HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 05-23-1986, Ft
L.
CITY O�
PUMOu i I t
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
May 23, 1986
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. CITY OFFICES CLOSED -- Monday, May 26. City offices closed in
observance of Memorial Day.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY MEETING CANCELLED -- The Planning
Commission Study meeting scheduled for Wednesday, May 28 has been
cancelled due to scheduling conflicts. The study items will be
discussed at a subsequent meeting in June.
3. DUNE CALENDAR -- A revised June calendar which includes the Dune 9
information meeting on County Road 9 is attached. (M-3)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION.....
1. SPRING ROAD BREAK UPS -- Attached is a memo from Tom Vetsch, Street
Supervisor, to re Moore dealing with road break up problems this
Spring. Most of the break up problems can be attributed, I believe,
to a combination of saturated base soils or a poor base. These
types of problems should normally be anticipated given the soils we
have here in Plymouth. Soil testing prior to initial construction
would likely identify most of these problem areas in order that they
could be taken care with the initial construction. If the poor
soils were excavated and appropriate granular material used as fill,
the base would likely have held up better. Another need is to
ensure that the base area can drain properly and not store water
which through the freeze -thaw cycle will heave and cause
deterioriation of the surface asphalt. Such action taken during the
initial phase of construction would, of course, increase the first
cost of the road. In my view, that is a better alternative than to
have streets deterioriating prematurely and thereafter requiring
patching type of corrections. The fact of the matter is that as
long as the poor base conditions exist, the patch solution is only a
temporary fix. These problems exist throughout the City in projects
built by the City as well as private developments. The item of
basic street, engineering and design considerations merits Council
discussion in my view. (I-1)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
May 23, 1986
Page two
2. ENTREPRENEUR OF THE YEAR -- Annually, the Twin West Chamber of
Commerce selects two "Entrepreneurs of the Year". This year, Curt
Gustafson, President of Banner Engineering, was chosen as the
"Entrepreneur of the Year" for larger businesses. Banner Engineer-
ing, as the Council is aware, has expanded several times in the
vicinity of their current site on 10th Avenue. Ed Hanlon, owner of
the "Boston Subway" restaurant of Hopkins was selected as the
"Entrepreneur of the Year" for small businesses. St. Paul Mayor
George Latimer acted as the moderator for the event which was held
In conjunction with the 1986 Small Business Week.
3. ARBITRATION BETWEEN JEROME P. BEGIN CONTRACTING COMPANY AND THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH -- The Jerome P. Be—gin Contracting Company has
previously requested arbitration of its dispute with respect to
construction claims for the Medina Road improvement between Niagara
and Vicksburg Lanes. The arbitration hearing will be held on
September 3 and 4 before a panel of three arbitrators.
4. MINUTES: -- The following -minutes are attached:
a. Planning Commission, May 14, 1986 (I -4a)
b. Park and Recreation Advisory Commission, May 8, 1986 (I -4b)
c. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, March 27, 1986, April
3, 1986, and April 17, 1986. (I -4c)
5. RADAR SURVEILLANCE - 18TH AVENUE -- From May 13 through May 16, six
stationary radar assignments were conducted on 18th Avenue at or
near Forestview Lane. The surveillance was done in response to
speeding complaints in this area. A copy of the results from this
traffic surveillance is attached for the Council's information.
(I-5)
6. COUNCIL FOLLOW-UPS:
a. Town Meeting Feedback Responses -- Attached are staff responses
to resident feedback forms received at the April 14 Town Meeting
for Area 10. (I -6a)
b. Resident Concern on Day Care Center -- Mrs. Pam Bruzek, 14535 -
13th Avenue North, recently contacted Mayor Schneider regarding
the operation of a day care center by her neighbor. The
Community Development Department has investigated the matter and
a copy of Frank Boyles' memo to the Mayor is attached. (I -6b)
c. Chelsea Woods Lighted Address Sign -- On a trial basis, the
Chelsea Woods Association, has installed an electrically
operated house number sign on one of their residences. A
Chelsea Woods representative called the City and asked that City
staff stop by and observe the sign during evening and daylight
hours and provide feedback on its visibility. Attached is a
memorandum from doe Ryan on staff's observations on the sign.
(I -6c)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
May 23, 1986
Page three
7. PLYMOUTH EMPLOYEES -- I have received the following correspondence
on City employees:
a. Letter of appreciation to Rick Busch, from Bruce Vandersall, for
help in scheduling Prep and Junior Babe Ruth leagues. (I -7a)
b. Letter of appreciation to Scott McLellan, Assistant Building
Official, from Rob and Cindy Moran, 3910 Glacier Lane. (I -7b)
c. Letter of appreciation to Frank Boyles, from David Wagner,
Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, for the use of City's
copying equipment. (I -7c)
8. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter to dames C. Olson, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &
Associates, from Fred Moore, regarding the construction of the
Bass Lake Plaza area streets and utilities and the extension of
sanitary sewer to serve the proposed Harrison Hills
Development. (I -8a)
b. Letter to Connie Lillibridge, 4825 Trenton Lane, from Eric
Blank, regarding the petition for playground development at the
Rolling Hllls Park. (I -8b)
c. Letter to Mayor Schneider, from delle de Boef, President,
Imperial Hills Homeowners Association, regarding traffic
concerns on County Road 6 between Highway 101 and Peony Lane.
(I -8c)
d. Letter of appreciation from Sohn Gutekunst, Football Coach,
University of Minnesota, responding to my letter on his
attendance and speech at the Plymouth Community Awards Banquet.
(I -8d)
e. Letter to Terri Thompson Neby, 4925 Pineview Lane, from City
Manager in response to Ms. Neby's letter concerning the Tammie
Middlemist Addition street lighting issue. (I -8e)
James G. Willis
City Manager
OGW:jm
attach
J
W
Z
1�
Cn 11J rV ^J W ,
N
►moi
_
LLqN
coO�N(`�
N N O
}
a)
co
N cli
0:1
V S
N
co N
co
�•I
~ N N
o
C\l
F D � N
uo C��N
�
a
I i
w
C�
c7
z ¢
x
HLn
�
�
00
•
M
\
a H
U
O
M �
7
�
p rz
rx
oa.
�
Lo
Oa
�V
CD u
�z
..a
z ••a
z
z
t°a
o
ado
cn
z
O
Qw
N
U
O P�
U
O
O •• O
Cn
U.,.4
En
P4
CC
JJ
P!
934
6x
Es
4-4W
rs
O
u
O U
TTw
U
�z;U
O
OU U�
ro
Oa
O
---c
M
V���
U
R' H.
O
O
U O U
O
O
W
UP+�^
M\
O
M
U�pr�U
`n44
V
p °a+°owUc
�Doao
00�
�CO7C7
7o z
W ;
U 0w�U
x•DU0aD—
r°PWG
o
c0 0.
can�o
CCS
00
c
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: May 16, 1986
TO: Fred Moore, Public Works Director
'
FROM: Tom Vetsch, Street Supervisor ( \ `+
SUBJECT FROST BOILS IN THE SPRING OF 1986
As you recall we had a very wet Fall in 1985. This coupled with a very
mild January, 1986 produced more frost boils than we normally have.
They will be listed below with what I feel the cause was.
1. 46th. Ave. east of Vicksburg Ln. Two frost boils.
Cause: saturated base plus heavy truck traffic earlier in spring.
18 tons of asphalt.
2. Shenandoah Ln. south of Co. Rd. 6. low spot, yearly occurance.
Cause: poor base, fatigued asphalt.
8 tons of asphalt.
3. Vicksburg Ln. south of Hwy 55, northbound Ln.
Cause: unknown
6 tons of asphalt.
4. 5730 Vicksburg Ln.
Cause: wet base material. Not repaired as yet.
5. Vicksburg Ln. immediately south of Co. Rd. 47. severe break up.
Cause: bad base. Not repaired as yet.
6. 47th. Ave. Oakview. Two frost boils, yearly occurance.
Cause: wet area. Not repaired as yet.
7. Holly north of Co. Rd. 9.
Cause: deteriorated asphalt
9 ton of asphalt.
8. 2675 Jewel Ln.
Cause: wet area, saturated base
5 ton of asphalt.
9. 2635 Jewel Ln.
Cause: wet area, saturated base.
5 ton of asphalt.
10. 2605 Zircon.
Cause: unknown
4 ton of asphalt.
-2 -
SUBJECT: FROST BOILS IN THE SPRING OF 1986 CONTINUED
11. 32ND. Ave. east of Holly Ln.
Cause: High water table, saturated base.
18 tons of asphalt.
12. Brockton In. immediately south of Co. Rd. 24.
Cause: no base. Not repaired as yet.
13. 2805 Brockton In.
Cause: unknown.
10 tons of asphalt.
14. Peony between Hwy 55 and Co. Rd. 9.
Cause: high water table.
21 tons of asphalt.
15. 3205 Walnut Grove In.
Cause: high water table poor base.
2 tons of asphalt.
16. 3800 Annapolis In.
Cause: poor asphalt quality.
2.25 tons of asphalt.
17. 48th. Ave.- Nathan Ln.
Cause: poor asphalt quality, settled back down does not have to be dug.
Not repaired yet.
18. 5100 to 5700 Zachary In.
Cause: heavy traffic on wet base, high water table
34 tons of asphalt.
19. 2900 Black Oaks Ln.
Cause: poor base, old blacktop.
10 tons of asphalt.
20. 1110 Magnolia In.
Cause: deteriorated asphalt. Not repaired yet.
21. 700 Sycamore In.
Cause: unknown. Not repaired yet.
22. 2935 to 2855 Xanthus In.
Cause: poor base, high water. Not repaired yet.
23. Hugh Johnson, 3115 Shadyview, 33rd. Ave. Shadyview Ln. 3220 Queensland Ln.,
3235 Ranier Ln.
Cause: This whole area is wet. I suspect the base and asphalt may have
been of lesser thickness.
15 tons of asphalt
-3 -
SUBJECT: FROST BOILS IN THE SPRING OF 1986 CONTINUED:
24. Nathan Ln. south of Co. Rd. 10 and 56th. Ave. east of Nathan Ln.,
and west of Co. Rd. 18 service Dr.
Cause: this road was never constructed to last ng time. No base,
thin mats of asphalt. \
74.08 tons of asphalt.
25. Urbandale Ln. north of Co. Rd. 24.
Cause: Not enough base, high water table.
21.90 tons of asphalt.
You will note I put down the tons of asphalt used for each. In addition to
asphalt we put many loads of class 5 gravel base down before patching. Our
normal procedure is to dig the entire bad area out. I want to pull the
paver over all these frost boils to help strengthen the areas around the
actual frost boil and to improve the ride ability.
Two other areas I would like to mention; the gravel roads have been very
soft. It has been difficult for us to get on them to work and improve them.
The heavy rains over the week end of April 26, 27 caused washouts which we
have to repair.
The second area I want to mention is newer additions that have been failing.
These are settlements, and aligatoring. The settlements I feel are hard to
control, but the aligatoring and cracks should not be showing up as soon as
they do. The additions that come to mind are Seven Ponds, and Cedar Ridge.
If you have any further questions feel free to contact me.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 14, 1986
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners
Wire, Magnus, Plufka, Mellen, and Pauba
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Stulberg
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MINUTES OF
Plufka to recommend approval of the April 16, 1986 and April APRIL 16, AND
23, 1986 Planning Commission Minutes as submitted. APRIL 23, 1986
Commissioner Magnus requested that a correction be made to VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
the April 16, 1986 Minutes adding his name under "Members
Present". VOTE 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application by Craig FREEMAN'S INC.
Freeman, Freeman's Inc. and requested an overview of the May PRELIMINARY PLAT,
5, 1986 staff report by Coordinator McConn. FINAL PLAT, SITE PLAN
AND VARIANCES
Chairman Steigerwald requested clarification of the Vari- (86010)
ances by Coordinator McConn.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Craig Freeman who
explained the proposal and noted that the variances could be
minimized if it were not for the fact that the right-of-way
does not follow the curve of the frontage road. He discus-
sed the matter with the Engineering Department who advised
that this right-of-way must be maintained for potential
future needs. Engineer Goldberg explained there is a jog in
the right-of-way because of a culvert. Mr. Freeman does not
agree that the right-of-way cannot follow the roadway be-
cause of the culvert, he doubts that this angle will be
used. He noted that the "proof -of -parking" requirements are
restrictive and he stated this building would never be used
as a manufacturing facility; however, he does agree to the
covenants as suggested. Coordinator McConn explained that
the location for the right-of-way is based on the City's
Thoroughfare Guide Plan and is part of the overall circula-
tion system. She noted that currently there are planning
applications being reviewed for this area. The right-of-way
is necessary for future traffic needs and to assure good
circulation.
S.IFAI
Page 88
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
Commissioner Mellen inquired how the city acquired the
right-of-way; Coordinator McConn stated the City purchased
the land from Mr. Freeman's parents.
Coordinator McConn further explained that the covenants
relative to "proof -of -parking" are recommended because of
the deficiencies as noted. The covenants are not in -lieu of
a variance but because of the variances requested. The
purpose of them is so that future users of the property are
aware of the lack of parking.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing.
Mike Sell, representing DeVac, Inc., stated he has served on
the Golden Valley Board of Zoning and noted that the City of
Plymouth "runs a tight ship". He stated he has read the
staff report which is easily understood and well presented.
He advised the Commission they have no problem with this
development plan and generally support Mr. Freeman. He
noted that this piece of land is particularly hard to work
with.
Mike Monteon, representing DeVac, Inc., had no further
comment.
Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Pauba
to recommend approval for the Preliminary Plat and Final
Plat for Craig Freeman, Freeman's Inc., subject to the
conditions as stated in the May 5, 1986 staff report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Commissioner Pauba noted the Commission will further discuss
the Site Plan and Variances.
Commissioner Wire stated he does not understand the need for
the present road right-of-way and that this area would be
more compatible as part of the site plan, giving a better
opportunity for landscaping and eliminating property that
the City now has to mow and maintain.
Commissioner Mellen stated the present location of the
right-of-way causes an artificial position and that
engineering may be addressing drainage rather than
roadway needs.
Chairman Steigerwald stated it was useful to accomplish a
clean-up of this intersection, but the angle is causing the
problems for the development plan.
MOTION TO APPROVE
PRELIMINARY PLAT
AND FINAL PLAT
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Page 89
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
Commissioner Plufka recalled a semi -half cul-de-sac by
Schmidt Lake; it appears there is no need to be concerned
about preserving sufficient space for roadway. He noted
that visually it appears there should be a sufficient area
to widen the roadway.
Chairman Steigerwald noted there could be green space to the
curbline and he would be more comfortable in granting the
variances, without defining the right-of-way lines or
selling back the property previously acquired.
Commissioner Wire stated he would like to have the land
available for landscaping. Commissioner Plufka noted he
would rather keep the wide expanse of green space for the
entrance to the building which would be preferable to
additional parking lot area. Commissioner Wire concurred
and stated his concern that the aesthetic appearance be
retained.
Coordinator McConn stated that based on the Engineering
information, the right-of-way should be maintained because
of anticipated traffic and the need for additional
circulation through this area. She stated it is in the
City's interest to retain the right-of-way especially until
all future needs are determined.
Comissioner Wire stated that landscaping should be allowed
within the right-of-way. Coordinator McConn questioned who
would maintain the landscaping and if trees are removed, or
signs erected, would the City be liable for maintainance and
safety measures?
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommend approval of the Site Plan and Variances for SITE PLAN AND
Craig Freeman, Freeman's Inc., subject to the conditions as VARIANCES
stated in the May 5, 1986 staff report. The basis for the
variances is the unique lot shape due to right-of-way, with
the understanding there will be no landscaping in the
right-of-way.
Commissioner Magnus asked for clarification of the
"proof -of -parking"; Coordinator McConn explained the
variance request is not for the number of spaces, but only
the setbacks.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
c�'
Page 90
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the Conditional Use Permit PETER BIH
application for Peter Bih and requested an overview of the CONDITIONAL USE
May 1, 1986 staff report by Coordinator McConn. PERMIT FOR
RESTAURANT
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Peter Bih who had no CARRY -OUT SERVICE
comments or questions. (86035)
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit
for a restaurant with carry -out service, subject to the
conditions as stated in the May 1, 1986 staff report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application by Pilgrim PILGRIM UNITED
United Methodist Church and requested an overview of the May METHODIST CHURCH
6, 1986 staff report by Coordinator McConn. REZONING, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AND SITE
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Wayne Corrigan, repre- PLAN (86042)
senting the church.
Mr. Corrigan stated he agrees with the staff report and dis-
cussed the needs of the church. He noted that in the Back-
ground section of the report, the land exchange in 1981 also
included an understanding of sharing parking lots in order
to avoid parking of vehicles on the street. The church
allows those persons using the ball fields to park on the
church site during the week. He noted those persons also
have used the church restrooms; and, that the church is open
to the City as a polling place. The church has always been
community -minded in that they open the building to senior
citizen groups and young people such as the Boy Scouts. The
church and the City have always had a good rapport. He
confirmed that sanitary sewer will be extended as agreed.
However, their budget may not allow them to finance the
sewer installation as a private improvement. They have been
told they can petition the City Council to extend the sewer
and assess the church, rather than the church paying all
costs in one lump sum. This should not affect the discus-
sion of the development plans by the Commission.
Coordinator McConn assured that staff will coordinate the
petition with the church for consideration by the City
Council.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
Page 91
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommend approval for the Rezoning, Conditional Use Per-
mit, and Site Plan for the Pilgrim United Methodist Church,
acknowledging the petition for sanitary sewer improvements,
subject to the conditions as stated in the May 6, 1986 staff
report.
Commissioner Pauba noted that this plan is a nice addition
to the church and the church is a good neighbor.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION CARRIED.
MELVIN H. TESLER
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application by Mr. CONDITIONAL USE
Melvin Tesler for an addition onto his residence at 1250 PERMIT/SITE PLAN
Archer Lane. Reading of the May 1, 1986 staff report was AMENDMENT (86047)
waived.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Tesler who had no
questions or comments.
Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was
no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was
closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Mellen to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit
Site Plan Amendment for Mr. Melvin H. Tesler, subject to the
conditions as stated in the May 1, 1986 staff report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the application by John JOHN DUFFY
Duffy and requested an overview of the May 5, 1986 staff SITE PLAN AND
report by Coordinator McConn. VARIANCES (86045)
Chairman Steigerwald recalled similar variances for another
building constructed near this site and discussed those
variances with Coordinator McConn.
Commissioner Wire confirmed that the other building with
similar variances has a flat parking lot. This site is
contoured so the setbacks are not as visually unacceptable.
However, the issues pertaining to the driveway and retaining
wall should be addressed.
_:L2
Page 92
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
Commissioner Magnus confirmed that there will be upgrading
of County Road 73, and inquired about encroachment by this
proposed building layout. Coordinator McConn explained
there is an easement for 7 ft. of additional right-of-way
beyond the current County Road 6 right-of-way.
Commissioner Wire inquired about the right-of-way, comment-
ing the pavement does not extend to the right-of-way edge.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Sohn Duffy. Mr. Duffy
stated the trash enclosure will comply with the Ordinance
standards and it is doubtful there will be rooftop
equipment. The fire lane variance is supported by the Fire
Inspection Division. He stated that relative to the
retaining wall, he is not concerned whether it remains. He
noted that the owners of the property live in Florida and
the daughter states she has no concerns.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if Mr. Duffy had talked with
the owners about purchasing the property. Mr. Duffy stated
he is interested in purchasing it depending upon the price.
He explained that the grade will be lower so as to be flush
with the property; he doesn't want the retaining wall to be
an issue.
Mr. Duffy explained his request for the variances come from
the fact that he misunderstood how the distance for setbacks
are to be measured. Coordinator McConn clarified that Mr.
Duffy requested the setbacks be measured to the south of the
9 ft. wide road right-of-way, rather than the property line,
and that the Engineering Department has identified that on
the southern property boundary, an additional 7 ft. of
roadway easement is required. This was explained to the
petitioner; the application was forwarded to the Commission
at the petitioner's request.
Mr. Duffy inquired about the vacation of right-of-way. Co-
ordinator McConn stated the issue should not be whether
there is too much right-of-way, but that there is too much
development for this site.
Commissioner Plufka confirmed that the "Park & Ride" lot is
adjacent to the subject property. He asked if the
petitioner had inquired if he could acquire right-of-way
from the State of Minnesota Highway Department. Mr. Duffy
stated he had not thought of this and it would be a good
idea. Commissioner Plufka explained that he would look more
favorably upon requests for yard variances to Highway 55 as
it would diminish the impact of the number of variances.
Commissioner Wire stated he is not comfortable with the
number of variances requested.
Page 93
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
Mr. Duffy reiterated that if he had been able to have the
setback dimensioned to the Highway 55, he could have
diminished or eliminated some of the variances.
Commissioner Plufka inquired if perhaps this development
plan is premature with the possibility of negotiations with
the neighboring property owner to acquire property that
would allow the plans to be revised. Mr. Duffy stated he
cannot delay the development of the property because of
commitments to tenants who need to relocate.
Chairman Steigerwald stated he is not comfortable with re-
design of this site plan, and there seems to be many
alternatives.
MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO DEFER
Pauba to recommend deferral for redesign of the Site Plan
and Variance application by Sohn Duffy.
Mr. Duffy stated that he has considered the options as
presented and honestly feels this is a final design, except
to move the layout 9 ft. closer to Highway 55.
Chairman Steigerwald suggested that even so, he wants to
review the plans as redrawn to meet Ordinance minimum
requirements. Commissioner Plufka stated he is not
comfortable with only verbal direction to move everything a
few feet. Buildings are meant to last, errors made now
would require living with those errors for many years.
Commissioner Wire concurred and stated the plans must be
revised for staff review.
Mr. Duffy inquired if the Commission would discuss the other
items, such as parking to building. He noted that the
property is out of square so that measurements vary. His
design provides more than 10 ft. of green areas around the
building in some locations. The alternative would be to
build out of square and this would be very expensive.
Commissioner Plufka stated that the building defines a
square shape and the parking defines a squareshape; the site
would have a strange appearance if not designed concentric.
Chairman Steigerwald confirmed there is no development to
the north; to the south is the Plymouth Automotive garage.
There should be less concern regarding geometrics and more
concern to achieve the minimum setbacks. City Engineer
Goldberg stated the building and parking should be parallel.
Mr. Duffy stated that the building is an approximate 8,000
sq. ft., with 16% lot coverage; he feels this is not
excessive. He stated the parking has been discussed with
Page 94
Planning Commission Minutes
May 14, 1986
the owner/tenant and they feel the parking is adequate.
He inquired if he should ask for setback variances, or a
variance to the number of spaces of required by the
Ordinance. Chairman Steigerwald stated the number of spaces
should be retained. He stated that the City's concern is
for the future, when a different tenant/user may need
Ordinance required parking because the use could change. He
reiterated that the Commission wants to see fewer variances
with this development plan.
VOTE. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
Coordinator McConn discussed future meeting dates. It was
noted that Chairman Steigerwald and Commissioner Plufka will
not be available for the meeting of May 21, 1986.
Commissioner Mellen stated he would be unavailable for the
May 28, and dune 11th meetings; and Commissioner Plufka also
stated he would be unavailable for the meetings on dune 18,
and dune 25th.
ADJOURNMENT
Meetinq adjourned at 8:45 P.M.
---T 4c'-,
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
_. ---�A\
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
May 8, 1986
Page 11
Present: Chair Edwards, Commissioners Anderson, Beach, LaTour, Mullan, Reed
and Rosen; Councilmember Zitur; staff Blank, Busch and Pederson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Edwards called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Anderson
approving the minutes of the April meeting as presented.
3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
a. Athletic Associations. None were present at this meeting.
b. Staff. Rick Busch gave a presentation on our adult softball program
which included showing the commissioners the various sizes of softballs
used in our leagues. He indicated that we have 153 adult teams
registered this year divided into 20 leagues, and they will play a total
of 1,000 games. He discussed the addition of four new electric score-
boards at the Zachary Playfield and mentioned the softball tournaments
that Plymouth will be hosting throughout the summer.
c. Others. None.
4. REPORT ON PAST COUNCIL ACTION
a. Parkers Lake Plans, Specifications & Bid. The Council approved the
Parkers Lake plans and specs at a recent meeting. Bids will be ad-
vertised in local newspapers for 21 days and then received and opened
on May 28.
b. The City Council approved the contribution to help improve the Sunset
Hill Elementary playground.
c. The 1986 trail projects were approved.
d. The landscaping at Zachary Playfield was also approved.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Neighborhood Park Concept Plans - Queensland & Imperial Hills. Director
Blank reviewed the concept plans for Imperial Hills park with the residents
in attendance at the meeting. An informal question and answer session
was then held between the residents and PRAC. Residents were concerned
with what type of surface would be put in for the softball area, whether
or not the jogging path could be moved farther north than its present
location, consideration of play equipment for older children, tennis
courts for the adults, ways to make the park active in order to dis-
courage vandalism , extending the proposed path all the way to Troy
Lane to give people who live sauth of Troy Lane access to the park.
Director Blank responded that a typical neighborhood park is designed
primarily for pre-school and elementary age children. He stated that
tennis courts are not put in neighborhood parks, but rather are located
in larger parks such as community playfields. He indicated that ball
field surfaces are generally just grass and are meant for pick-up games
PRAC Minutes - May 8, 1986
Page 12
and not formal games like the ones you'd find at Oakwood Playfield,
for example. He also explained that there is usually a high level
of maintenance on a neighborhood park, with mowing scheduled weekly
and trash picked up on Mondays and Fridays. He stated that the
budget for this park is approximately $30,000. Installation should
run somewhere between $7,000 and $8,000, and the BigToy play structure
will cost approximately $15,000. If our own City crews install the
trail running through the woods, that cost could be held down to around
$500. The residents then concurred on Plan #3 calling for the large
climber, soccer goals, picnic tables, benches, bike rack, hard
surface for basketball, a backstop for softball, and extending the
looped trail to Troy Lane.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MULLAN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
ANDERSON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLAN #3, INCLUDING THE EXTENSION
OF THE TRAIL TO TROY LANE, VOLLEYBALL STANDARDS AND SOCCER GOALS.
AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED
BY COMMISSIONER BEACH TO EXPLORE THE ADDITION OF MONKEY BARS FOR THE
OLDER CHILDREN IF MONEY ALLOWS AFTER THE BIDS ARE IN. THE AMENDMENT
AND THE MOTION PASSED WITH ALL AYES.
This item will be going to the City Council on June 2nd. If it is
approved, the play equipment would be ordered and should arrive around
mid-July. That work which can be done by City crews would be started
as soon as possible after Council approval of the plan.
Director Blank then reviewed the Queensland neighborhood park plans
stating that two plans were eventually combined into a third "final"
plan based on comments received when the plans were first reviewed
by residents at an earlier meeting. The budget for this park is
approximately $30,000. Residents in attendance were concerned about
the trail and how much of it would be paved. Director Blank recommended
paving the entire length of the trail for easier maintenance. Residents
also requested the dredging of the pond within the park to allow for more
wildlife and waterfowl habitat, and to make the area more aesthetically
pleasing for those jogging or biking on the path. Director Blank
responded that before dredging can be considered, a survey must be done
to determine if area to be dredged is on public or private property.
Residents favored the proposed plan #3 with the addition of volleyball
standards and the requested pond dredging. Commissioner Rosen recommended
that we do something for all ages in this park and he wondered if we would
be setting a precedent if we approve dredging the pond. He also stated
he was not in favor of parking stalls for the park. It was then pointed
out that the guidelines for neighborhood parks call for parking for up to
eight cars to accommodate the handicapped, elderly and mothers with small
children. Commissioner Beach favored the parking stalls and recommended
putting the pond dredging in a separate motion. Commissioner LaTour
suggested a turn -around area so people dropping off park visitors would
not have to back in and out of residents' driveways. It was then
pointed out that the Hadley Hills residents do not have walking access
to this park, so a parking lot would be a nice addition. Commissioner
Reed was in favor of the pond dredging, but stated that its location
PRAC Minutes - May 8, 1986
Page 13
will only benefit a few people.
Commissioner Anderson stated that
dredging the pond.
He favors a parking lot for four cars.
he is concerned with the cost of
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BEACH AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
MULLAN TO APPROVE PLAN 3, INCLUDING PAVING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
TRAIL AND ADDING PARKING FOR FOUR CARS, VOLLEYBALL STANDARDS NEAR THE
SHELTER BUILDING AND BALLFIELD FENCING.
AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MULLAN AND SECONDED
BY COMMISSIONER LATOUR TO ALLOCATE UP TO $2,000 FOR DREDGING THE POND
IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. THE AMENDMENT PASSED WITH FIVE AYES.
COMMISSIONERS REED AND ANDERSON VOTED NAY. THE FIRST MOTION AS
ONCE AMENDED PASSED WITH SIX AYES. COMMISSIONER ROSEN VOTED NAY.
This item will go to the Council on June 2nd.
b. Parkers Lake Park Update. The Parkers Lake bid opening will be May 28.
Construction could begin as early as June 15.
C. St. Mary's Land Acquisitiorl. The contract for deed is finalized and
is being filed by the City's attorney.
d. Zachary Playfield Update. The fitness court which was purchased with
a donation from the Rotary Club will be installed Saturday, May 10,
weather permitting. The landscape plans for the common area between
fields 1, 2, 3 and 4 will be reviewed by staff on Thursday, May 15.
e. 1987 LAWCON Grant. The Phase II Parkers Lake LAWCON grant was turned
in on Friday, May 2. This is a preliminary application only. If it
is viewed favorably, a final grant application will be written later.
f. Parks Tour. All commissioners with the exception of Barb Edwards,
and Councilmember Zitur will go on a tour of the parks on Saturday,
May 10, beginning at 8:30 a.m.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. New Plats. A preliminary application for the Mud Lake plat near the
intersection of County Road 47 and I-494 has been received by the
Planning Department. Dedication for a neighborhood park is included
in this plat.
b. 1987-1991 CIP. Director Blank reviewed a draft of the 1987-91 CIP.
In 1987, three neighborhood parks (County Road 61, Amhurst, and
Rolling Hills) are proposed for development. The Plymouth Creek
pond dredging has not yet been approved by the DNR. In 1988, staff
is proposing the acquisition of land for West Medicine Lake City Park
and the development of two more neighborhood parks. The addition
of tennis courts in Plymouth Creek Park is also proposed. Phase
I development of West Medicine Lake City Park has been pushed back
to 1988 from the 1987 CIP. The proposed Community Center has been moved
from 1988 to 1989, and Phase II development of West Medicine Lake
City Park is proposed for 1989, also. The first phase development
of a playfield is proposed for 1990, along with trail construction,
neighborhood park acquisition/development, and more Plymouth Creek
=-_�A V
PRAC Minutes - May 8, 1986
Page 14
pond dredging. The year 1991 calls for more trails, neighborhood
park acquisition/development, playfield development, and pond
dredging in Plymouth Creek Park.
Director Blank indicated that a local landscaper has been approached
about designing and donating a garden area in Parkers Lake City Park.
Also, a local resident has indicated some interest in donating play-
ground equipment for this park.
Director Blank stated that no funds have been allocated in the 1987-91
CIP for the development of school playgrounds, Lions Park improvements
or the removal of the house on Fernbrook Lane within Plymouth Creek
Park.
Commissioner Mullan requested that staff and PRAC return to the
original priority list established for the development of neighbor-
hood parks which calls for West Medicine Lake to be developed in
1987. He indicated that he strongly supports developing this park
before developing County Road 61, Amhurst and Rolling Hills, since
the Medicine Lake neighborhood has been in existence for many more
years than these other areas.
c. Green Oaks Park. Director Blank indicated that the City Council has
requested that PRAC hold a public meeting to discuss the relocation
of the play equipment in this park at the request of some of the resi-
dents closest to the park who have complained of the excessive noise
and other problems associated with the location of the play equipment.
Chair Edwards reviewed the City Manager's recommendation on this item
as well as the history of the development of this park, which was
originally constructed in 1976-77. She also reviewed the minutes
of the Council and PRAC meetings when this park was discussed in 1985.
Director Blank stated that the Council feels the playground is an
unfair intrusion on surrounding residents. They have suggested that
PRAC review relocating the equipment. Director Blank recommended
that PRAC visit the site before making any decisions. He stated that
moving the entire play structure could cost somewhere between $20,000
and $30,000. If just a portion of it were moved, using City crews,
the cost could be reduced to around $5,000. Commissioner Mullan
stated his concern that moving the equipment could set a precedent,
resulting in the City being asked to move any number of other things
that residents find annoying. Commissioner Rosen indicated that
we set a precedent every time we hold a public meeting and make
decisions based on only a few residents' comments. He stated that
in the future, PRAC must be more conscious of how close they place
equipment to people's homes. Commissioner Mullan pointed out that
regardless of where equipment ends up, it will be a problem for someone.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BEACH AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LATOUR TO HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING ON JUNE 12 REGARDING THE PLAY EQUIP-
MENT IN GREEN OAKS PARK. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES.
PRAC Minutes - May 8, 1986
Page 15
d. Guidelines for Requesting City Contributions to Playground Improvements
on School Property. The Commission reviewed proposed guidelines for
requesting City contributions to school playground improvements which
had earlier been drafted by staff and submitted to the City Council.
The City Council reviewed them and passed them back to PRAC for their
review and comment. PRAC made two changes in the guidelines and
requested staff to re -submit them to the City Council for their
approval.
7. COMMISSION PRESENTATION
Commissioner Beach indicated a desire to purchase a gift for Ruth Brown's
baby. Other commissioners approved and asked her to buy something and
bill them individually.
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:21 p.m.
MEETING OF THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
March 27, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by
Chairman Peter Enck, Thursday, March 27, 1986, at 11:35 at the
Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL: CRYSTAL: Commissioner William Sherburne
GOLDEN VALLEY: Commissioner Edward Silberman
MEDICINE LAKE: Commissioner James Padden
MINNEAPOLIS: Alternate Commissioner Marvin Hoshaw
Commissioner Perry Smith
MINNETONKA: Commissioner Don Asmus
NEW HOPE: Commissioner Peter Enck
PLYMOUTH: Commissioner Fred Moore
ROBBINSDALE: Not represented
ST. LOUIS PARK: Commissioner Don Rye
COUNSEL: Curt Pearson
ENGINEER: Len Kremer, Barr Engineering Co.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Elaine Anderson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Sherburne that the
minutes of the February 27 meeting be approved by replacing the following
on page 2: "At the February 3 meeting of the Plymouth City Council, Fred
Moore was reappointed as Commission and John Sweeney as Alternate Commis-
sioner. Carried unanimously.
It was moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Asmus that the minutes
of the special meeting of March 14 be approved. Carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Mr. Silberman moved the approval of the financial statement showing a
checking account balance of $29.85, a savings account balance of $460.27,
and an investment balance of $152,831.68 subject to audit. Seconded by
Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION OF INVOICE FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL
Mr. Silberman moved the approval of the Barr Engineering invoice for
$14,256.57 covering the period February 2 -March 15 subject to arithmetic
verification.. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman
1) Communication from Professional Development and Conference Services
regarding Waste Management.
2) Communication from St. Louis Park regarding their capital improve-
ments program.
Counsel: Deferred until later.
PAGE 2
Commissioners: Mention was made of the recent newspaper clipping regard-
ing payments of local share.
Engineer: Nothing that will not be taken up under New Business. —
WASHINGTON MEETING
A report was given on the Washington trip. The Commission delegation
consisted of Mr. Enck, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kremer, and Mr. Pearson. Dr. Bory
Steinberg, Mr. Robert Dawson, and Dr. Dickey were at the meeting which
was held in the office of Senator Boschwitz. Corps representatives,were
Mr. Robert Post and Colonel Briggs. Representatives of Senator Duren-
berger's and Congressman Sabo's offices, the local sponsor, and the Corps
of Engineers were in attendance. Mr. Pearson presented the background
and history of the project. He outlined the items that are in question
as allowable credits which fell into three main categories: a) Past
engineering and coordination cost incurred by the sponsor in developing
the project with the Corps of Engineers, b) Costs incurred in administer-
ing floodplain regulations and ordinances in the watershed, and c) Costs
incurred in purchasing lands, easements, and rights-of-way to preserve
storage and floodplain areas in the watershed. Mr. Dawson stated the
position of the Army but cautioned about budgetary constraints. He asked
Dr. Ed Dickey, his staff assistant, to work with the Corps in reaching a
decision on the credits. He left and the delegation then discussed the
matter at length with Dr. Steinberg who swung over from a negative posi-
tion to a positive one. While no concrete word has been communicated,
Mr. Pearson is awaiting word from Mr. Post. Chairman Enck expressed
appreciation for all the groundwork laid by counsel and engineer.
Basically the arguments presented by the Commission were effective.
Mr. Kremer handed out a percentage share and estimated cost for the nine
municipalities for their share in the #215 agreement. He distributed a
list of credits for local expenditures as presented at the meeting with
Assistant Secretary of the Army Robert Dawson. He also had prepared a
worst scenario statement of cost distribution for the municipalities and
a copy of the most recent statement for credits for land acquisition.
The consensus of opinion of the Commissioners was that they would like
this same information but to have it spread out on one sheet which could
be presented to their city councils along with an engineering report of
the "Feasibility of Constructing Improvements for Flood Control."
Mr. Pearson said that the Commission had considered having a Public
Hearing in April and that it was imperative that the Commission now set a
date for such a hearing. The question was raised as to whether the
Commission is prepared for a hearing. It was asked whether the munici-
palities should have the information regarding the project cost and
payment schedule beforehand. The Corps needs the Local Cooperative
Agreement signed by June 15 which means that Minneapolis must have the
necessary assurances and signatures by the middle of May. Mr. Moore said
that this emphasized the need for the previously mentioned spread sheet
showing the total cost, what the land credits are, and how many years we
have to pay it.
PAGE 3
It was mentioned that April 17 would be the next meeting date. A special
meeting could be called. First of all, Thursday, April 10, was sug-
gested, then April 9. Mr. Pearson checked the Joint Powers Agreement
which stated that a written notice has to be mailed 45 days before the
hearing. If we would have a special meeting on April 3, the resolution
could be mailed on the next day, April 4, so that the hearing could be
held on May 22.
NEW BUSINESS
1) Pineview, Inc., Plymouth. This is a copy of permit request to do
some dredging for access in Medicine Lake. They propose to dredge to
a depth of 4 feet. The DNR is requesting comments. It was moved by
Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Asmus that the Commission express
concern about the effect on water quality if this dredging would be
done. Seconded by Mr. Padden and carried unanimously.
2) Request for comments on a 16 -acre residential family development next
to Parkers Lake (west side) in Plymouth. A storm sewer is proposed
that will drain into the lake. It was suggested that the outlet of
the storm sewer should be closer to the normal water level of the
lake. No water quality enhancement features were presented. It was
moved by Mr. Sherburne and seconded by Mr. Asmus: that the Commission
write a letter to the City of Plymouth to the effect that there
should be water quality enhancement features and that there should be
a sump in the manhole and that water should be discharged closer to
the normal water level of the lake. Carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
1) The final draft of the brochure will be presented at the next meet-
ing.
2) The announcement regarding the Public Hearing will be made in the
brochure.
3) Shafer Construction Company has filed a claim against the City of
Golden Valley for extra monies for their construction work.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Sherburne that the meeting
be adjourned to the April 3 meeting. The motion was made at 2:25 P.M.
E. Peter Enck, Chairman Laine Anderson, Recorder
Date:
Donald Asmus, Secretary
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BASSETT CREEK FLOOD MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
April 3, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
A special meeting of the Bassett Creek Flood Water Management Commission
was called to order at 11:35, April 3, by Chairman Peter Enck at the
Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL: Crystal: Attended by Dan Smith, Assistant City Manager
Golden Valley: Commissioner Ed Silberman
Medicine Lake: Comissioner Jim Padden
Minneapolis: Commissioner Perry Smith
Alternate Commissioner Marvin Hoshaw
Also attended by Dan Smith and Al Hyatt,
Assistant City Attorney.
Minnetonka: Commissioner Don Asmus
New Hope: Commissioner Peter Enck
Plymouth: Commissioner Fred Moore
Robbinsdale: Commissioner Lee Gustafson
St. Louis Park: Not represented.
Counsel: Curt Pearson
Engineer: Len Kremer, Barr Engineering Co.
Recording Secretary: Elaine Anderson
MINUTES: None STATEMENTS: None INVOICES: None
} COUNSEL:
Mr. Pearson reported that after the last meeting he had contacted Bob
Post who had talked to Dr. Steinberg. Apparently Mr. Dickey hadn't been
convinced at that point in time. The St. Paul Corps of Engineers had
wanted additional information prepared by the Engineer as to why the City
of Plymouth has to receive credit. The Senate bill has passed and is in
Conference Committee. Senator Durenberger is on the Senate Committee.
We should get to Senator Durenberger to get some input into the bill.
Mr. Pearson has been calling Dan McNamara. We should try to get a state-
ment in the bill that local sponsors could receive credits for land that
reduces the federal cost.
Mr. Pearson had prepared Resolution 86-1 - RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARA-
TION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT. Moved by Mr. Asmus, seconded by Mr.
Hoshaw, passed with seven affirmative votes. Representatives from the
City of Crystal and the City of St. Louis Park were not present.
(Resolution attached to official minutes.)
Mr. Kremer presented the spread sheet which had been prepared at the
request of the Commission. This contains the same information as the
material handed out on March 27 except that it is all on the one sheet.
This sheet is attached to the official minutes.
For the Public Hearing, the third and fourth columns from the end are the
important ones.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT (See Resolution 86-2). Moved by Mr.
Asmus, seconded by Mr. Hoshaw. Passed with seven affirmative votes.
Crystal and St. Louis Park Commissioners were not present.
PAGE 2
Chairman Enck authorized Mr. Pearson to work with Mr. Al Hyatt, Attorney,
City of Minneapolis in the preparation of local agreements.
Mr. Silberman said that when the Notice of Hearing is sent to the indi-
vidual municipalities that a copy of the feasibility report should be
included. If any municipality would have questions before the meeting it
was suggested that they could discuss them with Mr. Kremer or Mr.
Pearson.
Mr. Asmus, Secretary, will handle the mailing of the resolution and
feasibility report to each city clerk. This will be mailed on April 4.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mr. Gustafson and seconded by Mr. Moore that the meeting
adjourn. Chairman Enck adjourned the meeting at 1:30 P.M.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman
Donald Asmus, Secretary
Laine Affderson, Recorder
Date:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF BASSETT CREEK
WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the
Bassett Creek Water Management Organization was held on the 3rd day of
April , 1986.
The following members were present:
Silberman - Golden Valley: Medicine Lake - Padden: Minneapolis - Smith*:
Minnetonka - Asmus; New Hope - Enck: Plymouth - Moore: Robbinsdale -
Gustafson.
and the following members were absent: Sherburne - Crystal:
Rye - St. Louis Park
*Also attended by Hoshaw.
Commissioner gSm-,s introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements:
Construction of flood storage in recreational and
open space areas throughout the Bassett Creek
Watershed; and construction of a tunnel under the City
of Minneapolis. The flood storage will generally
consist of increased temporary inundation on existing
golf courses, parks, and open space. The outlet
tunnel is a cooperative venture with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and the Corps of Army
Engineers. The project consists of approximately
2.2 miles of tunnel (12 to 13 feet in diameter) , six
flood control structures, f ive earth embankments, two
bridge removals, one railroad bridge replacement, one
railroad bridge modification, one low -head dam
removal and replacement, nine culvert replacements,
one culvert removal, 5000 linear feet of channel
imp.rovement and bank protection, 157,000 cubic yards
of storage area excavation, and flood proofing of five
private residences
with the total cost to be divided among the nine member municipalities,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BASSETT CREEK WATER
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION, That the proposed improvement be referred to Barr
Engineering for study and that Barr Engineering is instructed to report to
the Commission in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement
is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the
improvement as recommended.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hoshaw , and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor of the motion:
Unanimous vote of the seven Commissioners
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the motion was declared duly passed and adopted.
Chairman
Attest:
Secretary
Project: FLOOD CONTROL 86 - L
BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
TO THE NINE MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES:
Notice is hereby given that the Bassett Creek Water Management
Commission will meet at the Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley
Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m. on May 22, 1986, to consider
the making of the following improvements:
Construction of flood storage in recreational and
open space areas throughout the Bassett Creek
Watershed; and construction of a tunnel under the City
of Minneapolis. The flood storage will generally
consist of increased temporary inundation on existing
golf courses, parks, and open space. The outlet
tunnel is a cooperative venture with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and the Corps of Army
Engineers. The project consists of approximately
2.2 miles of tunnel (12 to 13 feet in diameter) , six
flood control structures, five earth embankments, two
bridge removals, one railroad bridge replacement, one
railroad bridge modification, one low -head dam
removal and replacement, nine culvert replacements,
one culvert removal, 5000 linear feet of channel
improvement and bank protection, 157,000 cubic yards
of storage area excavation, and flood proofing of five
private residences
pursuant to Article VII, Subdivision 5, of the Joint Powers Agreement
creating said Commission. The amount proposed to be assessed each member
municipality for such improvements is estimated to be as follows:
Crystal $ 162,000
Golden Valley $ 1,467,200
Medicine Lake $ 30,500
Minneapolis $ 630,300
Minnetonka $ 0
New Hope $- 100,500
Plymouth $ 1,160,200
Robbinsdale $ 104,000
St. Louis Park $ 212,300
The estimated total cost of such improvements is $31,400,000 in 1985
dollars. It is proposed that the costs be divided 75% to the United States
Army Corps of Engineers and 25% to the nine member cities. It is estimated
that at least $4,033,000 has been paid and credits will be received by local
members for that amount, and therefore the maximum additional cash
contribution and responsibility to the nine member cities should not exceed
the presently estimated amount of $3,867,000. The local share shall be
allocated and paid in accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement formula.
The formula also provides for land acquisition and credits to local
communities who acquire lands required for the project and those costs and
credits may result in adjustments to final costs allocated to each member
city. Each member municipality which desires to be heard with reference to
the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. .
Donald L. Asmus, P.E.
Secretary, Bassett Creek
Water Management Organization
MEETING OF THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
APRIL 17, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by
Chairman Peter Enck, Thursday, April 17, 1986, at 11:40 A.M. at the
Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL:
Crystal: Alternate Commissioner Betty Herbes. Also attended by
Dan Smith.
Golden Valley: Commissioner Edward Silberman
Medicine Lake: Commissioner James Padden
Minneapolis: Commissioner Perry Smith
Minnetonka: Commissioner Don Asmus. Also attended by Alternate
Commissioner Michael Johnson
New Hope: Commissioner Peter Enck
Plymouth: Commissioner Fred Moore
Robbinsdale: Commissioner Lee Gustafson
St. Louis Park: Not represented
Counsel: Curt Pearson
Engineer: Len Kremer, Barr Engineering Co.
Recording Secretary: Elaine Anderson
It was requested that the recording secretary send either flowers or a
plant to William Sherburne at his home rather than the hospital since he
will be in the hospital for a*short time only.
MINUTES TO APPROVE: Deferred until next meeting.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Mr. Silberman presented the financial statement as of April 17, 1986,
showing a checking account balance of $73.20, a ,savings account balance
of $33,192.59 and an investment balance of $152,831.68. He moved its
approval subject to audit. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unani-
mously. He also announced that only Robbinsdale and Golden Valley had
paid their assessments so far. Chairman Enck said that Mr. Moore wishes
to discuss payment of assessments later on in the meeting.
PRESENTATION OF INVOICE FOR PAYMENT APPROVAL:
Mr. Silberman presented the Barr Engineering Co. invoice for $13,666.71
for the period from March 17 to April 12 and moved its approval subject
to arithmetic verification. Seconded by Mr. Asmus. Mr. Silberman
explained that brochure expenses as well as Washington expenses were
included in the invoice. The motion passed unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Enck:
1) Received a communication announcing a seminar regarding water and
environmental studies.
2) Had received a water quality report on Ridgedale Stormwater Treatment
from Barr Engineering Co.
PAGE 2
3) Received a report by the Metropolitan Council by a Study Committee on
Metropolitan River Corridors.
4) Received a communication regarding Congressman Frenzel Is not being
notified regarding the Washington trip. Mr. Kremer explained that
the office had been called but apparently the message had not been
relayed.
5) The American Express Company had sent a letter of apology to Mr. Enck
for their mixup at the time of the prior Washington trip.
6) Had received a second draft of the proposed guideliness for #509
plans from the Water Resources Board regarding Metropolitan Watershed
Management.
Counsel:
1) Mr. Pearson distributed copies of a memo that he had sent to Repre-
sentative Connie Levi after attending a seminar sponsored by the
University of Minnesota regarding watershed planning. He had heard
from representatives of various agencies as they explained how they
perceive Chapter 509 and the responsibility of their agencies. Mr.
Mel Sinn of the Water Resources Board was the first speaker. They
have an agency of 3 people with final responsibility to approve the
WMO plan. He indicated that they are still working with the WMOIs
to establish what is required in the plans. He was reasonable and
cooperative. The second speaker was Mr. Gary Oberts of the Metro
Council Review. They have 10-15 people involved in the review
proposal. Mr. Pearson went on to explain that if the WMO's refuse to
change their plan or comply with staff directives the Metro Council
could take the WMO's or the cities to court to enforce the Met
Council standards. Mr. Pearson questioned if this is what the law
means by comment. The legislature gave the final review authority to
the Water Resources Board and if the Met Council has the authority to
use an expanded staff to make a more detailed review, he feels that
the legislature should clarify the roles of the various agencies.
After further discussion, it was moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded
by Mr. Asmus that Mr. Pearson send a letter to Sandra Gerberding and
Gary Oberts expressing the need for clarification. The State Legis-
lators should be copied. Carried unanimously.
2) Mr. Pearson had distributed a copy of a "draft memorandum prepared by
the Corps of Engineers for the Assistant Secretary of the Army
regarding credits to be allowed local sponsors for the Bassett Creek
improvement. Based on data received from the St. Paul District, it
appears that $1,900,000 of additional land values meet the necessary
criteria and should be considered as a project cost and therefore a
credit to local sponsors under the lands, easements and rights-of-way
category. The savings to the communities in the watershed will be
$1,480,00 if the Secretary of the Army approves the memorandum.
3) An appraiser
purchased by
tives of the
decided that
PAGE 3
had been retained to estimate the value of lands
the communities but, after a meeting with representa-
Corps of Engineers regarding the documentation needed he
the time commitments would be too great.
4) Mr. Kremer distributed a "Distribution of Remaining Project Costs
with consideration of Land Credits, April, 1986."
NEW BUSINESS
1) Payment of assessments. Mr. Moore of Plymouth brought up the payment
of the assessments. For example, $55,000 is due from Plymouth. He
explained that the City has to borrow off the reserve to pay the
assessments and that they would like to pay part of it later. Mr.
Silberman explained that payment schedule had been set up the way it
was to anticipate the city's budgeting. While they had ordered that
the payment be due on February 1, a different schedule of payments
could be moved, for example, half be paid on February 1 and half on
August 1. Mr. Silberman suggested that this should be discussed at
the next budget meeting. A long discussion followed. It was moved
by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Asmus that the assessment for
1986 should be due and payable in two installments with the first
half payment to be made by February 1 and the second August 1 and
that any municipality that has paid may request reimbursement for
half of the assessment. In discussing the motion, Mr. Gustafson said
that Robbinsdale would not request reimbursement for half of the
assessment. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Moore asked if this should be a part of the Bylaws. Mr.
Pearson said that he would advise against that.
The Budget Committee will consist of Mr. Silberman, Mr. Asmus, and
Mr. Enck.
3) It was moved by Mr. Silberman that our regular meeting be held on
the same date as the Public Hearing, May 22. Seconded by Mr. Asmus
and carried unanimously.
4 ) Request by City of New Hope for the Commission to review a proposal
for a commercial development at Nevada Avenue south of 36th Avenue
tributary to the North Fork of the Creek. This is adjacent to the
MiniStorage structure reviewed last year. After discussion, it was
moved by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Ms. Herbes that the Commission
recommend approval if the ditch slope is maintained at less than 1/2%
to minimize erosion between the outlet of the storm sewer and the
water quality pond and that there be a 30' easement for drainage over
the westerly part of the property. Carried unanimously.
5) Request for review of stream crossing (sanitary sewer) between the
Wisconsin Avenue and Highway 55 in Golden Valley. There will be no
disturbance of the creek bed. The contractor will be required to
presettle the discharge water and install erosion measures. It was
moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Gustafson that the pro-
posal be approved. Carried unanimously.
f
PAGE 4
6) Request from Golden Valley for review of outlet from Ring Pond to
Courtland Pond and from Courtland Pond to the South Fork of the
Creek. They will eventually tie into a storm sewer to be built by
MNDot along Laurel Avenue. The engineer recommended approval. Moved
by Mr. Silberman, seconded by Mr. Moore, and carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
1) Brochure. Mr. Kremer said the brochure would be ready the next day.
2) Mr. Pearson said we have to keep on pushing the right-of-way question
at Wirth Park.
3) Mr. Kremer will contact Mr. Peterson, Attorney for the Golden Valley
Golf Club, regarding their questions on the proposed structure in the
Golf Club.
ADJOURNMENT:
It was moved by Mr. Moore and seconded by Ms. Herbes that the meeting
adjourn. Mr. Enck adjourned the meeting at 1:35 P.M.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman
Donald Asmus, Secretary
Elaine Anderson, R corder
Date:
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: May 19, 1986
TO: Director Carlquist
FROM: D. Paul son
SUBJECT Selective Traffic Enforcement
(86-3) 18th Avenue at or near Forestview Lane
(30 MPH Zone)
Six stationary radar assignments have been completed in response to the
speeding complaints in this area. The assignments were made on four
different days and the results are as follows:
MPH
20/Less
20/25
26/30
31/35
36/40
41/45 46/50
05/13/86 -0700-0900
Cars/Misc.—
04
08
20
19
01
01
Trucks/Buses
01
05/13/86 -1500-1700
Cars/Misc.
01
13
08
01
01
Trucks/Buses
05/14/86 -1500-1700
Cars/Misc.—
05
10
16
01
Trucks/Buses
03
05
05/15/86 -0700-0900
Cars/Misc.—
16
14
21
11
01
Trucks/Buses
01
01
02
05/16/86 -0700-0900
Cars/Misc.—
05
16
32
18
03
Trucks/Buses
05/16/86 -1500-1700
Cars/Misc.—
02
30
29
08
01
01
Trucks/Buses
86-3
Page Two
Summary: 20/Less 20/25 26/30 31/35 36/40 41/45 46/50 Totals
Cars/Misc 28 86 120 73 06 04 317
Trucks/Buses 01 05 07 13
20/less 20/25 26/30 31/35 36/40 41/45 46/50
.09% .28% .38% .22% .02% .01%
Time Expenditure (Hours): 12
Tags Issued: 06
Verbal Warnings: 02
PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT
AREA 10
April 14, 1986
I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads
III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE
IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
V. ADJOURN
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NATURE OF CONCERN!PRnpERTY ADDRESS INVOLVE.:
G
N YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE:
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT:
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: G'
PHONE NUMBER: �'-j_ 17 2:
L- C.-
0
t
i
May 19, 1986 CITY O�
PLYMOUTR
Ms. Gail Schmoller
2580 Queensland Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Ms. Schmoller:
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning additional widening necessary
on Highway 101 continuing North from the present project which will stop at
approximately Merrimac Lane. The City has recognized this need for several
years and has been requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) for additional improvements. Since this is a State Highway they are
the agency responsible to construct these improvements. It has been through
the efforts of the City that at least a portion of the project will be
undertaken this year.
As was mentioned at the Town Meeting late this fall, Highway 101 will be
changed to the jurisdiction of the Hennepin County Department of
Transportation. After this road jurisdiction transfer takes place we will
begin working with Hennepin County on needed improvements on Highway 101.
By State law when MnDOT had jurisdiction of Highway 101 they were prohibited
from spending highway funds to improve the roadway. Highway 101 was classified
as a "temporary" State highway and funds cannot be expended on temporary
highways. Since the roadway will be a permanent roadway for Hennepin County,
the City may be more successful in having them spend funds to improve the
roadway.
The shoulders of a roadway are not designed for vehicular traffic, they are
there for safety reasons for an emergency parking place for a disabled vehicle.
In order for the shoulders to be used at intersections for turning traffic they
must be designed as a roadway improvement to support that traffic. It would be
the first option of the City to have the County extend the four lane
improvement all the way to County Road 24. If this is unsuccessful we will be
working for, at a minimum, turn lanes at the major intersections.
If there are any additional questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT
AREA 10
April 14, 1986
I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads
III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE
IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
V. ADOOLRN
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NATURE OF CONCERN/ PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED:44
l (L 1 L` / , hL-►K�j Com' )GLt/�
ACTION YOU DESIR THE CITY TO TAKE:
L.
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: n
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: _ , L' C{ u-�"t� v�✓yt�2 -" 1
PHONE NUMBER: `7 -7 3 - �254-S
0
May 19, 1986
Mrs.Monte Wolenetz
3205 Ranier Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mrs Wolenetz:
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH+
We have received information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) with regard to the traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 6
and Highway 101. This is the agency which is responsible for .the maintenance
and the operation of this traffic signal.
Presently there are separate left turn lanes on County Road 6 for traffic
desiring to turn either North or South on Highway 101. In order to accomodate
this traffic movement there is a separate left turn arrow which operates
whenever there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
On Highway 101 because of right-of-way restrictions there are not separate left
turn lanes. There are two lanes in each direction but they serve both through
and left turning traffic. Because of the heavy left turning movement during
certain periods of the day MnDOT has installed a separate left turn arrow which
operates during certain times of the day. When this arrow is in operation, the
traffic on Highway 101 opposing each other do not move at the same time.
The left turn arrow operates on a time clock and presently operates on the
present schedule:
1. On weekdays the arrow operates from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
2. On weekends the arrow operates from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Through an analysis of the intersection, MnDOT has determined that this is the
appropriate time for the arrow to operate. During other periods of the day
the traffic volumes are much lighter and this left turn movement can occur with
very little delay. This also permits the total cycle of the intersection to be
shorter during periods of low traffic.
With the additional commercial construction taking place at this intersection
traffic volumes will increase. The City and MnDOT will continue to study this
intersection to evaluate needed improvements in the traffic signal system. We
would expect that in the future a separate left turn lane will need to be
installed on Highway 101.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
May 19, 1986
Page Two
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning the traffic signal at this
intersection, and if there are any additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT
AREA 10
April 14, 1986
I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads
III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE
IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
V. ADJOURN `
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern. QQ
NATURE OF CON_ CERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS I"!.'OLL'Eri
--ti �,�\r�l�-�•`��r �• ��'1L'�ti�.�\�� \'.�'�J����i\;.;� 1_. \ ��..�Q.lv- (ihM�,�`,
ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE:
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: �_, r � '��. � ,� ,\\Ivv
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT:
PHONE NUMBER:
May 19, 1986
Mr. Ralph Goodwin
1430 Ranier Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mr. Goodwin:
\ f
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH
We have received information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) with regard to the traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 6
and Highway 101. This is the agency which is responsible for the maintenance
and the operation of this traffic signal.
Presently there are separate left turn lanes on County Road 6 for traffic
desiring to turn either North or South on Highway 101. In order to accomodate
this traffic movement there is a separate left turn arrow which operates
whenever there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
On Highway 101 because of right-of-way restrictions there are not separate left
turn lanes. There are two lanes in each direction but they serve both through
and left turning traffic. Because of the heavy left turning movement during
certain periods of the day MnDOT has installed a separate left turn arrow which
operates during certain times of the day. When this arrow is in operation, the
traffic on Highway 101 opposing each other do not move at the same time.
The left turn arrow operates on a time clock and presently operates on the
present schedule:
1. On weekdays the arrow operates from 6:30 a.m, to 9:30 p.m.
2. On weekends the arrow operates from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Through an analysis of the intersection, MnDOT has determined that this is the
appropriate time for the arrow to operate. During other periods of the day
the traffic volumes are much lighter and this left turn movement can occur with
very little delay. This also permits the total cycle of the intersection to be
shorter during periods of low traffic.
With the additional commercial construction taking place at this intersection
traffic volumes will increase. The City and MnDOT will continue to study this
intersection to evaluate needed improvements in the traffic signal system. We
would expect that in the future a separate left turn lane will need to be
installed on Highway 101.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
May 19, 1986
Page Two
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning the traffic signal at this
intersection, and if there are any additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
I 9t
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
t
CITYor
May 19, 1986 PLYMOUTH
Mr. Clarence Jansson
1250 Highway 101 North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mr. Jansson:
We have received information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) with regard to the traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 6
and Highway 101. This is the agency which is responsible for the maintenance
and the operation of this traffic signal.
Presently there are separate left turn lanes on County Road 6 for traffic
desiring to turn either North or South on Highway 101. In order to accomodate
this traffic movement there is a separate left turn arrow which operates
whenever there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
On Highway 101 because of right-of-way restrictions there are not separate left
turn lanes. There are two lanes in each direction but they serve both through
and left turning traffic. Because of the heavy left turning movement during
certain periods of the day MnDOT has installed a separate left turn arrow which
operates during certain times of the day. When this arrow is in operation, the
traffic on Highway 101 opposing each other do not move at the same time.
The left turn arrow operates on a time clock and presently operates on the
present schedule:
1. On weekdays the arrow operates from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
2. On weekends the arrow operates from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Through an analysis of the intersection, MnDOT has determined that this is the
appropriate time for the arrow to operate. During other periods of the day
the traffic volumes are much lighter and this left turn movement can occur with
very little delay. This also permits the total cycle of the intersection to be
shorter during periods of low traffic.
With the additional commercial construction taking place at this intersection
traffic volumes will increase. The City and MnDOT will continue to study this
intersection to evaluate needed improvements in the traffic signal system. We
would expect that in the future a separate left turn lane will need to be
installed on Highway 101.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
May 19, 1986
Page Two
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning the traffic signal at this
intersection, and if there are any additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NATURE OF CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED:
/52/
ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO -TAKE: L. �°'�'u 1 �,✓' G� u
�,�7Ctn„y,,,.=^'�'N�J. ...r�...;l�J,i.v, Cla.i-:.•,C.y,j '���.3�L �...a+[c`t- �/'/LGaGr,�
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT:
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT:
PHONE NUMBER: �� �— �-3
r"
CITY C)'
May 19, 1986 PLYMOUTR
Ms. Pat Jung
18125 20th Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Ms. Jung:
We have received information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) with regard to the traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 6
and Highway 101. This is the agency which is responsible for the maintenance
and the operation of this traffic signal.
Presently there are separate left turn lanes on County Road 6 for traffic
desiring to turn either North or South on Highway 101. In order to accomodate
this traffic movement there is a separate left turn arrow which operates
whenever there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
On Highway 101 because of right-of-way restrictions there are not separate left
turn lanes. There are two lanes in each direction but they serve both through
and left turning traffic. Because of the heavy left turning movement during
certain periods of the day MnDOT has installed a separate left turn arrow which
operates during certain times of the day. When this arrow is in operation, the
traffic on Highway 101 opposing each other do not move at the same time.
The left turn arrow operates on a time clock and presently operates on the
present schedule:
1. On weekdays the arrow operates from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
2. On weekends the arrow operates from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Through an analysis of the intersection, MnDOT has determined that this is the
appropriate time for the arrow to operate. During other periods of the day
the traffic volumes are much lighter and this left turn movement can occur with
very little delay. This also permits the total cycle of the intersection to be
shorter during periods of low traffic.
With the additional commercial construction taking place at this intersection
traffic volumes will increase. The City and MnDOT will continue to study this
intersection to evaluate needed improvements in the traffic signal system. We
would expect that in the future a separate left turn lane will need to be
installed on Highway 101.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
May 19, 1986
Page Two
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning the traffic signal at this
intersection, and if there are any additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
Lo
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NAT — �1F f`—CE.—j . lI1DE.— ewvpESS INvwa.VED:
ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE: 8L,�-ViS"2 ll
r
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: o UJY
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT:
PHONE NUMBER: 17 �(
4 9 �..w� \
ow
rc r
W
t
CITY Or
May 19, 1986 PUMOUTR
Mike and Athalie Terry
18530 22nd Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Terry:
We have received information from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) with regard to the traffic signal at the intersection of County Road 6
and Highway 101. This is the agency which is responsible for the maintenance
and the operation of this traffic signal.
Presently there are separate left turn lanes on County Road 6 for traffic
desiring to turn either North or South on Highway 101. In order to accomodate
this traffic movement there is a separate left turn arrow which operates
whenever there is a vehicle waiting to turn left.
On Highway 101 because of right-of-way restrictions there are not separate left
turn lanes. There are two lanes in each direction but they serve both through
and left turning traffic. Because of the heavy left turning movement during
certain periods of the day MnDOT has installed a separate left turn arrow which
operates during certain times of the day. When this arrow is in operation, the
traffic on Highway 101 opposing each other do not move at the same time.
The left turn arrow operates on a time clock and presently operates on the
present schedule:
1. On weekdays the arrow operates from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
2. On weekends the arrow operates from 9:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Through an analysis of the intersection, MnDOT has determined that this is the
appropriate time for the arrow to operate. During other periods of the day
the traffic volumes are much lighter and this left turn movement can occur with
very little delay. This also permits the total cycle of the intersection to be
shorter during periods of low traffic.
With the additional commercial construction taking place at this intersection
traffic volumes will increase. The City and MnDOT will continue to study this
intersection to evaluate needed improvements in the traffic signal system. We
would expect that in the future a separate left turn lane will need to be
installed on Highway 101.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
May 19, 1986
Page Two
I wish to thank you for your comments concerning the traffic signal at this
intersection, and if there are any additional questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
T
PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT
AREA 10
April 14, 1986
I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads
III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE
IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
V. ADJOURN
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NATURE nr CONCERN/PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED: /''
�if
T��_ � J�,ZJG�/ r`� ' /''- i.i f`/� �i l.«, r, — /L�CJ i�C//G�ii!`z ? /C1:./�> i` /, �. — _ •( i'� '
�CC�/G�7U.l �i. /. �///C ire' /" V Lt .. � i.• 'r"� /.J// /..���/ �:. �; i �' r.! ,•v� ." ..�f� C �C �'
ACTION YOU'DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE:
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT: `7"
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT:
PHONE NUMBER:
- L YJ
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: May 22, 1986
TO: Virgil Schneider, Mayor
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT COMPLAINT FROM PAM BRUZEK, 14535 - 13TH AVENUE NO.
Attached is a memorandum I wrote to Blair Tremere asking him to follow
up on your telephone call regarding a complaint received from Pam
Bruzek with respect to a day care center operated by her next door
neighbor. Briefly, Blair indicates that this matter involves a neigh-
borhood conflict between two persons. We have also received
complaints against the Bruzek's from the individual running a day care
next door. In investigating the matter we found that no conditional
use permit has been issued or is required for the day care center. To
date, no State license has been issued as required. State law
requires that a license is required to permit up to 11*_� �cFiildren in an
authorized day care operated out of a single family residential use.
Operation of an unlicensed day care center is a violation of State law
and City ordinance. We have advised the appropriate persons at the
County in order that they can proceed to investigate this matter to
bring the day care into compliance. I will provide you with addi-
tional information as it becomes available from the County or State.
FB:jm
attach
cc: dames G. Willis
Blair Tremere
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: May 14, 1986
TO: Blair Tremere, Director of Planning & Community Development
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager��'
SUBJECT RESIDENT CONCERN
Mayor Schneider contacted me today regarding a complaint he received
from Pam Bruzek, 14535 - 13th Avenue North, 475-2523. Ms. Bruzek is
concerned about the operation of a day care center by her next door
neighbor. She claims that as many as seventeen children receive care
through this facility. Please advise whether or not this day care
facility has received a conditional use permit as a home occupation
from the City. Could you also investigate whether or not the day care
has been licensed by the State, and the maximum number of children to
be cared for in this facility. The Mayor has asked that I get back to
him with this information as soon as possible in order that he can
advise Ms. Bruzek.
14, - s- Iq- S�
FB:jm
cc: James G. Willis 0 Wt IgLS0 (`EcL" UL P cowtP&AIAIT
S/F 5/19 A 3o Lk- T 145 2 -r 4 AV. NO,
F(zom THE gf2uzE� S .
Tt4E CamPL►A IN T 15 +3F -1f4
IQVeATC7. t?vTt4
� A (ZT c E S 1--� � U' C B C C N
� N THE
C o wr yq C T w I.T H LA
s -r IA T E L-AW.
NJ cuP NAS 6 01E t ssuC- a:--' /VCR
15 o NG /�E74> u r 2E D
TO DATE, NO S T -I4 TE L / cE-NSE
O4 ,-Lc t
(NC UC 1j 0 P,Ec E-1 VEF D .
Mo -Ti c C- 6F i N TL N T TD
L i c &n15 c� pL e s T 1� / L�4Lt/',
STIgTE Li4vV (ATT�qCI-FCD)
Cput2cs A L -JCC - /V 5L=
14 AJ � u P �..� z
T v
CC1U 5 �T I Ta 7 C A A7 r 7"7",6� D
S11v 6>L E F19IY71L y 1ZC--51P &7A '7-1AL
IA 5 e—f
�r4 Y c �fizC-: C cw TE -/z r s
V t0Lk+ T roN OF 5 Taj
,+tvD c rry a-9 1,> Iti 1.7 G c-
w >4 v e Co M T (A M L D 'Ttfrf-T
i P 2o�P P�2 so-� 4- i
Y� C CDU N -F 1 S IrW/91RC
6 F T ffe Ci 2 c m m5 Thr/ of s.
J'/QG�vt 57N TE" 5 7-A -
Ury"iN , Eti �3 Ai C=; f1�T
Subd. 6a. It is the policy of this state that handicapped persons and children
should not be excluded by municipal zoning ordinances or other land use regulations
from the benefits of normal residential surroundings. For purposes of subdivisions
6a through 9, 'Verson" has the meaning given in section 245.782, subdivision 2.
Subd. 7. Permitted single family use. A state licensed residential facility
serving six or fewer persons or a licensed dav age facilit servin 12 or fewer
persons shall be considered a permitt sin a family resider use o property for
the purposes of zoning.
Subd. B. Permitted multifamily use. Unless otherwise provided in any town.
municipal or county zoning regulation as authorized by this subdivision, a state
licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16 persons or a licensed day care
facility serving from 13 through 16 persons shall be considered a permitted
multifamily residential use of property for purposes of zoning. A township,
municipal or county zoning authority may require a conditional use or special use
permit in order to assure proper maintenance and operation of a facility, provided'
that no conditions shall be imposed on the facility which are more restrictive than
those imposed on other conditional uses or special uses of residential property in the
same zones, unless the additional conditions are necessary to protect the health and
safety of the residents of the residential facility. Nothing herein shall be construed
to exclude or prohibit residential or day care facilities from single family zones
if
otherwise permitted by a local zoning regulation.
History:1965 c 670 s 7; 1969 c 259 s 1; 1973 c 123 an S s 7, 1973 c 379 s 4;
1973 c 539 s 1; 1973 c 559 s 1,2; 1975 c 60 s 2; 1978 c 786 s 14,15; Ex 1979 c 1 s
42,43; 1981 c 356 s 248; 1982 c 490 s 2; 1981 c 507 s 22; 1984 c 617 s 6,8
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: May 15, 1986
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Joe Ryan, Building Official
SUBJECT CHELSEA WOODS LIGHTED ADDRESS SIGN
In response to your Memo dated April 30, 1986, a site inspection was performed at
16225 18th Avenue North to observe an electrically operated house number sign which
is being utilized on a trial basis, by the Chelsea Woods Association.
The address numerals appear to be four inches in height and of a contrasting color to
the base to which they are attached. The placement of the address numerals are
located on the front wall of the attached garage which is visible from the public
street.
As far as I can determine, the sign appears to be in compliance with the provisions
of the City Code. I have asked Dick Carlquist to have a police officer observe the -
sign during the evening hours and to provide me a summary of their findings. I will
keep you informed as to their findings.
Thank you.
5%zn(Fsco J►M , —04 'V,0uee. �cPT . ZUspcc—Ed —TPraPer,ry Cit�.l�., Tke
Fire. 'S'1q -To -T uducc Oe.L Goc' c�
U
.L U✓UM�w+Q� 101.1 �oa 0S 161L.t MQ..
�Aalae.R 10 UAC s ►a CL1 c ca -r G� T{raT T�r: aSSOC► A'T 1 o►J
�� Q.esPous�6l�. i o It��-a►.�—Re.pi��.e.►.rr
d -f kozy -T�re 1` ;x j 6e. Son,,c To Zc.
T l uc>v L8 Cc5Kj'r AG -r A^C,
I T Is To 6 ttxcc parA-(cd
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 30, 1986
TO: dames G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Judy McMillin
SUBJECT CHELSEA WOODS - LIGHTED ADDRESS SIGN
I received a call from a Mr. Weber, 16225 - 18th Avenue No. (Phone -
871-7115) this afternoon. The Chelsea Woods Association has installed
an electrical house number sign on his garage on a trial basis for
approximately 6 weeks. If enough positive feedback is received on the
sign, Chelsea Woods plans on installing this type of sign on all the
units. He asked that perhaps you might stop by and also personnel
from the Police and Fire Departments to look at the sign sometime
during this period. He would appreciate any feedback on how the sign
reads during the day and night.
3M
cc: Dick Carlquist
MOORE, JURAN AND COMPANY, INC. • AtlMTUENTSfCtMM
IDS CENTER • 80 South Eighth SIr"I • Suite 4650 • Minneapolis. Monnesola 55402
TekVhone (6121339 8071
MEMO FROM THE DESK OF—
Bruce Vandersall
5/6/86
Dear Rick,
Thanks very much for your help in
scheduling for the Prep and Junior Babe
Ruth leagues. You did a terrific job and
certainly made it easy for all of the
communities involved. I know in jobs like
yours you never get the credit or thanks
that you deserve, but we want you to know
that we're very appreciative.
Sincer
ruce
AW ZMW
l�� v
May 12, 1986
Scott McLellan
Assistant Building Official
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Blvd
Plymouth, MN
Dear Scott:
We grant to thankyou for all of your help with getting
our dirt pile moved. We appreciate your quick response
to our problem and the speed in which the problem was
resolved. We are very happy to have chosen a community
that cares so much. Again, many thanks.
Sincerely,
Qn6 *+
Rob and Cindy Morin
3910 Glacier Place
Plymouth:; MN 55446
?i
cc: Mike Kulsak
Frank Boyles, Asst. City Manager
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN. 55447
Dear Mr. Boyles;
NORTHWEST HENNEPIN
HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
7323 - 58th Avenue No. Crystal, MN 55428
(612) 536-0327.- .
RECEi`1 .\
CITY
May 15, 1986
Thank you for allowing the Northwest Hennepin Human Services
Council access to your city's xeroxing equipment. With this in-
kind contribution, the Council was able to distribute over 6,000
public hearing notices throughout School District #281. We
greatly appreciate the timely and professional response our re-
quest received.
S' ce el
David A. Wagner
Planner
DW/vg
CITY OF
PLYMOUTI+
May 20, 1986
Mr. James C. Olson
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Subject: Harrison Hills Sanitary Sewer Extension
Project No. 630
Dear Jim:
On May 19th the City Council held a public improvement hearing with regard to
the construction of the Bass Lake Plaza area streets and utilities. You had
recently updated the Preliminary Engineering Report for this project (Project
011). At the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council ordered the
project for construction.
Before we can begin work on the plans and specifications for that project the
City Attorney's Office must clarify the development agreement with the Bass
Lake Plaza Addition which was entered into in 1973. It is possible under that
agreement that the original developer, M. G. Astleford, can install part of the
improvements which were required by that development contract. We will inform
you of the outcome of that decision and when work can begin on the plans and
specifications for the improvements outlined in that report.
At the conclusion of that public hearing the City Council also adopted a
resolution directing the preparation of a Preliminary Engineering Report to
extend the sanitary sewer contained within Project 011 to serve the proposed
Harrison Hills Development. Attached is a copy of a drawing showing the parcel
to be served and the proposed end of the sanitary sewer as part of Project 011.
The City Council further designated Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates,
Inc. as the Consulting Engineer to prepare the Preliminary Engineering Report
and this report is to be presented to them at the June 16, 1986 Council
Meeting. In order to meet this schedule the City staff will need to receive
the Preliminary Engineering Report on or before June 11, 1986.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
James C Olson
May 20, 1986
Page Two
If there are any question
Engineering Report or its
know if you would like to
discuss the report. Also
me know in order that I ca
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
Enclosure
cc: Sherm Goldberg,
James G. Willis,
n
s with regard to the preparation of this Preliminary
expected contents, please contact me. Please let me
meet with Sherm Goldberg, City Engineer or myself to
if you cannot meet this proposed schedule, please let
inform the City Council.
City Engineer
City Manager
C,�.
f..
May 21, 1986 Q. CITY C�
PLYMOUTH+
Connie Lillibridge
4825 Trenton Lane N
Plymouth, MN 55442
Dear Mrs. Lillibridge:
Mayor Schneider has forwarded your petition to me for distribution to the
Park and Recreation Advisory Commission. The Commission is currently
studying the capital improvements program for the years 1987-1991. Your
request for proceeding as quickly as possible on the Rolling Hills park
will be reviewed and discussed by the Commission at their June 12 and
July 10 meetings. At this time, I can tell you that the draft CIP
distributed to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission on May 8 shows
the development of the Rolling Hills park taking place in 1987. The
City Council will be taking final action on approving the capital improve-
ments budget on or before October 6, 1986.
On behalf of the City Council, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
and staff, let me thank you for your time and interest in the Plymouth
park system. Let me assure you that we will endeavor to do everything
we can to meet your neighborhood park needs at the earliest possible time.
If I can be of any further assistance to you, please don't hesitate to
give me a call at 559-2800 x 265.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
/np
cc: City Manager
Park and Recreation Advisory Commission
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
C�L•c-� LCc—F..i �'2... , , �.G-� 1_.J �[r�-C-(.,L � l/CL�Lc--C.t c�tL.�
i- , /J' /y �f�
ea..4_,
0- t hall �Y�a—a4
10/
Virgil Schneider
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mayor:
May 21 1986
The Board of Directors of the Imperial Hills Home -Owners
Association is concerned with the growing trafic on County Road
#6 between Highway #101 and Peoney Lane where two lanes become
one just before the entrance to Imperial Hills.
On the North side of County Road #6 the side-walk/bike-path from
Super -Value and the bank ends at Olive Lane and both bikers and
pedestrians must walk/bike the one block distance within the area
between the white line and the North side of County Road #6, an
extremely dangerous situation as cars turning into Imperial Hills
frequently use this part of the road as a right -turn lane giving
on-going trafic room to pass on the left.
With the opening of a shopping center on the South side of County
Road #6, which will have an entrance of Olive Lane South of
County Road #6 this problem will become even more acute with
drivers coming from the shopping center out of Olive Lane wanting
to turn into Peoney Lane.
In adition, the closing of Highway #101 later this year will
bring additional traffic to this area as Drivers will use Peoney
Lane as an alternate route.
We like to make the following suggestions:
1. The continuation of two traffic -lanes going West
from Highway #101 on County Road #6 upto Peoney Lane
with the outside lane becoming a right -turn lane
from Olive Lane into Peoney Lane.
2. The intallation of a segregated side-walk/bike-path
on the North side of County Road #6, connecting the
Peoney Lane path with the path going East from Olive
Lane towards the Bank and the school.
This very imported necessary improvement does not require major
financial outlays, it will complete the Highway #101 -County Road
#6 intersection and most definitely safe us from having some
unfortunate accidents.
Your consideration for inmediate action will be greatly
appreciated by all.
Sinrel You
Glly
J 1 d oef
r sident
mperial Hills Home -Owners Association
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA / DEPARTMENT OF MEN'S INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS
May 20, 1986
Mr. James G. Willis
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Jim:
Thank you very much for your letter and kind words. It was
my pleasure to attend the Plymouth Community Awards Banquet,
as it isn't often that a person gets the opportunity to thank
their community.
My family and I love this area, and with the won -loss record
permitting, we hope to make Minnesota our home for a long,
long time.
Appreciate the warm hospitality extended by everyone. Again,
thanks for your support and kind consideration.
Sincerel ,
Jo n Gutekunst
Head Football Coach
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
JG:cb
Bierman Field Athletic Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Gold Country
5`
May 23, 1986 '
�x
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH
Ms. Terri Thompson Neby
4925 Pineview Lane
Plymouth, MN 55442
Dear Ms. Neby:
What a day brightener your letter was.
We all appreciate your thoughtfulness in taking the time to share with us
your satisfaction with the resolution of the street liqhtinq in your area.
The City Council expends a great deal of time and effort in seeking to
equitably resolve problems of competing interests. In this particular case,
I believe the Council was successful.
Thank you again for your kind and thoughtful letter.
Yours truly,
ACi
es G. Willis
y Manager
JGW: fm
cc: Mayor & City Council
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
�j
U
zekh I/°'rrsl