Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 07-18-1986r CITY OF PLYMOUTFt CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. PLYMOUTH FORUM -- Monday, July 21, 7:00 p.m. Plymouth Forum in the City Council conference room. 2. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, July 21, 7:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting in the Council Chambers. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, July 23, 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda attached. (M-3) 4. CONCERTS IN THE PARKS -- The first of three free summer concerts sponsored by the Park and Recreation Department and Wayzata Bank and Trust will be held on Wednesday, July 23 at 7:30 p.m. at the Green Oaks Park. The concert will feature "Stoney Lonesome", playing Country Western and Bluegrass music. FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. TRAFFIC DELAYS - I-494 NORTH OF HIGHWAY 55 -- The Minnesota Depart- ment of Transportation has announced that beginning July 21, they will be resurfacing I-494 north of Highway 55 to I-94 in Maple Grove. Road crews will be working day and night, Monday through Friday. Traffic will be restricted to one lane in each direction for part of each weekday. All lanes will be open during the follow- ing weekday periods: Monday -Friday from 5:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., Monday -Thursday from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Friday from 3:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. The work is scheduled to be completed before September 8. The contractor will receive a "bonus" of $3,500 for each day the work is completed prior to September 8, and will be charged a $3,500 penalty for delays beyond September 8. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page two 2. PLYMOUTH METROLINK - JUNE REPORT -- Shown below is a table displaying our average daily ridership for the commuter/ reverse commuter, internal circulator and total system for each week of June. The second table displays the year to date averages in each service area compared with the target which we must achieve in order to have a successful project. MONTHLY PLYMOUTH METROLINK DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY WEEK BY SERVICE TYPE JUNE 1986 Total System SERVICE TYPE Commuter/ Internal Total TARGET 337 Reverse Commuter Circulator System WEEK OF: - 13% + .3% 6/1 - 6/7 357 42 399 6/8 - 6/14 360 62 422 6/15 - 6/21 337 60 397 6/22 - 6/28 326 69 395 6/29 - 6/30 364 86 450 ----------------- MONTH LONG ------------------ ------------- ---------------- AVERAGE 349 64 413 YEAR TO DATE Item Commuter/ Reverse Commuter Internal Circulator Total System YEAR TO DATE RIDERSHIP AVERAGE1 346 49 394 TARGET 337 56 393 % OVERRUNDER) TARGET + 2.6% - 13% + .3% CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page three A number of observations are in order: 1. Internal circulator ridership made substantial gains in dune with an average daily ridership of 64, which is above the 53 passenger per day average established in dune 1985. We expect a continued increase in ridership for the internal circulator during the summer vacation months. 2. The commuter/reverse commuter portion of the service rebounded in dune with an average of 349 persons per day, which is above the 314 posted in dune 1985. 3. In terms of our system -wide ridership target of 393 passengers per day, we are slightly above our goal by one at 394 passengers per day. The month of dune has recorded the best system -wide average this year. DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY MONTH FOR CALENDAR YEARS 1984 - 1986 SERVICE TYPE Commuter/ Internal Total Reverse Commuter Circulator System MONTH: 1984 1985 1986 1984 1985 1986 1984 1985 1986 January 330 307 351 21 51 40 351 358 391 February 310 292 350 25 50 47 335 342 394 March 307 311 338 25 56 64 332 367 402 April 301 295 354 27 55 44 331 350 398 May 295 298 332 27 36 35 322 334 367 June 276 314 349 41 53 64 317 367 413 July 277 297 42 52 319 349 August 266 292 47 57 313 349 September 275 322 32 42 307 364 October 276 312 36 55 312 367 November 271 311 35 57 306 368 December -------------- 265 320 39 52 304 372 YEAR LONG ------------------ ------------------ -------------------- AVERAGE 287 306 346 36 51 49 321 357 394 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page four 3. CABLE SERVICE FOR 2500 BLOCK OF TROY LANE -- In my June 27 memo I indicated that the cable company had installed the cable on the 2500 block of Troy Lane. The Council may recall that Mrs. Berman had sought to connect to the cable system, but was informed that there was opposition from one or more neighbors for the construction of cable across their property. That matter has now been satis- factorily resolve and Mrs. Berman is connected to the cable system. 4. NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL & WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL FUNDING REQUEST FOR 198 -- On Thursday, July 3, Frank Boyles met with Marcy Shapiro, West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, and Mary Cayan, Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, to discuss proposed 1987 funding from the City to each human service organization. The City Council directed that this meeting take place in order that 1987 funding requests by each agency could be more directly related to the population which each actually serves in Plymouth. At the meeting, Marcy and Mary submitted their own proposal (see attached July 3, 1986 memo) which would provide that the City of Plymouth fund both organizations for 1987 in the amount of 20¢ per capita times the City's estimated 1985 Metropolitan Council population of 38,940, for a total funding request for both organi- zations of $7,788 (see attached memorandum). In 1985 the two Boards requested a total of $9,804 together and received a total of $5,000. The 20¢ per capita figure requested is substantially more than the 13t requested by West Hennepin for 1986, and 15¢ requested by Northwest Hennepin for 1986. (Both groups expect their 1987 budget requests to other communities will be based upon a 15¢ to 15.5¢ per capita rate. The reason that the Plymouth per capita rate is higher is because both organizations are serving the community, thereby improving the human service accessibility to Plymouth residents. The Council made the determination a number of years ago to be served by both organizations, rather than Just one. To provide the Council with additional information on this subject, Frank asked Marcy and Mary to put together a memorandum (see attach- ed July 10 memo) describing specifically the added benefits accruing to Plymouth residents because both organizations serve our community rather than just one. In the memorandum they were asked to contrast how those service levels would be cut back if only one or the other organization were to serve the entire Plymouth community. Because their July 10 memorandum did not address this request, a letter was sent on July 17 again requesting this information. I will place a copy of these materials in the 1987/1988 budget file for Council consideration at the budget study sessions or public hearing. (I-4) 5. SIGNAL LIGHTS AT VICKSBURG LANE & COUNTY ROAD 6 -- Hennepin County has now completed the revisions to the light sequencing at County Road 6 and Vicksburg. The new lighting sequence will provide for protected left turning movements at all four legs of the inter- section. It is anticipated that this safety improvement will reduce the number of accidents at this increasingly busy intersection. CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page five 6. 1986 POPULATION ESTIMATES -- We have Just received from the Metro- politan Council their provisional population estimates for Plymouth as of April 1, 1986. On that date, according to their projections, Plymouth had a population of 41,207. This would indicate an increase of 2,267 from the 1985 estimate. While there is little question that we grew rapidly during the past year, part of the increase may be a function of the methodology used by the Metropolitan Council. They note that hereafter they will be using "a more conventional, mathematical method that uses data more precisely and objective". This newer method, which I anticipate will be used for 1987, uses household estimates and the number of persons residing in the household. If that approach were used for 1986, our population would be approximately 665 fewer. I am attach- ing for your information a copy of the population estimates for all municipalities in Hennepin County which were forwarded to us by the Metropolitan Council. (I-6) 7. QUESTIONS WITH RESPECT TO NEW TOWING CONTRACT -- When the Council took action to terminate the City's towing contract with Plymouth Village Automotive, staff was directed to respond to a number of concerns made by Mr. Hendricks. Attached is a memorandum from Mel Solberg addressing the six issues raised. Also attached are memorandums from Blair Tremere, Director of Planning and Community Development, and Stan Scofield, Fire Inspector, regarding the zoning, building and fire code status of the facilities used by Valley Towing Service for their office and vehicle storage. I believe that these materials are responsive to the City Council's earlier direction. (I-7) 8. WEST MEDICINE LAKE COMMUNITY CLUB CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE -- Attached is a July 11, 1986 letter from the City Attorney's office indicating that under existing city code provisions, the West Medicine Lake Community Club would be precluded from obtaining a charitable gambling license for next year on or about September 14, 1986. The ordinance provision does not affect the Club's current license which will expire this fall. Also attached is a letter from Frank Boyles to Pete Hill of the West Medicine Lake Community Club, advising him of the City Attorney's findings and the fact that the existing ordinance would preclude Council issuance of a gambling license for September 15, 1986 through September 14, 1987. (I-8) 9. MINUTES -- The following minutes are attached: a. Plymouth Advisory Committee on Transit, July 16, 1986. (I -9a) b. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, May 22 and June 26, 1986. (I -9b) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page six 10. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS -- The following departmental reports for the month of June are attached: a. Police Department and first half 1986 statistical report for Investigations Division. (I -10a) b. Fire Department (I -10b) 11. JEFF HOWARD - ZONING VIOLATION -- A copy of the Affidavit and Complaint to be issued against Jeff Howard for violation of the City's Zoning Ordinance with respect to the ten foot high chain link fence installed in his front yard is attached. Also attached is a copy of an article on Mr. Howard which appeared in the July 15 Minneapolis Star. (I-11) 12. COUNCIL FOLLOW UPS: a. Town Meeting Feedback Responses -- Attached are staff responses to resident feedback forms received at the May 12 Area 1 Town Meeting. (I -12a) b. Community Improvement Reminder -- Attached is a response to a "community improvement reminder" form submitted by Councilmember Crain on behalf of Ms. Lee Bean, 4675 Balsam Lane, regarding damage to curbs in the Deerwood Estates development. (I -12b) c. Curb Painter -- We received a number of inquiries this week from residents concerning a notice being delivered door-to-door by the "Reflective Street Address Maintenance Co." for the painting of home addresses on curbs. A copy of the notice is attached. Thanks to the efforts of "undercover officer" Matt Crain, we were able to track down the individual distributing the notice, Mr. David Mills, and provide him with a copy of the City ordinance on solicitors, peddlers and transient merchants. This morning, Mr. Mills applied for a solicitor's permit. At the same time, Mr. Mills was also given the attached letter from Frank Boyles regarding the City's concern with the wording of his notice. (I -12c) d. Councilmember Vasiliou Inquiries -- Attached is a note from Councilmember Vasiliou concerning the repair of the scoreboard at Oakwood park and the status of apartments proposed to be built on County Road 6 and Highway 101. Staff responses are also attached. (I -12d) 13. PLYMOUTH EMPLOYEES -- I have received the following correspondence on City employees: a. Letter from Helen Rusten, to Blair Tremere, on her July 11 meeting with Blair and Fred Moore. (I -13a) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 18, 1986 Page seven b. Letter of appreciation from Gary Hart, 3695 Dallas Lane, for assistance provided to him by Plymouth police officers. The officers assisting Mr. Hart included Field Supervisor Ron Foreman, and Police Officers Mark Bevins and Mike Buske.(I-13b) 14. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter to Mayor Schneider from Alan Beals, Executive Director, National League of Cities, concerning the City's decision not to renew its membership in the NLC. (I -14a) b. Letter to Robert Burger, President, Plymouth Development Council, from Blair Tremere, communicating the City's proposed ordinance regarding ground water drainage systems. (I -14b) c. Memorandum to file from City Manager concerning his meeting with Susan Seylar and Michael Seeland, FBS Property Resources Corporation, on Downtown Plymouth. (I -14c) d. Letter of appreciation to Wes Clemens, Plymouth Civic League, from City Manager, on this year's successful Music In Plymouth event. (I -14d) e. Letter to Jelle De Boef, from City Manager, responding to Mr. De Boef's inquiry on road improvements on County Road 6. (I -14e) f. Letter from 0. J. "Lon" Heinitz, submitting his resignation from the Plymouth Port Authority. Lon will be moving to Arizona in August. (I -14f) g. Letter from Representative Bill Frenzel providing an update of recent action on the Tax Reform Act. (I -14g) h. Letter from Janice Shiebe, St. Louis Park resident, with respect to Plymouth's water quality. Ms. Shiebe was under the assumption that she received her water from the City of Plymouth. The City Manager's response to her letter is also attached. (I -14h) i. Letter to Sandra Gardebring, Metropolitan Council, from City Manager, providing the City's comments on the draft "Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework" document. (I -14i) 15. SIGNAGE -- Attached are several "creative ideas" for possible signage for Plymouth. (I-15) James G. Willis City Manager JGW:Jm attach PLANNING COM11ISSION MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 1986 �-3 WHERE: Plymouth City Center 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL 3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes, July 1, 1986 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Robert tiidd l.emist for "Tepley Addition". Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Variances for property west of Zachary Lane, east of Zachary Lane Park, and north of the City water tower. (86078) B. Reverend Szrohschein, Glory of Christ Lutheran Church. Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for property east of Highway 101 and southwest of Highway 55. (86083) C. Ryan Construction Company for "Groves Office Park". Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for property at northwest quadrant of State Highway 55 and County Road 18. (86044) 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Ryan Construction Company for "Groves Office Park". Planned Unit Development Final Plan/Plat and Site Plan for Phase I at the northwest quadrant of State Highway 55 and County Road 18. (86044) B. Commercial Development Corporation for "Cimarron Business Center". Lot Consolidation/ Division, Site Plans and Variances for three office warehouse buildings south of 21st Avenue North and east of 19th Avenue No. (86001/86003/86004) 6. OLD BUSINESS NONE 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Capital Improvement Program 1987 - 1990 8. ADJOURNMENT 10:00 P.M. June 4 1986 i Marcy Shapiro Executive Director West Hennepin Human Services 4100 Vernon Avenue So. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Dear Ms. Shapiro: I CITY OF PLYM0UTFF Planning Board At their dune 2 meeting, the City Council discussed its philosophy with respect to funding human service planning boards for 1987 and 1988. You will recall that last year the Council expressed a desire to relate planning board funding requests specifically to the estimated 1985 population served times some appropriate per capita dollar amount. The Council has once again expressed this desire for 1987/88 and that is the reason I am writing this letter. The Council has directed that I meet with representatives of the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council to determine whether we can agree to the geographic area and population served by each organization in Plymouth. The Council would expect that these geographical areas and populations would not overlap. The Council has also directed that I work with you to develop a dollar amount per capita against which the client population figure can be applied to yield appropriate monetary support to each body. In addition to this information, the Council will be seeking from you infor- mation required by the policy (attached). The Council is concerned about receiving more detailed information from each of you with respect to services you provide and the client populations served. As in previous years, they are also interested in other information which shows your compliance with the Council's policy. I will be in touch with you within the next two weeks to arrange for a meeting date and time in order that we can further discuss this matter. Yours very truly Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager FB:jm cc: S/F 6/13 ✓ 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 POLICY RELATING TO CITY FUNDING OF HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES Resolution No. 84-506 July 23, 1984 IN GENERAL The City Council is aware that there are many worthwhile human service aqencies serving metropolitan area residents and that such organizations are supported primarily through public and private contributions. Contributions to such agencies from the City of Plymouth, when made, will be distributed in accordance with this policy. POLICY GUIDELINES The Plymouth City Council is responsible for periodically determining whether a financial or in-kind contribution will be made by the City to assist human service agencies. The City Council will consider the following guidelines in determining which human service agency(ies), if any, receive funding. This policy should not be construed to obligate the City Council to provide funding or in-kind human service contributions. 1. The City Council shall not normally engage in long term (multi-year) funding to any human service agency. Instead, all funding shall be evaluated for impact and appropriateness each year. 2. The City Council will normally consider human service priorities established annually by the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and Northwest Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and will confine funding to those identified priorities. 3. Human service agencies will be expected to provide data substantiating the need for their specific type of service within the Plymouth community. Specific figures on the Plymouth population(s) served through their efforts, fiscal analysis of cost of delivery of such services and documentation that their services do not duplicate those of other agencies serving the Plymouth population. 4. The City Council will only consider funding programs or agencies which can demon- strate that the funds are used solely to provide services to Plymouth residents. 5. The City will give preference to funding human service delivery agencies that act as an advocate and advisor regarding other available human services for the Plymouth population. 6. Funding requests will normally be considered in relation to existing City human service commitments and the target populations served. -26- ncJV1Ul1U11 Flu. 6'i-7VC Page 2 7. Preference will be given to agencies or programs which: a) Have taken affirmative efforts to raise funds to support their efforts. b) Demonstrate in their budgets that there is a continuing concentration on minimizing adminsitrative and overhead costs. c) Cannot be effectively or fully funded through other sources. d) Sponsor programs which have verifiable benefits to the community at large - for example, programs that put people to work or enhance the effectiveness of City service delivery programs. e) Make effective use of volunteer skills and in-kind contributions to reduce the cost of program/service delivery. -26a- N T N N N N T T N N Milt V C L N• - s N !dam ALVA NORTHWEST HENNEPIN Waal nar 4z rtr% num^­J4 HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL SERVICES PLANNING HOARD �—"- Memo To: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager City of Plymouth Memo From: Marcy Shapiro, Director West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board Mary Cayan, Director Northwest Hennepin Human -Services Council Date: July 3, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 FUNDING FOR WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES BOARD AND NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL FROM THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH. The West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council are proposing that the City of Plymouth fund both organizations for 1987 in the amount of $.20 per capita, or $7,788.00, based ulon the 1985 Metropolitan Council population estimates for the City of Plymouth. The Board of Directors of each organization,---' would then meet to decide how the total allotment from the City of J?. Plymouth would be divided between the two organizations. The West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council feel that this approach to resolving the issue of the City of Plymouth funding both organizations will be benefi- cial to the City of Plymouth,. to the residents of Plymouth, and to the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the Northwest. Human Services Council because of the following reasons: • The division of Plymouth into geographical service areas can be avoided through this approach. Both organizations are presently serving all the residents of Plymouth. Any geographical service boundaries that could be agreed upon would inconvenience residents of Plymouth in need of services. • The Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board would submit joint funding proposals to the City of Plymouth saving administrative proposal preparation time for the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and proposal review time for the staff and council members of the City of Plymouth. • The drawing of geographical service boundaries would inhibit the data -collection and needs assessment processes of both the North- west Hennepin Human Services Council and the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board because data is not available based upon such fine geographical divisions. Our primary missions are to ad- dress the broad issues of human services such as service delivery systems, networking among providers, coordination of efforts, and needs assessment. The strength of these missions lie in the fact that these activities encompass a broader scope than that of an individual municipality or part of an individual municipality. - LA -2- • This approach will allow the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and West Hennepin Human Serices Planning Board to continue to deliver programs in their present format. A geographical ser- vice division may require changes in present service delivery systems which would disrupt both the service providers and the residents of Plymouth who receive services. • This approach will allow the West'Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council to decide for themselves on how to share funding received from the City of Plymouth so that each organization may best serve the residents of Plymouth in any given year. NORTHWEST HENNEP I N HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD ` \. MEMO TO: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager _'A City of Plymouth '\ FROM: Mary Cayan, Ca an Director Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Marcy Shapiro, Director West Hennepin Human Services Planning Boaro DATE: July 10. 1586 RE: 1587 Fundina of the Human Services Councils by the City of Plymouth As a follow-up to our memo of July G, 1566, we would like to let you know what the advantages are to Plymouth to fund beth human services councils and what the additional 5 cents buys. By participating in both Councils, it: * Allows Plymouth residents greater choice and access than residents of other munbicipalities in their useage of the energy assistance, commodities, and emergency services programs since they care participate in these programs through either Council and at locations offered by both councils; * Allows Plymouth to have the opportunity for representation on both Boards of Directors/Advisory Commissions and in decisionmaking in both areas on service priorities and agency governance; * Opportunity for input and representation on a broader variety of citizen activities, committees and data generation in both the West and Northwest areas, e.g. municipal profiles, CSSA priority reports, public hearings, issue comm it tees, etc. (see attached list); * Broader networking opportunities for services providers working with Plymouth residents by participating in both organizations which allows for better coordination of services and stronger efforts to prevent duplication of services; * Access to the paid staff, volunteers and resources of both organi- zations for technical assistance to the city council, city staff, citizens, and providers serving Plymouth; * Access to the perspectives and advice of both human services councils in human services decisionmaking by the City of Plymouth. Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board have different histories and different structures. Each has special` strengths and areas of expertise. by participating in both, Plymouth gains the added ability to utilize both councils' strengths and expertise and to better meet the human services needs of Plymouth's citizens. July 17, 1986 Ms. Marcy Shapiro Executive Director C ITY OF PLYMOUTR West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 4100 Vernon Avenue So. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Ms. Mary Cayan Director Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council 7323 - 58th Avenue No. Crystal, MN 55428 Dear Marcy and Mary: Thank you for your July 10, 1986 memorandum outlining the advantages which accrue to Plymouth residents as a result of the City funding both human service organizations. I had hoped that the memorandum would be somewhat more detailed. For example, what additional human services are available to Plymouth residents? How is accessibility to public services improved by having more than one agency serve the community? The Council would also be interested in knowing how service levels would have to be cutback if only one or the other organization were to serve Plymouth. I am providing your July 3 memorandum and July 10 memorandum to the City Council for information purposes. I believe that the Council will likely desire this additional information when they consider your proposal later this year at a budget study session or budget public hearing. If you elect to provide additional materials, I will, of course, pass them along to the City Council. If not, I will contact you prior to the Council's consider- ation of your funding request in order that you can be present to discuss the matter further with the Council. Yours v trul Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager FB:Jm cc: Mayor & City Council 1987-1988 Budget File 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 APRIL 1, 1986 POPULATION ESTIMATES Persons Per Household April 1, April 1, April 1, April 1, 1980 1986 1980 1986 HENNEPIN COUNTY Census Estimate Census Estimate Bloomington 81,831 84,289 2.82 2.60 Brooklyn Center 31,230 30,267 2.89 2.67 Brooklyn Park 43,332 51,424 2.84 2.72 Champlin 9,006 11,566 3.29 3.16 Chanhassen (Pt.) 8 4 4.00 4.00 Corcoran 4,252 4,802 3.42 3.37 Crystal 25,543 24,628 2.82 2.67 Dayton (Pt.) 4,000 4,176 3.45 3.41 Deephaven 3,716 3,671 3.02 2.83 Eden Prairie 16,263 25,991 3.01 2.56 Edina 46,073 45,055 2.55 2.34 Excelsior 2,523 2,601 2.15 1.98 Fort Snelling 223 216 3.12 2.71 Golden Valley 22,775 21,541 2.86 2.62 Greenfield 1,391 1,504 3.46 3.28 Greenwood 653 653 2.79 2.60 Hanover (Pt.) 248 242 3.87 3.72 Hassan Twp. 1,766 1,910 3.91 3.65 Hopkins 15,336 15,211 2.12 1.96 Independence 2,640 2,684 3.35 3.18 Long Lake 1,747 1,955 2.89 2.52 Loretto 297 345 2.72 2.41 Maple Grove 20,525 30,216 3.29 3.13 Maple Plain 1,421 1,622 2.92 2.76 Medicine Lake 419 407 2.59 2.45 Medina 2,623 2,867 3.41 3.22 Minneapolis 370,951 360,000 2.19 2.10 Minnetonka 38,683 42,636 3.00 2.75 Minnetonka Beach 575 575 3.07 2.61 Minnetrista 3,236 3,446 3.32 3.13 Mound 9,280 9,742 2.74 2.69 New Hope 23,087 22,770 2.91 2.66 Orono 6,845 7,093 2.99 2.82 Osseo 2,974 2,801 2.66 2.48 Plymouth 31,615 41,207 2.96 2.72 Richfield 37,851 36,891 2.46 2.36 Robbinsdale 14,422 14,212 2.46 2.34 Rockford (Pt.) 380 395 3.04 2.97 Rogers 652 708 3.10 2.93 St. Anthony (Pt.) 5,619 5,312 2.90 2.68 St. Bonif acius 857 1,053 3.05 2.79 St. Louis Park 42,931 42,493 2.38 2.20 Shorewood 4,646 4,788 3.13 2.99 Spring Park 1,465 1,474 1.97 1.87 Tonka Bay 1,354 1,436 2.74 2.55 Wayzata 3,621 3,654 2.25 2.05 Woodland 526 500 2.87 2.79 COUNTY TOTAL 941,411 973,033 2.51 2.38 Date: July 3, 1986 To: Chief Carlquist From: Mel Solberg Subject: Towing Contract In response to Council direction from the meeting of June 16 regarding Plymouth Village Automotive and the new towing contractor, I have answered the questions below in the order listed in the memo. 1. City payments in arrears: * a. The payments past due for administrative and clerical costs by Plymouth Village Automotive were as follows: July 1985 $420.00 August 1985 $405.00 September 1985 $520.00 Total $T345.00 00 Demand of payment was mailed to Plymouth Automotive on October 10, 1985. b. The following checks were returned marked N.S.F. February 1986 $440.00 March 1986 $485.00 Total 3925.00 2. Overcharging for towing by Plymouth Village Automotive. On October 10, 1985, a verbal warning was given to Plymouth Village Automotive for overcharging of towed vehicles. Out of 104 impounds for the month of September, 46 customers were charged $34.00 instead of the correct fee of $30.00. Mr. Hendricks stated his employees were in error and he would make certain it would not happen again. 3. New Vendor storage facilities. Valley Towing Service located at 2081 East Center Circle has indoor storage space available for 25 vehicles. This meets the requirements of the towing contract. 4. Zoning for new contractor - location On July 2, 1986, I discussed the zoning with Blair Tremere and he will review the request and also send a building official to inspect the premises. see co --G—, * Since the cancellation of the contract with Plymouth Village Automotive, they have presented the City with a cashiers check in the amount of $1380.00. There is a balance of $265.00 for the period June 1 through June 16, 1986. Continued Page 2 Fire Inspector Stan Scofield has inspected the facilities to make certain fire codes are met. Larger fire extinquishers were required, and this requirement has been met. The garage floor drain (oil separators or trap) needs cleaning. The owner of the building, Carlson Companies, has been notified and this will be corrected. 5. No large tow trucks for buses, etc: Gary Hausladen, owner of Valley Towing, has a verbal agreement with North Suburban Towing and Eagon's Towing for towing large vehicles. This has been the practice of Plymouth Village Automotive for several years until recently at which time they purchased a larger truck. 6. Arrangements to clear existing cars and reimburse Plymouth Village Automotive for current costs: Mr. Hendricks was agreeable to releasing vehicles that he had .previously towed and/or scrapping them out. The only change he said would be to change his hours of operation (different than contract) so he would not have to pay an employee for sitting around during off hours. cc: James G. Willis, City Manager CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: duly 16, 1986 TO: Assistant City Manager Frank Boyles FROM: Community Development Director Blair Tremere V �---- SUBJECT ZONING AND BUILDING CODE STATUS OF VALLEY TOWING SERVICE I have had the opportunity to investigate the status of the Valley Towing Service at their premises in the Minneapolis Industrial Park at 2081 East Center Circle. The office is located at that address, and the operation also involves the use of the premises at 2080 East Center Circle and 2064 East Center Circle. I have talked to the owner, Gary Hausladen, and he has provided me with a written description of the operation. This property is in the I-1 (planned industrial) Zoning District and the operation at this time involves storage of vehicles, as well as the related office space for the Valley Towing Service. Storage includes company vehicles after regular business hours, storage of vehicles impounded by the Police, and minor maintenance of company vehicles. There is no automotive service work performed on the premises. Storage is allowed in- side the building in the I-1 District, and at this time, there is no outside storage related to this use. I therefore find that the use is consistent with the requirements of the I-1 District. I also asked Building Official doe Ryan to investigate the premises from the Building Code standpoint. He reports that the premises meet the requirements of the State Building Code for this use with the exception that illuminated exit signs are needed and, in the case of one of the tenant areas, adjustments need to be made to the hard- ware on an exit door. These corrections have been related to the tenant and to the building owner. The premises otherwise satisfy the Building Code requirements for this occupancy. I also understand that the Fire Inspector has investigated the premises and has direct- ed certain corrections. I conclude that Valley Towing Service complies with the City's zoning and building code requirements at this location, at this time. BT/gw cc: Building Official doe Ryan Lt. Mel Solberg File CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: July 16, 1986 TO: Blair Tremere, Planning Director FROM: Stan Scofield, Fire Inspector SUBJECT GOLDEN VALLEY TOWING TENANT SPACE The tenant space at 2081 East Center Circle being leased by Valley Towing Company meets the fire code requirements for the use of the space. The flammable liquid trap for the building must be cleaned out and a regular maintenance inspection and cleaning schedule will be done by the Carlson Real Estate Company, managers of the property. LSS: Iv July 15, 1986 ( f CITY O� PLYMOUTR Mr. Pete Hill West Medicine Lake Community Club 1701 Forestview Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Pete: At their July 7 meeting, the City Council discussed gambling licenses for establishments which also serve liquor of any form. The City Attorney advised the Council that establishments which serve liquor of any form were prohibited under current City Ordinance Section 1215.05 Subdivision 5 from also issuing a gambling license. I am attaching a copy of a July 11, 1986 letter from James Thomson of the City Attorney's office which confirms this fact. Mr. Thomson also confirms that under current City ordinance provision, your request for a renewed gambling license on or about September 14, 1986 could not be honored. I am providing the City Council with a copy of this letter and Mr. Thomson's letter in order that they are aware of this development. If you have any questions, Yours very trt �,j Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager FB:jm attach please feel free to contact me. cc: Laurie Brandt, City Clerk Mayor & City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 2000 First Bank Place Vves,, Minneapolis M;nnesota 55402 Telephone (612 333-0543 Teiecopier 1612; 333-054: Clav:cn L. Lere:ere Helben P. Lef'c J. Dennis O Enc--, J -1-c _ D,a Dai• d J Kennel, Jchr E Dec - Glenn E. Furdue Richard J. Sch Offer Charles L. LeFevere Herbe , F. Lefie- 1; James J. Thomsc^., J, Thomas R. Ga'; Davie Nora! B,iar' F. Rice John G Kresse'. Lorra-ne S. C!jc�: James h/i. ST- O.-,-re-Ronald H Ea^, vviGiam P Jo,d6", susa•� Drke' "I, , Kur• J. Encksc,n Vdifliam R. $kaliEr,i� Rodney D. Anders-,', Corrine A. Heine John R. McDonald, Jr Davit D. Beaucn - L(,Fcci c 1,041 Kann -•(h ()'Brien K, I)raNN 7 1 11i'il, ,pinnal k—m iai iw i July 11, 1986 Mr. Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: West Medicine Lake Community Club Charitable Gambling License Dear Frank: I have received your letter of July 8, 1986, concerning the above matter. In your letter you ask whether there is a conflict between Plymouth City Code Section 1215.05, Subdivision 5, and the issuance of a gambling license for the West Medicine Lake Community Club. Subdivision 5 currently reads: "No gambling or any gambling device shall be permitted on a licensed premises." Because the West Medicine Lake Community Club possesses a non - intoxicating malt liquor license and a consumption and display license, gambling is not allowed at the club. A representative of the club has inquired as to whether the club can conduct a raffle on July 20, 1986 in conjunction with the club's carnival. The club has been issued a gambling license by the State Charitable Gambling Control Board. The license expires on September 14, 1986. Apparently, the above provision in the city's ordinance was overlooked because the city did not object to the state's issuance of the license. I have not yet received a copy of the gambling license which was issued by the state. However, I have called the Charitable Gambling Control Board and they have told me that there are no restrictions on the license that was issued as to the number of raffles the club can conduct. = g Mr. Frank Boyles July 11, 1986 Page 2 It is my opinion that the license issued by the state permits the West Medicine Lake Community Club to hold a raffle on July 20, 1986. The club will need to reapply to the state for a gambling license for any gambling activities after September 14, 1986. Unless amended, the city's liquor ordinance will preclude the issuance of any such license. Sincerely, LeFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Thomson, 0066LT02.G53 - k - qC MINUTES PLYMOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT July 16, 1986 PRESENT: Nancy Holter, Barbara Roberts, Melissa Holiday, Dale Knutson Dennis Jacobson, Dave Brownell, Dick Maki, Frank Boyles I. APPROVAL OF JUNE 11, 1986 MINUTES The minutes of the June 11 meeting were approved as submitted. II. RIDERSHIP STATISTICS The committee reviewed the June ridership statistics. It was noted that the ridership performance of the internal circulator during this month ties with March as the best average this year. It suggests that vacationing students are continuing to use the service. Total system statistics, at 413 riders, constitutes the highest one month total in the system's history. The commuter/ reverse commuter service continues to show strong ridership. III. FOLLOW UP FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS The committee reviewed a memorandum prepared by Dave Pesch with respect to nine areas for improvement identified at the last meeting. Conclusions were as follows: a. Park and Ride Lot Transfer - Since the last meeting the transfer has gone more smoothy and the second transit bus does not entire the lot until the first one leaves. b. Alternate Routes from Highway 12 to 55 - Drivers have radio ahead periodically trying to avoid particularly congested areas. c. Pineview - Dunkirk Minicoach Delay - Fewer delays have occurred along this route. Dave Pesch will be asked to help define where this issue will be addressed in the 1986 planning work efforts. d. Inclement Weather - During the last month, the full size coaches have been waiting for the mini's. A better assesment of this item will be available with the Fall rains. e. Larger Coaches on 4:35 p.m. Outbound - No exceptions noted. f. Top Speed of Buses - Riders still question whether drivers were exceeding the roadway speed limits. This items will be referred to the MLL safety director through Dave Pesch. g. Bus Maintenance - Frank Boyles and Dave Pesch will discuss bus maintenance in hopes of avoiding future breakdowns of a hazardous nature. h. Windows - Drivers have not been closing windows after the end of their routes. PLYMOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT July 16, 1986 Page two I. Fare Card Promotion - More consideration will be given to fare card promotion of some type. j. Committee members discussed the proposed Metrolink memo postcard. They concurred that they would prefer to keep in touch by telephone rather than by mail. It was agreed that business cards would be distributed to PACT members so they had both Frank's and Dave's phone number. Frank distributed his business cards and Dave will do so at the next meeting. IV. IDENTIFICATION OF NEW AREAS OF CONCERN AND RECOMMENDATION A suggestion was made that the internal circulator should concentrate on serving multi -family units such as the Oakwood Apartments. Nancy Holter stated that her mother lives in this complex and would be interested in petitioning tenants to assess the number of riders which could be expected by providing some service level to this facility. She will report back her results in writing. Concern was expressed about the substitution of full size coaches for minicoaches, especially on the hottest days, given the fact that only minicoaches are air conditioned. There was a concern that charters may be taking precedence over Metrolink riders. Frank Boyles and Dave Pesch will discuss this. V. REVIEW OF MARKETING AND PLANNING EFFORTS The committee reviewed the outline of 1986/87 Metrolink marketing and planning activities. PACT members concurred with the outlines as submitted. As part of the discussion, the RTB Metrolink rider survey was also reviewed. PACT members discussed some of the findings of the survey. Frank Boyles stated that these findings will be used in conjunction with the planning and marketing efforts. He reported that with respect to marketing, the past promotion is still being imple- mented. The billboard advertising has been confirmed with Naegele Sign and publications have been placed in the Plymouth on Parade newsletter. Schedules have also been distributed. Committee members recommended a number of additional marketing efforts including the possibility of re- running the clock promotion perhaps in conjunction with the system's October anniversary, consider a fare card promotion which would enable qualifying riders to receive a free trip to Valleyfair or Canterbury Downs, re -run the champagne flight, or run a promotion which would award Metrolink shirts, caps or umbrellas. Committee members also concurred that the planning activities as contained in Exhibit 1-A would provide a reasonable means to identify areas where routes could be improved or modified based upon transit needs and continuing City development. The meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 10 at 7:00 p.m. =_1=kb THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Minutes of the Meeting of May 22, 1986 The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by Chairman Peter Enck, Thursday, May 22, 1986, 7:35 P.M., at the Golden Valley Municipal Building. ROLL CALL: CRYSTAL - Commissioner William Sherburne GOLDEN VALLEY - Commissioner Ed Silberman MEDICINE LAKE - Commissioner Jim Padden MINNEAPOLIS - Commissioner Perry Smith MINNETONKA - Commissioner Don Asmus NEW HOPE - Commissioner Peter Enck PLYMOUTH - Commissioner Fred Moore ROBBINSDALE - Commissioner Lee Gustafson ST. LOUIS PARK - Alternate Commissioner James Grube Counsel: Curt Pearson Engineer: Len Kremer Recorder: Elaine Anderson Gen. Mills Rep.: John Schevenius Corps of Engineers: Dave Raasch Also in attendance: Dan Donahue, New Hope; Lowell Odland, Golden Valley; Marc Hanson, New Hope; Tom Schrader, Medicine Lake; Dan Smith, Crystal; John Taylor, Golden Valley. Richard Koppy, Westwood Engineering Co., attended part of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: Chairman Peter Enck welcomed those in attendance and made the intro- ductory remarks. He thanked Mr. Odland of Golden Valley for hosting the meeting and directed Mr. Kremer and Mr. Pearson to make the presentations regarding the proposed project.. Mr. Pearson briefly outlined the program saying that this represents 18 years for the Commission as a formal organization. He advised that this total overall plan has been approved by the United States Congress. Essentially we are going to embark on construction. Congress has not authorized any new construction costs since the program and plan were approved as a part of the Water Resources Act of 1976. Local cost sharing of 75%-25% is mandatory under the rules established by the Secretary of the Army. Our 25% can be made up partly of credits. Right now $1,900,000 is being recommended by General Hatch for additional credits. A tentative resolution has been prepared. One of the major conditions is that the nine member municipalities have to enter into a local cooperative agreement (LCA) with the United States Government. We are anticipating that the member cities and the Commission will give Minneapolis the assurances that they need to be the local sponsor. Mr. Kremer then briefly described the project. He indicated that MnDOT completed a major part of the project (the deep tunnel) in 1981 and that an additional 800 feet of deep tunnel is now ready to be built and construction will be initiated in the Fall. He described the different important features of the project (which will later be listed in the resolution). Hennepin County is doing BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 2 the construction which is required bythe project at Douglas Drive. This will be a credit. The City of Golden Valley will be doing the construction on Wisconsin Avenue. As far as contribution of funds, the Corps of Engineers has set a schedule as to when the monies will be necessary. The bulk of the construction will be in 1989-1990. Mr. Moore presented Resolution No. 86-244 from the City of Plymouth indicating that the Plymouth City Council supports and endorses the proposed flood control project and that the City will provide the funds which are the responsibility of the City of Plymouth in accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement. Mr. Raasch of the Corps of Engineers then made a brief presentation. RESOLUTION 86-4 PROJECT: FLOOD CONTROL 86-1 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was held on the 22nd day of May, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. at the Golden Valley City Hall. The following members were present: Crystal: William Sherburne Golden Valley: Edward Silberman Medicine Lake: James Padden Minneapolis: Perry D. Smith Minnetonka: Donald Asmus New Hope: W. Peter Enck Plymouth: Fred Moore Robbinsdale: Lee Gustafson St. Louis Park: James Grube and the following were absent: None Commissioner Asmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS - SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission adopted the 3rd day of April, 1986, fixed the 22nd day of May, 1986, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: Construction of flood storage in recreational and open space areas throughout the Bassett Creek Watershed; and construction of a tunnel under the City of Minneapolis. The flood storage will generally consist of increased temporary inundation on existing golf courses, parks, and open space. The outlet tunnel is a cooperative venture with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Corps of Army Engineers. The project consists of approximately 2.2 miles of tunnel (12 to 13 feet in z� BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 3 diameter), six flood control structures, five earth embank- ments, two bridge removals, one railroad bridge replacement, one railroad bridge modification, one low -head dam removal and replacement, nine culvert replacements, one culvert removal, 5000 linear feet of channel improvement and bank protection, 157,000 cubic yards of storage area excavation, and flood - proofing of five private residences, and WHEREAS, all members of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission were provided with mailed notice of this hearing at least 45 days in advance of this hearing pursuant to Article VII, Subd. 5 of the Joint Powers Agreement creating this Commission; and WHEREAS, the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission engi- neers have presented a feasibility report and have explained the proposed improvements and the estimated cost to each member munici- pality, and WHEREAS, each member has had an opportunity to be heard and to provide this Commission with data and input relating to the proposed improvement; and WHEREAS, a substantial portion of these costs are to be paid for at some future date by the United States of America and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and said agencies have certain procedures which must be complied with before contracts can be let and costs incurred, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION: 1. Such improvements as set out above and for the areas as above indicated are hereby ordered as proposed in Commission Resolu- tion adopted April 3, 1986. 2. The aforementioned improvement shall be paid for by the United States of America and members of this Joint Powers Commission and said costs as are the responsibility of our Members are allo- cated by the following percentages: Estimated Cost Including Land Cost City Percent and Land Credits Crystal 5.38 $ 162,000 Golden Valley 28.62 1,467,000 Medicine Lake 0.49 30,500 Minneapolis 11.68 630,000 Minnetonka 4.92 0 New Hope 5.98 100,500 Plymouth 36.4 1,160,200 Robbinsdale 1.98 104,000 St. Louis Park 4.55 212,300 3. Barr Engineering and the United States Army Corps of Engineers are hereby designated as the project engineers to prepare plans and specifications for this improvement BUT no work shall commence until a contract has been approved and executed between the City of Minneapolis which shall act as the local sponsor and the BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 4 7-- c� b United States Army Corps of Engineers, it being the specific intent of this condition that no action be taken to jeopardize federal participation in the costs of this construction or to move forward with construction until monies are appropriated by the United States Government. 4. Minneapolis is hereby designated as sponsor to execute the agreement with the Corps of Engineers. Minneapolis is desig- nated as the member who will contract with the Army Corps of Engi- neers to move forward jointly with this project and will represent and protect this Commission and each of the members. Each member City shall be required to obtain necessary rights-of-way as called for by the plan and this project shall be subject to all provisions of the Joint Powers Agreement. 5. Each member City shall schedule for the construction of table for the estimated payment. be provided with an estimated time the improvement and with a time - 6. Each member City shall have until August 21, 1986, to advise this Commission as to how it will pay its share of these costs. It is the intent of this provision that each member shall contract with the City of Minneapolis as to the method and timing of paying each member's share and each member is further encouraged to work and cooperate with Minneapolis in implementing this Order of the Commission. This Commission would hope that the mechanics and method of proceeding can be agreed to by each member and the con- tracting City of Minneapolis. 7. The Chairman, Secretary, and the Commission's Attorney, Curtis A. Pearson, are authorized and directed to work with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the sponsoring City of Minneapolis in executing all documents required to obtain federal funding. They are further authorized to pursue as rapidly as possible approval of said contracts including authority to travel to Chicago and/or Washington, D.C., to obtain Corps of Engineers approval. 8. The City of Minneapolis shall not proceed to award any contract as the Army Corps of Engineers will be awarding contracts. If for any reason it is necessary that Minneapolis or any other member City award a contract for or under the project, they shall first obtain the consent and approval of this Commission. 9. Any and all members who are required to obtain easements or rights-of-way shall proceed at once to obtain said rights so that the Army Corps of Engineers may proceed to award contracts at the earliest possible date. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Silberman, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Sherburne, Silberman, Padden, Smith, Asmus, Enck, Moore, Gustafson, Grube BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 5 The following voted against the same: None The following (were absent) (abstained from voting): None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. W. Peter Enck, Chairman Attest: Donald Asmus, Secretary — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Chairman Enck then declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Pearson asked Mr. Raasch if he had any further news but Mr. Raasch indicated that he did not. Mr. Pearson then asked if there was anything that should be done at this time. Mr. Sherburne then left the meeting. Chairman Enck thanked him for attending. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Moore and seconded by Mr. Smith that the minutes of the March 27, April 3, and April 17 meetings be approved. Carried unanimously. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Mr. Silberman moved the approval of the financial statement as of May 22 showing a checking account balance of $6.57, a savings account balance of $23,009.62, and an investment balance of $225,366.57. Seconded by Mr. Gustafson and carried unanimously. He reported that all of the municipalities had paid their assessments (Plymouth paid the first half). PRESENTATION OF INVOICES FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL 1. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the Larry P. Larson audit invoice for $265.00. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unani- mously. 2. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the Barr Engineering invoice subject to arithmetic verification of $10,559.84 covering the period April 13 to May 10. Seconded by Mr. Moore and carried unanimously. Mr. Kremer called attention to the fact that this invoice included a brochure printing charge of $4,208.00. COMMUNICATIONS Chairman 1. A thank you note had been received from Mr. Sherburne for the plant sent to him last month. BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 6 �� 2. A refund had been received from American Express for the Washington trip of a year ago. Counsel 1. Mr. Pearson reported that a draft of the proposed contract between the City of Minneapolis as local sponsor and the other eight member cities was delivered to Mr. Hyatt yesterday. Engineer 1. Letter from Peter A. Fischer regarding the decision process for final selection and design of project features. 2. A discussion had been held with property owners around Medicine Lake who are concerned about the high level of the lake. 3. Mr. Kremer reported that they had reviewed a reach of the creek in New Hope and had subsequent discussions with New Hope regarding the amount of time it took for Northwood Lake to recede. BUDGET Mr. Silberman reported that a budget meeting had been held on May 3 and that the total budget proposed is for $146,700. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the budget. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously. Action on the assessments will be taken during the June meeting. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from the City of Plymouth to review a proposed plan for trails and park improvements at Parkers Lake; 9000 lineal feet of trails around the north and west side of Parkers Lake are proposed. Parking for about 60 cars is on the north side of the lake. A boat launch and a picnic shelter are proposed. The level of the trails are above the flood level of the lake. Some storm sewers will have to be extended 30 or 40 feet to construct the trails. There is still another 100 feet before the water gets to the lake. Mr. Kremer suggested that it would be better to have an extension all the way into the lake. There is also no water quality enhancement being proposed for parking lot runoff. Since the parking lot is small, it may not be necessary. After further discussion it was moved by Mr. Moore and seconded by Mr. Gustafson that a letter be sent to the City of Plymouth indicating the recommendations for water - quality enhancement and erosion control. Carried unanimously. 2. Request by the City of Plymouth for review of a proposed plan by S. J. Groves. Dick Koppy, Westwood Engineering, was in attendance. This involves a 471.5 acre parcel for a office building. They have an existing office building in the area. They have proposed a significantly large pond to enhance the water quality and will have a skimming device and erosion control (silt fence). After discussion and upon recommendation by the engineer, it was moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by BC Minutes - May 22, 1986 - Page 7 Mr. Asmus that the proposed project be approved with the under- standing that the final plans be brought to the Commission. Carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS 1. Proposal for two bridges to cross creek (Plymouth Creek branch) at Xenium Lane (Hwy 494). This is part of the Northwest Business Campus. There would be no impact on the management envelope. Mr. Kremer has reviewed the proposal and on his recommendation it was moved by Mr. Grube and seconded by Mr. Smith that a letter be sent to the City of Plymouth indicating the Commission's approval. 2. Plymouth Creek Fish Barrier. The Department of Natural Resources is making a $36,000 contribution towards construction of the fish barrier. $12,500 has been promised by the Hennepin County Park System, and $25,000 by the Hennepin County Public Works so the funding is being totally provided by these agencies. It was moved by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Moore that the commission authorize the preparation of plans and specifications when written confirmation is received from the Department of Natural Resources. Carried unanimously. 3. The brochures have been distributed. 4. After discussion, it was decided that the next Commission meeting be held on June 26 rather than June 19. Elaine Anderson will make arrangements with the Minneapolis Golf Club. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mr. Smith and seconded by Mr. Padden that the meeting adjourn. Chairman Enck adjourned the meeting at 9:30 P.M. Elaine Anderson, Recorder W. Peter Enck, Chairman Donald Asmus, Secretary Date: THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Minutes of the Meeting of June 26, 1986 The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by Vice Chairman Fred Moore, Thursday, June 26, 1986, 11:30 A.M., at the Minneapolis Golf Club. ROLL CALL: CRYSTAL - Audited by Dan Smith GOLDEN VALLEY - Alternate Commissioner Dean Chenoweth MEDICINE LAKE - Not represented MINNEAPOLIS - Alternate Commissioner Marvin Hoshaw MINNETONKA - Commissioner Don Asmus NEW HOPE - Alternate Commissioner Jeff Johnson PLYMOUTH - Commissioner Fred Moore ROBBINSDALE - Commissioner Lee Gustafson ST. LOUIS PARK - Alternate Commissioner James Grube Counsel: Curt Pearson Engineer: Len Kremer Recorder: Elaine Anderson General Mills Representative: John Schevenius Corps of Engineers Representative: Dave Raasch Also in attendance: Al Hyatt, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The correction/approval of the May 22, 1986, minutes will be handled at the July 17 meeting. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: None PRESENTATION OF INVOICES FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL: Mr. Chenoweth pre- sented the Barr Engineering invoice for $7685.45 for the period May 11 to June 14 and moved its approval subject to arithmetical verifi- cation. Seconded by Mr. Hoshaw and carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS: Vice Chairman: None Counsel: Counsel Pearson informed the Commission that the contractual docu- ment (LCA) between the City of Minneapolis and the United States Government was delivered June 28. The document has to be signed by June 30. Mr. Pearson briefed the Commission on the latest developments with the Corps of Engineers. Even though credit for upland storage had been recommended by Major General Hatch and Dr. Steinberg, the Assistant Secretary of the Army made the decision that no credit should be given for upland storage. The Corps has taken the position, therefore, at the highest level that they are not going to give us the credits. They have presented us with the LCA which has to be signed by Monday, June 30. The document has a number of things that we would like to negotiate. The word is that the Corp is not going to change anything. We are placed in a position where we will have to sign a document with which we are in disagreement. T- q b BC Minutes - June 26, 1986 - Page 2 If we don't sign it, we drop out. It makes no sense or rationale. On the positive side of the coin, the Corps has agreed to pay the $4,000,000+ for current in-place facilities. We wish that amount to go to the City of Minneapolis to help satisfy their contractual agreement which they entered into with MnDott. It was asked how this decision affects the amounts the municipalities will have to pay. We had prepared ourselves for the worst possible situation so the upper amounts will still be the same. After discussion, Acting Chairman Moore asked Mr. Kremer to work up a proposal in which the Commission will be the advisers to the city as the construction proceeds. Counsel Pearson will send a letter on behalf of the Commission explaining why we are not pleased with the document and that we are signing it under duress. Mr. Pearson thanked the Commission for the flowers and note received while in the hospital for back surgery. Commissioners: Two letters had been received - one from Norman C. Wenk and Associ- ates, Consulting Hydrologists, and one from the Mudcat Division of National Car Rentals. Mr. Hoshaw has received the communications regarding the agreement between the City of Minneapolis and all other member cities except for Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, and Plymouth. He expressed his appreciation. The others will be forthcoming soon. It appears that all the cities have ratified the agreement. This agreement supports Minneapolis which has the responsibility to carry out the terms of the LCA as signed by Mayor Fraser. Engineer• 1) Have had communications with Senators Boschwitz and Duren- berger. They will pursue further the reasons for the Corps' decision and will get back to us. 2) Had received a communication from the DNR indicating that they had received approval of the $36,000 that we had requested for the fish barrier so the design can be initiated. 3) Communication with the Corps of Engineers regarding the design of a reach of the tunnel. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request by a representative of the owner for construction requirements on two lots near Highway 100 on the main stem of Bassett Creek, Lots 7 and 8, Westbrooke Addition, City of Crystal. The total volume on the two lots at the 100 year flood plain elevation of 847.5 is about 3000 cubic yards. Mr. Kremer recommends that we only require that this property provide compensating storage below the 100 year flood level. The flood level was affected by a control structure which was built as part of the 215 project. Mr. Asmus moved approval. Seconded by Mr. Hoshaw and carried unanimously. BC Minutes - June 26, 1986 - Page 3 2. Review of proposed development at Norwest Business campus on the Plymouth Creek Branch. Grading for the overall site was approved by the Commission several years ago. The total area to be graded is about 65 acres. The water quality requirements of the Commission are being met by diverting all storm water runoff to the inundation area upstream of 26th Avenue North, and separate water quality enhancement is not necessary. Mr. Kremer Kremer recommended approval. Moved by Mr. Hoshaw, seconded by Mr. Asmus, and carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS 1. Assessments: Mr. Grube of St. Louis Park asked if instead of the annual changing in assessment evaluations, we could just change the numbers every other year. Mr. Moore explained that we were doing it annually because that had been the request of the City of Crystal and that under the present setup it does not take long to get the figures needed. Motion was made by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Gustafson to adopt the assessment for fiscal year 1987 in the amount of $146,700 (Minneapolis $15,716, St. Louis Park $7,012, Minnetonka $8,215, Crystal $7,746, Golden Valley $41,325, Robbinsdale $1,582, Plymouth $55,057, New Hope $8,333, Medicine Lake $704). A roll call vote levying a total assessment of $146,700 was taken which resulted in seven affirmative votes or a unanimous vote. 2. The question was raised as to whether or not it would be pos- sible to adopt a budget earlier in the year. It was explained that we are operating under the terms of the Joint Powers Agreement and that we are already two or three months ahead of our member cities. 3. Request for review of the Boone Avenue Interstate 394 drainage plans. Mr. Kremer said they have not been able to complete the review. 4. The question was raised as to where the Commission stands on adopting the Water Management Plan. Mr. Kremer indicated that parts of it have been completed. The area that is not yet com- pleted is the water quality section. Mr. Pearson cautioned that we have to submit it prior to the end of the year. Mr. Moore indicated that after the Commission adopts it, we submit it to the member communities which have 60 days to comment. It could take up to 18 months if everyone took the full amount of time. ADJOURNMENT: It was moved by Mr. Gustafson and seconded by Mr. Hoshaw that the meeting adjourn. Vice Chairman Moore adjourned the meeting at 1:10 P.M. Fred Moore, Vice Chairman Donald Asmus, Secretary Elaine Anderson, Recorder Date: PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MONTH CLASS I MURDER RAPE I ROBBERY I ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON 1985 1 0 0 0 1 12 19 124 9 0 1986 1 0 0 1 1 20 19 81 10 I 0 = - \o a,... JUNE 1986 . TOTALS 1985 164 1986 131 -20.1% CLASS II FORGERY L STOLEN WEAP PROSTI SEXPROS GAMB OFFENSESLIQ DISORDERLY COUNTERFEITIFRAUDI MENT 1PROPERTYlVANDALISMIOFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM/CHILDID.W.I.1 LAW I CONDUCT I OTHER 1 1985 1 8 0 0 57 0 0 4 8 0 0 37 2 5 41 1986 2 6 0 1 87 1 0 2 1 0 0 34 17 10 45 TOTALS 1985 163 1986 206 +26.3% CLASS III ACCIDENT INJURY DAMAGE I ACCIDENT DROWNING EMERGENCY SUICIDE ATTEMPTS I DEATH I BITES AFIRE 1985 1 13 49 1 0 0 72 0 0 1 3 18 1986 0 16 61 1 0 0 59 0 3 1 6 25 TOTALS 1985 157 1986 171 + 8.9% CLASS IV ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERIOUTS JAGENCYISERVED IDETAIL IVIOLATIONJINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC. 1 1985 25 138 89 6 120 28 15 126 2 112 1 21 171 162 1986 29 141 96 7 134 40 21 172 6 111 3 26 211 89 TOTALS 1985 1,016 1986 1,086 + 6.9% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 351 1986 436 +24.2% NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 570 1986 442 -22.5% CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 21.7% 1986 31.4% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 1,500 1986 1,594 + 6.3% PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT CLASS I 1 MURDER i RAPE ROBBERY 1 ASSAULT 1 BURGLARY 1 THEFT 1 AUTO THEFT ARSON I 1985 0 1 0 1 1 1 55 1 111 461 39 3 1986 0 1 4 4 I 96 1 114 1 451 45 3 TOTALS 1985 670 1986 717 + 7.0% CLASS II MONTH JANUARY - JUNE 1986 FORGERY M8 L STOLEN P PROSTI SEX 1 COUNTERFEIT 1FRAUDI MENT 1PROPERTYIVANDALISMIOFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM/CHILDID.W.I.ILAW�I CONDUCT I OTHER 1985 1 2 1 89 1 0 1 2 1 208 1 1 1 0 1 121 38 1 0 1 3 1 180 1 7 1 .17 1 177 1 1986 �_ 14 1 55 1 3 1 2 1 270 1 2 1 0 1 141 61 1 0 1 6 1 219 1 52 1 32 1 213 1 TOTALS 1985 736 1986 943 +28.1% CLASS III 1 ACCIDENT 1 INJURY DAMAGE ACCIDENT I DROWNING EMERGENCY SUICIDE 1 ATTEMPTS I DEATH I BITES I FIRESI 1985 1 81 320 i 0 0 I 348 1 6 I 10 16 I 109 1986 2 I 77 1 397 I 0 0 1 347 i 2 18 8 28 1 136 TOTALS 1985 892 1986 1,015 +13.8% CLASS IV 1986 5,493 + 7.3% 1986 SSIST HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 1,935 1986 2,541 +31.3% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 7,415 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 3,408 1986 3,850 +13.0% ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSjPROWLERI OUTS 1AGENCYISERVED (DETAIL IVIOLATIONjINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCE1 MISC. 1 1985 I 95 1 727 520 1 31 1 589 1 196 1 128 722 1 12 639 I 10 83 1 561 1 804 I 1986 120 720 506 1 25 I 748 1 206 i 199 1 1020 1 12 1 580 1 8 1 88 1 696 1 565 1 TOTALS 1985 5,117 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 34.2% 1986 5,493 + 7.3% 1986 33.6% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 1,935 1986 2,541 +31.3% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 7,415 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 3,408 1986 3,850 +13.0% 1986 8,168 +10.2% F- N W N !— ti U Q r C C/7 > M- Z: Z i, W CC H- ►+ L Q O Z +J U d. W O M: p O 1- L LL- F- -C C) � d C Q 000 tY Z L LJ W p I— O Ln h- W c i> J M Z LL) C til a p tl >. L Q z a x � O •r � W d Ln '-r (I%i M r! 1p N OC LC) Q^ t\ O Ln t19 .--4 O O r+ Ln l0 N ri N tf) t\ N Ln N N ra Ln Q t000(.Ot0 N N M 0) (7� C) t0 .--L 1\ Ln Un C) O M M M OO M ct .—L Lo .4 N f\ 0) OtCO)Lr) Cr) 0 O')OOOmC)0) rr C O O O R:t eY + Ln ri N qct cY00 NNN1\N 0*1 ANN C)NO M-4Nt0Ln'-+ C)00Ln-40)O F- W -L . L -4 M LO 0) .-+ r L N d' N f\ .--I ri N t0 U) N Ln V) . a W Q � U Z Q W Z c �s N N Q f\ ritocf Nt0 CN�t0t000-td- NMN OC LOM NM NCOctM CD-4Lo 1-LnN 01C)COMLr) Cc C=)-gMefOct M -4N t.0r-NN 00LnM N0iNtO1\M W N � Q II U i N Ot000:d.Nt0 1� mMO)MN .. .. N to W .-4MLnQ)r-"C MOO Mr♦CLf; (.0-4LOrn MM CY)kc= Ul>M00 L C L J 1-�m1\Md 00 ^1\ OtDML.0 MLn0)�* mqd- UiO-41,-OQLP) r-. NcY GtN ON .-i N ri d' NNLO 1 --Lo Ln t\M-•L i r+ 1-1 N O C Cr r_ .--I M COrC N CLC•C C O"C •r 0) CO'oC Q J N MRt0) U)et Mt.0 NOtp t0 tDNr" Lf) Ln0 C CD00%D ^M N J 01-:1-Mt0MC Mr4'-ftp-*-O NMfl, MctC) MOD lc 00r�t.0 0 > M M n .- L -4 1-4 M M 1\ .1 N N d .-i '-L -4 ct M C) •-a >> U M .--L t0 C M ri t0 O 0 O O M .-L tO F- t6 •r W •r L �� N N O = Z O 3 W r r rr r rr•-r J rr•r- r r r r r rrr- ::1-- • U • •• • N b b LO • r (]1 M17 CU L6 • •r GJ tII R t0 • •r N RJ LC C) F- C) Omt O LT1" C)ONM1,-C 34 C Z Ct CcYr\ 00 r-- 00 C3, all MLP C) NCT) t`-Zd- Nm 00m00O1-4Ln C cL W . LO O Lc) t0 f\ l0 mt M 00 Lf) Ln Ln t0 U Q x 7 t- L-- F- P' Q L >- Q f 7 F- 1-- F- 00 tY 01) W r- d O C � D W 1 Z O 1- N ff)O Ln N .- M-4 --1 Ln ko M--4 MOL000 M N�tp p� OM L- LL. t0 Z O O C TJ 7 Z W O Ln ►� O F– J Q U CD M 00f\00OOC Mn LnLn� Cr t000(.Ot0 N N M 0) (7� C) t0 .--L 1\ Ln Un C) O M M M OO M ct .—L Lo .4 N f\ 0) OtCO)Lr) Cr) 0 O')OOOmC)0) rr C O O O R:t eY + Ln ri N qct cY00 NNN1\N 0*1 ANN C)NO M-4Nt0Ln'-+ C)00Ln-40)O F- W -L . L -4 M LO 0) .-+ r L N d' N f\ .--I ri N t0 U) N Ln V) . a W Q � U Z Q W Z c �s N N Q f\ ritocf Nt0 CN�t0t000-td- NMN OC LOM NM NCOctM CD-4Lo 1-LnN 01C)COMLr) Cc C=)-gMefOct M -4N t.0r-NN 00LnM N0iNtO1\M W N � Q II U i M -ti- CO tC) N C O t0 01 l0 L7) C) t:t •r tO 1\ N ev 0) Ln t0 C) tO u cY N C) M C N N •r v N O L U C •r n O L O E V4 n Ch tO "a 00 CO LL t0 Ln L LL V t0 Ln 0000— m )00m m 4) -4 .-•1 C C O N L 0! N fl. n7 C 4J O O r F-- W T7 > C 0 C'3 it .. .. N N .. .. N N .. .. N to .. .. N N .. .. N N L C.L L C L L LL L LL L LL O C Cr r_ >> COrC CLC•C C O"C •r 0) CO'oC Q X X: r 4J X: 4-) M: N QC 2 i -)f (Ar 4-J :2 O N Q1 0 > LA r N C L LA •-a >> M r -L t0 M .--L t0 C M ri t0 O M r♦ t0 O O M .-L tO F- t6 •r tC •r L �� N O = Z 3 W r r rr r rr•-r rr•r- r r r r r rrr- ::1-- • •r O tl7 tLy t0 • •• • N b b LO • r (]1 M17 CU L6 • •r GJ tII R t0 • •r N RJ LC A= C a ttv O O 00 C d b O O O O C M- (a>)O O 00 C cL O O O 0 a t(C O O O O Q M 7 F- F- F- 1 4 Q X - 1- 7 F - F ► -y Q x 7 t- L-- F- P' Q m 7 F- F-- F- >- Q f 7 F- 1-- F- M -ti- CO tC) N C O t0 01 l0 L7) C) t:t •r tO 1\ N ev 0) Ln t0 C) tO u cY N C) M C N N •r v N O L U C •r n O L O E V4 n Ch tO "a 00 CO LL t0 Ln L LL V t0 Ln 0000— m )00m m 4) -4 .-•1 C C O N L 0! N fl. n7 C 4J O O r F-- W T7 > C 0 C'3 it F- C_ O a ZI C 4 Y v C. i =3 N C G) Z O N S F- 00 � Q 1. e -i LLJ Z W S 00 F -CN '--I C) r S W v-1 i V) � ~ � M N N w a N r1 2 r•1 F- Lf w Y F- 'C Q 41 V y -� 00 e N L C O Oc v L N U N 'o C 4c- m D N Q! F- C ¢ U S N O_ V) 4) ¢ N N N N � N � M d N U N N N S U RS F- O Y .) U O J 1-- V) r r 1 r 49 r N 41 41 41 Q 41 C O O � O m L1') N ¢ F- LL F - z Y ¢ W m C] O C U V) U f D 2 F- O Lr) U N U f Q- lr F - Z C W C L/] O o\o C Z W CL J d F- O F - LO b O N 41 4- C N C y OC W N S F- 00 � O 1. e -i LLJ Z C J 00 2 C) U S v-1 i LL � LI) � 00 Y a 00 3 r•1 Z Lf w Z F- 'C N 41 V y G i c gC 0 C O Oc v L N U N 'o C 4c- U D N Q! Q C ¢ U S N O_ U 4) C N N N N C N G1 4) d N U N N N 3 U RS Q O Y .) U J J C_ J r r 1 r 49 r W 41 41 41 U. 41 C O O O O O X F- LLJ U C ¢ Z N Z O W 3 f D d OOC C' Lr) d f OC U Q- C) Q. d Z J F- L/] O U 2 U US W O LL o� LM w w J U Z W U OC W CL C C Z C) O Z Q F- O F- I\ C7 Z O Z W CL J Q C) O F- N m J U J Q F- O F- -i,t O LLJZ C7 V) N J Q F- O F - V) d J U � G) 4 c O C CJ) C C G i c N C O ¢ U = d LO o\ N F- 00 rw� N e -i LLjO C] d o\ LL 00 N C) N S v-1 i o\o � n � 00 F- a 00 ¢ r•1 Z F- F- 'C N 41 V y G i c O C O Oc v L N V N 'o C 4c- U D N Q! C C ¢ U d N O_ F- 4) N N N N N LL N G1 4) d N U N N N N U RS O O Y .) U U J S F� r r 1 r 49 r r b 41 41 41 1 41 C O O O O O F- � G) 4 c O C CJ) C C G i c N C O ¢ U = d LO = N F- 0 N LLjO C] d H LL N N S v-1 i C C O F- ¢ Z F- F- m N Z C v U Q S Q F- d LL 00 00 r•4 O N J C F- 0 F - Z N O N Lr C T N J Y S N N N z N ` N U d v a) c a c c N O � N OJ 4- C N r c a C w 2 F- LJO U Z Q V) Z C] d ¢ LL W 3 NV) v-1 i C C T U Z C7 z w O F- V) V) Q N Z O V7 CL V) S O Z V) O 00 00 r•4 H C L7 N e �a42, N N N O r♦ O O N to Op N Q N w O M N O M Lr) J tD O O n O m p� I N O N N J J N LA Itt ^ LA Q ^ L\ LIQ r -i LO a) Q) , U • -� M LO O O O O O O O O LY U Ln to O O U. O Ln O w Ln S r ^ U') N ^ L\ O m O N N Ln O Z Cl 0 0 0 0 o O o I N LC) o O LO o 0 0 F ►-+ CT ¢t O N O N GF t0 N OJ +J -1 r -L r4 wt N a O w Of c- >- >- +•) O to 1- 4-) •r L .. C3 o O o 0 0 0 0 Ln I-- a LO O O Lf) LA O Ln n UZ cm 1- > Q L N N r-1 cz tC r4 +� O O .--L M LC) N L N d N Z y C w F - LY +-) 41 Q Rs N J L � W CL) Y u4-) r - r N w >- 4- O tL LA U7 O O O p > Q v) f, N LI) Ln O .~-r-� C N -lG . . . . r -L O M 00 .--1 ct 00 M s S LO r+ M eY f O O U � Z O •-� LA Q 4-) O O O O O O O O U r O LA O Ln LO Lf) O O r -L N N rL M N E 3 E O O Z U � LU L O Lf) Ln n N O >- O LC) LT M N r4O N M N N Z E LOO O Ln Ln LO o E OJ n O O N N NC) O CL M N O L2 00 C� M U rL N • • • r •r >) • • }1 • • • r- LO G L17 C mo L L >, C r CL +) > U +3 O co R3 O m d fO =5 CJ u O (1) O 01 CYI r- Li � Q rL ''� '7 Q N O Z O I-- ch z O t a mi W x z D 0 z- tc C C J= G L L L C 1 L L C C W c C l L1) Ln L L c i t W L E = N I.- L L!) Lo Ln t 1 to Ln Ln (M .0 1 -. LnO d•MN N M. -i.-1 ��rr 1 t-r'•+N�� MN. --t 1 1 ^ 1 N ^^^^ ^ to • 1 r N N N N N N Y N 1 •'d Ln Y Y Y Y Y Y r L 1 4j W r r r r r r I.3 +3 t 1 4J N Z 4-1 4) 4•) 4.1 4-1 4 t O 1 U u Ln N O N N Net N N 1 Q LO O O O M N l0 MinLn m yl 'r 1 W L7 Ln M O Lo Ln Ln CD Lo h --<V t.n -4O-4-4OC) Ln CD U-) LO f* -M 1 Q to r -t r-1 N .--t Y L Z t W r- N N W t a. > t1 Y O_ 1 C •r U Cn ; W �p r ty 2 r m W t Z7 \ •'� N \ � t r.r F•- t p. L1 .-r 1 y 41 T n T T r 1 •� O ^ O Z7 L ._ y t V) ce Ln z m a z I 3 v Y y -J •r- r..1 •.� 4.1 4J 4.1 •r 4.1 1.1 W i -J Y to 4.1 Y 4-3 4J 41 Y 4.1 4--) Y 1 'UJ 4� 4.1 Y N Y 4J 0 fA U- LA O a :/) O to 0 N O N N 0 t U- N :n O N O v) T Li.. v L O y L y 1) O L d v i- t Li .1 11) L JTN OZ31'Z3Z ZZ3 ZZ3 t 1 OZZ�--- I t 'v Ln t r� L ^ CO t t C 1 ^ �•-. � � - 111 t L U :.J V Z L L CV C L y 4-•1 M N Z L O v U L U �- � cn O 0 O O O N Lto to C C U U O U = t r L y J r L y S O r 0 0 ••n N y 0-7) -D y O n v n L n= v 1' L - i. O Orr L•- iC) O [- :.'�0_a.Q'7CnaCLC'Jm OUCO f C'�0.--�ZJUMm t t 1 t t c M t y N t 1 43 1 1 i cn v y y cn 1 :n Z N V U Z I N U to V u4+ n+Ja.au Q ; ti y 4y- 5 w y O w >, y >, Z 1 L O >, S 'J V) to 7 't5 L A 4.1 N 4•t W t d O - n 4.1 4j N y 4- a) 1 y>1 y = 1] r V 4- t9 4- :J t O [. 4- 4.) LF.. t- 10 `0 Ln IC 1 r O M •^ r4 O 2' r C IJ O O r Ln L/) 0- 1 .... = Ln C V) =2 T U V TJ 1 U C= O = 4.1 4- _rOco z mUmF- I Z O 1 "7 Q 1 L.J Mso�rn J 1 T ~ 11J 0.^�d'1)Ln:p J - Z •- •--� r4 ,--/ '.n "J '.0 0:) -4 --t N N N h- kc r•+ ;v N N N N O Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 cJ Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 I '-0 E O to -n Ln .n Ln '-n _n Ln Ln Ln '-0 Ln I- 1 i G 11C 110 1.0 110 'd LO z- tc C L C L L C •r L • •r � • L •r W G L L- = .0 Ln ` • �n t.n • n In T -- C6 \_ M 1 I f - Z W 11 Cn LJ r - 34 _7 ly M- ko •�L s✓� • •.0 � •L S= N �.J✓i W C L L L L L Y Ln 2 Ln O Ln u, t to LA 2 LO Ln L LO Ull In r-•1 r-1 . . • 11 r♦ N . . .•••1 • • N 0 N N In W W Y 1 Y Y 1 U _ Z � rQ rQ Z Q L V C G . 75 r- r. M a W Z In F -- O :n � W L 0 0 0 1.n Ln CD 1—NU•f OOO)MNLn N N Lo -A .--1 —4 /f rl L V U O Q r•••I r-1 to C 1/1 O O V Ln t\ N co LL -C U V +-> �•-� U 1 N N O L C Cn cn 1 f - C: = Z U :7 = 7 � L. C •- C •1 W '-••' [n 3 O � •^ Z = 1 \ L to J N a a\ c .^ ._ n .r IJ Z >- 0 O L O to C (A N N cV •r CJ rJ L fV l) 3 V L. 't L. y b V CJ W CD ZM=Ln= SZ3=3 ZS ZZZ /) 4-1 G r - n \ O s •r •r •r +J 4.1 4-1 4-1 W Y ,C ,C 7 +-I +J 4..1 +-> � N •r N CT •r •r •r _ c > c c T O C O L to In N N W L rp L rp J 11 'lJ y 0 3 2 3 U Z Z Z Z L JV L W � L y � U I 1J >> 1 w V ^3 J •r 'n � Z L 4-j y..7 +•) n y O N In y :JJ U Z •r ;n rt � C J N u- = Q s o u 3 v N O C C s In 7 I m= O :J Ln O N UU U 4.J = _ • r U O .^J y :ems s22:�za. _ t ON z >1 O V 4-)- Q >, •r a sJ Y•> >, W -n c v •r u aJ� .-4-+ 4-) cw z v- 6 +) li O J 0 1 rC •r L y N rte-- 2 1 7 s U = •r 13 J T U C v s 'Oi T J In T -- C6 \_ M 1 I f - Z W 11 Cn LJ r - 34 _7 ly M- ko •�L s✓� • •.0 � •L S= N �.J✓i W C L L L L L Y Ln 2 Ln O Ln u, t to LA 2 LO Ln L LO Ull In r-•1 r-1 . . • 11 r♦ N . . .•••1 • • N 0 N N In W Y 1 Y Y 1 _ Z � rQ rQ b L V C Z N N N N 75 r- r. M a W 110 c = F -- O :n � F- x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.n 0 0 0 0 0 1.n Ln CD Q N M O N cp Ln r~ ct -4 r--1 N N Lo -A .--1 —4 /f rl L V U O L C 1/1 O O V Ln O D U N LL -C U V +-> �•-� U •r L1 N N O L C Cn cn W W W Vf C: = p n 4-•1 rt N U :7 = 7 � L. C •- C •1 y '-••' [n 3 O � •^ Z = �- \ L to J a\ c .^ ._ n n ._ .- ►-� a -- •-- >.a c a c _c > M -0.0 >- 0 O L O to C (A N N cV •r CJ rJ L fV l) 3 V L. 't L. y b V CJ W CD ZM=Ln= SZ3=3 ZS ZZZ u rn c c L O O moi' y � 4 -J4 -)'a yv v.- V 'J 11 v v..• v.- 3 U 0 r0 O a- V- 7 'O ea cn cn rI C ^7 V T7 N N y Ln W n N W U U iv tD 1•-r-•- 7Y •- 7 7 7 C 71Y � •--•^ � S ^ L O O •r s= O L p 0 0 .- .- L .0 C O a 1-U0_(1t-mUl—=h-r-F- b= ovC-) .-1 J 1' z Q Z F- r -r r-. M M r\ 00 00 .--1 r-4 --4 - 1 :N 1 N N 11 N M C Q I l l l l l l l l l l l t i t l l � G� CfG'cf�14t�i Itil cl- Z:lld I:*,c•'•�7 v 1 _ L V C 41 75 r- r. M a r- 110 c = G O � � •C O :n � ...� p O V U O C 1/1 O O V N O O D U LL -C U V +-> �•-� U N N O L C Cn cn W W W Vf C: = 17 >> >, c :7 = 7 N 0 O 4J 4••/ O cn>-S-=c.7t•7000D rn c c L O O moi' y � 4 -J4 -)'a yv v.- V 'J 11 v v..• v.- 3 U 0 r0 O a- V- 7 'O ea cn cn rI C ^7 V T7 N N y Ln W n N W U U iv tD 1•-r-•- 7Y •- 7 7 7 C 71Y � •--•^ � S ^ L O O •r s= O L p 0 0 .- .- L .0 C O a 1-U0_(1t-mUl—=h-r-F- b= ovC-) .-1 J 1' z Q Z F- r -r r-. M M r\ 00 00 .--1 r-4 --4 - 1 :N 1 N N 11 N M C Q I l l l l l l l l l l l t i t l l � G� CfG'cf�14t�i Itil cl- Z:lld I:*,c•'•�7 =- :- k o C,. L . L • L C L N L' N • • N • N N W L L L L L L i L L L L L W L L L.7 C L. L L L' L Ln - c L C >= L t C s= E Z L N n C •--4 N • N •-•i r-•4 N -4 ,l Ln .--4 .--+ M -� r -- M N N W Y Y U W Z O O LC•1 U C4-J 4-1 W u N Z L I- L W I- G` Lr, w CO LO Ln C\j CC Co :I- N LP Q CV M -4 C',J r- Q1 N --4 rl_ F- N M r� r• -i M �* •••,-i N lC 1 ! I Z W W ch 1 G Z r � W r Y W F- ^ \ O L c/) 4-J 4-J 4-) a'r = as^J+>4- r- 'J.J 4-J aJ Y O Y Y al J J U •r •r r (,71 rS •r v''1 C'1 •r r .•- \ W aJ y Z Jl y Y '.J-� .-- r- \ •r •r N � W 0 un L C r- L C L C N T,7 L y r ^r C_ un N L 0 QCZZ=SOU OmOT?.Y JII N J W L l7 CV ICK.. U O C �. •r C v � I I 4- O .-. •� f I N 1 '1J J L • L L u 'T� = O O G N G N� n ar- a) S• r t• N— i S ai US•r OAU N O -S•r n J•^ Nr Y _ to 0) 1j 4-3 S +..1 •r C I N"0 4-1 0 C^ c.�-, O 2 r0 C O L u L^ :•J -M it U I ^ d a) N Y rfl O y.J N y' y •11 T7 :i 1 I G rL !C N .- O M C u C= N = N 10 N C N L- a) a) U y a) a- J7 4l 5 C y >) J7 I O Zy .G M L L L O M C= 7 C I Y y C ,^..' •r C tZ SG YCCCnGCULL- • >) r- a +) c u r- ^ L U c- C O :J r-• �- _y � Q ra O 6-4-1 u o6 ra - F - y3 -17 C C •r r LL •r >) O C V) y L J. N C a) N ra uZ '•'-" .r. ^' L '� (1) = C) L L .Z 71 -n 00 C _ L. L r- Y L_ L- > > •r 0 7 C C 7- '7 _" it 1 X .- C =r a) a; c L O L L O O C L L r O = •-' ^J O O >= r9 C C r' CY Z F'- C '7 U -- z 7 C S O _ L 7 _ U- --I J - LiJ G•' G' lC 1.0 rl_ n -4 ;") M r-_ 1W N r3". O' ?' LI" Z �- f� n e --i •--i -� ^. .1 .--� .V N N N N :V Z r- lC r•-. , r•••i .--', N I I I I 1 — 'J C 11 1 1 1 I 1 E r' r+ r+ .--' .••-� r+ .-� .--� .-i .--� ,--� .� •--� •--� •--� u N N N Com,' N Com.' N r- PLYMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY YOUTH SERVICES JUVENILE CASE DISPOSITIONS JUNE 1986 - CASE ASSIGNMEMENTS - 25 Cases Assigned 44 Juveniles Identified 9 Females 35 Males 10 Recidivist 9 Male 1 Female - OFFENSES - 8 Shoplifting 5 Theft 09 Criminal Damage 0 Neg. Fires 3 Harassing Comm 9 Court 19 Warn & Release 0 Bridge 9 WESJOP 0 Truancy 2 Runaway 0 Health & Welfare 5 Alcohol Viol. 12 Other - DISPOSITIONS - Other Nia Wronski Youth Service Officer OOT \oQw- 1 Assault 7 Trespass 8 Curfew 1 Controlled Subst. 0 Child Protection 2 Counseling 0 SOS 5 Restitution PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT YPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY MONTH JUNE 1986 =- � V 0001 0401 0801 1201 1601 2001 CONFIRMED FALSE PERMITS ESTIMATED 10400 1 0800 11200 11600 12000 12400 I CALLS I ALARMS I TOTAL I ISSUED I LOSS PRIVATE DWELLINGS I j 1 I 2 I 2 I 1 I 2 I 4 j 4 I 8 I -- I $64,000 I APARTMENTS I 1 I 4 I 3 I 3 I 6 I 4 I 2 I 19 I 21 I -- I 500 I HOTELS AND MOTELS I i I I I 2 j I 0 I 2 I 2 ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL I I I I I 1 I I 0 j 1 I 1 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY i j I I i I I 0 I 0 I 0 SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES j I I I I I 1 I 0 j 1 j 1 HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS j I I 2 I 1 I 1 I I 0 j 4 I 4 PENAL INSTITUTIONS i I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 STORES AND OFFICES I I I 1 I 1 I I I 0 I 2 j 2 INDUSTRY, MFG I I I 3 I l l I 1 I 2 I 4 j -6 I -- I 5,000 I STORAGE IN STRUCTURES I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 0 j 1 I -- I 11,600 _ SPECIAL STRUCTURES I I I I 1 i I I 1 I 0 I 1 FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES I 2 I I i 3 I l j 1 I 6 I 1 j 7 j -- I 9,600 I FIRES IN OTHER VEHICLES I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 FIRES IN BRUSH, GRASS I I I I I 4 I I 4 j 0 I 4 FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 _ ALL OTHER FIRES I I I I I I I 0 I O I O I I - MEf1ICAL AID RESPONSES j I I I I j j 0 I 0 I 0 "*MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 ALL OTHER RESPONSES I I I l I l I 1 I 2 I 5 I 0 I 5 TOTALS j 4 I 5 I 12 j 13 I 18 I 11 I 25 I 38 1 63 I 0 j $90,700 I "INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARMS TOTALS JUNE 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 10 FALSE ALARMS 21 TOTAL CALLS 31 ESTIMATED LOSS $1,500 PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT YPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY MONTHLY JANUARY - JUNE 1986 TOTALS 1 19 1 36 1 45 1 61 1 73 1 53 1 134 1 153 1 287 1 1 1 $203,6101 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 129 FALSE ALARMS 131 TOTAL CALLS 260 ESTIMATED LOSS $256,600 0001 0400 0401 0800 0801 1200 1201 1600 1601 2000 2001 2400 CONFIRMED CALLS FALSE ALARMS NUMBER U� PERMITS TOTAL I ISSUED ESITMATED I LOSS I PRIVATE DWELLINGS 1 2 1 5 1 9 1 11 1 16 1 14 1 39 1 18 1 57 1 -- 1 $126,3001 APARTMENTS i 10 1 17 1 12 1 15 1 16 1 15 1 12 1 73 1 85 1 - - 1 4,0001 HOTELS AND MOTELS I 1 1 1 I I 2 1 1 1 0 I 4 1 4 ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL I I I 2 1 I 1 1 i 0 ( 3 1 3 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY 1 1 I 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 5 SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES I I 1 1 I 3 1 1 1 1 4 I 1 1 5 1 -- 1 2001 HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS 1 I 1 1 3 I 7 I 3 I 3 I 2 1 15 1 17 I 1 1 - -1 PENAL INSTITUTIONS I I I I 1 1 I I 0 I 1 1 1 1 -- 1 1001 STORES AND OFFICES 1 I 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 9 1 11 INDUSTRY, MFG. 1 I 3 1 6 1 4 1 7 1 2 1 6 I 16 1 22 1 -- 1 31,5001 STORAGE IN STRUCTURES I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 0 1 1 1 -- 1 11,6001 SPECIAL STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 0 1 1 FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES 1 3 1 2 1 5 1 6 1 3 1 1 1 14 I 6 1 20 1 -- 1 27,9101 FIRES IN OTHER VEHICLES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 -- I 1,0001 FIRES IN BRUSH, GRASS 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 9 1 1 1 17 1 1 i 18 FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 i 4 I 0 I 4 ALL OTHER FIRES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 1 7 1 - 1 190001 MEDICAL AID RESPONSES I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 3 *MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS I 1 1 I I I 1 0 I 0 1 0 MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 2 I 0 1 2 ALL OTHER RESPONSES I 1 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 5 1 14 I 5 1 19 TOTALS 1 19 1 36 1 45 1 61 1 73 1 53 1 134 1 153 1 287 1 1 1 $203,6101 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 129 FALSE ALARMS 131 TOTAL CALLS 260 ESTIMATED LOSS $256,600 PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTH JUNE 1986 FIRE FIGHTER PARTICIPATION THIS MONTH/TO DATE FIRE STATION #1 1 CALLS I PERCENT NAME I MONTH I DATE i MONTH I DATE NOLTING I 18 104 I 33 I 44 EVENSON, DEN I 24 95 I 44 I 40 JACH I 25 92 ( 45 I **40 SHELDON, R I 41 i 189 75 I **81 KUSS 27 I 112 I 49 I 48 TOMCZYK 28 I 114 **41 **49 I SCHARLAU, A I 27 I 108 I 49 I 46 WELCH 21 I 108 I 38 I **49 VEFLIN I 41 149 I 75 I **65 SISK I 29 I 100 I 53 I *43 I HEBERT, W I 23 1 131 I 42 I 56 I PHILLIPPE I 13 I 75 I 24 I**33 I JOHNSON, B i 37 I 194 I 67 I 83 NELSON I 34 I 117 I 62 i *50 I LINDBERGER I 22 I 96 40 **42 I FOURNIER 28 I 87 51 37 SCHARLAU, C 29 I 144 53 I 61 LEUER, D i 29 120 **62 I **55 ELLIOTT, D I 44 I 164 I 80 I**79 I PLACK I 25 I 83 I 45 I**40 I KNUTH I 19 I 59 I 35 I **28 ELLIOTT, S I 25 42 i 45 I 18 I LAHTI I 26 I 134 **58 I **60 I ARBOGAST I 27 I 88 I 49 I *37 I HEBERT, DAVID I 24 I 87 I 44 I 37 HEBERT, BARB I 12 I 108 I**67 I**55 I SMITH, CARY I 18 I 91 I 33 I 39 I FOLEY 23 I 56 I **48 I **24 I 007�-l0b * Not adjusted for period of time in training. ** Adjustment for vacation and excused leave of absence. TOTAL ALARMS THIS MONTH 63 TO DATE 287 FIRE STATION #1 THIS MONTH 55 TO DATE 235 FIRE STATION #2 THIS MONTH 54 TO DATE 217 PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE FIGHTER PARTICIPATION THIS MONTH/TO DATE 1FIRE STATION #2 1 CALLS TO I PERCENT 1**48 1 1NAME J THIS MONTH I DATE THIS I MONTH I lu DATE JBEGIN, R. 1 19 1 105 1 35 1 48 1 JARBEITER 1 20 1 109 1 37 1 50 1 MARTIN 1 12 1 62 1 22 1 29 1 BEGIN, K. 1 26 1 131 1 48 1 60 1 JBRANYUN 1 35 1 118 1 65 1 54 1 IBULLEN 1 21 1 76 1 39 1 35 1 SCHRODEN, T 1LYMER, RON 1 10 1 27 1**77 1**48 1 JBOHLMAN 1 13 1 71 1 **34 1 **38 1 JLUTH 1 32 J 115 1**68 1**57 1 JTOMBERS, WM. 1 18 102 1 33 1 47 1 1LEUER, G. 1 38 1 136 1 70 1**71 1 1WIMMERGREN 1 36 1 9R 1 67 1 **48 JBERRY 11 18 1 **22 1 ** 8 (BRENNAN 21 96 1 39 1 *44 JFISHER 0 1 57 1 0 1**27 1 1SCOFIELD J 44 1 179 1 81 1 **85 1 1JULSETH J 36 1 138 1 67 1 64 1 ILEUER, K. 1 30 1 150 56 69 1 1STARR 1 23 J 85 43 J **42 J 1JAMINSKI 1 19 1 73 J 35 J **35 ]ANDERSON, P. 1 21 J 80 1**47 1**42 J 1BURKE, DAVID 1 38 1 145 1 70 1 69 1 JDAHLSTROM 1 15 1 98 1 28 1 *45 1 (FRANKS 1 28 J 94 1 52 1 *43 1 MONTH JUNE 1986 * Not adjusted for period of time in training. ** Adjustment for vacation and excused leave of absence. TOTAL ALARMS THIS MONTH 63 TO [SATE 287 FIRE STATION #1 THIS MONTH 55 TO DATE 235 FIRE STATION #2 THIS MONTH 54 TO DATE 217 Lefo ci Lefler hellne(1\ O•Brien Drawl ri i:❑ a n. G ff rp-, P 1; �L JUN 2000 First Bank Place odes' June 25 , 19 8 6 CIT' Minneapol,s �4is. -•F:.S �t � Minnesota 55402 Telephone (612, 333-0543 Telecopier (6121 333-0540 Clay -ori L. LeFe�e­e Herbert F. Lege, J. Dennis p'Br,� Jona, E. Dra\,.z David J. Kenneo, JOhr B. Dea: Glenn E Puree Richard J Scnierer Cheries L. LeFevere Herbert P. Lefler I James J. Thomsc-: J, Thomas R. Ga" Davle Nola Bnan F, Race John G. Kress Lorraine S Ci.:c - James r,°. St..,,,_ Rona!d H. E ", Will i an P. Jc c. - Susan DicL_c Kurt J. Er cr,s, y William R. Shape Rodney D. Andersc- Corrine A- Hei-e John R McDonald. Jr. David D Beajo.. Mr. Joseph Ryan Building Official City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Jeff Howard -- Zoning Violation Dear Mr. Ryan: Pursuant to our telephone conversation, enclosed are the revised Affidavit and Complaint. Please review the Affidavit and, if accurate, execute and date it and have your signature acknowledged by a notary. Please return it to me in the enclosed stamped, self-addressed envelope. Very truly yours, LeFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIE� DRAWZ, P.A. James M. Strommen Enclosures 1/0066Lt02.H37 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ----------------------------- City of Plymouth, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Plaintiff, V. Jeffrey S. Howard, Defendant. ----------------------------- �E!- `� DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT File No. AFFIDAVIT I, JOSEPH R. RYAN, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, depose and state: 1. My name is Joseph R. Ryan. I am the Building Official for the City of Plymouth ("City"), 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447. My telephone number is 612-559-2800. 2. As Building Official, I am authorized to act on behalf of the City with respect to building and zoning matters as they arise within the City. 3. On or about April 21, 1986 it was brought to my atten- tion that a ten foot high chain link fence or gate had been installed in the front yard of Defendant's property at 5140 Zachary Lane North, in the City in violation of City Ordinance Section 10, Subdivision D, Paragraph l.b. I proceeded to prop- erty on that day and took photographs of the fence/gate. 4. On April 23, 1986 I met with the Defendant together with Associate City Planner, Allan Cottingham, to discuss the above -reference fence/gate. At that meeting, I provided Defen- dant with a copy of the relevant Zoning Ordinance and answered 2 a-- � k questions Defendant had regarding the fence/gate. Defendant was instructed to remove the fence/gate. 5. By letter dated April 30, 1986 I requested Defendant to remove the above-described fence/gate within five days of the date of the letter or pursue a variance application with the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals. 6. On or about May 8, 1986 I performed an inspection of Defendant's property and observed that the structure had not been removed or altered. I also took photographs of the site on that date. 7. On or about June 12, 1986, I conducted another site inspection of Defendant's property and observed that additional fencing had been installed adjoining the north side of the previously referred to fence/gate. The new fencing is approximately eight feet in height and is also in violation of the above -referenced City Ordinance section. I took additional photographs of the site on that date. 8. By letter dated June 13, 1986, I requested Defendant to remove the above-described fencing within five days of the date of the letter. 9. I performed a final inspection of Defendant's property on June 19, 1986 and observed that none of the fencing previously installed on Defendant's property had been removed or altered. 10. I have reviewed the Complaint and hereby state that it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. M FURTHER THIS AFFIANT SAITH NOT. DATED : ALt-r- aC , (98e,� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) MIME,�=.. F FJOSEPH A. RYAN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of <�tiVl �i , 198, by Joseph R. Ryan. Notary Public /1 ■ ✓.nnNvwvtivwv_ MILTON L. DA: .E NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA NENN,PIN COUNTY e My Commissior Expires Aug 14, 1990 r.ti�.n,�vV�vvV'.nM/��nNWVW�M/YdV: � 3/0066AFO1.H37 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ----------------------------- City of Plymouth, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Plaintiff, V. Jeffrey S. Howard, Defendant. ----------------------------- DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT File No. COMPLAINT FOR AN INJUNCTION This is a complaint under Rule 65 of the Minn. R. Civ. P. , for a temporary and permanent mandatory injunction, for attorney's fees, costs, disbursements and other relief. 1. The Plaintiff, the City of Plymouth, is a municipal corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota and located in Hennepin County. 2. The Defendant, Jeffrey S. Howard, is the owner of real estate located in the City, said parcel being approximately one-half an acre in size, located at 5140 Zachary Lane North and legally described as: The North 145 feet of the West 183.21 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, except road, Section 12, Township 118, Range 22. 3. The Plaintiff has adopted permanent zoning regulations which are presently in full force and effect and have been in full force and effect at all times relevant to this Complaint. 2 4. On or about April 21, 1986 a site inspection performed by Joseph R. Ryan, Building Official for the Plaintiff, revealed that Defendant had installed a chain link fence or gate in the front yard of his property approximately ten feet in height and twenty feet in width. 5. A fence or gate of this size and location is in viola- tion of Plymouth City Ordinance Section 10, Subdivision D, Paragraph lb which states: Interior side lot lines. No fence, wall or shrub planting of more than three (3) feet in height above the level of the street curb level shall be erected on any interior lot within the front yard as required in each district. Section 4, Subdivision B of Plymouth City Zoning Ordinances defines a fence to be: Any partition, structure, wall or gate erected as a dividing marker, barrier or enclosure and located along the boundary or within the required lot area. 6. On or about April 23, 1986 Ryan and Allan Cottingham of the Plymouth City Planning Department met with Defendant regarding the fence which is the subject matter of this Complaint. At that meeting Ryan and Cottingham informed Defendant that his fence was in violation of the above -referenced Ordinance and instructed Defendant to remove the fence or apply for a variance from the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals. 7. Subsequent to the April 23, 1986 meeting, no apparent attempt to alter or remove the fence was made and by letter dated April 30, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, Plaintiff informed Defendant that it was requesting him to remove the fence within five days of the date of the letter. 3 8. On or about May 8, 1986 Ryan reinspected the Defendant's property and observed that the fence had not been removed or altered. 9. On or about June 12, 1986, Ryan conducted another site inspection of the Defendant's property which revealed additional construction of a chain'link fence adjoining the north side of the initial fence referred to above. Ryan observed that the additional fence was approximately eight feet in height and was also located in the front yard of Defendant's property. 10. By letter dated June 13, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, Plaintiff informed Defendant that it was requesting him to remove the additional fencing within five days of the date of the letter. 11. On or about June 19, 1986, Ryan reinspected the Defendant's property and observed that the neither the original fence nor the additional fencing had been removed or altered. 12. As of the date of this Complaint, the Defendant has neither removed the fence nor applied to the Plaintiff for a variance enabling the fencing to exist without being in violation of Plymouth City Zoning Ordinances. 13. The Plaintiff is without an adequate remedy at law in this matter. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for an Order declaring: 1. That the above -referenced fencing is in violation of Plymouth City Zoning Ordinances; 2. That Defendant be required to remove the fencing from the real estate described herein; 4 3. That Defendant be required to alter the fencing des- cribed herein to conform with Plymouth City Zoning Ordinances; 4. That Plaintiff be awarded its costs and disbursements; 5. That Plaintiff be awarded any costs, disbursements, reasonable attorney's fees, and witness fees incurred in any assertion by Defendant of frivolous, unfounded, fraudulent, or bad faith claims which may be asserted pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 549.21; 6. That Plaintiff be awarded such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and equitable. DATED: Respectfully Submitted, LeFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN AND DRAWZ, a Professional Association By 4/0066CMO1.H37 James M. Strommen, #152614 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2000 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 333-0543 April 30, 1986 Mr. Jeff Howard 5140 Zachary Lane North Plymouth, Mn 55442 Dear Mr. Howard: This letter is in regards Plymouth City Center in the CITY C)� PLYMOUTR to our meeting which took place on April 23, presence of Associate Planner Al Cottingham. 1986 at the The purpose of our meeting was to discuss your recent installation of a chain link fence approximately 10 feet in, height and 20 feet in width; located in the front yard of your property referenced above. A site inspection performed by our office on April 21, 1986 verified this information. As you are aware, the installation of this fence is in violation of the Plymouth City Ordinance. Section 10 Subdivision D Paragraph 1.b. states the following: "Interior side lot lines. No fence, wall or shrub planting of more than three (3) feet in height above the level of the street curb level shall be erected on any interior lot within the front yard as required in each district". A copy of this section was provided to you during our meeting. A copy of Section 7 Subdivision A and B of the Plymouth City Zoning Ordinance was also provided to you during this meeting. This section describes the purpose and intent of the residence districts. You will note that future restricted development districts such as your property, are included as being part of.this section. You indicated during our meeting that the structure you erected was not a fence but rather a gate. Section 4 Subdivision B of the Plymouth City Zoning Ordinance defines a fence to be: "Any partition, structure, wall or gate erected as a dividing marker , barrier or enclosure and located along the boundary or within the required lot area". A copy of this section was provided to you during our meeting. You also indicated that the purpose of installing a fence in the front yard of your property, would be to restrict your animals from gaining access beyond the physical boundaries of your land. You felt that in order to accomplish this, a fence being approximately 6 feet in height would need to be installed. I then stated that there is a mechanism by which one can make application to request a variation of the fence regulations set forth in the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. A copy of the Variance and Appeal application procedure was given to you during our meeting. By notice of this letter you are being requested to remove that section of fencing described above within five (5) days date of this letter. If in the event you may wish to pursue a variance application, you would still be required to remove the fence within the time frame specified. A reinspection of your property will take place after five days to insure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. I am confident we will be able to resolve this matter without the necessity of formal action. Please contact me at 559-2800 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Ryan Building Official cc: James Strommen City Attorney's Office 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 June 13, 1986 Mr. Jeff Howard 5140 Zachary Lane North Plymouth, Mn 55442 Dear Mr, Howard: Exhibit B This letter is in regards to a site inspection I performed yesterday, June 12th, regarding the installation of a chain link fence. This fence is approximately eight feet in height and located in the front yard of your property. As you are aware, based on my letter dated April 30, 1986, Section 10, Subdivision D, Paragraph 1.b of the Plymouth City Ordinance states the following: "Interior side lot lines. No fence, wall or shrub planting of more than three (3) feet in height above the level of the street curb level, shall be erected on any interior lot within the front yard as required in each district". This additional fencing has been installed along the front yard of your property which extends beyond that portion of the existing fence described in my letter dated April 30,1986. Enclosed for your reference is a copy of that letter and a copy of the Ordinance Section referenced above. By notice of this letter, you are being requested to remove that section of fencing described above within five (5) days of the date of this letter. A re -inspection of your property will take place after the time frame indicated, to insure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. I am hopeful you can resolve this matter without the necessity of further legal action. Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Ye Ry Buildi Official cc: James Strommen City Attorney's Office 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 U) 75 f E CO c co E 0 E CL W ,0 I 0 a`uLu c�o � .a°•ag � u8 �� 'c �.. a T0i c ��3 u u =,:. a< :. ��a_xopcpee cno.um °=ems 5�oxa uos88ca cEmEmo �� 5� o=s 5ua: ou=?� oo°�S o �; c`e�S 1O nuc aruxc�c E`c �_ c°su� Sx �_ma ��cio; iso s3 cm` 5poYcuuo xEio Wou� c a u o c ym E a,•uc• u u u ro$ x m i vc t w L c c BS x$ m m m a0 a m d a z` m°"mYiu mmo c°o oE'xi �+'rE mom" c= �v E caa�_ vu..r `Ec `pa Eu gJ:;um mos 2aougTXaros uua m c �'go 0�E C_m uuoo-'ou o�_�' c mom_ Lx mc$1_ c if E .. S.Y. y8y;;�z o °'ohm 3�° 99 LS�`o aa. .Y.y 9v `u oe a.TY aEC m_=� i,m e. -0m,= ccs CE�py�c�xm m.. m<°'eco Jg ` mm:u. nou-> co'oa <a u �ugu0ai '�3�d 9 f]a W `m'��`�' `o y.e E9 o�c m 9 E e'> mioL Yai55 a o._m a Sc 9 Eui b' u -_p -m L c3 a e_x a Ya o> �-mcC g C yy"1y ve-•uEr_- <_- o m v9mc vZ u 0J .- v _ggo c `�eII oo. u m Y.. 9 mm oEv ESE` aErE�� 3a u�i, L'Y',-0'0�- 3E'`'Em°gym `m E3o��� ?;pyEEE '.550 of `oCE�uoi° yn€` m3E� aFrxaSv z5�um�o z`oa5u x.°.oa_ xuu:5>� t`irxm`�5u <uvYxc zm50o mrm�m5°u�5 0.auSE FzuB Eo`m5> $�=red vvHa+-o00 Saoc? �'m xvE LemE3vucE�aEe LaB L= � am5d mSE�o�= m.vaa.9�o v>m� a> v23�9 i Yj mm N� ESHvi V uOC<W �.� Cy... m O !!o ucv oav 3c�uoEmu m �° `m U c y 3 L m S aE79e o `LULU 5°y° Lo Ex_x es 00 c u 08 my Q E• ynu o -d 'o u �� Eo SE 53 Ec� 3m �3m m`mu o�`m dc0 EE `vu �'��"oe�� x$05' Qoru ala 5m es;� ocrv_T m5 a=max as 1! nD;'4Ey� aaycu55E Oi oma' m 5Y-` oum �iffimyZ '�e��c`e o�3e'L iE v`m �' €?m`�momu m`�re Eo s:L�SL'ueE c u E- E_> E�m> ung=m`->'' mmHg uSayevc9u 00 �3-oT,a EL'S!°_Su uyu `mY a°eAu<.LY. `ece e�eao6mu3vo eL�3. E aE••__ a me xo 0cu3 su�o>m�.o Bi w o mau�3= of °ex`>a' cTy �o Ea3�er'Sm 01 .0 e r y Y$` • u _� �^ Y ail .. y Lyye e_MoM9 m vea mE Lm CmW E Z ._aE•uo'cc aha Eb' Ev YY= -`>m =eE'�v_u �`emum 00E��Z` I v E." -°•3g i,E �i >' F T$ p v Y m G o W ma _ ce39 xmSLE •fie zim$_m_ 2.`.3 L e N i v 3 ofC j�a 3d T_�ia ia.e-�Yao 03c _• ?O�o Lazme ;m°�c51-CYocm ° nu a 3_E -•'m a_ e> == L �oL� 5nm. to,�.�. `�eaoffi `�ELYEY�Cr� v� mi5aai $m:�ti-Ldt�=e 8Le3o°�S0`u��o = 5H-2 �mac�L a.�gL Loi3Ei E�3am,m c 5>i vu=E 9 c °;`o LY'u5� H53cu-mom? �E_uLwguu'cmm v Y E- r83�E�mvr�v3« t=v� 3 • 9 Y T Q r T u �. m Y Y ti L v■ x�coa� x> o..-a�o3i mym x3sai..a 3 o..! E x j_ om ou c S m cm�u TE L m m `o o� ;3E v o og Y�$yE�i m E�'�o aev..3 uaao eES- my 9 mL O ocY_ dm "'zL =m $-c aE e`�o3oa v W•J mi�m o_o_�T:. E,�v� um uLu U^vac 3 a 3: 5iL `�u :_cm rc c� Ym-�„;c mF� 9uYSe a=ommu� ?oC°-' ae3iu.ve >c'9 m��to• � m m�c=cEimsE-'^ca U ^mEa.mg? !149 " 9 2Y�cH. mcro 2'm -m Dvmovg - Y IL E O x 9 g E g G r 5aE'emdmm`e=mt` o-L-�`o-a3•a..�°. -p6 �•ua^^6T mma5x° �9 ;c_�xu o_ve'—P. a�eTmvem e� v — m - g— $yru Lj' Jd oE_;$o yc 'u g< ya `d $ E7i:E ma'c� E L"2 mS° aqquyi •0i ue�- u5igyy� ��_^■e E m"�yy�'E sw 2S Ec 3�Y.8.uyE y� �oYc%5S 30'8 T.�Y00_Oa44 TWC`i OOE F'`m Y�=aaG s4 OC mF°YG0a MI: vmCSC See �m�C�aga'C9 alT xi aE3 Eumee a o.a -i,e x$ei a s a. 1.9 F ox .... i�a_le Te PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May, 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. 0 t NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: . . Pa ( S - v v ACTION YOU DESIRE THE TY TO TAKE: / , 'r—y-/ f �U f t An `/% NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: � " /-r/ Y -6r ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: 1 L) (!ct ie 41 ! PHONE NUMBER: V-7 0 '07- \a �. July 14, 1986 Ms. Lois Troemel 14808 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY Or PLYMOD+ Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Ms. Paulson: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. Late this summer or early next fall the County will be returning the jurisdiction of County Road 15 to the City of Plymouth. After this roadway is the responsibility of the City of Plymouth we will review the need for any additional traffic control devices or signs. Although the speed limit along the roadway is established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, we will be requesting the State to undertake the study, also, after we have received the jurisdiction of the street. Depending on the results of their study, we'll determine if the speed limit will change. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: rt- r NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: eU Sgx-i-- ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: O f'Gj-� iri Ln PHONE NUMBER: '473- SO (a Z Tft. cac, July 14, 1986 Ms. Suzanne Cossette 120 Orchid Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY OF P&MOUTR Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Ms. Cossette: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 Ica Please use this form if you have a Question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO 'TAKE: (A n c-\(-}- c,� �,-�- NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT:L2Ltd ADDRESS OF RESIDE'N)T: 1 � �-� �i C.> �--�,, �? <<, �y1-7) PHONE NUMBER: f �xic ram. July 14, 1986 Mr. Don Hauge 15430 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 E 1 CITY Or PLYMOUTH+ Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr Hauge: This lettp- will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 =- ka PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your l r /, concern. , NATURE OF CONCERN PROPERTY ADDRESS INV LV D:V'4� A' /G l` J ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: l T PHONE NUMBER: L/ ��� July 14, 1986 Mr. Don Mueller 14913 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY O� PLYMOUTR Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr Mueller: z- ka This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: CC 72 - ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKEN Tn NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: 15'2,3 PHONE NUMBER: L�'7.5 -`J,--�-6 8 =- k a =,.4 July 14, 1986 Ms. Della Shelstad 15730 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY OF PIYMOUTR Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Ms Shelstad: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. Late this summer or early next fall the County will be returning the jurisdiction of County Road 15 to the City of Plymouth. After this roadway is the responsibility of the City of Plymouth we will review the need for any additional traffic control devices or signs. Although the speed limit along the roadway is established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, we will be requesting the State to undertake the study, also, after we have received the jurisdiction of the street. Depending on the results of their study, we'll determine if the speed limit will change. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: 6as (hr Y,(4 s 4 - ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: i,(-- X-'- 0 -X-'- NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: 'P"� ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: l Z& Cb /C J j7 - PHONE NUMBER: (,fJJ 3 7 6-3 tam. July 14, 1986 Ms. Carol Paulson 15710 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 r CITY 0" PLYKbUT4 Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Ms. Paulson: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. Late this summer or early next fall the County will be returning the jurisdiction of County Road 15 to the City of Plymouth. After this roadway is the responsibility of the City of Plymouth we will review the need for any additional traffic control devices or signs. Although the speed limit along the roadway is established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, we will be requesting the State to undertake the study, also, after we have received the jurisdiction of the street. Depending on the results of their study, we'll determine if the speed limit will change. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM: kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: Xy A� ANON YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: Z 7 111 a 0�x Ts % /: i- j -ru m r- 1"4 veli tt el ?W , NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: �%eAm.* — J% ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: PHONE NUMBER: =- t Q C-, July 14, 1986 CITY Or PLYMOUTH Mr. Donald E. Moore 205 Lanewood Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr Moore: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. Late this summer or early next fall the County will be returning the jurisdiction of County Road 15 to the City of Plymouth. After this roadway is the responsibility of the City of Plymouth we will review the need for any additional traffic control devices or signs. Although the speed limit along the roadway is established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, we will be requesting the State to undertake the study, also, after we have received the jurisdiction of the street. Depending on the results of their study, we'll determine if the speed limit will change. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM: kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBAC+n FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: g/ k e ?* -rJ-4 O .rJ f ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: 574 TN E -n, r�r—oP&o.- wtf*-r 74okpo�,cr =T �►�� N ���� s$ .7>m 4 (� �/f 9 C rii t Q g N it t T> fm AL P a r -n, sr ,. s 6+ a *- 5 wry --:�+ Q a/ k. t& s `r- w A. tr t...r NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: .7>m 4 (� �/f 9 C ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: 1.67-16 Go . FL V r .r PHONE NUMBER: Y 73 — 3 7 S3 �-ka42", July 14, 1986 Mr. Doug Paulson 15710 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY Or P&MOUTR Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr Paulson: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM: kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 =,- � ate. PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City, to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: 7),fJ,�y;�/� / L ACTION YOU DESIREE/ THE CITY TO TAKE: "'7 4 „T 1117 ff4-- /"oz �1y NAME OFF CONCERNED RESIDENT: ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: ,s„S %0 � fs—PHONE NUMBER: �7/`J2 .2 / y 5/ - u 7 Z - w July 14, 1986 Mr. Walter Rasha 15510 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY O' PLYmbD+ Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr Rasha: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 1aIN. PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: �1 ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: l l ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: PHONE NUMBER: Ji 7 '' July 14, 1986 Mr. Gerald and Janet Leaf 15105 County Road 15 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CITY Or PLYMOUTR Subject: County Road 15 Bikeway Dear Mr and Mrs. Leaf: This letter will update you on the action taken by the City of Plymouth with regard to the proposed bikeway on County Road 15 since the May 12th Town Meeting. You provided written comments with regard to your opinion of the bikeway at that meeting. On June 23rd the City Council held an information meeting for the affected residents immediately adjacent to the proposed bikeway along the North side of County Road 15. At the conclusion of this meeting the City Council directed that plans and specifications be prepared for the project, and the project be constructed as soon as possible. The consulting engineer is presently preparing these necessary plans. It is projected that work will begin on the bikeway early this fall and be completed next spring. I wish to thank you for your comments on the need for this bikeway. Sincerely, -Ilevtj Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh c: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our action and findings with respect to your concern. ` (� NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVQLVED: lme44 .,,.00 +(m / - C�./iu.- nPd �cocc� �1���ZJ blbcietd. ©Po�tki /ajl "trai/Pits (eujtr�srotunololr� ih,I �� �©LGl%e O� s*.cef %9�`s w,a,Eik� da�tq.Glaua� Sou�►`� a� C'e.�.('1• (oJ r..P,a�u�4�9� �.as� �f'a�r�is Luh ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: / 5, „,��a %9" a ovr �`o wge . �zd. 6, Sn non- ruzal sa c ht� _ sures ,, e h; e2h S -vc zae� 71- c S—ICL& 4 t- ecv . /,V agkc ,�r�C Gt sP�P �.�� .�i act .,-� c�c �E os., r.. Co a /d a.�l; irw+•ep 6� /ops at .Gi►, 4vi ced. ,,, Ee added r, . NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: mar s%Q V; �i(e e,,- ADDRESS ,1 ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: PHONE NUMBER: W y73 ('w) 9y/- O//O CITY O� P&MOUTR July 14, 1986 Ms. Marsha Videen 1151 Kingsview Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Ms. Videen: As you learned at the town meeting on May 12th, a traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of County Road 6 and Fernbrook Lane. Last week the City received the agreement and the plans for this signal installation from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. Provisions are being made as part of the plans to warn motorists not to block the Glacier Lane intersection. Street lights within residential areas of Plymouth are requested and paid for by the owners of the homes within the area. This cost is approximately $2.00 per month and is part of the utility bill submitted by the City of Plymouth. The City views that street lights benefit the areas in which they are installed. It is for this reason that some areas of Plymouth have street lights and other areas do not at the choice of the property owners. Unless we received a petition from the property owners requesting the installation of street lights, they are not installed. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 1 0"5 --- k ate.. PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT AREA 1 May 12, 1986 I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider V. ADJOURN RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your concern. NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: /935 -- PHONE NUMBER: LJ7S--d 570!2 d/Nf5 t `ate July 14, 1986 Mr. Craig Hamilton 1135 Harbor Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mr. Hamilton: CITY O� PLYMOUR+ Last week the City received the plans from the Hennepin County Department of Transportation for the proposed traffic signal at County Road 6 and Fernbrook Lane. As part of the approval of these plans the City is requiring that a sign be installed requesting motorists not to block the Glacier Lane intersection. I wish to thank you for your suggestion on the need for this sign. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 gab Community Improvement Reminder io, I have noticed a p with: Resident has no m wl— the Street/Potho Brush/Weeds/ Drainage Traffic �ark Traffic/Stre Dead Animals Sign M. SM.a fivE[ <Watermain/Hydrant 6 1986`,� Filling/ExcavatingDunk Cars ,�.i';; = Garbage/Debt s ign/Signal Erosion/Dirtyt� reets reet Broken/Damaged Equipment Streetlight If Other Description r_ U Location (17-4 13 �,.. ,. .-4 A-- v -7 ---t Your name Date � i Resident's Name -T- ZPJ,e, �12�,17 Address V67J' 40o%, Phone. rS"�--��/� ? CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: June 26, 1986 TO: Sherm Goldberg, City Engineer FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT REMINDER CARD Attached is a copy of a Community Improvement Reminder Card submitted by Dave Crain on behalf of Ms. Lee Bean, 4675 Balsam Lane regarding extensive damage to curbs in the Deerwood Estates development. Would you please investigate this matter and provide me with a report of your findings. I would appreciate a response by Friday, June 27 so it may be included in the Council Information Memorandum. Thank you. FB:dma attach. cc: James G. Willis, City Manager S/F - 6/27/86 June 27,86 Frank: I inspected the area on Balsam Lane $ 47th ave and could not see any curbing that was so bad that it would "stand out like a sore thumb" ! There are a few cracked curb sections but nothing that would require being removed and replaced, The curbing in that area does take a beating from the construction equipment but that is the "nature of the beast". There is one piece of curbing that needs to be replaced in front of the hydrant on Balsam Lane @ 47th due to a watermain break, This is scheuled to be replaced. Sherm ldberg CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO Date: July 18, 1986 To: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager From: Mel Solberg, Lt. Subject: House number painter David Scott Mills 576 Hiawath Drive Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 Temp. address Camden Motel 4651 Lyndal e Rm. 31 522 3361 He is a one person company putting himself through college. Will be in on Friday for a permit. �- \ a c_,, Addresses will consist of a REFLECTIVE white background with bold, black, four -inch numbers, which are proved best for night viewing. NOTICE To have your home included, please leave your name and address at the REFLECTIVE STREET ADDRESS MAINTENANCE CO REFLECTIVE HOME ADDRESSES WILL - - C C BE PAINTED ON THE CURBS ALONG beginning at 9:00 in the morning, these notices will be picked up and the YOUR STREET TOMORROW. YOUR < < • HOME TO BE INCLUDED ONLY ' r '- f)-,fWITH YOUR PERMISSION. C. r •t t c t C r This service is provided to assure you that in an emergency, _- Police, Fire Depts., and Ambulance services can reach your did. Please display on your front door until 5:00 p.m. home with a minimum amount of delay. Homes that are not adequately numbered can possibly cost lives. In most cases, • ti existing home addresses are extremely difficult to read or Name see at night. Your address, painted on the curb with a :: i reflective background however, will provide your home with ( ! l•'--� an easy to read REFLECTIVE home address that will insure Address prompt emergency services if you should ever need them. Addresses will consist of a REFLECTIVE white background with bold, black, four -inch numbers, which are proved best for night viewing. To have your home included, please leave your name and address at the bottom of this notice and replace it on your front door. Tomorrow, beginning at 9:00 in the morning, these notices will be picked up and the addresses painted on the curbs. Your cost for this service is only $5.00 and you pay nothing until after the work Is done and you are completely satisfied. Fill in your name and address. Tomorrow you'll be glad you _- did. Please display on your front door until 5:00 p.m. • ti Name c_a_ :: i ( ! l•'--� Address E� • f"�It 1 IL 0C E duly 16, 1986 Mr. D. S. Mills 576 Hiawatha Drive 48858 Mount Pleasant, r_ Dear Mr. Mills: a member of the of a note written to a Plymouth resident by I am attaching a copy an asking that payment for their ei services associated On the basis of the note, I assume that y Reflective Stour ad da dress. Ss Maintenance Company be sent to y with the company and should be aware of a number of things.e Section 1140 addressing Plymouth City Co ch First, I am attaching a copy of the Ply Members of the Reflective Street solicitors, peddlers and transient merchants. I am enclosing several Company are solicitors under the the 'City - employee the ordinance an eche Address Maintenance aired to be licensed with employee is therefore req Section 1140.05 of the ordinance defines In lication form. our license request to be considered. copies of the al in operating illegally, and if such materials which are require dicense, yo rr firm is op a f ormal the absence of securing a days be and the date of this letter, action continues for five ale ndar and the company. complaint will be issued againstYour notice suggests that your our notice. sponsored in some fashion by the City of Plymouth. The firs We are also concerned about the nature of y You that in an business is supported or P "This service is provided to assure our home with a line of the notice which reads, opera is associated with the enc police, fire department and ambulance our services can reach y whether the emergency, �� is suggestive that y minimum amount of delay-", mouth. The an is part of the City of Plymouth. not related We have received numerous Inquiries Y s from residents askingan City. private company Reflective Street Address Maintenance notice should be changed to clarify that the firm is a p to the City of Plymouth. coo eration with these matters in order that we can resolve I would appreciate your P to formal action. these issues witho t resorting Yours very ruly Ij Frank Boyles Manager Assistant City FB:jm cc: City Clerk Public Safety Director Mayor & City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYtv1OUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 t ac, Plymouth City Code Section 1140 - Solicitors, Peddlers and Transient Merchants 1140.01 (Rev. 1986) 1140.01. Definitions. Subdivision 1. For purposes of this Section, the terms defined in this Subsection have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. "Peddler" means a person who with no fixed place of business goes from house to house, from place to place, or from store to store conveying or transporting goods, wares or merchandise or offering or exposing the same for sale or making sales and delivering articles to purchasers. Subd. 3. "Solicitor" means a person who goes from house to house, from place to place or from street to street soliciting or taking or attempting to take orders fro sale of goods, wares, merchandise or personal services of any nature whatsoever for future delivery or future performance whether or not such individual has, carries or exposes for sale, a sample of the subject of such order or whether or not he is collecting advance payments for such orders. Any such activity shall be deemed soliciting if it has as its ultimate purpose the obtaining of orders of such nature, even though it may not purport, initially, to be an effort to obtain such an order. Subd. 4. "Transient Merchant" means any person, individual, co -partnership, incorporation, both as principal and agent, who engages in, does, or transacts any temporary and transient business selling goods, wares, and merchandise; and, who for the purpose of carrying on such business, has complied with the licensing requirements of the City Code, and hires, leases, occupies, or uses a building, structure, vacant lot, motor vehicle, trailer, or railroad car in a zoning district where it is allowed by this Ordinance. (Added, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 1, effective August 15, 1986) Subd. 5. "Transient Produce Merchant" means any person who engages in or transacts in any temporary and transient business within the City, selling the products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by that person; and, who for the purposes of carrying on such business, hires, leases, occupies, or uses, a building, structure, vacant lot, motor vehicle trailer, or railroad car, on a site other than the property on which the produce is grown and cultivated, in a zoning district where it is allowed by this code. (Added, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 1, effective August 15, 1986) 1140.03. Registration Required. No peddler, solicitor or transient merchant shall sell or offer for sale any goods, wares, or merchandise within the City unless a license therefor shall first be secured as provided in this Section. The registration fee is set by Chapter R. No transient produce merchant shall engage in or transact in any temporary and transient business within the City, selling the products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by that person without first securing registration as provided in this Section. (Amend- ed, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 2, effective August 15, 1986) 1140.05. Conditions Governing Registration. Registration shall be made with the City Clerk of the City at least five days prior to the date when the activi- ty to be carried on is to commence. Persons registering must file with the City Clerk an accurate sworn registration statement in writing, on a form furnished by the City Clerk, giving the following information: T'- kac., Plymouth City Code 1140.07 (Rev. 1986) (a) name and physical description of the applicant; (b) complete home and local address of the applicant and, in the case of transient merchants, the local address from which proposed sales will be made; (c) a brief description of the nature of the business and the product or services involved; (d) if employed, the name and address of the employer, together with credentials therefrom, establishing the exact relationship; (e) the dates and hours of the day during which the activity will be carried on; (f) the source of supply of any goods or property proposed to be sold or orders taken for the sale thereof, where such goods or products are located at the time said registration is filed and the proposed method of delivery; (g) two copies of a recent photograph of the registrant, which picture is approximately 2 1/2 x 2 1/2", showing the head and shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinguishable manner; (h) a statement as to whether or not the registrant has been convicted of any crime, misdemeanor or violation of any crime, misdemeanor or violation of any municipal ordinance of any municipality other than traffic violations, the nature of the offense and the punishment or penalty assessed therefor; (i) the last municipalities, not to exceed five, where the applicant carried on business immediately preceding the date of the application and the address from which such business was conducted in those municipalities; (j) written statement of permission from fee owner of property where transient sales are to be held. (Added, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 3, effective August 15, 1986) 1140.07. Exemptions. This Section does not apply to persons engaged in the following activities: (a) selling personal property at wholesale to dealers in such articles; (b) acting as newsboys; (c) selling products of the farm or garden on the property on which the products are grown and cultivated. (Amended, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 4, effective August 15, 1986) (d) soliciting money, donations or financial assistance of any kind for any religious or charitable organization or selling or distributing literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited on behalf of such an organization; this exception does not include any activity which has as its primary purpose profit for the individuals who are engaged in such activity; Plymouth City Code =- \ ac., 1140.09 (Rev. 1986) (e) calling upon householders in connection with a regular route service for the sale and delivery of perishable daily necessities of life such as bakery products and dairy products; this exception does not relieve such person of the duty of compliance with any other applicable provision of this Code. 1140.09. Proof of Registration. Upon receipt of a complete registration, the Clerk shall transmit the same to the Chief of Police for approval. Every registration shall bear the written approval of the Chief of Police. Within five days after such registration, the City Clerk shall provide the registrant with a written certificate showing proof of registration with him. Such proof of registration shall have one copy of the registrant's photograph attached to the same, and shall be exhibited by the registrant upon request of any police officer or of any person in the City who is being contacted by the registrant in pursuance of the registrant's registered activity. 1140.11. Registration Non -transferable. No registration is transferable from one individual to another. Fach individual shall be separately registered where more than one individual is involved in the same type of activity even though associated with the same organization. 1140.13. Practices Prohibited. No peddler, solicitor or transient merchant shall call attention to his business or to his merchandise, by crying out, by blowing a horn, by ringing a bell, or by any loud or unusual noise in areas zoned for residential use. 1140.15. Duration of Registration. Each registration shall be valid only for the period specified therein, and no registration may extend beyond the 31st day of December of the year in which it is granted. 1140.17. Exclusion of Peddlers and Solicitors. Any person who wishes to exclude peddlers, solicitors or transient merchants from premises occupied by him may place upon or near the usual entrance to such premises a printed placard or sign bearing the following notice: "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited". Such placard shall be at least 3 3/4 inches long and 3 3/4 inches wide and the printing thereon shall not be smaller than forty-eight point type. No peddler, solicitor or transient merchant shall enter in or upon any premises or attempt to enter in or upon any premises where such placard or sign is placed and maintained notwithstanding the fact that he may have obtained a solicitation certificate or solicitation credentials, as the case may be, under the provi- sions of this Section. No person other than the person occupying such premises shall remove, injure or deface such placard or sign. 1140.19. Revocation. Any license may be revoked by the Council for a violation of any provision of this Section. 1140.21. Compliance with Zoning. Transient merchants and transient produce merchants shall comply with provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Code. (Added, Ord. No. 86-08, Sec. 5, effective August 15, 1986) Jim, A resident called today to inquire about why the scoreboard at Oakwood is not working. •,� He said he has been told that there's a part missing and the city hasn't been able to locate a supplier for the part. Is that true? --4"a aw3p,71A Also, could you tell me what the status WW—I l: of the proposed apartments scheduled to [ -W-1170 it :4 be build behind the shopping center on �- --- 6 & 101 is? Do they have final approval? Thanks. i Maria Vasiliou 7-14-86 z- \a %k.. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: duly 16, 1986 TO: Assistant City Manager Frank Boyles FROM: Community Development Director Blair Tremere SUBJECT INQUIRY FROM COUNCIL MEMBER VASILIOU This is in response to your memo regarding the question raised by Council member Vasiliou regarding the status of the proposed apartments in the southwest quadrant of County Road 6 and Highway 101. The City Council approved the Site Plan for the apartments now known as "Coachman Trails" on dune 3, 1985, under Resolution No. 85-398. The City ordinance provides that Council approval is good for one year, unless extended at the written request of the developer. This developer did request an extension and now has until December 3, 1986 to draw building permits under the original City Council approval. The City Council will be considering the Final Plat for "Coachman Trails" for this developer, at the duly 21, 1986 meeting. As of this writing, the Development Contract is in the hands of the developer, and are due to be executed and delivered to the City by noon today. Upon filin of the Final Plat, they will be able to proceed with construction.��� BT/gw T 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 6 6 C DATE: July 15, 1986 T0: James G. Willis, City Manager-) FROM: Eric Blank, Director of Parks & Recreation, SUBJECT: Oakwood Scoreboards Through my investigation, I have discovered that our department has dropped the ball with regards to the repair of the Oakwood Scoreboard. Rick Busch communicated to the Maintenance Division that we were having trouble with the scoreboards and that they should try to repair it. The maintenance people did look at the scoreboard a day or so afterwards and determined that they were unable to make the repairs. Unfortunately, they did not communicate this back to Rick, and they have not proceeded to take any other actions themselves to try to have an outside person look at and repair the scoreboard. We have contacted the Colorado Scoreboard people to see if their technicians can lend us assistance in getting the scoreboard back into operation as quickly as possible. I will keep you informed of our progress on its repair. :ds cc Mark Peterson Rick Busch A-- Am. . July 12, 1986 jL11 1,5 Ism R.aire Treurere, Director+ { Community Development City of Plymouth c;i rr 3400 Plymouth HLvd. Plymouth, 1211 55447 Dear Mr. Tremere t Thank you very much for coming to our home yesterday and brin3ing Mr. Iloore :with you. Our conversations cleared up some things for me which I have been wondering about for a long time. It did occur to me that even though wetland soil can be made buildable, to permit it is to destroy not only natural drainaGe patterns but also Gods nat- ural and efficient filtration plants from keeping our under3round water re- charged and our lases a little cleaner. I really appreciate your interest in studying 1:1hat procedures are bein3 used thou3hout the country in r33ard to wet- lands. I sh11 loot for^:rard to receiving your findings as they relate to Plymouth. Please express my than::s to r. Moore. Sincerely, �3b Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 (612) 479.3121 fr-� July 11, 1986 City of Plymouth J Police Department 3400 Plymouth Blvd. ✓ Plymouth, MN. 55447 Attn: Mr. Richard Carlquist, Chief of Police , r I Dear Mr. Carlquist: I want to thank you and your fine professional police force for the excellent service rendered to my family and myself the night of 7/7/86 during a burglary at 3695 Dallas Lane. You and our fine community should be proud to have such fine officers working for us. Would you please pass along my appreciation to these officers. Thanks again. Si erely, Gary Hart GH/hs WELL DRILLING AND REPAIRING PUMP INSTALLATION AND SERVICE MUNICIPAL - INDUSTRIAL DOMESTIC - ANY SIZE - ANY DEPTH National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW League Washington, DjZ�. of "004 Cities (2 (32) 6 3000 li _ ll July 14, 1986 The Honorable Virgil Schneider Mayor of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mayor Schneider: =- 1-Silio Officers Pres'de-t Her,,, , G Gen.e,c Mavc, San Antonio Texas First Vice Pres,ce Cainy Reyno'ds Co„ncawoman a! Large Denver. Colorado Second Vice Presse Pamela P P�.,m, Counc,!cr. Porta^.d Mane Immediate Pasr Presio'en; George V Vomc,cn Mayor Cleve�and On,c Executive D,rector Alan Bea's We are extremely sorry to learn that the City of Plymouth will not be renewing its membership in the National League of Cities for the coming year. Your membership expired June 30, 1986. This year will be an important year with respect to city issues before Congress. In this regard, the withdrawal of Plymouth will be of significant loss to NLC. We have appreciated the City's membership and support and hope that we may have the opportunity to serve you again in the future. Sincerely, eQ� eal, Alan Beals Executive Director cc: League of Minnesota Cities Pest Presidents: Tom Bradley, Mayor Los Angeles California a Ford L. Harrison, Mayor, Scotland Neck, North Carolina . William H. Hudnut, III, Mayor. Indianapolis. Indiana a George LatimeF Mayor. St Paul Minnesota . Henry W. Maier, Mavor Milwaukee Wisconsin . Jessie M. Rattley, Councilwoman, Newport News. Virginia . John P. Rousakis, Mayor, Savannah, Georgia . Charles Royer, Mayor. Seattle Washinwon. Directors: Jose G. Benevides, Council Member. Sterlm8 Heights, Michigan. Richard L. Barkley, Mayor. Kansas City. Missouri a Maria A. Berriozibal, Council Member. San Antonio. Texas. Rose Besserman, Council Member. Vancouver. Washington. Bob Bolen, Mayor. Fort Worth. Texas. Scott A. Burgess, Executive Director, Alaska Municipal League. Eugene Cox Dunwody, Council President. Macon. Georgia. Donald M. Fraser, Mayor. Minneapolis, Minnesota. Stacey A. Garner, Mayor, Pulaski, Tennessee. Terry Goddard, Mayor, Phoenix, Ar zona a W. Wilson Goode, Mayor, Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. Ron Gonzales, Vice Mayor, Sunnyvale. California a Alec Hansen, Executive Director, Montana League of Cities and Towns. Robert W. Harpster, Executive Director. League of Iowa Municipalities. Steven E. Jeffrey, Executive Director, Vermont League of Cities and Towns. Brendan J. Kennedy, Alderman, New Britain, Connecti- cut. Roland A. Luedtke, Mayor, Lincoln, Nebraska. Arthur E. Morris, Mayor. Lancaster, Pennsylvania a Joy Ficus, Council Member, Los Angeles, California. Dans G. Rinehart, Mayor, Columbus, Ohio. Ruth H. Scott, Council Member. Rochester. New York. James W. Segel, Executive Director, Massachusetts Municipal Association. Lottie Shackelford, City Director, Little Rock. Arkansas. Raymond C. Sittig, Executive Director. Florida League of Cites . Donald A. Slater, Executive Director. League of Minnesota Cities, Archie Spigner, Council Member. New York. New York. Dan D. Theobald, Mayor Shelbyville. Indiana . Minette C. Troseh, Council Member. Charlotte. North Carolina a Thomas X. White, Council Member, Greenbelt, Maryland . Douglas S. Wright, Mayor, Topeka Kansas July 16, 1986 CITY OF � Mr. Robert Burger PLYMOUTI I ,(, Bass Lake Development Company 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 RE Proposed Ordinance Regarding Ground Water Drainage Systems Dear Mr. Burger: I am writing you as President of the Plymouth Development Council. I have attached a copy of a draft Ordinance which we will be sending to the City Council on August 4, 1986. This Ordinance has been designed after extensive discussion at the City Council level and at the staff level. The City Code now prohibits the introduction of any storm water drainage into the sani- tary sewer system. Yet, as you may know, sump systems and drain tile systems through- out the City have been designed in such a manner that the effective way of disposing of the water is to run it into a floor drain or into a laundry sink in the basement. We find that while developers often install elaborate and effective sump systems, the installation is not complete in that the outlet or disposal is not finished so that the water will be directed to an approved means of storm water drainage. This language does not require the installation of a sump system or drain tile system. Rather, it addresses the situations where such a system is proposed and installed. It focuses on the point of installation (usually with new construction), rather than on a later time when the homeowner is confronted with the urgent need to dispose of water generated by the sump. The Building Division will be communicating this requirement to the builders as permits are drawn, and through the periodic "newsletter" which Doe Ryan publishes. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding this. Sincerely, Blair Tremere, Director Community Development BT/gw cc: File City Manager Jim Willis ENC 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 a:.: V -kb CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDINANCE NO. 86 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO INSTALLATION OF DEVICES THAT CONVEY GROUND WATER AND AMENDING CHAPTER IV, SECTIO14 400 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Plymouth City Code, Chapter IV, Section 400 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection to read: 400.15 Installation of devices that convey ground water. All drain tile and sump systems, sumps, or other system or device designed to collect and convey storm water, surface water, ground water, roof water runoff, subsurface drainage, cooling water, or unpolluted industrial process water which are installed with new construction or in conjunction with remodeling of existing structures shall be constructed in a permanent manner so as to discharge the water to the Storm Water Drainage System. The installation shall be done in a manner so that such waters are not conveyed, directed, or discharged into the municipal sanitary sewer. code/amend(ord86)1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: July 14, 1986 TO: TO FILE FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager SUBJECT DOWNTOWN PLYMOUTH I recently met with Susan Seylar and Michael Seeland, representing FBS Property Resources Corporation. FBS is a member of the First Bank Systems and they are handling the marketing of the First Bank property in downtown Plymouth. Ms. Seylar noted that the bank had spent a good deal of time and effort trying to acquaint perspective developers with the downtown Plymouth property, but with only limited success. It appears that most developers are waiting for something to happen on the Super Valu site. She did note that the restaurant property fronting along Highway 55 could develop as a strip commercial area, but that she had been informed by the City that the plan for downtown Plymouth did not contemplate such development in that location. I confirmed that fact. I also that the downtown Plymouth plan had not been "cast in concrete", and that if they wish to reanalyze the entire plan, including the theme center, they could do so without any preconceived notions on the part of the City staff. Ms. Seylar also noted that they have had some interest on the theme site, but that a "galleria" type of shopping area did not appear to be feasible at this time. I indicated to both Mr. Seeland and Ms. Seylar that Vern Bergren of Super Valu Stores had contacted me regarding Super Valu's intent to have a new trade area survey done for this market. That study should be completed within the next two weeks. Following receipt of information regarding the study from Mr. Bergren, I will be back in touch with Ms. Seylar. The long and short of the matter still appears to be, that there is no pending development in downtown Plymouth. JGW:Jm July 14, 1986 CITY O� PLYMOUTH+ Mr. Wes Clemens President Plymouth Civic League 5615 Evergreen Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 Dear Wes: Thanks to you and members of the Board of Directors of the Plymouth Civic League for another outstanding "Music In Plymouth". I've heard nothing but praise from all sorts of people since the event concluded Wednesday evening. It's hard to believe that something as significant as Music In Plymouth can get better each year. But it does! It appeared to me that more families came earlier to appreciate the various activities and enjoy a leisurely evening under a blue sky. The crowd by 7:30 p.m. was certainly in excess of anything we have experienced previously. All in all, it was a perfect evening and the entire event went off without a hitch. I know that a lot of individuals spent an enormous amount of time putting this event together. And I know they gained a large sense of satisfaction from just being a part of Music In Plymouth, but please convey to them the appreciation of the entire community for their dedication and commitment to making Plymouth a better place in which to live. Best regards, J mes G. Willis C' y Manager JGW:jm cc: Mayor & City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 July 14, 1986 Mr. Jelle De Boef 18120 - 18th Avenue No. Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Jelle: �F CITY O.- KymbUTR S- \ 1A Since our telephone conversation on Wednesday, I have received a response to my letter regarding your request for road improvements on County Road 6. I am enclosing a copy of the response that I have received from Dennis Hansen, County Traffic Engineer, dated July 7. You will note that Mr. Hansen indicates that the impacts with which you are concerned may develop once the new shopping center is open for business. You can be assured that the City will monitor the traffic situation on County Road 6, and I would also ask that you and your association keep me appraised of concerns which you may observe as well. I would anticipate that any traffic impacts on County Road 6 as a result of the shopping center, not to mention general increasing traffic, should be clearly evident within twelve months. Thank you again for your interest. If I may be of further assistance to you in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, aures G. Willis Cit Manager JGW:Jm encl cc: Mayor & City Council Fred Moore, Public Works Director 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av, South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Lr -u 935-3381 TTY 935-6433 July 7, 1986 Mr. James G. Willis City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, 114 55447 RE: CSAH 6 between TH 101 and Peony Lane Dear Mr. Willis: Your letter to Mr. Herbert 0. Klossner dated May 29, 1986 suggested that improvements may be advisable on CSAH 6 in the vicinity of Peony Lane. The Home Owners Association of Imperial Hills has expressed concern that the roadway should be widened to four lanes in view of anticipated increase in traffic caused by the neighborhood shopping center currently under construction in the southwest corner of CSAH 6 and TH 101. The Home Cleaners Association has a valid point. Traffic volumes will undoubtedly increase on all legs of the CSAH 6/TH 101 intersection once the shopping center is active. However, it is difficult, at this pint, to predict the full effect of the increases and what adverse impacts it may have on traffic operations. At some similar locations where a major traffic generator has been added, the roadway system has been able to absorb the additional traffic without undue difficulty. However, at other locations, traffic problems have become immediately evident. In this situation, we would suggest that both the city and county closely monitor traffic conditions on CSAH 6 once the shopping center is open. This will provide positive answers to the question of traffic implications of the shopping center and allow us to undertake necessary remedial actions. One of the necessary remedial actions may well be the widening of CSAH 6. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Z-\ Lke- J. M-Ilis July 7, 1986 Page 2 Should additional information be necessary or should you care to discuss this matter further, please call me at 935-3381. Sincerely, n Dennis L. Hansen, P. E. ODunty Traffic Engineer DLH:mr cc: Herb Klossner O. J. "Lon" Heinitz /�, District 48A Hennepin -Wright Counties Committees: Financial Institutions and Insurance Governmental Operations Health and Welfare Rules and Legislative Administration Minnesota House of Representatives Harry A. Sieben, Jr.,AIeY; . �l 7'yr© utt' 194 J �-L �- co CL 'IT r1� Reply to: ❑ 389 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 ; �' ffice: 2) 296-4320 L1 2555 Queensland Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 +'el*' BILL FRENZEL THIRD DISTRICT, MINNESOTA WASHINGTON OFFICE: 1026 LONGWORTH BUILDING 202-225-2871 Dear Friend: Congrett of the Mniteb Otatrz J0ouge of 3Atpulentatibe5 Ra bington, DIC 20515-2303 July 1986 MINNESOT OFFICE- � Room 445 r{ 8120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431-1326 612-881-4600 Because of your interest in the Tax Reform Act, I want to provide you with an update on recent action in that area. The Senate on June 24 overwhelmingly passed its version of tax reform send- ing the measure back to the House which will request a conference to resolve the major differences between the two bills. The Conference is expected to begin sometime in mid-July. The Senate -passed bill reduces individual tax rates to two brackets - 15 and 27 percent - and reduces the top corporate rate to 33 percent. The rate reductions are paid for by broadening the tax base, including the repeal of the investment tax credit and limiting or repealing a number of other tax breaks. The bill would shift $100 billion dollars from the individual to the corporate sector - as opposed to $140 billion in the House plan. In my judgment, the Senate version is a quantum leap from the House -passed version. The bill is closer to true tax reform in which the rates are signifi- cantly reduced and major loopholes are closed. There are still major problems with the Senate bill, including provisions relating to passive losses, capital recovery, the minimum tax, Individual Retirement Accounts and the effective dates. The troublesome provisions in the Senate bill are complemented by better proposals in the House -passed bill. I am encouraged that the two bills may be meshed in a fashion that will produce tax policy that is generally bene- ficial to our country and its economy. Enclosed, for your use, is a comparison of the two bills. Your input through- out this difficult process is greatly appreciated. I hope you will continue to communicate with me. BF:do enclosure Yours very truly, Bill Frenzel Member of Congress THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED FIBERS BILL FRENZEL THIRD DISTRICT. MINNESOTA WASHINGTON OFFICE. 1026 LONGWORTH BUILDING 202-225-2671 Individual rates Capital gains =— k11,4� MINNESOTA OFFICE: Room 445 8120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431-1326 6 12-881-4 600 Congm;2; of the Mniteb *tate; Joouoe of tepregentatibe.5 Wagbington, 33C 20515-2303 July 1986 Individual Taxes HOUSE BILL Four brackets, 15, 25, 35, and 380 22% effective rate Personal exemption $2,000, indexed; $1,500 for itemizers Zero bracket single joint head of hshld. Income averaging Two -earner deduct Fringe benefits: Health Wage Replacement Unemployment comp Workers" comp Itemized Deductions State and local taxes Charitable contributions Mortgage Other interest New standard deduction $2,950 4,800 4,200 Repeal Repeal Not taxed Taxed Not taxed Deductible Deductible for item- izers; non -itemizers $100 floor SENATE BILL Two brackets, 15 and 270 15% rate phased out for high-income taxpayers Two rates set at 15 & 27% $1,900 in 1987; $2,000 in 1988; phased out for high-income taxpayers New standard deduction $3,000 5,000 4,400 Repeal, except for farmers Same as House bill Same as House, but self- employed may deduct 50% of amount paid Same as House bill Same as House Bill Limit sales tax deduction to 60% of excess over income taxes. Deductible for itemizers Non -itemizer deduct expires. Deductible for Same as House bill principal, second homes $10,000 limit for indv. No deduction except $20,000 joint plus net net investment interest investment interest THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED FIBERS Corporate rate Dividend relief Dividends received deduct Depreciation Corporate Taxes HOUSE BILL 36%, graduated for small business Exclusion repealed loo dividends paid deduction, phase in over 10 years Drop to 700 New system with 10 classes, from 3-30 years; 200% declining balance for class 1-9; straight-line for class 10 z k Llc� SENATE BILL 33%, graduated for small business Exclusion repealed no dividends deduct Drop to 800 Current law, with changes for some type of equipment 200% d.b. for class 5 and 10; 150% for most other; real estate 27.5 and 31.5 year class with straight-line. Expensing Deduct $10,000 yearly Same as House with unavailable for those anti -abuse rules with more than $200,000 equipment purchase yearly Investment Tax Credit Repeal; spread out over Same as House, value 5 years for transition reduced to 70% for property; Carryforwards transition period allowed in full and carry forwards Other credits Rehabilitation Energy Targeted Jobs R&D 10% for non -historic 20% for historic Business and res. solar; bus. and res. geothermal credits extended 3 years Extend 2 years; $2,400 first-year wages, unavailable 2nd year 20%; tighten definition Same as House bill Business solar, thermal and geothermal extend 3 years Extend 3 years 25% credit through 1989 Capital gains Repeal preferential Retain 28% effective treatment rate Accounting Cash method Disallow for taxpayers Current law with over $5 million in gross receipts, exempt professionals S \ 4c, Corporate Taxes HOUSE BILL SENATE BILL Production cost Uniform rules requiring House rules extend capitalization of most to wholesalers and costs, replace completed retailers contract method with percentage completion method for most taxpayers Installment Sales No deferral if Same, but no excemption receivable are for revolving credit pledged, exception for revolving credit Financial Institutions Bad debt reserve Repeal for banks with Current law assets over $500 million Deduction for Repeal interest to carry tax exempts Current law Municipal bonds Limit projects funded Retain current law volume by private -purpose cap bonds; reduce volume caps but expand type of bonds under cap, including small - issue IDBs, multi -family housing bonds, mortgage revenue bonds; add new arbitrage restrictions Minimum tax New alternative tax w/ Same as House, but 200 25% rate; add prefer- rate, add dealer ences including tax- installment reporting, exempt interest, FSC capital construction income funds, 50% percent of book income as preference Medical expenses Meal and entertainment expense Passive, tax shelter loss Retirement savings: IRA limit Spousal IRA 401(k) plans Individual Taxes HOUSE BILL SENATE BILL Current law floor Increase floor to 5% AGI 7.5% AGI 80% deductible No provisions $2,000 $250 $7,000 dollar -for dollar offset of IRAs Minimum tax 25% rate, adding preferences: tax- exempt interest on non- governmental bonds, losses from passive investments, untaxed appreciated property contributed to charity Same as House Deductions allowed against income other than passive income, exceptions for oil and gas, rental real estate. $2,000 deduction for taxpayers without pension plans, and no deduction for others $250 only for spouses of taxpayers without corporate plans $7,000 20% rate, adding passive losses. No preference for appreciated property and tax-exempt interest At -risk rules Extend to real estate Same as House bill with 3rd -party exemption Generation skipping Flat 55% tax, dropping to 50% in 1988. Direct trans- fers taxed. July 14, 1986 C I T Y Or PLYMOUTR Ms. Janice C. Shiebe Loop Station P.O. Box 2519 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0519 Dear Ms. Schiebe: Jim Willis has asked that I respond to your July 5 water quality. In your letter you indicate that you Louis Park, but receive water from Plymouth. Since flushes its pipes, you had rust problems. letter with respect to presently live in St. Plymouth periodically In checking with Public Works Director Fred Moore, I find that Plymouth has not supplied St. Louis Park with water since July 5, 1984. We have, however, agreed that we will provide water to the Shelard Park area only during emergency conditions in the future. Therefore, the water problems you have experienced in the past must relate to the St. Louis Park water system and not the Plymouth system. You may want to direct your concerns to Sharon Klump, Assistant City Manager, at the City of St. Louis Park. If I have misinterpreted your concern, please let me know by calling me at 559-2800, Ext. 20X Yours ver trul Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager FB:Jm cc: James G. Willis' Jerry W. Sisk 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 I 11tJC� jD� MR (l �CLll-� s) 1986 .►1y+,y pr TF1;17 J _ Uc 9 19,-6( tit" ti 1 1 / \L N. July 15, 1986 Ms. Sandra Gardebring, Chair Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th & Robert Sts. St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Ms. Gardebring: _4 CITY C)� PLYMOUTI4 ==1 � The City of Plymouth is taking this opportunity to comment upon the draft "Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework" which has been published in the form of a working document for purpose of public hearing. We discussed the draft and the preliminary forecast with members of your planning staff earlier this spring and two key items were identified: Certain projections by your staff relative to population and housing units were not accurate and are to be recheck- ed; and, initial projections as to demand and supply varied from the acreage calcula- tions which we had made using the Staged Growth Plan the City adopted in 1982. We held the discussion with your staff to develop an understanding as to how the fore- casts and projections would relate to the comprehensive planning the City has under- taken including the staging of development growth utilizing this plan. The verification of the population and household numbers may have some bearing on the forecast. The important consideration for the City is that actual development experi- ence and trends since 1980 - 1982, when the Comprehensive Plan was updated and when the Plymouth Staged Growth Plan was adopted indicate no need for the Staged Growth Areas within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. It is important to understand that the Staged Growth Plan adopted by the City of Plymouth identified areas within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area which would be left unserved with municipal trunk sewer service until 1990. The City of Plymouth's comprehensive planning has and does contemplate the established Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary, beyond which is the Rural Service Area where urban development is not expected until the appropriate Metropolitan interceptor sewer is provided. The Plymouth Staged Growth Plan will not be needed for the 1990 - 2000 period, and thus the supply/demand figures addressed in the draft Framework should be adjusted accord- ingly for the 1980 -1990 and the 1980 - 2000 period. City plans now comprehend the extension of urban services only within the approved Staged Growth Areas; for the next decade, extension of urban services would only be extended within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The extensions of trunk sewers, municipal water, and other services would be to provide developable sites for orderly residential growth, including affordable housing opportunities, and for orderly com- mercial and industrial development to assure a viable tax base and increased services and employment. IlAon 01 VkAO11TW R/II II FVARn 01 YKAOI1TN ININNFCCITA 55dd7 TPI FPN(1NF (A 191 FFA-PRnn =- \�A ,\ Page two Ms. Sandra Gardebring, Chair Metropolitan Council Duly 15, 1986 The City, landowners, and developers have abided by the Staged Growth Plan since it was adopted. The planning for future development has been based upon the full expectation that potential growth areas within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area would be avail- able throughout the Metropolitan Urban Service Area in parts of Plymouth through the Year 2000. Extension of lateral sanitary sewer service from the trunk sewers is not anticipated to result in full development of the serviced areas for many years. This is based upon actual experience of the already serviced areas of the City, where land that was serviced in the early 1970's, for example, has not fully developed due to such factors as physical, economic, and marketing constraints. The City recognizes the capacity limitations of the Metropolitan Sanitary Sewer system and the need for sound physical and investment planning. The City of Plymouth's Comprehensive Plan, including the Staged Development Plan, accounts for this, particu- larly through the end of the decade. The Draft Framework indicates that forecasts for the developing area should not neces- sarily be viewed as an upper limit on growth, if it can be shown that regional systems can accommodate the greater growth. We understand that planning efforts by the Metro- politan Waste Control Commission and by the Metropolitan Council, particularly as they relate to sanitary sewers, will more than adequately provide the system capacity for the defined Urban Service Area in Plymouth. The draft document also makes substantial reference to the desirability of local and private participation. As you know, Plymouth has undertaken several improvements locally which have been found consistent with Metropolitan plans. The City, in con- junction with the private sector, have used Tax Increment Financing to establish the much-needed interchange at County Road 15 and I-494; also, plans are well underway to develop a similar interchange at County Road 6 and I-494. The costs of these major facilities which serve and will serve the metropolitan area as well as the City of Plymouth have been borne locally and have not been a burden on the metropolitan community. Plymouth has developed as a City with the philosophy that development should pay its own way and that excessive utilities and other services are to be avoided. Utilities and urban services should be planned and provided in conjunction with the development which not only needs them but which can support them. The draft document infers a need for a virtual paternalistic guidance of local govern- ment when it comes to planning and fiscal management. We strongly recommend that the Metropolitan Council avoid such paternalism and provide planning and coordination of services and assistance, particularly for communities that do not have substantive resources. The Investment and Development Framework should be a viable and dynamic planning tool which is responsive to the real world of land economics and market demand. Failure to achieve this will result in a continuing trend of development which skips the Metro- politan Urban Service Area entirely, resulting in premature and unplanned development of rural areas beyond the seven -county area. Staged growth boundaries within Ahe --I-- k�A� Page three Ms. Sandra Gardebring, Chair Metropolitan Council July 15, 1986 Metropolitan Urban Service Area which are artificially created in response to forecasts and outdated statistics will only tend to create inordinately high land costs which ultimately are reflected in the cost of housing and non-residential development. This is contrary to State planning and development (construction) policies. Local comprehensive planning efforts which are responsive to staged growth, utilization of available systems and capacities, and to sound future growth opportunities should be recognized for their merits and complemented by Metropolitan plans and policies. Growth occurring in such areas which is paying its way and which is in response to market demands should be nurtured and not arbitrarily re -directed contrary to the market demand only because statistical forecasts call for it or because other areas in the region are experiencing less or no development. The Development Investment Framework seems to be oriented toward orderly and planned growth within the Metropolitan Urban Service Areas of the region; the City of Plymouth concurs, and suggests that the sound and effective comprehensive planning by municipal- ities within the Urban Service Area be promoted and assisted. The Development and Investment Framework should be carefully reviewed by the Metropolitan Council to assure that it realistically and practically meets that goal. Continuing and meaningful communications with local government should be acquired and fostered by the Framework. An example is to involve local government thoroughly in any discussions regarding the content of comprehensive plan amendments. Local government was involved when the initial content guidelines were established. Likewise, other administrative and procedural requirements identified as necessary to implement the policies of the Framework should meaningfully involve local government. The effectiveness of the Framework will be directly proportional to the degree to which It is not imposed upon local governments but rather, to the degree to which it is mutually used to foster and guide physical growth and capital investments throughout the region. We look forward to continuing our working relationship with you and your staff, not only with respect to the updating of the Development Investment Framework, but also in terms of undertaking the necessary amendments to our Comprehensive Plan to assure proper planning and growth through the end of this decade and through the end of the century. Sincerely, mes G. Willis Ci y Manager of Plymouth cc: Mayor and Council Ms. Josephine Nunn, Metropolitan Council Member Community Development Director Blair Tremere "1'11 bet we save 100 deer a year with this siOnl" THE ROTARIAN/OCTOBER 1978 ' `V.Ic, told him to cross ONLY at deer crossings !" 6 Ziqav / By Tom Wilson NTHIS SITE GO� WkLDO 7.17 S r s... t !� J