Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 04-18-1988I CITY OF PLYMOUTH A G E N D A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 18, 1988 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. FORUM 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION 3. ROLL CALL 4. PRESENTATION - Certificates of Appreciation to members of Kani Win Ga Camp Fire Horizon group 5. PROCLAMATION - "Be Kind To Animals Week" May 1 - 7, 1988 6. MINUTES - Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council meeting of April 4, 1988 7. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Establishment of Economic Development District No. 5 and TIF District No. 5-1 B. Establishment of Economic Development District No. 6 and TIF District No. 6-1 C. Establishment of Amended Economic Development TIF District No. 1-5 D. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District No. 3-2 E. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District No. 4-3 F. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District No. 3-3 G. Vacation of easements, in Outlot 0, Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from BLH Development Co. to reduce assessments for curb and gutter on Northwest Blvd. for Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition B. Petition from Wayzata School District 284 for public improvement project for Willow Meadows Addition (southwest corner C.R. 9 and Vicksburg Lane) C. Approve Payment No. 4 and final for Gleason Lake Drive trail improvements, Project No. 602 D. Receive preliminary engineering report and order project for Dunkirk Meadows Addition, Project No. 817 E. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Fernbrook Woods Addition utility improvements, Project No. 720 F. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Carlson Center 8th Addition improvements, Project 751, adding sewer and water services for Suomala Addition, Project No. 718 G. City of Plymouth. Final Plat and Development Contract for "Dunkirk Meadows" located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North (87097) H. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Reductions: 1) Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st Avenue North (87092) 2) Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st Avenue North (87092) I. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Release: 1) Honeywell located at 12001 Highway 55 (A-151) 0. Authorize payment for rehabilitation work performed through Community Development Block Grant Program K. Ordinance amendment to 1310.03 relating to parking regulations L. Award of Bid: 1) Towing 2) Reforestation 0 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. Approval of 1988 Plymouth Metrolink Contracts: 1) City of Plymouth and Regional Transit Board 2) City of Plymouth and Medicine Lake Lines 10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS A. Amber Woods/Hughes Addition removal of sump pump connections to sanitary sewer system - Status report 11. ADJOURNMENT 15. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 14, 1988 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT "BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK" Attached is a proclamation declaring the week of May 1 - 7 as "Be Kind To Animals Week in Plymouth." The Mayor may wish to read this proclamation at the meeting. FB:Jm attachment ip ti.• A. 1 a• z eoffmid Prodamation r CITY OF PLYMOUTH s WE1WS: We have been endowed not only with the bless- iY• t ings and benefits of our animal friends, who give us companionship i r and great pleasure in our daily lives, but also with a firm responsibility to protect these fellow creatures with which we share the earth from need, pain, fear and suffering; and 1 WhVWS: we recognize that teaching attitudes of kind- i ness, consideration and respect for all living things through humane education in the schools and the community helps to provide the basic values on which a humane and civilized society is built; and ti! WhOWS: the people in the City (or State) of Pi=outh are deeply indebted to their animal care and control agencies for their invaluable contribution in caring for lost and unwanted animals, in- r• stilling humane values in our children through humane education pro- r: r grams, and promoting a true working spirit of kindness and considera- tion for animals in the minds and hearts of all people, and 44• WfteneaS: the first 6,111 week of May has been set as the annual celebration of the national week observing the philosophy of tt kindness to animals, r Npti11 ` "pre: 1 Virgil A. Schneider J rip A. name of officer) 4. by virtue of the power vested in me as Mayor i• 41 J-4 4. of the City of Plymouth do proclaim and pro- V` city, State) nounce the week of May 1st through 7th, 1988 as "Be Kind To Animals Week;' and do heartily commend to all our citizens a full participation in all the events related thereto in this community. A6 r' Seal) i zs Mayor 4 11 I N U T F S REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 4, 1988 A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on April 4, 1988. PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur, and Sisk, City Manager Willis, Planning Director Tremere, Public Works Director Moore, Park Director Blank, City Attorney Thomson, and City Clerk Brandt ABSENT: None LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Manager Willis reported that the Senate tax bill is in LEGISLATIVE UPDATE committee and explained its impact. Item 4 CONSENT AGENDA MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt the consent agenda as presented. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MINUTES MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to approve the minutes of the March 28 Special Council Meeting as submitted. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:49 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Item 5 MINUTES - SPECIAL MEETING, MARCH 28 1988 Item 6* MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by RESOLUTION NO.88-217 Councilmember Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-217 AUTHORIZING EASEMENT VACATION THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND EASEMENT ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF P.I.N. NO. Item 7-A 26-118-22-42-0058 OR ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1988 Page 95 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Mayor Schneider opened the public information meeting at 7:50 P.M. Director Moore reported that property owners, at the March public information meeting, asked that the frontage road be connected to the existing 57th Ave. cul-de-sac. This is possible as there is a vacant lot available for the road. The County has reviewed the proposal and found it to be feasible. Bill Bealles, 11610 57th Ave., stated he opposed the connection because he bought his home because it was on a cul-de-sac. He is concerned about his property value, drainage, and maintenance of abutting property. He stated all the homeowners west of Deerwood Lane on 57th Ave. oppose the connection, and presented a written statement. Gerry Kaupa, 11805 Bass Lake Road, requested the extension originally, but now doesn't want it because of increased traffic flow it will create on 57th Ave. Steve Cheney, 11915 Bass Lake Road, suggested that, if the connection is made, there be direct access from the service road to C.R. 10 going east. Paul Svensson, 11745 Bass Lake Road, stated the connection is necessary for safety. Mayor Schneider closed the information hearing at 8:12 p.m. Mayor Schneider asked about property values being affected on 57th Ave. Director Moore answered that the assessor would have to answer that. There will not be an entrance to C.R. 10 from the frontage road. Mayor Schneider stated the drainage would not be any different that it is now. The property between any service road and the abutting property would be turned over to the property owner. Director Moore stated all the connections that can be eliminated from C.R. 10 would make it safer. It would also be safer to connect 57th Ave. to the service road. Councilmember Ricker pointed out that the elimination of one lot should be added to the overall costs of the project and, unless there is a safety factor, he doesn't favor the connection. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - C.R. 10 Item 8 0 Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1988 Page 96 MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 8, DENYING PRELIMINARY LAYOUT, COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION, CITY PROSECT NO. 812. Councilmember Sisk stated he doesn't believe staff has had enough time to address all the safety concerns. SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to table the layout approval until an engineering study of safety can be completed. Motion carried, five ayes. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Kevin VonRiedel, McCombs, Frank, Roos, representing the developer, stated this is a 40 acre parcel. The proposal is for 80 single family lots and 42 townhome lots. Scott Bratten, 14560 40th Ave., stated the concern is with the increased traffic and safety of the children in Cedar Ridge. Russ Thour, 14635 39th Ave., stated concern with the water problems which might be created. He asked about the flood plain and whether the trail would be under water some of the time. Sherry DeWolf, 3855 Glacier Lane, stated concern with the increased traffic and children's safety. RPUD CONCEPT PLAN PARKVIEW RIDGE (88018) Item 9-A Mayor Schneider explained that this is just a concept of about RPUD CONCEPT PLAN where lots and houses would be. The next step would be a PARKVIEW RIDGE preliminary plat layout and at that time the Planning Commission (88018) will discuss drainage. Councilmember Sisk asked why 39th Ave. has to go through. Director Moore answered that, while it is not a collector street; it is for overall traffic circulation, and was contemplated in the plan approvals for this area. Councilmember Zitur asked about open space. Mr. VonRiedel stated the open space is 11.5% of the entire parcel. The areas around the ponds would not be graded out. Director Tremere pointed out that there is extensive development to the north of C.R. 9 and Fernbrook Lane. Traffic will increase in the future. If access to the west is not provided from Cedar Ridge through this plat, Cedar Ridge will only have two access points and they will both be to Fernbrook Lane. Regular Council Neetinq April 4, 1988 Page 97 Councilmember Vasiliou asked if the park were considered part of their open space and she doesn't consider that the open space requirement has been met. Director Tremere answered that, given the topography of the development and concerns about transition, it warrants PUD status. The specific design can be modified; the project was evaluated by staff as if the public park were part of the open space. Councilmember Vasiliou added that the fact that the children in Cedar Ridge now play in the streets is not an acceptable reason to seal off 39th Avenue and it is not safe. Councilmember Zitur agreed that kids shouldn't be playing in the streets, especially when the City has provided parks. Mayor Schneider stated the recent speed study showed that all the vehicles counted were within the speed limit. Councilmember Sisk stated the Council has to consider the good of the entire City. He cannot see that connecting 39th Ave. will be a detriment to safety. He believes there might be ground water problems for the new homes in the northwest corner because of elevation. Discussion continued on the topography and open space planned. Mr. VonRiedel stated they are trying to maintain the topography and attempting to keep the grades consistent with the surrounding area. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, to defer action on the petition to refer it to the Planning Commission for reconsideration based upon the Council's direction for redesign. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, that 39th Ave. should go through this plat, from the development on the west to the development on the east as proposed. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded b Councilmember Zitur, that there be a concentration of effective usable open space, particularly in the detached housing area. Councilmember Vasiliou stated active open space is needed in a planned unit development as intense as this; otherwise, it should be platted as a conventional development. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1988 Page 98 MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, that the overall plan design is to be enhanced to preserve natural features such as hills, low areas, and trees on property as they are now. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. Mayor Schneider reminded them that the lot coverage is to be 20% maximum; trails are to be built per City standards. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, that, with regard to transition, attached homes would be as per this plan (to the west) and single family detached homes to the east. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Ricker, that particular attention shall be given to minimum floor elevations so that homes will be planned at elevations that will not have a "guaranteed" water problem. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. Main motion as amended carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Zitur, that anyone who spoke at the Planning Commission or Council meetings should be informed of the date the Planning Commission will reconsider revised concept plans. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-218 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-218 DECLARING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINDING OF NO NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STTEMENT (EIS) FOR EIS, PRIME WEST BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET BUSINESS PARK (87123) EAW) DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1988 FOR PRIME WEST BUSINESS PARK Item 9-B* PROPOSED BY PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 87123). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Manager Willis stated the request is recommended for approval by SITE PLAN, FIRE the Planning Commission. The site plan meets all the conditions STATION 3 (88012) and no variances are requested. Item 9-C Director Tremere stated that the Planning Commission was concerned generally about the exterior finish. Their recommendation would not preclude metal but they were not shown the metal. Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1988 Page 99 MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-219 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF PLYMOUTH FIRE STATION III (88012) deleting item #12. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Ricker, to amend to add condition #12 as follows: "The exterior finish materials used for the construction of Fire Station 3 shall be the same color as City Center, using the glass, brick, and metal as presented previously to the Council. Motion to amend carried, five ayes. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, directing staff to inform consultants retained by the City, that are making presentations to the Council and commissions to be fully prepared for discussion. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-220 APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ST. MARY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. Councilmember Sisk stated he didn't know it would be this expensive. Director Blank stated the target figure was $100,000 but the parking lot was added, at Council direction, at a cost of 10,000. Discussion followed on the original cost estimate and the items which are now being bid as alternates and what might be deleted or added later. Larry Decker, Barton-Aschman, stated that part of the trail could be deleted initially at a cost savings of $20,000 and this Includes the bridge at $10,000. Discussion continued on the parking, entrances to the park, and whether some grading could be deleted initially. Councilmember Vasiliou questioned the amount of the play equipment being requested and whether there weren't options. Director Blank stated there will be three basic components. Every item will be a line item and quantities can be changed. RESOLUTION NO. 88-219 SITE PLAN, FIRE STATION 3, CITY OF PLYMOUTH (88012) Item 9-C RESOLUTION NO. 88-220 FINAL PLANS & SPECS ST. MARY'S PARK Item 9-D Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1938 Page 100 Councilmember Ricker stated it seemed that without the play structure, why have a park. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-221 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-221 APPROVING PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER PROJECT NO. 809, PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD. FIELD, PROJECT 809 Item 9-E Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, directing staff, the City Manager, and Director Blank, that the purpose of the new soccer field is to allow renovation and rest of existing fields, at the discretion of staff. Director Blank stated the intent is to rest one field at a time to have time to get it back into good condition. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-222 Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-222 APPROVING GARBAGE HAULERS 1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE APPLICATIONS. 1988 LICENSES Item 9-F Councilmember Sisk pointed out that Reuter's cannot comply with the new ordinance requiring a yard waste management program because all their refuse goes to the plant. Director Moore stated the City's ordinance states that every licensed hauler must have a separate yard waste program and they must take the waste to a facility which will certify that the material is being composted. The only site doing this is the Hennepin County site. Attorney Thomson stated that, when the ordinance was drafted, the Reuter situation was considered in the wording. Reuter can still collect refuse but not yard waste. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Ricker, to change "their" to add "an approved ....." in the last paragraph of the resolution and add, "Failure to comply with this requirement will render the license null and void." Motion to amend carried, five ayes. Motion as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Discussion followed on the current work level and the amount of STANDARDS FOR PERMIT information given and time spent with customers at the counter. ISSUANCE & INSPECTION SERVICES Item 9-G Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1985 Page 101 Councilmember Vasiliou stated that, particularly during the construction season, priority should be given to field inspections and permit issuance over instructional or informational activities. Director Tremere stated that, as the City grows, there will be more residents requesting help. Temporary personnel have been and will be retained to assist during peak periods. Mayor Schneider stated necessary help should be hired on a temporary rather than full time basis. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to accept and file the report. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember RESOLUTION NO. 88-223 Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-223 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 FINAL PAYMENT AND FINAL, FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2, FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM in FIRE STATION 1 & 2 the amount of $3,703 to Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. Item 9-H Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-224 RESPREADING OF DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS, LEVY NO. 10970. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-225 RESPREADING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, LEVY NO. 10059 .AND 10970. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-226 ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 5 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 5-1 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-227 ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 6 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 6-1 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 88-224 RESPREADING DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS, LEVY 10970 Item 9-I* RESOLUTION NO. 88-225 RESPREADING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, LEVY 10059 & 10970 Item 9-I* RESOLUTION NO. 88-226 ORDERING HEARING ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 5 AND TIF DISTRICT 5-1 Item 9-3* RESOLUTION NO. 88-227 ORDERING HEARING ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 6 TIF DISTRICT 6-1 Item 9-O* Regular Council Meeting April 4, 1986 Page 102 MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-228 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-228 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING PUBLIC HEARIkG ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF DISTRICT 1-5 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 1-5 April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-229 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-229 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF DISTRICT 3-2 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 3-2 April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-230 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-230 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF DISTRICT 4-3 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 4-3 April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-231 Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-231 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF DISTRICT 3-3 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 3-3 April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Mayor OTHER BUSINESS Schneider, directing staff to send a letter to the soccer association outlining Plymouth's plan for building and resting fields so they can plan accordingly and telling them that Wayzata will be taking two fields out of service. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Council - member Vasiliou, that the Communications Coordinator be instructed to use all forms of media to educate residents on the dog ordinance and they can use 9-1-1 to call in animal complaints. Motion carried, five ayes. The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. City Clerk CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 12, 1988 for City Council meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ESTABLIS MENT INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 1. CZ /t OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND TAX ACTION REQUESTED: Following the public hearing, it is requested that the Council adopt the attached resolutions creating Economic Development Districts 5 and 6, amending Tax Increment Financing District 1-5, and establishing Tax Increment Financing Districts 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 5-1 and 6-1. 2. BACKGROUND: The City Council has previously established various economic development districts throughout the City. The purpose for the establishment of these development districts is to provide a means by which subsequent tax increment financing districts might be established. The tax increment financing districts are designed to be established at the time commercial and/or industrial land is developing, so as to "capture" increased tax increments resulting fromdevelopment. The revenues derived from tax increment financing districts are to be used in carrying out the development program in each of the respective development districts. The specific projects are more fully explained in the development program for each of the development districts. Essentially, the development programs revolve around improving the transportation infrastructure required to adequately serve developinglands. A substantial portion of the development programs in each of the districts involves work on transportation facilities under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and/or the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. Both of these agencies have found it difficult to finance work needed on their roads that is required and accordingly, are hindering the City's ability to develop in accordance with our comprehensive plans. 3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The State Legislature has, for a number of years, authorized the use of tax increment financing as a means of encouraging appropriate development and/or redevelopment in cities PUBLIC HEARINGS ON FINANCING DISTRICTS April 12, 1988 Page 2 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND TAX INCREMENT throughout the State. During the last few years, particularly with the decline of other revenue sources, more cities have turned to tax increment financing for a variety of projects. Some members of the Legislature have expressed concern about the proliferation of tax increment financing districts and their impact on the overall tax stability with the respective taxing jurisdictions. During this session, primary emphasis has been on redevelopment districts, of which Plymouth has none. The Senate Tax Bill, currently in the joint Senate/House Conference Committee, contains a provision which would preclude the establishment of additional economic development tax increment financing districts or economic development districts. This particular action, abruptly taken at a Senate tax hearing, is not supported by the League of Minnesota Cities, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities or any other government group. This bill, particularly that section which eliminated economic development districts, reinforces a concern of many of us in local government that the State government cannot be relied upon to develop and/or follow a coherent policy as it relates to local government. The establishment of development districts and subsequent tax increment financing districts is a rather complex measure and involves a good deal of thoughtful planning. We have planned for our development districts over the past several years and have sought to execute them in a timely, but staged fashion. Because of the pending change in the state law, however, we are attempting to establish all of the tax increment financing districts which we would have otherwise planned to establish over the next several years at one time. This is done solely because I am fearful that the Legislature may prohibit us from being able to execute our plans as previously contemplated. Indeed, depending on the final actions of the Legislature dealing with the tax bill, it may already be too late. Copies of the Development Programs for Economic Development Districts 5 and 6, and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Districts 1-5, 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 5-1 and 6-1 are on file and available for review in my office. These plans have been sent to the school districts involved and Hennepin County for their information. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend the Council adopt the attached resolutions creating Economic Development Districts 5 and 6, amending Tax Increment Financing District 1-5, and establishing Tax Increment Financing Districts 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 5-1 and 6-1. JW:kec CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88-234 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 3-2 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 3 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax Increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-2, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-229, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and Its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 3-2 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-234 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the .Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will of the City as a Program by private CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs whole, for the development of the project proposed in the enterprise. RESOLUTION NO. 88-234 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. while a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing. 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 3-2 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-234 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 3-2 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88-235 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 3-3 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section I. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 3 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-3, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, In accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-231, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 3-3 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-235 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the Program by private enterprise. CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) RESOLUTION NO. 88-235 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 3-3 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-235 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and T.IF District No. 3-3 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88-236 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 4-3 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 4 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 4-3, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-230, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 4-3 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-236 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the Program by private enterprise. CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) RESOLUTION NO. 88-236 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 4-3 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-236 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 4-3 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call. and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88-237 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 5-1 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 5 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 5 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set.out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed a tax increment financing plan entitled "Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-226, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 5-1 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-237 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the Program by private enterprise. CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) RESOLUTION NO. 88-237 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing. 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 5-1 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-237 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 5-1 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88-238 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 6-1 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 6 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed a tax increment financing plan entitled "Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 6-1, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved February 1, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-227, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 6-1 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-238 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the Program by private enterprise. CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) RESOLUTION NO. 88-238 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 6-1 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-238 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 6-1 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88-239 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND AMENDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-5 IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows: Section I. Background. 1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 1 (the District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act. 1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-5, City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved February 1, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-228, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act. 1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 1-5 be established in the District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry out the Program. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) RESOLUTION NO. 88-239 Page 2 Sec. 2. Findings. 2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for the construction and financing of the project. 2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the following specific findings: a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District. The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base through the encouragement of private commercial development. b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described in the Plan will meet this purpose. c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program. d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the Program by private enterprise. CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE) RESOLUTION NO. 88-239 Page 3 The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within the District. e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within the District. Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing. 3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is incorporated by reference herein. 3.02. TIF District No. 1-5 as described in the TIF Plan is established. 3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the Act. 3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. 3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described in the TIF Plan. Sec. 4 Administration. 4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District. CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR) RESOLUTION NO. 88-239 Page 4 4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 1-5 is the responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 13, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18,,,1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR PONDING PARKERS LAKE NORTH 2ND ADDITION OUTLOT 0 The City Council has established a public hearing on April 18, 1988 on the petition to vacate drainage and utility easements within Outlot 0, Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition. These easements were dedicated on the Final Plat at the time this area was platted into outlots. When the area was platted into outlots, the exact description of the necessary drainage and utility easements and the ponding easements were not known. The developer established an easement over the entire outlot. Since that time this outlot has been re -platted as Mallard Pointe Addition. On the new plat the exact description of the necessary easements is defined. Unless new information is presented at the public hearing, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution vacating the original easements. 10A Chester J. ison, Jr., 1-11 CJH:kh attachments: Resolution Map CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: The following members were absent: X X is adoption: XXX meeting of the City Council of day of , XXX introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR PONDING PURPOSES IN OUTLOT 0 - PARKERS LAKE NORTH 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, a petition was received to vacate certain utility and drainage easements and drainage easement for ponding purposes in Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for April 18, 1988, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 as amended; and WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks prior to the meeting of April 18, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on April 18, 1988, to inform any and all interested parties relevant to the vacation of certain utility and drainage easements and drainage easement for ponding purposes in Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easements were not needed for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the following utility and drainage easements and drainage easement for ponding purposes be vacated: The drainage and utility easements and drainage easement for ponding purposes in Outlot 0, Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XXX if :: SC I XXX Mi z o F- C) 0 a D Z N x O z W Y Ow AE r- r I00o 'O o, O o 84 j AO n M 16 f I1.'L, N" o i ppS1E z I z 06 ' Jr- Ir't F i 10 lJOZI'— IN 1-- 01 rn t N F W p J Q v rn l00ON = w O oov R 1i = , •• FF cNI 06 I Q Cry I J tiP Pp /S>s.Z,D pW tl I [B6_, 2 w 00. 1 mo., 21,01.C29S f „/ Fb4 6915 p 9 /C) co \ : . 2 pm^ `tet tl N f[blrb_-bb."9:D 69b011 3/1y H 6216651 m1w ' —: h 9C. i E6Cl. 8 c0 a N c 1 •V m 2101.5 b m; rr 2!'0a `?' 0 '6- 1 M 19 6, - 2,O Z ``s•.tl z ; , g4 y0• 3 I O CIE-\ o e I M 3 CC,0" ogq \` 'o ;ds°a j6r: v'b -,Aa \ Ir 'po as vnof O. 00 10 r N u J N SNR 1 Z, ( 1 v) J v o OpZ o61 cr 40 o r v o , I°m QaIt50.9 9 5 .i ,' $pr ro u \ O 0 d O QD AOOd m + OZ I \ 1' \ •R 1 m o ; 6c 71 IL LL 1 ip cr' •. ,i cr °`ter \ — a \ , rd J I R r \ 00 0 ti o 4 i9 jbiy OZ Ld 09 ri cr Iyy I I i 100 rr. I IU/ ui I z a t 1 a. OZ I OJ J Q QO ONOri D MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 14, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR REDUCTION IN CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT ON NORTHWEST BOULEVARD BASS LAKE HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION (85126) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Dickman Knutson, on behalf of BLH Development Company, has requested that their responsibility for the cost of concrete curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard for the Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition Development be reduced from 2,020 feet to 567 feet. The responsibility, as it currently exists, is in accordance with the approved plat and development contract. It is recommended that no change be made in the development contract. 2. BACKGROUND: Attached is a request from Dickman Knutson, on behalf of BLH Development Company, to revise the development contract for the Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition. He is requesting that their responsibility for the cost of curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard be reduced from 2,020 feet to 567 feet. Attached is a drawing showing the location of the lots and outlots as referenced in his letter. During the City Council approval process for this plat as a planned unit development, there were considerable negotiations between the City and the developer for the conditions of approval. Some of the items involved were as follows: a. The location of Northwest Boulevard. b. Assessments for Northwest Boulevard C. Amount of land to be dedicated for the Neighborhood Park. d. Payment for park land in excess of dedication requirement. e. Payment for grading on park land which was proposed by the developer. f. Change in sanitary sewer boundary to allow development of the entire plat. REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY April 14, 1988 Page Two All of these items were considered and agreed to between the developer and the City Council with the Final Plat approval. The developer executed the development contract containing the terms of their financial responsibilities for the curb and gutter construction. The developer is now requesting a change in their responsibility for the cost of the concrete curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard. Mr. Knutson is stating they should not be responsible for the curb and gutter along the west side of Northwest Boulevard (Outlot A), and also adjacent to the park property on the east side (Outlot E). Attached is a letter dated December 21, 1987, informing Mr. Knutson that the development contract was in accordance with the City's policy on assessing City owned property. Although Outlot E was dedicated to the City as park, the City paid $33,000 for the 2.2 acres in excess of the actual Park Dedication requirement. The total size of the park is 4.7 acres. The developer did use this 4.7 acres dedicated as park in calculating the number of dwelling units permitted within the planned unit development. The responsibility for the concrete curb and gutter along Outlot A on the west side of Northwest Boulevard was considered by the Council in determining the location of Northwest Boulevard and the final ownership of Outlot A. Based upon the guiding of Outlot A, it would be responsible for the construction of one half the cost of Northwest Boulevard, in addition to the concrete curb and gutter. As part of the negotiations, the City determined that this plat would only be responsible for concrete curb and gutter and the remainder of the construction cost would be the responsibility of the future developer of Outlot A. The Final Plat and development contract was approved for this development in February of 1987. The development contract and the engineer's memorandum contained the requirement for the future assessment for the concrete curb and gutter along all frontage of the plat on Northwest Boulevard. When Mr. Knutson received the development contract for execution before being presented to the City Council, he contacted Bob Johnson, Senior Engineering Technician, in the Engineering Department. He requested at that time that their responsibility for the curb and gutter assessment be changed. Mr. Johnson informed him that since this was part of the entire negotiated development plan, it would have to be changed by the City Council and he should return the development contract unexecuted along with a letter requesting the change. Mr. Knutson stated that he did not want to remove the item from the City Council "Consent Agenda", and therefore, would be signing the development contract and making the request at a future time. i REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY April 14, 1988 Page Three 3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The primary issue is whether this developer is responsible for the cost of concrete curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard in accordance with the executed development contract. He is stating he should not be responsible for that portion adjacent to the City park and the outlot on the west side of Northwest Boulevard. As has been indicated in the background material, the approval of this development as a planned unit development was approved after considerable discussions, deferral and negotiations between the City and the developer. The existing requirement for payment of concrete curb and gutter is in accordance with the approval agreed to in 1987. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council not amend the development contract for the Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition by changing the requirement for concrete curb and gutter. If the City Council concludes that the change is in order, they should determine the footage of property responsible for the cost of concrete curb and gutter and direct staff to prepare an amended development contract for execution by the City and developer. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Drawing Request Letter BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 3030 HARBOR LANE PLYMOUTH. MINN. 55441 TEL. 612-553-0474 March 23, 1988 Mr. James Willis City Manager City of Plymouth Plymouth, MN 55447 Subject: Curb and Gutter Assessment Northwest Boulevard, Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition Dear Mr. Willis: I would like to schedule to be placed on the agenda of the Plymouth City Council to review the assessment for curb and gutter as it pertains to Northwest Boulevard and in particular, to Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition. I've discussed this item a number of times with your staff, it is my under- standing that a formal request has to be made in order to have council action. gass Lake Heights 4th Addition is unique in that this is very little private ownership of the actual development fronting on Northwest Boulevard. It is our contention, only that property fronting on the trailway adjoining Northwest Boulevard should be assessed. The property in question is Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1; and Lot 1, Block 3; and Outlot C which is owned by the other 36 lots in the 4th Addition. The frontage of these parcels is 567.09 feet. bd th iC't f DCK:cb WINTER ADORE SS 538 S. 72ND ST. MESA. AZ 85208 TEL 9818139 The remaining frontage on Northwest Boulevard is owne y e Plymouth (Outlot A) 906.03 linear feet; the City of Plymouth y o public park) 505.03 linear feet; and adjoining land owner 192.86 linear feet. 4wn 4w_;%Z7 Dickman C. Knutson President I request that the development contract be reviewed that the assessment in Northwest Boulevard be reduced from $16,649 to $4,672 (567.09 x $8.24). As 1 understand, the property west of Northwest Boulevard is guided LA -3, t tr The property east of Northwest Boulevard is guided LA -1. I believe that this is a reasonable request, thank you in advance. DCK:cb WINTER ADORE SS 538 S. 72ND ST. MESA. AZ 85208 TEL 9818139 Sincerely, 4wn 4w_;%Z7 Dickman C. Knutson President DCK:cb WINTER ADORE SS 538 S. 72ND ST. MESA. AZ 85208 TEL 9818139 J y y . • a'x w i i i2eau'u of w, ooh oo a• A' O'st r vim,' N bir : M N 3, « oroi eoYt IW w O Y IA J QQTLO i f! r ' ^ t m a V , e— ense, 71 J.: s. N +• Q N r- r•n, Epp— s. .. -1 1 4t t v f 0 71 f t 1 t ' y v v J Act C I Y 0." December 21, 1987 PLYMOUTH Mr. Dickman Knutson BLH Development Company 3030 Harbor Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 SUBJECT: CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT NORTHWEST BOULEVARD Dear Mr. Knutson: The curb and gutter assessments for Northwest Boulevard, as outlined in Development Contract No. 85126, were based on "Policy Concerning Assessing City Owned Property", Resolution No. 74-93, dated February 11, 1974. Your request that the City amend the assessments levied against your property by removing the approximately 515 feet adjacent to the City park will have to be considered by the City Council. A letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works, requesting the review of the assessment will be required prior to you being scheduled for a Council meeting. Please call me if you have any questions. Sin rely, Robert C. ohnson Senior Engineering Technician RCJ:kh cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works John R. Sweeney, Assistant Engineer File No. 85126w -w, 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 POLICY CONCERNING ASSESSING CITY-ObJNED PROPERTY Resolution No. 74-93 February 11, 1974 The City from time to time undertakes public improvement projects benefiting property within the City, and City -owned property is occasionally benefited by such improvements. In order that the Council may fully review the matter of proposed benefit to City -owned property, the City Manager is directed to report to the Council prior to the ordering of public improvement projects which would benefit City - owned property with his recommendations concerning how such benefiting property should be treated in the spreading of the assessments on the proposed project. In making such a recommendation, he shall be guided generally as follows: 1. Property owned or used by a City utility operation shall be deemed to benefit in the same manner and to the same extent as a single- family residential property. 2. Park land shall be viewed on an individual basis; however, smaller neighborhood parks shall normally not be assessed; rather the costs spread throughout the benefiting district. Community or central parks should normally be assessed for benefit as single-family residential property. 3. Storm water holding areas shall not normally be deemed to be assessed. 4. Other categories of property shall be reviewed on an individual basis to determine benefit. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call anlootice thereof, a special meeg of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 29th day of September . 1986. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider ouncilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasiliou, and Zitur he 7`olTlor%ing mem ers were absent: none Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved Its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 86-597 APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO STAGED GROWTH ELE- MENT FOR DICKMAN KNUTSON, ULTRA HOMES, INC. (85126) 1HEREAS, Dickman Knutson, Ultra Homes, Inc., has requested approval of a Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Concept Plan and Amendment to the Staged Growth Element of the City of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, for development of property west of Pineview Lane, approximately one-half mile south of County Road 47, one-eighth mile north of the Soo Line Railroad; and one-fourth mile east of Interstate 494; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing; and, WHEREAS, on March 31, 1986, the City Council considered the request and deferred action on the proposal for further discussion and analysis; and, WHEREAS, based on discussions between the City, the petitioner, Hennepin County, and the Department of Natural Resources, an alignment for future Northwest Boulevard has been determined; and, WHEREAS, based on engineering information, it has been determined that the development of this property could be accomodated if the entire NC -10 District is re -directed, sub- ject to approval of an Amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the Adopted City's Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner has submitted three alternate options for development, in res- ponse to the further discussions and analysis; WHEREAS, the City Council remanded the matter to the Planning Commission for review, after redesign by the petitioner; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby approve the request by Dickman Knutson, Ultra Homes, Inc. for a Planned Unit Development Concept Plan based on Concept Plan and Amendment to the Staged Growth Element of the City of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Maximum density shall be 1.8 units per acre for the land at or above the estab- Pp lished high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as verified by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed as follows: a) A deduction of two points based on the size of the project. PLEASE SEE PACE TWO Page two Resolution No. 86-597 40 0 4. The final number of dwelling units shall be determined at the RPUD Preliminary 1 Plan/Plat Stage of review. For density calculation purposes, half of thn right- of-way for future Northwest Blvd. and all land at or above the established High Water Elevation, east of future Northwest Boulevard shall be utilized. 5. Draft restrictive covenants for the private open areas shall be submitted with preliminary plat/plan application. 6. No private drive access shall be permitted to Northwest Boulevard; all private drives shall be provided by internal public streets. 7. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Staged Growth Amendment is contingent upon, and subject to the required review and response by the Metropolitan Council, and the Final Plan/Plat which shall be approved by the City Council prior to finalization of the Amendment. 8. The location of future Northwest Boulevard shall be consistent with the final location to be determined by the City. 9. Outlot A ::call be deeded to the City. 10. Outlot C shall be deeded to a Homeowner's Association for the benefit, use, and maintenance by the residents of this development. 11. Re -directing the sewer flow from NC10 District is subject to approval of an Amend- ment to the Adopted Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 12. All right-of-way for public roads shall be dedicated as part of the plattinq action. 13. Approximately 4.7 acres shall be deeded to the City for public park purposes, 2.2 acres of this amount is in excess of park dedication requirements and shall be purchased by the City for $15,000.00 per acre, or $33,000.00. 14. The preliminary plat/plan application shall include proposed minimum lot areas and yard setbacks. Any proposed side yard of less than 10 ft. shall be specifically identified and explained. All yard dimensions and areas shall be per the approved preliminary and final PUD plan. 15. The developer shall prepare an overall site grading plan which shall include the proposed park. It is recognized that the park site will be lowered to accommodate its future development, including the parkland to the north of this site. It is estimated that the extra costs anticipated to be incurred by the developer for grading on the park portion of the site will be approximately $15,000.00 which shall be paid by the City following site grading. 16. The Preliminary Plat/Plan shall indicate all mature trees to be saved, except those within approved rights-of-way, and those trees to be destroyed will also be Indicated. A statement shall be included on how the saving of the trees will be assured. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly. seconded by Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Sc neider, Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, and Zitur The follow nq voted against or abstained: Councilmember Vasiliou hereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call d notice thereof, a regular mee k of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 2nd day of Februar , 1987. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider,-Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasiliou and Zitur The following members were absent: none Mayor Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 87-72 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE SANITARY SEWER PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RESI- DENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DICKMAN KNUTSON, BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, FOR BASS LAKE HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION (85126) WHEREAS, Dickman Knutson, BLH Development Company, has requested approval for an Amend- ment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning, Residen- tial Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for 36 single family residential lots located west of Pineview Lane at 54th Avenue North; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hear- ing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Residential Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Dickman Knutson, BLH Development Co., for Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition consisting of 36 single family residential lots located west of Pineview Lane at 54th Avenue North, subject to the followinq conditions: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Maximum density shall be 1.8 units per acre for the land at or above the established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage P1z,1 as verified by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed as follows: A deduction of two points based on the size of the project. The maximum number of units is 36. 4. Provisions for public park and trail outlot per Comprehensive Park Plan, as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards. Outlots B and E shall be deeded to the City for public park purposes. 5. No private drive access shall be permitted to Northwest Boulevard; all private drives shall be provided by internal public streets. 6. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Staged Growth Amendment and Sanitary Sewer Element are contingent upon, and subject to the required review and response by the Metropolitan Council, and the Final Plan/Plat which shall be approved by the City Council prior to finalization of the Amendment. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO Page two Resolution No. 87-72 7. The location of future Northwest Boulevard shall be consistent with the final location to be determined by the City. 8. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City. 9. Outlot C shall be deeded to a Homeowner's Association for the benefit, use and maintenance by the residents of this development. 10. All right-of-way for public roads shall be dedicated as part of the platting action. 11. Approximately 4.7 acres shall be deeded to the City for public park purposes, 2.2 acres of this amount is in excess of park dedication requirements and shall be purchased by the City for $15,000.00 per acre, or $33,000.00. 12. The developer shall prepare an overall site grading plan which shall include the proposed park. It Is recognized that the park site will be lowered to accommodate Its future develop-ent, including the parkland to the north of this site. It is estimated that the extra costs anticipated to be incurred by the developer for grading on the park portion of the site will be approximately $15,000.00 which shall be paid by the City following site grading. 13. Street names shall comply with the City Stret Naming System. 14. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regardinq minlrrrjm floor elevations for new structures In subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 15. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat. 16. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 17. Yard setbacks are: 30 ft. front yard and 50 ft. along Northwest Boulevard, except for Lot 1, Block 3 which shall have a 10 ft. setback; 10 ft. side yard and 25 ft. rear yard. 18. Final Plat mylars shall refer to PUD No. 87-1. 19. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat. 20. Final title documents shall be submitted for review, as requested by the City Attorney, as part of the Final Plat application. 21. The existing two residences shall be retained as diagrammed on the petitioners graphic dated December 31, 1986; all other structures and buildings shall be removed at the developer's expense. 22. The driveway for Lot 1, Block 1, shall be located northeasterly on the lot; the driveway for Lot 1, Block 3, shall be located as far east as possible: and, shall be shown on the survey for Building Permits. eve- oP e't Co-.t K et' 8.2 The water andhLary sewer area type assessme and assessments for t Project 416 for is development are as follows. Watermain Area 33 units x $645.00/unit $ 21,285 Sanitary Sewer Area 33 units x $360.00/unit 11,880 Total Area Assessments - Residential Lots $ 33,165 Watermain Area 4.47 acres x $1,290/acre = $ 5,766.30 Sanitary Sewer Area 4.47 acres x $720.00/acre 3,218.40 Total Assessments Outlot E $ 8,984.70 Project 416,curb and gutter estimated cost $16,649 The Developer understands and agrees to these charges, and hereby waives his right to a public hearing with respect to them including area assessments and Project 416. The water and sanitary sewer Residential Equivalent Connection (REC) charges for the lots to be developed shall be computed at the time of connection to the municipal utility system. The Developer understands that the aforementioned REC charges shall be paid for each dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building or plumbing permit for the dwelling unit. 9. Street Maintenance During Construction The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when streets become impass- able, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event resi- dences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provde proper surface drainage. The developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash onto the street from his operation. The developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from said streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for re -shaping said streets because of snow plowing operations, and if they are requested and providing snow plowing service, it does not constitute final acceptance of said streets. ' 9.1 The developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. 1(). Acceptance of Subdivision in Units The City of Plymouth will accept complete in units of one (1) block which have been completed in accordance with the provisions of this contract. The developer shall furnish a progress schedule for the construction of streets in the subdivision. Requests for acceptance of streets shall be made in writing by the developer. The developer shall furnish certificates of completion a5 outlined in Paragraph 11.1 herein for each unit completed, certifying that work has been completed in accordance with the terms of this contract, and shall also furnish mylar as -built" reproducibles for all phAs.ea of construction incl,i.led in this contract. 12- City of Plymouth ENC I N E E R ' S ?MEMO to Planning Commission 6 City Council DATE: Jaru 29, 1987 FILE NO.: 1 PETITIONER: ''r. Dignan Knutson: - Ultra Homes, Inc. - 30,,0 Harbor Lane - Plymouth, MN 55441 FINAL PLAT: "ass Lake Heigl:tc> 4t;, Addition LOCATION: West of Pinieview Lane, North of the Soo Tine PaiZroa,a Tracks, Last of Medicine Lake Drive in the Northeast 1/4 of Sect, -'on 10. ASSESSMENT RECORDS: N/A Yes No 1. _ Y Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use. 2. Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed use. 3. — _ SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are issued. These are in addition to the assessments shown in No. 1 and No. 2. Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at the time of final plat approval. 4. Area assessments: I;'ater'nain area assessment used on 36 units - 3 units rev.ousZ? assesse = 33 units x X645. 00 ur.2.t = 21, 285, an for Chit of based on 4.47 acres r v1290.00/acre = t5 766. 3G. San2taru Sever area assessment based on 36 units - .3 units nreviou-Z2i asscsse = 3 units .{ 5360. 00/unit = 511, 880, and ror Out Lot L' baser on 4.4 ' acres X %7?,0.00 an it = .3, 218. 40. 5. Other additional assessments estimated: C.u-hand (.utter for Northwest ouZevard. This cost is estimated to be b2 020.52 feet X t18.24 toot = 16, 649. 08 divided b? 36 Zots = L4E2. 47/Zot. Legal/Easements/Pe nits: 6. ,: Complies with standard utility/drainage easements - The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. P MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 14, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284 (WAYZATA) ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE WILLOW MEADOWS ADDITION 1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council needs to determine if the City will extend public improvements as petitioned by School District No. 284 to serve their proposed elementary school site in the Willow Meadows Addition. In 1980, when this parcel of land at the southwest corner of County Road 9 and Vicksburg Lane was approved for development, the City Council stated that the improvements must be extended by the private developer and not by public improvement. 2. BACKGROUND: In 1980, the City Council approved the development for the land at the southwest corner of County Road 9 and Vicksburg Lane which was called Willow Meadows Addition. Attached is a copy of the approving resolution and the minutes from the Council meeting when approval was granted. This parcel of land required trunk sanitary sewer and watermain extension in order to be developed. These improvements were not contained within the City's five (5) year Capital Improvements Program. After considerable discussion and debate, the City Council did approve the development but stated as follows: "Utility improvements in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans must be extended by private development and not by public improvement." During this same time, the City was in the process of preparing our Staged Growth Plan" in order to comply with the directive from the Metropolitan Council that we had to delineate areas of the City which could not develop before 1990. The Willow Meadows area was one of the areas being considered to be included within the Staged Growth Plan, since it did not have trunk sanitary sewer and water. With the commitment of the developer to install all of the improvements without the use of public funds, the City Council approved the development and did not include this area in the post 1990 development area. The plat, as approved for Willow Meadows Addition, divided the property into three outlots and platted the right-of-way for 41st Avenue. The general development plan for the area indicated that the outlot at the PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284 April 14, 1988 Page Two corner of Vicksburg Lane and County Road 9 would be a church site, the outlot parallel to 41st Avenue was for trail right-of-way and the other outlot was for an attached housing development. A development contract was signed by the developer which required them to install all of the public improvements. The developer did not proceed to install any of the public improvements and the property is currently undeveloped. The school district is proposing to purchase the property, with the exception of the church site, for an elementary school site. They have petitioned the City to extend 41st Avenue and Xene Lane, along with the necessary utilities to provide service to the property. The details of the necessary improvements cannot be determined until the City Council has approved the revised preliminary plat for the property. At a minimum, the necessary improvements will include the following: a. Watermain, street improvements and sewer and water services on 41st Avenue. b. Sanitary sewer, watermain, sewer and water services and street improvements on Xene Lane. C. Trunk watermain extension along County Road 9. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) extended trunk sanitary sewer along 41st Avenue and Xene Lane in order to provide service to the City of Medina. By agreement with MWCC, this sanitary sewer will become part of Plymouth's sewer system when the City allows connections to the sewer. The City's current Capital Improvements Program indicates that this area would receive sanitary sewer and water service in 1992. 3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The primary issue with regard to this request is whether conditions have changed and the City will extend improvements as petitioned for by the school district. The necessary improvements can be divided into two categories: a. Trunk watermain extension along County Road 9. b. Lateral street and utility improvements on 41st Avenue and Xene Lane. In order to meet enrollment demands, the school district has stated that they need additional elementary classrooms in 1989. Because of future residential development within this immediate area, the school has selected this property as a good location for an elementary school. The use of this property as an elementary school site does not need to be approved at this time, but the school district should be informed PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284 April 14, 1988 Page Three whether the City will accept their petition and extend the necessary public improvements, or the City Council will continue the same requirements which were approved for the original private developer and the school district is responsible to extend and finance the improvements with the development of the property. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed development of the property as a school site, instead of residential housing, is different than the original 1980 approval and requires further consideration with regard to the extension of public improvements. Schools need to be built in advance of full development of an area in order to meet enrollment needs. Since the property is proposed for development as a school site, I recommend that the City extend the necessary trunk watermain as a public improvement project and assess the development in accordance with our assessment policy. The City Council will need to determine whether the lateral utility and street improvements on 41st Avenue and Xene Lane should be constructed as a public improvement project, and therefore, financed by the City and assessed to the property or are to be constructed by the developer. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Resolution Minutes Eos J. NICHOLAS RUEHL, AIA BERTIL E. HAGLUND, AIA March 18, 1988 Mr. Fred Moore City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Plymouth Creek Elementary School Vicksburg & County Road 9 Dear Fred, Enclosed please find a petition requesting the City of Plymouth to construct Xene Lane and a portion of 41st Avenue North. A description of the proposed construction is included on the petition. It is intended that the construction would occur during 1988. The need for this work is prompted by a new elementary school to be constructed by Wayzata Public Schools near the intersection of Vicksburg and County Road 9. As architects for Wayzata Public Schools, EOS Corporation is submitting this petition on their behalf. Wayzata Public Schools is in the process of acquiring the property for the elementary school. New Ventures Christian Church is the owner of neighboring property. The petition has been signed by representatives of both Wazyata Public Schools and New Ventures Christian Church. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact our office. Sincerely, Bert Haglund, AIA BH:bh Enclosure cc: Stan Tikkanen, Wayzata Public Schools Rev. Robert Johns, New Ventures Christian Church Steve DeCoster, EOS Corporation EOS CORPORATION 470 Water Street, Excelsior, MN 55331 (612) 474-3291 CITY OF PLYMOUTH PETITION We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City of Plymouth, Mayor and Council for the installation of the following public improvements: Water main, storm sewer, and street construction in Xene Lane from Co. Rd. 9 to 41st Ave. No. and in 41st Ave. No. from Xene Lane to Vicksburg Lane; sanitary sewer in Xene Lane from ±80' South of Co. Rd. 9 to 41st Ave. No. Should the Council not approve said public improvements, or the petitioner elects not to proceed with said public improvements, the petitioner agrees to reimburse the City of Plymouth for any expense incurred for preparation of engineering reports, plans, specifications, etc. for said public improvement. NAME ADDRESS J F. f 19 ff. o 22 PdVWOUYH-40 31, 14 STORu SEWER t RDISTRICT 80UNCART SURVEY DIVISION NE _ S+GJI DISiIC/ BOUNDARY NENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA 6 _WAI,aSNE 0 DISTRICT BDUNDARI L) 0.. AO,"'Ll1.0, 55 ••....••••. ••... •. ' v -=°t `f.Ni BOUNOARI 1l€l(!clttACoCori, of,,4`,C.Inci),(b(!!R C,(l(Ev €2€la€l€l(latom IV 'p,n.ftac2vo v 0n CITY OF PLYM UTH u.:tlt to : e call ar•'d notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City t•:".i1 Cf t'1C Cit` -' ~T I•lY'•)Uth ,inneso6 was lTeTx OT—<< day of l" x._ • The fol ioW my rlf:mbers present: Ftayor• Hunt, _ s..rr i.r..i 'u/J T t, i ' t I ndi `c'In e i dCl' Zl•..=:.._L.._L. Lei. 11_', ane r;, lGwlr:'a r,mD r were absent: !Voll` 3d? tdt tfrR uncilmercber Neils _ introduced the following Resolution and moved its • RESOLUTION NO. 80-293 APP?' -,-)'v :' CONCEPT PLAN ;ND VARIANCE FOR "PLYM;IuTH MILS ESTATE$" !:PUD FOR FRANK LARS0N/(;.AR-L .° PROPERT?t5 (00013) W'!EREAS, -rank Properties has reyu2ste6 approval of a concent plarl and variance for "1ymouth Hills Estates" RPUC on approximately 25.2 acres iocatt d generally at the southwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and Ccunty Road 9; and, WHE-P AS, the City Council has determined that amendment of the adopted f;ve year Capital irrnrcveme^ts ?lin should to approved to allow f•xtension of utilities to serve this project; and, WiiERFAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the matter at a duly called public: infon t.iona+ hearing: NOW, TiLPFFOR!:, 8E IT HERESY PESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the concept plan and variance for Frank :3-son/C:ar-I_ar Properties for "Ply -mouth Hills Estates" RPUv at the soiltl;'+/est cork ?r of Vic-sbur, lade and Cojnt.! Road 9 subJect to the following condi tions: 1. ''lr.riancc as to PUD minimium. is granted hased upon consideration of or,iirance variance criteria. 2. Compliance hath the City, Engineer's Memr•anduri. 3. Gtility improvements. in accordaice with the City's Co,•r;rehell sive Sewer and 40 N.>ter Plans, rust oe extended by privt..e aevelopment and not by puhl;c improvement. 4. Corr: -1 e tion of the Env i ronrlental ; ssessment. Worksheet process prior to final ttll;;. 5. (,t!mp;iance +lith the provisions of Section 6 of the Joninq Ordinancc relative to subdivision end developnsrnt. in the Generai Flood Plain District. i f;, Written arvr^'val by the I'-epzrt'Tent of 'natural Resources as to the alteration 0f designatf-" w't1.and on the site. r_ ., .s:.L'i r......,s'.ii'...i a l.d.a.k ati b:.:v:r.;,r.,:sM 1M".]R.eti+ik a`i , •,'Ji 1bltil.Yi Ci4 Y61ciRc.?.'%v'.iW'23'•+'../.4a ii-i17i i.'iV.3\ , ry,j Provisions for buffering ant' berir.ing along County Road 9 and along icksburg Lane. H. Final aligniment of public trails to be in accordance with City plans and reviewed by the City Engineer. 9. "'• ximum density for the project shall be determined by the Planning Cor.,nission after consideration of Conditions 1, 10, 11 and 12 of this resolution and the City's bonus point and high water elevation policies, and rc density shall be giver, for low and moderate cost housing until the development can demonstrate that such housing will be built on the site. 10. Approval of extension of utility services tothis parcel is recognized to be beyond the City's Five Year Capital Impruvement Program, and is granted by private development based on circumstances that this property must L-aar substantial assessment for public improvements previously ordered I.Vicksh:;rg Lane). 11. Preliminary plat submittal shall include a revised Concept Plan including the Stivland parcel to the southeast and will show ultimate possible access to that parcel from other than Vicksburg Lane. 12. Consideration shall be given in the preliminary plat to provide access streets for continuity to the wstern property line. the motion for tIx, &&- tion of the foregoing Resolution vas duly seconded by Mayor Hunt , and uqm vote t Bing ttken themm, the foil -Wing ti —3-1h—livor t erro Mavor Hunt, Councilmembers Neils, vert and Schneider Z lc+ng vat sha nsto: Estalru:`_.___ Whern•rpc+i. the Resolution wes declared duly 11 4,.: : ,. - • Hee • i a^ 11is reviewed the request of Frank Larson and Gar- ONCE:" ar e-es for ap,roval of cont^,,^t plan and variance for PLYMC.'H wl'' S ES%—rl P,' 1 s Estates RPU2 on approximately 25.2 acres FRAK. LARSn%; ,r"Ao_, c±,-^ a* the southwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and County PROPEP7"ES (80013) 3 -1,'c' Mdnagar stated the Planning Commission recom- Iter- e e de^1al of this request based on the fact that this rc.-e" v is outside the trunk improvement area per the 5 -Year I-:rover,ent Program until 1953; therefore, the pro- se: dove?o rent is premature. veils stated if this concept plan is approved, it s^.ld oe clearly under_`ood that public improvements to se-vc the plat mus; be installed by the developer in accordance w th the City's comprehensive plans for sewer and water, includi-, construction of the interceptor to continue service to the west. P'i0. Sathre, MCCombs-Knutson Associates, displayed the proposed concert ,Ian and a topographical map Showing the flood plain area and Ponds. Mr. Sathre stated since Vicksburg Lane is completed and public improvements are accessible to the plat, this plat is the logical extension of the Plymouth Hills plat to the east. He asked that it not be considered as a separate RPUD, but as addition or amendment to the RPUD areas in Plymouth Hills and be penalized for being less than the required 40 acres. Mr. Sathre requested 3.4 units of density per acre and felt they should be granted bonus points for providing two different housing types and also for the open space and ponds in the plat since they propose to set aside the flood plain area for open space. In addition, they have planned to provide some moderate cost housing in the prcject. Mr. Sathre claimed this residential development will' enco.:rage the development of the commercial areas in the PlymoL:lh Hills area and they would like to begin construction next spring. Councilmember Schneider inquired if the developer intends to con- struct the public improvements and provide the oversizing necessary to extend the utilities to the west. Mr. Sathre replied it is their intent to do this. Mayor Hunt inquired if the developer can show proof that they have made a reasonable effort to incorporate the Stivland parcel on the southeast corner of the plat into this development. Frank Larson Larson replied they have talked to the owner of this parcel about selling and they showed no interest in selling at present. Mayor Hunt stated the Council would ask for assurance that this parcel, if eventually incorporated into the development, would not have access directly onto Vicksburg Lane. He noted that when the land was reguided last year, direction was given to include the parcel In the concept plan. Mayor Hunt stated, in regards to the utility extension, the City does not desire to open up any additional inter- ceptor lines which will open up a massive piece of land for develop- ment prematurely. If approved, the developer must be responsible for extension of the utilities, per City plans. 138- l eTer `;ells questioned if the need for street continuity for '-*,re access to at'jacent parcels to the wes' and south had bee- a'drfssed. Mr. Sathre replied the Planning Commission was T re concerned with determining whether this development was pre - ma'. -e and did ;.ot review the details of the project. Crag, :arson, petitic-er, reviewed the status of the Plymouth Hills de,e'cY-e^' for Council and displayed a map indicating which pro - e," es have Seen sold or are under option. He also reviewed the s' of firr-s with ownership in Plymouth Hills and noted those o:,ernes in which Gar -Lar Properties retains an interest. Mr. Larscr stated to get Downtown Plymouth commercial development s'arte,i sorle residential development must be begun, and they are willing to taAe the lead in this development. He claimed this is an advantageous time to build, if financing is available, and they are pre;^s,no to start grading on this parcel next ring. Further, he felt this would not encourage development to the west, but would be an i^;-etus for the commercial development in Plymouth Hills to start. Council discussed the proposed density for the plat and Condition 9 of the proposed resolution approving the concept plan which elir^inates the 12 units and cul-de-sac arrangement in the south- west area and allows 3 units per acre. Councilmember Davenport questioned the basis for granting bonus points. Planner Tre^rere replied bonus points would be granted for open space providing the cul-de-sac is eliminated. Council agreed final density will be based upon the acreage above the established high water elevation to be determined by the City Engineer. There was discussion of whether the proposed plat can be included as part of the Plymouth Hills RPUD's. Mayor Hunt asked Mr. Lars^n if his intention was to include any other parcels adjacent to the proposed plat in this RPUD in the future. Mr. Larson replied _his was not his intent. Council reviewed the proposed conditions of the resolution approving the concept plan and approved Conditions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. MOTION; was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmenher Hoyt, to give favorable consideration to Condition 1 of the reso- lution granting variance as to PUD minimum size. Motion carried, five ayes. Council discussed the question of whether development of this parcel would be premature based on the City's adopted 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program which would not bring utilities to the area until 1983. Manager Willis stated he would not recommend this development because he does not feel it is wise to approve it before the 5 -Year C.I.P. calls for it since it may recult in speculation in property along the trunk utility routes and attempts to develop other properties prermturely. 139- Me e ; r, s `4c associates, stated in his experience Sawer ha S horCere a piece of prc+per'_y and was available, he e:or see- the extension of utilities denied to that property. ti's r .. ex -essed his opinion that since the extension of utilities s -2r,,el would not affect any other parcels and would not affect C v's indebtedness, and since the parcel is directly adjacent to y ilities and is being assessed for the develo:Y^ent of Vicksburg he wo.;ld be in favor of the extensior: of' utilities to the parcel, a* 1 o s expense, at this time. Neils stated if public improve^ents in the plat are rri- a_e . so that it does not involve the Citv's C.Isin i-c f Ce:,: service, the City wo..ld benefit fro^ the area assess-e,*s ala ^s' the property and he feels the development of the land would nct re-a:.:re. mere w S further discussion of proposed density for the project and how 7uch over, space would be left after the high, water elev3t:on is deter^fined. Mayor Hunt stated he would like the proposal to be re- turne to the M anning Commission to detemine the bonus points that w4ll be for density consideration with reeard to open space an; flood plain. Mr. Sathre state if the pruject is to be considers as an extension of the Plymouth Hills RPUC's, wr,icr, have less than acres, bonus points should not be deducted for the size of the parcel. Mr. Larson stated they intend to limit the plat to 86 units. Mr. Kn,;tson asked for one bonus point for provision, of low and moderate income housing and one bonus point for provision of t o types of dwel- ling units and one for preservation of oper space. Councilmember Neils re=lied bonus points will not be granted for the low and moderate housing until the developer can demonstrate that such housing will be provide!*' Councilme'nber Neils stated he would not like to see all the density cc, centrated in the area east of the creek, but would like to see more fleri.ility. M""ION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Mayor Hunt, to t' ' RESOLUTION NO. 80-793, A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONCEPT PLAN ..) VARIANCC FOR "PLYMOUTH HILLS ESTATES" RPUD FOR FRAM;. - LAP.SON/GAR-LAR PROPERTIES substituting the following for Con- d.tion 3: "Utility improvements, in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans, must be extended by private develo;nent and not by public improvement," and adding Condition 10 as follows: "Approval of extension of utility services to this parcel is recognized to be beyond the City's 5 -Year C.I.P. and is granted by private development based on circumstances that this property must bear substantial assessment for public improvements previously ordered (Vicksburg lane)." NOTION TO A.MENID was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Council - member Neils, by adding Condition 11 as follows: "Preliminary plat submittal shall include a revised Concept Plan including the Stivland parcel to the southeast and will show ultimate possible access to that parcel from other than Vicksburg lane" 140- 6 VARIANCE FOP PLY'J,%,: HILLS ESTA'ES R FRA': IARSON!GA-L dR PPOPER'IES (80013) Co nci1 Meet, va lo., a^c a ! ng Condition 12 stating: "Consideration shall be given inthe ;tee?iminary plat to provide access streets for continuity tothewesternpropertyline." Motion to amend carried, five ayes. M2t1C'1 TO AMEND was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council- mer,ber Davenport, by substituting the following for Condition 9 oftheresolution: "Maximum density for the project shall be determinedbythePlanningCommissionafterconsiderationofConditions1, 10, 11 and 12 of this resolution and the City's bonus point and high water elevation policies, and no density shall be given for low and moc'erate cost housing until the development can demonstrate thatsuchhousingwillbebuiltonthesite. N'C'ion to amend carried, five ayes. Motion to adopt Resolution llo. 80-293, as amended, carriedOnaPollCallvote, four ayes. Councilmember Hoyt abstained. Planner Tremere stated staff understood the variance approved under Condition 1 included a variance from the required deduction of den- sity points for projects of less than 40 acres. Mr. Knutson questioned whether the are. within the flood plain is usable if there is no water standing c", it. Mayor Hunt replied in the past building has been allowed on approved reclaimed ilood plain, The density allowed will be the net area above the high water eleva- tion following any reclamation. Mr. Sathre stated the flood plain area is not designated as a storageareaintheproposal, but as a floodway. They do not propose to re- strict the floodway but to leave it as it is and ask for density foropenspace. Pr. Knutson questioned why density credit cannot be given for flood plain that is under water since credit was given for the four outlotsinthePlymouthHillsAddition. Planner Tremere replied the develop- ment of those four outlots was in accordance with the original Ply- mouth Hills general development plan which was approved without spe- cific analysis of wetlands versus density. The Council had directed that the design of the developments on the outlots be in accordancewithordinancePUDstandards. The City's policy not to allow densitycreditforlandbelowtheestablishedhighwatermarkestablishedin the 1973 Storm Water Drainage Plan or as modified by approved recla- mation has otherwise been applied to other fully designed and origi- nally proposed RPUD's where such wetland vs. density analysis is required. T r Neils, seconded by Council- menber Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTI •T- ; APPROVING SITE PIAN FOR HICKS { RUCT 'Al'•Tf E•= ,ICKS CONCRETE COfiSTRISOUTHWESTCORNEROF ;# AND RAI-HVIEW LANE (80018). T -•.# _g Mo rried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. 141- MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 11, 1988 For Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PAYMENT: GLEASON LAKE DRIVE TRAIL PREFERRED PAVING, INC. PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL CITY PROJECT NO. 602 Attached is the following request for payment: Payment No. Date Contractor Project Amount 4 & Final 4-12-88 Preferred Paving, Inc. 602 $10,096.54 The project overran the contract by $12,011.50 or 8.2%, the principle reason for the overrun is minor variances in actual quantities compared to estimated quantities and a large quantity change due to unsuitable material encountered in the boulevard area during excavation for the trail. Also attached under separate memo is a recap of the project with respect to the consulting engineer and contractor and citizen involvement on the project. I would recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the approving the final payment. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Request Resolution CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of 1988. The following members were present: , The following members were absent: XXX its adoption: XXX introduced the following Resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. 88 - REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL GLEASON LAKE DRIVE - TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 602 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Preferred Paving, Inc. as contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Gleason Lake Drive Trail Improvements, City Project No. 602, said agreement being dated November 5, 1986; and WHEREAS, the Engineer, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the original contract amount was $147,154.10 and the value of the work to date is $159,165.60. 2. That the work performed by the Contractor for the Gleason Lake Drive - Trail Improvement project and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of 10,096.54 to Preferred Paving, Inc. for the Gleason Lake Drive - Trail Improvements is hereby approved and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XXJt XXX XXX MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 12, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION FOR GLEASON LAKE DRIVE TRAIL CITY PROJECT NO. 602 This project consisted of constructing a detached 8 foot wide bituminous trail on the north side of Gleason Lake Drive (County Road 15) from Carlson Parkway to Vicksburg Lane. Right turn lanes were also constructed at the intersection of Niagara Lane and Gleason Lake Drive. Even though public meetings were held and letters were sent out to the affected property owners explaining this project, a lot of concerns dealt with trying to save existing trees, shrubbery and correcting existing drainage problems. Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., our Consulting Engineer on this project, was very responsive to all concerns which were expressed, and were able to correct or improve most of them without major cost additions to the project. The contractor for this project was Preferred Paving, Inc. The majority of the project was completed within the time limits of the contract, however, final restoration work took until September, 1987 to be completed. This was due to the contractor's refusal to respond to our requests. Restoration was finally completed by Hardrives, Inc., who is the contractor for the Hwy. 101 and Fernbrook Lane Trail Improvement Project No. 724. After talking with some of the residents along Gleason Lake Drive, once the project had been completed, most felt very happy with how the trail blends in with the area and thought that the trail was a welcome addition to the neighborhood. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh ACI ZIOK- AAMM MSEN ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS N PLANNERS January 6, 1988 Mr. Dan Campbell City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 t.. 222 EAS-' I7`LE CANADA ROAD 57 P.A;;L, MINNESOTA 55177 612484-D272 RE: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA GLEASON LAKE ROAD - TRAIL CITY PROJECT NO. 602 SEH FILE: 86089 Preferred Paving, Ines. application for final payment is enclosed. We have reviewed the final quantities and extensions and find the application in order. All final punch list items have been completed by the contractor. We recommend payment in full to the contractor subject to the submittal of "Certificate of State Tax Withholding" and lien waivers from major subcontractors and suppliers. Sincerely, David J. Pillatzke jms cc: Gerry Brown, Preferred Paving, Inc. SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC MINNESC'4 WISCONSIN r.n - n. r - APPLICATIONFORPAYMENT UNIT PRICE CONTRACT) NO. Four --Final Si'. PvuiL OWNER: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO. 602 ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 86089 LOCATION: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA CONTRACTOR PREFERRED PAVING, INC. CONTRACT DATE 24 SOUTH OLIVE CONTRACT AMOUNT $147,154.10 WACONIA, MN 55387 CONTR. FOR GLEASON LAKE DRIVE (C.R. 15) TRAIL APPLIC.DATE PERIOD END. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 1. CLEARING EACH 2. GRUBBING EACH 3. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & L.F. GUTTER 4. REMOVE CULVERTS L.F. 5. SAWING BITUMIN. PAVEMENT L.F. 6. SALVAGE METAL CULVERTS L.F. 7. COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. 10 9.0- 10 12.0 ` 120 100.0- 206 241.5- 1860 1916.0, 186 229.5-- 1067 29.5= 1067 2503.0 - PAGE 1 OF 4 SHORT—ELLIOTT—HENDRICKSON, INC. 65.00 $ 585.00 45.00 $ 540.00 4.00 $ 4on _ oo 8.50 2,052.75 1.50 2,874.00 8.50 1,950.75 3.95 886.85 CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 8. TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) C.Y. 420 461.0 - 8.00 3,688.00 9. SUBGRADE PREPARATION R.S. 61 30.0- 150.00 4' 5nn _ no 10. AGG. BASE CL. 5 100%CRUSHED TON 790 1288.56 - 9.50 12, 241.32 11. 2331 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL TON 25 24.08- 140.00 3,371.20 FOR MIXTURE 12. 2331 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 320 437.78 . 20.52 13. 2331 BINDER COURSE MIX. TON 160 0.01 21.00 9. 00 14. 2341 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL TON 10 11.9 - 140.00 1,666.00 FOR MIXTURE 15. 2341 WEARING COURSE MIX. TON 160 217.0 24.52 5.320.84 16. BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR GAL. 180 190.01 1.75 332-50 TACK COAT 17. STREET PATCHING S.Y. 183 0.0 14.75 n nn 18. RESTORE DRIVEWAY S.Y. 521 779.0 - 10.50 8,179.50 19. STONE RETAINING WALL S.F. 262 11.77. 8.50 100.05 20. 10" CM PIPE CULVERT L.F. 15 36.5 - 16.20 591.30 21. 12" CM PIPE CULVERT L.F. 84 214.5 19.20 4,11R_4n 22. 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 4 4.0 210.00 24000 23. 1511RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 2.0- 250.00 500.00 24. INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT L.F. 186 229.5 10.80 2,478.60 25. 12" RCF STORM SEWER L.F. 549 555.7- 19.20 10,669.44 DESIGN 3006, CLASS V 26. 15" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 283 282.55 - 21.00 5,931_C5 DESIGN 3006, CLASS V 27. ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 2 8.0, 100.00 28. ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 1 2.0 60.00 120.00 29. RELOCATE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 1 0.0- 1200 0.00 30. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN L.F. 14.4 22.4 , 240.00 5,3765 -nn DESIGN H 31. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN L.F. 16.7 19.43 240.00 4T663.2g DESIGN ST -5 (48") PAGE 2 OF 4 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 32. CONSTR. CATCH BASIN DES. EACH 1 2.6 - 1200.00 3,120.00 SPECIAL STRUCTURE NO. 1 33. RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE L.F. 1 4.46, 480.00 2,140.80 34. CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE EACH 3 4,2, 240.00 1,008.00 R -1642-B 35. CASTING ASSEM.TYPE R-2577 EACH 1 1.0- 210.00 210.00 36. CASTING ASSEM.TYPE R-3246 EACH 4 5.0 - 250.00 1,250.00 37. CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE EACH 1 1.0- 360.00 360.00 R-4370-22 38. ADJUST FRAME & RING CAST. EACH 10 13.0- 150.00 1,q n_no 39. RIPRAP CL.II W/GEOTEXTILE C.Y. 5.1 5.1- 45.00 22g Eip FABRIC 40. GRANULAR PIPE SUBGRADE C.Y. 165 244.0- 9.00 2.196.00 BACKFILL 41. BITUMINOUS TRAIL S.F. 33930 33930.0 0.78 26,465.40 42. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER L.F. 1255 1096.0 5.40 41 R _ 4n DESIGN B618 43. EVERGREEN TREES, 61HEIGHT EACH 3 7.0- 150.00 1,050.00 44. SHADE TREES,2 1/2"CALIPER EACH 6 1.01 168.00 168.00 45. ORNAMENTAL TREES, 1 1/2" EACH 5 0.0. 120.00 0.00 CALIPER 46. EVERGREEN SHRUBS, #2 POTS EACH 2 2.0, 50.00 inn -nn 47. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EACH 2 2.0, 35.00 7000 15" HEIGHT 48. SODDING S.Y. 7572 5860.0- 1.65 9,669.00 PAGE 3 OF 4 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued otal Contract Amount $ 147,154.10 1/Total Amount Earned Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incoporated into Work Contract Change Order No. 1 ContractChangeOrderNo. Contract Change Order No. Percent -Complete 100 Percent Complete 0.00 498.00 Z 5 Percent Complete $ GROSS AMOUNT DUE ............... $ A ./ LESS _% RETAINAGE......... $ AMOUNT DUE TO DATE ............. $ LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS..... $ AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION.... $10,096.54t CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress. payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under- signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said contract, and (2) all material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances. Preferred Paving, Inc. Dated t_ ) c_ c= - 19 Con r or By: Name and Title COUNTY OF C_I,w' f: Com_ ) SS STATE OF , ,.tee s< a ) Before me on this Z i-,•`~ day of = , 19 F,-) personally appeared 6, cocce known to me, w o being TuTy sworn, did depose and say that he is the r e 77 of the Contractor above mentioned; Office that he executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalfof "id Contractor; and that all of the statements contained therein are tru ' correct and comple . My Commission Expires: ? Cynthia D. Hansen ` ^ Notary Public -Minnesota Notar ubl itYE'y 1 Carver County y a•,,.•, My Comm. Exp. 817.91 The undersigned has the ation for Payment shown above. A part of this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this Contract have been applied by him to discharge in full all of his obligations in connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment. In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the Amount Due. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. Date By Page 4 of 4 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 8, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer SUBJECT: DUNKIRK MEADOWS FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 817 I have reviewed the feasibility study concerning the proposed improvements for Dunkirk Meadows. We are constructing sanitary sewer, watermain and the roadway for 33rd Avenue as a part of this proposed project. Recommendation: I do hereby recommend that the feasibility report be accepted and that the City Council authorize final design of the plans and development of specifications, for Dunkirk Meadows Subdivision. Chester J. HaXT son, Jr., P.E. CJH:kh CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: The following members were absent: cX is adoption: meeting of the City Council of day of , introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DUNKIRK MEADOWS - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 817 WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of Dunkirk Meadows by the installation of sanitary sewer, watermain and street to serve the proposed Fire Station Site was duly presented to the Council on the 18th day of April, 1988; and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the City Council adopted March 21, 1988, a report has been prepared by Westwood Planning and Engineering Company with reference to the improvement and this report was received by the Council on April 18, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council finds and determines that said petition was signed by all owners of real property abutting upon the streets named as the location of the improvement. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted March 21, 1988. 3. Westwood Planning and Engineering Company is designated as engineer for the improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XX .X XXX T CXX MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 7, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1938 ff TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works FROM : Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FERNBROOK WOODS CITY PROJECT NO. 720 Following further review of the sanitary sewer plan for this project, it has been decided, based on the depth of the sanitary sewer, that ductile iron pipe should be used in lieu of poly vinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The cost shown on the attached change order is reasonable and acceptable for this type of construction. Recommendation: I do hereby recommend that the change order here and attached be approved as shown. Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P:C CJH:kh attachments: Resolution Change Order CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: XX)C adoption: meeting of the City Council of day of , XX)C introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FERNBROOK WOODS PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 720 WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has been prepared providing for the following: Replacing the 8" PVC SDR 26 sanitary sewer with 8" CL52 DIP to conform with the City of Plymouth Engineering Guidelines for sanitary sewer over 21 feet in depth. The additional costs will be assessed to the Fernbrook Woods Addition. WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for the Fernbrook Woods Phase I Improvements Contract, Project No. 720 is recommended for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that Change Order No. 1 for Fernbrook Woods Phase I Improvements Contract, Project No. 720 by adding $5,600.00 is approved. Original Contract Amount $246,403.70 Previous Change Orders -0- THIS CHANGE ORDER NO.1 - Add 5,600.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.......... $252,003.70 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. X'XX XXX I CHANGE ORDER DATE: April 1, 1988 PLACE: Plymouth, Minnesota FILE N0: 70242 PROJECT: Fernbrook Woods Utility and Street Improvements PROJECT NO: 720 CONTRACTOR: Ceca Utilities, 201 Travelers Trail, Burnsville, MN 55337 CHANGE ORDER NO: 1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: This Change Order provides ductile iron pipe (D.I.P.) lines and tees, in lieu of P.V.C., on the deep sanitary sewer along Ithaca Lane, north of 47th Avenue. The stronger material, D.I.P., was determined to be more appropriate for this deep installation than P.V.C. Change Order Item 8" D.I.P., Class 52 sanitary sewer in lieu of 8" P.V.C. 8' x 4" D.I.P. tee in lieu of 8" x 4" P.V.C. wye Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......... Approved by: City of Plymouth, Minnesota By Mayor By Clerk Date: CO -70242-1 246,403.70 0.00 5,600.00 252,003.70 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTR00, ROSENE „ ANDERLIK & By Approved By Est'd Total Unit Price Quantity Amount L.F. 6.00 700 4,200.00 Each 140.00 10 1,400.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ADD .... 5,600.00 246,403.70 0.00 5,600.00 252,003.70 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTR00, ROSENE „ ANDERLIK & By Approved By MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 11, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CARLSON CENTER 8TH ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO. 751 ADDING CITY PROJECT NO. 718, SUOMALA ADDITION Resolution No. 87-183, dated March 16, 1987, adopted assessments covering the installation of sanitary sewer and water laterals and street installation for the Suomala Addition. Two quotations were received to provide the services required: o Ceca Utilities - $17,680 o Bury and Carlson, Inc. - $13,400 I recommend that the attached resolution, adding Change Order No. 1 to City Project No. 751, Carlson Center 8th Addition, providing sanitary sewer, water service and street restoration to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Suomala Addition, be approved as shown. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Resolution Change Order No. 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: XXX adoption: meeting of the City Council of day of introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CARLSON CENTER 8TH ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO. 751 WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1, adding City Project No. 718, Suomala Addition, has been prepared providing for the following: Providing sanitary sewer and water service and street restoration to Lots 1 and 2, Suomala Addition. WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for the Carlson Center 8th Addition Improvements contract, City Project No. 751 is recommended for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that Change Order No. 1 for Carlson Center 8th Addition Improvements contract, City Project No. 751 by adding 13,400 is approved. Original Contract Amount $149,569.84 Previous Change Orders 0.00 THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD 13,400.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.......... $162,969.84 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 7 CXX )CX )f a XX d ( 41 V1Jc{-Cr SC'JIC.CS ropo l lao. 00 114 OQ / 115,7_3 _ 112 25.31 ep-30.33• E Ne0'J0' 73' E Sir -0-t o.. (62) art oi e 2640. I I' ES. _ 1 60 1 w R a.u• 1. eo• a +o64 . s ... C , Q D ; o.. n• vJ 200' . .......+ 7 l P `+ • Q (27) 47) 48) .o• I A . s (46)+ G SU MALA RE t.,jO5TH AVE N 1 (2) t 164.54• +04. j BLOCK I 137.0' 160. 22• a L(33) h s(32) ADDITION ( ) 3 14 p. w(` 3 ( 23) - 170• $ ` ? a• 33' ?} fl 95 8 jE'•' _• —24.tiff . oJ- - ' n• — 200.0' 49-36- CC R . L . S Z g - a - ST 1257 ( 35) s (4 4) I7) S I EASTcz)co200' 4J 23) 8 g R a Al 205.00 - 36) 23) BUT TT' a J 4 (39) 14 25) g n. 600. 326) y WQ*Z7 E 22) N. n SI) ---- trn- ADD. 53) a; 64) BLOCK8 I 245 A. ` 2 l March 24, 1988 File No. 0870920 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 PROJECT: Carlson Center 8th Addition Area Plymouth Project No. 751 CONTRACTOR: Bury & Carlson, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota WHEREAS: The City of Plymouth desires to provide water and sanitary sewer service to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Greer's Orchard Tracts, located east of Xenium Lane on Sixth Avenue North; THEREFORE: In accordance with the terms of the Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to install water and sanitary sewer service lines extending from the existing mains in Sixth Avenue to the right-of-way boundary at the said Lots 1 and 2. The work shall include restoration of the disturbed pavement structure including aggregate base and concrete curb and gutter. All work shall be performed as shown on the attached drawings. Payment will be based on actual quantities as measured by the Engineer in the field and as itemized below: INCREASE Unit TotalItemNo. Item Unit Quantity_ Price Price 2104.501 Remove Concrete Lin. Ft. 30 $ 1.05 31.50 Curb & Gutter 0331.605 Remove & Restore Lump Sum 1 5348.05 5348.05 Bituminous Pavement 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Lin. Ft. 30 $ 4.79 143.70 Gutter Design B618 0503.602 4" Service Connection Each 2 2257.50 4515.00 to Existing 12" R.C.P. 0503.603 4" Service Pipe Lin. Ft. 125 15.75 1968.75 0503.603 4" Riser Pipe Lin. Ft. 16 21.00 336.00 0504.602 1" Corporation Each 2 27.00 54.00 0504.602 1" Curb Stop W/Box Each 2 79.00 158.00 0504.603 1" Copper Service Lin. Ft. 65 13.00 845.00 Pipe TOTAL INCREASE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 13,400.00 3 Change Order No. 1 Continued ISSUED: / STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. ACCEPTED: File No. 0870920 a3 z v DAT. BURY AND CARLSON, INC. DATE APPROVED: CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY OF PLYMOUTH DATE DATE al- lam. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 12, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988 TO: ;lames G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director SUBJECT CITY OF PLYMOUTH. FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR DUNKIRK MEADOWS 87097) ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolutions approving the Final Plat and Development Contract for Dunkirk Meadows, and establish conditions to be met prior to filing the Final Plat with Hennepin County. The petitioner was provided a copy of the Development Contract and has returned an executed copy. BACKGROUND: The petitioner requests approval of the Final Plat for Dunkirk Meadows. The plat calls for one lot and three outlots located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposal and finds it in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat and Resolution No. 83-125. AffAnhmPntce 1. Resolution Approving Final Plat 2. Resolution Setting Conditions for Filing Final Plat 3. Location Map 4. Development Contract 5. Final Plat CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19_ The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR DUNKIRK MEADOWS FOR THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH (87097) (MPUD 88-01) WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has requested approval for a Final Plat for Dunkirk Meadows for one lot and three outlots located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North; and, WHEREAS, the City staff has prepared a Development Contract covering the improvements related to said plat; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Final Plat and Development Contract for the City of Plymouth for Dunkirk Madows located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North; and, FURTHER, that the Development Contract for said plat be approved, and that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute the Development Contract on behalf of the City. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a _ City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the following members were present: following members were absent: adoption: meeting of the City Council of the day of , 19 The The introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR DUNKIRK MEADOWS FOR THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH (87097) (MPUD 88-01) WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Final Plat and Development Contract for Dunkirk Meadows as requested by the City of Plymouth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the following to be met, prior to recording of, and related to said plat: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. The Ordinance rezoning the property shall be published upon evidence that the Final Plat has been filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City. This satisfies Park Dedication. require- ments for Lot 1, Block 1. Dedication requirements for the balance of the development will be per the Park Dedication Policy in effect at the time the final plats are filed. 4. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for the con- struction of municipal sewer and water. 5. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 7. No yard setback variances are granted or implied. S. Submittal of required utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Engineer prior to filing the Final Plat. 9. No Buildinq Permits to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO Page two Resolution No. 88- 10. The Final Plat mylars shall contain a statement noting that the plat is part of the approved MPUD 88-01 per Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Access shall be limited to internal public roads and restricted from Dunkirk Lane except for Lot 1, Block 1, until future Medina Road is constructed. It is the intent that then access to Dunkirk Lane will be closed and the access will be from Medina Road. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. A 8 04 o SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1. SCOPE OF WORK The Developer shall provide the City with plans and specifications for the construction of the following for the plat of Dunkirk Meadows. 1. Streets 2. Sanitary Sewer 3. Watermain 4. Storm Drainage Facilities (pipe, water, ponds, etc.) 5. Grading and Erosion Control 6. Miscellaneous Facilities 1.2 Said plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer subject to review and written approval by the City Engineer. They shall be prepared in accordance with the "Manual of Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department." This manual outlines City standard materials, drawings and procedures which shall be adhered to for the above mentioned plat. 1.3 Changes in plans for the purpose of saving trees and other desirable features on private property and on streets will be permitted, providing revised plans and specifications are submitted and approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to the making of any contemplated change. In the event changes are made which affect occupied residences, such changes shall be discussed with the affected owner and their approval secured in writing. 2. STREETS 2.1 General The following streets are to be constructed by the Developer to City Standards including concrete curb and gutter: a. Residential Streets Thirty-two (32') wide face to face curb, seven ton design with concrete curb and gutter design Standard Surmountable in conformance with City Standard Plate No. STRT-2 33rd Avenue 5 2. STREETS (continued) b. Collector and/or Thoroughfare Streets feet wide face to face curb, nine ton design with concrete curb and gutter design B-618 in conformance with Standard Plate No. Medina Road is to be constructed in accordance with the City's Capital Improvement Program and assessed to the property in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. 2.2 Sub -grade Unsuitable soil shall be excavated within three feet 3') of sub -grade. The Developer shall furnish a complete soils report which shall include recommendations as to the sub -grade correction, etc. 2.3 Sub -base Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved plans. 2.4 Base Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved plans. 2.5 Surfacing Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the approved plans. 3. UTILITIES 3.1 Sanitary Sewer Shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and the City Master Sanitary Sewer Plan adopted November 15, 1982. 3.2 Storm Sewer Storm sewer as well as all drainage ways and ponds shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and shall conform to the City of Plymouth Master Storm Drainage Plan adopted November 15, 1982, and the appropriate watershed district requirements where applicable. 3.3 Watermains Watermains shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the City Master Water Distribution Plan adopted November 15, 1982. 3.4 Private Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the installation of telephone, electrical and natural gas service. The required utilities shall not be installed until the boulevard or utility easements have been graded. All such utilities shall be installed underground. m 4. MISCELLANEOUS 4.1 Street signs shall be required at each street intersection at the cost of the Developer. The City will furnish and install said signs and bill the Developer for said work. 4.2 The Developer shall furnish all Engineering services as outlined in the Manual of Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department. 4.3 Engineering services furnished by the City: The City will not exercise direct supervision and inspection of the work during the construction operations. The City Engineer or his representative will make periodic inspection of the work and will consult with the Developer's Engineer in regard to engineering problems concerning the work and observe all tests and conduct the final inspection as outlined in the "Manual of Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department." The Developer shall pay to the City Treasurer upon execution of this Contract *Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars. 500) to cover all City administration cost required in preparing and administering this Contract. * Minimum charge 4.4 The Developer shall do all site grading, including building sites, common greenway and open space areas, ponds, and surface drainage ways, and all private streets in accordance with the approved grading, drainage and site plan. The plan shall indicate, by arrows, how the drainage will be directed on the site. The Developer shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the City Policy dealing with Erosion and Sediment Control, Resolution No. 84-760 or its latest revision. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining this plan and to assure his compliance with said plan and to provide for the cleaning of storm sewer, ditches, ponds, etc., necessitated by erosion from said land development, the Developer's bond will include said maintenance costs as shown in Paragraph 8.1, Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. 4.5 All boulevards shall be sodded by September 1 , 19 89 . 5. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. 7 6. Guarantee of Performance by Developer 6.1 In the event the Developer requires building permits prior to completion of all improvements as listed in Paragraph 8, he shall furnish a certified check, certificate of deposit, or irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $168 as shown in Paragraph 8, or a surety bond in the amount of 252, which is 150% of the cost requirement in Paragraph 8. 6.2 Reduction in cash escrow or surety bond guarantee may be granted upon written request by the Developer based upon the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of the reduction will be submitted to the City Council for action. 6.3 The cash escrow or surety bond shall not be reduced to less than 20% twenty percent) until all sewer, watermain, drainage systems and streets and other work covered by this contract are completed and approved by the City. 6.4 Prior to commencing any grading, a cash deposit in the amount of $-0- and a irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $-0-, as shown in Paragraph 8.1, shall be furnished by the developer. 7. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance The Developer shall furnish the City of Plymouth Public Liability Insurance in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) and Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) and Property Damage Insurance in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) and Twenty-five Thousand Dollars 25,000). These insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its execution by the Developer and the City of Plymouth. These insurance policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this contract. B. Estimated Cost Subdivision Development The following items shall be the responsibility of the Developer and shall be covered by an escrow guarantee (bond, cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, etc.) as specified: 8. (continued) 1) Public Improvement Project - City to own and/or maintain after development completed. Project No. 817 $109,529 x 25% _ $27,382 cash deposit or assessment guarantee of $109,529 x 60% _ $65,717 (letter of credit). 2) Private - Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain after development completed. Letter of Cash Credit Total 8.1 Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Street Sweeping and Storm Sewer Cleaning $ To be included with Site Plan See Page 9) 9 ESTIMATED, COSTS ITEM Public( 1) Private Total Street Construction 28,812 0- 28,812 Sanitary Sewer System 62,510 0- 62,510 Watermain System 18,207 0- 18,207 Storm Sewer System 0- 0- 0- Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod Included in Street Construction 0- Pond or Ditch Construction 0- 0- 0- Street Signs 0- 150 150 Park & Trail Improvements 0- 0- 0- Site Grading & Drainage Improvement Included with Site Plan 0- SUB-TOTAL: 109,529 150 109,679 Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts 12%) 0- 18 18 TOTAL: 109,529 168 109,697 1) Public Improvement Project - City to own and/or maintain after development completed. Project No. 817 $109,529 x 25% _ $27,382 cash deposit or assessment guarantee of $109,529 x 60% _ $65,717 (letter of credit). 2) Private - Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain after development completed. Letter of Cash Credit Total 8.1 Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Street Sweeping and Storm Sewer Cleaning $ To be included with Site Plan See Page 9) 9 8.2 The water and sanitary sewer area type assessments and Project No. 817, street and utility assessment for this development are as follows: Area Assessments None Project No. 817 estimated street and utility assessments Lot 1, Block 1: $40,444. Outlot C: 69.085. Total: $109,529. The Developer understands and agrees to these charges, and hereby waives his right to a public hearing with respect to the estimated assessments for Project No. 817. The water and sanitary sewer Residential Equivalent Connection (REC) charges for the lots to be developed shall be computed at the time of connection to the municipal utility system. The Developer understands that the aforementioned REC charges shall be paid for each dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building or plumbing permit for the dwelling unit. 9. Street Maintenance During Construction The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage. The developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash onto the street from his operation. The developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from said streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping said streets because of snow plowing operations, and if they are requested and providing snow plowing service, it does not constitute final acceptance of said streets. 9.1 The developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. 10. Acceptance of Subdivision in Units The City of Plymouth will accept complete in units of one (1) block which have been completed in accordance with the provisions of this 10 10. Acceptance of Subdivision in Units (continued) contract. The Developer shall furnish a progress schedule for the construction of streets in the subdivision. Requests for acceptance of streets shall be made in writing by the Developer. The Developer shall furnish certificates of completion as outlined in Paragraph 11.1 herein for each unit completed, certifying that work has been completed in accordance with the terms of this contract, and shall also furnish mylar "as -built" reproducibles for all phases of construction included in this contract. 11. Acceptance of Completed Subdivision 11.1 Prior to acceptance of the completed subdivision by City Council, it will be necessary to furnish the following affidavits: a. Contractor's Certificate b. Engineer's Certificate C. Land Surveyor's Certificate d. Developer's Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract. 11.2 All necessary forms will be furnished by the City of Plymouth. 11.3 Upon receipt of affidavits (Paragraph 11.1 above) and recommendation by the City Engineer that completed work be accepted, the City Council will be requested to accept the completed public improvements. Acceptance will be by formal Resolution of the City Council. 12. Plat Approval 12.1 Preliminary Plat was approved by Resolution No. 88-150 by the City Council on March 7, 1988 subject to Twelve conditions. 12.2 Final Plat and Development Contract were approved by Resolution No. by the City Council on 13. Land Dedicated for Public Use, Parks and Private Recreation Areas 13.1 Outlot B shall be deeded to the City. This will satisfy the Dedication Policy for Lot 1, Block 1. 13.2 Park Dedication for Outlots A and C will be satisfied with further platting of these. 14. Other Requirements 14.1 Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 14.2 Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 14.3 No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and water, and the PCA Permit issued. 11 14. Other Requirements (continued) 14.4 Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 14.5 No building permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 14.6 Rezoning shall be finalized with the filing of the Final Plat. 14.7 Final Plat Mylars shall refer to MPUD 88-01. 12 City of Plymouth E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0 to Planning Commission & City Council DATE: April 13, 1988 FILE NO.: 87097 PETITIONER: Richard J. Carlquist, Director of Public Safety, City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Mn. 55447 FINAL PLAT: Dunkirk Meadows LOCATION: East of Dunkirk Lane, north of 30th Ave. North in the northeast 1/4 of Section 20. ASSESSMENT RECORDS: N/A Yes No 1. X Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use. 2. X Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed use. 3. X SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are issued. These are in addition to the assessments shown in No 1 and No. 2. Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at the time of final plat approval. 4. Area assessments: None. 5. Other additional assessments estimated: Project 817 Street and Utility Improvements Estimated Cost 5109,529. LEGAL/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: 6. _ X Complies with standard utility/drainage easements - The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet 10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. N/A Yes No 7. X 8. X 9. X All standard utility easements required for construction are provided - The City will require twenty foot (20') utility and drainage easements for proposed utilities along the lot lines where these utilities are proposed to be installed. This item has been reviewed with the final construction plans and the following changes are necessary: Complies with ponding requirements - The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100 year high water elevation and conformance with the City's comprehensive storm water drainage plan. All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been vacated - It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way to facilitate the development. This is not an automatic process in conjunction with the platting process. It is the owner's responsibility to submit a petition as well as legal descriptions of easements proposed to be vacated. 10. X The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to the City with this application - If it is subsequently determined that the subiect property is abstract property. then this requirement does not aonly. It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the city attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order that he may file the required easements referred to above. 11. _ _ X All necessary permits for this project have been obtained - The following permits must be obtained by the developer: X DNR Bassett Creek Mn DOT X Minnehaha Creek Hennepin County Elm Creek X MPCA Shingle Creek X State Health Department X Army Corps of Engineers Other 2 N/A Yes No 12. X 13. X 14. X 15. X UTILITIES: 16. X Conforms with the City's grid system for street names - The names of the proposed streets in the plat must conform to the City grid system for street names. The following changes will be necessary. Conforms with the City's adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan - The following revisions must be made to conform with the City's adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan. Acceleration/deceleration lanes provided - Acceleration/deceleration lanes are required at the intersection of and All existing street rights-of-way are required width - Additional right-of-way will be required on Conforms with City standards requiring the developer to construct utilities necessary to serve this plat - In accordance with City standards, the developer shall be responsible for constructing the necessary sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and streets needed to serve this plat. A registered professional engineer must prepare the plans and profiles of the proposed sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer facilities and streets to serve the development. City Project 817. 3 N/A Yes No 17. X 18. X 19. 20. X 21. X Final utility plans submitted comply with all City requirements - The developer has submitted the required construction plans for the proposed sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities; and has also furnished profiles of these utilities as well as the proposed street system (public and private). See Item 18. Per developer's request final plans will be prepared by the City. If it is their desire to have the City construct these facilities as part of its Capital Improvements Program, a petition must be submitted to the City. The cutoff date for petitions is October 1 of the year preceding construction, if the developer is paying 100% of the cost. Final Plans are beine Drenared for Citv Proiect E•1" Minimum basement elevations - Minimum basement elevations must be established for the following lots. 997.5 adjacent to Pond GL -P2. The construction plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive Water Distribution Plan - The following revisions will be required: See Item 18. The construction plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan - The following revisions will be required: See Item 18. 4 N/A Yes No 22. _ X It will be necessary to contact Bob Fasching, the City's public utility foreman, 24 hours in advance of making any proposed utility connections to the City's sanitary sewer and water systems. The developer shall also be responsible for contacting Jim Kolstad of the Public Works Department for an excavating permit prior to any digging within the City right-of-way. All water connections shall be via wet tap. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: 23. _ X Complies with Storm Drainage Plan - The grading, drainage and erosion control plan has been submitted to the City's consulting engineer for review to see if it is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. All of their recommendations shall be incorporated in a revised plan. The grading and drainage plan shall also indicate proposed methods of erosion control, including the placement of silt fence in strategic locations. Additionally, the following revisions will be necessary: SPECIAL CONDITIONS REQUIRED: 24. A. Avenue shall be added to the dedication sheet. B. A temporary cul-de-sac easement shall be provided in recordable form. C. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be provided along the southside of 33rd Ave., east side of Dunkirk Lane and a 6 foot drainage and utility easement along all of the church property and 31st Avenue to Black Oaks Lane. i Submitted by: Chester J. H ison, Jr., City Engineer 5 4 F-3 d V In b T r ' b F n T 9 G G 9 v Q 4 v v v b0 O U N Ca b0 N W M n L C] n wF c m y b qz eti ° H rc r a H • p F .H q M ° L M 9 % C v T L O H y O N w U G TJ C v L. N I C N 4 C v y N Y y fi 7 n n P i c N 6 ElDa+ v b >.. c >+ P .r rn as P L v U o V N rd _ti tJ S. H % w C C [. fi '] v U v a O 4 4 N N N O mfr H U a L M C q N v .i ' L O! N 0. W U H o o%~ O 0.A P v 6 4 H N G T [. N 1] q O O O C P H H q P Cl g U N O uL O y + C- t] v V W P V O C m HbGrp } F L M O d 4 v C @ m V n Y % C v ro% u 'd % ,+ 5 H aro+ w D u q... n L q V C~ a In N y C %] :[ p•. q v -+ n S y n T n o d (+C H c J L G O '.•. 9 U N d q 'J N L N O L N m w ~ V tl rl 41 M UvPvfiv ] v 0., P v w U q m O W v M 2 N >. ' n T L F O V fi N 6 U N O M 0 H L V 6 0 a+ C q U N H D 2 U N Tu H v -. O F n W 4 O T q q I t' % .+ N F r p L v g m m G }: Y. fn T Y S N % In a 0 O M C O O C p p 9 LC ra,L. va U T O Iv. T N w O 6 K Y. ° C C. P C U NLvN .O Q .i O> O H O n +- ClIn N_ U N ti U V 'p O. CYO C n aro L I H v U 0.N > U v v v w c v 'r. O O ro A v9 . Cy] WT P] ( AT ja`: Pt. L O y p +, nj 1 O P N U I C4 L M ON G C W 5 W NO A % W PO u N G H A C7 V D: n w UwqWwUv 'C b A C [. g V q H .41 wA y1 wvroTN9y. O > P F fiv IN W N d W L 2] y] N F L qW6CPmF' O O 9C%W'O Ymd v y NN O `LVN Q O O L.A H Ol0PNAto y rH ° dFd Hw uF. S: IVO I a w T O L V• N > v U O w A v v v w a u v ro c t b w v F NL, N C a U P 'O o C t N A o H q W N 'O 'O N v GL •-+ p F L L. N O v V 'O A V '.] v v 'D y R N n y V F n N V E4 ° u d ' O U N L L C A U O C O O N p O L V L v G L W y W L O m L W N N q N H NIn LVYt%09 I InVLI In ro In IOLWO d Q 6 --r O W .] W N N U O m N N U C 'an N W Y F N O 'C C O T] L co w u w N v L) v A v N V N y !"' y n w C b[ Y W DL C h v V V N N g r EO 'n N L O. T :tl C I• m O W C' F: w pp C V w V C O V Y q N Y. N T C U r+ L E['n % a` p C O 0[ O C 7 L N n U O •• I+ g .Z 'C F N •-1 H M y V b ^-1 rC C F V R N v v v v g aO dq L' O a N C S. v N i.] N' V L r: « O N H w n m y • N l.' w Ll O L p nC%ro Cv4+- G wB vN Y G 64 v O M u +. H v G C M w m v U a+ q N 'C C •-. v 5 W L ° q O p(, .n L O 3 L• w 0= L ' O w O v N N- M G S': v d O O U ' C g N U N v v V !', l% V T V W N G N M ^. N d N A 6 •r C C N N !+ C 'O v •.' R1 —r v H V .. N N y q v M P1 O 3 A W W O N q o O H s.. N O v O F "' v V q (C pO O q U N% n v 'T V N v F A O g N W 'd I A P% NL v N w QI. N 'J' V d ti W^ N V N Y N n N C NO 4! m0, h g CO U O v C N G % o L P. v L L u 2> a r H O G C C V Gr .0 v L N V U 'U ' 'O v L.. g C M W v O O o o O v C <: L o p w O v v o C v 9 C- n 2 v 0C 0 L 'O ry rn N H Y. N v O H (' N W L CO'C O N v o N N Y. A t i N W a! c. W O r ^ v 9 N d ti N W W G C C J v a .. U# Pr m g v 7 -n N v F O A C T C M 'a ^ v % U C O O v N 4 qlu L Nr INN w O v N 7 v v n V O U O N O v w U ~F' O V -+ b4 N H % It 4y O Cl [1 T V Y+ w N N W /, u rJ 2. H V w C 'C C C q f. Sl U N u N P w J 4 O N Cl N v v .. N C v N p q W OI N N . w C - H Oi `U 9 N M O' f1 'O N [) Yn r C Cr p `-r U C L v O C4 C H k (U •• 'O 'O N F' L ro M n d U A M S Y. 'O O W U G ti. pp .Y f+• • ' F rd C v N v D7 1' v F a V 1. L N O N N N 4 9 n C y G N L. L u LO w N N P G Q C F U q N 7 O 1+ A N F 3 7 O TJ 4 C% O N O C ti n N M V. N l• A U' L O H'O % C v n L GE v C C. E1 ro A L 4 41 .-r n m O Y P u" W '!r n M SJ N N S p N L 'T N w N -• Y O U O :+T H F O Cr g E H L O t- N F C- L O O 6 v v% 9 P d O M '.0 N 9 'V N N U V R Of r`] 'O `j ' T] W •n M U C C v V L H 'O 'O v U'J ' F '" N 4 ? N N C q q U N C L M U C N N y Crv° CF 'd w 0C« N C N W fy v rn F C V V H V % g d O v V .• V c! .• In M L R C F v 1. C a+ L. O N W v S v 3 1. U d N r L n O C C C N H v n ti ro M w gY. O O L. n q N- L v 1- M N L O h ^Fr tl v V 'd ,.C -r aA/ Y G O a N 'V P 6 d b v N N a n L a L O W W C 4r U V N W V v Y- 'tl 'T N g C W IC ' N N' N L N D 4 AJ F+ q Lj A 9 O G C .+ a n C W N 'O 'd C t: Q 3 g Y L N A -+ O W E:.-, N .-r O L w W N W v •• v • H O v v V -r ^ a O O v N N U v W w -+ O N O H .0 .0 O C G 6 L` -ti L L N W d N rJ '-' . p O N C N C W .1 L• O D w W C U m P L q W O V v L u L 0 9 N 's u L C W w V L a o v y m C N w P v h L >i 1. v- '.7 T 7 T Y VO L L H T Y w y F CWV q O OH v o v H L O U> U L O m v H v« v o A V G P 9 N C v H O N H C CON 0 P N d 9 0q N 9 Y W M ra p 'p Y Y .a n W O 61 -~-r v 7 U C N U L 1C N V C F N v ti W D C `.IJ ro v v D. (u <] v q d u b 3 0.xZ3 N C W roxA i.c+ C L N ..tiC 4G C`-Fi~ U MF V C N W Fw b n C v N F% b A w H E'n u M u v G W m C O 41 N .. S 'n F r F O G v V%% W a +' F c q CO' %' v v L H M',J N L w v U > C N J v Tq0ATuqO Y 'Y m F v 3 S 0.v [` # V; N Q + n b N w - 'l. ' T H m n b u -+ N D: 'O b A m FOL dcl V C v J T36O3f a> ! Y ix Y Z D ZZ a 'BII 4'00 0- 5 to M 3 ayl IsL Io d/I aM .44 Jo awl Wnns ayy_„ r - m u J os zc J N b o O N L O 37 cv v e a, b 20 GO L C] { d \ F, hU S 4O Q Co r vo 9 4 p J N b o O N O cv v e b 20 GO L C] { hU OCJ 4O Q Co 0 9Z'Ibb OVOcy J, -' 00009---- t10,009 0009— ` b0'OOG M„Lb,bbcBBS A d p ti OW 6 v vl 61=v e td7Js N ciYe _ or, 11 ' Noy e5 yy p N Qi eo a / CI I Aa,t va — r. IJJ c B 13ai\'1 N IN 'ant/ N W££ . s - o 3 e£szoeari 0, zoo Ob m W h N nI o rl1 F,I x m 0la 9ZF nC. Zprr M ISISI ` a F52B ti4i c02 .!'- DI to I 12 HSY ^ - 0 _ LI 6B>. sa,Fl llS 1011n0 dl'6F£ 3 ra Hcz oo'a la= V/V/c a,ns,b,v O 20 O U ck_\A--1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988 TO: City Manager :lames G. Willis FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director Blair Tremere SUBJECT ' REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092) ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the reduction of the Site Performance Guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property located at 13700 1st Avenue North. BACKGROUND: The City Council authorized a reduction of this financial guarantee on March 7, 1988. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Planning Staff inspected the site. The following deficiencies and requirements remain: 1. Site Grading 2. Storm Sewer 3. Bituminous Paving 4. Concrete Curb and Gutter 5. Sidewalk 6. Lighting 7. Landscaping 8. An "As- Built" Utility Plan RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend adoption of the attached Resolution to reduce the financial guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property at 13700 1st Avenue North. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Site Location Map 3. Resolution No. 87-632 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092) WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st Avenue North was approved under City Council Resolution No. 87-632; and, WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of a Construction Loan in the amount of $385,000.00; and, WHEREAS, the City Council on March 7, 1988, under Resolution No. 88-160 approved the reduction to $282,900.00; and, WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and recommends reduction of the financial guarantee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the reduction of the Construction Loan in the amount of $282,920.00 which was submitted to guarantee site improvements for Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st Avenue North, to $275,720.00. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. loi-S3I w '(2 W AND 50 '50 C F z a a2 a2 Z - J --, -- --------------- --_ • (7) t2 J Z 3(111 v 41 J .1 ZWp ct: 4r00 W R - - j = z (2031 r:.• co JA F Y e Q 240.00 z OT F w : c _ /N i g wee o7 1 Toe 1 .: U 4 LLJ ( 28) ( 2i) 2 Z (33) _] W y A V rlol (27 a I I N x M 1 IIS TE s ;. LIDT A 0 z ( 16) (25) f . I r i "S I 1. I LL - tt se, OAKS 3) I Q2 MTII 24) 5u e1 R' y L) W (5+) 35) rs , ffI ° C a 2 1 2ii+t i, JJT "- (23) 30 1.1 11.722. e2'1 'Tj ' A (55), 40. (' , 7 CLSON 3 r C 3:15'•. C (7y ( a 10 e S` `' • '' I P) B OCs Fa, w >> ' ( I) ( 2) ( 1) ( 19) ` ( zo) 9 / I S fsy h^1 7 8 Lel 6 0 r 1 _ :. 45. SUNSEq ' I RASETTlo• ,,,, ZINNIA L, A. cl> , z I I r THn. ADDI ION193 s 8 9 10( B OCK 17 . OO • I I c37) 21 cis) cs i I 0 S TLO I S OT J(38) 9J V IGT cVEr-cN-HE-i 6R FF-- •, a R 1l.s9 50B 31 3 w -yrs . .. ....;. 2•.... _...., OUTLOT C (+z) ( I) I a 8TH ADDITION ------------ 22 R BLOCK 2 1. -. ------------ OU 4, X LOT I I ' (10) 2 UTH V! - Dail CITY PLYvowCITCAJ. 14 :. 4 ' Y4. c... t R' _ 2639.20' RES (2) - 40 i - (+) 5) u CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5th day of October , 1987. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Vasiliou, Zitur, Crain and Sisk The following members were absent: None Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87-632 APPROVING SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR CARLSON TECH CENTER BUILDING A (87092) WHEREAS, Trammell Crow Company has requested approval of a Site Plan and Variance for Building A an office/showroom facility in the Carlson Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Trammell Crow Company for a Site Plan and Variance for Building A, an office/showroom facility in the Carlson Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 5. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provisions. 7. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants and fire lanes. 8. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no outside storage is permitted. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO LI Page two Resolution No. 87-632 9. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy. 10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 11. A variance is approved for a 32 ft. setback from the property line to the parking lot versus the Zoning Ordinance requirement of 50 ft. on the basis that the Ordinance Variance Criteria have been met. 12. The rooftop equipment on Building A shall be visually screened, per Ordinance, to effectively buffer noise so that it is not transmitted beyond the boundaries of the property so to be perceptible in the abutting residential district. 13. The berm to be installed along the north property line of the site shall be 6 ft. above the floor elevation of Building A; the slope shall be within the City standards. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Zitur, Crain and Sisk The following voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988 TO: City Manager James G. Willis FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director Blair Tremere ( SUBJECT REDUCTION'OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092) ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the reduction of the Site Performance Guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property located at 13805 1st Avenue North. BACKGROUND: The City Council authorized a reduction of this financial quarantee on March 7, 1988. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Planning Staff inspected the site. The following deficiencies and requirements remain: 1. Site Grading 2. Storm Sewer 3. Water Mains, Hydrants, and Sanitary Sewer 4. Bituminous Paving 5. Concrete Curb and Gutter 6. Concrete Sidewalk 7. Exterior Lighting 8. Landscaping 9. An "As -Built" Utility Plan RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend adoption of the attached Resolution to reduce the financial guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property at 13805 1st Avenue North. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Site Location Map 3. Resolution No. 87-633 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092) WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st Avenue North was approved under City Council Resolution No. 87-633; and, WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of a Construction Loan in the amount of S95,000.00; and, WHEREAS, the City Council on March 7, 1988, under Resolution No. 88-161 approved the reduction to $83,400.00; and, WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and recommends reduction of the financial guarantee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the reduction of the Construction Loan in the amount of $83,400.00 which was submitted to guarantee site improvements for Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st Avenue North, to $81,600.00. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 0 2 I AvE, z, 3/2/ag 40 liz ILM 10.0 map WOOD ra a Q Wo VZOO o mi F s ( 2.) w•o Vii:, s' 26)m ao (n 1 < _z a Z s(N ° ": 1 tt) SFT 131,79 OAK! ( S l6" ` (2s) - Su cis) ( r~. V cs) MILL zc=•, I :+ z w) crn • q9, ', 4,^ yo C LSON . x 1 3 K r rr•.Y a. n II ) 4 I f 3(15) i C N) ° (6) ) 71 to po / 4i- LIP) BLOCK Qa,_/`` y () (2) (19) ) (20) (---- 1 /r e J. I I O_ S 8a,,e LW ZINNIA LA. p C ca, SUNSET •` .rw , 1 n« 7 12 T ADDITIION94tNX r i B OCK I17a•; j' •e,a I50Q' CARLSON CENTER I (m) cs7) air ; BLOCK I 1 pt 1 ;k LOT I I _ •> 145T AVE. Flo. 30) 16T AVENUE NORTALLrt ui SITE . r . i OUTLOTOEM ' C (12) R8THADDITION • i BLOCKiBLOCK 2 D U TL O T: A y... `.---------= LOT I J i~. ( '•.•'}(i0) 1 CITY 00 A I. F 0j. 40. 1453 267Y.20' RES (3) at _ I ( 4) may. `• CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5th day of October 1987. The following members were present: Mayor Schnee e'er, 7ouncilmem erg s Vasil -10-u—, Zitur, Crain and Sisk The following members were absent: None Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87-633 APPROVING SITE PLAN .AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR CARLSON TECH CENTER BUILDING B (87092) WHEREAS, Trammell Crow Company has requested approval of a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Building B, a facility with 50% warehouse/showroom and 50% office use in the Carlson Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Trammell Crow CompanyforaSitePlanandConditionalUsePermitforBuildingB, a facility with 50% warehouse/showroom and 50% office use in the Carlson Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 5. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provisions. 7. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants and fire lanes. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO Page two Resolution No. 87-633 8. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no outside storage is permitted. 9. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy. 10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 11. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 12. Compliance with applicable Building and Fire Code requirements shall be verified by the City prior to Permit issuance. 13. All parking shall be off-street in designated areas which comply with the Zoning Ordinance. 14. Appropriate legal documents for shared drives and access shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded by the petitioner prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. The Conditional Use Permit is for 50% office occupancy. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: avor, chneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Zitur, Crain and Sisk The following voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I,- ck — T-- N CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988 TO: City Manager dames G. Willis FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director Blair Tremere ' SUBJECT RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151) ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the release of the Site Performance Guarantee for Honeywell, Inc. for property located at 12001 Highway 55. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Planning staff inspected the site and found all the site improvements to be completed and recommend adoption of the Resolution authoring the release of the Site Performance Guarantee for Honeywell, Inc. for property at 12001 Highway 55. 1. Resolution 2. Site Location Map 3. Resolution No. 85-166 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87 - AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151) WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Honeywell, Inc. located at 12001 Highway 55 was approved under City Council Resolution No. 85-166; and, WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of a Bond in the amount of 520,000.00; and, WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and recommends release of the financial guarantee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the release of the Bond No. 400HF5413 in the amount of $20,000.00, which was submitted to guarantee site improvements for Honeywell, Inc. located at 12001 Highway 55. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular Feting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, -as held on the 4th _ day of March 1985, The following members were present: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Crain, Schneider and Vasiliou The Irolloving members were absent: Councilmember Neils f Nf Y!f f#f Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved Its adoption: RESOLUTIOIJ NO. 8.- 166 APPROVING MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN, AND VARIANCE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151) WHEREAS, Honeywell, Inc. has requested approval of a Master Plan Amendment, Site Plan, and Variance for an approximate 6,000 ft. addition at 12001 State Highway 55; arid, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Honeywell, Inc. for a Master Plan Amendment, Site Plan, and Variance for an approximate 6,000 ft. addition located at 12001 State Highway 55, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum 2. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for complet:un of site improvements, prior to issuance of permits. 3. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- als per Ordinance provisions, and in accordance with the Master Plan staff dated January 21, 1985. 4. Approved Variances include: a 50 ft. setback to the zoning line between B-1 and FRO Districts, rather than the required 75 ft. setback considering the property is intended to remain undeveloped and will serve as a buffer to already devel- oped areas. 5. Submittal of a complete landscape plan prior to issuance of Building Permits. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Cour.cilmember Crain, and upon vote being taken thereon, the foll-,wing voted in favor thereof: Mayor avenport, Councilmembers Crain, Schneider and Vasiliou The following voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 0 DATE M FROM CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO April 14, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988 James G. Willis, City Manager Blair Tremere, Community Development Director D:_ - SUBJECT AUTHORIZED PAYMENT FOR REHABILITATION WORK PERFORMED THROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing payment for completed work for a rehabilitation job where the final cost exceeded the maximum qrant amount as established by the City Council policy. The work was authorized under the Community Development Block Grant Program which does have adequate funding to cover this work. BACKGROUND: The application involved structural improvements to the roof and to the chimney of an older owner -occupied home. The necessary work was found to be appropriate under the guidelines of the program and the owner is qualified based on income and assets. The estimated cost from the low bidder was high compared to the maximum established by the City Council several years ago, S8,250.00. The contractor was requested to reduce the amount of work so that the cost would be below or at the policy maximum. There was very little margin for extra or unexpected necessary work. Such work was identified as the roof system was being replaced, primarily in the form of the need for additional insulation, and the work was authorized by the City staff member in charge of program administration. The total cost of the work exceeds the $8,250.00 maximum by $1,602.00. Subsequent to the authorization of this work, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority HRA) recommended raising the maximum grant amount to $10,000; the City Council deter- mined that it should remain at $8,250.00. I was not aware of the specific matter until after the City Council action. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The request is to authorize an exemption for this particular case from the City Council policy. There are available federal Community Development Block Grant funds. Page two Memorandum to City Manager 1985CityCouncilMeetingApril18, April 14, 1988 Ihave carefully examined the records in the particular case and find that the work was bona fide rehabilitation work and the so -ca ilei mprovementork was also in order as matter of proper construction and energy 9 sigHaled the potential The error was one of judgment. nt hamougnt and initial shoubid ld haveshould been have carefulln a rantz amounand t for exceeding the maximum g resolved before the work co unt ced l specific The authorization was ereceived to exceed the should not have been authorized City policy. ram does have guidelines and check points which designed The rehabilitation progThere assure the expenditures are ofide a instance which find within isannexceptinopolicies. exception, not pthe rule. was a deviation in this nd I have required the per involved to caeSfnotyhappenevaluate agai n. update For example, guidelines are and procedural steps to assure that this omaxium l flag establishing a limit that is below the City o uinitialcil ablis eexceedmthatwhich1 werllimit. es pro posed work if t a closer examination of p P provided to absorb additional or unexamina- That will assure that a margin has been p ated upon thorough work. Usually, the "extra" items can be reasonably anticipated judgments in a tion by Building Inspectors and bn amount inrs. exesslof the $ 8f all , 250.00ewoud be needed, is particular instance conclude that a work the proposal will be brought to the City Council for consideration be ore authorized. RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSIONS the tance was I recommend adoption of this Resolution orehabilitationsis aandhthe oprovisionrkin sfor seffective justified as a matter of the structural provideThehomeisofsounod construction condition wwherbe lit should l w it has now been br g subsequent additions); shelter for many years. administrative error has been appropriately addressed. I have concluded that the The but needed a heightened awareness of the need to program is operating appropriately, exemption actions firmly identify the total cost up front and to in appropriate be fore work is authorized. The Community Development Block Grant Program establishes he reaffirmed policy and will see that it istheincome qualification limits, but leaves the maximum grant amount to the discretion of the local authority. We understand followed as it was intended by the City Council. Attachment Resolution 17 rO SIi,' P;EHH'I; ITHTIT GPP; SCO -E F I ; PROVENI, E"JS homeowner: grant administrator: r M It Dale, AUTHORMY G;4 OF FuVMQUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOLKEVARD i2 -4A, ' MN 33"7 - phone: 9!;(q_ Z jOD Below is a listing of eligible repairs as determined by the Administering Entity, prioritized in the order listed. Bids must be obtained by the arant applicant for this work, up to the maximum Grant amount allowed. Any questions regarding the priority ranking of the work should be directed to the Grant Administrator. All questions by contractors pertaining to the work to be bid should be directed to the Grant Administrator listed above. D rV D 6 v/f- W JV- b aro Gu 5 r,Wv, n baa -v' o 40RK NR0iD0Jr,1 iD 77T i !' i TT Fl,I I I term zed Cost Sl'Sfvrh dYll ii5/OD ;r c r0p, kna,7?4-J, W15' vr froj v' Coves dor all Io, ocv r' {ur r/,,r gs G N tri Or 0f nOl s pS af'yl T7v as 3 Co Stru f a Acv f r ,4 Sa/ roof oaf 7*1J Sf51 N D. G, I,i 1 '7 K 2 x hGH ° Ana/ res f oh 1d 01 Cu f G4v Gid iGS/' S {i f 5, Cot fraar /oj a'i roof, ala-, c S Homeowr HOUSING; REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY Of PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD PLYMOUTH, MN 5u47 ame: ure: U 7/' 3 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING REHABILITATION; GRANT PROGRAM, HOMEOWNER APP'ICATION FOR GRANT— it/ Z RANTCom% - HOUSEHOLD INFORMATICN -- Please Print First Name Name of Spouse Address Home Phone _ City PL y/ t4l D U 7- ly /, Zip Code Work Phone City of residence if other than mailing address Marital Status (check one) married, single, divorced, separated, widowed Race (check one) White, Black, American Indian/Native Alaskan, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander The information concerning Minority Group Categories is requested for statistical purposes only so that Hennepin County may determine the degree to which its programs are utilizedbyMinorityhouseholds. INCOME INFORMATION Income" means any amount received from the following sources by a Resident. Any public assistance VA educational grants Estate or trust income Gains from the sale of property or securities Pensions and annuities, including social security and PERA Alimony and/or child support Interest and dividends Salaries, including commissions, tips, bonuses, and overtime pay Rental income Business profit for self-employed, including farmers and child care, etc. Payments received from property being sold on contract for deed All other income received by the household List all the residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes, if any. RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least nine (9) months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. Total number of residents in the household I_ income of names of ages of residents residents residents per month S S s source of income OFFICE USE ONLY 1 in ouseho d verified incomes q — s s s S S Total Income S per monthsperyear O-S, D income per month s Cp inc me per year ASSET INFORMATION List the cash value of assets held by all residents of your household. If money is owed on any item, the value listed should equal the market value of the item minus the amount that is owed. OFFICE USE ONLY verified assets 1. CASH on hand........................................S S 2. CASH in checking accounts ...........................5 3. CASH in savings accounts (including those held .....$ C $ in trust) 11. Cash value of ScCurtties or 6.5. Savings oonas...... b $ 5. Redemption value of life insurance policies.........! Q 5 6. Current Market Value of real estate, NOT INCLUDING the property to be improved and up to 2 surrounding acres. Include 100% of the outstanding balance owed to you on property sold on Contract for Deed ... S () S 7. Other personal property (excluding household furnishings, clothing and one personal vehicle) ..... $ 14 $ TOTAL ASSETS ............................................$ ' / $ PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide the following information about the property to be improved with this grant. I. Is your property: a single family house; a duplex c! 2. How many years have you lived in the house? cam'' 3. What is the anprnYlmate age cf the houoc° -/ C Gd /LJ — --- v 4. Do you have any outstanding mortgages on the house? Yes; __LL No If yes, with whom? Amount S 5. Do you have any outstanding Contract for Deed on the house? Yes; k ----No If yes, with whom? Amount $ 6. Have you ever received a Housing Rehabilitation Grant before? Yes; /-'No If yes, what type? Amount S Urban Hennepin County or an authorized representative shall have the right to inspect the property to be improved at any time from the date of the Grant upon giving due notice to the occupant(s). Any person who makes a false statement or misrepresentation in connection with the appli- cation for or use of Urban Hennepin County Grant funds shall be subject to a fine or imprisonment, or both, under the provisions of the Minnesota Criminal Code, and/or may be required to return all or part of the Grant Funds to Urban Hennepin County. I, the undersigned, certify subject to penalty under law that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that the provisions stated are accepted and agreed to. 7 Pi anMts ie date'of application Note: All names and financial information provided on this application are considered private data on individuals and are subject to privacy of information provisions, pursuanttoStateStatute. Not,/ To : "OU6(Na/1Eoevso04++f AUTHORnTY C?Y Of PLYMOUTH 00 PLYMOUTH BOULNVARD Pl YMCA mi 'µw "AV CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 13, 1988 TO: games G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City SUBJECT AMENDMENT TO PLYMOUTH CITY CODE SECTION 1310.03 RELATING TO PARKING REGULATIONS 1. ACTION REQUESTED: The attached ordinance amendment is housekeeping in nature and specifically allows city vehicles to park within 20 feet of an intersection or traffic control device to conduct official citybusiness. Under the current ordinance, a city vehicle could be tagged if parked within 20 feet of an intersection, even though conducting official business such as sign installation or repair, hydrant painting or water valve exercise. The ordinance is recommended for adoption. FB:kec attachment Ordinance No. 88 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND PARKING REGULATIONS, AND AMENDING SUBSECTION 1310.03 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1. The Plymouth City Code, Subsection 1310.03, Subdivision 1 is amended to read: 1310.03 Parking Prohibited. Subdivision 1. Specified Places. A vehicle may not be parked, whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device in any of the places specified in this Subsection. This subsec- tion does not apply to City vehicles while on official City business when it is reasonably necessary for the City vehicles to be parked in a manner that would_ otherwise be in violation of this subsection. Sec. 2. This ordinance is effective on the date of its publication in accordance with Subsection 110.11. Mayor Attest: Clerk 0066OR07.I34 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: April 13. 1988 for Council Meeting of 04/18/88 TO: James G. Willis - City Manager FROM: Richard J. Carlauist - Public Safety Director SUBJECT REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS ACTION REQUESTED: It is recommended that the City Council pass the accomoanvina resolution re_iectina the recent bids received on the towing contract for 1988 through 1990. I have reviewed this matter with the City Attorney and he advises there is adecauate reason to reject the bids if the Council so chooses. BACKGROUND: The current towing contract expires April 30. 1988. It is with Valley Towing__. which is located in the City of Plymouth. They have held the contract since 1986. when the towing contract with Plymouth Automotive was discontinued by Council action. We received three bids for the towina contract. which has a three-vear duration Period. They were from Dick's Towina located in Hopkins: Kellv's Towing located in Wayzata: and, Valley Towina located in Plymouth. A towing proposal format was used for the bidding process. The Council should also be aware that we have an ordinance amendment change concerning towing that will be Presented at a future Council Meetina. The reasons that we want to reject the current bids and re -bid are: 1. The maiority of our tows involve passengers vehicles. We had anticipated two different categories of these types of tows. i.e. Type I durina the daytime. and Type III during the evening. We had also created a Type II tow for all daytime tows involving motorcycles. snowmobiles. etc.. and a Type IV tow for the same types of vehicles but during the evening. In so doina. we had one bidder, Dick's Towing. who bid extremely low in the Type I1 and Type IV towings, thereby affecting his overall bid dramatically in comparison to the others. By referring to the attached summary of the respective bids from the three organizations. it is apparent that our process was impaired by creatina a format that could be modified in an innovative way. Also. with respect to Dick's Towina, he added a definition under the storaae rate that was different from the one in our bidding proposal. i.e., he wrote "Storage per day, midnight to midnight. or calendar day". In effect. if a vehicle were towed at 11:30 p.m.. and not picked up until the following morning at 8:00 a.m.. he could charge 2 days storaae under that stipulation. Our bidding proposal would not allow that. In any event, Dick's Towing_ was the lowest total tabulation because of the previously mentioned motor- cycle and snowmobile tows. REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS For Council Meeting_ of 04/18/88 Paae Two BACKGROUND: (continued) 2. With respect to Kelly's Towing in Wayzata. we found that he had the lowest towina costs for passenaer vehicles. He also had the lowest storage rate per day. However, in checking with the City of Wayzata, we found that the business that Kelly's Towina is conducting at 253 East Lake Street in Wayzata is not allowed by City ordinance: nor has Kelly applied for a conditional use permit to operate same. 3. The third bidder and current provider. Valley Towina, was the highest in total tabulation and passenaer vehicle tows. In order to be a business located in Plymouth and bid on the towina contract reauires that the operator must conform to the City of Plymouth code. Valley Towina currently has inside storaae and does conform to the Plymouth City Code. However, we did not include lanauaae such as this for contractors outside of our City. and therefore could be faced with a situation where legal action could literally close the contracting service down. thereby affecting us. A possible exposure in this area is the reference made to Kelly's Towina in the preceding paragraph. For Council information. Dick's Towina_ has a conditional use permit for an impound lot from the City of Hopkins. I think it is in the best interest of all concerned for the City of Plymouth to re -bid the towing contract. In order to minimize any problems of the type encountered, we will tighten up on the definition of types of tows. In short, how much for a tow and daily storaae charae! RJC•as 0 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. a _ Council of the City of Plymouth. Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: The following_ members were absent: tion. meeting of the City day of introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoo- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS WHEREAS. the City of Plymouth regularly enters into a towina contract on a three-year basis as provided by City code: and WHEREAS. the current contract expires April 30. 1988: and WHEREAS. the three bids that were received may not reflect the best interest of the City of Plymouth during a three-vear contract: NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA: to reiect all towing_ bids and hereby direct the Finance Director to re- bid the towing contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT an extension of the current contract with Valley Towing be implemented for a period not lonaer than ninety (90) days. The motion for the adoption of the foreaoing Resolution was dulv seconded by and upon vote being_ taken thereon. the following_ voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared dulv passed and adopted. BID SL MARY FOR TOWING AND BIDOLMING OF VEHICLES DICK'S TOWING MOM TYPE 1988 1989 1990 I $32.08 $32.08 $32.08 II. 9.41 9.41 9.41 III. 32.08 32.08 32.08 IV. 14.16 14.16 14.16 WINCHING .00 .00 .00 SERVICE CALLS .00 .00 .00 TOWING .00 .00 .00 STORAGE RATE PER DAY 10.00 11.00 13.00 Service Calls and Towing of Cit KELLY'S TOWING YEAR 1988 1989 1990 25.00 $27.00 $29.00 25.00 27.00 29.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 00 .00 .00 00 .00 .00 6.00 7.00 8.00 y Owned Passenger Cars. APRIL 12, 1988 VALLEY TOWING YEAR 1988 1989 1990 35.00 $37.50 $40.00 35.00 37.50 40.00 40.00 42.50 45.00 40.00 42.50 45.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Figures adjusted to reflect a more accurate comparison of costs since the majority of tows are passenger type vehicles (Type I and III) and impounded for one day. 42.08 43.08 45.08 19.41 20.41 22.41 42.08 43.08 45.08 24.16 25.16 27.16 31.00 34.00 37.00 31.00 34.00 37.00 36.00 39.00 42.00 36.00 39.00 42.00 45.00 $47.50 $50.00 45.00 47.50 50.00 50.00 52.50 55.00 50.00 52.50 55.00 13 PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY INFORMATION FOR TOWING AND IMPOUNDING OF VEHICLES April 12, 1988 DICK'S TOWING KELLY'S TOWING VALLEY TOWING LOCATION OF 900 N.E. 2nd St. 255 East Lake 14288 23rd. Ave. IMPOUND LOT Hopkins Street, Wayzata Plymouth OWN OR LEASE 5 yr. lease thru Monthly lease 36 month leasePROPERTYOct. 1992 thru. April, 1990 MEETS ZONIN REQUIREMENTS Yes No Yes MILES FROM CITY LIMITS 4.2 miles 1.7 miles Within city limits SPA ES AVAILABLE 50 40 30 inside storage TRUCKS AVAILABLE 8 5 7 STORAGE AREA FENCED yes no N/A TOTAL RELEASE HRS. AVAILABLE Weekday 50 hrs. 50 hrs. 47.5 hrs. Weekend 6 hrs. 5 hrs. 3 hrs. BETTER BUSINESS No record of any No record of any No record of anyBREAcomplaints. complaints. complaints. CREDIT CHECKS No negative No negative No negative information. information. information. C TYPE I: All daytime tows involving a vehicle which is on or immediately adjacent to a public street or highway. TYPE II: All daytime tows involving a motorcycle, moped, snowmobile, or all terrain vehicle. TYPE III: All evening tows involvng a vehicle which is on or immediately adjacent to a public street or highway. TYPE IV: ALL evening tows involving a motorcycle, moped, snowmobile, or all terrain vehicle. WINCHING MORE THAN 50 FEET: SERVICE CALLS: (City Owned Passenger Vehicles Only) TOWING City Owned Passenger Vehicles Only) STORAGE RATE: (Per day) The undersigned has examined the advertisement for bids, the specifications for towing and impounding of vehicles and the towing ordinance for the City of Plymouth on file in the offices of the City of Plymouth. This bid is based on the document on file at the time of the bid. BIDDER TO FILL IN THE FOLLOWING: FIRM NAME: TOW TYPE I TOW TYPE II TOW TYPE III TOW TYPE IV WINCHING MORE THAN 50' PERIOD COMMENCING MAY 1, 1988 MAY 1,1989 MAY 1,1990 SERVICE CALLS (city owned cars) TOWING (city owned cars) STORAGE RATE (per day) TOTALS BID AVERAGE TRUCKS ONE (1) TON OR MORE IN WEIGHT EXCLUDED FROM BIDDING. 6) MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 12, 1988, for Council Meeting of April 18 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: 1988 REFORESTATION BID 1. ACTION REQUIa=3 : The attached resolution awards the 1988 Reforestation Bid to Lino Lakes Nursery in the amount of $22,895. 2. BACKGROUND: As in past years the City forester is responsible for planting trees on publicly owned land. In 1988, the three sites that will receive the most attention are: A. Parkers Lake City Park B. Turtle Lake Neighborhood Park C. Rolling Hills Neighborhood Park 3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CON=IONS: I recommend the City Council award the 1988 reforestation contract to Lino Lakes Nursery in the amount of 22,895. Eric J. Blank, Director Parks and Recreation EJB/np Attachments CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: The following members were absent: XXX adoption: lYXX meeting of the City Council of day of , introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AWARDING BID FOR THE 1988 REFORESTATION PROPOSAL WHEREAS, the Forestry Division is responsible for the 1988 Reforestation program to be carried out on City owned lands; and WHEREAS, in accordance with City bid specifications that were prepared, distributed and bid proposals received and opened March 30, 1988 and WHEREAS, the following bids were received: R1 LINO LAKES NURSERY 8,545. 9,122. 5,228. 22,895 MARGOLIS BROTHERS 10,985. 11,370. 6,577. 28,932 GREENWORKS 12,780. 10,520. 6,490. 29,790 NOBLE NURSERY 11,950. 11,745. 7,075. 30,770 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING 14,034.54 12,568.27 8,670.48 35,273.29 DUNDEE LANDSCAPE NO BID GREEN ACRES TREE NO BID SHADE TREE LANDSCAPING NO BID WHEREAS, the bid of Lino Lake Nursery is in conformance with the City specifications for the plant materials Lino Lakes Nursery is therefore declared the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: that it should and hereby does accept the proposal of Lino Lakes Nursery in the amount of $22,895.00 further, that funds for this proposal are authorized from Forestry account NO. 206-206-810.26 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 4, 1988 TO: Eric Blank, Director of Parks & Recreation FROM: Mark S. Peterson, Superintendent of Parks SUBJECT: 1988 REFORESTATION BID On March 30, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. bids were received and opened for the 1988 Reforestation Program. Bids were received from the following: Lino Lakes Nursery $22,895. Margolis Brothers $28,932. Greenworks $29,790. Noble Nursery $30,770. Midwest Landscaping $35,273.29 Lino Lakes Nursery is low at $22,895. They have been awarded previous reforestation contracts with Plymouth and have performed satisfactorily. It is my recommendation that the City award the 1988 Reforestation Contract to Lino Lakes Nursery. MSP:cr DATE OF OPENING March 30, 1988 TIME OF OPENING 9:00 A.M. BID QUOTATION SPRING REFORESTATION 1988 NAME OF BIDDING CONTKACT PERSON BID BOND AMT. AMOUNT OF BID (LIST NUMBER CO & ADDRESS & TELE. 1 0. TYPE SECTION BADS IF APPR( 1. Greenworks Tom Grygelko 5% Sec.A $12,780. 8940 Greenfield Rd. 498-7696 Surety Sec.B 10,520. Loretto, MN 55357 Sec.0 6,490. TOTAL 29,790. 2. Lino Lakes Nursery Steve Houle 5% Sec.A $8,545. 18400 Lexington Ave 464-6026 Surety Sec.B 9,122. Wyoming, MN 55092 Sec.0 5,228. TOTAL 22,895. 3. Midwest Landscaping Roy Anderson 5% Sec.A $14,034.54 15050 93rd. Ave. N. 420-4201 Surety Sec.B. 12,568.27 Maple Grove, MN Sec.0 8,670.48 55369 TOTAL 35,273.29 4. Noble Nursery Tom Carlson 5% Sec.A $11,950. 10530 Troy Ln. 720-2419 Surety not to Sec.B 11,745. Maple Grove, MN exceed $1,750. Sec.C. 7,075. 55369 TOTAL 30,770. 5. Margolis Brothers Jerry Romero 5% Sec.A $10,985. 1171 West Larpenteur 488-7258 Surety Sec.B 11,370. Roseville, MN 55113 Sec.0 6,577. TOTAL 28,932. 6. Dundee Landscape Cent r Dave Nassif NA No Bid 16800 Hwy 55 559-4004 Plymouth, MN 55446 7. Green Acres Tree SErv'ce Wes Bendickson NA No Bid 6705 Hwy 12 479-1107 Maple Plain, MN 55359 8. Shade Tree Landscaping Rich Eide NA No Bid 2024 Yellowstone Trail 560-3640 Brooklyn Pakr, MN 55444 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 DATE: April 14, 1988 for City Council meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager / ' FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manage AA SUBJECT APPROVAL OF 1988 CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND MEDICINE LAKE LINES FOR THE PROVISION OF PLYMOUTH METROLINK 1 ACTION REQUESTED: Annual operation of Plymouth Metrolink requires the execution of two contracts. The first contract is between the City andtheRegionalTransitBoard (R.T.B.), (previously with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) and sets forth the general requirements for the Program and procedures for financing and reimbursement. The second contract between the City of Plymouth and Medicine Lake Lines set forth operating responsibilities for Medicine Lake Lines and administrative responsibilities for the City. Copies of both documents amounting to almost forty pages are available for City Council review and inspection at City Center. Council approval of the attached resolution is recommended which authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract with Medicine Lake Lines and the separate contract with the R.T.B. for the provision of Plymouth Metrolink Services for calendar year 1988. 2. BACKGROUND: Contract between the R.T.B. and the City of Plymouth In July, 1987 we began assembling the contract documents for the 1988 Plymouth Metrolink operation. Funds for operating Plymouth Metrolink are derived from the transit tax levy of 1.5 mills collected by the R.T.B. In the case of Plymouth, this amounts to about $900,000. The proposed 1988 contract would continue the 1.5 mill levy. It would also allow for $430,910 of the 900,000 levy to be returned to the City to provide services to our residents and businesses. The remaining money subsidizes the regional transit system. The subsidy required for 1988 Plymouth Metrolink operation is $18,240 less than the 1987 amount of $449,150. The primary reason for decrease is much more economical insurance costs for Medicine Lake Lines. The services provided essentially will be the same as in previous years. APPROVAL OF 1988 CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND MEDICINE LAKE LINES FOR THE PROVISION OF PLYMOUTH METROLINK April 14, 1988 Page 2 Plymouth/Medicine Lake Lines Contract The contract between the City and Medicine Lake Lines sets forth the relationship of the two parties - Plymouth as administrator, and Medicine Lakes Lines as operator of the system. The contract reflects fine tuning in commuter/reverse commuter routes in December 1987 to better respond to community growth and development. The contract also contemplates the lease of six new mini -coaches for the same cost as the combined lease/maintenance costs of our four year old mini -coaches in 1987. The new vehicles, in addition to being more dependable, will be a positive asset in drawing new riders. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Authorization of both contracts is recommended through adoption of the attached resolutions. The three-year Plymouth Metrolink objectives adopted by the Council earlier this year will be used as evaluatory criteria next year when we request contract approval for the 1989 program year. FB:kec attachment CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: -- The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSIT AND AN AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PLYMOUTH METROLINK PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM WITH MEDICINE LAKE LINES WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has operated the Plymouth Metrolink System since duly 1, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Regional Transit Board has assumed the role and contract administrator in place of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the City has annually entered into contract with the Contract Administrator and with Medicine Lake Lines to clearly set forth the responsibilities of each party; and WHEREAS, the Regional Transit Board has agreed under contract to reimburse costs to the City associated with Plymouth Metrolink for 1988 in a maximum amount not to exceed 430,910.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that it should, and hereby does, authorize that: 1. The City Manager to execute the Regional Transit Board agreement with the City of Plymouth for funding public transit. 2. The City Manager execute an agreement for operation and management of Plymouth Metrolink Public Transportation System for calendar year 1988 with Medicine Lake Lines, Inc. 3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute requests for reimbursement from the Regional Transit Board during calendar year 1988. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. El o. A. MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: April 7, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer SUBJECT: PROPOSED PROCEDURES TO ELIMINATE INFLOW/INFILTRATION (I/I) INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Property owners in Amber Woods Addition, located north of County Road 24 and west of State Highway 101, have received a letter identifying the problems associated with clear water entering the sanitary sewer. Also, a neighborhood meeting was held and a follow-up letter stating what was discussed was sent out (see attached copies of the information). We have identified the illegal sump -pump connections and the fact that the sanitary sewer manholes are leaking and need repair. As a part of the 1988 maintenance program, we will be repairing the damaged manholes with City forces or contract forces under our supervision. The residents are responsible for correcting the illegal connection and have asked for assistance from the City to evaluate their individual problems and assist in improving the yard drainage associated with the sump -pump water. After discussions with the Building Department, we are recommending that two intern University Engineering students be hired. These individuals would meet with each resident to discuss their individual problems concerning the I/I and yard drainage. If expertise concerning sump -pumps is beyond that of the Engineering students, both the Building and Engineering Department staff will be available to assist the residents. These student Engineers will also be used to track erosion problems and assist the Engineering Department with construction management, inspection and record drawings of City-wide projects. Also attached is a copy of the "draft" letter proposed to be sent the residents of the Amber Woods and Hughes Addition to kick the program off. We intend to evaluate all properties during the summer (from June 15 to September 30, 1988). It will also be necessary to have a neighborhood meeting with the Hughes Addition in the immediate future explaining all the information previously presented to the Amber Woods Addition. In that way, all the residents involved with the program will be equally informed. PROPOSED PROCEDURES TO ELIMINATE INFLOW/INFILTRATION (I/I) INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM April 7, 1988 Page Two I recommend that two University Engineering students be hired to implement the infiltration program with Amber Woods and Hughes Additions between June 15 and September 30, 1988. We are presently budgeted for one staff person to manage erosion control for 1988, estimated cost of $4,400. Additional funding of 4,000 is needed for the second staff person. This could be taken from the salary budgeted for manhole sealing. If we are unable to achieve 100% cooperation from the residents with pump connections to the sanitary sewer, we will be proposing to assess the estimated $800 to those individual residents with continual sanitary sewer connections. Our intention is to bring the situation back to the City Council in September for further action. This is only the first step in developing an annual program to eliminate clear water from entering the sanitary sewer system throughout Plymouth. 04070. 161191 Chester J. fiv CJH:kh attachment: Letters June, 1988 SUBJECT: INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Residents of Amber Woods and Hughes Addition: During March of this year, representatives from the City's Engineering Department met with the Board of Directors of the Amber Woods Homeowner's Association and held a neighborhood meeting of the Amber Woods Addition. 155 letters were sent to homeowners in the Amber Woods Addition and 24 residents attended the meeting at City Hall on March 15. After obtaining input from the Amber Woods Addition, the Engineering Department submitted a report to the City Council at their April 18, 1988, meeting. The report contained recommendations for resolution of the infiltration/inflow problem. Direction was given by the City Council, and subsequently, in May, a neighborhood meeting was held with the Hughes Addition residents to explain the problems, obtain input and discuss proposed solutions. This letter is being sent to 207 residents of the Amber Woods and Hughes Additions. It is the intent of the Engineering Department to meet with every homeowner to discuss the collective, as well as individual problems and recommend solutions to both the sump -pump water and subsequent drainage problems. It would expedite matters if each homeowner would call City Hall and ask for the Engineering Department after receipt of this letter and prior to June 15. 1988. The purpose of the call would be to schedule a meeting with a representative of the Engineering Department to review your particular situation. It is the intent of the City Council to have all illegal connections to the City's sanitary sewer system removed by September 30, 1988, with City approved sump -pump installations in place and in operation by that date. In the event that illegal connections still remain, we will be recommending to the City Council that a surcharge be placed on those homes in the amount of $66 per month. This is the estimated treatment cost for processing clear water through the sanitary sewer system. Sincerely, Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P.E. City Engineer JRS:kh 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 March 8, 1988 CITY O PLYMOUT4 Residents of Amber Woods Addition: SUBJECT: INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM On March 15 1988 at 7.00 P.m. the City has scheduled a meetine at City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, to discuss with you the details addressed in this letter. Please plan to attend. In response to increasing awareness of a Metropolitan -wide problem with infiltration and inflow (I/I) into various cities respective sanitary sewer systems, the City of Plymouth authorized a Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation survey during 1987. The survey and report was completed for the City by the consulting firm Donohue and Associates. It is apparent that a program should be undertaken in an effort to reduce the infiltration and inflow, the two conditions that substantially affect the design and operation of both waste water treatment plants and interceptor sewers. Infiltration is ground water entering into the sewer system because of deterioration of the sewer and/or faulty original construction. Inflow is the entry of the surface waters into the sewers through legal or illegal connections of private drainage systems to the local sanitary sewer systems. Both infiltration and inflow introduce clean water into the sanitary sewer system. This water must be handled and treated along with the normal waste water produced by domestic, industrial and other sources. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission is considering a penalty to be assessed against communities that have not implemented a plan to reduce the Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) in their sanitary sewer system. Presently, the citizens of Plymouth are paying high sewer rates to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission because of these added costs. We have severe problems within our community including, but not limited to, the Amber Woods Addition. Excessive levels of I/I in the Metropolitan Sewer System have a number of severe impacts on that system, such as: Higher peak flows due to high inflows occasionally causes bypassing of untreated sewage and flooding of basements. Larger capital investments resulting from oversized treatment facilities to accommodate this clear water. The timing of treatment plant improvements is substantially moved ahead by capacity I/I uses that would otherwise be available to handle urban growth in the service area. Both operations and maintenance costs are increased. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM March 8, 1988 Page Two It appears that I/I is probably the greatest factor presently causing expansion of interceptors and waste water treatment plants well before the expansion dates originally planned. The Donohue study estimates that the annual inflow of sump pumps improperly connected in the Amber Woods Addition is estimated to exceed 20 million gallons per year. The treatment costs for I 6 I only are estimated to be 800 per year per home This is above and beyond the treatment costs for the processing of normal sewage. It can be seen from these figures that the cost of the problem is astronomical and growing in dollar value. There are several corrective measures available, such as: An increased rate for every home owner until they have provided the City with evidence that they do not have an illegal connection to the sanitary sewer system. The City would be willing to consider setting up a project to correct the problem using one of several alternates listed below. The numbers assigned to the alternates are for identification purposes only and do not indicate a preference: 1. Reroute discharge piping to ground surface. Approximately 54 sump pumps at $75 per sump pump equals $4,050. 2. Reroute discharge piping to ground surface in front of house at street or driveway. 54 sump pumps at $300 per sump pump equals $16,200. 3. Discharge to existing storm sewer or new 12 inch storm sewer if no existing storm available. The estimated cost, 207 units at 3,089 per unit equals $639,500. 4. Discharge to existing storm sewer or new eight inch storm sewer if no existing storm sewer available. The estimated cost, 207 units at 2,904 per unit equals $601,100. 5. Surface discharge during warmer months, discharge to sanitary sewer during colder months. This would require the installation of a "T" valve on the sump pump discharge line to divert flow to the appropriate source. The estimated cost, 207 units at $400 per unit equals $82,800. INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM March 8, 1988 Page Three 6. Expand the existing storm sewer system to ensure sufficient capacity to convey storm water runoff and I/I from sump pumps. An estimated cost of this alternate cannot be determined at this time. During 1988 the Engineering Division will contact each homeowner that has a sump pump connected to the sanitary sewer system, and the homeowners that were not contacted as part of the initial survey. A recommendation will be made to each one of these homeowners on corrective measures to be taken to ensure that they have a properly installed sump pump. The existing surface drainage around the house, including the need for regrading, rain gutters and downspouts, would also be reviewed in making this recommendation. Each homeowner would then be required to disconnect their sump pump from the sanitary sewer system within 90 days after receiving the recommendation. The City may consider providing a low interest construction and funding program to pay the project cost for each property owner to remove their connection. If there are property owners that have not disconnected their sump pumps, the City could enact an ordinance placing a surcharge to the use of the sanitary sewer system for sump pump discharges. The surcharge should reflect the $800 per year treatment cost at a minimum. Further details of this program will be discussed at the meeting to be held on March 15 1988 at 7:00 p.m.! Sincerely, Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P.E. City Engineer CJH:kh MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 16, 1988 TO: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City EngineerC.. SUBJECT: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AMBER WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MARCH 15, 1988 - 7:00 P.M. Chet Harrison, City Engineer John Sweeney, Assistant Engineer Jim Miller, Donohue Consulting Engineer Jerry Sisk, Councilmember 24 residents were present (155 notices were sent out) The City Engineer explained the situation with clear water entering the sanitary sewer system and eventually winding up at a Metropolitan -wide sewer treatment plant for treatment. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has directed communities to develop a program to eliminate the clear water from entering the sanitary sewer system. This has prompted the City to investigate the problems that are known and to develop a program to eliminate this clear water in the system. Jim Miller explained the process used in evaluating the clear water in the sanitary sewer system within the Amber Woods Addition, and how they went about that process which included looking at the sanitary_ sewer manholes in the street that are taking clear water into them through cracks and leaks within the manholes. 32 manholes were discovered that potentially have unsealed frames and chimneys that need to be sealed up. The second item looked at carefully was the sump pump connections. There were potentially 207 homes to be reviewed, out of that number 166 inspections were made and from that, 54 homes were found to have illegal sump pump connections to the sanitary sewer. If, in fact, there are 54 improper connections as indicated in the study, approximately 30 million gallons of clear water is being pumped into the sanitary sewer system. Assuming that each home is generating a half million gallons of clear water from their sump a year into the sanitary sewer system. The treatment costs are estimated to be $800 per year per home that is illegally connected to the sanitary sewer system. Following the identification of this sump pump problem, alternatives were evaluated which ranged from disconnecting from the sanitary sewer and running a sump pump hose outside to a complete new storm sewer being placed throughout the subdivision that the sump pump hoses could be connected to. The cost to correct this situation ranged in value from $75 per home to $3,000 per home. Memo: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW INTO THEE SA'tiITAR`i SEWER SYSTEM March 16, 1988 Page Two A We then discussed alternatives that would be the least costly to the individual residents, as well as being effective in it's improvement. Based on conversations with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, we believe that the City could allow sump pump connections to the sanitary sewer during the winter months. This would require a "T" valve in the sump pump line leading from the sump pump. The valve would be switched from winter to summer on a predetermined schedule. Some type of locking system would have to be developed that would allow the City to control and monitor those sump pumps, making sure that they are not pumping to the sanitary sewer system during the summer months. It was suggested that a schedule of November 15 to April 15 be set up to allow the residents to pump directly into the sanitary sewer system, the remaining months of the year they would have to pump their sump pump water outside. Also, of utmost importance is to have these sump pump hoses directed to the street, taking the water away through the storm sewer system. A major concern of the residents is the ponding of drainage water. This includes both rain water and sump pump water. These homeowners need some type of improvement to the existing drainage system, particularly in the rear yards of their properties. The City suggested that the neighbors work together on a plan, present that plan to the Engineering Department and we could potentially recommend approval if the system is practical and workable. The City staff also stated that we will be glad to meet with individual residents trying to resolve these yard drainage problems, as a part of the sump pump systems corrections. The sump pumps must be redirected from the sanitary sewer to the front yards. Following are two major advantages to disconnecting the sump pumps from the sanitary sewer system: 1. The lift station that all the sanitary sewer dumps into goes over capacity when this sump pump water is running into it, causing it to flood and also to flood neighboring homes, which means backup of sanitary sewer water into individual homes. This will be eliminated if the sump pumps are disconnected. 2. There will be a substantial cost savings to both the residents and the City as a whole if this sump pump water is eliminated from entering the sanitary sewer system. At the present time the City is not proposing to place a surcharge on the properties that have sump pumps connected to the sanitary sewer until we have had an opportunity to go through all the homes affected by this plan and relocate the sump pump hoses out to the yards and/or into the street. If the City is unable to accomplish this, surcharges may be required to be levied to cover the cost of treating this sump pump clear water. End of meeting. Results of the meeting: The City Engineer will be recommending to the City Council that the Building and Engineering Departments will be working with the Amber Woods residents to disconnect all sump pumps from the sanitary sewer and to develop a drainage plan to accommodate the clear water pumped. If we are not successful in eliminating these connections during the summer of 1988, a surcharge will be recommended to the City Council, which will cover the costs of handling this clear water entering the sanitary sewer system. This surcharge will only be implemented if all other avenues of resolution have failed. CJH:kh attachment