HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 12-12-1986CITY OF
PLYMOUTH -
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
December 12, 1986
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. JOINT COUNCIL/PRAC MEETING -- Monday, December
Council has scheduled a study meeting with the
Advisory Commission commencing with a dinner
Council Conference Room.
15, 5:00 p.m. The
Park and Recreation
at 5:00 p.m. in the
2. PLYMOUTH FORUM -- Monday, December 15, 7:00 p.m. The Plymouth Forum
will be held in the City Council conference room.
3. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, December 15, 7:30 p.m. Regular
City Council meeting in City Council Chambers.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, December 17, 7:30 p.m. The
Planning Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda
attached. (M-4)
5. EMPLOYEE CHRISTMAS PARTY -- Friday, December 19. The Plymouth
Employee Christmas Party will be held at the Sheraton Park Place
Hotel beginning at 6:30 p.m. Dinner will be at 7:15 p.m. with
entertainment and dancing afterwards.
6. INTERVIEWS OF CONSULTANTS FOR RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES TASK FORCE --
Saturday, December 20. The City Council. will meet in Council
conference room at 8:45 a.m., with the consultant interviews
beginning at 9:00 a.m.
7. APPRECIATION DINNER FOR SANDRA GARDEBRING -- A dinner honoring
Metropolitan Council Chair Sandra Gardebring will be held on
Tuesday, December 30 at the Sheraton -Midway Hotel. A copy of the
dinner invitation is attached. Councilmembers desiring to attend
should contact Laurie so reservations may be made. (M-7)
8. REVISED CALENDARS -- Revised meeting calendars for December and
January are attached. (M-8)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
December 12, 1986
Page two
FOR YOUR INFORMATION.....
1. CITY OF PLYMOUTH VERSUS MENDOTA, INC. -- The City's action against
Mendota, Inc. with respect to the dedication of right-of-way for
County Roads 10 and 61 commenced this past Monday morning in the
court of Judge Fitzgerald. As of this date, Fred Moore, Blair
Tremere, and I have completed our testimony. Beyond the time of the
City Attorney, it has also taken a good deal of our own staff time.
Blair Tremere and I each spent the equivalent of at least 1 and 1/2
days in the courtroom, while Fred Moore has been there
continuously. I have a good feeling about the direction of the
trial and further believe that we have done everything that we can
do to insure that the facts, from our perspective, have been fairly
presented. Mr. Hickok's attorney, Mr. Rapp, is aggressively
defending his client. You may recall that Mr. Rapp also represents
Mr. Middlemist in his action against the City. Based upon the
timing of the Mendota case, the trial of the Middlemist matter has
been deferred until April 20, 1987 before Judge Levy. It is
expected that Judge Fitzgerald's decision in the current case will
be rendered well in advance of April 20 and his decision will help
clarify the legal position of the parties with respect to the matter
of road dedication.
2. NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES MEETING -- Councilmember Zitur
attended a meeting of the Northwest Hennepin Human Services
Wednesday morning. Bonnie Miller of Hennepin County spoke and
distributed the attached information dealing with the County's
approach to dealing with the concentration of group homes. Also
attached is a tabulation of community based residential facilities
in Minneapolis and by suburban communities. (I-2)
3. MINUTES:
a. Planning Commission, December 3, 1986. (I -3a)
b. Plymouth Safety Committee, December 3, 1986 (I -3b)
c. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, November 18, 1986
(I -3c)
4. DEPARTMENT REPORTS -- The following departmental reports for the
month of November are attached:
a. Police Department (I -4a)
b. Fire Departament (I -4b)
5. PLYMOUTH MARKET FOCUS -- Included separately with the information
memorandum is the Minnesota Real Estate Journal "Market Focus" on
Plymouth.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
December 12, 1986
Page three
6. BUILDING INSPECTION NEWSLETTER -- Attached is a copy of the Building
Inspection newsletter distributed to building contractors and
developers who who have performed work within the City. Topics
covered include: building permit fee schedule for 1987 and 1988,
1987 sewer availability charges, maintenance of construction sites,
processed permit applications, requirements for residential
handrails, and frost precautions for cold weather construction.
(I-6)
7. N.W. HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES -- The attached telephone card is being
distributed by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council. The
card lists telephone numbers residents may use for requesting
emergency assistance and human service requirement needs. (I-7)
8. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Memorandum from Dale Hahn regarding a December 8 meeting with
CNA Insurance Company representatives to discuss claims
processing. Also included is a letter from Mr. Edward McCabe,
CNA Branch Manager, which outlines revised procedures for future
claims processing. (I -8a)
b. Memorandum from Dick Carlquist concerning a request he received
for law enforcement data under the Government Data Practices
Act. (I -8b)
James G. Willis
City Manager
OGW:Jm
attach
PLANNING COMHISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1986
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate dist-Ussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on
the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Minutes, December 3, 1986
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. William Deliel. Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the
Hollydale Golf Course clubhouse at 4710 Holly Lane. (86132)
B. Minneapolis Auto Auction. Conditional Use Permit Renewals for outside storage
of vehicles at 1125 Nathan Lane and 1605 County Road 18. (85074/85075)
C. C.O.M.B. Company. Conditional Use Permit to erect terrestrial microwave
antenna at 1405 Xenium Lane. (86135)
5. NEW BUSINESS
* A. Hoyt Development Company. Site Plan approval for a 80,679 sq. ft. office -
warehouse building at the southwest corner of 27th Avenue and Fernbrook Lane.
(86127)
6. OLD BUSINESS
K QFN
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Streamlining the Development Review Process
8. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 P.M.
"Power means two things:
Opportunity to express your
ideas and attempt to lead. It
also means you can make a
difference—you're not
voiceless, you can influence
events, influence people."
Sandra Gardebring
Metropolitan Council Chair
May 1984 -December 1986
Appreciation Dinner for
Sandra Gardebring
Please join us in honoring Sandra Gardebring for the positive
difference she has made in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area as
Metropolitan Council Chair—and will make in the state as
Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services.
Date: Tuesday, Dec. 30
Time: 6 p.m., Cash Bar; 7 p.m., Dinner and Program
Place: Sheraton -Midway Hotel, 1-94 & Hamline Av., St. Paul
Cost: $15 per person
Please make checks payable to "Gardebring'Dinner,"and mail to Rosemarie Johnson,
300 Metro Square Bldg., 7th and Robert Sts., St. Paul, MN 55101. Checks must be
received by Dec. 21. For more information, call 291-6461.
M—S
isrr
3 2 f��
w
2
EC -1
W U:
Flzc�c�x
'I
H
U P� F
1 �
I
LO i3
u�J
cq
Lr, h^c�
j�
z O
I
1 f
pp
C14
I
j P4
w
oG
Vj
r—I HOC)
��
CN
coa Q�
U
Uczi
Mc'
cl
j
w
p= n U
J
En
I
I
I
P
�
j�
� �Oc�i�
r-� ucv
i�
.�
�z
cn
..a
z •a
I
z^ U
c�
o
� �l
d��
w
U
w '
a�oU
Z
�
w
H � W
I
cq
OM V
/1l
l� V
O
C)
n
1-4
C7
c E-4 U
H �
U A4
z
LOH
op"
c
O
r-1 o U
r --4H oo
0 0 0
C\j
cq
..
E5a�u
cu
C4 L)
UpCW4
00
V1
i
G
iti + CC1:
00
M I g• • O
V \ ( !
O P+ W M O P
Vl U r{ U x
� � •-- O U i O U
M
rzz�I ~"L) i az z ; •z
w 0� a co.
Cz N `�
�< H� ~
`� z
fC E O F+ <
O W Cly \' 1 N x O
a o Awz O ..ai
w o !
Q U
z 3 w3ao ��E'
cnWwo 0 C!
>�,,, WUI
m; ' to
w�On H H + WI a p" V] a w
N N (Wi� a U F+ L) Fti m! i"j V U
>•
G °� �Qcz
wLO $
O O � on.r H•rs�UOU r,,,,{ oUOU r.{ oo� I N UOU
�, a �N as a ..,, ,�� ..a x>+U a ••a
SCA N P `,E N coH
W N NjU P G a zpU U
N OfH+ FWjUO; LCTI. U w
N
P N
00
r--4 N
x '� N N
CC
cn
M
i
1
I
i
i
I
i
!
�
co
wN
`
a
G
iti + CC1:
00
M I g• • O
V \ ( !
O P+ W M O P
Vl U r{ U x
� � •-- O U i O U
M
rzz�I ~"L) i az z ; •z
w 0� a co.
Cz N `�
�< H� ~
`� z
fC E O F+ <
O W Cly \' 1 N x O
a o Awz O ..ai
w o !
Q U
z 3 w3ao ��E'
cnWwo 0 C!
>�,,, WUI
m; ' to
w�On H H + WI a p" V] a w
N N (Wi� a U F+ L) Fti m! i"j V U
>•
G °� �Qcz
wLO $
O O � on.r H•rs�UOU r,,,,{ oUOU r.{ oo� I N UOU
�, a �N as a ..,, ,�� ..a x>+U a ••a
SCA N P `,E N coH
W N NjU P G a zpU U
N OfH+ FWjUO; LCTI. U w
N
P N
00
r--4 N
x '� N N
—cZ
DATE: October 28, 1986
TO: Roger Engstrom
HENNEPIN I FROM: Bonny Miller
SUBJECT: Hennepin County Plan Regarding Concentration of Group
Homes
Following is the current status of the work plan:
1. _Cigct 12a on EglYiaeggjda aIld SUtiiizaoD tXhua11
Clients.
Target Date: 3/85 - 6/85
Fesponsibi_ i i ty: Corimun i ty Servi.ces Department/Community Resources
Di.v i q on, T cocr6,inat i or v=itis D i s a b i 1 i ty
Divisions, Human Services Councils and service pro-
viders.
Tiie data collected represents disability division caseloads, residen-
tial facility Otil izat i.on, and state hospital census by geographic
area (suburban city or human service council. area). The United Way
has done a survey of their funded programs which includes geographic
data. Their suburban cities are not grouped the sane as our plarning
areas making their information less useful.
2. zes a op Dga� rip -1 -on of !hg of Ekaj knt i al ana aD_P_P_Qx_t
Services Needed h: Each Disability Groin,.
Target Date: 5/85
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, service providers, advocacy groups.
The Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Chemical Health Divisions
have responded.
3. Survey. AZZess _C2ltinuum gf Residenlia! aIld 2upppu �g�v_iugg Avail-
able in Each Raman Services Council Planning Area.
Target Date: 9/85
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, Human Services Councils, service
providers.
The Human Service Councils included this information in their 1986
CSSA responses
I —c
F.oc�cr I:�r���•tron
Qctc�i�cr 30, l�+fi6
Page 2
4. DeterLine Residential anc3 Support Service in Eac HuaEL Services
Council Planning Area.
Target Date: 3/66
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, Human Services Councils.
The Hur;lan Services Councils include: this information in their 1986
CSSk responses.
r:. netermine Suitable Locations f" Needed Services.
Target Date: 9/PE
Lesponsi.bility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination witi, Disability Divi-
sions, Human Services Councils, r:unicipalities.
Rec,uested of Council of Human Service Councils Chair ty letter dated
August 27, 1986. They have begun working on it.
6. Develop rep".Lj; 5e1-yi ces iD LAch F_eLaD EkI_yiceZ �oulLci?
PlanaiL.Z Area, Throuoh Relocation_. Cor_tractino. and/or Qoeratina Non_
Residential Services,
Target Date: 1/68
Responsibi_1.ity: Community Services Department/Community Resource_
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, service providers, Human Services
Councils, municipalities.
lie should be able to meet this schedule.
7. Identi.fv-ojon-unity-Based Residential Facilities Willing #2 Relocate to
Fill I=An services Council planning Area Service Gans.
Target Date: 6/87
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination -with Disability
Divisions, service providers.
4;'e should be able to meet this schedule.
Roger Engstror,
Gctoijer 3;G, 19E.G
Page 3
8. Assess Anjd Develoo Appropriate Transfer Plans f,_Qj LIJ clients Living
in Facilities hillich jijl.1 Relocate.
Target Date: At least 30 days prior to each relocation_.
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, service providers.
We should be able to meet this schedule.
9. p LQv i d e on el t a tig-n, IgohniS-Ai Azalalang-e -aIl� .ilUppQ _t tQ Azai-q-t
Facilities to Relocate by IZ,9.
Target Date: 6/87 - 1/90, Ongoing
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination. with Disabilit1
Divisions, Department of Human_ Services, tlinnesotc
Department of Health.
We should be able to meet this schedule.
10. Coordinate aee tin_a I—o Identify Factors w is . y7ill Increase fD-jimun-
j,.y Acceptance Qf facilities. Including A11.y Needed Modifications of
Local Zoning Procedures.
Target Date: By 6/85
Responsibility: Community Resources Division, in coordination with
Disability Divisions, Human Services Councils,
providers, advocates, League of Municipalities.
Six community roeetir_gs for providers, inner-city neighbors,
underserved area neighbors, consumers, municipal staff r%eople anc,
municipal officials were held January 14 - February 19, 1986.
11. Coordinate A- Task Force I_o Develop Guidelines for Facilities tg Use in
hr_oLkillg with NkisbhQLhQQda And fQ peY&121� Nl _t9LiA .a.X2P_kAhgX_a Anjd
MgkhQh,a JQ ys3gg.ajc Abouf Q2MIUunity 5gjXi.cg Uegj3�
Clients Alld Residential Services.
Target Date: 6/85 - 1/86
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division in coordination with Disability
Divisions, Human Services Councils, municipali-
ties, providers, advocates.
The Task Force began its work on November 7, 1985, and completed their
final report dated October, 1986.
Roser Engstrom
Cwtoher 30, 1.966
Page 4
12. in 2ZoY!.O-iD9 and Bktgiiklz� IQ Bldnigipalitigz
�,bere Res;-dential Facilities will Locate.
Target Date: 1/86, Ongoing
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, Human Services Councils, advocates,
providers.
The Task Force Report recommends that Hennepin County take the lead in
implementing its education recommendations. A list of resources is
included in the report.
13. Protect Non-Reipnburseable Costs of Facility Relocations ADL Relocation
Paymgnt.* to jknanjjq J)y -CQIlY.Q.Lesion of Rgntal Tlnila I4
SQLnmunity-Based Residential. Facllities.
Target Date: 6/86
Responsibility: Community Services Departn-:ent/Comrunity Resources
Division, in coordination_ ivith Disability Division:,
service providers.
Information that was received fron facilities which have relocated
including their unreimbursed costs has been used in a legislative
proi�osal from the Conirounity Services Department.
14 S.ollg i d e e Q i� ation jon AD to E-un_d P g jQg atjQn iioa t g •
Target Date: 1/87
Responsibility: Hennepin County Board of Commissioners.
Target date same.
15. Participate with the DePartP- of HUMAn Services in thg Development of
Criteria for ytllizina Relocation Appropriation.
Target Date: 6/87
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability Divisions,
service providers.
Presuries adoption of legislation. This will probably take DES longer.
Q--' .
jrC,(-.( i FIIIF 1:1 Or,
1 E . oopea t E' ��iL� �i�Y Qf LiIlIlo�Q�l� iIl ��aYz a' o QYoI=
Concentrat.i on an() iD pet errpinino Eclui.table Lothods of f_o Ligen-
a roc Neic:hborbood jfhj.h Ieriain Over -Concentrated.
Target Date: 6/86
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Cor<,wunity Rezources
Division, in coor6ination v7iti? D?�cbilit.y DiVlsior8,
advocates, service providers.
i suggest dela]°ing this at least a year. i don't believe we have
sufficient inforrlation on dumber of facilities which will/may relocate
(target. date 6/87, #7), it may be that the number will be few to
none. Response to the rec nest for proposals for development of SLRs
in ur)Cer.serveC areas will demondstrate vendor interest in and ability
to (re)locate outside overconcentrated neighborhoo6s. if we have
estalhl,ished a corciper,satior:- Protocol, v,e raiF-,E' Ex1-E-Ct.at;.or, for
implernentation, and we may not be able to deliver.
17. E-go-reLt a L&.a l Opinion 1egardino �on_ver�ion� of �racatea -C-roup LoLos
Q€r jj_.q€a aIla �Qn��e� s i. ono of �oara dna Loc��ing Laoiiigb to
Su)norti.ve Livinc, Residences.
Target Date: 1/85
Responsibi_1 i ty: Coin muni tj Serv_cE,s Departrc!ent.
Rec,ue:tec fro., the City of. I_inneapol.is May 2, 1985. Nothing has been
received.
18. Fssgst the ImpaCt of ail 2ro!�g-d -9f-Q. L! a.Ilj
Facilities to Supportive Living Facilities.
Target Date: 1/85 anti Ongoing
Responsibility: Community Services Department/Community Resource:;
Division, in coordination with Disability Divi_sicr;r
and service providers.
fi: cer ion is the only converstion to date; a report was written or
July 22,1985. When the Board and Lodging/SLR rehabilitation L-rograr,
is completed, the 12 facilities ir.; the prograr, will be assessec.
approximately three to six months after conversion.
Oi)c r C) 19L,G
19. I e vklp ' A 2LQqkLL 121 Laa_U ina that Llignt EaLkIlAlz and_ EundiLo
LclikfL' kPic P -Lf Ilot inti tc LDY faziilty h cb iz Qp-kxktin�i
I11eaally and Develm Procedures for ReiDortina Facilities Suspected
Qf Operating Illegally to the Arpropriate Lah €nforcengjit.gaencv.
Target Date: 6/85
Responsibility: Community Services Departrlent/Cortrriun_ity Resources
Division, in coordination_ r?ith Disability
Divisions, enforcement agencies.
Pertinent licensing and inspections have been identified.
20. lnc�..a LdYi.LQLX Rith LQMmunitx in All
Ejurcna,ag Qf 2gLYicg LoLggLgIItg nIIa �QQLd and t4d i ProyidkL
Anreements.
21.
jr,
Target Date: l/86 and Onoo-inc.
Respor_sibi.ii.ty: Community Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination `s,ith Disability
Divisions, service 1;rovi6ers.
This was re uested of the Purchase of Service office by rterno
Se1;teiober 5, 1.9F5. Necessary lanoua�;e will be included in the 1987
contracts.
Target date should be chancled to 1/87 and onooinc.
incJjjd�Q 2Lior i ty f o r q�b1dLpan S_' ientg iII �ontLQct
Residential service ProviOers.
Target Date: 1/86 and Ongoing
Responsi.e3 Ji 1 itv: COrc.Llunity Services Department/Community Resources
Division, in coordination with Disability
Divisions, service r.rovi der:.
This was reiuestec; of the Purchase of Sery i cF• office by n-er-,o
September 5, 1985. Necessary language will be included in the 1987
contracts.
Target date shoul.cj he changed to 1/87 and ongoing.
X »- %-o
4- c co
o
vm
�
o E
a)
c
cUZ
O_
O.V
CLL •V
U
` c m LL
cN
L oV—
C
V O Q
C
O
O
C�
2
0
N
LL
Of
m
U�
wU m
;- LL
LLU�cp
UII
OLLLLZ c
ZJZ
OQZ j
Qz
J U
d
�ui
p}
Z7m
uu
ZO�J
OHO
UQQ
u
>- Z
Z
�Z
0
x
OL
a
Q
rn
L 0)
J N
-v
° vm
L
CO O
m
c
O
CU
CO
O
L
H
C U
C
o .h
PlEaw
N
F-
0�
LU
H
Z
Z
O
N °r m opo %% ON ON
M
co m N --r 04 C� Ln M
M N
CN r- C�4 O cn C14
a\ N -:r co d7
C\ O N co Ln r -
H
U
u1 u1 M O w —
O — O \O M Q
O� f: M O M Q
W
H
Q
F-
V)
cn Z
O F- Z
" H
h
c a � ° ? � O
L -s D Z
aci t o `0 0 N O
U a a. Z U
o
�
�
�
:t
04
O
O_
O
O
O
O
_O
O
N
—
O
O
N
C�
co
0
\0
N
N
O
o
�
N
M
N
M
co m N --r 04 C� Ln M
M N
CN r- C�4 O cn C14
a\ N -:r co d7
C\ O N co Ln r -
H
U
u1 u1 M O w —
O — O \O M Q
O� f: M O M Q
W
H
Q
F-
V)
cn Z
O F- Z
" H
h
c a � ° ? � O
L -s D Z
aci t o `0 0 N O
U a a. Z U
M
o
�
�
�
:t
04
O
r-
LI)
00
-t
N
O
N
—
O
O
N
C�
0
0
0
0
o
c
o
0
N
M
N
-
N
vi
O
D
Ul)
Z
Z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
2P
2P
90
cn
ON
N
O,
�
000
O
O
r-
O
O
—
—
p
—
N
Le)
Ln
M
N O \0 \D a M O
N — N — — O\
o
LO
Ln
O
O
O
O
00
-t
N
O
r
N
(\
\O
Ln
f
C)
O
o
—
O
C)
—
—
N
M
N
-
N
vi
O
D
Ul)
Z
Z
J
U
N
M
2P
2P
2P
90
000
O
O
r-
O
O
`_'
00
p
N
N
N
\z
Oo
r`
M
N O \0 \D a M O
N — N — — O\
I
LO
a
_N
J
N
O
r
N
(\
\O
Ln
O\
O
Z
3
Co-
c
co
O
M
►N
-
N
vi
0�
D
Ul)
Z
Z
J
U
N
M
I
LO
a
_N
J
t
L
N
O
O
a
h
Z
3
c
co
JQ
UJ
z
O
c
vi
0�
D
Ul)
Z
Z
J
U
I
cm
'E v o
DE—
Et
U 4' v
u
o >
U�
c Ln
C.
C
L
J
O
d
Z Z
N
Li C
H G
jo
Z
CLL
J J
QU
-X
f-- w
Z
w�
O�Lj
7n f-
xQ
v
4
L >-
L U f-
m� �
1 u
ZZ Li
Z
i0
U
O
U
CL
w
Z
Z
w
L-
X
0
Z
w
c
u °m_
k- ae ae be ae ae 6Q aQ aQ ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae aQ
c 0 " N O M Ln O 'n O vpi O d 0 - d
u1 O O- O N
U ,. o Q
0
0 LA — Ln N O O -Y n GO — O O— S O CD co Q
m O% M LO - T - _ N NW Ln .Y N Ln -Cr W Lrrl
N
p
n M M - M - - - Ln N - d - M N N
LL
C C O v
0 U
co co
N
c
O
u1
1
1
1
I
1
-
1
1
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 M
O
U
CD
OD
.o
M
M
rn
M
w
M
—
—
1
1
1
1
N
—
1
1
1
M
—
— O
7
CD
7
Ln
W
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 O
1
p
O
N
M
M
M
Ln
n
%4
r�
n
pWm
�O
1-
-T
Ln
G
-
N
"O
COD
O�
CO
.,
N
_
M
.,
N
O
M
..
u'1
.. co
O
.
O%
N
CD
.,
:r
..
?
T
O
O
M
Q
N
�Y
N;
M
M
N
M
m
I
d
L
v
C
A
>1C
O
Gg'
U
D
C
O
o
>
v
=
-Y
L
_W
d
p Ln
v
E
>c
.
�t
>
�c
c
d
c
c
J
w
v
•�
,N
i
v
w°%
J
►a -
u
m
cn
c`
U
w
w
U
W
I
i
Z
0
a
X
Ln
3
co
o�
N
C
a
c
C
O
0
U
0
0
`c
v
E
°a
C
°
co
01
wait bnnnspin buffion 019rvic411 planning board
4100 vaimm aYtAYt mutt, it. loult pork, elnnetoto $5416
pit
snnspin 440-5553
bumon
161VICsi
PRIORITY GUIDELINES FOR PARTICIPATION
HOUSE DOCTOR PROGRAM
PLYMOUTH, ST. LOUIS PARK b TONKA BAY
Requirements for participation in the House Doctor Program are:
a. Residential heating customers of Minnegasco.
b. Own the own home and reside in it.
C. Meet one or more of the following priority requirements:
(PT,ioity will be given to those meeting the most requirements.)
1. Have an income which is lower than the income requirements
found in Attachment A.
2. Being a household with the following characteristics:
elderly, handicapped, single parent head -of household,
disabled or otherwise disadvantaged.
3. Required to pay out disproporationate share of income for
medical and other emergency expenses.
4. Have a natural gas consuption above the average of the
participating city.
Attachment A
SIZE PCR % ATMU ZATION FOR SECT ON 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
$ 71088
$19,250
91518
22,000
11,948
24,750
14,378
27,750
16,808
29,200
19,238
30,950
21,668
32,650
24,098
34,400
PROPOSED RULES
Pwftw to blow tMaL of 2K N ICU a1 agency nay prspeoe to adopt. Nowd, aged or Meat gabs wkhud first WOW a pobac'
hearing as ba= w the assess do ormlus dist ate rubes wp1 be no-ontrovendal is nature. nit agency mat atilt pub li a notiae of Womt to
adopt rubes wftow a pole bnriag op " wftb the proposed rules, in the Saari Resister. The notice mat advise the publk:
1. that they have M days in which to eobmk comment oo the proposed rule;
2. that no public houttig wall be hebd oak= 25 or more persons make a written request for a hearing within the 30 -day comment period;
3. of the -area in which persons shall request a hearuS on the proposed auks; and
4. that the rule may be modified if the modf wbons are supported by the data and views submitted.
If, during the 30 -day comment period, 25 or snore perouts submit to the agency a written rapeot for a hearing of the proposed rubes, the
agency must proceed under the provisions of ff 14.14.14.20, which state that If an agency deKides to bobd a public bearing, it trust publish a
notice of intent in the State Register.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. if 14.29 and 14.30, agesxaes may propose emergency rules under certain circuumances. Proposed emergency rules
ars published in the State Relater and, for at lean 25 days tbaeafter. interested persons may submit data and views in writing to the
proposing agency.
Department of Energy and Economic Development
Proposed Permanent Rules Relating to Community Energy Council Grants
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Rule wrkhout a Public Hearing
Notice is hereby given that the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Energy Division, intends
to adopt the above- noted rule without a public hearing following the procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act
for adopting Hiles without a public hearing in Minnesota Statutes, sections 14.22 to 14.28. The statutory authority to adopt the
rule is Minnesota Statutes, sections 1161.035, subdivision 2 and 116].381, subdivision 4, which permit the Commissioner to adopt
rules pursuant to chapter 14 as necessary to carry out his duties and responsibilides pursuant to chapter 1161, and to provide
professional and financial assistance to communities to establish community energy councils and develop and implement community
effigy programs.
All persons have 30 days in which to submit comment in support of or in opposition to the proposed rule or any part or subpart
of the rule. Comment is encouraged. Each comment should identify the portion of the proposed rule addressed, the mason for the
comment, and any change proposed.
Any person may make -a written request for a public hearing on the rule within the 30 -day comment period. If 25 or more persons
/submit a written request for a public hearing within the 30 -day comment period, a public hearing will be held unless a sufficient
number withdraw their request in writing. Any person requesting a public hearing should state his or her name and address, and
pcou
enraged to identify the portion of the proposed rule addressed, the reason for the request, and any change proposed. If a
ublic hearing is required, the agency will proceed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 14.131 to 14.20.
Comments or written requests for a public hearing must be submitted to:
Marie Schoenbaum, DEED, 900 American Center Building, 150 E. Kellog Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55101. Oral statements will
be received during regular business hours by telephone at (612) 297-3602 and in person at the above address.
The proposed rule may be modified if the modifications are supported by data and views submitted to the agency and do not
result in it substantial change in the proposed rule as noticed.
The rules proposed for adoption relate to the following matters: These rules amend the program governing the distribution of
funds for community energy council grants (Minn. Rules, pans 4160.5100-4160.5900) in response to a three million dollar allocation
from the Exxon oil overcharge case. The rules amend the application schedule and review process, increase the maximum award
amount of $rants, establish that a portion of funds will be reserved to fund applications submitted by cities o the fust class, clarify
that rental enemy conservation activtges aRgfble activtiies, and amend the grant agreement conttsn�s�_furidii -period, and
di.tLt! merit.schedule, A free copy of the rule is available upon request from Mark Schoenbaum, DEED, 900 American Center
BuJding, 150 E. Kellogg Blvd., St. Pau- I, NIN 55101, telephone (612) 297-3602.
A Statement of Need and Reasonableness that describes the need for and reasonableness of each provision of the proposed rule
and identifies the data and information relied upon to support the proposed Wile has been prepared and is available hem Mark
Schoenbaum, DEED, 900 American Centex Building, 150 E. Kellogg Blvd.. St. Paul, MN 55101, tekpaone (612) 297-3602,
tq= request.
If no hewing is required, upon adoption of the rmk, the ink and required supporting documents will be subn4ted to the Attorney
General for review as to legality and form to the extent the form relates to legality. Any persm may request notification of the
dor of submission b the Attorney General. Persona who wish to be adviaed of the a Nniasioo of this mrgerial to the Attorney
PAGE 80 r+ STATE REGISTER, Monday 10 November ttlrd (CITE 11 &R. 850)
r
•1,
J
PROPOSED RULES
General, or who wish w mcetve a copy of the adopted rule, trust submit do wnftc request to Mast Schoeobwm, DEED, 900
American Ceotoa Bpi ldis�, 150 E. Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, MTI 55101.
Dated: 21 October 1966
Matt B. Dayton, Commissioner
Deparunent of Energy and Economic Development
Rules n PropoMd
COWAUN rY ENERGY COUNCIL GRAM'S
4160.5100 DEFINITIONS.
Subpart 1. Scope. For purposes of parts 4160.5200 to 4160.5900, the following terms have the meaning given them.
Subp. 2. Cotmmi.aboer. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of the Department of Energy and Ec000mic Development.
Subp. 3. Community eoerp council. "Community energy council" means a council, committee, board, or other body forted
by a city or county, individually or through the exercise of joint powers agreements, to address local energy isuua.
Subp. 4. Depwtment. "Department" means the Department of Energy and Economic Development.
Subp. S. Ebgible applicant. "Eligible applicant" means a Minnesota city or county.
4160.5200 PURPOSE.
Parts 4160.5100 to 4160.5900 establish the method by which the department provides funds to Minnesota cities and counties
in support of community energy council activities, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 116J.381.
4160.5300 GRANT PROGRAM.
Subpart 1. Appticatkm schedule. After announcement by the department in the State Register, the department shall accept
applications for community energy council grants from cities and counties, individually, collectively, or through the exercise of
Joint powers agreements. All available funds shall be announced at the beginning of each g aa_nt cycle. No apybeant may agply for
more than one grant ocr cycle. The department shall consider for funding only applications received by the deadline announced
in the State Register.
Subp. 2. Review process. The commissioner shall select the members of a committee to assist him or bw tb commissioner to
review and rank applications. The review committee shall score applications according to criteria in part 4160.5500 and transmit
its rscomatendations to the commissioner. The commissioner shall approve, disapprove, or return for farther consideration appli-
cations recommended by the comrrurtee. 7Jx department must compictc its review and ja Tpor applicants gf its decisign within
days of 1he grolication deadline. Upon approval by the commissioner, a grant agreement may be negotiated with the department
in accordance with part 4160.3800.
Subp. 3. Mazimum award amount. The maximum amount of a community energy council grant to an individual applicant
other than cities of the first class is 615,,QW $30.000 or the fust year and $15,000 for the second year and requires at least a ten
percent local match. The maximum amount of a community energy council grant to it joint application f10 dg: fust yW is 6134199
$30.000 for the first applicant and $12, $24,000 for each additional applicant up to a maximum of 636;999 $80.000, and
requires at least a ten percent local match. ni maximumma out of a commune energy council SM to a joint aamlicabon for
Sk smond y_eal i,4IS 5.000 ffa alk fart i antra_td $12,000 for each additional amlicant u2 Ig g maximum Qj 548.000, uta_—d
reguircsp_t least >« percent local M&h.
Subo. 4� Ckies o! the Mt clans. When tree nt announces the trvailability of new grant � iq ft Stag Register, tt�t
dicyartment &Mfl announce g ion of clue funds is reserved to iand applicapons submitted ¢y cipa o[ �e est class. Ik
rprtionserves & applications submitted ¢y cities o{ the first JIM shall gal 1k Percentage Q.f a;v 1lable hUldi 451+.6! 14 lb£
percent 4j ft state constitutod by cities of tt�t asst Class. ]IN JC2431019t shall c k�� ul Sk 29= Of Sk povWaWn
comlu pY £a= 2f 1k LIM class AM ft = loceat 02W2boa f1M lvWable If= ft QEDU 2f lk SM
g Sk VMIed A BJil3dli Stf Sk Ste. w y 111 lM recent. If l& Mig—w 001010MM !=h I!6 82 Lv£=
KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION — Undertinirtg indicates additions to existing nae tan uW. &Ww Ova indicate
deletions from existins rule tanguagc. If a proposed rule is totally new. it is designated "all new material.- ADOPM
RULES SECTION — Undedining indicates additions to proposed rule language. SwAw tt m indicate deletions from
proposed rule sang sw -
(CITE 11 Lit Mt) a f a (TATE RN3ISTER, WW* 10 WW"116011 I M PAGE M1
t
•1.
PROPOSED RULES
10M1R10612JIM X9916M121kS M2104160.5300.!=4ftb-efWcls��sdirll�f4i!EW aiogum
£� W 191k � l( h091 1W teats 111 MJ of Ik state 02WAH00-
4160.5400 APPLICATION FOR CONVA NITY ENERGY COUNCIL. GRANT.
Subpart 1. For. Applications mast be submitted in a form prescribed by the department.
Subp. 2. Conteata. Applications must contain the following information:
A. Documentation of the existence of a community energy council must include a copy of the resolution of the governing
body establishing a community energy council, and a list of members appointed by the governing body to serve on the community
energy council, including the members' relevant affiliations, if any.
B. Applicants shall include a work plan that explains how the applicant intends to undertake program planning and
implementation during the grant period. Applicants shall specify major tasks to be undertaken and a project schedule that includes
beginning and ending dates for each task. The expected results or product of each task must be identified.
C. The budget must identify major expenditure categories and amounts and the amount and source of the local match.
D. Applicants shall submit a copy of the resolution or resolutions that authorize the submission of the application to the
41".S500 EVALUATION OF GRANT APPLICATION.
Subpart 1. Criteria. The review committee shall evaluate grant applications according to the following criteria:
A. Community energy councils must include representatives of labor, small business, volunteer organizations, senior citizens,
and low and moderate income residents, and may include city and county officials, and other interested parties.
B. A work plan will be evaluated to determine its potential to reduce energy use and energy costs in the applicant community.
Positive indicators of this potential are:
(1) a work plan that implements one or more eligible activities as listed in part 4160.5600, subpart 1, during the grant
prod;
(2) a work plan that demonstrates how the applicant will coordinate activities undertaken with community energy council
grant funds with activities of other energy service providers, including cities and counties: or
(3) a work plan that indicates efforts that are underway or planned to secure funds in addition to a community energy
council grant for project implementation.
C. Past or current experience in conducting energy-related community programs will be considered by the review committee
as an indicator of the applicant's capability in this area and cornu to nt to energy programs.
D. A grant application must be clear, concise, and complete.
Subp. 2. Point values for applications. The review committee shall award points to each application as follows:
A. representation of community energy council membership, up to a maximum of 35 points;
B. adequacy of applicant work plan, up to a maximum of 40 points;
C. energy-related program experience, up to a maximum of 15 points; and
D. clarity, conciseness, and completeness, up to a maximum of ten points.
4160.5600 CLASSIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE GRANTEE ACTIVITIES.
Subpart 1. Eligible actHtles. Planning, promotion, coordination, and implementation of the following activities are eligible for
community energy council grants:
Residential energy conservation activities may include energy audits, workshops, distribution of energy conservation
match is and information, and financing programs.
B) Dental encm conservation ac ivi6es include encm audits, workshoM. distribution of cr m conservation materials
A ' etifortxMCM 4f 11W enerry efficiency standards. and financing yro¢tams. TenantsLe raj $ooeM owners
Sts ally 2[ �$( ener¢v conservation activities.
r12 B=iwu energy conservation activities may include matings and worksbops, energy audits, distribution of energy
conaervatioa maaerials and udbrmation, and financing pregrwm.
Ct-C* Trxmpoctatkm energy conservation actio car -cam may include r-caclinics, promotion of energy efficient aaruportation
modes. fkM ayncbroniraaion.
PAGE IWI STATE REG)STER, Monday 10 NOvOmbOr 11106 (CRE 11 S.R. �
PROPOUD RULES
a. CarWtmity CMID planaisg activities tray include developau:w d ocmmumty energy use and cost profile and
estimates of eneW conservation and alternative energy pownhals.
& E Local government energy cone vatioa activities may include ewW use and cost accounting, fleet management,
procurement of eaeW efficient vehicles and equipment, and recycling.
& Q Energy efficient land use planning activities may include developing and amending comprehensive plans and zoning
ordinances, subdivision regulations, and other land use controls to facilitate energy efficient development and the use of renewable
energy resources.
G. I; Alternative energy activities may include projects the objective of which is the substitution of alternative energy
sources for fossil fuels.
Subp. 2. Is tigitAe activities. The following activities are ineligible for community energy council grants:
A. projects conducted outside a grantee's corporate boundaries by the grantee alone; and
B. real property acquisition.
4160.5700 CLASSQ7CATION OF ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE GRANTEE EXPENMURES.
Subpart 1. EBgible grantee expend inns. The following an eligible grantee expenditum:
A. salaries and wages;
B. fringe benefits;
C. in -stere travel;
D. space rental and utilities;
E. rental and lease of equipment;
F. consumable supplies;
G. telephone;
H. postage;
1. printing and printed materials; and
J. insurance.
Subp. 2. Ineligible grantee expenditures. The following are ineligible grantee expenditures:
A. out-of-state travel, unless specifically approved in an agreement between the grantee and the department;
B. purchase of real property;
C. purchase of equipment, except consumable supplies; and
D. retroactive payment of grant funds for activities undertaken prior to the effective date of the grant agreement.
4160.5800 GRANT AGREEMENT.
Subpart 1. Contents. An agreement must specify the grant amount and the duration of the grant. The agreement must include
assurance that the local share will be provided wW, that the work program agreed upon will be carried out and that the grant"
will use all interest earned on grant funds for eligible purposes consistent with the g aLnt agreement. A grant agreement based upon
a joint application must be executed by the applicant city or county that will be directly responsible for financial management of
the grant, and that will be responsible for the required reports in part 4160.5800, subpart 4, and the records required in part
4160.5800, subpart 5. Amendments and extensions may only be made in writing and must be signed by all parties.
Subp. 2. Funding period. Grants will be approved for a period of up to one year, unless other terms art agreed to by the
commissioner. Grants will be approved for a second yew Lf the first vow work RLa_n has been completed or if tf grantee hasaid
substantial progress towards completion of the first IM w t Alan. as der I the commissioner.
Subp. 3. Disbursement icbedulc. Funds will be disbursod accordinx to res con in i n A }fin
Fg glglyt s Om 11 12 g IM than S4 ,W0. the department shall disburse 80 percent of the grant motley when it receives
KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION — Undedinir4 indicates additions lo existing rule Wgump. &ago gala indicate
deletions from existing rue tanguage. If i proposed ruk is totally new. it is designated -sM new anterial." ADOPM
RULES SECnON — Underiinind indicates sadditions to proposed rule laap:age. SaAw ew s indicate dektions from
proposed rule languw-
(CITE 11 im ser) • to a STATE REGIVEII, k%xdmy 10 November 11114141 PAGE 893
• I,
PROPOSED RULES
AL
W invoice of pro)OCIDd Cotta. The deprtmeat shall disburse the remaining 20 percent when the gramme work prop= is compku
and the depwrtmew reoeiva a satisfacaory final report.
IL £g him mm 1n X4.000. Sk dc fol lhi:buru 1fll MEW 2f 1E MW iMOSIG4 -wbu h receives an
!a o>a regwggg disbtaserrtsat. Fgllowitia 1X initial die mirient, !!K demimot gpll mimburm gds ouretyt 1 for actual
>fWM9 - 2M94142 11M 1102Lhs &bM 1k Mintel submits 91� JM4 g fmaxial mmen docunxntina
ltlsm uW 29 pent 2f 1k Iim amount hK b2M diibursed. 'Ilic dmamcat 1W daburse lk dein ten percent
Y-110 2K &iM 3 mou= l; comictc hllg the dcriartmont iv 5 mwfwtm fillk [per:
Subp. 4. Regnhred reports, The grantee shall submit to the department on the first of each month a one to two page report
briefly stating the activities that have taken place during the month. The grantee shall provide the department with three copies of
A final report and financial statement, describing all activities that took place during the grant period. Tete final report must
mmmarize planning and implementation steps in chronological order and identify all parties involved during the grant period.
Subp. 5. Recwrds. The grantee shall maintain financial records according to generally recognized accounting methods for a
period of not less than three years from the date of the execution of the contract of all transactions related to the receipt and
expenditure of gnat money.
Subp. 6. Greet agreement deviMioos. Unkss the grantee demonstrates to the department that the grantee's circumstances have
changed since execution of the grant agreemew to such an extent that a deviation is necessary to complete the &$recd upon work
program, ao grant funds may be used to finance activities by consultants or local staff if the activities are not included in the grant
agreement. A grantee may not contract out all its energy-related activities to consultants unless the Fume demonstrates to the
department that such contracting is necessary to complete the won program.
4160.5900 GRANT CLOSE-OUT.
Subpart 1. Evaluatbo. 7tte department shall conduct an evaluation of the final report and all the required reports and financial
documents within 60 days of their sutvmission by the grantee to the department. The evaluation shall asseu:
A. whether the local share contributed was equal to or greater than ten percent of the total cost of the agreed upon work
program;
B. whether the agreed upon work program was completed; and
C. whether tete governing body has formally reviewed the completed final report.
Subp. 2. Review. Upon completion of a satisfactory evaluation by the department, the department shall disburse the remaining
90 pereem wf dw $sant amount owed to the grant recipient. If the results of the evaluation are unfavorable to the grantee and the
grantee does not agree with the findings of the evaluation, the grantee may request a review by the commissioner.
Water Resources Board
Proposed Permanent Rules Relating to the Comprehensive Local Water Management
Act
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Rub wtthout a Public Hearing
Notice is hereby given that the State Water Resources Board intends to adopt the above -entitled ruk without a public hearing
following the procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act for adopting rules without a public hearing in Minnesota
Statutes, sections 14.22 to 14.28. Tete statutory authority to adopt the rule is Minnesota Statutes 1985 Supplement, section I JOB. 10,
Subd. 2.
All persons have 30 days in which to submit comments in support of or in opposition to the proposed rule or any part or subpart
of the rule. Comments aro encouraged. Each commew should identify the portion of the proposed rule being addressed, the reason
for the continent, and any chane proposed.
Any person may make a wrium request for a public twannj oo the proposed ruts within the 30'day cuu m w Period. If 25 or
more pasom sUbm wainen requests for a public hearing within the 304ay comment period, a pontic beanie$ will be beld unless
a sufficient number withdraw their requests in writing. Any person requesting a public bearing should Stant their time and address,
and is enoorraged to identify the portion of the proposed rule being addressed, the reason for the nom, and say change proposed.
If a public hearing is required, the Water Resources Board will proceed parsuaot to Mianesou Scutes, seeporn 14.131 ap 14.20.
PAGE 064 • w e STATE RE04M. Mloriday 10 Mom n w 1M6 (CRE t1LR. 064)
`1.
ti -3 C.1 -
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 3, 1986
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners
Wire, Stulberg, Magnus, Plufka, Mellen
and Pauba
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to approve the November 19, 1986 Minutes as
submitted.
Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg abstained. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Clark
Construction Company and requested an overview of the
November 18, 1986 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator
McConn. She informed the Commision of the City Council
approval of the Preliminary Plat and Rezoning requests at
the December 1, 1986 meeting. This action included
direction that transition be provided to the single family
residences to the east.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mike Gair, Gair & Associ-
ates, representing the petitioner and asked that Mr. Gair
comment on the City Council direction concerning the land-
scaping for this project.
Mr. Gair introduced his project team and stated that they
appreciated the direction received from City staff.
He explained the landscape diagram which described a large
front yard with landscaping and parking area. They will
create screening from the building, and to Xenium Lane with
berming and plantings.
In response to the concern about the exception parcels on
the south; they have conceptually diagrammed 30 units which
can be accommodated as far as density, and accounting for
Flood Plain.
-263-
RON CLARK
CLARK CONSTRUCTION
FINAL PLAT, SITE PLAN
AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (86115)
Page 264
Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, 1986
Mr. Gair inquired about Condition No. 10 in the staff report
which states the Conditional Use Permit would not be trans-
ferable; and, requested a clarification regarding Clark
Construction Company being encumbered by this condition with
respect to the sale of the building in the future.
Coordinator McConn explained this is a standard condition
as this land is a conditional use in the R-4 Zoning
District. The petitioner and/or landowner is subject to the
conditions of approval. Future owners would need to come
before the City and state their compliance with all
conditions of approval. For example, this is especially
important for the maintenance of the property; and, that the
City have a record of the contact person, so in the case of
problems, those responsible can be notified.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Stulberg to recommend approval for the Final Plat, Site
Plan, and Conditional Use Permit for Ron Clark, Clark
Construction Company, subject to the conditions of approval
as stated in the November 18, 1986 Planning Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by George and
Teresa Hoff, d/b/a Design Mechanical, Inc., for a Home Occu-
pation Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a
business office including bookkeeping and telephoning in
their residence at 10800 41st Avenue North. Reading of the
November 18, 1986 Planning Staff Report was waived.
Coordinator McConn advised the Commission that a letter was
submitted by a neighboring property owner, opposing the Home
Occupation Conditional Use Permit. The Commission was given
copies of the letter, and a copy was given to Mr. Hoff as
petitioner.
Chairman Steigerwald asked for Mr. Hoff's response to the
letter.
George Hoff, 10800 41st Avenue North, stated he didn't know
what to say in response. As far as traffic, he personally
owns a pick-up truck; there is no company name on the truck;
and, he is not operating a plumbing business from his home.
He and his wife were contacted by the City because of a
complaint and they were told they would need to apply for a
Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit. They tried to
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
GEORGE & TERESA HOFF
HOME OCCUPATION
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (86122)
Page 265
Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, 1986
explain to the City they are not running a business from the
home, but do some bookeeping and telephoning from their
home. He noted that if he had an office away from home, he
would still bring plans home to review. The business is
mainly run from his vehicle and radio.
He explained the company is run by supervisors and foremen
over the men on Job sites; and, the materials are shipped to
the Job sites. For the past five months, he has had no
company vehicles at his home. He stated that personnel
could be fired for driving company vehicles to his home.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the preparation of the
payroll and if checks are mailed to the employee . Mr. Hoff
answered affirmatively, and noted the company has a Post
Office Box, the company mail is not sent to the home. Mr.
Hoff further noted, there is some increased traffic from
3:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M., but this traffic is generated by a
neighbor who gives piano lessons. He stated that Mr.
O'Leary is employed by Thompson Plumbing Company, a competi-
tor, and this may have something to do with his opposition.
Mr. Hoff stated he does not cause any additional traffic in
his neighborhood. Commissioner Plufka inquired if any
deliveries are made to the home, and how they obtain the
accounting records? Mr. Hoff stated he picks up the time
cards on the Job site, and returns all materials to the
site. He reiterated that employees are not allowed to come
to his home. If he meets with employees or customers, this
is done at restaurants, he conducts no meetings in his
home. He further noted that he has seen nine Thompson
Plumbing trucks at the O'Leary's home.
Commissioner Mellen inquired if the City approached him
directly regarding the need for the Permit? Mr. Hoff stated
this was the case; this was confirmed by Coordinator McConn.
Mr. Hoff stated they closed their office/showroom at the 4 -
Seasons Mall as they do not want to do residential business
any more. They have expanded to the commercial field. They
make all their contacts by phone. They warehouse nothing,
all materials go directly to the Job site where they have
on-site storage.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Keshaviah, 10840 41st Avenue North, stated he has
noticed no increase of traffic in the area, and attended the
meeting because he thought Mr. Hoff was thinking of changing
or increasing his business; as there is no change to what
Mr. Hoff is doing in his home, he has no problem with it and
noted that it has not been obtrusive.
Page 266
Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, '1986
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner
Mellen to recommend the finding that George and Teresa Hoff
are not operating a business from their home and therefore
do not require a Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit.
Their office work is no different from that of an insurance
man or attorney who would take work home and use their home
telephone.
Coordinator McConn stated there are several insurance agents
and attorneys who do have Home Occupation Conditional Use
Permits doing similar work in their homes. She gave other
examples of issued permits including piano teachers.
Commissioner Plufka stated he believes there is a great deal
of difference, because, such as with the case of an attorney
or insurance man, they may have a few visitors; but often
professional people have offices and bring work home. This
should not have the status of a Home Occupation Conditional
Use Permit.
Coordinator McConn noted the business is in essence run from
the Hoff's home as it entails bookkeeping, payroll and
accounting work which necessitates the setting aside of a
portion of the home for the office.
Commissioner Wire stated he concurs with Commissioner Plufka
in that many professional people do work in their homes,
even though they have offices or work for businesses away
from home.
Commissioner Stulberg inquired about the address used by the
corporation. Mr. Hoff stated they use a P.O. Box number.
Commissioner Pauba stated he concurs with staff in that the
City needs some handle on the number and types of Home
Occupations.
Coordinator McConn explained the definition of a Home Occu-
pation as stated in the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, which is
an activity that is secondary to the residential use of the
dwelling.
Chairman Steigerwald stated that most people have offices in
their homes. Commissioner Plufka stated people may do many
things within their homes, and that 30% of the homes in
Plymouth probably should apply for a Home Occupation. It is
his opinion that the argument is with the Ordinance itself.
NOTION RECOMMENDING
NO NEED
Page 267
Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, 1986
Coordinator McConn stated that by the current definition and
according to the current regulations in the Zoning Ordin-
ance, Mr. Hoff requires a Home Occupation Conditional Use
Permit. If the Ordinance is outdated and the premise does
not apply, the Planning Commission and City Council should
then discuss an Ordinance amendment.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if Mr. Hoff had a special need
regarding his homeowners insurance? Mr. Hoff stated he has
business insurance riders, and this gives him additional
insurance on his home. Chairman Steigerwald inquired if
this fact does not point out that a Home Occupation
Conditional Use Permit applies in this case?
Mr. Hoff stated he disagrees that he is running a business
from his home, the application fees are not the point, but
he wants to know if he can continue to keep records and make
telephone calls from his home. He stated he did not know he
was doing anything wrong. His father was a salesman, and
had an office in his home in Plymouth for years.
Commissioner Magnus called the question. It was explained
that the Motion is to recommend a finding of No -Need for a
Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit for George and Teresa
Hoff.
Commissioner Magnus stated he wanted to make sure this
recommendation would not delay the Hoff's application, in
that the City Council may remand the application back to the
Planning Commission. Coordinator McConn explained the City
Council's options; they may support the Commission's recom-
mendation; they may approve or deny the Home Occupation
Conditional Use Permit; or, they may defer action and return
the application to the Planning Commission.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. Commissioner Pauba and Chairman VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Steigerwald, Nay. MOTION carried.
Commissioner Plufka stated the Commission and Council should
address the requirements for a Home Occupation. Coordinator
McConn noted that there will be a Joint meeting of the Plan-
ning Commission and City Council on January 26, 1987; and,
this matter could be a topic of discussion. Commissioner
Plufka stated the Commission can discuss this tonight and
put together something for publication for the Joint meeting
as suggested by Coordinator McConn.
Mr. Hoff stated that in determining whether he needs Home
Occupation Conditional Use Permit, he wants the record to
show that he does not lease space to the corporation and
this should enter into whether there is an occupation.
Page 268
Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, 1986
Commissioner Plufka stated the Ordinance should be oriented
toward such things as traffic; the Ordinance language is
weak; and, there should be a requirement in applying for a
Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit for a business in a
home which should be located on a well traveled street,
rather than on a quiet cul -de -sac.
Coordinator McConn stated the Home Occupation Conditional
Use Permit is not a permit that allows a full commercial
business, it is not meant to circumvent the commercial zon-
ing districts of the City. It does permit the use of a
limited area of the home; allowing some business activity
that does not include outside employees; and, discourages
and /or limits the number of customers and deliveries made to
or from the home.
Commissioner Stulberg stated that staff has done what they
are required to do because of the complaint made to the
City. However, it is his opinion that when permits are
granted the petitioner may introduce a larger business in
the home because of the Conditional Use Permit; this way,
if the business, such as in this case, should increase, the
party would be required to get a permit.
Commissioner Wire noted that families with teenagers cause
more traffic than a person having an office in his home.
Mrs. Hoff stated she is concerned that her friends will not
be able to come to her home and park their cars because of
this complaint. Chairman Steigerwald stated she should not
be concerned with this. Engineer Goldberg stated that the
trips in and out of the home are a standard 5 to 6 trips per
day.
Commissioner Plufka reiterated his reasons for recommending
no need for a Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit in this
case; no meetings are held in the home; no people are visit-
ing the home; this is merely a convenience for the Hoffs and
should not be considered as a Home Occupation.
Coordinator McConn stated the Commission and Council need to
establish the parameters to define and regulate this use by
Ordinance.
ADJ"NMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
1 -3b
MINUTES
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
December 3, 1986
PRESENT: John Sweeney, Tom Vetsch, Tim Ole, Gil Konop, Gary Smith
John Wenner, Tom Nelson, Frank Boyles
ALSO PRESENT: Dave Volker, Gordy Simons, Mark Peterson
ABSENT: Lyle Robinson
I. OLD BUSINESS
A. Approval of November 12 Meeting Minutes - The committee approved the
November 12 minutes as submitted.
B. Report on Safety Activities
1. Monitor Status of Employee Safety Suggestions -- Mark Peterson
was present to discuss with the committee the following items
from his September 8 memorandums:
a. Mark advised that Park Maintenance employees have reviewed
the policies contained in the September 8 memorandums.
b. Item 5. The small bucket for the case tractor has been
received and installed. Because of the bucket's limited
capacity, Mark will have employees operate the equipment for
a trial period prior to placing the half -load warning
sticker on the window of the tractor.
c. Item 6B. General Electrical Policy. The warning sign for
posting on the outside of the utility door at City playfield
buildings, is expected to be received in January.
d. Item 7. Underground Excavation. The policy should be
amended as follows: 1) Item 3.(2) posting of the warning
sign will be on the door to the utility room; 2) addition
to policy that lockout of the power source will be at the
power panel, rather than the utility room door; and 3) Item
3.(4) Employees should check the power by flipping the
switch on, and if the power does not return, the supervisor
should be contacted.
e. Field Light Replacement. Mark advised that the clamp for
t e locator had ee�n received and a hands -on demonstration
was provided to employees by the sales representative.
f. Item 10. Bleachers. The wide load banner for towing has
been received. The policy should be amended to reflect
that towing speed should not exceed 10 mph.
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
December 3, 1986
Page two
II.
B. Report on Safety Activities (Cont.)
2. Action on Final Traffic Warning Device Policy - The committee
reviewed the City Attorney's response on the proposed adoption
of a City policy regulating traffic control and safety efforts.
The Attorney recommends the City consider modifying the policy
to include a statement in the Purpose clause to indicate that
the policy is intended to supplement and clarify State regula-
tions, and further that the specifics of the policy be drafted
in such a way that they will not conflict with the State regula-
tions. The committee concluded that the policy should be
revised to conform with State traffic regulations. Frank Boyles
will schedule a meeting for the purpose of drafting the
revisions and will invite representatives from the State and
Warning Lights, Inc. to attend.
3. Rim Training Program - The committee reviewed the final draft
of the Rim Training Program. Frank Boyles indicated he would
have supervisors review the policy with vehicle operators to
assure they are familiar with the correct procedure for inflat-
ing a tire while the wheel is on the vehicle. Dave Volker
recommended Section 11.d. of the policy include a warning to
employees to not stand in the trajectory area whenever tires are
serviced. The committee agreed the City should purchase a clip -
on chuck with remote pressure indicator and control so that
tires may be inflated clear of the trajectory areas. The policy
should reflect this. Frank indicated the policy would be
revised as discussed and then distributed to supervisors for
review with employees.
4. Respirator Training Program - Frank Boyles advised that Lyle
Robinson will have a draft program for committee review at the
January meeting. Dave Volker suggested the draft program
include reference to the City's designated physician /clinic, and
the person responsible for administering the program.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Review of Personal Injury /Vehicular Accidents -- The committee
reviewed two vehicular ccidents; both accidents were determined to
be non - preventable. The vehicular accident involving Lyle Robinson
will be reviewed at the January meeting. Committee members
requested that a copy of the City's policy regarding insurance
coverage on leased vehicles be included with the January agenda
materials.
B. Risk Management Committee meeting -- This item was deferred until
Dale Hahn could be present.
C. Park Facility Hazard Identification -- Frank Boyles stated this item
was included in the agenda or nformation purposes. A committee
has been formed to review City parks to identify potential areas of
-fib
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
December 3, 1986
Page three
al b
liability. One -third of the City's parks have been completed,
numerous enhancements have been noted and are now underway or
completed. This program is one of our risk management efforts which
the City will increasingly engage in.
D. Rotation of Membership -- In accordance with Safety Committee Member
rotation guidelines, the following employees were named as repl�c- -e-
ments on the Safety Committee: Mark Peterson, representing
Maintenance Supervisors; Russ Elzy, representing Equipment
Maintenance; and Steve Herwig, representing the Sewer and Water
Division. Frank Boyles will follow up on the naming of a replace-
ment member for the Police Department. The committee agreed that
outgoing committee members would serve as alternate members to the
Safety Committee. Frank Boyles will arrange a breakfast meeting in
January for new and outgoing committee members as a aet acquainted
orientation session.
III. OTHER BUSINESS
Tom Nelson asked if any action had been taken to date with regard to
private vehicles pulling city trailers. Frank Boyles indicated he would
investigate and report back to the committee.
John Wenner reported that the snowplowing training program had not been
provided to all snowplow operators. Frank Boyles stated he would check
with Jim Kolstad on the status of training plans.
The meeting adjourned at 10:04 a.m.
THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting of November 18, 1986
CALL TO ORDER: The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was
called to order by Chairman W. Peter Enck on Tuesday, November 18,
1986, 11:35 A.M., at the Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL: CRYSTAL - Commissioner Bill Monk
GOLDEN VALLEY - Alternate Commissioner Dean Chenoweth
MEDICINE LAKE - Commissioner Jim Padden
MINNEAPOLIS - Alternate Commissioner Marvin Hoshaw
MINNETONKA - Commissioner Don Asmus
NEW HOPE - Commissioner W. Peter Enck
PLYMOUTH - Commissioner Fred Moore
ROBBINSDALE - Commissioner Lee Gustafson
ST. LOUIS PARK - Commissioner Don Rye
Counsel: Curt Pearson
Engineer: Len Kremer, Barr Engineering Co.
Recorder: Elaine Anderson
General Mills Representative: John Schevenius
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by Mr. Padden, seconded by Mr. Monk, and
carried unanimously that the October 16 minutes be approved.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Mr. Chenoweth presented the
financial statement as of November 18, 1986, showing a checking
account balance of $29.19, a savings account balance of $98,277.95,
and an investment balance of $153,130.15 and moved its approval
subject to audit. Seconded by Mr. Hoshaw and carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION OF INVOICE FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL: Mr. Chenoweth moved
that the Barr Engineering Co. invoice for $13,567.23 for the period
Sept. 28 through Nov. 1 be approved for payment subject to arith-
metical verification. Seconded by Mr. Gustafson and carried unani-
mously.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman:
1) Chairman Enck reported that Mr. Silberman has had phlebitic com-
plications following his hip surgery but is making good progress
at Methodist Hospital and will be discharged soon.
2) Communication had been received from Vandman Construction.
3) Mention was made of monies being made available from the Federal
Government for flood construction work at Rochester.
4) Communication from L & G Rabine Company.
Counsel
1) The right -of -way from the Soo Line Railroad and from the Minne-
apolis Park Board has been approved. The signing will be done
shortly.
2) Mr. Pearson has worked with The Corps of Engineers and will be
arranging a meeting with them. The Corps will be ready to do
the construction at Highway 55 and at Wirth Park.
3) Tunnel reimbursement. Mr. Kremer had met with the Project Engi-
neer of Hydraulics at the District 5 office of MnDOT to discuss
3 c_
BC Minutes - November 18, 1986 - Page 2
revising cost arrangements regarding tunnel construction that
has already been completed. The meeting had gone very well.
They will now go through the computations and come up with the
revised numbers. There will then be another meeting. A meeting
had been held previously with Bill Crawford, District 5 Engi-
neer, Perry Smith, Leonard Kremer and Curt Pearson. Mr.
Crawford was very amenable to work with the Corps of Engineers
and the City of Minneapolis in allocating costs and applying for
reimbursement for the tunnel construction. Bassett Creek is
also entitled to certain sums from MnDOT for waters being trans-
ferred from the Minnehaha watershed to the Bassett Creek water-
shed. If the technical details can be worked out, Mr. Crawford
will not have a problem approving it.
4) Mr. Pearson had copied the Commissioners regarding the article
about President Reagan vetoing the Clean Water Act. The
President did indicate approval of the stormwater provisions but
was unhappy with the 18 billion dollar sewer provisions. The
Clean Water Act will be re- introduced and chances are that it
will be enacted by the new Congress. The National League of
Cities is afraid that the present law leaves cities wide open
for lawsuits and damages of $10,000 per day for each violation.
Engineer
1) The Water Resources bill was signed this week which has some
provisions in it that would allow credits for previous work
done. It requires that the Secretary of the Army draft regula-
tions regarding how credit will be obtained.
2) Communication from the Department of Natural Resources request-
ing comments regarding some riprapping being done by a homeowner
on a bank along the creek in Golden Valley downstream of West -
brooke Road. The DNR had been contacted by a neighboring
homeowner. There had been no application for a permit. The
City of Golden Valley has not been involved. While hydraulics
are not affected in this particular instance, the next time it
is done there could be an impact on the creek. After discussion
it was moved by Mr. Rye and seconded by Mr: Hoshaw that a letter
be sent to *the Department of Natural Resources indicating that
procedurally this could have an unfavorable impact. Carried
unanimously. Chairman Enck suggested that we write to Mr.
Odland of Golden Valley to find out if it was intentional that
the City had not done anything concerning this riprap.
3) Request from the Department of Natural Resources for comments on
a situation in Plymouth where a property owner has modified a
channel of the creek immediately west of Medicine Lake. The
creek has meandered and there has been some deposition. Mr.
Kremer reported that they would be going out there to check on
the amount of fill as well as excavation. This also came to the
attention of the DNR because of a neighbor's complaint.
4) Mr. Kremer reported that he had toured some sites with the Corps
where plans and specifications are going to be prepared so that
construction can be completed next year. These are at West -
brooke Road, the Golden Valley Golf Club, and Conagra and
Inglewood Waters.
BC Minutes - November 18, 1986 - Page 3
He explained that the work at Westbrooke Road is very straight-
forward. Golden Valley Golf Club has a complication in that
they are having a major tournament in 1988 so they may not want
any work done in 1987. At Conagra the railroad may abandon one
of the lines which will make the new bridge less expensive and
eliminate a problem with encroachment on park property. The
retaining walls in that particular area are in rough shape and
in the process of failing. They are relocating the channel away
from the Glenwood Inglewood storage building built 3 -4 years ago
between Glenwood Avenue and the dam. The Corps is not proposing
any channel change between Glenwood Avenue and a small rock dam
upstream of the railroad bridge. The situation concerns Mr.
Kremer as something needs to be done. If the walls fail it will
restrict flow. The Corps feels that it's a maintenance problem.
They are not being asked to do anything at this time. A long
discussion followed. We could ask the City of Minneapolis or
the Park Board what they wish to do about it. It would cost
about $200,000 to correct it. Mr. Enck asked Mr. Kremer to
bring pictures of the area to the December 18 meeting so that we
can discuss it further. Mr. Pearson cautioned that we were
getting into an area where we are categorizing what is main-
tenance or what is a capital improvement for which we would have
to go through the hearing procedure. There is also a potential
piece of property we may have to acquire from the Park Board.
The relocation of the railroad tracks would take it out of the
railroad right -of -way and into Park Board property. Further
discussion was deferred to the December meeting.
NEW BUSINESS: None.
OLD BUSINESS:
1) Fish Barrier - Medicine Lake. A
in for $53,215.00 and has been
lot of work for the DNR. The
right now. The plan has been
cost, however, will be slightly
bid from Sevcon, Inc., has come
accepted. This company does a
barrier is under construction
modified slightly. The total
Less than budget.
2) The suit with Shafer Construction for the extra charges for the
#215 project has been settled. While Mr. Kremer thought the
settlement was high, it was much less than the $240,000 the
contractor was requesting. The total bill for the #215 work now
exceeds the maximum previously estimated. It was asked whether
we should have Mr. Odland come to discuss it with us. Mr.
Kremer said he will bring a breakdown of the costs to the next
meeting. He was asked to bring the worst case scenario on a
spread sheet. Mr. Kremer explained that the total charges are
still less than the worst case we assumed at the time of the
hearing on the project.
3) The draft Management Plan has been sent to all of the Commis-
sioners. Comments have been received from Golden Valley and
Minneapolis. Mr. Silberman has some comments relative to storm
sewer separation. We should refer to the fact that the city has
a separation program under way. We should state that the origi-
nal plan was based on City management plans that had been sub-
mitted by communities in the late 19601s. It is important to
stress that there has been coordination with the communities and
3 c.�
BC Minutes - November 18, 1986 - Page 4
that we don't expect the communities to make significant
changes. The comments from Minneapolis were just that the wye
for connecting the next reach of the tunnel to the completed
tunnel is being relocated.
4) Mr. Rye wished to know the deadline for comments on the plan and
the procedure to follow. Theoretically the plan is to be sub-
mitted to Hennepin County agencies for review by December 31,
but it has to be delivered to the communities first. Mr. Kremer
said that he wants the comments from the Commissioners first.
Mr. Pearson said it isn't as much of a problem for us since we
are an existing organization. He said that we should submit it
to the city clerks and give them 60 days for review. From the
cities, it will go to the county, and then to the Water Re-
sources Board. The Hearing will be in February or March. After
further discussion it was moved by Mr. Moore that the Commis-
sioners have their comments back to the engineer on or before
December 1 and that Mr. Kremer will submit any substantial
changes that are proposed to the Commission and that the Commis-
sion be should be ready to approve the plan at the December 18
meeting. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously. Mr.
Gustafson asked some questions about the history of the plan.
5) Following the discussion of engineering and legal expenses for
the acquisition of right -of -way and for the establishment of
credits for the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission com-
munities, Curtis Pearson had prepared a draft resolution which
was presented at this time. Discussion followed. It was sug-
gested that the words "in the acquisition of right -of -way" be
added in the third to the last line of the resolution after the
words "attorney or the engineer ". Resolution 86 -5, A RESOLUTION
RELATING TO ENGINEERING P.ND LEGAL EXPENSES FOR THE ACQUISITION
OF RIGHT -OF -WAY AND FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CREDITS FOR THE
BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGE4ENT COMMISSION COMMUNITIES, was moved
by Mr. Rye and seconded by Mr. Hoshaw. Carried by a unanimous
roll call vote (all 9 municipalities represented).
6) It was repeated that Milt Christiansen, Mr. Kremer and Mr.
Silberman will meet with the Corps of Engineers concerning any
problems with the tunnel project.
7) It was questioned whether Mr. Kremer working with the City of
Minneapolis on the tunnel project represents any conflict of
interest. It was stated this is really no different than his
consulting on the #215 work. The consensus was that no conflict
of interest is involved.
ADJOURNMENT: Since there was no further business, it was moved by
Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Moore that the meeting adjourn.
Chairman Enck adjourned the meeting at 1:45 P.M.
W. Peter Enc , Chairman Elaine Anderson, Recorder
Date:
Donald Asmus, Secretary
3 C,
RESOLUTION NO. 86 -5
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ENGINEERING AND LEGAL
EXPENSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY AND
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CREDITS FOR THE BASSETT
CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION COMMUNITIES
WHEREAS, the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission consists
of nine cities who are joined together under a Joint Powers Agreement
to pursue a common flood control project, and
WHEREAS, the nine - member cities have been acquiring real estate
for many, many years to accommodate the construction of the improve-
ment project and much of this land has been acquired at Commission
direction or as properties are developed or has been in or under
municipal control for many, many years, and
WHEREAS, the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission and its
nine - member cities are now committed to going forward with a major
project in conjunction with the United States Army Corps of Engineers
and that, as a part of that project, the nine - member cities will be
required to pay 25% of the cost of the total project and 20% of said
25% may be in credits for lands or for other items performed by the
Commission or its member communities prior to this time, and
WHEREAS, the attorney for the Commission and the engineer for the
Commission have been directed to work with an appraiser in trying to
appraise said lands to maximize the credits to be received by all of
the member municipalities; and, in addition thereto, there are certain
lands which still must be acquired for the construction of certain
structures as a part of the project, and
WHEREAS, this Commission is aware that its engineer and its
attorney are better versed on the background of certain land matters
and in the attempt to get credits and /or to obtain certain specific
easements and, therefore, they have directed the engineer and the
attorney to work with the member communities or with the property
owners to acquire said easements, and
WHEREAS, THE Commission desires that expenses that have been
incurred directly in acquiring right -of -way by a municipality and for
which that municipality will get credit, should be incurred by the
specific municipality unless this Commission authorizes its staff to
do work on these acquisitions for which the Commission will be gen-
erally responsible,
\ 3 c.,
RESOLUTION 86 -5 - Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Bassett Creek Water Manage-
ment Commission as follows:
1. The attorney and
authorized and directed to
of Engineers and appraisal
Commission in an attempt
project. The expenses ir.
appraisal data will all be
sion.
the engineer for the Commission are hereby
work with the member communities, the Corps
experts to be hired and paid for by by this
to maximize the credits received for this
,curred in obtaining these credits and the
considered a general expense of the Commis-
2. The attorney and the engineer are hereby authorized and
directed with Commission approval to work with individual member
municipalities in acquiring rights -of -way for the construction of
certain structures which are a part of the Corps of Engineers'
approved plan for the watershed. It is understood by the members that
each member municipality has the responsibility for obtaining these
rights -of -way and unless this Commission has for some reason waived
this responsibility or authorized the attorney and /or the engineer to
work with the member municipality then the community shall do this
work and shall pay its consultants for any work done on acquiring the
right -of -way. Time spent by the attorney and the engineer in acquir-
ing rights -of -way from the Minneapolis Park Board, the Soo Line
Railroad and the Golden Valley Golf Course prior to- this date are
hereby deemed to be expenses incurred by this Commission and should be
paid by this Commission. From this point forward any time or expenses
occurred by the attorney or the engineer in the acquisi Lion of right -
of -way shall be an arrangement between those member cities and the
consultants unless this Commission gives specific direction.
At the November 18, 1986, meeting of the Bassett Creek Flood Manage-
ment Commission meeting, the motion for the adoption of the above
Resolution 86 -5 was duly made by Commissioner Rye and seconded by
Alternate Commissioner Hoshaw. The nine municipality roll call vote
was unanimous, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman
Attest:
Donald Asmus, Secretary
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
CLASS I
MURDER RAPE ROBBERY t ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON
1985 0 0 5 125 244 957 71 7
1986 0 4 11 167 238 882 75 3
TOTALS 1985 1,409
1986 1,383 -1.8%
CLASS II
MONTH JANUARY - NOVEMBER 1986
FORGERY EMBEZZEL STOLEN WEAP ROSTI &EX GAMB OFFENSES LIQ. DISORDERLY
COUNTERFEIT 1FRAUDI MENT 1PROPERTYlVANDALISMIOFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM /CHILDID.W.I.ILAW I CONDUCT I OTHER
1985 11 1 164 0 5 420 2 1 0 1 231 89 1 0 1 9 1 373 1 36 1 33 1 325 1
1986 28 1 106 4 2 556 5 0 1 351 90 1 0 1 21 369 1 94 61 430
TOTALS 1985 1,490
1986 1,801 +20.9%
CLASS III
FATZ
L
PROPERTY
SNOWMOBILE
MEDICAL
SUICIDE
NATURAL
NIMAL
LOST
ACCIDENT
INJURY
DAMAGE
ACCIDENT
DROWNING EMERGENCY
SUICIDE ATTEMPTS
DEATH
BITES
FIRES
1985 3
148
632
0
0 625
1 9
18
25
221
1986 3
168
818
0
0 667
2 33
16
47
237
39 1178
28
184 1
1413 1050
TOTALS 1985
9,804
TOTALS 1985
1,682
CRIMINAL OFFENSES
CLEARED
1985
32.2%
1986
1,991
+18.4%
CLASS IV
ANIMAL
FALSE
LOCK
ASSISI
OTHER
WARRANT
TRAFFIC
FIREARM SUSPICION
MISSING
LOST
PUBLIC
IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERI
OUTS
JAGENCYISERVED
IDETAIL
IVIOLATIONJINFORMATIONIPERSON
IFOUNDINUISANCEj
MISC. 1
1985 182 1361
997 73
1172
356
308
1311
37 1158
18
198 1
1117 1516
1986 ( 258 1379
1058 70
1448
408
300
1836
39 1178
28
184 1
1413 1050
TOTALS 1985
9,804
CRIMINAL OFFENSES
CLEARED
1985
32.2%
1986 10,649 + 8.6%
HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 4,382 1986 4,418 + 1.0%
NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 5,958 1986 5,032 -15.5%
1986 32.5%
TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 14,385
1986 15,824 +10.0%
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
CLASS I
MURDER RAPE ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON
1985 0 0 0 7 25 73 6 2
1986 0 0 1 11 19 79 3 0
TOTALS 1985 113
1986 113 - %
CLASS II
MONTH NOVEMBER - 1986
FORGERY L WEAP PROSTI SEX GAMB OFFENSES LIQ DISORDERLY
COUNTERFEITIFRAUDI MENT 1PROPERTYlVANDALISMIOFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM /CHILDID.W.I.1 LAW I CONDUCT I OTHER 1
1985 3 22 0 0 35 1 0 0 3 1 13 1 0 1 31 7 3 1 26
1986 0 11 1 0 37 1 1 0 3 1 5 1 0 5 30 0 3 1 38
TOTALS 1985 144
1986 134 - 6.9%
CLASS III
FATAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
SNOWMOBILE
MEDICAL
SUICIDE
NATURAL N L
ACCIDENT INJURY. DAMAGE
ACCIDENT
DROWNING EMERGENCY
SUICIDE ATTEMPTS
DEATH BITES FIRE
1985 0 17 90
0
0 57
0 2
2 0 20
1986 1 21 ( 115
0
0 60
0 3
1 2 24
TOTALS 1985 188
1986 227 +20.7%
CLASS IV
ASSIST
ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC
IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERIOUTS JAGENCYISERVED IDETAIL IVIOLATIONJINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC.
1985 17 1 100 ( 97 1 2 112 41 89 1 107 5 1 96 3 1 10 95 1 105
1986 17 1 121 114 1 3 144 31 23 1 159 5 1 86 0 1 17 83 1 99
TOTALS 1985 879
1986 902 +2.6%
HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 399 1986 363 - 9.0%
NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 427 1986 298 -30.2%
CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 34.7%
1986 29.2%
TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 1,324
1986 1,376 +3.9%
PLYAOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
TYPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY
MONTHLY JANUARY - NOVMEBER 1986
TOTALS 1 44 1 68 1 111 1 134 1 147 1 89 1 238 1 355 1 593 1 2 1 $624,6101
*INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS
JANUARY - NOVEMBER 1985
CONFIRMED CALLS 252
FALSE ALARMS 270
TOTAL CALLS 522
ESTIMATED LOSS $335,025
0001
0400
0401
0800
0801
1200
1201
1600
1601
2000_1
2001
2400
CONFIRMED
1 CALLS
FALSE
ALARMS
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
PERMITS
ISSUED
ESTIMATED
LOSS
PRIVATE DWELLINGS
3
1 7
1 20
1 23
30
1 16
62
37
1 99
1 - -
$48310001
APARTMENTS 1
24
1 32
1 27
1 41
1 42
I 38
1 26
I 178
1 204
I 1
1 4,500(
HOTELS AND MOTELS 1
2
1
1
1 2
I 4
1 1
1 0
1 9
I 9
ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL I
I
1 2
1
1 1
1
I 0
1 3
1 3
PUBLIC ASSEMBLY I
1
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 3
1 1
1 7
1 2
I 9
SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES I
1
1 3
1 4
I 5
I
1 1
I 5
1 9
I 14
1 --
1 2001
HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS i
1
1 3
1 8
1 10
1 5
1 4
1 5
I 26
1 31
1 1
1 1,1501
PENAL INSTITUTIONS 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 --
I 1001
STORES AND OFFICES
1 2
1 2
I 9
1 4
1 8
1 2
1 3
1 24
1 27
1 -
1 - -1
INDUSTRY, MFG 1
1 6
1 21
1 14
i 11
1 4
1 14
1 42
1 56
1 --
1 42,7501
STORAGE IN STRUCTURES
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I
1 3
1 0
1 3
1 --
1 46,6001
SPECIAL STRUCTURES
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 2
1 0
1 2
FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 2
FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES
1 4
1 5
1 10
1 12
1 8
1 3
1 31
1 11
1 42
1 --
1 44,3101
FIRES IN OTHER VEHICLES
I
I
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 -
1 1,0001
FIRES IN BRUSH, GRASS
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 7
1 15
i 3
I 26
1 3
1 29
FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS
I 1
1
i
1 1
1 4
1
1 6
1 0
1 6
ALL OTHER FIRES
I
I
I
1 1
1 3
1 6
1 10
1 0
1 10
1 --
1 1,0001
MEDICAL AID RESPONSES
1 1
1 1
1
1 4
1 1
1
I 7
1 0
1 7
*MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS
1
1
I
1
1
1
1 0
1 0
1 0
MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 0
1 2
ALL OTHER RESPONSES
1 2
1 5
1 7
1 6
1 8
1 8
1 27
1 9
1 36
TOTALS 1 44 1 68 1 111 1 134 1 147 1 89 1 238 1 355 1 593 1 2 1 $624,6101
*INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS
JANUARY - NOVEMBER 1985
CONFIRMED CALLS 252
FALSE ALARMS 270
TOTAL CALLS 522
ESTIMATED LOSS $335,025
PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
TYPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY
MONTH NOVMEBER - 1986
0001 0401 0801 1201 1601 2001 CONFIRMED FALSE PERMITS ESTIMATED
0400 1 080n 1 1200 1 1600 1 2000 1 2400 1 CALLS I ALARMS L TOTAL I ISSUED I LOSS
PRIVATE DWELLINGS 1 1 1
5 I
5 1 2 I 1
10
1 3
1 13 1
- 1$325,550 1
APARTMENTS 1 3
3 I 6
7 1 6 1 5 1
5
1 25
I 30
HOTELS AND MOTELS I
I I
I 1 1
0
1 1
1 1
ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL I I
I I
I I I
0
I 0
I 0
PUBLIC ASSEMBLY 1 I
I I
I 1 I 1
1
1 0
I 1
SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES I I
I 1 I
I I I
0
I 1
I 1
HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS I I
I 2 1
I 1 I I
2
I 1
I 3 1
- 1 1,000 1
PENAL INSTITUTIONS I I
I I
I I 1
0
1 0
I 0 I
-- 1 --
STORES AND OFFICES I I
I 1 1
I l I i
0
1 2
1 2
INDUSTRY, MFG I I
2 1 4 I
2 I l I I
3
6
1 9 I
-- 1 2,000 1
STORAGE IN STRUCTURES I
I I
1 I I
0
0
1 0
SPECIAL STRUCTURES 1
I 1
I I I
0
0
1 0
FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES I I
1 1
1 i
0
0
1 0
FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES
l i 2 I
l 1
3
1 1
I 4 1
-- 1 3,000 I
IN OTHER VEHICLES I
I
1 I
0
1 0
0
_FIRES
FIRES IN BRUSH, GRASS I
I 1
I 1 1 1
1
1 0
1 1
FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS I I
I I
1 I I
0
I 0
I 0
ALL OTHER FIRES I I
I I
I I I
0
I 0
I 0
MEDICAL AID RESPONSES I I
I I
I I I
0
I 0
I 0
--
* *MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS I I
I I
I i i
0
I 0
I 0
MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE I
I I 1
I I I
0
I 0
1 0 1
ALL OTHER RESPONSES I
I I
I 2 I l i 1
2
1 1
1 3 1
TOTALS 1 4 1 6 1 21 I 17 1 15 1 5 1 27 1 41 1 68 1 1 1$331,550 1
* *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARMS TOTALS
NOVEMBER 1985
CONFIRMED CALLS 22
FALSE ALARMS 28
TOTAL CALLS 50
ESTIMATED LOSS $8,400
BUILDING INSPECTION NEWSLETTER
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
December 1986
The purpose of this periodic newsletter is to provide another means of communication
among the Building Inspection Division, contractors, and developers who are involved in
construction work in the City of Plymouth. The content will be designed to outline
topics of general interest as provided not only by the City but also by the development!
community. We believe that by bringing items to your attention in written form as well
as verbally, we will improve the quality of service to provide you, as well as the
quality of work you provide the citizens of Plymouth.
Let us hear from you! If you have questions or comments, please call Building Official
Joe Ryan at 559 -2800, or drop us a note.
BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
The City Council adopted the building permit fee schedule published in the 1985 Edition
of the Uniform Building Code. The new schedule becomes effective in two phases, and the
first phase commences January 1, 1987. The City has used the fee schedule from the 1982
Uniform Building Code for several years.
The first phase represents 50% of the increase and all building permits issued after
January 1, 1987 will have fees calculated according to the new schedule. The second
phase will be effective January 1, 1988 and represents the other 50% of the increase
and the full application of the 1985 Uniform Building Code fee schedule.
Permits issued through close of business on December 31, 1986 will be subject to the
current City fee schedule. I have enclosed a copy of the adopted building permit fee
schedule for the years 1987 and 1988.
1987 SEDER AVAILABILITY CHARGES
The Metropolitian Waste Control Commission has approved the sewer availability charge
rates for 1987. The base SAC unit will increase from the present rate of $475 to $525
commencing January 1, 1987.
Other 1987 rates for base SAC units can be found on the enclosed reserve capacity
charge form provided by the Metro Waste Control Commission.
MAINTANENCE OF CONSTRUCTION SITES
Recently we have observed a number of construction sites where debris and building
materials have been scattered. It is your responsibility to assure the proper disposal
of such materials and to maintain the sites in a neat and sanitary condition. Please
advise employees and subcontractors to keep this a priority.
PLEASE TURN OVER FOR FUTHER "NEWS"
_- vo
PROCESSED PERMIT APPLICATIONS
We have an accumulation of permit applications that have not been claimed after
approval. .A policy of disposing of expired applications has been implemented. Permits
must be taken within 30 days of the date they are ready for issuance.
We have notified persons who have permit applications which have been processed and
ready for some time, that unless the permit is paid for and taken within ten days, the
application will become null and void.
If the expired application required a plan review by us, the applicant will be invoiced
for the entire amount of the required review fee, and that fee must be paid before any
further permit applications will be accepted.
RESIDENTIAL HANDRAILS
Many contractors have made inquiries regarding the requirements for residential
handrails.
The building code states in part, "Stairways serving one individual dwelling unit may
have one handrail, except that such stairways open on one or both sides must have
handrails provided on the open side or sides. Private stairways 30 inches or less in
height may have handrails on one side only. Stairways having less than four risers and
serving one individual dwelling unit need not have handrails. Handrails shall be placed
not less than 30 inches nor more than 34 inches above the nosing of the treads. They
shall he continuous the full length of the stairs and except for private stairways, at
least one handrail shall extend not less than six inches beyond the top and bottom
risers. Ends shall be returned or terminate in newel posts or safety terminals."
"The handgrip portion of handrails shall be not less than 1 1/4 inches nor more than
2 inches cross - sectional dimension or the shape shall provide an equivalent gripping
surface. The handgrip portion of handrails shall have a smooth surface with no sharp
corners."
"Handrails projecting from the wall shall have a space of not less than 1 112 inches
between the wall and the handrail."
FROST PRECAUTIONS FOR COLD WEATHER CONSTRUCTION
Frost presents a constant problem for construction. Because frozen soils undergo a
moisture volume expansion, we strongly recommend that frozen soils never be used as
fill material. For the same reason we recommend that fill soils not be placed over
frozen materials.
Winter excavation should be limited to the amount of work that can be accomplished and
protected from freezing temperatures in one day's time. After excavation, footing
trenches should be observed to judge that all frozen materials have been removed;
concrete placement should not be delayed.
The newly placed footing should be covered immediately to keep the cold out and
maintain the heat of the concrete mass. The protective covering should be maintained
until an adequate set has been achieved with the concrete. This generally takes two
days. Thereafter, the footings can be stripped and the construction continued, assuming
a heated environment is being supplied.
Backfilling operations, both interior and exterior, should be completed either before
temporary heating facilities are removed or during a time in which ambient temperatures
will permit effective soil placement. In addition, interior footings or footings
designed without frost protection should be extended below frost depth unless adequate
precautions are taken to prevent frost intrusion.
Page three
December 1986
After the structure has been enclosed, we recommend that all floor slab areas receive
ample heat to allow thawing of the soil system. The floor slab area should be
periodically checked for remanent areas of frost and in -place density prior to slab
placement.
Further information regarding this matter will be made available at our front service
counter.
MONTHLY STATISTICS - 1986 BUILDING PERMITS, BY TYPE
Public Commercial /New
Jan.
0
2
Feb.
0
4
Mar.
0
5
Apr.
0
2
May
1
5
June
0
10
July
0
9
Aug.
1
13
Sept.
0
6
Oct.
0
4
Nov.
0
4
TOTAL
2
64
SEASON'S GREETINGS!
Alteration Residential Multi- Family Remodeling
12
33
0
16
7
53
1
'14
11
64
1
11
9
103
0
65
11
109
3
97
13
78
4
87
18
90
0
95
14
65
0
73
10
68
0
55
15
90
1
62
9
43
0
51
129
796
10
626
Joe, Scott, Don, Arnie, Mike, Diane, and Pat
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
558- 2800 /Extension 222
TWO PHASE SCHEDULE FOR
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
=- -P
The following are the Building Permit fees adopted by the City Council and they are
from the 1985 Uniform Building Code. The fee schedule is in two phases and the
effective dates are listed.
The following Building Permit fees shall be effective beqinning January 1, 1987.
Total Valuation Fee
$1.00 to $500.00 $12.50
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $12.50 for the first $500.00
plus $1.75 for each additional $100.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $38.75 for the first $2,000.00
plus $7.50 each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $211.25 for the first $25,000.00
plus $5.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
or fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $348.75 for the first $50,000.00
plus $3.75 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $536.25 for the first $100,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $1,736.25 for the first $500,000.00
plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up $3,111.25 for the first $1,000,000.00
plus $2.25 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof.
-T- - �p
Page two
Schedule of Building Fees
Phase II
The following Building Permit fees shall be effective beginning January 1, 1988.
Total Valuation
Fee
$1.00 to $500.00 $15.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus
$2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus
$9.00 each additional $1,000.00
or fraction
thereof, to and including
$25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$252.00 for the
first $25,000.00 plus
$6.50 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00
$414.50 for the
first $50,000.00 plus
$4.50 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including
$100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00
$639.50 for the
first $100,000.00
plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and
including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up
bldg(fees)1 -2
$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00
plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof.
METROPOLITRil
WAfTE
COi TIC
CGS; iii jiff cn
iw;, Cces Hta
November 24, 1986
Mr. James Willis
City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Willis:
LCIrl
a `r,lj
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission at its October meeting
changed the policy for the collection of SAC units so that now SAC
is collected for only those buildings that have a central sanitary
sewer s to t e property. SAC will be collected a
the time the building permit is issued for those buildings for
which sewer service is available. All buildings served by on -site
systems will be charged SAC when a sewer connection permit is issued
to provide sanitary sewer service to the property.
Enclosed are two copies of the revised Reserve Capacity Manual,
one for your use and one for your Building Inspection Department.
The manual has been revised to reflect the Commission's new policy
for the collection of SAC. Also enclosed is a supply of new SAC
reporting forms. These forms have been changed to simplify the
application of SAC credits against new uses as allowed by the
Commission's policy. Example calculations have been included as
part of the Reserve Capacity Manual to demonstrate the proper use
of these forms. All old forms should be discarded.
The Commission at its meeting of November 18 approved the SAC rates
for 1987. The base SAC unit will increase from the oresent rate of
$475.00 to 1577.00 on January 1, 87. The ase rate for those
Mmmu7i'ir- s 't!iaat ave no metropo itan interceptors will be $310.00.
Our new monthly summary form MWCC -86, does not show the 1987 unit
charge. Enclosed is a copy of form MWCC -86 with the proper amounts
indicated for each category. Please insert these amounts on the
monthly forms.
If you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact
either Don Bluhm or Sandy Selby of our staff.
Sincerely,
Louis J. Breimhurst
Chief Administrator
LJB:DSB:jlw
Attachments
cc: W. R. Johnson, MWCC
R. L. Berg, MWCC
v; JJ `,'ta•� Sqi: or° Budd; -,g, �a r.` Paul. Mrrnescto 612-222
Municipality
Month of
MWCC 86
RESERVE CAPACITY CHARGE
MONTHLY REPORT
Remit to: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
350 Metro Square
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
(If Item H is credit balance, stop nere ano carry IUKWUL W Im.
Administrative Fee (1: of Net Charges) subtract f( )
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above is true and correct to the best oF1
my knowledge and represents the activities for the month
indicated above.
Naate
Title
Total Amount Due $ $
White Copy - Return to MWCC
I
, BUILDING
( CONNECTION TOTAL I UNIT
RESERVE CAPACITY
ITEM
TYPE OF UNIT ( PERMIT
PERMIT SAC UNITS CHARGE
CHARGES j
I SAC UNITSI
SAC UNITS
A
Single Family House
1$525-00
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
(Ea. Housing Unit =
Duplexes 1 SAC Unit)
1$525.00 (
i
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
Townhouses (Ea. Housing Unit
Condominiums 1 SAC Unit)
I$525.0O
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
f
I
(Ea. Housing Unit =
` I
8
Apartments 1 SAC Unit)
( 1$420,00
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
C
Public Housing
1. Single Family i
( 1$393.75
I
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
I
I (Ea. Housing Unit =
2. Duplexes 1 SAC Unit)
(Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
( 1$393.75
I
(Ea. Housing Unit = (
I
i
3. Townhouses 1 SAC Unit)
1$393.75 1
I
( (Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
I
( (Ea. Housing Unit =
4. Apartments 1 SAC Unit)
1$315.00
l
j (Per attached Form MWCC 86A)
D
Commercial A Institutional
1$525.00
(Per attached Form MWCC 86C)
E
Industrial
j$525.0O
(Per attached Form MWCC 86B 1&2)
Demolition Credit:
I Unused SAC credit from previous month
( SAC credits from current month
Sub -Total Reserve Capacity Charges
S
$
$
�l
I F
I G
�1
(Per attached Form MWCC 86D)
,
Sub-Total-Reserve Capacity Credits
Net Reserve Capacity Charges or Credits
S
S
�1
H
H
(If Item H is credit balance, stop nere ano carry IUKWUL W Im.
Administrative Fee (1: of Net Charges) subtract f( )
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above is true and correct to the best oF1
my knowledge and represents the activities for the month
indicated above.
Naate
Title
Total Amount Due $ $
White Copy - Return to MWCC
KEEP THIS CARD BY YOUR TELEPHONE
NORTHWEST
HENNEPIN
HUMAN SERVICES
General Information and Referral Services:
Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council ... 536 -0327
First Call for Help' ....... . ..... . .......... 340 -7431
C. E . A. P . . ............................... 566 -9600
Food, Clothing and Shelter Services:
C. E.A. P ... ............................... 566 -9600
C.R.O.S.S. ........................... 425 -1050
Energy Assistance Program ................. 536 -9948
Emergency Financial Assistance .............. 348 -4952
N. E.A.R . . ............................... 533 -2836
P.R.I.S.M . ... ............................ 544 -7522
Surplus Food Distribution ................... 536 -0327
Senior Citizen Services
C. E.A.P . . ............................... 566 -9600
Dayton Senior Center ...................... 428 -4692
Golden Valley Senior Citizens Program ......... 593 -8039
Metropolitan Visiting Nurse Assoc . ............ 348 -2777
School District 281 Senior Services ........... 535 -1790
Individual and Family Services:
American Red Cross /Northwest Branch ........
533 -3048
Child Abuse Hotline' ......................
348 -3552
Greater Minneapolis Day Care Assoc. ..........
823 -7243
Hennepin County Women /Children's Health Clinic.
569 -2660
Home Free Shelter for Battered Women' .......
559 -4945
Northwest Family and Children's Services ......
424 -6211
Northwest Mental Health Center ..............
533 -2600
Northwest YMCA .........................
535 -4800
The House Community Counseling Center ......
533 -5213
Your Emergency Services /NEON' ............
379 -6363
ALWAYS REMEMBER!
DIAL 911 FOR EMERGENCIES
The Nunn— Hunan C
Human Sees KMI is funded by cg*s of the rgrVvW area and Hav*W County.
Published January. 1807.
' 24 -Hour Service
CX�
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
MEMO
DATE: December 9, 1986
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Dale Hahn, Finance Director �W—
SUBJECT MEETING WITH CNA INSURANCE COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES
A meeting was held on December 8, 1986 with Edward J. McCabe, Jr.,
Branch Manager and Julie Kronbach, Branch Claims Manager from CNA
Insurance. They were very apologetic about the manner in which the
Novy's Sanitary Sewer backup claim was handled, and clearly regretted
the crudeness with which this claim was processed.
We discussed what measures could be taken to assure that future
claims are processed in a more pleasing manner. These
recommendations are outlined on the letter attached from Mr. McCabe.
He assured us that personnel from CNA Insurance Companies would be
made aware of this meeting and advised of our concerns.
I feel confident after meeting with representatives from CNA
Insurance that all future claims will be handled in a positive
and sensitive way.
CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES
700 Piper Jaffray Tower -P.O. Box 9322, 222 S. 9th St., Minneapolis, MN 55440 Edward J. McCabe, Jr.
December 8, 1986 Branch Manager
Mr. Dale Hahn
Finance Director
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Claim Handling
Dear Dale:
Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and your staff
this afternoon.
Confirming our discussion, on new reported claims, we will:
1) Make telephone contact with the City of Plymouth
representative (Ms. Bobbi Leitner) and with the
claimant. Face to face meetings, as warranted,
will be held.
2) Investigation conducted will include factual
development both from the City of Plymouth personnel
and from other sources, including claimants.
3) Gary Kirkpatrick, Claim Supervisor, telephone number
347 -6768, has been designated to coordinate my special
requests or communications that may arise.
4) Conies of correspondence on City of Plymouth claims
will be provided to you. New reported claims should
indicate this request.
Again, thank you for meeting with Julie Kronbach and myself.
We look forward to building a strong relationship with you.
Sincerely,
!Edward f;�M�c C6�e , Jr.
Branch Manager
EJM:hgg
CHA
For All the Commitments You Make'
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
MEMO
DATE: Decefit per 9. 1986
TO: James G. Wi11i=s - City Manager
FROM: Richard J. Car lquist - Public Safety Directo-
SUBJECT REQUEST FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA
1 tho-unht that you wc)uld 'De interested in the new twist for the old terminology
itaml- ,ulance The attorney f i rr of Wersal & McNamara, P.A. , 7841 Wayzate
E!1,_),_-1evard, ccrresnonded wit.h:- f1r ar`�'roximately four weeks ago concerning certain arrest
data thr: t is coris i der c�d nub 1 i c. information under the Government D,3ta Pract. i ccs Act.
Durir;q their initial contact with-; me via letter. they quoted many sections of the
or va v Act, and r e,- t!e.,tecl th c2t. wr:? respond according to the genera! requirements of
t.!:is act a5 it pertains to di5�;ernination of records. I have enclosed with-: this memc., a
corDy of a letter that is now sent out on a weekly basis.
Most dint._± cc,ncerning the arreE.t- of individuals is considered public. Therefore, we
must comply with request 4 such as the attorney firm mentioned in this memo. it is
Poor+ that we are autorated with our records. The retrieval of arrest records and the
program that we have deve1oned allow-. us to respond quite efficieni.1y. If we were not
automated, we would still h^ required to provide the information manually and still
not recover our costs associated with collating the data and typing it. Nevertheless,
reQuests and use of arrest data such, as the attorney firm in question reinforces my
belief that there are jest too many attorneys!
RJC : ate'
Enclosure
Wersal & McNamara, P.A.
Attorneys at Law
Sgt. Thomas Saba
Plymouth Police Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Sirs:
Reply to:
7841 Wayzata Boulevard
Suite 211
Minneapolis, MN 55426
(612) 546 -3513
I request that you send our office in the envelope provided the
following information:
1. The period I am interested in is from 1�� 17 k'� to
IZ
2. The names and addresses of all individuals charged with a
crime by your police department during that period.
3. The crime or crimes with which these individuals were charged.
I understand that your charge for this service is $4.00 for the
first ten pages and $.25 a page thereafter. I have enclosed a
check in the amount of $4.00. If_ any additional amount is owing
please bill my office. This request for information is made
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 13.82, Subd. 2 (a), (e), and (j),
which states that the name and last known address of adults arrested,
the charges against them, and the date, time and place of the action
is public information.
Yours truly,
Gregory F. W/ersal
Date: 2-lj