Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 11-26-1986CITY OF PLYMOUTFF CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM November 26, 1986 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY -- City offices will be closed Thursday, November 27 and riday, November 28. 2. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, December 1, 7:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting in City Council Chambers. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, December 3. The Planning Commission Forum will begin at 7:15 p.m., with the regular Planning Commission meeting following at 7:30 p.m. Agenda attached. (M-3) 4. CROWN AUTO RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY - Mr. Sam Van Tassel called the office today to extend an invitation to members of the Council to attend a ribbon cutting ceremony scheduled for Monday, December 8, at 4:00 p.m. for the new Crown Auto store and Wash Me car wash facility. 5. EMPLOYEE CHRISTMAS PARTY -- Friday, December 19, Sheraton Park Place. As a reminder, please contact Laurie if you plan to attend. FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY .MEETING -- The Council has scheduled a study meeting for Monday, December 15 with PRAC commencing with a dinner at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room. A copy of the proposed agenda for this meeting, which has been reviewed and developed by PRAC and Eric Blank, is attached. If the Councilmembers wish to revise this agenda, please let me know Monday evening. (I-1) 2. CITIZEN'S LEAGUE REPORT ON TRANSIT STRATEGIES -- A special committee of the Citizen's League has recently completed a study of regional transit. Attached is an extract of that report which appeared in the November 25 issue of "Minnesota Journal" published by the Citizen's League. The report notes that people are makinq more 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM November 26, 1986 Page two trips than in past years within the metropolitan area and that much of this growth is occurring within the suburbs. Most significantly, these trips are being made in passenger automobiles. Given these facts, the Committee takes a dim view of light rail transit as a "solution" to most transportation needs in the metropolitan area. Rather, they suggest that ride sharing offers the most practical approach with the quickest impact. I have asked for a copy of the entire report and will be pleased to share it with members of the Council if you desire. (I-2) 3. MINUTES: a. Planning Commission, November 19, 1986 (I -3a) 4. MLC UPDATE -- Attached separately is a copy of the November/December issue of the Municipal Legislative Commission's Update newsletter. The newsleter is sent to legislators in an effort to inform them of the issues and events of importance to MLC cities. 5. FUND ESTABLISHED FOR PURCHASE OF BULLET-PROOF VESTS FOR POLICE OFFICERS -- On November 25, Mr. Roger Redmond presented the Plymouth Police Association with a check for $350.00 to initiate a fund to purchase bullet-proof vests for police officers. Mr. Redmond, a Plymouth resident, is the owner of Roger Redmond Homes, and has built homes in the Plymouth area. Mr. Redmond was interviewed by reporters from the Plymouth Sailor and Plymouth Post. He stressed that he had a concern for the safety of the officers after reading about an incident in Minneapolis recently where an officer was shot, but sustained no life- threatening injury because of his protective vest. According to Dick Carlquist, all patrol officers, that he is aware of, do wear protective vests. However, the life expectancy of these vests is approximately 4-5 years. The cost of replacement is currently $350.00. The fund will be managed by the Police Association. 5. ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN CITIES -- Attached is a bulletin from the Association of Metropolitan Cities announcing a vacancy on the AMM Board and reporting on several other metro matters. The AMM is seeking nominations for a vacancy on its Board due to a recent resignation. The term for this vacancy would end May 31, 1988. The Board is expected to fill the vacancy at its January Board meeting. Written nominations will be accepted until December 31. Other matters reported in the bulletin include the Metropolitan Council's program for solid waste household rebate program, the metropolitan highway jurisdiction study, and the formation of the League of Minnesota Cities' Property Tax Reform Technical Committee. (I-5) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM November 26, 1986 Page three 6. METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - SAC CHARGES -- During October and November, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission revised its policy for the collection of SAC units, and established new SAC rates effective January 1, 1987. Attached is a letter from Louis Breimhurst, Chief Administrator for the MWCC, providing further information on the changes. (I-6) 7. COMMUNITY INFORMATION BOOKLET -- On Tuesday, November 25, 17,118 Community Information booklets were delivered to the post office. Distribution to households began on November 26. As of this writing, I have received comments from two Plymouth residents; Mr. John Springer and Mr. Dominic Dahlheimer, who have provided positive comments about the book, its contents and use. One resident has already expressed an interest in obtaining additional copies for use by clubs, etc. It appears that the Community Information booklet will be a positive addition to our public relations arsenal. Attached separately is a copy of the Community Information booklet for each Council member. 8. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter from Mayor Schneider sent to County and State officials concerning the City's November 10 meeting on road improvement projects. (I -8a) b. Letter from Mayor Schneider to Mr. Ernie Ledoux regarding his concern about not receiving an absentee ballot for the general election. (I -8b) c. Letter from Sherm Goldberg to Dr. James Craig, 10008 South Shore Drive, in response to drainage concerns expressed by Dr. Craig in a letter dated November 4 to Mayor Schneider. (I -8c) d. Letters from Mr. and Mrs. David Mesley, and Linda Buranen, concerning the Alpha Human Services petition. (I -8d) e. Memorandum from Joe Ryan, Building Official, concerning a proposed addition and building permit application for 12006 Sunset Trail (Benjamin and Audrey Bambenek). On Friday, November 21, Joe met with Mr. Bob Frakes, consultant for the property owner, to discuss the application. Mr. Frakes had previously contacted Councilmember Zitur on this matter. (I -8e) James. G. Willis City Manager JGW:jm attach PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1986 �A -3 WHERE: Plymouth City Center 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC FORUM 7:15 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL 3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes, November 19, 1986 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ron Clark, Clark Construction Company. Final Plat, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 222 unit apartment complex located east of I-494; west of Xenium Lane at 34th Avenue North. (86115) B. George and Teresa Hoff dba Design Mechanical Inc. Conditional Use Permit for a home occupation at 10800 41st Avenue North. (86122) 5. NEW BUSINESS NONE 6. OLD BUSINESS NONE 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Streamlining the Development Review Process 8. ADJOURNMENT 8:30 P.M. AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING December 15, 1986 5:00 P.M. Dinner - 5:00-5:30 p.m. The primary purpose of the meeting is to clarify and develop consensus on the City Council's expectations for the Park and Recreation Advisory Commis- sion relating to the Council's 1987 objectives. Items for discussion parallel the City Council's objectives which are set forth below: I. Community Center Data Gathering The investigation and data gathering for a community center should be accomplished to identify if, when, and how this issue should be presented to the citizens requesting bonding authority. By July 1, 1987. II. Trail Completion for Public Safety. Planning and construction of trail segments required to enhance the public safety should be given first priority. Such trails should be identified, funded, and constructed no later than September 1, 1987. III. Study of Park Usage and Maintenance Levels A comprehensive study of the appropriate use of parks by type and maintenance program for each should be evaluated by the Council to determine whether changes should be made to the comprehensive Park and Trail Plan and maintenance standards by September 1, 1987. IV. Construction of Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks scheduled for construction in 1987 should be accomplished by November 15, 1987. V. Grand Opening of Parkers Lake City Park a. Possible dates b. Events sponsorship C. Special guest d. Other VI. Other VII. Adjourn 7:00 p.m. I',-- _L_ t CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 DATE: November 24, 1986 MEMO T0: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: QUESTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL.'S REVIEW -PRIOR TO' JOINT MEETING WITH PRAC The following is a list of questions prepared by the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and a second list from staff evolving around issues dealing with the proposed community center. A. List of Questions Developed by PRAC 1. What is the status of the financial needs of the various school districts within the City,•specifically, the Wayzata School district? 2. What is the degree of data .that the Council wishes the Park Commission to gather, review, etc.? 3. What is the view of each member of the Council toward the community center idea at this time? 4. Does the facility have to be designed to be self supporting, or is that an ideal goal to be striving for? 5. Does the Council agree with the building components as proposed in the 1984 referendum? 6. Does the Council wish to seriously explore a public/private part- nership venture on this item? 7. The Commission has asked that the Council be distributed copies of the final report from the 1984 study group. What aspects of this report do they agree or disagree with, and what information do they feel is lacking? B. Staff Generated Questions 1. What role does the City Council wish to play in this issue? 2. What role does the City Council wish PRAC to play? 3. What role should staff play? 4. What role will the general citizens have? 5. Should we appoint a special blue ribbon citizens committee, appointed by the Mayor and City Council, to work with PRAC on this subject? TI Questions for Review by City Council Prior to Joint Meeting with PRAC Page Two 6. Should an outside consultant be used to work with the Park Commission on a finding of needs study or other type of research? 7. Can we start soliciting public information using Plymouth on Parade as a vehicle for input, or cable television? 8. What about the use of tv shows, models, drawings, etc., of proposed facilities or other like facilities for public display? 9. Should the City Council and PRAC be touring other facilities to better understand the overall role these facilities play in other communities? 10. At what point will we use a telephone survey consultant to determine citizen attitudes? 11. Has the City Council provided for funding for any of this research that may be necessary as this project moves forward? 12. If it is necessary to determine cost estimates, will we use, once again, BRW, the firm that was selected in 1984 to design this facility? 13. Should PRAC look at other funding needs, i.e., trails, parks, etc., for inclusion in a bond referendum? From New Destinations for Transit, a new Citizens League's report Transportation trends that began years ago in the Twin Cities metropolitan area have continued and in some cases accelerated. We make more trips than we did in the past and we make most of our trips by car. Some of us ride public transportation, but more of us ride as passengers in cars and vans, and the overwhelming majority of us choose to drive alone ... More and more businesses, retail centers, and residential areas are developing in the suburbs ... Transit strategies must accommodate these patterns. Transit must accommodate where the people are, where the jobs are, and where the trips go ... Transit means any trip other than one in which a single occupant drives a vehicle. Our future mobility is at risk because of trends in travel and vehicle use. Peak -period con- gestion has increased in our area and is expected to worsen. In the past the region has accommodated increasing congestion by adding to road capacity. This area has maintained high levels of mobility which have contributed to its level of development, economic health, and quality of life. However, major new road construction in the developed areas will be very limited ... Major traffic congestion in the Twin Cities has expanded outward over time to include more and more of the highway facilities in the suburban areas of the region ... We're traveling more often and longer ... In the absence of more ridership we will have increased congestion and increased travel time and costs. We could tolerate this, but we have the opportunity to avoid it. We need not endure the inconvenience of not getting where we want to go in a timely manne, nor the unnecessary costs of solo - occupant cars, nor the loss of job opportuni- ties for people unable to transport themselves. The conditions are urgent for the region to make a policy commitment to ridership ... However, incentives are needed to encour- age ridership. Merely providing an aftemative to driving alone will not create demand for transit... Ridership should be encouraged where it can compete effectively with the single -occupant auto in terms of time, con- venience, and expense ... Multi -passenger vehicles must have priority use of the roadways and parking facilities ... (the Minnesota Department of Transportation), the (Regional Transit Board) RTB, munici- palities, and private businesses should give more emphasis to those strategies which encourage people to use high -occupancy vehicles ... We have a dispersed pattem of travel in all directions as a result of the area's widely dispersed pattern of residential and em- ployment locations ... The cost of regular route bus operations has risen well in excess of inflation... Competition between transit providers would benefit serv- ice. Low-cost options are needed so the greatest amount of transit service is offered per dollar... The RTB should phase in competitive bids for service to lower the cost of bus -hours of service. The RTB should focus its competitive bidding on the highest cost portion of the (Metropolitan Transit Commission) — the peak hour service... Strategies for transit must recognize travel trends This (competition) includes taxis, limousines, bus companies, paratransit servi^es, and other vendors ... The Legislature should expand the role taxicabs may play as transit providers by allowing metropolitan -wide licensing of taxicabs, an unlimited number of taxi licenses, non-regulated fares, and shared, group -ride service ... The RTB should be responsible for main- taining the regional nature of the transit system and for high standards of performance ... The Metropolitan Council should take the lead in recommending transit financing changes. Because the Metropolitan Council has the broad role of coordinating the regional November 25. 1986 Minnasntn .lournal systems, it is in the best position to analyze the competing needs of transit and the other regional services. Any investment of money for a fixed -guideway project should not come at the expense of existing transit programs ... A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the different applications of fixed -guideway is needed ... The Metropolitan Council should not request a public investment of money for, and the Legislature should not approve, constructing fixed -guideway. Instead the Council and the RTB should focus on phasing in competitive bids for transit service around the region, and providing incentives to increase ridership in the expanded transit system recommended earlier in this report ... The Metropolitan Council should not act on any fixed -guideway proposal until small area applications of fixed -guideway are de- signed and analyzed in comparison with corridor applications. The Council should decide to accept or reject a fixed -guideway proposal based on: (1) Whether the project would attract significant numbers of drivers out of their single -occu- pant cars, or otherwise reduce the need for travel on highways, (2) An assurance that when a fixed -guideway proposal depends on development and land use changes, that the public and private actions necessary to bring those changes about will be accomp- lished, (3) Whether sufficient private dollars have been leveraged from the benefiting property owners to implement the project, and (4) Whether the public dollars involved are providing the most ridership per dollar ... The program known as Metro Mobility is the state -funded, publicly organized program that offers door-to-door transportation for handicapped individuals... Metro Mobility is only one piece of a large network that pro- vides specialized transportation. Other formal providers include county providers, churches, nonprofit groups, senior centers, and other social service agencies To make the most rides available for disabled and elderly people ... financial incentives are needed that encourage selection of vendors based on both the quality and the price of the service. Providers should be allowed to compete with each other based on the price of their service to the riders. The vendors should be able to offer rides for any price up to a maximum, permitting riders to choose among a variety of rides and prices ... Low-income riders should receive priority so they are not priced out of transportation. A co -payment system should be instituted on a sliding fee scale in which riders pay a portion of the ride's cost based on their ability to pay. 017-- 3 CA-) CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 19, 1986 The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:34 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Pauba, Commissioners Wire, Magnus, Plufka and Mellen Chairman Steigerwald arrived at 7:41 P.M. MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Stulberg STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Sara McConn City Engineer Sherm Goldberg Parks & Recreation Director Eric Blank Community Development Director Blair Tremere Planning Secretary Grace Wineman *CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus MOTION TO APPROVE to adopt the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. *MINUTES MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus MOTION TO APPROVE to approve the October 22, 1986 and November 5, 1986 Minutes as submitted. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on approval for October 22, 1986 Minutes. Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried on approval for November 5, VOTE - MOTION CARRIED 1986 Minutes. Commissioner Plufka abstained. PUBLIC HEARINGS Vice Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Image Homes IMAGE HOMES and requested an overview of the October 7, 1986 Planning RPUD CONCEPT PLAN Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT REZONING AND Coordinator McConn introduced Parks & Recreation Director CONDITIONAL USE Eric Blank, who explained the location and size of the PERMIT (86087) anticipated parkland. He responded to the neighborhood input, as he explained the City's wish to preserve the pond- ing area as part of the park and the need for better public access to the park. He reviewed the unique configuration and topography of the area . -250- 3 ck , Page 251 Planning Commission Minutes November 199 1986 Chairman Steigerwald introduced Tim Erkkila, Westwood Plan- ning & Engineering, who described the site owned by the City of Plymouth. He noted the City has encouraged them to pur- sue the development as a Planned Unit Development; and,have discouraged separate development plans for the twoparcels. The City desires to have these parcels develop at the same time. The amenities as discussed in the staff report are located for the most part on the north and west wide; this property has mature trees, and contains the ponding area, which the developer has agreed to retain as parkland. In designing the layout for the north side, they noted the northwest side of this property has a rugged terrain, and much of the existing vegetation and mature trees are contained in this area. It was their opinion that multi- family dwellings would be inappropriate; that 32 single family dwelling units would be more suitable and desirable from a marketing standpoint; that multi -family units would have the same impact on the property as single family detached dwellings; and, that the single family homes would be more in character with the surrounding neighborhoods. The proposal is for 77 single family detached units, 32 on the north side, 45 on the south. The plans preserve the amenities, existing vegetation, and provide the roadway system per City standards. Mr. Erkkila stated their plans give much more than what was given credit for in the Plan- ning Staff Report. It is their opinion they have developed a good plan, especially for the property on the south side. He explained the constraints which include limited access; the lot size and lot width as proposed are within 9% of comparable lots in the adjacent development. He believes the lot frontages are more expansive than those lots in surrounding developments. The development plans, which include the 8 acres for park- land, establishes their compliance with the expected Planned Unit Development (PUD) Attributes. However, they are will- ing to work with Director Blank and City staff regarding the changes needed per the Park Director's November 7, 1986 memorandum. Mr. Erkkila believes it is questionable that a 45 lot sub- division should be required to provide private open space in addition to the land granted for public park purposes. He stated that even though this philosophy may have some validity, it could become a burden to the home owners. Page 252 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Mr. Erkkila discussed the requested setback variance, stat- ing they would drop this request and provide the ordinance required setbacks. The increased lot coverage requested for one lot, is to accommodate the future property owner for space to add a deck or porch if desired. Mr. Erkkila discussed the question of housing diversity and reiterated their opinion that multiple family dwellings would be too burdensome for the site. He stated they are providing open space; that they were eligible for a higher density but have lowered this to 77 single family units. Mr. Erkkila stated that residents living in Heritage Ridge and Heritage Highlands would be expressing their concerns and commenting on the proposed development. Commissioner Plufka inquired if the limits of the grading would reduce the buildable area? Mr. Erkkila pointed out the area, explaining that on Lots 13, and 11, building sites will go beyond the grading limit. Commissioner Plufka inquired about the cul-de-sac at 32nd Avenue and whether these sites would also encroach into that area? Mr. Erkkila explained their efforts to retain trees, but it is accurate to say that the buildings may take out a tree or two beyond the grading limits. Commissioner Plufka inquired if this is inconsistent with their comments regarding setbacks? Mr. Erikkila stated they would prefer to have the 25 ft. setback, but if this becomes a point of approval, they will retract this request. Commissioner Mellen inquired about the 25% lot coverage for Lot 3, Block 3; and, if the developer is proposing a deck as part of the house design? Mr. Erkkila stated Mr. Al Stobbe could perhaps answer this question, but the initial plans may not include a deck; however, it would allow for the deck should the buyer want to add it later. Commis- sioner Mellen stated his concern regarding the variance, which could elicit a request by the property owner for an even higher percentage of lot coverage in the future. Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning & Engineering, stated this request was made so it would not restrict the footprint for the house. Rather than reducing the size of the home, they are requesting a variance so that all the homes could be constructed with decks. Commissioner Magnus inquired about the changes requested by the Parks & Recreation Director, and if the proposed park acreage is useable. Mr. Blank explained that the City bought the property for County Road 61, and the Comprehen- sive Park Plan shows a neighborhood park for this area. 0`, Page 253 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 He explained the history of the area noting that this proposal has not gone before the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, but the plan is close to what the Comprehensive Park Plan perceives for the neighborhood. Commissioner Magnus stated his concerns for children having to cross County Road 61 to access the park, and he does not see the benefit to the residents on the south side. Director Blank stated this was a difficult area to plan in that the parkland is basically located north of County Road 61. He further explained the history of the park planning when the City Council decided not to build two City parks. He assured the Commission that the City will work to provide safe crossings for the residents using the park. Commissioner Magnus inquired if the additional four acres could be exchanged for an area south of County Road 61? Director Blank stated this would serve little purpose. The need for private open space and compliance with the PUD attributes was discussed. Coordinator McConn discussed the proposal, specifically, the area southeast of County Road 61, where plans do not reflect compliance with the PUD Attributes. Mr. Erkkila stated the development is too small to accommodate and plan private open space in addition to the parkland granted to the City. Coordinator McConn point- ed out that there are a number of small Planned Unit Developments which do comply with the PUD requirements; along with conventional developments which were planned with residential amenities. She noted it is important that the development be unified, even though it is divided by County Road 61. Commissioner Magnus stated he is concerned about the parcel to the south being isolated; and, that this side of the pro- posed development, and the residents to the south, are not being treated fairly. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing. Mark McCullough, representing the Heritage Highlands Home- owners Association, stated a letter was sent to the Planning Commission relative to these development plans. He noted the neighborhood is concerned about the area on the north side. It is their opinion that multi -family dwellings are inappropriate for this neighborhood and they oppose such development. Page 254 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Mr. McCullough stated they were given the site layout by the developer that included townhouses and the Association was not happy with that plan. Single family housing is more appropriate; the City has established a pattern for single family detached homes in this area, even for that land clas- sified as LA -2. He stated, that including multi -family dwellings just because of the PUD provisions is not suf- ficient reason. He stated the developer has been very cooperative and will follow the City direction to preserve the vegetation. Cluster housing would be incompatible with the more expen- sive homes in this area. The problems created by City decisions about County Road 61 should not be the burden of this developer. Mr. McCullough listed concerns including their suggestion to delete Lot 7, Block 4, and add a lot at the end of 32nd Avenue North. They have reviewed the development plan and discussed the sewer and drainage for this development; it is their opinion the drainage should be directed to the south; staff has proposed the opposite, but would not discuss the reasons. They want assurance regarding landscape require- ments, and have discussed this with the developer. This is a responsible developer whose plans are consistent with the existing neighborhoods, they encourage the Planning Commis- sion to approve this Concept Plan. Director of Parks and Recreation Eric Blank stated the 32nd Avenue access to the park is preferred because of the pond- ing and unique shape of this park. He stated that in study- ing the topographic characteristics, shape, and vegetation in this area it could not be seen where the construction of a home would be accommodated. The trail system and open space activities were described. Sherm Goldberg stated the sanitary sewer would be handled by pipe to the north. There are no capacity problems, and it could be handled by pipe from either direction. Carol Brownell, 3060 Rosewood Lane, stated that a petition for a park was made in 1984 because of the number of small children living in the area. She read from the Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) who moved to amend the Comprehensive Park Plan to provide for 3 to 5 acres for a mini park for Westminster; approximately 8 to 12 acres for the Heritage Estates development area; and to pro- vide some land south of County Road 61. The City Council did not permit this action. Ms. Brownell noted they are back to the same problems, having to cross a busy street to go to the park; their concern for the safety of the children; and, the fact that the West Medicine Lake Park cA� Page 255 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 will not develop for at least another 5 years. She believes it has been the intent of the Planning Commission and City Council that the area south of County Road 61 be developed with single family residences, but the proposals made by Sohn Karos, and now by Image Homes, can in no way provide comparable housing to that in the existing neighborhoods, because the lots are too small. The south side has swamp and flood plain and would provide no play area. The proposal shows no retention of trees in the southeast portion. Ms. Brownell read into the record, a letter from Peggy Schaefer, a Plymouth resident who opposes this development proposal. Ms. Schaefer states the lots are too small and the development should be similar to the Westminster devel- opment. It is her opinion the City should stand by the original plans for the area. She noted her concern for the children and the lack of play areas; and, the City park is too close to privately owned land. Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning, reiterated their plan to save as many trees as possible that are not located in future streets or frontage. Bill Ciora, 3045 Rosewood Lane, stated he objects to the development because the density is too high, especially on the south side. It is his opinion the numbers are inac- curate regarding lot size and width. He wants the unit number reduced to fit in with the existing neighborhood. Deleting 6 to 8 dwelling units would improve the plan. Higher density next to Westminster is not acceptable. Westminster lacks recreational areas and perhaps would not be approved today. He pointed out there is much more existing vegetation than is shown on the plans. He is concerned about the requested setbacks which could cause the homes to be on top of each other. He read from the Planning Commission Minutes regarding the development proposal by Sohn Karos, and statements by the Chairman regarding lot size and layout which leaves no "elbow room". Commissioner Plufka concurred with Mr. Ciora in that the site has more vegetation than what is shown on the plans. Tim Erkkila stated that trees in this area are lesser quality species and fast growing, such as Boxelder. This site lacks the dominant vegetation found on the north side. The trees surround a depression and do not relate to the development plan. Page 256 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Paul Waldon, 3365 Rosewood, stated he lives in Heritage Estates and is a new resident in Plymouth. He stated the vegetation on the north side consists of oak and apple trees and that constructing multi -family dwellings here would not save these trees. He stated this area is prime single- family residential real estate and it would be a waste to construct multi -family dwellings. Arlene Johnson, 3535 Rosewood Lane, stated she is also concerned about the children having to cross County Road 61. They conveyed their concerns about crossing to French Park and were told there was no chance for stop signs as the traffic has to move. This development will have just as many problems with access to the park. Their neighborhood has been promised a park for years. She noted her neighbor- hood got along without public park by people putting swing sets in their yards. She discussed the mini -park that was defeated. She is concerned about losing more trees because the City chopped down many trees putting in County Road 61, and this development plan should preserve the oak and maple trees. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the park access from the northwest. Director Blank stated they have purchased the 30 ft. corridor from Ives Lane; Coordinator McConn pointed out the access points. Mr. Ciora stated they are asking relief from the higher density. Tim Erkkila, Westwood Planning stated they didn't want the Planning Commission to get caught up in the City issues for parkland. The development plan provides the land requested and they don't want to be the "whipping boy" for the park system. They want to move forward with their Concept Plan, and defer the preliminary plat stage. They will review the plans with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission to clarify the issues and will work with the planning staff to clarify the lot size and width requirements. He feels they are very close to compliance with their plan as submitted. The concept is reasonable and should be approved. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Pauba inquired about the feasibility for a foot bridge to the park, or would the cost be prohibitive? Director Blank stated this would be incredibly expensive and in most cases where they have been erected they are not used. Commissioner Pauba noted his concern that the south side has been short changed. Director Blank stated they looked at going under the road, but there is not enough room. _T: 3CA.1 Page 257 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Commissioner Plufka stated the need to review the PUD Attributes. He applauds the plan for the north side and the parkland provided; however, when reading the expected attribute that "more useable and suitably located recreation facilities and other public and common facilities than would otherwise be provided . . . ", a poor job has been done with the plans for the south side. Commissioner Plufka noted the plans cannot ignore County Road 61 as a barrier. Commissioner Wire concurred, stating that County Road 61 should not be used to separate the development making the plans for each side totally different. It is obvious the south side comes up on the short end. Commissioner Mellen noted the City Council has directed the park on the north side; Chairman Steigerwald concurred, but noted that the residents are due these amenities and that private open space is required for a Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Magnus stated his concern regarding the small lot size, and that the plan needs to be improved for the south side. Chairman Steigerwald stated there are unusual circumstances with the development of this property, and he empathizes with the developer. The resident groups are active in this area and have many concerns; the City is the land owner; and, it is his opinion the developer should be given time to work out these problems. He stated that in deference to accepting this Concept Plan, he would entertain a motion to table the entire request with no date certain, to give the developer time to prepare a better plan for the southeasterly side of this property. Coordinator McConn noted the City's concern in tabling or deferring this item with no time limit. She explained that the application has been in process for several months. If the Planning Commission defers their recommendation, it would be appropriate to reconsider the item at their Decem- ber 17, 1986 meeting. She discussed the correspondence sent to the petitioner listing the concerns and their late res- ponse to these items. The staff review comments have not changed since the petitioner has elected to submit no alternatives. Commissioner Plufka stated the City has been painstaking in delineating the parkland, and has within its power as land owner to require that a plan more in keeping with the requirements for a PUD Plan be prepared for the south side of the property. mac... Page 258 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Coordinator McConn stated that staff encouraged the petitioner and consultants to review the development plan submitted by Sohn Karos. The staff has provided direction from previous Commission discussions and explained the deficiencies of the plans submitted; however, it is the petitioner's choice whether to make changes and provide those alternatives. Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning, stated he had been asked by staff to respond to those areas of non-compliance, and have been willing to cooperate. However, the development plans have been under review since duly. He feels there should be an economic reconsideration and discussion regard- ing the purchase price. The parkland and roadway accounts for 25% of the purchase price that the developer has had to write off; and, this should be taken into consideration. How much more do we have to give back to the City? Coordinator McConn stated the financial considerations must be discussed with the City Council. She noted further, in response to Mr. Neumeister's statements that the review of these plans was not accomplished in a timely manner; that the application was submitted on duly 15th; correspondence requesting further information and detailing the staff concerns following plan review was forwarded to the petitioner and consultant on August 1st and August 8th, which elicited no response. Inquiries as to the status of providing a response were sent to the petitioner in September and October. MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO DENY Wire to recommend denial of the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Image Homes on the basis that compliance with the Planned Unit Development expected attri- butes have not been demonstrated. Commissioner Plufka asked that the record indicate to the City Council that he does not concur with the staff report that it is imperative for this plan to have a mix of hous- ing. This is not the issue for denial. The City, as owner of the property, has seen a good plan for the north side; but, the major concern is that the City as seller of this property must have a better plan for the southeasterly parcel, and must commit to those people living on the south side. The problem should not be compounded by adding more density. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. I..:..__.__._. - VOTE - NOTION CARRIED Page 259 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Ron Clark RON CLARK Construction Company for Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Variance for property east of I-494; west of Xenium Lane at REZONING, PRELIMINARY 34th Avenue North. He requested an overview of the November PLAT AND VARIANCE 12, 1986 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. (86115) Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Ron Pentz, Prudential Insurance Company. Mr. Pentz stated they have submitted a letter in response to staff concerns. Mike Gair, Gair & Associates, stated they have met with the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Swienton, 3335 Xenium Lane North, south of the proposed development and have made the arrangements that will allow them to maintain their access. They also agree to the conditions as proposed by City staff. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Richard Swienton asked why the petitioner could not buy their property? He stated they are sitting on an island now. They have been approached by persons interested in buying the property, however, they have backed off because of this development proposal. He noted others have been interested in buying the entire area. He is concerned about his property being locked in and the City of Plymouth then condemning the property. Commissioner Plufka noted that a condition of approval for this development would be that the final plat shall include a conceptual plan showing how the exception parcels can develop in the future and the plan must be consistent with the development regulations of the City. Mrs. Swienton stated their property value will be reduced because the house will no longer have a good setting. Chairman Steigerwald discussed the zoning and guiding of the property. Mike Gair stated there is no problem showing how this property can be further developed and there is potential for separate uses. Chairman Steigerwald further explained the City review of the proposed development to the Swientons. Mr. Swienton stated the developer has been very cooperative. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. Page 260 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Chairman Steigerwald to recommend approval for the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and Variance for Ron Clark Construction Company, subject to the conditions as listed in the November 12, 1986 Planning Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Mark Austin Smith for "Tires Plus". He requested an overview of the November 12, 1986 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Mark Smith, 115 2nd Avenue South, Minneapolis, who stated he would answer any questions; he has read and concurs with the staff report. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. NOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MARK AUSTIN SMITH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCE (86120) MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Pauba MOTION TO APPROVE to recommend approval for the General Development Plan Amendment, Site Plan, Conditional use Permit and Variance for Mark Austin Smith for "Tires Plus", subject to the conditions listed in the November 12, 1986 Planning Staff Report. Commissioner Plufka inquired about Mr. Smith's reaction to the requirement of a covenant to be placed on the property regarding limitations to the property based on available parking. Mr. Smith stated he has no problem placing this covenant on the property as he will be a tenant and hopes to do business at this location for quite some time. He drafted the covenant that was reviewed by the City Attorney and is aware of the intent and purpose of that covenant, and wants it for his own protection. He stated that company officers for "Tires Plus" are present and could answer any questions. This operation will be high quality, as will the business to be run by "Harmon Glass", and they have also agreed to all the conditions including storing their company vehicles inside the building. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Z: 3co� Page 261 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 OLD BUSINESS MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus *AT&T COMMUNICATIONS to recommend approval of the Site Plan for AT&T Communica- SITE PLAN (86086) tions for the construction of an attached garage to the NOTION TO APPROVE principal building located northeast of 15th Avenue North and Xenium Lane, subject to the conditions as listed in the November 7, 1985 Planning Staff Report. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. OTHER BUSINESS VOTE - NOTION CARRIED The Planning Commission discussed potential measures that STREAMLINING THE could be taken to streamline the development review and DEVELOPMENT PROCESS approval process. The suggestions included in the November 5, 1986 memorandum from Community Development Director Blair Tremere, served as a basis for the discussion. Commissioner Plufka confirmed that land uses designated as a conditional use including Planned Unit Developments would not be included for administrative approval. A site plan for developments in non-residential areas of Planned Unit Developments (PUD), once the PUD Plan had been considered in accordance with the current review procedures, would be subject to the same administrative procedures and require- ments as non-PUD's; the finding would additionally be made that the proposed plans were consistent with the approved PUD Plan. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that in order to institute revised procedures for approval of site plans, a public hearing would be required to consider amendatory language to the Zoning Ordinance. Chairman Steigerwald inquired of the Commission whether a "hook" should be included in the pro- cedures, via a Planning Commission member reviewing those applications which would qualify for administrative approval prior to such approval being granted. The Commission repre- sents the citizens and should be aware of development. Commissioner Wire expressed his view that some of the Ordin- ance standards are not clear, such as lighting, and questioned how compliance with the Ordinance would be deter- mined administratively. He suggested that the applications, which satisfy all the Ordinance requirements be processed through the Commission, but not be formally discussed. Co- ordinator McConn explained the Planning Commission already operates with a consent agenda for such items. The consent agenda saves the petitioner time at the Planning Commission meeting, but does not substantially reduce the overall time for processing the application. —E- 3c.,,,-� Page 262 Planning Commission Minutes November 19, 1986 Director Tremere explained many of the requirements and pro- cedures were adopted some time ago when the City's concerns and needs were different. The City has adopted sophisti- cated and effective ordinances and policies which, if met, constitute a plan that is in order and, thus, not particu- larly in need of extensive non-technical review. Chairman Steigerwald suggested a member could be appointed to serve as a representative to meet with the staff members before regular commission meetings. The Planning Commission member would be responsible for identifying potential prob- lems that should be reviewed by them for formal discussion at a subsequent meeting. If there were no questions or problems, the application could be administratively approved. The Commission discussed alternate ways that the Planning Commission, or a particular member on a rotating basis could meet with staff to review qualified plans prior to adminis- trative approval. Chairman Steigerwald and Commissioner Plufka expressed concern that the Commission should be aware of those applications which would be approved. Director Tremere explained that the staff would keep the Commission and Council informed. The discussion concluded that staff should prepare a summary of procedures which would take into consideration the con- cerns expressed by the Planning Commission members for further discussion. The Commission will review those items currently allowed as conditional uses to determine if the classification could be changed to "permitted". When specific items have been identified by the Planning Commission, staff will survey other communities to determine if they are allowed as permitted or conditional uses. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. association of metropolitan municipalities .r� November 26, 1986 TO: AMM Member Cities FROM: Verpyeterson, Executive Director -7--s RE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCY AND OTHER METRO MATTERS 1. NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD VACANCY WANTED: Please be advised that there is one vacancy on the AMM Board due to a recent resignation. The person selected to fill the vacancy will serve the balance of the term which ends May 31, 1988 and will be eligible for re-election at that point in time. The Board would like to fill the vacancy at its January Board Meeting and is soliciting nominations via this Bulletin. It would be appreciated if nominations are accompanied by a brief resume to help facilitate the Board's deliberation. NOMINATIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE AMM OFFICE IN WRITING BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 1986. 2. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO RECEIVE APPLICATIONS FOR SOLID WASTE HOUSEHOLD REBATE PROGRAM: The Metropolitan Council is administering a program to reimburse cities and towns in the seven county metropolitan area for solid waste abatement and resource recovery expenses for 1986. Cities are eligible for reimbursement for up to 50 cents per household for eligible expenses. Applications will be accepted from December 2, 1986 until Janaury 15, 1987- No late applications will be accepted. We would encourage you to take advantage of this program. CALL SUNNY EMERSON AT THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AT 291-6499 IF YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION OR HAVE QUESTIONS. 150 _ __ 18.3 univez;i ty avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 221-5600 - 3. METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY JURISDICTION STUDY: The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) is conducting a study of Highway Jurisdiction in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area at the request of the Metropolitan Council.. Studies were mandated to be carried out in each region of the state by the 1985 Legislature, and to be conducted in accordance with guidelines provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The TAB appointed a Task Force to oversee the study. Its membership consists of a mix of municipal and county elected and appointed officials as well as state agency, Metropolitan Council and citizen representatives. Steve Loeding, Dakota County Commissioner, chairs the Task Force. The primary focus of the study to date has been on possible alternative jurisdiction alignments of state and county roadways in the seven county region. The county engineers have been actively participating in the study. Potential jurisdictional changes between counties and municipalities will probably not be addressed in detail, rather a process for affecting jurisdictional changes at this level may be recommended. Other issues still to be addressed include potential impacts on such matters as funding, law enforcement, and highway staffing. The TAB is scheduled to complete its work by March 31, 1987 at which time its report will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. The Commissioner of Transportation is to present a statewide highway jurisdiction plan, using the various plans prepared at the regional level. The plan is to be presented to the Legislature by March 1, 1988. IF YOU WANT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE TAB STUDY YOU CAN CONTACT: BRIAN VOLLUM, PROJECT MANAGER, 291-6537 EMIL BRANDT, TAB COORDINATOR, 291-6347 Representing the AMM and Municipal interests on the Task Force are George Bentley, Eden Prairie, Barbara Savanick, Apple Valley, Fran Hoffman, Edina, and John Walker, Newport. The AMM through its representatives, is staying informed and will provide information to member cities concerning task force progress and opportunity for input as appropriate. -2- 4. LMC PROPERTY TAX REFORM TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: As you probably are aware, property tax "reform" is very likely to be one of the top issues before the 1987 Legislature. The potential effects on cities of comprehensive "reform" of the property tax structure and system of local government aids will be wide-ranging. The AMM Board and Staff are very cognizant of the potential impacts on cities in the Metropolitan Area and will be watching this issue very carefully. We will also be cooperating directly with the LMC in this effort. The LMC is forming a Property Tax Reform Technical Committee and has asked the AMM to appoint an official to represent the AMM on the LMC's Technical Committee. Other city groups have also been asked,to participate. It is hoped that the Technical Committee can work to achieve consensus and cooperation among the various city organizations and help to provide a consensus "city" response as the various "reform" proposals begin to surface. BOB THISTLE, AMM PRESIDENT, WILL BE REPRESENTING THE AMM ON THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT HIM OR AMM STAFF WITH YOUR CONCERNS/QUESTIONS/SUGGESTIONS. Distribution Note: This Bulletin has been mailed to AMM member Mayors and Managers/Administrators only. Please distribute to other officials in your city as you deem appropriate. Thank you. -3 - mETROPOL.ITAn WAITE ConTROL (cm- miff ion lmn "hies rano: November 24, 1986 Mr. James Willis City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mr. Willis: z -k4 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission at its October meeti changed the policy For the collection ot SAC units so that now QAC is collected for only those buildings that have a central sanitary wer system available to the property. SAC will be co ec e -Ene time the building permit is issued for those buildings for which sewer service is available. All buildings served by on-site systems will be charged SAC when a sewer connection permit is issued to provide sanitary sewer service to the property. Enclosed are two copies of the revised Reserve Capacity Manual, one for your use and one for your.Building Inspection Department. The manual has been revised to reflect the Commission's new policy for the collection of SAC. Also enclosed is a supply of new SAC reporting forms. These forms have been changed to simplify the application of SAC credits against new uses as allowed by the Commission's policy. Example calculations have been included as part of the Reserve Capacity Manual to demonstrate the proper use of these forms. All old forms should be discarded. Commission at its meeting of November 18 a f�r�4 7. Th hacr� SA _ ,in; t wi increase from the present rate of $475.00 to $525.00 on January 1, 1987. The base rated those communities that have no metropolitan interceptors will be $310.00. Our new monthly summary form MWCC-86, does not show the 1987 unit charge. Enclosed is a copy of form MWCC-86 with the proper amounts indicated for each category. Please insert these amounts on the monthly forms. If you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact either Don Bluhm or Sandy Selby of our staff. Sincerely, Louis J. Breimhurst Chief Administrator LJB:DSB:jlw Attachments cc: W. K. Johnson, MWCC R. L. Berg, MWCC _rre Square'Ruilding, ��;nr Paul, P�',; e ,a 55^0 62 '22 ,?,:, � November 21, 1986 �g CITY OF PLYMOU1'H- ..5...' c c-4 ' Senator dames Ramstad 136 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear SPnatnr R=te ad: 1)t -m Whether or not your schedule allowed you to make our November 10 point City Council, State, and County Official meeting, I want to thank you for the assistance and efforts you have put forth on behalf of the City of Plymouth and it's residents. As a developing community, there are formidable projects yet to be undertaken which are essential for our continued successful development. In Plymouth, we have prided ourselves on the fact that we have aggressively worked to bring about important improvements to the community. Our establishment of economic development districts for tax increment financing purposes and ultimately, the construction of roadways and interchanges, graphically demonstrates this point. Moreover, we have been active in securing right-of-way through the development process in order that County and State projects can be accomplished economically and expeditiously. We cannot accomplish our development goals alone. We continue to need your support in helping Plymouth's development. For your information, I am attaching a copy of our agenda which summarizes transportation issues in the community as well as projects of priority to the Plymouth City Council. I have also attached a background memorandum prepared for the Mayor and City Council by City Manager, dim Willis. This memorandum will provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the issues of importance facing the City and our concerns with respect to each. Once again, whether or not your schedule permitted your attendance, thank you for your efforts. We look forward to working closely with you in the future. Yours very truly, .14 Vir 1 4 Schneider Mayor VS:dma 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 O'M- %b ERNIE LEDOUX 10730 GARNETTE DRIVE SUN CITY. ARIZONA 85373 602-972-1354 Mr. Mayor of Plymouth Dear Sir: 1025 XENE LANE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55447 612-473-7072 10-4-86 Today is voting day - and someone in Plymouth stole my vote as well as my wife s. Prior to Oct- 5th, I went to the Plymouth city hall, and filled out forms for absentee voting. I also filled out forms and whatever for the 1987 homested. I have done this for 8 years, and never a problem - so you can understand why I am upset this yesr - I never miss an election - not for 50 years, and didn't want to start now. Possibly you are not involved in this - but this is a federal offense - if not, please see that the person who did this gets back to me at once. Please answer to my Sun City home E.A. LeEtoux ...- -7-- fib November 18, 1986 � k CITY OF PLYMOUTR a Ernie Ledoux 10730 Garnette Drive Sun City, AZ 85373 Dear Mr. Ledoux: Thank you for your October 4 letter expressing concern about your Absentee Ballot. I have asked City Clerk, Laurie Brandt to Investigate and respond to your concerns. Laurie advises me that you visited our offices prior to the election to apply for an Absentee Ballot. I have attached copies of your applications. The applications appear to indicate that you were going to contact us when you arrived in Sun City so we could send the ballots. We have no record of your contacting us, subsequently,. therefore, the ballots were never sent. I am sorry that you were unable to vote. Ernie, your letterhead shows two addresses, the latter is 1025 Xene Lane, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55447. As you can probably appreciate, one of the major challenges of developing communities such as Plymouth is to develop a sense of community identity. Please help us promote community identity when you next reprint your letterhead by revising your address to read Plymouth, Minnesota. Thank you for your letter. I am sorry you were unable to vote but I am pleased that we were able to clarify the matter. Sincerely, Vi gil Schneider Mayor VS:dma cc: Laurie Brandt, City Clerk 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 J` 4J tv 41 V 0 J V M 4 00 1 1 -7 $b W a z k - W C OC Y 1 (i0 1 ( I I a � � a � u n o � I (iC Lb li J Li lJC1 vi > bo r S n J 1Jo, ct i Ic J M •__� �- , T V 3 -7 $b 0 I OFFICE USE OILY FICE USE ONLY M— W— F–'' EG O G ST Co—RECEIVED C11-72 �fUN-- }---- Form No. 5—A.V.E.—Ap,lication for Ball,:u BALLOTS ISSUED ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION Absentee Ballot Application for Louise LeJoux Print or Type your Name READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING I hereby apply for absentee ballots to be voted upon in I am applying for absentee ballots to be voted upon my precinct for the following reason: (check one Box) in the following election(s): (Check one Box) Xabsence from precinct - Primary Election ONLY ❑ illness or disability General Election ONLY ❑ religious discipline or observance of religious holiday ❑BOTH Elections ❑ service as election judge in another precinct MY LEGAL RESIDENCE ADDRESS IS: 1,125 :(':,ne Line Street or Route Number Apr. No. Rural Box No. Plymouth, -,,-,.n. ="n-nr.s __ + ,7 J City 77 'rowrsbip County' Lipcode MAIL MY ABSENTEE BALLOTS) TO ME AT THE FOLLO«TNG ADDRESS: 1,1730 "-arnette —;r. Strcet or Route Number Apt. No. Rural Box No. City or Township` to �Q — D — sj b Zipcwc ✓ 9-22-86 Date Legal Signature I J OFFICE USE tiNTLY CE USE ONLY N1 W P_— —4G N T G ST CO RECEIVED MUN_ Form \o. 5—A.V.E.-Application for Ballots BALLOTS ISSUED ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION Absentee Ballot Application for Print or Type your Name READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING I hereby apply for absentee ballots to be voted upon in I am applying for absentee ballots to be voted upon my precinct for the follo%ving reason: (check one Box) in the following election(s): (Check one Boa) [absence from precinct i ; Primary Election ONLY ❑illness or disability IAI6eneral Election ONLY ❑ religious discipline or obser.-ance of religious holiday = BOTH Elections ❑ service as election judge in another precinct MY LEGAL RESIDENCE ADDRESS IS: Street or Ro to Number No. Rural Boz No. 1 _d�Township County Zipcode MAIL MY ABSENTEE BALLOT(S) TO ME AT THE FOLLOW- G ADDRESS: 10 2 � 0 Z /I ���lZe �(Ad k"" treet or Route Number % Apt) NO. Rural Box N . or Dates V- - �Lr Legal Signature FPW 45:. November 21, 1986 Mr. James L. Craig 10008 South Shore Drive Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Subject: Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Craig: Your letter of November 4, 1986 has been referred to me for a response. Last week I and Bob Johnson, from the Engineering Department, inspected your yard and did not observe any problems. We did notice the catch basin in your yard which, because of its design (beehive), would have to be kept clean in order for it to function. That type of catch basin does require maintenance, and it is something that the homeowner should be able to do without too much problem. Because the weather has been relatively dry, we did not notice any runoff, as you indicated, coming from the South side of the road from the commercial area. I would be glad to meet with you at your convenience, and probably best when there is some storm water runoff to observe the problem that you suggest takes place. Please contact me and we can set up a time. Yours very truly, Sherman L. Goldberg, P.E. City Engineer SLG:kh cc: Fr. G. Moore, Director of Public Works rJames G. Willis, City Manager f. 3400 PLYNICUTH BOUL-EVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 November 4, 1986 10008 South Shore Drive Plymouth, MN 55441 Hon. Virgil Schneider, Mayor City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN Dear Mayor Schneider: F/ a •,1 o' . I am writing to express my concern with the zoning ordinances that cover the Medicine Lake area. I.was most surprised with the Planning Commission's recent action which indicated that the ordinances did not prohibit the building of the Alpha House in the Medicine Lake area. If this be the case, I request that the Council give serious consideration to passing an ordinance that will protect one of the beauty spots of Plymouth as well as the state. I built a house and moved to Plymouth four years ago because of the beauty of and geographic location of Medicine Lake. The only negative thing I found in the area was a series of warehouses and a steel company which, in my opinion, represents a serious error by a previous Planning Commission that allowed such a beautiful lake area oT the city to be zoned for commercial purposes. On the north end of Medicine Lake Plymouth's ordinances have also permitted alcoholic detoxification centers and similar facilities that are other examples of the city's mismanagement of one of the beauty spots of the city, county and state. These examples are past history which serve as monuments to a city government that couldn't foresee the potential of such a great natural resource. More recently, the Auto Auction was given additional privi- ledges and now Alpha House. Past wrongs do not make a right and it appears that now is the time to take action to preserve the land surrounding the lake as the DNR has done to preserve the shoreline and the lake itself. It appears incongruous to me that the DNR would go to such great efforts to preserve the natural resources and beauty of the lake while the city allows industrial development, detention homes, detox centers, etc., to scar the land surrounding the lake. Another less serious but still significant example of poor planning involved an extension of warehouse parking area and hard -surface roads across from my house last year. Following the first rain it was obvious that the water runoff had increased many times and park property began to erode around the one drain that handles the runoff to the lake. My wife talked to the City Engineering Department who reported that the parking lot and road water was supposed to go in another direction and that the new parking lot area met "regulations". However, we asked a City Engineer to observe the runoff and erosion and he agreed that something needed to be done to control the runoff and keep the dirt and silt from stopping up the one drain that could result in flooding of our area. That was over one and one-half years ago and there has been no action. This is another example of poor planning of commercial property next to residential property and of a city that fails to correct the con- sequences. I can foresee a similar situation if Alpha House is built and a time when the City will disregard public anxiety, protection and other related consequences of allowing such a facility in the Medicine Lake area. November 4, 1986 Page 2 At the public hearings property value questions were not answered because there are no comparable properties unless one uses Lake Harriet, Calhoun or Minnetonka. Property around these lakes have been protected by good zoning and this has had the proper expected effect on the property values in the area. I am not a realtor, but common sense tells me you can't compare the rise in property value of lake property with non -lake property. One of the Planning Commissioners said that Parker Lake pro- perty values haven't been affected by the Penal Farm and I just don't understand his reasoning, because you can't compare Parker Lake property to non -lake property unless you disregard the value of the lake. It is my understanding that Alpha House propo- ses to transport inmates from the Penal Farm on Parker Lake (another great natural resource) to the proposed Medicine Lake facility. This not only seems to be poor judgement, but shouldn't the law abiding citizens of Plymouth be able to have a recreational lake without exposure to criminals? It appears that the City Planners and Planning Commission have numerous detailed rules and regulations to cover, in my opinion small items. I remember when I built my house it took me months to go through the process of being sure I wasn't too close to the lake, too close to the road, too close to the property line, so much hard sur- face, etc., etc. I was amazed at what appeared to be endless details, but at that time I was pleased that the City had ordinances and regulations that appeared to me at the time to protect everyone involved. But after seeing the inability of ordinan- ces to deal with auto auctions, steel mills, warehouses and now Alpha House reminds me of the biblical verse ye blind guides,.which strain for a gnat and swallow a camel". Certainly, the Planning Commission has enough rules and regulations to deal with picky details, but when it comes to the big issues that truly affect the beauty and protection of people, property and a great natural resource, Medicine Lake, the Planning Commission appears powerless. Therefore, I again appeal to you to pass ordinances that do as much for the shoreline and land surrounding the lake as the DNR is doing to protect the quality of the lake. To continue your present course of action and to use old ordinances that have permitted previous planning blunders should be corrected before the present City Administration builds another monument to city government's nearsightedness and mismanagement. I do not handle adversional issues well and it is against my basic nature to get involved in this type of thing, but the City's previous disregard for the beauty and proper use of Medicine Lake has lead me to conclude that I have a citizen's respon- sibility to get involved. I started to appear at the public hearings, but I was so appalled at the power plays that I felt I would get angry --something I did not want to do in public! However, I hope this letter will express my position to you and, hopefully, will help you realize what you are allowing to happen. Give the Planning Commission power to protect our natural resources. Appoint Planning Commissioners that can deal with big planning issues and direct the City Planners to look at issues other than what is taught in elementary planning. I believe a visit by the City Council to Medicine Lake will help you to understand and appreciate my concern. Thank you for reading my letter. Sincerely yours, gimes L. Craig, M.D. cc: E. F. (Bud) Robb, Hennepin County Commissioner Randy Johnson, Hennepin County Commissioner City of Plymouth Planning Staff ,:TL:-. %C�4— 11720 27th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 October 21, 1986 ,. The Honorable Virgil Schneider ±alQy �8 , Plymouth City Council- 340OPlymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mayor Schneiders' I understand the need for treatment centers such as Alpha House are necessary. However, I do not feel that the choice of location for this center is appropriate as so many children live in the vicinity of the proporsed site. There is also a liquor store within walking distance of the proposed site and this would be quite a temptation for the residents who are chemically dependent. If you have small children or have neices or nephews who are young. would you want the Alpha House to be in YOUR neighborhood????????? I hope that you can give yourself, and us, an honest gnswer to that question. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. David A. Mesley /� 986! Sr ADAM ON •-�, _ �� (F an r - SC/%ls,s, 6ra5, �,�ieb x ' :AN ee, oIAJ►. ou . 1 All ela..v O� 47 OWA 17 M 1 ti VF " A aarsel P.b. .1�"i3:eflY.�i.-. vIIiaro -•� ���•..,asi:Y �'ra.a,n.>....w�� .. �f �, �..��•A ,b'.w kw::wTf'•- 4 ��.. - I INDA BURANt-'N 545-8172 w �, �___ �t = ,ogre -- � .WdU W dipenanme By Sam ral.Hu .,rt UMphrey- anda cochairmen j, St.. Paul .task fore 'jil 7 -.Were press confere Three Minnesota ;counties -Ip4rsdjy�loy��o experiment with allowing certain sexual qjr, :PkY4iclkl lithe: document' sanly'minority%re- child abusers to ayoJd.cnMu1ju pen._-.. port,'- Hennepin County; Attorney ally by.coaf =.ingand to tIP910-Thomas'-4ohnson objected to two of _treatments the .three ro eWriments. . He - T_ 4. said the bulk,of task force testimony sed--prosecV000, 'pot diversion, gt#g.� _tre4Went.'-and ..�prgveating as the -preferred method. of dealing e`;bk-4ti.eopI6.r' h- Harm, $b users: with' ; kirm th- 7;� ;'their :Qin Ov users-�'.'W�,SbOul;l stay the be said: *- the"' Attorney-4enerai's -,Xa k -, Force , I Ahe'.view ,of a A4' roport.OPPorts' -_oi 611d Abuie,.Wjtbii� We'y- -ng -pub I ;.:-number 91 � C and:private -off! 1!1* , k'---�:Two��: Ot', thi-iountllw:milj*'!, 14d%-,: claW' including ipf Justice Douglas .Anoka,'.-4rNq' In th , e'.Twfn,CiiUs` Imetro=-­ dahl at reme Couch in th�.Twfn'CitWS4ne.t.r6, .AmdaW a - the�state S _polit"_ . I . -, t - , _:. n .toa)Is a yuVra..l �qut4prncounr - Abg oo'contnued on7,page'5A • with poss ible dismimlafter succi ful treatment,�q Abuse. it Continued from'pago sen 4�sj cycle of nesotans.-M The tasl( foic�."ciiie d others III " e�r.' National 'Cl 'He,an ;­ ers studying.,,C, a6use"�.the -Ab 61 after th prevention.concluded more al)',4A,�',"*be"�WnUng,,to�coasideF,experirdo!ttal,,.MO(I eO., Hui ' . ' - - W. ra , :,! -,-Advacacy, Center,��W.• year-alp-that,­Oxcei) .4 g te�jn �dren's .;extremf vllle,-Aia:,�tkiaj -would -houkL vari . eonfe sses .aql d'r - ncludin&law enfor pro: cageCan abuser.w o Z. fessionals -1. .As able.and willing 'Wbi"Ardi4t, 7 't services, p;osecull Msi human'. ow WO) and,mental4hialth.Ao decide. ho%A offamli To be 410bje; 4ibu�, 7 1, i 4rt­­_, _y abuse penalties: A*Uow 1�pmefia-. !i I 1P eis Mould. aye That 1 group ,concluded that abusers- r hie to;treatment, andz willft'to' s-spe Y all .trained alcl ' would bi morillikelY Wask llorhelp.?.gull child development interview c or'others would more -.likely report-,-�, dren.-W rooms -designed �to appea them, if the:abusers-could'aVold pub�­- Here- 18'4� SuMmaTY-Of the .-three7ex p k Y� I re6 fereat',ages," the Chi per d of A f rt'- sai&", VV.ideotapft'--•is avail,: ptlsoo:aod famll _q- 0' force g,is,*0t:to a m �i- mu -Interview JohnsoW' and,tothers _Jnd4tbaKyW_ ..;AJ ;�F the Onowi�k Ifig'6tal he. caW,chiIdabqsp,bidgd ly 9�;P, -ot;tre should :no:more ,e=Pe--prOsecu-9�u-,•,., W progr4mls be tsf:, 'era _Ai a6 41IM7 Ir ou n _"V hlfd,e� e Thefasu $fdWl Im I V I 'I IN - uld -e� COU'atiqsShowk MP , Z, I . .1, -4 T provioers sp ' o pilot iiiiijlti� 0, V _k 0 W-', st'L91 - o4c 3110 d;,the- � Ous e e, ,familial as4 diagn( County'' attorney, was'ionc6mmittal agreeMentw':'-' 0 rmircov"e- by'he _kO C -lorcesaid.- It ta__ WaeAttorieY_. yesterd6V: Da Man Robe.rt*4 d'--the.4'a �W,- N 00 r01140'Pald'114P1 �Mf,--aou u uldV44ef-treatment 1,,insureq 01 allow victims _,elrnployers should force yedtk"Y�tba�-+'e�_ Jpyenll eat getting b&k-W*effi id 00'•jobs N, 0-il "CO14SA ln;e X _5L, *naities, futur Doug-RdW.COU100t, ceedings*ge'i �t-4t 1cfaily are',zioW, pubU4 e;jr n - - I., . - j commo t: scrutiny). y ,Proceedings jOuld-66-Vid .4V:HUPlihri '.1ast countlepowere 410 "ffeadep�ooui,4-ad- SOPU=1. The three ,D7 the Unive taPed'd- - - - for, jingtjullf undiroathbefore a judge., 'Minneapolis lief that they �.w .�op-Minnosotai-eandf the,be W4, ze". -because the P. to pirimenf�AnA el ex d": Th W -f 34iw 4 'j&'�io'.re le; WWII A resented jmeLropolli Y, id=j drurt -an la,atti` i� I , . a t,,_ T couvtj4J*d�Ra 6iJ4 0 'M ere'shou t'iof H L ISF task fdrj�pree Idelines =p Sg 0 f�.wltnesses f.jkli the propos; n 'Irij, --' .sw n a tall. jamilpab*,110 P.6 on bis )P4;iQrity4;N U. t the e i,16 - ... U' 66ai' COM -"Qr ild-abm4ectio ombudsman to PlafPts" I action to a. about the child-protectioU system ' successful treatment. withhold ac- , ry AbortstaVj,4..Joseph said and increased use -of team AMAN-,.,.i..ceptancg.ofithe :guilty ,,PI -P 4_1 .­iatv 'nf nr�ffmqlonals to'declde;� 'tfie-offendee7on;16hk,-tb . pro0atio v- Oj 'gui a or d. -del, , �+�an, -.I -_n By Paul Levy �thdh Staff W ' . Write . Partin of Public Safe terBrYPolat,an.. Dr. fieItKS .. molesters to Beaver, ' Child are; eve �iatry and d 1. a professor "of psy. Syst- Basta%pod�i they fear; They be, ne ry parent'sal.ectOr of fhe Behavior- .. M e told theyrre suI •said. . uncles. coos.Medlctne teachers o st,:,, I, a En I-aboratory. at the : � 4`that /t' : ply to �. $Cho.I,Cine,._Q '' ilaiversity .School the $, °�' outlined the �! MedJ.' Denson whs s abY ,to' report sexab usipg th Last week 2''Drofesstoruaj to thepar4cipants at the conferenlem .'Maybe they don't A ' ` who deal with V orAut of rePortoutoti Children the People _Accor respect lora ear, . met at Breezy abuse of Abel feel .cjose relative the to be Point to but 'Who Y lines or to develop statewide ' �E1gh4'fJv ' , ll 1ust.the same. Or ah�°g dealing with Guide- ` liras are. C Percent ot;�USe.. lust don t nIId maybe they The unique the Problem,, bQ� Usuai ti'l�'' be end that s was three-day confer SomCone-;.the: lY.: ihC'-tipy �$gO�pl40d; gime y� called project Im encs Rare � Offender` 8u�elin dls uce/ ming 10 develoP�he m P odd F� male, nders ` almost always A8 the ne y 15 xt two years. than aon Y svBhtJ ly begin moj Ys abused vicUmss t neat d the sexual, .... lett often start of a yob age . Minnesota is a leader in dealin tteated at th the sexual abuse west Children's` a Mid "' s:r Project Im °f childre 8 with , the Children's ReSt)uTCe Center at �1A�rnews�vfth more then Pact may n, and accordln hospital in St. - offenders .Indust 500 sex el for other stat y become a mod. Sandra g to staff child PsycholW� have• a preterencetllor 8 offenders comm' �, said Paul Uchida, Hewitt 81St But 011e commissioner of the Minnesota rade reel ' Year-0lds ,In thislnstchUdren of Y show country, lads' don't swatch -., t#nY age. _ AbWe 4t!e4 aapa8e'12B ;e Cnatinued from page IB iders Giros&, -alt socjo-eco--: An offender averages .3.6 types of ing." , The root of .the -problem is We of ps. Abel hp4 studied sex sex crimes. .. - - - , . . ;i. .; . ;�.' fender and ,that of may be �� New Vbrk City, Atlanta Seeds for Project Impact were'plant , committing a' variety of crimes," granting anonymity to IN Sex offenders do not believe+in':'' ed in 1983 — before the:_Children's• Abel do ;we do? Loci; 'is, or their. cooperation. In .said:"'What. casual one-time interests, studies and, Theatre, and Jordan `scandals„that..::.them c up?, Many offenders serve ork City study, the male interviews showed. A young female-. shocked Minnesotans: Much; of 'Oe - _their time',and then move to :other iterviewed came within a victim is molested in one. form or.`,; state. was oblivious to or close. to.. duplicating the city's ra-- _states.” another an average of 23 times..A `-..ignore child abuse within or outside:. inic: makeup. The offend-. young male victim is molested an-.-. :the family. before- the. -Scott County ",While' the professionals working with i all shapes.and sizes -and average of 360 times cases. -made national headlines.,. Project Impact' consider how and very possible educational . •' _ ::" how. uiuc6:effort and expense is to "These are big numbers," Abel said ' don't think that kind of publicity. _. be put'inioahe treatment of offend • "These surveys, obviously, were not ` was good," said Anoka County'Judge ers,•Abel'"miggests that young people xoffenders'wbo'admitted `percent done in Minnesota. I'm not certain -`,Lynn Olson, who headed the gover-,;.,"learn at an early .'age what is and young boys, 40 , that matters. It may be the environ-,.._ nor -appointed . three -person. -inquiry _<: isn't appropriate sexual behavior. were abused themselves .:ment is a powerful influence on devi `., panel concerning.'the, conduct;of;- . Were young. Of the -sex -.' Scott ant behavior.I doubt it. I don't see ;,Scott County attorney•Kathieeq`Mor :'' -'sexual behavior is a learned behav- who admitted molesting ..: any evidence ,that, environment is ; during the.Jordan hearings. -"But ' ior," Abel 'said. "It 4s not genetic. s, 20 percent said they going to have much affect op arous-' • it did bring -things ou is the open."'? Your: drive- is ' hormonically Gon- d themselves as children. al:. `trolled; but' not what you do or - 'Project ; After the -Jordan hearings, there was .. Choose.. The things you- get involved iders often commit a mul Impact? was made ' possible :.: a decrease in caseloads at the -Coil 1 with over time; have. a tremendous Imes. In one study of 208, ' by a $980,000 federal grant through dren's..Hospit4 iiewitt said' :This.; impact.. :. vho molested young girls, .� the Justice Assistants Acts and anoth-': spring, 7 the reported number of- incl ; " • , admitted to raping adult', er $800,000 in federal money expect-.',, dents reached- an all-time high, -;she J.-, "You just talk about sex. The current percent admitted being ' ed for next year. Project Impact has said ' ''_system of education is to not talk its and 38 percent. admit- ": ,�,� brought together social workers, at °- ' c -V. 3 -- about it. Children need to be taught sting young boys. '' torneys, therapists, government offs 14'Times ' are changing," -Olson said, that .the' use of sadomasochism is cials, judges and physicians. Togeths noting, that - people ", :are "no -° longer ; harmful." study of 146 men who er, these professionals hope to better -. ,afraid to discuss. a problem 'once nolested boys, 52 percent develop a system of rehabilitating only spoken of in -whispered ,hushes. Ftnaliy in order.to get young people "to Iris outside .the home, 11 • offenders 'while better protecting But,- Olson cautioned, "If Minnesota" report offenders, the act of report- ,olested girls within. the Minnesota's most precious resource: is at the forefront of handling child . Ing must be presented, as a positive percent were rapists and children. sexpal abuse, then heaven hWP4he , thing.:.; exhibitionists. countrv." . IV -. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 November 25, 1986 MEMO DATE: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director TO: Joe Ryan, Building Official qmo— FROM: 12006 SUNSET TRAIL NORTH (BENJAMIN & AUDREY BAMBENEK) SUBJECT On Friday, November 21st I met with Mr. Bob Frakes who contacted Councilmember Zitur regarding the proposed addition and building permit application for this property. Mr. Frakes is a personal friend and is acting as a consultant for the property owner. The general contractor is a firm named Preimesberger Construction. The owner is Mr. Rodney Preimesberger. The proposed addition involves the construction of a 24 x 24 foot attached tuckunder garage with a 12 x 24 foot porch and a 12- x 24 foot deck over the garage. The existing house is located approximately 26 feet from the easterly side property line. The addition of the proposed structure would result in a side yard setback of approximately three to four feet. I informed Mr. Frakes that in order to construct such an addition, the property owner would need to obtain approval from the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals. I provided Mr. Frakes with a variance application form and referenced the materials required in order to process such an application. Mr. Frakes asked for my opinion if such a request were to be submitted. I indicated that as a member of staff, I would recommend denial as there are other alternatives which could be pursued to construct this addition without the need to require a variance. I also informed Mr. Frakes that in order for our office to process a variance request, the application materials would need to be submitted to us by noon on Monday, November 24, 1986. On Monday morning November 21, 1986 Mr. Frakes submitted the application materials required for us to process the variance request. This request will be on the next Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals meeting of December 9, 1986. The proposed addition has been modified to reflect construction of a 20 x 24 foot tuck under garage with a family room over. The proposed variance is for a 5 foot 8 inch encroachment into the required side yard setback of 15 feet. Please contact me should you have further questions. MUNICIPAL 4 IL( LEGISLATI`(77E COMMISSION November/December 1986 ELECTION ISSUE • MLC City Elections, pages 2-3 • Other Election Issues, page 3 • New MLC Mayors, page 4 • New MLC City Council Members, pages 5-6 • Two New MLC State Senators, page 7 Vol. III, No. 6 • Two New MLC State Representatives, page 8 • 1987-88 Senate and House Membership, page 9 • MLC Elects New Secretary -Treasurer, page 9 • Non -Election MLC Personnel Changes, page 10 • Brooklyn Park Computerized Elections, page 11 MUNICIPAL. LFGISLATTVE COMMISSION MLC CITY ELECTIONS Page 2 Six of the 15 cities that are members of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) held their municipal elections on November 4. These cities were Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple Grove and Woodbury. The information below highlights the results of these municipal elections. Brooklyn Park Council Member Doug Pearson defeated John McCluskey 3,325 to 1,180 for a two-year term. Incumbents Council Members Bill Dix and Erick Engh were unopposed and were reelected to serve two-year terms. Burnsville Daniel C. McElroy, ran unopposed for Burnsville's mayoral seat and will replace Mayor Connie Morrison, who was elected to the Minnesota House of Representatives. Incumbent Council Members Ken Wolf and Bernard Peroz, ran uncontested and were reelected to serve four-year terms. In a special election for a two-year council seat, Glenn McKee defeated Anthony Razzini, 4,394 to 3,562. Eden Prairie Mayor Gary D. Peterson defeated Gerry Hegge for a second two-year term, 5,342 to 2,135. Council Member Dick Anderson with 4,025 votes, and Jean Harris, with 3,974 votes, won four-year city council terms. Defeated were Doug Reuter, 3,553 votes; Curt Connaughty, 1,033; and Dick Sentz, 721. Incumbent Council Member Paul Redpath did not file for reelection. Edina Council Member Fred Richards, with 6,605 votes; and Glenn Smith, with 5,917 votes, were elected for four-year terms. They defeated John Senior, Jr. and Robert Bell, who had 5,655 and 3,081 votes, respec- tively. Incumbent Council Member Charles Bredesen III did not file for reelection. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION MLC City Elections (continued) Maple Grove Two -term Mayor James Deane defeated his challenge Member Chuck. Dehn for the city's first four-year Deane received 4,857 votes to Dehn's 2,956. Dehn the Council. Page 3 r City Council mayoral term. will remain on Incumbent Council Members David Burtness, with 3,324 votes, and Donna Ryon, with 2,848 votes, won four-year terms. Defeated were John Benber, 732; Donald Lucas, 2,316; Helen Baker, 1,962; Theresa Buschs, 1,949; and Michael Borgie, 828. Woodbury Mayor Dan Guider, mayor to serve Frances Moore and to serve four-year Jr., ran unopposed and was reelected as Woodbury's a two-year term. Incumbent Council Members Lloyd Scheel, ran unopposed and were reelected terms. OTHER ELECTION ISSUES The City of Bloomington was the only MLC city that had a referendum issue on the ballot this year. The Bloomington residents overwhelm- ingly rejected a pay raise for their mayor and six city council members. 15,106 residents voted against a pay raise for their city officials, while only 7,791 residents voted yes. Bloomington also overwhelmingly voted to prohibit City Council Members from working for another city agency. Bloomington residents voted in favor of adding the prohibition to the city charter, by a vote of 18,624 to 3,611. MUNICIPAL Page 4 LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION NEW MLC MAYORS Burnsville Daniel McElroy 12805 Welcome Lane 941-5400 (o) Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 894-3800 (h) Occupation: Business Owner, Travel Professionals, Inc., Burnsville, with branch offices in Eden Prairie, Wayzata, Downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul Education: Notre Dame, B.A. in History Government: Burnsville City Council Member, 1982-86 Member, Burnsville City Chart Commission, 1982-86 Organizations: Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce Member, Burnsville Rotary Club 1?ncnvi 1 1 a The Roseville City Council appointed Donn Wiski as Mayor of Roseville at a City Council Meeting held on Monday, November 17. Wiski fills the seat that was vacated when former Roseville Mayor June Demos resigned effective September 30. Donn Wiski 2714 MacKubin Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 482-0546 (h) Occupation: Development Consultant, Resolutions, Inc., Roseville Former Director, Research and Planning Department, Duluth, 1968-72 Education: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, M.A. Public Administration Macalester, B.A. in Political Science Government: Member, Roseville Planning Commission, 1983-86 Organizations: Member, Citizens League Member, Minneapolis Downtown Council Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers Member, Urban Land Institute MUNICIPAL LBGISLAT VE COMMISSION NEW MLC_ CITY_ COUNCIL MEMBERS Burnsville Page 5 Glenn McKee 13722 Heather Hills Drive 888-8450 (o) Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 431-2710 (h) Occupation: President, Payroll General Corporation, Bloomington Government: Member, Burnsville Planning Commission Former Chairman, Burnsville Economic Development Commission Political: Precinct Delegate House 38A Vice Chairman Senate District 38 Resolutions Chairman Organizations: Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce Member, Burnsville Rotary Former Chairman, Independent School District 191 Community Education Advisory Council Former President, Burnsville Jaycees Eden Prairie Jean Harris, M.D. 10860 Forestview Circle 853-4334 (o) Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 829-0285 (h) Occupation: Vice President, Business Development, Control Data, 1982 -present Former Professor of Family Practice, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Richmond, 1973-78 Former Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Howard University, 1960-72 Education: Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, M.D., 1955 Virginia Union University, Richmond, B.S., Chemistry, 1951 MUNICIPU Page 6 LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION New MLC Council Members (continued) Eden Prairie Council Member Dr. Harris (continued) Government: Eden Prairie Development Commission, 1986 Secretary of Human Resources, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, 1978-82 Member, President Reagan's Private Sector Initiative Task Force, 1981-82 Vice Chair, President Carter's Commission on Alcohol and Alcohol -Related Diseases, 1980 Member, Executive Committee on Richmond Renaissance, (public-private urban revitalization and economic development committee) Edina Glenn L. Smith 5717 Susan Avenue 944-8190 (o) Edina, Minnesota 55435 941-6767 (h) Occupation: President, Video Training Resources, Inc., Edina, which provides video tapes for industrial, vocational and paramedic training Former Chief Legal and Financial Officer of a farm equipment manufacturer Education: William Mitchell College of Law, J.D. St. Cloud State University, B.S. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, A.A. Political: IR Precinct Chairman Caucus Convener Fundraiser Organizations: Member, Edina Foundation Board Member, Edina Historical Society Board Former Member, Edina Park Board Former Member, Association of Metropolitan School Districts Former Member, Edina School Board Former Member, Hennepin Technical Center Board Former PTA President, Concord Elementary School MUNICIPAL LEGISLAnVE COMMISSION TWO NEW MLC STATE SENATORS Senator John Marty (DFL) 2478 Lydia Avenue West Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Page 7 633-8934 (h) District 63 (Roseville) Occupation: Research Consultant, J. Stamstad Associates Former Grant Administrator for Lutheran Brotherhood Foundation Former Administrator of House Criminal Justice Committee Education: St. Olaf College, B.A. in Ethics Organizations: Member, Citizens League Member, League of Women Voters Member, Sierra Club Senator James Metzen (DFL) 312 Deerwood Court 451-2133 (o) South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 451-0174 (h) District 39 (Inver Grove Heights) Occupation: Banking/Real Estate Education: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, A.A. Government: Served in the Minnesota House of Representatives for 12 years. During the 1985-86 Session he served on the following committees: Appropriations -- Agriculture, Transportation and Semi -State Division; Financial Institutions/Insurance; General Legislation/Veterans Affairs South St. Paul City Council Member, 1968-74 Organizations: Member, Dakota County Family Service Board Member, Southview Acres Health Advisory Board Member, Inver Grove Heights/South St. Paul Chamber of Commerce MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION TWO NEW MLC STATE REPRESENTATIVES Representative Robert P. Milbert (DFL) 308 Deerwood Court South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 451-6188 (h) District 39B (Inver Grove Heights) Occupation: Controller, Milbert Company Education: Dartmouth College, 1971 Government: Member, South St. Paul City Council since 1975 Member, Mayor's Development Action Team Organizations: Member, South St. Paul Chamber of Commerce Board Member, Small Business Investment Corporation Representative Connie Morrison (IR) 909 West 155th Street 435-3030 (o) Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 435-7647 (h) District 38A (Burnsville) Occupation: Realtor, Merrill Lynch Education: Normandale Community College, A.A. Government: Mayor of Burnsville, 1983-86 Council Member of Burnsville, 1977-83 Organizations: Board Member, United Way Board Member, League of Minnesota Cities Advisory Board Member, Metropolitan Council Chair Member, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce Former Chair, Municipal Legislative Commission MUNICIPAL Page 9 LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 1987-88 SENATE AND HOUSE MEMBERSHIP It was an election year for DFLers. Governor Rudy Perpich was reelected with a 57-43 percentage margin. DFLers retained control of the Minnesota Senate increasing their majority by four seats to hold a 47-20 margin. In the Minnesota House of Representatives, the IRs lost 18 seats and control of the House. The new DFL majority is 83-50.* In the legislative races, no DFL incumbent was defeated. Of the 18 seats lost by IRs in the House, nine were in office for only one term having been elected in 1984, and 14 were from outside the seven -county non -metropolitan area. Leadership in the Senate will remain with Senator Roger Moe as Majority Leader, and Senator Glen Taylor as Minority Leader. In the House, Democrats have chosen Representative Fred Norton as Speaker, and Representative Bob Vanasek as Majority Leader. Republicans have elected former Tax Committee Chairman, Bill Schreioer, as Minority Leader. MLC ELECTS NEW SECRETARY -TREASURER The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Board of Directors met on Wednesday, October 29 and unanimously elected Mark Sather as MLC's new Secretary -Treasurer. Sather is White Bear Lake's City Manager and can be reached at: White Bear Lake City Hall 4700 Miller Avenue White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 (6 12) 429-8526 Sather was elected to fill Gary Dickson's unexpired term, effective November 1. * A Special Flection will be held before the Session reconvenes on January 6, 1987, to fill the vacancy that has occurred due to the death of IR Representative Ben Omann. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION NON -.ELECTION MLC PERSONNEL CHANGES Maplewood Page 10 Ken Haider will be serving as the acting city manager of Maplewood while the City of Maplewood is in the process of conducting a nationwide search for a new manager to fill the position vacated by Don Lais at the beginning of November. Haider has served as acting city manager a previous time while the City of Maplewood was in the processing of hiring a manager in 1985. In addition to handling the responsibilities of city manager, Haider, is also continuing to manage his regular duties as Maplewood's public works and city engineer, a post he has held for the past eight years. Haider received a degree in civil engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1973. The City of Maplewood has not yet set a deadline for filling this position. Shoreview Shoreview's Director of Community Development, Mike Black, has been named acting city manager for Shoreview and will retain his previous duties while the city conducts a nationwide search for a city manager to fill the position which was previously held by Gary Dickson. Black has worked as City Planner for Shoreview since February 1979 until January 1983, when he was named Shoreview's Director of Community Development. Prior to his employment with the City of Shoreview, he was the Assistant City Planner for Cottage Grove and worked there from 1975-79. Black received his Bachelors of Science Degree in Urban Studies from Mankato State University in 1973. Black indicated that the City of Shoreview plans to conduct an intensive job search for a candidate over the next couple of months. Black said the city hopes to make their final decision and hire a new city manager some time after February. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION Page 11 BROOKLYN PARK COMPUTERIZED ELECTIONS Brooklyn Park was selected by the Secretary of State's Office as a test site for a new computerized voting system for the primary and general elections. This was the first time in the nation that this computer system, Optech III, was used in a citywide election. Brooklyn Park first tested this system in the Primary Election in September and found that they were able to obtain a hard copy of the election results 14 minutes after the polls closed at 8:00 p.m. In the General Election, Brooklyn Park had the final election results at 8:19 p.m. The efficiency of this new computerized system compares drastically with Brooklyn Park's previous system which had election results available between approximately midnight and 2 a.m. Using the Optech III, the voter takes a ballot, marks it accordingly and feeds it into an electronic ballot box which records the information on a cassette -like disc. After the polls close, this disc is brought into city hall where it is fed into a computer which automatically reads the votes and provides the election judges with a hard copy of the results. The obvious advantage of this system is an early return and the ability to provide an immediate hard copy of the election results. This system also makes it easier to recount votes. Another advantage of this system is that the voter is prevented from voting incorrect- ly, and inadvertently invalidating their vote. Any ballots that are improperly marked are immediately returned to the voter with instructions to correct the error which eliminates invalidated ballots. This was illustrated in the Primary Election, when many votes would have been disqualified due to incorrect cross-over voting. This system gave the voter the opportunity to correct their error and recast their vote. The only case where this wasn't effective was with absentee ballots. At this point, the only disadvantage that can be determined is the time that will be required to educate the public and the election judges on how the system operates. While the state has not made any final decisions to use Optech III, it is hoped that this system will be installed in many communities in time for the 1988 Elections. The cost of installing this computer would be approximately $4,167, plus the cost of ancillary equipment, which would bring the total cost estimate to between $4,400 and $4,500 per precinct. (MUNICIPAI, LEGISLATI\7E COMMISSION MLC SCHEDULES LEGISLATIVE DINNER WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21 On Wednesday, October 29, the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Board of Directors met and decided to schedule their Annual MLC Legislative Dinner for Wednesday, January 21, 1987. The MLC legislative delegation (15 Senators and 22 Representatives), the MLC mayors, council members and city managers will be invited to attend this event. A Reception will be held at 6:15 p.m., to be followed by a Dinner at 7:00 p.m. and a guest speaker at 8:00 p.m. The MLC Legislative Dinner has been scheduled at the Decathlon Club in Bloomington. Please mark this date on your calendar. Update is the official newsletter of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC). Its primary audience is the 37 legislators that comprise the MLC Legislative delegation. Its purpose is to inform legislators of the issues and events of importance to the 15 MLC cities. Update is published monthly during the Legislative Session, and bimonthly during the interim.