey Mayor City of Wayzata 600 Rice Street Wayzata, MN 35391 Dear Bill: `S - \ O o. t-7_) Congratulations on receiving the "Indian Leadership Award" that was presented by the American Indian Professionals Association to you in recognition of your help and friendship with the Indian community. Wayzata should be pleased to have as its Mayor a person that represents such high ideals and commitment to the family of man. I Mayor DJD: cap avenport 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 1© aC$) CITY OF PLYMOUTFF April 23, 1985 Mrs. Betty Threinen 5860 North Lawndale Lane Plymouth, MN 55446 Dear Betty: You recently concluded six years of representing Plymouth on the Community Education Advisory Council for Independent School District 284. You did your usual outstanding job in a position that little attention is drawn to until something goes awry. You brought the same commitment and dedication to bear on your service to the Advisory Council as you do with the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. Thank you again, Betty, for serving so capably. Sinq,ereXy, Dapid J./Davenport Mayor DJD: cap 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 City of Medicine Lake April 23, 1985 The Honorable David J. Davenport Mayor of Plymouth 340'0 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, 1,21; 55441 Dear Mayor Davenport: 10609 SOUTH SNORE DRIVE- MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 On behalf the City of Medicine Lake, I wish to extend my thanks for the time and courtesies extended by you and your officials during our visit at your meeting last night. I will be calling Jim Willis in the near future to see if we can work out a mutually satisfactory arrangement for backup fire protection. Very truly yours, r Neal E. Sorensen Mayor, City of Medicine Lake PC: Jim Willis City Manager t CITY OF PLYMOUTf+ April 19, 1985 William I. West 984 Zanzibar Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mr. West: Senator Ramstad shared with me a letter that he sent to you concerning the problems on the Luce Line. On occasion we have scheduled Officers to actively police that portion of the Luce Line located in the City of Plymouth. However, most of the time we rely on citizens to report their concerns directly to us. I encourage you to do this by calling 911 whenever you witness any criminal violations occurring on the Luce Line. Please rest assured that we will respond to your concerns in a vigorous and timely manner. The Luce Line is one of those amenities in the City of Plymouth that impacts positively on our quality of life. Unfortunately there are those in society who will take advantage of these recreational amenities and abuse their intended use. When I consider all of the demands placed upon us for police services I must candidly admit that the police resources are severely limited when it comes to any ongoing commitment to general patrol on the Luce Line. I would be more than happy to discuss this matter will you in the future. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 559-2800 ext. 350. Sincerely, VPLYMOUTH 9LICEDEPARtTMENT y CC: Senator James Ramstad / City Manager, James Willis ✓ Bulletin Board 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800