HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 08-22-1986CITY OF
PLYMOUTF+
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. COUNCIL/STAFF DINNER MEETING -- Monday, August 25, 6:00 p.m. A
Council/staff dinner meeting will be held in the City Council
conference room. An agenda for the dinner meeting is included
separately.
2. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, August 25, 7:30 p.m. Special
City Council meeting in City Council Chambers.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, August 27, 7:30 p.m. The Planning
Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda
attached. (M-3)
4. BUDGET STUDY SESSIONS -- The time table proposed for review and
adoption of the City's 1987-1988 budgets is as follows:
Tuesday, September 2 - Budget Study Session I - 7:30 p.m. Council
Conference Room.
Tuesday, September 9 - Budget Study Session II - 8:05 p.m.
Lunchroom
Monday, September 15 - Budget Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m. City
Council Chambers.
Monday, September 22 - Budget Study Session III - 7:30 p.m.
Council Conference Room
Monday, October 6 - Formally adopt 1987 Budgets, set 1987 Tax
Levy, preliminarly adopt 1988 budgets, and
1987-1991 Capital Improvement Program -
7:30 p.m. Council Chambers
5. RECEPTION FOR DR. DAVID LANDSWERK -- A welcoming reception for Dr.
David andswerk will be heldhursday, September 4 from 7:00 p.m. to
8:30 p.m. at the Wayzata Senior High School. A copy of the
invitation from the Wayzata School Board and the Parent-Teacher
Liaison Council is attached. (M-5)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
Page two
6. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES REGIONAL MEETING -- A Regional Meeting of
the League of Minnesota Cities is scheduled for Wednesday, September
17 at the Medina Ballroom. The meeting will begin at 2:30 p.m. with
status reports from LMC Legislative Committees and discussions on
insurance issues. Following the afternoon program, a Table Talk
session will be held at which representatives from various Minnesota
state agencies will be available to answer questions from City
officials. Dinner will begin at 6:30 p.m., with a meeting following
to discuss the League's 1987 legislative policies. Attached is a
packet of information received from the League on the meeting. If
any member of the Council desires to attend, please contact Laurie
in order that reservations may be made. (M-6)
7. REVISED CALENDARS -- Revised meeting calendars for the months of
August, eptem er and October are attached. (M-7)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION....
1. DOWNTOWN PLYMOUTH - SUPER VALU PROPERTY -- Tuesday I called Mr. Vern
erggren of Super Valu to inquire if there had been any further
discussions about the development of their property. Mr. Berggren
informed me that there have been no further discussions and that he
did not anticipate any development on this site in 1986. He
indicated that if development activity were to occur, it would be
the Spring of 1987 at the earliest.
2. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE TRAINING FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS & COMMISSIONERS
-- Clayton Lerevere of the LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, 0'97177 -5-7
Drawz office, has expressed a willingness to provide training to
Council and Commission members on the fundamentals of parliamentary
procedure for effective public meetings. Mr. LeFevere has previous-
ly taught courses on this subject. The intent of the course is to
help Council and Commission members use parliamentary procedure as
an effective time management tool at public meetings. The course
would consist of three parts as follows: 1) fundamentals of parlia-
mentary procedure; 2) real world examples and role playing; and 3) a
question/answer session. Mr. LeFevere suggested that this overview
course would require approximately one and one-half hour. Each
participant in the course would receive a copy of "Parliamentary Law
at a Glance", which is handy reference document for Council and
Commission members. It is suggested that this course be scheduled
for either October 6 or October 14 (see October calendar). Dinner
would be scheduled from 5:30 to 6:00 p.m., with the course from 6:00
to 7:30 p.m. Council direction regarding course content, time and
date is requested. Following receipt of Council input, we will
finalize plans for this workshop. I would anticipate that if
invitations are extended to all Council and Commission members and
staff working directly with each, the total number of persons
invited would be thirty-five.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
Page three
3. PLYMOUTH METROLINK - JULY REPORT -- Shown below is a table
displaying our average daily ridership for the commuter/reverse
commuter, internal circulator and total system for each week of
July. The second table displays the year to date averages in each
service area compared with the target which we must achieve in order
to have a successful project.
MONTHLY
PLYMOUTH METROLINK
DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY WEEK BY SERVICE TYPE
JULY 1986
Total
System
SERVICE TYPE
Commuter/
Internal
Total
TARGET
337
Reverse Commuter
Circulator
System
WEEK OF:
- 9%
+ .3%
7/1 - 7/5
299
61
360
7/6 - 7/12
340
58
398
7/13 - 7/19
332
66
398
7/20 - 7/26
344
54
398
7/27 - 7/31
322
73
395
-----------------
MONTH LONG
------------------
-------------
----------------
AVERAGE
328
62
390
YEAR TO DATE
Item
Commuter/
Reverse Commuter
Internal
Circulator
Total
System
YEAR TO DATE
RIDERSHIP AVERAGE1
343
51
394
TARGET
337
56
393
% OVER/(UNDER)
TARGET
+ 1.8%
- 9%
+ .3%
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
Page four
A number of observations are in order:
1. Internal circulator ridership continues strong following June's
excellent performance with an average daily ridership of 62,
which is above the 52 passenger per day average established in
July 1985. Vacationing school students continue to use the
service.
2. The commuter/reverse commuter portion of the service slipped in
July with an average of 328 persons per day, which is above the
297 posted in July 1985. The months of July and August are
normally the worst months for this service.
3. In terms of our system -wide ridership target of 393 passengers
per day, we remain slightly above our goal by one at 394
passengers per day.
DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY
MONTH
FOR CALENDAR
YEARS
1984 -
1986
SERVICE
TYPE
Commuter/
Internal
Total
Reverse Commuter
Circulator
System
MONTH:
1984
1985
1986
1984
1985
1986
1984
1985
1986
January
330
307
351
21
51
40
351
358
391
February
310
292
350
25
50
47
335
342
394
March
307
311
338
25
56
64
332
367
402
April
301
295
354
27
55
44
331
350
398
May
295
298
332
27
36
35
322
334
367
June
276
314
349
41
53
64
317
367
413
July
277
297
328
42
52
62
319
349
390
August
266
292
47
57
313
349
September
275
322
32
42
307
364
October
276
312
36
55
312
367
November
271
311
35
57
306
368
December
265
320
39
52
304
372
--------------
YEAR LONG
------------------
------------------
--------------------
AVERAGE
287
306
343
36
51
51
321
357
394
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
Page five
4. BUILDING INSPECTION NEWSLETTER -- Attached is a copy of our third
Building Inspection newsletter—. The newsletter will be distributed
to approximately 150 building contractors who have performed work
within the City during the last twelve months. The newsletter
represents our continuing efforts to promote communications between
the City and builders in our community. (I-4)
5. MINUTES -- The following minutes are attched:
a. Planning Commission, August 13, 1986 (I -5a)
b. Park and Recreation Advisory Commission, August 14, 1986 (I -5b)
c. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, July 17, 1986 (I -5c)
6. PARKER'S LAKE PROPERTY -- The attached article entitled, "Big Plans
for Plymouth", is taken from the August issue of the Minnesota Real
Estate Journal. The article focuses on United Properties proposed
development plans for the Parker's Lake site currently owned by the
City of Minneapolis. (I-6)
7. BOAT USE RESTRICTIONS -- Attached is a letter from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources defining local restrictions on boat
use. According to the DNR, any restriction placed on the surface
use of public waters after January 1, 1975, must have the approval
of the Commissioner of Natural Resources. Restrictions enacted
prior to January 1, 1975, are "grandfathered" unless they have been
amended.
With regard to restrictions at launch ramps, because of an amendment
to State Statute 378 by the 1986 Legislature, any restrictions on
the type and sizes of boats or the horsepower of motors at launch
ramps, are now invalid as of March 26, 1986.
The DNR encourages cities to contact their office before drafting
any ordinance dealing with boat restrictions on public waters.
(I-7)
8. BOND NEWSLETTER -- The August bond newsletter from Ehlers and
Associates is attached for your information. (I-8)
9. COUNCIL FOLLOW UPS:
a. Plumbing Inspections -- Attached is a memorandum from Council -
member Zitur to the City Manager regarding a complaint he
received from Cordell Johnston, Plymouth Plumbing Company, Inc.,
on the City's plumbing inspection process. Also included is a
response from Joe Ryan, Building Official, to the memo. In
addition, I have been informed by Joe that he has contacted Mr.
Johnston to schedule a meeting to discuss his concerns more
specifically. (I -9a)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1986
Page six
b. Community Improvement Reminder Cards -- In response to a com-
munity improvement reminder card submitted by Councilmember
Zitur regarding traffic problems at Balsam Lane and 47th Avenue,
a traffic enforcement study was conducted by the Public Safety
Department on August 15 and August 18. Traffic problems noted
by Councilmember Zitur included speeding on 47th Avenue and
vehicles not stopping for the stop sign at Balsam and 47th
Avenue. The results of the study are attached for your infor-
mation. (I -9b)
c. Barking Dogs Complaint -- Attached is a letter from Mr. Melvin
alarri,1304 West Medicine Lake Drive, to Mayor Schneider,
requesting the Council consider amending the City Code with
respect to barking dogs. Mr. Harris' letter has been forwarded
to Dick Carlquist for investigation and response. A copy of
Dick's response will be provided to the Council when available.
(I-90
10. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter from DuWayne Kasma of Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and
Associates, for the Council's consideration of their firm for
consulting engineering services for water system improvements.
(I -10a)
b. Letter from Peter Meintsma, Chairman of the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission, providing information on the City's 1985
Final Cost Allocation and 1986 and 1987 Statement of Charges for
interceptor and treatment works use. (I -10b)
c. Letter to U.S. Representative Gerry Sikorski, from Frank Boyles,
requesting his support for an amendment to HR 5225 (risk reten-
tion legislation) which would expand the definition of risk
retention groups to include municipal risk retention groups.
(I -10c)
d. Letter of appreciation to City Manager from Daryl Clark, Board
Chairman for the Twin West Chamber of Commerce, for his support
during his tenure as Chairman. (I -10d)
e. Letter from Senator Roger Moe and Representative Douglas
Carlson, Co -Chairs for the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources, requesting comments on the evaluation study to be
undertaken on the management and organization of the Department
of Natural Resources. (I -10e)
f. Letter to City Manager from Dan Huschke, Recycling Coordinator
for Hennepin County, in response to City's comments on the
County's solid waste recycling ordinance. (I -10f)
g. Letter to City Manager from Steve Apfelbacher, Ehlers and
Associates, regarding comparison of similar sales to the August
18, 1986 bond sale. (I -10g)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1986
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on
the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Minutes, August 13, 1986
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Robert Sondag. Conditional Use Permit Amendment to construct a two-family
dwelling in R-2 Zoning District at 13300 33rd Avenue No. (86088)
B. St. Philip the Deacon Church. Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Amendment to
allow parking lot expansion at 17205 County Road 6. (86071)
C. Gerald Kaplan for Alpha Human Services Inc. Conditional Use Permit for the
operation of an institution in the R-3 Zoning District and a Site Plan for the
construction of a facility northwest of South Shore Drive and 11th Avenue No.
(86080)
D. Greg Begin, Begin Contracting Company. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and General
Development Plan for the development of property in the southeast corner of
County Road 9 and Xenium Lane. (86085)
E. Capital Improvement Program.
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. Robert and Laurel Scribner. Lot Consolidation and Variances for property at
2015 Lancaster Lane. (86098)
6. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
7. OTHER BUSINESS
None
8. ADJOURNMENT
10:30 P.M.
i
dos f to w recqfwsv
to mf" GOYH."
)fwrf�ay -f j
7:00ym
4,�,f��en�or �
671,11
ik fttulwll�l
league of minnesota cities
Regional Meeting Agenda
Afternoon Session
2:30 - 4:30 pm
1. Status Report of LMC Legislative Committees
2. Update on Insurance Issues
a. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
b. Tort Liability Changes
3. Question/Answer Session
Table Talk Session
5:00 - 6:30 pm
City officials will be able to visit with representatives
from the Department of Transportation, Department of Energy
and Economic Development, Department of Natural Resources,
Department of Health and the Pollution Control Agency.
Evening Program
6:30 - 9:30 pm
1. Dinner
2. Welcome by Host City
3. LMC President's Comments
4. City Policy Issues
5. Question/Answer Period
6. Brief Comments by Legislative Candidates
I
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (C 1 23 227-5600
All]
U league of minnesota cities
1986 Regional Meetings
Date
City
Site
City Contact Person
Tues., August 26
Stephen
American Legion
Daryl Nelson
(218) 478-3614
Wed., August 27
Gonvick
American Legion 41304
Linda Johnson
(218) 487-5243
Thurs., August 28
Detroit Lakes
Holiday Inn
Lynn Neitkze
(218) 847-5658
Tues., Sept. 2
Slayton
Royal Supper Club
Cathy Magnus
(507) 836-8534
Wed., Sept. 3
Redwood Falls
Donavon's Conference
Neil Ruddy
Center
(507) 637-5755
Thurs., Sept. 4
Eagle Lake
American Legion
Joanne Malinski
(507) 257-3218
Wed., Sept. 10
Morris
Sunwood Inn
Sandy Anderson
(612) 589-3141
Thurs., Sept. 11
Spicer
Safari South
Ardyce Hegstrom
(612) 796-5562
Tues., Sept. 16
Eyota
American Legion
Geraldine Asleson
(507) 545-2135
Wed.,
Medina
Medina Motel and
Donna Roehl
Enterntainment Center
(612) 473-4643
(Medina Ballroom)
Thurs., Sept. 18
Virginia
Coates Plaza Hotel
Norma L. Nekich
(218) 741-3890
Tues., Sept. 23
Hinckley
Tobies
Jim Ausmus
(612) 384-6472
Thurs., Sept 25
Brainerd
Cragun's Resort
Dick Johnson
(218) 829-2526
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227-5600
M III --III
I Mll� I
U league of minnesota cities
August 13, 1986
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Jim Miller, President, League of Minnesota Cities
RE: Regional Meetings
The League Board of Directors considers regional meetings to be a major priority
for the League. It is a primary way in which the League Board and staff maintain
contact with members around the state, learn of issues and problems which cities
face, and develop information which can become part of League services or
legislative policies.
This year's meetings are especially important because we are assessing the value
of the current format of regional meetings and attempting to get directions from
city officials about modifications in the program. We hope that you will attend
the meetings and give us your advice about how they can be improved and made more
effective for you. Enclosed is an agenda and a list of meeting dates and
locations for your information.
The 1986 regional meetings will provide an opportunity for city officials to
review the progress of League policy development. We will be asking your opinion
of the progress of the League's policy committees and your suggestion for future
areas of study.
As we all know, this is an election year. The regional meetings will provide an
opportunity for candidates for the Legislature to meet with city officials whom
they hope to represent. It is an excellent time to discuss particular problems
which your city has and solutions which you would like to see developed at the
Legislature.
We have also arranged for table talk sessions with representatives of several
state agencies which will be held from 5:00 until 6:30. You can seek individual
answers to problems of your city with representatives of the Departments of
Transportation, Energy and Economic Development, the Pollution Control Agency, and
the Department of Natural Resources. (Please see memo from Tom Thelen.)
League staff have prepared brief issue papers concerning the work of the policy
committees thus far, a copy of each of those issue papers is enclosed for your
information. Additional copies will be available at the regional meetings. You
may wish to look these over in order to raise questions about the policies which
are under consideration by the League committees.
We look forward to seeing you at the regional meetings.
JM:DS:rmm
I E33 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227-5600
T
111
league of minnesota cities
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
ISSUE PAPER
The Development Strategies Committee has identified several areas of study for
revision in the League policy governing this field.
I. TAX INCREMENT FINANCE
During the last session of the Legislature, the House of Representatives passed a
bill which developed new requirements for tax increment finance. The bill did not
become law. These requirements, however, included the establishment of a limit
for tax increment finance activity by cities, a substantial change in the pre -79
project law, and a number of other changes. The committee will review this area
with Representative Schreiber who drafted the bill. They will develop a proposed
policy on tax increment finance with last year's legislation as well as new
federal restrictions in mind.
II. PORT AUTHORITY LEGISLATION
The Legislature enacted an economic development authority law which substantially
fulfilled the League policy which suggested that all cities should have the
ability to establish port authorities in order to do economic development
programs. However, the bill which was signed into law by the Governor contains
some significant limitations as compared with the pre-existing port authority
statutes which were enacted for individual cities. The committee will consider
whether the League should seek additional legislation in this field or be content
with the products of the Legislature during the last session.
III. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
The committee is reviewing the operation of the various programs of technical and
financial assistance of the Department of Energy and Economic Development. The
committee will consider the adequacy of these programs and develop policy to
affirm or ask modification of the DEED programs in this field.
IV. HOUSING
The currently pending Federal Tax Reform Act renders the current League policy in
the housing field in need of substantial revision. The Development Strategies
Committee is awaiting the completion of the Federal Tax Reform Act so that the
League may work on a policy position which would conform to the restrictions
contained in the new federal law.
I 00 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 CECT 2) 227-5000
M - Vo
IIII
uu
LL
league of minnesota cities
Government Structure and General Legislation Committee
Issue Paper
Committee to focus efforts on tort reform
In 1985, the Legislature responded to recent increases in the cost of insuring
cities and other local units of government from public liability exposure. The
legislation can perhaps be best described as a modest effort to reduce municipal
liability exposure in state court actions. Experiences since the enactment of
the legislation has demonstrated a continued need for legislative limitations on
liability. Further, recent Minnesota court decisions have raised the question
regarding the utility of the 1985 legislative enactments.
The Government Structure and General Legislation Committee (GSGL) is expected to
review and act on both general and specific policy options for further limiting
the exposure of municipalities. These policy options include:
1. Adopting additional legislative language supporting the continued existence
of the municipal tort liability act. Limiting cities liability exposure
for specific types of torts, as well as for overall damage amounts. This
action is felt by many to be necessary to prevent a court of law from
ruling that the Tort Liability Act is unconstitutional as a violation of the
Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
2. Addressing the recent Minnesota Appeal's Court decision that held the
participation of cities in self-insurance pools, such as the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, constitutes a waiver of statutorily
provided for defenses to liability.
3. Clarifying the exposure of cities and their taxypayers to punitive damages
claims brought against their officers and/or employees. 1985 legislation
prohibits cities from indemnifying officers charged by the court with
punitive damages for willful or malicious actions. Proposals by interested
parties include requiring indemnification for any punitive damage,
abolishing punitive damages for government employees, granting governmental
bodies the discretion to idemnify employees for punitive damages, or
limiting the amount that can be assessed any employee.
4. Possible modifications to 1985 legisation that limits municipal exposure
for joint and several liability. These changes may be necessitated due to
the potential equal protection problem caused by hte enactment of the
section protecting local units of government, but not private citizens or
businesses, without specific findings rationalizing the legislative action.
The GSGL Committee is also expected to address problems with the open meeting
law, state mandates, special assessments, and elections.
1 33 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 C612)227-5600
µ-V-0
IIlt �Ilt
league of minnesota cities
LAND USE, ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
STUDYING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FINANCING
Wastewater Treatment
The 1986 Legislature adopted several of the League's proposals for
administrative changes in the wastewater treatment construction
grants program as well as enacting League supported legislation
authorizing the privatization of wastewater treatment systems. The
1987 legislature is expected to continue the analysis of the existing
grant program, explore the creation of a revolving loan fund, and
decide on a level of state financial assistance in wastewater
treatment programs.
Despite determined efforts by local governments and the state, there
is still an estimated need for wastewater treatment systems costing
approximately $1.1 billion. This need is required to be met by
federal legislation that mandates all dischargers of sewage effluent
to meet federal standards by 1988. The committee will address the
following issues:
1. The level of state financial assistance. Currently, the state
contributes approximately $11 million to the state wastewater
treatment financial assistance program which is raised out of the
cigarette tax. This contrasts significantly with Wisconsin which has
raised over $260 million for state assistance to local governments.
2. The type of state financial assistance. Current federal and
state financial assistance programs are in the form of matching
grants. There has been preliminary discussions regarding the
creation of a revolving loan fund which would provide low or no
interest loans, rather than grants, to communties. Whether to
proceed with this approach, its level of funding, eligibility
requirements, and interplay with the existing grant programs are all
issues which need resolution.
3. Additional administrative or agency changes. The future role of
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in this area is currently
under consideration. Options range from removing the agency totally
from grant administration oversight to having the agency take
complete control of system construction with municipalities taking
over the operation and maintenance of the system once the state
finishes its construction.
4. Fees for discharge permits. The legislature recently increased
the level of state fees for the administration and enforcement of
wastewater treatment laws. The fee formula and fee levels are issues
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 161 2) 227-5000
that will be addressed by the committee.
Other committee issues include land use and planning legislation,
annexation, solid and hazardous waste management, surface and
groundwater protection programs, and transportation and transit
legislation.
fliI
fill Il1I
league of minnesota cities
Personnel and Public Safety Committee
Issue Paper
Rule of 85 Extension. Should eligibility to retire with an unreduced benefit
with any combination of age and years of service equalling 85 or more years be
extended to people who qualify on or after January 1, 1987.
Local Police and Fire Relief Associations Merging into PERA. Should members of
the local police and paid fire pension plans be allowed to elect coverage under
PERA rather than their local plan. Should this be allowed and encouraged if the
local plan is eliminated and all active former local members draw benefits and
pay contributions under the PERA formula, with the transferring city paying full
actuarial costs to PERA.
Workers Compensation Offset. Should PERA be allowed to pay full disability
benefits to disabled members (especially police and fire members) while the
disabled member draws workers compensation payments, as is permitted under the
local police and fire plans.
Funded Retirees Health Insurance. Should PERA be establish a program to offer
health insurance to retired employees. If so, should it be fully or partially
financed be governmental employees. Should cities have the option whether or
not to participate.
Elected Officials Retirement. Should elected officials and volunteers (i.e.
ambulance) be subject to the regular PERA program with an option of membership
when salary reaches $325 per month. Or should they be covered under a defined
contribution plan similar to an IRA.
Discipline and Discharge. Minnesota statutes currently constitute a legal mine
field for public employers seeking to discipline or discharge their employees.
Any grievance or disciplinary action undertaken by a city may involve the
state's Veteran Preference Laws, Public Employer Labor Relations Act, civil
service or merit systems, Human Rights Act, as well as federal and state
constitutional due process requirements. The committee is currently considering
two major approaches to solving the discipline and discharge problem.
1. Accelerate discharge procedures. While the League does not opposes
termination hearings where they are required by state statute or federal or
state constitutions, it seems an unnecessary waste of taxpayers' money to
allow these procedures to last in excess of a year in some cases. The
problem, is exaggerated under the state's Veterans Preference Law which
provides that a veteran is suspended with pending a final determination by
a veterans preference board. In many cases, the result has been payment by
the municipality for two employees during the suspension period, a result
which is particularly burdensome to small communities.
The PPS committee will be studying ways to streamline discharge processes,
particularly the veterans preference statutes.
I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227-5600
Personnel and Public Safety Issue Paper
Page 2
2. Dual Disciplinary Hearings. Under current law, employees covered under
both a collective bargaining agreement grievance and discharge procedures
who are also veterans protected under the veterans preference statutes, are
entitled to hearings under both procedures. The result is not only grossly
inefficient, but may also be unworkable since the standards for court
review of the decisions of veterans preference boards and grievance
arbitrators vary significantly. The Minnesota Supreme Court, in a recent
case, indicated its dissatisfaction with the dual hearing mechanism.
The committee will consider a policy that legislation be enacted providing
that a public employee faced with a potential discharge, would be required
to select a single hearing procedure.
Pay Equity. The 1986 legislature again considered the issue of pay equity or
"comparable worth", in the end enacting a modification to the 1984 statute that,
in the opinion of many, has substantially weakened the ability of local
governments and other units of government to maintain equitable compensation
relationships in the light of arbitrations for essential employees.
The PPS committee will attempt to evaluate problems experienced by cities in
the process of implementing the studies, as well as potential problems in
maintaining equity once the studies are implemented.
league of minnesota cities
REVENUE SOURCES COMMITTEE DEBATING PROPERTY TAX REFORM AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
Although cities were spared major cuts in their state
funding this year, the 1987 legislature is likely to consider
changes in the property tax system and local government aid
program which could dramatically affect cities' revenues and
budgets. The Revenue Sources Committee, composed of
representatives from cities throughout the state, will be
studying these key tax and financing issues during the next
two months. The Committee's recommendations will be the
first step in defining the League's legislative policies and
priorities for next year. Issues the Committee is
considering include:
* Property Tax Reform: While applauding simplification and
accountability as desirable property tax reform goals, the
League's draft policy cautions the legislature to analyze
proposals not just for their impact statewide, but also
for their effect on individual communities. Major shifts in
the relative tax burdens among taxing jurisdictions must be
avoided as should major shifts in tax burdens among property
classes. The League's draft policy also argues that local
government aid should be maintained as an essential component
of the property tax relief system. Additionally, property
tax reforms should not jeopardize existing tax increment
financing districts.
* Local Government Aid: The League's draft policy supports
continuation of the local government aid program with annual
appropriations increases of six percent in 1988 and 1989.
The Revenue Sources Committee will be debating whether the
League should recommend specific revisions in the current
formula or general principles for reform. These general
principles could include: the formula should reflect both
need and revenue raising capacity of a municipality; a city's
decisions on expenditures for "basic municipal services"
should be a factor in the formula; and any major formula
changes should allow for adequate transition periods.
* Levy Limits: The League's draft policy recommending repeal
of levy limit laws will be especially important if local
governments are forced to contend with cuts in state and
I 60 university avenue east, St. paul, minnesota 551 01 C61 2) 227-5600
federal financial aid.
* Muncipal Bonds: The League's draft policy favors permanent
repeal of interest rate limits on bonds enabling cities to
respond to changing market forces and federal action.
* Local Option Taxes: The League is considering policy which
favors granting cities local option to utilize
non-traditional revenue sources, such as sales taxes, to
replace loss in state shared revenues.
- Le
M�1
mi IIID
lam; LUleague of minnesota cities
CURRENT FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE POLICY ISSUES
General Revenue Sharin
With future funding of General Revenue Sharing uncertain, alternatives
to the current program of direct federal assistance to local
government are being considered by the LMC Federal Legislative
Committee. LMC policy continues to support full funding of GRS, along
with explicit concern for future targeting of GRS payments to
recognize differences in fiscal capacity and the essential role of the
federal government in assuring adequate levels of service at the local
level.
The committee will discuss provisions of the Targeted Fiscal
Assistance Act (S. 2037) introduced by Senator David Durenberger and
recommend policy to the membership in November.
Federal Tax Reform
Alarm has replaced earlier concerns over provisions of federal tax
reform legislation that severely restrict cities' authority to issue
municipal bonds. Imposition of unworkable tests for tax-exempt
financing along with the further lowering of an arbitrary per capita
volume limit for many types of bonds have left cities without many of
the development and public financing tools they have traditionally
used to improve local economies and infrastructure.
Pending final adoption of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the LMC Federal
Legislative Committee has been monitoring the legislative
deliberations and will make specific recommendations on its provisions
with respect to their impact on city finances and development
initiatives.
Housing
Loss of federal housing programs and assistance since 1981 has
left cities without the means to provide low and moderate income
housing to meet the demand for affordable residential units except
through the use of single and multifamily housing bonds. Federal tax
reform restrictions may make access to such bond authority even more
limited than at present. In that circumstance, the
Legislative Committee may look to new strategies and financing
alternatives to meet cities' housing needs.
Gramm-Rudman
1 33 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (01 2) 227-5000
�^ w
The turning over of direct responsibility for deficit reduction to
non -elected federal bureaucrats and the sacrifice of 100 percent of
federally funded programs and aid to cities to that budget -cutting
process has created a sense of dismay and concern among cities.
Members of the Federal Legislative Committee will examine the impact
of Gramm-Rudman on cities in 1986 and look at projections for FFY187.
Opposition to this means of deficit reduction is likely to be
recommended to member cities in November.
Stormwater Permits
Current LMC federal policy expresses strong opposition to diverting
wastewater treatment construction grant funds to address non -point
source pollution problems and opposes 1985 proposed EPA stormwater
regulations that would require city testing of thousands of outfall
sites for stormwater discharge.
Modification of the stormwater permit regulations has been making its
way through Congress as part of the reauthorization of the Clean Water
Act. The Federal Legislative Committee will examine the results of
Congressional efforts to develop policy dealing with pollution
problems resulting from stormwater run-off and will recommend a
position reflecting cities' interests in the compromise legislation.
Hazardous Materials Transportation
The committee has been following NLC policy deliberations and is
working together with the LMC Land Use, Energy, and Transportation
Committee to develop policy on the roles cities play in the routing,
emergency response, and regulation of the shipment of hazardous
materials.
IA -4
LLL111
U league of minnesota cities
August 12, 1986
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Thomas H. Thelen, Field Representative j�
RE: Table Talk Sessions at Fall Regional Meetings
We would like to call to your attention the Table Talk sessions which
will be conduted at each of the regional meetings this fall. City
officials will have an oppoprtunity to visit with personnel of the
Department of Transportation, Department of Natural Resources,
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, and
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development.
If you have business to conduct with any of these agencies or wish to
confer with them regarding future projects or issues you will have the
chance from 5:00 - 6:30 pm at each site.
While state agency personnel have been attending our meetings for years
we felt we could improve our program for city officials and give the
agencies personnel a more active role in the meetings also.
Make plans now to attend the meeting in your area. See you soon.
1 83 university avenue east, St. paul, minnesota 551 01 161 2) 227-5000
cq
V1
OC
W
�)cq
H
w
I
H
/��^�,
C l
V V
Uoz�
M :7I
j
a
f
!
0
a
OU
ia'
4
X11
LN
V
O
1. V U C�
H0-4
1� H
a c
cs
P4
ASU
c7 a
cqcli
^�
N
Pa H
q�j
P4 0
60 •• 0
Cgf�U
L7
z
p
N N N
V1
H La
p.r
H
fn
1-a PL
y.l
W
/-: fi
���Lo
�Ra
.C\j In
n
coaw44
0
a
o x
�
O
�o
�.i
m 3: C, o�v
m NLU
Ucn
��
.�..
��p
UOU
/���
cq
mpp
M
OOF
�j
uj
PZ
4
G
q$4
U 0 O
� O O
6 O
a U.oU
O d
rxU
U.oc�
ww
En L)
CIF
CIQ
0
9 ~mO.n-Nfpph
CJ)
r V
�
/Z/
` 1
^�NN
Lo (D'2RN
ew
H
H
OH
�
W
�
NLS M NM
H PQ
�
H N C: N c
OLij^,
CO
INN
V V
N
W
�
N
y
��
c�
O� ?R,
p U
.n
i
Lr, Lr) 10
ew
Pa PQ n U
N M 'R N
H
H
OH
�
W
�
�3
O�
Q
H PQ
�
M�-NM
W
INN
W
�
U
y
��
-4
p U
.n
A a V
Py O z
H
Pa PQ n U
N M 'R N
H
H
OH
�
c
>4
�3
O�
Q
H PQ
Cn
M�-NM
C1
O aoa�
oah
H o a
U
r�
o�
C1 C7 M
-4
p U
.n
A a V
Py O z
H
n
z a1�F
O M O
z U
C9 t
i
r-.
L r l
Pa PQ n U
N M 'R N
H
H
OH
�
00 M
>4
�3
O�
Q
H PQ
Cn
M�-NM
H o a
O
o a
C)
W
A
A a V
Py O z
PQ
O M O
Pa PQ n U
N M 'R N
W
00 M
^QNCC
�3
O�
Q
U
Cn
Pa PQ n U
N M 'R N
w 2 N N
�:r
^QNCC
�3
O�
Q
��R�
�C\irn(D
Q 00 N
Cn
M�-NM
m
a
a
W oo c cn
H W % H W Ia-1H �W
O W A ►44
a C7P+'� o
'r7 a ��ii H H ...a
UOU zPOpUO tl O NCq HU UO U
dnH a+ U� �rH V4Up HU do H
WC7 O pOC,H6C7 0O GSW WC WC7
OU �O C7 W PG 8_ �p U� _I t!1 U W
0
M
LO
cq
r^
i
I
~
ce�
O
•
��
r�
W
PG
V�
►-a , Ul
O
CrJ
O
W
, r--�
I Gil
C'rJ
14
U 0 Z
0,
P ^ U
I
�
I
� wl
�j
r�
Ln
L)
U'
� LO
cq
OaI
U
��
..
gum
rI
�
O U
cq
^1
Hf� H
Z U
H 1� H
V/
U
O
I
ww
U
a U
C�
i
� 1
Haz o
a w
u.1I
zoH
H M
'..moi
N U
M
a
w^Uicq
NH
O alCq
aU
�V
U
� r
�O
%pWp;;
m
O O
rte" Ln
L)
Pa ^ U
ra.
a
a
w�
U.
Q N N
O ^
7 �� z
zi W
U �i w
F+
U '�"..� W
:ZD
O
P+
Pr
r•+
m�
�NacNo
�k
[HH
wUUO
U
r�
O
O
O
`^`,�
O
O
Li
c��Ln
c)� �N
► P�
Ma
a ^ UV
pUCOa7
�0
M�7
z�
Cn
N 01 N M
GAj
C, M
LD �
r=
�CjH
•
r�H�+
R
P4
...+
u
is
r°a
r�
U
.'i
Uzcan
w
U
co(
CN
Ln 1-0N
�LL
uj
Q�_�N
O.-
GV
N
^,
V V
WF-
NQ)�NN
cn�"��Nfv
N N
BUILDING INSPECTION NEWSLETTER
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
August, 1986
The purpose of this periodic newsletter is to provide another means of communication
among the Building Inspection Division, contractors, and developers who are involved in
construction work in the City of Plymouth. The content will be designed to outline
topics of general interest as provided not only by the City but also by the development
community. We believe that by bringing items to your attention in written form as well
as verbally, we will improve the quality of service to provide you, as well as the
quality of work you provide the citizens of Plymouth.
Let us hear from you! If you have questions or comments, please call Building Official
Joe Ryan at 559-2800, or drop us a note.
SUMP PUMP ORDINANCE
Recently the Plymouth City Council adopted the following provision as part of the
Plymouth City Code. "Installation of devices that convey ground water. All draintile
and sump systems, sumps, or other system or device designed to collect and convey storm
water, surface water, ground water, roof water run-off, sub -surface drainage, cooling
water, or unpolluted industrial processed water which are installed with new
construction or in conjunction with remodeling of existing structures shall be
constructed in a permanent manner so as to discharge the water to the storm water
drainage system. The installation shall be done in a manner so that such waters are not
conveyed, directed, or discharged into the Municipal sanitary sewer."
Our inspection personnel will be enforcing this new code provision to assure that
appropriate installation measures have been taken prior to the approval of final
inspection. A self adhesive label explaining this code language will be provided to
advise property owners of this requirement. Further information regarding this matter
will be made available at our front Service Counter.
INSPECTION REQUEST SERVICE
The Building Inspection Division has implemented a recording device capable of
receiving inspection request calls 24 hours a day, every day, for your convenience.
The telephone number for this service is 559-2985.
This system is designed for only those inspections which do not require "same day"
attention, such as; framing, insulation, plumbing visuals, mechanical rough -ins and
finals, and building final inspections.
The recorded messages are checked in the morning and afternoon of each working day.
When calling in your request, provide the following information:
1. Your name or company name.
2. Type of inspection needed.
3. Job site address.
4. The permit number.
PLEASE TURN OVER FOR FUTHER "NEWS"
TRUSS DRAWINGS ON SITE
If your construction requires either a roof truss or a floor truss sytem, Engineered
Truss drawing are required to be on the Job site of each building. These drawings are
available from the company that supplies your trusses. Without these drawings, neither
our inspectors nor your employees can determine if the trusses are installed or
supported as per the fabricator's instructions.
CHECK YOUR SOBS BEFORE CALLING
Recently we have received several calls from contractors requesting us to verify if an
inspection has been made and/or information regarding a correction order which was
posted on the Job site. It is the contractor's responsibility to check their Jobs. If
the inspector has not returned from the field, we have no way of knowing whether the
inspection was made or what type of corrections were needed. Please check your Jobs and
if there are questions, contact the appropriate inspector between the hours of 8 A.M to
9 A.M. and 4 P.M. to 4:30 P.M., Monday thru Friday.
INSPECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE BEFORE WORK IS COVERED
Some contractors have indicated that there is a rule stating that if their project is
not inspected within 24 hours, they can cover the work and continue with the
construction. Inspections are to be made before any work is covered. The Building Code
is very specific regarding inspections.
Section 305 Paragraph (d) of the 1982 Uniform Building Code states approval required.
"No work shall be done on any part of the building or structure beyond the point
indicated in each successive inspection without first obtaining the approval of the
Building Official. Such approval shall be given only after an inspection has been made
of each successive step in the construction."
Don't be misinformed. Inspections are to be made before work is covered!!
OBTAINING PERMITS
Once an application for a building permit is
Division will contact the applicant to inform
permit number. Please Jot this information down
Finance Cashier when obtaining your permit.
FIREPLACE INSTALLATIONS
processed and ready for issuance, our
them of the fee amount as well as the
and provide the permit number to the
Many building permits submitted to our office for new home construction, indicate the
installation of fireplaces. Please be certain to indicate the type of fireplaces to be
installed i.e. masonry versus prefabricated. Inspections for fireplaces are required,
and in the case of a prefabricated unit, a copy of the specifications shall be made
available at the Job site.
Note: If a fireplace is not indicated on the approved plans, a separate building permit
will be required.
EDUCATION
Both Inver Hills Community College and North Hennepin Community College offer evening
classes in Building Inspection Technology. Some of the course work includes studies in
concrete, soils engineering, field inspection, energy conservation, plumbing,
mechanical, and electrical systems. Please contact the colleges for additional
information.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 1986
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners
Wire, Stulberg, Plufka, Mellen and
Pauba
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Magnus
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to adopt the Consent Agenda as submitted.
6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to approve the duly 23, 1986 Minutes as submitted.
VOTE. 5 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg abstained. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application by Paul PAUL SUOMALA
Suomala and requested an overview of the duly 29, 1986 Plan- PRELIMINARY PLAT
ning Staff Report by Coordinator McConn. She provided a (86076)
summary of the staff concerns and recommendation for
deferral.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Greg Frank, McCombs -Knutson
Associates, representing the petitioner. He explained that
the decision for the plat layout is based on economics and
on the property owner's desire that the wooded knoll on the
property be preserved. Mr. Frank explained that because of
the high cost of assessments, water service and street
construction, there would be no benefit to the property
owner to achieve additional lots. He explained the need for
both lots to have street access, which would in turn pre-
serve the wooded area.
-153-
Page 154
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
Commissioner Plufka inquired about the concern in preserving
the knoll, noting that construction of a home on the
westerly parcel would require removal of trees. He stated
he believes in maintaining existing vegetation, but from a
cost standpoint the net loss of the woods would be offset by
having the shared drive.
Mr. Frank stated that preservation of the trees on the knoll
is their objective, and it is their opinion that the buyer
for the west lot would try to save as many trees as possible
when constructing the home. Mr. Suomala pointed out there
is a natural open area to the west, where no trees would be
lost. Commissioner Plufka inquired about the lot layout.
Mr. Frank explained Mr. Suomala's wish for larger "estate
lots". Commissioner Plufka noted that the lots on 6th
Avenue North would be impacted by heavier traffic, and hav-
ing two drives so close together could cause traffic
problems.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the resistance to the
construction of a cul-de-sac. Mr. Suomala reiterated the
costs involved; and, that realtors see more value in the
larger lot.. „6iits to preserve the larqer lot size for
his own home and wants to provide attractive settings for
the other homes. He sees no rationale for more lots.
Chairman Steigerwald explained the Commission's concerns of
properties in higher traffic areas where shared drives are
appropriate. Mr. Suomala stated the amount of traffic will
be the same and there is no evidence that separate drives
would not be appropriate. Commissioner Plufka commented
that a shared drive to 6th Avenue North would be less
dangerous.
Commissioner Pauba inquired if they had considered a private
drive to Vinewood Lane; Mr. Suomala stated they had con-
sidered this, however, he thought a variance would be re-
quired for not directing the access to the adjacent public
road.
Coordinator McConn stated that a private drive was not dis-
cussed as part of the review and explained that legal docu-
ments could be filed on the property for the shared drive.
She noted that both lots have frontage on a public street.
The Commission inquired about driveway construction to
Vinewood Lane and grades; Engineer Goldberg stated this
could be worked out.
Page 155
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
Commissioner Pauba stated he would prefer to see the plat
layout with a private drive to Vinewood Lane. Coordinator
McConn asked for clarification whether the access to Vine -
wood Lane would be from Lot 1 only, or from both lots. Com-
missioner Pauba stated a loop drive could serve both lots
from Vinewood Lane.
Mr. Suomala stated an existing drive is on the west side
through Lot 3 to Lot 1; it may be difficult to go through
the existing Evergreen trees with the drive construction.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Joseph Peretti, 520 Sycamore Circle, asked for a clarifica-
tion of existing access points to 6th Avenue North.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Pauba stated that access and retention of trees
is important to this property; a private drive for both lots
to Vinew000d Lane would eliminate any access to 6th Avenue
North.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Stulberg to recommend deferral of the application for re-
design with direction that a private drive for proposed Lots
1 and 2 be directed through Lot 3 to Vinewood Lane, preserv-
ing as many trees as possible.
Roll Call Vote. MOTION carried.
NEW BUSINESS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by AT&T Communi-
cations and requested an overview of the August 4, 1986
Planning Staff Report by Coordinator McConn.
Coordinator McConn also explained the recommended condition
which would require the anticipated building expansion,
which would connect the principal building and proposed
accessory building, to occur within two years; and, the
condition requiring a covenant to be filed on the property.
Rich Heck, consultant to the petitioner, explained the
master planning for this site which would include further
expansion to the north of the current facility. He stated
this proposal is the most functional for this site because
of their operations in the principal building. AT&T plans
for expansion in the direction of the detached building,
however, the need for the garage for storage is a present
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
SITE PLAN AND
VARIANCE (86086)
Page 156
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
need. He explained further the limitations of locating the
garage to be attached to the principal building, considering
the parking design, access to the garage, and entrances to
the principal building by employees. Their concern was
noted regarding the susceptibility of equipment that could
be detrimentally affected by carbon monoxide.
Mr. Heck stated AT&T cannot set a specific time for the
expansion to occur. They want to assure the Commission,
that this is not a temporary building. They are confident
they are following the spirit of the City's codes and
ordinances, but they prefer not to give any guarantees
regarding further expansion plans for this site.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired about Condition No. 5 of the
staff recommendation that sets completion within two years.
Coordinator McConn stated this was considered reasonable
because, during the review of the application, expansion was
designated to occur in 1987.
Mr. Heck stated they prefer no time limit.
Mr. Jerome A Ritter, Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, stated that
all indications were positive for growth on this site, how-
ever, they can't say how much the business will increase to
be able to submit a date certain for further expansion. He
noted that the accessory building will be constructed of the
same materials as the existing facility.
Mr. Heck stated that AT&T would be receptive to placing
covenants on the land to establish the use of the accessory
building.
Coordinator McConn explained that the recommendation in
Condition No. 4 was based on the anticipated expansion plans
and attachment of the accessory building to the principal
structure; however, the petitioner says they can make no
commitment regarding their schedule for expansion. She
noted that without this basis for granting the variance,
staff finds no unique .site characteristics or variation to
the parcel that would not be applicable to other property
within this zoning district, and do not support the request.
Chairman Steigerwald commented that the Commission is caught
in between; the applicant is stating in actual fact there
may be no expansion. He questioned what the City could do.
Karen Carmichael, AT&T Communications, stated they cannot
give guarantees, but the company is looking at future
expansion for this site.
M
5CL-
Page 157
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if the City should mandate a
deadline such as five years? Coordinator McConn stated she
could not determine any legal course the City should take;
however, staff accepted the petitioner's good faith to date,
that the conditions of approval would be met.
Commissioner Plufka stated that approval would be setting a
precedent. Commissioner Wire concurred; noting this appli-
cation must stand on its own merits.
Commissioner Mellen stated he could not visualize their
tearing down the building if a certain time limit is not
met.
Karen Carmichael stated the exhaust fumes from the mainten-
ance of trucks, and the possible fire hazard, are the basis
for their preference that this building not be attached to
the present facility.
Commissioner Stulberg stated the application does not satis-
fy the first two criteria for granting the variance, but
does meet the last four of six. He inquired if the company
is saying they will never attach the buildings, even with
future expansion.
Commissioner Pauba inquired about the approval for a de-
tached building for PYA Monarch. Coordinator McConn stated
that was for the repair and maintenance of semi -trailer
trucks and was granted on the basis of the nature of the
business which is a food distributor.
Rich Heck stated the separate garage is desired because of
security issues for the main building. Development of
additional entrances to that building would not be
acceptable.
Commissioner Plufka inquired about parking needs. Rich Heck
stated the proposed additional 12 spaces would meet the
future needs at the building.
The Commission discussed the safety hazards. Commissioner
Wire noted that based on the operation, and because of the
security issues, they don't ever want the garage attached to
the main building.
Traffic circulation and structural needs for this techology
were discussed.
Page 158
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if this would be the only
equipment site in the State? Karen Carmichael stated no,
but this will be the main site. She explained further, that
their tower in the downtown area will soon be blocked be-
cause of future high rise construction.
Chairman Steigerwald stated the public safety aspect could
be a basis for the variance. Commissioner Mellen stated
insurers prefer that maintenance facilities be at least 30
ft. from the main facility; in this light, this application
would not be inconsistent.
Chairman Steigerwald stated he understands the situation but
feels the petitioner should have more clearly defined these
items while the the application was under review.
Commissioner Plufka stated the basis for the accessory
building, on further discussion, does seem to be unique to
this company; especially when considering the sensitivity of
the equipment in use and the proposed use for the ancillary
building.
Commissioner Stulberg stated this could be used as a basis
for granting the variance, however, if this affects the
public health and safety; any other business in the
industrial/commercial districts could establish this reason-
ing for a similar application, especially when it involves
telephone equipment which is a part of all business. If the
variance is granted on this basis, a condition should be
made that the garage never be attached to the principal
building.
Commissioner Plufka stated that approval should also
consider the master site planning and parking lot
circulation.
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire
to recommend approval for the Site Plan and Variance for
AT&T Communications subject to the conditions as stated in
the August 4, 1986 Planning Staff Report, deleting Condition
No. 5; renumbering, and adding Condition No. 6 to provide
that the accessory building is relocated to remain a minimum
of 10 ft. from the principal structure; and, that it will be
constructed within the required setbacks for this property.
The Variance is granted for the reasons cited by the
petitioner; that the equipment within the main building is
sensitive to the carbon monoxide which would be inherent
with the storage of company vehicles; for security reasons;
and, in consideration of master site planning for on-site
circulation.
lz:D CA -
MOTION TO APPROVE
Page 159
Planning Commission Minutes
August 13, 1986
VOTE. 5 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg, Nay. MOTION carried. NOTION CARRIED
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner *RPUD FINAL PLAN/
Plufka to recommend approval for the Residential Planned PLAT FOR TYRELL THIRD
Unit Development Final Plan/Plat for "Tyrell Third Addition" ADDITION FOR HANS
for Hans Hagen Homes, Inc., subject to the conditions listed HAGEN HOMES (86081)
in the July 29, 1986 staff report.
VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner
Plufka to recommend approval for the Site Plan for Robert
Skarsten, Lancaster Construction Company to construct an
office/warehouse on Lot 4, Block 1, Vicksburg Industrial
Park, subject to the conditions as listed in the August 4,
1986 staff report.
VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
Commissioner Wire stated he may be absent from the August
27, 1986 meeting; the other Commissioners will be present.
Commissioner Plufka stated he will be absent from the
September 24, 1986 Planning Commission meeting.
The November and December meeting calendars were discussed.
It was the consensus of the Commission to schedule meetings
in November for the 5th and 19th because of the Thanksgiving
holiday.
The Commission requested the December meeting calendar be
discussed further at their next meeting.
AD30URNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
*ROBERT SKARSTEN
LANCASTER CONSTRUCT-
ION INC. SITE PLAN
(86082)
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
S -5b
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
August 14, 1986
Page 24
Present: Chair Edwards, Commissioners Anderson, Reed, Mullan, LaTour, Beach
and Rosen; staff Blank and Pederson; Paul Fjare of Brauer and
Associates
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair Edwards at 7:32 p.m. in the
Council Chambers.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Commissioner Beach and seconded by Commissioner
LaTour to approve the minutes of the July meeting as presented. The
motion carried with all ayes.
3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitors present at this meeting.
4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTION
Director Blank indicated that the City Council had directed PRAC to
hold another public hearing on the issue of the Green Oaks play equipment.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Green Oaks Play Equipment. Director Blank briefly reviewed the sites
earlier proposed by the park consultant and staff and stated that
Site B which had been approved by PRAC at their July meeting was
not approved by the City Council, because of resident disapproval.
He indicated that the Council had directed that PRAC hold a public
meeting to further review the proposed equipment relocation. Director
Blank shared with the Commission and the residents a drawing showing
the location of a new "compromised" site for the relocation of the play
equipment. This new location is approximately 20 feet south of the
earlier proposed Site B. Putting the play equipment in this location
will require moving the ball field to the southeast section of the
park.
Jim Richter, 2625 Zircon Lane, stated that he approves of the new
compromised site.
Dave Volker, 2830 Brockton Lane, shared a drawing of the park showing
where the new site was located. He indicated that this site fulfills
the criteria of the park planner and the residents. He stated that
it is accessible from the park trail and that the ballfield, when
moved, would be 200 feet from the play equipment.
Commissioner Beach stated her concern with children and adults
hitting balls into the play equipment area. Mr. Volker responded
that few professional ball players are capable of hitting balls
that great a distance, so the chances of parents and children
playing pick-up softball driving a ball into the play equipment
are very slim. Staff concurred with Mr. Volker's opinion.
Rick Rosen, 18715 27th Avenue, stated that the people who had objected
to Site B are in favor of the new proposed site. He is confident that
if PRAC will approve this site, the Council will also.
PRAC Minutes of August 14, 1986
Page 25
_7— S; \z)
Commissioner Beach indicated her concern with the cost to move this
equipment, as well as the added cost now to move the ballfield. She
wants cost estimates before any decisions are made. Director Blank
stated that moving the ballfield would cost approximately $700-$800,
and moving the equipment will cost approximately $15,000.
Jean Grates, 18630 26th Avenue, stated that she has concerns with the
noise and teen parties held between 10:30 p.m. and 4:30 a.m. She does
approve of the new proposed site, because the police will better be
able to see it when they drive into the park.
Some residents at the meeting indicated their disapproval of the
shelter building still being in place. They indicated that their
understanding was that the shelter would be dismantled shortly
after the June PRAC meeting.
Commissioners questioned staff on where the money would come from
to move this park equipment and ballfield. Director Blank responded
that funds would be taken from park dedication, neighborhood account.
Chair Edwards asked if anyone in the audience disapproved of the
new proposed site, prior to PRAC passing any motion on this issue.
Gail Schulenburg, 2605 Zircon Lane, stated that she and her husband
would prefer to see the equipment left exactly where it is now, since
they are able to see the equipment from their window.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
REED TO RECON1MEND THE RELOCATION OF THE PLAY EQUIPMENT TO THE NEW CENTRAL
COMPROMISE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DIRECTIVE FROM THE CITY COUNCIL
TO RELOCATE THE PLAY EQUIPMENT IF THE COUNCIL CAN JUSTIFY THE
EXPENDITURE. The motion carried with four ayes. Commissioners Mullan,
Beach and Rosen abstained.
Dave Volker requested that copies of his drawing be made available to
the City Council.
b. Parkers Lake Update. The curb and gutters are in and work continues
to proceed on schedule.
C. 1987-91 CIP - Work on Trail Program. Director Blank informed the Park
and Recreation Advisory Commission that the City Council had recently
met with staff to discuss their interest in proceeding with a number of
trail projects as soon as possible in the interest of safety. Council
has approved the construction of the trail along County Road 15, which
will cost approximately $137,000. Of this amount, staff has suggested
that $87,000 come from Park Dedication and $50,000 from the Public
Works Reserve Fund. Director Blank further stated that the City
Manager had informed him that $250,000 of Public Works Reserve Fund
is available to be used for trails. In consideration of these
monies being available, Director Blank is proposing that Class I
trail construction be considered along four major roadways in an
effort to reduce the risk of traffic accidents between bikers,
walkers and automobiles. These trails include Fernbrook Lane between
PRAC Mirtutes of August 14, 1986
Page 26
County Road 6 and County Road 9, Highway 101 from 19th Avenue to
25th Avenue, Zachary Lane from County Road 9 to County Road 10,
and the County Road 15 trail.
Commissioner Mullan indicated his interest in constructing a trail
along West Medicine Lake Drive, also in consideration of safety.
Director Blank pointed out that the trail for this location is
being delayed due to the fact that West Medicine Lake Drive may �-
be realigned and upgraded at a later date.
Several commissioners felt that it might be wise to consider doing
all of our trails at one time by passing a bond referendum. Discus-
sion then followed on the timing of a bond referendum, and it was
the general consensus that it would be best to move ahead as soon
as possible on constructing the major trails listed above, and
discuss a possible bond referendum for other trail work with the
City Council the next time a joint meeting is scheduled.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BEACH TO ACCEPT THE DRAFT TRAIL PROGRAM AS PROPOSED BY STAFF ON
AUGUST 14, 1986. The motion passed with all ayes.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MULLAN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BEACH TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ALLOCATE FUNDS TO RESEARCH
THE NEED FOR A BIKE TRAIL ALONG WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE WITH THE
UNDERSTANDING THIS MAY NECESSITATE THE REALIGNMENT OF THIS ROAD.
The motion carried with all ayes.
d. Plymouth Creek Park Site Planning. This item will be discussed
in further detail at the October PRAC meeting, and Director Blank
reminded PRAC that they should walk the site at their convenience
prior to that meeting.
e. 1987 LAWCON Grant Update. Director Blank stated that our grant
proposal is ranked number 6 at this time. Due to federal and state
funding cutbacks, we may not be funded.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. New Plats. There were no new plats to discuss.
7. COMMISSION PRESENTATION
None.
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
Director Blank discussed the MRPA Fall Conference scheduled for late
September in Duluth.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting of July 17, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by
Chairman Peter Enck, Thursday, July 17, 1986, 11:30 A.M., at the
Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL:
CRYSTAL - Audited by Dan Smith
GOLDEN VALLEY - Commissioner Ed Silberman
MEDICINE LAKE - Not represented
MINNEAPOLIS - Alternate Commissioner Marvin Hoshaw
MINNETONKA - Alternate Commissioner Mike Johnson
NEW HOPE - Commissioner Peter Enck
PLYMOUTH - Commissioner Fred Moore
ROBBINSDALE - Commissioner Lee Gustafson
ST. LOUIS PARK - Not represented
Counsel: Curt Pearson
Engineer: Len Kremer
Recorder: Elaine Anderson
Also in attendance: Dr.
Barr
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Hal Runke and Steve Preston
Engineering Co.
It was moved by Mr. Gustafson and seconded by Mr. Silberman that the
minutes of the May 22 meeting be approved. Carried unanimously.
Mr. Moore corrected the minutes of the June 26 meeting by making the
insertion "and that the assessment be payable in two equal install-
ments due February 1 and August 1, 1987" after the words Medicine
Lake $704) (third paragraph, page 3). With this correction it was
moved by Mr. Hoshaw and seconded by Mr. Moore that the minutes of
June 26 be approved. Carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Mr. Silberman presented the financial statement as of July 17, 1986,
showing a checking account balance of $81.73, a savings account bal-
ance of $12,639.33, and an investment balance of $225,366.57 and
moved its approval subject to audit. Seconded by Mr. Hoshaw and
carried unanimously. He also presented the 1985 budget report as of
the same date for informational purposes.
PRESENTATION OF INVOICES FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL:
None
BC Minutes - July 17, 1986 - Page 2
MISCELLANEOUS:
Dan Smith of Crystal reported that Bill Sherburne has pneumonia and
is in intensive care at North Memorial Hospital. Elaine Anderson
was directed to send flowers or a plant on behalf of the Commission.
COMMUNICATIONS:
Chairman:
Chairman Enck reported that he had sent all communications he had
received since the last meeting to Mr. Kremer.
Counsel: None
Commissioners:
Alternate Commissioner Hoshaw of Minneapolis reported that he was
happy to have all the agreements from the member municipalities and
that they should be signed and sent out sometime next week.
Chairman Enck thanked Mr. Hoshaw for coordinating the signing of the
contracts.
Recording Secretary:
At the direction of Chairman Enck, Elaine Anderson had spent the
major portion of a week in June working with the records of the Com-
mission stored at the Minnetonka City Hall. She reported that Mr.
Asmus had been most diligent in saving the necessary documents. The
financial statements and invoices over seven years ago were
discarded but the audit reports are on file. Mr. Moore suggested
microfilming the records. After discussion, it -was moved by Mr.
Silberman and seconded by Mr. Gustafson that Elaine Anderson and Mr.
Moore look into the costs of microfilming the records and report
back to the Commission. Carried unanimously.
Engineer
1) Had communicated with Dan McNamara, Assistant to Senator
Durenberger, who indicated he would follow up with the Corps as
to the reasons for the denial of upland credits. Approval of
our request for credits would have set precedents for other
projects. He asked Mr. Kremer to send a description of the
items for which we were seeking credit. The Senators on the
Committee had been opposed to modification of the legislation
to include our credits. As an alternative, he intended to talk
to Representative Stangeland. Another possibility would be to
amend the plan to include some of these lands. The St. Paul
Corps District Engineer could amend their report. Mr. Kremer
recommended that we pursue that angle. We would write a letter
to David Raasch of the Corps and ask for information regarding
the procedure for preparing an amended plan.
BC Minutes - July 17, 1986 - Page 3
2) At the present time, the only thing that could stop construc-
tion would be failure to secure necessary easements. Mr.
Kremer had a call from a representative of the Golden Valley
Golf Club. They had had a meeting with their attorney and
their golf course architect who had some suggestions.
Attorney Peterson called. They had planned to meet last Thurs-
day but the meeting had to be canceled. They would like to
adopt a plan that would mean some modifications to the creek.
Mr. Kremer also explained the status of easements at Medicine
Lake and Theodore Wirth.
After further discussion, the Commission directed Counsel to
prepare the written material for the Wirth Park easements.
The project manager for MnDOT reported they have all the ease-
ments they will need for the 800' construction reach for the
tunnel. The design contract for the tunnel has just been
signed by the Corps.
NEW BUSINESS
1. REPORT ON THE 1984-1985 WATER QUALITY PROGRAM
Dr. Hal Runke, Limnologist, and Steve Preston, Environmental
Engineer, both from Barr Engineering Co., were in attendance.
Dr. Runke presented an outline of the results of the 1984-1985
water quality monitoring program. The report was distributed.
In addition, a short summary of the report was presented. The
question was raised as to whether the five-year water quality
improvement program adopted by the Commission was mandated by
the 1983-1984 legislature. Mr. Pearson said the Commission is
not mandated to follow any specific policy but is to be
concerned and attempt to improve water quality within the
watershed. He recommended that the Commission not agree or
state that it will do everything in the report but rather that
the Commission keep its options open so that when we adopt our
plan these items will be goals for the improvement of water
quality. The five-year plan would be a part of the overall
plan. Mr. Pearson requested that we not bind future
Commissioners to the expenditures necessary for these
improvements. Mr. Kremer will qualify that when the plan
is put together, we will try to obtain financing for water
quality enhancement from other sources because of the fact
that Medicine Lake is a regional resource, etc. Dr. Runke
suggested that the Commissioners review the report and call if
there are any questions.
Chairman Enck thanked Dr. Reinke and Mr. Preston for the
presentation and for the work they had done in preparing the
report.
BC Minutes - July 17, 1986 - Page 4
2) Application by Golden Valley for permit from the Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) for two storm sewer outfalls into
Bassett Creek immediately downstream from Highway 100. The
City of Golden Valley is proposing to install a pipe to replace
an open ditch in the vicinity of Scott Avenue. There is an
extensive storm sewer system proposed to be installed in the
area. They are proposing to outlet the storm sewer into two
locations on the creek. After discussion it was moved by Mr.
Silberman and seconded by Mr. Moore that we recommend approval
but with the stipulation that an erosion control plan be
prepared and submitted for Commission review. Carried
unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Request for comments on Highway 394 between Highway 73 and
Winnetka Avenue. In this reach, MnDOT is proposing several
ponds to replace storage volume or provide water quality
enhancement.
Two small water quality enhancement ponds will be located in
the Boone Avenue and Interstate 394 interchange. The outlets
of the small ponds are submerged which will provide skimming of
floating debris. Another larger pond is located northwest of
the interchange and provides compensating storage volume for
the area below the management envelope which will be filled to
build the Boone Avenue interchange, Boone Avenue and the
entrance to General Mills. A large box culvert connects the
largest of these ponds to Bassett Creek at Boone Avenue.
Two additional ponds are being proposed on either side of
Interstate 394 in the vicinityof Ford Road and the interstate.
The pond on the south side drains to the pond on the north side
of the interstate which in turn outlets to an existing storm
sewer system which outlets to Bassett Creek upstream of County
Road 18. No skimming is being provided on these ponds before
they drain to the creek.
Mr. Kremer recommended approval of the plan with the exception
that skimming devices be added to the westerly ponds before
they outlet to the existing storm sewer system. Moved by Mr.
Gustafson and seconded by Mr. Moore. In the ensuing discussion
it was asked how we could be sure that there will be sufficient
maintenance of the ponding areas. Mr. Silberman said that
would be MnDOT's responsibility. Mr. Kremer said he didn't
know if MnDOT has prepared a maintenance plan. Chairman Enck
said we should ask what kind of a program they intend to
implement and to follow it up a year after completion of
construction. It was suggested that the following be added to
the motion. "The Commission expects MnDOT to maintain the
water quality enhancement ponds and to submit a copy of the
plan for Commission review." This was acceptable to both Mr.
Gustafson and Mr. Moore who made and seconded the motion.
Carried unanimously.
BC Minutes - July 17, 1986 - Page 5
2) Request for comments on a DNR permit application for S. J.
Groves Office Park, Plymouth. This is the first of the office
buildings which they are proposing to build. The preliminary
application was submitted to the Commission at their May
meeting. They are filling 1/2 acre feet below the management
envelope and providing 8 AF of compensating volume. The
Commission requested the installation of a skimmer. They are
submerging the outlet between the pond and the creek so no
floating debris would leave the pond. At the 100 year flood
level, the entire reach would be flooded. They have submitted
an application to the DNR to discharge groundwater dewatering
to the creek. They are proposing to install wells and well
points and to discharge from the well point system at 200
gallons per minute. The water quality should be good. Mr.
Kremer recommended that a letter be sent to the DNR indicating
that the proposal is consistent with the policies of the
Commission. Moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Gustafson,
and carried unanimously. A copy of the letter will be sent to
the City of Plymouth.
3) At the June Commission meeting the function and structure of
the Committee which will work with the Corps on the flood
control project was discussed. Mr. Kremer had been asked to
come back with a proposal. Although it had been suggested that
the entire Commission serve as the review committee, in order
for the committee to be effective a smaller group should report
back to the Commission. Chairman Enck asked for volunteers.
Mr. Silberman indicated that he would serve. Chairman Enck
asked Mr. Kremer to find out if Mr. Hoshaw would serve. Other
volunteers from the Commission should notify Mr. Enck or Mr.
Kremer of their willingness to serve. Mr. Kremer will work
with Dave Raasch to define how the committee will function.
ADJOURNMENT
Since there was no further business, it was moved by Mr. Gustafson
and seconded by Mr. Silberman that the meeting adjourn. Chairman
Enck adjourned the meeting at 1:55 P.M.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman Elaine Anderson, Recorder
Date:
Donald Asmus, Secretary
Page 8 ' 9. /15'1/3 / 8
uPDwTES CONT.
Big plans
for Plymouth
UNITED PROPERTIES
TO BUY 200 ACRES
nixed Properties has grabbed one
of the few large, undeveloped
parcels still available in the Win Cities
western suburbs. The Bloomington -based
developer plans to close a $5.7 million deal by
December for almost 200 acres in central
Plymouth.
The parcel, tentatively dubbed Parker's
Lake North, is expected to include multi-
family residential, light industrial and
commercial projects phased in over a four- to
six-yeaar period starting next spring. No pure
office space is planned, said United's project
manager Tom Bisanz. "This is a huge infill
site.
The 192.8 -acre parcel, owned by the city of
Minneapolis, came on the market when it
was declared excess property about two
months ago. The Minneapolis City Council
approved the terms of the sale Aug. &
An undulating expanse of farm land, the
site is located just south of State Highway 55
in the heart of Plymouth between Niagara and
Vicksburg lanes, near County Road 6 and
Parkers Lake.
The city of Plymouth already approved a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) that
divides the site into about 135.7 acres of
residential land, about 4.4 acres of
commercial and about 52.7 of light industrial.
Bisanz says United Properties might stick to
that setup, although market studies might
dictate another configuration.
Residential market studies are done and,
while the results are confidential, Bisanz said
it's fair to assume United wouldn't be going
ahead unless the project were feasible. An
industrial market study is expected to begin
soon and a retail study is being considered.
Bisanz said the large residential component
Minnesota Real Estate Journal 1
of the project will be developed and marketed
under a common theme emphasizing Parkers
Lake. There will probably be a mix of
condominiums and townhomes—some for
rent and some for sale—along with a few
small apartment buildings.
The retail element is expected to be a
25,000 square foot neighborhood shopping
center, while the industrial space will
emphasize research and development
facilities.
uW 11ke b � �
uytng
sizeable pawels of land
we can develop over a
number of years."
— Tom Bisanz
United Properties
Bisanz said United Properties pounced on
the Parkers Lake opportunity mostly because
of its hefty dimensions.
"We like buying sizeable parcels of land we
can develop over a number of years," he said,
adding that United prefers to tackle large
developments where it can exercise better
control.
And the Plymouth location is a plus, he
said, because of the community's positive
population and employment growth patterns.
United Properties is a division of
Minneapolis-based Northland Co. whose
subsidiary and holding company, Northland
Land Co. is the actual purchaser of the
Parkers Lake site. The land will later be
conveyed to United Properties.
Besides agricultural use, the property was
previously part of the Hennepin County
Adult Corrections Facility commonly
referred to as "the workhouse," and as a tree
nursery for the Minneapolis Park Board.
—Murmy Hbif
Make,\room
for hisfory
HGA DESIGN FOR MHS
LINKS PA , P"SENT
-r he new Minnesota History Cente
will bemore thahjust an attractiv
new building. Architects Hammel Green 1
Abrahamson (HGA) promise it ,will establis
not only aAstrong link betweenMinnesota
past and prdwnt but between Capitol Hill,an
downtown Sf. Paul as well.
HGA's design -for the Minnesota Historic
Society's (MHS) new home was selected Jun
28 by a jury made up of members of th
society and the Capitol Area Architecam
and Planning Board. Out of six finalists in th
nationwide competition, Minneapolis -base
HGA was the only entrant from Minnesota
All entries were anonymous to the jury.
Since the judiciary branch of the stat
legislature isscheduled to take atter an.
expand MHS'. present offices, the non -profs
independe"rlt,: organization, wilj b
consolidatiiig.'its entire collections o:
Minnesota's colorful history in one easy
access, yet protec=ted, facility.
The $50 million; six -level complex wil
house a library, museum, archival pollection
Planned Minnesota
over)120 year,,;
'Ibwle Real Estate In,
..sem
9 JURAN &
rF-r
\ = 1
rnn��SnnTAATE OF
I,EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
BOX 46 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55146
DNR INFORMATION August 18, 1986
(612) 296-6157
All City Clerks and Administrators:
Several years ago the department sent out a request for information on local
restrictions on boat use. We have compiled that information from both cities and
counties and have discovered that some municipalities are unaware of the statutes
which regulate this function.
In order to clarify this, you should be aware that:
1. Any restriction placed on the surface use of the public waters (lakes,
rivers or streams) on or after January 1, 1975, must have the approval
of the Commissioner of Natural Resources. Restrictions without this
approval are invalid and not enforceable. Those restrictions enacted
prior to January 1, 1975 are "granfathered-in" unless they have been
amended since that date. (Restrictions would include speed, time,
horsepower, area or activity restrictions.) For further reference see
M.S. § 378.32 and 459.20 and Minn. Rule 6110.3000 - 6110.3800.
2. If your city is contemplating restrictions of any type, please contact
us by phone (612)296-3310 or by letter, so we can assist you. It is
important that this be done before any ordinance is drafted.
3. Another related item is an amendment by the 1986 Legislature to M.S. §
378.32 which prohibits cities, towns and counties from restricting the
type and sizes of boats or the horsepower of motors at any access when
there is not a similar approved restriction on the surface of the lake
or river. That is to say that a lake or river that does not have any
horsepower restrictions cannot have any horsepower restrictions on an
access. Any such restrictions on launch ramps are now invalid as of
March 26, 1986. For further reference, please see M.S. § 378.32 as
amended by Chapter 439 or give us a call.
As always, if you need further information, assistance or copies of laws or
rules, please call (612)296-3310 or drop us a line.
Sincerely,
Rim A. Elverum
Boat and Water Safety Coordinator
XC: Joseph Alexander, Commissioner
Steven Thorne, Deputy Commissioner
WSUM Task Force
Paul Swenson, Trails & Waterways Director
Regional Administrators
Bob Nethercut, Metro Council
Cindy Wheeler, DEED
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
IRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-6291 (AREA CODE 612)
August, 1986
VOLUME 32, NUMBER 4
F I LE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc.
Please distribute to governing body members
POOLED BOND FINANCING
Organizations in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin are surveying three-year capital needs for municipalities to
be used to size and market pooled loan programs prior to enactment of the Tax Reform Act. The programs
are promoted as a means of providing low cost variable rate long term financing.
On review of this approach, we believe that municipalities should proceed with extreme caution in view of
the following concerns:
- Upper Midwest municipalities have not had problems in securing financing. This is documented
in the enclosed article entitled "'Pooled' Bonds and Bond Banks -- Boon or Bust?" by Robert
Ehlers.
- Overall issue -related expenses for pooled financings will cost the same or be higher than those
for individual issuers. The pooled approach requires more parties to be involved, and one more
level of expense (the pool or bank).
- Lower variable coupon rates do not generate the total savings projected. The pools will
leverage lower variable coupon rates when compared to current fixed rate long term financing,
but the promotional material does not add these significant additional costs to the coupon rates:
1) Additional front end fees
2) Letter of credit fees securing the short term "puts"
3) Remarketing fees to resell the bonds
4) Insurance costs to ensure the holders of the bonds against default
5) Cost of later reissuing long-term bonds in exchange for "put" bonds
6) Advice and financial planning that you receive from an independent financial advisor.
These additional costs may add 2% to 3% to the quoted variable rate coupons.
- Exemption from arbitrage rebate provisions appears available to tax-exempt municipalities who
issue under $5,000,000 in bonds in any year. This provision in the Senate version is included in
the bill being considered by the Conference Committee. Effective July 17, 1986, pooled
financing became subject to the proposed arbitrage rebate provisions pursuant to a joint
statement by leaders of Congress and the Administration unless it can meet two very stringent
tests.
- Municipalities take two additional risks with variable rate financing. Variable rate bonds are
characterized by the right of bondholders to "put" their bonds back to the issuer weekly,
monthly, semiannually, annually, converting the obligation into a demand debt. The issuer has
the new risk that at some time, perhaps because of market conditions, its creditors may demand
payment. If a demand is made and the money is not available, the issuer has an immediate cash
crisis. If the borrower can't pay, the LOC bank may have to take up the put bonds, but at very
high interest rates. Market conditions may be such that reasonable long term borrowing may
not be available. This risk is compounded since thousands of other issuers may have similar
problems involving tens of billions of bonds at the same time.
l
Prior to the 1930's practically all borrowing was demand debt that could be called any time, or „
at least annually. That depressed economy triggered hosts of nonrenewals and defaults. Higher
interest is part of long term borrowing, but that is a price paid to avoid a substantial risk.
Currently long-term rates are as low as they have been in the last seven years.
- If a municipality takes advantage of committing to dedicated pool financing, they may be
prevented from financing the project tax-exempt on their own, outside the pool in a better
market.
- Why borrow for future projects when interest rates may become lower. With tax reform certain
trends have surfaced. They are:
1) Current tax-exempt rates are closer to or greater than on direct U.S. Treasury
obligations. This is due to the current high volume of tax-exempt bonds and uncertainties
associated with the Tax Reform Act.
2) The Tax Reform Act will probably restrict the supply of tax-exempt bonds.
3) Tax-exempt bonds will probably be one of the few tax shelters left.
Assuming all other factors remain the same these trends would restrict supply, create more
demand for tax-exempt bonds and bring lower tax-exempt interest rates.
As a Firm we have always taken the position that we will recommend to our clients the most cost effective
financing method available to our clients provided it meets the overall financing objectives of the City. We
don't believe the program meets these objectives and would not recommend the pooled program until all of
the costs and risks are understood.
Very truly yours,
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Atevenpfel a r
Director
SFA:hd
Encl.
0692a
i g
inFm'Fm'l�M'1L tt y 7Ri76Nl�i 73r'bw'�b`R'R'R`1 R'�m1�m1ymI S �MM�t'r " v~ b'!� ri'i`♦C
00 ----- " - - - -- - ---------
y y v O P
w w r r w '. r - ♦ w b r r r 10 m b♦ b r r
m�
N ♦ � N lel ♦ fn N N r —" p — 1�1 — N N N♦ PI Y� N N �O
y W ✓ 2 2
4 d •� C d C N� m P � N� � 2 x8 .6p� .^ x8 �— y� �� N N� N Y � p �
m NN � 111 � ✓ C G C $ Ci m m o € � ° � C
�p �p ✓p pM 4
2 2✓ 2
Z' C L 'E i' « t' L M v« L€ S O O S d Y S ,MO N y. yY� �■ •^C C aP( Leg
: � � F a � SI $ � tOT x Y'. � � x , NN NN A 1- A ✓ � —RRR �I PPPN a � T e , NNN $ a .. - _C .^C 01( � a Fp
U 1." U A A W, N.1 di 6' C
F q O O O pC O g O O O O Yi d4 $ 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 O �R Sq O O Sp O O O S O O O
U O OO
U' V U' O 2 O V 3 V V V U'' fA V U'
W dl 7s 7sisggs; ".-":se oo�s000c;:: ccs: :::essa::Roos�-
� � 7S 3S 3SiS888�S '\b"\b'66'6"b"b' 88888888888 88348 7488000000 0 0 7S8888800000
Q 7n o e i
" e
kA
✓ ` y� C
O 1" C
C
0 O x = LL C Y U P 1 x T=- wO U p
N p� C— � q L
C E D C LLG111 O (((JJJ s iif]]] 9� y> d 4 C 1 V �I P q mm W W C_ 4 4 yE p Sp
co
YY y y�_ _
���mod�!= s : i i�i<im�t�W
i Q
W
Q
LL — —
�1�'•p��•pp�•pO•�•p��•�pp�R',!�,3�`,75yC�15�b'lS�b'b�'It'�`ftkltltlt
M to 17 ! . lel f^ In m " " Yi ^ P P P P P P P O m . "
ow m w w w r r w r w r r r w r w w r
z _ _
o � m
?��j �4j 1�1 ♦ — Yl PI N ♦ N �O P lel �O �O ♦ ♦ P — ^1
14
y� QQN
• Y r 2 N N r M N N
<<✓E ax x7: o las✓- ::so ✓ as✓�
?� ���✓���•aaa.aa� aaa� �aa
.00' Coco 0 occooccoo
Y 7S 7S 7S 8 8 8 0 ^�^ •♦• == R R w 0 0 0 0 0 0$ 0 0 0 0^. m P Pf ♦♦ N A. SZ O m P N v+ �D
'6'6'6'8'6'�i'8'E'8'6'6'6'6'b"6'8'88888888888i4748 8888888 8 87474scss000 8
O T
O \
ae"
e T a re
" T ✓ T
M N ✓ M �� O y
O C
— � Y U � Q C� V � � M M M S u, 4 O P �� ✓ U
c o• � � o � v
yy Kk k KKleK� ca of �i �r �i�-T rrNE��PMMMMMMMM
P P jj
P 6� P m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
^^^^ r r mmm m mm mm mm m r r r r w rr r — - - r
7777777
a �s� aN�ppcam�a- pp` a Paa aha a
P N N^ O O O N P m P< N
�g3�< 3g���a3sgg� ��ov ,J�3�333���33��a��
6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 0 o O 0 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 6 O O O O O 66 g 0 0 66
r
6666.. V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V6 V V V V6 V V V V V6 V V 66 V V V6 V V V V V V V V V V u U' 6 V V
f ^^ 0 0 ^ E
� gggggg� g���gg'\$gggg'`$ � gggg���lg00000000000000000 000 0 00000 00
G ya N v
v S
L N G
'� 3,��'>'�.. ���cac�i�i�a�io.• .• Smd3 ie3� �uRc9i'i'i'<`i�� n��.. ..vi2fii�., a°��',
3�3< MM
<I3g<€� ��< �3< ���«« «33��7E«< 3 35353 €333
��� ^rrwrrrrrrrr rrrrwrr rrr rrr rrrrrrrrrrrr^r^rrrwr O� IV: ll� 0!
------ -- r r r r -- b r N -------- N^r-Nm m
m 4-Hij�j!4
MINIMA MHAll
m b b NN mN N rN N NO is
A
a• 5����3�����3.����,� �.�x ��_��.�����x3�3��3� 0 3�� N o<ffiNN<�X��
sill
o"sa000000000<0000aoo 000 000 00000000000000Aoa�go 000000000
dl 8 888 RRRR L. R�ry NRsss,oss��8ssE FEMME
a �S�S7S1SlSiS�SiSSSfS�S� iS�S�1S��� lSlS1S ffi�� SS�SiS1S�ffi7SiSBgBggggBgggg gBggggggg
O L T g � N •� � � I ! � � N y � � O � � s� � d « O O r « yps a�� �}"� N « « � ✓ G Y. N C G N G X40
c eo��mi�cs�3v,N � W �'�s�i ►�V!<«. iS�,R ��R.�,.N.'�i2a3G���1�s�.��"'�.s .. .m.'.�.. ..«vr,��
i Q C -4 --
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: August 15, 1986
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Bob Zitur, Councilmember
SUBJECT PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
Last night I was given a blast on our plumbing inspection process. Mr.
Cordell Johnston, Plymouth Plumbing Company, Inc., had definite concerns
about our system. What I was hearing was that our system, compared to
neighboring communities such as Brooklyn Park, wasn't working. Such
things as issuance of a card that is to be posted in the residence being
built and the 24 hour wait for the permit in the first place.
Eventually the card is torn up, blown away, put into a wall, etc. and
the plumbing inspector will not inspect unless the card is posted. I
was hearing such things as open holes on weekends because they cannot
seem to get inspections. I was told that, if they are sued, probably
the City of Plymouth could be attached also. My retort, in defense of
the City, was that we do have a lot of building going on compared to
neighboring communities and budget concerns as far as hiring. I asked
him if he would be willing to meet with the Manager and/or department
head to discuss these concerns. He said he would. Please contact him
and hear him out. Thank you.
cc: Councilmembers
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Joe Ryan, Building Officialgot—
SUBJECT PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
In response to your Memo dated August 15, 1986, I am offering the following
information in regards to plumbing inspection requirements.
1. Inspection Record Cards. These are cards issued with all permits, to all
contractors of all trades. This card is to be posted at the site and protected
and maintained on the site until the job is completed. This card contains
important information regarding the job and is used to record inspections
performed. This card provides verification to the inspector that a permit has
been issued, and that the required inspections have been performed.
2. Automated Permit System. Recently we have implemented modifications to our
system, as you know, to accept and process complete applications for plumbing
work on one and two family dwellings between the hour of 9 A.M. and 10 A.M.,
Monday thru Friday. Plumbing permit applications submitted outside of these hours
are processed within a 24 hour period.
3. Our Division makes every attempt to provide inspections within 24 hours of a
scheduled request. Because of the recent increase in construction activity, the
number of inspection requests has surpassed our ability to provide this service
within the 24 hour time frame, without the authorization of overtime. The State
Plumbing Code requires that contractors provide a 24 hour notice for inspection
requests.
4. I am not aware of any situation where Plumbing Inspector, Don Kilian has not been
able to perform an inspection within 24 hours of the scheduled time requested. I
do believe, however, that a plumbing contractor could anticipote this time frame
when requesting an inspection in order to eliminate any hazard of open trenches
during weekends and holidays.
5. I would be more than happy to contact and meet with Mr. Johnston to discuss this
matter.
Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you.
cc: File
i
- 1
i
Community Improvement Reminder
I have noticed a problem with: 0 :
Resident has noticed a problem wir a �) c�
Street/Potholes Watermain/Hydrant '
Brush/Weeds/Trees Filling/Excavating
Drainage dunk Cars
Traffic ar ing Violation Garbage/Debris
Traffic/Street S,4n SignaT— Erosion/ rty t3 reets
Dead Animals in reet Br ken/ maged Equipment
Sign- fight
Other
Deser n
beQ4Ue n
1
9
e6
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800�-
f�
MEMO
C
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Director Carl qu i st
FROM: D. Paulson
SUBJECT Selective Traffic Enforcement
(86-15) 47th Avenue North at Balsam Lane
Three stationary patrol assignments have been completed in response
to the stop sign complaint at this location. The assigments were
made on two different weekdays and the results are as follows:
Acceptable Stop Poor Stop Illegal Stop
W/Warning W/Tag
08/15/86 -0700-0900
Cars/Mi sc. 86 03
Trucks/Buses 03
08/15/86 -1500-1800
Cars/Misc. 77 03 01
Trucks/Buses
08/18/86 -0700-0900
ars isc, 48 05
Trucks/Buses 07
Acceptable Stop Poor Stop Illegal Stop Totals
W/Warning W/Tag
Summary:
Cars/Misc. 211 11 01 223
Trucks/Buses 10 10
Time Expenditure (Hours): 07 Tags issued: 01 Verbal Warnings: 02
ME BEA
OE
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION 01 ATTORNEY -CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
.N0 LAW OFFICES
MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF RIOBNEI- CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNIANIS
MELVIN R. HARRIS, LTD.
SUITE 915 PARK PLACE, 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
August 20, 1986
Virgil Schneider, Mayor
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
AREA CODE 612
546-3535
Re: Barking Dog Ordinances
in the City of Plymouth
Dear Mayor Schneider:
I am requesting that you bring before the City Council a request
for changing the City Code with regard to barking dogs. I live
at 1304 West Medicine Lake Drive in the Sunrise Bay Condominium
facing Medicine Lake. During the past week, one or more dogs has
been continuously barking throughout the night. I complained to
the Police Department, and later found out that several other
residents of the condominium and of the apartment complex
directly across from the condominium had also been complaining
and were very bitter.
To my surprise and to others, the Police Department informed us
that they had no power to stop the relentless barking throughout
the night unless they received a written complaint from two or
more persons residing in the vicinity of the dog. Only then can
the Chief of Police notify the owner to abate the nuisance within
forty-eight hours, thereby subjecting the residents to an extra
two nights of loss of sleep.
After receiving the written complaint, and only after the passing
of the forty-eight hours is there a violation of the public
nuisance ordinance (Section 915.13, Subdivisions 1 and 4).
I am sure that you agree that there is no excuse for an ordinance
to require a written complaint for a violation that can be heard
by any Police Officer first hand who checks on the complaint. To
require two written complaints before the Chief notifies the
owner to abate the nuisance is an insult to the residents who
have to bear the burden of sleepless nights.
I hope that you will bring this before the City Council and
request that the ordinance be amended to permit the issuance of a
citation immediately upon the observation of a barking dog, if
any complaint has been made, whether or not the complaint is in
writing.
Virgil Schneider, Mayor
August 20, 1986
Page 2
I am assuming that the copy of the ordinance that I have is not
complete, since I do not see any penalty provided for its
violation. Would you please have your secretary send me a copy
of the statutes setting forth the penalties for failing to abate
Section 915.13, the public nuisance ordinance.
Yours very truly,
`i
MELVIN R. HARRIS
mrh/jb
1�7kC'
TKDA ANDA KING.TES.IN ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
• ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292-4400
August 20, 1986
Mr. Virgil Schneider, Mayor
Mr. Dave Crain, Councilmember
Mr. Jerry Sisk, Councilmember
Ms. Maria Vasiliou, Councilmember
Mr. Robert Zitur, Councilmember
Mr. James Willis, Manager
Mr. Fred Moore, Director of Public Works
Re: Consulting Engineering Services for Water System Improvements,
Plymouth, Minnesota
Honorable Mayor, City Council and Staff:
Duane Prew, Tom Kirk and I want to thank you for considering our firm for
your water system improvements. Needless to say, we are very disappointed
In not being selected for the water wells or water treatment plant design
work.
I believe that we have provided the City of Plymouth with a Comprehensive
Water System Plan which will provide for the future growth both from a
technical design standpoint and an economically financial standpoint. We
would like the opportunity to work with you again on municipal improvement
projects in your community.
Yours very truly,
C 'Il �,
DuWayne R. Kasma, P.E.
Vice President
DRK:kmd
COr `
��Elri li.rl�k���/
i
August 14, 1986
Mr. Virgil Schneider, Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor Schneider:
The Metropolitan Waste Control Cam-Lission would like to take this opportunity
to inform the city about the 1985 Final Cost Allocation and the 1986 and 1987
Statement of Charges for interceptor and treatment works use. The following
paragraphs explain that the Final Cost Allocation is based on actual flow and
expenditures while the Statement of Charges is based on estimated flow and
budgeted expenditures. We trust that this explanation will assist you in the
continuation of an equitable charge system to your users.
We have determined the actual wastewater flow from your city to be 2134 million
gallons (MG) in 1985 (refer to Attachment A - Final Sewage Flow Determination).
This wastewater flow to the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) was based on the
metered and unmetered flow originating from your community. It also includes
14 MG for your community's proportional contribution of the total estimated
infiltration into the Commission's Joint Interceptor. Located in St. Paul, this
major interceptor serves communities that have their wastewater treated at the
Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant.
In late 1984, the Commission issued your community a "Statement of 1985 Sewer
Service Charges". This "statement" was based on the expenditures approved in
the Commission's 1985 Budget and on your community's 1985 estimated wastewater
flaw, which in early 1984 was estimated to be 1940 MG. In accordance with the
"Statement of 1985 Sewer Service Charges", your community paid the Commission
$ 1,422,560.04 in 1985.
The Commission has completed the 1985 Final Cost Allocation (Attachment B).
The Final Cost Allocation is based on the Cammission's actual 1985 budget
expenditures and on the actual 1985 wastewater flaws. In accordance with the
1985 Final Cost Allocation, your charges are $1,339,675.56 for the 2134 MG that
were discharged to the MDS in 1985. Therefore, the Commission received an
overpayment of $ 22,884.48 from your community ($1,422,560.04 - $1,339,675.56 =
$ 22,884.48) in 1985. This amount will be credited on the 1987 "Statement of
Sewer Service Charges".
350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423
Mayor Virgil Schneider
Page Two
August 14, 1986
The reason for the credit is that the Commission underspent its 1985 budget by
6.3%, or approximately $ 5,700,000. The budget was underspent primarily in
the areas of contracted services, wages, material, supplies, utilities, and
motor vehicle expenses. The Commission also realized increased revenue from
its Industrial Strength Charge and investment earnings.
In addition, the total flaw discharged to the MDS in 1985 was greater than
estimated by approximately 3.6%. The increased flow is primarily due to
annual precipitation significantly above normal for the last several years.
As shown in Attachment C - Annual Community Flows, the total metropolitan
area wastewater flow varies nearly + 7 percent depending upon the amount of
precipitation received in the period prior to and during the year of the record.
This variation in the wastewater flow is primarily the change in the amount of
inflow/ infiltration (I/I) as a percentage of the total wastewater volume.
According to our flow records, it appears that significant I/I flow is present
in your sewage collection system. The volume of I/I flow is minimized when
sewers are properly installed and an on-going maintenance program is implemented.
The Commission has begun the preparation of the 111987 Statement of Sewer
Service Charges" for the 105 communities who discharge to the MDS. The initial
step in this process is to estimate the wastewater flow that will be generated
by each of these commninities in 1987. Based on historic flow records,
precipitation trends, and your ccmTunity's anticipated growth (i.e., 1200
residential equivalent connections), the Commission has estimated your
community's 1987 flow to be 2260 MG.
The Commission has completed the preparation of its 1987 Budget. The Budget
includes the Commission's operation and maintenance costs plus the user
portion of the debt service necessary to fund existing and proposed capital
improvement projects. The 1987 Budget has been presented for public hearing
and is 4.63% greater than the Commission's 1986 Budget. In accordance with
State Statutes, the budget will be allocated proportionally to the 105
communities who discharge to the MDS, based on their estimated wastewater
flow.
The 1986 wastewater flow estimate for your community is 2170 MG (refer to
Attachment D - Statement of 1986 Sewer Service Charges). This estimate, which
was made in mid -1985 includes the 1000 new residential equivalent connections
(RFC's) that are expected to be added to your sewer system during 1986. Based
on the metered flow data from the first half of 1986, this estimate appears
to be low. Should future flow data indicate a major departure from the flow
originally estimated, the Comtission will advise accordingly.
Mayor Virgil Schneider
Page Three
August 14, 1986
Hopefully, the information contained in this letter will help you understand the
process the Commission utilizes to allocate sewer service costs to its users.
If you have any questions on the above information or on any of the attachments,
please contact the Commission. Commissioners and staff are available to discuss
any aspect of this letter at a time and place convenient to you.
Sincerely,
Peter E. Meintsma
Chairman
PEM:RAO:jlw
cc: James Willis, City Manager
Paul McCarron, Commissioner
L. J. Breimhurst
R. L. Berg
Attachments: A - 1985 Final Sewage Flow Determination
B - 1985 Final Cost Allocation
C - Annual Community Flows
D - Statement of 1986 Sewer Service Charges
FINAL SEWAGE FLOW DETERMINATION
19S6-
COMMUNITYq m,,ifh
1971 TOTAL (1FS
1972 TOTAL 71a
1973 TOTAL r1l-k,-�
1974 TOTAL '77-.z,
1975 TOTAL /003
1976 TOTAL
1977 TOTAL 1141
1978 TOTAL /141527
1979 TOTAL 1559
1980 TOTAL /Ec8
CURRENT YEAR ESTIMATED FLOW
METER FORMULA , r ( - I IS -- 'M - I ►q
1981 1550
1982 /(074
1983
lyoo
1984
ao6�
1985
\ 010
METER
NUMBERS AND FLOW VOLUMES MG
ONTH
- I
1 -tq
TOTAL FLOW
Jan.
158.1
/ C'
157 /
Feb.
O
Mar.
Apr.
May
/. 4
/3 4,
June
17-7,7
/.3
/7G•`�
Jul
/07, /
Aug.
1.93. l
/• Z
/X 1
Se t.
209'./
/, =
2 4;7,
Oct.
2 47. D
; .
��FS• d
Nov.
194.1
/82-.
Dec.
/-7
1
1 i
OTAL
a, 2 /.
G, l
o s, s
QUARTER METERED FLOW *UNMETERED FLOW TOTAL FLCW
4-76.7
2.
3. j 5 G 3
*UNMETERED FLOW -- Basis of unmetered sewage flow (see reverse side)
UNMETERED FLOW
FLOW TO: UNMETERED FLOW (MG):
SUBTOTAL:
FLOW FROM: UNMETERED FLOW (MG):
i�{dine - 90
SUBTOTAL: -
TOTAL: --72
172
PLYMOUTH
2- 2l- 0"2W.110•
O1
TOTAL ANNUAL AC'T'UAL CHARGES
1985 CASH PAYMENTS
NET SURPLUS (CSR DEFICIT)
4.4.86
MILLION
GALTANS
I -
AMOUNT
2,134 $1,317,381.34
2,134 184,484.75
1,501,866.09
217.00 CR
10,762.00 CR
91,211.53 CR
102,190.53 CR
1,339.675.56
1,422.560.04
22,884.48
TABLE I - ANNUAL COMKJNITY FLOAS MY)
ccnminity
1971
MY
1972
MY
1973
MGY
1974
MY
1975
MY
1976
MGY
1977
NGY
1978
MGY -
1979
NUY
1980
NEY
MOVER
0
0
0
0
0
6
48
76
72
97
NOKA
382
636
619
588
518
576
626
660
650
685
PPLE VALLEY
174
192
288
300
383
441
468
538
570
670
RDEN HILLS
184
193
218
245
265
265
310
361
436
427
AYPORT
175
174
150
164
189
185
177
171
195
162
IRCHWOOD
22
22
20
22
25
24
27
29
27
29
LAID
323
423
472
501
583
590
626
654
710
733
LOOMINGPON
2,382
2,346
2,477
2,360
2,407
2,440
2,564
2,736
2,938
2,867
ROOKLYN CTR
858
945
949
986
1,117
1,114
1,075
1,125
1,087
1,077
ROOKLYN PARK
661
822
849
882
960
911
11011
1,213
1,352
1,286
URNSVILLE
638
714
756
758
847
832
906
996
1,060
1,005
HAMPLIN
64
64
65
62
71
71
75
74
72
80
HANHASSEN
63
71
91
136
150
134
155
214
241
219
HASKA
192
211
264
252
314
297
270
352
330
235
IRCLE PINES
64
60
68
67
81
92
87
88
94
89
OLUMBIA HEIGH'T'S
751
712
689
744
838
718
712
750
705
690
DON RAPIDS
543
548
630
666
885
882
782
908
948
918
XTAGE GROVE
276
317
336
332
329
332
354
490
584
585
RYSTAL
781
792
784
801
951
849
838
956
940
849
EEPHAVEN
1
36
64
104
107
114
123
148
152
132
AGAN
173
270
440
471
577
560
669
797
938
900
DEN PRAIRE
6
19
82
179
214
247
299
363
484
541
DIVA
1,681
2,037
2,140
2,232
2,457
2,386
2,428
2,597
2,658
2,501
SIRE TOWNSHIP
0
0
1
3
3
6
10
12
13
14
AKE ELMO
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
XCELSIOR
145
147
116
122
126
106
101
105
113
112
ALOON HEIGHTS
380
379
405
393
414
414
404
351
365
388
ARMINGTON
122
111
147
127
215
134
125
192
279
234
OREST LAKE
81
92
124
145
213
197
194
248
281
248
OREST LAKE TSP
58
75
76
81
88
86
87
99
115
118
RIDLEY
1,031
1,033
1,177
1,175
1,313
1,240
1,135
1,219
1,204
1,220
EM LAKE
10
7
7
7
7
9
18
17
18
15
OLDEN VALLEY
1,074
1,180
1,221
1,113
1,285
1,128
1,226
1,314
1,277
1,097
REENWOOD
0
2
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
ASTINGS
332
425
481
472
469
477
500
522
495
526
ILLTOP
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
OPKINS
567
790
767
787
726
726
738
727
749
740
UGO
0
0
0
2
46
25
37
36
39
35
NVER GROVE HGTS
213
230
251
291
288
291
290
335
386
380
AKEvrOM TSP
0
0
0
0
0
1
13
21
22
21
AKEVILLE
180
172
283
319
370
305
309
409
458
457
ANDFALL
16
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
22
22
AUDERDALE
72
72
50
46
53
48
44
54
55
55
FKINGPON
44
54
39
41
52
34
34
46
40
36
INO LAKES
0
0
3
4
4
3
4
9
13
13
ILYDALE
0
0
4
6
10
12
15
16
20
17
IT= CANADA
183
174
145
194
257
222
190
267
275
245
OM LAKE
57
61
49
63
78
57
63
95
96
69
MIUMEDI
87
79
90
93
108
100
94
111
123
121
APLE CAVE
0
25
91
142
206
258
301
374
471
522
TABLE II - ANNUAL OOMMUNITY FLOWS (MGY
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
maunity MGY NGY MGY NGY NGY MGY MGY NGY
.qDOVER
83
88
90
102
101
140KA
634
671
722
746
719
PPLE VALLEY
654
625
702
784
798
ZDEN HILLS
410
409
450
441
416
%YPORT
173
191
197
182
192
LRCHWOOD
29
30
29
33
32
CAINE
786
802
866
919
916
LOOMINGTON
2,946
3,087
3,137
3,404
3,414
;;,100KLYN CTR
1,024
1,137
1,216
1,168
1,168
ROOKLYN PARK
1,298
1,370
1,465
1,568
1,614
JRNSVILLE
1,036
1,319
1,538
1,627
1,575
HAMPLIN
101
110
128
167
197
HANHASSEN
225
269
317
363
324
HASKA
253
290
373
396
338
LRCLE PINES
85
82
95
102
111
MUMBIA HEIGHTS
663
527
491
493
524
)ON RAPIDS
941
1,020
1,089
1,082
1,114
7ITAGE GROVE
442
459
474
475
492
IYSTAL
831
867
978
911
951
MPHAVEN
142
138
134
138
137
kGAN
961
1,050
1,189
1,300
1,327
)EN PRAIRE
585
660
966
897
1,022
)INA
2,475
2,597
2,700
2,744
2,777
4IPIRE TOWNSHIP
15
15
16
16
17
UCE ELMD
2
1
1
1
1
(CEISIOR
99
108
116
126
103
LOON HEIGHTS
357
367
361
392
421
URMINGTON
220
308
449
464
402
)REST LAKE
275
276
293
315
295
)REST LAKE TSP
103
113
123
129
129
UDLEY
1,266
1,177
1,233
1,314
1,360
N LAKE
16
12
8
9
9
)EDEN VALLEY
1,129
1,268
1,331
1,379
1,395
2EENWOOD
23
23
21
23
24
kSTINGS
544
549
605
600
605
CLLTOP
22
30
31
31
31
)PKINS
748
775
795
791
822
]GO
34
44
44
51
53
AVER GROVE HGTS
383
407
397
407
481
Umli N TSP
20
14
15
15
16
UCEV . -
495
519
729
837
782
MFALL
22
22
22
23
23
WDERDALE
54
74
80
78
80
DC`NG'I'ON
42
46
47
48
55
M LAKES
17
22
26
32
34
CLYDALE
17
18
20
22
20
MLE CANADA
276
265
247
263
306
)NG LAKE
72
90
106
108
102
MOMEDI
107
118
125
137
137
,PIE GROVE
557
625
716
755
864
�0b
1989 1990
NGY NGY
1971 1972 1973 1974
anminity MGY MGY NUY NUY
\db
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
WY WY MGY MGY WY MGY
APLE PLAIN
80
99
82
86
128
78
63
88
93
65
APLEWOOD
1,285
1,444
1,479
1,472
1,607
1,469
1,452
1,467
1,532
1,497
EDICINE LAKE
16
10
7
7
8
8
8
10
9
10
EDINA
26
31
27
27
37
29
35
59
51
43
E DCfrA HEIGHTS
287
257
282
327
346
284
303
377
399
370
QNNEAPOLIS
30,361
29,789
28,215
26,406
26,662
23,501
23,289
23,407
24,085
23,508
[INN MNKA
121
162
343
622
887
1,002
1,097
1,240
1,370
1,422
[INNEPONKA BEACH
0
0
0
0
1
10
14
21
23
24
FOUND
334
373
398
434
402
384
423
431
401
364
QNNETRISTA
0
0
0
7
30
37
40
89
97
61
UUNDS VIEW
223
258
335
326
359
364
371
391
436
424
IEW BRIGHTON
493
584
574
561
665
665
649
780
759
737
iEW HOPE
903
945
861
924
1,036
838
838
941
964
892
ZEn1PORT
65
63
65
62
83
79
99
119
122
106
FORTH OAKS
3
5
6
9
11
9
10
11
11
12
FORTH ST. PAUL
437
512
442
388
463
407
413
482
543
518
AKDALE
257
304
381
378
414
386
412
517
532
499
AK PARK HGTS.
29
34
44
52
79
77
70
78
112
101
RONO
88
105
112
118
130
118
130
188
181
179
SSEO
96
101
100
102
134
111
108
116
124
122
L)MQ rrH
645
712
722
772
1,003
1,047
1,191
1,459
1 5,;9
1__6n8
RIOR LAKE
42
43
46
56
104
161
206
247
290
262
ICHFIELD
1,451
1,134
1,139
1,080
994
1,058
978
1,000
1,004
983
OBBINSDALE
524
495
498
544
548
488
457
505
450
485
OSEMOUDTP
36
39
44
74
80
87
97
106
108
106
OSEVILLE
1,636
1,577
1,486
1,504
1,790
1,481
1,524
1,603
1,542
1,496
T. ANTHONY
304
309
352
323
425
360
349
385
387
341
T. LOUIS PARK
2,523
2,522
2,465
2,374
2,415
2,268
2,181
2,289
2,454
2,397
T. PAUL
25,533
24,459
22,303
21,906
23,802
20,000
19,909
21,635
21,423
19,770
T. PAUL PARK
111
113
108
101
118
129
130
140
135
117
SAVAGE
115
121
106
138
153
140
141
134
158
138
,HAKOPEE
434
449
462
574
615
648
638
675
714
693
MOREVIEW
321
279
337
364
516
513
497
589
623
583
>HOREWDOD
0
15
64
108
141
146
153
192
229
192
;0WH ST. PAUL
3,717
3,403
3,275
3,470
3,742
3,007
3,000
2,774
2,890
2,278
SPRING PARK
58
72
61
63
82
79
80
101
105
107
MING LAKE PARK
155
137
153
145
161
162
171
184
195
191
T. BONIFACIUS
0
2
10
10
17
18
19
26
27
22
TILLWATER
796
716
665
650
685
691
697
726
803
741
TILIWATER TWP.
0
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
ONKA BAY
39
40
63
69
82
52
51
78
67
64
ADNAIS HGTS.
32
64
107
98
117
124
158
260
262
231
'IMORIA
18
19
21
22
24
25
31
35
36
36
ACONIA
0
0
0
0
17
109
114
126
128
113
fAYZATA
184
203
190
204
240
208
205
262
265
243
M ST. PAUL
559
701
809
748
864
754
812
885
940
866
MITE BEAR LAKE
501
596
632
597
719
739
613
724
749
685
1HITE BEAR TWP.
65
72
99
62
87
81
106
145
125
147
UUMUM
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
UODBURY
184
205
261
206
300
298
328
437
525
500
RVILLE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
22
23
90,380 90,343 88,301 87,131 94,005 84,760 85,307 91,502 94,294 89,918
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
b[M=ity MGY MGY MGY MGY MGY
1APLE PLAIN
84
114
116
135
141
[APLE,WOOD
1,536
1,530
1,574
1,637
1,710
®ICINE LAKE
12
13
14
14
16
EDINA
45
61
84
118
111
MDOTA HEIGHTS
337
351
394
516
569
1INNEAPOLIS
22,826
23,101
24,737
25,328
25,893
[INNEIiONKA
1,405
1,574
1,786
1,919
1,903
aNNEIUNIKA BEACH
19
25
23
27
27
rxm
373
421
437
467
410
ENNEPRISTA
56
53
65
69
79
UUNDS VIEW
463
394
432
469
470
lBq BRIGHTON
807
820
882
895
860
&1 HOPE
899
955
1,109
1,096
1,052
MWPORT
90
103
121
106
108
FORTH OAKS
13
13
15
15
16
JORTH ST. PAUL
438
490
546
628
594
14KDALE
505
535
658
655
630
)AK PARK HGL'S.
92
104
101
133
121
)RONO
168
185
207
212
214
ISSEO
116
114
104
105
108
'LympIIIii
1.550
1.674
1.900
2,064
2,134
PRIOR LAKE
264
283
391
366
363
LICHFIELD
979
921
1,024
1,007
869
tOBBINSDALE
468
474
471
503
502
tOSEMOUNr
110
114
125
135
138
tOSEVILLE
1,525
1,575
1,793
1,891
1,756
T. AN TONY
353
405
408
440
402
T. LOUIS PARK
2,287
2,279
2,558
2,539
2,448
T. PAUL
18,740
18,234
21,030
19,653
18,455
T. PAUL PARK
118
125
136
138
134
MAGE
145
176
217
228
233
)HAKOPEE
716
721
781
762
809
iHOREVIEW
636
657
655
739
759
'HOP EWOOD
189
220
240
259
253
XXJTH ST. PAUL
2,441
3,016
3,037
2,759
2,044
)PRING PARK
106
107
106
111
110
)PRING LAKE PARK
193
198
208
226
228
T. BONIFACIUS
29
30
26
32
30
>TiLi a,'i'F'R
749
849
935
947
878
TINTER THIP.
1
1
1
1
1
UNKA BAY
61
63
76
73
59
FADNAIS HGI'S.
236
236
222
245
252
FICTORLA
38
51
54
58
62
MCIONIA
124
140
156
160
162
AYZATA
235
242
254
253
251
ZEST ST. PAUL
841
876
966
962
1,019
HITE BEAR LAKE
699
724
801
839
843
MITE BEAR THIP.
149
163
198
244
232
MLLERNIE
16
16
16
16
16
XMBURY
486
518
583
604
605
RV T F
28
33
38
39
38
88,488 91,161 100,114 101,245 99,954
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
MGY Nry MGY MGY NAY
`C)b
172
PlyIInuth
GALLONAGE % OF TOTAL A 4DUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES
TREATMENT WORKS COSTS 2,170 .021691 $1,543,164.43
SEMM SERVICE AREA NO. 01 2,170 .031361 207,653.20
TOTAL CHARGES 1,750,817.63
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT 217.00 CR
DEBT PA)2,21rT CREDIT 10,469.00 CR
1984 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 37,927.80 CR
TOTAL CREDO CR CWZES 48,613.80 CR
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIh1,TED NET PANT DUE
Due on the first day of each month. Installments
not received by the 10th day of each month in which
due shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear
interest from the first day of such month at the
rats of 6% per annm.
1,702,203.83
141,850.32
= \ Oce
August 15, 1986
.f
t
The Honorable Gerry Sikorski CITY OF
U.S. Representative pL�MOUTI
414 Cannon House Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
SUBJECT: RISK RETENTION LEGISLATION
Dear Representative Sikorski:
The Commerce, Transportation, and Tourism Subcommittee of the House of Representatives
is considering HR 5225 which is intended to allow municipalities to form risk reten-
tion groups to provide liability insurance for members. The thrust of the legislation
is to provide an alternative to the conventional insurance market for cities and other
public bodies which find themselves unable to obtain insurance because of high
premiums, unavailability or limited coverage. Under the bill as currently written,
risk retention groups would be free to sell insurance to participating members oh an
interstate basis largely free from state regulatory requirements.
There is one problem with the legislation as currently proposed. The legislation
defines a risk retention group as being licensed or chartered as an insurance company
in at least one state. None of the municipal pools currently in operation or at the
planning stage, would qualify under this definition as a risk retention group.
Consequently, the legislation would be of little or no benefit. Municipal pools, such
as risk retention groups, are normally established by Joint powers agreement which
extends certain municipal powers to Joint powers groups for the purpose of accomplish-
ing a specific objective. This means that Joint powers groups are governed by munici-
pal rather than insurance law. If HR 5225 is adopted without a revision to the defin-
ition of risk retention group, municipal pools will not be allowed to use the legis-
lation to pool across state lines. Municipalities had hoped that the legislation
would facilitate interstate pooling on a regional basis. This would be particularly
useful for the smaller states.
I encourage you to support amendments to HR 5225 which would expand the definition of
risk retention groups to include municipal pools. With this revision, HR 5225 would
truly enhance the ability of municipalities to secure insurance coverages without
being victims of random market fluctuations, marketing decisions of insurance
companies not to sell to municipalities, or precipitous premium increases.
Thank you for your active interest in this important municipal issue. Please feel
free to contact me if you have any questions.
Yours vetrul ,
Frank Boyles
Assistant City Manager
FB:jm
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
TwinWest*
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Woodside Office Park 10550 Wayzata Boulevard
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 (612) 540-0234
August 15, 1986
Mr. Jim Willis
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Jim:
_7_ \ 0(:�_
On September 30, 1986 I complete my term as Chairman of the Board of
the TwinWest Chamber of Commerce. As I reflect on my term as Chairman,
the impression that stands out most in my mind is the quality and
dedication of Chamber volunteers like yourself, who have helped make
TwinWest the quality organization that it is today.
As you finish your Board term, I want to take this opportunity to
personally thank you for your support, not only of me as Chairman, but
of the organization as a whole. Even though you have completed your
term of service on the Board, I know you will remain an active par-
ticipant in the affairs and activities of the Chamber.
On behalf of the Chamber, I wish to express appreciation for your
efforts in carrying out the Board's duties during your term and I know
our new Chairman, Phil Kronlage, looks forward to your continued sup-
port and cooperation.
Sincerely,
P &A4,L
Daryl Pj Clark
Chairman of the Board
DC:cp
P.S. Please mark your calendar for lunch, tentatively scheduled for
November 19, when we will officially recognize you for your
efforts.
* SERVING CRYSTAL, GOLDEN VALLEY, HOPKINS, MEDICINE LAKE, MINNETONKA, NEW HOPE, PLYMOUTH AND ST. LOUIS PARK
\0Q,
.L'1 -4k iue eamm"4ui0s 01"M' R
ROOM 65 / STATE OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155 • (612) 296-2406
ROBERT E. HANSEN
Executive Director
August 11, 1986
Fellow Minnesotans:
The Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) is
required by law to contract with a consultant to conduct a
study of the management and organization of the Department
of Natural Resources (DNR). (ML86, 1st Special Session,
Chap. 1, Article 11, Sec. 1, Subd. 3 (not to include Subd. 1
and 2 thereof)).
Subd. 3 of the law states:
The law states:
The Study must .include an evatuat.io n o j , and contain
recommendations 6or change where appropriate .in, .the
bottow.ing subjects retat.ing to the Department:
1. E6 tabt ib h.ing a ratio o6 regio nat 6 to 6 6 to
cents. o6jice 6ta66 greater than .the ratio
established .in the 1986-87 b.ienn.iat budget (a)
6or emptoyees .inctuded .in the Department's Zeg.is-
tat.ivety apptcoved complement; and (b) 6or emptoyeez
not .included .in the Depatctment'6 complement.
2. The ne6pon6.ivene66 o6 the Department to public
and resource needs.
3. The d.isttibut.ion o6 decision-making authority
bor ptann.ing, policymaking, budgeting, .inctud.ing
any saving or potentiat .increased cost, and program
.imptementat.ion within the Department.
4. The pe"onnet structure and career opportunitiez
within the Department.
5. Assistance to tocat * unit6 o4 government .in the
development, management and 6und.ing of resource
management programs.
6. Po66.ibZe savings .in expenditures 6or Zegat
services and unemployment compensation that cou.id
be achieved through changes .in management and organ-
ization of the Department.
7. Coordination and cooperation within the Department.
8. The ref-at.ions h.ip o s new programa, to present
personne.b structure and management objectives.
REP. DOUGLAS CARLSON, CHAIRMAN, SANDSTONE • SENATOR GENE MERRIAM. VICE CHAIRMAN, COON RAPIDS • REP. WILLARD MUNGER. SECRETARY, DULUTH
• SENATORS: HOWARD KNUTSON, BURNSVILLE • WILLIAM LUTHER, BROOKLYN PARK • ROGER D. MOE, ERSKINE • CLARENCE PURFEERST, FARIBAULT • EARL
RENNEKE, LE SUEUR • GERALD L. WILLET, PARK RAPIDS • REPRESENTATIVES: TONY BENNETT, SHOREVIEW • GAYLIN DEN OUDEN, PRINSBURG • VIRGIL JOHNSON.
CALEDONIA • FRED C. NORTON, ST. PAUL • JOHN ROSE, ROSEVILLE.
Fellow Minnesotans
August 11, 1986
Page 2
We, in Minnesota, are very fortunate in having a natural resource
base which forms the foundation of the often referred to "quality
of life." How Minnesota goes about managing its bountiful natural
resources is everyone's concern. The study gives us an opportun-
ity to evaluate how our natural resources are being managed, to
expand on the good things, and make improvements where needed.
We request your candid opinion on which parts of the law you feel
we should or should not concentrate our evaluation on, and which
other areas of natural resource management need evaluation. If
you choose, unsigned comments are welcome.
Please mail your written comments to our office no later than
September 15, 1986. They will be provided to the consultant hired
to conduct the study.
Thank you for your comments and suggestions as we begin this process.
Sincerely,
•'/oe
De
Sen r Roger
Stu Co -Chair
Repres ntative Douglas W. Carlson,
Study Co -Chairman
HENNEPIN
Lfu
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY
822 South Third Streei, Suite 300
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Phone; (612) 348-6846
August 18, 1986
James G. Willis
City Manager
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Willis:
Thank you for your written comaeents regarding Ordinance 13. The
staff at the Department of Environment and Energy have an immense
task before us in preparing an ordinance of this type and we value
your input. We are in the process of redrafting Ordinance 13 and
you will be notified before the next hearing. `
Sincerely,
Dan Huschke
Recycling Coordinator
Hennepin County
DH:tma
ORD13LTR
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE
August 18, 1986
Mr. Jim Willis
City Manager
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
-T-; \ O
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES,C.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612)
RE: Comparison of Similar Sales to the August 18, 1986 Bond Sale
Dear Jim:
The bids we awarded Monday night were approximately 70 basis points lower than
our June projection. During July tax-exempt bonds were trading 90% to 100% of
U.S. Treasury instead of last years 80% to 85%. Potential bond buyers had
been staying away from tax-exempt bonds because no one knew what changes would
take place in the tax laws. Purchasers of tax-exempt bonds now feel more
comfortable about the final shape of Tax Reform and how tax-exempt bonds will
be treated. In a survey of general obligation bonds sold during the same
period, the reoffering coupons were as follows:
Community
Plymouth
Edina
Washington County
Sale Date
August 18
August 18
August 19
Moody's Rating
A-1
AA-
A-1
Amount
$2,175,000
$8,500,000
$5,000,000
1990
5.50%
5.40%
5.40%
1991
5.70%
5.60%
5.60%
1992
5.90%
5.80%
5.80%
1993
6.10%
6.00%
6.00%
1994
6.30%
6.20%
6.20%
1995
6.50%
6.40%
6.40%
Discount taken
1.1%
1.4%
1.55%
Computed net interest
cost and rate for
$2,175,000 based
on
bid coupons &
discount
$883,512.50
$876,099.99
$879,362.99
6.3391%
6.2859%
6.3093%
When running the coupons and discount taken on the Edina and Washington County
bids for the Plymouth bond issue, you can see there is really very little
difference in total interest cost. The purchaser took less discount on the
Plymouth bid. Washington County probably received the benefit of an improving
market to account for the lower coupons. In review of these bids, we believe
the City received a very competitive bid and was justified in awarding th
bid. The City is bid as a strong A-1 credit.
Jim Willis
Plymouth
Page 2 of 2
In reviewing the preliminary material on the Tax Reform Act it appears that
had Ryan been in a position for us to sell on August 4, 1986 both issues could
have been sold but at a rate 20 to 25 basis points higher. In talking to Da_ve
Kennedy had both issues been combined on August 18 we would have had to reject
bids for the combined issue. He did not have enough information to make a
decision on the land write down portion.
As soon as the necessary Tax Reform information is available, we will proceed
with the marketing of the $825,000 bond issue. I will keep you informed. I
would guess that if we are going to be able to do the bond issue as a
tax-exempt security we would proceed with issuing and closing on the bond
issue by September I.
As always, it is our pleasure to work with you on this bond issue.
Very truly yours,
EHLERS,AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Speveen F. Apfelbacher
Director
SFA: hd
cc: Dale Hahn
0917a
BID TABULATION
$2,175,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 198 A `
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
SALE: Monday, August 18, 1986
AWARD: CRONIN & COMPANY, INC.
BBI: 7.33%
NAME OF BIDDER
CRONIN & COMPANY, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
DAIN BOSWORTH, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS
Minneapolis, Minnesota
MILLER SECURITIES, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL
St. Paul, Minnesota
Moore, Juran & Company, Inc.
Summit Investment Corp.
PIPER, JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
FIRST BANK MINNEAPOLIS
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Allison -Williams Company
American National Bank & Trust Company
of St. Paul
Juran & Moody, Inc.
PaineWebber, Inc.
Robert W. Baird & Company, Inc.
Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc.
M.H. Novick & Co., Inc.
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
RATING: "A-1"
COUPON NET INTEREST COST
RATE YEAR & RATE
5.50%
5.70%
5.90%
6.10%
6.30%
6.50%
5.50%
5.75%
5.90%
6.10%
6.30%
6.50%
5.50%
5.75%
6.00%
6.20%
6.40%
6.50%
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
PRICE
$883,512.50 $2,151,075.00
f
6.3391%
$884,187.50
6.3439%
$891,737.50
6.3981%
$2,151,075.00
$2,151,075.00
1 144 .�vw_�
$2,175,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Monday, August 18, 1986
Page 2
COUPON NET INTEREST COST
NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR & RATE PRICE
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK
5.60%
1990
& TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO
5.90%
1991
Chicago, Illinois
6.10%
1992
THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
6.30%
1993
Chicago, Illinois
6.50%
1994
PRUDENT IAL-BACHE SECURITIES, INC.
6.70%
1995
Chicago, Illinois
BLUNT, ELLIS & LOEWI, INC.
Chicago, Illinois
Centerre Bank, N.A.
Van Kampen Merritt Inc.
First Tennessee Bank, N.A.
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
507 MARQUETTE AVENUE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 339-8291
$908,425.00 $2.153,250.00
6.5178%