Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 09-24-2002Adopted Minutes Regular Council Meeting September 24, 2002 Mayor Tierney called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on September 24, 2002. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Tierney, Councilmembers Hewitt, Slavik, Black, Harstad, Johnson, and Stein. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager Ahrens, Fire Captain Hurr, Community Development Director Hurlburt, Public Works Director Faulkner, Park and Recreation Director Blank, Police Chief Gerdes, Building Official Ryan, Planning Supervisor Senness, Solid Waste Coordinator Hageman, Recreation Supervisor Greupner, City Forester Buck, City Attorney Knutson, and City Clerk Paulson. Plymouth Forum Karen Chesebrough, 11255 36th Place North, stated she is a volunteer mediator for the North Hennepin Mediation Program. She requested that the Council consider maintaining and/or increasing their contribution to this program. Mayor Tierney thanked Ms. Chesebrough for addressing the Council and stated that the Council would be discussing the social service agencies' budgets prior to final approval of the budget in December. Kay, with Home Free Community Programs, 4309 Kilmer Lane, invited the Council to attend a vigil for domestic violence on October 6 at 6:00 p.m. at Parkers Lake Pavillion. She stated this vigil is for women and children who have lost their lives due to domestic violence. Councilmembers Heweitt, Johnson, and Black stated they would be attending the event. Councilmember Johnson suggested that notice of this event be on Channel 16. Councilmember Hewitt thanked the Police Department for actively working with this organization. Presentations and Public Information Announcements 4.01) Business Environmental Champion Awards Solid Waste Coordinator Hageman announced that Honeywell Solid State Electronic Center and Progress Casting Group Inc. are the 2002 Business Environmental Champion Award winners. Awards were presented to the recipients by Mayor Tierney and the Council. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 2 of 14 4.02) Plymouth on Parade Presentation Recreation Supervisor Greupner reported on the 5th Annual Plymouth on Parade and other activities to be held on October 5. 4.03) Planting Plymouth Proud Awards City Forester Buck announced this year's Planting Plymouth Proud Awards. Mayor Tierney and the Council presented the Children's Award to G & F Environmental (Abbey Glaze, Jacob Fantel, et al) for the American Spirit Garden at Parkers Lake Playfield, the Steward's Award to Ruth Buezis on behalf of the Plymouth Covenant Church, 4300 Vicksburg Lane, and the Mayor's Award was presented to Tim Scott, 10300 27th Avenue North. 4.04) Teen Concert Police Chief Gerdes reported on the Teen Concert to be held on October 12 from 2:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Hilde Performance Center. He stated the Teens Driving Safe NHTSA Grant project would be funding this event along with Target Corporation. He stated high school students from Hopkins, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Osseo, Robbinsdale, and Wayzata school districts are invited to the free concert, and the concert would be a chemical free event and would address safe driving concerns. Councilmember Johnson thanked the Police Department and others for coordinating this event, and she requested that a notice of this concert be on Channel 16. 4.05) CONECT Collaborative Kristina Korsmo, Coordinator for CONECT Collaborative, discussed their program. She stated that their organization has been in existence for seven years. She stated their organization reaches out to financially struggling families and children who reside in six apartment complexes in the City. She thanked the City for their continued support of their program. Approval of Agenda Councilmember Harstad requested to add a brief report on municipal bonds as item No. 9.1 under Reports and Staff Recommendations. Councilmember Hewitt requested to add the scheduling of future Study Sessions as item No. 9.2 under Reports and Staff Recommendations. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Slavik, to gpprove the amended agenda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 3 of 14 Consent Agenda Mayor Tierney asked if there were any additions, corrections, or deletions to be made to the Consent Agenda. Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to approve the amended Consent Agenda, which included the following items: 6.01) Regular Council Meetings of August 27 and September 9, Special Council Meeting of September 3. 6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements for the Period ending September 14, 2002 Res2002-425). 6.03) Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an Expansion, Conditional Use Permit for Height, Interim Use Permit for reduced Parking, and a Fire Lane Variance at Peace Lutheran Church located at 3695 County Road 10.1 (2002099 — Res2002-426). 6.04) Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow Operation of an Automobile Touch Up Paint Business and a Variance for Parking Setback for Property located at 9625 36'' Avenue North (2002106 — Res2002-427). 6.05) Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract for ZB Construction, Inc. for Sunrise Marsh" Addition for Property located South of 34th Avenue and East of Pilgrim Lane 2002012-F — Res2002-428), and a Resolution Adopting Assessments for Watermain Area (2036 Res2002-429). 6.06.1) Resolution Awarding Bid for County Road 101 Landscape Improvements Project (9005 Res2002-430). 6.06.2) Resolution Awarding Bid for Traffic Control System and Turn Lane for Peony Lane/Old Rockford Road (2009 — Res2002-431). 6.07) Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment for 2002 Street Reconstruction, Schmidt Lake Area (2001— Res2002-432), Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment for Nathan Lane/Lancaster Lane Street Improvements (10 14 — Res2002-434), Resolution Ordering Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2002 Street Reconstruction, Schmidt Lake Area (2001 — Res2002-433), and a Resolution Ordering Hearing on Proposed Assessment for Nathan Lane/Lancaster Lane Street Improvements (10 14 — Res2002-435). 6.08.1) Resolution Reducing Required Financial Guarantee for Rockford Glen Addition (94155 Res2002-436). Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 4 of 14 6.08.2) Resolution Reducing Required Financial Guarantee for Jordan's Ridge (2002004 — Res2002-437). 6.09) Resolution Amending the Development Contract for the Reserve Addition (20092 — Res2002-438). 6.10) Resolution Approving Winter Trails Activity Report (Res2002-439). 6.11) Resolution Approving Change Order No. 2 for Plymouth Boulevard Median Improvements (2003 — Res2002-440). 6.12) Resolution Renaming Mud Lake Park (Res2002-441). 6.13) Resolution Approving 2002-2003 Membership Dues in League of Minnesota Cities Res2002-442). 6.14.1) Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment for 2002 Removal and Destruction of Diseased Trees, Roll 1 (Res2002-443), and a Resolution Ordering Public Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2002 Removal and Destruction of Diseased Trees, Roll 1 (Res2002-444). 6.14.2) Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment for 2002 Weed Eradication and Destruction, Roll 1 (Res2002-445), and a Resolution Ordering Public Hearing on Proposed Assessment for 2002 Weed Eradication and Destruction, Roll 1 (Res2002-446). 6.15) Resolution Approving Wetland Replacement Plan for Cascades Development (2002058 — Res2002-447). Councilmember Hewitt thanked the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission for making the recommendation to rename Mud Lake Park to Lake Camelot Park (item No. 6.12). Councilmember Johnson congratulated Peace Lutheran Church on their proposed expansion item No. 6.03). She asked if this addition would affect relocating the watermain. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied staff has been reviewing the location of the watermain to make sure it's in the best location in relationship to the requirements of the tree preservation ordinance. Councilmember Harstad stated regarding item No. 6.11, the Council has previously approved dedicating the City portion of tax forfeited land proceeds to the affordable housing fund. He asked whether tree restoration funds could also be dedicated to the affordable housing fund. Mayor Tierney stated that staff should research if this is possible. J Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 5 of 14 The motion carried to approve the amended Consent Agenda. Public Hearings There were no public hearings). General Business 8.1) Consider Resolution and Order of Abatement of Hazardous Excavations located on the "Little Peninsula" of Medicine Lake Building Official Ryan reported on the proposed Resolution and order for the abatement of three hazardous excavations located on the "Little Peninsula" of Medicine Lake (PIN #26-118-22-44- 0006). He stated that James Touve is the owner of the property, and he sold the property on which the Candlewood Suites (formerly "Homestead Village") extended -stay hotel has begun construction. Wetland mitigation for the hotel site was to occur on the Little Peninsula, which was owned by Homestead Village. He noted that Mr. Touve received ownership of the peninsula property as part of the payment for the hotel site. He stated on August 5, 1998, the Council approved the Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Interim Use Permit, and Variances for Homestead Village for property located south of Highway 55, west of Highway 169, and east of Nathan Lane. He stated condition No. 10 of the resolution states that "any existing junk materials or debris located on the `Little Peninsula" shall be removed from the property and disposed of properly in accordance with City Ordinances." In addition, the Council adopted a Resolution whereby accepting the donation of the Little Peninsula for park purposes, subject to conditions. Condition (b.) of this Resolution states that all hazards on the property shall be cleaned up." He stated after these Resolutions were adopted, the developer decided to transfer ownership of the site to Mr. Touve and not donate it to: the City. He indicated as the wetland mitigation was under construction in the fall of 2001, the contractor performing the site grading for the developer asked City staff whether the existing concrete foundation walls on the site could be buried in the fill. Staff informed the contractor that the foundation could not be buried and should be removed. At about the same time, Mr. Touve became aware of this, and indicated that he did not want the foundation material to be buried, and that in his opinion, the foundation systems were considered debris and therefore should be removed as a requirement of the mitigation. The developer of the property felt that removal of the foundations was not covered as part of the required mitigation cleanup efforts, therefore was not willing to do so because of the additional cost. He stated on October 23, 2001, staff received correspondence from Jeffrey Mastro (attorney for the developer) indicating that in his opinion the developer is not authorized nor required to remove them from the "Little Peninsula" property by the Council resolution. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 6 of 14 On November 2001, he stated he conducted a site inspection and found three concrete foundations of former buildings that were destroyed, demolished or removed. He found that the foundations in their present condition constitute "hazardous excavations" as defined by Minnesota Statutes in that they represent a danger if someone were to fall into one. Numerous photographs of the site have been taken. There is evidence that the property has been used by the public on foot and by snowmobile. He stated he notified Mr. Touve of the inspection, and Mr. Touve requested a letter documenting the findings. On December 11, 20001 he sent a certified letter to Mr. Touve requesting that he abate the hazardous condition within 60 days, consistent with the City's procedure for addressing such hazards. After the letter was sent, Mr. Touve appeared before the Council on December 18, 2001 to express concerns regarding the clean-up efforts of the wetland mitigation work occurring on his property. He felt that there was some discussion by the Council at their meeting of August 5, 1998 regarding the concrete foundations. He stated in addition to the Resolutions, staff researched the Council minutes and found no reference, intent or discussion relative to the foundations. City Attorney Knutson was requested to review the record on this matter to determine whether the Council's action required the hotel developer to remove the foundations. He concludes that the foundations are not "junk" or "debris." The foundations constitute a hazardous excavation under the law, and the property owner is required to remove the hazard. He stated on January 28, 2002, he received correspondence from Mr. Touve requesting an extension of time to remove the three existing foundations from his property. On February 1, 2002, he sent Mr. Touve a certified letter granting him an extension to remove the existing foundations from the property by July 1, 2002. He stated the requested action is consistent with the procedure set forth by Minnesota Statute for hazardous excavations. He noted that an inspection of the property performed on August 12, 2002 revealed no physical change to the existing condition of the three abandoned foundation wall systems since the initial inspection of the property in November 2001. He stated the next step is for the Council to adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Attorney to serve the order and to proceed with enforcement in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, which would allow the City to demolish and remove the foundation/floor systems, fill in the open excavations and assess all related costs against the property. He noted that it wouldn't be until after a freeze late this fall before Mr. Touve could proceed with the demolition due to the condition of the ground from the heavy rainfalls that were received this past summer. Councilmember Harstad asked if the hazardous material could be crushed and disposed of on site. Building Official Ryan replied there couldn't be any reduced rock in greater diameter than 12". In addition, it would be prudent to remove the material from the site in case there would be any future development of the site where the materials could affect the stability of the soil. Community Development Director Hurlburt referred to correspondence dated September 23, 2002 from Mr. Touve to the Council whereby Mr. Touve is requesting that the crushed Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 7 of 14 hazardous material be left on site, which would be used for a future road base. She stated the City couldn't allow him to use the hazardous material for a road. Therefore, staff is recommending that the material be removed from the site. Building Official Ryan noted that the cost of demolition is less in the winter months. The material would be hauled to a construction and demolition landfill. Mayor Tierney asked if it would be feasible to request Mr. Touve to remove the foundations rather than temporarily fence the area, and if so, what would occur if there would be a lot of rain and flooding problems. Building Official Ryan replied it would be less costly now rather than at a later date. He stated his concern is that the materials are removed in a timely fashion. Staff has tried to work with Mr. Touve, but there has been no progress. Mayor Tierney stated it's important for the Council to include a date whereby the work should be completed. City Attorney Knutson stated if Mr. Touve disagrees with the order, he has a right to file an answer, and the judge would determine whether or not the City proceeds with the order. He noted that it could take up to 90 days before the City would have an answer from the court. Councilmember Harstad stated it appears that according to Resolution No. 98-474, the City owns the Little Peninsula. Community Development Director Hurlburt stated there has been some confusion over the City's interest in this property. At one point, the Homestead Village company had discussed conveying the Little Peninsula to the City. The City agreed they would accept the property under certain conditions. The Homestead Village company preferred to not do the legal work so instead of conveying the property to the City, they conveyed it to Mr. Touve in consideration for other property that they acquired from Mr. Touve. Councilmember Black asked if Mr. Touve would need to fill in the area after the foundations are removed. Building Official Ryan replied yes. He noted that there is a drop of seven feet to the concrete floor of the foundations. He is unsure if there is fill on the site to assist in filling that site. He stated the bridge would need to be reinforced for access to the site. Any equipment travelling to the site would need to be relatively small unless it's during the winter months. Councilmember Black asked if there are any springs in the lake in that area where there could be difficulty in freezing. Building Official Ryan replied if the City went to bid with construction contractors, the contractors would check the site and note if there would need to be additional reinforcement. Mr. Touve stated he has been in contact with various City departments on least 10 different occasions this past summer to discuss his problems as well as possible solutions to his dilemma. He stated access to the site is very difficult as the bridge over the creek crossing consists of four 5 x 5 beams that are 12 feet long. He stated something would need to be constructed so the crossing could be made as one can't cross over this area without a temporary bridge. He stated Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 8 of 14 regarding frost, there could be 11 to 12 feet of frost in a street without snow cover. In a wooded area where there are leaves and sod and a foot of snow, there is no frost no matter how cold it is outside. The leaves and snow protect the ground from freezing. If there were to be a mild winter, there would be no frost. He stated by recognizing this problem and by including the foundations and mitigation, he desires to introduce a possible solution to this whole problem. His contractor has indicated that they can perform both jobs without a lot of cost. The contractor could bring in the least amount of equipment which would be a crusher on tracks. This equipment could be backed in and then used to crush the concrete which would then be used for fill, roadbed, trails, etc. He stated if the City would require him to remove the foundations, there would be a minimum of 100 truckloads of material that would be hauled from the site. This would break up the frost. He questioned how this could be accomplished without some exorbitant cost (truck and machine time). He stated the mitigation contractor was given permission to bury the concrete at higher ground; however, he doesn't know if that had changed. He stated he's at a loss unless he can keep the material on the island (crush it, level it off, and cover with dirt). He has discussed his situation with a crushing contractor, and they agree with him. There could be a tremendous problem if they try to move the materials by trucks. He illustrated recent photographs the site as well as the site when it was covered with snow in November 2001. He stated these foundations are not an improvement to the property as noted in staff's report. They are debris. Community Development Director Hurlburt stated the proposed Resolution doesn't address debris. The Resolution addresses the foundations that are attached to the ground that fall under the definition of hazardous materials according to State Statutes. Mr. Touve stated the debris could be utilized on a stockpile basis. He would propose that at the end of the driveway, where there is a turn around, he would place the material there and build it up. The material could be used for backfill, dirt, or other use. The material would have the appearance of crushed rock or concrete. Councilmember Harstad stated residents have asked him why the Little Peninsula isn't park property. Mr. Touve stated if the City hadn't placed such strict conditions on Homestead Village, it would be a park. He stated he has no intention of building more than three single-family homes on the Little Peninsula site. He stated it would difficult to construct two high profile homes on this site. He indicated that in the future, he would need a road to access the site, but he isn't requesting that immediately. Mayor Tierney asked if Mr. Touve would be allowed a road and if this property would be allowed to be developed. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied the wetlands would need to be filled as well as part of Medicine Lake, and without a bridge to go over the waterway, there would be no way to access the site. Without a bridge, this property wouldn't be buildable. She stated if currently there was a request for a Building Permit, the City couldn't Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 9 of 14 issue a permit due to City access requirements. She added that it would be economically difficult to develop this property. Mayor Tierney asked Mr. Touve if he has considered giving this property to the City. Mr. Touve replied he is unsure. He stated the City has indicated that this property would be difficult to develop because of the wetlands, but the City has proposed walkways in the wetland areas of the Northwest Greenway project. He added that there is one quarter of a mile from the high ground to his property, and 600 feet of that is less than one foot from the water level. Therefore, it is impossible to haul the material. Building Official Ryan stated with the three foundations and two of them being partial, he estimates there would be 12 to 15 truckloads of material to be hauled. He reiterated that a demolition contractor would reinforce the access to the site. He noted that the mitigation contractor had equipment on the site previously. Mayor Tierney asked if the barge is a hazard. Building Official Ryan replied he hasn't seen the barge as his purpose on the site was to review the three foundations. Mr. Touve stated the barge and foundations were to be removed by Homesteaad Village as part of the approval by the Council. This was a condition of the permit for the hotel project. He stated staff has provided a situation which is new to him, that junk and debris removal was a condition of the City accepting the Little Peninsula as a donation. If this is true, why wasn't it included in the permit fee if the material was hazardous. Councilmember Black asked why the erection of a fence wouldn't be satisfactory. Building Official Ryan replied he has spoken with Mr. Touve over the course of a year, and he encouraged Mr. Touve to fence off the area. He stated with both of his visits last winter and this fall, there is evidence that people are using the peninsula. He stated fencing is only a temporary option, and the City has the option of abating hazardous excavations under Minnesota Statutes. Councilmember Harstad commented that he would like to see the barge removed. He asked if a structure could be rebuilt on an existing foundation that hasn't been damaged. City Attorney Knutson replied no. He added that there needs to be public access to the site. Councilmember Johnson recalled that when the Council previously discussed this in 1998, there was a concern of the City acquiring property where there would be hazardous materials. If Homestead Village would convey the property to the City, they would need to remove the hazardous materials so that the taxpayers wouldn't be responsible for that cost. Councilmember Johnson asked if this process for the abatement of the hazardous materials is consistent for other properties in the City where there has been destruction that has taken place on the property. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied yes. She stated staff works with the property owner in abating the situation, and if the property owner doesn't abate the situation, the City seeks the court order process. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 10 of 14 Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Myor Tierney, to adopt a Resolution Adopting and Approving Order for Removal of Hazardous Excavation at PIN # 26- 118-22-44-0006 (Res2002-448). Councilmember Johnson asked as this process progresses, how are trees and wetlands affected on the peninsula. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied there is a parallel process occurring with the hotel development. That development might sit idle for the next six months as there is a dispute between the developer and the contractor. This is the reason why staff is advocating for the removal of the foundations only. Staff has reached the conclusion that tying it to the wetland mitigation for that site could leave the hazardous materials in place for another year. Councilmember Slavik asked if the City is aware of a hazardous situation and doesn't take action to correct the site, could the City be liable for anything that occurs at the site. City Attorney Knutson replied that is a possibility. Councilmember Stein stated it would be very difficult and expensive to remove the foundations as well as being detrimental to the land if the work would be performed now versus the winter months. Motion was made by Councilmember Stein, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to amend i the main motion to enforce a deadline of February 15, 2003 to complete the abatement of hazardous materials and that the area be fenced. City Attorney Knutson suggested that the Council consider adopting the Resolution as presented and then state that the City wouldn't retain a contractor to go on site prior to February 15, 2003. Councilmember Stein stated he would support that. Community Development Director Hurlburt suggested that the Council define a time period as to when the fence should be constructed. Friendly amendments were made to the motion that the fence needs to be constructed within 30 days as well as no trespassing signs erected on the peninsula. City Attorney Knutson added the security fence would need to be deemed secure by the Building Official. Mr. Touve reiterated that he fails to see where the City can prevent him from crushing the concrete and burying the materials on site. He stated utilizing a crusher is very expensive. He would like to address the hazardous conditions, and then allow the process to work itself out. He stated the mitigation project may not be completed this winter. He stated he is unsure how he could meet the Council's deadline of February 15, 2003. He would like to remove the foundations before they are frozen. The crushing could then occur this winter. There would be a crushed product that would remain on the peninsula. He stated there would be a disruption no matter what kind of equipment is used. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 11 of 14 Councilmember Johnson asked Mr. Touve why he hasn't resolved the hazardous conditions. Mr. Touve replied he has been in contact with the City's Building Department on numerous occasions, and due to how the mitigation project was proceeding, he just let it go. Mr. Touve stated he discussed this matter with his attorney, and under the definition of hazardous excavation in the State Statutes, he can protect it. Motion was made by Councilmember Stein, and seconded by Councilmember Black, to call the question on the amended amendment. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. The Council voted on the amended amendment and with all members voting in favor, the motion carried. The Council then voted on the amended main motion and with all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Councilmember Johnson stated this property was a "buyer beware" situation, and she reiterated that the Council was previously concerned about the hazardous materials on the site when the previous property owner indicated that they would convey the property to the City. Mayor Tierney asked if Mr. Touve could crush the concrete. Community Development Director Hurlburt replied it all depends on what Mr. Touve intends to do with the material and how much material there is. She stated there could be site plan and/or interim use permit approvals that would be necessary. 8.2) Review Membership in the I-494 Corridor Commission Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to take no action and remain a member of the I-494 Corridor Commission. Councilmember Black asked if any of the member cities would have the option of not participating in MOVE. Planning Manager Senness replied no, as a vote of the entire Commission approved the agreement. Councilmember Black voiced her concerns about the City participating in a Commission that appears to not really address the concerns of the City. She stated members of the Commission must understand that the City has no other mass transit options other than busses. Councilmember Slavik added that after discussing this item at the Study Session conducted earlier this evening, she wouldn't want to affect any of the City businesses. She reiterated that lobbied improvements to I-494 are further south from the City, and MOVE doesn't appear to be addressing the City's concerns. However, she would continue to monitor the Commission's meeting minutes, and if a dues increase would be proposed in the future, she would request the Council discuss this issue again. Councilmember Johnson stated she is encouraged that the Twin West Chamber of Commerce and the City's business community are participating. She would support the City's membership for another year. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 12 of 14 Councilmember Harstad commented that until the Legislature increases the gas tax, there would not be the funding to make improvements to the infrastructure. There being no further discussion and with all members voting in favor, the motion carried. 8.3) Review Membership in the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council (NHHSC) Assistant City Manager Ahrens reported at the Study Session conducted on August 13, Hennepin County Commissioner Mary Tambornino offered to host a meeting with Mayor Tierney, other City and County officials, as well as Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, to discuss the County's intent with respect to human service delivery. She stated the meeting was not held due to difficulties in scheduling. However, a meeting was conducted with Councilmembers Johnson and Hewitt and Commissioners Steele and Steinglein in attendance. The County Commissioners provided their perspectives on human service delivery and suggested that the City needs to consider whether NWHHSC is still a good fit for the City. She discussed sections of the staff report and indicated that the Council may want to consider an alternative by working with a smaller group of cities that are similar to Plymouth and do some collaboration to determine what the human service needs are. She recommended that the Council withdraw from the NWHHSC, authorize payment to NWHHSC in the amount of $3,281 for the period through September 30, and allocate up to $1,500 in order to continue the activities of the Plymouth seniors in the Senior Leadership Council. Councilmember Hewitt provided the history on the NWHHSC in the community. She stated she contacted PRISM and Interfaith Outreach to receive their comments on the effectiveness of NWHHSC in the City. They indicated that NWHHSC is not the agency that is bringing the community together with social service issues. She noted that the NWHHSC does a great job with the other member cities; however, those cities do not have the same social service issues as the City. She requested there be more collaboration with other cities that are similar to Plymouth. Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to adopt a Resolution Withdrawing from the Joint and Cooperative Agreement with Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, Inc. (Res2002-449). Councilmember Harstad stated he couldn't support the motion if human service agency efforts were diminished, which could feasibly lead to a barrier to expanded affordable housing programming. Councilmember Hewitt disagreed and stated that the City's HRA, affordable housing advocates, and non-profit agencies work on affordable housing. Councilmember Johnson voiced her support with the City working collaboratively with other cities that are similar to Plymouth. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 13 of 14 Councilmember Stein agreed with Councilmember Johnson, and he thanked Councilmember Hewitt for bringing this issue to the Council's attention. Councilmember Hewitt reiterated that no direct services would be lost by withdrawing from the NWHHSC agreement, as they are only a planning agency. There being no further discussion and with all Councilmembers voting in favor, the motion carried. Reports and Staff Recommendations 9.1) Municipal Bonds Councilmember Harstad illustrated the trend line on municipal bond rates which are currently below 4%. He noted that the City has a Aaa credit rating and at some point, the Council needs to consider bonding for affordable housing and road reconstruction. 9.2) Schedule Future Study Sessions Councilmembers Stein, Johnson, and Black requested that land trust and related. issues be moved up to the pending Study Session list. Community Development Director Hurlburt added that theaHRAwouldbediscussingthisitemattheirmeetinginNovember. Councilmembers Stein, Black, and Mayor Tierney requested that septic system drainage issues be added to the pending Study Session list. The Council removed from the pending Study Session list the options for expansion of the lower level of the Plymouth Creek Center, and requested it be placed on a future Regular Council Meeting agenda. Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by Councilmember Slavik, to schedule the following Study Sessions: 1. October 8 at 5:30 p.m. (Ives/Jonquil drainage issues and lift station in Autumn Hills) 2. October 22 at 5:30 p.m. (Shingle Creek and Elm Creek's Second Generation Watershed Management Plans) 3. November 19 at 7:00 p.m. (continuance of Public Safety Advisory Board, firefighter policy, weed mowing and assessment ordinance, Metropolitan Council Blueprint 2030, and policy for fallen trees) With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Adjournment Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Hewitt, to adjourn the meetingat 9:58 p.m. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Adopted Council Minutes Regular Meeting of September 24, 2002 Page 14 of 14 S`andra R. Paulson, City Clerk