HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 04-18-1988I
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
A G E N D A
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 18, 1988
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
in normal sequence on the agenda.
FORUM
7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION
3. ROLL CALL
4. PRESENTATION - Certificates of Appreciation to members
of Kani Win Ga Camp Fire Horizon group
5. PROCLAMATION - "Be Kind To Animals Week"
May 1 - 7, 1988
6. MINUTES - Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council
meeting of April 4, 1988
7. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Establishment of Economic Development District
No. 5 and TIF District No. 5-1
B. Establishment of Economic Development District
No. 6 and TIF District No. 6-1
C. Establishment of Amended Economic Development
TIF District No. 1-5
D. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District
No. 3-2
E. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District
No. 4-3
F. Establishment of Economic Development TIF District
No. 3-3
G. Vacation of easements, in Outlot 0, Parkers Lake
North 2nd Addition
9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from BLH Development Co. to reduce
assessments for curb and gutter on Northwest
Blvd. for Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition
B. Petition from Wayzata School District 284 for
public improvement project for Willow Meadows
Addition (southwest corner C.R. 9 and Vicksburg
Lane)
C. Approve Payment No. 4 and final for Gleason Lake
Drive trail improvements, Project No. 602
D. Receive preliminary engineering report and order
project for Dunkirk Meadows Addition, Project
No. 817
E. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Fernbrook Woods
Addition utility improvements, Project No. 720
F. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Carlson Center 8th
Addition improvements, Project 751, adding sewer
and water services for Suomala Addition, Project
No. 718
G. City of Plymouth. Final Plat and Development
Contract for "Dunkirk Meadows" located east of
Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North (87097)
H. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Reductions:
1) Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st
Avenue North (87092)
2) Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st
Avenue North (87092)
I. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Release:
1) Honeywell located at 12001 Highway 55 (A-151)
0. Authorize payment for rehabilitation work
performed through Community Development Block
Grant Program
K. Ordinance amendment to 1310.03 relating to parking
regulations
L. Award of Bid:
1) Towing
2) Reforestation
0
9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
M. Approval of 1988 Plymouth Metrolink Contracts:
1) City of Plymouth and Regional Transit Board
2) City of Plymouth and Medicine Lake Lines
10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Amber Woods/Hughes Addition removal of sump pump
connections to sanitary sewer system - Status
report
11. ADJOURNMENT
15.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 14, 1988
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT "BE KIND TO ANIMALS WEEK"
Attached is a proclamation declaring the week of May 1 - 7 as "Be Kind To
Animals Week in Plymouth." The Mayor may wish to read this proclamation at
the meeting.
FB:Jm
attachment
ip
ti.•
A. 1
a• z
eoffmid
Prodamation
r
CITY OF PLYMOUTH s
WE1WS: We have been endowed not only with the bless- iY•
t ings and benefits of our animal friends, who give us companionship i
r and great pleasure in our daily lives, but also with a firm responsibility
to protect these fellow creatures with which we share the earth from
need, pain, fear and suffering; and
1
WhVWS: we recognize that teaching attitudes of kind-
i
ness, consideration and respect for all living things through humane
education in the schools and the community helps to provide the basic
values on which a humane and civilized society is built; and
ti!
WhOWS: the people in the City (or State) of Pi=outh
are deeply indebted to their animal care and control agencies for their
invaluable contribution in caring for lost and unwanted animals, in-
r• stilling humane values in our children through humane education pro- r:
r grams, and promoting a true working spirit of kindness and considera-
tion for animals in the minds and hearts of all people, and
44• WfteneaS: the first 6,111 week of May has been set as the
annual celebration of the national week observing the philosophy of
tt
kindness to animals, r
Npti11 ` "pre: 1 Virgil A. Schneider
J
rip
A. name of officer)
4. by virtue of the power vested in me as Mayor i•
41 J-4
4. of the City of Plymouth do proclaim and pro- V`
city, State)
nounce the week of May 1st through 7th, 1988
as "Be Kind To Animals Week;' and do heartily commend to all our citizens
a full participation in all the events related thereto in this community.
A6
r'
Seal) i
zs Mayor
4
11 I N U T F S
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 4, 1988
A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to
order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on
April 4, 1988.
PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker,
Zitur, and Sisk, City Manager Willis, Planning
Director Tremere, Public Works Director Moore, Park
Director Blank, City Attorney Thomson, and City Clerk
Brandt
ABSENT: None
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Manager Willis reported that the Senate tax bill is in LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
committee and explained its impact. Item 4
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to approve the minutes of the March 28
Special Council Meeting as submitted.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING
Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m.
No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:49 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 5
MINUTES - SPECIAL
MEETING, MARCH 28
1988
Item 6*
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by RESOLUTION NO.88-217
Councilmember Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-217 AUTHORIZING EASEMENT VACATION
THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND
EASEMENT ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF P.I.N. NO. Item 7-A
26-118-22-42-0058 OR ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1988
Page 95
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
Mayor Schneider opened the public information meeting at 7:50
P.M.
Director Moore reported that property owners, at the March
public information meeting, asked that the frontage road be
connected to the existing 57th Ave. cul-de-sac. This is
possible as there is a vacant lot available for the road. The
County has reviewed the proposal and found it to be feasible.
Bill Bealles, 11610 57th Ave., stated he opposed the connection
because he bought his home because it was on a cul-de-sac. He
is concerned about his property value, drainage, and maintenance
of abutting property. He stated all the homeowners west of
Deerwood Lane on 57th Ave. oppose the connection, and presented
a written statement.
Gerry Kaupa, 11805 Bass Lake Road, requested the extension
originally, but now doesn't want it because of increased traffic
flow it will create on 57th Ave.
Steve Cheney, 11915 Bass Lake Road, suggested that, if the
connection is made, there be direct access from the service road
to C.R. 10 going east.
Paul Svensson, 11745 Bass Lake Road, stated the connection is
necessary for safety.
Mayor Schneider closed the information hearing at 8:12 p.m.
Mayor Schneider asked about property values being affected on
57th Ave.
Director Moore answered that the assessor would have to answer
that. There will not be an entrance to C.R. 10 from the
frontage road.
Mayor Schneider stated the drainage would not be any different
that it is now. The property between any service road and the
abutting property would be turned over to the property owner.
Director Moore stated all the connections that can be eliminated
from C.R. 10 would make it safer. It would also be safer to
connect 57th Ave. to the service road.
Councilmember Ricker pointed out that the elimination of one
lot should be added to the overall costs of the project and,
unless there is a safety factor, he doesn't favor the
connection.
PUBLIC INFORMATION
MEETING - C.R. 10
Item 8
0
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1988
Page 96
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 8, DENYING
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT, COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18 SOUTH
FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION, CITY PROSECT NO. 812.
Councilmember Sisk stated he doesn't believe staff has had
enough time to address all the safety concerns.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to table the layout approval until an
engineering study of safety can be completed.
Motion carried, five ayes.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Kevin VonRiedel, McCombs, Frank, Roos, representing the
developer, stated this is a 40 acre parcel. The proposal is for
80 single family lots and 42 townhome lots.
Scott Bratten, 14560 40th Ave., stated the concern is with the
increased traffic and safety of the children in Cedar Ridge.
Russ Thour, 14635 39th Ave., stated concern with the water
problems which might be created. He asked about the flood plain
and whether the trail would be under water some of the time.
Sherry DeWolf, 3855 Glacier Lane, stated concern with the
increased traffic and children's safety.
RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
PARKVIEW RIDGE (88018)
Item 9-A
Mayor Schneider explained that this is just a concept of about RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
where lots and houses would be. The next step would be a PARKVIEW RIDGE
preliminary plat layout and at that time the Planning Commission (88018)
will discuss drainage.
Councilmember Sisk asked why 39th Ave. has to go through.
Director Moore answered that, while it is not a collector
street; it is for overall traffic circulation, and was
contemplated in the plan approvals for this area.
Councilmember Zitur asked about open space.
Mr. VonRiedel stated the open space is 11.5% of the entire
parcel. The areas around the ponds would not be graded out.
Director Tremere pointed out that there is extensive development
to the north of C.R. 9 and Fernbrook Lane. Traffic will
increase in the future. If access to the west is not provided
from Cedar Ridge through this plat, Cedar Ridge will only have
two access points and they will both be to Fernbrook Lane.
Regular Council Neetinq
April 4, 1988
Page 97
Councilmember Vasiliou asked if the park were considered part of
their open space and she doesn't consider that the open space
requirement has been met.
Director Tremere answered that, given the topography of the
development and concerns about transition, it warrants PUD
status. The specific design can be modified; the project was
evaluated by staff as if the public park were part of the open
space.
Councilmember Vasiliou added that the fact that the children in
Cedar Ridge now play in the streets is not an acceptable reason
to seal off 39th Avenue and it is not safe.
Councilmember Zitur agreed that kids shouldn't be playing in the
streets, especially when the City has provided parks.
Mayor Schneider stated the recent speed study showed that all
the vehicles counted were within the speed limit.
Councilmember Sisk stated the Council has to consider the good
of the entire City. He cannot see that connecting 39th Ave.
will be a detriment to safety. He believes there might be
ground water problems for the new homes in the northwest corner
because of elevation.
Discussion continued on the topography and open space planned.
Mr. VonRiedel stated they are trying to maintain the
topography and attempting to keep the grades consistent with the
surrounding area.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, to defer action on the petition to refer it to the
Planning Commission for reconsideration based upon the Council's
direction for redesign.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, that 39th Ave. should go through this plat,
from the development on the west to the development on the east
as proposed.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded b
Councilmember Zitur, that there be a concentration of effective
usable open space, particularly in the detached housing area.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated active open space is needed in a
planned unit development as intense as this; otherwise, it
should be platted as a conventional development.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1988
Page 98
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, that the overall plan design is to be enhanced to
preserve natural features such as hills, low areas, and trees on
property as they are now.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider reminded them that the lot coverage is to be 20%
maximum; trails are to be built per City standards.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Sisk, that, with regard to transition, attached homes would be
as per this plan (to the west) and single family detached homes
to the east.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Ricker, that particular attention shall be given to minimum
floor elevations so that homes will be planned at elevations
that will not have a "guaranteed" water problem.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Main motion as amended carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Zitur, that anyone who spoke at the Planning Commission or
Council meetings should be informed of the date the Planning
Commission will reconsider revised concept plans.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-218
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-218 DECLARING NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FINDING OF NO NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STTEMENT (EIS) FOR EIS, PRIME WEST
BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET BUSINESS PARK (87123)
EAW) DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1988 FOR PRIME WEST BUSINESS PARK Item 9-B*
PROPOSED BY PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 87123).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Manager Willis stated the request is recommended for approval by SITE PLAN, FIRE
the Planning Commission. The site plan meets all the conditions STATION 3 (88012)
and no variances are requested. Item 9-C
Director Tremere stated that the Planning Commission was
concerned generally about the exterior finish. Their
recommendation would not preclude metal but they were not shown
the metal.
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1988
Page 99
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-219 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR
CITY OF PLYMOUTH FIRE STATION III (88012) deleting item #12.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Ricker, to amend to add condition #12 as follows: "The exterior
finish materials used for the construction of Fire Station 3
shall be the same color as City Center, using the glass, brick,
and metal as presented previously to the Council.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, directing staff to inform consultants retained by the
City, that are making presentations to the Council and
commissions to be fully prepared for discussion.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-220 APPROVING
FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ST. MARY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PARK.
Councilmember Sisk stated he didn't know it would be this
expensive.
Director Blank stated the target figure was $100,000 but the
parking lot was added, at Council direction, at a cost of
10,000.
Discussion followed on the original cost estimate and the items
which are now being bid as alternates and what might be deleted
or added later.
Larry Decker, Barton-Aschman, stated that part of the trail
could be deleted initially at a cost savings of $20,000 and this
Includes the bridge at $10,000.
Discussion continued on the parking, entrances to the park, and
whether some grading could be deleted initially.
Councilmember Vasiliou questioned the amount of the play
equipment being requested and whether there weren't options.
Director Blank stated there will be three basic components.
Every item will be a line item and quantities can be changed.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-219
SITE PLAN, FIRE
STATION 3, CITY OF
PLYMOUTH (88012)
Item 9-C
RESOLUTION NO. 88-220
FINAL PLANS & SPECS
ST. MARY'S PARK
Item 9-D
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1938
Page 100
Councilmember Ricker stated it seemed that without the play
structure, why have a park.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-221
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-221 APPROVING PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER
PROJECT NO. 809, PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD. FIELD, PROJECT 809
Item 9-E
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, directing staff, the City Manager, and Director Blank,
that the purpose of the new soccer field is to allow renovation
and rest of existing fields, at the discretion of staff.
Director Blank stated the intent is to rest one field at a time
to have time to get it back into good condition.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-222
Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-222 APPROVING GARBAGE HAULERS
1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE APPLICATIONS. 1988 LICENSES
Item 9-F
Councilmember Sisk pointed out that Reuter's cannot comply with
the new ordinance requiring a yard waste management program
because all their refuse goes to the plant.
Director Moore stated the City's ordinance states that every
licensed hauler must have a separate yard waste program and they
must take the waste to a facility which will certify that the
material is being composted. The only site doing this is the
Hennepin County site.
Attorney Thomson stated that, when the ordinance was drafted,
the Reuter situation was considered in the wording. Reuter can
still collect refuse but not yard waste.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Ricker, to change "their" to add "an approved ....." in the last
paragraph of the resolution and add, "Failure to comply with
this requirement will render the license null and void."
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Motion as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Discussion followed on the current work level and the amount of STANDARDS FOR PERMIT
information given and time spent with customers at the counter. ISSUANCE & INSPECTION
SERVICES
Item 9-G
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1985
Page 101
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that, particularly during the
construction season, priority should be given to field
inspections and permit issuance over instructional or
informational activities.
Director Tremere stated that, as the City grows, there will be
more residents requesting help. Temporary personnel have been
and will be retained to assist during peak periods.
Mayor Schneider stated necessary help should be hired on a
temporary rather than full time basis.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to accept and file the report.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember RESOLUTION NO. 88-223
Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-223 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 FINAL PAYMENT
AND FINAL, FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2, FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM in FIRE STATION 1 & 2
the amount of $3,703 to Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. Item 9-H
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-224 RESPREADING
OF DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS, LEVY NO. 10970.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-225 RESPREADING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, LEVY NO. 10059 .AND 10970.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-226 ORDERING A
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT 5 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 5-1 PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-227 ORDERING A
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT 6 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 6-1 PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-224
RESPREADING DEFERRED
ASSESSMENTS, LEVY
10970
Item 9-I*
RESOLUTION NO. 88-225
RESPREADING SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT, LEVY
10059 & 10970
Item 9-I*
RESOLUTION NO. 88-226
ORDERING HEARING
ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 5
AND TIF DISTRICT 5-1
Item 9-3*
RESOLUTION NO. 88-227
ORDERING HEARING
ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 6
TIF DISTRICT 6-1
Item 9-O*
Regular Council Meeting
April 4, 1986
Page 102
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-228
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-228 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING
PUBLIC HEARIkG ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF
DISTRICT 1-5 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 1-5
April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-229
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-229 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF
DISTRICT 3-2 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 3-2
April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-230
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-230 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF
DISTRICT 4-3 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 4-3
April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 88-231
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-231 ORDERING A ORDERING HEARING
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ESTABLISHING TIF
DISTRICT 3-3 PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 for DISTRICT 3-3
April 18, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Mayor OTHER BUSINESS
Schneider, directing staff to send a letter to the soccer
association outlining Plymouth's plan for building and resting
fields so they can plan accordingly and telling them that
Wayzata will be taking two fields out of service.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Council -
member Vasiliou, that the Communications Coordinator be
instructed to use all forms of media to educate residents on the
dog ordinance and they can use 9-1-1 to call in animal
complaints.
Motion carried, five ayes.
The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
City Clerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 12, 1988 for City Council meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ESTABLIS MENT
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
1.
CZ /t
OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND TAX
ACTION REQUESTED: Following the public hearing, it is requested that
the Council adopt the attached resolutions creating Economic
Development Districts 5 and 6, amending Tax Increment Financing
District 1-5, and establishing Tax Increment Financing Districts 3-2,
3-3, 4-3, 5-1 and 6-1.
2. BACKGROUND: The City Council has previously established various
economic development districts throughout the City. The purpose for
the establishment of these development districts is to provide a means
by which subsequent tax increment financing districts might be
established. The tax increment financing districts are designed to be
established at the time commercial and/or industrial land is
developing, so as to "capture" increased tax increments resulting fromdevelopment.
The revenues derived from tax increment financing districts are to be
used in carrying out the development program in each of the respective
development districts. The specific projects are more fully explained
in the development program for each of the development districts.
Essentially, the development programs revolve around improving the
transportation infrastructure required to adequately serve developinglands. A substantial portion of the development programs in each of
the districts involves work on transportation facilities under the
jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and/or the
Hennepin County Department of Transportation. Both of these agencies
have found it difficult to finance work needed on their roads that is
required and accordingly, are hindering the City's ability to develop
in accordance with our comprehensive plans.
3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The State Legislature has, for a number
of years, authorized the use of tax increment financing as a means of
encouraging appropriate development and/or redevelopment in cities
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
FINANCING DISTRICTS
April 12, 1988
Page 2
4.
ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND TAX INCREMENT
throughout the State. During the last few years, particularly with the
decline of other revenue sources, more cities have turned to tax
increment financing for a variety of projects. Some members of the
Legislature have expressed concern about the proliferation of tax
increment financing districts and their impact on the overall tax
stability with the respective taxing jurisdictions. During this
session, primary emphasis has been on redevelopment districts, of which
Plymouth has none.
The Senate Tax Bill, currently in the joint Senate/House Conference
Committee, contains a provision which would preclude the establishment
of additional economic development tax increment financing districts or
economic development districts. This particular action, abruptly taken
at a Senate tax hearing, is not supported by the League of Minnesota
Cities, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities or any other
government group.
This bill, particularly that section which eliminated economic
development districts, reinforces a concern of many of us in local
government that the State government cannot be relied upon to develop
and/or follow a coherent policy as it relates to local government. The
establishment of development districts and subsequent tax increment
financing districts is a rather complex measure and involves a good
deal of thoughtful planning. We have planned for our development
districts over the past several years and have sought to execute them
in a timely, but staged fashion. Because of the pending change in the
state law, however, we are attempting to establish all of the tax
increment financing districts which we would have otherwise planned to
establish over the next several years at one time. This is done solely
because I am fearful that the Legislature may prohibit us from being
able to execute our plans as previously contemplated. Indeed,
depending on the final actions of the Legislature dealing with the tax
bill, it may already be too late.
Copies of the Development Programs for Economic Development Districts 5
and 6, and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Districts 1-5, 3-2, 3-3,
4-3, 5-1 and 6-1 are on file and available for review in my office.
These plans have been sent to the school districts involved and
Hennepin County for their information.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend the Council adopt the
attached resolutions creating Economic Development Districts 5 and 6,
amending Tax Increment Financing District 1-5, and establishing Tax
Increment Financing Districts 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 5-1 and 6-1.
JW:kec
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-234
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 3-2
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 3
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 3 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct
various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City
staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax
Increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration
by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled
Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-2, City of
Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan
has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been
forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to
the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located,
in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-229, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
Its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 3-2 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-234
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the .Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the
District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement
Program.
d) The TIF Plan will
of the City as a
Program by private
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
enterprise.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-234
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. while a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing.
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 3-2 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-234
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 3-2 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-235
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 3-3
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 3
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section I. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 3 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct
various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City
staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax
increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration
by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled
Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-3, City of
Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan
has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been
forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to
the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located,
In accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-231, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 3-3 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-235
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the
District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement
Program.
d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
Program by private enterprise.
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-235
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 3-3 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-235
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and T.IF District No. 3-3 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-236
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 4-3
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 4 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct
various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City
staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax
increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration
by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled
Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 4-3, City of
Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan
has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been
forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to
the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located,
in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-230, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 4-3 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-236
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the
District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement
Program.
d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
Program by private enterprise.
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-236
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 4-3 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-236
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 4-3 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call. and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-237
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 5-1
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 5
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 5 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set.out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various
public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to
prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment
financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the
Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed a tax increment financing plan entitled "Tax
Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1, City of Plymouth,
Hennepin County, Approved April 18, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been
submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for
review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school
boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in
accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-226, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 5-1 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-237
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Program for the District and
the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program.
d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
Program by private enterprise.
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-237
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing.
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 5-1 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-237
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 5-1 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-238
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 6-1
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 6 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted a Development Program (the "Program") to construct various
public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City staff to
prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax increment
financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration by the
Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed a tax increment financing plan entitled "Tax
Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 6-1, City of Plymouth,
Hennepin County, Approved February 1, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan has been
submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been forwarded for
review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to the school
boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located, in
accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-227, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 6-1 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-238
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Program for the District and
the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement Program.
d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
Program by private enterprise.
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-238
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filin
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 6-1 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-238
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 6-1 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88-239
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND AMENDING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-5
IN MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, as follows:
Section I. Background.
1.01. This Council has duly established Municipal Development District No. 1 (the
District") in accordance with the procedures set out in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
469 (Act), and adopted and amended a Development Program (the "Program") to construct
various public improvements (the "Project") in the District; and has directed the City
staff to prepare a tax increment financing plan for an economic development tax
increment financing district (the "TIF District") within the District for consideration
by the Planning Commission and the Council all in accordance with the Act.
1.02. The City staff has developed an amended tax increment financing plan entitled
Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-5, City of
Plymouth, Hennepin County, Approved February 1, 1988," (the "TIF Plan"). The TIF Plan
has been submitted to the Planning Commission for review. The TIF Plan has been
forwarded for review and comment to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and to
the school boards of the school districts in which the TIF District is to be located,
in accordance with Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 of the Act.
1.03. This Council, by Resolution No. 88-228, set a public hearing on the proposed TIF
Plan and Amended Program for this date, and duly published notice of the hearing was
given pursuant to that resolution as required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the
Act.
1.04. The public hearing on the amended TIF Plan was duly held on this date and all
persons wishing to express an opinion, orally or in writing, were given an opportunity
to be heard.
1.05. This Council finds and determines for the reasons more fully set out hereinafter
that it is necessary and desirable for the sound financial management of the City and
its efficient and economic development that TIF District No. 1-5 be established in the
District in accordance with the TIF Plan in order to construct the Project and carry
out the Program.
CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-239
Page 2
Sec. 2. Findings.
2.01. This Council has reviewed the amended district program and proposed TIF Plan and
finds that they conform to the requirements of the Act and provide a workable plan for
the construction and financing of the project.
2.02. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 of the Act, this Council makes the
following specific findings:
a) The proposed TIF District is an Economic Development District.
The proposed TIF District is an economic development district as defined in
Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 of the Act. The City Council finds that it is
in the public interest to undertake the Project and the Improvements described
in the TIF Plan within the District, because these Improvements will: make
feasible the development and induce and make feasible other new commercial
development through the provision of an adequate roadways transportation
system, and create additional employment and enhance the City's tax base
through the encouragement of private commercial development.
b) The proposed economic development described in the TIF Plan cannot, in the
opinion of the City Council, reasonably be expected to occur solely through
private development within the reasonably forseeable future and therefore the
use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
The proposed development in the District has been planned and predicated on the
provision of an adequate roadways transportation system by the City to service
an area that previously was not adequately serviced by roadways. A traffic
analyses conducted by an independent engineering consulting firm and by the
City staff has determined that there is insufficient traffic capacity within
the District to accommodate new commercial/industrial growth. Therefore, the
proposed development cannot reasonably be expected to have occurred or to occur
in the absence of the Project and the Improvements. The Improvements described
in the Plan will meet this purpose.
c) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
The City's Planning Commission has reviewed the Amended Program for the
District and the proposed Improvements, and found them to be in conformance
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the City's Capital Improvement
Program.
d) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the project proposed in the
Program by private enterprise.
CONTINUED ON PAGE THREE)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-239
Page 3
The opportunity and feasibility for development of the District and the TIF
District by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment
financing. While a portion of the costs of the Improvements will be met
through special assessments, this source of funding is not sufficient by itself
to fund the Improvements. Given the unavailability of funding from other
governmental sources and the necessity of the Improvements as an inducement to
private development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within the District.
e) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section
469.177, Subdivision 3, Clause (b) of the Act.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 3, of the Act, the City elects the
method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the
contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities Act (Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 473F) will be applied proportionately to all
commercial/industrial properties within the City, including properties within
the District.
Sec. 3. Establishment; Certifications; Filing.
3.01. The amended TIF Plan dated April 18, 1988 is approved. The TIF Plan is
incorporated by reference herein.
3.02. TIF District No. 1-5 as described in the TIF Plan is established.
3.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution together with a certified copy of the TIF Plan to the Director of Property
Taxation of Hennepin County with a request that the original assessed value of the
TIF District be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 1 of the
Act.
3.04. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the TIF Plan
with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development.
3.05. This Council shall at the appropriate time take action to issue and sell its
general obligation bonds or other obligations to finance the Improvements as described
in the TIF Plan.
Sec. 4 Administration.
4.01. The City Manager shall establish such special funds and accounts as are
necessary and required by the Act and subsequent resolution of this Council to insure
compliance with the Act and the proper use of tax increments from the TIF District.
CONTINUED ON PAGE FOUR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-239
Page 4
4.02. The administration of the District and TIF District No. 1-5 is the
responsibility of the City Manager. The Manager shall insure that all reports and
disclosures required by Section 469.175, Subdivision 5 of the Act are made.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 13, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18,,,1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR PONDING
PARKERS LAKE NORTH 2ND ADDITION
OUTLOT 0
The City Council has established a public hearing on April 18, 1988 on the
petition to vacate drainage and utility easements within Outlot 0, Parkers
Lake North 2nd Addition. These easements were dedicated on the Final Plat
at the time this area was platted into outlots.
When the area was platted into outlots, the exact description of the
necessary drainage and utility easements and the ponding easements were not
known. The developer established an easement over the entire outlot.
Since that time this outlot has been re -platted as Mallard Pointe Addition.
On the new plat the exact description of the necessary easements is
defined.
Unless new information is presented at the public hearing, it is
recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution vacating
the original easements.
10A
Chester J. ison, Jr., 1-11
CJH:kh
attachments: Resolution
Map
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
X X is
adoption:
XXX
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR PONDING PURPOSES IN
OUTLOT 0 - PARKERS LAKE NORTH 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, a petition was received to vacate certain utility and drainage easements and
drainage easement for ponding purposes in Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for April 18,
1988, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 as amended; and
WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks
prior to the meeting of April 18, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on April 18, 1988, to inform any and all
interested parties relevant to the vacation of certain utility and drainage easements
and drainage easement for ponding purposes in Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition; and
WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easements were not needed for
public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA: That the following utility and drainage easements and drainage easement for
ponding purposes be vacated:
The drainage and utility easements and drainage easement for ponding
purposes in Outlot 0, Parkers Lake North 2nd Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXX if :: SC
I
XXX
Mi
z
o
F-
C)
0
a
D
Z
N
x
O
z
W
Y
Ow
AE
r-
r
I00o 'O
o, O
o
84
j
AO
n
M
16
f I1.'L,
N" o
i
ppS1E z I
z
06 ' Jr- Ir't F
i
10
lJOZI'—
IN
1-- 01
rn t N F W
p J Q v rn
l00ON = w
O oov R
1i = , •• FF
cNI 06 I Q Cry I
J
tiP
Pp /S>s.Z,D
pW
tl
I [B6_, 2 w 00.
1
mo.,
21,01.C29S
f „/
Fb4
6915 p 9 /C)
co \ : .
2
pm^ `tet
tl N f[blrb_-bb."9:D
69b011 3/1y H 6216651 m1w ' —:
h 9C.
i E6Cl. 8 c0
a N c
1 •V
m 2101.5 b m; rr 2!'0a `?' 0 '6-
1 M 19 6, - 2,O Z ``s•.tl z ; , g4 y0•
3 I O CIE-\
o e I M 3
CC,0"
ogq \` 'o ;ds°a j6r: v'b -,Aa \
Ir 'po
as
vnof
O.
00
10 r
N u
J
N SNR
1
Z, (
1
v)
J
v o
OpZ
o61
cr 40
o r v o , I°m QaIt50.9 9 5 .i ,' $pr ro u \
O 0 d O QD
AOOd
m + OZ
I \ 1' \ •R 1 m o ; 6c
71
IL
LL
1
ip
cr' •. ,i cr °`ter \ — a \ , rd
J
I R r \ 00
0
ti o 4
i9
jbiy
OZ
Ld
09
ri cr
Iyy
I
I
i
100 rr.
I
IU/
ui
I z a
t 1
a. OZ
I OJ
J
Q
QO
ONOri D
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 14, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR
REDUCTION IN CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT ON NORTHWEST BOULEVARD
BASS LAKE HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION (85126)
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Dickman Knutson, on behalf of BLH Development
Company, has requested that their responsibility for the cost of
concrete curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard for the Bass Lake
Heights 4th Addition Development be reduced from 2,020 feet to 567
feet. The responsibility, as it currently exists, is in accordance
with the approved plat and development contract. It is recommended
that no change be made in the development contract.
2. BACKGROUND: Attached is a request from Dickman Knutson, on behalf of
BLH Development Company, to revise the development contract for the
Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition. He is requesting that their
responsibility for the cost of curb and gutter along Northwest
Boulevard be reduced from 2,020 feet to 567 feet. Attached is a
drawing showing the location of the lots and outlots as referenced in
his letter.
During the City Council approval process for this plat as a planned
unit development, there were considerable negotiations between the City
and the developer for the conditions of approval. Some of the items
involved were as follows:
a. The location of Northwest Boulevard.
b. Assessments for Northwest Boulevard
C. Amount of land to be dedicated for the Neighborhood Park.
d. Payment for park land in excess of dedication requirement.
e. Payment for grading on park land which was proposed by the
developer.
f. Change in sanitary sewer boundary to allow development of the
entire plat.
REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
April 14, 1988
Page Two
All of these items were considered and agreed to between the developer
and the City Council with the Final Plat approval. The developer
executed the development contract containing the terms of their
financial responsibilities for the curb and gutter construction. The
developer is now requesting a change in their responsibility for the
cost of the concrete curb and gutter along Northwest Boulevard.
Mr. Knutson is stating they should not be responsible for the curb and
gutter along the west side of Northwest Boulevard (Outlot A), and also
adjacent to the park property on the east side (Outlot E).
Attached is a letter dated December 21, 1987, informing Mr. Knutson
that the development contract was in accordance with the City's policy
on assessing City owned property. Although Outlot E was dedicated to
the City as park, the City paid $33,000 for the 2.2 acres in excess of
the actual Park Dedication requirement. The total size of the park is
4.7 acres. The developer did use this 4.7 acres dedicated as park in
calculating the number of dwelling units permitted within the planned
unit development.
The responsibility for the concrete curb and gutter along Outlot A on
the west side of Northwest Boulevard was considered by the Council in
determining the location of Northwest Boulevard and the final ownership
of Outlot A. Based upon the guiding of Outlot A, it would be
responsible for the construction of one half the cost of Northwest
Boulevard, in addition to the concrete curb and gutter. As part of the
negotiations, the City determined that this plat would only be
responsible for concrete curb and gutter and the remainder of the
construction cost would be the responsibility of the future developer
of Outlot A.
The Final Plat and development contract was approved for this
development in February of 1987. The development contract and the
engineer's memorandum contained the requirement for the future
assessment for the concrete curb and gutter along all frontage of the
plat on Northwest Boulevard. When Mr. Knutson received the development
contract for execution before being presented to the City Council, he
contacted Bob Johnson, Senior Engineering Technician, in the
Engineering Department. He requested at that time that their
responsibility for the curb and gutter assessment be changed. Mr.
Johnson informed him that since this was part of the entire negotiated
development plan, it would have to be changed by the City Council and
he should return the development contract unexecuted along with a
letter requesting the change. Mr. Knutson stated that he did not want
to remove the item from the City Council "Consent Agenda", and
therefore, would be signing the development contract and making the
request at a future time.
i
REQUEST FROM THE BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
April 14, 1988
Page Three
3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The primary issue is whether this
developer is responsible for the cost of concrete curb and gutter along
Northwest Boulevard in accordance with the executed development
contract. He is stating he should not be responsible for that portion
adjacent to the City park and the outlot on the west side of Northwest
Boulevard. As has been indicated in the background material, the
approval of this development as a planned unit development was approved
after considerable discussions, deferral and negotiations between the
City and the developer. The existing requirement for payment of
concrete curb and gutter is in accordance with the approval agreed to
in 1987.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City
Council not amend the development contract for the Bass Lake Heights
4th Addition by changing the requirement for concrete curb and gutter.
If the City Council concludes that the change is in order, they should
determine the footage of property responsible for the cost of concrete
curb and gutter and direct staff to prepare an amended development
contract for execution by the City and developer.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Drawing
Request
Letter
BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
3030 HARBOR LANE PLYMOUTH. MINN. 55441
TEL. 612-553-0474
March 23, 1988
Mr. James Willis
City Manager
City of Plymouth
Plymouth, MN 55447
Subject: Curb and Gutter Assessment Northwest Boulevard, Bass Lake Heights
4th Addition
Dear Mr. Willis:
I would like to schedule to be placed on the agenda of the Plymouth City
Council to review the assessment for curb and gutter as it pertains to
Northwest Boulevard and in particular, to Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition.
I've discussed this item a number of times with your staff, it is my under-
standing that a formal request has to be made in order to have council action.
gass Lake Heights 4th Addition is unique in that this is very little private
ownership of the actual development fronting on Northwest Boulevard. It
is our contention, only that property fronting on the trailway adjoining
Northwest Boulevard should be assessed. The property in question is Lots
1, 2 and 3, Block 1; and Lot 1, Block 3; and Outlot C which is owned by
the other 36 lots in the 4th Addition. The frontage of these parcels is
567.09 feet.
bd th iC't f
DCK:cb
WINTER ADORE SS
538 S. 72ND ST.
MESA. AZ 85208
TEL 9818139
The remaining frontage on Northwest Boulevard is owne y e
Plymouth (Outlot A) 906.03 linear feet; the City of Plymouth
y o
public park)
505.03 linear feet; and adjoining land owner 192.86 linear feet.
4wn 4w_;%Z7
Dickman C. Knutson
President
I request that the development contract be reviewed that the assessment in
Northwest Boulevard be reduced from $16,649 to $4,672 (567.09 x $8.24).
As 1 understand, the property west of Northwest Boulevard is guided LA -3, t tr
The property east of Northwest Boulevard is guided LA -1. I believe that
this is a reasonable request, thank you in advance.
DCK:cb
WINTER ADORE SS
538 S. 72ND ST.
MESA. AZ 85208
TEL 9818139
Sincerely,
4wn 4w_;%Z7
Dickman C. Knutson
President
DCK:cb
WINTER ADORE SS
538 S. 72ND ST.
MESA. AZ 85208
TEL 9818139
J
y y . •
a'x
w i
i
i2eau'u of w, ooh oo a• A' O'st
r
vim,'
N bir : M N
3, « oroi eoYt IW w
O Y IA
J
QQTLO i f!
r ' ^
t
m
a
V ,
e—
ense,
71 J.: s.
N +• Q
N
r-
r•n, Epp— s. .. -1
1
4t
t
v f
0
71
f t
1
t '
y
v v
J
Act
C I Y 0."
December 21, 1987 PLYMOUTH
Mr. Dickman Knutson
BLH Development Company
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
SUBJECT: CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT
NORTHWEST BOULEVARD
Dear Mr. Knutson:
The curb and gutter assessments for Northwest Boulevard, as outlined in
Development Contract No. 85126, were based on "Policy Concerning
Assessing City Owned Property", Resolution No. 74-93, dated February 11,
1974.
Your request that the City amend the assessments levied against your
property by removing the approximately 515 feet adjacent to the City
park will have to be considered by the City Council.
A letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council through Fred G. Moore,
Director of Public Works, requesting the review of the assessment will
be required prior to you being scheduled for a Council meeting.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sin rely,
Robert C. ohnson
Senior Engineering Technician
RCJ:kh
cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
John R. Sweeney, Assistant Engineer
File No. 85126w -w,
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
POLICY CONCERNING ASSESSING CITY-ObJNED PROPERTY
Resolution No. 74-93
February 11, 1974
The City from time to time undertakes public improvement projects benefiting
property within the City, and City -owned property is occasionally benefited
by such improvements.
In order that the Council may fully review the matter of proposed benefit to
City -owned property, the City Manager is directed to report to the Council
prior to the ordering of public improvement projects which would benefit City -
owned property with his recommendations concerning how such benefiting property
should be treated in the spreading of the assessments on the proposed project.
In making such a recommendation, he shall be guided generally as follows:
1. Property owned or used by a City utility operation shall be deemed
to benefit in the same manner and to the same extent as a single-
family residential property.
2. Park land shall be viewed on an individual basis; however, smaller
neighborhood parks shall normally not be assessed; rather the costs
spread throughout the benefiting district. Community or central
parks should normally be assessed for benefit as single-family
residential property.
3. Storm water holding areas shall not normally be deemed to be assessed.
4. Other categories of property shall be reviewed on an individual basis
to determine benefit.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call anlootice thereof, a special meeg of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 29th day of September . 1986. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider ouncilmembers Crain, Sisk,
Vasiliou, and Zitur he
7`olTlor%ing mem ers were absent: none
Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved Its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-597
APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO STAGED GROWTH ELE-
MENT FOR DICKMAN KNUTSON, ULTRA HOMES, INC. (85126)
1HEREAS, Dickman Knutson, Ultra Homes, Inc., has requested approval of a Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) Concept Plan and Amendment to the Staged Growth Element of the City
of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, for development of property west of Pineview Lane,
approximately one-half mile south of County Road 47, one-eighth mile north of the Soo
Line Railroad; and one-fourth mile east of Interstate 494; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public
Hearing; and,
WHEREAS, on March 31, 1986, the City Council considered the request and deferred action
on the proposal for further discussion and analysis; and,
WHEREAS, based on discussions between the City, the petitioner, Hennepin County, and
the Department of Natural Resources, an alignment for future Northwest Boulevard has
been determined; and,
WHEREAS, based on engineering information, it has been determined that the development
of this property could be accomodated if the entire NC -10 District is re -directed, sub-
ject to approval of an Amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the Adopted
City's Comprehensive Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner has submitted three alternate options for development, in res-
ponse to the further discussions and analysis;
WHEREAS, the City Council remanded the matter to the Planning Commission for review,
after redesign by the petitioner; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby approve the request by Dickman Knutson, Ultra Homes,
Inc. for a Planned Unit Development Concept Plan based on Concept Plan and Amendment to
the Staged Growth Element of the City of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, subject to the
following:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as
approved by the City Engineer.
3. Maximum density shall be 1.8 units per acre for the land at or above the estab-
Pp lished high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as
verified by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed as follows:
a) A deduction of two points based on the size of the project.
PLEASE SEE PACE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 86-597 40 0
4. The final number of dwelling units shall be determined at the RPUD Preliminary
1 Plan/Plat Stage of review. For density calculation purposes, half of thn right-
of-way for future Northwest Blvd. and all land at or above the established High
Water Elevation, east of future Northwest Boulevard shall be utilized.
5. Draft restrictive covenants for the private open areas shall be submitted with
preliminary plat/plan application.
6. No private drive access shall be permitted to Northwest Boulevard; all private
drives shall be provided by internal public streets.
7. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Staged Growth Amendment is contingent upon, and
subject to the required review and response by the Metropolitan Council, and the
Final Plan/Plat which shall be approved by the City Council prior to finalization
of the Amendment.
8. The location of future Northwest Boulevard shall be consistent with the final
location to be determined by the City.
9. Outlot A ::call be deeded to the City.
10. Outlot C shall be deeded to a Homeowner's Association for the benefit, use, and
maintenance by the residents of this development.
11. Re -directing the sewer flow from NC10 District is subject to approval of an Amend-
ment to the Adopted Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
12. All right-of-way for public roads shall be dedicated as part of the plattinq
action.
13. Approximately 4.7 acres shall be deeded to the City for public park purposes, 2.2
acres of this amount is in excess of park dedication requirements and shall be
purchased by the City for $15,000.00 per acre, or $33,000.00.
14. The preliminary plat/plan application shall include proposed minimum lot areas and
yard setbacks. Any proposed side yard of less than 10 ft. shall be specifically
identified and explained. All yard dimensions and areas shall be per the approved
preliminary and final PUD plan.
15. The developer shall prepare an overall site grading plan which shall include the
proposed park. It is recognized that the park site will be lowered to accommodate
its future development, including the parkland to the north of this site. It is
estimated that the extra costs anticipated to be incurred by the developer for
grading on the park portion of the site will be approximately $15,000.00 which
shall be paid by the City following site grading.
16. The Preliminary Plat/Plan shall indicate all mature trees to be saved, except
those within approved rights-of-way, and those trees to be destroyed will also be
Indicated. A statement shall be included on how the saving of the trees will be
assured.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly. seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: Mayor Sc neider, Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, and Zitur
The follow nq
voted against or abstained: Councilmember Vasiliou hereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call d notice thereof, a regular mee k of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 2nd day of Februar , 1987. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider,-Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasiliou
and Zitur The
following members were absent: none
Mayor Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION 87-72
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE SANITARY SEWER PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RESI-
DENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
DICKMAN KNUTSON, BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, FOR BASS LAKE HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION (85126)
WHEREAS, Dickman Knutson, BLH Development Company, has requested approval for an Amend-
ment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning, Residen-
tial Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for 36
single family residential lots located west of Pineview Lane at 54th Avenue North; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hear-
ing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan
Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Residential Planned Unit Development Preliminary
Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Dickman Knutson, BLH Development Co., for Bass
Lake Heights 4th Addition consisting of 36 single family residential lots located west
of Pineview Lane at 54th Avenue North, subject to the followinq conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as
approved by the City Engineer.
3. Maximum density shall be 1.8 units per acre for the land at or above the
established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage P1z,1 as
verified by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed as follows: A
deduction of two points based on the size of the project. The maximum number of
units is 36.
4. Provisions for public park and trail outlot per Comprehensive Park Plan, as
verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of detailed
plans as to construction of the trail per City standards. Outlots B and E shall
be deeded to the City for public park purposes.
5. No private drive access shall be permitted to Northwest Boulevard; all private
drives shall be provided by internal public streets.
6. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Staged Growth Amendment and Sanitary Sewer
Element are contingent upon, and subject to the required review and response by
the Metropolitan Council, and the Final Plan/Plat which shall be approved by the
City Council prior to finalization of the Amendment.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 87-72
7. The location of future Northwest Boulevard shall be consistent with the final
location to be determined by the City.
8. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City.
9. Outlot C shall be deeded to a Homeowner's Association for the benefit, use and
maintenance by the residents of this development.
10. All right-of-way for public roads shall be dedicated as part of the platting
action.
11. Approximately 4.7 acres shall be deeded to the City for public park purposes, 2.2
acres of this amount is in excess of park dedication requirements and shall be
purchased by the City for $15,000.00 per acre, or $33,000.00.
12. The developer shall prepare an overall site grading plan which shall include the
proposed park. It Is recognized that the park site will be lowered to accommodate
Its future develop-ent, including the parkland to the north of this site. It is
estimated that the extra costs anticipated to be incurred by the developer for
grading on the park portion of the site will be approximately $15,000.00 which
shall be paid by the City following site grading.
13. Street names shall comply with the City Stret Naming System.
14. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regardinq minlrrrjm floor elevations for
new structures In subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water
drainage facility.
15. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat.
16. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
17. Yard setbacks are: 30 ft. front yard and 50 ft. along Northwest Boulevard, except
for Lot 1, Block 3 which shall have a 10 ft. setback; 10 ft. side yard and 25 ft.
rear yard.
18. Final Plat mylars shall refer to PUD No. 87-1.
19. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants
and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final
Plat.
20. Final title documents shall be submitted for review, as requested by the City
Attorney, as part of the Final Plat application.
21. The existing two residences shall be retained as diagrammed on the petitioners
graphic dated December 31, 1986; all other structures and buildings shall be
removed at the developer's expense.
22. The driveway for Lot 1, Block 1, shall be located northeasterly on the lot; the
driveway for Lot 1, Block 3, shall be located as far east as possible: and, shall
be shown on the survey for Building Permits.
eve- oP e't Co-.t K et'
8.2 The water andhLary sewer area type assessme and assessments for
t
Project 416 for is development are as follows.
Watermain Area 33 units x $645.00/unit $ 21,285
Sanitary Sewer Area 33 units x $360.00/unit 11,880
Total Area Assessments - Residential Lots $ 33,165
Watermain Area 4.47 acres x $1,290/acre = $ 5,766.30
Sanitary Sewer Area 4.47 acres x $720.00/acre 3,218.40
Total Assessments Outlot E $ 8,984.70
Project 416,curb and gutter estimated cost $16,649
The Developer understands and agrees to these charges, and hereby waives
his right to a public hearing with respect to them including area
assessments and Project 416.
The water and sanitary sewer Residential Equivalent Connection (REC)
charges for the lots to be developed shall be computed at the time of
connection to the municipal utility system. The Developer understands
that the aforementioned REC charges shall be paid for each dwelling unit
prior to the issuance of a building or plumbing permit for the dwelling
unit.
9. Street Maintenance During Construction
The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the
streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when
hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same
and directing attention to detours. If and when streets become impass-
able, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event resi-
dences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall
maintain a smooth surface and provde proper surface drainage. The
developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without
the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash
onto the street from his operation. The developer may request, in
writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by
plowing snow from said streets prior to final acceptance of said
streets. The City shall not be responsible for re -shaping said streets
because of snow plowing operations, and if they are requested and
providing snow plowing service, it does not constitute final acceptance
of said streets. '
9.1 The developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately
adjacent to the development. A copy of this contract shall be approved
by the City before grading is started.
1(). Acceptance of Subdivision in Units
The City of Plymouth will accept complete in units of one (1) block
which have been completed in accordance with the provisions of this
contract. The developer shall furnish a progress schedule for the
construction of streets in the subdivision. Requests for acceptance of
streets shall be made in writing by the developer. The developer shall
furnish certificates of completion a5 outlined in Paragraph 11.1 herein
for each unit completed, certifying that work has been completed in
accordance with the terms of this contract, and shall also furnish mylar
as -built" reproducibles for all phAs.ea of construction incl,i.led in this
contract.
12-
City of Plymouth
ENC I N E E R ' S ?MEMO
to
Planning Commission 6 City Council
DATE: Jaru 29, 1987
FILE NO.: 1
PETITIONER: ''r. Dignan Knutson: - Ultra Homes, Inc. - 30,,0 Harbor Lane - Plymouth, MN 55441
FINAL PLAT: "ass Lake Heigl:tc> 4t;, Addition
LOCATION: West of Pinieview Lane, North of the Soo Tine PaiZroa,a Tracks, Last of
Medicine Lake Drive in the Northeast 1/4 of Sect, -'on 10.
ASSESSMENT RECORDS:
N/A Yes No
1. _ Y Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
2. Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
3. — _ SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are
issued. These are in addition to the assessments shown in No. 1 and No.
2.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed
annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at the
time of final plat approval.
4. Area assessments: I;'ater'nain area assessment used on 36 units - 3 units
rev.ousZ? assesse = 33 units x X645. 00 ur.2.t = 21, 285, an for Chit of
based on 4.47 acres r v1290.00/acre = t5 766. 3G. San2taru Sever area
assessment based on 36 units - .3 units nreviou-Z2i asscsse = 3 units .{
5360. 00/unit = 511, 880, and ror Out Lot L' baser on 4.4 ' acres X %7?,0.00
an it = .3, 218. 40.
5. Other additional assessments estimated: C.u-hand (.utter for Northwest
ouZevard. This cost is estimated to be b2 020.52 feet X t18.24 toot =
16, 649. 08 divided b? 36 Zots = L4E2. 47/Zot.
Legal/Easements/Pe nits:
6. ,: Complies with standard utility/drainage easements -
The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet (10') in
width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in width adjoining side and
rear lot lines.
P
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 14, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284 (WAYZATA)
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
WILLOW MEADOWS ADDITION
1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council needs to determine if the City will
extend public improvements as petitioned by School District No. 284 to
serve their proposed elementary school site in the Willow Meadows
Addition. In 1980, when this parcel of land at the southwest corner of
County Road 9 and Vicksburg Lane was approved for development, the City
Council stated that the improvements must be extended by the private
developer and not by public improvement.
2. BACKGROUND: In 1980, the City Council approved the development for the
land at the southwest corner of County Road 9 and Vicksburg Lane which
was called Willow Meadows Addition. Attached is a copy of the
approving resolution and the minutes from the Council meeting when
approval was granted.
This parcel of land required trunk sanitary sewer and watermain
extension in order to be developed. These improvements were not
contained within the City's five (5) year Capital Improvements Program.
After considerable discussion and debate, the City Council did approve
the development but stated as follows: "Utility improvements in
accordance with the City's Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans must be
extended by private development and not by public improvement."
During this same time, the City was in the process of preparing our
Staged Growth Plan" in order to comply with the directive from the
Metropolitan Council that we had to delineate areas of the City which
could not develop before 1990. The Willow Meadows area was one of the
areas being considered to be included within the Staged Growth Plan,
since it did not have trunk sanitary sewer and water. With the
commitment of the developer to install all of the improvements without
the use of public funds, the City Council approved the development and
did not include this area in the post 1990 development area.
The plat, as approved for Willow Meadows Addition, divided the property
into three outlots and platted the right-of-way for 41st Avenue. The
general development plan for the area indicated that the outlot at the
PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284
April 14, 1988
Page Two
corner of Vicksburg Lane and County Road 9 would be a church site, the
outlot parallel to 41st Avenue was for trail right-of-way and the other
outlot was for an attached housing development. A development contract
was signed by the developer which required them to install all of the
public improvements. The developer did not proceed to install any of
the public improvements and the property is currently undeveloped.
The school district is proposing to purchase the property, with the
exception of the church site, for an elementary school site. They have
petitioned the City to extend 41st Avenue and Xene Lane, along with the
necessary utilities to provide service to the property. The details of
the necessary improvements cannot be determined until the City Council
has approved the revised preliminary plat for the property.
At a minimum, the necessary improvements will include the following:
a. Watermain, street improvements and sewer and water
services on 41st Avenue.
b. Sanitary sewer, watermain, sewer and water services and
street improvements on Xene Lane.
C. Trunk watermain extension along County Road 9.
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) extended trunk
sanitary sewer along 41st Avenue and Xene Lane in order to provide
service to the City of Medina. By agreement with MWCC, this sanitary
sewer will become part of Plymouth's sewer system when the City allows
connections to the sewer. The City's current Capital Improvements
Program indicates that this area would receive sanitary sewer and water
service in 1992.
3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The primary issue with regard to this
request is whether conditions have changed and the City will extend
improvements as petitioned for by the school district. The necessary
improvements can be divided into two categories:
a. Trunk watermain extension along County Road 9.
b. Lateral street and utility improvements on 41st Avenue
and Xene Lane.
In order to meet enrollment demands, the school district has stated
that they need additional elementary classrooms in 1989. Because of
future residential development within this immediate area, the school
has selected this property as a good location for an elementary school.
The use of this property as an elementary school site does not need to
be approved at this time, but the school district should be informed
PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 284
April 14, 1988
Page Three
whether the City will accept their petition and extend the necessary
public improvements, or the City Council will continue the same
requirements which were approved for the original private developer and
the school district is responsible to extend and finance the
improvements with the development of the property.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed development of the
property as a school site, instead of residential housing, is different
than the original 1980 approval and requires further consideration with
regard to the extension of public improvements. Schools need to be
built in advance of full development
of an area in order to meet enrollment needs. Since the property is
proposed for development as a school site, I recommend that the City
extend the necessary trunk watermain as a public improvement project
and assess the development in accordance with our assessment policy.
The City Council will need to determine whether the lateral utility and
street improvements on 41st Avenue and Xene Lane should be constructed
as a public improvement project, and therefore, financed by the City
and assessed to the property or are to be constructed by the developer.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolution
Minutes
Eos
J. NICHOLAS RUEHL, AIA
BERTIL E. HAGLUND, AIA
March 18, 1988
Mr. Fred Moore
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Plymouth Creek Elementary School
Vicksburg & County Road 9
Dear Fred,
Enclosed please find a petition requesting the City of
Plymouth to construct Xene Lane and a portion of 41st Avenue
North. A description of the proposed construction is included
on the petition. It is intended that the construction would
occur during 1988.
The need for this work is prompted by a new elementary school
to be constructed by Wayzata Public Schools near the
intersection of Vicksburg and County Road 9. As architects
for Wayzata Public Schools, EOS Corporation is submitting this
petition on their behalf.
Wayzata Public Schools is in the process of acquiring the
property for the elementary school. New Ventures Christian
Church is the owner of neighboring property. The petition has
been signed by representatives of both Wazyata Public Schools
and New Ventures Christian Church.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact
our office.
Sincerely,
Bert Haglund, AIA
BH:bh
Enclosure
cc: Stan Tikkanen, Wayzata Public Schools
Rev. Robert Johns, New Ventures Christian Church
Steve DeCoster, EOS Corporation
EOS CORPORATION 470 Water Street, Excelsior, MN 55331 (612) 474-3291
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PETITION
We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City of Plymouth, Mayor and Council for
the installation of the following public improvements:
Water main, storm sewer, and street construction in Xene Lane from Co. Rd. 9
to 41st Ave. No. and in 41st Ave. No. from Xene Lane to Vicksburg Lane;
sanitary sewer in Xene Lane from ±80' South of Co. Rd. 9 to 41st Ave. No.
Should the Council not approve said public improvements, or the petitioner elects
not to proceed with said public improvements, the petitioner agrees to reimburse
the City of Plymouth for any expense incurred for preparation of engineering
reports, plans, specifications, etc. for said public improvement.
NAME ADDRESS
J
F. f 19 ff. o 22 PdVWOUYH-40
31, 14
STORu SEWER
t
RDISTRICT
80UNCART SURVEY DIVISION
NE _
S+GJI DISiIC/ BOUNDARY NENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
6 _WAI,aSNE 0 DISTRICT BDUNDARI
L)
0.. AO,"'Ll1.0, 55 ••....••••. ••... •. '
v -=°t `f.Ni BOUNOARI
1l€l(!clttACoCori, of,,4`,C.Inci),(b(!!R C,(l(Ev €2€la€l€l(latom IV 'p,n.ftac2vo v 0n
CITY OF PLYM UTH
u.:tlt to : e call ar•'d notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City
t•:".i1 Cf t'1C Cit` -' ~T I•lY'•)Uth ,inneso6 was lTeTx OT—<< day of
l" x._ • The fol ioW my rlf:mbers present: Ftayor• Hunt, _
s..rr i.r..i 'u/J T t, i ' t I ndi `c'In e i dCl' Zl•..=:.._L.._L. Lei. 11_',
ane r;, lGwlr:'a r,mD r were absent: !Voll`
3d? tdt tfrR
uncilmercber Neils _ introduced the following Resolution and moved
its •
RESOLUTION NO. 80-293
APP?' -,-)'v :' CONCEPT PLAN ;ND VARIANCE FOR "PLYM;IuTH MILS ESTATE$" !:PUD FOR FRANK
LARS0N/(;.AR-L .° PROPERT?t5 (00013)
W'!EREAS, -rank Properties has reyu2ste6 approval of a concent plarl
and variance for "1ymouth Hills Estates" RPUC on approximately 25.2 acres iocatt d
generally at the southwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and Ccunty Road 9; and,
WHE-P AS, the City Council has determined that amendment of the adopted f;ve year
Capital irrnrcveme^ts ?lin should to approved to allow f•xtension of utilities to
serve this project; and,
WiiERFAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the matter at a duly called public:
infon t.iona+ hearing:
NOW, TiLPFFOR!:, 8E IT HERESY PESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the concept plan and variance
for Frank :3-son/C:ar-I_ar Properties for "Ply -mouth Hills Estates" RPUv at the
soiltl;'+/est cork ?r of Vic-sbur, lade and Cojnt.! Road 9 subJect to the following
condi tions:
1. ''lr.riancc as to PUD minimium. is granted hased upon consideration of
or,iirance variance criteria.
2. Compliance hath the City, Engineer's Memr•anduri.
3. Gtility improvements. in accordaice with the City's Co,•r;rehell sive Sewer and
40 N.>ter Plans, rust oe extended by privt..e aevelopment and not by puhl;c
improvement.
4. Corr: -1 e tion of the Env i ronrlental ; ssessment. Worksheet process prior to final
ttll;;.
5. (,t!mp;iance +lith the provisions of Section 6 of the Joninq Ordinancc relative
to subdivision end developnsrnt. in the Generai Flood Plain District.
i
f;, Written arvr^'val by the I'-epzrt'Tent of 'natural Resources as to the alteration
0f designatf-" w't1.and on the site.
r_ ., .s:.L'i r......,s'.ii'...i a l.d.a.k ati b:.:v:r.;,r.,:sM 1M".]R.eti+ik a`i , •,'Ji 1bltil.Yi Ci4 Y61ciRc.?.'%v'.iW'23'•+'../.4a ii-i17i i.'iV.3\ ,
ry,j
Provisions for buffering ant' berir.ing along County Road 9 and along
icksburg Lane.
H. Final aligniment of public trails to be in accordance with City plans and
reviewed by the City Engineer.
9. "'• ximum density for the project shall be determined by the Planning
Cor.,nission after consideration of Conditions 1, 10, 11 and 12 of this
resolution and the City's bonus point and high water elevation policies,
and rc density shall be giver, for low and moderate cost housing until
the development can demonstrate that such housing will be built on the
site.
10. Approval of extension of utility services tothis parcel is recognized to
be beyond the City's Five Year Capital Impruvement Program, and is granted
by private development based on circumstances that this property must L-aar
substantial assessment for public improvements previously ordered I.Vicksh:;rg
Lane).
11. Preliminary plat submittal shall include a revised Concept Plan including
the Stivland parcel to the southeast and will show ultimate possible access
to that parcel from other than Vicksburg Lane.
12. Consideration shall be given in the preliminary plat to provide access
streets for continuity to the wstern property line.
the motion for tIx, &&- tion of the foregoing Resolution vas duly seconded
by Mayor Hunt , and uqm vote t Bing ttken themm, the
foil -Wing ti —3-1h—livor t erro Mavor Hunt, Councilmembers Neils,
vert and Schneider
Z lc+ng vat sha nsto: Estalru:`_.___
Whern•rpc+i. the Resolution wes declared duly
11
4,.: : ,. - • Hee • i
a^ 11is reviewed the request of Frank Larson and Gar- ONCE:"
ar e-es for ap,roval of cont^,,^t plan and variance for PLYMC.'H wl'' S ES%—rl
P,' 1 s Estates RPU2 on approximately 25.2 acres FRAK. LARSn%; ,r"Ao_,
c±,-^ a* the southwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and County PROPEP7"ES (80013)
3 -1,'c' Mdnagar stated the Planning Commission recom- Iter-
e e de^1al of this request based on the fact that this
rc.-e" v is outside the trunk improvement area per the 5 -Year
I-:rover,ent Program until 1953; therefore, the pro-
se: dove?o rent is premature.
veils stated if this concept plan is approved,
it s^.ld oe clearly under_`ood that public improvements to
se-vc the plat mus; be installed by the developer in accordance
w th the City's comprehensive plans for sewer and water,
includi-, construction of the interceptor to continue service
to the west.
P'i0. Sathre, MCCombs-Knutson Associates, displayed the proposed
concert ,Ian and a topographical map Showing the flood plain area
and Ponds. Mr. Sathre stated since Vicksburg Lane is completed
and public improvements are accessible to the plat, this plat is
the logical extension of the Plymouth Hills plat to the east. He
asked that it not be considered as a separate RPUD, but as addition
or amendment to the RPUD areas in Plymouth Hills and be penalized
for being less than the required 40 acres. Mr. Sathre requested
3.4 units of density per acre and felt they should be granted
bonus points for providing two different housing types and also
for the open space and ponds in the plat since they propose to
set aside the flood plain area for open space. In addition,
they have planned to provide some moderate cost housing in the
prcject. Mr. Sathre claimed this residential development will'
enco.:rage the development of the commercial areas in the PlymoL:lh
Hills area and they would like to begin construction next spring.
Councilmember Schneider inquired if the developer intends to con-
struct the public improvements and provide the oversizing necessary
to extend the utilities to the west. Mr. Sathre replied it is their
intent to do this.
Mayor Hunt inquired if the developer can show proof that they have
made a reasonable effort to incorporate the Stivland parcel on the
southeast corner of the plat into this development. Frank Larson
Larson replied they have talked to the owner of this parcel about
selling and they showed no interest in selling at present. Mayor
Hunt stated the Council would ask for assurance that this parcel,
if eventually incorporated into the development, would not have
access directly onto Vicksburg Lane. He noted that when the land
was reguided last year, direction was given to include the parcel
In the concept plan. Mayor Hunt stated, in regards to the utility
extension, the City does not desire to open up any additional inter-
ceptor lines which will open up a massive piece of land for develop-
ment prematurely. If approved, the developer must be responsible
for extension of the utilities, per City plans.
138-
l eTer `;ells questioned if the need for street continuity
for '-*,re access to at'jacent parcels to the wes' and south had
bee- a'drfssed. Mr. Sathre replied the Planning Commission was
T re concerned with determining whether this development was pre -
ma'. -e and did ;.ot review the details of the project.
Crag, :arson, petitic-er, reviewed the status of the Plymouth Hills
de,e'cY-e^' for Council and displayed a map indicating which pro -
e," es have Seen sold or are under option. He also reviewed the
s' of firr-s with ownership in Plymouth Hills and noted those
o:,ernes in which Gar -Lar Properties retains an interest. Mr.
Larscr stated to get Downtown Plymouth commercial development
s'arte,i sorle residential development must be begun, and they are
willing to taAe the lead in this development. He claimed this is
an advantageous time to build, if financing is available, and they
are pre;^s,no to start grading on this parcel next ring. Further,
he felt this would not encourage development to the west, but would
be an i^;-etus for the commercial development in Plymouth Hills to start.
Council discussed the proposed density for the plat and Condition
9 of the proposed resolution approving the concept plan which
elir^inates the 12 units and cul-de-sac arrangement in the south-
west area and allows 3 units per acre. Councilmember Davenport
questioned the basis for granting bonus points. Planner Tre^rere
replied bonus points would be granted for open space providing
the cul-de-sac is eliminated. Council agreed final density
will be based upon the acreage above the established high water
elevation to be determined by the City Engineer.
There was discussion of whether the proposed plat can be included
as part of the Plymouth Hills RPUD's. Mayor Hunt asked Mr. Lars^n
if his intention was to include any other parcels adjacent to the
proposed plat in this RPUD in the future. Mr. Larson replied _his
was not his intent.
Council reviewed the proposed conditions of the resolution approving
the concept plan and approved Conditions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
MOTION; was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmenher
Hoyt, to give favorable consideration to Condition 1 of the reso-
lution granting variance as to PUD minimum size.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Council discussed the question of whether development of this
parcel would be premature based on the City's adopted 5 -Year
Capital Improvement Program which would not bring utilities
to the area until 1983. Manager Willis stated he would not
recommend this development because he does not feel it is wise
to approve it before the 5 -Year C.I.P. calls for it since it
may recult in speculation in property along the trunk utility
routes and attempts to develop other properties prermturely.
139-
Me e ;
r, s `4c associates, stated in his experience
Sawer ha S horCere a piece of prc+per'_y and was available, he
e:or see- the extension of utilities denied to that property.
ti's r .. ex -essed his opinion that since the extension of utilities
s -2r,,el would not affect any other parcels and would not affect
C v's indebtedness, and since the parcel is directly adjacent to
y ilities and is being assessed for the develo:Y^ent of Vicksburg
he wo.;ld be in favor of the extensior: of' utilities to the parcel,
a* 1 o s expense, at this time.
Neils stated if public improve^ents in the plat are rri-
a_e . so that it does not involve the Citv's C.Isin i-c
f Ce:,: service, the City wo..ld benefit fro^ the area assess-e,*s
ala ^s' the property and he feels the development of the land would nct
re-a:.:re.
mere w S further discussion of proposed density for the project and
how 7uch over, space would be left after the high, water elev3t:on is
deter^fined. Mayor Hunt stated he would like the proposal to be re-
turne to the M anning Commission to detemine the bonus points that
w4ll be for density consideration with reeard to open space
an; flood plain. Mr. Sathre state if the pruject is to be considers
as an extension of the Plymouth Hills RPUC's, wr,icr, have less than
acres, bonus points should not be deducted for the size of the parcel.
Mr. Larson stated they intend to limit the plat to 86 units.
Mr. Kn,;tson asked for one bonus point for provision, of low and moderate
income housing and one bonus point for provision of t o types of dwel-
ling units and one for preservation of oper space. Councilmember Neils
re=lied bonus points will not be granted for the low and moderate housing
until the developer can demonstrate that such housing will be provide!*'
Councilme'nber Neils stated he would not like to see all the density cc,
centrated in the area east of the creek, but would like to see more
fleri.ility.
M""ION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Mayor Hunt,
to t' ' RESOLUTION NO. 80-793, A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONCEPT
PLAN ..) VARIANCC FOR "PLYMOUTH HILLS ESTATES" RPUD FOR FRAM;. -
LAP.SON/GAR-LAR PROPERTIES substituting the following for Con-
d.tion 3: "Utility improvements, in accordance with the City's
Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plans, must be extended by private
develo;nent and not by public improvement," and adding Condition
10 as follows: "Approval of extension of utility services to this
parcel is recognized to be beyond the City's 5 -Year C.I.P. and is
granted by private development based on circumstances that this
property must bear substantial assessment for public improvements
previously ordered (Vicksburg lane)."
NOTION TO A.MENID was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Council -
member Neils, by adding Condition 11 as follows: "Preliminary
plat submittal shall include a revised Concept Plan including
the Stivland parcel to the southeast and will show ultimate
possible access to that parcel from other than Vicksburg lane"
140-
6 VARIANCE FOP PLY'J,%,:
HILLS ESTA'ES R
FRA': IARSON!GA-L dR
PPOPER'IES (80013)
Co nci1 Meet,
va lo.,
a^c a ! ng Condition 12 stating: "Consideration shall be given inthe ;tee?iminary plat to provide access streets for continuity tothewesternpropertyline."
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
M2t1C'1 TO AMEND was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council- mer,ber Davenport, by substituting the following for Condition 9 oftheresolution: "Maximum density for the project shall be determinedbythePlanningCommissionafterconsiderationofConditions1, 10, 11 and 12 of this resolution and the City's bonus point and high
water elevation policies, and no density shall be given for low and
moc'erate cost housing until the development can demonstrate thatsuchhousingwillbebuiltonthesite.
N'C'ion to amend carried, five ayes.
Motion to adopt Resolution llo. 80-293, as amended, carriedOnaPollCallvote, four ayes. Councilmember Hoyt abstained.
Planner Tremere stated staff understood the variance approved under
Condition 1 included a variance from the required deduction of den-
sity points for projects of less than 40 acres.
Mr. Knutson questioned whether the are. within the flood plain is
usable if there is no water standing c", it. Mayor Hunt replied in
the past building has been allowed on approved reclaimed ilood plain,
The density allowed will be the net area above the high water eleva- tion following any reclamation.
Mr. Sathre stated the flood plain area is not designated as a storageareaintheproposal, but as a floodway. They do not propose to re-
strict the floodway but to leave it as it is and ask for density foropenspace.
Pr. Knutson questioned why density credit cannot be given for flood
plain that is under water since credit was given for the four outlotsinthePlymouthHillsAddition. Planner Tremere replied the develop-
ment of those four outlots was in accordance with the original Ply- mouth Hills general development plan which was approved without spe-
cific analysis of wetlands versus density. The Council had directed
that the design of the developments on the outlots be in accordancewithordinancePUDstandards. The City's policy not to allow densitycreditforlandbelowtheestablishedhighwatermarkestablishedin
the 1973 Storm Water Drainage Plan or as modified by approved recla-
mation has otherwise been applied to other fully designed and origi-
nally proposed RPUD's where such wetland vs. density analysis is required.
T r Neils, seconded by Council-
menber Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTI •T- ;
APPROVING SITE PIAN FOR HICKS { RUCT 'Al'•Tf E•= ,ICKS CONCRETE COfiSTRISOUTHWESTCORNEROF ;# AND RAI-HVIEW LANE (80018). T -•.# _g
Mo rried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
141-
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 11, 1988 For Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PAYMENT:
GLEASON LAKE DRIVE TRAIL
PREFERRED PAVING, INC.
PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL
CITY PROJECT NO. 602
Attached is the following request for payment:
Payment
No. Date Contractor Project Amount
4 & Final 4-12-88 Preferred Paving, Inc. 602 $10,096.54
The project overran the contract by $12,011.50 or 8.2%, the principle reason for the
overrun is minor variances in actual quantities compared to estimated quantities and a
large quantity change due to unsuitable material encountered in the boulevard area
during excavation for the trail.
Also attached under separate memo is a recap of the project with respect to the
consulting engineer and contractor and citizen involvement on the project.
I would recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the
approving the final payment.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Request
Resolution
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1988. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
XXX
its adoption:
XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL
GLEASON LAKE DRIVE - TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 602
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Preferred Paving, Inc. as
contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Gleason Lake Drive Trail
Improvements, City Project No. 602, said agreement being dated November 5,
1986; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., has certified his
acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. That the original contract amount was $147,154.10 and the
value of the work to date is $159,165.60.
2. That the work performed by the Contractor for the Gleason
Lake Drive - Trail Improvement project and certified to the
Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is
hereby released from the contract except as to the
conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights
of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty
work after final payment.
3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of
10,096.54 to Preferred Paving, Inc. for the Gleason Lake
Drive - Trail Improvements is hereby approved and the City
Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay
the same forthwith.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXJt XXX XXX
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 12, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION FOR GLEASON LAKE DRIVE TRAIL
CITY PROJECT NO. 602
This project consisted of constructing a detached 8 foot wide bituminous
trail on the north side of Gleason Lake Drive (County Road 15) from Carlson
Parkway to Vicksburg Lane. Right turn lanes were also constructed at the
intersection of Niagara Lane and Gleason Lake Drive.
Even though public meetings were held and letters were sent out to the
affected property owners explaining this project, a lot of concerns dealt
with trying to save existing trees, shrubbery and correcting existing
drainage problems.
Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., our Consulting Engineer on this project,
was very responsive to all concerns which were expressed, and were able to
correct or improve most of them without major cost additions to the
project.
The contractor for this project was Preferred Paving, Inc.
The majority of the project was completed within the time limits of the
contract, however, final restoration work took until September, 1987 to be
completed. This was due to the contractor's refusal to respond to our
requests. Restoration was finally completed by Hardrives, Inc., who is the
contractor for the Hwy. 101 and Fernbrook Lane Trail Improvement Project
No. 724.
After talking with some of the residents along Gleason Lake Drive, once the
project had been completed, most felt very happy with how the trail blends
in with the area and thought that the trail was a welcome addition to the
neighborhood.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
ACI ZIOK-
AAMM MSEN
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS N PLANNERS
January 6, 1988
Mr. Dan Campbell
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
t..
222 EAS-' I7`LE CANADA ROAD 57 P.A;;L, MINNESOTA 55177 612484-D272
RE: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
GLEASON LAKE ROAD - TRAIL
CITY PROJECT NO. 602
SEH FILE: 86089
Preferred Paving, Ines. application for final payment is
enclosed. We have reviewed the final quantities and extensions
and find the application in order. All final punch list items
have been completed by the contractor.
We recommend payment in full to the contractor subject to the
submittal of "Certificate of State Tax Withholding" and lien
waivers from major subcontractors and suppliers.
Sincerely,
David J. Pillatzke
jms
cc: Gerry Brown, Preferred Paving, Inc.
SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS,
HENDRICKSON INC MINNESC'4 WISCONSIN
r.n -
n. r -
APPLICATIONFORPAYMENT
UNIT PRICE CONTRACT)
NO. Four --Final
Si'. PvuiL
OWNER: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO. 602
ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 86089
LOCATION: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTOR PREFERRED PAVING, INC. CONTRACT DATE
24 SOUTH OLIVE CONTRACT AMOUNT $147,154.10
WACONIA, MN 55387
CONTR. FOR GLEASON LAKE DRIVE (C.R. 15) TRAIL
APPLIC.DATE
PERIOD END.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL
1. CLEARING EACH
2. GRUBBING EACH
3. REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & L.F.
GUTTER
4. REMOVE CULVERTS L.F.
5. SAWING BITUMIN. PAVEMENT L.F.
6. SALVAGE METAL CULVERTS L.F.
7. COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y.
10 9.0-
10 12.0 `
120 100.0-
206 241.5-
1860 1916.0,
186 229.5--
1067
29.5=
1067 2503.0 -
PAGE 1 OF 4 SHORT—ELLIOTT—HENDRICKSON, INC.
65.00 $ 585.00
45.00 $ 540.00
4.00 $ 4on _ oo
8.50 2,052.75
1.50 2,874.00
8.50 1,950.75
3.95 886.85
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL
8. TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) C.Y. 420 461.0 - 8.00 3,688.00
9. SUBGRADE PREPARATION R.S. 61 30.0- 150.00 4' 5nn _ no
10. AGG. BASE CL. 5 100%CRUSHED TON 790 1288.56 - 9.50 12, 241.32
11. 2331 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL TON 25 24.08- 140.00 3,371.20
FOR MIXTURE
12. 2331 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 320 437.78 . 20.52
13. 2331 BINDER COURSE MIX. TON 160 0.01 21.00 9. 00
14. 2341 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL TON 10 11.9 - 140.00 1,666.00
FOR MIXTURE
15. 2341 WEARING COURSE MIX. TON 160 217.0 24.52 5.320.84
16. BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR GAL. 180 190.01 1.75 332-50
TACK COAT
17. STREET PATCHING S.Y. 183 0.0 14.75 n nn
18. RESTORE DRIVEWAY S.Y. 521 779.0 - 10.50 8,179.50
19. STONE RETAINING WALL S.F. 262 11.77. 8.50 100.05
20. 10" CM PIPE CULVERT L.F. 15 36.5 - 16.20 591.30
21. 12" CM PIPE CULVERT L.F. 84 214.5 19.20 4,11R_4n
22. 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 4 4.0 210.00 24000
23. 1511RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 2.0- 250.00 500.00
24. INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT L.F. 186 229.5 10.80 2,478.60
25. 12" RCF STORM SEWER L.F. 549 555.7- 19.20 10,669.44
DESIGN 3006, CLASS V
26. 15" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 283 282.55 - 21.00 5,931_C5
DESIGN 3006, CLASS V
27. ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 2 8.0, 100.00
28. ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 1 2.0 60.00 120.00
29. RELOCATE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 1 0.0- 1200 0.00
30. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN L.F. 14.4 22.4 , 240.00 5,3765 -nn
DESIGN H
31. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN L.F. 16.7 19.43 240.00 4T663.2g
DESIGN ST -5 (48")
PAGE 2 OF 4 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL
32. CONSTR. CATCH BASIN DES. EACH 1 2.6 - 1200.00 3,120.00
SPECIAL STRUCTURE NO. 1
33. RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE L.F. 1 4.46, 480.00 2,140.80
34. CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE EACH 3 4,2, 240.00 1,008.00
R -1642-B
35. CASTING ASSEM.TYPE R-2577 EACH 1 1.0- 210.00 210.00
36. CASTING ASSEM.TYPE R-3246 EACH 4 5.0 - 250.00 1,250.00
37. CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE EACH 1 1.0- 360.00 360.00
R-4370-22
38. ADJUST FRAME & RING CAST. EACH 10 13.0- 150.00 1,q n_no
39. RIPRAP CL.II W/GEOTEXTILE C.Y. 5.1 5.1- 45.00 22g Eip
FABRIC
40. GRANULAR PIPE SUBGRADE C.Y. 165 244.0- 9.00 2.196.00
BACKFILL
41. BITUMINOUS TRAIL S.F. 33930 33930.0 0.78 26,465.40
42. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER L.F. 1255 1096.0 5.40 41 R _ 4n
DESIGN B618
43. EVERGREEN TREES, 61HEIGHT EACH 3 7.0- 150.00 1,050.00
44. SHADE TREES,2 1/2"CALIPER EACH 6 1.01 168.00 168.00
45. ORNAMENTAL TREES, 1 1/2" EACH 5 0.0. 120.00 0.00
CALIPER
46. EVERGREEN SHRUBS, #2 POTS EACH 2 2.0, 50.00 inn -nn
47. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EACH 2 2.0, 35.00 7000
15" HEIGHT
48. SODDING S.Y. 7572 5860.0- 1.65 9,669.00
PAGE 3 OF 4 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued
otal Contract Amount $ 147,154.10 1/Total Amount Earned
Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incoporated into Work
Contract Change Order No. 1
ContractChangeOrderNo.
Contract Change Order No.
Percent -Complete 100
Percent Complete
0.00
498.00
Z
5
Percent Complete $
GROSS AMOUNT DUE ............... $ A ./
LESS _% RETAINAGE......... $
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE ............. $
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS..... $
AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION.... $10,096.54t
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress.
payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to
above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under-
signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said
contract, and (2) all
material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this
Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and
encumbrances.
Preferred Paving, Inc. Dated t_ ) c_ c= - 19
Con r or
By:
Name and Title
COUNTY OF C_I,w' f: Com_ ) SS
STATE OF , ,.tee s< a )
Before me on this Z i-,•`~ day of = , 19 F,-) personally appeared
6, cocce known to me, w o being TuTy sworn, did depose
and say that he is the r e 77 of the Contractor above mentioned;
Office
that he executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalfof "id Contractor;
and that all of the statements contained therein are tru ' correct and comple .
My Commission Expires: ? Cynthia D. Hansen ` ^
Notary Public -Minnesota Notar ubl itYE'y 1 Carver County y
a•,,.•, My Comm. Exp. 817.91
The undersigned has the ation for Payment shown above. A part of
this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him
under this Contract have been applied by him to discharge in full all of his obligations in
connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment.
In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the
Amount Due.
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
Date By
Page 4 of 4
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 8, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer
SUBJECT: DUNKIRK MEADOWS FEASIBILITY REPORT
CITY PROJECT NO. 817
I have reviewed the feasibility study concerning the proposed
improvements for Dunkirk Meadows. We are constructing sanitary sewer,
watermain and the roadway for 33rd Avenue as a part of this proposed
project.
Recommendation:
I do hereby recommend that the feasibility report be accepted and that
the City Council authorize final design of the plans and development of
specifications, for Dunkirk Meadows Subdivision.
Chester J. HaXT son, Jr., P.E.
CJH:kh
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
cX is
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
DUNKIRK MEADOWS - STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 817
WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of Dunkirk Meadows by the
installation of sanitary sewer, watermain and street to serve the proposed Fire Station
Site was duly presented to the Council on the 18th day of April, 1988; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the City Council adopted March 21, 1988, a report
has been prepared by Westwood Planning and Engineering Company with reference to the
improvement and this report was received by the Council on April 18, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council finds and determines that said petition was signed by all
owners of real property abutting upon the streets named as the location
of the improvement.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution
adopted March 21, 1988.
3. Westwood Planning and Engineering Company is designated as engineer for
the improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the
making of such improvement.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XX .X XXX T CXX
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 7, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1938
ff
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM : Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
FERNBROOK WOODS
CITY PROJECT NO. 720
Following further review of the sanitary sewer plan for this project, it
has been decided, based on the depth of the sanitary sewer, that ductile
iron pipe should be used in lieu of poly vinyl chloride pipe (PVC). The
cost shown on the attached change order is reasonable and acceptable for
this type of construction.
Recommendation:
I do hereby recommend that the change order here and attached be approved
as shown.
Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P:C
CJH:kh
attachments: Resolution
Change Order
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present: _
The following members were absent:
XX)C
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
XX)C
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
FERNBROOK WOODS PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 720
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has been prepared providing for the following:
Replacing the 8" PVC SDR 26 sanitary sewer with 8" CL52 DIP to conform with the
City of Plymouth Engineering Guidelines for sanitary sewer over 21 feet in depth.
The additional costs will be assessed to the Fernbrook Woods Addition.
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for the Fernbrook Woods Phase I Improvements Contract,
Project No. 720 is recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA; that Change Order No. 1 for Fernbrook Woods Phase I Improvements Contract,
Project No. 720 by adding $5,600.00 is approved.
Original Contract Amount $246,403.70
Previous Change Orders -0-
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO.1 - Add 5,600.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.......... $252,003.70
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
X'XX XXX
I
CHANGE ORDER
DATE: April 1, 1988
PLACE: Plymouth, Minnesota FILE N0: 70242
PROJECT: Fernbrook Woods Utility and Street Improvements
PROJECT NO: 720
CONTRACTOR: Ceca Utilities, 201 Travelers Trail, Burnsville, MN 55337
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
This Change Order provides ductile iron pipe (D.I.P.) lines and tees, in lieu of P.V.C.,
on the deep sanitary sewer along Ithaca Lane, north of 47th Avenue. The stronger
material, D.I.P., was determined to be more appropriate for this deep installation than
P.V.C.
Change Order Item
8" D.I.P., Class 52 sanitary sewer in
lieu of 8" P.V.C.
8' x 4" D.I.P. tee in lieu of 8" x 4"
P.V.C. wye
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ..........
Approved by: City of Plymouth, Minnesota
By Mayor
By Clerk
Date:
CO -70242-1
246,403.70
0.00
5,600.00
252,003.70
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE „ ANDERLIK &
By
Approved
By
Est'd Total
Unit Price Quantity Amount
L.F. 6.00 700 4,200.00
Each 140.00 10 1,400.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ADD .... 5,600.00
246,403.70
0.00
5,600.00
252,003.70
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE „ ANDERLIK &
By
Approved
By
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 11, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CARLSON CENTER 8TH ADDITION
CITY PROJECT NO. 751
ADDING CITY PROJECT NO. 718, SUOMALA ADDITION
Resolution No. 87-183, dated March 16, 1987, adopted assessments covering
the installation of sanitary sewer and water laterals and street
installation for the Suomala Addition.
Two quotations were received to provide the services required:
o Ceca Utilities - $17,680
o Bury and Carlson, Inc. - $13,400
I recommend that the attached resolution, adding Change Order No. 1 to City
Project No. 751, Carlson Center 8th Addition, providing sanitary sewer,
water service and street restoration to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Suomala
Addition, be approved as shown.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolution
Change Order No. 1
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present: _
The following members were absent:
XXX
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CARLSON CENTER 8TH ADDITION
CITY PROJECT NO. 751
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1, adding City Project No. 718, Suomala Addition, has been
prepared providing for the following:
Providing sanitary sewer and water service and street restoration to Lots 1
and 2, Suomala Addition.
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 for the Carlson Center 8th Addition Improvements contract,
City Project No. 751 is recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA; that Change Order No. 1 for Carlson Center 8th Addition Improvements
contract, City Project No. 751 by adding 13,400 is approved.
Original Contract Amount $149,569.84
Previous Change Orders 0.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD 13,400.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.......... $162,969.84
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
7 CXX )CX )f
a
XX
d (
41
V1Jc{-Cr SC'JIC.CS
ropo l
lao. 00 114 OQ / 115,7_3 _ 112
25.31 ep-30.33• E
Ne0'J0' 73' E
Sir -0-t
o.. (62) art oi e
2640. I I' ES. _
1 60 1
w R
a.u• 1. eo• a +o64 .
s ...
C , Q D ; o.. n•
vJ
200' . .......+ 7 l
P `+ • Q (27)
47) 48) .o• I A .
s (46)+ G
SU MALA RE
t.,jO5TH AVE N 1 (2) t 164.54• +04.
j
BLOCK I 137.0'
160. 22•
a
L(33) h
s(32) ADDITION ( ) 3
14 p. w(` 3 (
23) - 170• $ ` ? a•
33' ?}
fl
95
8 jE'•' _• —24.tiff .
oJ- - '
n• — 200.0'
49-36- CC
R . L . S
Z g -
a -
ST 1257 (
35)
s (4 4)
I7) S I
EASTcz)co200' 4J
23) 8 g R a
Al
205.00 -
36)
23) BUT
TT' a J
4 (39) 14 25) g
n. 600. 326) y WQ*Z7 E
22) N.
n
SI) ----
trn-
ADD.
53)
a; 64)
BLOCK8 I
245
A. ` 2 l
March 24, 1988 File No. 0870920
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
PROJECT: Carlson Center 8th Addition Area
Plymouth Project No. 751
CONTRACTOR: Bury & Carlson, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
WHEREAS: The City of Plymouth desires to provide water and
sanitary sewer service to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Greer's
Orchard Tracts, located east of Xenium Lane on Sixth
Avenue North;
THEREFORE: In accordance with the terms of the Contract, you are
hereby authorized and instructed to install water and
sanitary sewer service lines extending from the existing
mains in Sixth Avenue to the right-of-way boundary at the
said Lots 1 and 2. The work shall include restoration of
the disturbed pavement structure including aggregate base
and concrete curb and gutter. All work shall be
performed as shown on the attached drawings. Payment
will be based on actual quantities as measured by the
Engineer in the field and as itemized below:
INCREASE
Unit TotalItemNo. Item Unit Quantity_ Price Price
2104.501 Remove Concrete Lin. Ft. 30 $ 1.05 31.50
Curb & Gutter
0331.605 Remove & Restore Lump Sum 1 5348.05 5348.05
Bituminous Pavement
2531.501 Concrete Curb & Lin. Ft. 30 $ 4.79 143.70
Gutter Design B618
0503.602 4" Service Connection Each 2 2257.50 4515.00
to Existing 12" R.C.P.
0503.603 4" Service Pipe Lin. Ft. 125 15.75 1968.75
0503.603 4" Riser Pipe Lin. Ft. 16 21.00 336.00
0504.602 1" Corporation Each 2 27.00 54.00
0504.602 1" Curb Stop W/Box Each 2 79.00 158.00
0504.603 1" Copper Service Lin. Ft. 65 13.00 845.00
Pipe
TOTAL INCREASE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 13,400.00
3
Change Order No. 1 Continued
ISSUED: /
STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC.
ACCEPTED:
File No. 0870920
a3 z v
DAT.
BURY AND CARLSON, INC. DATE
APPROVED:
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
DATE
DATE
al- lam.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 12, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988
TO: ;lames G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director
SUBJECT CITY OF PLYMOUTH. FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR DUNKIRK MEADOWS
87097)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolutions approving the Final Plat and
Development Contract for Dunkirk Meadows, and establish
conditions to be met prior to filing the Final Plat with Hennepin County. The
petitioner was provided a copy of the Development Contract and has returned an executed
copy.
BACKGROUND:
The petitioner requests approval of the Final Plat for Dunkirk Meadows. The plat calls
for one lot and three outlots located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue North.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposal and finds it in substantial
compliance with the approved preliminary plat and Resolution No. 83-125.
AffAnhmPntce
1. Resolution Approving Final Plat
2. Resolution Setting Conditions for Filing Final Plat
3. Location Map
4. Development Contract
5. Final Plat
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19_ The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR DUNKIRK MEADOWS FOR THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH (87097) (MPUD 88-01)
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has requested approval for a Final Plat for Dunkirk
Meadows for one lot and three outlots located east of Dunkirk Lane and 33rd Avenue
North; and,
WHEREAS, the City staff has prepared a Development Contract covering the improvements
related to said plat;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Final Plat and Development
Contract for the City of Plymouth for Dunkirk Madows located east of Dunkirk Lane and
33rd Avenue North; and,
FURTHER, that the Development Contract for said plat be approved, and that the Mayor
and City Manager be authorized to execute the Development Contract on behalf of the
City.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a _
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the
following members were present:
following members were absent:
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of the
day of , 19 The
The
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR DUNKIRK
MEADOWS FOR THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH (87097) (MPUD 88-01)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Final Plat and Development Contract for
Dunkirk Meadows as requested by the City of Plymouth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the following to be met, prior to
recording of, and related to said plat:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. The Ordinance rezoning the property shall be published upon evidence that the
Final Plat has been filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City. This satisfies Park Dedication. require-
ments for Lot 1, Block 1. Dedication requirements for the balance of the
development will be per the Park Dedication Policy in effect at the time the final
plats are filed.
4. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for the con-
struction of municipal sewer and water.
5. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water
drainage facility.
7. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
S. Submittal of required utility and drainage easements as approved by the City
Engineer prior to filing the Final Plat.
9. No Buildinq Permits to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 88-
10. The Final Plat mylars shall contain a statement noting that the plat is part of
the approved MPUD 88-01 per Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
11. Access shall be limited to internal public roads and restricted from Dunkirk Lane
except for Lot 1, Block 1, until future Medina Road is constructed. It is the
intent that then access to Dunkirk Lane will be closed and the access will be from
Medina Road.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
A
8 04
o
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
FOR
SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
1. SCOPE OF WORK
The Developer shall provide the City with plans and specifications for the
construction of the following for the plat of Dunkirk Meadows.
1. Streets
2. Sanitary Sewer
3. Watermain
4. Storm Drainage Facilities (pipe, water, ponds, etc.)
5. Grading and Erosion Control
6. Miscellaneous Facilities
1.2 Said plans and specifications shall be prepared by a Registered
Professional Engineer subject to review and written approval by the City
Engineer. They shall be prepared in accordance with the "Manual of
Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department." This
manual outlines City standard materials, drawings and procedures which
shall be adhered to for the above mentioned plat.
1.3 Changes in plans for the purpose of saving trees and other desirable
features on private property and on streets will be permitted, providing
revised plans and specifications are submitted and approved in writing by
the City Engineer prior to the making of any contemplated change. In the
event changes are made which affect occupied residences, such changes shall
be discussed with the affected owner and their approval secured in writing.
2. STREETS
2.1 General
The following streets are to be constructed by the Developer to City
Standards including concrete curb and gutter:
a. Residential Streets
Thirty-two (32') wide face to face curb, seven ton design with concrete
curb and gutter design Standard Surmountable in conformance
with City Standard Plate No. STRT-2
33rd Avenue
5
2. STREETS (continued)
b. Collector and/or Thoroughfare Streets
feet wide face to face curb, nine ton design with concrete
curb and gutter design B-618 in conformance with Standard Plate
No.
Medina Road is to be constructed in accordance with the City's Capital
Improvement Program and assessed to the property in accordance with the
City's Assessment Policy.
2.2 Sub -grade
Unsuitable soil shall be excavated within three feet 3') of sub -grade.
The Developer shall furnish a complete soils report which shall include
recommendations as to the sub -grade correction, etc.
2.3 Sub -base
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the
approved plans.
2.4 Base
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the
approved plans.
2.5 Surfacing
Shall be constructed in accordance with the typical section shown on the
approved plans.
3. UTILITIES
3.1 Sanitary Sewer
Shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications; and the City Master Sanitary Sewer Plan adopted November
15, 1982.
3.2 Storm Sewer
Storm sewer as well as all drainage ways and ponds shall be constructed in
accordance with the approved plans and specifications and shall conform to
the City of Plymouth Master Storm Drainage Plan adopted November 15, 1982,
and the appropriate watershed district requirements where applicable.
3.3 Watermains
Watermains shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and the City Master Water Distribution Plan adopted November
15, 1982.
3.4 Private Utilities
The developer shall be responsible for the installation of telephone,
electrical and natural gas service. The required utilities shall not be
installed until the boulevard or utility easements have been graded. All
such utilities shall be installed underground.
m
4. MISCELLANEOUS
4.1 Street signs shall be required at each street intersection at the cost of
the Developer. The City will furnish and install said signs and bill the
Developer for said work.
4.2 The Developer shall furnish all Engineering services as outlined in the
Manual of Engineering Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department.
4.3 Engineering services furnished by the City: The City will not exercise
direct supervision and inspection of the work during the construction
operations. The City Engineer or his representative will make periodic
inspection of the work and will consult with the Developer's Engineer in
regard to engineering problems concerning the work and observe all tests
and conduct the final inspection as outlined in the "Manual of Engineering
Guidelines, City of Plymouth Engineering Department."
The Developer shall pay to the City Treasurer upon execution of this
Contract *Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars.
500) to cover all City administration cost required in preparing and
administering this Contract. * Minimum charge
4.4 The Developer shall do all site grading, including building sites, common
greenway and open space areas, ponds, and surface drainage ways, and all
private streets in accordance with the approved grading, drainage and site
plan. The plan shall indicate, by arrows, how the drainage will be
directed on the site.
The Developer shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan in
accordance with the City Policy dealing with Erosion and Sediment Control,
Resolution No. 84-760 or its latest revision. The Developer shall be
responsible for maintaining this plan and to assure his compliance with
said plan and to provide for the cleaning of storm sewer, ditches, ponds,
etc., necessitated by erosion from said land development, the Developer's
bond will include said maintenance costs as shown in Paragraph 8.1,
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
4.5 All boulevards shall be sodded by September 1 , 19 89 .
5. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments
The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and
at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be
placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to
preserve the lot markers for future property owners.
7
6. Guarantee of Performance by Developer
6.1 In the event the Developer requires building permits prior to completion of
all improvements as listed in Paragraph 8, he shall furnish a certified
check, certificate of deposit, or irrevocable letter of credit in the
amount of $168 as shown in Paragraph 8, or a surety bond in the amount of
252, which is 150% of the cost requirement in Paragraph 8.
6.2 Reduction in cash escrow or surety bond guarantee may be granted upon
written request by the Developer based upon the value of the completed
improvements at the time of the requested reduction. The amount of the
reduction will be submitted to the City Council for action.
6.3 The cash escrow or surety bond shall not be reduced to less than 20%
twenty percent) until all sewer, watermain, drainage systems and streets
and other work covered by this contract are completed and approved by the
City.
6.4 Prior to commencing any grading, a cash deposit in the amount of $-0- and a
irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $-0-, as shown in Paragraph
8.1, shall be furnished by the developer.
7. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance
The Developer shall furnish the City of Plymouth Public Liability Insurance
in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) and Two Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) and Property Damage Insurance in the
amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) and Twenty-five Thousand Dollars
25,000). These insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its
execution by the Developer and the City of Plymouth. These insurance
policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this
contract.
B. Estimated Cost Subdivision Development
The following items shall be the responsibility of the Developer and shall
be covered by an escrow guarantee (bond, cash, certificate of deposit,
letter of credit, etc.) as specified:
8. (continued)
1) Public Improvement Project - City to own and/or maintain after development
completed. Project No. 817 $109,529 x 25% _ $27,382 cash deposit or
assessment guarantee of $109,529 x 60% _ $65,717 (letter of credit).
2) Private - Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain
after development completed.
Letter of
Cash Credit Total
8.1 Maintenance of Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan,
Street Sweeping and
Storm Sewer Cleaning $ To be included with Site Plan
See Page 9)
9
ESTIMATED, COSTS
ITEM Public(
1)
Private Total
Street Construction 28,812 0- 28,812
Sanitary Sewer System 62,510 0- 62,510
Watermain System 18,207 0- 18,207
Storm Sewer System 0- 0- 0-
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod Included in Street Construction 0-
Pond or Ditch Construction 0- 0- 0-
Street Signs 0- 150 150
Park & Trail Improvements 0- 0- 0-
Site Grading & Drainage Improvement Included with Site Plan 0-
SUB-TOTAL: 109,529 150 109,679
Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts
12%) 0- 18 18
TOTAL: 109,529 168 109,697
1) Public Improvement Project - City to own and/or maintain after development
completed. Project No. 817 $109,529 x 25% _ $27,382 cash deposit or
assessment guarantee of $109,529 x 60% _ $65,717 (letter of credit).
2) Private - Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain
after development completed.
Letter of
Cash Credit Total
8.1 Maintenance of Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan,
Street Sweeping and
Storm Sewer Cleaning $ To be included with Site Plan
See Page 9)
9
8.2 The water and sanitary sewer area type assessments and Project No. 817,
street and utility assessment for this development are as follows:
Area Assessments None
Project No. 817 estimated street and utility assessments
Lot 1, Block 1: $40,444.
Outlot C: 69.085.
Total: $109,529.
The Developer understands and agrees to these charges, and hereby waives
his right to a public hearing with respect to the estimated assessments for
Project No. 817.
The water and sanitary sewer Residential Equivalent Connection (REC)
charges for the lots to be developed shall be computed at the time of
connection to the municipal utility system. The Developer understands that
the aforementioned REC charges shall be paid for each dwelling unit prior
to the issuance of a building or plumbing permit for the dwelling unit.
9. Street Maintenance During Construction
The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the
streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when
hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and
directing attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable,
such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are
occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth
surface and provide proper surface drainage. The developer shall be
responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept
clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash onto the street from his
operation. The developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the
streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from said streets
prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be
responsible for reshaping said streets because of snow plowing operations,
and if they are requested and providing snow plowing service, it does not
constitute final acceptance of said streets.
9.1 The developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately
adjacent to the development. A copy of this contract shall be approved by
the City before grading is started.
10. Acceptance of Subdivision in Units
The City of Plymouth will accept complete in units of one (1) block which
have been completed in accordance with the provisions of this
10
10. Acceptance of Subdivision in Units (continued)
contract. The Developer shall furnish a progress schedule for the
construction of streets in the subdivision. Requests for acceptance of
streets shall be made in writing by the Developer. The Developer shall
furnish certificates of completion as outlined in Paragraph 11.1 herein for
each unit completed, certifying that work has been completed in accordance
with the terms of this contract, and shall also furnish mylar "as -built"
reproducibles for all phases of construction included in this contract.
11. Acceptance of Completed Subdivision
11.1 Prior to acceptance of the completed subdivision by City Council, it will
be necessary to furnish the following affidavits:
a. Contractor's Certificate
b. Engineer's Certificate
C. Land Surveyor's Certificate
d. Developer's Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract.
11.2 All necessary forms will be furnished by the City of Plymouth.
11.3 Upon receipt of affidavits (Paragraph 11.1 above) and recommendation by the
City Engineer that completed work be accepted, the City Council will be
requested to accept the completed public improvements. Acceptance will be
by formal Resolution of the City Council.
12. Plat Approval
12.1 Preliminary Plat was approved by Resolution No. 88-150 by the City
Council on March 7, 1988 subject to Twelve conditions.
12.2 Final Plat and Development Contract were approved by Resolution No.
by the City Council on
13. Land Dedicated for Public Use, Parks and Private Recreation Areas
13.1 Outlot B shall be deeded to the City. This will satisfy the Dedication
Policy for Lot 1, Block 1.
13.2 Park Dedication for Outlots A and C will be satisfied with further
platting of these.
14. Other Requirements
14.1 Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
14.2 Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's
expense.
14.3 No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for
sewer and water, and the PCA Permit issued.
11
14. Other Requirements (continued)
14.4 Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor
elevations for new structures adjacent to, or containing any open storm
water drainage facility.
14.5 No building permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and
recorded with Hennepin County.
14.6 Rezoning shall be finalized with the filing of the Final Plat.
14.7 Final Plat Mylars shall refer to MPUD 88-01.
12
City of Plymouth
E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: April 13, 1988
FILE NO.: 87097
PETITIONER: Richard J. Carlquist, Director of Public Safety, City of Plymouth,
3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Mn. 55447
FINAL PLAT: Dunkirk Meadows
LOCATION: East of Dunkirk Lane, north of 30th Ave. North in the northeast 1/4
of Section 20.
ASSESSMENT RECORDS:
N/A Yes No
1. X Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
2. X Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed
use.
3. X SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits
are issued. These are in addition to the assessments shown in No
1 and No. 2.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are
reviewed annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
4. Area assessments: None.
5. Other additional assessments estimated: Project 817 Street and
Utility Improvements Estimated Cost 5109,529.
LEGAL/EASEMENTS/PERMITS:
6. _ X Complies with standard utility/drainage easements -
The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet
10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in width
adjoining side and rear lot lines.
N/A Yes No
7. X
8. X
9. X
All standard utility easements required for construction are
provided -
The City will require twenty foot (20') utility and drainage
easements for proposed utilities along the lot lines where these
utilities are proposed to be installed. This item has been
reviewed with the final construction plans and the following
changes are necessary:
Complies with ponding requirements -
The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for
ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100
year high water elevation and conformance with the City's
comprehensive storm water drainage plan.
All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been
vacated -
It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way
to facilitate the development. This is not an automatic process
in conjunction with the platting process. It is the owner's
responsibility to submit a petition as well as legal descriptions
of easements proposed to be vacated.
10. X The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to
the City with this application - If it is subsequently determined
that the subiect property is abstract property. then this
requirement does not aonly.
It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the city
attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order
that he may file the required easements referred to above.
11. _ _ X All necessary permits for this project have been obtained -
The following permits must be obtained by the developer:
X DNR Bassett Creek
Mn DOT X Minnehaha Creek
Hennepin County Elm Creek
X MPCA Shingle Creek
X State Health Department X Army Corps of Engineers
Other
2
N/A Yes No
12. X
13. X
14. X
15. X
UTILITIES:
16. X
Conforms with the City's grid system for street names -
The names of the proposed streets in the plat must conform to the
City grid system for street names. The following changes will be
necessary.
Conforms with the City's adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan -
The following revisions must be made to conform with the City's
adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan.
Acceleration/deceleration lanes provided -
Acceleration/deceleration lanes are required at the intersection
of and
All existing street rights-of-way are required width -
Additional right-of-way will be required on
Conforms with City standards requiring the developer to construct
utilities necessary to serve this plat -
In accordance with City standards, the developer shall be
responsible for constructing the necessary sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer and streets needed to serve this plat. A registered
professional engineer must prepare the plans and profiles of the
proposed sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer facilities and
streets to serve the development. City Project 817.
3
N/A Yes No
17. X
18. X
19.
20. X
21. X
Final utility plans submitted comply with all City requirements -
The developer has submitted the required construction plans for
the proposed sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities;
and has also furnished profiles of these utilities as well as the
proposed street system (public and private). See Item 18.
Per developer's request final plans will be prepared by the City.
If it is their desire to have the City construct these facilities
as part of its Capital Improvements Program, a petition must be
submitted to the City. The cutoff date for petitions is October 1
of the year preceding construction, if the developer is paying
100% of the cost. Final Plans are beine Drenared for Citv Proiect
E•1"
Minimum basement elevations -
Minimum basement elevations must be established for the following
lots. 997.5 adjacent to Pond GL -P2.
The construction plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive
Water Distribution Plan -
The following revisions will be required: See Item 18.
The construction plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan -
The following revisions will be required: See Item 18.
4
N/A Yes No
22. _ X It will be necessary to contact Bob Fasching, the City's public
utility foreman, 24 hours in advance of making any proposed
utility connections to the City's sanitary sewer and water
systems. The developer shall also be responsible for contacting
Jim Kolstad of the Public Works Department for an excavating
permit prior to any digging within the City right-of-way. All
water connections shall be via wet tap.
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL:
23. _ X Complies with Storm Drainage Plan -
The grading, drainage and erosion control plan has been submitted
to the City's consulting engineer for review to see if it is in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan.
All of their recommendations shall be incorporated in a revised
plan. The grading and drainage plan shall also indicate proposed
methods of erosion control, including the placement of silt fence
in strategic locations. Additionally, the following revisions
will be necessary:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS REQUIRED:
24. A. Avenue shall be added to the dedication sheet.
B. A temporary cul-de-sac easement shall be provided in recordable form.
C. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be provided along the southside
of 33rd Ave., east side of Dunkirk Lane and a 6 foot drainage and utility
easement along all of the church property and 31st Avenue to Black Oaks Lane.
i
Submitted by:
Chester J. H ison, Jr.,
City Engineer
5
4
F-3
d
V
In b T
r '
b
F n T 9 G G 9 v Q 4 v v
v
b0 O U N Ca b0 N W M n
L C]
n wF c m y b qz eti ° H
rc r a H •
p F .H q M °
L M 9 % C v T L O H y
O N w
U G TJ C v L. N I C
N 4 C
v y N Y y fi 7 n n P i c N 6 ElDa+ v b >.. c >+ P .r
rn as P L v U o V N rd _ti tJ S. H % w
C C [.
fi '] v U v a O 4 4 N
N N O mfr H U a L M C q N v .i ' L O! N
0. W U H o o%~ O 0.A
P v 6 4 H N G T [. N 1] q O O O C P
H H q P Cl g U N O
uL O y + C- t] v V W P V O C m HbGrp } F L M O d 4 v C @ m
V n
Y % C v ro% u 'd % ,+ 5
H
aro+
w D u q... n L q V
C~ a In
N
y C %] :[ p•. q v -+ n S y n T n o d (+C H c J L G O '.•.
9 U N d q 'J N L N O L N m w ~ V tl rl 41 M UvPvfiv ] v 0., P v w U q m O W v M 2 N >. ' n T L F O V
fi N 6 U N O M 0
H L V 6 0 a+ C q U N H D 2 U N Tu
H v -. O F n W 4 O T
q q
I
t' % .+
N F r p L
v g m m G }:
Y. fn T Y S
N % In a 0 O
M
C O O C
p
p 9 LC
ra,L. va
U T O
Iv.
T N w O 6 K Y. ° C C. P C U NLvN .O Q .i O> O H O n +- ClIn N_ U N ti U V 'p O. CYO C n
aro L I H v U 0.N > U v v v w c v 'r.
O O ro A v9 .
Cy] WT
P] (
AT
ja`: Pt.
L O y p +, nj 1 O P N
U
I C4 L M ON
G C W 5 W NO A % W PO u
N G
H A C7 V D: n w UwqWwUv 'C b A C [. g V q H .41 wA
y1 wvroTN9y. O > P F
fiv
IN W N d W L 2] y] N F L qW6CPmF' O O 9C%W'O Ymd v y NN O `LVN Q
O O L.A H Ol0PNAto y rH ° dFd Hw uF. S:
IVO
I
a
w
T O L V• N > v U O w A v v
v w a u v ro c t b w v F
NL, N C a U P 'O o C t N A o H q
W N 'O 'O N v GL •-+ p F L L. N O v V 'O A V '.] v v 'D y
R N n y V F n N V E4 ° u d ' O U N L L C A U
O C O
O N p O L V L v G L W y W L O m L W N N q
N
H NIn LVYt%09 I InVLI In
ro In IOLWO d Q 6 --r O W .] W N N U O m N N
U C 'an N W Y F N O 'C C O T] L
co w u w N v
L) v A v N V N y !"' y n w C b[ Y W DL C h v V V N N g r EO 'n N L O. T :tl
C I• m O W C' F: w pp C V w V C O V Y q N Y. N
T
C U r+ L E['n % a` p C O 0[ O C 7 L N n U O •• I+ g .Z 'C F
N •-1 H M y V b ^-1 rC C F V R N v v v v g aO dq L' O a N C
S. v N i.] N' V L r: « O N H w n m y • N l.' w Ll O L
p nC%ro Cv4+- G wB vN Y G 64 v O
M u +. H v G C M w m v U a+ q N 'C C •-. v 5 W L ° q O
p(, .n L O 3 L• w 0= L ' O w O v N N- M G S': v d O O U '
C g N U N v v V !', l% V T V W N G N M ^. N d N A 6 •r
C C N N !+ C 'O v •.' R1 —r v H V .. N N y q v M P1
O 3 A W W O N q o O H s.. N O v O F "' v V q (C
pO O q U N% n v 'T V N v F A O g N W 'd I A P%
NL
v
N w QI. N 'J' V d ti W^ N V N Y N n N C NO 4! m0, h g CO U O v C N G % o L P. v L L u 2> a r
H
O G C C V Gr .0 v L N V U 'U ' 'O v L.. g C M W v O O
o o O v C <: L o p w O v v o C v 9 C- n 2 v 0C 0 L 'O
ry rn N H Y. N v O H (' N W L CO'C O
N v o N N Y. A t i N W a! c. W O r ^ v 9 N d ti N W
W G C C J v a .. U# Pr m g v 7 -n N v F O A C T C M 'a ^ v %
U C O O v N 4 qlu L Nr
INN w O v N 7 v v n
V O U O N O v w U ~F' O V -+ b4 N H % It 4y O Cl [1 T V Y+
w N N W /, u rJ 2. H V w C 'C C C q f. Sl U N u N
P w
J 4 O N Cl N v v .. N C v N
p q W OI N N . w C - H Oi `U 9 N M O' f1 'O N [) Yn r C Cr
p `-r U C
L v O C4 C H k (U •• 'O 'O N F' L ro M n d U A M S Y. 'O O W U G
ti. pp .Y f+• • '
F rd C v N v D7 1' v F a V 1. L N O N N N 4 9 n C y G N
L. L u LO w N N P G Q C F U q N 7 O 1+ A N F 3 7 O TJ 4
C% O
N O C ti n N M V. N l• A U' L O H'O % C v n L GE v C C. E1 ro
A L 4 41 .-r n m O Y P u" W '!r n M SJ N N S p N L 'T N w N -• Y O U O :+T H
F O Cr g E H L O t- N F C- L O
O 6 v v%
9 P d O M '.0 N 9 'V N N U V R Of r`] 'O `j ' T] W •n M
U C
C v V L H 'O 'O v U'J ' F '" N 4 ?
N N C q q U N C L M U C N N y Crv° CF 'd w 0C« N C N W fy v rn F C V V
H V % g d O v V .• V c! .• In M L R C F v 1. C a+ L. O N
W v S v 3 1. U d N r L n O C C C N H v n ti ro
M
w gY. O O L. n q N- L v 1- M N L O h ^Fr tl v V 'd ,.C -r
aA/
Y G O a N 'V P 6
d b v N N a n L a L O W
W C 4r U V N W V v Y- 'tl 'T N g C W IC ' N N' N L N D
4 AJ
F+ q Lj A 9 O G C .+ a n C W N 'O 'd C t: Q 3 g Y L N A -+ O W E:.-, N .-r O
L w W N W v •• v • H O v v V -r ^ a O O v N N U v W w -+
O N O H .0 .0 O C G 6 L` -ti L L N W d N rJ '-' . p O N C N C W .1 L• O D w W C U
m P L q W O V v L u L 0 9 N 's u L C W w V L a o v
y m C
N w P v h L >i 1. v- '.7 T 7 T Y VO L L H T
Y w y F
CWV q O OH v o v H L O U> U L O m v H v« v o A V G P 9
N C v H O N H C CON 0
P N d 9 0q N 9 Y W M
ra p 'p Y Y .a n W O 61 -~-r v 7 U C N U L 1C N V C F N v ti W D C `.IJ ro v v D. (u <] v
q
d u b 3 0.xZ3 N C W roxA i.c+ C L N ..tiC 4G C`-Fi~ U MF V C N W Fw b
n C v N F% b A w H E'n u M u v G W m C O 41 N .. S 'n F r F
O G v V%% W a +' F c q CO' %' v v L H M',J N L w v U > C N J v
Tq0ATuqO
Y 'Y m F v 3 S 0.v [` # V; N Q + n b N w - 'l. ' T H m n b u -+ N D: 'O b A m
FOL
dcl
V
C
v
J
T36O3f
a> !
Y
ix
Y
Z
D
ZZ a 'BII 4'00
0-
5 to M 3 ayl
IsL
Io d/I aM .44 Jo awl Wnns ayy_„
r -
m
u
J
os zc
J
N
b
o
O
N
L
O
37
cv v
e
a,
b
20
GO L
C] {
d \ F,
hU
S
4O
Q Co
r
vo
9 4
p
J
N
b
o
O
N
O
cv v
e b
20
GO L
C] {
hU
OCJ
4O
Q Co
0
9Z'Ibb
OVOcy
J, -'
00009----
t10,009
0009— `
b0'OOG M„Lb,bbcBBS
A d p
ti
OW 6
v vl 61=v e td7Js N
ciYe _ or, 11 ' Noy e5 yy p N Qi eo
a /
CI I Aa,t va — r.
IJJ c B
13ai\'1 N IN 'ant/ N W££ .
s -
o 3 e£szoeari 0, zoo
Ob
m W h
N
nI o
rl1 F,I x
m
0la
9ZF
nC.
Zprr
M ISISI ` a
F52B
ti4i
c02 .!'-
DI to I 12 HSY ^ - 0 _ LI 6B>.
sa,Fl
llS
1011n0
dl'6F£ 3
ra Hcz oo'a la= V/V/c a,ns,b,v
O
20
O
U
ck_\A--1
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988
TO: City Manager :lames G. Willis
FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director
Blair Tremere
SUBJECT '
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the reduction of the Site
Performance Guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property
located at 13700 1st Avenue North.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council authorized a reduction of this financial guarantee on March 7, 1988.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Planning Staff inspected the site. The following deficiencies and requirements remain:
1. Site Grading
2. Storm Sewer
3. Bituminous Paving
4. Concrete Curb and Gutter
5. Sidewalk
6. Lighting
7. Landscaping
8. An "As- Built" Utility Plan
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I recommend adoption of the attached Resolution to reduce the financial guarantee for
Trammell Crow Company for property at 13700 1st Avenue North.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Site Location Map
3. Resolution No. 87-632
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092)
WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st Avenue North was
approved under City Council Resolution No. 87-632; and,
WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of
a Construction Loan in the amount of $385,000.00; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council on March 7, 1988, under Resolution No. 88-160 approved the
reduction to $282,900.00; and,
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends reduction of the financial guarantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the reduction of the Construction
Loan in the amount of $282,920.00 which was submitted to guarantee site improvements
for Trammell Crow Company located at 13700 1st Avenue North, to $275,720.00.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
loi-S3I
w '(2
W AND 50 '50
C
F z
a
a2 a2
Z -
J --, -- --------------- --_ • (7)
t2
J
Z
3(111 v 41 J .1 ZWp
ct:
4r00
W R - -
j = z (2031 r:.•
co
JA
F Y e Q 240.00 z
OT F w : c _ /N i g wee o7 1 Toe 1 .:
U 4 LLJ (
28) (
2i) 2 Z (33) _] W
y A
V rlol (27 a
I I N x
M
1
IIS
TE s ;.
LIDT A
0
z (
16) (25) f . I
r i "S I 1. I LL -
tt se,
OAKS
3)
I
Q2
MTII
24) 5u e1
R'
y L) W (5+)
35) rs ,
ffI °
C
a
2 1 2ii+t i, JJT "- (23)
30
1.1 11.722. e2'1 'Tj ' A (55),
40. (' ,
7
CLSON 3
r
C 3:15'•. C (7y ( a
10
e S` `' • ''
I
P) B OCs Fa,
w >> ' (
I) (
2) (
1) (
19) ` (
zo)
9 / I
S fsy h^1 7 8 Lel 6 0 r 1 _ :.
45.
SUNSEq '
I RASETTlo• ,,,, ZINNIA L, A. cl> ,
z I I
r
THn.
ADDI ION193
s 8 9 10(
B OCK
17 .
OO • I
I
c37)
21
cis)
cs
i I 0 S TLO
I
S OT J(38)
9J
V
IGT cVEr-cN-HE-i 6R FF-- •,
a R
1l.s9 50B 31
3 w -yrs . .. ....;. 2•.... _....,
OUTLOT
C (+z) (
I)
I a
8TH ADDITION ------------
22 R
BLOCK 2
1. -. ------------
OU
4,
X LOT I I ' (10)
2
UTH V! - Dail
CITY PLYvowCITCAJ. 14 :.
4 '
Y4. c...
t R' _
2639.20' RES (2) - 40 i - (+)
5)
u
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5th day of October , 1987. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Vasiliou, Zitur,
Crain and Sisk The
following members were absent: None
Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87-632
APPROVING SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR CARLSON TECH CENTER
BUILDING A (87092)
WHEREAS, Trammell Crow Company has requested approval of a Site Plan and Variance for
Building A an office/showroom facility in the Carlson Tech Center to be located
southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Trammell Crow Company
for a Site Plan and Variance for Building A, an office/showroom facility in the Carlson
Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage
facility.
4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
completion of site improvements.
5. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance.
6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals
per Ordinance provisions.
7. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants and fire
lanes.
8. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no outside
storage is permitted.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
LI
Page two
Resolution No. 87-632
9. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the
release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy.
10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County.
11. A variance is approved for a 32 ft. setback from the property line to the parking
lot versus the Zoning Ordinance requirement of 50 ft. on the basis that the
Ordinance Variance Criteria have been met.
12. The rooftop equipment on Building A shall be visually screened, per Ordinance, to
effectively buffer noise so that it is not transmitted beyond the boundaries of
the property so to be perceptible in the abutting residential district.
13. The berm to be installed along the north property line of the site shall be 6 ft.
above the floor elevation of Building A; the slope shall be within the City
standards.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Zitur, Crain
and Sisk The following
voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988
TO: City Manager James G. Willis
FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director
Blair Tremere (
SUBJECT
REDUCTION'OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the reduction of the Site
Performance Guarantee for Trammell Crow Company for property
located at 13805 1st Avenue North.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council authorized a reduction of this financial quarantee on March 7, 1988.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Planning Staff inspected the site. The following deficiencies and requirements remain:
1. Site Grading
2. Storm Sewer
3. Water Mains, Hydrants, and Sanitary Sewer
4. Bituminous Paving
5. Concrete Curb and Gutter
6. Concrete Sidewalk
7. Exterior Lighting
8. Landscaping
9. An "As -Built" Utility Plan
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I recommend adoption of the attached Resolution to reduce the financial guarantee for
Trammell Crow Company for property at 13805 1st Avenue North.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Site Location Map
3. Resolution No. 87-633
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY (87092)
WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st Avenue North was
approved under City Council Resolution No. 87-633; and,
WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of
a Construction Loan in the amount of S95,000.00; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council on March 7, 1988, under Resolution No. 88-161 approved the
reduction to $83,400.00; and,
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends reduction of the financial guarantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the reduction of the Construction
Loan in the amount of $83,400.00 which was submitted to guarantee site improvements for
Trammell Crow Company located at 13805 1st Avenue North, to $81,600.00.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
0 2
I AvE, z,
3/2/ag
40 liz
ILM 10.0 map WOOD ra a
Q
Wo
VZOO
o
mi
F
s (
2.) w•o Vii:,
s'
26)m
ao (n 1 < _z
a
Z
s(N ° ": 1 tt) SFT 131,79 OAK! (
S l6" ` (2s) - Su
cis) (
r~. V cs) MILL
zc=•, I :+ z w) crn • q9, ', 4,^ yo
C LSON .
x 1
3
K r rr•.Y a. n
II ) 4 I
f 3(15)
i C N) ° (6) )
71
to
po /
4i-
LIP) BLOCK Qa,_/`` y () (2) (19) ) (20) (----
1 /r e J. I I
O_
S
8a,,e
LW ZINNIA LA.
p
C
ca, SUNSET •` .rw , 1 n« 7
12
T ADDITIION94tNX
r
i
B OCK I17a•; j' •e,a
I50Q' CARLSON CENTER I (m)
cs7)
air ; BLOCK I 1
pt
1 ;k LOT I I _ •>
145T AVE. Flo.
30)
16T AVENUE NORTALLrt
ui
SITE . r . i
OUTLOTOEM '
C (12)
R8THADDITION •
i
BLOCKiBLOCK 2 D U TL O T: A y... `.---------=
LOT I
J i~. ( '•.•'}(i0) 1
CITY 00
A I. F 0j. 40. 1453
267Y.20' RES (3) at _
I (
4)
may. `•
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5th day of October 1987. The
following members were present: Mayor Schnee e'er, 7ouncilmem erg s Vasil -10-u—, Zitur,
Crain and Sisk The
following members were absent: None
Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87-633
APPROVING SITE PLAN .AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR CARLSON
TECH CENTER BUILDING B (87092)
WHEREAS, Trammell Crow Company has requested approval of a Site Plan and Conditional
Use Permit for Building B, a facility with 50% warehouse/showroom and 50% office use in
the Carlson Tech Center to be located southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Trammell Crow CompanyforaSitePlanandConditionalUsePermitforBuildingB, a facility with 50%
warehouse/showroom and 50% office use in the Carlson Tech Center to be located
southwest of Sunset Trail and County Road 61, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage
facility.
4. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
completion of site improvements.
5. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance.
6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals
per Ordinance provisions.
7. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire hydrants and fire
lanes.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 87-633
8. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure and no outside
storage is permitted.
9. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the
release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy.
10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County.
11. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and
violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
12. Compliance with applicable Building and Fire Code requirements shall be verified
by the City prior to Permit issuance.
13. All parking shall be off-street in designated areas which comply with the Zoning
Ordinance.
14. Appropriate legal documents for shared drives and access shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney and recorded by the petitioner prior to the issuance
of building permits.
15. The Conditional Use Permit is for 50% office occupancy.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: avor, chneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Zitur, Crain
and Sisk The following
voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
I,- ck — T-- N
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 13, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988
TO: City Manager dames G. Willis
FROM: Associate Planner Al Cottingham through Community Development Director
Blair Tremere '
SUBJECT
RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the release of the Site
Performance Guarantee for Honeywell, Inc. for property located at
12001 Highway 55.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Planning staff inspected the site and found all the site improvements to be completed
and recommend adoption of the Resolution authoring the release of the Site Performance
Guarantee for Honeywell, Inc. for property at 12001 Highway 55.
1. Resolution
2. Site Location Map
3. Resolution No. 85-166
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The
following members were present:
The
following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87 -
AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151)
WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Honeywell, Inc. located at 12001 Highway 55 was approved under
City Council Resolution No. 85-166; and,
WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in the form of
a Bond in the amount of 520,000.00; and,
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends release of the financial guarantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the release of the Bond No.
400HF5413 in the amount of $20,000.00, which was submitted to guarantee site
improvements for Honeywell, Inc. located at 12001 Highway 55.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular Feting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, -as held on the 4th _ day of March 1985,
The following members were present: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Crain,
Schneider and Vasiliou
The Irolloving members were absent: Councilmember Neils
f
Nf Y!f f#f
Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved Its
adoption:
RESOLUTIOIJ NO. 8.- 166
APPROVING MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN, AND VARIANCE FOR HONEYWELL, INC. (A-151)
WHEREAS, Honeywell, Inc. has requested approval of a Master Plan Amendment, Site
Plan, and Variance for an approximate 6,000 ft. addition at 12001 State Highway 55;
arid,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Honeywell, Inc.
for a Master Plan Amendment, Site Plan, and Variance for an approximate 6,000 ft.
addition located at 12001 State Highway 55, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum
2. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for
complet:un of site improvements, prior to issuance of permits.
3. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv-
als per Ordinance provisions, and in accordance with the Master Plan staff dated
January 21, 1985.
4. Approved Variances include: a 50 ft. setback to the zoning line between B-1 and
FRO Districts, rather than the required 75 ft. setback considering the property
is intended to remain undeveloped and will serve as a buffer to already devel-
oped areas.
5. Submittal of a complete landscape plan prior to issuance of Building Permits.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Cour.cilmember Crain, and upon vote being taken thereon, the
foll-,wing voted in favor thereof: Mayor avenport, Councilmembers Crain,
Schneider and Vasiliou
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
0
DATE
M
FROM
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
April 14, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 18, 1988
James G. Willis, City Manager
Blair Tremere, Community Development Director
D:_ -
SUBJECT AUTHORIZED PAYMENT FOR REHABILITATION WORK PERFORMED THROUGH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing payment for
completed work for a rehabilitation job where the final
cost exceeded the maximum qrant amount as established by the City Council policy. The
work was authorized under the Community Development Block Grant Program which does have
adequate funding to cover this work.
BACKGROUND:
The application involved structural improvements to the roof and to the chimney of an
older owner -occupied home. The necessary work was found to be appropriate under the
guidelines of the program and the owner is qualified based on income and assets.
The estimated cost from the low bidder was high compared to the maximum established by
the City Council several years ago, S8,250.00. The contractor was requested to reduce
the amount of work so that the cost would be below or at the policy maximum.
There was very little margin for extra or unexpected necessary work. Such work was
identified as the roof system was being replaced, primarily in the form of the need for
additional insulation, and the work was authorized by the City staff member in charge
of program administration.
The total cost of the work exceeds the $8,250.00 maximum by $1,602.00.
Subsequent to the authorization of this work, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
HRA) recommended raising the maximum grant amount to $10,000; the City Council deter-
mined that it should remain at $8,250.00.
I was not aware of the specific matter until after the City Council action.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The request is to authorize an exemption for this particular case from the City Council
policy. There are available federal Community Development Block Grant funds.
Page two
Memorandum to City Manager
1985CityCouncilMeetingApril18,
April 14, 1988
Ihave carefully examined the records in the particular case and find that the work was
bona fide rehabilitation work and the so -ca
ilei
mprovementork
was also in order as
matter of proper
construction and energy 9
sigHaled the potential
The error was one of judgment.
nt hamougnt and
initial
shoubid
ld
haveshould
been
have
carefulln
a rantz amounand
t
for exceeding the maximum g
resolved before the work co
unt
ced
l specific
The
authorization was ereceived to exceed the
should not have been authorized
City policy.
ram does have guidelines and check points
which
designed
The rehabilitation
progThere
assure the expenditures are ofide a
instance which find
within
isannexceptinopolicies.
exception,
not pthe rule.
was a deviation in this
nd
I have required the per
involved to
caeSfnotyhappenevaluate
agai n.
update
For example,
guidelines
are
and procedural steps to assure that this omaxium l flag
establishing a limit that is below the City o uinitialcil ablis eexceedmthatwhich1 werllimit.
es pro posed work if t
a closer
examination of p P provided to absorb
additional or unexamina-
That will assure that a margin has been p ated upon thorough
work. Usually, the "extra" items can be reasonably
anticipated
judgments in a
tion by Building
Inspectors and bn amount
inrs.
exesslof the $
8f
all ,
250.00ewoud be needed,
is
particular instance conclude that a work
the proposal will be brought to the City Council for consideration be ore
authorized.
RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSIONS
the
tance was
I recommend
adoption of this Resolution
orehabilitationsis aandhthe oprovisionrkin sfor seffective
justified as a matter of the
structural
provideThehomeisofsounod
construction
condition wwherbe lit should
l w
it has now been br g
subsequent additions);
shelter for many years.
administrative error has been appropriately addressed.
I have concluded that the
The but needed a heightened awareness of the need to
program is operating appropriately,
exemption actions
firmly identify the total cost up front and to in
appropriate
be fore work is authorized. The Community
Development Block Grant Program establishes
he reaffirmed policy and will see that it istheincome
qualification limits, but leaves the maximum grant amount to the discretion
of the local authority.
We understand
followed as it was intended by the City Council.
Attachment
Resolution
17
rO SIi,' P;EHH'I; ITHTIT GPP;
SCO -E F I ;
PROVENI,
E"JS
homeowner: grant administrator:
r
M It Dale,
AUTHORMY
G;4 OF FuVMQUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOLKEVARD
i2 -4A, ' MN 33"7 -
phone: 9!;(q_ Z jOD
Below is a listing of eligible repairs as determined by the Administering
Entity, prioritized in the order listed. Bids must be obtained by the
arant applicant for this work, up to the maximum Grant amount allowed. Any
questions regarding the priority ranking of the work should be directed to
the Grant Administrator.
All questions by contractors pertaining to the work to be bid should be
directed to the Grant Administrator listed above.
D rV D 6 v/f- W JV- b aro Gu 5
r,Wv,
n baa -v'
o
40RK NR0iD0Jr,1
iD 77T i !' i
TT Fl,I I I term zed Cost
Sl'Sfvrh dYll ii5/OD ;r c r0p,
kna,7?4-J, W15'
vr froj v' Coves dor all Io, ocv r' {ur r/,,r gs
G N tri Or 0f nOl s pS af'yl
T7v
as
3 Co Stru f a Acv f r ,4 Sa/ roof
oaf 7*1J Sf51
N
D. G, I,i 1 '7 K 2 x
hGH ° Ana/ res f oh
1d 01
Cu f G4v Gid iGS/' S {i f
5, Cot fraar /oj a'i roof, ala-, c S
Homeowr
HOUSING; REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
CITY Of PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD
PLYMOUTH, MN 5u47
ame:
ure:
U 7/' 3
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
HOUSING REHABILITATION; GRANT PROGRAM,
HOMEOWNER APP'ICATION FOR GRANT—
it/ Z RANTCom% -
HOUSEHOLD INFORMATICN -- Please Print
First Name
Name of Spouse
Address Home Phone _
City PL y/ t4l D U 7- ly /, Zip Code Work Phone
City of residence if other than mailing address
Marital Status (check one) married, single, divorced, separated,
widowed
Race (check one) White, Black, American Indian/Native Alaskan,
Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander
The information concerning Minority Group Categories is requested for statistical purposes
only so that Hennepin County may determine the degree to which its programs are utilizedbyMinorityhouseholds.
INCOME INFORMATION
Income" means any amount received from the following sources by a Resident.
Any public assistance
VA educational grants
Estate or trust income
Gains from the sale of
property or securities
Pensions and annuities,
including social security
and PERA
Alimony and/or child support
Interest and dividends
Salaries, including commissions, tips,
bonuses, and overtime pay
Rental income
Business profit for self-employed,
including farmers and child care, etc.
Payments received from property being
sold on contract for deed
All other income received by the
household
List all the residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their
incomes, if any.
RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least
nine (9) months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax
purposes.
Total number of residents in the household I_
income of
names of ages of residents
residents residents per month
S
S
s
source of income
OFFICE USE ONLY
1
in ouseho d
verified incomes
q —
s
s
s
S
S
Total Income S per monthsperyear O-S, D
income per month
s Cp
inc me per year
ASSET INFORMATION
List the cash value of assets held by all residents of your household.
If money is owed on any item, the value listed should equal the market
value of the item minus the amount that is owed. OFFICE USE ONLY
verified assets
1. CASH on hand........................................S S
2. CASH in checking accounts ...........................5
3. CASH in savings accounts (including those held .....$ C $
in trust)
11. Cash value of ScCurtties or 6.5. Savings oonas...... b $
5. Redemption value of life insurance policies.........! Q 5
6. Current Market Value of real estate, NOT INCLUDING
the property to be improved and up to 2 surrounding
acres. Include 100% of the outstanding balance
owed to you on property sold on Contract for Deed ... S () S
7. Other personal property (excluding household
furnishings, clothing and one personal vehicle) ..... $ 14 $
TOTAL ASSETS ............................................$ ' / $
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Provide the following information about the property to be improved with this grant.
I. Is your property: a single family house; a duplex
c!
2. How many years have you lived in the house?
cam'' 3. What is the anprnYlmate age cf the houoc° -/ C Gd /LJ — ---
v
4. Do you have any outstanding mortgages on the house? Yes; __LL No
If yes, with whom? Amount S
5. Do you have any outstanding Contract for Deed on the house? Yes; k ----No
If yes, with whom? Amount $
6. Have you ever received a Housing Rehabilitation Grant before? Yes; /-'No
If yes, what type? Amount S
Urban Hennepin County or an authorized representative shall have the right to inspect the
property to be improved at any time from the date of the Grant upon giving due notice to
the occupant(s).
Any person who makes a false statement or misrepresentation in connection with the appli-
cation for or use of Urban Hennepin County Grant funds shall be subject to a fine or
imprisonment, or both, under the provisions of the Minnesota Criminal Code, and/or may be
required to return all or part of the Grant Funds to Urban Hennepin County.
I, the undersigned, certify subject to penalty under law that the above information is
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that the provisions stated
are accepted and agreed to.
7
Pi anMts ie date'of application
Note: All names and financial information provided on this application are considered
private data on individuals and are subject to privacy of information provisions, pursuanttoStateStatute.
Not,/ To : "OU6(Na/1Eoevso04++f
AUTHORnTY
C?Y Of PLYMOUTH
00 PLYMOUTH BOULNVARD
Pl YMCA mi 'µw "AV
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 13, 1988
TO: games G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City
SUBJECT AMENDMENT TO PLYMOUTH CITY CODE SECTION 1310.03 RELATING TO PARKING
REGULATIONS
1. ACTION REQUESTED: The attached ordinance amendment is housekeeping in
nature and specifically allows city vehicles to park within 20 feet of
an intersection or traffic control device to conduct official citybusiness. Under the current ordinance, a city vehicle could be tagged
if parked within 20 feet of an intersection, even though conducting
official business such as sign installation or repair, hydrant painting
or water valve exercise. The ordinance is recommended for adoption.
FB:kec
attachment
Ordinance No. 88 -
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY
AND PARKING REGULATIONS, AND AMENDING SUBSECTION
1310.03 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
Section 1. The Plymouth City Code, Subsection 1310.03,
Subdivision 1 is amended to read:
1310.03 Parking Prohibited. Subdivision 1. Specified
Places. A vehicle may not be parked, whether attended
or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict
with other traffic or in compliance with the directions
of a police officer or traffic control device in any of
the places specified in this Subsection. This subsec-
tion does not apply to City vehicles while on official
City business when it is reasonably necessary for the
City vehicles to be parked in a manner that would_
otherwise be in violation of this subsection.
Sec. 2. This ordinance is effective on the date of its
publication in accordance with Subsection 110.11.
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
0066OR07.I34
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: April 13. 1988 for Council Meeting of 04/18/88
TO: James G. Willis - City Manager
FROM: Richard J. Carlauist - Public Safety Director
SUBJECT REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS
ACTION REQUESTED: It is recommended that the City Council pass the accomoanvina
resolution re_iectina the recent bids received on the towing contract for 1988 through
1990. I have reviewed this matter with the City Attorney and he advises there is
adecauate reason to reject the bids if the Council so chooses.
BACKGROUND: The current towing contract expires April 30. 1988. It is with Valley
Towing__. which is located in the City of Plymouth. They have held the contract since
1986. when the towing contract with Plymouth Automotive was discontinued by Council
action.
We received three bids for the towina contract. which has a three-vear duration
Period. They were from Dick's Towina located in Hopkins: Kellv's Towing located in
Wayzata: and, Valley Towina located in Plymouth.
A towing proposal format was used for the bidding process. The Council should also be
aware that we have an ordinance amendment change concerning towing that will be
Presented at a future Council Meetina. The reasons that we want to reject the current
bids and re -bid are:
1. The maiority of our tows involve passengers vehicles. We had anticipated two
different categories of these types of tows. i.e. Type I durina the daytime. and
Type III during the evening. We had also created a Type II tow for all daytime
tows involving motorcycles. snowmobiles. etc.. and a Type IV tow for the same
types of vehicles but during the evening. In so doina. we had one bidder, Dick's
Towing. who bid extremely low in the Type I1 and Type IV towings, thereby
affecting his overall bid dramatically in comparison to the others. By referring
to the attached summary of the respective bids from the three organizations. it
is apparent that our process was impaired by creatina a format that could be
modified in an innovative way. Also. with respect to Dick's Towina, he added a
definition under the storaae rate that was different from the one in our bidding
proposal. i.e., he wrote "Storage per day, midnight to midnight. or calendar
day". In effect. if a vehicle were towed at 11:30 p.m.. and not picked up until
the following morning at 8:00 a.m.. he could charge 2 days storaae under that
stipulation. Our bidding proposal would not allow that. In any event, Dick's
Towing_ was the lowest total tabulation because of the previously mentioned motor-
cycle and snowmobile tows.
REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS
For Council Meeting_ of 04/18/88
Paae Two
BACKGROUND: (continued)
2. With respect to Kelly's Towing in Wayzata. we found that he had the lowest towina
costs for passenaer vehicles. He also had the lowest storage rate per day.
However, in checking with the City of Wayzata, we found that the business that
Kelly's Towina is conducting at 253 East Lake Street in Wayzata is not allowed by
City ordinance: nor has Kelly applied for a conditional use permit to operate
same.
3. The third bidder and current provider. Valley Towina, was the highest in total
tabulation and passenaer vehicle tows. In order to be a business located in
Plymouth and bid on the towina contract reauires that the operator must conform
to the City of Plymouth code. Valley Towina currently has inside storaae and
does conform to the Plymouth City Code. However, we did not include lanauaae
such as this for contractors outside of our City. and therefore could be faced
with a situation where legal action could literally close the contracting service
down. thereby affecting us. A possible exposure in this area is the reference
made to Kelly's Towina in the preceding paragraph. For Council information.
Dick's Towina_ has a conditional use permit for an impound lot from the City of
Hopkins.
I think it is in the best interest of all concerned for the City of Plymouth to re -bid
the towing contract. In order to minimize any problems of the type encountered, we
will tighten up on the definition of types of tows. In short, how much for a tow and
daily storaae charae!
RJC•as
0
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. a _
Council of the City of Plymouth. Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present:
The following_ members were absent:
tion.
meeting of the City
day of
introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoo-
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
REJECTION OF TOWING BIDS
WHEREAS. the City of Plymouth regularly enters into a towina contract on a three-year
basis as provided by City code: and
WHEREAS. the current contract expires April 30. 1988: and
WHEREAS. the three bids that were received may not reflect the best interest of the
City of Plymouth during a three-vear contract:
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH.
MINNESOTA: to reiect all towing_ bids and hereby direct the Finance Director to re-
bid the towing contract.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT an extension of the current contract with Valley Towing be
implemented for a period not lonaer than ninety (90) days.
The motion for the adoption of the foreaoing Resolution was dulv seconded by
and upon vote being_ taken thereon. the following_ voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared dulv passed and adopted.
BID SL MARY FOR TOWING AND BIDOLMING OF VEHICLES
DICK'S TOWING
MOM
TYPE 1988 1989 1990
I $32.08 $32.08 $32.08
II. 9.41 9.41 9.41
III. 32.08 32.08 32.08
IV. 14.16 14.16 14.16
WINCHING .00 .00 .00
SERVICE
CALLS .00 .00 .00
TOWING .00 .00 .00
STORAGE
RATE
PER
DAY 10.00 11.00 13.00
Service Calls and Towing of Cit
KELLY'S TOWING
YEAR
1988 1989 1990
25.00 $27.00 $29.00
25.00 27.00 29.00
30.00 32.00 34.00
30.00 32.00 34.00
15.00 15.00 15.00
00 .00 .00
00 .00 .00
6.00 7.00 8.00
y Owned Passenger Cars.
APRIL 12, 1988
VALLEY TOWING
YEAR
1988 1989 1990
35.00 $37.50 $40.00
35.00 37.50 40.00
40.00 42.50 45.00
40.00 42.50 45.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
10.00 10.00 10.00
Figures adjusted to reflect a more accurate comparison of costs since the majority
of tows are passenger type vehicles (Type I and III) and impounded for one day.
42.08 43.08 45.08
19.41 20.41 22.41
42.08 43.08 45.08
24.16 25.16 27.16
31.00 34.00 37.00
31.00 34.00 37.00
36.00 39.00 42.00
36.00 39.00 42.00
45.00 $47.50 $50.00
45.00 47.50 50.00
50.00 52.50 55.00
50.00 52.50 55.00
13
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY INFORMATION FOR TOWING AND IMPOUNDING OF VEHICLES
April 12, 1988
DICK'S TOWING KELLY'S TOWING VALLEY TOWING
LOCATION OF 900 N.E. 2nd St. 255 East Lake 14288 23rd. Ave. IMPOUND LOT Hopkins Street, Wayzata Plymouth
OWN OR LEASE 5 yr. lease thru Monthly lease 36 month leasePROPERTYOct. 1992 thru. April, 1990
MEETS ZONIN
REQUIREMENTS Yes No Yes
MILES FROM
CITY LIMITS 4.2 miles 1.7 miles Within city limits
SPA ES
AVAILABLE 50 40 30 inside storage
TRUCKS
AVAILABLE 8 5 7
STORAGE AREA
FENCED yes no N/A
TOTAL RELEASE
HRS. AVAILABLE
Weekday 50 hrs. 50 hrs. 47.5 hrs.
Weekend 6 hrs. 5 hrs. 3 hrs.
BETTER BUSINESS No record of any No record of any No record of anyBREAcomplaints. complaints. complaints.
CREDIT CHECKS No negative No negative No negative
information. information. information.
C
TYPE I: All daytime tows involving a vehicle which is on
or immediately adjacent to a public street or highway.
TYPE II: All daytime tows involving a motorcycle, moped,
snowmobile, or all terrain vehicle.
TYPE III: All evening tows involvng a vehicle which is on
or immediately adjacent to a public street or highway.
TYPE IV: ALL evening tows involving a motorcycle, moped,
snowmobile, or all terrain vehicle.
WINCHING MORE THAN 50 FEET:
SERVICE CALLS: (City Owned Passenger Vehicles Only)
TOWING City Owned Passenger Vehicles Only)
STORAGE RATE: (Per day)
The undersigned has examined the advertisement for bids, the
specifications for towing and impounding of vehicles and the towing
ordinance for the City of Plymouth on file in the offices of the City of
Plymouth. This bid is based on the document on file at the time of the
bid.
BIDDER TO FILL IN THE FOLLOWING:
FIRM NAME:
TOW TYPE I
TOW TYPE II
TOW TYPE III
TOW TYPE IV
WINCHING MORE THAN 50'
PERIOD COMMENCING
MAY 1, 1988 MAY 1,1989 MAY 1,1990
SERVICE CALLS (city owned cars)
TOWING (city owned cars)
STORAGE RATE (per day)
TOTALS
BID AVERAGE
TRUCKS ONE (1) TON OR MORE IN WEIGHT EXCLUDED FROM BIDDING.
6)
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 12, 1988, for Council Meeting of April 18
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: 1988 REFORESTATION BID
1. ACTION REQUIa=3 : The attached resolution awards the 1988
Reforestation Bid to Lino Lakes Nursery in the amount of $22,895.
2. BACKGROUND: As in past years the City forester is responsible for
planting trees on publicly owned land. In 1988, the three sites that will
receive the most attention are:
A. Parkers Lake City Park
B. Turtle Lake Neighborhood Park
C. Rolling Hills Neighborhood Park
3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CON=IONS: I recommend the City Council award the
1988 reforestation contract to Lino Lakes Nursery in the amount of
22,895.
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EJB/np
Attachments
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
XXX
adoption:
lYXX
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
AWARDING BID FOR THE 1988 REFORESTATION PROPOSAL
WHEREAS, the Forestry Division is responsible for the 1988 Reforestation
program to be carried out on City owned lands; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with City bid specifications that were prepared,
distributed and bid proposals received and opened March 30, 1988 and
WHEREAS, the following bids were received:
R1
LINO LAKES NURSERY 8,545. 9,122. 5,228. 22,895
MARGOLIS BROTHERS 10,985. 11,370. 6,577. 28,932
GREENWORKS 12,780. 10,520. 6,490. 29,790
NOBLE NURSERY 11,950. 11,745. 7,075. 30,770
MIDWEST LANDSCAPING 14,034.54 12,568.27 8,670.48 35,273.29
DUNDEE LANDSCAPE NO BID
GREEN ACRES TREE NO BID
SHADE TREE LANDSCAPING NO BID
WHEREAS, the bid of Lino Lake Nursery is in conformance with the City
specifications for the plant materials Lino Lakes Nursery is therefore
declared the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA: that it should and hereby does accept the proposal of Lino Lakes Nursery in
the amount of $22,895.00 further, that funds for this proposal are authorized from
Forestry account NO. 206-206-810.26
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 4, 1988
TO: Eric Blank, Director of Parks & Recreation
FROM: Mark S. Peterson, Superintendent of Parks
SUBJECT: 1988 REFORESTATION BID
On March 30, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. bids were received and opened
for the 1988 Reforestation Program.
Bids were received from the following:
Lino Lakes Nursery $22,895.
Margolis Brothers $28,932.
Greenworks $29,790.
Noble Nursery $30,770.
Midwest Landscaping $35,273.29
Lino Lakes Nursery is low at $22,895. They have been awarded
previous reforestation contracts with Plymouth and have
performed satisfactorily. It is my recommendation that the
City award the 1988 Reforestation Contract to Lino Lakes
Nursery.
MSP:cr
DATE OF OPENING March 30, 1988
TIME OF OPENING 9:00 A.M.
BID QUOTATION
SPRING REFORESTATION 1988
NAME OF BIDDING CONTKACT PERSON BID BOND AMT. AMOUNT OF BID (LIST
NUMBER CO & ADDRESS & TELE. 1 0. TYPE SECTION BADS IF APPR(
1. Greenworks Tom Grygelko 5% Sec.A $12,780.
8940 Greenfield Rd. 498-7696 Surety Sec.B 10,520.
Loretto, MN 55357 Sec.0 6,490.
TOTAL 29,790.
2. Lino Lakes Nursery Steve Houle 5% Sec.A $8,545.
18400 Lexington Ave 464-6026 Surety Sec.B 9,122.
Wyoming, MN 55092 Sec.0 5,228.
TOTAL 22,895.
3. Midwest Landscaping Roy Anderson 5% Sec.A $14,034.54
15050 93rd. Ave. N. 420-4201 Surety Sec.B. 12,568.27
Maple Grove, MN Sec.0 8,670.48
55369 TOTAL 35,273.29
4. Noble Nursery Tom Carlson 5% Sec.A $11,950.
10530 Troy Ln. 720-2419 Surety not to Sec.B 11,745.
Maple Grove, MN exceed $1,750. Sec.C. 7,075.
55369 TOTAL 30,770.
5. Margolis Brothers Jerry Romero 5% Sec.A $10,985.
1171 West Larpenteur 488-7258 Surety Sec.B 11,370.
Roseville, MN 55113 Sec.0 6,577.
TOTAL 28,932.
6. Dundee Landscape Cent r Dave Nassif NA No Bid
16800 Hwy 55 559-4004
Plymouth, MN 55446
7. Green Acres Tree SErv'ce Wes Bendickson NA No Bid
6705 Hwy 12 479-1107
Maple Plain, MN
55359
8. Shade Tree Landscaping Rich Eide NA No Bid
2024 Yellowstone Trail 560-3640
Brooklyn Pakr, MN
55444
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
DATE: April 14, 1988 for City Council meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager / '
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manage AA
SUBJECT APPROVAL OF 1988 CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND REGIONAL
TRANSIT BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND MEDICINE LAKE LINES FOR THE
PROVISION OF PLYMOUTH METROLINK
1 ACTION REQUESTED: Annual operation of Plymouth Metrolink requires the
execution of two contracts. The first contract is between the City andtheRegionalTransitBoard (R.T.B.), (previously with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation) and sets forth the general requirements
for the Program and procedures for financing and reimbursement. The
second contract between the City of Plymouth and Medicine Lake Lines
set forth operating responsibilities for Medicine Lake Lines and
administrative responsibilities for the City. Copies of both documents
amounting to almost forty pages are available for City Council review
and inspection at City Center. Council approval of the attached
resolution is recommended which authorizes the Mayor and City Manager
to enter into a contract with Medicine Lake Lines and the separate
contract with the R.T.B. for the provision of Plymouth Metrolink
Services for calendar year 1988.
2. BACKGROUND: Contract between the R.T.B. and the City of Plymouth
In July, 1987 we began assembling the contract documents for the 1988
Plymouth Metrolink operation.
Funds for operating Plymouth Metrolink are derived from the transit tax
levy of 1.5 mills collected by the R.T.B. In the case of Plymouth,
this amounts to about $900,000. The proposed 1988 contract would
continue the 1.5 mill levy. It would also allow for $430,910 of the
900,000 levy to be returned to the City to provide services to our
residents and businesses. The remaining money subsidizes the regional
transit system.
The subsidy required for 1988 Plymouth Metrolink operation is $18,240
less than the 1987 amount of $449,150. The primary reason for decrease
is much more economical insurance costs for Medicine Lake Lines. The
services provided essentially will be the same as in previous years.
APPROVAL OF 1988 CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND REGIONAL TRANSIT
BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND MEDICINE LAKE LINES FOR THE PROVISION OF
PLYMOUTH METROLINK
April 14, 1988
Page 2
Plymouth/Medicine Lake Lines Contract
The contract between the City and Medicine Lake Lines sets forth the
relationship of the two parties - Plymouth as administrator, and
Medicine Lakes Lines as operator of the system.
The contract reflects fine tuning in commuter/reverse commuter routes
in December 1987 to better respond to community growth and
development. The contract also contemplates the lease of six new
mini -coaches for the same cost as the combined lease/maintenance costs
of our four year old mini -coaches in 1987. The new vehicles, in
addition to being more dependable, will be a positive asset in drawing
new riders.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Authorization of both contracts is
recommended through adoption of the attached resolutions. The
three-year Plymouth Metrolink objectives adopted by the Council
earlier this year will be used as evaluatory criteria next year when
we request contract approval for the 1989 program year.
FB:kec
attachment
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present: --
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER
INTO CONTRACT WITH THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR
FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSIT AND AN AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT
OF THE PLYMOUTH METROLINK PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM WITH MEDICINE LAKE LINES
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has operated the Plymouth Metrolink System since duly 1,
1983; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Transit Board has assumed the role and contract administrator in
place of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the City has annually entered into contract with the Contract Administrator
and with Medicine Lake Lines to clearly set forth the responsibilities of each party;
and
WHEREAS, the Regional Transit Board has agreed under contract to reimburse costs to the
City associated with Plymouth Metrolink for 1988 in a maximum amount not to exceed
430,910.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that it should, and hereby does, authorize that:
1. The City Manager to execute the Regional Transit Board agreement with the
City of Plymouth for funding public transit.
2. The City Manager execute an agreement for operation and management of
Plymouth Metrolink Public Transportation System for calendar year 1988 with
Medicine Lake Lines, Inc.
3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute requests for
reimbursement from the Regional Transit Board during calendar year 1988.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
El o. A.
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: April 7, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 18, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer
SUBJECT: PROPOSED PROCEDURES TO ELIMINATE INFLOW/INFILTRATION (I/I)
INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
Property owners in Amber Woods Addition, located north of County Road 24 and
west of State Highway 101, have received a letter identifying the problems
associated with clear water entering the sanitary sewer. Also, a neighborhood
meeting was held and a follow-up letter stating what was discussed was sent
out (see attached copies of the information).
We have identified the illegal sump -pump connections and the fact that the
sanitary sewer manholes are leaking and need repair. As a part of the 1988
maintenance program, we will be repairing the damaged manholes with City
forces or contract forces under our supervision.
The residents are responsible for correcting the illegal connection and have
asked for assistance from the City to evaluate their individual problems and
assist in improving the yard drainage associated with the sump -pump water.
After discussions with the Building Department, we are recommending that two
intern University Engineering students be hired. These individuals would meet
with each resident to discuss their individual problems concerning the I/I and
yard drainage. If expertise concerning sump -pumps is beyond that of the
Engineering students, both the Building and Engineering Department staff will
be available to assist the residents. These student Engineers will also be
used to track erosion problems and assist the Engineering Department with
construction management, inspection and record drawings of City-wide projects.
Also attached is a copy of the "draft" letter proposed to be sent the
residents of the Amber Woods and Hughes Addition to kick the program off. We
intend to evaluate all properties during the summer (from June 15 to September
30, 1988). It will also be necessary to have a neighborhood meeting with the
Hughes Addition in the immediate future explaining all the information
previously presented to the Amber Woods Addition. In that way, all the
residents involved with the program will be equally informed.
PROPOSED PROCEDURES TO ELIMINATE INFLOW/INFILTRATION (I/I)
INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
April 7, 1988
Page Two
I recommend that two University Engineering students be hired to implement the
infiltration program with Amber Woods and Hughes Additions between June 15 and
September 30, 1988. We are presently budgeted for one staff person to manage
erosion control for 1988, estimated cost of $4,400. Additional funding of
4,000 is needed for the second staff person. This could be taken from the
salary budgeted for manhole sealing.
If we are unable to achieve 100% cooperation from the residents with pump
connections to the sanitary sewer, we will be proposing to assess the
estimated $800 to those individual residents with continual sanitary sewer
connections. Our intention is to bring the situation back to the City Council
in September for further action.
This is only the first step in developing an annual program to eliminate clear
water from entering the sanitary sewer system throughout Plymouth.
04070.
161191
Chester J. fiv
CJH:kh
attachment: Letters
June, 1988
SUBJECT: INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
Residents of Amber Woods and Hughes Addition:
During March of this year, representatives from the City's Engineering
Department met with the Board of Directors of the Amber Woods Homeowner's
Association and held a neighborhood meeting of the Amber Woods Addition.
155 letters were sent to homeowners in the Amber Woods Addition and 24
residents attended the meeting at City Hall on March 15.
After obtaining input from the Amber Woods Addition, the Engineering
Department submitted a report to the City Council at their April 18, 1988,
meeting. The report contained recommendations for resolution of the
infiltration/inflow problem. Direction was given by the City Council, and
subsequently, in May, a neighborhood meeting was held with the Hughes
Addition residents to explain the problems, obtain input and discuss
proposed solutions. This letter is being sent to 207 residents of the
Amber Woods and Hughes Additions.
It is the intent of the Engineering Department to meet with every homeowner
to discuss the collective, as well as individual problems and recommend
solutions to both the sump -pump water and subsequent drainage problems.
It would expedite matters if each homeowner would call City Hall and ask
for the Engineering Department after receipt of this letter and prior to
June 15. 1988. The purpose of the call would be to schedule a meeting with
a representative of the Engineering Department to review your particular
situation.
It is the intent of the City Council to have all illegal connections to the
City's sanitary sewer system removed by September 30, 1988, with City
approved sump -pump installations in place and in operation by that date.
In the event that illegal connections still remain, we will be recommending
to the City Council that a surcharge be placed on those homes in the amount
of $66 per month. This is the estimated treatment cost for processing
clear water through the sanitary sewer system.
Sincerely,
Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P.E.
City Engineer
JRS:kh
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
March 8, 1988
CITY O
PLYMOUT4
Residents of Amber Woods Addition:
SUBJECT: INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
On March 15 1988 at 7.00 P.m. the City has scheduled a meetine at City
Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, to discuss with you the details addressed in
this letter. Please plan to attend.
In response to increasing awareness of a Metropolitan -wide problem with
infiltration and inflow (I/I) into various cities respective sanitary sewer
systems, the City of Plymouth authorized a Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation
survey during 1987. The survey and report was completed for the City by
the consulting firm Donohue and Associates. It is apparent that a program
should be undertaken in an effort to reduce the infiltration and inflow,
the two conditions that substantially affect the design and operation of
both waste water treatment plants and interceptor sewers. Infiltration is
ground water entering into the sewer system because of deterioration of the
sewer and/or faulty original construction. Inflow is the entry of the
surface waters into the sewers through legal or illegal connections of
private drainage systems to the local sanitary sewer systems.
Both infiltration and inflow introduce clean water into the sanitary sewer
system. This water must be handled and treated along with the normal waste
water produced by domestic, industrial and other sources. The Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission is considering a penalty to be assessed against
communities that have not implemented a plan to reduce the
Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) in their sanitary sewer system. Presently, the
citizens of Plymouth are paying high sewer rates to the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission because of these added costs. We have severe problems
within our community including, but not limited to, the Amber Woods
Addition.
Excessive levels of I/I in the Metropolitan Sewer System have a number of
severe impacts on that system, such as:
Higher peak flows due to high inflows occasionally causes
bypassing of untreated sewage and flooding of basements.
Larger capital investments resulting from oversized
treatment facilities to accommodate this clear water.
The timing of treatment plant improvements is substantially
moved ahead by capacity I/I uses that would otherwise be
available to handle urban growth in the service area.
Both operations and maintenance costs are increased.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
March 8, 1988
Page Two
It appears that I/I is probably the greatest factor presently causing
expansion of interceptors and waste water treatment plants well before the
expansion dates originally planned.
The Donohue study estimates that the annual inflow of sump pumps improperly
connected in the Amber Woods Addition is estimated to exceed 20 million
gallons per year. The treatment costs for I 6 I only are estimated to be
800 per year per home This is above and beyond the treatment costs for
the processing of normal sewage. It can be seen from these figures that
the cost of the problem is astronomical and growing in dollar value.
There are several corrective measures available, such as:
An increased rate for every home owner until they have
provided the City with evidence that they do not have an
illegal connection to the sanitary sewer system.
The City would be willing to consider setting up a project
to correct the problem using one of several alternates
listed below. The numbers assigned to the alternates are
for identification purposes only and do not indicate a
preference:
1. Reroute discharge piping to ground surface.
Approximately 54 sump pumps at $75 per sump
pump equals $4,050.
2. Reroute discharge piping to ground surface in
front of house at street or driveway. 54 sump
pumps at $300 per sump pump equals $16,200.
3. Discharge to existing storm sewer or new 12
inch storm sewer if no existing storm
available. The estimated cost, 207 units at
3,089 per unit equals $639,500.
4. Discharge to existing storm sewer or new eight
inch storm sewer if no existing storm sewer
available. The estimated cost, 207 units at
2,904 per unit equals $601,100.
5. Surface discharge during warmer months,
discharge to sanitary sewer during colder
months. This would require the installation
of a "T" valve on the sump pump discharge line
to divert flow to the appropriate source. The
estimated cost, 207 units at $400 per unit
equals $82,800.
INFILTRATION/INFLOW TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
March 8, 1988
Page Three
6. Expand the existing storm sewer system to
ensure sufficient capacity to convey storm
water runoff and I/I from sump pumps. An
estimated cost of this alternate cannot be
determined at this time.
During 1988 the Engineering Division will contact each homeowner that has a
sump pump connected to the sanitary sewer system, and the homeowners that
were not contacted as part of the initial survey. A recommendation will be
made to each one of these homeowners on corrective measures to be taken to
ensure that they have a properly installed sump pump. The existing surface
drainage around the house, including the need for regrading, rain gutters
and downspouts, would also be reviewed in making this recommendation. Each
homeowner would then be required to disconnect their sump pump from the
sanitary sewer system within 90 days after receiving the recommendation.
The City may consider providing a low interest construction and funding
program to pay the project cost for each property owner to remove their
connection.
If there are property owners that have not disconnected their sump pumps,
the City could enact an ordinance placing a surcharge to the use of the
sanitary sewer system for sump pump discharges. The surcharge should
reflect the $800 per year treatment cost at a minimum.
Further details of this program will be discussed at the meeting to be held
on March 15 1988 at 7:00 p.m.!
Sincerely,
Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P.E.
City Engineer
CJH:kh
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 16, 1988
TO: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
FROM: Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City EngineerC..
SUBJECT: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
AMBER WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
MARCH 15, 1988 - 7:00 P.M.
Chet Harrison, City Engineer
John Sweeney, Assistant Engineer
Jim Miller, Donohue Consulting Engineer
Jerry Sisk, Councilmember
24 residents were present (155 notices were sent out)
The City Engineer explained the situation with clear water entering the sanitary
sewer system and eventually winding up at a Metropolitan -wide sewer treatment plant
for treatment. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has directed communities
to develop a program to eliminate the clear water from entering the sanitary sewer
system. This has prompted the City to investigate the problems that are known and
to develop a program to eliminate this clear water in the system. Jim Miller
explained the process used in evaluating the clear water in the sanitary sewer
system within the Amber Woods Addition, and how they went about that process which
included looking at the sanitary_ sewer manholes in the street that are taking clear
water into them through cracks and leaks within the manholes. 32 manholes were
discovered that potentially have unsealed frames and chimneys that need to be sealed
up.
The second item looked at carefully was the sump pump connections. There were
potentially 207 homes to be reviewed, out of that number 166 inspections were made
and from that, 54 homes were found to have illegal sump pump connections to the
sanitary sewer. If, in fact, there are 54 improper connections as indicated in the
study, approximately 30 million gallons of clear water is being pumped into the
sanitary sewer system. Assuming that each home is generating a half million gallons
of clear water from their sump a year into the sanitary sewer system. The treatment
costs are estimated to be $800 per year per home that is illegally connected to the
sanitary sewer system.
Following the identification of this sump pump problem, alternatives were evaluated
which ranged from disconnecting from the sanitary sewer and running a sump pump hose
outside to a complete new storm sewer being placed throughout the subdivision that
the sump pump hoses could be connected to. The cost to correct this situation
ranged in value from $75 per home to $3,000 per home.
Memo: INFILTRATION AND INFLOW INTO THEE SA'tiITAR`i SEWER SYSTEM
March 16, 1988
Page Two
A
We then discussed alternatives that would be the least costly to the individual
residents, as well as being effective in it's improvement. Based on conversations
with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, we believe that the City could allow
sump pump connections to the sanitary sewer during the winter months. This would
require a "T" valve in the sump pump line leading from the sump pump. The valve
would be switched from winter to summer on a predetermined schedule. Some type of
locking system would have to be developed that would allow the City to control and
monitor those sump pumps, making sure that they are not pumping to the sanitary
sewer system during the summer months. It was suggested that a schedule of November
15 to April 15 be set up to allow the residents to pump directly into the sanitary
sewer system, the remaining months of the year they would have to pump their sump
pump water outside. Also, of utmost importance is to have these sump pump hoses
directed to the street, taking the water away through the storm sewer system.
A major concern of the residents is the ponding of drainage water. This includes
both rain water and sump pump water. These homeowners need some type of improvement
to the existing drainage system, particularly in the rear yards of their properties.
The City suggested that the neighbors work together on a plan, present that plan to
the Engineering Department and we could potentially recommend approval if the system
is practical and workable. The City staff also stated that we will be glad to meet
with individual residents trying to resolve these yard drainage problems, as a part
of the sump pump systems corrections. The sump pumps must be redirected from the
sanitary sewer to the front yards.
Following are two major advantages to disconnecting the sump pumps from the sanitary
sewer system:
1. The lift station that all the sanitary sewer dumps into goes over capacity when
this sump pump water is running into it, causing it to flood and also to flood
neighboring homes, which means backup of sanitary sewer water into individual
homes. This will be eliminated if the sump pumps are disconnected.
2. There will be a substantial cost savings to both the residents and the City as a
whole if this sump pump water is eliminated from entering the sanitary sewer
system. At the present time the City is not proposing to place a surcharge on
the properties that have sump pumps connected to the sanitary sewer until we
have had an opportunity to go through all the homes affected by this plan and
relocate the sump pump hoses out to the yards and/or into the street. If the
City is unable to accomplish this, surcharges may be required to be levied to
cover the cost of treating this sump pump clear water.
End of meeting.
Results of the meeting: The City Engineer will be recommending to the City Council
that the Building and Engineering Departments will be working with the Amber Woods
residents to disconnect all sump pumps from the sanitary sewer and to develop a
drainage plan to accommodate the clear water pumped.
If we are not successful in eliminating these connections during the summer of 1988,
a surcharge will be recommended to the City Council, which will cover the costs of
handling this clear water entering the sanitary sewer system. This surcharge will
only be implemented if all other avenues of resolution have failed.
CJH:kh
attachment