HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 04-04-1988CITY OF PLYMOUTH
A G E N D A
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 4, 1988
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
in normal sequence on the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION
3. ROLL CALL
4. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
5. CONSENT AGENDA
6. MINUTES - Approval of Minutes of the Special Council
meeting of March 28, 1988
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vacation of drainage and utility easement in
Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition
8. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING - County Road 10 south
frontage road connection to 57th Ave.
9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Robert Wachter for Dimension Development Co.,
Inc. PUD Concept Plan for residential (single and
multi -family) development on property located at
14915 C.R. 9 (88018)
B. Resolution making negative declaration for EIS for
Prime Development Corporation for Prime West
Business Park located northwest of State Highway
55 and Quaker Lane (87123/E)
C. City of Plymouth. Site Plan for Fire Station 3
east of Dunkirk Lane between 31st Ave. and Highway
55 (88012)
D. Final plan and specifications for St. Mary's Park
9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
E. Approval to proceed with Plymouth Creek soccer
field
F. Garbage Haulers license renewals
G. Building Permit review, processing, issuance and
inspection time standards
H. Resolution approving payment No. 4 and Final for
fire station Nos. 1 and 2 sprinkler system
I. Resolution approving respreading of deferred
assessments for Outlot D, Heritage West Addition
3. Tax Increment Financing proposal to set public
hearing to establish Economic Development
Districts Nos. 5 and 6 and Tax Increment Financing
District No. 5-1 and 6-1
10. ADJOURNMENT
I G
M I N U T E S
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 28, 1988
A special meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to
order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Cham-
bers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on March 28,
1988.
PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker,
Zitur, and Sisk, City Manager Willis, Assistant
Manager Boyles, Planning Director Tremere, Public
Works Director Moore, Public Safety Director
Carlquist, Finance Director Hahn, City Attorney Heine,
and City Clerk Brandt
ABSENT: None
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- CONSENT AGENDA
member Ricker, to adopt the consent agenda as presented. Item 4
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- MINUTES - REGULAR
member Ricker, to approve the minutes of the March 21 Regular MEETING, MARCH 21
Council Meeting as submitted. 1988
Item 5*
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Manager Willis updated the Council on the activities of the LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
legislature and summarized proposed changes in the property tax Item 6
law and how they would affect Plymouth.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Manager Willis reported that the League of Minnesota Cities AWARD OF INSURANCE
Insurance Trust is the only company that provided quotes on the Item 7-A
City's property and liability insurance. The cost is essential-
ly the same as last year.
Director Hahn reported that, based on the projected savings that
the City adopt option 2 which increases the deductibles. He
pointed out the changes from the present policy to the proposed
policy.
Special Council Meeting
March 28, 1988
Page 89
Councilmember Ricker asked about the class action suit against
insurance carriers for collusion.
Don Kuplic, the City's insurance agent, stated there are several
states in the suit and explained the charges.
Councilmember Ricker reminded the Council that with increasing
limits on self insurance the City was incurring additional
risks. He noted that he believed these risks to be appropriate
in light of our insurance risk reserves, but that sometime a
large claim would likely be made against the reserve.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NO. 88-215
ber Zitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 AWARDING THE CONTRACT AWARDING INSURANCE
FOR INSURANCE FOR THE 1988/1989 INSURANCE PROGRAM, Option 2, to Item 7-A
the League of Minnesota Cities at a cost of $132,387.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 88-216
member Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 88-216 APPROVING DISBUR- DISBURSEMENTS FOR
SEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 29, 1988 in the amount of PERIOD ENDING 2/29/88
1,932,036.48. Item 7-B*
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Director Moore reported that the contractor for wells 8 and 9
has run into a problem with the pump delivery. There is a com-
pletion deadline of April 1. The portion of the contract for
repair work will be completed on wells 2 and 3 this week. The
pumps are scheduled to be delivered the third week of April
leaving a May 1 operation date. A plan has been set up that a
temporary pump will be installed at well No. 8 if the new pumps
cannot be delivered. If a temporary pump is installed, it can-
not be taken out of operation and replaced with the new ones un-
til September.
Mayor Schneider read a proclamation declaring the month of May,
1988 as Spring clean-up, fix -up, paint -up and planting month in
the City of Plymouth.
The Council accepted and filed a report on the hiring of a human
resources specialist. Manager Willis recommended the matter be
reviewed in 1989.
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Item 8-A
1988 CLEANUP PROGRAM
Item 8-B
HUMAN RESOURCE
SPECIALIST REPORT
Item 8-C
Manager Willis reported that the Public Safety Department has REVISED FIRE ALARM
had a problem dealing with false police and fire alarms and sug- ORDINANCE
gested amendments to the existing ordinance to tighten it up and Item 8-D
try to further control the number of false alarms.
Special Council Meeting
March 28, 1988
Page 90
Discussion followed on the number of responses per year and the
cost of the permits.
Director Carlquist stated the proposed ordinance would set fines
for police and fire false alarm systems immediately after the
first false alarm. Most of the false alarms are caused by em-
ployee carelessness or faulty detectors. One of the problems is
that the City doesn't know how many or which businesses and res-
idents have alarm systems.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked what happens to a false alarm cal-
led in by a person.
Director Carlquist answered that fines are levied only for sys-
tems that send out false alarms.
Councilmember Sisk pointed out that some alarms are initiated by
the public.
Director Carlquist stated that false alarms which are not in the
control of the owner are not fined.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- ORDINANCE NO. 88-13
member Zitur, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 88-13 RELATING TO ALARM REVISED FIRE ALARM
SYSTEMS; AMENDING SECTION 1155 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE revis- ORDINANCE
ing the first reissued fire permit fee to $100 and subsequent Item 8-D
permits at $200.
Manager Willis pointed out that an annual $25 fee is required
for registration of each system, however, if the resident or
company registers in December, the fee will be waived.
Director Carlquist noted the ordinance would take effect in Jan-
uary, 1989 to give staff time to notify businesses and resi-
dents.
Manager Willis stated it is important to hold a public informa-
tion meeting to address resident concerns, but he doesn't expect
opposition to the ordinance.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Zitur, directing staff that each issue of Plymouth on Parade be-
tween now and February, 1989 include notice of the new ordi-
nance, a leaflet be prepared for people having false alarms in-
dicating the ordinance, the ordinanace be broadcast on cable,
and notice be placed in the water bills.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Special Council Meeting
March 28, 1988
Page 91
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, to endorse the bid of Minneapolis/St. Paul as the lo-
cation of the 1996 summer Olympic Games.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Manager Willis pointed out that some of the scheduled meeting
dates are on the same day as regular Council meetings.
The Council adopted the schedule.
SUPPORTING SITE OF
1996 OLYMPIC GAMES
Item 8-E
1989/90 BUDGET
CALENDAR
Item 8-F
Manager Willis stated that, after the issue was discussed CONSIDERATION TO
recently, the petitioner's attorney asked that the Council con- AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE
sider a change in the ordinance to allow automotive service sta- (87125)
tions in the B-1 zone. Discussion followed regarding the March Item 8-G
24, 1988 staff report.
Director Tremere stated that, if the Council agreed, staff will
investigate the appropriate means of implementing that policy
direction. Another means to accomplish a similar result would
be to create a freeway district which identifies specific areas
adjacent to a freeway or at interchanges where certain types of
commercial business can be accommodated. He presented a map
showing the zones which would be affected.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated her concern is that the proposal
doesn't address the overall benefit to the City, but is aimed at
only one parcel. She doesn't support an amendment that would
have a citywide impact.
Councilmember Sisk stated there are a limited number of sites in
the City along 494 which could be considered because some are
already zoned differently or already developed. A freeway dis-
trict may have merit.
Councilmember Ricker stated these are the same alternative ques-
tions the Council could have considered when they first consid-
ered the petition. He doesn't favor changing the B-1 zone in
the City. The owners should have understood the limits on the
use of the property before purchasing it.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, directing staff to study
the potential of establishing a freeway district in certain
areas along 494.
Motion died for lack of a second.
It was the consensus of the Council that the proposed change in
the B-1 zone is neither necessary or desirable.
Councilmember Zitur stated the Northwest Human Services Board is CCR REPORTS
moving to Brooklyn Park. He asked for an alternate representa- Item 8-H
tive to the Board. Councilmember Vasiliou offered to be first
alternate and Manager Willis stated he would be second.
Special Council Meeting
March 28, 1988
Page 92
Councilmember Vasiliou reported on her presentation at Widsten
school for American Pride Week.
OTHER BUSINESS
Councilmember Ricker stated Councilmember Zitur's proposed Citi- OTHER BUSINESS
zen Safety Advisory Committee contains more than he would like
to see in a final version but there are safety areas which would
work better with more input from the residents. However, he
doesn't want to infringe on the present safety committee's res-
ponsibility.
Discussion followed on which items could be considered and
whether the committee should be ongoing or problem specific.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmem-
ber Ricker, that staff look into what the committee charge would
be and check with other cities on their activities.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider stated many home buyers are not aware that they
have obligations as part of a PUD, such as maintenance of
trails, outlots, etc., because the builder doesn't tell them,
and they may have to pay dues to accomplish this.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Sisk, directing staff to research: 1) alternatives the Council
may have to better ensure more information is passed to the ul-
timate consumer of single family lots and homes; and 2) the fi-
nancial guarantee and the development contract include a de-
scription as to what is involved with the ultimate project, such
as what outlots will look like when done and the guarantee to
install improvements as planned and approved. Also, relevant
ordinance standards should also be considered.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Director Tremere stated there is a question with the Parkers
Lake North 3rd Addition proposed by Laukka Development because
the maximum lot coverage appears to be exceeded by first homes
shown on building permit applications. He presented the devel-
oper's proposal for lot coverage and the staff response. The
question is what should the maximum ground coverage of be, given
the Council's approval of the PUD Plan and the need to regulate
the coverage as the development proceeds. He recommended the
developer's architect provide a table of house size for each lot
as a measure for the building inspectors.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated an "open ended" coverage maximum
was a scary precedent to set.
Special Council Meeting
March 28, 1988
Page 93
Director Tremere stated that Mr. Laukka's attorney proposed the
development will not exceed 25% overall which would include out -
lots and exclude decks. Further discussion followed and the
Mayor recalled the Council approved a specific pian which
included substantial design flexibility.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Vasiliou, directing staff to administer the PUD plan as origi-
nally adopted to assure that what was represented is what is
developed.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Sisk, that a commercial sauna ordinance and an adult book store
ordinance be researched and drafted.
Motion carried, five ayes.
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
City Clerk
7A
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988
tir
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore,—director
of Public Works
FROM : Richard J. Pouliot, Project Coordinator
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION
The City Council received a request from Robert A. Penney, 11814 18th
Avenue North, to vacate a utility and drainage easement on Lot 4, Block
3, Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition. This easement was provided as a
condition for a Lot Consolidation/Split. The house is located on a
portion of this easement which prevents the owner from obtaining
financing and clear title.
Unless new information is presented at the public hearing, it is
recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution vacating
this utility and drainage easement at the conclusion of the public
hearing.
Richard J. Pouliot
RJP:kh
attachment: Resolution
Drawing
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of ,
1988. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
XXX
adoption:
XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF P.I.N. NO. 26-118-22-42-0058 OR
ELMHURST GATEWAY 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, a petition was received to vacate certain utility and drainage easement in
Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for April 4,
1988, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 as amended; and
WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks
prior to the meeting of April 4, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on April 4, 1988, to inform any and all
interested parties relevant to the vacation of said easement in Elmhurst Gateway 2nd
Addition; and
WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easement was not needed for
public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA: That the following utility and drainage easement be vacated:
The Northwest 5 feet of the Northeast 20 feet of the Southeasterly 10 feet
of Lot 4 and that part of Lot 5 lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from a
point on the Northwesterly line thereof, distant 25 feet Northeasterly from
the Northwest corner thereof to a point on the Southeasterly line thereof,
distant 25 feet Northeasterly from the Southwest corner thereof all in
Elmhurst Gateway 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CX C 7Y 'xX XXX
i
v
je
t ` d_ . ` •',` I. .p +`"
ISL
Co
e
s \ 1 ti
i - f' ,,/ OC.' • ./ tri
7
pot
pLacI /
the
Lot
CAWery
R01'95ED LOT PI 10N
4 - %t
7=ici,._..-_',: err.. ...ri.- + .ti
A.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
COUNTY ROAD 10
SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION TO 57TH AVENUE
In February the City Council held a public information meeting on the
preliminary layout for the County Road 10 Improvement Project. The
preliminary plan was prepared by the Hennepin County Department of
Transportation and they were requesting City approval. Based upon comments
from property owners at the public information meeting the City Council
approved the preliminary layout on March 7, 1988, subject to several
conditions. Attached is a copy of the approving City Council resolution.
One of the conditions was to investigate whether the existing frontage road
along the south side of County Road 10 could be connected to 57th Avenue.
At the public information meeting and following the meeting, by petition
the property owners along this frontage road requested this connection.
Before making this determination, the City Council stated that they would
hold an additional public information meeting to inform the property owners
along 57th Avenue of this request. Attached is a letter sent to the
property owners along 57th Avenue and the south frontage road.
From an engineering and construction standpoint, it is feasible to make the
connection as requested. This would improve the traffic conditions on
County Road 10 by eliminating one street connection. A majority of the
right-of-way needed to make this connection is a vacant lot on the 57th
Avenue cul-de-sac.
Unless new information is presented at the public information meeting, it
is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
requesting the County to eliminate the direct connection from the south
frontage road to County Road 10 and connect the frontage road to 57th
Avenue.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachment: Resolution
Letter
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1988. The following members were present: ,
I
The following members were absent:
fXX XXX XXX
its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING PRELIMINARY LAYOUT
COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18
SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD CONNECTION
CITY PROJECT NO. 812
WHEREAS, On March 7, 1988, by Resolution No. 88-163, the City Council gave
preliminary approval to the layout for the County Road 10 Improvement project
subject to six conditions; and
WHEREAS, Condition No. 4 stated that the City Council would hold an additional
public information meeting for the property owners along 57th Avenue and the
frontage road; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the additional public information meeting was to
discuss the feasibility of connecting the existing frontage road along the
south side of County Road 10 to the cul-de-sac at the end of 57th Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held the additional public information meeting on
April 4, 1988; and
WHEREAS, it is feasible and beneficial to connect the existing frontage road
to 57th Avenue and eliminate an additional street connection to County Road
10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the County is requested to connect the south
frontage road along County Road 10 to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac.
FURTHER, the County is requested to purchase the vacant lot at the end of 57th
Avenue immediately in order to prevent the construction of a home on the land
necessary to make the frontage road connection.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXX XXX XXX
F
u C
703. 5_ n 2C3.
LIJ
PARI OF lot 57
43 1 . ir•
44
6 9 (1) ` r 7T2 72 72 72
r' ii' : 2
per,•
c
06. . F I 48 49 5o
A.,
47 (14) 13) (Iq) (15) (sb^
o.
Srtem -
es r: Fottti hoguse
26)... ....
45 D D .
27)
a>
28) 1 13;' -
f
7 72 72 7
0'96' ----- --
QES..e{' t6. . - - "•35'3p y _ _ +- - - - - - tOtS 5i2;.*_, \
is 1 \ _ r _ _ 7 TLTRCL-
30
gs. \ i9 $ r 1 `( 24) _ ..3C.
R - 59. ;R 1015 52' - -
I .5'vemsor
L— —A-, q, rer`V's V C'r- V. °5. _
OOD eatfes .6.0°' Everson Lee
7 ASS I
I ° DS KN g _
29)
9J• Sj
1eTlya'
nde,rs.
5e6r0, • r7.95 GnI;
26(
2iI5C ) (
24) (23)-
0
23)-` (
28 :
i' b 10II
Z
II
tlro
ls
s
101. '`°• (
30) €
a $
57TH AVE. N.
x ,
qq° 6 45i 110 110 114. •I .
R;c-'ars?• ` 9` SORESS 14
air
6F: I
r; (33) At71t nporionNelsonFteck ' ,
I I in n, I lei n22
14.: I / '
97. 15.62"
FS n (20) / 4Q
0.
1 (
19) -
i 0. 1. C o
T
20. 73' o
r12.2
1 b A
2
1 (q) (13) 0:40;' •
1
10' _ • t t $ \
1E . . ', AJ 30.75•
I$' .R., 1 • O 5 71.6"If
1 $
0.,...... TIT.
I 51'
r
Nt.
I II•: - 17• • -.
Z -5
w 164•79
I `
D
March 24, 1988
Dear Property Owner:
The Plymouth City Council will be having an additional Public Information
Meeting at 7:30 p.m., April 4, 1988 on the proposed improvements to County
Road 10. This meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers at the
City Center Building, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. This additional meeting
will only be on the proposal to connect the existing frontage road along
the south side of County Road 10 to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac. If this
connection were made, there would be no connection between the frontage
road and County Road 10. On the other side of this letter is a drawing
showing the connection to the 57th Avenue cul-de-sac.
On February 22 the Council held the first Informational Meeting on County
Road 10. Several of the property owners along the frontage road on the
south side of County Road 10 suggested that this frontage road not be
connected to County Road 10. They stated since there is a vacant lot at
the end of this frontage road, it is possible to make the connection to
57th Avenue. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has examined
the connection to 57th Avenue and has stated it would be feasible to make
this connection.
At this additional Information Meeting the property owners along 57th
Avenue and the frontage road can state their preference with regard to the
connection. If you cannot attend this meeting, you can submit any comments
which you may have in writing.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
FGM:kh
O.Q to
z
p o, e " , . 2 Q Z
10D
P Cr
ILLJ
ell LJ 0
CITY 0' 1""'90CTIi
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a reCt,11 meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 7th day of
March , 1988. The following members were present: ,
Mayor Schneider. Councilmembers Vas iIiou, 12icker, -iter and Sisk
The following members were absent
Councilmemher Sisk
its adoption:
None
X T X JC iC is
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 88-163
APPROVING PRELIMINARY LAYOUT
COUNTY ROAD 10/I-494 TO COUNTY ROAD 18
CITY PROJECT NO. 812
WHEREAS, Layouts No. 1 and No. Base, Project No. 7408 showing the proposed
improvement of County State Aid Highways No. 10 and 61 within the limits of
the City has been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Layouts No. 1 and No. Base be in
all things approved and that Hennepin County is hereby authorized by the City
to acquire all rights-of-way, permits and/or easements required for said
improvement in accordance with said Layouts No. 1 and No. Base subject to the
following:
1. Construct berms along the roadway wherever possible to reduce
noise levels to adjacent properties.
2. Extend the trail along the south side from Kirkwood Lane
westerly to the intersection with New County Road 61.
3. Stage the construction to pro•:ide maximum local access.
4. It appears feasible to connect the existing frontage road
along the south side of County Road 10 to the cul-de-sac at
the end of 57th Avenue. The City Council will hold an
additional public information meeting for the property owners
along 57th Avenue and the frontage road and will notify the
County by April 8, 1988 on whether to make the connection to
57th Avenue or leave the frontage road connection to County
Road 10 as proposed in the preliminary layout. If it is
feasible to make the connection between 57th Avenue and the
frontage road, that the County acquire the needed vacant lot
at the end of 57th Avenue as soon as possible.
5. Review and report to the City on the feasibility of
flattening the curve and moving County Road 10 northerly at
the New County Road 61 intersection.
Resolution No. 88-105
Page Two
6. Lower the proposed grade of County Road 10 west of Kirkwood
Lane approximately two or more feet from the original
proposal to minimize noise impacts.
FURTHER, that final construction plans shall be presented to the City for
approval before a construction contract is awarded.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded byCouncilmemberZitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the followingvotedinfavorthereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker,
Zitur and Sisk '
The following voted against or abstained: Done
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XX X
f X if
9A_
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MAMO
DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director 60--k—
SUBJECT ROBERT WACHTER, DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT PLAN FOR PARKVIEW RIDGE (88018)
ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which approves the Residential
Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Dimension Development
Company, Inc. for property located southwest of Juneau Lane and County Road 9.
The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the Public Informational Hearing on
March 23, 1988, and recommended approval by a 3 - 1 vote.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission spent substantial time discussing the merits of
this proposal as a Planned Unit Development, given the Ordinance
Criteria. Attention was directed to whether effective and suitable common open space
was provided since a significant part of the land area is devoted to single family
detached dwellings. Our recommendation was based on the overall design and the topo-
graphy of this site which represents an in -fill development between developed PUD's.
That is not to say the public park area to the south was deemed a substitute for effec-
tive private open space; rather, it is to say that overall, the PUD satisfies the
intent of the Ordinance and provides a mix of housing type and transition.
A number of residents, particularly from the Cedar Ridge neighborhood to the east, were
present, and stated concerns about ground water drainage and traffic.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
We received the attached letter after the Planning Commission meeting from some resi-
dents who live to the east. We have prepared a qraphic which delineates the flood
plain, and as we indicated to the residents at the Planning Commission meeting, the
concerns about drainage, filling, and traffic will be considered in more detail with
the preliminary plat.
The internal road system has been designed with the intent of discouraging through -
traffic; it should be recognized however that the interconnection of the neighborhoods
is vital to the transportation system for this area. It has been suggested that a
cul-de-sac be provided by closing 39th Avenue North from such neighborhood traffic;
this would have negative consequences to the overall system which is meant to provide
an internal neighborhood street other than County Road 9.
Page two
Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
March 28, 1988
The concerns about filling and drainaqe will be accounted for during the review of the
detailed preliminary plat plans. We are proposing a condition which would focus on
whether the necessary storm water ponding areas in the single family detached portion
of the project should be outlots or whether they should be, perhaps, easements across
individual lots. This hinges on whether the storm water ponding areas should be viewed
as common open space for the recreational benefit of the residents of the PUD.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
This is a Concept Plan and the hearing was an informational hearing. If the Council
approves it, the more detailed preliminary plat/plan will be subject eventually to a
formal public hearinq which will have the benefit of detailed analyses of the issues
raised.
I recommend that the Council focus on whether the PIJD Criteria are met and, thus,
whether this proposal should be granted POD status so that it can proceed to the next
level. The proposal is responsive to the intent of the Ordinance, especially consider-
ing this site and the need for effective transition between two exsiting developments.
The proposed road system should be endorsed as consistent with the City's Transporta-
tion Plan and in consideration of the design which has been proposed as a means of
discouraging unnecessary through traffic.
Attachments:
1. Approving Resolution
2. March 23, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes
3. Resident Correspondence
3. Area Composite Drawing
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19_ The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR FOR PARKVIEW RIDGE FOR
ROBERT WACHTER, DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (88018)
WHEREAS, Robert Wachter, Dimension Development Company, Inc. has requested approval of
a Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the development of "Parkview
Ridge" a proposal for 80 single family detached units and 40 attached townhome units on
approximately 40 acres located southwest of Juneau Lane and County Road 9; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public
Informational Hearinq and has recommended approval;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan for Robert Wachter, Dimension Development Company, Inc., for a development
to be known as "Parkview Ridge" consisting of 80 single family detached dwelling units
and 40 multi -family attached townhomes on approximately 40 acres located southwest of
Juneau Lane and County Road 9, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as
approved by the City Engineer.
3. Maximum density shall be 3.2 units per acre for the land at or above the
established high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as
verified by the City Engineer. A density bonus point is assigned for housing mix.
4. The preliminary plat/plan application shall include an explanation of any request
for lot coverage over 20%. No ground coverage in excess of the Ordinance standard
is approved.
5. Draft restrictive covenants for
preliminary plat/plan application.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
the private open areas shall be submitted with
Page two
Resolution No. 88-
6. An access drive off County Road 9 shall be provided for construction vehicles, and
all construction traffic shall access the property from County Road 9, until the
first home is certified for occupancy.
7. No private drive access shall be permitted to County Road 9; all private drives
shall be provided by internal public streets.
8. Consideration should be given with the preliminary plat as to the most appropriate
means of providing for necessary storm water ponding (outlots versus easements),
and as to whether the required ponding areas constitute common open space.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 23, 1988
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Pauba, Commissioners Zylla,
Marofsky and Tierney
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Wire, Stulberg and Plufka
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director
Blair Tremere
Assistant City Engineer Oof" weeney
Planning Secretary Grac-e--Vineman
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner M fsky, seconded by Commissioner
Tierney to approve e Minutes for March 9, 1988, as
submitted.
VOTE 3 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla abstained.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Pauba announced that due to a time conflict, the
representative for John DeVries was going to be late and,
thus, the application would be heard later in this meeting.
Chairman Pauba introduced the request and an overview of the
March 14, 1988 staff report was provided by Director
Tremere.
Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Kevin Von Riedel, McCombs,
Frank, Roos Associates, representing the petitioner. Mr.
Von Riedel introduced Mr. Bob Wachter, and explained the
background of this application; the unique topography; the
drainage situation; and, assured that this development will
be compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods.
Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. F. Eisenbauer, 3960 Orchid Lane, is concerned that
existing trees be retained for transition, and wants assur-
ance there will be no drainage runoff from this development
to the west. He inquired about completion dates and the
prices of the homes, near the Creekside of Plymouth
development.
67-
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
ROBERT WACHTER
DIMENSION DEVELOPMENT
RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
88018)
Page 68
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1988
Mr. Scott Bratten, 14560 40th Place North, stated concern
with the extension of 39th Avenue North. Vehicles from
Rockford Road and Fernbrook Lane could consider this
extension as a "short-cut" which would produce heavier traf-
fic in their residential neighborhood. Also, he is con-
cerned with the safety of the children who play near the
streets and in the park.
Chairman Pauba asked Engineer Sweeney if vehicles traveling
Fernbrook Lane or County Road 9, would be apt to use this
street extension as a short-cut. Engineer Sweeney said
this should not be the case; such a circuitous residential
route would not save time for a driver., nor would it be any
easier to access County Road 9/Rockford Road. He noted that
traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of
County Road 9 and Fernbrook Lane which will alleviate the
traffic problems people are seeing at this time.
Director Tremere explained further that this street connec-
tion was planned prior to the development of the Cedar Ridge
development, and is meant to serve all these residential
neighborhoods. He agreed with Engineer Sweeney that people
would trend to not use this street for a short-cut.
Commissioner Marofsky pointed out that this street would
carry neighborhood traffic to "Downtown Plymouth" and to
access the major north/south and east/west roadways.
Ms. Patty Bratten, 14560 40th Place North, stated she is
more than aware of the heavy traffic on County Road 9 as it
backs their property; they would not use this street to get
to County Road 9 and she is very concerned about their
children's safety since they often play in the street.
Ms. Julie Howell, 3935 Harbor Lane, stated her opposition to
the extension of 39th Avenue North which would be detrimen-
tal to the safety of children living in Cedar Ridge. She
pointed out that the Cedar Ridge neighborhood would be at
the bottom of a hill which could be a problem during the
winter months. She inquired where construction traffic will
enter and exit for this new development; and whether it
would come through her neighborhood.
Director Tremere reiterated that the street connection is
meant to carry local traffic; he explained the City's trans-
portation plan.
Russ Thour, 14635 39th Avenue North, stated that the people
from the townhomes on the west would use this as a short-cut
and they believe this will pour too much traffic through
their neighborhood. He also stated concern with the drain-
Page 69
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1959
age from this development site and inquired about the swale
on the east side. He stated this has overflowed and caused
flooding in the past. He inquired whether the culvert would
be extended on through the park.
Engineer Sweeney explained that the drainage situation will
be reviewed thoroughly at the preliminary plat and plan
stage for this development. He stated that consulting
engineers have addressed this and that a larger culvert may
be needed, however, sizing and routing has not been deter-
mined at this time.
Director Tremere explained the Concept stage of development;
that this is a public informational hearing to allow people
to understand the type of development under consideration.
At the preliminary plat and plan stage, there is a Public
Hearing, property notices are sent; and, more detailed plans
are prepared by the petitioner which includes the direction
provided by the Commission and Council.
Chairman Pauba explained that the Commission will make a
recommendation on the concept of development and are not
considering detailed development plans this evening.
Bruce Rand, 14515 39th Avenue North, stated he disagrees
with the comments made by the City that this street would
not be used as a short-cut, he believes this will occur. He
stated that when he purchased his lot, he was led to believe
by a realtor and by the design that this street (39th
Avenue) would be a cul-de-sac. He is concerned about the
proposed grading of the higher elevations of this property
and the diminishing wildlife and natural topography.
He stated that an alternative to this the extension should
be pursued, including closing the access onto County Road 9.
Mr. Rand stated that the children in Cedar Ridge are 5 to 7
years of age, and have played in the streets since moving
there, and, have been able to come and go from the play
fields without fear for their safety. Residents access the
City Center area via 34th Avenue and do not need the acces
via 39th Avenue.
Chairman Pauba stated the neighborhood concerns will be for-
warded to the City Council, and the developer's representa-
tive will be asked to answer questions.
Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing.
Page 70
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1988
Mr. Kevin Von Riedel stated that at this time, the active
extent of the grading is not known, there will be some
cut and fill to prepare building pads, and it is a fact that
some wildlife will be displaced because of new development.
He stated that the drainage will be thoroughly reviewed
along with the grading plans. He explained the location of
catch basins and the ponding areas.
Mr. Von Riedel explained the access for heavy equipment dur-
ing the construction phase would be to County Road 9, inter-
nal traffic would not occur until the Certificate of Occu-
pancy is issued for the first building. He noted that the
price range for the homes would be S95,000 - 120,000 for the
townhomes and $130,000 - $180,000 for the single family
homes. He estimates completion in two to three years.
Mr. Von Riedel stated they would maintain matched grading
and would retain the natural tree line. He explained the
method of erosion control. He noted that the existing
buildings on the site will be razed.
Further discussion ensued regarding the culverts and
ponding.
Commissioner Zylla inquired about the issue on lot cover-
age. Mr. Von Riedel stated that with the lot size of 8,400
sq. ft., they would request a higher ratio of ground cover-
age. Director Tremere stated that if the developer proposes
lot coverage of treater than 20%, they would be required to
show the specific lots chosen, and the City would review the
merit of the request based on the retention of natural
topography and vegetation. The City Council had given
direction that this issue would be a decision made during
later stages of development.
Commissioner Tierney asked about the trail location. Mr.
Von Riedel explained the access and location. Director
Tremere noted the requirement for paved trail.
MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE
Tierney to recommend approval for the Planned Unit Develop-
ment Concept Plan for Dimension Development, subject to the
conditions as listed in the March 14, 1988 staff report.
Commissioner Marofsky stated his concern with the layout of
the streets in this development; that they should be more
efficient and effective. He stated that the configuration
as proposed is too convoluted if intended as lateral
access. He explained the alternative of routing 39th Avenue
to the south to 38th Avenue, which he believes would give a
better flow, and could cul-de-sac to the balance of the
homes.
Pane 71
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1989
Secondly, he is concerned about the recreational areas for
the project, 3.3 acres for the townhomes and 1.2 acres for
the 80 single family units, which seems to be all in ponds
and a small trailway. The homes to the north, on County
Road 9 have no open space or recreational areas adjacent to
them. It would seem a more efficient use would be to place
the townhomes, with more open space, along County Road 9.
He stated the proposal does not clearly meet two of the PUD
Criteria.
Commissioner Zylla asked staff to discuss the open space
requirements and to explain why staff feels this plan meets
the PUD Criteria.
Director Tremere stated that, considering the topographical
features of this property, this development seems to respond
to the intent of the PUD Criteria. The plan would not
destroy the natural features of the site, and these natural
features also lead to the road configuration.
The designers are taking advantage of the open space and
park; the Commission must decide if there should be more
effective private open space, especially with the single
family homes. While staff believes the criteria have been
met overall, the Commission needs to give direction regard-
ing any reservations they may have on this development meet-
ing the Planned Unit Development requirements. This is a
Concept Plan and it is appropriate to question these
aspects.
Commissioner Z_ylla said that this is a difficult site for
development and he will not second guess the street design.
The curvilinear streets make sense by accomplishing the de-
celeration of traffic through the residential neighborhood.
He believes the open space is adequate considering the
design and topography; to provide for further open space
would push the density below that allowed by the Guide
Plan. The location of the open space makes sense for this
layout and this is a good in -fill development plan.
Cmmissioner Marofsky inquired if the streets conform to the
City's street -naming policy. Director Tremere answered
affirmatively. Commissioner Marofsky pointed out another
street layout which would produce more of a "loop" effect,
and which would have a lesser impact on the adjacent
neighborhood.
Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay.
MOTION carried.
Chairman Pauba introduced the re 4
hvr
es for a
Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. An oarch 11,
1988 staff report was provided byre. He
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
JOHN DEVRIES
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN
AMENDMENT (88010)
o *
t
ery
4
5
Virgil Schneider ul jGF
11520 54th Avenue N.
Plymouth, MN" 5544"1.
Dear Mr. Schneider:
This letter is concerning the. concept plan for the Parkview
Ridge development proposed by Dimension Development Inc. We
support. the proposed mix of single family units and the multi-
family units. The location of t.iir unit.: makes for a smooth
transition from thfe sin` - fair,ii> 110rr1-::3 An the Cedar Ridge
development. to the multi -family units to the, west.
There are concerris we. have with tire proposed concept plan.
Our first concern is the f i 1 i irrt of the. swamp and running of a
culvert to the flood plain in Cedar Ridge. (see. Map 1) . The swamp
currently acts. as a natural holding arra for excess water. By
filling the swamp, the water would run directly into the flood
plain via the culv(ert.. This could cause water problems for all
the homes, adjacent tc, t hc, f lood plairi . Marry of the homes have
surnp pumps which run the nia.jc)rit. the. year. It is our belief
that. the impact. of t•hi.s i.sstle research.
Our second concern is regardingthe proposed trail. The
plans show the. trail running t.hrougl-r flood plain (see Map 1).
This trail would be unusaole for ninst., if not all of the year
because of high water.
It. is our belief t.1,ai. the culvert sl;ould be extended to the
creek which runs through the parr,. This, would solve both of the
problems above.
Our final concern is regarding a possible traffic: problem.
The proposed street. layout encourage!:. a shortcut. from County Road
9 to Fer.nbrook via 39th Avenue during rush hour traffic periods.
We. foresee County Road 9 backing up when lights are installed at
the intersection, of Fernbrook and County Road 9. There are
presently 13 children under the age of 5 on 39th Avenue. We are
extremely concerned that cars will be going too fast on our
streets. Possible solutions would be to cul-de-sac 39th Avenue
from both directions. This could be. doIie without the developer
losing any lots. Another solution would be to change the
proposed street layout to discourage any possible shortcutting,
as was proposed by commissioner Marofsky.
i
It is our tenet that you, as t.rte mayor•, will take seriously
our concerns ana asi. f o1' SLUplels about the above
iwskaes We IE•eI. i your job to ensure 1.•]tat the. high quality
of Lite 1 ilialrtt.ctiltlE'•l lti Yiytr;outl
n F
U z
C
j,
r` o
o
J
4
aC
4. FJ !fi it P A A 7_ .
Ri p z
c :.a
a •?^• ,.,q. p '
a 1. t •i : p _ ` Y s
R __i i <
1b
AC
all : R ,. _ ^ - .'
L _ •
vs . -
I
R 'E -' :.1°r`' ` -i N d• SIJ c } . .. u,i
i rte._ •d .Y
N VI
r _
LL
LL
i-
zz W -
II Pyr . >•.' . - .., , e J . ti
OOF
r r_ `
AV
a[•IAl M0161 _
I I '
Jqz
Sea-P S N• d,R
J ^ R ;
i + ..
n 'J
AK '
t Y Ts• __ r c L 1A 1 aV
Uo
n1MT•ra Ca
Y .
1< .
9
c 3
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
TO: 3ames G. Willis, City Manager G_-
FROM: Al Cottingham, Associate Planner through Blair Tremere, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR "PRIME WEST
BUSINESS PARK" (87123)
ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which declares a finding of "No
Need" for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), based upon the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) review process for Prime Development Corpora-
tion for "Prime West Business Park."
707,47-117"111
The project is located northwest of Highway 55 and Quaker Lane. The required 30 -day
review comment period has expired and upon review of all comments received, it is
determined that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Review comments and recommendations were received the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (PCA); the Metropolitan Council; the Minnesota Department of Transportation
MnDOT); and, the Minnesota Historical Society.
The Metropolitan Council has identified that the City will need to process an amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan for the interchange at State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane.
This issue has been discussed with the Metropolitan Council staff and we have acknow-
ledged that, as we update our Comprehensive Plan, there is a need to specifically
reference the intersection. We have explained to them that it was fully signalized in
conjunction with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and that, when the narra-
tive portion of the Comprehensive Plan was adopted several years ago, the intersection
was effectively not contemplated as the upgraded controlled intersection it has come to
be.
The Pollution Control Agency has identified another aspect of the State law which man-
dates certain air quality information that the PCA contends should have been in the
EAW. We have notified the petitioner that a Supplemental EAW is to be prepared regard-
ing that subject. The supplement will then be distributed in accordance with the State
regulations.
Page two
Memorandum to the City Manager for City Council Meetinq April 4, 1988
March 28, 1988
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Adopt the attached Resolution as one of the final steps in the State Environmental
review process. The need for a supplement regarding an air quality analysis is not
viewed as a deficiency or as the basis for findinq that an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed. The PCA has also identified that the developer will need to apply
for and receive what is called an Indirect Source Permit, and that deals with the
subject of air quality. Thus, the requirement presently is for additional information
and we are recommending that that be a condition of the Resolution making the negative
declaration.
AttarhmPntc
1. Draft Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Preliminary Plat
4. Responses
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
DECLARING FINDING OF NO NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) BASED UPON THE
REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) DATED FEBRUARY 16, 1988 FOR
PRIME WEST BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED BY PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (87123)
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat for Prime West Business Park by
Resolution No. 88-119 on February 22, 1988; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Rule No. 4410.4300,
Subpart 14 A (3), the Environmental Review Process, the City of Plymouth, as the
responsible governmental unit, submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
for the development on February 16, 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the 30 -day review comment period expired on March 23, 1988, and all comments
and recommendations received from reviewing agencies and other interested parties have
been considered; and,
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed development does not present a poten-
tial for significant environmental effects;
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does make a negative declaration on the need for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed development known as Prime West
Business Park for prime Development Corporation, subject to the following:
1. City staff is directed to prepare the necessary amendment to the Transportation
Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the identification of the inter-
section of Quaker (Revere) Lane and State Highway 55 when the Comprehensive
Plan is updated.
2. The Supplement regarding the air analysis prescribed by State law and identi-
fied in the March 22, 1988 letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
PCA) shall be completed by the petitioner, and submitted for approval and
distribution prior to any further platting and issuance of permits.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by _
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
00
i
T T-
CITY OF SST . LOUIS
i
i
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 22nd day of February , 1988. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker,
Zitur and Sisk The
following members were absent: None
Councilmember Sisk
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88-119
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PATRICK HAGEN, PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR PRIME
WEST (87123)
WHEREAS, Patrick Hagen, Prime Development Corporation, has requested approval for a
Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for eight commercial lots and one outlot on approximately
41.3 acres located northwest of State Highway 55 and Quaker Lane; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hear-
ing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Preliminary Plat for Patrick Hagen,
Prime Development Corporation for Prime West located northwest of State Highway 55 and
Quaker Lane, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication Policy in effect at the time of issuance of the Building Permit.
5. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water
drainage facility.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat.
8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
9. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 88-119
10. Access shall be limited to internal public roads. Private drive access onto State
Highway 55 and Revere Lane is prohibited.
11. Configuration of the intersection of the frontage road with the existing Quaker
Lane/Highway 55 intersection shall be coordinated with the access point for the
land to the east.
12. The manufactured homes located along the western portion of the site shall be
removed prior to this area being platted into lots; or, the encroachment will be
legally resolved including any necessary revisions to the plat.
13. All structures and light poles, relating to the "Driving Range" shall be removed
prior to or concurrent with the first phase of construction. Any existing wells
and/or septic systems shall be appropriately sealed and/or removed.
14. Appropriate legal documents shall be reviewed and approved the the City Attorney
encumbering 0utlot A to the land on the west side of future Revere Lane.
15. The required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) shall be processed in
accordance with the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) regulations and City policy.
16. Prior to the issuance of any Building Permits within the plat, the developer will
agree to pay one-half the cost of a detailed traffic diversion study to accurately
identify and assess useage percentages and subsequent assessment obligations on
the Revere Lane extension; and, that the total cost of Revere Lane from 8th Avenue
North to 10th Avenue North will be assessed to the Prime and Ryan parcels.
Further, before a Building Permit is issued, the Development Contract associated
with the Final Plat will state this development's obligation toward the
construction of Revere Lane as determined by the diversion study.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur
and Sisk The following
voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
REVISED
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904
DATE: March 23, 1988
TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee
FROM: Long Range Planning Program (Robert Overby)
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Prime West Business Park in Plymouth
Metropolitan Council Distr-ct c
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14424-1
Prime Development Corporation is proposing a planned development on about 42
acres located north of TH 55 and west of Quaker Lane in the City of Plymouth
see !.:'tachment 1) . The project will consist entirely of office space, with a
an overall size of approximately 450,003 square feet.
The site will be developed in stages, and occur over a 4 -year period, starting
in 1988. Each stage will occupy approximately 10 acres, and individual sites
within each stage will range from 20,000 to 100,000 square feet. Sites can be
combined for larger buildings or divided for smaller buildings, creating some
flexibility beyond Phase I in order to respcnd to changes in market conditions.
Under Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB) regulations, the project
requires the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW).
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
MEQB rules recuire that EAWs prepared under the Minnesota Environmental Review
Program -.ust be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. Any
recipient of an EAW or member of the public may make comments and
recommendations to the responsible agency. The responsible agency for this
project is the City of Plymouth.
ANALYSIS
The EAW adequately identifies the regional issues which need to be addressed,
except for transportation.
Transportation
1. The traffic analysis appears to be incomplete and, therefore, inaccurate in
its assessment of traffic impacts from this proposed development.
2. The forecast analysis is good only up to the year 1995. Of the seven
intersections that were analyzed, three were shown to exceed p.m. peak
capacity and three were identified as near capacity. Background traffic
obviously will continue to strain these intersections beyond the 1995 time
frame. The report indicates that monitoring of future traffic conditions
would be necessary.
A key intersectior. is Quaker Lane and 7E 55. According to the report,
improvement of this intersection, is :_nco nsiste nt with the Plymouth
comprehensive plan. A plan amendment will be needed to accomodate this
development proposal. The integrity of the metropolitan hi Shway system is
of paramount importance here, and deletion of this existing intersection
instead of improvement would better serve mainline traffic on TE 55•
Deletion of this intersectio wot:=d mean, however, that additional demand
would be placed on the other intersections identified in the report.
4. Council forecasts on nearby CSAE 18 indicate a substantial increase in
traffic volumes. Since the report identified unacceptable levels of service
at the CSAR 18 access points and sug`ested revised road geometries and the
installation of signals at various intersections, additional analysis
should be undertaken with the most current 2000 or 2010 backgroound traffic
forecast data. The Council or M nDCT can provide these forecasts to the
City.
Metropolitan Development and Investment Frar.ework
The EAk' indicates that the project is consistent with the city's comprehensive
plan, with the exception of a 3 -acre parcel in the southeast corner of the
site. The 3 -acre parcel is presently proposed for public and semi-public future
land uses. However, it is presently zoned as planned industrial district. The
city proposes to rezone the 3 -acre parcel as office limited business district.
The EAW indicates that the proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding
land use.
RECONLIIENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
That the Council adopt this report and its conclusions as its comments on the
Prime West Business Park EAk.
1. The EAk' adequately addresses regional issues, except for transportation.
2. The traffic analysis should be expanded to specifically address the items
outlined in the body of this report.
3. The city should prepare a comprehensive pian amendment that addresses the
inconsistency of the project; with. the Plymouth comprehensive plan regarding
a) the improvement of the intersection of Quaker Land and TH55; and (b)
the effect of the project on the regional transportation plan.
80007, PROTX3
40125' :`:,8 R. 22 W. R. 21 W. 1409
ee9 ,%. si"-Radia^ owerWOVIii 'Zu
v.
o % BN, 894 E•' -». .: .,
Illedicine Lake
IFisrLS
F IF
TN '/l -1-" •lig . • : \ 41
tj
rLA r; 51 T ' Its
A1JD
IF IF
IF
1; ,,.z• , .
r /'' – •'-
i _ `r
X. ar
c I . ` .' II fft Wtv e Sch —
1 stolic '' CA % • 7 r •
J _LEL i
Q- - _-•- - - _
j, ;Park ••) . r`,.
FIGURE 2
M wombs r•2nk ccs Associates, Inc- NOD NE V,$,(a,$, MAP
7..Y+G1•s S. GouC
PR/ME WEST BUS/NESS PARK
15CSC LJ2 A t tt E^•gmeers FILL tic.
F rY-cvull MN
s. a
P.annen
6447 PLYMOUTH, MN.
i i :TO r. w..rw\` )0^« s iv( •rE I'—; ji
p IEiw! I
t "
1\'.
o
774
675
C.
a l i OI I I a{ I • I o t \ s ` /a, r"'„^"""" MOOi c i n e - ---- 1
Ll
DEMAND tAVA1LA8LE
CAPACITY
1160 Nf I I
DEMAND AVAILABLE
CAPACITY
I_
L `)
JIW
U `O
OSI
ERE
Study Area Boundary `
464
DEMAND AVAIL
STNC
INSULTCOF.
PAUSC`it, ttiC.
t'tlNti('LTINI: t:NGtNF.tatti
l DEMAND CAPACI'
I
rl -Proposed Prim
Vest Business
Park
ST LOUIS PARK
Is
P.M. PEAK HOUR CRITICAL MOVE DEMAND/ AVAILABLE CAPACITY
City of Plymouth FIGURE
Caaacity Analysis
7
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
March 22, 1988
Blair Tremere
Director of Community Development
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mr. Tremere:
Re: Prime West Business Park Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
The above document has been reviewed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
MPCA) staff. We note that item 11 does not mention the need for an Indirect
Source Permit (ISP) from the MPCA Air Quality Division. This permit is
required for new indirect sources of air pollutants if they meet certain
criteria. If the project includes creation of more than 1000 parking places,
an assessment must be performed to determine if an ISP is necessary.
This assessment must consider the following factors. This project is located
near two major highways. The proposer must apply for the permit if 60% of the
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count of a nearby highway is greater than 8333.
Since Hennepin County 18 in the vicinity has an ADT count of 68,900 north of
Highway 55, and 81,700 south of it, and since Highway 55 between County 18 and
Saratoga Lane has an ADT count of 38,100, it appears that a permit will be
required. This assessment requirement is in Minnesota Rules 7001.1290.
The law requires that the project proposer submit data to the MPCA which we can
use to perform the air analysis prescribed in Minnesota Rules 7001.1320. The
results of this analysis must be presented in the EAW so that adequate public
review is assured. Since the EAW does not now contain this analysis, an EAW
supplement which does contain it must be prepared.
You may wish to contact Suzanne Spitzer of the IPCA Division of Air Quality for
further information on this requirement, and to discuss indirect source
permitting. Questions on this letter should be directed to William J. Lynott
of the Office of Planning and Review at 296-7794.
Sincerely,
Clifford T. Anderson
Director
Office of Planning and Review
CTA: mf1
cc: Suzanne Spitzer, MPCA, Division of Air Quality
Phone:
520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
ONESpr4
O 2
D ° Minnesota Department of Transportation
o Transportation Building. St, Paul. MN 55155
Q
OF TF P
March 22, 1988
Blair Tremere
Community Development Director
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Prime West Business Park
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
District 5 (Plymouth, Hennepin County)
Dear Mr. Tremere:
2_3
r-
Phone
296-1251
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed a
review of the above -referenced EAW. We anticipate that the proposed
project will cause some adverse impacts to our transportations
facilities.
A portion of Trunk Highway (T.H.) 55 drains across this property. The
existing drainage pattern must be maintained. Drainage computations
and pipe sizes should be submitted with a drainage permit application
prior to making a connection to the existing pipe on the right of way
Figure 8). Please contact Bill Worden, Roadway Regulations
Supervisor at (612) 593-8449 for further information.
The Plymouth Drainage Plan shows no pipes in this area. Bassett Creek
Watershed Management District review and a Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) permit are required for any proposed
drainage/floodplain changes.
It is important that coordination continues between the project
proposer, the consultant, the city and Mn/DOT as to appropriate
resonsibilities for providing more vehicle capacity and making any
other roadway modifications such as frontage road connections.
To discuss this further, please contact Carl Hoffstedt, Transportation
Analysis Engineer at our District Office in Golden Valley, telephone
number (612) 593-8540.
Sincerely,
pcvb
Patricia Bursaw
Environmental Coordinator
Environmental Services Section
An Equal Opporrunur Empluver
March 4, 1988
MINN'ESC)-;
Mr. Al Cottingham
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mr. Cottingham:
F-7ra.,3
CAW
HISTORICAL SOC I ETl' .
1 1 1 • (612 ) 720-1 11
Re: Prime West Business Park, NTW of Quaker Lane and St. Hwy. 55
SE/4 NW/4, S36, T118, R22, Plymouth, Hennepin County
MHS Referral File Number: 88-0880
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above
project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given
the State Historic Preservation Officer by the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the National
Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (36CFR800).
This review reveals the location of no known sites of historic,
architectural, cultural, archaeological, or engineering
significance within the area of the proposed project. There are
no sites in the project area which are on the National Register
or eligible for inclusion on the National Register, and
therefore, none which may be affected by your proposal.
Again, thank you for your participation in this important effort
to preserve Minnesota's heritage.
Sincerely,
Dennis A. Gimmestad
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DAG:dmb
9(L
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 28, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director
SUBJECT CITY OF PLYMOUTH. SITE PLAN FOR FIRE STATION III (88012)
ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached Resolution which approves the Site Plan for
the City of Plymouth Fire Station III to be constructed east of
Dunkirk Lane and north of 33rd Avenue North.
The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the meeting on March 23, 1988, and
recommended approval by unanimous vote.
Attachments:
1. Approving Resolution
2. March 23, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes
3. Fire Chief's Memorandum
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19 The
following members were present: _
The
following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF PLYMOUTH FIRE STATION III (88012)
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has requested approval of a Site Plan to construct Fire
Station III to be located east of Dunkirk Lane and north of 33rd Avenue North; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for the City of Plymouth
for a Site Plan to construct Fire Station III on property located east of Dunkirk Lane
and north of 33rd Avenue North, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
Dedication Policy, for residential land, at two units per acres, to be paid with
issuance of Building Permit.
3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage
facility.
4. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance.
5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv-
als per Ordinance provisions.
6. Approval of the Fire Lane Variance subject to the requirements of the Fire
Inspector's Memorandum, dated March 9, 1988.
7. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure, and no
outside storage is permitted.
8. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to
the release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Paqe two
Resolution No. 88-
10. No Building Permit to be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded with
Hennepin County.
11. Upon completion of the Medina Road extension, the access to Dunkirk Lane will be
closed with access only onto Medina Road.
12. Materials used for the construction of the Fire Station shall be brick and glass.
The motion for adoption of the foregoinq Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained: Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Page 74
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1988
this site, so all land north of the alignment would be
viewed similarly, with notification of all residents who
were sent notice of the hearing, as well as any others per
the new petition. This is in consideration of the apparent
confusion about this hearing and the need to have a clear
picture of the guiding in this area.
Bob Smith, Hedlund Engineering, stated they areprepared to
submit a preliminary plat and this deferral-' could cause
delay for the developer. i
r
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the,,,,preliminary plat could
be combined with the reguiding. Director Tremere stated
they could submit informal planssfor review, but these could
not be formally processed ,until the City Council takes
action on the reguiding application.
Director Tremere expLained the process for a public improve-
ment project. He plained the importance of initiating the
supplemental re idinq request. He stated that when notice
is sent, it w' 1 include a graphic clearly showing the road
right-of-way; however, the purpose of the meeting is not to
debate the construction of Schmidt Lake Road, that can and
will be discussed later.
Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. Commissioner Z_ylla, Nay. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
carried. _
NEW BUSINESS
Chairman Pauba introduced the request and reading of the
March 14, 1988 staff report was waived.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if there is a trail to the
outlot north of Medina Road, and whether this would be
through the Fire Station property. He asked about the
lighting plan; and, when Medina Road is constructed, would
the access to Dunkirk Lane be closed.
Director Tremere stated the access to Dunkirk Lane would be
closed once there is access to Medina Road; and, that if a
trail were required to the outlot, it could cross the fire
station property.
MOTION by Chairman Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Z_ylla to
recommend approval for the Site Plan for Fire Station III,
subject to the conditions as stated in the March 14, 1988
staff report.
MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner
Zylla to Amend the Motion by adding Condition No. 11: The
access to Dunkirk Lane will be closed when the extension of
Medina Road is completed.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
SITE PLAN FOR
CITY FIRE STATION
III (88012)
NOTION TO APPROVE
NOTION TO AMEND
Page 75
Planning Commission Minutes
March 23, 1988
MOTION by Commissioner Z_ylla, seconded by Commissioner
Marofsky to Amend the Motion by adding Condition No. 12.
The exterior materials for the Fire Station building will be
brick and glass.
Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried.
VOTE on the Main Motion as twice amended. 4 Ayes. MOTION
carried.
OLD BUSINESS and
OTHER BUSINESS
Director Tremere vised that the Commission will be receiv-
ing follow-up infortion regarding the possible revisions
to the Zoning Ordinanc -.{larking standards. A meeting in
April is contemplated for"'t-e continuation of the Public
Hearing.
The Commission and Director Tremere di ussed a meeting in
April to submit the statement of direc 'on to the City
Council regarding the Community-based re 'dential care
facilities study.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
MOTION TO AMEND
VOTE ON AMENDMENT
MOTION CARRIED
VOTE - MAIN MOTION
MOTION CARRIED
FrFrol2
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 9, 1988
TO: Al Cottingham, Associate Plann
FROM: Stan Scofield, Fire Inspector
SUBJECT: FIRE LANE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR FIRE STATION III
The Fire Department will grant the requested variance to the fire
lane on the west side of Fire Station III.
The request is granted based on the explanation on the attached
request and the fact that the building will be totally
sprinklered.
LSS:ly
attachment: Lyle C. Robinson Memo
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 25, 1988, for Council Meeting of April 4
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: ST. MARY'S PARK - APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
ACTION REQUESTED: The attached resolution approves the final plans and
specifications for St. Mary's Neighborhood Park and authorizes the
Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with bidding this project.
The total estimated construction cost as prepared by the City's
consultant is $117,520.
2. BACKGROUND: On Monday, March 7, the City Council approved the master plan
for St. Mary's park and directed that the final plans and specifications
be prepared. In accordance with that direction, the plans and
specifications have now been completed and we seek authorization to
proceed to bid this project. The consultant has prepared a cost estimate
for this project at $117,520. At Council's directions the specifications
include the plans for bidding as an alternate the parking lot at a price
of $9,960 and the alternate for floating boardwalk of $5,500.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend the City Council authorize
the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with bidding Project No.
808 in accordance with the specifications that have been prepared and
submitted. The project budget is to be set at $117,520. These funds will
be transferred from neighborhood park dedication funds account 219-219 to
the 401 construction fund.
i
Eric J. t1ank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EJB/np
Attachments
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of
19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
s
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ST. MARY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
WHEREAS, the park consultant has prepared the final plans and specifications
for St. Mary's neighborhood park project no. 808, and
WHEREAS, the Director of Parks and Recreation has recommended approval of the
final plans and specifications, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said project,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized
to bid project no. 808 in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications, and further, that the Finance Director is authorized to
transfer $117,520 from neighborhood park account 219-219 to the 401
construction account for funding of said project.
u
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor t ere- .
the following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passe an aopt
Q3KSTRUCTIC T OOST ESTIMATE
for
St. Mary's Neighborhood Park Construction
in
Plymouth, Minnesota
City Project No. 808
Item Unit
No. Contract Item Units Quantity Price Total
1 Mobilization L.S. 1 3,000.00 3,000.00
2 Clearing and
Grubbing L.S. 1 450.00 450.00
3 Remove Two (2) Back-
stops and TWo (2)
Benches L.S. 1 250.00 250.00
4 Pedestrian Bridge L.S. 1 10,000.00 10,000.00
5 Site Grading L.S. 1 8,000.00 8,000.00
6 Granular Borrow L.V. C.Y. 1,000 5.50 5,500.00
7 Bituminous Hardcourt S.Y. 214 11.00 2,354.00
8 Bituminous Parking
Area (Delete Alt. A) S.Y. 520 12.00 6,240.00
9 Concrete Curb and Gutter
B618 (Delete Alt. A) L.F. 420 8.50 3,570.00
10 Riprap (Delete Alt. A) C.Y. 3 50.00 150.00
11 15" CMP Culvert L.F. 68 22.00 1,496.00
12 15" CMP Apron EA 6 90.00 540.00
13 18" CMP Culvert L.F. 16 25.00 400.00
14 18" CMP Apron EA 2 120.00 240.00
15 Geotextile Filter S.Y. 640 2.00 1,280.00
16 8' Wide Bituminous
Trail L.F. 3,000 7.00 21,000.00
Item Unit
No. Contract Item Units Quantity Price Total
17 Erosion Control Fence L.F. 650 5.00 3,250.00
18 Pend Excavation C.Y. 700 4.50 3,150.00
19 Seeding Acre 2.5 1,500.00 3,750.00
20 Sodding S.Y. 2,500 2.00 5,000.00
21 Basketball Standard L.S. 1 1,100.00 1,100.00
22 Benches EA 4 500.00 2,000.00
23 Install Play Structure L.S. 1 28,900.00 28,900.00
24 Floating Boa k
Delete Alt. B) L.S. 1 5,500.00 5,500.00
25 Bicycle Rack EA 1 400.00 400.00
TOTAL CONSIMMON BID 117,520.00
r
c
D
S
n Gm
lMI
ia
i' r
0
rl
T
co
f` zDD
l ~-
TV
D
A '
D v
n 0
z
e (A
m Z D
U) m
D
m
m
D m m
n rrn
r 3 Ln
rm
D D
D
Dn
Z
i0 r
30m D
Z
c g z
o n
0
OCm0
0
f
s
a
H D
D
m
z m
x
m.
1
V7 V7
O
D
r
0 qE
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 25 for Council Meeting of Aril 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK SOCCER FIELD
ACTION REQUESTED: The attached resolution authorizes the Director of
Parks and Recreation to proceed with the development of a new soccer
field at Plymouth Creek Playfield. The estimated cost for this project
including additional trail work is $50,000, which will be paid for by
park dedication fund 218-218.
2. BACKGROUND: The 1988 capital improvements budget calls for the addition
of a new soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park. One of the reasons for
needing this additional field is so that we may transfer games from
existing fields onto the new field to allow for more time to renovate and
rest existing fields.
3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Attached for Council review is a copy of the
preliminary engineering report prepared by Dan Campbell of the City's
engineering department for this facility. The report compared the capital
costs for developing a natural turf field vs. an artificial turf field.
This study was done to determine if major cost savings in on-going
maintenance could offset the additional cost of construction. The
conclusion of the report is that cost savings would not justify the
additional construction cost of about $330,000 extra. It is anticipated
that this project will be designed, bid and supervised by city staff from
the park and recreation and engineering departments. It will consist of
three contracts:
A. Grading contract
B. Irrigation contract
C. Seed and sod contract
The field will be designed to the same standard as our existing soccer
fields, which are 120 yards long and 80 yards wide. The field will not be
lit at this time.
The Plymouth Creek athletic complex was designed with the addition of this
field in mind. Based on future use trends, it may be necessary to add
additional parking for between 30-50 cars in the future.
PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD
Page 2
4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The Park and Recreation Advisory
Commission recommended approval of this project with an estimated budget
of $50,000 at their meeting of Thursday, March 10. I recommend the City
Council authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation to proceed with the
construction of a soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park. The project budget
will be set at $50,000 with the funds to be appropriated from park
dedication account 218-218. These funds will be transferred to the 401
construction account for project no. 809.
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EJB/np
Attachments
CITY OF PLYMOUFH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on t e day of
19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING PROJECT NO. 809 PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD
WHEREAS, the 1988 capital improvements budget calls for the construction of
one soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park, and
WHEREAS, the Director of Parks and Recreation has prepared a cost analysis for
the construction of this field, and
WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission has reviewed and
recommended approval of the construction of said field,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized
to proceed with the construction of a soccer field as proposed at Plymouth
Creek Park, and further, that funding for said project will transfer $50,000
from park dedication account 218-218 to construction account 401-401, Project
809.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passea and adopted.
PRAC Minutes/March 10, 1988
Page 14
Mr. Watson and Director Blank will work on a new concept plan that
does not show a par 3 golf course and will have it ready by the
April meeting.
d. St Mary's Neighborhood Park Update. Director Blank indicated that
a contractor working on I-394 will be bringing in free dirt fill for
some areas of this park, which will then be covered with better top
soil. He said that he has not made a final selection on the
playground equipment. He indicated that bid letting will be
sometime in May.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. New Plats - Review Neighborhood Park - 494 & Co. Rd. 9. Director
Blank reviewed the proposed size, shape and location of this future
park and stated that in order to save as many trees as possible in
and around the marsh, the City must hold a public hearing for the
purpose of amending the comprehensive park sytem plan, so that this
park can be enlarged on the plan. By holding a public hearing, the
current land owners can be legally notified that the City will be
proposing to take more land from them. Commissioners agreed that it
was a good idea to save the trees.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
HANSON TO RECOMMEND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE CONDUCTED ON APRIL 14
FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PARK SYSTEM PLAN. THE
MOTION CARRIED WITH ALL AYES.
i
b. Report on Plymouth Creek Soccer Field. Commissioners reviewed a
staff report from Dan Campbell, Engineering, and from Director
Blank, on the costs of installing a natural turf soccer field vs. an
artificial turf field in Plymouth Creek Playfield. The cost for an
artificial field would be $361,000. The cost for a natural turf
field would be approximately $33,000. Commissioners agreed that it
was not worth it to install the artificial turf.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ROSEN AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
REED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY INSTALL A NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELD
AT PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK WITH A BUDGET ESTIMATED AT $50,000 FOR THE
PROJECT, AND FURTHER THAT THE COST FOR THIS IS TO COME FROM 218-218
COMMUNITY PLAYFIELDS-PARK DEDICATION ACCOUNT. THE MOTION CARRIED
WITH ALL AYES.
Director Blank stated that this field should be operational by
August 31, 1988.
C. Joint Meeting with Council on April 4. Three items were discussed
by PRAC to be part of the agenda for the joint meeting: the
proposed community center, Plymouth Creek park site planning, and
the cost usage report. Commissioner Rosen stated that he feels the
sole purpose of the joint meeting should be to get firm direction
from the Council on the community center and to find out exactly how
they stand on this issue.
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 9, 1988
TO: PRAC ; 11, 7)
FROM: Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD
Attached for your review is the preliminary engineering report prepared by Dan
Campbell of the City's engineering department. Dan has concluded that an
artificial turf field would cost approximately $361,000 vs. a natural grass
field for about $33,000. To these numbers you have to add approximately
15,000 for trail realignment work and miscellaneous items. The cost to
maintain a soccer field for a year is approximately $8,000 to $10,000
annually. Based on a cost difference between these two methods of
construction of approximately $330,000, the payback over 33 years is difficult
to justify.
On a natural grass field we can play approximately 40-60 games per year. The
artificial turf field could handle very easily 300-400 games per year. The
reality is that without lights on this field, nor the athletic associations
playing extensive weekend schedules, you would not be able to schedule enough
games at this site in order to justify the cost for the artificial turf. As
the cost of installing artificial turf surfaces decreases in the future, and
our maintenance costs increase, this is an area that we must continue to
explore for possible renovations of our fields in future years.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings of this preliminary cost estimate, I
recommend the City proceed with the installation of a natural turf soccer
field at Plymouth Creek Park with a budget estimated at approximately $50,000
for the project. The cost for this will come from 218-218 community
playfields-park dedication account. This item is currently proposed in the
1988 capital improvements budget.
EB/np
Attachment
01W
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 3, 1988
TO: Erick Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Daniel K. Campbell,' Senior Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK - SOCCER FIELD
A Preliminary Engineering Report has been prepared dealing with the
construction of a natural grass versus artificial turf soccer field at
Plymouth Creek Park.
My recommendation would be to proceed with Alternate No. 1 which is the
natural grass soccer field installation.
DKC:kh
attachment
cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
Chester J. Harrison, Jr., City Engineer
REPORT ON THE
PROPOSED SOCCER FIELD
INSTALLATION
AT
PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK
March 3, 1988
Prepared by:
City of Plymouth
Engineering Department
Daniel K. Campbell
Senior Engineering Technician
I N D E X
Title Page
Index
Page No.
Conclusions and Recommendations....................................1
Location...........................................................2
Existing Conditions................................................2
Project Scope - Alternate 1 ........................................3
ProjectScope - Alternate 2 ........................................3
EstimatedCosts....................................................4
Figure I.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Both alternates outlined in this report are feasible relative to
engineering matters.
1. Alternate No. 1 is the least costly of the two options
proposed and requires more continuous maintenance.
2. Alternate No. 2 is a relatively maintenance free
artificial surface which would be usable from April to
October and is least affected by weather conditions.
3. The existing sanitary sewer manhole located in the middle
of the proposed playing area should be abandoned and a new
structure constructed to the north end and outside of the
playing surface.
4. Soil testing should be done to determine poor soil
conditions. These poor soils could result in differential
settlement of the playing surface causing poor drainage
and continual resurfacing of the playing field. A
recommendation from a soils engineer on sand -soil mixtures
for best grass growth and a favorable low injury surface
should be part of the soils report.
1-
Location:
The proposed soccer field would be located directly west of and
adjacent to the present soccer field at Plymouth Creek Park (see
Figure No. 1).
Existing Conditions:
The site has an existing eight inch PVC sanitary sewer line running
through it with a manhole structure in the middle of the proposed
playing surface. A portion of the site contains a low lying marshy
area which would be filled with on-site excavation material. An
existing eight foot wide bituminous trail crosses the center of the
site.
2-
Project Scope - Alternate No. 1
This alternate proposes to construct a typical natural grass soccer
field by doing the following:
1. Grade the site, creating approximately 4,900
cubic yards of excavation.
2. Provide an extension to the existing sprinkler
system for irrigation of the playing surface .
3. Construct a five inch sand soil layer to create
a low injury surface.
4. Sod the entire playing surface and seed the
remaining disturbed areas.
Project Scope: - Alternate 2
This alternate proposes to construct an artificial grass soccer
field by doing the following:
1. Grade the site creating approximately 4,900
cubic yards of excavation.
2. Place a layer of geotextile fabric over the
subgrade to prevent fine soils from migrating
into the drainage pipe system. Migrating soils
would eventually cause the drainage system to
fail.
3. Install a perforated PVC pipe drainage system
for vertical drainage through the artificial
turf layer.
4. Place four inches of crushed rock to provide a
porous but stable base.
5. Install artificial turf fabric and sand filler
layer.
6. Paint permanent playing field lines on surface.
3-
4-
COST ESTIMATE
Alternate No. 1: Natural Grass Soccer Field
Common Excavation 4,900 C.Y. at $1.25/C.Y. 6,125
Common Borrow 650 C.Y. at 2.00/C.Y. 1,300
Sand Borrow 650 C.Y. at 6.50/C.Y. 4,225
Sod 10,000 S.Y. at 1.10/S.Y. 11,000
Sprinkler System Lump Sum 9,000
Construct New Sanitary Manhole Lump Sum 1.500
Total 33,150
Site may need placement of a geotextile fabric prior to fill placement.
Estimated cost = additional 8,000
Alternate No. 2 - Sporturf Artificial Turf System
Sporturf Economy System
86,400 S.F. at $4.00/S.F. _ 345,600
Permanent Painted Field Lines Lump Sum 10,000
Common Excavation 4,900 C.Y. at $1.25/C.Y. = 6.125
Total 361,725
4-
jr
f+aC1 ;.` }
54
A41
4b N
ilt`.
t.42
is
li •
2), e -
Viz, ; o• ..,,,.'„- . Vit, ,;; . 'i 5.,; `
l •
ry 74ua
l ` ; `./ } ,
ir
k s
r'
x '
h x`
p+ j, ;: ' ... Y =; c ; { .,.rx •' '` x
t 7
es
p - '
Y •
Ap
10 in
MU' s-
ry' " yam. .-ry"'•waar, i
lop
Ifri
cr Y
r 6 ..
1 it
z"`.'_ '" •'y, r.
J
ew' '!'".
2507.47 ; F
FIG 1
rj
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 31, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Sharon T. Reisinger, License Clerk
SUBJECT 1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE
The City of Plymouth is in receipt of renewal applications from 17 Garbage Haulers
All fees have been paid, Certificates of Workers' Compensation and Bonds have been
provided as required for licensing.
Attached is a resolution approving a license for each applicant for Council consid-
eration, contingent on each applicants response to the City's ordinance amendment
regarding yard waste collection.
A list of each applicant is contained in the resolution attached.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the •
day of 19 The following members were
present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
APPROVING 1988 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
WHEREAS, applications for Garbage Haulers Licenses have been received from:
Baldy Sanitation, Inc. Block Sanitation Inc. Browning-Ferris Ind. of MN
5906 Henry Street 6741 79th Ave. N. P.O. Box 1440
Maple Plain 55359 Brooklyn Park 55445 Minneapolis 55440
Cleanway Sanitation
P.O. Box 220
Long Lake 55356
Haugen Haulers
Route 2, Box 10613
Buffalo 55313
Hilger Transfer
8550 Zachary Lane
Maple Grove 55369
Robbinsdale Transfer
5232 Hanson Court
Crystal 55429
Crosstown Sanitation
10110 38th Ave. N.
Plymouth 55441
Gallagher's Service
1691 91st. Ave. N.E.
Blaine 55434
Nistgler Rubbish
21203 Horseshoe Tr.
Hamel 55340
Scherer Sanitation
P.O. Box 272
Delano 55328
Dave's Sanitation
4072 Hamel Road
Hamel 55340
G.D. LaPlant Sanitation
P.O. Box 334
Buffalo 55313
Randy's Sanitation
Route 3, Box 342
Delano 55328
Waste Mgmt.
P.O. Box 9
Circle Pines 55014
Waste Technology Woodlake Sanitary Service
410 11th Ave. S. 4000 Hamel Road
Hopkins, MN 55343 Hamel, MN 55340
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that a Garbage Haulers License be approved for the above
named applicants for a one year period ending March 31, 1988 subject to any
revision of the City Code creating an "organized collection system".
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval of the licenses is contingent upon
the licensees furnishing the City with their yard waste collection program, as
required by ordinance, prior to April 15, 1988.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following
voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 31, 1988 for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Blair Tremere, Community Development Director
SUBJECT STANDARDS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSPECTION SERVICES
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the attached performance standards for the Building
Inspection Division which is one of the items identified in your
1988 Performance Objectives and Standards. Our direction is to establish reasonable
time standards for review and processing of permit applications, plans and subsequent
issuance of permits and periodic inspections. The standards are to account for all
required duties such as enforcement of the Erosion Control Policy and the State Build-
ing Code requirements.
BACKGROUND: Activities of the Building Inspection Division are defined by the
mandatory Building Code which is contained in both State statutes and
regulations, by City Codes and Ordinances, and by City policies. Most of the activi-
ties center around the issuance of permits which are required by law and which depend
upon the verification that the applicant has submitted plans and other materials which
demonstrate the proposed work has been designed in acordance with the applicable code.
The applications and plans, therefore, require checking and verification before issu-
ance of the permits can be authorized.
Once permits have been issued, the law requires that the permitted work be inspected so
to verify that the code requirements have been met. Most inspections relative to
permits are requested by the permitees and are provided on a demand/response basis.
Other inspections are performed by the City as a random check on on-going work and are
performed in response to complaints or requests (where permits are not necessarily
involved).
State laws and local requirements, including financial accounting rules, establish a
variety of administrative procedures which must be followed. This is to assure sound
record keeping and sound financial management, since substantial fees are involved with
the number of permits that are issued.
Several years ago, we implemented an automated permit issuance system which assists us
substantially in performing the latter.
The desirability of performance standards in the areas of permit issuance and inspec-
tion is defined mostly by the requirements of what can be termed "customer service".
It is also a means by which the level of productivity can be gauged.
Page two
Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
March 31, 1988
PRIMARY ISSUES & ANALYSIS
There are several basic items which must be appreciated if such standards are to be
practical and meaningful.
A.) Applications must be complete. We have developed detailed checklists and pro-
cedural information, in conjunction with the Plymouth Developers Council, to
assist applicants in assembling their applications. Incomplete applications
require additional time, since the applicant needs to be informed of the
deficiencies and usually needs time to overcome the deficiency.
b.) Construction plans must meet or exceed the State Building Code as to struc-
tural and life -safety matters. Plans which do not meet or exceed those stand-
ards must be revised and that can take time. Plan checking by the City is not
plan perfection" and we operate on the premise that applicants have the
expertise personally or through consultants to develop the information and
material required. The State Building Code is applicable throughout the
metropolitan area and is not unique to Plymouth.
c.) The demand for services, volume of permits issued, and volume of inspection
requests or not easily forecast. There needs to be available the resource of
supplemental help in the form of temporary personnel who can be hired or
contracted to perform plan checking services (primarily) and inspections.
d.) Persons requesting inspections for permitted work should request the inspec-
tion is actually ready. We have prepared, in conjunction with the Plymouth
Development Council, a checklist for permitees so they can identify all the
items that should be ready when they call for an inspection. We find that we
often have the "airline reservation" problem where developers will call and
request inspections in advance, and in anticipation that they will have the
work done. If the inspector arrives and the work is not done, it has been a
waste of the inspector's time and has impacted the service performance for
some other work which was ready.
e.) Requests for inspection of critical work, such as poured concrete and sewer
and water line installation, where third parties are involved, i.e., concrete
contractors and excavators, must be coordinated. This means that, before
scheduling concrete or digging at a specific time, the builder should arrange
for an inspection at that time, or at least verify when inspections would be
available within a business day.
We have a staff and authorization for temporary help which we find can reasonably
respond to the demands for our service at this time. As the City grows the level of
people problems" will increase and the demand for those services, particularly in the
area of building, zoning, and environmental will require either more manpower or
diversion of manpower from construction -related services.
Finally, it needs to be recognized that the Building Division performs another task
that is very time consumptive and which rises as the homeowning population increases:
People expect educational services from the Building Inspection Division as homeowner
projects are undertaken such as the construction of garages, house additions, an
decks. The retail outlets for building material and other sources commonly refer
Page three
Memorandum to City Manager for City Council Meeting April 4, 1988
March 31, 1988
people to the Building Inspection Division for "What You Need to Know" , to assure a
successful project. One inexperienced homeowner with a relatively minor construction
project can take more time than a project of a much more complex nature proposed and
undertaken by a professional developer. We strive to serve both customers well.
The important consideration is that in judging the adequacy of performance by time
standards, one needs to also consider the nature of the particular project and qualifi-
cations of the particular customer. Thus, the standard for performance of the various
services are meaningful when predetermined and predefined conditions are understood and
satisfied. When appears that standards are not being met, it is my experience that the
first thing that should be done is to evaluate the nature of the work and to define the
circumstances.
The matter of Ordinance enforcement in response to complaints or observed violations
and the matter of enforcement of policies such as the Erosion Control Policy are not
easily subjected to performance standards of the same type. The Erosion Control Policy
establishes time frames within which a developer must resolve the problem before
further enforcement measures are taken. The inspectors are charged with not performing
inspections when violations of that Policy are observed and verified.
We have operated for a number of years on the premise that, at least during the main
construction season, construction -related inspection and enforcement take precedence
over other requests for enforcement actions involving zoning and housing codes, for
example. I anticipate that the Development Services Technician will be able to enhance
the delivery of those services. Performance of those enforcement actions is not best
gauged by the time since the time to complete enforcement and, possibly, prosecution is
defined by the problem itself and the ability of other agencies to do their work.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I recommend your consideration and approval of the attached performance standards.
Building Official Joe Ryan and I have concluded that these are reasonable standards
given the availability of budgeted funds for hiring supplemental and temporary help and
services during peak periods. We continue to work with the Plymouth Development
Council and individual builders to enhance the knowledge about the requirements for
obtaining permits and for obtaining inspections. This has substantially improved
general conditions over the past couple of years. We conclude, however, that the most
efficient operation will be that which favors the applicant or customer who has done
their homework and has submitted a complete and accurate application or who has made a
bona fide request for inspection of completed work. Others who are unable to
accomplish those basic requirements readily, are taken in the order of available man-
power and as time permits. The Development Services Technician should significantly
improve the level of service to citizens and homeowners who seek information and some
basic education.
Attanhment
Proposed Performance Standards for Permit Issuance and Inspections
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
PERMIT ISSUANCE AND INSPECTION SERVICES
The following are the Performance Standards of the Building Inspection Division
for Plan Checking Services, Permit Issuance, and Inspection Services. Division
personnel strive to operate within these standards which are considered maximums.
Checklists and information sheets are available to assist customers in defining
what is necessary for a complete application for a permit and what constitutes
complete work for an inspection. puestions and comments regarding this should be
directed to the Building Official.
1. Applications for new work and for remodeling work for single-family and two-
family Building Permits -- maximum of 7 business days upon receipt of
completed application and materials. Additional time, up to 7 working days,
may be needed to evaluate revised plans and information.
2. Application for permit for single-family and two-family plumbing, sewer and
water, mechanical work -- maximum of one business day upon receipt of
completed application forms.
3. Applications for commercial/industrial/multiple family dwelling building per-
mits (new construction and additions) -- maximum of 15 business days upon
receipt of completed application and materials. Additional periods of up to
15 business days may be needed when revised plans and information are
submitted. A letter detailing any plan deficiency is provided to all
applicants. Also, and very importantly, related special conditions of
approval, detailed in the City Council action or administrative action
authorizing the permits, must be satisfied before permits are actually issued.
4. Applications for Building Permits for finishing tenant areas in commercial/
industrial buildings -- maximum of 5 working days upon receipt of completed
application and materials.
5. Applications for plumbing, sewer and water, fire sprinkling systems, and
mechanical systems permits in commercial/industrial/multiple family dwelling
buildings -- maximum of 3 business days upon receipt of completed application,
plans, and materials. This applies when such applications are made separately
from the Building Permit for these classes of work.
6. Applications for sign permits and for building moving permits -- maximum of 5
business days upon receipt of completed application and materials.
7. Application materials for grading permits will be reviewed and routed to the
City Engineer for required approval within 2 business days of receipt. The
permit will be ready for issuance within one business day after receiving the
approval from the City Engineer and after any required Performance Agreements
and financial guarantees have been satisfied.
8. Inspections will be scheduled for the next business day unless no time period
is open; in that case, the inspection will be scheduled for the following
business day. Requests for specific times will be honored whenever possible;
when desired times are not available the next business day, the customer will
be so informed so that an alternate time can be selected.
Page two
Standards
NOTE: Delivery of concrete and availability of special inspection equipment and
personnel should be scheduled by the customer in advance so that the City
inspection can be arranged within this time frame. The City cannot assure
that an inspector will be available for checking critical work such as pouring
concrete or filling or back -filling sewer and utility trenches, and other
special tests on short notice. These work items and tests should be scheduled
so that they coincide with the confirmed time of the inspection.
NOTE: A responsible, knowledgeable person should be available on the Job site when
inspection required by a building permit for new construction work are
scheduled. This facilitates the communication between the inspector and the
contractor, particularly where corrective work is required.
NOTE: The Erosion Control Policy will be enforced in accordance with the terms of
the Policy; when violations are observed and verified, required inspections
will not be made and the violations will be referred to the Public Works
Department within one business day, where corrective measures are needed that
involve the developer or where street cleaning is involved. The permittee
will be notified within one business day when corrective work on the site is
needed so that proper erosion control measures can be installed.
9"14
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
CONTRACT FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2
PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL
Payment
No. Contractor Proiect Amount
4 & Midwest Fire Protection, Fire Station No. 1 & 2 $3,703.00
Final Inc. Fire Sprinkler System
In 1985 the City awarded a contract for installing a fire sprinkler system at Fire
Station No. 1 and 2. The contractor substantially completed the work in 1985, but
there were some minor items which had not been completed and; therefore, the City
had not finally accepted the work. The system has been in operation since October
1985.
The work not completed was for items such as replacing a few damaged ceiling tile,
painting some of the piping and installing decorative plates at the sprinkler
heads. The City has been holding 10% of the funds to ensure the completion of the
work. Although we periodically reminded the contractor of work yet to be
completed, they did not choose to do the work until this winter.
All the work has now been completed and it is recommended that the project be
accepted and final payment made to the contractor. The final contract amount is
150 less than the original contract because of a minor change in the scope of the
project.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the
work and approving Payment No. 4 and Final.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Request
Resolution
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1988. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
XXX
its adoption:
XXX XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 AND FINAL
FIRE STATION NO. 1 AND 2
FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. as
contractor, have entered into an agreement for a fire sprinkler system at Fire
Station No. 1 and 2, said agreement being dated July 15, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer, Michaud, Cooley, Erickson and Associates, Inc., has
certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for
payment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. That the original contract amount was $38,530.00, and the
value of the work to date is $38,380.00.
2. That the work performed by the Contractor for a fire
sprinkler system at Fire Station No. 1 and 2 and certified
to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the
same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the
conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights
of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty
work after final payment.
3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of
3,703.00 to Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. is hereby
approved and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized
and directed to pay the same forthwith.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXX XXX XXX
s
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: March 31, 1988 FOR PERIOD:
PLACE: Plymouth, Minnesota FROM: Sept. 30, 1985 to March 31, 1986
PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1 & 2 Fire Sprinkling System
CONTRACTOR: Midwest Fire Protection Inc
ADDRESS: 324 Harding St. N. E.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55413
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 4 and Final
SUMMARY:
Contract Amount
Change Order
Value Completed to Date
Amount Earned
Less Retainage 0
Sub -Total
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
NO. 4 and Final
OWNER APPROVAL:
By:
Date:
38,530.00
0-
38,380.00
38,380.00
0-
38,380.00
34,677.00
3,703.00
Approved By: Director of Public Works
City of Plymouth
By
Approved By:
By:
Contractor
4 q'.T
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: March 31, 1988 For City Council Meeting of April 4, 1988
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: ADOPTING DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND RE -SPREADING OF ASSESSMENTS
OUTLOT D - HERITAGE WEST ADDITION
LEVY NO. 10059 AND 10970
In 1985 the City Council adopted assessments on the Vern Midthun property
for the improvement of Xenium Lane north of the Northwest Business Campus.
A portion of these assessments were deferred in accordance with our
Deferred Assessment Policy." Since that time the property has been
platted as part of Heritage West Addition.
Mr. Midthun has also entered into a Contract for Deed to sell his property
to Wayne Jopp. Attached is a request from Vern Midthun and Wayne Jopp to
have the deferred assessments levied against the property and the existing
assessments re -spread to other lots within Heritage West 2nd Addition.
This request would remove all assessments from the Midthun property (Outlot
D) and place them on the single-family lots which Mr. Jopp owns. We are in
agreement with this request since, in all likelihood, the City will collect
the assessments sooner, as single-family homes are built on the platted
lots.
Attached are two resolutions which are recommended for City Council
adoption. One resolution places the deferred assessments on Outlot D and
the second resolution re -spreads the assessments on Outlot D to the other
lots owned by Mr. Jopp in Heritage West 2nd Addition.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolutions
Request
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present: _
The following members were absent:
XX):
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RESPREADING OF DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS
Levy h1c. 1 o 970
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Policy certain parcels of homestead land were assessed
at a residential rate with the remainder of the assessment deferred at the established
rate; and
WHEREAS, the deferral was for a five year period provided, however, that if the
property is sold not used by the owner for his homestead or further subdivided during
that five year period, the deferred assessment shall become payable.
WHEREAS, an agreement has been made by the present owner to have the deferred
assessments re -spread; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Council to determine the period of years over
which the deferred assessment is to be paid.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the assessments listed below which were previously deferred be respread for the
period of years indicated:
Number of Interest
P.I.D. N0. Levv Year Rate
15-118-22-43-0044 10970 5 9.36%
Assessment
6,977.90
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of 5 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the
first Monday in January 1989, and shall bear interest at the rate of 9.36% pet annum
from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this Resolution
until December 31, 1989. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
U
Resolution No. 88 -
Page 2
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Director,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30
days from the adoption of this Resolution; and he may at any time thereafter pay the
City Finance Director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December
31 of the next succeeding year.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Finance Director to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and
such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
9
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1988. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
RE -SPREADING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 10059 AND 10970
Resei i:on Il o, ro.n Oilier
resol.i:o..
WHEREAS, pursuant to the adoption of Resolution No's 85-788 and * 8B- assessments
were levied by the City Council for Project No. 505, Xenium Lane; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of Outlot D, Heritage West Addition, requested assessments
be re -spread for the above mentioned improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has agreed to do so; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
That the assessments be re -spread in the following amounts as they apply to
each parcel here listed:
ORIGINAL LEVY REVISED LEVY
Levy # Levy # Levy Levy #
P.I.N. 10059 10970 10059 410970
15-118-22-43-0044 13,246.20 $ 6,977.90 $ 0.00 0.00
15-118-22-43-0045 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0047 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0049 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0050 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0051 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0052 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0053 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0054 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0055 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0056 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.19
15-118-22-43-0057 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20
15-118-22-43-0059 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20
15-118-22-43-0060 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20
15-118-22-43-0061 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20
15-118-22-43-0062 0.00 0.00 883.08 465.20
Total 13,246.20 $ 6,977.90 $ 13,246.20 6,977.90
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
C?CiC X)C .X 7GClYiC
I
ATTORNEYS
GEORGE E. ANTRIM. III
THOMAS J. MILLER
ANTRIM & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
SUITE 3801
PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER
222 SOUTH NINTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE: (61 2) 3441 550
November 25, 1987
Mr. Dan Campbell
Engineering Department
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
I
Re: Contract for Deed between Vern Midthun and Wayne R. Jopp,
d/b/a Wayne R. Jopp Construction Co., Inc.; Our Office File
No. 8710A-73.
Dear Mr. Campbell:
I am sending this letter to you pursuant to our recent
telephone conversation, wherein I informed you that it is the
intention of the parties signed below to transfer all of the
special assessments levied against Outlot D of Heritage West
Addition to the following parcels in equal amounts:
1. Lot 1, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition;
2. Lot 3. Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition;
3. Lot 5, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition;
4. Lot 6, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition;
5. Lot 7, Block 1 Heritage West Second Addition;
6. Lot 1, Block 2 Heritage West Second Addition;
7. Lot 1, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition;
8. Lot 2, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition;
9. Lot 3, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition;
10. Lot 4, Block 3 Heritage West Second Addition;
11. Lot 1, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition;
12. Lot 3, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition;
13. Lot 4, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition;
14. Lot 5, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition;
15. Lot 6, Block 4 Heritage West Second Addition.
and
Mr. Dan Campbell
Engineering Department
City of Plymouth
November 25, 1987
Page Two
It is our understanding at this time, that there are
approximately $18,500.00 worth of assessments against Outlot D of
Heritage West Addition which is currently the homestead of Vern
and Arniss Midthun.
Dated this 25th day of November, 1987.
ANTRIM & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
By
Thomag J. Miller
Attorney at Law
I hereby agree with the above -request in the above -captioned
matter.
Dated this day of November, 1987.
VERN & ARNISS MIDTHUN, Owners of Outlot
D Heritage West Addition
By
Vern Midthun, Owner
And By
Arniss Midthun, Owner
I hereby agree with the above -request in the above -captioned
matter.
Dated this 't' day of November, 1987.
WAYNE R. JOPP, d/b/a Wayne R. Jopp
Construction Company, Inc., Owner of
Outlot D Heritage West Addition
fSy_ -/
Wayne R. Jon ; b/a
Wayne R. Jop Construction
Company, Inc.
0
L'
0
z
N
H
A
W
jai`
101100
ILul
OOOr/-- 1 0
06 zf/
o R ` 00'097 3IS,yf.88N - oC
2O
La 2
Q
O
m 2
0
z
N
H
A
W
vy
vol
r7
89N -
f0"06
yy TO
lo-ilno
ES,891V---- ----
N
N
WW
S
U,
jai`
101100
ILul
OOOr/-- 1 0
06 zf/
o R ` 00'097 3IS,yf.88N - oC
vy
vol
r7
89N -
f0"06
yy TO
lo-ilno
ES,891V---- ----
N
N
WW
S
U,
w UJt
La 2
vy
vol
r7
89N -
f0"06
yy TO
lo-ilno
ES,891V---- ----
N
N
WW
S
U,
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 31, 1988
09S
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager ,
SUBJECT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS
DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND 6, AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 5-1
AND 6-1
REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt resolutions scheduling public hearings for
April 18 on proposal to establish two additional economic development
districts and two tax increment financing districts.
2. BACKGROUND: I had planned to present these proposals to the Council in
late April or May. The Legislature, however, is considering amendments
which would, if adopted, preclude the City from establishing additional
economic development districts and/or tax increment districts. Because
of this potential, I believe it is prudent to proceed to establish these
new districts at this time.
3. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The City Council has previously
established four economic development districts. The purpose for
creating these development districts, and subsequent tax increment
financing districts, has been to provide a means by which the City could
proceed in an orderly way to complete major transportation improvements
required for the continued development of commercial/industrial
properties in the community. Because neither the federal, state or
county governments have had available appropriate funding for the
completion of certain major road improvements, which are under their
jurisdiction, it has fallen to the City to develop some portions of
county roads and/or improvements to state, county or federal
facilities. I anticipate that such a condition will continue.
Economic Development District No. 5 would provide the opportunity for
the City to capture tax increments which would assist in financing the
extension of County Road 9, westerly from I-494 to Fernbrook Lane and
perhaps beyond. It also could be used to assist in financing any
upgrading on Fernbrook Lane which may be required as a result of
continuing development in that area (see attached Exhibit A).
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS
DISTRICTS NO. 5 AND 6, AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 5-1 AND 6-1
March 31, 1988
Page 2
Economic Development District No. 6 (Exhibit B) would be established to
assist in three potential improvement areas. The first would be to
assist in financing the extension of 6th Avenue, easterly from Pineview
Lane to Highway 55. This project is currently contemplated in the
City's Capital Improvement Program for 1990. The second component would
be to assist in the extension of County Road 73, northerly from former
County Road 15, to connect to Highway 55. This project, while being
directly related to the 6th Avenue improvement, may not be constructed
at the same time. With the completion of I-394 and the interchange at
County Road 73, it is anticipated that there will be additional traffic
on County Road 73, both north and southbound, resulting in the need to
improve the geometrics of County Road 73 as it intersects with Highway
55. Attached is an illustration (Exhibit C) of alignment of this
proposed improvement, prepared by Strager-Roscoe-Fausch for the City of
Plymouth. The Council has previously reviewed several possible
alignments for these improvements, and this was selected as the most
preferred.
The final improvement would involve intersection improvements at West
Medicine Lake Boulevard and Highway 55. This improvement would be
needed in conjunction with the proposed Marcus Development and/or the
redevelopment of the Schiebe Shopping Center.
Prior to the April 18 public hearing, we will know whether or not the
Legislature has taken any action to restrict the City's ability to
establish or modify development districts or tax increment financing
districts. If they take such action, and the effective date of the
legislation is prior to the public hearing date, this exercise may well
be in vain. On the other hand, if they take action and the effective
date is after the public hearing date, the City may still be able to
effectively carry out the programs generally outlined above.
4. RECOMNENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: The use of economic development
districts and tax increment financing districts in the City of Plymouth
has been totally responsible and supportive of community and regional
objectives. The City has been a leader in using tax increment financing
as a means by which sound development proposals have been able to
proceed in conjunction with the extension of the necessary
transportation facilities. In large measure, these transportation
facilities have been the jurisdictional responsibility of other
agencies. I believe that it is sound public policy to continue this
practice and I accordingly recommend that the Council adopt the attached
resolution scheduling a public hearing for April 18.
OW:kec
attachment
61 OL 101 ivi I IM NJ MTA = I tOl am
aolUson
0
11.-2r:
0
w
G y y
Si
s•C }t'..
r t• F •. w A.;
4q1 Q# I ? rP ,?.
yea -
xr .a
i ` 3.. rr•...
ti
Ty :
Fes. i i•. a°l c`S!
4Rp €sem , . "c i t
E'im rs'i
8C-P321AV
1 8 P
001540 - , ` , 1lYV._F 0895
C 3 d{'d:1'l C i•Tdl'2 Aid jA`Ja`.-. .
1/ {li -.1. V
t .
w't
EXHIBIT C
fsew.+•
Y
fir y
r
r ` ; fir' y,; ` ` . } t , , kr
G.
T #,
7F - a ` Sci
I
Y '
r ' . n
cif f. - j:.A to j R+s _ ''r • "
may_ y .Y '
v_
s• i• , ryt ,moi S -1 fi
Add.
t-
Qt,*,.,
N4
FIGURE 18
L , INC • ;
In•1,, ••Id• 11 •,'I,q ^., :IU Jn qq• .. CITY OF PLYMOUTH •;pTc J:Ic •Jca:.'.:r r, r,att. ;...l: r. •-----
a.rned Ir ... ..., .. .,... c„ail i rv0' S. KOTKE
11.1 I f•1• Iea •I•.•d 7E•-I(:Nf 0 (11 •.),- 2
I".,,.., .;,.•',. ,,•, ,, CONCEPT PLAN FOR -----__.__ L. ERICKSON _ —
ERS t'•'••"''•"••'
COUNTY HIGHWAY 15
r.F.r.rKrnrA, —""—
Fu.- l -K -Ir NO
1•a •• BETWEEN CO. HWY. 61 AND T.H. 55
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of , 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469
WHEREAS, the City Manager, in a report dated March 30, 1988, recommended that the City
Council consider establishing Economic Development District No. 5 and Tax Increment
Financing District No. 5-1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, on April 4, 1988, reviewed the City Manager's report and
noted that the creation of such a development district and tax increment financing
district would assist in achieving certain public objectives; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that an essential first step in the
establishment of proposed Economic Development District No. 5 and Tax Increment
Financing District 5-1 requires the establishment of the development program for
Municipal Development District No. 5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
that the City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 18, 1988 for the purpose of
conducting a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program for
Municipal Development District No. 5 and the establishment of a Tax Increment Financing
District No. 5-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469; and
FURTHER, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of
said hearing in substantially the form of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday,
April 18, 1988
in the Council Chambers in the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth
Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing on the
establishment of the Development Program for Municipal Development District
No. 5, establishment of an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing
District No. 5-1 (TIF District), and the approval of a Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the TIF District. The TIF District is proposed to be
located within Development District No. 5.
The general boundaries of the District are as follows:
Commencing at the center line of the intersection of Interstate Highway
I-494 and T.H. 55; thence westerly along the center line of Highway 55
to the west line of the Fox Meadows First Addition; thence northerly
along the west line of the Fox Meadows First Addition to the north line
of the Fox Meadows First Addition; thence easterly along the north line
of Fox Meadows First Addition to the center line of Fernbrook Lane;
thence northerly along the center line of Fernbrook Lane to center line
of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 118, Range 22; thence
easterly along said center line of the northwest quarter of Section 15
to the center line of Interstate Highway I-494; thence southerly along
said center line to the point of beginning.
The legal description of property in the proposed TIF District are as
follows:
P.I.N. 15-118-22-23-0012
P.I.N. 15-118-22-24-0006, 0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011, 0012
P.I.N. 15-118-22-31-0008, 0009
P.I.N. 15-118-22-32-0074
P.I.N. 21-118-22-14-0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0012, 0013, 0018
P.I.N. 21-118-22-41-0023
P.I.N. 22-118-22-22-0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0010, 0011, 0014,
0016, 0017
P.I.N. 22-118-22-23-0003, 0007
P.I.N. 22-118-22-32-0011, 0012, 0013
The establishment of the Development Program, TIF Plan and the TIF District
are proposed to be approved, established, and adopted pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 469.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Page 2
Draft copies of the Development Program for the Development District and the
TIF Plan will be available for public inspection at the office of the CityClerkafterApril4duringnormalCitybusinesshours.
Any person wishing to express a view concerning the Development Program ortheproposedTIFPlan, will be heard orally or in writing at the publichearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s/ Laurie Brandt
City Clerk
Dated: April 4, 1988
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council oftheCityofPlymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of 19
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 469
WHEREAS, the City Manager, in a report dated March 30, 1988, recommended that the CityCouncilconsiderestablishingEconomicDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6-1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, on April 4, 1988, reviewed the City Manager's report and
noted that the creation of such a development district and tax increment financingdistrictwouldassistinachievingcertainpublicobjectives; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that an essential first step in theestablishmentofproposedEconomicDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and Tax Increment
Financing District 6-1 requires the establishment of the development program for
Municipal Development District No. 6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
that the City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 18, 1988 for the purpose of
conducting a public hearing on the establishment of the Development Program forMunicipalDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6 and the establishment of a Tax Increment FinancingDistrictNo. 6-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469; and
FURTHER, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of
said hearing in substantially the form of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
following voted in favor thereof:
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Monday,
April 18, 1988
in the Council Chambers in the Plymouth City Center, 3400 PlymouthBoulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing on the
establishment of the Development Program for Municipal Development DistrictNo. 6, establishment of an Economic Development Tax Increment FinancingDistrictNo. 6-1 (TIF District), and the approval of a Tax IncrementFinancingPlanfortheTIFDistrict. The TIF District is proposed to belocatedwithinDevelopmentDistrictNo. 6.
The general boundaries of the District are as follows:
Commencing at the center line of T.H. 55 and County Road 18, thencesoutherlyalongsaidcenterlinetothesouthcitylimits; thence
westerly along the south City limits to the center line of PineviewLane; thence northerly along the center line of Pineview Lane to thecenterlineofthenorthwestquarterofSection35, Township 118, Range22; thence easterly along said center line and also the center line of
the northeast quarter of said Section 35 to the southwest corner of the
northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 35; thence
northerly along the west line of said northeast quarter of
said northeast quarter, Section 35 to the north line of said Section35; thence easterly along said north section line to the northeastcornerofSection35; thence southerly along the east line of saidSection35tothecenterlineofT.H. 55; thence easterly along saidcenterlinetothepointofbeginning.
The legal description of property in the proposed TIF District are asfollows:
P.I.N. 35-118-22-11-0017, 0018,
P.I.N. 35-118-22-13-0004, 0006,
P.I.N. 35-118-22-14-0004, 0005,
0015, 0018, 0019
P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0007, 0008,
P.I.N. 36-118-22-41-0005, 0006,
P.I.N. 36-118-22-43-0202, 0203
P.I.N. 36-118-22-44-0006, 0007,
0036
0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011
0008, 0009, 0010, 0012, 0013, 0014,
0009, 0010
0007
111:
The establishment of the Development Program, TIF Plan and the TIF Districtareproposedtobeapproved, established, and adopted pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Chapter 469.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Page 2
Draft copies of the Development Program for the Development District and the
TIF Plan will be available for public inspection at the office of the City
Clerk after April 4 during normal City business hours.
Any person wishing to express a view concerning the Development Program or
the proposed TIF Plan, will be heard orally or in writing at the public
hearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s/ Laurie Brandt
City Clerk
Dated: April 4, 1988