HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 02-28-1986CITY OF
PLYMOUTH -
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
February 28, 1986
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, March 3, 7:30 p.m. Reqular City
Council meeting in City Council Chambers.
2. MLC BREAKFAST MEETING -- Wednesday, March 5, 7:45 a.m, the
Northwest Regional of the MLC will be meeting at the Plymouth
Radisson Inn for breakfast. This will be a good opportunity to hear
a legislative update from our legislators, lobbyists and to meet
with other municipal leaders in the MLC.
3. TOWN MEETING -- Monday, March 10. The Area 9 Town Meeting will be
held in the City Council Chambers beginning at 7:30 p.m. A copy of
the invitation mailed to area residents is attached. (M-3)
4. REVISED MARCH CALENDAR -- A copy of a revised March meeting calendar
is attached. Revisions to the calendar include: 1) 6:00 p.m.
meeting time for March 13 PRAC Seminar; 2) addition of March 25
Special PRAC meeting, 7:00 p.m.; and 3) addition of March 24 meeting
to interview Fire Station No. 3 architects and Board of Zoning
Adjustments candidates. (M-4)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION.....
1. JOINT MEETING WITH PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION AND CITY
COUNCIL -- PRAC members have recently discussed topics they would
like to discuss with the City Council at the joint meeting to be
held on April 2. Their topics center around the Council's thinking
with respect to continued development of the park system including
neighborhood parks, the community center, and basic park maintenance
activities. In order to facilitate the development of an agenda for
this meeting, including preparation of background materials, it
would be helpful if the Council would give me any thoughts they have
for topics of discussion at this meeting.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
C11Y CUUNCIL 1NFURMATION MLMURANDUM
February 28, 1986
Page Two
2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE FUND -- Senators Ramstad and Jude are
co -sponsoring SF 1956 which would provide a means by which all
cities could develop reserve funds for future infrastructure repair
and replacement. The Senate Local and Urban Government Committee
held a public hearing on this bill on Thursday, February 27.
Senator Ramstad and I testified on behalf of the bill and it was
passed out of the committee to the Tax Committee. A similar bill
has been authored by Senator Roger Moe. Senator Moe's bill, SF
1984, would permit county governments to participate in a similar
program. Because both bills address the same topic, the committee
recommended that the authors merge the two bills before they
actually are heard at the Senate Tax Committee. Because Senator Moe
is Senator Majority Leader and has many bills to follow, he has
asked Senator Ramstad to accomplish this. A copy of the bill in its
present form is attached. (I-2)
3. STATE BUDGET BALANCING -- The House version of the budget balancing
act has now been approved. The House bill leaves local government
aid (LGA) and homestead credits intact. The House bill would change
the LGA payment schedule so that we would receive one-half of our
allocation on July 15, and the other half on December 15. This
would be of minor impact to Plymouth. More significantly, however,
the House bill would substantially cut other state expenditures
including a $12 million reduction in funding to the Regional Transit
Board (RTB). The Senate is now beginning to work on its own
solution to the budgetary problem and it can be contemplated that
their solution will be substantially different from that of the
House.
4. GLACIER MEADOWS -- The City has now closed on two of three houses in
the Glacier Meadows plat. We have executed all the closing
documents with the new homeowners who will be residing at 1500 and
1520 Glacier Lane. I anticipate both these families willbe moving
in promptly. In addition, we contemplate that the third and final
house located at 1510 will be closed within the week and the new
homeowners moving in promptly. This has been a lengthy process, but
the results, I think, are well worth the considerable efforts which
were expended by the HRA and Milt Date.
5. METROPOLITAN HOUSING UPDATE -- The Metropolitan Council has reported
that in 1985 the number of building permits for single family
housing in the metropolitan area totals 17,415 compared to 13,607 in
1984. The areas of the fastest growth were in the southeastern
suburban area including Eagan, Apple Valley and Rosemount with a
total of 4,648 permits. In Plymouth we issued 589 single family
residential permits and 19 multi dwelling permits (490 dwelling
units). The Metropolitan Council has projected that over the next
15 years, the population in the area will increase by almost
500,000. It is difficult for me to subscribe to this figures as it
appears to be substantially beyond that which was previously
forecast. To the extent the number is accurate, however, Plymouth
C1tY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM
February 28, 1986
Page Three
should continue to be a major "winner". It is projected that the
Twin Cities will continue to evolve as a major service center for
the upper midwest. The Metropolitan Council has also noted that the
average value of undeveloped residential land has increased at twice
the rate of inflation during the past five years. One can't help
but wonder if the Council's own development framework, including the
establishment of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) has not
had some major affect in that escalating cost.
6. "LOCKING UP THE TAXPAYERS DEEP POCKETS" -- The attached article from
the Western City magazine demonstrates how participatory democracy
can work. The California constitution provides for initiative. As
such, the State is generally confronted on election day with
numerous initiative proposals. The League of California Cities,
frustrated with the failure on the part of the state legislature to
address what they consider to be excessive claims against local
governments, sponsored an initiative which will be on the June
ballot in California. The Council may interested in this topic as
it is obviously one of concern to all public officials everywhere.
The Doctrine of Joint and Several Liability provides that if there
is more than one defendant involved in a law suit, and any of the
defendants is unable to pay a judgement, the remaining defendants
are obligated to pay 100% of the judgement. Because cities are
frequently brought into such liability cases as a defendant, it is
obvious that the plaintiff's are looking to "deep pockets" to pay
the judgements. Because of the contingency fee nature of such
cases, the trial lawyers associations of the respective states,
vigorously oppose anything which would tend to restelct their access
to local governments "deep pockets". (I-6)
7. COACHMAN TRAILS -- This is an apartment development located on the
southwestern corner of Highway 101 and County Road 6. It is in
effect the second and final phase of the ongoing multiple family
dwelling on that site. Recently, the developer requested a six
month extension of the site plan approval. The zoning ordinance
provides that the Planning Director may administratively approve
such an extension for a period of six months. A copy of Blair
Tremere's letter to the developer of this project, Mr.. John
Schuette, is attached. (I-7)
8. MINUTES -- The following minutes are attached for your information:
a. Plymouth Development Council, January 29, 1986 (I -8a)
b. Municipal Legislative Commission, Operating Committee Meeting,
February 13, 1986 (I -8b)
c. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, January 16, 1986
(I -8c)
February 28, 1986
Page Four
9. COMPARABLE WORTH STATUS REPORT -- Attached is a memorandum from the
Metropolitan Area Management Association providing an update on the
joint compensation study. (I-9)
10. CONTINGENCY PLAN TO ASSIST HOMELESS -- Attached is a letter from
Hennepin County Commissioner Bud Robb on concerns the County has
with respect to changes made by the 1985 Legislature in the General
Assistance Program which may result in the possible increase of
individuals who may require assistance and shelter. In an effort to
address the problem, the County Board has asked the three human
service councils serving suburban Hennepin County to develop a
contingency plan to provide emergency shelter beds in each of their
respective areas in the event a crisis of new homeless individuals
occur. Representatives from the human service councils will be
contacting cities for assistance and support in this regard. (I-10)
11. PICTURES ARE WORTH MORE THAN WORDS:
YOU'RE IN DIRECT
VIOLATION,
WElRGFLLIG
V7bBRING FA
OF THE LAW DOWN ON YOU.
2i
Now REMEMBER— IF TWIS
HAPPENS AGAIN `tbu LL GET
MoRE ofTNE SAME THING!
)
Ziggy ' By Tom Wilson
ON TN Is SITE
WE WILL ERKT
A BIG OFFICE
BUILDING IVHEN'
WEGETARDUND'
TO IT! 1
t
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM
February 28, 1986
Page Five
11. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. A copy of the letter sent to Plymouth State Legislators from
Frank Boyles regarding transit funding legislation. (I -11a)
b. Letter of congratulations to Robert Alan Brough, 17720 - 26th
Avenue No. from Mayor Schneider on attaining the rank of Eagle
Scout. (I -11b)
c. Letter of appreciation from City Manager to Harry Dean, Or.,
Community Service Chairman for the Minnetonka Rotary Club on the
Club's contribution to the Zachary Lane playfield fitness
course. (I -11c)
d. Letter from City Manager to Vern Hartenburg regarding the
proposed regional trail along East Medicine Lake Boulevard.
(I -11d)
James G. Willis
City Manager.
JW:Jm
attach
February 25, 1986
Dear Plymouth Resident:
r
F A
�i-
f:
t
CITY OF
PUMOUTR
SUBJECT: TOW14 MEETING, MARCH 10
iA-3�
Because Plymouth is a developing community, there are many actions underwav
or in the planning stage which could impact upon you. In order to maintain
open communication channels with residents of the community, the Citv
Council has -scheduled a Town Meeting for�Monday, March 10 for residents of
your area. In order to keep the meetings on an informal basis while dealing
with specific topics of interest to you, the Town Meeting will be for
residents living north of County Road 6, west of Vicksburg Lane, south of
36th Avenue and east of Highway 101.
The Town Meeting is scheduled to begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Plymouth City
Center. On the reverse side of this letter is a list of topics for
discussion at the Town Meeting. If you have other matters of interest we
will seek to address them also.
I encourage you to join Councilmembers Crain, Vasiliou, Sisk, Zitur and
myself at 7:30 p.m., Monday, March 10 at the Plymouth City Center. We are
anxious to meet you and look forward to this opportunity to meeting
Informally to discuss matters of mutual interest. If you have any questions
about the Town Meeting, please feel free to call your City Clerk, Ms. Laurie
Houk at 559-2800, ext. 204.
Sincerely,
Virgil Schneider
Mayor
VS:jm
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
TOWN MEETING AGENDA
AREA NINE
March 10, 1956
7:30 p.m.
I. THOROUGHFARES
A. Highway 101 from County Road 6 to Merrimac Lane
B. Interchange at I-494 and County Road 6
C. Medina Road
II. PARKS
A. Maple Creek and Shiloh Neighborhood Parks
B. Oakwood Community Playfield
C. Parkers Lake City Park --and Playfield
D. Trails
III. HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT
A. Fox Run and Steeplechase
B. Parkers Lake North
C. Welsh Neighborhood Shopping Center
IV. PUBLIC SAFETY
A. Police/Fire Report
B. Neighborhood Watch Program
C. Proposed Fire Station No. 3
V. OTHER ITEMS
A. Public Transportation feedback - Plymouth Metrolink
B. State Shortfall and Local Government Cutbacks
C. Local Government Access Cable Channel 7
••
0
i
i
�f
m n U
i
C\l
( c
a
w� 0'C�1
00
I
�cc
�
o
LL
LO
A
U
d p G
�O
F-7 a' U H
p n Chi
Q
H
�rcno�r
W
p
O W
EH+
Z m! Ems_, EI Fes,
i
U
�f
m n U
W�
a
w� 0'C�1
-U
Pam'
I
LO
U'
d
U
d p G
�O
F-7 a' U H
p n Chi
P "C U
�rcno�r
i
m n U
cA
H
-U
rr
I
LO
Ln
U
Pa R'
F-7 a' U H
H
C�
r�
�rcno�r
H W
U
p
O W
EH+
Z m! Ems_, EI Fes,
U p W
U
I
EiZ
:3z
L)
•�;
z^�
z •z
O '4
p Cl)�-
z ••
P. d' M H
c„)
..
O�^��N
`• ✓
o U
U
r --I a
w^ U
I
�I
o �I H •I ~
r
F
t \
U)
H fM
W
I En
z!M
U
•
Pr p
z �* U
U C p
v, t ,
�
3 Wp;
Hx`P pU
U
A pi U
E-
i
EE4d�U
F�
its
£
i
m n U
cA
H
-U
co Lo h
U
Pa R'
F-7 a' U H
H
C�
�rcno�r
H W
U
p
O W
EH+
Z m! Ems_, EI Fes,
U p W
U
I
�
M
p-'
O '4
p Cl)�-
z ••
P. d' M H
c„)
..
O�^��N
`• ✓
o U
U
r --I a
w^ U
o
�I
o �I H •I ~
r
F
c. No h1
��
U
•
Pr p
z �* U
U C p
v, t ,
�
3 Wp;
Hx`P pU
U
EE4d�U
F�
its
£
cl'�
f
Lo -crN
Y
vF-
to�2NN
J�J
^
^�, iiWnn
Q3 �(4F
N
v V V �/
crF- Q:: �?N
a
CIO
CO
LL f`')OLL — - N
(n NOS -0N
1/21/86 [REVISCR ] HMW/SR 86-3583
CX
Senators Ramstad and Jude introduced—
S. F. No. 1956 Referred to the Committee on Local and Urban Government
1 A bill for an act
2 relating to local government; providing for city
3 capital improvement reserve funds; amending Minnesota
4 Statutes 1984, section 471.57.
5
6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
7 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 471.57, is
8 amended to read:
9 471.57 [FEBhie-WARNS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE FUND.]
10 Subdivision 1. [TAX LEVY.] The eeancil_governingbody of
11 any home rule charter or statutory cityT-heweser-ergamiredT may
12 establish, by a two-thirds vote of all its members, by ordinance
13 or resolution a pnb+ie-works capital improvement reserve fund
14 and may annually levy taxes-within-existimg-limits a property
15 tax for the support of such fund. �t-marT-b7-the-ordinance
16 eetabi=ehimg-the-famdT-desigmete-a-specific-eapitai-improeememt
17 er-a-type-ef-eapitai-impreveremt-for-which-the-farad-is-te-be
18 teed- The proceeds of taxes levied for its support shall be
19 paid into the pablie-werks capital improvement reserve fund.
20 There may be paid into such fund any other revenue from any
21 source not required by statute or charter to be paid into some
22 other fund or to be used for purposes other than those
23 provided in-this-seetiom for the use of the pebiie-werks capital
24 improvement reserve fund. A tax levied in accordance -with -this
25 section is a special levy within the meaning of section 275.50,
1
J./ ti/ ov
1 subdivision 5.
2 Subd. 2. (PURPOSES.) Except as provided in subdivision 3,
3 the pabiie-werks capital improvement reserve fund shall be used
4 only for the-speeifie-eapita�-impressment-er-type-ef-sap=ta:
5 iznpresemeat-designated-by-the-ordiaenee-estab;liking-the-fad-
6 �f-net-se-designatedT-it-ska�f-be-need-ersty-fer-eapitai
7 impresements-ef-a-type-fer-whisk-the-munieipa�ity-estabsiskirg
8 the-fund-is-aatkoriaed-te-issue-bonds-.--eke-term-Yeapita�
9 impressment'+-does-net-inefnde-the-eenstraetien-or-aegaisztior.-o'_
10 any-steam-heat=-te�epkeneT-gee-er-e�eetrie-pant-er-syste�---blo
11 expenditures-ska��-be-made-f rem-the-pub�ie-works-reserse-fend
12 before-the-fist-fisea�-Year-fed}eMing-eessetien-ef-kesti�itie�
13
in-the-present-war-ea-declared-by-prepee-federal
14
authority capital improvements for which bonds may be issued
by
15
the city under section 475.52, subdivisions 1 and 2.
16
Subd. 3. (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.] In a city subject
17
to sections 473.851 to 473.86, a balance in the capital
18
improvement reserve fund may be used only in accordance with
the
19
comprehensive plan adopted by the city pursuant to those
20
sections. In any other city a balance in the capital
21
improvement fund may be made only in accordance with an adopted
22
capital improvement program as defined in section 462.352,
23
subdivision 9.
24
Subd. 3 4. (MAY-8SE-FUNH-P6R-eTHER-PURFeSES-HpeN-veTE
USE
25
OF FUND FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE.) The eeunei+ governing body
of
26
any-menieipaiity a city which has established a pubiie
27
works capital improvement reserve fund by-an-erdinanee
28
designating-the-spteifie-improsement-er-type-ef-eapita�
29
impressment-fer-whisk-the-fund-mal-be-aced may submit to the
30 voters of -the -municipality -et -any at a regular or special
31 election the question of using the fund for some -ether -purpose a
32 specific improvement or type of capital improvement. If a
33 majority of the votes cast on the question are in favor of
34 such disersien-from-the-original-parpese a limitation on the use
35 of the fund, it may shall be used only for any the purpose
36 so approved by the voters.
2
1/21/86 (REVISOR ] HMW/SK 86-3583
1 Subd. 5. (HEARING; NOTICE.] A capital improvement fund may
2 not be established until after a public hearing on the question.
3 Notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing must be
4 published for two successive weeks in the official newspaper of
5 the city. The second publication must be not later than sever.
6 days before the date of the hearing.
7 Subd. 6. [TERMINATION OF FUND.] A city may terminate a
8 capital improvement fund at any time in the same -manner as the
9 fund was established. Upon termination of the fund any balance
10 shall be irrevocably appropriated to the debt service fund of
11 the city to be used solely to reduce tax levies for or bonded
12 indebtedness of the city or, if the city has no bonded
13 indebtedness, for capital improvements authorized by this act.
14 Sec. 2. [TRANSITION.]
15 A Dublic works reserve fund established pursuant to section.
16 471.57 before the effective date of this act may be continued
17 but is governed by this act.
18 Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
19 This act is effective the day after final enactment.
3
RE: SF 1956, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT RESERVE FUND
Senate Local and Urban Government Committee
Tuesday, February 25, 1986
My name is dames G. Willis. I am the City Manager of Plymouth and I am here
tonight representing the Plymouth City Council to speak on behalf of SF
1956.
We believe that the Capital Improvement Reserve Fund bill is a "good
government" bill. Essentially it would accomplish two objectives, which
from a local governmental perspective, are critically important.
First, this bill would carve out an exemption to levy limits. The bill
(subdivision 1) provides that the local governing body, by a two-thirds
vote, would be able to establish a property tax levy to support a capital
improvement reserve fund. This special level would be irrevocably committed
to the capital improvement reserve fund. Funds in the capital improvement
reserve fund could be allowed to accumulate to meet major programmed capital
expenditures.
Second, the bill would provide an improved means by which municipalities
could appropriately plan the orderly repair and replacement of their
Infrastructure through the establishment of reserve funds. Subdivision 2
requires that bonds issued must be only for those purposes authorized under
present law for statutory and home rule charter cities (MSA 475.52, Subd. 1
and 2). Subdivision 3 of the bill ties the use of capital improvement
Page 2
reserve funds to a capital improvement program adopted pursuant to existing
statutes. In the metropolitan area, the Metropolitan Land Use Planninq Act
(MSA 473.851 through 473.86) governs. In all other cities, the capital
improvement program as defined in MSA 462.352, Subd. 9 governs.
Why is this bill needed? There is virtually no disputing the fact that the
public's investment in its infrastructure is wearing out. People may not
agree on the degree to which the infrastructure is deterioriating, but
deterioriating it is. Adequate provisions are not being made by many
municipalities to meet their future infrastructure responsibilities. In
large measure, this is because municipalities do not have the fiscal tools
to generate the monies required to meet infrastructure demands. Current law
encourages debt rather than establishing reserves to meet capital program
needs.
If local government is given more adequate tools to meet its infrastructure
responsibilities it will meet its challenge. The general property tax will
be a major source of such local financing. Given the levy limitations
imposed by existing legislation, it will not be possible for municipalities
to develop reserve funds to meet infrastructure requirements without such
levies being made exempt from levy limitations. The alternative is to defer
orderly repair and replacement and finance the neessary replacement through
the sale of bonds. And why? Because debt repayments can be financed by
levies outside of current levy limits.
Page 3
Plymouth is a relatively "new" community, and as such, has relatively new
infrastructure. Nonetheless, our Council in 1983 established a Community
Development Task Force to examine how the city could meet its future
obligations for the replacement of its infrastructure. As a result of our
study, we have projected that by 1999 the city will be faced with the
replacement of existing infrastructure in the amount of $40 million. Of
this sum, more than $31 million is represented in streets alone. In order
to meet this challenge, the City Council has sought to generate a modest
capital reserve fund within our existing revenue capacities. In 1985, the
Council set aside $150,000 for this purpose, and in 1986, has budgeted
$180,000. Our Council recognizes these sums are not adequate, however, they
represent an acknowledgement of the problem confronting us and a willingness
to initiate actions to face them squarely.
Local governmental units would, of course, prefer that there were no levy
limitation statutes. Recognizing that the legislature has not yet seen fit
to repeal this statute, we believe that an exemption should be established
for a capital improvement reserve fund.
We believe local government can responsibly face its future infrastructure
maintenance and repair problems if given the appropriate tools. Adoption of
this bill would be a major step in providing us the tools that we so
desperately need. Thank you.
'ITY
a Clark
-eigand
YBrien _
n Flagg - esldent's
;pecker
lT ES 1. essllge
Street"
`145814
�
CERS Locking Up the Taxpayers' Deep Pockets
esident
Russell
Angeles
esident In five long years of deliberations, the Assembly Judiciary Committee failed to
e Baker agree on a bill to right the inequity in California's "Deep Pocket" law.
n Mateo
esident But, it took just 74 days to collect 660,000 signatures from the people of California
Paula
to Paula to put a League -sponsored initiative on the June ballot. This was far more than the
esident 394,000 necessary to qualify and the Secretary of State's office quit counting when
Carroll
/acavilie it had verified 462,000 signatures.
director To date, more than 285 California City Councils have gone on record in support of
ghoven `
:CTORs the initiative.
ed sem All 58 of California's Counties have endorsed the measure.
oon Bay The California Taxpayers Association and the California Chamber of Commerce
Brad
rgell% are at the top of a long list of private sector organizations which support the
happeil proposition.
t Covina
J. Clark In what must be some kind of record, 68 newspapers, radio and television stations
g Beach editorialized in favor of the initiative before it ever qualified.
R. co:
i!a vista All of this is a clear indication of just how much support there is for a change in
ck Crist this law which makes it possible for a city or other "Deep Pocket" defendant to be
rament0
einstein required to pay 100 percent of the judgment in an accident injury lawsuit where the
ranc,sco city may be no more than one percent responsible for the damages.
tra Gard
Redding In practice, that means cities, counties and other entities with substantial pocket -
Gomez books are increasingly being named in lawsuits where they have little or no respon-
❑. Tulare
onzales sibility to provide a "Deep Pocket" capable of paying the judgment.
,nnyvale The law is unfair and the people of California are becoming increasingly aware of
n Griset
tnta Ana that fact.
Haartzog Mesa In 1984, these lawsuits cost 162 of California's cities more than $19 million. Not
debrand included in that figure is the $16 million my own city of Los Angeles paid out that
cod city year.
Hughes
,c Grove That money could — and should — have been used for important public services,
"O"y and the taxpayers and voters know that.
r, Fresno
Krieger In the coming months, opponents — primarily the California Trial Lawyers As-
asaden
Maisettl sociation — will claim that the measure will leave the victims of accidents out in the
'atterson cold.
Acintre
asadena Not true: the initiative ensures that out-of-pocket expenses, such as medical bills
Wherter and loss of income, will be paid. But the initiative would limit the amount of "Deep
Ventura
msinger Pocket" defendants would pay for non -out-of-pocket damages, such as pain and
Modesto suffering, to no more than their degree of responsibility for the injury.
Murphy The initiative ensures that injured parties are taken care of, while protecting the
drat City j p p g
-erstreet taxpayers from outrageous judgments they should not have to pay.
. Ventura But, the trial lawyers have an intense economic self-interest in keeping the law as
-uuieno y P g
sta Mesa it is. Their fees generally are based on a percentage of the total judgment in these
3Ai
Angeles cases, so they stand to lose financially from any change in the law that provides relief
:hroeder for the taxpayers. So, they'll be working hard to confuse the issue. So, it's important
tor. Lodi
i I Smith that the voters continue to become better and better informed about how the "Deep
Helena Pocket" law really works. The more they know about how this unfair and costly law
1. Tatum
Vacaville works, the more likely they are to do what the Assembly Judiciary Committee was
2. Tirado unable to do: find a fair and humane way to change the law while protecting the
Calexico
lestgard taxpayers' pocketbooks.
nion City — Pat Russell
Williams
ian Jose
I Wilson
Oakland
I
W. Witt
an Diego
FebruurY 1986/Western Citv
Z 4_1
T
CITY OF
February 25, 1986 PLYMOUTR
Mr. Sohn E. Schuett
Schuett Investment Company
Suite 188
620 Mendelssohn Avenue
Golden Valley, MN 55427
RE Coachman Trails (85022)
Dear Mr. Schuett:
Thank you for your correspondence of February 21, 1986 which provides us with a current
status regarding the above referenced development. In response to your correspondence
and in accordance with Section 11, Subd. A. 9., of the Zoning Ordinance, please be
informed that the City Council approval of your Site Plan is hereby extended for a six
month period beyond the original approval date. Specifically, the Site Plan approval
is extended to December 3, 1986.
Please be reminded that all plans submitted with En application for a Building Permit
more than six months after the date of City Council approval, including all plans for
which approval has been extended, shall be subject to mandatory compliance with the
Ordinance requirements and State Building Code requirements which are in effect at the
time of application for a Building Permit. Compliance with the applicable codes and
ordinances shall be determined by the Zoning Official and plans shall be appropriately
modified prior to issuance of the Building Permit.
We appreciate your cooperation and look forward to your development going forward.
Should you have questions, or need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
.4 da.oy- >;6
Sara L. McConn
Community Development Coordinator
SM/ gw
cc: Community Development Director Blair Tremere
Building Official doe Ryan
File 85022
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a rpnijar meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the jrri day of June 19L
The following members were present: MaVnr navPnTnnrt r'nuncil rain
The following members were absent:
fnunrilmPmher CrhnaidPr introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 85- 398
APPROVING SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SCHUETT INVESTMENT COMPANY (85022)
WHEREAS, Schuett Investment Company has requested approval for a Site Plan and Con-
ditional Use Permit for the construction of two multi -family buildings with a total
of 153 units to be located west of 14th Avenue North and Olive Lane on Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1 of Schiebe's Oakwood Addition to be platted as "Coachman Trails"; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Schuett Investment
Company for a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of two multi-
family buildings with a total of 153 units to be located west of 14th Avenue North
and Olive Lane, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum
2. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
completion of site improvements.
3. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance.
4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv-
als per Ordinance provisions.
5. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no out-
side storage is permitted.
6. No Conditional Use Permit or Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat
Is filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
7. Appropriate legal documents regarding shared access and circulation system as
approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat.
8. Approval of .a Variance from the requirement of fire lanes subject to the struc-
tures being sprinklered, in accordance with the Fire Chief's recommendation.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 85- 398
9. The pool and tennis court hours shall be restricted to no tenant or guest use
after 10:30 P.M., or prior to 7:00 A.M..; and, no lights shall be installed at
the pool or tennis courts.
10. No access to the pond shall be provided and no paths, docks, or signage pointing
out the pond shall be constructed; there shall be no advertising published for
this development that would allude to the use of the pond.
11. Additional plantings including pine trees and evergreens shall be placed alonq
the south lot line and along Outlot A north to the pond at a rate of 15 ft. on
center. Additional plantings to be approved by staff, as to location, may not
necessarily be 15 ft. on center for all plantings. The 102 additional evergreen
plantings shall be a minimum 8 ft. in height. -
12. Adequate devices shall be installed to prevent direct run-off from this property
into the pond and this drainage shall be treated to remove the accumulation of
sediment.
13. Approve a variance of 5 ft. for a maximum 40 ft. height of the 3 -story building.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Crain , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Crain,
Neils. Schneider and Vasiliou
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH `
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 3rd day of June . 1935.
The following members were present: Ma.yor Davenport. Councilmembers Crain.
Fdailq�,rhnairi r And Va,,ilinu
The following members were absent: nnnp
rni,nrilmamhar SrhnPirlar introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 85-397
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SCHUETT INVESTMENT COMPANY FOR COACHMAN TRAILS (85022)
WHEREAS, Schuett Investment Company has requested approval for a Preliminary Plat for
Coachman Trails on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Schiebe's Oakwood Addition to construct
two multi -family structures for a total of 153 units to be located west of 14th
Avenue North and Olive Lane; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Preliminary Plat for Schuett
Investment Company for Coachman Trails on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Schiebe's Oakwood
Addition to construct two multi -family structures for a total of 153 units located
west of 14th Avenue North and Olive Lane, subject to the following:
1.
Compliance
with the
City Engineer's Memorandum.
2.
Removal of
all dead
or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3.
No Building Permits
shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4.
Payment of
park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication
Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
5. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits
in an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and ac-
cording to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit
issuance.
6. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
7. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
8. Public access shall be limited to internal public roads 14th Avenue North and
Olive Lane.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Davenport Counrilmembers Crain,
The ng voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
PLYMOUTH DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
January 29, 1986
PRESENT: Bob Burger, Burger Development Group; Marlin Grant, Mary Anderson
Construction Company; Randy Laurent, Laurent Builders; Dale
Kennedy, Carlson Properties; Rick Murray, Builders Development
and Finance Company; Don Myron, Don Myron Realty; John Mullan,
Barton Aschman; Maria Vasiliou, Fred Moore, Blair Tremere, Joe
Ryan, Sara McConn, Sherm Goldberg, Jim Willis, and Frank Boyles,
City of Plymouth
Bob Burger called the meeting to order at 7:35 a.m.
I. City Staff Report on Fast Track Plan Review and Permit Issuance Process for
Single Family Dwelling Permits
Blair Tremere summarized the fast track plan review and permit issuance
process for single family dwelling permits. A major step In -expediting the
process is identifying specifically the City's needs, including type of
documents as well as the information to be included in each document. In
1986 the City will again hire a temporary plan review person who's sole
responsibility will be to complete plan reviews. As a final step, priority
review will be given to those applications which are complete and in order
from a code perspective. Incomplete applications or petitions not in
compliance with the building code will require greater processing time. The
fast track process is a mutual effort by the builders and City.
II. Review of Automated Permit System for Non -Plan Review Items such as reroof-
ing, residing, plumbing, mechanical, etc.
Blair Tremere stated that "bugs" had been worked out of the automatic permit
Issuance system making it responsive to requests for non -plan review
permits. Instead of requiring a 24 hour wait. these perm..its ^:uy be received
"while you wait" between 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. each day. Surprisingly, very
few contractors have taken advantage of this service. The City has Initiat-
ed an invoicing procedure for those permits which do not require plan
review. So long as the invoices are paid promptly, the contractor may
continue to take advantage of invoicing. The contractor agrees to not
commence work prior to permit issuance and to request inspections in a
timely manner.
III. Sewer Capacity Issue
Fred Moore stated that the City has been attempting to convince the Metro-
politan Council that their growth projections need correction and that
Plymouth will exceed them based upon development projections. There is also
some question on which sewer interceptors will be constructed, including Elm
Creek and Pike Lake. As part of the capital improvement program, three
trunk lines are proposed for extension over the next five years to increase
developable area within the MUSA lines.
Bob Burger asked about the Pike Lake interceptor. Fred stated that three
alignments are being reviewed by Tennant Company. The City's consulting
January 29, 1986 vvv vy� cam_.
Page 2
engineer has identified the associated costs of each alignment and the City
has selected the one it desires. A meeting is scheduled for January 30 with
Tennant representatives to discuss this alignment, associated costs and
easements necessary for construction to take place.
The construction timing of the Pike Lake interceptor will be based upon the
results of this meeting. It does not appear at this time that Tennant will
be proceeding to develop their property in the near fuVture, but they have
indicated they would not obstruct efforts to bring the sewer line across the
property, assuming reasonable easement payments were provided. Council -
member Vasiliou stated that she had received a letter from the Peterson's
wanting to know when Tennant Company would be moving. Fred stated that the
meeting should provide a better idea of Tennant's plans, however, they have
no deadline in this matter. To establish a deadline would most likely
require that the City condemn construction easements.
IV. 1986 Improvements for County Road 9 and County Road 10
Fred Moore stated that Hennepin County moved the development of County Road
10 up to 1987 on their construction schedule. A consulting engineer will be
designing this project for the County.
County Road 9 is in the final design stage with Hennepin County scheduled to
complete plans this spring, and bid letting and the first phase of construc-
tion completed in 1986. Full construction will be completed in 1987. The
typical highway section will be four -lane divided with curbing and median.
fhe intersections will have left and right turn lanes with signals.
V. Other Business
Joe Ryan stated that the activity level for the Building Division in 1985
was substantial and distributed a year end report. Total building permits
were 1,304 against 1,288 for 1984. Residential permits in 1985 were 633 as
compared to 589 in 1984. A total of 16 multi family permits representing
259 units, were issued in 1985 versus 19 permits for 406 units in 1984.
Remodeling permits in 1985 at 486 were somewhat less than the 499 issued in
1984. More significant increases were experienced in other permits includ-
ing plumbing, mechanical, and septic installation and removal. There were
1,013 plumbing permits in 1985 against 1,070 in 1984. A total of 1,040
mechanical permits were secured in 1985 compared with 1,020 in 1984. Septic
permits amounted to 111 over none for 1984. A total of 451 certificates of
occupancy were issued in 1985 against 386 in 1984. If interest rates remain
stable, it is likely that 1986 will also be a good development year.
Blair Tremere stated that to reduce conflicts during the course of construc-
tion, the Building Inspection Division has established pre -construction
meetings to enhance communications between contractors and the Building Div-
ision. Experience to date suggests that pre -construction meetings have
reduced delays in the construction process.
rL nnUUin ULVLLUNMLNI CUUNCIL
January 29, 1986
Page 3
Sara McConn reported that 1985 planning applications, amounted to total of
341 in 1985 versus 338 in 1984. This includes 28 conventional preliminary
plats, 47 conventional final plats, 10 preliminary PUD's, and 18 final plan
PUD's. She stated there have been many inquires for anticipated Spring and
Summer construction.
Bob Burger reported that he was pleased with the progress Blair, Sara, Joe
and other members of the Planning and Building Inspection Department have
made in solving problems which contractors had identified in permit issuance
and plan review. He is pleased with the hard work and tenaciousness which
the department has displayed in alleviating these problems.
Marlin Grant asked what the deadline was for developers to request the City
to construct public improvements within their developments, Fred stated
that if the project is 100% developer paid, the deadline is May 1. If any
special assessment procedure is involved, the deadline was October 1, 1985.
Don Myron asked when the interceptor at Highway 55 would open up land west
to the City's western border. Fred Moore stated that the existing inter-
ceptor is to Highway 55 and Vicksburg at this point. During the 1986-1990
CIP it is proposed to be extended to Highway 101 to serve the triangular
segment between County Road 24, Highway 55 and Brockton Lane. This is
projected for 1990. The CUSA line does not currently include this area, but
the City will be petitioning the Metropolitan Council to include this in the
development area.
Jim Willis stated that the City Council at their January 27 meeting
discussed enhancing its efforts to notify the public with respect to devel-
opment petitions. The Council is considering the desirability of putting up
a 4' x 8' sign saying to the effect that. "THIS LAND IS SUBJECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PETITION. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL..." Such a change in
policy would actively involve developers. The Council has not determined
what criteria would be used - whether it would be limited exclusively to
public hearing related items or be more expansive. The Council is looking
for input from the Development Council specifically regarding the type of
criteria which should be used and the issue of cost and expense.
Blair Tremere reported that in Minnetonka, signs are required only for sub-
divisions and zoning issues. The signs are posted by the city's street
department based upon a work order at least ten days prior to the petition
being heard. This practice requires an inventory of at least one dozen of
each sign type, together with a number of special purpose signs. They have
found that the bulk of calls received were from realtors and not residents.
They have also learned that the practice does not absolve them from resident
complaints that they were unaware of the petition.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that the use of signage would not be a
substitute for current procedures for mailed notification, cable televising
of council agendas and mailing of agendas to homeowner association
presidents. She stated that the problem in the past has been that neighbor-
hood groups close to projects, but not so close as to receive public hearing
notification, have felt surprised when issues affecting their neighborhood
FL_ 11'IVV 111 VLYLLVrI"IL 1\ 1 \.VVa\1.1L QQ
January 29, 1986 Com.
Page 4
have arisen. The installation of signage is intended to reach people circu-
lating in the area.
Marlin Grant expressed concern about the additional telephone calls such
signage would entail. It is likely to tie up the existing limited number of
staff persons and there would be question on whether additional personnel
would be required. The signage may also provoke overly concerned citizens
including those not living in the immediate or general vicinity of the
property. He can't see the positive side of the proposal. He believes that
"word of mouth" is by far the most effective means of communicating issues
of local concern. "I don't know" is simply not an acceptable excuse.
Rick Murray stated that the installation of signage would disrupt his devel-
opment procedures. Their normal practice is to conduct neighborhood
meetings once they have put a package together. The installation of signs
would get neighbors involved before he would be prepared to deal with
specific questions and issues.
Don Myron said he appreciated the City's continued sensitivity to the
public, but he believes the installation of signs becomes a big expense
which may not significantly help anyone. He believes there are not a
sufficient number of countervailing pluses to outweigh the minuses of such a
program. He believes that the City has sufficient steps to advertise
developments using current practices.
Bob Burger stated that the development process is complex enough now without
adding yet another element which will incrementally increase developer
costs. He is also concerned about the impact which telephone calls will
have upon City staff as well as developers.
Dale Kennedy believes that the signs are fine for issues of where a public
hearing is required, but not for site plans.
Rick Murray expressed concern that sign requirements not be discriminatory
with respect to one set of developers over another.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that the Council does have the option of
placing the responsibility for notification more on the individual and
Homeowner Association than on the City. She believes the City should work
with the Homeowner Associations to help them remain aware.
Jim Willis commented that development issues will continue to be paramount
in Plymouth as development occurs in small undeveloped "pockets". These
infull developments create greater sensitivity since neighbors are affected
by the development and because the land which is left for development, in
many cases, is marginal. He stated he would convey the Development
Council's comments to the City Council for their consideration on this
matter.
The meeting adjourned at 8:58 a.m.
THIRTIETH MLC OPERATING COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, February 13, 1986
9:00 - 11:00 a.m.
Edina City Hall
MINUTES
The Thirtieth MLC Operating Committee Meeting was called to order at
9:05 a.m. by Tom Hedges, the MLC Vice Chair.
Members Present: Jim Andre, Roseville; Gary Dickson, Shoreview;
Tom Hedges, Eagan; Dick Henneberger, Brooklyn Park; Carl Jullie,
Eden Prairie; Jim Lacina, Woodbury; Jim Miller, Minnetonka; John Pidgeon,
Bloomington; Doug Reeder, Maple Grove;- Mark Sather, White Bear Lake;
Bob Schaefer, Inver Grove Heights; and Jim Willis, Plymouth.
Also Present: D.J. Leary, Media Services; Bob Renner,- Chris Moore and
Deb Luebke of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
Hedges welcomed Bob Schaefer, the City Manager of Inver Grove Heights,
as the newest member to join the MLC.
A motion was made by Willis to approve the minutes from the previous
MLC Operating Committee Meeting. Henneberger seconded the motion
which was passed unanimously.
Gary Dickson presented the Treasurer's Report. A motion was made and
seconded to approve the Treasurer's Report and was passed.
Renner discussed the Governor's Budget Reduction Proposal, referring
to the chart on page 3 of the Update to show the effects of the cuts
on MLC cities. A long discussion ensued regarding budget cuts. The
Operating Committee expressed concern regarding the Coalition of Out -
state Cities'aggressive lobbying campaign to have budget cuts taken
from homestead credit, rather than local government aids. The
Operating Committee felt this effort should be counteracted by
MLC lobbyists. Information will be compiled by the MLC lobbyists
and provided to the Operating Committee.
The New 1987 Local Government Aid Formula was discussed by Renner.
The Governor's proposal was discussed in which the suggested funding
level for 1987 was 3.5% applied against the reduced base. The City
of Minneapolis's Proposal, "The Balanced Reliance LGA Formula," was
also discussed and a handout was distributed. No plans to introduce
a bill were expected at -L-his mime and any action that might occur,
would take place in a conference committee.
It was announced that the House Tax Committee had scheduled a hearing
on local government aids for Friday, February 14. The Operating
Committee requested the opportunity to testify at this hearing.
Renner would discuss the possibility of MLC testifying with
Representative Schreiber, the Chairman of the House Tax Committee.
The MLC City Profile form was distributed and city managers were asked
to fill out the form and return it to Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren.
Thirtieth MLC Operating Committee Meeting
February 13, 1986
Page 2
A city survey of MLC members,with the purpose of evaluating the Legislature
was discussed. It was determined that Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren
would develop this survey, which would then be completed by MLC mayors
and council members.
A list of the members on the Port Authority Task Force was distributed.
The MLC lobbyists were asked to monitor H.F. 1990, which is the proposed
legislation creating economic development powers for cities which would
be similar to the powers cities now have as port authorities.
D.J. Leary presented the MLC Communications Report. Leary mentioned
an interview had been scheduled with the Minneapolis Tribune Editorial
Page Editor, Mayor Morrison and Bob Renner for Monday; February 17.
Leary also said MLC Directories and the February issue of the Update
would be distributed to the members of the Capitol Press Corp ttiat--
dealt with MLC issues.
The Update was reviewed, and while it was targeted at the MLC
Legislative Delegation, copies would also be sent to MLC mayors and
council members, legislative leadership, the capitol and suburban
press. It was suggested that each city manager receive 10 copies
of the Update, which they would then distribute to their mayors,
council members and local press at their city council meetings.
The MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings(which were listed in the Update)
were discussed. They have been scheduled at the following times
and locations: East Region, March 4, 7:45 a.m., Shoreview Plaza
Hotel; Northwest Region, March 5, 7:45 a.m., Plymouth Radisson Inn;
Southwest Region, March 12, 7:45 a.m., Decathlon Club, Bloomington.
Renner presented his perception of the likely scenario for the 1986
Legislative Session. He didn't think the House would support cuts
in aid to education, homestead credit or local government. He felt
the Senate would closely follow the Governor's recommendations
on budget cuts. Renner predicted that a 10 -member joint conference
committee would be appointed to resolve the budget shortfall.
The next MLC Operating Committee Meeting was scheduled for Thursday,
March 6 at the Edina City Hall at 9:00 a.m.
The MLC Operating Committee Meeting was adjourned at 11:20 a.m.
THE BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting of January 16, 1985
CALL TO ORDER
The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by
Chairman Peter Enck, Thursday, January 16, 1986, 11:35 A.M., at the
Minneapolis Golf Club.
ROLL CALL: CRYSTAL - Commissioner William Sherburne
GOLDEN VALLEY - Commissioner Ed Silberman
MEDICINE LAKE - Commissioner Jim Padden
MINNEAPOLIS - Alternate Commissioner Mary Hoshaw
MINNETONKA - Commissioner Don Asmus
NEW HOPE - Commissioner Peter Enck
PLYMOUTH - Alternate Commissioner John Sweeney
ROBBINSDALE - Commissioner Lee Gustafson
ST. LOUIS PARK - Commissioner Don Rye
Counsel: Curt Pearson Engineer: Len Kremer
Recorder: Elaine Anderson Gen. Mills Rep.: John Schevenius
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Padden that the
December 19 minutes be approved. Carried unanimously.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Mr. Silberman presented the financial statements as of January 16,
1986, showing a checking account balance of $67.91, a savings
account balance of $47,591.95, and an investment balance of
$141,301.30. He moved its approval subject to audit. Seconded by
Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously. The budget report was presented
for informational purposes only.
PRESENTATION OF INVOICES FOR APPROVAL:
Mr. Silberman presented the invoice from Elaine Anderson for her
services as recording secretary during the calendar year 1985 for
$2,500 for services plus $593 for expenses totaling $3,093 and moved
its approval. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and carried unanimously.
Mr. Silberman presented the invoice from Curt Pearson, Counsel, for
$19,889.93 for legal services and $869.53 for expenses totaling
$20,759.46 and moved its approval. Seconded by Mr. Asmus and car-
ried unanimously.
Chairman Enck expressed appreciation on behalf of the Commission for
the services received in these two areas. He also thanked Mr.
Pearson for organizing the Christmas party.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman
1. Communication received from Robert K. Dawson, Secretary of the
Army (Civil Works).
2. A meeting had been held with the Corps of Engineers in which
negotiation of credits had commenced.
3. Met with Golden Valley Golf Course representatives.
Commissioners
Mr. Asmus reported that the Water Resources Board is setting up an
advisory board which is having its first meeting today. Fred Moore
BC Minutes - January 16, 1985 - Page 2
is on the committee. Chairman Enck indicated that he would ask Mr.
Moore for a report.
Engineer
1. Letter from Mr. Peter Fischer of the Corps of Engineers regard-
ing the schedule for providing construction easements for the
Golden Valley and Theodore Wirth construction areas. Current
plans are that there will be no construction funding in the
first $400,000 received in Federal funding as it is designated
to be used for planning and design. There will have to be a
supplemental appropriations act to obtain construction funding.
The Corps is planning on having those first two structures con-
structed this year.
2. Communicated with the Corps regarding scope of work that they
are in the process of preparing for the design: of the tunnel
which will connect to the existing tunnel and provide an outlet
for drainage from the Third Avenue Distributor.
3. Talked to MnDot to see if funds can be provided by MnDot for
construction of the Third Avenue Distributor tunnel or whether
they have to be obtained from the Federal Department of Trans-
portation. They indicated that a decision regarding the avail-
ability of funds should be made within the next two weeks.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Received a request from the Department of Natural Resources for
comments on a proposal from the City of Golden Valley to irri-
gate the Brookview Golf Course. This would be a maximum of 2.2
CFS with a volume not to exceed 67 AF per year which amounts to
approximately 10" over the entire golf course or 22 million
gallons of water. Mr. Kremer indicated that he had no problems
with the request. Discussion followed. The question was
raised whether someone else may come in and want a similar
amount of water. Mr. Silberman said we could ask the DNR to
set a minimum low flow and that there would be no withdrawals
below that limit. Mr. Rye asked if we would be doing suffi-
cient monitoring. Mr. Kremer replied that Golden Valley would
have to set up a gage and rating curve for the creek at the
location where the appropriation is being made. It was moved
by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Rye that a letter be sent to
the DNR indicating that we see no problems with the request
itself but to express our concerns regarding a minimum flow.
Carried unanimously.
2. Permit application for irrigation of the Golden Valley Country
Club. This would be taken from a deep well and would amount to
approximately 6" per year or 15,000,000 gallons. They would
pump 3 days a week for 8 hours a day. It was moved by Mr. Rye
and seconded by Mr. Gustafson that the Commission take no posi-
tion on this request, leaving it up to the DNR. Carried unani-
mously.
3. MnDot has requested comments on construction of bridges along
#394 in the Dunwoody area. After discussion and upon the engi-
neer's recommendation, it was moved by Mr. Silberman and
seconded by Mr. Asmus that a letter be sent to MnDott indicat-
u
February 25, 1986
CITYOF
PLYMOM+
Mr. Harry B. Dean, Jr.
Chairman, Community Service
Minnetonka Rotary Club
c/o Northwest Industrial Realty, Inc.
3025 Harbor Lane
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Harry:
Please extend our sincere thanks to your membership for their generous
contribution to the fitness course at the Zachary Lane playfield community
park.
This contribution is eloquent testimony to the commitment your club has to
our community. I am confident that the many Plymouth residents and others
who use the Zachary Lane playfield will enjoy the new fitness course in the
years ahead.
Thank you again for your Club's generosity and your willingness to be of
service to the Plymouth community.
Yours truly,
Oa s G. Willis
City Manager
OGW:jm
cc: Mayor & City Council
ric Blank, Director of Park and Recreation
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
February 24, 1986
44+,
CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
Robert Alan Brough
17720 - 26th Avenue No.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Bob:
=-- \ Q -b
Congratulations on attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. I appreciate the hard
work involved in this accomplishment as my son will also soon be achieving
the Eagle Scout status. It is an award very few Boy Scouts receive and it
will help you the rest of your life. To be a recipient of Eagle Scout
status, says a lot for your Troop, your scoutmaster, your parents and
certainly yourself. Good work!
On behalf of myself and the City Council, congratulations once again. I
hope that you will view your Eagle Scout status as a beginning and not an
end in your scouting career. There are palms to be earned and leadership
positions in the troop that will need your help.
Sincerely,
Vi gil Schneider
Mayor
VS:jm
cc: City Council
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
February 28, 1986
F
C ITY O"
PLYMOUTH
Vern Hartenburg, Superintendent
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District
P.O. Box 41320
12615 County Road 9
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Vern:
Last Monday, the City Council met to discuss the upgrading of East
Medicine Lake Boulevard between Medicine Ridge Road and 36th Avenue. The
City's consultant engineer, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc., reviewed
possible road alignments and the effects of such widening would have on
abutting property. Because of the potential for a tremendous effect on
either side of the road, the Council has ordered the consultant to prepare
two different conceptplans that could be taken to an informal public
meeting to gather citizen input on this sensitive issue.
Before we schedule these public hearings, I believe it is important
that we coordinate our thoughts with regards to the road and regional trail
alignment. Although there are a number of different issues which need to be
addressed, the most prominent one is the future of the existing homes
located just north of the East Medicine Lake Boulevard and Medicine Ridge
Road intersection between the road and the lake. A decision by the District
as to whether or not these parcels will be acquired by the District for the
construction of the regional trail will be necessary for the City to make a
decision on the alignment of this new collector street.
My staff will be pleased to continue working with your staff in order
to supply the necessary data so that your board can properly address this
subject. I will invite you and your staff to participate in the public
meetings at such time as they are scheduled. If you would like to discuss
this subject matter, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
�a s G. Willis
Rt Manager
/dma
cc: Mayor and Council
Eric Blank, Director of Park and Recreation
Fred Moore, Director of Public Works
David Latvaho, Chairman, Suburban Hennepin County Park District
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
February 21, 1986
Representative Dale Clausnitzer
523 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
�� CiTY O
PLYMOUTH
SUBJECT: Transit Funding Legislation
Dear Dale:
During this session of the Legislature, I know that you will be dealing with
transit funding issues. Since Plymouth has taken the initiative to develop
its own transit program, I want to share our perspective on the transit
funding issue.
Plymouth Metrolink is funded exclusively through property tax dollars paid
by residents and businesses in the community. From our perspective, the
legislature should resist any attempts to limit the ability of a munici-
pality to directly utilize all or a portion of its property tax contribution
to the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District for its own transit program
purposes.
Plymouth is also served by Medicine Lake Lines. Medicine Lake Lines, as the
MTC, is supported both through property tax dollars and state income tax
dollars. Obviously any cut in state or federal funding will impact greatly
upon Medicine Lake Lines' ability to adequately serve Plymouth. I recognize
that both the state and federal government have pressing reasons for limit-
ing their funding. I would hope, however, that the state legislature will
use this opportunity to develop a funding program for transit operators
which encourages experimental non-traditional transit demonstrations over
traditional transit programs which have proven incapable of supporting them-
selves except in the central business district. You have an unique oppor-
tunity before you to develop a transit funding system which promotes innova-
tion and cost effectiveness in transit delivery in place of the existing
"cash give-away program" which does little, if anything, to promote effec-
tiveness and innovation in transit affairs. I hope that the legislature
will work with the appropriate agencies to this end.
Yours veU tru(,
Frank Boyles
Assistant City Manager
FB:jm
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
-2-
to develop a contingency mechanism to provide 10 to 15 emergency shelter
beds in each of their respective areas should a severe crisis of new home-
less individuals occur. As a community leader, we are asking your
assistance in identifying potential buildings to be used for such purposes,
in identifying organizations that would be willing to operate such an emer-
gency shelter, and in building community support for the suburban area to
provide an emergency back up to provide for its own citizens should they
become homeless. Representatives of your human service council and of other
organizations who have offered to cooperate will soon be in touch with you
to solicit your support and assistance.
Should you have questions or suggestions with this effort, please feel free
to contact me or staff of the County Bureau of Social Services. On behalf
of the entire Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, I thank you for your
support and assistance.
Sincerel ,
Com issioner E. F Robb, Jr.
Board of Hennepin ounty Commissioners
EFR:cl
E. F. ROBB, JR. 1,1
�4 . co PHONE r'
COMMISSIONER 348-3084
fVPVE50
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487
January 27, 1986
Dear Community Leader:
You have undoubtedly heard of the problem of homeless citizens. in this
country through the media and through your own personal civic participation.
We have seen a remarkable national growth in the phenomenon of homeless
individuals, more commonly called ustreet people" since late 1981. In
addressing this problem, we have worked cooperatively with many organiza-
tions, including the City of Minneapolis and other municipalities, reli-
gious organizations, community human service agencies and advocacy organiza-
tions. Through County and private foundation funding, we have seen the
development of transitional housing to assist homeless individuals in moving
from shelter care to more permanent housing. Recently, we have concluded an
agreement with the City of Minneapolis and local foundations to expand and
rehabilitate existing housing for low income individuals, and the Minneapo-
lis Community Development Agency has also increased its efforts to deal with
poor and disabled. young adults. The cumulative result of these efforts has
been to provide a variety of services which we thin;; compares favorably with
any other jurisdictions nationally.
Changes made by the 1985 Legislature in the General Assistance Program,
which provides basic income for adults with no ability to provide for them-
selves financially, may result in a significant number of General Assistance
recipients being terminated from the program. Some months ago it appeared
that a large number of recipients would be terminated causing a severe
crisis with many new homeless individuals. Our experience, to date, indi-
cates that the number of individuals terminated will not be as severe as
seemed to be the case some months ago. Nevertheless, because of our concern
for homeless individuals and because of the severe weather we experience
locally, the County Board has asked that a contingency plan be developed,
not unlike an emergency preparedness plan, in the event that a severe crisis
of large number of homeless individuals occurs.
As part of that plan, one of the County buildings would be opened to house
such individuals on a very short-term basis. However, there is concern that
an influx of additional people from the suburbs to the shelters in Minneapo-
lis would compound the crisis in the City. Therefore, we are asking your
assistance in developing a similar contingency plan within the suburban
area. Specifically, we have asked the three suburban human service councils
—C�
nTffAMetropolitan Area Management Affociation
of the Twin City Area
February 18, 1986
TO: ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN
JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY
FROM: William S. Joynes, Chairman
MAMA General Labor Relations Committee
SUBJECT: JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY STATUS REPORT
Progress on the Joint Compensation Study has been made in a number of
areas.
First, Business Advisors is conducting a detailed analysis of task values
across the seven occupational groups. This analysis is being conducted to
identify value relationships by factor of both identical and similar tasks
in each questionnaire. Following this analysis, results will be presented
in March to Occupational Advisory Groups and the Personnel Committee in
order to finalize task values for the Study.
Second, a quality review of TIME SPENT PROFILES is in process by Business
Advisors. An optional revision process is under development and will be
made available to participating jurisdictions, to be communicated in a
later letter.
Finally, Business Advisors is continuing work on the market study and the
benchmark job study.
WSJ: hfc
BC Minutes - January 16, 1985 - Page 4
-�--Fo;
to replace both crossings. These crossings have to be lowered
significantly. The wetland area along the South Fork between
Glenwood Avenue -and Turners Crossroads will be excavated to
provide replacement storage volume. Vegetation will be allowed
to grow again. The proposed ponds will more than replace
existing storage volume. It is part of #394 drainage facili-
ties. When final plans are prepared, they will come before the
Commission. The cost of the improvements are being shared by
MnDot and Golden Valley. There is no cost to the Commission.
MnDott has requested our comments. It is also public water so
the DNR will have input. Hennepin County gets involved because
Glenwood Avenue is a county road. The flood levels are lower
than the management envelope but storage is the same. Chairman
Enck said it is consistent with our management plan. It was
moved by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Silberman that a letter
be written to MnDot expressing that the proposal is consistent
with our management plan. Carried unanimously.
2. Scanticon developer in Plymouth has discussed the possibility
of replacing the proposed crossing of Plymouth Creek having a
40' span with culverts. The Commission indicated that they
would want to maintain the 100 year flood profile in this area.
The developer will have to come back with data regarding his
proposed crossing. Mr. Kremer raised the question as to
whether it should be reviewed by the Commission or the engi-
neer. Mr. Asmus asked whether we should be concerned with head
room. Mr. Kremer indicated that was not a problem. It was
moved by Mr. Silberman and seconded by Mr. Asmus that this be
handled by the engineer. Carried unanimously.
3. Memo regarding the Golden Valley Golf Course. The proposed
control structure would interfere with Hole 9 of the golf
course and they wish it moved further to the east. There also
is a large cottonwood tree they would like to leave standing.
They would also like the erosion problems caused by meandering
of the creek repaired as part of the project. They are con-
cerned about the schedule for construction of the control
structure at Wisconsin Avenue. The Corps is looking into the
possibility of relocating the golf club structure and saving
the cottonwood tree.
4. Mr. Kremer informed the Commission that the Shafer Construction
Company has filed suit against the City of Golden Valley for
additional costs which they say were caused by delays and
weather.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mr. Padden and seconded by Mr. Sweeney that the meet-
ing adjourn. Chairman Enck adjourned the meeting at 12:57 P.M.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman Elaine Anderson, Recorder
Date:
Donald Asmus, Secretary
. vs
BC Minutes - January 16, 1985 - Page 3
ing our approval as it is consistent with the management plan
and that they do have an erosion control plan.
4. Request from the DNR regarding a permit application from a de-
veloper in Plymouth. The area is to the east of the Plymouth
Shopping Center where an intermittent tributary to Medicine
Lake crosses Highway 55. This intermittent tributary is also
the outlet of Crane Lake to Medicine Lake. The developer is
proposing to fill the channel of the intermittent tributary and
some adjacent wetland and install a storm sewer to replace the
open ditch. It is not part of the management envelope and
therefore the proposal is consistent with the plan. We are
involved from a water quality standpoint as it is tributary to
Medicine Lake. They are proposing a silt fence around the
filled area until the site has been revegetated. It appears
that they are planning to extend the shopping center. It was
suggested that we request that existing and future drainage
from the shopping center parking lots be run into a pond. Upon
the engineer's recommendation, it was moved by Mr. Asmus and
seconded by Mr. Rye that the Commission write a letter to the
DNR indicating our approval but expressing concerns regarding
drainage. Carried unanimously.
S. Although the developer had not asked to be placed on the
agenda, Mr. Kremer briefly discussed a proposal by the
Chelsey-Carlson Company for the construction of a commercial
building in Plymouth near the Prudential Business Campus and
Plymouth Creek. This will be referred to the Commission as
plans are being developed. There would be some controversy
regarding water quality enhancement if runoff from parking is
going to go into the creek. An adjacent parking lot north of
the area has been developed. Chairman Enck said it would be
appropriate for Plymouth to go into the history of this devel-
opment. Mr. Enck requested Mr. Sweeney to check with Plymouth
and to report back to the Commission. Mr. Kremer will get back
to the developer as they wished to know what our policies were.
6. Since the third Thursday presented conflicts for a meeting, it
was moved by Mr. Asmus and seconded by Mr. Hoshaw that the
meeting be held on February 27. Carried unanimously. The
meeting will be held at the Golden Valley Country Club. Mr.
Pearson will make the arrangements.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Request from MnDot for comments on storm sewer system between
Breck Pond and #394. The project involves a 72" storm sewer
from proposed Interstate 394 to Laurel Avenue along Hampshire
Avenue, a 84" storm sewer along Laurel Avenue from Hampshire
Avenue to Colorado Avenue, then northeasterly to Glenwood
Avenue and the Soo Line Railroad. The storm sewers bypass
Cortland Pond. A 96" pipe would be placed under Glenwood
Avenue. The maximum proposed flood level north of Glenwood
Avenue and south of the Soo Line Railroad is 854. The previous
calculated level was 857 is being lowered by 3 feet so that
Glenwood Avenue is not flooded. The South Fork crossing of the
Soo Line railroad track will have to be replaced as well as the
South Fork crossing of Turners Crossroads. MnDot is proposing