Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 04-04-1988CITY OF PLYMOUTH A G E N D A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 4, 1988 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION 3. ROLL CALL 4. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 5. CONSENT AGENDA 6. MINUTES - Approval of Minutes of the Special Council meeting of March 28, 1988 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Vacation of drainage and utility easement in Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition 8. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - County Road 10 south frontage road connection to 57th Ave. 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Robert Wachter for Dimension Development Co., Inc. PUD Concept Plan for residential (single and multi -family) development on property located at 14915 C.R. 9 (88018) B. Resolution making negative declaration for EIS for Prime Development Corporation for Prime West Business Park located northwest of State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane (87123/E) C. City of Plymouth. Site Plan for Fire Station 3 east of Dunkirk Lane between 31st Ave. and Highway 55 (88012) D. Final plan and specifications for St. Mary's Park 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS E. Approval to proceed with Plymouth Creek soccer field F. Garbage Haulers license renewals G. Building Permit review, processing, issuance and inspection time standards H. Resolution approving payment No. 4 and Final for fire station Nos. 1 and 2 sprinkler system I. Resolution approving respreading of deferred assessments for Outlot D, Heritage West Addition 3. Tax Increment Financing proposal to set public hearing to establish Economic Development Districts Nos. 5 and 6 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1 and 6-1 10. ADJOURNMENT I G M I N U T E S SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 28, 1988 A special meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Cham- bers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on March 28, 1988. PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur, and Sisk, City Manager Willis, Assistant Manager Boyles, Planning Director Tremere, Public Works Director Moore, Public Safety Director Carlquist, Finance Director Hahn, City Attorney Heine, and City Clerk Brandt ABSENT: None CONSENT AGENDA MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- CONSENT AGENDA member Ricker, to adopt the consent agenda as presented. Item 4 Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MINUTES MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- MINUTES - REGULAR member Ricker, to approve the minutes of the March 21 Regular MEETING, MARCH 21 Council Meeting as submitted. 1988 Item 5* Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Manager Willis updated the Council on the activities of the LEGISLATIVE UPDATE legislature and summarized proposed changes in the property tax Item 6 law and how they would affect Plymouth. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Manager Willis reported that the League of Minnesota Cities AWARD OF INSURANCE Insurance Trust is the only company that provided quotes on the Item 7-A City's property and liability insurance. The cost is essential- ly the same as last year. Director Hahn reported that, based on the projected savings that the City adopt option 2 which increases the deductibles. He pointed out the changes from the present policy to the proposed policy. Special Council Meeting March 28, 1988 Page 89 Councilmember Ricker asked about the class action suit against insurance carriers for collusion. Don Kuplic, the City's insurance agent, stated there are several states in the suit and explained the charges. Councilmember Ricker reminded the Council that with increasing limits on self insurance the City was incurring additional risks. He noted that he believed these risks to be appropriate in light of our insurance risk reserves, but that sometime a large claim would likely be made against the reserve. MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 ber Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 AWARDING THE CONTRACT AWARDING INSURANCE FOR INSURANCE FOR THE 1988/1989 INSURANCE PROGRAM, Option 2, to Item 7-A the League of Minnesota Cities at a cost of $132,387. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 88-216 member Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-216 APPROVING DISBUR- DISBURSEMENTS FOR SEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 29, 1988 in the amount of PERIOD ENDING 2/29/88 1,932,036.48. Item 7-B* Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Director Moore reported that the contractor for wells 8 and 9 has run into a problem with the pump delivery. There is a com- pletion deadline of April 1. The portion of the contract for repair work will be completed on wells 2 and 3 this week. The pumps are scheduled to be delivered the third week of April leaving a May 1 operation date. A plan has been set up that a temporary pump will be installed at well No. 8 if the new pumps cannot be delivered. If a temporary pump is installed, it can- not be taken out of operation and replaced with the new ones un- til September. Mayor Schneider read a proclamation declaring the month of May, 1988 as Spring clean-up, fix -up, paint -up and planting month in the City of Plymouth. The Council accepted and filed a report on the hiring of a human resources specialist. Manager Willis recommended the matter be reviewed in 1989. PROJECT STATUS REPORT Item 8-A 1988 CLEANUP PROGRAM Item 8-B HUMAN RESOURCE SPECIALIST REPORT Item 8-C Manager Willis reported that the Public Safety Department has REVISED FIRE ALARM had a problem dealing with false police and fire alarms and sug- ORDINANCE gested amendments to the existing ordinance to tighten it up and Item 8-D try to further control the number of false alarms. Special Council Meeting March 28, 1988 Page 90 Discussion followed on the number of responses per year and the cost of the permits. Director Carlquist stated the proposed ordinance would set fines for police and fire false alarm systems immediately after the first false alarm. Most of the false alarms are caused by em- ployee carelessness or faulty detectors. One of the problems is that the City doesn't know how many or which businesses and res- idents have alarm systems. Councilmember Vasiliou asked what happens to a false alarm cal- led in by a person. Director Carlquist answered that fines are levied only for sys- tems that send out false alarms. Councilmember Sisk pointed out that some alarms are initiated by the public. Director Carlquist stated that false alarms which are not in the control of the owner are not fined. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- ORDINANCE NO. 88-13 member Zitur, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 88-13 RELATING TO ALARM REVISED FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS; AMENDING SECTION 1155 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE revis- ORDINANCE ing the first reissued fire permit fee to $100 and subsequent Item 8-D permits at $200. Manager Willis pointed out that an annual $25 fee is required for registration of each system, however, if the resident or company registers in December, the fee will be waived. Director Carlquist noted the ordinance would take effect in Jan- uary, 1989 to give staff time to notify businesses and resi- dents. Manager Willis stated it is important to hold a public informa- tion meeting to address resident concerns, but he doesn't expect opposition to the ordinance. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Zitur, directing staff that each issue of Plymouth on Parade be- tween now and February, 1989 include notice of the new ordi- nance, a leaflet be prepared for people having false alarms in- dicating the ordinance, the ordinanace be broadcast on cable, and notice be placed in the water bills. Motion carried, five ayes. Special Council Meeting March 28, 1988 Page 91 MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, to endorse the bid of Minneapolis/St. Paul as the lo- cation of the 1996 summer Olympic Games. Motion carried, five ayes. Manager Willis pointed out that some of the scheduled meeting dates are on the same day as regular Council meetings. The Council adopted the schedule. SUPPORTING SITE OF 1996 OLYMPIC GAMES Item 8-E 1989/90 BUDGET CALENDAR Item 8-F Manager Willis stated that, after the issue was discussed CONSIDERATION TO recently, the petitioner's attorney asked that the Council con- AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE sider a change in the ordinance to allow automotive service sta- (87125) tions in the B-1 zone. Discussion followed regarding the March Item 8-G 24, 1988 staff report. Director Tremere stated that, if the Council agreed, staff will investigate the appropriate means of implementing that policy direction. Another means to accomplish a similar result would be to create a freeway district which identifies specific areas adjacent to a freeway or at interchanges where certain types of commercial business can be accommodated. He presented a map showing the zones which would be affected. Councilmember Vasiliou stated her concern is that the proposal doesn't address the overall benefit to the City, but is aimed at only one parcel. She doesn't support an amendment that would have a citywide impact. Councilmember Sisk stated there are a limited number of sites in the City along 494 which could be considered because some are already zoned differently or already developed. A freeway dis- trict may have merit. Councilmember Ricker stated these are the same alternative ques- tions the Council could have considered when they first consid- ered the petition. He doesn't favor changing the B-1 zone in the City. The owners should have understood the limits on the use of the property before purchasing it. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, directing staff to study the potential of establishing a freeway district in certain areas along 494. Motion died for lack of a second. It was the consensus of the Council that the proposed change in the B-1 zone is neither necessary or desirable. Councilmember Zitur stated the Northwest Human Services Board is CCR REPORTS moving to Brooklyn Park. He asked for an alternate representa- Item 8-H tive to the Board. Councilmember Vasiliou offered to be first alternate and Manager Willis stated he would be second. Special Council Meeting March 28, 1988 Page 92 Councilmember Vasiliou reported on her presentation at Widsten school for American Pride Week. OTHER BUSINESS Councilmember Ricker stated Councilmember Zitur's proposed Citi- OTHER BUSINESS zen Safety Advisory Committee contains more than he would like to see in a final version but there are safety areas which would work better with more input from the residents. However, he doesn't want to infringe on the present safety committee's res- ponsibility. Discussion followed on which items could be considered and whether the committee should be ongoing or problem specific. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmem- ber Ricker, that staff look into what the committee charge would be and check with other cities on their activities. Motion carried, five ayes. Mayor Schneider stated many home buyers are not aware that they have obligations as part of a PUD, such as maintenance of trails, outlots, etc., because the builder doesn't tell them, and they may have to pay dues to accomplish this. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, directing staff to research: 1) alternatives the Council may have to better ensure more information is passed to the ul- timate consumer of single family lots and homes; and 2) the fi- nancial guarantee and the development contract include a de- scription as to what is involved with the ultimate project, such as what outlots will look like when done and the guarantee to install improvements as planned and approved. Also, relevant ordinance standards should also be considered. Motion carried, five ayes. Director Tremere stated there is a question with the Parkers Lake North 3rd Addition proposed by Laukka Development because the maximum lot coverage appears to be exceeded by first homes shown on building permit applications. He presented the devel- oper's proposal for lot coverage and the staff response. The question is what should the maximum ground coverage of be, given the Council's approval of the PUD Plan and the need to regulate the coverage as the development proceeds. He recommended the developer's architect provide a table of house size for each lot as a measure for the building inspectors. Councilmember Vasiliou stated an "open ended" coverage maximum was a scary precedent to set. Special Council Meeting March 28, 1988 Page 93 Director Tremere stated that Mr. Laukka's attorney proposed the development will not exceed 25% overall which would include out - lots and exclude decks. Further discussion followed and the Mayor recalled the Council approved a specific pian which included substantial design flexibility. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, directing staff to administer the PUD plan as origi- nally adopted to assure that what was represented is what is developed. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Sisk, that a commercial sauna ordinance and an adult book store ordinance be researched and drafted. Motion carried, five ayes. The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. City Clerk 7A MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988 tir TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore,—director of Public Works FROM : Richard J. Pouliot, Project Coordinator SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION The City Council received a request from Robert A. Penney, 11814 18th Avenue North, to vacate a utility and drainage easement on Lot 4, Block 3, Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition. This easement was provided as a condition for a Lot Consolidation/Split. The house is located on a portion of this easement which prevents the owner from obtaining financing and clear title. Unless new information is presented at the public hearing, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution vacating this utility and drainage easement at the conclusion of the public hearing. Richard J. Pouliot RJP:kh attachment: Resolution Drawing CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of , 1988. The following members were present: , The following members were absent: XXX adoption: XXX introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF P.I.N. NO. 26-118-22-42-0058 OR ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, a petition was received to vacate certain utility and drainage easement in Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for April 4, 1988, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 as amended; and WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks prior to the meeting of April 4, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on April 4, 1988, to inform any and all interested parties relevant to the vacation of said easement in Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easement was not needed for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the following utility and drainage easement be vacated: The Northwest 5 feet of the Northeast 20 feet of the Southeasterly 10 feet of Lot 4 and that part of Lot 5 lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the Northwesterly line thereof, distant 25 feet Northeasterly from the Northwest corner thereof to a point on the Southeasterly line thereof, distant 25 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner thereof all in Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CX C 7Y 'xX XXX i v je t ` d_ . ` •',` I. .p +`" ISL Co e s \ 1 ti i - f' ,,/ OC.' • ./ tri 7 pot pLacI / the Lot CAWery R01'95ED LOT PI 10N 4 - %t 7=ici,._..-_',: err.. ...ri.- + .ti A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING COUNTY ROAD 10 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION TO 57TH AVENUE In February the City Council held a public information meeting on the preliminary layout for the County Road 10 Improvement Project. The preliminary plan was prepared by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation and they were requesting City approval. Based upon comments from property owners at the public information meeting the City Council approved the preliminary layout on March 7, 1988, subject to several conditions. Attached is a copy of the approving City Council resolution. One of the conditions was to investigate whether the existing frontage road along the south side of County Road 10 could be connected to 57th Avenue. At the public information meeting and following the meeting, by petition the property owners along this frontage road requested this connection. Before making this determination, the City Council stated that they would hold an additional public information meeting to inform the property owners along 57th Avenue of this request. Attached is a letter sent to the property owners along 57th Avenue and the south frontage road. From an engineering and construction standpoint, it is feasible to make the connection as requested. This would improve the traffic conditions on County Road 10 by eliminating one street connection. A majority of the right-of-way needed to make this connection is a vacant lot on the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac. Unless new information is presented at the public information meeting, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution requesting the County to eliminate the direct connection from the south frontage road to County Road 10 and connect the frontage road to 57th Avenue. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachment: Resolution Letter CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of 1988. The following members were present: , I The following members were absent: fXX XXX XXX its adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING PRELIMINARY LAYOUT COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION CITY PROJECT NO. 812 WHEREAS, On March 7, 1988, by Resolution No. 88-163, the City Council gave preliminary approval to the layout for the County Road 10 Improvement project subject to six conditions; and WHEREAS, Condition No. 4 stated that the City Council would hold an additional public information meeting for the property owners along 57th Avenue and the frontage road; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the additional public information meeting was to discuss the feasibility of connecting the existing frontage road along the south side of County Road 10 to the cul-de-sac at the end of 57th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council held the additional public information meeting on April 4, 1988; and WHEREAS, it is feasible and beneficial to connect the existing frontage road to 57th Avenue and eliminate an additional street connection to County Road 10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the County is requested to connect the south frontage road along County Road 10 to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac. FURTHER, the County is requested to purchase the vacant lot at the end of 57th Avenue immediately in order to prevent the construction of a home on the land necessary to make the frontage road connection. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: , The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XXX XXX XXX F u C 703. 5_ n 2C3. LIJ PARI OF lot 57 43 1 . ir• 44 6 9 (1) ` r 7T2 72 72 72 r' ii' : 2 per,• c 06. . F I 48 49 5o A., 47 (14) 13) (Iq) (15) (sb^ o. Srtem - es r: Fottti hoguse 26)... .... 45 D D . 27) a> 28) 1 13;' - f 7 72 72 7 0'96' ----- -- QES..e{' t6. . - - "•35'3p y _ _ +- - - - - - tOtS 5i2;.*_, \ is 1 \ _ r _ _ 7 TLTRCL- 30 gs. \ i9 $ r 1 `( 24) _ ..3C. R - 59. ;R 1015 52' - - I .5'vemsor L— —A-, q, rer`V's V C'r- V. °5. _ OOD eatfes .6.0°' Everson Lee 7 ASS I I ° DS KN g _ 29) 9J• Sj 1eTlya' nde,rs. 5e6r0, • r7.95 GnI; 26( 2iI5C ) ( 24) (23)- 0 23)-` ( 28 : i' b 10II Z II tlro ls s 101. '`°• ( 30) € a $ 57TH AVE. N. x , qq° 6 45i 110 110 114. •I . R;c-'ars?• ` 9` SORESS 14 air 6F: I r; (33) At71t nporionNelsonFteck ' , I I in n, I lei n22 14.: I / ' 97. 15.62" FS n (20) / 4Q 0. 1 ( 19) - i 0. 1. C o T 20. 73' o r12.2 1 b A 2 1 (q) (13) 0:40;' • 1 10' _ • t t $ \ 1E . . ', AJ 30.75• I$' .R., 1 • O 5 71.6"If 1 $ 0.,...... TIT. I 51' r Nt. I II•: - 17• • -. Z -5 w 164•79 I ` D March 24, 1988 Dear Property Owner: The Plymouth City Council will be having an additional Public Information Meeting at 7:30 p.m., April 4, 1988 on the proposed improvements to County Road 10. This meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers at the City Center Building, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. This additional meeting will only be on the proposal to connect the existing frontage road along the south side of County Road 10 to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac. If this connection were made, there would be no connection between the frontage road and County Road 10. On the other side of this letter is a drawing showing the connection to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac. On February 22 the Council held the first Informational Meeting on County Road 10. Several of the property owners along the frontage road on the south side of County Road 10 suggested that this frontage road not be connected to County Road 10. They stated since there is a vacant lot at the end of this frontage road, it is possible to make the connection to 57th Avenue. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has examined the connection to 57th Avenue and has stated it would be feasible to make this connection. At this additional Information Meeting the property owners along 57th Avenue and the frontage road can state their preference with regard to the connection. If you cannot attend this meeting, you can submit any comments which you may have in writing. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works FGM:kh O.Q to z p o, e " , . 2 Q Z 10D P Cr ILLJ ell LJ 0 CITY 0' 1""'90CTIi Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a reCt,11 meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 7th day of March , 1988. The following members were present: , Mayor Schneider. Councilmembers Vas iIiou, 12icker, -iter and Sisk The following members were absent Councilmemher Sisk its adoption: None X T X JC iC is introduced the following Resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. 88-163 APPROVING PRELIMINARY LAYOUT COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18 CITY PROJECT NO. 812 WHEREAS, Layouts No. 1 and No. Base, Project No. 7408 showing the proposed improvement of County State Aid Highways No. 10 and 61 within the limits of the City has been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Layouts No. 1 and No. Base be in all things approved and that Hennepin County is hereby authorized by the City to acquire all rights-of-way, permits and/or easements required for said improvement in accordance with said Layouts No. 1 and No. Base subject to the following: 1. Construct berms along the roadway wherever possible to reduce noise levels to adjacent properties. 2. Extend the trail along the south side from Kirkwood Lane westerly to the intersection with New County Road 61. 3. Stage the construction to pro•:ide maximum local access. 4. It appears feasible to connect the existing frontage road along the south side of County Road 10 to the cul-de-sac at the end of 57th Avenue. The City Council will hold an additional public information meeting for the property owners along 57th Avenue and the frontage road and will notify the County by April 8, 1988 on whether to make the connection to 57th Avenue or leave the frontage road connection to County Road 10 as proposed in the preliminary layout. If it is feasible to make the connection between 57th Avenue and the frontage road, that the County acquire the needed vacant lot at the end of 57th Avenue as soon as possible. 5. Review and report to the City on the feasibility of flattening the curve and moving County Road 10 northerly at the New County Road 61 intersection. Resolution No. 88-105 Page Two 6. Lower the proposed grade of County Road 10 west of Kirkwood Lane approximately two or more feet from the original proposal to minimize noise impacts. FURTHER, that final construction plans shall be presented to the City for approval before a construction contract is awarded. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded byCouncilmemberZitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the followingvotedinfavorthereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk ' The following voted against or abstained: Done Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XX X f X if 9A_ CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MAMO DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director 60--k— SUBJECT ROBERT WACHTER, DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT PLAN FOR PARKVIEW RIDGE (88018) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which approves the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Dimension Development Company, Inc. for property located southwest of Juneau Lane and County Road 9. The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the Public Informational Hearing on March 23, 1988, and recommended approval by a 3 - 1 vote. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission spent substantial time discussing the merits of this proposal as a Planned Unit Development, given the Ordinance Criteria. Attention was directed to whether effective and suitable common open space was provided since a significant part of the land area is devoted to single family detached dwellings. Our recommendation was based on the overall design and the topo- graphy of this site which represents an in -fill development between developed PUD's. That is not to say the public park area to the south was deemed a substitute for effec- tive private open space; rather, it is to say that overall, the PUD satisfies the intent of the Ordinance and provides a mix of housing type and transition. A number of residents, particularly from the Cedar Ridge neighborhood to the east, were present, and stated concerns about ground water drainage and traffic. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: We received the attached letter after the Planning Commission meeting from some resi- dents who live to the east. We have prepared a qraphic which delineates the flood plain, and as we indicated to the residents at the Planning Commission meeting, the concerns about drainage, filling, and traffic will be considered in more detail with the preliminary plat. The internal road system has been designed with the intent of discouraging through - traffic; it should be recognized however that the interconnection of the neighborhoods is vital to the transportation system for this area. It has been suggested that a cul-de-sac be provided by closing 39th Avenue North from such neighborhood traffic; this would have negative consequences to the overall system which is meant to provide an internal neighborhood street other than County Road 9. Page two Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 March 28, 1988 The concerns about filling and drainaqe will be accounted for during the review of the detailed preliminary plat plans. We are proposing a condition which would focus on whether the necessary storm water ponding areas in the single family detached portion of the project should be outlots or whether they should be, perhaps, easements across individual lots. This hinges on whether the storm water ponding areas should be viewed as common open space for the recreational benefit of the residents of the PUD. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: This is a Concept Plan and the hearing was an informational hearing. If the Council approves it, the more detailed preliminary plat/plan will be subject eventually to a formal public hearinq which will have the benefit of detailed analyses of the issues raised. I recommend that the Council focus on whether the PIJD Criteria are met and, thus, whether this proposal should be granted POD status so that it can proceed to the next level. The proposal is responsive to the intent of the Ordinance, especially consider- ing this site and the need for effective transition between two exsiting developments. The proposed road system should be endorsed as consistent with the City's Transporta- tion Plan and in consideration of the design which has been proposed as a means of discouraging unnecessary through traffic. Attachments: 1. Approving Resolution 2. March 23, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes 3. Resident Correspondence 3. Area Composite Drawing CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19_ The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR FOR PARKVIEW RIDGE FOR ROBERT WACHTER, DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (88018) WHEREAS, Robert Wachter, Dimension Development Company, Inc. has requested approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the development of "Parkview Ridge" a proposal for 80 single family detached units and 40 attached townhome units on approximately 40 acres located southwest of Juneau Lane and County Road 9; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Informational Hearinq and has recommended approval; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Robert Wachter, Dimension Development Company, Inc., for a development to be known as "Parkview Ridge" consisting of 80 single family detached dwelling units and 40 multi -family attached townhomes on approximately 40 acres located southwest of Juneau Lane and County Road 9, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Maximum density shall be 3.2 units per acre for the land at or above the established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as verified by the City Engineer. A density bonus point is assigned for housing mix. 4. The preliminary plat/plan application shall include an explanation of any request for lot coverage over 20%. No ground coverage in excess of the Ordinance standard is approved. 5. Draft restrictive covenants for preliminary plat/plan application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO the private open areas shall be submitted with Page two Resolution No. 88- 6. An access drive off County Road 9 shall be provided for construction vehicles, and all construction traffic shall access the property from County Road 9, until the first home is certified for occupancy. 7. No private drive access shall be permitted to County Road 9; all private drives shall be provided by internal public streets. 8. Consideration should be given with the preliminary plat as to the most appropriate means of providing for necessary storm water ponding (outlots versus easements), and as to whether the required ponding areas constitute common open space. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 23, 1988 The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Pauba, Commissioners Zylla, Marofsky and Tierney MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Wire, Stulberg and Plufka STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Blair Tremere Assistant City Engineer Oof" weeney Planning Secretary Grac-e--Vineman MINUTES MOTION by Commissioner M fsky, seconded by Commissioner Tierney to approve e Minutes for March 9, 1988, as submitted. VOTE 3 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla abstained. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Pauba announced that due to a time conflict, the representative for John DeVries was going to be late and, thus, the application would be heard later in this meeting. Chairman Pauba introduced the request and an overview of the March 14, 1988 staff report was provided by Director Tremere. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Kevin Von Riedel, McCombs, Frank, Roos Associates, representing the petitioner. Mr. Von Riedel introduced Mr. Bob Wachter, and explained the background of this application; the unique topography; the drainage situation; and, assured that this development will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Mr. F. Eisenbauer, 3960 Orchid Lane, is concerned that existing trees be retained for transition, and wants assur- ance there will be no drainage runoff from this development to the west. He inquired about completion dates and the prices of the homes, near the Creekside of Plymouth development. 67- MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED ROBERT WACHTER DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT RPUD CONCEPT PLAN 88018) Page 68 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1988 Mr. Scott Bratten, 14560 40th Place North, stated concern with the extension of 39th Avenue North. Vehicles from Rockford Road and Fernbrook Lane could consider this extension as a "short-cut" which would produce heavier traf- fic in their residential neighborhood. Also, he is con- cerned with the safety of the children who play near the streets and in the park. Chairman Pauba asked Engineer Sweeney if vehicles traveling Fernbrook Lane or County Road 9, would be apt to use this street extension as a short-cut. Engineer Sweeney said this should not be the case; such a circuitous residential route would not save time for a driver., nor would it be any easier to access County Road 9/Rockford Road. He noted that traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of County Road 9 and Fernbrook Lane which will alleviate the traffic problems people are seeing at this time. Director Tremere explained further that this street connec- tion was planned prior to the development of the Cedar Ridge development, and is meant to serve all these residential neighborhoods. He agreed with Engineer Sweeney that people would trend to not use this street for a short-cut. Commissioner Marofsky pointed out that this street would carry neighborhood traffic to "Downtown Plymouth" and to access the major north/south and east/west roadways. Ms. Patty Bratten, 14560 40th Place North, stated she is more than aware of the heavy traffic on County Road 9 as it backs their property; they would not use this street to get to County Road 9 and she is very concerned about their children's safety since they often play in the street. Ms. Julie Howell, 3935 Harbor Lane, stated her opposition to the extension of 39th Avenue North which would be detrimen- tal to the safety of children living in Cedar Ridge. She pointed out that the Cedar Ridge neighborhood would be at the bottom of a hill which could be a problem during the winter months. She inquired where construction traffic will enter and exit for this new development; and whether it would come through her neighborhood. Director Tremere reiterated that the street connection is meant to carry local traffic; he explained the City's trans- portation plan. Russ Thour, 14635 39th Avenue North, stated that the people from the townhomes on the west would use this as a short-cut and they believe this will pour too much traffic through their neighborhood. He also stated concern with the drain- Page 69 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1959 age from this development site and inquired about the swale on the east side. He stated this has overflowed and caused flooding in the past. He inquired whether the culvert would be extended on through the park. Engineer Sweeney explained that the drainage situation will be reviewed thoroughly at the preliminary plat and plan stage for this development. He stated that consulting engineers have addressed this and that a larger culvert may be needed, however, sizing and routing has not been deter- mined at this time. Director Tremere explained the Concept stage of development; that this is a public informational hearing to allow people to understand the type of development under consideration. At the preliminary plat and plan stage, there is a Public Hearing, property notices are sent; and, more detailed plans are prepared by the petitioner which includes the direction provided by the Commission and Council. Chairman Pauba explained that the Commission will make a recommendation on the concept of development and are not considering detailed development plans this evening. Bruce Rand, 14515 39th Avenue North, stated he disagrees with the comments made by the City that this street would not be used as a short-cut, he believes this will occur. He stated that when he purchased his lot, he was led to believe by a realtor and by the design that this street (39th Avenue) would be a cul-de-sac. He is concerned about the proposed grading of the higher elevations of this property and the diminishing wildlife and natural topography. He stated that an alternative to this the extension should be pursued, including closing the access onto County Road 9. Mr. Rand stated that the children in Cedar Ridge are 5 to 7 years of age, and have played in the streets since moving there, and, have been able to come and go from the play fields without fear for their safety. Residents access the City Center area via 34th Avenue and do not need the acces via 39th Avenue. Chairman Pauba stated the neighborhood concerns will be for- warded to the City Council, and the developer's representa- tive will be asked to answer questions. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. Page 70 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1988 Mr. Kevin Von Riedel stated that at this time, the active extent of the grading is not known, there will be some cut and fill to prepare building pads, and it is a fact that some wildlife will be displaced because of new development. He stated that the drainage will be thoroughly reviewed along with the grading plans. He explained the location of catch basins and the ponding areas. Mr. Von Riedel explained the access for heavy equipment dur- ing the construction phase would be to County Road 9, inter- nal traffic would not occur until the Certificate of Occu- pancy is issued for the first building. He noted that the price range for the homes would be S95,000 - 120,000 for the townhomes and $130,000 - $180,000 for the single family homes. He estimates completion in two to three years. Mr. Von Riedel stated they would maintain matched grading and would retain the natural tree line. He explained the method of erosion control. He noted that the existing buildings on the site will be razed. Further discussion ensued regarding the culverts and ponding. Commissioner Zylla inquired about the issue on lot cover- age. Mr. Von Riedel stated that with the lot size of 8,400 sq. ft., they would request a higher ratio of ground cover- age. Director Tremere stated that if the developer proposes lot coverage of treater than 20%, they would be required to show the specific lots chosen, and the City would review the merit of the request based on the retention of natural topography and vegetation. The City Council had given direction that this issue would be a decision made during later stages of development. Commissioner Tierney asked about the trail location. Mr. Von Riedel explained the access and location. Director Tremere noted the requirement for paved trail. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE Tierney to recommend approval for the Planned Unit Develop- ment Concept Plan for Dimension Development, subject to the conditions as listed in the March 14, 1988 staff report. Commissioner Marofsky stated his concern with the layout of the streets in this development; that they should be more efficient and effective. He stated that the configuration as proposed is too convoluted if intended as lateral access. He explained the alternative of routing 39th Avenue to the south to 38th Avenue, which he believes would give a better flow, and could cul-de-sac to the balance of the homes. Pane 71 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1989 Secondly, he is concerned about the recreational areas for the project, 3.3 acres for the townhomes and 1.2 acres for the 80 single family units, which seems to be all in ponds and a small trailway. The homes to the north, on County Road 9 have no open space or recreational areas adjacent to them. It would seem a more efficient use would be to place the townhomes, with more open space, along County Road 9. He stated the proposal does not clearly meet two of the PUD Criteria. Commissioner Zylla asked staff to discuss the open space requirements and to explain why staff feels this plan meets the PUD Criteria. Director Tremere stated that, considering the topographical features of this property, this development seems to respond to the intent of the PUD Criteria. The plan would not destroy the natural features of the site, and these natural features also lead to the road configuration. The designers are taking advantage of the open space and park; the Commission must decide if there should be more effective private open space, especially with the single family homes. While staff believes the criteria have been met overall, the Commission needs to give direction regard- ing any reservations they may have on this development meet- ing the Planned Unit Development requirements. This is a Concept Plan and it is appropriate to question these aspects. Commissioner Z_ylla said that this is a difficult site for development and he will not second guess the street design. The curvilinear streets make sense by accomplishing the de- celeration of traffic through the residential neighborhood. He believes the open space is adequate considering the design and topography; to provide for further open space would push the density below that allowed by the Guide Plan. The location of the open space makes sense for this layout and this is a good in -fill development plan. Cmmissioner Marofsky inquired if the streets conform to the City's street -naming policy. Director Tremere answered affirmatively. Commissioner Marofsky pointed out another street layout which would produce more of a "loop" effect, and which would have a lesser impact on the adjacent neighborhood. Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay. MOTION carried. Chairman Pauba introduced the re 4 hvr es for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. An oarch 11, 1988 staff report was provided byre. He VOTE - NOTION CARRIED JOHN DEVRIES LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT (88010) o * t ery 4 5 Virgil Schneider ul jGF 11520 54th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN" 5544"1. Dear Mr. Schneider: This letter is concerning the. concept plan for the Parkview Ridge development proposed by Dimension Development Inc. We support. the proposed mix of single family units and the multi- family units. The location of t.iir unit.: makes for a smooth transition from thfe sin` - fair,ii> 110rr1-::3 An the Cedar Ridge development. to the multi -family units to the, west. There are concerris we. have with tire proposed concept plan. Our first concern is the f i 1 i irrt of the. swamp and running of a culvert to the flood plain in Cedar Ridge. (see. Map 1) . The swamp currently acts. as a natural holding arra for excess water. By filling the swamp, the water would run directly into the flood plain via the culv(ert.. This could cause water problems for all the homes, adjacent tc, t hc, f lood plairi . Marry of the homes have surnp pumps which run the nia.jc)rit. the. year. It is our belief that. the impact. of t•hi.s i.sstle research. Our second concern is regardingthe proposed trail. The plans show the. trail running t.hrougl-r flood plain (see Map 1). This trail would be unusaole for ninst., if not all of the year because of high water. It. is our belief t.1,ai. the culvert sl;ould be extended to the creek which runs through the parr,. This, would solve both of the problems above. Our final concern is regarding a possible traffic: problem. The proposed street. layout encourage!:. a shortcut. from County Road 9 to Fer.nbrook via 39th Avenue during rush hour traffic periods. We. foresee County Road 9 backing up when lights are installed at the intersection, of Fernbrook and County Road 9. There are presently 13 children under the age of 5 on 39th Avenue. We are extremely concerned that cars will be going too fast on our streets. Possible solutions would be to cul-de-sac 39th Avenue from both directions. This could be. doIie without the developer losing any lots. Another solution would be to change the proposed street layout to discourage any possible shortcutting, as was proposed by commissioner Marofsky. i It is our tenet that you, as t.rte mayor•, will take seriously our concerns ana asi. f o1' SLUplels about the above iwskaes We IE•eI. i your job to ensure 1.•]tat the. high quality of Lite 1 ilialrtt.ctiltlE'•l lti Yiytr;outl n F U z C j, r` o o J 4 aC 4. FJ !fi it P A A 7_ . Ri p z c :.a a •?^• ,.,q. p ' a 1. t •i : p _ ` Y s R __i i < 1b AC all : R ,. _ ^ - .' L _ • vs . - I R 'E -' :.1°r`' ` -i N d• SIJ c } . .. u,i i rte._ •d .Y N VI r _ LL LL i- zz W - II Pyr . >•.' . - .., , e J . ti OOF r r_ ` AV a[•IAl M0161 _ I I ' Jqz Sea-P S N• d,R J ^ R ; i + .. n 'J AK ' t Y Ts• __ r c L 1A 1 aV Uo n1MT•ra Ca Y . 1< . 9 c 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 TO: 3ames G. Willis, City Manager G_- FROM: Al Cottingham, Associate Planner through Blair Tremere, Community Development Director SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR "PRIME WEST BUSINESS PARK" (87123) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which declares a finding of "No Need" for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), based upon the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) review process for Prime Development Corpora- tion for "Prime West Business Park." 707,47-117"111 The project is located northwest of Highway 55 and Quaker Lane. The required 30 -day review comment period has expired and upon review of all comments received, it is determined that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Review comments and recommendations were received the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA); the Metropolitan Council; the Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT); and, the Minnesota Historical Society. The Metropolitan Council has identified that the City will need to process an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the interchange at State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane. This issue has been discussed with the Metropolitan Council staff and we have acknow- ledged that, as we update our Comprehensive Plan, there is a need to specifically reference the intersection. We have explained to them that it was fully signalized in conjunction with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and that, when the narra- tive portion of the Comprehensive Plan was adopted several years ago, the intersection was effectively not contemplated as the upgraded controlled intersection it has come to be. The Pollution Control Agency has identified another aspect of the State law which man- dates certain air quality information that the PCA contends should have been in the EAW. We have notified the petitioner that a Supplemental EAW is to be prepared regard- ing that subject. The supplement will then be distributed in accordance with the State regulations. Page two Memorandum to the City Manager for City Council Meetinq April 4, 1988 March 28, 1988 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Adopt the attached Resolution as one of the final steps in the State Environmental review process. The need for a supplement regarding an air quality analysis is not viewed as a deficiency or as the basis for findinq that an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. The PCA has also identified that the developer will need to apply for and receive what is called an Indirect Source Permit, and that deals with the subject of air quality. Thus, the requirement presently is for additional information and we are recommending that that be a condition of the Resolution making the negative declaration. AttarhmPntc 1. Draft Resolution 2. Location Map 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Responses CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - DECLARING FINDING OF NO NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) BASED UPON THE REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1988 FOR PRIME WEST BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED BY PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (87123) WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat for Prime West Business Park by Resolution No. 88-119 on February 22, 1988; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Rule No. 4410.4300, Subpart 14 A (3), the Environmental Review Process, the City of Plymouth, as the responsible governmental unit, submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the development on February 16, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the 30 -day review comment period expired on March 23, 1988, and all comments and recommendations received from reviewing agencies and other interested parties have been considered; and, WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed development does not present a poten- tial for significant environmental effects; NOW, THERFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does make a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed development known as Prime West Business Park for prime Development Corporation, subject to the following: 1. City staff is directed to prepare the necessary amendment to the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the identification of the inter- section of Quaker (Revere) Lane and State Highway 55 when the Comprehensive Plan is updated. 2. The Supplement regarding the air analysis prescribed by State law and identi- fied in the March 22, 1988 letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency PCA) shall be completed by the petitioner, and submitted for approval and distribution prior to any further platting and issuance of permits. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 00 i T T- CITY OF SST . LOUIS i i CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 22nd day of February , 1988. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk The following members were absent: None Councilmember Sisk adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88-119 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PATRICK HAGEN, PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR PRIME WEST (87123) WHEREAS, Patrick Hagen, Prime Development Corporation, has requested approval for a Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for eight commercial lots and one outlot on approximately 41.3 acres located northwest of State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hear- ing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Preliminary Plat for Patrick Hagen, Prime Development Corporation for Prime West located northwest of State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense. 3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer and water. 4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of issuance of the Building Permit. 5. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System. 6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 7. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat. 8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 9. No yard setback variances are granted or implied. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO Page two Resolution No. 88-119 10. Access shall be limited to internal public roads. Private drive access onto State Highway 55 and Revere Lane is prohibited. 11. Configuration of the intersection of the frontage road with the existing Quaker Lane/Highway 55 intersection shall be coordinated with the access point for the land to the east. 12. The manufactured homes located along the western portion of the site shall be removed prior to this area being platted into lots; or, the encroachment will be legally resolved including any necessary revisions to the plat. 13. All structures and light poles, relating to the "Driving Range" shall be removed prior to or concurrent with the first phase of construction. Any existing wells and/or septic systems shall be appropriately sealed and/or removed. 14. Appropriate legal documents shall be reviewed and approved the the City Attorney encumbering 0utlot A to the land on the west side of future Revere Lane. 15. The required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) shall be processed in accordance with the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) regulations and City policy. 16. Prior to the issuance of any Building Permits within the plat, the developer will agree to pay one-half the cost of a detailed traffic diversion study to accurately identify and assess useage percentages and subsequent assessment obligations on the Revere Lane extension; and, that the total cost of Revere Lane from 8th Avenue North to 10th Avenue North will be assessed to the Prime and Ryan parcels. Further, before a Building Permit is issued, the Development Contract associated with the Final Plat will state this development's obligation toward the construction of Revere Lane as determined by the diversion study. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk The following voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. REVISED Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904 DATE: March 23, 1988 TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee FROM: Long Range Planning Program (Robert Overby) SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Prime West Business Park in Plymouth Metropolitan Council Distr-ct c Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14424-1 Prime Development Corporation is proposing a planned development on about 42 acres located north of TH 55 and west of Quaker Lane in the City of Plymouth see !.:'tachment 1) . The project will consist entirely of office space, with a an overall size of approximately 450,003 square feet. The site will be developed in stages, and occur over a 4 -year period, starting in 1988. Each stage will occupy approximately 10 acres, and individual sites within each stage will range from 20,000 to 100,000 square feet. Sites can be combined for larger buildings or divided for smaller buildings, creating some flexibility beyond Phase I in order to respcnd to changes in market conditions. Under Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB) regulations, the project requires the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW MEQB rules recuire that EAWs prepared under the Minnesota Environmental Review Program -.ust be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. Any recipient of an EAW or member of the public may make comments and recommendations to the responsible agency. The responsible agency for this project is the City of Plymouth. ANALYSIS The EAW adequately identifies the regional issues which need to be addressed, except for transportation. Transportation 1. The traffic analysis appears to be incomplete and, therefore, inaccurate in its assessment of traffic impacts from this proposed development. 2. The forecast analysis is good only up to the year 1995. Of the seven intersections that were analyzed, three were shown to exceed p.m. peak capacity and three were identified as near capacity. Background traffic obviously will continue to strain these intersections beyond the 1995 time frame. The report indicates that monitoring of future traffic conditions would be necessary. A key intersectior. is Quaker Lane and 7E 55. According to the report, improvement of this intersection, is :_nco nsiste nt with the Plymouth comprehensive plan. A plan amendment will be needed to accomodate this development proposal. The integrity of the metropolitan hi Shway system is of paramount importance here, and deletion of this existing intersection instead of improvement would better serve mainline traffic on TE 55• Deletion of this intersectio wot:=d mean, however, that additional demand would be placed on the other intersections identified in the report. 4. Council forecasts on nearby CSAE 18 indicate a substantial increase in traffic volumes. Since the report identified unacceptable levels of service at the CSAR 18 access points and sug`ested revised road geometries and the installation of signals at various intersections, additional analysis should be undertaken with the most current 2000 or 2010 backgroound traffic forecast data. The Council or M nDCT can provide these forecasts to the City. Metropolitan Development and Investment Frar.ework The EAk' indicates that the project is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan, with the exception of a 3 -acre parcel in the southeast corner of the site. The 3 -acre parcel is presently proposed for public and semi-public future land uses. However, it is presently zoned as planned industrial district. The city proposes to rezone the 3 -acre parcel as office limited business district. The EAW indicates that the proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding land use. RECONLIIENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS That the Council adopt this report and its conclusions as its comments on the Prime West Business Park EAk. 1. The EAk' adequately addresses regional issues, except for transportation. 2. The traffic analysis should be expanded to specifically address the items outlined in the body of this report. 3. The city should prepare a comprehensive pian amendment that addresses the inconsistency of the project; with. the Plymouth comprehensive plan regarding a) the improvement of the intersection of Quaker Land and TH55; and (b) the effect of the project on the regional transportation plan. 80007, PROTX3 40125' :`:,8 R. 22 W. R. 21 W. 1409 ee9 ,%. si"-Radia^ owerWOVIii 'Zu v. o % BN, 894 E•' -». .: ., Illedicine Lake IFisrLS F IF TN '/l -1-" •lig . • : \ 41 tj rLA r; 51 T ' Its A1JD IF IF IF 1; ,,.z• , . r /'' – •'- i _ `r X. ar c I . ` .' II fft Wtv e Sch — 1 stolic '' CA % • 7 r • J _LEL i Q- - _-•- - - _ j, ;Park ••) . r`,. FIGURE 2 M wombs r•2nk ccs Associates, Inc- NOD NE V,$,(a,$, MAP 7..Y+G1•s S. GouC PR/ME WEST BUS/NESS PARK 15CSC LJ2 A t tt E^•gmeers FILL tic. F rY-cvull MN s. a P.annen 6447 PLYMOUTH, MN. i i :TO r. w..rw\` )0^« s iv( •rE I'—; ji p IEiw! I t " 1\'. o 774 675 C. a l i OI I I a{ I • I o t \ s ` /a, r"'„^"""" MOOi c i n e - ---- 1 Ll DEMAND tAVA1LA8LE CAPACITY 1160 Nf I I DEMAND AVAILABLE CAPACITY I_ L `) JIW U `O OSI ERE Study Area Boundary ` 464 DEMAND AVAIL STNC INSULTCOF. PAUSC`it, ttiC. t'tlNti('LTINI: t:NGtNF.tatti l DEMAND CAPACI' I rl -Proposed Prim Vest Business Park ST LOUIS PARK Is P.M. PEAK HOUR CRITICAL MOVE DEMAND/ AVAILABLE CAPACITY City of Plymouth FIGURE Caaacity Analysis 7 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 22, 1988 Blair Tremere Director of Community Development 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mr. Tremere: Re: Prime West Business Park Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) The above document has been reviewed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MPCA) staff. We note that item 11 does not mention the need for an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) from the MPCA Air Quality Division. This permit is required for new indirect sources of air pollutants if they meet certain criteria. If the project includes creation of more than 1000 parking places, an assessment must be performed to determine if an ISP is necessary. This assessment must consider the following factors. This project is located near two major highways. The proposer must apply for the permit if 60% of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count of a nearby highway is greater than 8333. Since Hennepin County 18 in the vicinity has an ADT count of 68,900 north of Highway 55, and 81,700 south of it, and since Highway 55 between County 18 and Saratoga Lane has an ADT count of 38,100, it appears that a permit will be required. This assessment requirement is in Minnesota Rules 7001.1290. The law requires that the project proposer submit data to the MPCA which we can use to perform the air analysis prescribed in Minnesota Rules 7001.1320. The results of this analysis must be presented in the EAW so that adequate public review is assured. Since the EAW does not now contain this analysis, an EAW supplement which does contain it must be prepared. You may wish to contact Suzanne Spitzer of the IPCA Division of Air Quality for further information on this requirement, and to discuss indirect source permitting. Questions on this letter should be directed to William J. Lynott of the Office of Planning and Review at 296-7794. Sincerely, Clifford T. Anderson Director Office of Planning and Review CTA: mf1 cc: Suzanne Spitzer, MPCA, Division of Air Quality Phone: 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer ONESpr4 O 2 D ° Minnesota Department of Transportation o Transportation Building. St, Paul. MN 55155 Q OF TF P March 22, 1988 Blair Tremere Community Development Director 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Prime West Business Park Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) District 5 (Plymouth, Hennepin County) Dear Mr. Tremere: 2_3 r- Phone 296-1251 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed a review of the above -referenced EAW. We anticipate that the proposed project will cause some adverse impacts to our transportations facilities. A portion of Trunk Highway (T.H.) 55 drains across this property. The existing drainage pattern must be maintained. Drainage computations and pipe sizes should be submitted with a drainage permit application prior to making a connection to the existing pipe on the right of way Figure 8). Please contact Bill Worden, Roadway Regulations Supervisor at (612) 593-8449 for further information. The Plymouth Drainage Plan shows no pipes in this area. Bassett Creek Watershed Management District review and a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permit are required for any proposed drainage/floodplain changes. It is important that coordination continues between the project proposer, the consultant, the city and Mn/DOT as to appropriate resonsibilities for providing more vehicle capacity and making any other roadway modifications such as frontage road connections. To discuss this further, please contact Carl Hoffstedt, Transportation Analysis Engineer at our District Office in Golden Valley, telephone number (612) 593-8540. Sincerely, pcvb Patricia Bursaw Environmental Coordinator Environmental Services Section An Equal Opporrunur Empluver March 4, 1988 MINN'ESC)-; Mr. Al Cottingham City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mr. Cottingham: F-7ra.,3 CAW HISTORICAL SOC I ETl' . 1 1 1 • (612 ) 720-1 11 Re: Prime West Business Park, NTW of Quaker Lane and St. Hwy. 55 SE/4 NW/4, S36, T118, R22, Plymouth, Hennepin County MHS Referral File Number: 88-0880 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given the State Historic Preservation Officer by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the National Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (36CFR800). This review reveals the location of no known sites of historic, architectural, cultural, archaeological, or engineering significance within the area of the proposed project. There are no sites in the project area which are on the National Register or eligible for inclusion on the National Register, and therefore, none which may be affected by your proposal. Again, thank you for your participation in this important effort to preserve Minnesota's heritage. Sincerely, Dennis A. Gimmestad Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DAG:dmb 9(L CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director SUBJECT CITY OF PLYMOUTH. SITE PLAN FOR FIRE STATION III (88012) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which approves the Site Plan for the City of Plymouth Fire Station III to be constructed east of Dunkirk Lane and north of 33rd Avenue North. The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the meeting on March 23, 1988, and recommended approval by unanimous vote. Attachments: 1. Approving Resolution 2. March 23, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes 3. Fire Chief's Memorandum CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF PLYMOUTH FIRE STATION III (88012) WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has requested approval of a Site Plan to construct Fire Station III to be located east of Dunkirk Lane and north of 33rd Avenue North; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for the City of Plymouth for a Site Plan to construct Fire Station III on property located east of Dunkirk Lane and north of 33rd Avenue North, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy, for residential land, at two units per acres, to be paid with issuance of Building Permit. 3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage facility. 4. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- als per Ordinance provisions. 6. Approval of the Fire Lane Variance subject to the requirements of the Fire Inspector's Memorandum, dated March 9, 1988. 7. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure, and no outside storage is permitted. 8. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO Paqe two Resolution No. 88- 10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 11. Upon completion of the Medina Road extension, the access to Dunkirk Lane will be closed with access only onto Medina Road. 12. Materials used for the construction of the Fire Station shall be brick and glass. The motion for adoption of the foregoinq Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 74 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1988 this site, so all land north of the alignment would be viewed similarly, with notification of all residents who were sent notice of the hearing, as well as any others per the new petition. This is in consideration of the apparent confusion about this hearing and the need to have a clear picture of the guiding in this area. Bob Smith, Hedlund Engineering, stated they areprepared to submit a preliminary plat and this deferral-' could cause delay for the developer. i r Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the,,,,preliminary plat could be combined with the reguiding. Director Tremere stated they could submit informal planssfor review, but these could not be formally processed ,until the City Council takes action on the reguiding application. Director Tremere expLained the process for a public improve- ment project. He plained the importance of initiating the supplemental re idinq request. He stated that when notice is sent, it w' 1 include a graphic clearly showing the road right-of-way; however, the purpose of the meeting is not to debate the construction of Schmidt Lake Road, that can and will be discussed later. Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. Commissioner Z_ylla, Nay. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED carried. _ NEW BUSINESS Chairman Pauba introduced the request and reading of the March 14, 1988 staff report was waived. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if there is a trail to the outlot north of Medina Road, and whether this would be through the Fire Station property. He asked about the lighting plan; and, when Medina Road is constructed, would the access to Dunkirk Lane be closed. Director Tremere stated the access to Dunkirk Lane would be closed once there is access to Medina Road; and, that if a trail were required to the outlot, it could cross the fire station property. MOTION by Chairman Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Z_ylla to recommend approval for the Site Plan for Fire Station III, subject to the conditions as stated in the March 14, 1988 staff report. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner Zylla to Amend the Motion by adding Condition No. 11: The access to Dunkirk Lane will be closed when the extension of Medina Road is completed. CITY OF PLYMOUTH SITE PLAN FOR CITY FIRE STATION III (88012) NOTION TO APPROVE NOTION TO AMEND Page 75 Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1988 MOTION by Commissioner Z_ylla, seconded by Commissioner Marofsky to Amend the Motion by adding Condition No. 12. The exterior materials for the Fire Station building will be brick and glass. Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE on the Main Motion as twice amended. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried. OLD BUSINESS and OTHER BUSINESS Director Tremere vised that the Commission will be receiv- ing follow-up infortion regarding the possible revisions to the Zoning Ordinanc -.{larking standards. A meeting in April is contemplated for"'t-e continuation of the Public Hearing. The Commission and Director Tremere di ussed a meeting in April to submit the statement of direc 'on to the City Council regarding the Community-based re 'dential care facilities study. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M. MOTION TO AMEND VOTE ON AMENDMENT MOTION CARRIED VOTE - MAIN MOTION MOTION CARRIED FrFrol2 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 9, 1988 TO: Al Cottingham, Associate Plann FROM: Stan Scofield, Fire Inspector SUBJECT: FIRE LANE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR FIRE STATION III The Fire Department will grant the requested variance to the fire lane on the west side of Fire Station III. The request is granted based on the explanation on the attached request and the fact that the building will be totally sprinklered. LSS:ly attachment: Lyle C. Robinson Memo MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 25, 1988, for Council Meeting of April 4 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: ST. MARY'S PARK - APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ACTION REQUESTED: The attached resolution approves the final plans and specifications for St. Mary's Neighborhood Park and authorizes the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with bidding this project. The total estimated construction cost as prepared by the City's consultant is $117,520. 2. BACKGROUND: On Monday, March 7, the City Council approved the master plan for St. Mary's park and directed that the final plans and specifications be prepared. In accordance with that direction, the plans and specifications have now been completed and we seek authorization to proceed to bid this project. The consultant has prepared a cost estimate for this project at $117,520. At Council's directions the specifications include the plans for bidding as an alternate the parking lot at a price of $9,960 and the alternate for floating boardwalk of $5,500. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend the City Council authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with bidding Project No. 808 in accordance with the specifications that have been prepared and submitted. The project budget is to be set at $117,520. These funds will be transferred from neighborhood park dedication funds account 219-219 to the 401 construction fund. i Eric J. t1ank, Director Parks and Recreation EJB/np Attachments CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: s introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ST. MARY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WHEREAS, the park consultant has prepared the final plans and specifications for St. Mary's neighborhood park project no. 808, and WHEREAS, the Director of Parks and Recreation has recommended approval of the final plans and specifications, and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said project, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to bid project no. 808 in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and further, that the Finance Director is authorized to transfer $117,520 from neighborhood park account 219-219 to the 401 construction account for funding of said project. u The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor t ere- . the following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passe an aopt Q3KSTRUCTIC T OOST ESTIMATE for St. Mary's Neighborhood Park Construction in Plymouth, Minnesota City Project No. 808 Item Unit No. Contract Item Units Quantity Price Total 1 Mobilization L.S. 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 2 Clearing and Grubbing L.S. 1 450.00 450.00 3 Remove Two (2) Back- stops and TWo (2) Benches L.S. 1 250.00 250.00 4 Pedestrian Bridge L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 5 Site Grading L.S. 1 8,000.00 8,000.00 6 Granular Borrow L.V. C.Y. 1,000 5.50 5,500.00 7 Bituminous Hardcourt S.Y. 214 11.00 2,354.00 8 Bituminous Parking Area (Delete Alt. A) S.Y. 520 12.00 6,240.00 9 Concrete Curb and Gutter B618 (Delete Alt. A) L.F. 420 8.50 3,570.00 10 Riprap (Delete Alt. A) C.Y. 3 50.00 150.00 11 15" CMP Culvert L.F. 68 22.00 1,496.00 12 15" CMP Apron EA 6 90.00 540.00 13 18" CMP Culvert L.F. 16 25.00 400.00 14 18" CMP Apron EA 2 120.00 240.00 15 Geotextile Filter S.Y. 640 2.00 1,280.00 16 8' Wide Bituminous Trail L.F. 3,000 7.00 21,000.00 Item Unit No. Contract Item Units Quantity Price Total 17 Erosion Control Fence L.F. 650 5.00 3,250.00 18 Pend Excavation C.Y. 700 4.50 3,150.00 19 Seeding Acre 2.5 1,500.00 3,750.00 20 Sodding S.Y. 2,500 2.00 5,000.00 21 Basketball Standard L.S. 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 22 Benches EA 4 500.00 2,000.00 23 Install Play Structure L.S. 1 28,900.00 28,900.00 24 Floating Boa k Delete Alt. B) L.S. 1 5,500.00 5,500.00 25 Bicycle Rack EA 1 400.00 400.00 TOTAL CONSIMMON BID 117,520.00 r c D S n Gm lMI ia i' r 0 rl T co f` zDD l ~- TV D A ' D v n 0 z e (A m Z D U) m D m m D m m n rrn r 3 Ln rm D D D Dn Z i0 r 30m D Z c g z o n 0 OCm0 0 f s a H D D m z m x m. 1 V7 V7 O D r 0 qE MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 25 for Council Meeting of Aril 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK SOCCER FIELD ACTION REQUESTED: The attached resolution authorizes the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with the development of a new soccer field at Plymouth Creek Playfield. The estimated cost for this project including additional trail work is $50,000, which will be paid for by park dedication fund 218-218. 2. BACKGROUND: The 1988 capital improvements budget calls for the addition of a new soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park. One of the reasons for needing this additional field is so that we may transfer games from existing fields onto the new field to allow for more time to renovate and rest existing fields. 3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Attached for Council review is a copy of the preliminary engineering report prepared by Dan Campbell of the City's engineering department for this facility. The report compared the capital costs for developing a natural turf field vs. an artificial turf field. This study was done to determine if major cost savings in on-going maintenance could offset the additional cost of construction. The conclusion of the report is that cost savings would not justify the additional construction cost of about $330,000 extra. It is anticipated that this project will be designed, bid and supervised by city staff from the park and recreation and engineering departments. It will consist of three contracts: A. Grading contract B. Irrigation contract C. Seed and sod contract The field will be designed to the same standard as our existing soccer fields, which are 120 yards long and 80 yards wide. The field will not be lit at this time. The Plymouth Creek athletic complex was designed with the addition of this field in mind. Based on future use trends, it may be necessary to add additional parking for between 30-50 cars in the future. PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD Page 2 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission recommended approval of this project with an estimated budget of $50,000 at their meeting of Thursday, March 10. I recommend the City Council authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with the construction of a soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park. The project budget will be set at $50,000 with the funds to be appropriated from park dedication account 218-218. These funds will be transferred to the 401 construction account for project no. 809. Eric J. Blank, Director Parks and Recreation EJB/np Attachments CITY OF PLYMOUFH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on t e day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING PROJECT NO. 809 PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD WHEREAS, the 1988 capital improvements budget calls for the construction of one soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park, and WHEREAS, the Director of Parks and Recreation has prepared a cost analysis for the construction of this field, and WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission has reviewed and recommended approval of the construction of said field, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized to proceed with the construction of a soccer field as proposed at Plymouth Creek Park, and further, that funding for said project will transfer $50,000 from park dedication account 218-218 to construction account 401-401, Project 809. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passea and adopted. PRAC Minutes/March 10, 1988 Page 14 Mr. Watson and Director Blank will work on a new concept plan that does not show a par 3 golf course and will have it ready by the April meeting. d. St Mary's Neighborhood Park Update. Director Blank indicated that a contractor working on I-394 will be bringing in free dirt fill for some areas of this park, which will then be covered with better top soil. He said that he has not made a final selection on the playground equipment. He indicated that bid letting will be sometime in May. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. New Plats - Review Neighborhood Park - 494 & Co. Rd. 9. Director Blank reviewed the proposed size, shape and location of this future park and stated that in order to save as many trees as possible in and around the marsh, the City must hold a public hearing for the purpose of amending the comprehensive park sytem plan, so that this park can be enlarged on the plan. By holding a public hearing, the current land owners can be legally notified that the City will be proposing to take more land from them. Commissioners agreed that it was a good idea to save the trees. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HANSON TO RECOMMEND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE CONDUCTED ON APRIL 14 FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PARK SYSTEM PLAN. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. i b. Report on Plymouth Creek Soccer Field. Commissioners reviewed a staff report from Dan Campbell, Engineering, and from Director Blank, on the costs of installing a natural turf soccer field vs. an artificial turf field in Plymouth Creek Playfield. The cost for an artificial field would be $361,000. The cost for a natural turf field would be approximately $33,000. Commissioners agreed that it was not worth it to install the artificial turf. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER REED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY INSTALL A NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELD AT PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK WITH A BUDGET ESTIMATED AT $50,000 FOR THE PROJECT, AND FURTHER THAT THE COST FOR THIS IS TO COME FROM 218-218 COMMUNITY PLAYFIELDS-PARK DEDICATION ACCOUNT. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES. Director Blank stated that this field should be operational by August 31, 1988. C. Joint Meeting with Council on April 4. Three items were discussed by PRAC to be part of the agenda for the joint meeting: the proposed community center, Plymouth Creek park site planning, and the cost usage report. Commissioner Rosen stated that he feels the sole purpose of the joint meeting should be to get firm direction from the Council on the community center and to find out exactly how they stand on this issue. MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 9, 1988 TO: PRAC ; 11, 7) FROM: Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD Attached for your review is the preliminary engineering report prepared by Dan Campbell of the City's engineering department. Dan has concluded that an artificial turf field would cost approximately $361,000 vs. a natural grass field for about $33,000. To these numbers you have to add approximately 15,000 for trail realignment work and miscellaneous items. The cost to maintain a soccer field for a year is approximately $8,000 to $10,000 annually. Based on a cost difference between these two methods of construction of approximately $330,000, the payback over 33 years is difficult to justify. On a natural grass field we can play approximately 40-60 games per year. The artificial turf field could handle very easily 300-400 games per year. The reality is that without lights on this field, nor the athletic associations playing extensive weekend schedules, you would not be able to schedule enough games at this site in order to justify the cost for the artificial turf. As the cost of installing artificial turf surfaces decreases in the future, and our maintenance costs increase, this is an area that we must continue to explore for possible renovations of our fields in future years. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings of this preliminary cost estimate, I recommend the City proceed with the installation of a natural turf soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park with a budget estimated at approximately $50,000 for the project. The cost for this will come from 218-218 community playfields-park dedication account. This item is currently proposed in the 1988 capital improvements budget. EB/np Attachment 01W CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 3, 1988 TO: Erick Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation FROM: Daniel K. Campbell,' Senior Engineering Technician SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK - SOCCER FIELD A Preliminary Engineering Report has been prepared dealing with the construction of a natural grass versus artificial turf soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park. My recommendation would be to proceed with Alternate No. 1 which is the natural grass soccer field installation. DKC:kh attachment cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer REPORT ON THE PROPOSED SOCCER FIELD INSTALLATION AT PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK March 3, 1988 Prepared by: City of Plymouth Engineering Department Daniel K. Campbell Senior Engineering Technician I N D E X Title Page Index Page No. Conclusions and Recommendations....................................1 Location...........................................................2 Existing Conditions................................................2 Project Scope - Alternate 1 ........................................3 ProjectScope - Alternate 2 ........................................3 EstimatedCosts....................................................4 Figure I. Conclusions and Recommendations Both alternates outlined in this report are feasible relative to engineering matters. 1. Alternate No. 1 is the least costly of the two options proposed and requires more continuous maintenance. 2. Alternate No. 2 is a relatively maintenance free artificial surface which would be usable from April to October and is least affected by weather conditions. 3. The existing sanitary sewer manhole located in the middle of the proposed playing area should be abandoned and a new structure constructed to the north end and outside of the playing surface. 4. Soil testing should be done to determine poor soil conditions. These poor soils could result in differential settlement of the playing surface causing poor drainage and continual resurfacing of the playing field. A recommendation from a soils engineer on sand -soil mixtures for best grass growth and a favorable low injury surface should be part of the soils report. 1- Location: The proposed soccer field would be located directly west of and adjacent to the present soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park (see Figure No. 1). Existing Conditions: The site has an existing eight inch PVC sanitary sewer line running through it with a manhole structure in the middle of the proposed playing surface. A portion of the site contains a low lying marshy area which would be filled with on-site excavation material. An existing eight foot wide bituminous trail crosses the center of the site. 2- Project Scope - Alternate No. 1 This alternate proposes to construct a typical natural grass soccer field by doing the following: 1. Grade the site, creating approximately 4,900 cubic yards of excavation. 2. Provide an extension to the existing sprinkler system for irrigation of the playing surface . 3. Construct a five inch sand soil layer to create a low injury surface. 4. Sod the entire playing surface and seed the remaining disturbed areas. Project Scope: - Alternate 2 This alternate proposes to construct an artificial grass soccer field by doing the following: 1. Grade the site creating approximately 4,900 cubic yards of excavation. 2. Place a layer of geotextile fabric over the subgrade to prevent fine soils from migrating into the drainage pipe system. Migrating soils would eventually cause the drainage system to fail. 3. Install a perforated PVC pipe drainage system for vertical drainage through the artificial turf layer. 4. Place four inches of crushed rock to provide a porous but stable base. 5. Install artificial turf fabric and sand filler layer. 6. Paint permanent playing field lines on surface. 3- 4- COST ESTIMATE Alternate No. 1: Natural Grass Soccer Field Common Excavation 4,900 C.Y. at $1.25/C.Y. 6,125 Common Borrow 650 C.Y. at 2.00/C.Y. 1,300 Sand Borrow 650 C.Y. at 6.50/C.Y. 4,225 Sod 10,000 S.Y. at 1.10/S.Y. 11,000 Sprinkler System Lump Sum 9,000 Construct New Sanitary Manhole Lump Sum 1.500 Total 33,150 Site may need placement of a geotextile fabric prior to fill placement. Estimated cost = additional 8,000 Alternate No. 2 - Sporturf Artificial Turf System Sporturf Economy System 86,400 S.F. at $4.00/S.F. _ 345,600 Permanent Painted Field Lines Lump Sum 10,000 Common Excavation 4,900 C.Y. at $1.25/C.Y. = 6.125 Total 361,725 4- jr f+aC1 ;.` } 54 A41 4b N ilt`. t.42 is li • 2), e - Viz, ; o• ..,,,.'„- . Vit, ,;; . 'i 5.,; ` l • ry 74ua l ` ; `./ } , ir k s r' x ' h x` p+ j, ;: ' ... Y =; c ; { .,.rx •' '` x t 7 es p - ' Y • Ap 10 in MU' s- ry' " yam. .-ry"'•waar, i lop Ifri cr Y r 6 .. 1 it z"`.'_ '" •'y, r. J ew' '!'". 2507.47 ; F FIG 1 rj CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: March 31, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Sharon T. Reisinger, License Clerk SUBJECT 1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE The City of Plymouth is in receipt of renewal applications from 17 Garbage Haulers All fees have been paid, Certificates of Workers' Compensation and Bonds have been provided as required for licensing. Attached is a resolution approving a license for each applicant for Council consid- eration, contingent on each applicants response to the City's ordinance amendment regarding yard waste collection. A list of each applicant is contained in the resolution attached. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the • day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - APPROVING 1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE APPLICATIONS WHEREAS, applications for Garbage Haulers Licenses have been received from: Baldy Sanitation, Inc. Block Sanitation Inc. Browning-Ferris Ind. of MN 5906 Henry Street 6741 79th Ave. N. P.O. Box 1440 Maple Plain 55359 Brooklyn Park 55445 Minneapolis 55440 Cleanway Sanitation P.O. Box 220 Long Lake 55356 Haugen Haulers Route 2, Box 10613 Buffalo 55313 Hilger Transfer 8550 Zachary Lane Maple Grove 55369 Robbinsdale Transfer 5232 Hanson Court Crystal 55429 Crosstown Sanitation 10110 38th Ave. N. Plymouth 55441 Gallagher's Service 1691 91st. Ave. N.E. Blaine 55434 Nistgler Rubbish 21203 Horseshoe Tr. Hamel 55340 Scherer Sanitation P.O. Box 272 Delano 55328 Dave's Sanitation 4072 Hamel Road Hamel 55340 G.D. LaPlant Sanitation P.O. Box 334 Buffalo 55313 Randy's Sanitation Route 3, Box 342 Delano 55328 Waste Mgmt. P.O. Box 9 Circle Pines 55014 Waste Technology Woodlake Sanitary Service 410 11th Ave. S. 4000 Hamel Road Hopkins, MN 55343 Hamel, MN 55340 RESOLUTION NO. 88 - Page Two NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that a Garbage Haulers License be approved for the above named applicants for a one year period ending March 31, 1988 subject to any revision of the City Code creating an "organized collection system". AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval of the licenses is contingent upon the licensees furnishing the City with their yard waste collection program, as required by ordinance, prior to April 15, 1988. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: March 31, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director SUBJECT STANDARDS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSPECTION SERVICES ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the attached performance standards for the Building Inspection Division which is one of the items identified in your 1988 Performance Objectives and Standards. Our direction is to establish reasonable time standards for review and processing of permit applications, plans and subsequent issuance of permits and periodic inspections. The standards are to account for all required duties such as enforcement of the Erosion Control Policy and the State Build- ing Code requirements. BACKGROUND: Activities of the Building Inspection Division are defined by the mandatory Building Code which is contained in both State statutes and regulations, by City Codes and Ordinances, and by City policies. Most of the activi- ties center around the issuance of permits which are required by law and which depend upon the verification that the applicant has submitted plans and other materials which demonstrate the proposed work has been designed in acordance with the applicable code. The applications and plans, therefore, require checking and verification before issu- ance of the permits can be authorized. Once permits have been issued, the law requires that the permitted work be inspected so to verify that the code requirements have been met. Most inspections relative to permits are requested by the permitees and are provided on a demand/response basis. Other inspections are performed by the City as a random check on on-going work and are performed in response to complaints or requests (where permits are not necessarily involved). State laws and local requirements, including financial accounting rules, establish a variety of administrative procedures which must be followed. This is to assure sound record keeping and sound financial management, since substantial fees are involved with the number of permits that are issued. Several years ago, we implemented an automated permit issuance system which assists us substantially in performing the latter. The desirability of performance standards in the areas of permit issuance and inspec- tion is defined mostly by the requirements of what can be termed "customer service". It is also a means by which the level of productivity can be gauged. Page two Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 March 31, 1988 PRIMARY ISSUES & ANALYSIS There are several basic items which must be appreciated if such standards are to be practical and meaningful. A.) Applications must be complete. We have developed detailed checklists and pro- cedural information, in conjunction with the Plymouth Developers Council, to assist applicants in assembling their applications. Incomplete applications require additional time, since the applicant needs to be informed of the deficiencies and usually needs time to overcome the deficiency. b.) Construction plans must meet or exceed the State Building Code as to struc- tural and life -safety matters. Plans which do not meet or exceed those stand- ards must be revised and that can take time. Plan checking by the City is not plan perfection" and we operate on the premise that applicants have the expertise personally or through consultants to develop the information and material required. The State Building Code is applicable throughout the metropolitan area and is not unique to Plymouth. c.) The demand for services, volume of permits issued, and volume of inspection requests or not easily forecast. There needs to be available the resource of supplemental help in the form of temporary personnel who can be hired or contracted to perform plan checking services (primarily) and inspections. d.) Persons requesting inspections for permitted work should request the inspec- tion is actually ready. We have prepared, in conjunction with the Plymouth Development Council, a checklist for permitees so they can identify all the items that should be ready when they call for an inspection. We find that we often have the "airline reservation" problem where developers will call and request inspections in advance, and in anticipation that they will have the work done. If the inspector arrives and the work is not done, it has been a waste of the inspector's time and has impacted the service performance for some other work which was ready. e.) Requests for inspection of critical work, such as poured concrete and sewer and water line installation, where third parties are involved, i.e., concrete contractors and excavators, must be coordinated. This means that, before scheduling concrete or digging at a specific time, the builder should arrange for an inspection at that time, or at least verify when inspections would be available within a business day. We have a staff and authorization for temporary help which we find can reasonably respond to the demands for our service at this time. As the City grows the level of people problems" will increase and the demand for those services, particularly in the area of building, zoning, and environmental will require either more manpower or diversion of manpower from construction -related services. Finally, it needs to be recognized that the Building Division performs another task that is very time consumptive and which rises as the homeowning population increases: People expect educational services from the Building Inspection Division as homeowner projects are undertaken such as the construction of garages, house additions, an decks. The retail outlets for building material and other sources commonly refer Page three Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988 March 31, 1988 people to the Building Inspection Division for "What You Need to Know" , to assure a successful project. One inexperienced homeowner with a relatively minor construction project can take more time than a project of a much more complex nature proposed and undertaken by a professional developer. We strive to serve both customers well. The important consideration is that in judging the adequacy of performance by time standards, one needs to also consider the nature of the particular project and qualifi- cations of the particular customer. Thus, the standard for performance of the various services are meaningful when predetermined and predefined conditions are understood and satisfied. When appears that standards are not being met, it is my experience that the first thing that should be done is to evaluate the nature of the work and to define the circumstances. The matter of Ordinance enforcement in response to complaints or observed violations and the matter of enforcement of policies such as the Erosion Control Policy are not easily subjected to performance standards of the same type. The Erosion Control Policy establishes time frames within which a developer must resolve the problem before further enforcement measures are taken. The inspectors are charged with not performing inspections when violations of that Policy are observed and verified. We have operated for a number of years on the premise that, at least during the main construction season, construction -related inspection and enforcement take precedence over other requests for enforcement actions involving zoning and housing codes, for example. I anticipate that the Development Services Technician will be able to enhance the delivery of those services. Performance of those enforcement actions is not best gauged by the time since the time to complete enforcement and, possibly, prosecution is defined by the problem itself and the ability of other agencies to do their work. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend your consideration and approval of the attached performance standards. Building Official Joe Ryan and I have concluded that these are reasonable standards given the availability of budgeted funds for hiring supplemental and temporary help and services during peak periods. We continue to work with the Plymouth Development Council and individual builders to enhance the knowledge about the requirements for obtaining permits and for obtaining inspections. This has substantially improved general conditions over the past couple of years. We conclude, however, that the most efficient operation will be that which favors the applicant or customer who has done their homework and has submitted a complete and accurate application or who has made a bona fide request for inspection of completed work. Others who are unable to accomplish those basic requirements readily, are taken in the order of available man- power and as time permits. The Development Services Technician should significantly improve the level of service to citizens and homeowners who seek information and some basic education. Attanhment Proposed Performance Standards for Permit Issuance and Inspections DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSPECTION SERVICES The following are the Performance Standards of the Building Inspection Division for Plan Checking Services, Permit Issuance, and Inspection Services. Division personnel strive to operate within these standards which are considered maximums. Checklists and information sheets are available to assist customers in defining what is necessary for a complete application for a permit and what constitutes complete work for an inspection. puestions and comments regarding this should be directed to the Building Official. 1. Applications for new work and for remodeling work for single-family and two- family Building Permits -- maximum of 7 business days upon receipt of completed application and materials. Additional time, up to 7 working days, may be needed to evaluate revised plans and information. 2. Application for permit for single-family and two-family plumbing, sewer and water, mechanical work -- maximum of one business day upon receipt of completed application forms. 3. Applications for commercial/industrial/multiple family dwelling building per- mits (new construction and additions) -- maximum of 15 business days upon receipt of completed application and materials. Additional periods of up to 15 business days may be needed when revised plans and information are submitted. A letter detailing any plan deficiency is provided to all applicants. Also, and very importantly, related special conditions of approval, detailed in the City Council action or administrative action authorizing the permits, must be satisfied before permits are actually issued. 4. Applications for Building Permits for finishing tenant areas in commercial/ industrial buildings -- maximum of 5 working days upon receipt of completed application and materials. 5. Applications for plumbing, sewer and water, fire sprinkling systems, and mechanical systems permits in commercial/industrial/multiple family dwelling buildings -- maximum of 3 business days upon receipt of completed application, plans, and materials. This applies when such applications are made separately from the Building Permit for these classes of work. 6. Applications for sign permits and for building moving permits -- maximum of 5 business days upon receipt of completed application and materials. 7. Application materials for grading permits will be reviewed and routed to the City Engineer for required approval within 2 business days of receipt. The permit will be ready for issuance within one business day after receiving the approval from the City Engineer and after any required Performance Agreements and financial guarantees have been satisfied. 8. Inspections will be scheduled for the next business day unless no time period is open; in that case, the inspection will be scheduled for the following business day. Requests for specific times will be honored whenever possible; when desired times are not available the next business day, the customer will be so informed so that an alternate time can be selected. Page two Standards NOTE: Delivery of concrete and availability of special inspection equipment and personnel should be scheduled by the customer in advance so that the City inspection can be arranged within this time frame. The City cannot assure that an inspector will be available for checking critical work such as pouring concrete or filling or back -filling sewer and utility trenches, and other special tests on short notice. These work items and tests should be scheduled so that they coincide with the confirmed time of the inspection. NOTE: A responsible, knowledgeable person should be available on the Job site when inspection required by a building permit for new construction work are scheduled. This facilitates the communication between the inspector and the contractor, particularly where corrective work is required. NOTE: The Erosion Control Policy will be enforced in accordance with the terms of the Policy; when violations are observed and verified, required inspections will not be made and the violations will be referred to the Public Works Department within one business day, where corrective measures are needed that involve the developer or where street cleaning is involved. The permittee will be notified within one business day when corrective work on the site is needed so that proper erosion control measures can be installed. 9"14 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PAYMENT CONTRACT FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2 PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL Payment No. Contractor Proiect Amount 4 & Midwest Fire Protection, Fire Station No. 1 & 2 $3,703.00 Final Inc. Fire Sprinkler System In 1985 the City awarded a contract for installing a fire sprinkler system at Fire Station No. 1 and 2. The contractor substantially completed the work in 1985, but there were some minor items which had not been completed and; therefore, the City had not finally accepted the work. The system has been in operation since October 1985. The work not completed was for items such as replacing a few damaged ceiling tile, painting some of the piping and installing decorative plates at the sprinkler heads. The City has been holding 10% of the funds to ensure the completion of the work. Although we periodically reminded the contractor of work yet to be completed, they did not choose to do the work until this winter. All the work has now been completed and it is recommended that the project be accepted and final payment made to the contractor. The final contract amount is 150 less than the original contract because of a minor change in the scope of the project. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the work and approving Payment No. 4 and Final. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Request Resolution CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of 1988. The following members were present: , The following members were absent: XXX its adoption: XXX XXX introduced the following Resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. 88 - REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. as contractor, have entered into an agreement for a fire sprinkler system at Fire Station No. 1 and 2, said agreement being dated July 15, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Engineer, Michaud, Cooley, Erickson and Associates, Inc., has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the original contract amount was $38,530.00, and the value of the work to date is $38,380.00. 2. That the work performed by the Contractor for a fire sprinkler system at Fire Station No. 1 and 2 and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of 3,703.00 to Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. is hereby approved and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: , The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. XXX XXX XXX s REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: March 31, 1988 FOR PERIOD: PLACE: Plymouth, Minnesota FROM: Sept. 30, 1985 to March 31, 1986 PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1 & 2 Fire Sprinkling System CONTRACTOR: Midwest Fire Protection Inc ADDRESS: 324 Harding St. N. E. Minneapolis, Mn. 55413 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 4 and Final SUMMARY: Contract Amount Change Order Value Completed to Date Amount Earned Less Retainage 0 Sub -Total Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 and Final OWNER APPROVAL: By: Date: 38,530.00 0- 38,380.00 38,380.00 0- 38,380.00 34,677.00 3,703.00 Approved By: Director of Public Works City of Plymouth By Approved By: By: Contractor 4 q'.T MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: ADOPTING DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND RE -SPREADING OF ASSESSMENTS OUTLOT D - HERITAGE WEST ADDITION LEVY NO. 10059 AND 10970 In 1985 the City Council adopted assessments on the Vern Midthun property for the improvement of Xenium Lane north of the Northwest Business Campus. A portion of these assessments were deferred in accordance with our Deferred Assessment Policy." Since that time the property has been platted as part of Heritage West Addition. Mr. Midthun has also entered into a Contract for Deed to sell his property to Wayne Jopp. Attached is a request from Vern Midthun and Wayne Jopp to have the deferred assessments levied against the property and the existing assessments re -spread to other lots within Heritage West 2nd Addition. This request would remove all assessments from the Midthun property (Outlot D) and place them on the single-family lots which Mr. Jopp owns. We are in agreement with this request since, in all likelihood, the City will collect the assessments sooner, as single-family homes are built on the platted lots. Attached are two resolutions which are recommended for City Council adoption. One resolution places the deferred assessments on Outlot D and the second resolution re -spreads the assessments on Outlot D to the other lots owned by Mr. Jopp in Heritage West 2nd Addition. Fred G. Moore, P.E. FGM:kh attachments: Resolutions Request CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: _ The following members were absent: XX): adoption: meeting of the City Council of day of , introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RESPREADING OF DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS Levy h1c. 1 o 970 WHEREAS, in accordance with City Policy certain parcels of homestead land were assessed at a residential rate with the remainder of the assessment deferred at the established rate; and WHEREAS, the deferral was for a five year period provided, however, that if the property is sold not used by the owner for his homestead or further subdivided during that five year period, the deferred assessment shall become payable. WHEREAS, an agreement has been made by the present owner to have the deferred assessments re -spread; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Council to determine the period of years over which the deferred assessment is to be paid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the assessments listed below which were previously deferred be respread for the period of years indicated: Number of Interest P.I.D. N0. Levv Year Rate 15-118-22-43-0044 10970 5 9.36% Assessment 6,977.90 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 1989, and shall bear interest at the rate of 9.36% pet annum from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this Resolution until December 31, 1989. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. U Resolution No. 88 - Page 2 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Director, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution; and he may at any time thereafter pay the City Finance Director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Finance Director to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 9 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 1988. The following members were present: The following members were absent: adoption: meeting of the City Council of day of , introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - RE -SPREADING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY NO. 10059 AND 10970 Resei i:on Il o, ro.n Oilier resol.i:o.. WHEREAS, pursuant to the adoption of Resolution No's 85-788 and * 8B- assessments were levied by the City Council for Project No. 505, Xenium Lane; and WHEREAS, the property owners of Outlot D, Heritage West Addition, requested assessments be re -spread for the above mentioned improvements; and WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has agreed to do so; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the assessments be re -spread in the following amounts as they apply to each parcel here listed: ORIGINAL LEVY REVISED LEVY Levy # Levy # Levy Levy # P.I.N. 10059 10970 10059 410970 15-118-22-43-0044 13,246.20 $ 6,977.90 $ 0.00 0.00 15-118-22-43-0045 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0047 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0049 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0050 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0051 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0052 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0053 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0054 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0055 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0056 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19 15-118-22-43-0057 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20 15-118-22-43-0059 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20 15-118-22-43-0060 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20 15-118-22-43-0061 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20 15-118-22-43-0062 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20 Total 13,246.20 $ 6,977.90 $ 13,246.20 6,977.90 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C?CiC X)C .X 7GClYiC I ATTORNEYS GEORGE E. ANTRIM. III THOMAS J. MILLER ANTRIM & ASSOCIATES, P.A. SUITE 3801 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE: (61 2) 3441 550 November 25, 1987 Mr. Dan Campbell Engineering Department City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 I Re: Contract for Deed between Vern Midthun and Wayne R. Jopp, d/b/a Wayne R. Jopp Construction Co., Inc.; Our Office File No. 8710A-73. Dear Mr. Campbell: I am sending this letter to you pursuant to our recent telephone conversation, wherein I informed you that it is the intention of the parties signed below to transfer all of the special assessments levied against Outlot D of Heritage West Addition to the following parcels in equal amounts: 1. Lot 1, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition; 2. Lot 3. Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition; 3. Lot 5, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition; 4. Lot 6, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition; 5. Lot 7, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition; 6. Lot 1, Block 2 Heritage West Second Addition; 7. Lot 1, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition; 8. Lot 2, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition; 9. Lot 3, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition; 10. Lot 4, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition; 11. Lot 1, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition; 12. Lot 3, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition; 13. Lot 4, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition; 14. Lot 5, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition; 15. Lot 6, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition. and Mr. Dan Campbell Engineering Department City of Plymouth November 25, 1987 Page Two It is our understanding at this time, that there are approximately $18,500.00 worth of assessments against Outlot D of Heritage West Addition which is currently the homestead of Vern and Arniss Midthun. Dated this 25th day of November, 1987. ANTRIM & ASSOCIATES, P.A. By Thomag J. Miller Attorney at Law I hereby agree with the above -request in the above -captioned matter. Dated this day of November, 1987. VERN & ARNISS MIDTHUN, Owners of Outlot D Heritage West Addition By Vern Midthun, Owner And By Arniss Midthun, Owner I hereby agree with the above -request in the above -captioned matter. Dated this 't' day of November, 1987. WAYNE R. JOPP, d/b/a Wayne R. Jopp Construction Company, Inc., Owner of Outlot D Heritage West Addition fSy_ -/ Wayne R. Jon ; b/a Wayne R. Jop Construction Company, Inc. 0 L' 0 z N H A W jai` 101100 ILul OOOr/-- 1 0 06 zf/ o R ` 00'097 3IS,yf.88N - oC 2O La 2 Q O m 2 0 z N H A W vy vol r7 89N - f0"06 yy TO lo-ilno ES,891V---- ---- N N WW S U, jai` 101100 ILul OOOr/-- 1 0 06 zf/ o R ` 00'097 3IS,yf.88N - oC vy vol r7 89N - f0"06 yy TO lo-ilno ES,891V---- ---- N N WW S U, w UJt La 2 vy vol r7 89N - f0"06 yy TO lo-ilno ES,891V---- ---- N N WW S U, CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: March 31, 1988 09S TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager , SUBJECT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND 6, AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 5-1 AND 6-1 REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt resolutions scheduling public hearings for April 18 on proposal to establish two additional economic development districts and two tax increment financing districts. 2. BACKGROUND: I had planned to present these proposals to the Council in late April or May. The Legislature, however, is considering amendments which would, if adopted, preclude the City from establishing additional economic development districts and/or tax increment districts. Because of this potential, I believe it is prudent to proceed to establish these new districts at this time. 3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The City Council has previously established four economic development districts. The purpose for creating these development districts, and subsequent tax increment financing districts, has been to provide a means by which the City could proceed in an orderly way to complete major transportation improvements required for the continued development of commercial/industrial properties in the community. Because neither the federal, state or county governments have had available appropriate funding for the completion of certain major road improvements, which are under their jurisdiction, it has fallen to the City to develop some portions of county roads and/or improvements to state, county or federal facilities. I anticipate that such a condition will continue. Economic Development District No. 5 would provide the opportunity for the City to capture tax increments which would assist in financing the extension of County Road 9, westerly from I-494 to Fernbrook Lane and perhaps beyond. It also could be used to assist in financing any upgrading on Fernbrook Lane which may be required as a result of continuing development in that area (see attached Exhibit A). TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND 6, AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 5-1 AND 6-1 March 31, 1988 Page 2 Economic Development District No. 6 (Exhibit B) would be established to assist in three potential improvement areas. The first would be to assist in financing the extension of 6th Avenue, easterly from Pineview Lane to Highway 55. This project is currently contemplated in the City's Capital Improvement Program for 1990. The second component would be to assist in the extension of County Road 73, northerly from former County Road 15, to connect to Highway 55. This project, while being directly related to the 6th Avenue improvement, may not be constructed at the same time. With the completion of I-394 and the interchange at County Road 73, it is anticipated that there will be additional traffic on County Road 73, both north and southbound, resulting in the need to improve the geometrics of County Road 73 as it intersects with Highway 55. Attached is an illustration (Exhibit C) of alignment of this proposed improvement, prepared by Strager-Roscoe-Fausch for the City of Plymouth. The Council has previously reviewed several possible alignments for these improvements, and this was selected as the most preferred. The final improvement would involve intersection improvements at West Medicine Lake Boulevard and Highway 55. This improvement would be needed in conjunction with the proposed Marcus Development and/or the redevelopment of the Schiebe Shopping Center. Prior to the April 18 public hearing, we will know whether or not the Legislature has taken any action to restrict the City's ability to establish or modify development districts or tax increment financing districts. If they take such action, and the effective date of the legislation is prior to the public hearing date, this exercise may well be in vain. On the other hand, if they take action and the effective date is after the public hearing date, the City may still be able to effectively carry out the programs generally outlined above. 4. RECOMNENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The use of economic development districts and tax increment financing districts in the City of Plymouth has been totally responsible and supportive of community and regional objectives. The City has been a leader in using tax increment financing as a means by which sound development proposals have been able to proceed in conjunction with the extension of the necessary transportation facilities. In large measure, these transportation facilities have been the jurisdictional responsibility of other agencies. I believe that it is sound public policy to continue this practice and I accordingly recommend that the Council adopt the attached resolution scheduling a public hearing for April 18. OW:kec attachment 61 OL 101 ivi I IM NJ MTA = I tOl am aolUson 0 11.-2r: 0 w G y y Si s•C }t'.. r t• F •. w A.; 4q1 Q# I ? rP ,?. yea - xr .a i ` 3.. rr•... ti Ty : Fes. i i•. a°l c`S! 4Rp €sem , . "c i t E'im rs'i 8C-P321AV 1 8 P 001540 - , ` , 1lYV._F 0895 C 3 d{'d:1'l C i•Tdl'2 Aid jA`Ja`.-. . 1/ {li -.1. V t . w't EXHIBIT C fsew.+• Y fir y r r ` ; fir' y,; ` ` . } t , , kr G. T #, 7F - a ` Sci I Y ' r ' . n cif f. - j:.A to j R+s _ ''r • " may_ y .Y ' v_ s• i• , ryt ,moi S -1 fi Add. t- Qt,*,., N4 FIGURE 18 L , INC • ; In•1,, ••Id• 11 •,'I,q ^., :IU Jn qq• .. CITY OF PLYMOUTH •;pTc J:Ic •Jca:.'.:r r, r,att. ;...l: r. •----- a.rned Ir ... ..., .. .,... c„ail i rv0' S. KOTKE 11.1 I f•1• Iea •I•.•d 7E•-I(:Nf 0 (11 •.),- 2 I".,,.., .;,.•',. ,,•, ,, CONCEPT PLAN FOR -----__.__ L. ERICKSON _ — ERS t'•'••"''•"••' COUNTY HIGHWAY 15 r.F.r.rKrnrA, —""— Fu.- l -K -Ir NO 1•a •• BETWEEN CO. HWY. 61 AND T.H. 55 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 88 - ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 WHEREAS, the City Manager, in a report dated March 30, 1988, recommended that the City Council consider establishing Economic Development District No. 5 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1; and WHEREAS, the City Council, on April 4, 1988, reviewed the City Manager's report and noted that the creation of such a development district and tax increment financing district would assist in achieving certain public objectives; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that an essential first step in the establishment of proposed Economic Development District No. 5 and Tax Increment Financing District 5-1 requires the establishment of the development program for Municipal Development District No. 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 18, 1988 for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program for Municipal Development District No. 5 and the establishment of a Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469; and FURTHER, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of said hearing in substantially the form of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, April 18, 1988 in the Council Chambers in the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program for Municipal Development District No. 5, establishment of an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing District No. 5-1 (TIF District), and the approval of a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District. The TIF District is proposed to be located within Development District No. 5. The general boundaries of the District are as follows: Commencing at the center line of the intersection of Interstate Highway I-494 and T.H. 55; thence westerly along the center line of Highway 55 to the west line of the Fox Meadows First Addition; thence northerly along the west line of the Fox Meadows First Addition to the north line of the Fox Meadows First Addition; thence easterly along the north line of Fox Meadows First Addition to the center line of Fernbrook Lane; thence northerly along the center line of Fernbrook Lane to center line of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 118, Range 22; thence easterly along said center line of the northwest quarter of Section 15 to the center line of Interstate Highway I-494; thence southerly along said center line to the point of beginning. The legal description of property in the proposed TIF District are as follows: P.I.N. 15-118-22-23-0012 P.I.N. 15-118-22-24-0006, 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011, 0012 P.I.N. 15-118-22-31-0008, 0009 P.I.N. 15-118-22-32-0074 P.I.N. 21-118-22-14-0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0012, 0013, 0018 P.I.N. 21-118-22-41-0023 P.I.N. 22-118-22-22-0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0010, 0011, 0014, 0016, 0017 P.I.N. 22-118-22-23-0003, 0007 P.I.N. 22-118-22-32-0011, 0012, 0013 The establishment of the Development Program, TIF Plan and the TIF District are proposed to be approved, established, and adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 Draft copies of the Development Program for the Development District and the TIF Plan will be available for public inspection at the office of the CityClerkafterApril4duringnormalCitybusinesshours. Any person wishing to express a view concerning the Development Program ortheproposedTIFPlan, will be heard orally or in writing at the publichearing. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL s/ Laurie Brandt City Clerk Dated: April 4, 1988 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council oftheCityofPlymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19 The following members were present: The following members were absent: adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 88 - ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469 WHEREAS, the City Manager, in a report dated March 30, 1988, recommended that the CityCouncilconsiderestablishingEconomicDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 6-1; and WHEREAS, the City Council, on April 4, 1988, reviewed the City Manager's report and noted that the creation of such a development district and tax increment financingdistrictwouldassistinachievingcertainpublicobjectives; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that an essential first step in theestablishmentofproposedEconomicDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and Tax Increment Financing District 6-1 requires the establishment of the development program for Municipal Development District No. 6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 18, 1988 for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program forMunicipalDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and the establishment of a Tax Increment FinancingDistrictNo. 6-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469; and FURTHER, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of said hearing in substantially the form of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by following voted in favor thereof: and upon vote being taken thereon, the The following voted against or abstained: Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, April 18, 1988 in the Council Chambers in the Plymouth City Center, 3400 PlymouthBoulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program for Municipal Development DistrictNo. 6, establishment of an Economic Development Tax Increment FinancingDistrictNo. 6-1 (TIF District), and the approval of a Tax IncrementFinancingPlanfortheTIFDistrict. The TIF District is proposed to belocatedwithinDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6. The general boundaries of the District are as follows: Commencing at the center line of T.H. 55 and County Road 18, thencesoutherlyalongsaidcenterlinetothesouthcitylimits; thence westerly along the south City limits to the center line of PineviewLane; thence northerly along the center line of Pineview Lane to thecenterlineofthenorthwestquarterofSection35, Township 118, Range22; thence easterly along said center line and also the center line of the northeast quarter of said Section 35 to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 35; thence northerly along the west line of said northeast quarter of said northeast quarter, Section 35 to the north line of said Section35; thence easterly along said north section line to the northeastcornerofSection35; thence southerly along the east line of saidSection35tothecenterlineofT.H. 55; thence easterly along saidcenterlinetothepointofbeginning. The legal description of property in the proposed TIF District are asfollows: P.I.N. 35-118-22-11-0017, 0018, P.I.N. 35-118-22-13-0004, 0006, P.I.N. 35-118-22-14-0004, 0005, 0015, 0018, 0019 P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0007, 0008, P.I.N. 36-118-22-41-0005, 0006, P.I.N. 36-118-22-43-0202, 0203 P.I.N. 36-118-22-44-0006, 0007, 0036 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011 0008, 0009, 0010, 0012, 0013, 0014, 0009, 0010 0007 111: The establishment of the Development Program, TIF Plan and the TIF Districtareproposedtobeapproved, established, and adopted pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Chapter 469. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 Draft copies of the Development Program for the Development District and the TIF Plan will be available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk after April 4 during normal City business hours. Any person wishing to express a view concerning the Development Program or the proposed TIF Plan, will be heard orally or in writing at the public hearing. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL s/ Laurie Brandt City Clerk Dated: April 4, 1988