HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 11-26-1986CITY OF
PLYMOUTFF
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
November 26, 1986
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY -- City offices will be closed Thursday,
November 27 and riday, November 28.
2. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, December 1, 7:30 p.m. Regular
City Council meeting in City Council Chambers.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, December 3. The Planning
Commission Forum will begin at 7:15 p.m., with the regular Planning
Commission meeting following at 7:30 p.m. Agenda attached. (M-3)
4. CROWN AUTO RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY - Mr. Sam Van Tassel called the
office today to extend an invitation to members of the Council to
attend a ribbon cutting ceremony scheduled for Monday, December 8,
at 4:00 p.m. for the new Crown Auto store and Wash Me car wash
facility.
5. EMPLOYEE CHRISTMAS PARTY -- Friday, December 19, Sheraton Park
Place. As a reminder, please contact Laurie if you plan to attend.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION....
1. JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION STUDY
.MEETING -- The Council has scheduled a study meeting for Monday,
December 15 with PRAC commencing with a dinner at 5:00 p.m. in the
Council Conference Room. A copy of the proposed agenda for this
meeting, which has been reviewed and developed by PRAC and Eric
Blank, is attached. If the Councilmembers wish to revise this
agenda, please let me know Monday evening. (I-1)
2. CITIZEN'S LEAGUE REPORT ON TRANSIT STRATEGIES -- A special committee
of the Citizen's League has recently completed a study of regional
transit. Attached is an extract of that report which appeared in
the November 25 issue of "Minnesota Journal" published by the
Citizen's League. The report notes that people are makinq more
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
November 26, 1986
Page two
trips than in past years within the metropolitan area and that much
of this growth is occurring within the suburbs. Most significantly,
these trips are being made in passenger automobiles. Given these
facts, the Committee takes a dim view of light rail transit as a
"solution" to most transportation needs in the metropolitan area.
Rather, they suggest that ride sharing offers the most practical
approach with the quickest impact. I have asked for a copy of the
entire report and will be pleased to share it with members of the
Council if you desire. (I-2)
3. MINUTES:
a. Planning Commission, November 19, 1986 (I -3a)
4. MLC UPDATE -- Attached separately is a copy of the November/December
issue of the Municipal Legislative Commission's Update newsletter.
The newsleter is sent to legislators in an effort to inform them of
the issues and events of importance to MLC cities.
5. FUND ESTABLISHED FOR PURCHASE OF BULLET-PROOF VESTS FOR POLICE
OFFICERS -- On November 25, Mr. Roger Redmond presented the Plymouth
Police Association with a check for $350.00 to initiate a fund to
purchase bullet-proof vests for police officers. Mr. Redmond, a
Plymouth resident, is the owner of Roger Redmond Homes, and has
built homes in the Plymouth area.
Mr. Redmond was interviewed by reporters from the Plymouth Sailor
and Plymouth Post. He stressed that he had a concern for the safety
of the officers after reading about an incident in Minneapolis
recently where an officer was shot, but sustained no life-
threatening injury because of his protective vest.
According to Dick Carlquist, all patrol officers, that he is aware
of, do wear protective vests. However, the life expectancy of these
vests is approximately 4-5 years. The cost of replacement is
currently $350.00. The fund will be managed by the Police
Association.
5. ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN CITIES -- Attached is a bulletin from
the Association of Metropolitan Cities announcing a vacancy on the
AMM Board and reporting on several other metro matters. The AMM is
seeking nominations for a vacancy on its Board due to a recent
resignation. The term for this vacancy would end May 31, 1988. The
Board is expected to fill the vacancy at its January Board meeting.
Written nominations will be accepted until December 31.
Other matters reported in the bulletin include the Metropolitan
Council's program for solid waste household rebate program, the
metropolitan highway jurisdiction study, and the formation of the
League of Minnesota Cities' Property Tax Reform Technical
Committee. (I-5)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
November 26, 1986
Page three
6. METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - SAC CHARGES -- During October and
November, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission revised its
policy for the collection of SAC units, and established new SAC
rates effective January 1, 1987. Attached is a letter from Louis
Breimhurst, Chief Administrator for the MWCC, providing further
information on the changes. (I-6)
7. COMMUNITY INFORMATION BOOKLET -- On Tuesday, November 25, 17,118
Community Information booklets were delivered to the post office.
Distribution to households began on November 26. As of this
writing, I have received comments from two Plymouth residents; Mr.
John Springer and Mr. Dominic Dahlheimer, who have provided positive
comments about the book, its contents and use. One resident has
already expressed an interest in obtaining additional copies for use
by clubs, etc. It appears that the Community Information booklet
will be a positive addition to our public relations arsenal.
Attached separately is a copy of the Community Information booklet
for each Council member.
8. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter from Mayor Schneider sent to County and State officials
concerning the City's November 10 meeting on road improvement
projects. (I -8a)
b. Letter from Mayor Schneider to Mr. Ernie Ledoux regarding his
concern about not receiving an absentee ballot for the general
election. (I -8b)
c. Letter from Sherm Goldberg to Dr. James Craig, 10008 South Shore
Drive, in response to drainage concerns expressed by Dr. Craig
in a letter dated November 4 to Mayor Schneider. (I -8c)
d. Letters from Mr. and Mrs. David Mesley, and Linda Buranen,
concerning the Alpha Human Services petition. (I -8d)
e. Memorandum from Joe Ryan, Building Official, concerning
a proposed addition and building permit application for 12006
Sunset Trail (Benjamin and Audrey Bambenek). On Friday,
November 21, Joe met with Mr. Bob Frakes, consultant for the
property owner, to discuss the application. Mr. Frakes had
previously contacted Councilmember Zitur on this matter. (I -8e)
James. G. Willis
City Manager
JGW:jm
attach
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1986
�A -3
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on
the agenda.
PUBLIC FORUM 7:15 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Minutes, November 19, 1986
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Ron Clark, Clark Construction Company. Final Plat, Site Plan and Conditional
Use Permit for the construction of a 222 unit apartment complex located east
of I-494; west of Xenium Lane at 34th Avenue North. (86115)
B. George and Teresa Hoff dba Design Mechanical Inc. Conditional Use Permit for
a home occupation at 10800 41st Avenue North. (86122)
5. NEW BUSINESS
NONE
6. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Streamlining the Development Review Process
8. ADJOURNMENT 8:30 P.M.
AGENDA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
December 15, 1986
5:00 P.M.
Dinner - 5:00-5:30 p.m.
The primary purpose of the meeting is to clarify and develop consensus on
the City Council's expectations for the Park and Recreation Advisory Commis-
sion relating to the Council's 1987 objectives. Items for discussion
parallel the City Council's objectives which are set forth below:
I. Community Center Data Gathering
The investigation and data gathering for a community center should be
accomplished to identify if, when, and how this issue should be
presented to the citizens requesting bonding authority. By July 1, 1987.
II. Trail Completion for Public Safety.
Planning and construction of trail segments required to enhance the
public safety should be given first priority. Such trails should be
identified, funded, and constructed no later than September 1, 1987.
III. Study of Park Usage and Maintenance Levels
A comprehensive study of the appropriate use of parks by type and maintenance
program for each should be evaluated by the Council to determine whether
changes should be made to the comprehensive Park and Trail Plan and
maintenance standards by September 1, 1987.
IV. Construction of Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks scheduled for construction in 1987 should be
accomplished by November 15, 1987.
V. Grand Opening of Parkers Lake City Park
a. Possible dates
b. Events sponsorship
C. Special guest
d. Other
VI. Other
VII. Adjourn
7:00 p.m.
I',-- _L_ t
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
DATE:
November 24, 1986 MEMO
T0: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: QUESTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL.'S REVIEW -PRIOR TO' JOINT MEETING WITH PRAC
The following is a list of questions prepared by the Park and Recreation
Advisory Commission and a second list from staff evolving around issues
dealing with the proposed community center.
A. List of Questions Developed by PRAC
1. What is the status of the financial needs of the various school
districts within the City,•specifically, the Wayzata School district?
2. What is the degree of data .that the Council wishes the Park
Commission to gather, review, etc.?
3. What is the view of each member of the Council toward the
community center idea at this time?
4. Does the facility have to be designed to be self supporting, or is
that an ideal goal to be striving for?
5. Does the Council agree with the building components as proposed
in the 1984 referendum?
6. Does the Council wish to seriously explore a public/private part-
nership venture on this item?
7. The Commission has asked that the Council be distributed copies of
the final report from the 1984 study group. What aspects of this
report do they agree or disagree with, and what information do they
feel is lacking?
B. Staff Generated Questions
1. What role does the City Council wish to play in this issue?
2. What role does the City Council wish PRAC to play?
3. What role should staff play?
4. What role will the general citizens have?
5. Should we appoint a special blue ribbon citizens committee, appointed
by the Mayor and City Council, to work with PRAC on this subject?
TI
Questions for Review by City Council Prior to Joint Meeting with PRAC
Page Two
6. Should an outside consultant be used to work with the Park Commission
on a finding of needs study or other type of research?
7. Can we start soliciting public information using Plymouth on Parade
as a vehicle for input, or cable television?
8. What about the use of tv shows, models, drawings, etc., of proposed
facilities or other like facilities for public display?
9. Should the City Council and PRAC be touring other facilities to
better understand the overall role these facilities play in other
communities?
10. At what point will we use a telephone survey consultant to determine
citizen attitudes?
11. Has the City Council provided for funding for any of this research
that may be necessary as this project moves forward?
12. If it is necessary to determine cost estimates, will we use, once
again, BRW, the firm that was selected in 1984 to design this
facility?
13. Should PRAC look at other funding needs, i.e., trails, parks, etc.,
for inclusion in a bond referendum?
From New Destinations for Transit, a new
Citizens League's report
Transportation trends that began years ago
in the Twin Cities metropolitan area have
continued and in some cases accelerated.
We make more trips than we did in the past
and we make most of our trips by car. Some
of us ride public transportation, but more of
us ride as passengers in cars and vans, and
the overwhelming majority of us choose to
drive alone ...
More and more businesses, retail centers,
and residential areas are developing in the
suburbs ...
Transit strategies must accommodate these
patterns. Transit must accommodate where
the people are, where the jobs are, and where
the trips go ... Transit means any trip other
than one in which a single occupant drives a
vehicle.
Our future mobility is at risk because of trends
in travel and vehicle use. Peak -period con-
gestion has increased in our area and is
expected to worsen. In the past the region
has accommodated increasing congestion
by adding to road capacity. This area has
maintained high levels of mobility which
have contributed to its level of development,
economic health, and quality of life. However,
major new road construction in the developed
areas will be very limited ...
Major traffic congestion in the Twin Cities
has expanded outward over time to include
more and more of the highway facilities in
the suburban areas of the region ... We're
traveling more often and longer ...
In the absence of more ridership we will
have increased congestion and increased
travel time and costs. We could tolerate this,
but we have the opportunity to avoid it. We
need not endure the inconvenience of not
getting where we want to go in a timely
manne, nor the unnecessary costs of solo -
occupant cars, nor the loss of job opportuni-
ties for people unable to transport themselves.
The conditions are urgent for the region to
make a policy commitment to ridership ...
However, incentives are needed to encour-
age ridership. Merely providing an aftemative
to driving alone will not create demand for
transit... Ridership should be encouraged
where it can compete effectively with the
single -occupant auto in terms of time, con-
venience, and expense ...
Multi -passenger vehicles must have priority
use of the roadways and parking facilities ...
(the Minnesota Department of Transportation),
the (Regional Transit Board) RTB, munici-
palities, and private businesses should give
more emphasis to those strategies which
encourage people to use high -occupancy
vehicles ...
We have a dispersed pattem of travel in all
directions as a result of the area's widely
dispersed pattern of residential and em-
ployment locations ...
The cost of regular route bus operations has
risen well in excess of inflation... Competition
between transit providers would benefit serv-
ice. Low-cost options are needed so the
greatest amount of transit service is offered
per dollar...
The RTB should phase in competitive bids
for service to lower the cost of bus -hours of
service. The RTB should focus its competitive
bidding on the highest cost portion of the
(Metropolitan Transit Commission) — the
peak hour service...
Strategies
for transit
must recognize
travel trends
This (competition) includes taxis, limousines,
bus companies, paratransit servi^es, and
other vendors ... The Legislature should
expand the role taxicabs may play as transit
providers by allowing metropolitan -wide
licensing of taxicabs, an unlimited number of
taxi licenses, non-regulated fares, and shared,
group -ride service ...
The RTB should be responsible for main-
taining the regional nature of the transit system
and for high standards of performance ...
The Metropolitan Council should take the
lead in recommending transit financing
changes. Because the Metropolitan Council
has the broad role of coordinating the regional
November 25. 1986 Minnasntn .lournal
systems, it is in the best position to analyze
the competing needs of transit and the other
regional services.
Any investment of money for a fixed -guideway
project should not come at the expense of
existing transit programs ... A comparison of
the advantages and disadvantages of the
different applications of fixed -guideway is
needed ...
The Metropolitan Council should not request
a public investment of money for, and the
Legislature should not approve, constructing
fixed -guideway. Instead the Council and the
RTB should focus on phasing in competitive
bids for transit service around the region,
and providing incentives to increase ridership
in the expanded transit system recommended
earlier in this report ...
The Metropolitan Council should not act on
any fixed -guideway proposal until small
area applications of fixed -guideway are de-
signed and analyzed in comparison with
corridor applications.
The Council should decide to accept or reject
a fixed -guideway proposal based on: (1)
Whether the project would attract significant
numbers of drivers out of their single -occu-
pant cars, or otherwise reduce the need for
travel on highways, (2) An assurance that
when a fixed -guideway proposal depends
on development and land use changes, that
the public and private actions necessary to
bring those changes about will be accomp-
lished, (3) Whether sufficient private dollars
have been leveraged from the benefiting
property owners to implement the project,
and (4) Whether the public dollars involved
are providing the most ridership per dollar ...
The program known as Metro Mobility is the
state -funded, publicly organized program
that offers door-to-door transportation for
handicapped individuals... Metro Mobility is
only one piece of a large network that pro-
vides specialized transportation. Other formal
providers include county providers, churches,
nonprofit groups, senior centers, and other
social service agencies
To make the most rides available for disabled
and elderly people ... financial incentives are
needed that encourage selection of vendors
based on both the quality and the price of
the service. Providers should be allowed to
compete with each other based on the price
of their service to the riders. The vendors
should be able to offer rides for any price up
to a maximum, permitting riders to choose
among a variety of rides and prices ...
Low-income riders should receive priority
so they are not priced out of transportation.
A co -payment system should be instituted
on a sliding fee scale in which riders pay a
portion of the ride's cost based on their ability
to pay.
017--
3 CA-)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 1986
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:34 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Pauba, Commissioners
Wire, Magnus, Plufka and Mellen
Chairman Steigerwald arrived at 7:41
P.M.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Stulberg
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Parks & Recreation Director
Eric Blank
Community Development Director
Blair Tremere
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus MOTION TO APPROVE
to adopt the Consent Agenda as submitted.
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus MOTION TO APPROVE
to approve the October 22, 1986 and November 5, 1986 Minutes
as submitted.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried on approval for October 22,
1986 Minutes.
Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried on approval for November 5, VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
1986 Minutes. Commissioner Plufka abstained.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Vice Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Image Homes IMAGE HOMES
and requested an overview of the October 7, 1986 Planning RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT
REZONING AND
Coordinator McConn introduced Parks & Recreation Director CONDITIONAL USE
Eric Blank, who explained the location and size of the PERMIT (86087)
anticipated parkland. He responded to the neighborhood
input, as he explained the City's wish to preserve the pond-
ing area as part of the park and the need for better public
access to the park. He reviewed the unique configuration
and topography of the area .
-250-
3 ck ,
Page 251
Planning Commission Minutes
November 199 1986
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Tim Erkkila, Westwood Plan-
ning & Engineering, who described the site owned by the City
of Plymouth. He noted the City has encouraged them to pur-
sue the development as a Planned Unit Development; and,have
discouraged separate development plans for the twoparcels.
The City desires to have these parcels develop at the same
time. The amenities as discussed in the staff report are
located for the most part on the north and west wide; this
property has mature trees, and contains the ponding area,
which the developer has agreed to retain as parkland. In
designing the layout for the north side, they noted the
northwest side of this property has a rugged terrain, and
much of the existing vegetation and mature trees are
contained in this area. It was their opinion that multi-
family dwellings would be inappropriate; that 32 single
family dwelling units would be more suitable and desirable
from a marketing standpoint; that multi -family units would
have the same impact on the property as single family
detached dwellings; and, that the single family homes would
be more in character with the surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposal is for 77 single family detached units, 32 on
the north side, 45 on the south. The plans preserve the
amenities, existing vegetation, and provide the roadway
system per City standards. Mr. Erkkila stated their plans
give much more than what was given credit for in the Plan-
ning Staff Report. It is their opinion they have developed
a good plan, especially for the property on the south side.
He explained the constraints which include limited access;
the lot size and lot width as proposed are within 9% of
comparable lots in the adjacent development. He believes
the lot frontages are more expansive than those lots in
surrounding developments.
The development plans, which include the 8 acres for park-
land, establishes their compliance with the expected Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Attributes. However, they are will-
ing to work with Director Blank and City staff regarding the
changes needed per the Park Director's November 7, 1986
memorandum.
Mr. Erkkila believes it is questionable that a 45 lot sub-
division should be required to provide private open space in
addition to the land granted for public park purposes.
He stated that even though this philosophy may have some
validity, it could become a burden to the home owners.
Page 252
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Mr. Erkkila discussed the requested setback variance, stat-
ing they would drop this request and provide the ordinance
required setbacks. The increased lot coverage requested for
one lot, is to accommodate the future property owner for
space to add a deck or porch if desired.
Mr. Erkkila discussed the question of housing diversity and
reiterated their opinion that multiple family dwellings
would be too burdensome for the site. He stated they are
providing open space; that they were eligible for a higher
density but have lowered this to 77 single family units.
Mr. Erkkila stated that residents living in Heritage Ridge
and Heritage Highlands would be expressing their concerns
and commenting on the proposed development.
Commissioner Plufka inquired if the limits of the grading
would reduce the buildable area? Mr. Erkkila pointed out
the area, explaining that on Lots 13, and 11, building
sites will go beyond the grading limit. Commissioner Plufka
inquired about the cul-de-sac at 32nd Avenue and whether
these sites would also encroach into that area? Mr. Erkkila
explained their efforts to retain trees, but it is accurate
to say that the buildings may take out a tree or two beyond
the grading limits. Commissioner Plufka inquired if this
is inconsistent with their comments regarding setbacks?
Mr. Erikkila stated they would prefer to have the 25 ft.
setback, but if this becomes a point of approval, they will
retract this request.
Commissioner Mellen inquired about the 25% lot coverage for
Lot 3, Block 3; and, if the developer is proposing a deck
as part of the house design? Mr. Erkkila stated Mr. Al
Stobbe could perhaps answer this question, but the initial
plans may not include a deck; however, it would allow for
the deck should the buyer want to add it later. Commis-
sioner Mellen stated his concern regarding the variance,
which could elicit a request by the property owner for an
even higher percentage of lot coverage in the future.
Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning & Engineering, stated
this request was made so it would not restrict the footprint
for the house. Rather than reducing the size of the home,
they are requesting a variance so that all the homes could
be constructed with decks.
Commissioner Magnus inquired about the changes requested by
the Parks & Recreation Director, and if the proposed park
acreage is useable. Mr. Blank explained that the City
bought the property for County Road 61, and the Comprehen-
sive Park Plan shows a neighborhood park for this area.
0`,
Page 253
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
He explained the history of the area noting that this
proposal has not gone before the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board, but the plan is close to what the
Comprehensive Park Plan perceives for the neighborhood.
Commissioner Magnus stated his concerns for children having
to cross County Road 61 to access the park, and he does not
see the benefit to the residents on the south side.
Director Blank stated this was a difficult area to plan in
that the parkland is basically located north of County Road
61. He further explained the history of the park planning
when the City Council decided not to build two City parks.
He assured the Commission that the City will work to provide
safe crossings for the residents using the park.
Commissioner Magnus inquired if the additional four acres
could be exchanged for an area south of County Road 61?
Director Blank stated this would serve little purpose.
The need for private open space and compliance with the PUD
attributes was discussed. Coordinator McConn discussed the
proposal, specifically, the area southeast of County Road
61, where plans do not reflect compliance with the PUD
Attributes. Mr. Erkkila stated the development is too small
to accommodate and plan private open space in addition to
the parkland granted to the City. Coordinator McConn point-
ed out that there are a number of small Planned Unit
Developments which do comply with the PUD requirements;
along with conventional developments which were planned with
residential amenities. She noted it is important that the
development be unified, even though it is divided by County
Road 61.
Commissioner Magnus stated he is concerned about the parcel
to the south being isolated; and, that this side of the pro-
posed development, and the residents to the south, are not
being treated fairly.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Mark McCullough, representing the Heritage Highlands Home-
owners Association, stated a letter was sent to the Planning
Commission relative to these development plans. He noted
the neighborhood is concerned about the area on the north
side. It is their opinion that multi -family dwellings are
inappropriate for this neighborhood and they oppose such
development.
Page 254
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Mr. McCullough stated they were given the site layout by the
developer that included townhouses and the Association was
not happy with that plan. Single family housing is more
appropriate; the City has established a pattern for single
family detached homes in this area, even for that land clas-
sified as LA -2. He stated, that including multi -family
dwellings just because of the PUD provisions is not suf-
ficient reason.
He stated the developer has been very cooperative and will
follow the City direction to preserve the vegetation.
Cluster housing would be incompatible with the more expen-
sive homes in this area. The problems created by City
decisions about County Road 61 should not be the burden of
this developer.
Mr. McCullough listed concerns including their suggestion to
delete Lot 7, Block 4, and add a lot at the end of 32nd
Avenue North. They have reviewed the development plan and
discussed the sewer and drainage for this development; it is
their opinion the drainage should be directed to the south;
staff has proposed the opposite, but would not discuss the
reasons. They want assurance regarding landscape require-
ments, and have discussed this with the developer. This is
a responsible developer whose plans are consistent with the
existing neighborhoods, they encourage the Planning Commis-
sion to approve this Concept Plan.
Director of Parks and Recreation Eric Blank stated the 32nd
Avenue access to the park is preferred because of the pond-
ing and unique shape of this park. He stated that in study-
ing the topographic characteristics, shape, and vegetation
in this area it could not be seen where the construction of
a home would be accommodated. The trail system and open
space activities were described.
Sherm Goldberg stated the sanitary sewer would be handled by
pipe to the north. There are no capacity problems, and it
could be handled by pipe from either direction.
Carol Brownell, 3060 Rosewood Lane, stated that a petition
for a park was made in 1984 because of the number of small
children living in the area. She read from the Minutes of
the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) who moved
to amend the Comprehensive Park Plan to provide for 3 to 5
acres for a mini park for Westminster; approximately 8 to 12
acres for the Heritage Estates development area; and to pro-
vide some land south of County Road 61. The City Council
did not permit this action. Ms. Brownell noted they are
back to the same problems, having to cross a busy street to
go to the park; their concern for the safety of the
children; and, the fact that the West Medicine Lake Park
cA�
Page 255
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
will not develop for at least another 5 years. She believes
it has been the intent of the Planning Commission and City
Council that the area south of County Road 61 be developed
with single family residences, but the proposals made by
Sohn Karos, and now by Image Homes, can in no way provide
comparable housing to that in the existing neighborhoods,
because the lots are too small. The south side has swamp
and flood plain and would provide no play area. The
proposal shows no retention of trees in the southeast
portion.
Ms. Brownell read into the record, a letter from Peggy
Schaefer, a Plymouth resident who opposes this development
proposal. Ms. Schaefer states the lots are too small and
the development should be similar to the Westminster devel-
opment. It is her opinion the City should stand by the
original plans for the area. She noted her concern for the
children and the lack of play areas; and, the City park is
too close to privately owned land.
Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning, reiterated their plan to
save as many trees as possible that are not located in
future streets or frontage.
Bill Ciora, 3045 Rosewood Lane, stated he objects to the
development because the density is too high, especially on
the south side. It is his opinion the numbers are inac-
curate regarding lot size and width. He wants the unit
number reduced to fit in with the existing neighborhood.
Deleting 6 to 8 dwelling units would improve the plan.
Higher density next to Westminster is not acceptable.
Westminster lacks recreational areas and perhaps would not
be approved today. He pointed out there is much more
existing vegetation than is shown on the plans. He is
concerned about the requested setbacks which could cause the
homes to be on top of each other. He read from the Planning
Commission Minutes regarding the development proposal by
Sohn Karos, and statements by the Chairman regarding lot
size and layout which leaves no "elbow room".
Commissioner Plufka concurred with Mr. Ciora in that the
site has more vegetation than what is shown on the plans.
Tim Erkkila stated that trees in this area are lesser
quality species and fast growing, such as Boxelder. This
site lacks the dominant vegetation found on the north side.
The trees surround a depression and do not relate to the
development plan.
Page 256
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Paul Waldon, 3365 Rosewood, stated he lives in Heritage
Estates and is a new resident in Plymouth. He stated the
vegetation on the north side consists of oak and apple trees
and that constructing multi -family dwellings here would not
save these trees. He stated this area is prime single-
family residential real estate and it would be a waste to
construct multi -family dwellings.
Arlene Johnson, 3535 Rosewood Lane, stated she is also
concerned about the children having to cross County Road
61. They conveyed their concerns about crossing to French
Park and were told there was no chance for stop signs as the
traffic has to move. This development will have just as
many problems with access to the park. Their neighborhood
has been promised a park for years. She noted her neighbor-
hood got along without public park by people putting swing
sets in their yards. She discussed the mini -park that was
defeated. She is concerned about losing more trees because
the City chopped down many trees putting in County Road 61,
and this development plan should preserve the oak and maple
trees.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the park access from the
northwest. Director Blank stated they have purchased the 30
ft. corridor from Ives Lane; Coordinator McConn pointed out
the access points.
Mr. Ciora stated they are asking relief from the higher
density.
Tim Erkkila, Westwood Planning stated they didn't want the
Planning Commission to get caught up in the City issues for
parkland. The development plan provides the land requested
and they don't want to be the "whipping boy" for the park
system. They want to move forward with their Concept Plan,
and defer the preliminary plat stage. They will review the
plans with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission to
clarify the issues and will work with the planning staff to
clarify the lot size and width requirements. He feels they
are very close to compliance with their plan as submitted.
The concept is reasonable and should be approved.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Pauba inquired about the feasibility for a foot
bridge to the park, or would the cost be prohibitive?
Director Blank stated this would be incredibly expensive and
in most cases where they have been erected they are not
used. Commissioner Pauba noted his concern that the south
side has been short changed. Director Blank stated they
looked at going under the road, but there is not enough
room.
_T: 3CA.1
Page 257
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Commissioner Plufka stated the need to review the PUD
Attributes. He applauds the plan for the north side and the
parkland provided; however, when reading the expected
attribute that "more useable and suitably located recreation
facilities and other public and common facilities than would
otherwise be provided . . . ", a poor job has been done with
the plans for the south side. Commissioner Plufka noted the
plans cannot ignore County Road 61 as a barrier.
Commissioner Wire concurred, stating that County Road 61
should not be used to separate the development making the
plans for each side totally different. It is obvious the
south side comes up on the short end.
Commissioner Mellen noted the City Council has directed the
park on the north side; Chairman Steigerwald concurred, but
noted that the residents are due these amenities and that
private open space is required for a Planned Unit
Development.
Commissioner Magnus stated his concern regarding the small
lot size, and that the plan needs to be improved for the
south side.
Chairman Steigerwald stated there are unusual circumstances
with the development of this property, and he empathizes
with the developer. The resident groups are active in this
area and have many concerns; the City is the land owner;
and, it is his opinion the developer should be given time to
work out these problems. He stated that in deference to
accepting this Concept Plan, he would entertain a motion to
table the entire request with no date certain, to give the
developer time to prepare a better plan for the
southeasterly side of this property.
Coordinator McConn noted the City's concern in tabling or
deferring this item with no time limit. She explained that
the application has been in process for several months. If
the Planning Commission defers their recommendation, it
would be appropriate to reconsider the item at their Decem-
ber 17, 1986 meeting. She discussed the correspondence sent
to the petitioner listing the concerns and their late res-
ponse to these items. The staff review comments have not
changed since the petitioner has elected to submit no
alternatives.
Commissioner Plufka stated the City has been painstaking in
delineating the parkland, and has within its power as land
owner to require that a plan more in keeping with the
requirements for a PUD Plan be prepared for the south side
of the property.
mac...
Page 258
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Coordinator McConn stated that staff encouraged the
petitioner and consultants to review the development plan
submitted by Sohn Karos. The staff has provided direction
from previous Commission discussions and explained the
deficiencies of the plans submitted; however, it is the
petitioner's choice whether to make changes and provide
those alternatives.
Will Neumeister, Westwood Planning, stated he had been asked
by staff to respond to those areas of non-compliance, and
have been willing to cooperate. However, the development
plans have been under review since duly. He feels there
should be an economic reconsideration and discussion regard-
ing the purchase price. The parkland and roadway accounts
for 25% of the purchase price that the developer has had to
write off; and, this should be taken into consideration.
How much more do we have to give back to the City?
Coordinator McConn stated the financial considerations must
be discussed with the City Council. She noted further, in
response to Mr. Neumeister's statements that the review of
these plans was not accomplished in a timely manner; that
the application was submitted on duly 15th; correspondence
requesting further information and detailing the staff
concerns following plan review was forwarded to the
petitioner and consultant on August 1st and August 8th,
which elicited no response. Inquiries as to the status of
providing a response were sent to the petitioner in
September and October.
MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO DENY
Wire to recommend denial of the Residential Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan for Image Homes on the basis that
compliance with the Planned Unit Development expected attri-
butes have not been demonstrated.
Commissioner Plufka asked that the record indicate to the
City Council that he does not concur with the staff report
that it is imperative for this plan to have a mix of hous-
ing. This is not the issue for denial. The City, as owner
of the property, has seen a good plan for the north side;
but, the major concern is that the City as seller of this
property must have a better plan for the southeasterly
parcel, and must commit to those people living on the south
side. The problem should not be compounded by adding more
density.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
I..:..__.__._. -
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
Page 259
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Chairman Steigerwald
introduced the
request by Ron Clark
RON CLARK
Construction Company
for Rezoning,
Preliminary Plat, and
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Variance for property
east of I-494;
west of Xenium Lane at
REZONING, PRELIMINARY
34th Avenue North. He
requested an overview
of the November
PLAT AND VARIANCE
12, 1986 Planning Staff
Report by Coordinator
McConn.
(86115)
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Ron Pentz, Prudential
Insurance Company. Mr. Pentz stated they have submitted a
letter in response to staff concerns.
Mike Gair, Gair & Associates, stated they have met with the
property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Swienton, 3335 Xenium
Lane North, south of the proposed development and have made
the arrangements that will allow them to maintain their
access. They also agree to the conditions as proposed by
City staff.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Richard Swienton asked why the petitioner could not buy
their property? He stated they are sitting on an island
now. They have been approached by persons interested in
buying the property, however, they have backed off because
of this development proposal. He noted others have been
interested in buying the entire area. He is concerned about
his property being locked in and the City of Plymouth then
condemning the property.
Commissioner Plufka noted that a condition of approval for
this development would be that the final plat shall include
a conceptual plan showing how the exception parcels can
develop in the future and the plan must be consistent with
the development regulations of the City.
Mrs. Swienton stated their property value will be reduced
because the house will no longer have a good setting.
Chairman Steigerwald discussed the zoning and guiding of the
property.
Mike Gair stated there is no problem showing how this
property can be further developed and there is potential for
separate uses.
Chairman Steigerwald further explained the City review of
the proposed development to the Swientons. Mr. Swienton
stated the developer has been very cooperative.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
Page 260
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Chairman
Steigerwald to recommend approval for the Rezoning,
Preliminary Plat, and Variance for Ron Clark Construction
Company, subject to the conditions as listed in the November
12, 1986 Planning Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Mark Austin
Smith for "Tires Plus". He requested an overview of the
November 12, 1986 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator
McConn.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Mark Smith, 115 2nd
Avenue South, Minneapolis, who stated he would answer any
questions; he has read and concurs with the staff report.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
NOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MARK AUSTIN SMITH
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE
PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, AND VARIANCE
(86120)
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Pauba MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommend approval for the General Development Plan
Amendment, Site Plan, Conditional use Permit and Variance
for Mark Austin Smith for "Tires Plus", subject to the
conditions listed in the November 12, 1986 Planning Staff
Report.
Commissioner Plufka inquired about Mr. Smith's reaction to
the requirement of a covenant to be placed on the property
regarding limitations to the property based on available
parking.
Mr. Smith stated he has no problem placing this covenant on
the property as he will be a tenant and hopes to do business
at this location for quite some time. He drafted the
covenant that was reviewed by the City Attorney and is aware
of the intent and purpose of that covenant, and wants it for
his own protection. He stated that company officers for
"Tires Plus" are present and could answer any questions.
This operation will be high quality, as will the business to
be run by "Harmon Glass", and they have also agreed to all
the conditions including storing their company vehicles
inside the building.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Z: 3co�
Page 261
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
OLD BUSINESS
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Magnus *AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
to recommend approval of the Site Plan for AT&T Communica- SITE PLAN (86086)
tions for the construction of an attached garage to the NOTION TO APPROVE
principal building located northeast of 15th Avenue North
and Xenium Lane, subject to the conditions as listed in the
November 7, 1985 Planning Staff Report.
Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
The Planning Commission discussed potential measures that STREAMLINING THE
could be taken to streamline the development review and DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
approval process. The suggestions included in the November
5, 1986 memorandum from Community Development Director Blair
Tremere, served as a basis for the discussion.
Commissioner Plufka confirmed that land uses designated as a
conditional use including Planned Unit Developments would
not be included for administrative approval. A site plan
for developments in non-residential areas of Planned Unit
Developments (PUD), once the PUD Plan had been considered in
accordance with the current review procedures, would be
subject to the same administrative procedures and require-
ments as non-PUD's; the finding would additionally be made
that the proposed plans were consistent with the approved
PUD Plan.
Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that in order to institute
revised procedures for approval of site plans, a public
hearing would be required to consider amendatory language to
the Zoning Ordinance. Chairman Steigerwald inquired of the
Commission whether a "hook" should be included in the pro-
cedures, via a Planning Commission member reviewing those
applications which would qualify for administrative approval
prior to such approval being granted. The Commission repre-
sents the citizens and should be aware of development.
Commissioner Wire expressed his view that some of the Ordin-
ance standards are not clear, such as lighting, and
questioned how compliance with the Ordinance would be deter-
mined administratively. He suggested that the applications,
which satisfy all the Ordinance requirements be processed
through the Commission, but not be formally discussed. Co-
ordinator McConn explained the Planning Commission already
operates with a consent agenda for such items. The consent
agenda saves the petitioner time at the Planning Commission
meeting, but does not substantially reduce the overall time
for processing the application.
—E- 3c.,,,-�
Page 262
Planning Commission Minutes
November 19, 1986
Director Tremere explained many of the requirements and pro-
cedures were adopted some time ago when the City's concerns
and needs were different. The City has adopted sophisti-
cated and effective ordinances and policies which, if met,
constitute a plan that is in order and, thus, not particu-
larly in need of extensive non-technical review.
Chairman Steigerwald suggested a member could be appointed
to serve as a representative to meet with the staff members
before regular commission meetings. The Planning Commission
member would be responsible for identifying potential prob-
lems that should be reviewed by them for formal discussion
at a subsequent meeting. If there were no questions or
problems, the application could be administratively
approved.
The Commission discussed alternate ways that the Planning
Commission, or a particular member on a rotating basis could
meet with staff to review qualified plans prior to adminis-
trative approval. Chairman Steigerwald and Commissioner
Plufka expressed concern that the Commission should be aware
of those applications which would be approved. Director
Tremere explained that the staff would keep the Commission
and Council informed.
The discussion concluded that staff should prepare a summary
of procedures which would take into consideration the con-
cerns expressed by the Planning Commission members for
further discussion.
The Commission will review those items currently allowed as
conditional uses to determine if the classification could be
changed to "permitted". When specific items have been
identified by the Planning Commission, staff will survey
other communities to determine if they are allowed as
permitted or conditional uses.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
.r�
November 26, 1986
TO: AMM Member Cities
FROM: Verpyeterson, Executive Director
-7--s
RE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCY AND OTHER METRO MATTERS
1. NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD VACANCY WANTED:
Please be advised that there is one vacancy on the AMM Board
due to a recent resignation. The person selected to fill the
vacancy will serve the balance of the term which ends May 31,
1988 and will be eligible for re-election at that point in
time. The Board would like to fill the vacancy at its January
Board Meeting and is soliciting nominations via this Bulletin.
It would be appreciated if nominations are accompanied by a
brief resume to help facilitate the Board's deliberation.
NOMINATIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE AMM OFFICE IN WRITING BY
NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 1986.
2. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO RECEIVE APPLICATIONS FOR SOLID WASTE
HOUSEHOLD REBATE PROGRAM:
The Metropolitan Council is administering a program to
reimburse cities and towns in the seven county metropolitan
area for solid waste abatement and resource recovery expenses
for 1986. Cities are eligible for reimbursement for up to 50
cents per household for eligible expenses. Applications will
be accepted from December 2, 1986 until Janaury 15, 1987- No
late applications will be accepted. We would encourage you to
take advantage of this program.
CALL SUNNY EMERSON AT THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AT 291-6499 IF
YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION OR HAVE QUESTIONS.
150
_ __ 18.3 univez;i ty avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 221-5600
-
3. METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY JURISDICTION STUDY:
The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) is conducting a study
of Highway Jurisdiction in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area at
the request of the Metropolitan Council.. Studies were mandated
to be carried out in each region of the state by the 1985
Legislature, and to be conducted in accordance with guidelines
provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
The TAB appointed a Task Force to oversee the study. Its
membership consists of a mix of municipal and county elected
and appointed officials as well as state agency, Metropolitan
Council and citizen representatives. Steve Loeding, Dakota
County Commissioner, chairs the Task Force.
The primary focus of the study to date has been on possible
alternative jurisdiction alignments of state and county
roadways in the seven county region. The county engineers have
been actively participating in the study. Potential
jurisdictional changes between counties and municipalities will
probably not be addressed in detail, rather a process for
affecting jurisdictional changes at this level may be
recommended.
Other issues still to be addressed include potential impacts on
such matters as funding, law enforcement, and highway staffing.
The TAB is scheduled to complete its work by March 31, 1987 at
which time its report will be forwarded to the Metropolitan
Council for review and approval.
The Commissioner of Transportation is to present a statewide
highway jurisdiction plan, using the various plans prepared at
the regional level. The plan is to be presented to the
Legislature by March 1, 1988.
IF YOU WANT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE TAB STUDY YOU CAN
CONTACT:
BRIAN VOLLUM, PROJECT MANAGER, 291-6537
EMIL BRANDT, TAB COORDINATOR, 291-6347
Representing the AMM and Municipal interests on the Task Force
are George Bentley, Eden Prairie, Barbara Savanick, Apple
Valley, Fran Hoffman, Edina, and John Walker, Newport. The AMM
through its representatives, is staying informed and will
provide information to member cities concerning task force
progress and opportunity for input as appropriate.
-2-
4. LMC PROPERTY TAX REFORM TECHNICAL COMMITTEE:
As you probably are aware, property tax "reform" is very likely
to be one of the top issues before the 1987 Legislature. The
potential effects on cities of comprehensive "reform" of the
property tax structure and system of local government aids will
be wide-ranging. The AMM Board and Staff are very cognizant of
the potential impacts on cities in the Metropolitan Area and
will be watching this issue very carefully. We will also be
cooperating directly with the LMC in this effort. The LMC is
forming a Property Tax Reform Technical Committee and has asked
the AMM to appoint an official to represent the AMM on the
LMC's Technical Committee. Other city groups have also been
asked,to participate. It is hoped that the Technical Committee
can work to achieve consensus and cooperation among the various
city organizations and help to provide a consensus "city"
response as the various "reform" proposals begin to surface.
BOB THISTLE, AMM PRESIDENT, WILL BE REPRESENTING THE AMM ON
THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT
HIM OR AMM STAFF WITH YOUR CONCERNS/QUESTIONS/SUGGESTIONS.
Distribution Note:
This Bulletin has been mailed to AMM member Mayors and
Managers/Administrators only. Please distribute to other
officials in your city as you deem appropriate.
Thank you.
-3 -
mETROPOL.ITAn
WAITE
ConTROL
(cm- miff ion
lmn "hies rano:
November 24, 1986
Mr. James Willis
City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Willis:
z -k4
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission at its October meeti
changed the policy For the collection ot SAC units so that now QAC
is collected for only those buildings that have a central sanitary
wer system available to the property. SAC will be co ec e
-Ene time the building permit is issued for those buildings for
which sewer service is available. All buildings served by on-site
systems will be charged SAC when a sewer connection permit is issued
to provide sanitary sewer service to the property.
Enclosed are two copies of the revised Reserve Capacity Manual,
one for your use and one for your.Building Inspection Department.
The manual has been revised to reflect the Commission's new policy
for the collection of SAC. Also enclosed is a supply of new SAC
reporting forms. These forms have been changed to simplify the
application of SAC credits against new uses as allowed by the
Commission's policy. Example calculations have been included as
part of the Reserve Capacity Manual to demonstrate the proper use
of these forms. All old forms should be discarded.
Commission at its meeting of November 18 a
f�r�4 7. Th hacr� SA _ ,in; t wi increase from the present rate of
$475.00 to $525.00 on January 1, 1987. The base rated those
communities that have no metropolitan interceptors will be $310.00.
Our new monthly summary form MWCC-86, does not show the 1987 unit
charge. Enclosed is a copy of form MWCC-86 with the proper amounts
indicated for each category. Please insert these amounts on the
monthly forms.
If you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact
either Don Bluhm or Sandy Selby of our staff.
Sincerely,
Louis J. Breimhurst
Chief Administrator
LJB:DSB:jlw
Attachments
cc: W. K. Johnson, MWCC
R. L. Berg, MWCC
_rre Square'Ruilding, ��;nr Paul, P�',; e ,a 55^0 62 '22 ,?,:,
�
November 21, 1986
�g
CITY OF
PLYMOU1'H-
..5...' c c-4 '
Senator dames Ramstad
136 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Dear SPnatnr R=te ad: 1)t -m
Whether or not your schedule allowed you to make our November 10 point City
Council, State, and County Official meeting, I want to thank you for the
assistance and efforts you have put forth on behalf of the City of Plymouth
and it's residents. As a developing community, there are formidable
projects yet to be undertaken which are essential for our continued
successful development. In Plymouth, we have prided ourselves on the fact
that we have aggressively worked to bring about important improvements to
the community. Our establishment of economic development districts for tax
increment financing purposes and ultimately, the construction of roadways
and interchanges, graphically demonstrates this point. Moreover, we have
been active in securing right-of-way through the development process in
order that County and State projects can be accomplished economically and
expeditiously.
We cannot accomplish our development goals alone. We continue to need your
support in helping Plymouth's development. For your information, I am
attaching a copy of our agenda which summarizes transportation issues in the
community as well as projects of priority to the Plymouth City Council. I
have also attached a background memorandum prepared for the Mayor and City
Council by City Manager, dim Willis. This memorandum will provide you with
a comprehensive understanding of the issues of importance facing the City
and our concerns with respect to each.
Once again, whether or not your schedule permitted your attendance, thank
you for your efforts. We look forward to working closely with you in the
future.
Yours very truly,
.14
Vir 1
4 Schneider
Mayor
VS:dma
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
O'M- %b
ERNIE LEDOUX
10730 GARNETTE DRIVE
SUN CITY. ARIZONA 85373
602-972-1354
Mr. Mayor of Plymouth
Dear Sir:
1025 XENE LANE
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55447
612-473-7072
10-4-86
Today is voting day - and someone in Plymouth stole
my vote as well as my wife s.
Prior to Oct- 5th, I went to the Plymouth city hall, and
filled out forms for absentee voting. I also filled out forms
and whatever for the 1987 homested.
I have done this for 8 years, and never a problem - so
you can understand why I am upset this yesr - I never
miss an election - not for 50 years, and didn't want to
start now.
Possibly you are not involved in this - but this is a
federal offense - if not, please see that the person
who did this gets back to me at once.
Please answer to my Sun City home
E.A. LeEtoux
...- -7--
fib
November 18, 1986
� k
CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
a
Ernie Ledoux
10730 Garnette Drive
Sun City, AZ 85373
Dear Mr. Ledoux:
Thank you for your October 4 letter expressing concern about your Absentee
Ballot. I have asked City Clerk, Laurie Brandt to Investigate and respond
to your concerns. Laurie advises me that you visited our offices prior to
the election to apply for an Absentee Ballot. I have attached copies of
your applications. The applications appear to indicate that you were going
to contact us when you arrived in Sun City so we could send the ballots. We
have no record of your contacting us, subsequently,. therefore, the ballots
were never sent. I am sorry that you were unable to vote.
Ernie, your letterhead shows two addresses, the latter is 1025 Xene Lane,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55447. As you can probably appreciate, one of the
major challenges of developing communities such as Plymouth is to develop a
sense of community identity. Please help us promote community identity when
you next reprint your letterhead by revising your address to read Plymouth,
Minnesota.
Thank you for your letter. I am sorry you were unable to vote but I am
pleased that we were able to clarify the matter.
Sincerely,
Vi gil Schneider
Mayor
VS:dma
cc: Laurie Brandt, City Clerk
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
J`
4J
tv
41
V
0
J
V
M
4
00
1
1
-7 $b
W
a
z
k
-
W
C
OC
Y
1
(i0
1
(
I
I
a
�
�
a
�
u
n
o
�
I
(iC
Lb
li
J
Li
lJC1
vi >
bo
r
S
n
J
1Jo,
ct
i
Ic
J
M
•__�
�-
,
T
V
3
-7 $b
0
I
OFFICE USE OILY FICE USE ONLY
M— W— F–'' EG O G
ST Co—RECEIVED C11-72
�fUN-- }---- Form No. 5—A.V.E.—Ap,lication for Ball,:u BALLOTS ISSUED
ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION
Absentee Ballot Application for
Louise LeJoux
Print or Type your Name
READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING
I hereby apply for absentee ballots to be voted upon in I am applying for absentee ballots to be voted upon
my precinct for the following reason: (check one Box) in the following election(s): (Check one Box)
Xabsence from precinct - Primary Election ONLY
❑ illness or disability General Election ONLY
❑ religious discipline or observance of religious holiday ❑BOTH Elections
❑ service as election judge in another precinct
MY LEGAL RESIDENCE ADDRESS IS:
1,125 :(':,ne Line
Street or Route Number
Apr. No.
Rural Box No.
Plymouth, -,,-,.n.
="n-nr.s __
+ ,7
J City 77 'rowrsbip
County'
Lipcode
MAIL MY ABSENTEE BALLOTS) TO
ME AT THE FOLLO«TNG ADDRESS:
1,1730 "-arnette —;r.
Strcet or Route Number
Apt. No.
Rural Box No.
City
or Township`
to
�Q — D — sj b
Zipcwc ✓
9-22-86
Date
Legal Signature
I
J
OFFICE USE tiNTLY CE USE ONLY
N1 W P_— —4G N T G
ST CO RECEIVED
MUN_ Form \o. 5—A.V.E.-Application for Ballots BALLOTS ISSUED
ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION
Absentee Ballot Application for
Print or Type your Name
READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING
I hereby apply for absentee ballots to be voted upon in I am applying for absentee ballots to be voted upon
my precinct for the follo%ving reason: (check one Box) in the following election(s): (Check one Boa)
[absence from precinct i ; Primary Election ONLY
❑illness or disability IAI6eneral Election ONLY
❑ religious discipline or obser.-ance of religious holiday = BOTH Elections
❑ service as election judge in another precinct
MY LEGAL RESIDENCE ADDRESS IS:
Street or Ro to Number No. Rural Boz No.
1
_d�Township County Zipcode
MAIL MY ABSENTEE BALLOT(S) TO ME AT THE FOLLOW- G ADDRESS:
10 2 � 0 Z /I ���lZe �(Ad k""
treet or Route Number % Apt) NO. Rural Box N .
or
Dates V- - �Lr Legal Signature
FPW 45:.
November 21, 1986
Mr. James L. Craig
10008 South Shore Drive
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
Subject: Drainage Problem
Dear Mr. Craig:
Your letter of November 4, 1986 has been referred to me for a response.
Last week I and Bob Johnson, from the Engineering Department, inspected
your yard and did not observe any problems. We did notice the catch basin
in your yard which, because of its design (beehive), would have to be kept
clean in order for it to function. That type of catch basin does require
maintenance, and it is something that the homeowner should be able to do
without too much problem. Because the weather has been relatively dry, we
did not notice any runoff, as you indicated, coming from the South side of
the road from the commercial area. I would be glad to meet with you at
your convenience, and probably best when there is some storm water runoff
to observe the problem that you suggest takes place.
Please contact me and we can set up a time.
Yours very truly,
Sherman L. Goldberg, P.E.
City Engineer
SLG:kh
cc: Fr. G. Moore, Director of Public Works
rJames G. Willis, City Manager
f.
3400 PLYNICUTH BOUL-EVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
November 4, 1986
10008 South Shore Drive
Plymouth, MN 55441
Hon. Virgil Schneider, Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN
Dear Mayor Schneider:
F/ a •,1
o' .
I am writing to express my concern with the zoning ordinances that cover the Medicine
Lake area. I.was most surprised with the Planning Commission's recent action which
indicated that the ordinances did not prohibit the building of the Alpha House in the
Medicine Lake area. If this be the case, I request that the Council give serious
consideration to passing an ordinance that will protect one of the beauty spots of
Plymouth as well as the state.
I built a house and moved to Plymouth four years ago because of the beauty of and
geographic location of Medicine Lake. The only negative thing I found in the area
was a series of warehouses and a steel company which, in my opinion, represents a
serious error by a previous Planning Commission that allowed such a beautiful lake
area oT the city to be zoned for commercial purposes. On the north end of Medicine
Lake Plymouth's ordinances have also permitted alcoholic detoxification centers and
similar facilities that are other examples of the city's mismanagement of one of the
beauty spots of the city, county and state. These examples are past history which
serve as monuments to a city government that couldn't foresee the potential of such a
great natural resource. More recently, the Auto Auction was given additional privi-
ledges and now Alpha House. Past wrongs do not make a right and it appears that now
is the time to take action to preserve the land surrounding the lake as the DNR has
done to preserve the shoreline and the lake itself. It appears incongruous to me
that the DNR would go to such great efforts to preserve the natural resources and
beauty of the lake while the city allows industrial development, detention homes,
detox centers, etc., to scar the land surrounding the lake.
Another less serious but still significant example of poor planning involved an
extension of warehouse parking area and hard -surface roads across from my house last
year. Following the first rain it was obvious that the water runoff had increased
many times and park property began to erode around the one drain that handles the
runoff to the lake. My wife talked to the City Engineering Department who reported
that the parking lot and road water was supposed to go in another direction and that
the new parking lot area met "regulations". However, we asked a City Engineer to
observe the runoff and erosion and he agreed that something needed to be done to
control the runoff and keep the dirt and silt from stopping up the one drain that
could result in flooding of our area. That was over one and one-half years ago and
there has been no action. This is another example of poor planning of commercial
property next to residential property and of a city that fails to correct the con-
sequences. I can foresee a similar situation if Alpha House is built and a time when
the City will disregard public anxiety, protection and other related consequences of
allowing such a facility in the Medicine Lake area.
November 4, 1986
Page 2
At the public hearings property value questions were not answered because there are
no comparable properties unless one uses Lake Harriet, Calhoun or Minnetonka.
Property around these lakes have been protected by good zoning and this has had the
proper expected effect on the property values in the area. I am not a realtor, but
common sense tells me you can't compare the rise in property value of lake property
with non -lake property. One of the Planning Commissioners said that Parker Lake pro-
perty values haven't been affected by the Penal Farm and I just don't understand his
reasoning, because you can't compare Parker Lake property to non -lake property unless
you disregard the value of the lake. It is my understanding that Alpha House propo-
ses to transport inmates from the Penal Farm on Parker Lake (another great natural
resource) to the proposed Medicine Lake facility. This not only seems to be poor
judgement, but shouldn't the law abiding citizens of Plymouth be able to have a
recreational lake without exposure to criminals?
It appears that the City Planners and Planning Commission have numerous detailed
rules and regulations to cover, in my opinion small items. I remember when I built
my house it took me months to go through the process of being sure I wasn't too close
to the lake, too close to the road, too close to the property line, so much hard sur-
face, etc., etc. I was amazed at what appeared to be endless details, but at that
time I was pleased that the City had ordinances and regulations that appeared to me
at the time to protect everyone involved. But after seeing the inability of ordinan-
ces to deal with auto auctions, steel mills, warehouses and now Alpha House reminds
me of the biblical verse ye blind guides,.which strain for a gnat and swallow a
camel". Certainly, the Planning Commission has enough rules and regulations to deal
with picky details, but when it comes to the big issues that truly affect the beauty
and protection of people, property and a great natural resource, Medicine Lake, the
Planning Commission appears powerless. Therefore, I again appeal to you to pass
ordinances that do as much for the shoreline and land surrounding the lake as the DNR
is doing to protect the quality of the lake. To continue your present course of
action and to use old ordinances that have permitted previous planning blunders
should be corrected before the present City Administration builds another monument to
city government's nearsightedness and mismanagement.
I do not handle adversional issues well and it is against my basic nature to get
involved in this type of thing, but the City's previous disregard for the beauty and
proper use of Medicine Lake has lead me to conclude that I have a citizen's respon-
sibility to get involved. I started to appear at the public hearings, but I was so
appalled at the power plays that I felt I would get angry --something I did not want
to do in public! However, I hope this letter will express my position to you and,
hopefully, will help you realize what you are allowing to happen. Give the Planning
Commission power to protect our natural resources. Appoint Planning Commissioners
that can deal with big planning issues and direct the City Planners to look at issues
other than what is taught in elementary planning. I believe a visit by the City
Council to Medicine Lake will help you to understand and appreciate my concern.
Thank you for reading my letter.
Sincerely yours,
gimes L. Craig, M.D.
cc: E. F. (Bud) Robb, Hennepin County Commissioner
Randy Johnson, Hennepin County Commissioner
City of Plymouth Planning Staff
,:TL:-. %C�4—
11720 27th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
October 21, 1986
,.
The Honorable
Virgil Schneider ±alQy �8 ,
Plymouth City Council-
340OPlymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor Schneiders'
I understand the need for treatment centers such as Alpha House are
necessary. However, I do not feel that the choice of location for
this center is appropriate as so many children live in the vicinity
of the proporsed site. There is also a liquor store within walking
distance of the proposed site and this would be quite a temptation
for the residents who are chemically dependent.
If you have small children or have neices or nephews who are young.
would you want the Alpha House to be in YOUR neighborhood?????????
I hope that you can give yourself, and us, an honest gnswer to that
question.
Sincerely,
Mr. and Mrs. David A. Mesley /�
986! Sr ADAM
ON •-�, _ ��
(F
an r - SC/%ls,s, 6ra5,
�,�ieb
x ' :AN
ee,
oIAJ►.
ou
. 1
All
ela..v O�
47
OWA
17
M 1 ti
VF
"
A
aarsel P.b.
.1�"i3:eflY.�i.-. vIIiaro -•� ���•..,asi:Y �'ra.a,n.>....w�� .. �f �, �..��•A ,b'.w kw::wTf'•- 4 ��.. -
I INDA BURANt-'N
545-8172
w
�, �___ �t = ,ogre --
�
.WdU W
dipenanme
By Sam
ral.Hu .,rt UMphrey-
anda cochairmen
j, St.. Paul
.task fore
'jil 7 -.Were press confere Three Minnesota
;counties -Ip4rsdjy�loy��o
experiment with
allowing certain sexual qjr,
:PkY4iclkl lithe: document'
sanly'minority%re-
child abusers to ayoJd.cnMu1ju pen._-.. port,'- Hennepin County; Attorney
ally by.coaf
=.ingand to tIP910-Thomas'-4ohnson objected to two of
_treatments the .three ro
eWriments. . He -
T_ 4. said the bulk,of task force testimony
sed--prosecV000, 'pot diversion,
gt#g.� _tre4Went.'-and ..�prgveating as the -preferred method. of dealing
e`;bk-4ti.eopI6.r' h- Harm, $b
users: with'
;
kirm th-
7;� ;'their :Qin Ov users-�'.'W�,SbOul;l stay the
be said:
*-
the"' Attorney-4enerai's -,Xa k -, Force ,
I Ahe'.view ,of a
A4' roport.OPPorts'
-_oi 611d Abuie,.Wjtbii� We'y-
-ng -pub I
;.:-number 91 � C and:private -off!
1!1* ,
k'---�:Two��: Ot', thi-iountllw:milj*'!, 14d%-,: claW' including ipf Justice Douglas
.Anoka,'.-4rNq' In th , e'.Twfn,CiiUs`
Imetro=- dahl at reme Couch
in th�.Twfn'CitWS4ne.t.r6, .AmdaW a - the�state S
_polit"_ . I . -, t - , _:.
n
.toa)Is a yuVra..l �qut4prncounr -
Abg
oo'contnued on7,page'5A
•
with poss
ible dismimlafter succi
ful treatment,�q
Abuse. it Continued from'pago
sen
4�sj
cycle of nesotans.-M The tasl( foic�."ciiie
d others III " e�r.' National 'Cl
'He,an ; ers studying.,,C, a6use"�.the -Ab
61 after
th
prevention.concluded more al)',4A,�',"*be"�WnUng,,to�coasideF,experirdo!ttal,,.MO(I eO., Hui
' . ' - - W. ra , :,! -,-Advacacy, Center,��W.•
year-alp-that,Oxcei) .4 g te�jn �dren's
.;extremf vllle,-Aia:,�tkiaj -would -houkL vari
. eonfe sses .aql
d'r - ncludin&law enfor
pro:
cageCan abuser.w o Z. fessionals -1.
.As able.and willing 'Wbi"Ardi4t, 7 't services, p;osecull
Msi human'.
ow WO) and,mental4hialth.Ao decide. ho%A
offamli To be 410bje; 4ibu�, 7 1, i 4rt_,
_y abuse
penalties: A*Uow 1�pmefia-. !i I 1P
eis Mould. aye
That 1 group ,concluded that abusers- r hie to;treatment, andz willft'to'
s-spe Y
all .trained
alcl
'
would bi morillikelY Wask llorhelp.?.gull
child development interview c
or'others would more -.likely report-,-�, dren.-W rooms -designed �to appea
them, if the:abusers-could'aVold pub�- Here- 18'4� SuMmaTY-Of the .-three7ex
p k Y� I re6 fereat',ages," the
Chi
per d of A f
rt'- sai&", VV.ideotapft'--•is avail,:
ptlsoo:aod famll _q-
0'
force
g,is,*0t:to a m
�i- mu -Interview
JohnsoW' and,tothers _Jnd4tbaKyW_ ..;AJ ;�F the Onowi�k
Ifig'6tal he.
caW,chiIdabqsp,bidgd ly 9�;P,
-ot;tre
should :no:more ,e=Pe--prOsecu-9�u-,•,., W progr4mls be
tsf:, 'era _Ai
a6 41IM7 Ir ou
n
_"V hlfd,e� e
Thefasu $fdWl Im I V I
'I IN
- uld -e�
COU'atiqsShowk MP , Z, I . .1, -4 T provioers sp ' o
pilot
iiiiijlti� 0,
V _k 0 W-', st'L91
-
o4c
3110 d;,the- � Ous
e e, ,familial as4 diagn(
County'' attorney, was'ionc6mmittal agreeMentw':'-'
0 rmircov"e- by'he
_kO C -lorcesaid.- It
ta__ WaeAttorieY_.
yesterd6V: Da Man
Robe.rt*4 d'--the.4'a
�W,- N 00
r01140'Pald'114P1 �Mf,--aou u uldV44ef-treatment
1,,insureq
01
allow victims
_,elrnployers should force yedtk"Y�tba�-+'e�_
Jpyenll
eat
getting b&k-W*effi id 00'•jobs N,
0-il
"CO14SA
ln;e X
_5L, *naities,
futur
Doug-RdW.COU100t,
ceedings*ge'i
�t-4t 1cfaily are',zioW, pubU4 e;jr
n - - I., . - j
commo t:
scrutiny).
y
,Proceedings jOuld-66-Vid
.4V:HUPlihri '.1ast
countlepowere 410 "ffeadep�ooui,4-ad- SOPU=1.
The three ,D7 the Unive
taPed'd- - - - for,
jingtjullf undiroathbefore a judge., 'Minneapolis
lief that they �.w .�op-Minnosotai-eandf
the,be
W4, ze".
-because the P.
to pirimenf�AnA
el
ex d": Th W -f 34iw 4
'j&'�io'.re le;
WWII A
resented jmeLropolli
Y, id=j
drurt -an
la,atti` i�
I , . a t,,_ T
couvtj4J*d�Ra 6iJ4 0 'M ere'shou
t'iof H L
ISF
task fdrj�pree Idelines
=p Sg
0
f�.wltnesses
f.jkli the propos; n
'Irij, --' .sw n
a tall. jamilpab*,110 P.6 on
bis )P4;iQrity4;N U. t the
e
i,16 - ...
U' 66ai' COM -"Qr ild-abm4ectio
ombudsman to PlafPts" I action to a.
about the child-protectioU system ' successful treatment. withhold ac- , ry AbortstaVj,4..Joseph said
and increased use -of team AMAN-,.,.i..ceptancg.ofithe :guilty ,,PI -P 4_1
.iatv 'nf nr�ffmqlonals to'declde;� 'tfie-offendee7on;16hk,-tb . pro0atio v-
Oj 'gui
a
or d. -del,
,
�+�an, -.I -_n
By Paul Levy �thdh
Staff W ' .
Write .
Partin of Public Safe terBrYPolat,an.. Dr. fieItKS ..
molesters to Beaver, '
Child are; eve �iatry and d 1. a professor "of psy. Syst- Basta%pod�i they
fear; They be, ne ry parent'sal.ectOr of fhe Behavior- .. M e told theyrre suI •said.
. uncles. coos.Medlctne
teachers o st,:,, I, a En I-aboratory. at the : � 4`that /t' : ply to
�. $Cho.I,Cine,._Q '' ilaiversity .School the $, °�'
outlined the �! MedJ.' Denson whs s abY ,to' report
sexab usipg th
Last week 2''Drofesstoruaj to thepar4cipants at the conferenlem .'Maybe they don't A ' `
who deal with V orAut of rePortoutoti
Children the People _Accor respect lora ear, .
met at Breezy abuse of Abel feel .cjose relative the
to be Point to but 'Who
Y
lines or to develop statewide ' �E1gh4'fJv ' , ll 1ust.the same. Or ah�°g
dealing with Guide- ` liras are. C Percent ot;�USe.. lust don t nIId maybe they
The unique the Problem,, bQ� Usuai ti'l�'' be end that s
was three-day confer SomCone-;.the: lY.: ihC'-tipy �$gO�pl40d; gime y�
called project Im encs Rare � Offender`
8u�elin dls uce/ ming 10 develoP�he m P odd F� male, nders ` almost always
A8 the ne y 15
xt two years. than aon Y svBhtJ ly begin moj Ys
abused vicUmss t neat d the sexual, .... lett often start of a yob age .
Minnesota is a leader in dealin tteated at th
the sexual abuse west Children's` a Mid "' s:r
Project Im °f childre 8 with , the Children's ReSt)uTCe Center at �1A�rnews�vfth more then
Pact may n, and accordln hospital in St. - offenders .Indust 500 sex
el for other stat y become a mod. Sandra g to staff child PsycholW� have• a preterencetllor 8 offenders
comm' �, said Paul Uchida, Hewitt 81St But 011e
commissioner of the Minnesota rade reel ' Year-0lds
,In thislnstchUdren of Y show
country, lads' don't swatch -., t#nY age. _
AbWe
4t!e4 aapa8e'12B
;e Cnatinued from page IB
iders Giros&, -alt socjo-eco--:
An offender averages .3.6 types of ing." , The root of .the -problem is We of
ps. Abel hp4 studied sex
sex crimes. .. - - - , . . ;i. .; . ;�.' fender and ,that of may be
��
New Vbrk City, Atlanta
Seeds for Project Impact were'plant , committing a' variety of crimes,"
granting anonymity to
IN Sex offenders do not believe+in':'' ed in 1983 — before the:_Children's• Abel do ;we do? Loci;
'is,
or their. cooperation. In
.said:"'What.
casual one-time interests, studies and, Theatre, and Jordan `scandals„that..::.them c up?, Many offenders serve
ork City study, the male
interviews showed. A young female-. shocked Minnesotans: Much; of 'Oe - _their time',and then move to :other
iterviewed came within a
victim is molested in one. form or.`,; state. was oblivious to or close. to..
duplicating the city's ra--
_states.”
another an average of 23 times..A `-..ignore child abuse within or outside:.
inic: makeup. The offend-.
young male victim is molested an-.-. :the family. before- the. -Scott County ",While' the professionals working with
i all shapes.and sizes -and
average of 360 times cases. -made national headlines.,. Project Impact' consider how and
very possible educational . •'
_ ::" how. uiuc6:effort and expense is to
"These are big numbers," Abel said ' don't think that kind of publicity. _. be put'inioahe treatment of offend
•
"These surveys, obviously, were not ` was good," said Anoka County'Judge ers,•Abel'"miggests that young people
xoffenders'wbo'admitted
`percent
done in Minnesota. I'm not certain -`,Lynn Olson, who headed the gover-,;.,"learn at an early .'age what is and
young boys, 40 ,
that matters. It may be the environ-,.._ nor -appointed . three -person. -inquiry _<: isn't appropriate sexual behavior.
were abused themselves .:ment
is a powerful influence on devi `., panel concerning.'the, conduct;of;- .
Were young. Of the -sex -.'
Scott
ant behavior.I doubt it. I don't see ;,Scott County attorney•Kathieeq`Mor :'' -'sexual behavior is a learned behav-
who admitted molesting ..:
any evidence ,that, environment is ; during the.Jordan hearings. -"But ' ior," Abel 'said. "It 4s not genetic.
s, 20 percent said they
going to have much affect op arous-' • it did bring -things ou is the open."'? Your: drive- is ' hormonically Gon-
d themselves as children.
al:. `trolled; but' not what you do or
-
'Project
; After the -Jordan hearings, there was .. Choose.. The things you- get involved
iders often commit a mul
Impact? was made ' possible :.: a decrease in caseloads at the -Coil 1 with over time; have. a tremendous
Imes. In one study of 208, '
by a $980,000 federal grant through dren's..Hospit4 iiewitt said' :This.; impact.. :.
vho molested young girls, .�
the Justice Assistants Acts and anoth-': spring, 7 the reported number of- incl ; " • ,
admitted to raping adult',
er $800,000 in federal money expect-.',, dents reached- an all-time high, -;she J.-, "You just talk about sex. The current
percent admitted being
'
ed for next year. Project Impact has said ' ''_system of education is to not talk
its and 38 percent. admit-
":
,�,�
brought together social workers, at °- ' c -V. 3 -- about it. Children need to be taught
sting young boys. ''
torneys, therapists, government offs 14'Times ' are changing," -Olson said, that .the' use of sadomasochism is
cials, judges and physicians. Togeths noting, that - people ", :are "no -° longer ; harmful."
study of 146 men who
er, these professionals hope to better -. ,afraid to discuss. a problem 'once
nolested boys, 52 percent
develop a system of rehabilitating only spoken of in -whispered ,hushes. Ftnaliy in order.to get young people
"to
Iris outside .the home, 11 •
offenders 'while better protecting But,- Olson cautioned, "If Minnesota" report offenders, the act of report-
,olested girls within. the
Minnesota's most precious resource: is at the forefront of handling child . Ing must be presented, as a positive
percent were rapists and
children. sexpal abuse, then heaven hWP4he , thing.:.;
exhibitionists.
countrv." .
IV -.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
November 25, 1986 MEMO
DATE:
Blair Tremere, Community Development Director
TO:
Joe Ryan, Building Official qmo—
FROM:
12006 SUNSET TRAIL NORTH (BENJAMIN & AUDREY BAMBENEK)
SUBJECT
On Friday, November 21st I met with Mr. Bob Frakes who contacted Councilmember Zitur
regarding the proposed addition and building permit application for this property.
Mr. Frakes is a personal friend and is acting as a consultant for the property owner.
The general contractor is a firm named Preimesberger Construction. The owner is Mr.
Rodney Preimesberger.
The proposed addition involves the construction of a 24 x 24 foot attached tuckunder
garage with a 12 x 24 foot porch and a 12- x 24 foot deck over the garage.
The existing house is located approximately 26 feet from the easterly side property
line. The addition of the proposed structure would result in a side yard setback of
approximately three to four feet.
I informed Mr. Frakes that in order to construct such an addition, the property owner
would need to obtain approval from the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals. I
provided Mr. Frakes with a variance application form and referenced the materials
required in order to process such an application.
Mr. Frakes asked for my opinion if such a request were to be submitted. I indicated
that as a member of staff, I would recommend denial as there are other alternatives
which could be pursued to construct this addition without the need to require a
variance.
I also informed Mr. Frakes that in order for our office to process a variance request,
the application materials would need to be submitted to us by noon on Monday, November
24, 1986.
On Monday morning November 21, 1986 Mr. Frakes submitted the application materials
required for us to process the variance request. This request will be on the next Board
of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals meeting of December 9, 1986. The proposed addition
has been modified to reflect construction of a 20 x 24 foot tuck under garage with a
family room over.
The proposed variance is for a 5 foot 8 inch encroachment into the required side yard
setback of 15 feet.
Please contact me should you have further questions.
MUNICIPAL
4 IL( LEGISLATI`(77E
COMMISSION
November/December 1986
ELECTION ISSUE
• MLC City Elections, pages 2-3
• Other Election Issues, page 3
• New MLC Mayors, page 4
• New MLC City Council Members, pages 5-6
• Two New MLC State Senators, page 7
Vol. III, No. 6
• Two New MLC State Representatives, page 8
• 1987-88 Senate and House Membership, page 9
• MLC Elects New Secretary -Treasurer, page 9
• Non -Election MLC Personnel Changes, page 10
• Brooklyn Park Computerized Elections, page 11
MUNICIPAL.
LFGISLATTVE
COMMISSION
MLC CITY ELECTIONS
Page 2
Six of the 15 cities that are members of the Municipal Legislative
Commission (MLC) held their municipal elections on November 4. These
cities were Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple
Grove and Woodbury. The information below highlights the results of
these municipal elections.
Brooklyn Park
Council Member Doug Pearson defeated John McCluskey 3,325 to 1,180
for a two-year term. Incumbents Council Members Bill Dix and Erick
Engh were unopposed and were reelected to serve two-year terms.
Burnsville
Daniel C. McElroy, ran unopposed for Burnsville's mayoral seat and
will replace Mayor Connie Morrison, who was elected to the Minnesota
House of Representatives. Incumbent Council Members Ken Wolf and
Bernard Peroz, ran uncontested and were reelected to serve four-year
terms. In a special election for a two-year council seat, Glenn
McKee defeated Anthony Razzini, 4,394 to 3,562.
Eden Prairie
Mayor Gary D. Peterson defeated Gerry Hegge for a second two-year
term, 5,342 to 2,135. Council Member Dick Anderson with 4,025 votes,
and Jean Harris, with 3,974 votes, won four-year city council
terms. Defeated were Doug Reuter, 3,553 votes; Curt Connaughty,
1,033; and Dick Sentz, 721. Incumbent Council Member Paul Redpath
did not file for reelection.
Edina
Council Member Fred Richards, with 6,605 votes; and Glenn Smith, with
5,917 votes, were elected for four-year terms. They defeated John
Senior, Jr. and Robert Bell, who had 5,655 and 3,081 votes, respec-
tively. Incumbent Council Member Charles Bredesen III did not file
for reelection.
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
MLC City Elections (continued)
Maple Grove
Two -term Mayor James Deane defeated his challenge
Member Chuck. Dehn for the city's first four-year
Deane received 4,857 votes to Dehn's 2,956. Dehn
the Council.
Page 3
r City Council
mayoral term.
will remain on
Incumbent Council Members David Burtness, with 3,324 votes, and Donna
Ryon, with 2,848 votes, won four-year terms. Defeated were John
Benber, 732; Donald Lucas, 2,316; Helen Baker, 1,962; Theresa Buschs,
1,949; and Michael Borgie, 828.
Woodbury
Mayor Dan Guider,
mayor to serve
Frances Moore and
to serve four-year
Jr., ran unopposed and was reelected as Woodbury's
a two-year term. Incumbent Council Members
Lloyd Scheel, ran unopposed and were reelected
terms.
OTHER ELECTION ISSUES
The City of Bloomington was the only MLC city that had a referendum
issue on the ballot this year. The Bloomington residents overwhelm-
ingly rejected a pay raise for their mayor and six city council
members. 15,106 residents voted against a pay raise for their city
officials, while only 7,791 residents voted yes.
Bloomington also overwhelmingly voted to prohibit City Council
Members from working for another city agency. Bloomington residents
voted in favor of adding the prohibition to the city charter, by a
vote of 18,624 to 3,611.
MUNICIPAL Page 4
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
NEW MLC MAYORS
Burnsville
Daniel McElroy
12805 Welcome Lane 941-5400 (o)
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 894-3800 (h)
Occupation: Business Owner, Travel Professionals, Inc., Burnsville,
with branch offices in Eden Prairie, Wayzata, Downtown
Minneapolis and St. Paul
Education: Notre Dame, B.A. in History
Government: Burnsville City Council Member, 1982-86
Member, Burnsville City Chart Commission, 1982-86
Organizations: Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce
Member, Burnsville Rotary Club
1?ncnvi 1 1 a
The Roseville City Council appointed Donn Wiski as Mayor of Roseville
at a City Council Meeting held on Monday, November 17. Wiski fills
the seat that was vacated when former Roseville Mayor June Demos
resigned effective September 30.
Donn Wiski
2714 MacKubin Street
Roseville, Minnesota 55113 482-0546 (h)
Occupation: Development Consultant, Resolutions, Inc., Roseville
Former Director, Research and Planning Department,
Duluth, 1968-72
Education: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, M.A.
Public Administration
Macalester, B.A. in Political Science
Government: Member, Roseville Planning Commission, 1983-86
Organizations: Member, Citizens League
Member, Minneapolis Downtown Council
Member, Institute of Transportation Engineers
Member, Urban Land Institute
MUNICIPAL
LBGISLAT VE
COMMISSION
NEW MLC_ CITY_ COUNCIL MEMBERS
Burnsville
Page 5
Glenn McKee
13722 Heather Hills Drive 888-8450 (o)
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 431-2710 (h)
Occupation: President, Payroll General Corporation, Bloomington
Government: Member, Burnsville Planning Commission
Former Chairman, Burnsville Economic Development
Commission
Political: Precinct Delegate
House 38A Vice Chairman
Senate District 38 Resolutions Chairman
Organizations: Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce
Member, Burnsville Rotary
Former Chairman, Independent School District 191
Community Education Advisory Council
Former President, Burnsville Jaycees
Eden Prairie
Jean Harris, M.D.
10860 Forestview Circle 853-4334 (o)
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 829-0285 (h)
Occupation: Vice President, Business Development, Control Data,
1982 -present
Former Professor of Family Practice, Department of
Internal Medicine, University of Virginia,
Richmond, 1973-78
Former Associate Professor, Department of Community
Medicine, Howard University, 1960-72
Education: Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, M.D., 1955
Virginia Union University, Richmond,
B.S., Chemistry, 1951
MUNICIPU Page 6
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
New MLC Council Members (continued)
Eden Prairie Council Member Dr. Harris (continued)
Government: Eden Prairie Development Commission, 1986
Secretary of Human Resources, Commonwealth of
Virginia, Richmond, 1978-82
Member, President Reagan's Private Sector
Initiative Task Force, 1981-82
Vice Chair, President Carter's Commission on Alcohol
and Alcohol -Related Diseases, 1980
Member, Executive Committee on Richmond
Renaissance, (public-private urban revitalization
and economic development committee)
Edina
Glenn L. Smith
5717 Susan Avenue 944-8190 (o)
Edina, Minnesota 55435 941-6767 (h)
Occupation: President, Video Training Resources, Inc., Edina,
which provides video tapes for industrial, vocational
and paramedic training
Former Chief Legal and Financial Officer of a farm
equipment manufacturer
Education: William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
St. Cloud State University, B.S.
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, A.A.
Political: IR Precinct Chairman
Caucus Convener
Fundraiser
Organizations: Member, Edina Foundation Board
Member, Edina Historical Society Board
Former Member, Edina Park Board
Former Member, Association of Metropolitan School
Districts
Former Member, Edina School Board
Former Member, Hennepin Technical Center Board
Former PTA President, Concord Elementary School
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLAnVE
COMMISSION
TWO NEW MLC STATE SENATORS
Senator John Marty (DFL)
2478 Lydia Avenue West
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Page 7
633-8934 (h)
District 63 (Roseville)
Occupation: Research Consultant, J. Stamstad Associates
Former Grant Administrator for Lutheran
Brotherhood Foundation
Former Administrator of House Criminal Justice
Committee
Education: St. Olaf College, B.A. in Ethics
Organizations: Member, Citizens League
Member, League of Women Voters
Member, Sierra Club
Senator James Metzen (DFL)
312 Deerwood Court 451-2133 (o)
South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 451-0174 (h)
District 39 (Inver Grove Heights)
Occupation: Banking/Real Estate
Education: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, A.A.
Government: Served in the Minnesota House of Representatives for
12 years. During the 1985-86 Session he served on
the following committees: Appropriations --
Agriculture, Transportation and Semi -State Division;
Financial Institutions/Insurance; General
Legislation/Veterans Affairs
South St. Paul City Council Member, 1968-74
Organizations: Member, Dakota County Family Service Board
Member, Southview Acres Health Advisory Board
Member, Inver Grove Heights/South St. Paul Chamber of
Commerce
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
TWO NEW MLC STATE REPRESENTATIVES
Representative Robert P. Milbert (DFL)
308 Deerwood Court
South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 451-6188 (h)
District 39B (Inver Grove Heights)
Occupation: Controller, Milbert Company
Education: Dartmouth College, 1971
Government: Member, South St. Paul City Council since 1975
Member, Mayor's Development Action Team
Organizations: Member, South St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
Board Member, Small Business Investment Corporation
Representative Connie Morrison (IR)
909 West 155th Street 435-3030 (o)
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 435-7647 (h)
District 38A (Burnsville)
Occupation: Realtor, Merrill Lynch
Education: Normandale Community College, A.A.
Government: Mayor of Burnsville, 1983-86
Council Member of Burnsville, 1977-83
Organizations: Board Member, United Way
Board Member, League of Minnesota Cities
Advisory Board Member, Metropolitan Council Chair
Member, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
Member, Burnsville Chamber of Commerce
Former Chair, Municipal Legislative Commission
MUNICIPAL Page 9
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
1987-88 SENATE AND HOUSE MEMBERSHIP
It was an election year for DFLers. Governor Rudy Perpich was
reelected with a 57-43 percentage margin. DFLers retained control of
the Minnesota Senate increasing their majority by four seats to hold
a 47-20 margin. In the Minnesota House of Representatives, the IRs
lost 18 seats and control of the House. The new DFL majority is
83-50.* In the legislative races, no DFL incumbent was defeated.
Of the 18 seats lost by IRs in the House, nine were in office for
only one term having been elected in 1984, and 14 were from outside
the seven -county non -metropolitan area.
Leadership in the Senate will remain with Senator Roger Moe as
Majority Leader, and Senator Glen Taylor as Minority Leader. In the
House, Democrats have chosen Representative Fred Norton as Speaker,
and Representative Bob Vanasek as Majority Leader. Republicans have
elected former Tax Committee Chairman, Bill Schreioer, as Minority
Leader.
MLC ELECTS NEW SECRETARY -TREASURER
The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Board of Directors met on
Wednesday, October 29 and unanimously elected Mark Sather as MLC's
new Secretary -Treasurer.
Sather is White Bear Lake's City Manager and can be reached at:
White Bear Lake City Hall
4700 Miller Avenue
White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110
(6 12) 429-8526
Sather was elected to fill Gary Dickson's unexpired term, effective
November 1.
* A Special Flection will be held before the Session reconvenes on
January 6, 1987, to fill the vacancy that has occurred due to the
death of IR Representative Ben Omann.
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
NON -.ELECTION MLC PERSONNEL CHANGES
Maplewood
Page 10
Ken Haider will be serving as the acting city manager of Maplewood
while the City of Maplewood is in the process of conducting a
nationwide search for a new manager to fill the position vacated by
Don Lais at the beginning of November. Haider has served as acting
city manager a previous time while the City of Maplewood was in the
processing of hiring a manager in 1985.
In addition to handling the responsibilities of city manager, Haider,
is also continuing to manage his regular duties as Maplewood's public
works and city engineer, a post he has held for the past eight years.
Haider received a degree in civil engineering from the University of
Minnesota in 1973.
The City of Maplewood has not yet set a deadline for filling this
position.
Shoreview
Shoreview's Director of Community Development, Mike Black, has been
named acting city manager for Shoreview and will retain his previous
duties while the city conducts a nationwide search for a city manager
to fill the position which was previously held by Gary Dickson.
Black has worked as City Planner for Shoreview since February 1979
until January 1983, when he was named Shoreview's Director of
Community Development. Prior to his employment with the City of
Shoreview, he was the Assistant City Planner for Cottage Grove and
worked there from 1975-79.
Black received his Bachelors of Science Degree in Urban Studies from
Mankato State University in 1973.
Black indicated that the City of Shoreview plans to conduct an
intensive job search for a candidate over the next couple of
months. Black said the city hopes to make their final decision and
hire a new city manager some time after February.
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
Page 11
BROOKLYN PARK COMPUTERIZED ELECTIONS
Brooklyn Park was selected by the Secretary of State's Office as a
test site for a new computerized voting system for the primary and
general elections. This was the first time in the nation that this
computer system, Optech III, was used in a citywide election.
Brooklyn Park first tested this system in the Primary Election in
September and found that they were able to obtain a hard copy of the
election results 14 minutes after the polls closed at 8:00 p.m. In
the General Election, Brooklyn Park had the final election results at
8:19 p.m. The efficiency of this new computerized system compares
drastically with Brooklyn Park's previous system which had election
results available between approximately midnight and 2 a.m.
Using the Optech III, the voter takes a ballot, marks it accordingly
and feeds it into an electronic ballot box which records the
information on a cassette -like disc. After the polls close, this
disc is brought into city hall where it is fed into a computer which
automatically reads the votes and provides the election judges with a
hard copy of the results.
The obvious advantage of this system is an early return and the
ability to provide an immediate hard copy of the election results.
This system also makes it easier to recount votes. Another advantage
of this system is that the voter is prevented from voting incorrect-
ly, and inadvertently invalidating their vote. Any ballots that are
improperly marked are immediately returned to the voter with
instructions to correct the error which eliminates invalidated
ballots. This was illustrated in the Primary Election, when many
votes would have been disqualified due to incorrect cross-over
voting. This system gave the voter the opportunity to correct their
error and recast their vote. The only case where this wasn't
effective was with absentee ballots. At this point, the only
disadvantage that can be determined is the time that will be required
to educate the public and the election judges on how the system
operates.
While the state has not made any final decisions to use Optech III,
it is hoped that this system will be installed in many communities in
time for the 1988 Elections. The cost of installing this computer
would be approximately $4,167, plus the cost of ancillary equipment,
which would bring the total cost estimate to between $4,400 and
$4,500 per precinct.
(MUNICIPAI,
LEGISLATI\7E
COMMISSION
MLC SCHEDULES LEGISLATIVE DINNER
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21
On Wednesday, October 29, the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC)
Board of Directors met and decided to schedule their Annual MLC
Legislative Dinner for Wednesday, January 21, 1987.
The MLC legislative delegation (15 Senators and 22 Representatives),
the MLC mayors, council members and city managers will be invited to
attend this event.
A Reception will be held at 6:15 p.m., to be followed by a Dinner at
7:00 p.m. and a guest speaker at 8:00 p.m. The MLC Legislative
Dinner has been scheduled at the Decathlon Club in Bloomington.
Please mark this date on your calendar.
Update is the official newsletter of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC).
Its primary audience is the 37 legislators that comprise the MLC Legislative
delegation. Its purpose is to inform legislators of the issues and events of
importance to the 15 MLC cities. Update is published monthly during the
Legislative Session, and bimonthly during the interim.