Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 07-10-2001Adopted Minutes Regular Council Meeting July 10, 2001 A Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Tierney at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on July 10, 2001. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Tierney, Councilmembers Hewitt, Johnson, Slavik, Stein, Black, and Harstad. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager Ahrens, Acting Police Chief Twaddle, Fire Captain Hurr, Finance Director Hahn, Community Development Director Hurlburt, Park and Recreation Director Blank, Superintendent of Parks Peterson, Director of Public Works Faulkner, City Attorney Knutson, and City Clerk Paulson. Plymouth Forum No one was present to address the Council. Presentations and Public Information Announcements 4.1) Announcement of League of Minnesota Cities Achievement Awards Mayor Tierney reported that the City is the recipient of two achievement awards at the recent League of Minnesota Cities Conference. She stated the first award was for innovation and excellence in communications that recognized the City's ReConnect (on- line registration for park and recreation programs). She noted that the City was the first city in the State and among the first in the country to offer on-line registration for park and recreation programs. The second award was for innovation and excellence in citizen, community, and youth involvement. This award recognized the City's Youth Advisory Council. 4.2) Presentation of Awards of Excellence Jan Ficken, from the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association, reported the City's Park and Recreation Department is the recipient of three Awards of Excellence. The first award was in the facility category, and it's recognizing the Plymouth Creek Center and Fieldhouse. She complimented the Council on the planning process utilized for the construction of facility. She noted the elegant features of the facility, the varied events Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 2 of 13 that are conducted at the facility, and the artificial turf at the fieldhouse that provides year around activities. She stated the second award is in the programming and events category, and the City is being recognized for the Chocolate Sampler event that was held in conjunction with the Millennium Garden project. She stated the third award is in the technology category, and the City is being recognized for the ReConnect program that provides on-line registration for the City's park and recreation programs. The Council commended the Park and Recreation Department for receiving these awards. 4.3) Recognition of Youth Advisory Council Town Forum Subcommittee Members Councilmember Johnson recognized Paul Lenhardt and Eric Jungles from the Youth Advisory Council who were present at the meeting. She noted that over 60 youth delegates throughout the State attended the League of Minnesota Cities Conference. Councilmember Johnson reported on Youth Advisory Council's sub -committee that organized the Youth Town Forum. She, as well as Mr. Lenhardt and Mr. Jungles, presented certificates of appreciation to Archana Balas, Supriya Gandham, and Ifna Ejebe. They noted that Nwamaka Ejebe was unable to attend this evening to receive her certificate. 4.4) Recognition of High School Students Councilmember Johnson reported that Jameson Johnson and Shea Hess, students at Wayzata High School and members of the school's SkillsUSA team, placed first at the National SkillsUSA competition in the television/video production category. She thanked Jennifer Polz and Will Endsley, who are the school advisors. 4.3) Announcement that Plymouth Community Band would be performing at the Orchestra Hall Martin Frank, 11525 52"a Avenue North, President of the Plymouth Community Band, reported that the band would be performing at Minnesota Orchestra Hall on July 14 at 11:00 a.m. He stated the band was started three years ago with the assistance of the City, and they have grown from 45 members to its 60 current members. He thanked the Council for their support. Darin Kragenbring, 15600 24th Avenue North, stated that they perform at Parkers Lake for the summer concerts, Plymouth on Parade, Primavera Arts Festival, History Fest, Music in Plymouth, Plymouth Fun Run, and at Wayzata High School. He also thanked the Council for their support the past three years. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 3 of 13 Mayor Tierney thanked the band for their contribution to the community and congratulated them on the honor of performing at the Minnesota Orchestra Hall. Approval of Agenda Mayor Tierney added reports on the City's water supply and Music in Plymouth as item No's. 9.1 and 9.2 respectively under Reports and Staff Recommendations. Motion was made b the Consent Agenda and seconded by Councilmember all members voting in favor, the motion City Manager Johnson reported that bids were opened on July 9 for item No. 6.12, and staff has provided a revised staff report outlining the bids received as well as the recommendation to approve the lowest qualified bidder. Motion was made by Councilmember to seconded by Councihnember items: 6.01) Minutes from Special Council Meeting of June 26 and Regular Council Meeting of June 26. 6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements for the Period Ending June 29, 2001 Res2001-286). 6.03) Resolution Approving Land Use Guide Plan Amendments for the City of Plymouth for Several Properties located throughout the City to Achieve Consistency between the Land Use Guide Plan and the Zoning Ordinance Map (2001042 — Res2001- 287), an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to Classify Certain Land Consistent with the Guide Plan Classification in the Comprehensive Plan (2001042 — Ord2001-23), and a Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning of Certain Land Consistent with the Guide Plan Classification in the Comprehensive Plan (2001042 — Res2001-288). 6.04) Resolution Approving 2001 Tobacco License for Abe's Tobacco, 16605 County Road 24, #103 (Res2001-289). 6.05) Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract for Rottlund Homes for Phase 1 of "The Reserve" for Property located West of I-494 and North of the Canadian Pacific Railroad (20092-F — Res2001-290). 6.06) Resolution Adopting a Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bond Financing Policy Res2001-291). Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 4 of 13 6.07) Resolution Approving a Variance for Impervious Surface Coverage in the Shoreland Management Overlay District and a Variance to the Side Yard Setback to Permit the Construction of a Garage and Living Space Addition for Nancy Mack on Property located at 10140 26th Avenue North (2001045 — Res2001-292). 6.08) Resolution Approving a Variance to allow a 6.1 -foot Side Yard Setback to Rebuild an Existing Garage on Property located at 1450 Larch Lane North (2001050- Res2001-293). 6.09) Resolution Approving a Lot Division for Ted Kemna/Schoell & Madson, Inc. to create Two Lots from Lot 1, Block 2, Walnut Grove Pond, 3380 Troy Lane North 2001058 — Res2001-294). 6.10) Approval of expenditure of $109,658.04 by the I-494 Corridor Commission for services from LJR, Inc. for calendar year 2001 and a Resolution Approving I-494 Corridor Commission Dues Increase (Res2001-295). 6.11) Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a Service Agreement with North Hennepin Mediation Program Inc. for 2001 (Res2001-296). 6.12) Resolution Awarding Bid for 2001 Major Street Mill and Overlay Improvements 1020 — Res2001-297). 6.13.1) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report for Street Lighting in the Plum Tree East 6th Addition (Res2001-298), and a Resolution Receiving Report and Ordering project for Street Lighting in the Plum Tree East 6th Addition (Res2001-299). 6.13.2) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report for Street Lighting in the Parkers Lake Shores (Res2001-300), and a Resolution Receiving Report and Ordering project for Street Lighting in the Parkers Lake Shores Res2001-301). 6.13.3) Resolution Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Report for Street Lighting for The Reserve (Res2001-302), and a Resolution Receiving Report and Ordering project for Street Lighting for The Reserve (Res2001-303). Councilmember Black registered a no vote for item No. 6.07. Councilmember Slavik asked why the Engineer's estimate changed on the revised staff report for item No. 6.12. Public Works Director Faulkner replied the engineer's estimate was modified due to incorporating additional field inspection costs. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 5 of 13 Public Hearings There were no Public Hearings scheduled. General Business 8.1) Installation of Children's Playground on Environmental Park Property Park and Recreation Director Blank reported on a proposed playground on the Environmental Park Property. The Environmental Park serves the neighborhood bounded by County Road 9 on the south, Schmidt Lake Road on the north, Fernbrook Lane on the west, and I-494 on the east. He stated this property was acquired by the City as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan in 1984. The Council previously authorized staff to identify a new location for a park which would replace two previous parks. Currently, the closest playground to this site is more than six blocks away, but with construction of a new playground, there would only be a three -block walk for residents. He stated staff sent letters to adjacent neighborhoods to this site for their comments, and they were invited to Park and Recreation Advisory Commission's (PRAC) meetings where this item was discussed. Based on their comments, the residents were invited to a March PRAC meeting. Due to inclement weather, they tabled action until the May meeting so they could review and walk the site. He explained that PRAC considered three options which were to not construct a playground at this time, proceed with the recommended site, or consider more of a northern or southern site. After reviewing the site, PRAC recommends constructing the playground at the proposed location. Park and Recreation Director Blank illustrated the areas more to the north and south and explained why those areas aren't recommended due to the removal of trees that would be necessary as well as being secluded and away from residential neighborhoods. Councilmember Harstad asked what is the coverage area goal for a neighborhood park. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied neighborhood parks are intended to be walked to or biked to, usually within a six -block area. He added no trees would need to be removed for the proposed location of the playground, and the playground would be located approximately 310' away from the closest Fernbrook Manor townhome. He noted that the proposed location of the playground would be located on property that was dedicated by the Fernbrook Townhome development. Mayor Tierney noticed the steep slope leading down to the location and asked if that could be flattened out. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied there would be controlled berming around the play area, and the play area itself would be flattened out. In addition, the proposed trails leading to the play area would be graded and handicap accessible. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 6 of 13 Community Development Director Hurlburt stated there could be a future application for a residential development that would be located north of the proposed location for the playground, and more than likely, there would also be a trail access from that development to the playground. Superintendent of Parks Peterson stated there is an existing road from the Fluidyne property north of this site that would be utilized for the trail. He also stated that very few trees would need to be removed. Park and Recreation Director Blank reported there would be a satellite bathroom facility at this playground similar to other neighborhood parks. However, there wouldn't be any parking facilities for the proposed site which is the situation for the majority of the City's neighborhood parks. Shirley Galvin, 14000 44th Place North, Unit 2, representing Fernbrook Manor Homeowners Association, stated the residents of their development are opposed to the proposed location of the playground. This playground would affect the wildlife in the area, reduce their property values, and create more noise in the area. She explained that when they purchased their homes, the builder stated that this area would be left in its natural state and not be developed. The end units even paid more for their units in order to be closer to the wildlife area. They've always felt very fortunate to be in such close proximity to a natural/wildlife area, and they would support improving the trail system in order that other residents could see the area. She stated the proposed playground would be of no benefit to their development as no one has children. Therefore, she suggested locating the playground closer to the Savannah Development who would utilize the park. She asked how close the trail would be from their end buildings on the east. Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied that they are unable to determine the exact location of the trail until a surveyor reviews the area. Upon preliminary review by staff, it appears that the trail would be located approximately 40 feet from the closest townhome building. Mayor Tierney asked what type of trail would be constructed from the Savannah development to the playground. Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied staff proposes a bituminous trail from their development to the swamp. Park and Recreation Director Blank added that the trails to the playground would either be bituminous or contain crushed rock so residents with bikes and strollers could access the park. Councilmember Johnson asked what type of housing surrounds Turtle Lake Park. Superintendent of Parks Peterson replied the majority of the homes are townhomes, and there have been no issues for these units regarding their close proximity to the neighborhood park. Sara Seltz, 4800 Cheshire Lane North, representing Savannah neighborhood, stated this park is very important to their neighborhood. She explained there are 46 homes in their Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 7 of 13 development with 60 children, and 50 of those children are less than 13 years old. She stated there is no park that their development can easily access within the six -block goal of the City. Currently, their neighborhood utilizes Turtle Lake Park, Gateway Park, and Nanterre Park which is a long distance for small children. In order to access these parks, residents are forced to cross Fembrook which can be very difficult and dangerous due to the traffic. She stated the majority of the homeowners in their development were told that when they were considering purchasing lots, there would be a neighborhood park near this location. She noted that over two years ago at a neighborhood Halloween Party, residents signed a petition requesting the construction of a neighborhood park. She disagrees with the residents of the Fembrook Manor development that the location of this playground would affect the wildlife. She also noted that out of the 102 units at the Fernbrook Manor development, only three of those units would back up to the playground area. Kerry Laman, 4715 Empire Lane North, stated when they considered relocating to the City over two years ago, they liked the City's neighborhood park concept. He indicated that the developer also conveyed to them that there would be a neighborhood park in this vicinity. He stated this playground would add value to the community. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Harstad to adopt a Resolution Approving Site for Plavground in Environmental Park (Res2001- Councilmember Harstad stated neighborhood parks provide the opportunity for interaction with neighborhoods and building a sense of community. He stated this park would be well utilized, and there would also be a future housing development in this area to utilize the park. Therefore, he supports the proposed playground. Councilmember Hewitt asked if playgrounds decrease the value of adjacent properties. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied no, and usually adjacent properties have higher property values. Councilmember Hewitt stated she agrees with Councilmember Harstad, and she stated that she does not want to remove trees in order to relocate it to another area. Councilmember Johnson stated that when the trails are constructed leading to the playground, there could be concerns of adjacent residents on the increased usage of the trails. Therefore, she asked if there are any options to provide buffering, additional tree plantings, split fencing, etc. Park and Recreation Director Blank replied these options would be discussed with the adjacent residents, and he stated the City typically utilizes split rail fencing and shrubs to define the trails. There being no farther discussion and with all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 8 of 13 8.2) Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a 125 -Foot High Monopole Antenna Tower and Related Equipment Shelter at the Hamel VFW, 19020 Hamel Road 2001046) Community Development Director Hurlburt reported on the request of Ulteig Engineers for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for the installation of a 125 -foot high monopole antenna tower and related equipment shelter at the Hamel VFW, 19020 Hamel Road. The property would be leased from the Hamel VFW for this purpose. She illustrated the proposed location and stated that six personal wireless service antennas would be mounted at the top of the monopole with the purpose to fill in a weak coverage area along Highway 55 in the AT&T Wireless Service system. A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the installation of the tower and related equipment while the Variance is required to allow the monopole to be 125 feet high, where 75 feet is the maximum height specified by the Zoning Ordinance. She noted that the City of Medina is opposed to the installation of this tower, and a copy of their Resolution has been provided in the Council packet. Councilmember Stein stated one of the City of Medina's concerns is that with the construction of this tower, it would make this property more difficult to redevelop. Therefore, why wouldn't the tower be located further back into the corner of the lot? Community Development Director Hurlburt replied the proposed location shouldn't affect the redevelopment of the property. She noted that there also needs to be ample setback from Highway 55 and where it wouldn't inhibit the current use of the property. Councilmember Black stated with the proposed 125 -foot tower, there doesn't seem to be that large of gain in the area coverage. Therefore, she is not convinced that granting the approvals would be beneficial. She asked what the City's legal options are with respect to whether the requests are approved. Community Development Director Hurlburt stated the Council has until September 15 to act on the application. Julie Townsend, from Ulteig Engineers and also representing AT & T Services, stated they have provided the analysis, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, to the Council. Councihnember Stein asked what the normal coverage area is for a tower. Ms. Townsend replied for an AT&T System, with a relatively flat topography, the signal could be projected two to four miles for a 75 -foot tower. Based on their drive test analysis, a 125 -foot tower is the minimum height needed. AT&T typically couldn't utilize a 75 -foot tower. Councilmember Johnson asked if other sites were explored to fill in the gap of the coverage area. Ms. Townsend stated they considered the City's water tower, the Wayzata High School site, and another site north of Highway 55. They also considered sites in Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 9 of 13 Medina, which included the City's water tower, and the Hamel playfreld. However, the City of Medina had a moratorium for the placement of towers. Councilmember Harstad asked if the tower could be camouflaged. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied the proposed location of the tower is the least visually intrusive, and other than the color of the structure itself, the City would require a gray finish. Councilmember Black asked if they considered the Hennepin County Public Works Facility. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied that facility is two miles outside the City and would be even further to the west than the Medina water tower. Councilmember Stein asked if the Medina playfield would be a better site than the VFW site. Ms. Townsend replied no, and she noted that not all the testing was completed on that site due to the moratorium. James Lane, a Councilmember from the City of Medina, stated the City of Medina requested that the Council deny the application. He stated the proposed tower and structure would have an enormous impact on uptown Hamel — an area which Medina is trying to redevelop that consists of light commercial and residential use. He stated the current use of the VFW is non -conforming, and with the addition of a tower, it would only intensify and expand upon that non -conforming use which could make it difficult to recover the intended conforming use of that property. He stated the city's second concern is the height of the tower. The City of Plymouth's requirement is 75 feet which is why the Variance is necessary in order to increase the height to 125 feet. He has not been convinced that AT&T has totally analyzed what the coverage could be off of the City of Plymouth's water tower which is a mile east of the proposed site or the City of Medina's water tower located a mile west of the proposed site. Therefore, he requested the applicant analyze all possible sites. He acknowledged that it's presumptuous for the City of Medina to instruct the City of Plymouth on how to conduct its affairs, but there could be good exchange of ideas and good will between the two cities. He stated the City of Medina permits these kinds of structures only in commercial and industrial areas. He stated their water tower is located in an industrial area that is on the edge of the existing coverage, and the City of Medina has a 75 -foot height requirement. He noted that the City of Medina's moratorium has been lifted. Ms. Townsend explained that a radio frequency engineer studies the entire area, reviews the "dead spots," and makes a recommendation on the ultimate location to fill in the gaps of coverage. She defined their search ring in relation to this application, and she stated their search ring didn't go any further than the Hamel playfreld. All possible sites were reviewed, and the VFW site was determined to the best site. She noted that per the City's ordinance, they have to review high mile distance, or supply analysis from other sites. The City of Medina's moratorium didn't exclude the possibility of considering sites in the city, but it swayed them more to review the VFW location. She stated they have a lease agreement with the VFW. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 10 of 13 Mayor Tierney asked what the City's legal parameters are for towers. City Attorney Knutson replied there are two different sets of regulations, which are the City's ordinances and the Federal Telecommunications Act. Under the Telecommunications Act, the City couldn't enact an ordinance to prevent reasonable coverage. However, the City doesn't have to allow the applicant to locate the tower in the most economical way. The City also can't discriminate amongst the providers. The applicant needs to comply with the City's requirements for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance. He stated regarding the non -conforming use issue, the tower wouldn't be an expansion of a non- conforming use on the VFW property assuming that it was approved. Councihnember Johnson asked if there could be a plan to utilize both cities' water towers with 75 -foot antennas on each, as she is very concerned about the proposed height of the tower. City Attorney Knutson stated if the Council desired to consider an alternate plan, the City would need to hire their own radio frequency engineer to determine if two 75 - foot towers would be more feasible than one 125 -foot tower. Councilmember Johnson stated these towers are not attractive, and she is concerned that an alternate site could be recommended, which she wouldn't support, that could impact the development further into Plymouth. An alternate location could impact single family neighborhoods. City Attorney Knutson stated it may be difficult to retain a radio frequency engineer to study this, and the study could take from a few weeks up to a six months to complete with an approximate cost of $2,000. Councilmember Harstad reiterated that the application is for the VFW site, and there is a proposed lease agreement with AT&T for this site. He suggested that the Council vote on the application, and if the motion fails, hire a radio frequency engineer to prepare an analysis. He noted that if the height is reduced to 75 feet, there could be a second site identified. Motion was made by Councilmember Harstad, and seconded by Mayor Tierney, to Use Pen -nit and Variance to allow Installation of a Monopole Antenna Tower and Related Equipment Shelter for Wireless Communication Services at the Hamel VFW, 19020 Hamel Road (2001046). Councilmember Slavik asked if there could be a restriction and/or condition placed on the height of the tower. Ms. Townsend replied the recommended 125 -foot tower wasn't selected arbitrarily, but that is the minimum required for the coverage area. Councilmember Slavik stated that she is not convinced that this would be a good location for this size of a tower. She asked if it has been proven that two 75 -foot towers wouldn't accomplish their goal to fill in the coverage area. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 11 of 13 Ms. Townsend stated that two 75 -foot towers wouldn't comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance. Two 75 -foot towers also wouldn't allow for co -location like a 125 -foot tower would. Councilmember Harstad asked if AT&T is compensated by co -locators. Ms. Townsend stated it depends on the agreements, and sometimes there is a reciprocal sharing of towers with other carriers. Councilmember Black asked if the Council is able to consider the plans for the redevelopment of uptown Hamel. City Attorney Knutson replied the Council could take them into consideration. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and amend the main motion to limit the height of the tower to 75 Councilmember Slavik, to Councilmember Johnson reiterated that an alternate plan could be identified that may intrude into the western edge of Plymouth with a 75 -foot tower which she may not support. Mayor Tierney stated she wouldn't support a 75 -foot tower, as she believes it wouldn't be effective. There being no further discussion, and with all members voting against the motion but Black, the motion failed. Councilmember Johnson asked since the Council has until September 15 to act on this application, are there any options to review sites in the City of Medina now that they have lifted their moratorium. Ms. Townsend stated AT&T would not be pleased with that decision as they have met all the conditions of the City's ordinance and provided all the required documentation. She explained it would be at least another six months to engineer another site, and more than likely, they would be presenting the same proposal before the Council. Mayor Tierney wondered if there are any structures or locations in the City of Medina that the applicant could utilize since their water tower wouldn't be feasible. She asked Mr. Lane what other area would be available between the City of Medina's water tower and the City of Plymouth's water tower, which the applicant could utilize. Mr. Lane reiterated that he isn't convinced that their water tower was fully analyzed. Mayor Tierney asked if AT&T could review the water tower site. Ms. Townsend replied it would be very difficult with a deadline of September 15. She also stated that the City of Medina's height requirement is 75 feet. If it was determined that a 150 -foot tower would be needed at the playfreld, the City of Medina probably wouldn't approve it. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 12 of 13 Motion was made by Councilmember Johnson, and seconded by Councilmember E to postpone this item to August 28 in order to provide opportunities for the City of Medina, AT&T, and the Citv of Plvmouth to review other options. Councilmember Hewitt asked what would be accomplished by postponing this issue. She stated the City couldn't require AT&T to perform further studies. Community Development Director Hurlburt stated there is background information that the radio frequency engineer prepared which could be assembled for the Council for their review. In addition, the City of Medina's zoning map could be reviewed for possible alternate sites. Councilmember Stein suggested that the Council might want to review its ordinance at a Study Session regarding the 75 -foot height requirement and the basis for that. He asked if the City of Medina would work with AT&T in determining a suitable location. Mr. Lane replied that wouldn't occur on the City of Medina's own initiative as that is AT&T's responsibility to prepare an application for submittal to the city. Councilmember Stein asked if the City of Medina could assist in locating a site and/or suggest a site for AT&T. Mr. Lane stated that he couldn't represent the City of Medina. However, he would be willing to communicate to their staff what is being requested. Councilmember Harstad stated that he supports the motion and allowing extra time for the City of Medina to work with Plymouth and AT&T. Ms. Townsend reiterated that their search ring for coverage included Medina and Plymouth, and she asked how is it any different for her to request a 125 -foot tower from the City of Medina. Motion was made b, call the question. With and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to in favor, the motion carried. The Council then voted on the motion to postpone the item to August 28. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Adopted City Council Minutes Regular Meeting of July 10, 2001 Page 13 of 13 Reports and Recommendations 9.1) City's Water Supply Public Works Director Faulkner stated that due to the dry conditions, the City could be experiencing a water shortage. Therefore, staff is in the process of distributing a flier to all residents explaining the odd/even water restriction in the City. He stated the odd/even water restriction is a standard procedure that is in effect from May through September. He indicated that the City is not in a critical situation, but it is a major concern. He noted that there are two watermain connections to the City of Maple Grove at Quinwood Lane and near Lake Camelot Estates which have been opened. Councilmember Harstad asked if the odd/even water restriction actually saves water or levels out the demand. Public Works Director Faulkner replied it levels out the critical peaks. Councilmember Hewitt asked how staff addresses those businesses who have underground sprinkling systems, and they are sprinkling the streets quite a bit of the time. Public Works Director Faulkner stated staff contacts the managers of those businesses and request that they adhere to the odd/even water restriction and adjust their sprinkler heads. 9.2) Music in Plymouth Mayor Tierney commended staff, the Plymouth Civic League and the Jim Willis family for an excellent Music in Plymouth event this year. She requested that letters be sent on behalf of the Council to everyone who was involved in organizing this year's event. Adjournment Motion was made by Councilmember adjourn the meeting at 10:13 p.m. k, and seconded by Councilmember Black, to members voting in favor, the motion carried. A&&- , ') Sandra R. Paulson, City Clerk