Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Packet 01-28-2014
RECAP AGENDA) CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 28, 2014, 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLYMOUTH FORUMIndividuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allottedfor the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not n eded for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or Commission for future report. 4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS 4.01 Announce School District 284's levy referendum on February 25 Superintendent Chace Anderson) 4.02 Update from the TwinWest Chamber of Commerce (Director of Government Affairs Deb McMillan) 4.03 Announce Fire and Ice Festival on February 1 (Park and Recreation Director Evans) 5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. (Approved) 6.01 Approve proposed City Council Minutes 6.02 Approve disbursements (Res2014-026) Regular Council Meeting 1 of 3 January 28, 2014 6.03 Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 10 15.3 3 of the City Code regarding Water and Sanitary Sewer Fees (Ord2014-07) 6.04 (This item was removed from the Agenda) 6.05 Approve Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Plymouth and the City of Maple Grove for Peony Lane North of Schmidt Lake Road (10015Res2014- 027) 6.06 Approve 2014 Liquor License Renewals (Res2014-028) 6.07 Approve Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 3 and Final for Ferndale North Lift Station Rehabilitation (12028Res2014-029) 6.08 Approve Final Payment for Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project (13005 Res2014-030) 6.09 Declare Costs to be Assessed and Set Assessment Hearing for Dunkirk Lane Street and Utility Improvements (13015Res2014-031 and Res2014-032) 6.10 Authorize Payment of 2014 Membership Dues for the Bassett Creek, Elm Creek and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commissions (Res2014-033) 6.11 Approve Purchase of fire engine/pumper and miscellaneous equipment Res2014-034) 6.12 (This item was removed from the agenda) 6.13 Approve Comment Letter regarding Xcel Energy's request to withdraw application for the Hollydale I I5kV Project 6.14 Approve name of Prairie Ponds Park in the Spring Meadows/Kirkwood/Timber Creek (Res2014-035) 6.15 Authorize application for transportation enhancement funds for Northwest Greenway/Vicksburg pedestrian bridge (Res2014-037) Regular Council Meeting 2 of 3 January 28, 2014 6.16 Approve Transportation Alternatives Program Grant application for trail on the east side of Fernbrook Lane between County Road 6 and the Luce Line Regional Trail (Res2014-038) 6.17 Approve Final Plat and Development Contract for "Providence Pointe" located southwest of 56th Avenue and Cheshire Parkway (2013115-F—Res2014-036 and Res2014-039) 6.18 Adopt Ordinance Amending Section 1015.19 of the City Code regarding Water and Sewer Area and Connection (REQ Charges (Ord2014-08) 6.19 Approve utilization of the Houston -Galveston Area Council (HGAC) purchasing consortium for the purchase of Police Department equipment and apparatus (Res2014-040) 6.20 Approve purchase of armored vehicle with the City of Maple Grove through the Houston -Galveston Area Purchasing Consortium (This item required 4/7 vote, with Councilmember Willis voting against, the item failed.) 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.01 Public Hearing on On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Liquor Licenses for Storm LLC, d/b/a Ketsana's Thai, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205 (Res2014-041) (Approved) 8. GENERAL BUSINESS 9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 10. ADJOURNMENT Regular Council Meeting 3 of 3 January 28, 2014 Setting the Standard. Leading the Way. Plymouth City Council -January 28, 2014 BY THE NUMBEF Represents 10 cities 700+ Members 55,000 jobs Manufacturing Retail Service Finance Hospitality Health Care Small Business Large International Corp, 30%.f—b. Mm &ofthisfootprint E Twin West Chamber TwinWest is an advocate for business. We are the voice of business in government and provide our members opportunities to grow their businesses and improve their communities. Strong Brand and Reputation Consumers are 63% more likely to buy goods and services from a company they believe is a local chamber of commerce member sally c.Owby The 9 Pa Gro =2 1/28/2014 Grow Minnesota! Business Retention & Expansion Visits Business Environment/ Policy Workforce Development B2B Taxes I Minimum Wage J Cq Local Priorities for 2014: I-494 Third Lane State of City' Events - March 111h in Plymouth Plymouth Business Council 2nd Tuesday of Each Month Expenditure-Type Reporting qqm- It cz SCI' W niln'nemn ;/-t V l I 1-I'*` B%SL,LOWi hilt State Priorities for 2014: Repeal 3 B2B Taxes Environmental Permitting Experiential Learning Support SWLRT Minimum Wage ` m x -Foundation Scholarships: $1M+ STEM Summit Early Childhood Initiative Support for Experiential Learning Grants 1/28/2014 2 1/28/2014 twikker Brad Maier C bMCM 1111, TMK B— Natalia Mciham vresiEmr GOJr RH In Ca. .4 Llan gr nor ViRorla Marley Valerie Larsan M— M 10700 Old County Rd. 15 Suite 170 uuMeEa o FOUNDATION Plymouth, MN 55441 763-450-2220 1 info@twinwest.com www.twinweSt.com 2014 TwinWest Legislative Priorities State Taxes, Spending, and Government Reform Repeal the business to business sales taxes enacted in the 2013 legislative session; these include the warehouse tax, telecommunications equipment tax and equipment repair sales tax Utilize the Governor's "Unsessiori' to reduce redundancy and increase efficiency in government programs, commissions and boards. Spending increases should come from economic growth, not tax increases. Transportation TwinWest supports bonding to advance the construction of the Southwest Light Rail project in 2014. TwinWest supports the prioritization of these transportation projects: the addition of a permanent third lane to I-494 in Plymouth; increasing capacity on Highway 169 from I494 to I-694; and the completion of Highway 610. MN DOT will create a better transportation system from increasing efficiencies and creating benchmarks that ensure tax dollars are spent as effectively as possible. Local and Regional Government City and county taxes should be based on the need for services and real growth. TwinWest supports the use of object based coding for all local governments. This accounting method increases transparency and creates greater understanding for taxpayers. Health Care TwinWest supports continuous improvement of the MN Sure system to ensure that it supports the goals of quality health care, affordability and consumer choice. Improvements and efficiencies should drive down the cost of running the exchange and support the goals of affordability and access without unduly burdening businesses either financially or administratively. E-12 and Lifelong Learning Systems, standards, and test results need to reflect the demands of a global economy. Focus should be placed on strengthening experiential learning and expanding college and prep programs for students. A focused and concerted effort should be made to ensure that every student has an effective teacher and that progress is being made on closing the achievement gap and increasing graduation rates. Post -secondary courses should be better aligned with industry needs. Minimum Wage TwinWest supports a minimum wage that conforms to the federal minimum wage ($7.25) Training Wage and Tiered Wage (Tip Credit) Allowances. TwinWest opposes automatic increases or escalators to the rate. Federal Legislation -Immigration TwinWest supports a comprehensive federal immigration solution that provides consistency and predictability for employers, addresses current and future needs for both high skilled and lower skilled workers and a workable, reliable national employee verification system. Federal Legislation -Energy TwinWest advocates for the development and expansion of American energy resources to improve national security and create jobs in the United States. Reliable and affordable energy is essential to running a business and fueling economic growth and competitiveness. 10700 Old County Road 15, Suite 170 • Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763.450.2220 • Fax: 763.450.2221 • www.twinwest.com TM TwinWest CHAMBER OF COMMERCE You are invited to attend the 2014 TwinWest State of the City Events It's time to mark your calendar for TwinWest's upcoming "State of the Cities" series where you will hear from mayors talking about important issues within our own communities. Expand your network, get involved in the city, and learn from the mayors about local issues and city initia- tives of interest to you as a business owner or resident. Attend the State of the City events and be "in the know" about what's happening in the TwinWest region. Hopkins Mayor Gene Maxwell Wednesday, February 5, 5:00-7:00p.m. Hopkins Center for the Arts 1a City of Hopkins MinnPtnnka Mayor Terry Schneider Wednesday, February 12, 7:30-9:00a.m. Minnetonka Community Center 0 City'? minnetonka Wf,emquaW isow*we New Hope Mayor Kathi Hemken Thursday, February New Hope City Hall 13, 7:30-9:00a.m. wo v St. Louis Park Mayor Jeff Jacobs Thursday, March 6, 7:30-9:00a.m. Location -TBD St. Louis Park MINNESOTA Plymouth Mayor Kelli Slavik Tuesday, March 11, 7:30-9:00a.m. Plymouth City Hall RCity of Plymouth Golden Valley Mayor Shep Harris Friday, March 27, 7:30-9:00a.m. Golden Valley City Hall itt4nlley 10700 Old County Road 15, Suite 170 • Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763.450.2220 9 Fax: 763.450.2221 9 www.twinwest.com Proposed Minutes 6.01 Special Council Meeting January 14, 2014 Mayor Slavik called a Special Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on January 14, 2014. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Slavik, Councilmembers Wosje, Willis, Stein, Bildsoe, Johnson, and Prom (arrived at 5:20 p.m.). ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Callister, Administrative Services Director Fischer, Community Development Director Juetten, Police Chief Goldstein, Ice Arena Manager Abel, Park and Recreation Director Evans, Public Works Director Cote, Assistant City Engineer Renneberg, and City Clerk Engdahl. Update on Hollydale I I5kV Project and Substation Site Public Works Director Cote reported that on December 10, 2013, Xcel Energy submitted a petition to withdraw their proposed Hollydale I I5kV project for reasons cited in their petition without prejudice. Crosswalk Signing and Marking Mayor Slavik stated she has received complaints from residents on a trail crossing on Dunkirk Lane that used to be a crosswalk and it's not longer being painted. She asked if that's a shift in policy in not marking the crosswalks. Public Works Director Cote replied stated a staff task force met in 2013 and provided a report that includes the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) guidelines on where marked crosswalks alone (i.e., without traffic -calming treatments, traffic signals and pedestrian signals when warranted, or other substantial crossing improvement) are insufficient and shouldn't be used under the following conditions: 1. Where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph. 2. On a roadway with four or more lanes without a raised median or crossing island that has or will soon have) an average daily traffic (ADT) of 12,000 or greater. 3. On a roadway with four or more lanes with a raised median or crossing island that has (or soon will have) an ADT of 15,000 or greater. Proposed Minutes 1 of 5 Special Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 1 Mayor Slavik requested and received support from the Council to paint the crosswalks at 24th and Dunkirk Lane and Revere Lane and Highway 55 (by Rainbow Foods). These two areas would be painted and staff would put out the pedestrian signs. Councilmember Bildsoe asked about the trail crossing in Ferndale that is heavily used and paint is almost worn off. Public Works Director Cote replied that that is one of the crosswalks that the State said they're not going to paint. The City can communicate with the State to restripe that crosswalk. The Council looked at the recommendations listed in the staff report and stated they support increased education, increased police enforcement, follow FHWA guidelines and either install facility enhancements to certain crossings or remove marked crosswalks. In addition, they support installing push button activated warning lights ($7,000 each) on uncontrolled crosswalks located on a four -lane roadway with speeds 40 mph or higher that are either school zones and directly adjacent to City parks (with playgrounds/ball fields/etc.), similar to the crossings at Wayzata Central Middle School and Lake Camelot Park as noted as item 3a in the report. Crosswalks included would be: Vicksburg Lane Lane at Plymouth Creek Elementary Fernbrook Lane at Plymouth Creek Park Schmidt Lake Road at Providence Academy The Council discussed removing eight crosswalks on roadways that the FHWA guidelines state should not be marked and had lower users and compliance in the counts noted above. This is item 3b of the staff report: Vicksburg Lane Lane at 25th and 39th, County Road 47 at Yucca Lane, Fernbrook lane at 44th Place, County Road 61 at 37th and 45th, and Niagara Lane at 23rd and 25th. Consider installing trail crossing signs at Vicksburg Lane Lane at 25th, Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place, County Road 61 at 37th, and Niagara Lane at 25th. Other locations are close to other trails or controlled intersections and would be eliminated. Pedestrians can still cross at these locations but would need to select a gap in vehicles large enough to cross safely. Councilmember Wosje stated his concern in removing the crosswalks is that it can make it less safe as people will cross the roadway anyway. He suggested taking steps to make them safer rather than removing them. Police Chief Goldstein stated if the crosswalks are eliminated, the ones that remain will try to be enhanced. He stated there shouldn't be crosswalks if the speed of the roadways is 40 mph or greater. Councilmember Bildsoe agreed and stated on a four -lane roadway, the motorists are going too fast and they can't react. Pedestrians shouldn't be put at risk on a four -lane roadway. He stated Proposed Minutes 2 of 5 Special Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 2 he wouldn't even support lights as we don't want to encourage pedestrians to cross these roadways. Councilmember Wosje stated he would support flashing lights. He stated it isn't safe to cross Vicksburg Lane from County Road 6 and Highway 55; therefore, he doesn't support removing the crosswalk at Vicksburg Lane and 25th. Councilmember Willis stated if the City has a trail system where pedestrians need to cross Vicksburg Lane, there should be lights. Councilmember Bildsoe stated it's easier for motorists to react on narrower roads. Striping a road and installing pedestrian signs that drivers can't see isn't good. It puts the burden on pedestrians that there is no cover. The Council needs to be clear if the City is going to maintain those areas. There needs to be something more substantial than a little yellow light flashing. Councilmember Johnson cautioned the Council about the development in Northwest Plymouth and sidewalk crossings. Public Works Director Cote stated there would be controlled and signalized intersections at County Road 47 and Peony Lane and County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane Lane. The Council reiterated that they support items 3a of the report as listed above. However, they requested staff to provide additional alternatives in signing crosswalks other than the $7,000 yellow flashing lights. This would come back to the Council at a future meeting. Regarding item 3b of staff's report, removal of crosswalks as listed above, Mayor Slavik requested that staff provide a report to the Council on the traffic counts, users, and what's surrounding those eight crosswalks, i.e. are they connecting to parks and trails. She stated the Council should consider adopting a sidewalk policy for consistency. Update on Plymouth Ice Center Training Facility Park and Recreation Director Evans and Ice Arena Manager Abel provided a presentation on the proposed training facility at the Ice Arena. This would be a public-private partnership between Acceleration Minnesota NW, Wayzata Youth Hockey Association, and the City. The City would lease the training facility to Acceleration Minnesota NW, and they would operate the facility and provide athletic training and skill development for all sports programs. This is a $1 million project with Wayzata Youth Hockey Association contributing $400,000. Acceleration Minnesota NW would have a 10 -year lease agreement which will include a yearly lease rate of $9 per square foot with a 3% yearly inflator ($64,980-$84,784). They will prepay their year one lease of 64,980 prior to 2014 construction. Lease payments for years 2-10 will be paid monthly following the terms of the lease agreement. The lease terms would require them to pay all utilities, taxes, and interior improvements. The lease revenue after the eighth year would be available for other facility improvements and/or needs. Proposed Minutes 3 of 5 Special Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 3 Councilmember Willis stated this isn't a good financial deal for the City, and it could be funded privately. Councilmembers Bildsoe, Johnson, and Wosje disagreed and stated this would be an asset for the Ice Arena as the City continues to update the facility so it's competitive with other facilities. Councilmember Wosje stated he would like further information on Acceleration Minnesota NW and how the City selected that firm. Park and Recreation Director Evans replied this firm has leased space at the Plymouth Creek Center, and they have been in partnership with the Wayzata Hockey Association. Mayor Slavik asked if there will be a parking problem at the Ice Center as 40% of Acceleration Minnesota NW's customers are hockey players. Ice Arena Manager Abel replied they have looked at the parking and there would be no loss of parking spaces. A lot of the other non - hockey athletes who will use the facility are during non -hockey times. The average of 12-15 vehicles shouldn't pose a parking problem. Mayor Slavik noted that she was contacted by Breakaway Academy and they would like to use this training facility. The majority of the Council gave staff direction to proceed with this project and hire a consultant to work on the project. Greg Gibson from the Wayzata Hockey Association, thanked the Council for their support of this public/private partnership. Set Future Study Sessions The Council scheduled the following study session, added item to existing study session, and scheduled a tour: 1. February 4 at 6:00 p.m.: Hilde Performance Center Improvements and Veterans Memorial update. 2. February 11 at 5:30 p.m.: added quarterly update with City Manager to the agenda. 3. February 18 at 6:00 p.m.: Tour of Maple Grove/Plymouth Shooting Range Facility. Proposed Minutes 4 of 5 Special Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 4 Adjournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 6:43 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Proposed Minutes 5 of 5 Special Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 5 Proposed Minutes Regular Council Meeting January 14, 2014 Mayor Slavik called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on January 14, 2014. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Slavik, Councilmembers Wosje, Willis, Johnson, Black, Bildsoe and Stein. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Callister, City Attorney Knutson, Park and Recreation Director Evans, Public Works Director Cote, Community Development Director Juetten, Police Chief Goldstein, Fire Chief Kline, Administrative Services Director Fischer, and City Clerk Engdahl. Plymouth Forum Roger Scherer, 12001 Bass Lake Road, spoke about the snow plowing and the amount of road salt that is being used which is destroying his landscaping and retaining wall. Mayor Slavik stated the City isn't responsible for anything placed in the right-of-way of a person's property. She stated staff will contact him regarding the snow removal. Diane Brower -Johnson, 10825 39th Avenue North, representing residents of the Four Seasons Mall area, requested they receive notifications from the City on the development of the Walmart site even though the majority of them reside outside the 750' required notification area. Mayor Slavik stated no applications for demolition or development of this site have been submitted to the City. She stated notifications are sent to all residents within 750' of the property, which is more than the 250' required by state law, as well as signs placed on the property. Wolfgang Ebert, 3930 Yorktown Lane, spoke against the proposed Wal-Mart development for the Four Seasons Mall site. Presentations and Public Information Announcements There were no presentations or announcements. Approval of Agenda Proposed Minutes 1 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 6 Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to gpprove the a egnda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Consent Agenda Item 6.08 was removed from the Consent Agenda and item 6.13 was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item No. 8.04. Motion was made by Councilmember Johnson, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt the amended Consent Agenda that included the followingitems: ems: 6.01) City Council Minutes for Special and Regular Meetings of December 10, 2013. 6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements Ending January 4, 2014 (Res2014-001). 6.03) Appointment of City Health Officer for 2014. 6.04) Appointment of City Council Secretary for 2014. 6.05) Resolution Appointing Official Depositories for City Funds for 2014 (Res2014-002). 6.06) Resolution Designating the Plymouth Sun Sailor as the City of Plymouth's Official Newspaper for 2014 (Res2014-003). 6.07) Resolution Accepting Donation from CenterPoint Energy for Fireworks at the Fire and Ice Festival (Res2014-004). 6.08) (This item was removed from the Agenda). 6.09) Resolution Authorizing Payment for Purchases that May Exceed $100,000 (Res2014- 005). 6.10) Resolution Approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for GWS Land Development of Plymouth LLC. For "Terra Vista 3rd Addition" for Property Located South of 59th Avenue between Dunkirk and Vicksburg Lanes (2013104Res2014-006) and a Resolution Adopting Assessments for Trunk Sanitary Sewer and WaterMain, Terra Vista 3rd Addition 2013104Res2014-007). 6.11) Resolution Authorizing Condemnation of Land, Peony Lane North of Schmidt Lake Road 10015Res2014-008). 6.12) Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 4 and Final for the Lancaster Lane Mill and Overlay and Watermain Replacement Project (11010Res2014-009). Proposed Minutes 2 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 7 6.13) (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item No. 8.04). 6.14) Resolution Accepting Streets for Continual Maintenance for Wood Crest of Plymouth 2nd Addition (2010094—Res2014-010). 6.15) Resolution Accepting Utilities for Continual Maintenance for Hampton Hills 3rd Addition 2011002—Res2014-011). 6.16) Resolution Accepting Utilities for Continual Maintenance for O'Donnell Woods Addition 2012099—Res2014-012). 6.17) Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Purchase Agreements and Easements for Streets and Utilities for Trillium Woods (2008085F—Res2014-013). 6.18) Resolution Awarding Contract for St. Mary's Drainage Improvement (12026Res2014- 014). 6.19) Resolution Approving Temporary Liquor Licenses for West Medicine Lake Community Club (Res2014-015). 6.20) Resolution Authorizing the Re -Advertisement for Bids for the Medicine Lake Retaining Wall (13020—Res2014-016). 6.21) Ordinance Amending Section 1016 of the Plymouth City Code Regarding Plymouth Ice Center Fees (Ord2014-04). With all members voting in favor, the motion passed. Public Hearings 7.01) Public hearing on Implementing Franchise Fees with Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy Minnesota Gas, d/b/a Centerpoint Energy, and Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association. City Manager Callister reported on implementing franchise fees to supplement funding for major street projects. The franchise fee will not eliminate the need for special assessments on major road improvements, but it will minimize the special assessments to stay at a minimal rate. When these fees are implemented, all households would pay the same franchise fees regardless of the value of the home. Tax exempt properties would also have to pay the franchise fees. The income from franchise fees is based on the number of utility connections in the City. There are approximately 33,500 electric connections and 28,000 gas connections. The proposed charge would be a $2 charge per month per utility. All the franchise fee revenue would be designated for the Street Reconstruction Fund for future capital improvements. The franchise fees would Proposed Minutes 3 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 8 generate an income of $2 million annually, which would be equal to a 7% increase in a property tax levy. He stated with major street improvement projects in the future such as Peony Lane and Vicksburg Lane, the City would benefit greatly from the fees. He stated in order to implement the franchise fees, they must be adopted by Ordinance. The fees would take effect after publication and written notice to the utility companies or about 90 days. Staff is recommending holding the public hearing, adopt the Ordinances with CenterPoint Energy, Xcel Energy and Wright Hennepin Cooperative, and send notices to the utilities. Mayor Slavik opened the public hearing. Wayne Baunschmidt, a representative from Wright -Hennepin Cooperative stated they support the franchise fee but aren't too excited about collecting the fee. Mayor Slavik closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wosje stated that there is support from the business community to proceed with the franchise fees. Councilmember Willis stated that some people will view this franchise fee as a tax. He stated the Council understands the need to invest and address the public transportation in the City so that it does not become undesirable to its citizens. He stated he doesn't like to raise taxes and fees; however the Council needs to protect the resources and assets and invest in the City's future. Councilmember Johnson stated she supports the franchise fees and wants to make sure that the revenues go to the reconstruction fund. Councilmember Bildsoe stated that because of these franchise fees, it will help other street repair projects to go through at a quicker pace. Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to Adopt the Ordinances Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company A Minnesota Corporation, D/B/A Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service within the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (Ord2014-01), an Ordinance Implementing a Gas Energy Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ("CenterPoint Energy) for providing Gas Energy Service within the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (Ord2014- 02), an Ordinance Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee for Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service within the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (Ord2014-03), Resolution Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance for Northern States Power Company A Minnesota Corporation, D/B/A Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns (Res2014-017), Resolution Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance for CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ("CenterPoint Energy:) Res2014-018), and a Resolution Authorizing Summary Publication of Ordinance for Wright - Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association, its Successors and Assigns (Res2014-019). Councilmember Prom stated that he doesn't believe the franchise fee will go away in the future. Proposed Minutes 4 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 9 Mayor Slavik stated she support the franchise fees because it is fairer to the residents all across the City. With Councilmembers Johnson, Wosje, Willis, Bildsoe, Stein and Mayor Slavik voting yes, and Councilmember Prom voting no, the motion carried. General Business 8.01) Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for "Brynwood" for property located at 5635 Vicksburg Lane (2013095) (Tabled from December 10, 2013) Community Development Director Juetten reported on the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Brynwood" for property located at 5635 Vicksburg Lane. He stated the item was tabled at the December 10, 2013 meeting because of resident's concerns about traffic flow in the development. At the request of the Council, the applicant was given the opportunity to bring back plat alternatives for their review. He discussed the four alternative plans that were listed in the staff report. The following residents from the Spring Meadows neighhorhood spoke before the Council and requested Council support for Alternative Plan E: 1. Andy Dahl, 16000 55th Avenue North 2. Chris Empson, 16060 55th Avenue North 3. Kyle Heller, 16215 54th Avenue North 4. Matthew Karban, 5500 Weston Lane North 5. Paul Nick, 5510 Weston Lane North 6. Chris Post, 16330 54th Avenue North 7. Joshua Brotemarkle, 16020 55th Avenue North 8. Deann Torrison, 16010 55th Avenue North 9. Robinson Zamorant, 16055 55th Avenue North 10. Charles Kanazeh, 16015 55th Avenue North 11. Heather Schroder, 16080 55th Avenue North 12. Tony Kuechle, 15985 55th Avenue North 13. Xianbo Zhang, 16065 55th Avenue North James Hill, representing K. Hovnanian Homes, thanked the Councilmembers for sharing their concerns and giving them concepts to work through with staff. He stated that all the alternatives are acceptable to their company. Their preference would be Alternative D. He also noted that the cul-de-sac on Alternative E can be incorporated into any of the plans. Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to qpprove an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 (Zoning Ordinance) of the City Code to Classify Proposed Minutes 5 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 10 Certain Land Located at 5635 VicksburgLaneane (2013095—Ord2014-05); a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat for K. Hovnanian Homes of Minnesota, LLC, for `Brynwood" for Property Located at 5635 Vicksburg Lane with Alternative Plan D with cul-de-sac on Weston Lane 2013095—Res2014-020); and a Resolution ApprovingFindingsindings of Fact for the Rezoning of Land Located at 5635 Vicksburglaneane (2013095—Res2014-021). Councilmember Willis stated he would not support this option because the street is too narrow on this plan. After further discussion, the width on 57th Avenue would better serve traffic and would align with the east side of Vicksburg if the road were wider. A Substitute Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to approve the documents noted in the above motion above but for Alternative Plan E. Councilmember Stein stated he would not support the cul-de-sac option, but would support a temporary construction barrier. Councilmember Prom asked what would occur to the existing Weston Lane in Spring Meadows in regards to the temporary cul-de-sac. Public Works Director Cote replied the preferred method would be to have the developer complete two separate cul-de-sacs with curbs and gutters. Councilmember Johnson requested the trail right-of-way maintained. Public Works Director Cote stated the two trails between the neighborhoods would be connected. Parks and Recreation Director Evans added a sidewalk would be constructed that connects the sidewalks in the development, not a trail. With Slavik, Johnson, Wosje, Willis, Bildsoe and Prom voting yes, and Stein voting no, the motion carried. 8.02) Preliminary and Final Plat request of EICHI, Inc. for "Kingsview Heights 5th Addition" on property north of 44th Avenue between Harbor and Juneau Lanes in the Wayzata School District (2013096) Community Development Director Juetten reported on the preliminary and final plat request by EICHI, Inc. for Kingsview Heights 5th Addition on property north of 44th Avenue between Harbor and Juneau Lanes to be platted as one single family lot. In 1984 this parcel was originally platted as an outlot. In 1987 the developer requested the property to be developed as one lot. Council denied the action. In 1996 Council rezoned the lot to a standard zoning district. In 2009 the current owner requested the property to be platted from an outlot to a single family lot and the Council denied. In 2013 the landowners went through court to register the property and determine who has ownership of property. The courts stated the developer does own the property and has full rights to that property. The applicant now requests the property to be platted from an outlot to a single family lot. The following residents from the Kingsview Heights neighborhood stated they are opposed to the preliminary and final plat request: Proposed Minutes 6 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 11 1. Josephine and Chester Cizio, 14870 45th Avenue N 2. William Peper, representing Todd Anderson, 4510 Juneau Lane North 3. Todd Anderson, 4510 Juneau Lane North 4. Richard Meyer, 14515 45th Place North 5. Mark Caprio, 4465 Harbor Lane North 6. Pam Koehler, 14905 46th Place North 7. Jeff Langfeldt, 4380 Juneau Lane 8. Michael Jogodka, 4355 Ithaca Lane North 9. Tambilyn Keller, 14515 46th Avenue North 10. Jill Sherritt, 14875 45th Avenue North 11. Joseph Stanek, 4415 Harbor Lane North Martin Harstad, applicant, stated his father developed the land many years ago. The title issues on the land have been resolved. The family held outlot A and have paid taxes since day one. Hans Hagen did not want to buy the outlot to be developed with the Hagen properties so it remained in the Harstad family. Because of the density requirement under the original PUD zoning ordinance, he couldn't plat the property. It was never intended to be part of the homeowners association. When the taxes were raised because of the valuation from the assessor, the reason was that the land is developable. The Minnesota judge and examiner stated that the Harstad family has full title to the property. City Attorney Knutson stated there is a court order that states that the developer does own the property. The issue to be voted on is whether the standards under the current ordinance for platting have been met. Councilmember Johnson explained some of the history with the property. She stated that the zoning ordinance in place now is different than it was before the 1996 rezoning of PUDs. She stated that in 2009, the Council denied the resolution as they needed further clarification on who owned the property. That has been clarified by the courts. Councilmember Stein asked how the adjacent properties would be affected by the drainage from this property if developed. Public Works Director Cote replied the property meets the City's drainage standards. Councilmember Prom asked if under the current zoning would this plat would be allowed for only a single family home. Community Development Director Juetten replied yes. The plans haven't been analyzed yet, but the flattest spot on the property would probably meet buffer and wetland setbacks. Motion was made by Councilmember Wosje, and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to adopt a Resolution Approving a Preliminary and Final Plat for EICHI, Inc. for "Kingsview Heights 5th Addition" for Property Located north of 44th Avenue between Juneau and Harbor Lanes 2013096—Res2014-022) and a Resolution to Adopt Assessments Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Kingsview Heights 5th Addition (2013096—Res2014-023). Proposed Minutes 7 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 12 Councilmember Stein asked what was changed from the 2009 resolution for denial, other than the ownership of the property. City Attorney Knutson replied the City has a court order saying the applicant is the owner of the property. If the property meets the current Zoning Ordinance requirements, then there is no basis to deny the application. Councilmember Wosje stated that he has viewed the property and he would prefer that it remain undeveloped, but the court didn't rule in favor the homeowners associations' claims. He must follow the law when it has been ruled upon by a judge. Councilmember Stein asked if there were any restrictions that could be placed on the plat that would help minimize drainage issues or if the City has input as to where the house is placed so that the views would be minimized for the neighbors. Community Development Director Juetten replied there are current setbacks on how high they have to be and how far back from the wetlands as well. When they submit their permit requests for removing trees, that can be looked at. The City cannot determine the size of the house, but only that it meets the set back requirements. City Attorney Knutson stated conditions can be placed on a property for variances. With the application this evening, all the Council can do is to make sure all the conditions are met with the Zoning Ordinance. Councilmember Willis stated that at the time the City was working on this development, they did have an intent that Outlot J would be a common open space for the development. That wasn't part of the final plat to be recorded. The ownership of the property is not unquestioned and the subdivision regulations have changed. The applicant has proven his ownership, and he can develop the property. He stated he's also sympathetic to the neighbors but he has to vote in favor of the motion. With Councilmembers Johnson, Wosje, Willis, Bildsoe, Stein and Prom voting yes; and Mayor Slavik voting no, the motion carried. 8.03) Ordinance Amending Section 2005.13 of the City Code and Exception from Section 2005.13 of the City Code Allowing Liquor Sales at the Hilde Performance Center on June 7, 2014 Motion was made by Councilmember Johnson, and seconded by Councilmember Wosje, to adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter XX, Section 2005 of the Plymouth City Code Concerning Liquor and Beer (Ord2014-06) and a Resolution Approving Exception from Section 2005.13 of the City Code for an Event at the Hilde Performance Center (Res2014-025). With all members voting in favor the motion carried. 8.04) Grade Separated Crossing on Vicksburg Lane at the Canadian Pacific Railroad 16001) Proposed Minutes 8 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 13 Councilmember Willis asked what the height of the retaining walls will to be and how these walls would impact the wetland areas on the corners of the bridge. Assistant City Engineer Renneberg replied the bridge is to be 30' high so the walls would be approximately 15' to 20' high. In addition, a meeting has been schedule with the regulatory agencies, and the wetlands will be discussed on the northeast and southwest corners of the project. Chris Empson, 16060 55th Avenue North, requested the Council table this item until more input could be received from the community. His main concern is how a 30' bridge will project noise into their neighborhoods. Tony Kuechle, 15985 55th Avenue North, stated he prefers to keep the road at grade crossing. He also requested this item be tabled. Councilmember Johnson stated that funding and timing is involved with this project and it's important to keep the momentum going in order to prevent delays. She stated the current crossing is terrible and is a huge safety issue. Notifications will be given regarding public hearings on the project at specified times. She suggested the residents watch for these publications and notices. Mayor Slavik agreed with Councilmember Johnson and reiterated the need to keep this project moving due to funding issues. Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to Approve a Resolution Approving a Grade -Separated Crossing on Vicksburg Lane at the Canadian Pacific Railroad For Vicksburg Lane from Schmidt Lake Road to Maple Grove Border Reconstruction and Extension Proiect (16001—Res2014-024). Reports and Staff Recommendations There were no Reports or Staff Recommendations. Adjournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Proposed Minutes 9 of 9 Regular Meeting of January 14, 2014 Page 14 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 2PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 14, 2014 To: Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by: Julie McMackins, Accountant Reviewed by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager Item: Disbursements Ending January 18, 2014 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution to approve the disbursements for the period ending January 18, 2014 2. BACKGROUND: Attached is a list of city fund disbursements for the period ending January 18, 2014. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers Resolution Page 1 Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 1.18.14/Council meeting 1.28.14 FUND 100 General Fund 417,695.46 200 Recreation Fund 5,990.52 210 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 0.00 220 Transit System Fund 275,170.45 234 Economic Development Fund 0.00 250 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 6,271.95 254 HRA Section 8 Fund 374.13 254 HAP Check Summary 5,380.00 258 HRA General Fund 1,326.85 300 1998C GO Activity Center 0.00 304 1998B Shenandoah Debt Sery 0.00 305 2004A GO Public Safety 0.00 307 1998A -TIF #7-5A Rottland 0.00 309 2007A Open Space Series 0.00 310 2009A TIF #7-5A Refund 1998A 0.00 311 2009B AC and FH Refunding 0.00 312 2010A GO Open Space 0.00 400 General Capital Projects Fund 20,614.19 401 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00 404 Community Improvement 0.00 405 Park Replacement Fund 0.00 406 Infrasturcture Replacement Fund 0.00 407 Project Administration Fund 0.00 408 Park Construction 3,553.00 409 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00 410 2003 Street Reconstruction 0.00 413 Improvement Project Construction 348,300.66 414 Shenandoah Administration 0.00 417 Project Warranty Repairs 0.00 418 Utility Trunk System Expansion 0.00 420 Water Sewer Construction 10,547.39 421 Enterprise -Other Construction 0.00 998 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const) 0.00 998 TIF # 7-3 P.O.S. (Const) 0.00 422 TIF #74 P.T.P (Const) 50.00 423 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const) 0.00 424 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const) 0.00 425 TIF Housing Assistance Program 0.00 426 TIF #7-7 Stonecreek ('Const) 0.00 427 TIF #7-8 Shops @ Plymouth Creek 0.00 428 TIF HRA Senior Apt. Constr. Fund 0.00 429 TIF HRA 1-3 Crossroads Station 0.00 430 CON -Open Spaces Series 2007A 0.00 431 CON -2010A Open Space 0.00 432 TIF #7-8 Quest 0.00 500 Water Fund 59,456.33 510 Water Resources Fund 8,366.89 520 Sewer Fund 119,594.21 530 Solid Waste Management Fund 60,346.35 540 Ice Center Fund 12,448.68 550 Field House Fund 5,884.65 600 Central Equipment Fund 91,606.59 610 Public Facilities Fund 29,897.31 620 Information Technology Fund 188,110.47 630 Risk Management Fund 32,504.13 640 Employee Benefits Fund 433,953.07 650 Design Engineering 0.00 660 Resource Planning 1,341.63 800 Investment Trust Fund 172.93 850 Plymouth Town Square 0.00 851 Vicksburg Crossing 0.00 Total Invoice Expense Distribution: 2,138,957.84 Page 2 I P City of Plymouth Check Payment Register 01/06/2014 to 01/18/2014 Check 135641 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Acme Tools Inv. 2354489 12/23/2013 Husq Cut n Break saw Inv. 2360836 12/27/2013 PI iers,screwdrivers, hex key set Check 135642 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Adam's Pest Control, Inc. Inv. 850876 12/27/2013 Dec'13 PCC Pest Control Check 135643 Date Paid:01109/2014 AIM Electronics Inc Inv. 36894 12/23/2013 Elm Creek rplcmnt scoreboards flds 1,2,4 Inv. 36902 12/26/2013 Rockford sign repairs Check 135644 Date Paid:01/09/2014 AI's Coffee Company Inv. 125714 12/20/2013 concessions resupply Check 135645 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Allied Waste Services Inv. 0894003373858 12/25/2013 12.26/12.25.13 IC Rubbish Removal Check 135646 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 9174 12/17/2013 Check 135647 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2014 01/09/2014 Check 135648 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2014 01/09/2014 Check 135649 Date Paid:01109/2014 Inv. 87948 12/31/2013 Check 135650 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. WO9008141 12/16/2013 Check 135651 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 53438 12/11/2013 Check 135652 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 80 8764X 1 12/17/2013 Check 135653 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131215 12/15/2013 Check 135654 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 295833 12/20/2013 Check 135655 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. HS95243 12/18/2013 Check 135656 Date Paid:01109/2014 Inv.091022 01/09/2014 Check 135657 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 55188241213 12/16/2013 Check 135658 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 7366 12/16/2013 Anderson Engineering Nov'13 So Shore Dr survey Osier Addn Amount: $1,536.68 1,469.53 67.15 Amount: $79.30 79.30 Amount: $17,758.70 17,662.31 96.39 Amount: $611.40 611.40 Amount: $270.51 270.51 Amount: $1,280.00 1,280.00 Association of Minnesota Building Officials Amount: $800.00 2014 Bldg Membership 800.00 ATOM Amount: $200.00 2014 Agency Membership 200.00 Barthold Inc Amount: $200.00 Nov2013 Pumpkin drop/recycling rolloff 200.00 Bertelson Total Office Solutions Amount: $24.01 desk calendar/refill/wall calendar 24.01 Borgen Radiator Amount: 464.68 Unit 281 fuel tank repair 464.68 Boyer Trucks Amount: 473.11 Tubeless 473.11 Bryan Rock Products Inc Amount: 1,085.19 12.3/12.4.13 49.41ton Ag Lime 1,085.19 57.31 Cadd/Engineering Supply Inc/CES Amount: 122.75 Plotter Paper 122.75 252.00 CDW Government Inc Amount: 26.61 adapter cable 26.61 Centex Amount: 1,000.00 R200904872 10.22.09 Erosion refund/Elm 1,000.00 Creek Highlands Centuryl-ink Amount: 57.31 Dec'13 551.8824 57.31 City of Robbinsdale Amount: 252.00 6th -8th Grade school soccer officials 252.00 Page 3 Check 135659 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Comcast Amount: 50.61 Inv. 07376150114 12/24/2013 Jan'14 CMCL Wireless 50.61 Inv. 01949482 12/20/2013 Check 135660 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Corval Constructors Inc Amount: 1,928.78 Inv. 805722 12/23/2013 Rink C service call 1,928.78 Mission Hills BB court replacement Check 135661 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Cub Foods Amount: 300.72 Inv. 131231 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Cub Food Charges 300.72 Check 135662 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Dalco Amount: 1,057.40 Inv. 2650881CM 09/19/2013 Cr inv 2650881/return terry towels 65.00) Inv. 2692455 12/27/2013 toliet tissue/towels 1,122.40 Check 135663 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Days Plumbing Service Co Amount: 1,049.00 Inv. 3607203 12/15/2013 12.18.13 CaCompte water heater repairs 1,049.00 Check 135664 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Derson Manufacturing Inc Amount: 464.91 Inv. 31790 12/17/2013 PW rplc retention head/hose on oil burner 464.91 Check 135665 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Designwrite Studios Inv. 5779 12/17/2013 Oct'13 Plymouth guide inserts Inv. 5780 12/17/2013 Nov-Dec'13 Plymouth News Check 135666 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Discount Steel Inc Inv. 01949482 12/20/2013 Supplies for Fire training center Check 135667 Date Paid:01/09/2014 DMJ Asphalt Inc Inv. 11984 11/01/2013 Roller rental Inv. 11985 10/28/2013 Mission Hills BB court replacement Check 135668 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 82700230613 12/11/2013 Inv. 82700231813 12/13/2013 Inv. 82700233513 12/17/2013 Check 135669 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 27241 12/19/2013 Check 135670 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 347536 12/11/2013 Inv. 64476 12/17/2013 Inv. 64477 12/17/2013 DPC Industries Inc 4,313gl Sodium Hypo @.6780 4,037gl Sodium Hypo @.6780 6,8481b Hydrofluorosilicic acid @ .3430 Education Speciality Publishing LLC 1200 Youth activity books Ehlers & Associates Inc review & submit spending plan Review/submit spending plan CREDIT(inv#347536) Review/submit spending plan special form to OSA for TIF7-4 Check 135671 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Emergency Response Solutions Inv. 1229 12/17/2013 Facepiece repairs Inv. 1247 12/23/2013 2 Fire Helmets Check 135672 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv.1312pcc 12/31/2013 Check 135673 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. MNPLY66106 12/20/2013 Check 135674 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 250795922 12/25/2013 Check 135675 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 01417639 12/16/2013 Check 135676 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 22187101 01/09/2014 eQuality Pathways to Potential Dec'13 PCC Janitorial Fastenal Company 5x5.5mm DIN FedEx 12.5/12.11.13 Fire/UT courier service Force America relief valve (2) Shawn N Funfar 5875 Vicksburg Ln water refund Amount: $925.00 240.00 685.00 Amount: $2,115.72 2,115.72 Amount: $7,937.69 908.44 7,029.25 Amount: $8,010.17 2,924.21 2,737.09 2,348.87 Amount: $396.00 396.00 Amount: $50.00 200.00 200.00) 50.00 Amount: $756.36 347.04 409.32 Amount: $384.75 384.75 Amount: $11.92 11.92 Amount: $175.03 175.03 Amount: $151.06 151.06 Amount: $30.50 30.50 Page 4 Check 135677 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Julia & Roman Gadaskin Inv. 24213815 01/09/2014 13120 Sunset TO water refund Check 135678 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 906667879 12/19/2013 Inv. 9319473329 12/16/2013 Inv. 9320875801 12/17/2013 Inv. 9321164981 12/17/2013 Inv. 9321744410 12/18/2013 Inv. 9322911307 12/19/2013 Inv. 9322911323 12/19/2013 Inv. 9323486069 12/19/2013 Check 135679 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131215 12/15/2013 Grainger Fillet Knife (1)/Skinning Knife (2) spotlight Adjustable box/compartments tarp Burn Drum -carbon steel drum bathroom supplies Theft Proof Mirrir Replacement sensor Greenway Lawn Maintenance Inc Dec'13 Kingswood snowplowing Check 135680 Date Paid:01/09/2014 GWS Land Development of MN LLC Inv. ESC13023AFP 01/09/2014 Refund Escrow ESC13023.AFP Steeple Hill 2nd Check 135681 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 104340 12/12/2013 Inv. 104349 12/12/2013 Inv. 104446 12/19/2013 Inv. 104473 12/23/2013 Inv. 104477 12/22/2013 Inv. 104489 12/31/2013 Inv. 104516 12/27/2013 Check 135682 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 16841 12/23/2013 Check 135683 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131227 12/27/2013 Check 135684 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 4331 01/01/2014 Check 135685 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131221A 12/21/2013 Check 135686 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 5759 12/18/2013 Check 135687 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 77299 12/18/2013 Check 135688 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 22980 12/17/2013 Inv. 23003 12/20/2013 Inv. 23004 12/20/2013 Hamel Lumber Inc Dec'13 Charges - mailbox/screws/mounting boards/house nbr Dec'13 Charges - RSC/shop time Dec'13 Charges - drill adapter/key wrenches/bits Dec'13 Charges - mit box/plate/base Dec'13 Charges - RSC/RSC Dec'13 Charges - training center supplies Dec'13 Charges - base/tip/nail box/sich Henry's Waterworks Inc Curb stop parts Home Depot Dec'13 Charges - Home Depot J Jenson Enterprises Dec'13 Snowplowing J P Schmitz Construction Co LLC 440 Vinewood Ln N water main repair K&S Engraving Name tags Sobotta Killmer Electric Company Inc CC orn lights &Bass Lake plyfld lighting Kris Engineering Inc Carbides and bumpers Carbides and bumpers Return 4 carbides/bumpers Check 135689 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Law Enforcement Technology Group LLC Inv. 14324 01/01/2014 Jan'14-Dec'14 LETG sftwre maint Check 135690 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Leica Geosystems Inc Inv. US900072308 12/20/2013 Replacement touch pens Amount: $500.00 500.00 Amount: $797.99 67.95 87.85 23.12 87.48 134.17 153.19 49.50 194.73 Amount: $850.00 850.00 Amount: $3,534.94 3,534.94 Amount: $1,387.83 96.90 68.30 67.91 79.47 39.70 967.47 68.08 Amount: 2,216.40 2,216.40 Amount: 3,009.38 3,009.38 Amount: 400.00 400.00 Amount: 750.00 750.00 Amount: 7.75 7.75 Amount: 5,790.00 5,790.00 Amount: $1,959.89 2,049.44 268.65 358.20) Amount: $56,055.23 56,055.23 Amount: $25.04 25.04 Page 5 Check 135691 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Loffler Companies Inc Inv. 105973 11/27/2013 Credit -HP Toner defective Inv. 1662884 11/27/2013 leaking toner Inv.1673174 12/17/2013 toner Check 135692 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Loretto Auto Recondition Inv. 36311 12/20/2013 Unit 5006 Body repair/paint Check 135693 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 140102 12/11/2013 Check 135694 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 36615 12/18/2013 Inv. 36695 12/21/2013 Check 135695 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 25194 12/31/2013 Check 135696 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 173535 12/01/2013 Check 135697 Date Paid:01/0912014 Inv. 80063 12/09/2013 Check 135698 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2014 01/09/2014 Check 135699 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 140102 01/09/2014 Lowe's Dec'13 charges - Lowe's Maple Crest Landscape 12.16.13 Snow plowing 12.19.13 Snow plowing Mark's Lawn Service Inc 12.4/12.16/12.20/12.24 Snowplowing Marsh & McLennan Agency 1 st qtr 2014 RJF Agency fees Metro Water Conditioning Inc. Rink A & C softner salt Minneapolis Rifle club 2014 Steve Thomas Membership Minnesota International Center 2014 Great Decisions Books and DVD Check 135700 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Minnesota Sheriffs Association Inv. 042230 01/09/2014 Feb'14 E ri k/Aaron "Street Officers Civil Disputes" Check 135701 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2013409 12/26/2013 Check 135702 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2723 12/24/2013 Check 135703 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. P00002247 10/23/2013 Check 135704 Date Paid:01109/2014 Inv. 00000181741 12/19/2013 Check 135705 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 2014 01/09/2014 Check 135706 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 1788 12/18/2013 Check 135707 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131217 12/17/2013 Check 135708 Date Paid:01/0912014 Inv. MN00000932 12/10/2013 Check 135709 Date Paid:0110912014 Inv.5969992X 01/09/2014 Check 135710 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv.6956114 01/09/2014 Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground 8 6" tables, 2 ADA table-Hilde MN BCA 12.10/12.12.13 Jonathan Goldenman/DMT Operator course MN Dept of Transportation 9.10/9.30.13 Materials testing MN Dept of Transportation Plymouth Blvd/TH 55 Intersection Project MN PRIMA 2014 Membership MnFiam Book Sales Firefighter 1 books Modern Office PCC 6 guest chairs MS Govern Jan'14-Dec'14 Govern Maintenance National Fire Protection Association 2014 Stan Scofield Fire Codes Membership NCPERS Minnesota Jan'14 Opt PERA Life INs Amount: $70.54 175.28) 175.28 70.54 Amount: $2,955.82 2,955.82 Amount: $185.66 185.66 Amount: $194.00 97.00 97.00 Amount: $1,420.00 1,420.00 Amount: $5,000.00 5,000.00 Amount: $591.48 591.48 Amount: $150.00 150.00 Amount: $182.00 182.00 Amount: $140.00 140.00 Amount: $7,372.24 7,372.24 Amount: $285.00 285.00 Amount: $578.13 578.13 Amount: $236,931.46 236,931.46 Amount: $50.00 50.00 Amount: $641.25 641.25 Amount: $3,424.28 3,424.28 Amount: $67,249.64 67,249.64 Amount: $1,165.50 1,165.50 Amount: $1,456.00 1,456.00 Page 6 Check 135711 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Newman Traffic Signs Inv. T10269632 12/19/2013 Sign order -EC Film -Flat -Notched & Punc Check 135712 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 71071375 12/12/2013 Inv. 71073225 12/13/2013 Inv. 71074263 12/16/2013 Inv. 71075477 12/17/2013 Inv. 71079669 12/20/2013 North American Salt Co 12.12.13 250.50tn Bulk road salt 12.13.13 313.11 ton Bulk road salt 12.16.13 211.54ton Bulk road salt 12.17.13 294.19ton Bulk road salt 12.18.13 130.53ton Bulk road salt Amount: $104.68 104.68 Amount: $87,957.15 18,363.03 22,952.73 15,507.06 21,565.76 9,568.57 Check 135713 Date Paid:01/09/2014 North Memorial EMS Education Amount: 2,300.00 Inv. PSA630 12/19/2013 12.16.13 !st Responder Refresher/Hultgren,P 100.00 1,125.00 Johnson snowplow Inv. PSA633 12/19/2013 12.5.13 44 PD Dept First Responder Refresher 2,200.00 Amount: $386.00 Check 135714 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Northern Safety Technology Amount: 89.73 Inv. 35098 12/27/2013 Strobe Mounts 89.73 164.20 Check 135715 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Northern Sanitary Supply Co Inc Amount: 918.51 Inv. 165802 12/18/2013 towels/sponges/laundry detergent/handsoap 918.51 287.89 Check 135716 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Northwest Animal Hospital Amount: 23.67 Inv. 1798 12/30/2013 11.12.13 K9 Odi medication 23.67 Check 135717 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Nuss Truck and Equipment Amount: 165.00 Inv. 5517A 09/30/2013 Unit 299 stainless coolant lines 165.00 Check 135718 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Oakwood Pet Clinic Amount: 55.00 Inv. 96608 01/03/2014 1.3.14 Medina dog at large assist 55.00 Check 135719 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Office Depot Amount: 295.09 Inv. 688987921001 12/16/2013 desk items/pencil cup 45.98 Inv.689471244001 12/19/2013 Envelopes 70.74 Inv. 68947126001 12/19/2013 scissor/refill ink 10.42 Inv. 690429317001 12/30/2013 Battery size AA/tape correction 56.03 Inv. 698006894001 12/16/2013 planner/retract pen 111.92 Check 135720 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 22166 12/30/2013 Inv. 22167 12/30/2013 Inv. 22168 12/30/2013 Inv. 22170 12/30/2013 Ostvig Tree, Inc. Amount: $6,237.79 Boxelder tree removal/4470 Deerwood LN/park $2,009.78 entrance Remaining portion of 2013 Pruning budget $1,982.53 16724 24th Ave N tree removal $1,042.03 forced cuts/16830 & 16832 49th PI N $1,203.45 Check 135721 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Outdoor Images Inc Amount: $1,125.00 Inv. 109317 12/16/2013 12.16.13 Cascades,Hidden Terrace,Wynfield 1,125.00 snowplow Check 135722 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Owens Companies Inc Amount: $386.00 Inv. 54021 12/20/2013 boiler alarm fail/reset & test 221.80 Inv. 54470 12/26/2013 burner pilot light failure/reset & test/cleaned 164.20 Check 135723 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Performance Signs & Displays Inc Amount: $287.89 Inv. 8634 12/26/2013 City Plaques 287.89 Check 135724 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 5090 12/15/2013 Check 135725 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Inv. 140102 01/02/2014 Permagreen 12.4.13 Westridge/Rockfors rd snowplowing Premier Lawn & Landscape LLC 12.4/12.16/12.20/12.25 Snowplowing Amount: $855.00 855.00 Amount: $4,600.00 4,600.00 Check 135726 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Printers Service Inc Amount: $57.71 Page 7 Inv. 268168 12/18/2013 ice knife sharp 57.71 Check 135727 Date Paid:01/09/2014 2 Echo trimmers, 2 blowers Public Agency Training Council Amount: $295.00 Inv. 173123 01/03/2014 3.11.14/3.12.14 Pete Johnson/"Supervising the 295.00 Check 135735 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Toxic Officer" Inv. 2927 Check 135728 Date Paid:01109/2014 12.5/12.19 Dynamite Dinosaurs Randy's Sanitation Inc Amount: $486.68 Inv. 112118191213 12/19/2013 Dec'13 CWP Rubbish Removal 79.78 Inv. 112572181213 12/19/2013 Dec'13 ZWP Rubbish Removal 79.78 Inv. 114317480114 12/19/2013 Jan'14 PCC Rubbish Removal 327.12 Check 135729 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Reinders Inc Inv. 302467300 12/20/2013 Glyphosate Pro 4 Check 135730 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Root -O -Matic Inv. 36349 12/19/2013 PD garage jet out 2 clogged drains Check 135731 Date Paid:01/09/2014 The Rose Companies Inc Inv. 17955 12/26/2013 12.4/12.16/12.20/12.24 Snowplowing Check 135732 Date Paid:0110912014 Safe Fast Inv. INV133798 12/10/2013 Safety Supplies Inv. INV134004 12/18/2013 telescoping ladder Inv. INV134023 12/18/2013 lined work Gloves Check 135733 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Scharber & Sons Inv. E02204 12/23/2013 Felling FT -3 trailer Inv. P14804 12/19/2013 2 Echo trimmers, 2 blowers Check 135734 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Scharber & Sons Inv. P34596 12/19/2013 Edge 84in bolt Check 135735 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Science Explorers Inv. 2927 12/10/2013 12.5/12.19 Dynamite Dinosaurs Inv. 2939 12/30/2013 12.30.13 Great Reactions Check 135736 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 6097 12/15/2013 Check 135737 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 84080 12/16/2013 Check 135738 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 276557 12/16/2013 Inv. 276558 12/16/2013 Check 135739 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 34338 12/25/2013 Inv. 34339 12/25/2013 Check 135740 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 119965 01/02/2014 Servocal Instruments Inc Lancaster LS flow meter Sherwin Williams Paint Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc/SEH 11.30.13 Verizon/Zach Antenna proj/R201301896/3714 11.30.13 Water towers antenna work Shred N Go Inc Shred Service thru 12/25/13 12.25.13 Public Works shredding service Smith -Sharpe Fire Brick Supply Smithfield 9x4 materials for FD training site Check 135741 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Steven Socher Inv. 1112 01/06/2014 12.4/12.16/12.20/12.24 Snowplowing Check 135742 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Standard Heating & Air Conditioning Inv. 140107 01/07/2014 14015 Rockford Rd furnace repair Check 135743 Date Paid:01/09/2014 State Industrial Products Inv. 96560677 12/03/2013 Credit - sales tax adj Inv. 96584981 12/23/2013 hand cleaner/magic mat scents Amount: $1,075.25 1,075.25 Amount: $370.00 370.00 Amount: $4,600.00 4,600.00 Amount: $570.69 64.64 367.65 138.40 Amount: $4,503.32 3,495.00 1,008.32 Amount: $212.36 212.36 Amount: $367.50 172.50 195.00 Amount: $4,809.38 4,809.38 Amount: $205.15 205.15 Amount: $1,576.87 815.20 761.67 Amount: $210.00 170.00 40.00 Amount: $1,555.26 1,555.26 Amount: $1,300.00 1,300.00 Amount: $679.00 679.00 Amount: $187.43 1.51) 188.94 Page 8 Check 135744 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Streicher's Inc Inv. 11060909 12/06/2013 nameplate - M Rumpza Inv. 11062738 12/16/2013 silver tag- Whitmore Inv. 11063314 12/17/2013 Nameplate - C. Watne Inv. 11063742 12/19/2013 seat organizer/portable Check 135745 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc Inv. 10122412 12/03/2013 wrangler tires (4) Inv. 10122428 12/04/2013 Wrglr at advent tires (4) Inv. 10122813 12/16/2013 Eag ug gw3 (6) Inv. 10122928 12/20/2013 Conti Vanco 4season (4) Check 135746 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Terminal Supply Company Inv. 7975600 12/20/2013 shrink ring/connector/terminal/packard tool; Inv. 9995709 12/17/2013 Credit -spot light (Inv#5196700) Check 135747 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Titan Machinery Inc Inv. 10364400007 11/09/2013 10.24/11.21.13 Miniexc rental Check 135748 Date Paid:01/0912014 Triple N Construction Inv. 130620 01/09/2014 R201302494 6.20.13 Fin Guar refund/Tile Shop prkng lot exp Check 135749 Date Paid:01109/2014 Inv. 186971 12/12/2013 Check 135750 Date Paid:01/0912014 Inv. 52623A 12/18/2013 Check 135751 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 1501001442 12/20/2013 Uniforms Unlimited Inc. knit caps (20) Unique Truck Equipment Inc 4 Ton OTC Hyd Jack Universal Athletic Service Inc Hockey Pucks (24) Check 135752 Date Paid:01/09/2014 USPCA Region 12 Inv. 140622 01/09/2014 6.22/6.24.14 Gliniany,Larson, Dane K9 certif registration Check 135753 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Value Plus Flooring Inc Inv. CG313393 12/27/2013 Pavilion tile installation Check 135754 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Verizon Wireless Inv. 9717380319 12/25/2013 11.26/12.25.13 MDCs Inv. 9717380320 12/25/2013 11.26/12.25.13 City wide cell phones Check 135755 Date Paid:01/0912014 Inv. 261974 10/15/2013 Inv. 262082 10/16/2013 Inv. 262200 10/18/2013 Inv. 262777 10/31/2013 Inv. 263051 11/08/2013 Inv. 263066 11/08/2013 Inv. 263532 11/22/2013 Inv. 263837 12/03/2013 Inv. 264967 12/30/2013 Inv. 265006 12/31/2013 Check 135756 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 26086 12/18/2013 Village Chevrolet Co. Locator spord Gasket Unit 5019 claim 2013.024 Core Returspord (inv#261792) Hose Connector Housing spord Glass spord Lamp pedal/sensor Vision Internet Providers Inc 9.13.13 Add XML -Based social icons to website Amount 7.47 16.01 9.61 58.77 Amount 391.38 731.88 758.54 647.32 91.86 2,529.12 Amount: $232.07 407.99 175.92) Amount: $1,378.69 1,378.69 Amount: $60,750.00 60,750.00 Amount: $203.55 203.55 Amount: $1,618.97 1,618.97 Amount: $34.63 34.63 Amount: $330.00 330.00 Amount: $2,762.50 2,762.50 Amount: $6,987.14 2,290.82 4,696.32 Amount: $217.99 12.65 10.61 126.27 641.25) 133.48 18.90 69.19 55.71 162.62 269.81 Amount: $460.00 460.00 Check 135757 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Visual Computer Solutions Inc Amount: $2,380.00 Page 9 Inv. 4537 01/01/2014 Check 135758 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 834178 12/19/2013 Check 135759 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 450A 12/26/2013 Inv. 4508 12/26/2013 Feb'14-Jan'15 POSS Maintenance $2,380.00 The Watson Company Amount: $688.71 Concession resupply 688.71 Gary Westergren Amount: $300.00 Nov'13-Dec'13 Garland Property snow removal 120.00 Jan-Mar'14 Garland Property snow removal 180.00 Check 135760 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Willy's Auto Detail Inv. 25866 12/13/2013 Unit 1700 clean up & detail Check 135761 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 51520312001213 12/16/2013 Inv. 51618204531213 12/27/2013 Inv. 51626172431213 12/30/2013 Xcel Energy 10.27/11.27.13 8 Lift Stations 11.9/12.17.13-Traffice Signals/Flashers 11.11/12.15.13 FS3,CC,PS, PCC/FH,HS,Residential Str /less credits Check 135762 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Yeadon Fabric Domes LLC Inv. US158531N 12/14/2013 Add airlock windows Check 135763 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Yocum Oil Company Inc Inv. 598794 12/17/2013 4500gl Unleaded fuel Inv. 598795 12/17/2013 3500gl Diesel fuel Inv. 601573 12/17/2013 Cr inv 598795/wrong price Inv. 601574 12/17/2013 Revised inv 3500gl diesel fuel Check 135764 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. PCO01525304 12/20/2013 Check 135765 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 140103 01/09/2014 Check 135766 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131220 12/20/2013 Check 135767 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131214 12/14/2013 Check 135768 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 131231 12/31/2013 Check 135769 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. 108591 12/18/2013 Inv. 108592 12/29/2013 Inv. 108593 12/29/2013 Check 135770 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1912 12/31/2013 Check 135771 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1921 01/08/2014 Check 135772 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1922 01/08/2014 Check 135773 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1918 01/08/2014 Check 135774 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1920 01/08/2014 Ziegler Inc Lamp GP -head Janine Kingsbury 12.21.13/1.3.14 PP 1 LTD Alyssa Krumholz 9.24/12.20.13 Mileage reimb 225.4 Steve Larson 12.13/12.14.13 Fuel/meals Duluth K9 conf Petty Cash Replenish buy money/services division Anthony D Reed DBA LumenSigns PS Library conf room LED retrofit PW replace 8 ballasts and 20amp circuit breaker CC install LED retrofit kits in 24 wall washers Bixby, Nancy Park and Rec Refund Brantner, Anne Park and Rec Refund Brantner, Anne Park and Rec Refund Jacobson, Carrie Park and Rec Refund Lan, Ming Park and Rec Refund Amount: $128.25 128.25 Amount: $29,835.90 5,380.58 834.84 23,620.48 Amount: $536.75 536.75 Amount: $24,773.20 13,719.15 10,633.70 10,633.70) 11,054.05 Amount: $152.34 152.34 Amount: $1,363.20 1,363.20 Amount: $127.36 127.36 Amount: $107.18 107.18 Amount: $1,063.63 1,063.63 Amount: $4,011.00 900.00 711.00 2,400.00 Amount: $42.00 42.00 Amount: $39.00 39.00 Amount: $39.00 39.00 Amount: $18.00 18.00 Amount: $42.00 42.00 Page 10 Check 135775 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import 1913 12/31/2013 Check 135776 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1915 01/08/2014 Check 135777 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1919 01/08/2014 Check 135778 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1923 01/08/2014 Check 135779 Date Paid:01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1917 01/08/2014 Check 135780 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1914 01/08/2014 Check 135781 Date Paid: 01/09/2014 Inv. Import - 1916 01/08/2014 Check 135782 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 2014 12/16/2013 Check 135783 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 125747 12/27/2013 Check 135784 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv.106370 01/03/2014 Puzzo, Jennifer Amount: 68.00 Park and Rec Refund 68.00 Amount: $42.00 Puzzo, Jennifer Amount: 204.00 Park and Rec Refund 204.00 185.00 Sahli, Patrick Amount: 63.00 Park and Rec Refund 63.00 590.00 SCP Distributors, LLC Amount: 268.18 Park and Rec Refund 268.18 Inv. 00177153 01/03/2014 Swenson, Teresa Amount: 42.00 Park and Rec Refund 42.00 Amount: Taynton, Holly Amount: $58.00 Park and Rec Refund 58.00 Wagner, Diane Amount: $42.00 Park and Rec Refund 42.00 AIA Minnesota Amount: $185.00 2014 AIA MN/Mpls Barb Thomson Membership 185.00 AI's Coffee Company Amount: $996.35 IC Concession coffee resupply $996.35 Allegra Print & Imaging Amount: $91.24 Forfeiture of MV forms for SIU $91.24 Check 135785 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Allied Waste Services Amount: 60,305.76 Inv. 0894003379124 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Curbside/Dropoff recycling less Nov rev 59,740.81 Inv. 0894003379416 12/31/2013 12.13.13 Parks Solid Waste Hauling 564.95 Check 135786 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Allina Health Amount: 590.00 Inv. 700076560114 01/03/2014 Dec'13 Employee physicals/drug tests 590.00 Check 135787 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 American Fastener Amount: 26.80 Inv. 00177153 01/03/2014 Hvy Hex Nut 26.80 Check 135788 Date Paid:01/16/2014 American Laser Cut Grafix Amount: 1,412.14 Inv. 71668 12/12/2013 Transit graphics for two buses 1,412.14 Check 135789 Date Paid:01/16/2014 American Messaging Services LLC Amount: 115.30 Inv. D2081166OA 01/01/2014 Jan'14 PD pager rental 115.30 Check 135790 Date Paid:01/16/2014 AMI Imaging Systems, Inc. Amount: 950.00 Inv. 0039641 IN 12/30/2013 3.9.14/3.8.15 Canon Fische Reader Maint 950.00 Check 135791 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Andy's Lawncare Amount: 395.15 Inv. 22066 01/01/2014 Jan'14 Sugar Hills/Parkwoods snowplowing 395.15 Check 135792 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Arteka Companies LLC Amount: 350.00 Inv. 22782 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Forestview/Deerwood Trail snow plow 350.00 Check 135793 Date Paid:01116/2014 Batteries Plus Amount: 56.63 Inv. 021288157 01/03/2014 7AV II ion 56.63 Check 135794 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Becker Arena Products Inc Amount: 2,395.00 Inv. 00097165 01/08/2014 New Ice Shaver 2,395.00 Check 135795 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 45430 12/30/2013 Check 135796 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 142253 12/31/2013 Bedford Technology Amount: $26,626.86 Composit lumber -picnic table repair $26,626.86 Beniek Property Service Inc Amount: $1,420.00 12.4,12.16,12.20,12.25 Snowplowing $1,420.00 Page 11 Check 135797 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Bertelson Total Office Solutions Amount: 34.19 Inv. W090341 11 12/31/2013 Folder/four section 34.19 Check 135798 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Blue Tarp Financial/Northern Tool Amount: 17.05 Inv. 405014077 12/30/2013 gas cap viper engine 17.05 Check 135799 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Boyer Trucks Amount: 44.01 Inv. 812526 01/03/2014 converter water valve 26.24 Inv.813402 01/07/2014 gasket 17.77 Check 135800 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Campbell Knutson Prof Assoc Amount: 33,764.42 Inv. 131130 11/30/2013 Nov'13 Attorney services 33,764.42 Check 135801 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Castrejon Inc Amount: 3,790.00 Inv. 11469 12/12/2013 Handholds for conduit -install handhold 3,790.00 Check 135802 Date Paid:01/16/2014 CDW Government Inc Amount: 1,546.57 Inv. HZ09519 01/02/2014 HP Smart AC Adaptor (2) 118.08 Inv. HZ36260 01/03/2014 Software 352.19 Inv. HZ66121 01/03/2014 Pan Havis Vehicle PT Repl-incl docking station 1,076.30 Check 135803 Date Paid:01/16/2014 CenturyLink Amount: 1,031.80 Inv. E2325760114 01/01/2014 Jan'14 E23.2576 101.00 Inv. E4404790114 01/01/2014 Jan'14 E44.0479 505.00 Inv. E4404930114 01/01/2014 Jan'14 E44.0493 425.80 Check 135804 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Coca Cola Refreshments USA Inc Amount: 2,091.07 Inv. 140104 01/04/2014 Dec'13 IC Concession pop resupply 2,091.07 Check 135805 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Crane Engineering Amount: 4,050.00 Inv. 019935 12/31/2013 Phase 2 solution proposals for leaning wall 4,050.00 Check 135806 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Erin F & Bryan A Crossland Amount: 2,000.00 Inv. 0711822140036 01/15/2014 Peony lane temp easement/17794 51 st Ave N 2,000.00 Check 135807 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Data Recognition Corporation Amount: 6,342.74 Inv. 00080842 12/31/2013 Dec'13 UB Processing 1,938.81 Inv. 206DEC13 12/31/2013 Dec'13 UB Postage 4,403.93 Check 135808 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Discount Steel Inc Amount: 1,407.45 Inv. 01950593 12/23/2013 Steel order 1,407.45 Check 135809 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Drew's Concessions LLC Amount: 575.98 Inv. 1693 01/08/2014 IC -Concessions resupply 575.98 Check 135810 Date Paid:01/16/2014 DTS/Document Tech Solutions Amount: 7,225.92 Inv. 244179099 12/29/2013 12.22.13/1.22.14 13 copier maintenance 7,225.92 Check 135811 Date Paid:01/16/2014 DTS/Document Tech Solutions Amount: 231.19 Inv. INV82391 12/26/2013 Toner/waste toner bottle 45.86 Inv. INV82437 12/27/2013 waste toner container 51.57 Inv. INV82458 12/30/2013 waste toner bottle/waste toner container 87.90 Inv.INV82474 12/31/2013 toner 45.86 Check 135812 Date Paid:01/16/2014 ECM Publishers Inc Inv. 62008 01/02/2014 File#2013-112 PHN Amount: $79.80 79.80 Check 135813 Date Paid: 01/1612014 EJM Pipe Services Inc Amount: $762.50 Inv. 0017680IN 12/17/2013 2015 Xanthus Ln sand fill slip lining of culvert $762.50 Check 135814 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Emergency Medical Products Inc Amount: $205.36 Inv. 1612627 01/03/2014 Jr airways for safety classes $205.36 Page 12 Check 135815 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Emergency Response Solutions Inv. 1282 01/02/2014 firefighter foam Check 135816 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 14337953 12/12/2013 Inv. 14344428 12/20/2013 Inv. 14357254 12/31/2013 Inv. 70169031 12/02/2013 Inv. 70170414 12/11/2013 Inv. 70170531 12/12/2013 Inv. 70171485 12/19/2013 Inv. 70172013 12/26/2013 Inv. 70172120 12/27/2013 Check 135817 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 315914 01/15/2014 Check 135818 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.0067804IN 10/14/2013 Inv. 00684251N 01/02/2014 Inv. 00684261N 01/02/2014 Inv. 00685321N 01/02/2014 Check 135819 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 8183 01/07/2014 Check 135820 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 55854121304 12/31/2013 Check 135821 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 01417231 12/10/2013 Factory Motor Parts Co Dec'13 Charges -splash drum Dec'13 Charges -CREDIT core dpst splash drum Dec'13 Charges -CREDIT vbelt rtn inv#70165843 Dec'13 Charges-rotor'06 Taurus Dec'13 Charges -Transmission fluid Dec'13 Charges-frt dis pad set Dec'13 Charges -resistor asy'09 F150 Dec'13 Charges -resistor asy - 08' F450 Dec'13 Charges-condensor asy'10 Crown Vic FBI - LEEDA 2014 Goldstein Membership Fidelity Building Services Inc PS/Fire admin comm room/floor redone Jan'14 Janitorial Jan'14 PD Sunday Janitorial Dec'13 3cs 43x48,1 cs 33x40,2cs 24x33 trash liners Fire Equipment Specialities turn out gear inspections First Transit Inc Dec'13 DAR Transit less fares Force America Unit 280 sensor claim 2013.32 Check 135822 Date Paid:01/16/2014 G&K Services Inc Inv. 1006873324 12/23/2013 12.23.13 Rug service Inv. 1006882687 12/27/2013 City Uniforms Inv. 1006894137 01/03/2014 City Uniforms Amount: $960.00 960.00 Amount: $630.25 100.46 16.03) 27.48) 91.82 63.48 60.95 24.61 24.61 307.83 Amount: $50.00 50.00 Amount: $8,806.83 338.26 8,010.00 250.00 208.57 Amount: $744.00 744.00 Amount: $272,669.19 272,669.19 Amount: $512.35 512.35 Amount: $804.64 114.78 350.86 339.00 Check 135823 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Gopher State One -Call, Inc. Amount: $983.10 Inv. 86294 12/31/2013 Dec'13 730 UT/SW Locates $983.10 Check 135824 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Swapna & Pradeep Gouni Amount: $3,650.00 Inv. 0711822140037 01/15/2014 Peony lane temp easement/17788 51st Ave N $3,650.00 Check 135825 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 9318682516 12/13/2013 Inv. 9325668862 12/23/2013 Inv. 9325887975 12/23/2013 Inv. 9328552709 12/30/2013 Inv.9331159914 01/03/2014 Check 135826 Date Paid: 0111612014 Inv.140304 01/15/2014 Check 135827 Date Paid: 01/1612014 Inv. 4955 01/01/2014 Grainger 2 pk of 12 white bath towels snow pusher eyebolt magnet vehicle wash 5 gal/insultated water nozzle overboots/men-J Ryan Grandstay Residential Suites Hotel Conf# 103725&103726 3.4/3.5.14 MRW conference GroundsCare Inc. Jan'14 Culdesac snowplowing Amount: $524.80 220.95 130.90 59.81 85.02 28.12 Amount: $404.16 404.16 Amount: $2,730.00 2,730.00 Page 13 Check 135828 Date Paid:01/16/2014 HAB Housing Software Solutions Inv. 00653471N 12/29/2013 2013 Section 8 1099 forms/envelopes Inv. 00655631N 01/01/2014 Jan-Dec'14 HMS for Windows V4 modules Check 135829 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Cristina Harty Inv. 70842 01/04/2014 12.21.13 Kharisma finishing school Check 135830 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hawkins Ash CPAs LLP Inv. 200317 01/08/2014 Jan'14 Section 8 acctg services Check 135831 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 3544840 R I 12/16/2013 Inv. 3544841 RI 12/16/2013 Check 135832 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 346470 12/31/2013 Check 135833 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 140108 01/08/2014 Amount: $4,564.13 44.13 4,520.00 Amount: $331.50 331.50 Amount: $252.00 252.00 Hawkins Inc Amount: $19,147.30 495gl Sodium Perm @15.86,314.98gl LPC -9L 9,573.65 @5.47 Dec'13 PD Radio Admin/MDCs 495gl Sodium Perm @15.86,314.98gl LPC -9L 9,573.65 @ 5.47 Hedberg Aggregate Inc Amount: $132.89 trap rock 132.89 Nate Heisick Amount: $300.00 2014 Aerial photography/memorial garden & 300.00 field Check 135834 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hennepin Co Dept Housing, Inv. 140109 01/09/2014 PY2013 Contrib to Consortium Fair Housing Initiative Check 135835 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hennepin Co Environmental Hlth Inv. 0506896 01/01/2014 2014 PCC kitchen/bar license Check 135836 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hennepin Co Info Tech Dept Inv. 131238038 12/31/2013 Dec'l3 Fire Radio Admin/MDCs Inv. 131238039 12/31/2013 Dec'13 PD Radio Admin/MDCs Inv. 131238094 12/31/2013 Dec'l3 PW Radio Admin fee Check 135837 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hennepin County Treasurer Inv. 1000037692 12/18/2013 Nov'13 Room/Board prisoners Check 135838 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Hennepin County Treasurer Inv. 1000038134 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Per Diem prisoners Amount: $1,500.00 1,500.00 Amount: $251.00 251.00 Amount: $5,920.98 1,480.33 4,122.65 318.00 Amount: $665.00 665.00 Amount: $2,692.18 2,692.18 Check 135839 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Hennepin County Treasurer Amount: 160.31 Inv. 1000038091 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Technical Support 160.31 Check 135840 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Hennepin County Treasurer Amount: 159.46 Inv. 1000038177 12/31/2013 Dec'13 2.58ton PM Solid waste hauling 159.46 Check 135841 Date Paid:01/16/2014 HOME Line Amount: 4,092.95 Inv. 131231 01/09/2014 Jul-Dec'l3 109 Tenant households 4,092.95 Check 135842 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Bhagya L & Pratapkum Immadisetty Amount: 3,350.00 Inv. 0711822140039 01/15/2014 Peony Lane temp easement/5107 Merrimac Ln 3,350.00 N Check 135843 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inforscore Inc Amount: 172.93 Inv. 2044 01/03/2014 Dec'13 Check processing 172.93 Check 135844 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Instrumental Research Inc Amount: 640.00 Inv. 8368 01/03/2014 Dec'13 Water testing 640.00 Check 135845 Date Paid:01/16/2014 International Association of Chiefs of Police/IACP Amount:$170.00 Inv. 1591750 01/15/2014 2014 Mike Goldstein Membership 170.00 Check 135846 Date Paid:01/16/2014 International Code Council/ICC Amount: 266.00 Inv. INV0360526 11/06/2013 2014 Region III William Tonn 266.00 Page 14 Check 135847 Date Paid:01/16/2014 International Institute of Municipal Clerks/IIMC Amount:$185.00 Inv. 131212 01/15/2014 2014 Engdahl Membership $185.00 Check 135848 Date Paid:01/16/2014 IpSwitch Inc Amount: $2,042.60 Inv. IN513406 12/23/2013 Whats Connected Upgrade $2,042.60 Check 135849 Date Paid:01/16/2014 ISG Infrasys Inv. 40384 12/31/2013 Thermal imager Check 135850 Date Paid:01/16/2014 J P Schmitz Construction Co LLC Inv. 131221 12/21/2013 10220 38th Court N water main repair Check 135851 Date Paid:01/16/2014 John Ballew Photography Inv. 103195 12/19/2013 8x10 print of K9 Knight for photo board Check 135852 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 7731421198 12/26/2013 Check 135853 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 125189 12/10/2013 Check 135854 Date Paid:0111612014 Inv. 140113 01/13/2014 Check 135855 Date Paid:0111612014 Inv. 140103 01/03/2014 Check 135856 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv. 14415 01/01/2014 Check 135857 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 5834 12/26/2013 Inv. 5835 12/26/2013 Check 135858 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 1312101 12/30/2013 Check 135859 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.20507 01/10/2014 Check 135860 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 10345582013113 11/30/2013 Check 135861 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 20145 12/31/2013 Inv. 20146 12/31/2013 Check 135862 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 1676795 12/30/2013 Check 135863 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 37762 12/31/2013 Check 135864 Date Paid:0111612014 Inv. 36321 12/27/2013 Check 135865 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 34208 12/31/2013 Check 135866 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 36751 12/26/2013 Check 135867 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.INV1758322 01/07/2014 Killmer Electric Company Inc Scoreboard elec rplcmnts Kinetic Leasing Jan-Dec'14 Wheel Loader lease Koepke Law Group PA PP26/PP1 Garnishment Court file no 27 -CV -11-7800 Mollie Kreibich Personal training -Winter Law Enforcement Technology Group LLC 2014 K9 Odie,Stryker,Knight tracker Lawncraft Corporation Jan-Feb'14 Holly Ln snowplowing Jan-Feb'14 Troy Ln & 39th snowplowing Lee Line Corp 12.6.13 Transport to Bloomington Eagle Club Steven Leuer 12.20.13 & 12.24.13 384hrs snowplowing LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc Nov'13 LexisNexis LightingHouseUSA Inc Median light bulbs Hilde Arch LED lights Loffler Companies Inc Toner Logis Dec'13 GIS/Internet Loretto Auto Recondition Unit 2014 Claim 2013.30 repairs Lyndale Plant Services Jan'14 Plant lease/care Maple Crest Landscape 12.24.13 Snowplow Marco 2.1.14/1.31.15 Phone System Maint Amount: $9,500.00 9,500.00 Amount: $1,000.00 1,000.00 Amount: $31.00 31.00 Amount: $953.44 953.44 Amount: $13,600.00 13,600.00 Amount: $1,514.57 1,514.57 Amount: $1,170.00 1,170.00 Amount: $360.00 360.00 Amount: $1,700.00 800.00 900.00 Amount: $438.75 438.75 Amount: $33,501.00 33,501.00 Amount: $74.00 74.00 Amount: $12,422.68 1,141.43 11,281.25 Amount: $114.36 114.36 Amount: $3,789.00 3,789.00 Amount: $1,127.49 1,127.49 Amount: $154.50 154.50 Amount: $97.00 97.00 Amount: $26,682.00 26,682.00 Page 15 Check 135868 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Marshall & Swift/Boeckh LLC Amount: $2,081.31 Inv. 140106 01/06/2014 Jan-Dec'14 Residential/MVS, Commercial $2,081.31 Estimator Check 135869 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 15218 01/06/2014 Check 135870 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 140214 01/15/2014 Matt's Lawn and Landscape 12.4/12.16/12.20/12.25.13 Snowplowing MCMA 2.14.14 Luke Fischer registration Check 135871 Date Paid:01/1612014 Medica Insurance Company Inv. C0033447481 12/12/2013 Jan'14 Health Insurance Inv. C0033740224 01/13/2014 Feb'14 Health Insurance Premium Check 135872 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.00480835SNV 01/06/2014 Check 135873 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 1306 12/11/2013 Check 135874 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 131231 12/31/2013 Check 135875 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 2014 12/01/2013 Inv. 3928 01/07/2014 Check 135876 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv. 2013412 12/30/2013 Check 135877 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv. ABR00877251 01/02/2014 MES Inc Fire hose Metropolitan Area Mgmt. Assoc/MAMA 11.20.13 Luke Fischer meeting Metropolitan Council Dec'13 Sewer Availiability Charge/SAC Amount: $7,400.00 7,400.00 Amount: $175.00 175.00 Amount: $423,069.51 225,721.23 197,348.28 Amount: $1,078.78 1,078.78 Amount: $20.00 20.00 Amount: $101,247.30 101,247.30 Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association/MCPA Amount:$1,530.00 2014 Dan Plekkenpol/Mike Goldstein $450.00 Membership 1.28/1.31.14 Dorfsman/Haseman Leadership $1,080.00 Academy Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground Playground equipment MN Dept of Labor & Industry City Hall boiler/pressure vessel permits Check 135878 Date Paid:01/16/2014 MN Rural Water Association/MRWA Inv. 130304 01/15/2014 3.4/3.6.13 3 Registr/Newberger,Steuben,Jordan Check 135879 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 519467 01/11/2014 Check 135880 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.76629586 01/03/2014 Check 135881 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.1006289055 01/15/2014 Check 135882 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 374760 12/02/2013 Inv. 375025 12/03/2013 Inv. 375143 12/04/2013 Inv. 375258 12/04/2013 Inv. 375430 12/05/2013 Inv. 375605 12/06/2013 Inv. 375762 12/06/2013 Inv. 376159 12/09/2013 Inv. 376294 12/10/2013 Inv. 376295 12/10/2013 Inv. 376492 12/11/2013 Inv. 376519 12/11/2013 Morrie's Imports Inc box asy-fuse Motorola Solutions Inc unit replaced service tkt#0997249448 NAHRO 2014 Agency Membership NAPA Geniune Auto Parts Co Dec'13 Charges -headlight Dec'13 Charges -dual durometer seal Dec'13 Charges -wiper blades (6) Dec'13 Charges -air filter'08 F450 Dec'13 Charges -lamp Dec'13 Charges-Battery/core dpst Dec'13 Charges -headlight bulb Dec'13 Charges -headlight Dec'13 Charges -Hi temp Dec'13 Charges -headlight Credit Dec'13 Charges -headlamp Tool Box Amount: $7,444.22 7,444.22 Amount: $50.00 50.00 Amount: $750.00 750.00 Amount: $319.31 319.31 Amount: $78.00 78.00 Amount: $505.00 505.00 Amount: $2,193.39 9.83 21.16 80.31 102.33 56.71 357.99 71.49 9.83 10.48 9.83) 76.08 840.30 Page 16 Inv. 376700 12/12/2013 Inv. 376712 12/12/2013 Inv. 376730 12/12/2013 Inv. 376744 12/12/2013 Inv. 376791 12/12/2013 Inv. 376862 12/12/2013 Inv. 377554 12/17/2013 Inv. 377760 12/18/2013 Inv. 378117 12/20/2013 Inv. 378496 12/23/2013 Inv. 378677 12/23/2013 Inv. 378894 12/26/2013 Check 135883 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 131231 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Charges -telescoping mirror Dec'13 Charges -12 Volt battery credit shows inv#376862 Dec'13 Charges -Battery Dec'13 Charges -D Earth Dec'13 Charges -Bulb Dec'13 Charges -12 V Battery credit Inv#376712 Dec'13 Charges -Halogen lamp/battery Dec'13 Charges -hose clamp pliers Dec'13 Charges -Gunk Antifreeze Dec'13 Charges -Sm light bulb Dec'13 Charges -blue def 2.5 gal Dec'13 Charges -seat cover New Paper LLC 12.26.13 In store charge Check 135884 Date Paid:01/16/2014 North Suburban Towing Inc Inv. 189193 12/30/2013 Skidsteer retrieved from 16405 9th Ave Check 135885 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Northern Safety Technology Inv. 35097 12/27/2013 6 Squad Skidplates Check 135886 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Northern Sanitary Supply Co Inc Inv. 165928 12/26/2013 liners/brush Inv. 166187 01/10/2014 handsoap/mophead Check 135887 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. I N48172 12/31/2013 Check 135888 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 686473659001 01/08/2014 Inv. 686473857001 01/08/2014 Inv. 689829745001 12/23/2013 Inv. 690341119001 12/27/2013 Inv. 690432154001 12/30/2013 Inv. 690581331001 12/31/2013 Inv. 690831005001 01/03/2014 Inv. 690831509001 01/03/2014 Inv. 690831576001 01/03/2014 Inv. 691048020001 01/03/2014 Northland Business Systems Inc 1.24.14/1.23.15 Winscribe Maint Contract Office Depot paper/envelopes/wipes Battery Lithium/AAA monitor riser/wipes/post its folders pens/tape ink/sharpies/steno pads stapler/staples/calendar/post-its post it note pads/binder/paper Index tbl Box, jewel,CD/CD Rom Check 135889 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Office of MN IT Services Inv. DV13120482 01/07/2014 Dec'13 Router/CSU for CJDN 28.34 85.49 101.52 51.24 49.16 85.49) 142.12 122.88 10.67 19.02 14.52 27.24 Amount: $31.85 31.85 Amount: $213.75 213.75 Amount: $1,163.82 1,163.82 Amount: $582.80 423.12 159.68 Amount: $4,471.36 4,471.36 Amount: $685.01 37.47 14.99 277.50 77.59 72.24 60.37 61.13 59.79 7.95 15.98 Amount: $90.00 90.00 Check 135890 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Ole and Lena's Garage Door Service LLC Amount: $4,258.00 Inv. 62281 12/27/2013 11.8.13 PW rpr/inspect bi.fold doors $4,258.00 Check 135891 Date Paid:01/1612014 Inv.22229 01/08/2014 Check 135892 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv. 109359 12/23/2013 Inv. 109379 12/31/2013 Ostvig Tree, Inc. 1300 Ives Ln pick up Outdoor Images Inc 12.20.13 Cascades/Hidden Terrace/Wynfield snowplowing 12.24.13 Cascades/Hidden Terrace/Wynfield snowplowing Amount: $100.00 100.00 Amount: $2,250.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 Page 17 Check 135893 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 54523 12/31/2013 Inv. 54533 12/31/2013 Inv. 54580 12/31/2013 Inv. 54616 12/31/2013 Inv. 54638 12/31/2013 Check 135894 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 8636 12/30/2013 Check 135895 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 5105 01/01/2014 Check 135896 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 042159 12/30/2013 Check 135897 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 207198 12/30/2013 Inv. 207203 12/30/2013 Check 135898 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 11648 11/22/2013 Check 135899 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. W26959 01/07/2014 Owens Companies Inc Amount: $4,988.12 check exhaust fan problem 571.80 Replace bad motor on radiant heater @ Public 1,112.04 Works Garage unit heater #11 -found & replaced bad valve 402.52 fieldhouse fan motor 2,125.46 elbow leaking on water pipe/replaced 776.30 Performance Signs & Displays Inc Amount: $13.89 City Plaques 13.89 Permagreen 12.20/12.25.13 Westridge/Rockfords Snowplowing Phasor Electric Company Olive lane park/ride rpr 4 lights Pixelwerx 2 3x6 Event banners 1 Rotary laminated check Police Executive Research Foru 2014 PERF Membership PowerPlan /RDO/Vermeer Wheel loader 200 repairs Check 135900 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Precise MRM LLC Inv. IN2001000953 12/27/2013 Nov'13 Streets pooled data Inv. IN2001000954 12/27/2013 Nov'13 Parks pooled data Check 135901 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Precision Auto Upholstery Inc Inv. 24086 12/27/2013 Repair of Seat #225 Check 135902 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Prescription Landscape Inc Inv. 199654 12/23/2013 12.16.13 Snow plowing Inv. 200056 01/02/2014 12.24/12.25.13 Snowplowing Check 135903 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 268256 12/31/2013 Check 135904 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 31349 01/02/2014 Check 135905 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. rtt103679 01/02/2014 Printers Service Inc Knife Sharp Reach PCC Digital software license Real Time Translations Inc/RTT Dec'13 PD Minutes used Check 135906 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Red Power Diesel Service Inv. B9745 01/02/2014 Unit 041 repair data link module/see credit Inv. B9757 01/07/2014 Cr inv B9665/unit 041 door seal Check 135907 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 10456 12/26/2013 Check 135908 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 669 12/02/2013 Check 135909 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 135741 12/23/2013 Check 135910 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 140101 01/01/2014 Robarge Enterprises Inc 9900 Shelard Pkwy nut repair SafeAssure Consultants Inc 2014 Safety Consulting Services Safety Signs Inc Signage for water main repair Standard Insurance Co Jan'14 Life,LTD & AD/D Amount: $1,710.00 1,710.00 Amount: $278.00 278.00 Amount: $218.03 153.90 64.13 Amount: $300.00 300.00 Amount: $1,879.36 1,879.36 Amount: $310.47 102.98 207.49 Amount: $169.89 169.89 Amount: $750.00 500.00 250.00 Amount: $38.48 38.48 Amount: $828.00 828.00 Amount: $40.00 40.00 Amount: $317.83 458.15 140.32) Amount: $956.53 956.53 Amount: $8,818.00 8,818.00 Amount: $150.00 150.00 Amount: $6,359.99 6,359.99 Page 18 Check 135911 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Star Tribune Amount: $86.45 Inv. 41872591213 12/29/2013 Acct 4187259 1.18/4.19.14 Daily newspaper $86.45 Check 135912 Date Paid:01/16/2014 BCA MNJIS Sect -Kim L State of Minnesota Amount: $870.00 Inv. 00000160810 12/31/2013 Oct-Dec'13 CJDN connect charges $870.00 Check 135913 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 11065191 12/26/2013 Inv. 11066174 01/02/2014 Inv. 11067368 01/08/2014 Check 135914 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Inv. 450130 01/03/2014 Inv. 450301 01/03/2014 Inv. CM93762 12/10/2013 Check 135915 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 2014 01/15/2014 Check 135916 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 4659773110114 01/02/2014 Check 135917 Date Paid:01/1612014 Inv. 13TF2309 12/19/2013 Check 135918 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 491 01/03/2014 Inv. 492 01/03/2014 Inv. 493 01/03/2014 Inv. 494 01/03/2014 Inv. 495 01/03/2014 Check 135919 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv.50950000114 01/13/2014 Check 135920 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 3000856082 01/01/2014 Check 135921 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 10004202 12/20/2013 Inv. 10004203 12/20/2013 Inv. 10005086 12/30/2013 Inv.10005774 01/03/2014 Inv. 40001912 12/31/2013 Check 135922 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 6771 12/30/2013 Inv. 6772 12/30/2013 Inv. 6773 12/30/2013 Check 135923 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. SV149789 12/26/2013 Check 135924 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 82559 12/13/2013 Check 135925 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Inv. 140101 01/01/2014 Check 135926 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Streicher's Inc Pants (1) - K Springer/Flashlight Fusee -30 minute with spike (3) 36/case Fusee -30 minute with spike 36/case Superior Brookdale Ford Unit 358 injector repairs Bulb repllaced/Bulb spord wire CREDIT Amount: $506.81 176.85 239.97 89.99 Amount: $1,988.79 1,965.52 47.93 24.66) SUSA Amount: $250.00 2014 Greg Cook/Scott Newberger $250.00 Memberships T Mobile Jan'14 UT/SW GPS Taho Sportswear Inc Gymnastics Hoodies Taylor Electric Company LLC Light and Pole for Well #12 replace timer for flood light Electrical Work at Water Facilities Dec'13 Electrical Work at Water Facilities Dec'13 Electrical work for Backwash tank valves TDS Metrocom Jan'14 509.5000 Land lines ThyssenKrupp Elevator Jan'14 PS Elevator Maint Toll Company anchor/superarc L/BSX Jacket Helmet propane/cylinder propane fuel gas Dec'13 Cylinder/Demurrage Total Control Systems Inc Maintain and upgrade SCADA system Maintain and upgrades to SCADA system SCADA system repairs and upgrades Amount: $56.58 56.58 Amount: $877.00 877.00 Amount: $17,178.84 1,791.83 435.54 1,145.59 3,258.49 10,547.39 Amount: $2,255.90 2,255.90 Amount: $200.98 200.98 Amount: $1,061.22 229.80 382.90 387.27 47.01 14.24 Amount: $7,064.22 3,407.79 674.31 2,982.12 Trans -Alarm Inc Amount: 309.85 Stn 73 alarm system repairs 309.85 Twinwest Chamber of Commerce Amount: 30.00 Dec'13 Jim Prom legis brkfst 30.00 Ultimate Martial Arts Inc Amount: 559.20 Jan'14 Little Tigers AM/PM, Tae Kwon Do 559.20 Valley Rich Co Inc Amount: 5,277.00 Page 19 Inv. 19581 12/08/2013 Emegency water main repair -12605 24th 5,277.00 Check 135927 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Verified Credentials Inc Amount: 94.00 Inv. 217131 12/31/2013 Dec'13 Background screening 94.00 Check 135928 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Village Chevrolet Co. Amount: 29.66 Inv.265448 01/10/2014 Handle 29.66 Check 135929 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Walser Chrysler Jeep Amount: 2,552.00 Inv. 621574 01/10/2014 Rebuit Longblock Engine #405 2,552.00 Check 135930 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Water Conservation Services Inc Amount: 2,129.76 Inv. 4489 01/05/2014 Dec'13 Leak detection services 2,129.76 Check 135931 Date Paid:01/16/2014 The Watson Company Amount: 3,482.03 Inv. 834376 12/26/2013 IC Concession food resupply 2,930.32 Inv. 834855 01/09/2014 Concession resupply 551.71 Check 135932 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Workers Comp Reinsurance Amount: 16,707.40 Inv. 003606 12/24/2013 2014 1st qtr WCRA premium 5,820.40 Inv. 140201 01/15/2014 2014 Deficient Prem Assmnt-final payment 10,887.00 Check 135933 Date Paid:01/16/2014 WSB & Associates Amount: 106,837.35 Inv. 017092201 12/23/2013 Nov'13 Hilde PHase II Predesign planning 2,719.00 Inv. 01792301 12/23/2013 PRK40006 Nov'13 Dunkirk Neighborhood park 3,553.00 Inv. 0208000019 12/23/2013 Proj10015 Nov'l3 Peony In/lawndale In 99,137.35 extension Inv. 024130002 12/31/2013 Nov'13 Hilde Phase II 247.00 Inv. 024130101 12/23/2013 Nov'13 Hilde Topography 1,181.00 Check 135934 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Xcel Energy Amount: 244.49 Inv. 51554915751213 12/27/2013 11.11/12.17.13 5 Lift Stations 244.49 Check 135935 Date Paid: 01/16/2014 Yocum Oil Company Inc Amount: 21,378.60 Inv. 600173 12/24/2013 4000gl Diesel fuel 12,450.00 Inv. 600577 12/24/2013 3000gl Unleaded fuel 8,440.20 Inv. 601587 12/24/2013 Cr inv 600173 wrong price 12,450.00) Inv. 601588 12/24/2013 Revised inv 4000gl diesel fuel 12,938.40 Check 135936 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Weixin & Bo Li Zhong Amount: 1,250.00 Inv. 0411822140043 01/15/2014 Peony lane temp easement/5131 Merrimac Ln 1,250.00 N Check 135937 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Ziegler Inc Amount: 938.76 Inv. SW050211328 12/24/2013 inspect engine & generator 470.25 Inv. SW050212106 12/31/2013 Generator repair work -Pike Lake LS 468.51 Check 135938 Date Paid:01/16/2014 City of Wayzata Amount: 2,261.00 Inv. 140110 01/15/2014 125 tabs for tax exempt vehicles and trailers 2,261.00 Check 135939 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Dan Heitke Amount: 18.00 Inv. 140110 01/10/2014 1.9/1.10.14 parking MN Green Expo 18.00 Check 135940 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Law Enforce Labor Serv./Union Amount: 1,403.82 Inv. 2014-00000004 01/10/2014 DUES POL - Police Union Dues * 1,403.82 Check 135941 Date Paid:01/16/2014 MN AFSCME Council #5 Amount: 2,244.69 Inv. 2014-00000006 01/10/2014 DUES MTCE - Maintenance Union Dues* 2,244.69 Check 135942 Date Paid:01/16/2014 MN Child Support Payment Ctr Amount: 1,812.17 Inv. 2014-00000007 01/10/2014 CHID SUP% - Child Support Percentage* 1,812.17 Check 135943 Date Paid:01/16/2014 Denise Whalen Amount: 78.00 Page 20 Inv. 140109 01/09/2014 PO Box rental/Section 8 wait list $78.00 Total Payments 303 Total Amount Paid: $2,133,577.84 Page 21 Date: 1121114 H.M.S. Windows - Housing Assistance Payments Page: 0001 Time; 8:30:03 AM PAYMENT REGISTER - SUMMARY Q:lhmslreponslPAYSUM.QRP Bank Account Description/Account ]Number 3110681 Number Date Method Status Name Of Payee 0007295 117114 Computer Ck. Paid Melair Associates LP DBA 0007296 117114 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 0007297 1/7/14 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCommons 0007298 117114 Computer Ck. Paid Minneapolis Public Housing Authority 0007299 1117114 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCornmons 0007300 1117114 Computer Ck. Paid Dawa Tashi Total For Bank Account Of Transactions Totals Computer Checks 9 $5,380.00 Manual Checks 0 $0.00 Direct Deposits 0 $0.00 Total For Bank: $5,380.00 Total - All Bank Accounts Printed: $5,380.00 Total 185,00 2,169.00 1,210.00 195.00 754.00 867.00 5,380.00 Page 22 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS ENDING JANUARY 18, 2014 WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending January 4, 2014 was presented to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the following funds is approved: M & I Bank — Check Register General & Special Revenue Construction & Debt Service Enterprise & Internal Service Housing Redevelopment Check Register Total M & I — Housing Assistance Payments Housing & Redevelopment Authority GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS ADOPTED by the City Council on January 28th, 2014 705,128.38 383,065.24 1,043,683.24 1,700.98 3,179,060.63 5,380.00 479,153.72 2,138,957.84 Page 23 1City ©f Agenda 6 . O 3 j Plymouth Number: Addins Q,.Vty to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Luke Fischer, Administrative Services Director Item: Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.33 of the City Code regarding Water and Sanitary Sewer Fees 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt ordinance amending section 10 15.3 3 of the City Code increasing rate fees for water and sanitary sewer for services incurred effective January 1, 2014. 2. BACKGROUND: In 2010, staff updated an utility rate study for water and sanitary sewer that projected rates for years 2011 - 2015. Staff is currently working on completing an update to this study during 2014 which will include evaluating the senior discount program. For 2014, it was determined that an increase was necessary to ensure that each utility fund is able to sustain an adequate funding level to afford the costs of ongoing maintenance and provide funding for capital improvement projects within each fund. The study recommended the following increases for 2014: Water 2.5% Sanitary Sewer 2.0% The monthly impact on an average residential customer is an estimated increase of $.75. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance increasing water and sanitary sewer rates for 2014. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Rate increases are included within the proposed budget. 4. ATTACHMENTS: 2010 Utility Rate Study Ordinance Page 1 City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life Water & Sanitary Sewer Utility Rate Study December 2010 Prepared By: Finance Division Page 2 This page intentionally left blank Page 3 Introduction This utility rate study was completed to update the financial projections for the water and sanitary sewer utilities. The purpose of this rate study is to ensure the following: Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing operations, capital improvements and to maintain adequate cash balances. 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of these utilities to users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. Background The City has maintained a comprehensive long-range capital improvement program for many years focusing upon replacement of existing infrastructure and expansion for new growth. This study incorporates this plan in analyzing the future demands of maintaining the utility systems. The City's planning has resulted in very little debt for the utility systems. Only one bond issue is outstanding, a $13,140,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bond originally issued in 2004, with a remaining balance of $8,360,000. This bond will be retired in 2019. Assumptions The following chart summarizes the significant assumptions in the rate study. 2010 connections over -projected per Comprehensive Plan. Shifted half of excess to 2011 and half to 2012. 2Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index Page 4 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility Growth New residential connections based on Table 3-3 of Comprehensive Plan: 2011-2012 - 215 per year' 2013-2015 -120 pe r yea r 2016-2020 -149 per year 2021-2025 - 122 per year Usage Usage per customer to remain steady. Operating Projections include increases of 3.8%2 annually to account for new demand and inflation. Expenses Capital Capital expenditures from 2010-2025 Capital expenditures from 2010-2025 Expenses estimated at $13.6M which is based on the estimated at $21.4M which is based on the City's Capital Improvement Program through City's Capital Improvement Program through 2015, and includes an inflation factor of 3.8% 2015, and includes an inflation factor of 3.8% for years beyond that. for years beyond that. Rates Projections in revenue are based on no Projections in revenue are based on no rate increase in 2011, 3.5% increase in 2012, 3.0% increase in 2011 and a 2% annual increase in 2013 and 2.5% in 2014. No projected thereafter through 2023. 3% increase in 2024 - increase thereafter. 2025. 2010 connections over -projected per Comprehensive Plan. Shifted half of excess to 2011 and half to 2012. 2Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index Page 4 Goals of a Utility Enterprise Rate Structure Water and sewer utility funds are reported in financial statements as enterprise funds, meaning that the charges for services are designed to cover the costs of operations. The Council should consider who should predominately pay for costs. While every community may weigh goals differently, the general goals of a utility rate structure are: Rates sufficient to cover capital and operating costs of the system Provide for adequate cash balances for cash-flow and contingencies Allocate costs appropriately to those that use the system Promote water conservation by charging higher rates for greater consumption Compliment the City's economic development goals Capital Needs The City has completed its Capital Improvement Plan (2011— 2015) which is incorporated into this rate study to ensure future capital needs are covered by the proposed rate structures. The CIP for the water and sewer utilities is provided in Appendix D, along with projected needs beyond the CIP timeframe. Water Utility Existing Water Fees The primary revenue sources of the water utility fund are usage fees, base, and demand charges. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water and primarily used to cover the costs of maintenance and enhancements to the existing system. In 2009, usage and base fees accounted for 88.6% of the water fund's operating revenue, and demand charges accounted for 5.9%. The following charts illustrate the relationship between the total residential and commercial customers in comparison to the amount of revenue generated by each: Water Utility Customers Revenue Sources - 2010 Budget Count, Percent) $4,845,4001 40,498, 75% \ 97.66% Residential Commercial so100 1,648,971 970, 2.34% 25% Although the customer base is primarily residential, over 25% of the utility revenue comes from commercial billings. Page 5 Base Charges are fixed monthly fees based on the size of meter in the home or business, and were established to recover expenses incurred regardless of the amount of water consumed, such as utility staffing and the billing system. The base charge in 2010 for all customers is $3.37 per month. Demand Charges are billed to commercial users with meters 1 %" or greater. Residential With a three -tiered rate system, the typical resident will pay more for water used for irrigation than they will for water used in daily activities. Most metro area suburbs have adopted a tiered rate system for the following reasons: To promote conservation efforts. To allocate costs appropriately to those who are generating them. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the heat of the summer. A tiered rate structure charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of over -sizing the system for peak days to the peak users. The Minnesota Legislature requires a conservation rate structure for all metropolitan area public water suppliers, who serve more than 1,000 people. A public water supplier must also have a conservation rate structure in place before the State will grant approval for constructing an additional well or for a request to increase the authorized volume of appropriation. The Department of Natural Resources has provided further guidance that an increasing block rate means that there is a significant increase between the blocks to encourage conservation, or at least 25% cost increase between the first two tiers and at least 50% more between the last two. The current and recommended rate structures are in compliance with these guidelines, as there is a 25.4% increase between the first two tiers and a 71.9% increase between the last two. Usage fees account for nearly 83% of the residential billings, with the remaining 17% coming from the base charges. Residential usage fees total around $4 million per year, while base charges bring in over 800 thousand. CnmmPrrinl The average commercial consumption over the past three years (2008-2010) was 798,687,963 gallons. Commercial businesses, industrial, and institutional organizations are included in this category. They comprise 25% of the City's total water usage. The following table shows the top 10 commercial water users which account for 31% of the total commercial consumption and 8% of the overall total consumption. Honeywell Minntech Corp Boston Scientific5cimed Inc United Health Group Hutchinson Technology Plymouth Business Center Regency Plymouth Ventures Providence Academy Lifetime Fitness Inc Hennepin County cuuy usage in canons 61, 288,147 51, 562, 288 25, 584, 671 20, 214, 600 16, 541, 300 16, 434,100 16, 335, 644 13,477,400 12,143, 000 11, 520, 000 Page 6 In addition to the usage fees, commercial users also have the same base charge as residential and a demand charge based on meter size. Commercial base and demand charges generate approximately 450,000 per year. Approximately 72% of commercial revenue is from usage fees, 26% from demand charges, and the remaining 2% from base charges. This is an area of opportunity for further conservation efforts. Changing the commercial usage rate structure to a tiered system could help support the City's goals of conservation. The following chart breaks down commercial usage by size and type of meter. 2010 Billing Total Count' Usage Minimum Maximum Average Median 11/2" meter 295 117,442,534 130 933,320 34,675 15,000 2" meter 135 90,105,554 1,000 1,383,500 57,465 27,000 3" meter 51 94,730,444 100 2,328,000 167,665 64,000 4" meter 20 90, 730, 716 100 2,898,000 403,248 191,700 6" meter 3 16,488,000 10,000 1,404, 000 515,250 425,700 Regular meter 261 47,225,376 10 743,000 17,043 4,600 Irrigation 379 270,278,550 10 2,180,300 123,415 76,000 727, 001,174 11,350 11, 870,120 1,318,761 804,000 Total billing count is not the some as individual accounts, as many businesses have more than one meter. 2 Irrigation rate added in 2010. Usage based on 2010April-November billings. Considering the primary purpose of a tiered rate structure is to promote conservation, it is difficult to identify a natural break in usage to determine where waste may be occurring due to the varying sizes employee count) of the businesses. In addition, tracking of irrigation usage just started in 2010, prior to which it was flowing through as overall usage. The lack of irrigation history makes any kind of trend analysis difficult, as 2010 was a wetter year than the couple of years prior. Irrigation accounted for 37% of total commercial usage last year. Based on this, in addition to calls received from residents, it may be worth looking at the rate structure for commercial irrigation. Residential irrigation is currently on a two- tiered rate structure, yet commercial only has one rate, regardless of gallons. The concern expressed from residents is that the rate is substantially lower than what residents pay for usage over 35,000 and they see businesses using sprinklers when it is raining. To encourage conservation by the commercial customers, the council should consider either tiering or raising the commercial irrigation rates. The average commercial irrigation usage in 2010 was 123,415 gallons and the median was 76,000. A second tier over the median value would help reconcile the variance between commercial and residential charges. A third tier could be considered for extraordinarily high usage, such as those over 500,000. Page 7 Current Water Rates The current billing structure is tiered based on consumption for residential and type of usage for commercial, with rates per 1,000 gallons as follows: Rate / 1,000aaI. Reaular Meter Irrigation-onlvMeter Residential 1.22 up to12,500gallons N/A 1.30 1.53 12,501 to 35,000 gallons up to 35,000 gallons 1.53 2.63 35,000 gallons 35,000 gallons Commercial 1.45 All regular usage N/A 2.63 1.81 N/A All irrigation usage Proposed Water Rates Based on the projections in Appendix C-1, increases would be needed in years 2012-2014 to maintain desired reserves in the water utility. The proposed rates are illustrated in the chart below. per 1, 000 gallons Proposed Residential Increases 0.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 0.00% in aallons 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 to 12,500 1.22 1.22 1.26 1.30 1.33 1.33 12,501 to 35,000 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 35,000 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 permonth Base Charge $3.37 $3.37 $3.49 $3.59 $3.68 $3.68 The affect of these rate increases on customers, by various consumption level are as follows: Projected Charges Gallons per Consumption Billing Level Period per customer, per month 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Light 10,000 15.57 15.57 16.11 16.60 17.01 17.01 Average 25,000 37.75 37.75 38.40 38.97 39.47 39.47 Above Avg 50,000 93.26 93.26 93.91 94.49 94.99 94.99 Heavy 90,000 198.46 198.46 199.11 199.69 200.19 200.19 Note: Projections are based on proposed increases to base charges and usage rates. Page 8 permonth Proposed Commercial Increases 0.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 0.00% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Usage Fees $1.45 $1.45 $1.50 $1.55 $1.58 $1.58 Demand Charges 11/2" meter 41.91 41.91 43.38 44.68 45.80 45.80 2" meter 62.87 62.87 65.07 67.02 68.70 68.70 3" meter 130.98 130.98 135.56 139.63 143.12 143.12 4" meter 209.58 209.58 216.92 223.42 229.01 229.01 6" meter 419.16 419.16 433.83 446.85 458.02 458.02 The water fund had a cash balance of $7,600,594 as of 12/31/09. One of the goals of completing a utility study is to identify appropriate cash balances. An operating reserve is used to accommodate fluctuations in revenue and expenses due to weather or unforeseen events. A capital reserve should be maintained to provide funding for the CIP and for unexpected repairs that will not be funded by growth. This type of reserve helps minimize the reliance on debt and allows for a steadier rate structure over time. Due to several larger projects over the next couple of years, the cash balances would fall below the recommended reserve in 2013 and 2014 by $421,000 and $235,000 respectively. A temporary transfer of $500 thousand from the Water Sewer Replacement fund in 2013 could be made to maintain the desired reserve. This transfer could be paid back in 2015. The Water Sewer Replacement fund has a projected balance of $5.7 million, which is in addition to the reserves shown in Appendix C, for unforeseen shortages in either the water or sewer fund. Because of this excess reserve, we do not believe the transfer is necessary, but the option is available if unforeseen circumstances caused the cash balances to be even lower than projections. With or without the transfer, increases of 2.5-3.5% are needed in 2012-2014 to maintain the desired long-term cash reserves in the water utility. This includes increases to usage, base and demand charges. We acknowledge that future trends may vary from assumptions made in this study and therefore recommend regular updates and adjustments if necessary. The calculations used to determine recommended reserve balances (shown in Appendix C-1) are described below. The differences in the cash balances with and without the $500,000 transfer are also shown in Appendix C-1, lines 76-97. Water Fund Recommendations 1) We recommend that the Council adopt the rates as presented in this study. We would also recommend that the Council update the study from time to time to make certain that rates are keeping pace with inflation and capital needs. 2) We recommend that the City Council discuss changes to the commercial irrigation rate. 3) Target Operating and Capital Reserves a. Operating Reserve We recommend the City maintain an operating reserve of an amount equal to three months of operating expenses, including depreciation, 100% of the following year's debt service and 50% of the following year's capital costs. b. Capital Reserve We recommend the capital reserve be maintained at 10% of accumulated depreciation. Page 9 The following graph shows the trend for the estimated cash balance in comparison to the recommended target reserves (see Appendix C-1): 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Water Fund Reserves tiQ titi tiV ti ti ti ti ti^ ti ti tiQ) Lti br tiM ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,LO ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 Estimated Actual Reserve (Target Reserves Page 10 Sanitary Sewer Utility The City of Plymouth participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer system. The City is responsible for the sewer collection system within the city limits and then pays MCES disposal fees for treatment. With an increase of 3.8% in 2010 and a budgeted increase of 3.2% for 2011, we projected future increases at 3.8% per year. These fees comprise approximately 67% of the sewer utility's operating expenses. Depreciation accounts for 11%, leaving only 22% of operating expenses within the City's control. Existing Sewer Fees The primary source of funding for the sewer utility fund is usage fees. Sewer usage fees are set at a single -rate structure, which includes a base fee of $4.94 per month plus a usage fee of $2.90 per 1,000 gallons for commercial and residential. The base fee helps cover the costs of expenses incurred regardless of usage, such as utility billing software and staff, while the usage fees are primarily to cover the costs of maintenance and enhancements to the existing system. Proposed Sewer Rates Based on the projections in Appendix C-2, it appears increases would be needed to maintain adequate reserves in the sewer utility. With conservation already encouraged with a tiered residential water rate structure, we do not believe it is necessary to change sewer rates to a tiered system. The proposed rates are illustrated in the chart below. Proposed Increases 0.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 base fee 1 $4.94 4.94 5.04 5.14 5.24 $5.35 per 1,000 gallons 1 2.90 2.90 2.96 3.02 3.08 3.14 The impact of the increases is summarized by various usage levels in the following chart. Projected Charges Consumption Level Gallons per Month 2010 customer, 2011 2012 2013 month 2014 2015 Light 10,000 33.94 33.94 34.62 35.31 36.02 36.74 Average 25,000 77.44 77.44 78.99 80.57 82.18 83.82 Above Avg 50,000 149.94 149.94 152.94 156.00 159.12 162.30 Heavy 90,000 265.94 265.94 271.26 276.68 282.22 287.86 Note: Projections are based on proposed increases to base charges and usage rates. Page 11 Cash Balances The sewer fund had a cash balance of $2,827,452 as of 12/31/09. One of the goals of completing a utility study is to identify appropriate cash balances. As with the water fund, an operating reserve should be maintained to accommodate fluctuations in revenue and expenses due to weather or unforeseen events. A capital reserve should be maintained to provide funding for the CIP and for unexpected repairs that will not be funded by growth. The calculations used to determine recommended reserve balances (shown in Appendix C-2) are described below. Sewer Fund Recommendations 1) Target Operating and Capital Reserves a. Operating Reserve We recommend the City maintain an operating reserve of an amount equal to thee months of operating expenses, including depreciation, 100% of the following year's debt service and 50% of the following year's capital costs. b. Capital Reserve We recommend the capital reserve be maintained at 5% of accumulated depreciation. The following graph shows the trend for the estimated cash balance in comparison to the recommended target reserve (see Appendix C-2): 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 Sewer Fund Reserves tiQ titi til ti11) ti1 1 tih ti0 Cb ti tiQ titi ti ti ti tih LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,y0 ,y0 ,LO ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 Estimated Actual Reserve (Target Reserve Page 12 Summary The City of Plymouth has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for almost all improvements on a cash basis. The rate study indicates that future increases are necessary to maintain cash balances and pay for capital improvements as well as debt. However, due to the current economy and goals of the Council, we are recommending no increase to either water or sewer rates for 2011, with increases in 2012-2014 for water and, annual increases of 2% to sewer rates in 2012 and beyond. See Appendix A for comparison of the Plymouth's rates to other neighboring cities. The results of this analysis conclude that the recommended rate increases should eliminate the need to issue debt. The utility fund balances should be reviewed regularly to determine whether the available cash is sufficient to cover upcoming capital and operational expenses to identify potential shortages early and reevaluate the option to issue new debt. Appendix A Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates Appendix B Historical Usage Trends Appendix C Water and Sewer Utility Projections Appendix D Capital Improvement Plans for Water and Sewer Page 13 Appendix A Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates The graphs below compare monthly water sewer charges based on 2010 rates and 20,000 gallons per month. Water Sewer Base Usage Base Usage Total Plymouth 3.37 31.41 4.94 58.00 97.72 Bloomington' 5.85 52.30 12.82 0.00 70.97 Brooklyn Park 1.10 39.00 1.10 50.00 91.20 Eden Prairie 2.08 35.00 2.08 44.00 83.17 Maple Grove 5.12 18.00 5.50 27.00 55.62 Minnetonka 0.00 41.38 0.00 59.00 100.38 Sewer charged at flat rate through 2010. Changing to $2.64/1,000 gallons in 2011, which would increase the usage fees to $52.80 for 20,000 gallons used. 2Minimum usage for water and sewer of 4,000 gallons/mo. Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka Water Rate Comparison 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka continued...) Sewer Rate Comparison 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 Base Usage Base Usage Page 14 continued from previous page) Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka Total Bill Comparison 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 Page 15 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 50000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Appendix B Historical Usage Trends Annual Per Capita water Demand (mg) m n ..s +v rn U un %b r coo Ch I I 1 1 ha ry rq ry fw ra rw ry rw PerCapita Demand Population Liner (Per Capita Dernand) Linear (Population) Annual Per Capita Sewer Flows (mg) Seweir Flows Population Linear (Sewer Flows) Linear (Population) Page 16 Daily Per Capita Water Usage and Sewer Flows HOW 160M it 140,00 1X1.00 —demand a IMOO Rainfall (in.} o 84.40 Sewer F lo+rs 04.00 Linear (Demand) 40.00 Linear (Ra lnfall Rin_)) 20-00 Linear (Sewer Flows) 0.00 r+r cn a 4n %0 r W Ga rn m e3+ c O+ Q 6 cIj rw ,+a ra r., ry j Page 17 1 Revenue growth assumption -non-usage 2 Investment income yield 3 Expense growth - personnel 4 Expense growth - all other 5 6 7 Beginning net assets 8 7 Operating Revenues 9 Water Utility Charges - Residential 10 Water Utility Charges - Commercial 11 Demand Charges 12 Penalties' 13 Fire Hydrant Inspection 14 Permits 15 Antennae Charges 16 Water Meter Sales 17 Other 18 Additional Revenue - new growth 19 20 Total Operating Revenues 21 22 Operating Expenses 23 Personal Services 24 Additional person for WTP (2015) 25 Materials & Supplies 26 Employee Development & Meetings 27 Dues & Subscriptions 28 Contractual Services 29 Equipment 30 Other Expenses 31 Depreciation 32 Allocations 33 34 Total Operating Expenses 35 36 Net Operations 37 38 Non operatino revenues (expenses) 39 Interest on Investments 40 Interest on Special Assessments 41 Capital contributions 42 Debt Service - Interest 43 Transfers In (Out) 44 Water Sewer Construction 45 Utility Trunk Replacement 46 Public Facilities 47 Central Equipment 48 General 49 Improvement Project Construction 50 Information Technology 51 Risk Management 52 Employee Benefits 53 54 Total non operating revenue (expense 55 56 Net increase (decrease)in resources 57 58 Ending net assets City of Plymouth Water Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2.0091 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00-A 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 54,652,063 54,208,836 53,765,612 53,114,261 52,490,112 52,270,154 52,141,780 52,072,832 51,864,026 51,723,448 51,513,459 51,231,610 50,875,362 50,419,321 49,867,166 49,213,039 48,450,600 47,572,994 88.56% 3,476,892 3,831,995 4,000,000 3,980,000 5,014,989 5,165,439 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 1,493,706 1,591,356 1,750,000 1,853,750 1,302,655 1,341,735 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 401,176 415,468 425,000 416,625 441,365 454,606 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 47,228 53,686 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000. 40,000. 40,000 40,000 40,000 54,635 60,000 60,000 61,200 62,424 63,672 64,946 66,245 67,570 68,921 70,300 71,706 73,140 74,602 76,095 77,616 79,169 7,031 4,386 7,000 7,031 7,172 7,315 7,461 7,611 7,763 7,918 8,076 8,238 8,403 8,571 8,742 8,917 9,095 9,277 88,405 105,795 93,000 93,000 94,860 96,757 98,692 100,666 102,680 104,733 106,828 108,964 111,144 113,366 115,634 117,946 120,305 122,712 19,191 40,736 20,000 20,000 20,400 20,808 21,224 21,649 22,082 22,523 22,974 23,433 23,902 24,380 24,867 25,365 25,872 26,390 75,657 26,030 58,946 95,652 133,772 178,163 227,871 285,658 350,022 420,965 498,485 582,584 670,679 764,173 863,067 967,360 1,077,052 5,609,286 6,124,087 6,395,000 6,529,352 7,078,293 7,322,856 7,545,037 7,598,567 7,660,251 7,728,591 7,803,588 7,885,244 7,973,561 8,065,959 8,163,843 8,267,213 8,376,073 8,490,423 1,770,178 1,802,125 1,587,549 1,609,987 1,642,187 1,675,030 1,708,531 1,742,702 1,794,983 1,848,832 1,904,297 1,961,426 2,020,269 2,080,877 2,143,303 2,207,602 2,273,830 2,342,045 65,000 660,194 721,502 642,600 708,900 723,078 737,540 752,290 767,336 790,356 814,067 838,489 863,644 889,553 916,240 943,727 972,038 1,001,200 1,031,236 4,952 5,291 12,600 12,600 12,852 13,109 13,371 13,639 14,048 14,469 14,903 15,350 15,811 16,285 16,774 17,277 17,795 18,329 3,285 3,437 4,700 4,700 4,888 5,084 5,287 5,498 5,718 5,947 6,185 6,432 6,690 6,957 7,235 7,525 7,826 8,139 1,441,025 1,344,977 1,723,138 1,783,338 1,854,672 1,928,858 2,006,013 2,086,253 2,169,703 2,256,491 2,346,751 2,440,621 2,538,246 2,639,776 2,745,367 2,855,182 2,969,389 3,088,164 5,775 9,279 10,050 8,550 8,892 9,248 9,618 10,002 10,402 10,818 11,251 11,701 12,169 12,656 13,162 13,689 14,236 14,806 4,684 4,782 5,000 5,000 5,200 5,408 5,624 5,849 6,083 6,327 6,580 6,843 7,117 7,401 7,697 8,005 8,325 8,658 2,543,610 2,499,455 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 463,290 508,457 446,972 428,527 445,668 463,495 482,035 501,316 521,369 542,223 563,912 586,469 609,928 634,325 659,698 686,086 713,529 742,070 6,896,993 6,899,305 6,932,609 7,061,602 7,211,436 7,406,438 7,605,435 7,831,929 7,962,143 8,164,378 8,373,892 8,590,950 8,815,829 9,048,816 9,290,209 9,540,315 9,799,455 10,067,961 1,287,707) 775,218) 537,609) 532,250) 133,143) 83,582) 60,398) 233,362) 301,892) 435,788) 570,304) 705,706) 842,268) 982,857) 1,126,366) 1,273,101) 1,423,382) 1,577,537) 324,069 67,248 100,000 100,000 76,471 88,382 91,236 88,142 187,400 212,885 235,041 253,943 269,213 313,688 355,225 393,648 428,763 460,363 17,274 10,964 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 237,427 867,459 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 375,175) 352,412) 335,756) 308,913) 280,300) 250,188) 216,800) 180,600) 143,100) 104,100) 63,600) 21,500) 730,443) 84,556) 28,952 4,771) 75,000) 79,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 938,127) 60,904) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 48,950) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 18,775) 1,617,700) 331,994 113,742) 91,899) 85,815) 44,792) 8,550) 24,556 161,314 225,799 288,455 349,457 386,227 430,702 472,239 510,662 545,777 577,377 2,905,407) 443,224) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 51,746,656 53,765,612 53,114,261 52,490,112 52,270,154 52,141,780 52,072,832 51,864,026 51,723,448 51,513,459 51,231,610 50,875,362 50,419,321 49,867,166 49,213,039 48,450,600 47,572,994 46,572,834 New anticipated growth added to budgeted numbers for 2011. 2 Penalties estimated to remain stable. Not usually addressed in fee increases. N Page 18 59 CIP Funding 60 Current year Capital 61 Additional Capital Equipment for WTP (2015) 62 Bond Proceeds 63 Bond Principal -20048 Issue 64 Total Capital & Related Debt 65 66 Accumulated Depreciation 67 Beginning Accumulated Depreciation 68 Expensed 69 Ending Accumulated Depreciation 70 71 Cash 72 Beginning Cash 73 Add net increase (decrease)in resources( 74 Add back depreciation (31) 75 Less capital contributions (41) 76 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 77 Net other 78 Ending Cash 79 2013 -Temporary Transfer from Replaceme 80 81 Target Operating Reserve 82 Target Capital Reserve 83 Total Target Reserves 84 Excess/(Shortfall) City of Plymouth Water Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 1 2010 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1,668,570) nt 145,460) 2,887,000) 1,250,000) 420,000) 1,640,000) 1,620,000) 350,000) 454,412) 471,679) 489,603) 508,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 86 Capital Outlay Coverage 835.84% 206.99% 268.97% 407.85% 235.69% 222.41% 450.28% 35,000) 483.83% 515.58% 534.66% 1701.13% 1909.59% 2083.29% 2224.11% 2333.82% 2414.09% 2560.19% 745,000) 760,000) 785,000) 805,000) 830,000) 860,000) 890,000) 920,000) 955,000) 995,000) 1,030,000) 1,075,000) 2,413,570) 905,460) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 29,555,779 32,055,779 34,555,779 37,069,779 39,638,446 42,261,112 44,895,446 47,544,926 50,210,129 52,891,652 55,590,116 58,306,163 61,040,463 63,793,708 66,566,619 69,359,943 651,351) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 27,056,323 29,555,779 32,055,779 34,555,779 37,069,779 39,638,446 42,261,112 44,895,446 47,544,926 50,210,129 52,891,652 55,590,116 58,306,163 61,040,463 63,793,708 66,566,619 69,359,943 72,174,456 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 6,082,429 5,876,147 6,246,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 56) 3,672,000) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,876,147 6,746,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 16,274,109 Fund 1 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 500,000 5,895,386 500,000) 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 99 Excess/(Shortfall) 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 4,095,601 5,682,986 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 3,472,611 1,917,608 427,352 179,357 123,361 80,425 256,454 351,288 955,638 1,441,812 1,827,264 947,049 2,089,662 3,130,059 4,062,154 4,879,368 5,574,602 6,221,842 85 86 Capital Outlay Coverage 835.84% 206.99% 268.97% 407.85% 235.69% 222.41% 450.28% 478.69% 483.83% 515.58% 534.66% 1701.13% 1909.59% 2083.29% 2224.11% 2333.82% 2414.09% 2560.19% 87 88 2013 - Without Temporary Transfer from Replacement Fund 89 Beginning Cash 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,368,647 6,266,675 7,116,165 7,854,700 8,484,771 8,993,778 10,476,265 11,860,844 13,141,589 14,312,089 15,365,418 90 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (56) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 76,448) 216,306) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 91 Add back depreciation (31) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 92 Less capital contributions (41) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 93 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,270,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 94 Ending Cash 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5;368,647 6,266,675 7,116,165 7,854,700 8,484,771 8,993,778 10,476,265 11,860,844 13,141,589 14;312,089 15;365,418 16,294,109 95 96 Target Operating Reserve 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 97 Target Capital Reserve 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 98 Total Target Reserves 4,095,601 5,682,986 1 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 99 Excess/(Shortfall) 3,472,611 1,917,608 1 427,352 179,357 123,361 419,575) 251,046) 371,288 975,638 1,461,812 1,847,264 967,049 2,109,662 3,150,059 4,082,154 4,899,368 5,594,602 6,241,842 100 101 102 Statistical 103 As a %of Operating Revenue 104 Usage fees 88.61% 88.56% 89.91% 89.35% 89.25% 88.86% 88.40% 87.78% 87.07% 86.30% 85.47% 84.59% 83.65% 82.69% 81.70% 80.68% 79.63% 78.56% 105 Base & Demand Charges 6.48% 5.85% 6.29% 6.05% 5.95% 5.93% 5.90% 5.86% 5.75% 5.68% 5.62% 5.55% 5.48% 5.39% 5.31% 5.22% 5.14% 5.06% 106 107 108 Alternate - Elimination afReplacement Reserve Fund 109 Beginning Cash 7,600,594 5,527,243 7,663,094 8,457,136 8,147,429 7,941,147 8,811,675 9,661,165 10,399,700 11,029,771 11,538,778 13,021,265 14,405,844 15,686,589 16,857,089 17,910,418 110 45% Replacement Reserve Cash 2,565,000 111 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (56) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 112 Add back depreciation (31) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 113 Less capital contributions (41) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 114 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 3,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 115 Ending Cash 7,569,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 7,663,094 8,457,136 8,147,429 7,941,147 8,811,675 9,661,165 10,399,700 11,029,771 11,538,778 13,021,265 14,405,844 15,686,589 16,857,089 17,910,418 18,839,109 116 117 Target Operating Reserve 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 118 Target Capital Reserve 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 119 Total Target Reserves 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,76$775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 120 Excess /(Shortfall) 427,352 2,744,357 2,688,361 2,145,425 2,321,454 2,916,288 3,520,638 4,006,812 4,392,264 3,512,049 4,654,662 5,695,059 6,627,154 7,444,368 8,139,602 8,786,842 Page 19 1 Revenue growth assumption - non -usage 2 Investment income yield 3 Expense growth - personnel 4 Expense growth - all other 5 6 7 Beginning net assets 8 9 Operating Revenues 10 Sewer Utility Charges - Residential 11 Sewer Utility Charges - Commercial 12 Penaltie52 13 Permits 14 Other 15 Additional Revenue - new growth 16 17 Total Operating Revenues 18 19 Operating Expenses 20 Personal Services 21 Materials & Supplies 22 Employee Development & Meetings 23 Contractual Services 24 Equipment 25 Other Expenses 26 Depreciation 27 Allocations 28 29 Total Operating Expenses 30 31 Net Operations 32 33 Non operating revenues (expenses) 34 Interest an Investments 35 Capital contributions 36 Transfers In (Out) 37 Water Sewer Construction 38 Utility Trunk Replacement 39 Public Facilities 40 Central Equipment 41 General 42 Improvement Project Construction 43 Resource Planning 44 Risk Management 45 Employee Benefits 46 47 Total non operating revenue (expenses) 48 49 Net increase (decrease)in resources 50 51 Ending net assets City of Plymouth Sewer Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 32,864,456 32,337,688 31,764,921 31,987,915 33,004,462 34,096,811 35,139,756 36,093,259 36,956,456 37,808,365 38,552,821 39,182,745 39,677,433 40,029,096 40,256,159 40,338,341 40,261,673 40,114,159 4,311,271 4,532,942 4,600,000 5,100,000 6,370,690 6,498,104 6,628,066 6,760,627 6,895,840 7,033,756 7,174,432 7,317,920 7,464,279 7,613,564 7,765,835 7,921,152 8,158,787 8,403,550 2,354,504 2,340,850 2;800,000 3,000,000 1,871,156 1,908,579 1,946,750 1,985,685 2,025,399 2,065,907 2,107,225 2,149,370 2,192,357 2,236,204 2,280,928 2,326,547 2,396,343 2,468,234 69,952 67,369 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 6,831 4,226 7,000 7,000 7,140 7,283 7,428 7,577 7,729 7,883 8,041 8,202 8,366 8,533 8,704 8,878 9,055 9,236 9,114 16,613 10,000 10,000 85,844 135,477 186,102 214,959 244,393 274,416 312,297 350,936 390,347 430,547 471,550 505,881 540,898 576,965 614,115 6,751,672 6,962,000 7,477,000 8,262,844 8,444,463 8,660,067 8,857,204 9,058,283 9,263,384 9,479,844 9,700,633 9,925,839 10,155,548 10,389,852 10,621,348 10,857,475 11,201,151 11,555,135 929,775 935,882 816,494 826,263 842,788 859,644 876,837 894,374 921,205 948,841 977,306 1,006,625 1,036,824 1,067,929 1,099,967 1,132,966 1,166,955 1,201,963 101,439 100,396 143,600 144,700 147,594 150,546 153,557 156,628 161,327 166,167 171,152 176,286 181,575 187,022 192,633 198,412 204,364 210,495 5,152 2,795 6,000 6,000 6,120 6,242 6,367 6,495 6,689 6,890 7,097 7,310 7,529 7,755 7,988 8,227 8,474 8,728 4,715,126 5,075,696 5,133,738 5,147,513 5,343,118 5,546,157 5,756,911 5,975,674 6,202,749 6,438,454 6,683,115 6,937,073 7,200,682 7,474,308 7,758,332 8,053,148 8,359,168 8,676,816 1,147 3,505 5,050 5,050 5,242 5,441 5,648 5,862 6,085 6,316 6,557 6,806 7,064 7,333 7,611 7,901 8,201 8,512 4,494 4,744 5,000 5,000 5,190 5,387 5,592 5,804 6,025 6,254 6,492 6,738 6,994 7,260 7,536 7,822 8,120 8,428 831,739 833,887 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 325,751 372,235 272,910 240,557 249,698 259,187 269,036 279,259 289,871 300,886 312,320 324,188 336,507 349,294 362,568 376,345 390,646 405,491 6,914,623 7,329,140 7,217,792 7,210,083 7,458,084 7,739,604 8,031,281 8,326,429 8,631,339 8,975,883 9,303,882 9,678,924 10,031,768 10,397,734 10,777,313 11,171,012 11,579,360 12,002,903 162,951) 367,140) 259,208 1,052,761 986,378 920,463 825,923 731,854 632,044 503,961 396,751 246,914 123,780 7,882) 155,964) 313,537) 378,209) 447,768) 106,406 15,474 45,000 45,000 52,185 68,695 73,794 77,557 166,080 186,709 179,387 193,987 174,097 181,160 184,360 183,084 176,909 168,469 186,914 269,572 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,246) 374,188) 125,000) 125,000) 26,391) 4,771) 54,000) 56,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 32,314) 7,500) 36,477) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 1,168 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 704,940) 205,627) 36,214) 36,214) 105,971 122,481 127,580 131,343 219,866 240,495 233,173 247,773 227,883 234,946 238,146 236,870 230,695 222,255 867,891) 572,767) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 31,996,565 31,764,921 31,987,915 33,004,462 34,096,811 35,139,756 36,093,259 36,956,456 37,808,365 38,552,821 39,182,745 39,677,433 40,029,096 40,256,159 40,338,341 40,261,673 40,114,159 39,888,646 New anticipated growth added to budgeted numbers for 2011. 2 Penalties estimated to remain stable. Not usually addressed in fee increases. x N Page 20 52 Met Council Detail 53 MCES Portion of Operating Expenses 54 MCES %of Operating Expenses 55 56 CIP Funding 57 Current Year Capital 58 Bond Proceeds 59 Bond Principal 60 Total Capital & Related Debt 61 62 Accumulated Depreciation 63 Depreciation as %of Operating Expenses 64 65 Beginning Accumulated Depreciation 66 Expensed 67 Ending Accumulated Depreciation 68 69 Cash 70 Beginning Cash 71 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (4 72 Add back depreciation (26) 73 Less capital contributions (35) 74 Less capital and related debt principal (60) 75 Netother 76 Ending Cash 77 78 Target Operating Reserve 79 Target Capital Reserve 80 Total Target Reserves 81 Excess / (Shortfall) 82 83 Capital Outlay Coverage 84 85 Alternate - Elimination of Replacement Resen 86 Beginning Cash 87 55% Replacement Reserve Cash 88 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (5 89 Add back depreciation (30) 90 Less capital contributions (40) 91 Less capital and related debt principal(62) 92 Ending Cash 93 94 Target Operating Reserve 95 Target Capital Reserve 96 Total Target Reserves 97 Excess / (Shortfall) D IDID CL X n N ry O3 3 s; CL City of Plymouth Sewer Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 4,429,433 4,630,076 4,700,000 4,850,400 5,034,715 5,226,034 5,424,624 5,630,759 5,844,728 6,066,828 6,297,367 6,536,667 6,785,061 7,042,893 7,310,523 7,588,323 7,876,679 8,175,993 64.06% 63.17% 65.12% 67.27% 67.51% 67.52% 67.54% 67.63% 67.72% 67.59% 67.69% 67.54% 67.64% 67.73% 67.83% 67.93% 68.02% 68.12% 882,560) (374,188) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 882,560) (374,188) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 12.03% 11.38% 11.57% 11.58% 11.51% 11.72% 11.92% 12.04% 12.02% 12.28% 12.25% 12.54% 12.51% 12.47% 12.44% 12.41% 12.38% 12.35% 13,148,551 13,983,551 14,818,551 15,676,884 16,583,884 17,541,218 18,543,551 19,580,939 20,683,014 21,822,859 23,036,757 24,291,350 25,588,183 26,928,862 28,315,053 29,748,486 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 12,314,665 13,148,551 13,983,551 14,818,551 15,676,884 16,583,884 17,541,218 18,543,551 19,580,939 20,683,014 21,822,859 23,036,757 24,291,350 25,588,183 26,928,862 28,315,053 29,748,486 31,230,955 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 9) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 5,251,498 2,019,379 2,178,448 2,407,521. 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3,214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 615,733 657,428 699,178 740,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 2,635,112 2,835,876 3,106,698 2,955,449 3,448,745 3,592,014 3,633,668 3,610,832 4,193,330 3,926,662 4,621,672 4,270,196 4,447,613 4,631,426 4,821,877 5,019,216 5,223,701 5,297,824 787,821 (8,424) 119,252) 523,545 1,130,931 1,327,606 1,536,788 1,925,155 2,030,316 2,052,891 1,844,569 1,533,035 1,591,041 1,513,901 1,280,932 877,755 391,942 46,326) 914.76% 378.00% 246.90% 497.00% 313.68% 325.80% 383.00% 526.42% 320.70% 527.72% 291.06% 475.35% 476.53% 467.19% 446.97% 416.09% 381.73% 356.98% ne Fund 2,827,452 2,987,446 6,613,993 7,714,676 8,054,620 8,305,457 8,670,987 9,358,646 9,114,554 9,601,241 8,938,231 9,173,654 9,280,327 9,237,809 9,031,971 8,750,643 3,135,000 5) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 6,613,993 7,714,676 8,054,620 8,305,457 8,670,987 9,358,646 9,114,554 9,601,241 8,938,231 9,173,654 9,280,327 9,237,809 9,031,971 8,750,643 8,386,498 2,407,521 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3,214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 699,178 740,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 3,106,698 2,955,449 3,448,745 3,592,014 3,633,668 3,610,832 4,193,330 3,926,662 4,621,672 4,270,196 4,447,613 4,631,426 4,821,877 5,019,216 5,223,701 5,297,824 119,252) 3,658,545 1 4,265,931 4,462,606 4,671,788 5,060,155 5,165,316 5,187,891 4,979,569 4,668,035 4,726,041 4,648,901 4,415,932 4,012,755 3,526,942 3,088,674 Page 21 CASH Ending Cash Balances 1 Water 2 Sewer 3 Water Sewer Replacement at 12/22/10 5 Total Ending Cash Target Operating Reserve - Water Target Capital Reserve - Water Target Operating Reserve - Sewer Target Capital Reserve - Sewer Total Target Reserves Excess / (Shortfall) X n w City of Plymouth Utility Funds Combined Cash 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,876,147 6,746,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 16,274,109 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 5,251,498 11,268,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 20,246,426 20,501,170 19,783,272 14,345,670 16,240,395 16,270,632 16,815,187 18,051,244 19,088,394 19,582,836 20,699,595 20,545,592 22,263,502 23,754,754 24,992,981 25,957,643 26,729,644 27,294,190 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5;830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 2,019,379 2,178,448 2,407,521 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3;214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 615,733 657,428 699,178 740,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 6,730,713 8,518,862 8,206,590 7,874,186 9,217,521 9,594,018 9,253,362 9,506,218 10,333,856 10,319,550 11,259,178 12,296,925 12,814,216 13,342,211 13,881,313 14,431,937 14,994,516 15,350,091 13,515,713 11,982,308 11,576,682 6,471,485 7,022,874 6,676,614 7,561,826 8,545,026 8,754,537 9,263,287 9,440,416 8,248,667 9,449,286 10,412,542 11,111,669 11,525,706 11,735,128 11,944,099 Page 22 City of Plymouth Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Inflation Rate 3.80% PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT# 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 A- inn Vrnv0-1 by Wnror P-1 Well refurbishing 07-W-002 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 250,000 Future well refurbishing 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Paint MIP water tower 09-W-003 50,000 550,000 Rpl altitude valve- central water tower 10-W-001 35,000 Paint Zachary watertower 12-W-001 60,000 70,000 1,000,000 Paint CR 101 water tower 14-W-001 45,000 100,000 1,200,000 Rpl roof - pump house #1 10 -FM -001 16,000 Rpl roof - pump house #3 10 -FM -002 16,000 CR101-CR6 to CR24 08 -ST -003 400,000 CR24 - 30th Ave to CR101 08 -ST -004 300,000 8th Avenue street reconstruction 09 -ST -010 100,000 2010 street recon - district #72 10 -ST -001 2,000,000 Polaris Lane reconstruction 10 -ST -002 50,000 Annapolis Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -004 50,000 Harbor Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -007 50,000 Lancaster Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -008 275,000 2012 street reconstruction 11 -ST -001 100,000 2013 street reconstruction 13 -ST -001 100,000 2014 street reconstruction 14 -ST -001 100,000 Hwy 55 frontage road reconstruction 14 -ST -002 50,000 2015 street reconstruction 15 -ST -002 100,000 Future street reconstruction 100,000 100,000 1 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Water Fund 2,887,000 1,250,000 420,000 1,640,000 1,620,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Inflated Total 454,412 471,679 489,603 508,208 527,520 547,566 568,373 589,971 612,390 635,661 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. D DDOl7Q X v N Page 23 City of Plymouth Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvement Program Inflation Rate 3.80% PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT# 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ronin Oln1';- A,, I --.- Sanitary sewer maintenance - annual 06 -SS -003 450,000 500,000 510,000 570,000 630,000 710,000 810,000 810,000 Future sanitary sewer annual maint 1,051,639 1,940,624 1,133,082 2,221,595 1,220,832 1,267,224 1,315,378 1,365,362 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 Imperial Hills lift station 11 -SS -001 140,000 600,000 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. Ferndale N lift station 13 -SS -001 100,000 700,000 28th Ave lift station 14 -SS -001 100,000 700,000 Greentree West lift station 15 -SS -001 140,000 600,000 Waterfront lift station 630,000 Bass Lake Plaza lift station 720,000 8th Avenue reconstruction 09 -ST -010 8,000 2010 street reconstruction 10 -ST -001 100,000 Polaris Lane reconstruction 10 -ST -002 50,000 Annapolis Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -004 50,000 Harbor Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -007 50,000 Lancaster Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -008 10,000 2012 street reconstruction 90,000 2013 street reconstruction 13 -ST -001 40,000 2014 street reconstruction 14 -ST -001 40,000 Hwy 55 frontage road reconstruction 14 -ST -002 50,000 2015 street reconstruction 15 -ST -002 40,000 Future street reconstruction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Sewer Fund 748,000 1,210,000 700,000 1,460,000 1,510,000 1,350,000 810,000 1,440,000 810,000 1,530,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 Inflated Total 1,051,639 1,940,624 1,133,082 2,221,595 1,220,832 1,267,224 1,315,378 1,365,362 1,417,246 1,471,102 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. Dvnm CL X o I Page 24 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N0. 2014 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING UTILITY FEES THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1015.33 of the Plymouth City Code is hereby amended as follows: 1015.33. Utility. Sanitary Sewer, water, storm water utility fees are as follows: a) Sewer Utility fees: 1) Base Fee. A charge of $544 $5.24 per month shall be made to every sanitary sewer account to defray administrative costs, billing costs, and other fixed costs of the City. (Ord. 2002-31, 11-26-2002; Ord. 2004-27, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-32, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) 2) Volume Charge. A charge of 2 $3.08 per one thousand gallons of sewage discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system shall be made to each sanitary sewer account except for qualified senior citizens for whom a charge of" $2.75 per one thousand gallons will apply. For purposes of this section, an individual must meet the following criteria for the qualified senior citizen discount to apply: (1) the individual must be 62 years of age or older; 2) the property must be homesteaded; and (3) the individual's name must appear on the bill. Seniors in a multi -unit building will also be eligible for a senior discount if the bylaws, or other governing documents for the building, require that at least one tenant/owner in each unit be at least 62 years of age. For residential customers, the volume of such sewage discharge shall be based upon the actual amount of water consumed during the appropriate two month billing, in the period of December through February. For non-residential customers, the volume of such sewer discharge shall be based upon the actual water consumed by the account each month. Alternatively, non-residential customers may have their volumes of sewer discharge based on actual sewage flows or calculated sewage flows if sewer usage or sewer deduct meters are installed. In instances where there is no metered water service to an account or the account history is inadequate, the volume of sewer usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. Alternatively, residential customers who desire to have the volume of sewer discharge based on average winter water usage may install a water meter to meter their well water usage. (Ord. 96-27, 11/20/96; Ord. 97-6, 04/16/97; Ord. 98-15, 05/06/98; Ord. 2002-31, 11/26/2002; Ord. 2003-08, 03/25/2003; Ord. 2004-27, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-32, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2007-07, 03/27/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008, Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) 3) Amount Due After Due Date. An amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current month service charges and an amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current bi-monthly service charges Page 25 shall be added to each account which is not paid by the due date as specified by the Finance Department. (Ord. 94-25, 12/19/94) b) Water Rates: The rate due and payable to the City by each water user within the City for water taken from the water supply system shall be as follows: 1) Base Fee. A charge of $3-59 $3.68 per month shall be made to every water account. This charge defrays administrative and billing costs of the City as well as the State water connection surcharge. (Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 0211312007: Ord. 2008-29,1210912008; Ord. 2-12-02,112412012; Ord. 2013-04,11812013) 2) Volume Charge -Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional. A charge of ". 1.58 per one thousand gallons of water used shall be made to each water account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 96-27, 11/20/96; Ord. 99-28, 11102/99; Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 112412012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) Volume Charge -Residential. A charge of" $1.33 per one thousand gallons of water for the first 12,500 gallons used, $1.67 per one thousand gallons of water for 12,501 to 35,000 gallons used, and $240 $2.87 per one thousand gallons of water for over 35,000 gallons used for a two month billing period, shall be made to each residential water account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 99-28, 11/02/99; Ord. 2004-26, 1110912004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) Volume Charge -Separately Metered Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional Irrigation. A charge of X9-3 $1.98 per one thousand gallons of water shall be made to each separately metered commercial, industrial, public and institutional irrigation account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 2009-20, 12/08/2009; Ord. 2012-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 11812013) Volume Charge -Separately Metered Residential Irrigation. A charge of X6-3 $1.67 per one thousand gallons of water for the first 35,000 gallons used per housing unit served, and S240 2.87 per one thousand gallons of water for over 35,000 gallons per housing unit served for a two month billing period, shall be made to each separately metered residential irrigation account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 2000-02, 02/01/2000; Ord. 2004-26,1110912004; Ord. 2005-34,1112912005; Ord. 2007-06,0211312007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) 3) Demand Charge. The following monthly charge shall be made to every Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional water account to reflect the water demand the establishment can place upon the system. Meter Size 1-1/2" Charge Page 26 2" mei $68.70 3" e'3 .$143.12 4" $223.42.$229.01 6" and over $446.85$458.02 Ord. 99-28,11102199; Ord. 2004-26,1110912004; Ord. 2005-34,1112912005; Ord. 2007-06,0211312007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) 4) Stopped or Faulty Meter. In case the meter is found to have stopped or to be operating in a faulty manner, the amount of water used will be estimated in accordance with the amount used previously. 5) Amount Due After Due Date. An amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current month service charges and an amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current bi-monthly service charges shall be added to each account which is not paid by the due date as specified by the Finance Department. (Ord. 94-25, 12/19/94) 6) Water Availability Charge. A water availability charge at the rate of $2.07 $2.12 per month is due and payable by the owner of each lot or parcel of land which has municipal water service available if such lot or parcel is not connected to the municipal water system; provided, this charge is not due if there is no building or other structure on such lot or parcel. (Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2-12-02, 1/24/2012; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) c) Storm Water Utility Rate: The storm water utility rate is $5 per month and shall be charged to all parcels not listed as exempt in Section 725.08. (Ord. 2004-22, 09/28/2004; Ord. 2005-33, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008; Ord. 2013-04, 1/8/2013) This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and with services incurred effective January 1, 2014. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 27 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 4PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Givonna Kone, Human Resources Manager January 23, 2014 Reviewed by: Luke Fischer, Administrative Services Director Approve modification to Minnesota's agreement to allow Item: Councilmembers to contribute to Social Security and Medicare 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution requesting a retroactive modification to Minnesota's section 218 Agreement. A retroactive modification allows the Social Security Administration to give credit to currently serving council members for contributions made since January 2003 and it allows the Social Security Administration to give credit for contributions made from January 28, 2014 forward by any Plymouth council member. 2. BACKGROUND: Prior to June 30, 2002, council members were able to participate in PERA's Defined Contribution Plan and Social Security simultaneously. Council members elected after July 1, 2002, are still able to participate in both plans as long as there is a 218 Agreement in place. Most of Plymouth's council members are paying into PERA's Defined Contribution Plan and Social Security and most were elected after June 30, 2002, which requires that there be a 218 Agreement in place to permit council members to make Social Security contributions. Staff is, therefore, recommending that the city council adopt a resolution that would request a retroactive modification to Minnesota's section 218 Agreement. A retroactive modification will ensure that council members receive credit for Social Security contributions made since January 2003 and it will approve future Social Security contributions. Setting the retroactive effective date for the 218 agreement modification to January 2003 ensures that all current council members will receive full credit for past Social Security contributions. Please note that the retroactive provisions of the resolution only apply to council members who are currently serving. Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution doing the following: a. Requesting a divided vote referendum. A divided vote referendum allows each member of the city council to submit a ballot indicating whether or not they, as an individual, will participate in Social Security. b. Authorizing the human resources manager to conduct the referendum. c. Establishing January 1, 2003 as the effective date of coverage. For each individual member of the city council, the retroactive period will begin on the latter of either the date established in the 218 modification (January 1, 2003) or the date the particular city council member took office. Page 1 d. Requesting a modification to Minnesota's section 218 Agreement in order to provide full Social Security coverage/credit to council members covered by the Defined Contribution Plan. e. Acknowledging the applicable state and federal laws and regulations regarding employee tax withholdings, employer contributions and record keeping. Each of the items listed above is covered in the attached resolution. Once the resolution is approved by the city council, staff will send the resolution to PERA with a list of city council members who are eligible to vote in the referendum (Slavik, Bildsoe, Johnson, Prom, Stein, Willis and Wosje). PERA will establish the official date upon which the referendum will be conducted. All council members who are eligible to vote in the referendum must be given 90 days notice of the referendum. Pending approval of the attached resolution, staff will provide the city council with additional information regarding the referendum. If the city council elects to pursue a modification to Minnesota's 218 Agreement, council members will receive credit with the Social Security Administration for all contributions made after the effective date of the 218 Agreement (January 1, 2003 is the proposed effective date.) With regard to past Plymouth council members, PERA has indicated, unofficially, that the Social Security Administration will likely give them credit for contributions they made even though those contributions are not covered under the proposed modification to the 218 agreement. The alternative to pursuing a modification to Minnesota's 218 Agreement is to discontinue council members' contributions to Social Security and request a refund from the IRS for past contributions made. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: If approved, the city will be required to pay approximately $300 in Social Security back taxes for one member of the city council. All other members of the city council are (and have been) paying into Social Security so there are no back taxes. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS TO SOCIAL SECURITY BY ELECTED OFFICIALS HOLDING POSITIONS COVERED BY THE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 355, as amended, establishes procedures that allow a governmental subdivision to extend Social Security coverage to certain local elected officials who are members of, or are eligible for membership in, the Defined Contribution Plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association; and WHEREAS, the desires to offer Social Security coverage to its eligible elected officials. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the does hereby adopt the following resolution: SECTION 1. It is hereby declared to be the policy of this governing body to extend the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 355.02 that provide Social Security coverage to eligible elected officials of the City of Plymouth. SECTION 2. In pursuance of said policy, this governing body hereby requests and authorizes the execution of a divided vote referendum under Section 218(d)(6) of the Social Security Act for the purpose of allowing current eligible elected officials the option of paying the Social Security tax. The coverage of current local elected officials shall be effective as of for those eligible officials who vote "Yes" in the Social Security referendum. The referendum will be conducted pursuant to applicable state and federal laws and regulations by a designee of the governmental subdivision under the supervision of a representative of the Public Employees Retirement Association acting as the designated State Social Security Administrator. SECTION 3. The Public Employees Retirement Association is hereby directed to execute a modification to the section 218 Agreement between the State of Minnesota and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to secure Social Security coverage of the eligible elected officials who vote "Yes" in the referendum and all local newly -elected officials of this governmental subdivision. SECTION 4. Withholdings from the salaries of elected officials for the purposes provided in this resolution are hereby authorized to be made in the amounts and at such times as may be required by applicable federal and state laws and regulations. SECTION 5. Employer contributions shall be paid from amounts appropriated for such purposes and payment of employee and employer contributions shall be paid to the Internal Revenue Service in such amounts and at such times as are designated in Internal Revenue Code. SECTION 6. Employees of this governmental subdivision shall maintain such records and submit such reports as may be required by the Public Employees Retirement Association, the Social Security Administration or the Internal Revenue Service. SECTION 7. This resolution shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage. Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 4 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 5PlymouthNumber: v Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Doran M. Cote, Public Works Director January 28, 2014 Approve Joint Powers Agreement between the Item: City of Plymouth and the City of Maple Grove for Peony Lane North of Schmidt Lake Road, City Project No. 10015 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Plymouth and the City of Maple Grove for the construction of Peony Lane north of Schmidt Lake Road, City Project No. 10015. 2. BACKGROUND: In 2010, the City of Plymouth began the process of evaluating the potential extension alignments for Peony Lane north of Schmidt Lake Road. The study developed four potential alignments for the Peony Lane extension, including one identified by residents. The analysis, completed in 2011 and documented in Technical Memorandum dated March 15, 2011, suggested that Alignments 1 and 3 would both serve the City's long-term transportation and land use needs. Alignment 313 was ultimately selected by the City Council for design. The City of Maple Grove has requested that the project include the upgrade of the one-quarter mile section of Lawndale Lane that is not currently to their standards. The terms of the agreement allow for the costs of the improvements attributable to each city to be allocated to and paid for by that city excluding staff time. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is identified in the 2014 — 2018 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with an estimated cost of $11.3 million. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Agreement Resolution Page 1 r Proposed Peony/Lawndale Lane Corridor Project Location Map w 63RD AVE N City of Maple Grove City of Plymouth 4; 09 H a~ z 56TH AVE proximate Corridor Location CD # w 54TH E RD 51 T sly J 00 Page 2 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND 714E CITE' OF MAPLE GROVE FOR. THE PEONY LANE/LAWN]DALE LADE EXTENSION PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF PLYMOUTH, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Plymouth") and the CITY OF MAPLE GROVE, a Mimiesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Maple Grove"), with the parties collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Cities". WHEREAS, the Cities desire to implement the design and construction of the Peony Lane/Lawndale Lane Extension Project in the cities (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project is identified as Plymouth Project 155-153-003/Maple Grove Project 89-106-98 WHEREAS, Mirm. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes two or more governinental Lints to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power; and WHEREAS, Plymouth has prepared the plans and specifications for the Project dated November 26, 2013 (the "Plans"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WSB & Associates, Inc. ("WSB") has prepared plans and specifications for the Project consistent with Plymouth and Maple Grove design standards, each City approving pursuant to the signature block on the plans. 2. BIDDING. Plymouth will advertise for bids for the construction of the Project in accordance with Minnesota Law and will provide Maple Grove with an analysis of the bids received. Maple Grove must approve the award of the bid to a contractor. 3. CONTRACT AWARD.. If approved by Maple Grove, Plymouth shall prepare contract documents and enter into a contract with the approved bidder. 4. COST ALLOCATION. Relevant project costs shall be paid by each Party in accordance with the construction quantity tabulation for items attributable to each Party. Project costs are: engineering, inspection, testing and constructions costs. Project costs do not include costs associated with the parties' employees. Each Party shall also pay for wetland mitigation in accordance with the wetland impacts within its corporate boundaries. 13058201 1 RNK:03/09/2007 Page 3 5. OWNERSHIP. Each party shall own the portion of the Project located within its corporate boundaries, provided, however, in the event of a warranty claire on the project, Plymouth will cooperate with Maple Grove in asserting that claim to the extent requested by Maple Grove.. 6. PAYMENT. Plymouth will act as the paying agent for all payments to the Contractor. Payments will be made as the Project work progresses and when certified by Plymouth Engineer. Plymouth, in turn, will bill Maple Grove for the project costs. Upon presentation of an itemized claim by one agency to the other, the receiving agency shall reimburse the invoicing agency for its share of the costs incurred under this agreement within 30 days from the presentation of the claim. If any portion of an itemized claim is questioned by the receiving agency, the remainder of the claim shall be promptly paid, and accompanied by a written explanation of the amounts in question. Payment of any amounts in dispute will be made following good faith negotiation and documentation of actual costs incurred in carrying out the work. 7. CHANGE ORDERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. Any change orders or supplemental agreements that affect the project cost payable by Maple Grove and changes to the plans must be approved by Maple Grove prior to execution of work or the change order.. 8. RULES AND REGULATIONS. Plymouth shallabide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules and contract administration procedures. Plymouth and Maple Grove shall be responsible for their respective Reports of State and Contract documents for submission to MnDOT. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. Plymouth agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Maple Grove against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Plymouth and/or those of Plymouth employees or agents. Maple Grove agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Plymouth against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement for which Maple Grove is responsible, including future operation and maintenance of facilities owned by Maple Grove and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Maple Grove and/or those of Maple Grove employees or agents. Under no circumstances, however, shall a party be required to pay on behalf of itself and the other party any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for both parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for either party. The intent of this paragraph is to impose on each party a limited duty to defend and indemnify each other subject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among the parties and to permit liability claims against both parties from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. 10. WAIVER. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by Maple Grove shall not be considered employees of Plymouth for any purpose, including Worker's Compensation, or any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on 130582v01 RNK:03/09/2007 Page 4 behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Plymouth employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of Maple Grove. The opposite situation shall also apply: Plymouth shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for u1y employees of Maple Grove. 11. AUDITS. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Plymouth and Maple Grove relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by Plymouth, Maple Grove, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. Plymouth and Maple Grove agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered Linder this agreement. 12. INTEGRATION. The entire and integrated agreement of the parties contained in this Agreement shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements between Plymouth and Maple Grove regarding the Project; whether written or oral. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officials. CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND Kelli Slavik, Mayor Dave Callister, City Manager 13058201 RNK:03/09/2007 0 3 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE Al Madsen, City I Mayor Page 5 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH AND THE CITY OF MAPLE GROVE FOR PEONY LANE NORTH OF SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD CITY PROJECT N0. 10015 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth and the City of Maple Grove wish to jointly construct Peony Lane/Lawndale Lane from Schmidt Lake Road to the Maple Grove border; and WHEREAS, Maple Grove desires to have their substandard portion of Lawndale Lane upgraded as part of this project; and WHEREAS, a Joint Powers Agreement has been prepared in which each city will be allocated costs relevant costs attributable to that city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The Joint Powers Agreement for the Peony Lane/Lawndale Lane Extension Project is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 6 1Citiy ©f j Plymouth AMns Q,.Vty to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 28, 2014 Agenda 6.06Number: To: Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Reviewed by: Luke Fischer, Administrative Services Director Item: Approve Renewal of Liquor Licenses for 2014 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution renewing 3.2 malt on -sale and off -sale liquor, off -sale intoxicating liquor, on -sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor, and wine licenses for the period February 1, 2014 through January 31, 2015. 2. BACKGROUND: The City has received and reviewed applications for renewal of all liquor licenses. The Police Department has conducted their investigations and has found no reason not to renew the attached licenses. All approvals are contingent on the receipt of all license fees, proof of required insurance for workers compensation, general liability, and liquor liability by January 31, 2014 as noted in the resolution. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: License fees in the following amounts will be received from each licensee: 3.2 Malt Liquor On -Sale 500 3.2 Malt Liquor Off -Sale 100 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor 8,240 On -Sale Sunday Liquor 200 Wine 2,000 Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor 380 Club Liquor License 300 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF 3.2 MALT ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE LIQUOR, OFF -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR, ON -SALE AND SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR, AND WINE LICENSES FOR 2014 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the attached licenses are approved for issuance for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015, with the following conditions: 1. That the required license fees be paid by January 31, 2014; and 2. That proof of worker compensation, general liability, and liquor liability insurance be provided by January 31, 2014. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 2 Resolution 2014 - Page 2 3.2 Off -Sale Licensee Venue Address Plymouth 1998 LLC Cub Foods #31454 4445 Nathan Lane SuperValu Inc. Cub Foods #31644 3550 Vicksburg Lane Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Holiday Stationstore #107 3020 Fernbrook Lane Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Holiday Stationstore #303 9700 Betty Crocker Drive Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Holiday Stationstore #317 2725 Campus Drive Kwik Trip, Inc. Kwik Trip #411 1605 Annapolis Lane N. RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8851 10200 6th Avenue N. RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8873 16705 Co. Rd. 24 Northern Tier Retail LLC SuperAmerica #3351 4325 Peony Lane N. Northern Tier Retail LLC SuperAmerica #4341 5750 Nathan Lane N. Northern Tier Retail LLC SuperAmerica #5005 15805 61st Avenue N. Target Corporation Target Store T-0664 4175 Vinewood Lane N 3.2 On -Sale Licensee Venue Address Begin Oaks Enterprises, LLC Begin Oaks Golf 5635 Yucca Lane N. Davanni's, Inc. Davanni's Pizza & Hot Hoagies 3015 Harbor Lane Hollydale Golf, Inc. Hollydale Golf Course 4710 Holly Lane Troupe America, Inc. Plymouth Playhouse 2705 Annapolis Lane N. D & D of Minnesota, Inc. Famous Dave's BBQ 11308 Hwy. 55, #5 India Palace Plymouth Inc. India Palace Corp. 4190 Vinewood Ln, #120 The Noodle Shop Co. -Colorado, Inc. Noodles & Co. 3425 Vicksburg Lane CSM Lodging Svcs, Inc. Residence Inn by Marriott -Plymouth 2750 Annapolis Cir Smashburger Acquisiton-Mpls, LLC Smashburger 3225 Vicksburg Lane, #3225G Asian Mill, Inc. Tea House 88 Nathan Lane LOTUS GROUP, LLC THAI TABLE 101006 th Ave N, Suite 114&115 On -Sale Wine Licensee Venue Address D & D of Minnesota, Inc. Famous Dave's BBQ 11308 Hwy. 55, #5 India Palace Plymouth Inc. India Palace Corp. 4190 Vinewood Ln, #120 The Noodle Shop Co. -Colorado, Inc. Noodles & Co. 3425 Vicksburg Lane CSM Lodging Svcs, Inc. Residence Inn by Marriott -Plymouth 2750 Annapolis Cir Smashburger Acquisiton-Mpls, LLC Smashburger 3225 Vicksburg Lane, #3225G Asian Mill, Inc. Tea House 88 Nathan Lane LOTUS GROUP, LLC THAI TABLE 101006 1h Ave N, Suite 114&115 Club/Sunday Licensee Venue Address Hamel VFW VFW of Hamel 19020 Hamel Road Page 3 Resolution 2014 - Page 3 Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licensee Cellars Wines -Spirits -Plymouth, Inc. Ken-Ebs Inc. Super Valu, Inc. Hasco Holdings, LLC Lund Beverages, LLC Montecore, LLC DNT Liquors 4, Inc. Plymouth Liquors, Inc. The Applebaum Companies Star Liquors, Inc. Wood & Associates Vinifera Wines and Ales, Inc. Thu Nguyen Venue Cellars Wines and Spirits Colony Liquors Cub Discount Liquors Haskell's Plymouth Lunds Wine Market MGM Wines & Spirits Paradise Liquors Plymouth Liquor Sid's Discount Liquor Star Liquors - Plymouth Vicksburg Liquors Vinifera Wines and Ales Wandering Spirits On-Sale/Sunday Intoxicating Liquor Licensee Apple Minnesota LLC Baku, LLC KB&J's Enterprises, Inc. Blazin Wings, Inc. ERJ Dining IV, LLC Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC The After Midnight Group III, LLC Regency Plymouth Ventures LP Flying Swine, LLC E. A. Plymouth, Inc. Metro Hospitality, Inc. Plymouth Jakes, Inc. Kobe Operating LLC Michael James Latuff Two Prix and a Princess Wadsworth Old Chicago, Inc. Red Robin International, Inc. RT Minneapolis Franchise, LLC Sakana Plymouth Inc. Rosengren & Associates, Inc. Norish Enterprises, LLC Venue Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar Baku Broadway Bar and Pizza Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar Chili's Grill & Bar Chipotle Mexican Grill Cowboy Jacks Crowne Plaza Minneapolis West Eat Shop EI Azteca Green Mill Plymouth Jake's City Grille Kobe Japanese Restaurant Latuff's Pizza Lucky's 13 Pub Old Chicago Red Robin America's Gourmet Burgers & Spirits Ruby Tuesday Sakana Hibachi, Sushi & Asian Bistro Sunshine Factory Bar & Grill Grizzly's Wood Fired Grille Address 16605 Co. Rd. 24 #201 15705 35th Avenue N. 4445 Nathan Lane 4130 Berkshire Lane 3455 Vicksburg Lane 3900 Vinewood Lane #1 12 Nathan Lane 11000 Hwy 55 10200 6th Avenue N. 4190 Vinewood Lane 1115 Vicksburg Lane, #5 1400 County Road 101 N, Suite K 3435 N. Hwy. 169 Address 3500 Vicksburg Lane 15 Nathan Lane N 13705 27th Avenue N 3505 Vicksburg Lane 4000 Vinewood Lane 3425 Vicksburg Lane 4120 Berkshire Lane N 3131 Campus Drive 16605 County Road 24 3500 Vicksburg Lane, #500 2705 Annapolis Lane 3005 Harbor Lane 15555 34th Avenue 10820 Highway 55 3000 Harbor Lane 3505 Vicksburg Lane 2669 Campus Drive 3405 Vicksburg Lane 4345 Nathan Lane N, Suite O 4100 Vinewood Lane N 220 Carlson Parkway Page 4 rp)City of Agenda 6 . O 7PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Scott Newberger, Utilities Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 3 and Final Item: Ferndale North Lift Station Rehabilitation City Project No. 12028 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 3 and Final for the amount of $23,672.87 to GM Contracting, Inc. for the Ferndale North Lift Station Rehabilitation, City Project No. 12028. 2. BACKGROUND: This project was located at 18310 5th Ave. It involved renovating the existing lift station, replacement of the forcemain from the lift station to the discharge manhole in a new route out of the backyards of several homes and placing the new forcemain in the road right of way and adding a conduit to connect to the Wayzata School District fiber optic network. Change Order No. 1 was needed to replace an existing ladder in the wet well of the lift station. During the initial inspection it appeared the ladder was in salvageable condition, but when removed it was determined that the ladder was unsafe and needed replacement. This Change Order added $5,598.64 to the original contract price of $361,484.60 or an increase of 02% over the original contract amount. The work on this project has been completed and certified as meeting project specifications by the City's consultant and City Staff. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The original contract amount was $361,484.60. Change Order No. 1 added $5,598.64 for a new contract amount of $367,083.24. This project was included in the 2013-2017 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for $ 100,000 for engineering and $700,000 for construction. The total project cost including engineering and administration is $433,632.40. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Resolution Page 1 LOCATION MAP EN,, r i r PROJECT LOCATION ExistingForcemain Proposed Forcemain Ferndale North Lift Station Rehabilitation City Project No. 12028 Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER No.1 AND PAYMENT NO. 3 AND FINAL FOR THE FERNDALE NORTH LIFT STATION REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT N0. 12028 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and GM Contracting, Inc. as contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Ferndale North Lift station Rehabilitation, City Project 12028, said agreement was approved by the City Council on June 25th 2013; and WHEREAS, the engineer has certified acceptance of the work and approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 1. That the original contract amount was $361,484.60. Change Order No. 1 is in the amount of $5,598.64 bringing the new contract amount to $367,083.24 and the value of work to date is $367,083.24 and is herewith approved. 2. That the work performed by the contractor for the Ferndale North Lift Station Rehabilitation and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 3 and Final in the amount of $23,672.87 to GM Contracting, Inc. for the Ferndale Lift Station Rehabilitation project is hereby approved and the City's Administrative Service Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. Funding for the total project cost of $433,632.40 will be from the Sewer Fund. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 3 City ofrpvPlymouth Agenda 6 . O 8Number: Adding Qoofity to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Joe Paumen, Construction Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Approve No. 4 and Final Payment Item: Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project City Project No. 13005 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving Payment No. 4 and Final to GMH Asphalt Corporation for the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 13005. 2. BACKGROUND: The Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project included Revere Lane N, from 45th Avenue N to 43rd Avenue N, 43rd Avenue N from Revere Lane N to Trenton Lane N and from Trenton Lane North to the cul-de-sac west, Trenton Lane N from 45th Avenue N to 44th Avenue N, and from 44th Avenue N to 43rd Avenue N, and 44th Avenue N, from Trenton Lane N to Trenton Lane N. This project included reconstruction of the streets in the Sagamore neighborhood, with a street section width that is 33 feet (from back of curb to back of curb), placement of a 11/2 inch bituminous wearing course, 21/2 inch bituminous base course, 8 inches of aggregate base, and 12 inches of granular sub -base with drain tile installed in the sub -base. Damaged concrete curb and gutter was removed and replaced as necessary in the project area. Trenton Lane N, just south of 45th Avenue N, and a portion of 44th Avenue were 53 feet wide and were narrowed to 33 feet (from back of curb to back of curb) to make it consistent with the rest of the streets in the project area. The end of the driveway entrance to Plymouth Green Villas was also reconfigured to match the new roadway. Concrete aprons were added to all entrances with the exception of the townhouses and single family homes on 43rd Avenue. This brought those entrances up to current City standards and improved the visual appeal of the neighborhood. Catch basins were added on 43rd Avenue N that eliminated an existing cross gutter and thereby improving the ride quality of the roadway. Additional catch basins were also added on 44th Avenue N to bring that section of street up to current City design standards. A rain garden was also included in the project for water quality purposes. Page 1 Prior to the start of construction on this project, the City's Utility Maintenance Division replaced all water main valves in the Sagamore neighborhood. Additionally, sanitary sewer manholes located in the roadway were sealed by the contractor in an effort to reduce storm water from seeping through the manhole rings into the City's sanitary sewer system. The work on the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project has been completed and certified as meeting project specifications by the City's Engineering Staff. Any warranty items that arise will be completed as necessary throughout the remaining warranty period on the project. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This proposed project was included in the 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program at an estimated cost of $1,470,000, including construction, engineering, administration, and contingencies. Based on the bid submitted by GMH Asphalt Corp., the total estimated project cost for reconstruction of the streets in the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project was $905,191.10. At project completion, the total project cost is $864,732.25. The total project cost is 4.47% below the estimated project cost at the time bids were received due to less than anticipated administrative costs associated with the project. Funding for this project will be through the Water Fund ($33,294.52), the Sewer Fund 2,116.00), the Water Resources Fund ($18,423.00), Special Assessments 265,728.58), and the Street Replacement Fund ($545,170.15). 4. ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Map Pay Request Resolution Page 2 Fl Z4CNARYLN w A a TR N O 4q' NTON O O b REVERE LN 6 I NLN SAGAMORE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY OF CITY PROJECT 13005 N PLYMOUTH PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1-500 Page 3 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: January 28, 2014 FOR PERIOD PLACE: Plymouth, MN FROM: 8-01-13 TO 1-28-14 . PROJECT: Saaamore Street Reconstruction Project PROJECT NO.: 13005 FILE NO.: SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: July 19, 2013 CONTRACTOR: GMH Asphalt Corp. ADDRESS: 9180 Laketown Road Chaska, MN 55318 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 4&Final SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount $ 724,152.88 2. Change Order - ADDITION 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 0 % 9. Less Liquidated Damages 10. Sub -Total 0.00 0.00 11. Less Amount Paid Previously 12. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 4& Final OWNER APPROVAL: By: By: Approved By: (ENGINEER) By: Approved By: (CONTRACTOR) By: By: 724,152.88 722,403.16 0.00 722,403.16 0.00 0.00 722,403.16 686,283.00 36,120.16 Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST FOR PAYMENT N0. 4 AND FINAL SAGAMORE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 13005 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as the owner and GMH Asphalt Corporation as the contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 13005, said agreement was approved by the City Council on April 23, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the original contract amount was $724,152.88 and the value of the work to date is $722,403.16 and is herewith approved. The project is below the original contract amount by 0.24%. 2. That the work performed by the contractor for the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of $36,120.16 to GMH Asphalt Corporation for the Sagamore Street Reconstruction Project is hereby approved and the Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. 4. Funding for this project will be through the Water Fund ($33,294.52), the Sewer Fund ($2,116.00), the Water Resources Fund ($18,423.00), Special Assessments ($265,728.58), and the Street Replacement Fund ($545,170.15). APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 5 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 9PlymouthNumber: Adding Qoofity to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Mike Payne, P.E., Design Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Setting Item: Assessment Hearing for the Dunkirk Lane Street and Utility Improvements, City Project No. 13015 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolutions Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Setting the Assessment Hearing for the Dunkirk Lane Street and Utility Improvements, City Project No. 13015. 2. BACKGROUND: The Dunkirk Lane Street and Utility Improvements, City Project No. 13015, includes Dunkirk Lane from 54th Avenue to 59th Avenue as shown on the location map. This project was originally petitioned by 49% of the affected property owners in the project area. Three more petitions were received representing an additional 16% of the owners have petitioned the proposed improvements since the petition was formally accepted by the City Council on April 9, 2013. Dunkirk Lane in the proposed project area is a gravel road with a rural design ditches). The roadway is improved within the new developments on either end of the project. The proposed project would complete the upgrade of the roadway between the Spring Meadows development on the south end and the Terra Vista development on the north end making the roadway an urban design between Schmidt Lake Road and County Road 47. The proposed improvements are consistent the City's Comprehensive Plan. The project would include upgrading the existing gravel road to a 32 foot wide (face -of - curb to face -of -curb) urban design roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and a trail on the east side of the roadway. The project would also include the extension of 12" diameter trunk watermain. The adjacent, benefitting property owners are proposed to be assessed for a portion of the project costs. It is the normal City policy to fully assess the cost of residential street construction (28 feet wide, 7—ton design, concrete curb and gutter) to the properties if they have direct or reasonable access to the street. Municipal State Aid MSA) funds are proposed to offset the additional cost of a wider street and 9 -ton MSA design standard. The trunk watermain costs are funded through previously Page 1 assessed and future area charges through the Utility Trunk Fund. The trail project costs are funded through Park Dedication just as if the trail were installed by a developer and reimbursed by the city. The public improvement hearing was scheduled for February 25, 2014. In accordance with state statute, notice of the proposed improvement hearing and assessment hearing for this project will be sent to all affected property owners and was be posted in the official City Newspaper prior to the hearings. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This proposed project is included in the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 for the street and storm sewer project and $220,000 for trunk watermain. The total estimated project cost is approximately $1,460,000 of which $1,000,000 of the street and storm sewer costs would be assessed or paid for using developer contributions. The estimated cost of the upgraded street over a typical residential street is estimated at $180,000 and would be funded through MSA. The watermain improvements are estimated at $210,000 of which $140,000 would be assessed and $70,000 would be funded from the Utility Trunk Fund. The trail improvements are estimated at $70,000 and would be funded through Park Dedication. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Resolutions Page 2 Dun1drk Lane Street and Utility Improvement Project Properties proposed to be assessed Location Map Page 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST To BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE DUNKIRK LANE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT N0. 13015 WHEREAS, estimated costs have been calculated for the Dunkirk Lane Mill & Overlay Project, City Project No 13015, including Dunkirk Lane, from 54th Avenue to 59th Avenue, and the estimated cost for such improvement is $1,240,000, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $220,000 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $1,460,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Plymouth is hereby declared to be $316,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $1,144,000. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2015, and shall bear the interest rate 3.69% for a 15 year term per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by the law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the City Council thereof. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE DUNKIRK LANE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT N0. 13015 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on January 28, 2014, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for Project No. 13015, the improvement of the Dunkirk Lane, from 54th Avenue to 59th Avenue, by upgrading the existing gravel road to a 32 foot wide (face -of -curb to face -of -curb) urban design roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and a trail on the east side of the roadway. The project would also include the extension of 12" diameter trunk watermain and all necessary appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 25th day of February, 2014, in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota at 8:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 5 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 1 0PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Authorize Payment of 2014 Membership dues for the Item: Bassett Creek, Elm Creek, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commissions 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution authorizing payment of the 2014 membership dues for the Bassett Creek, Elm Creek, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commissions. 2. BACKGROUND: The City of Plymouth is party to joint powers agreements for all three commissions and is responsible for a proportionate share of the annual operating costs for each commission. The joint powers agreement for each watershed outlines the procedure for member assessments. In general, assessments are based on property values and proportion of watershed area. The City's membership assessments in 2013 totaled $297,805.58. The City's membership assessments in 2014 total $291,125.60, a decrease of $6,679.98 or 2.2% (Table 1). This decrease in the total membership assessment is due to a decrease in the assessment from the Bassett Creek Watershed. Individual increases in Elm Creek and Shingle Creek for 2014 can be generally attributed to residential growth in those watersheds. Table 1. Watershed assessments to Plymouth for 2013 and 2014. Watershed 2013 Assessment 2014 Assessment $ change % change Bassett Creek $235,310.00 Elm Creek $12,912.58 Shingle Creek $49,583.00 Total $297,805.58 224,959.00 10,351.00 -4.4 13,882.60 970.02 7.5 52,284.00 2,701.00 5_4 291,125.60 6,679.98 -2.2 The City of Plymouth benefits from cooperative relationships with watersheds including funding partnerships on capital improvements, water quality monitoring, and education activities. Staff leverages these partnerships to assist in meeting the terms of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit (MS4) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) mandates. Page 1 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Watershed commission membership dues for Bassett Creek, Elm Creek, and Shingle Creek were included in the 2014 Budget for $300,000 and the actual assessments total $291,125.60. Financing of $291,125.60 will come from the Water Resources Fund. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Invoices (3) Resolution Page 2 January 9, 2014 Ms. Sandra Engdahl, City Clerk City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: 2014 Assessment to Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Dear Ms. Engdahl: Enclosed for your reference are the final 2014 operating budget and member -city assessment table of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The final budget was adopted by the BCWMC at its August 15, 2013 meeting. The amount of your City's assessment of costs associated with the BCWMC's fiscal year 2014 is $224,959. The bylaws of the BCWMC call for payment of this assessment by February I". I apologize for the late transmittal of this letter and I understand that payment by that date may not be possible. The assessment payment should be sent to: Sue Virnig, Deputy Treasurer Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission c/o City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please call me at 952-270-1990. Sincerely, Laura Jester, Administrator Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Encl. cc: Ginny Black, Chair, BCWMC Derek Asche, BCWMC TAC Sue Virnig, Deputy Treasurer Page 3 AE 1 F G H I J K H1 2014 Operating Budget Ftaascatt C rank Watnrchorf Nlananamant r-icci- - Ann-uarl Aii-o4 7r; rjni A 3 Item 2010 Actual 2071 Actual 12012 Adopted Budget 2012 Actual 2013 Adopted Budget 2014 Budget 4 1 ENGINEERING & MONITORING Transfer trom Long-term Maintenance Fund for P8 Model' 0 57 Expected interest income in 2013 0 Expected income from project review fees 48,OOD 5 Technical Services 119,832 127,840 120,000 97,715 120,000 120,000 Development/Project Reviews (funded by permit fees) 53,128 50,971 60,000 49,972 60,000 65,000 7 Commission and TAC Meetings 12,316 9,919 14,250 8,284 14,250 16,000 Surveys and Studies 17,899 21,411 10,000 7,024 10,000 20,000 Water Quality l Monitoring 24,489 29,957 20,000 19,686 40,000 45,000 10 Water Quantity 8,264 8,532 11,000 9,671 11,000 11,000 11 Inspections 12 Watershed Inspections 7,183 4,827 7,000 7,569 7,000 1,000 Annual Flood Control Project Inspections 9,372 2,291 9,000 9,317 15,000 20,000 14 Municipal Plan Review 7,927 0 2,000 0 2,000 2,000 15 Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program (WOMP) 6,818 9,106 10,000 5,710 17,000 17,000 16 Subtotal Engineering & Monitoring 267,228 264,854 263,250 214,948 296,250 317,000 17 PLANNING 18 Watershed -wide XP-SWMM Model 70,000 69,509 0 0 19 Watershed -wide P8 Water Quality Model 135,000 125,031 0 1 0 20 Next Generation Plan Development 40,000 23,959 40,000 40,000 21 Subtotal Planning 0 0 245,000 218,499 40,000 40,000 22 ADMINISTRATION 23 Administrator 30,297 24,099 50,000 4,662 50,000 60,000 24 1 Legal 17,331 16,953 18,500 16,197 18,500 18,500 25 Financial Management 3,054 3,100 3,045 3,000 3,045 3,045 26 Audit, Insurance & Bond 13,328 12,771 15,225 12,927 15,225 15,500 7 Meeting Catering Expenses 4,609 3,940 2,750 2,735 2,750 3,000 28 Adm€n Services (Recording Secretary+Panting+Postage) 42,578 39,303 40,000 32,784 40,000 35,800 29 Subtotal Administration 111,197 100,166 129,5201 72,3051 129,5201 1 $135,845 30 OUTREACH & EDUCATION 31 Publications 1 Annual Report 5,169 2,410 2,000 2,449 2,OOD 2,000 32 Website 1,031 214 2,500 120 2,500 2,000 77 DemonstrationlEducationGrants 3,140 0 0 0 0 0 34 Watershed Education Partnerships 16,150 19,055 13,000 11,030 15,000 15,500 5 Educabon and Public Outreach 2,911 0 5,775 3,316 14,775 15,000 19TPublic Communications 692 1,443 3,000 1,609 3,000 3,000 7 Subtotal Outreach & Educallon 1 29,0931 23,1221 26,275 18,5241 37,275 37,500 38 MAINTENANCE FUNDS 39 Erosion/Sediment (Channe€ Maintenance) 25,000 25,000 25,0001 25,000 25,000 25,000 Long -Term Maint. fFlood Control Project) 25,000 1 25,000 1 25,0001 25,000 25,000 1 1 25,000 41 Subtotal Maintenance Funds 50,400 1 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1 50,000 42 TMDLWORK TMDL Studies 10,000 0 72FTMDL Implementation Reporting, fncl. P8 Model Updates 0 10,000 1 10,000 10,000 1 1 20,000 45 Subtotal TMDL Studies 10,000 0 10,000 1 10,000 10,400 20,000 46 GRANDTOTAL 467,518 438,142 1 724,045 584,276 563,045 600,345 48 2013 Financial Information - Operating Budget 49 Audited fiscal year fund balance at January 31, 2013 331,935 50 Expected income from assessments in 2013 515,045 Transfer from Long-term Maintenance Fund for XP SWMM Me 0 Transfer trom Long-term Maintenance Fund for P8 Model' 0 57 Expected interest income in 2013 0 Expected income from project review fees 48,OOD Estimated funds available for fiscal year 2013 894.90 Estimated expenditures for fiscat year 2013 563,045 Estimated fund balance as of January 31, 2014 0 1) 2) 3) l4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 1 M 1411 wiw revenue ana ouager aarance uman Estimated fund balance as of January 31, 2014 331,935 Expected income from CIP Administrative Funds 25,000 (1 Expected income from assessments in 2014 490,345 (1 Expected income from project review fees 60,000 (1 Transfer from Long-term Maint Fund for Flood Control 20,000 (1 Income from WOMP reimbursement 5,000 Transfer from Long-term Maintenance Fund for XP SWMM M+ 0 Transfer from Long -tens Maintenance Fund for P8 Model` 0 Expected interest income in 2014 0 Estimated funds available for fiscal year 2014 Estimated expenditures for fiscal year 2014 600,345 Estimated fund balance as of January 31, 2015 331,936 2013 Budget Proposed 2014 Budget 2013 Capital Projects 1,000,000 Proposed 2014 Capital Projects (project costs) 1,000,000 2013 Operating Budget 563,045 Proposed 2014 Operating Budget 600,345 Total 2013 Budget 1,563. Proposed total 2014 Budget 2013 Assessments and Fees 2014 Assessments and Fees 2013 Operating Budget 563,045 2014 Proposed Assessments 490,345 Estimated 2013 permit fees (80% of permit expenditures) 48,000 Estimated 2014 rev'ew fees 60,000 Page 4 U NOTES 7 (1) Partially funded by project review fees. 2) Includes attendance at BCWMC meetings, TAC meetings and (in 2014) Next Generation Plan Steering Committee meetings, 2010- 2013 estimates based on 18 72 meetings. 2014 estimate based on 30 meetings 3) For Commission -directed studies, surveys and XP-SWMM model use and revision 74 (4) Detailed monitoring for Twin and Sweeney Lakes. Budget also includes other water quality -related tasks that arise. 75 (5) 2014 budget Includes inspection of double box culvert (performed once every 5 years), and assumes City of Minneapolis will assist with access. 76 (6) Assumed budget to address municipal and adjacent WMO plan amendments. 77 (7) Reimbursed $5,000 from Met Council. $17,000 includes $11,000 for Wenck or similar contractor + $6,000 for Barr's data management and analyses 8) Total estimated budget = $95,485; $23,960 spent in 2012, and the remainder ($71,525) budgeted for 2013 and 2014; Includes costs for Commission Engineer to develop 78 the Plan sections and expenses stemming from the public input process 9) Includes $32,400 for recording secretary and $3,400 for printing and postage (average of $283/mo) 10) Includes CAMP ($5,000), River Watch ($2,000), Metro WaterShed Partners ($3,500), Blue Thumb ($2,000), Metro Blooms ($3,000) 11) Includes $5,250 for event space, display materials and maintenance, WQ survey & quiz, seed packets, watershed coloring book and coloring contest, Watershed fold -out map - printing, and educational articles + $9,750 for West Metro Watershed Alliance administration and programs 12) Will be transferred to Channel Maintenance Fund 13) Will be transferred to Long -Term Maintenance Fund 14) Task includes reporting on TMDL implementation and updating P8 model to include new BMPs. 5) Income from 2.5% administrative portion taken from levy for CIP projects 6) Lower than 2013 assessments by $25,000 7) Project review fees help cover the costs of the project review program 8) Transfer from Long term Maintenance Fund to pay for all flood control project inspections shown in Line 13. Bassett Creek Watershed Manag ementComm ission 2014 Assessment Community For Taxes PayableIn2013 Net Tax Capacity 2013 Percent of Valuation Current Area Watershed in Acres percent of Area Average Percent 2012 Assessment 461,445 20132014 Assessment 515,016 Assessment 490,345 Crystal 56.392.836 5 31 1.264 509 5-20 S24.941 527.424 25 504 Golden Valley S28,334293 23,56 6.615 26.63 26-09 5115 080 5129.126 123 033 Medicine Lake 5743280 0.62 1 199 080 0-71 53.484 33.909 3479 I'Anneapolis 57.984.657 664 1.690 6-80 6.72 32.661 35236 32-953 tAnnetonka 58.079.544 6.72 1.108 446 5.59 524.920 528.454 527402 New Hope S6.929.451 5.76 1.252 504 5.40 S25.533 527.648 S26-179 R mouth 554.117.769 44.99 11.61 B 4677 4688 5209.101 235.310 5223 959 Rcbtinsdale 52.128.606 1 77 345 1 3cr 1 58 S8.022 S8 s75 7 733 1 Louis Park 55.578 665 464 752 3 03 3 83 517.303 519 420 S18 792 TOTAL 1213.289.100 14000 24.843 100.04 100.00 5461.045 5515 C''S 53u0 14=• Page 5 elm creek Watershed Management Commission 3235 Fernbrook Lane • Plymouth, MN 55447 Invoice Number: Telephone (763)553-1144 • FAX (763)553-9326 181 Invoice Date: Sold To: January 1, 2014 City of Plymouth Due Date: 3400 Plymouth Blvd January 1, 2014 Plymouth, MN 55447 Description Amount 014 Member Assessment 13,882.60 See copy of approved budget and member assessment enclosed) This invoice may be paid in two installments. The first half is due January 1, 2014, and the second half is due July 1, 2014. Please make clieck payable to Elm Creek WMO mitt maul to: Judie A. Anderson, Deputy Treasurer Elm Creek WMO 3235 Fernhrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Subtotal Total Invoice Amount Payment/Credit Applied TOTAL NOW DUE If you have questions regau-twig this invoice, please call 763-553-1144. Judie- A. Anderson, Dcput} 1'rca!M1FC1- 13,882.60 13,882.60 13,882.60 Page 6 Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 2014 Member Assessments 2011 2010 Taxable Market Value 2011 Budget Share age Dollars Increase over Prev Year age Dollars Champlin 488,685,600 4.75% 8,932.76 3.86% 332,21 Corcoran 704,789,600 6.85% 12,882.95 1.63% 206.10 Dayton 528,922,900 5.14% 9,668.26 3.33% 311.81 Hassan 406,303,500 3.95% 7,426.88 10.63% 883.40 Maple Grove 5,613,392,300 54.58% 102,608.03 5.79% 5,614.33 Medina 830,631,900 8,08% 15,183.24 9.85% 1,361.33 Plymouth 631,150,100 6.14% 11,536.89 6.08% 661.37 Rogers 1,081,067,600 10.51% 19,760.99 188,000.00 2.05% 1 4.44%1 396;25 8,000.00Totals10,284,943,500 100.00% 2012 Champlin 2011 Taxable Market Value 486,223,700 2012 Budget Share age Dollars 4.82% 9,311.12 Increase over Prev Year age Dollars 4.24% 378.36 Corcoran 702,744,800 6.97% 13,457.47 4.46% 574.52 Dayton 524,379,400 5.20% 10,041.80 3.86% 373.54. Hassan 401,007,300 3.98% 7,679.24 3.40% 252.36 Maple Grove 5,490,107,700 54.47% 105,134.84 2.46% 2,526.82 Medina 773,549,700 7.68% 14,813.38 2.44% 369.87 Plymouth 630,559,900 6.26% 12,075.14 4.67% 538.25 Rogers 1,069,825,600 10.62% 20,487.02 3.67% 726.03 Totals 10,078,398,1001 100.00%1 193,000.00 1 2.66% 5,000.00 2013 2012 Taxable Market Value 2013 Budget Share age Dollars Increase over Prev Year age Dollars Champlin 470,663,700 4.79% 9,428.89 1.26% 118 Corcoran 660,310,883 6.71% 13,228.13 1.70% 229 Dayton 473,494,814 4.82% 9,485.61 5.54% 556 Maple Grove 5,519,948,200 56.13% 110,582.11 5.18% 5,447 Medina 737,512,500 7.50% 14,774.72 0.26% 39 Plymouth 644,559,600 6.55% 12,912.58 6.94% 837 Rogers 1,327,196,863 13.50% 26,587.97 29.78% 1,578 Totals 9,833,686,560 100.00%1 197,000.00 2.07% 4,000.00 2014 2013 Taxable Market Value 2014 Budget Share age Dollars Increase over Prev Year age Dollars Champlin 427,287,300 4.71% 9,560.45 1.40% 132 Corcoran 608,933,512 6.71 % 13,624.74 3.00% 397 Dayton 417,808,839 4.61% 9,348.37 1.45% 137 Maple Grove 4,941,523,315 54.47% 110,565.38 16,395.08' 0.02% 10.97% 17 1,620Medina732,748,800 8.08% Plymouth 620,457,981 6.84% 13,882.60 7.51% 970 Rogers 1,323,964,166 14.59% 29,623.38 11.42% 3,035 Totals 9,072,723,913 100.00% 203,000.00 3.05%Q 6,000.00 Z:IElm CreeklFinancialslFinancials 2014/2014 Member Assess ments_approved. As Page 7 Shi nreek1;1P 3235 Fernbrook Lane - Plymouth, MN 55447 Telephone (763)553-1144 • FAX (763)553-9326 Sold To: City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Invoice Number: 216 Invoice Date: January 1, 2014 Due Date: January 1, 2014 Description Ainowit 014 Member Assessment See copy of approved member assessments enclosed) 52,254.04 Please make check payable to Slungle Creek WMO and mail to: Subtotal 52,284.00 Judie A. Andcnson, Deputy Treasurer Total Invoice Amount 52,284.00 Shuigle Creek WMO Payment/Credit Applied 3235 I{ernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 TOTAL 52,284.00 If you have questions regardnig this invoice, please call 763-553-1144 Judie A. Anderson, Deputy Treasurer Page 8 Shingle Creek 2014 Member Assessments 2012 Community Acreage 2011 Tax Capacity per Henn County Cost Allocation Based on Area age Dollars Cost Based on Tax Capacity age Dollars Total Cost age Dollars Brooklyn Center 3,720 14,994,165 13.07% 21,005 11.16% 17,932 12.11% 38,937 Brooklyn Park 7,080 33,002,420 24.88% 39,977 24.56% 39,468 24.72% 79,446 Crystal 2,480 10,449,298 8.71% 14,003 7.78% 12,497 8.25% 26,500 Maple Grove 5,020 614,672 17.64% 28,346 19.06% 30,633 18.35% 58,979 Minneapolis 1,950 9,055,776 6.85% 11,011 6.74% 10,830 6.80% 21,841 New Hope 2,070 11,359,474 7.27% 11,688 8.45% 13,585 7.86% 25,273 Osseo 300 2,011,096 1.05% 1,694 1.50% 2,405 1.28% 4,099 Plymouth 4,380 19,595,510 15.39% 24,732 14.58%a 23,435 14.99% 48,166 Robbinsdale 1,460 8,291,386 5.13% 8,244 6.17% 9,916 5.65%f 18,160 6=0 Totals 2013 Community 28,,460 Acreage 134,373,797 2012 Tax Capacity per Henn County* 100.00% 160,700 Cost Allocation Based on Area age Dollars 100.00% 160,700 Cost Based on Tax Capacity age Dollars 100.00% 321,400 Total Cost age Dollars Brooklyn Center 3,720 13,093,253 13.07% 21,005 10.86% 17,447 11.96% 38,452 Brooklyn Park 7,080 29,215,520 24.88% 39,977 24.23% 38,930 24.55% 78,907 Crystal 2,480 7,772,740 8.71% 14,003 6.45% 10,357 7.58% 24,361 Maple Grave 5,020 24,595,335 17.64% 28,346 20.39% 32,774 19.02% 61,119 Minneapolis 1,950 7,581,070 6.85% 11,011 6.29% 10,102 6.57% 21,113 New Hope 2,070 10,694,653 7.27% 11,688 8.87% 14,251 8.07% 25,939 Osseo 300 1,881,548 1.05% 1,694 1.56% 2,507 1.31% 4,201 Plymouth 4,386 18,650,155 15.39% 24,732 15.46% 24,851 15.43% 49,583 Robbinsdale 1,460 7,115,292 5.13% 8,244 5.90% 9,481 5.51% 17,725 Totals 2014 Community 28,460 Acreage 120,599,566 2013 Tax Capacity per Henn County* 100.00% 160,700 Cost Allocation Based on Area age Dollars 100.00%1 160,700 Cost Based on Tax Capacity age Dollars 100.00% 321,400 Total Cost age Dollars Brooklyn Center 3,720 11,903,396 13.07% 21,541 10.34% 17,038 11.70% 38,579 Brooklyn Park 7,080 27,501,737 24.88% 41,004 23.89% 39,365 24.38% 80,369 Crystal 2,480 7,757,750 8.71% 14,356 6.74% 11,104 7.72% 25,460 Maple Grove 5,020 23,105,021 17.64% 29,073 20.07% 33,071 18.85% 62,144 Minneapolis 1,950 6,985,489 6.85% 11,291 6,07% 9,999 6.46% 21,289 New Hope 2,070 10,021,756 7.27% 11,983 8.70% 14,345 7.999/a 26,328 Osseo 300 2,507,553 1.05% 1,731 2.18% 3,589 1.61% 5,321 Plymouth 4,380 18,807,711 15.39% 25,364 16.34% 26,920 15.86% 52,284 Robbinsdale 1,460 6,545,898 5.13% 8,456 5.69% 9,369 5.41% 17,826 Totals 28,460 115,136,313 100.00%j 164,800 100.00%1 164,800 100.00% 329,600 Z:\Shingle Creek\Financials\Financials 2014\2014 Member AssRrOs SC.xls CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT 2014 MEMBERSHIP DUES BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ELM CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth is party to a joint powers agreement with the Bassett Creek, Elm Creek, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commissions; and WHEREAS, the watershed commissions membership dues were included in the 2014 Budget as approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, financing will come from the Water Resources Fund in the amount of 224,959.00 for the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, $13,882.60 for the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, and $52,284.00 for the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Council authorizes payment of membership dues for the Bassett Creek, Elm Creek, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commissions totaling $291,125.60. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 10 rp)City of Agenda 6.1 1PlymouthNumber: Adding quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Thomas Vetsch, Public Works Superintendent January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Item: Approve Purchase of a Fire Engine/Pumper and Miscellaneous Equipment. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached resolution approving purchase of a new, current model fire engine/pumper to replace current Engine 11 and miscellaneous equipment. 2. BACKGROUND: The 2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) calls for the replacement of Engine 11 (City Unit No. 18) in 2014. The current truck, a 1989 General Safety Engine Pumper, is 25 years old. It has been in service since August 19, 1989 serving out of Fire Station No. 1. In March 2013, the Fire Department submitted a strategic apparatus plan that called for the replacement of Rescue 11 and Engine 11. The functions of these two trucks are to be combined into one vehicle, Engine 11. Rescue 1 I will not be replaced. In July 2013, the City Council authorized staff to prepare specifications and solicit bids after reviewing the need for this replacement fire truck. Specifications were prepared and published to vendors participating in a Houston -Galveston Area Consortium (HGAC), a purchasing consortium. Bids were received from the following bidders: Rosenbauer 5181 260th Street PO Box 549 Wyoming, MN 55092 Custom Fire 509 68th Avenue Osceola, WI 54020 Sealed bids were opened and read aloud on December 23, 2013. Page 1 Bids were reviewed for specification compliance and pricing. It was determined that Rosenbauer was the lowest bid meeting the City's specifications for a total cost of 499,890.00. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The 2014 CIP and 2014 Central Equipment budget include the replacement of Engine 11. The amount budgeted for this purchase was $475,000.00. The successful bid is 5.2% over budget. The Central Equipment Fund can support the extra cost. There will be no negative impact to the budget with this purchase. The city is exempt from sales tax on this vehicle. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Bid forms Bid tabulation sheet Resolution Page 2 Houston -Galveston Area Council (HGAC) BID FORM ONE (1)1500 GPM PUMPER FIRE TRUCK ON FIRE SERVICE CUSTOM CHASSIS MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPEMNT FOR THE City ofPlyynouth, Minnesota Bids Due Back: 4:30 pin, C.S.T. November 12, 2013 Plymouth City Hall — Fire Department 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55444-1482 Company Name Rosenbauer Minnesota LLC Address 5181 260th Street - P.O. Box 549 City, State, Zip Wyoming, MN 55092 Name and Title Authorized Sigr. Date 12/9/2013 BID AMOUNT: 1500 GPM Custom Pumper Fire Truck and Miscellaneous Equipment (Base Bid) Trade-in 1988 General Safety Pumper Fire Truck 1250 Waterous two stage pump Cummins L10 Engine e Allison 653 Transmission 71,500 Miles TOTAL - 509,890.00 10.000.00 499,890.00* Chassis to be progress paid in the amount of $187,812.00 upon its completion. Delivery to be 365 calendar days. Page 3 yy ousto -G lvestou Area Council ( GAC) BID FORM ONE (1) 1500 GPM -PUMPER FIDE TRUCK ON FIRE SERVICE CUSTOM CHASSIS MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPEMNT City of Plymouth, Minnesota Bids Due Back: 4:30 pin, C.S.T. December 27, 2013 Plymouth City Hall - Fire Department 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55444-1482 Company Naine Custom Fire Apparatus Address 509 68th ave Osceola WI 54020 City, State, Zip Name and Title Jim Kirvida 0 Authorized Signature Date 12-24-13 BID AMOUNT: 1500 CPM Custom Pumper Fire Truck and Miscellaneous Equipment (Base Bid) Trade-in 1988 General Safety P Limper Fire Truck 1250 Waterous two stage pump Cummins L10 Engine a Allison 653 Transmission IV 71,500 Miles 511,000.00 To Deduct Loose Items -55,793.00 8,500.00 Page 4 D on 1210 5 a 2oc) A 0 4 57cjo iS 5 TTZ7qnr Drcel&n, lowl Ev Sc Page 5 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF ONE NEW CURRENT MODEL FIRE ENGINE/PUMPER AND MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, City staff had approval to prepare specifications and solicit bids for a fire engine/pumper and miscellaneous equipment; and WHEREAS, bids were sent to HGAC purchasing consortium manufacturers; and WHEREAS, two bids were received, opened and read aloud on December 23, 2013, and WHEREAS, Rosenbauer met all specifications and was the lowest bidder for $499,890.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that they approve the purchase of one new current model fire engine/pumper and miscellaneous equipment from Rosenbauer for a delivered price of 499,890.00. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 6 1City of Agenda 6.12PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Jim Renneberg, P.E., Engineering Manager January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Authorize "No Parking" on School Days from 7 a.m. Item: to 10 a.m. on the West Side of Olive Lane from 51St Avenue to the Cul -De -Sac South. 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution authorizing the installation of "No Parking" signs on school days from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. on the west side of Olive Lane from 51St Avenue to the cul-de-sac south. 2. BACKGROUND: On December 31, 2013, the City received a petition from seven of the nine property owners adjacent to Olive Lane for three options to restrict parking on the west side of Olive Lane from 51St Avenue to the cul-de-sac south. According to the property owners, Olive Lane is being used as overflow parking from Wayzata High School on school days. The three options presented by the property owners were "visitor parking only", "no high school parking" and "no parking from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. on school days". Since "visitor parking only" and "no high school parking" would be difficult to enforce, staff is recommending to post "No Parking" signs on school days from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. on the west side of Olive Lane from 51St Avenue to the cul-de-sac south. After 10 a.m., guests of the property owners would still have the ability to park on the west side of the street as "No Parking" signs on the east side of Olive Lane were installed when Elm Creek Highlands was developed. All nine property owners adjacent to Olive Lane have been informed of the request and staff has not received any objections. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost for four "No Parking" signs is estimated at $400 for purchasing and installing the signs. This would be funded from the Street Maintenance Fund. 4. Attachments: Petition Map Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH PETITION We, the urodcr5i&T=J, do hmeby petit M the City of PlYMOUth, Mayor 21ml Cumcil, for the. indallaticm. of sib prohibiting pwkiag on the west side of Olive LnN fiom 5t" Ave N to Cul -Dv,- Sao as follows., We undcrstand that thcsc parking restrictions also apply to the propurtics that ari; rcprmcntud by the signatures below - NAME ADDRESS KO -CM I" AKA 050 0 L I LIV AJ. i rvc-l) ip drfs& (f S L I 07A 12 V -U FLh J pwc,-J -596c) oLiv& I -P )V MANINE F RHATTA. . 4LAL-YpwoAg J ojo-AP4W 6090 0 I-T.VC- 4 J D I iD nL:IJC- LA 16,-9 Sol 0 ou Page I of 4 DATE 0 (f 6 01' 1, 6 '2 1V I J- -,14 7 to-m-.2DI-9 VrNe%Park:inSPedtion.dor.x Page 2 Page 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2014 - A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE "NO PARKING" ON SCHOOL DAYS FROM 7 A.M. TO 10 A.M. ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLIVE LANE FROM 51 ST AVENUE TO THE CUL-DE-SAC SOUTH WHEREAS, a petition has been submitted by seven of the nine adjacent property owners on Olive Lane from 51 st Avenue to the cul-de-sac south; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that parking on school days from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. on the west side of Olive Lane is not needed to serve the immediate area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That it hereby, authorizes the installation of No Parking" signs on school says from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. on the west side of Olive Lane from 51 st Avenue to the cul-de-sac south. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 4 rp) City of Agenda 6.13 .13PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Item: Approve comment letter regarding Xcel Energy's request to withdraw application for the Hollydale 115kV project 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve comment letter regarding Xcel Energy's request to withdraw application for the Hollydale 115kV project. 2. BACKGROUND: On December 10, 2013, Xcel Energy submitted a petition to withdraw their proposed Hollydale 115kV project for reasons cited in their petition without prejudice. The opponents of the project are skeptical that Xcel Energy may simply propose another 115kV transmission line and simply relocate it to a slightly different route in the same general vicinity thus circumventing the recent legislation authored by Senator Bonoff and Representative Anderson. This law was intended to prohibit consideration of a transmission alternative to Xcel's energy upgrade needs unless no other viable alternatives can be proven to exist. Since December 10, 2013, a number of comments and proposed orders granting Xcel's request to withdraw with prejudice have been submitted by opponents to the Hollydale project. On December 23, 2013, Xcel Energy submitted their own proposed order citing lack of precedence or law supporting the imposition of conditions on their withdrawal. There has been no final order from the Administrative Law Judge granting the withdrawal as of the writing of this report. The public comment period for Xcel's request closes on January 29, 2014, and Council Member Johnson has requested that the attached comment letter be submitted as a formal comment to the Public Utilities Commission. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Comment Letter Page 1 January 28, 2014 Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2147 Subject: Xcel Energy and Great River Energy- Certificate of Need Hollydale 115 kV Transmission Line Project PUC Docket Number: E002, ET2/CN-12-113 Dear Mr. Haar: On October 25, 2011, the Plymouth City Council approved a motion to direct the Advisory Task Force (ATF) Representative and/or Alternate to support an alternative Hollydale 115 kV Transmission Line alignment between the Hollydale Substation and the Pomerleau Lake substation that limits impacts to residential properties such as the TH 55 and I-494 alignment. Please be advised that the position the City Council took then remains their position today. It is my understanding that Xcel Energy has submitted a petition to withdraw its application for a Certificate of Need for this project. In light of all of the public input received by the City of Plymouth and the Public Utilities Commission, the City Council respectfully requests that this input be carried forward in any future proceedings regarding this or any similar projects Xcel Energy may propose. Sincerely, Doran M. Cote, P.E. Acting City Manager Page 2 rp)City of Agenda 6.14PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Lrfe To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Barb Northway, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Diane Evans, Director of Parks and Recreation Item: Approve Name for New Neighborhood Park to be Prairie Ponds Park 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving the name for the new neighborhood park to be Prairie Ponds Park. 2. BACKGROUND: A new park in the Spring Meadows/Kirkwood/ Timber Creek developments will be constructed in 2014. The facility will be the neighborhood park for single family and multiple unit home developments. The park is located off of Dunkirk Lane and 51St Avenue. The park land has been an open field in which hay was baled as recently as the fall of 2013. In addition to serving as the neighborhood facility, the park property will also provide trail access and connection along the railroad corridor to Vicksburg Lane to the east, and to Schmidt Lake Road to the south. Future connections will include park and trail destinations to the east and the Northwest Greenway to the north. At their January 9, 2014 meeting, the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission reviewed a number of name options for this park site. After deliberation, the Commission selected the name Prairie Ponds Park for Council consideration. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: NA 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING NAME FOR NEW NEIGHBORHOOD PARK TO BE CALLED PRAIRIE PONDS PARK WHEREAS, the city currently has a new neighborhood park located on Dunkirk Lane and 51St Avenue; and WHEREAS, the park will be constructed in 2014 in the single family and multiple unit home development areas known as Spring Meadows, Kirkwood and Timber Creek; and WHEREAS, the park will serve as the neighborhood facility for this area and provide trail access and connection to Vicksburg, Schmidt Lake Road and the Northwest Greenway; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission has reviewed possible names and has recommended the name Prairie Ponds Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the new neighborhood park shall be officially named Prairie Ponds Park. Approved this 28th day of January 2014. Page 2 rp) City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 28, 2014 Agenda 6.15Number: To: Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by: Diane Evans, Director of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by: Authorize application for transportation enhancement funds Item: for a Northwest Greenway/Vicksburg pedestrian bridge 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve resolution supporting the City's application for a Northwest Greenway/Vicksburg pedestrian bridge Transportation Enhancement application. 2. BACKGROUND: The City of Plymouth is seeking Transportation Enhancement funds to construct a 500 -foot pedestrian bridge over Vicksburg Lane, as part of the City of Plymouth's planned Northwest Greenway Corridor. This project will enhance trail user safety and maintain the continuity of the Northwest Greenway by providing a grade -separated crossing of Vicksburg Lane for bicyclists, pedestrians and in-line skaters. The proposed Vicksburg Lane Pedestrian Bridge is a critical component of the City's planned Northwest Greenway Corridor, which is an eight mile long recreational and ecological trail system that will provide an integrated system of trails, parks, scenic open space and other recreation amenities. The Greenway will stretch from Wayzata High School and the Elm Creek playfield/wetland complex, eastward to Lake Camelot Park. The proposed Vicksburg Lane Pedestrian Bridge is located near the midpoint of the Greenway at Vicksburg Lane, approximately one-half mile south of Hennepin County Road 47. The City has recently hired SRF Consulting Group to prepare a Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Federal Grant Application for the bridge over Vicksburg Lane. The TAP grant is part of the federal government transportation bill referred to as MAP -21 that establishes a consolidated program that provides funding for a variety of alternative transportation projects. The attached resolution is necessary as part of the application process for this grant. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The project cost estimate is $1,600,000 utilizing Park Dedication Funds. The NWG pedestrian bridge project is scheduled in the Capital Improvement Program to be completed in 2015 in coordination with road improvements to Vicksburg Lane. Projects selected to be funded by the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) grant receive 80 percent Federal funding/20 percent State or local match subject to the sliding scale adjustment. Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TE GRANT FOR NORTHWEST GREENWAY/VICKSBURG PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has a Comprehensive Park & Trail Plan; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Park & Trail Plan includes a master plan for the Northwest Greenway; and WHEREAS, the adopted Northwest Greenway Trail Plan includes a pedestrian bridge over Vicksburg Lane; and WHEREAS, said bridge is necessary for the safety and enjoyment of the Northwest Greenway trail users; and WHEREAS, the Northwest Greenway connects to the Three Rivers Regional Trail System; and WHEREAS, the Northwest Greenway will ultimately connect to the cities of Maple Grove and Medina; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Council of Plymouth, Minnesota, is in support of federal funding for the pedestrian TE application for the Northwest Greenway/ Vicksburg Pedestrian Bridge. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 2 rp)City of Agenda 6.1 6PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Barb Northway, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Diane Evans, Parks and Recreation Director Approve Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Item: application for trail on the east side of Fernbrook Lane between County Road 6 and the Luce Line Regional Trail 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving a cooperative agreement between Three Rivers Park District and the City of Plymouth for submission of a Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant for a 10' trail on the east side of Fernbrook Lane No, between CR 6 and the Luce Line Regional Trail. 2. BACKGROUND: In December 2013, the Three Rivers Park District reached out to municipal partners to collaborate on a grant/cost share application for federal funds through the Transportation Alternatives Program TAP). Data gathering efforts indicate many people do not feel safe or comfortable accessing the regional trail network on foot or bike, and subsequently either drive to access the regional trail system, do not utilize the regional trail system, or utilize the system less frequently than desired. To address this feedback and improve local access, Three Rivers is orchestrating a multi jurisdictional Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) grant application to assist local communities with bike and pedestrian projects that provide or improve direct, safe, and multi -use access to the regional trail system. The City of Plymouth submitted the Fernbrook Lane No trail gap for the TAP grant. The Fernbrook Lane No trail has been identified as a trail gap in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The trail was also identified in the May 2012 City Council trail gap study session. The TAP Grant provides 80 percent of construction costs and requires a 20 percent local match. Three Rivers will fund and coordinate the grant application, acquire the necessary right-of-way, and design and construct the project. Three Rivers will also fund project expenses that are not grant eligible such as design and construction administration costs which typically run about 20 percent of the total construction cost. TAP grants are anticipated to be awarded in late Spring 2014. If approved, design and construction documents would be developed in 2016 and construction would occur in 2017. Page 1 The Fernbrook Lane No Trail is identified on the below map. L a i,. 89 . R Parkers Lake e—ml IP ML k yp ,CUL I Gap #94 — Fernbrook Lane No ti1N r` AY-- &C SCK R1U ti1At S 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The overall estimated cost for the Fernbrook Lane Trail is $117,300. The City of Plymouth's 20% cost sharing is $23,460.00, which will be utilizing Park Dedication Funds. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Cooperative Local Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement Resolution Page 2 COOPERATIVE BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AGREEMENT This cooperative agreement is between Three Rivers Park District, a Minnesota political subdivision Park District") and the City of Plymouth, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). WHEREAS, federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds may be available to assist local communities with bike and pedestrian projects which provide direct, safe, and multi -use access to the regional trail system; and WHEREAS, Park District is coordinating a multi jurisdictional application to utilize 2017 TAP funds; and WHEREAS, Park District solicited and is bundling the most competitive proposals from interested cities/agencies into a single grant application; and WHEREAS, City submitted a proposal to construct a new trail along Fernbrook Lane from County Road 6 to the Luce Line Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, Park District intends to include the City's proposal within the TAP grant application; and WHEREAS, it is expected that the federal TAP grant would fund 80 percent but not more than one million dollars for construction and land acquisition costs of the bundled proposals; and WHEREAS, Park District and City agree to cooperate to apply for these TAP funds and, if successful in their efforts, agree to cooperate on the funding, design, construction, and associated work items of the City's proposed project; and IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by City and Park District as follows: Park District will: a. bundle the most competitive, feasible, and geographically dispersed proposals totaling up to $1.25 million from interested cities/agencies into a single coordinated grant application, and b. coordinate and fund the application for the TAP grant, and design and construct the City proposed project and coordinate and fund reasonable non - grant eligible expenses including design and construction administration, if the TAP funds are received. 2. City will: a. execute and forward this Agreement to the Park District by January 29, 2014, and Page 3 b. provide all necessary property rights to complete the project where the City has rights to do so, and C. approve necessary measures by the Park District to secure any additional property rights needed to complete the City proposed project, and d. fund the required 20 percent local match in 2017, if the TAP funds are received. 3. Each party will: a. make staff and other resources available to meet project requirements and deadlines, b. operate, maintain, and assume all liabilities of the portion of the project located on lands controlled by each respective party, and C. enter into subsequent reasonable agreements as may be required to complete the project, and d. terminate this Agreement if the TAP grant application is unsuccessful. 4. The Park District reserves the right to terminate this Agreement if factors outside the control of the Park District result in the reasonable feasibility of one or more of the bundled projects resulting in the loss of TAP funds. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Plymouth and Park District have entered into this cooperative agreement as of the date and year signed below. Date: By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: By: City of Plymouth a Minnesota municipal corporation Kelli Slavik, Mayor Dave Callister, City Administrator Three Rivers Park District, a public corporation and political subdivision of the state of Minnesota Its Chair — Board of Commissioners Its Superintendent And Secretary to the Board Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION TO ENTER A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOR A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM GRANT WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has a Comprehensive Park & Trail Plan and trail gaps study; and WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Park & Trail Plan and trail gap study identifies Fernbook Lane No as a future trail link; and WHEREAS, the Fernbrook Lane No trail would provide access to the Luce Line Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, Three Rivers and the City of Plymouth will collaborate on applying for federal funds via the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP); and WHEREAS, 80% of construction costs will be provided through the grant and 20% will come in the form of cost sharing from the City of Plymouth Park Dedication Fund; and WHEREAS, notification of TAP grants awards are anticipated to be awarded in the Spring of 2014 with construction in 2017; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Council of Plymouth, Minnesota, is in support of entering into Cooperative Bike and Pedestrian Connection Agreement with Three Rivers Park District to apply for a TAP grant. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 5 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 1 7 Plymouth Number: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Kip Berglund, Associate Planner COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager and Steve Juetten, January 28, 2014 Community Development Director Approve the final plat and development contract for Review Deadline: Item: "Providence Pointe" located southwest of 56th February 16, 2014 Avenue and Cheshire Parkway (2013115-F) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the following attached items: a) a resolution approving a final plat and development contract for Providence Pointe; and b) a resolution adopting assessments for Providence Pointe. Approval requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. The applicant has also requested a PUD final plan, which is reviewed administratively. 2. BACKGROUND: On August 26, 2008, the City Council approved a preliminary plat for this site called "The Reserve 3rd Addition" for 17 single-family lots. Extensions have been granted to keep the plat valid through August 26, 2014. This final plat reduces the number of lots to 15. The requested final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Applicant's Narrative Location Map Approved Preliminary Plat Final Plat Development Contract Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract Resolution Adopting Assessments Page 1 1.01S t 1 5 f SSR* S R 11 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC, 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MINNESOTA, 55391 (952) 476-6000 FAX (952) 476-0104 Date: December 12, 2013 Subject: PROVIDENCE POINTE —15 Lots — Final Plat; Narrative - PUD Prepared For: PROVIDENCE 55, LLC. Contact: Bill Coffman Narrative: The proposed final plat (PUD Pian Application) for Providence Pointe will consist of 15 single family residential lots. The site is located just to the north of The Reserve, in between Cheshire Lane and Fernbrook Lane. The site is the proposed/former water tower site. (Please see the final plat application package) The project was approved as a Planned Unit Development by The Rottlund Company in 2008. This proposed plan meets the approval requirements, except that the lots have been revise to only create 15 single family lots, vs the 17 as originally approved. The site grading work is mostly complete. The utility and street construction will begin in the Spring of 2014. DLE C E I V DEC 1 8 2013 CITY of PLYMOUTH cOMMUN Y OEVELOPMENT DEPAMUENT Page 2 hal I A 1 I SITE a M On @, PW i4i!M `_`: i1i11 Location Map - 2013115F Providence 55, LLC Legend C, Comerdal cc. city Cenler Providence Pointe Co, Commercial office IP. Planned lndustrial LA -1, Living Are. 1 Final Plat LA 2. Living Area 2 LA -3, l iving Area 3 LA -4, Living Area 4 LA -R1 500 250 0 500r;bcity of Plymouth, Minnesota 1,000 LA -R2 Feet ® t -A -R3 0 LA -RT F/7-] P -I, PpW&Vl-Pyhlicllns;i; itlonal LEGAL DFSQRlPrlQj FOR PRELIM119ARY PLAT PURPOSES ONLY Cu not A, 7hIE RESERVE. accortllnR to the recordod plot thereof, rj .. Ncaaepla County, Mlrneiola. / / r / AL AREA 3.ge16 ALRE3 M.O.W. WEA p.Giei S TOT4 LOT AREA , 4.3637 ACRES 1 css VINSM 3.0955 LOTS ACRE NEi -ENS— E%MXS R 3.7334 LOTS/ACRE 1WROSEO 30NIN0 PUD U1 TiSS AVAILg X yRrq m rA55upIX•. BLOCK 1 -i I. , k, AI rl L 10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHDHTI THUS: NOT TO SCALE) / lV 5 ,• OGNL 6 FEEL :N MOTH, INDAIS ADJONINGATE sloeL. EE7 V OTH NT IMI +N SI EO, AND / IO FEET :N '4rR ANO NES N LE OTNC / 7uNes 7AN' ED acus um owes uN Ess orNER,usE / / .,.y ^ / 36M1 — _ _ _ _ • INoiurio ON niE RLAr, ,,. a Z.,n. ? J\/ — c .. F' a •- An17 - ti m %"asn eoc un uTmo I — 648 e ------------------- s 1` LfUPf11C 3ChLC ]N FL[.T PI*NEER,ee,irg M atlw AF n:481y9d99 12 Gzr Dr COM,NU%ITY Page 4 40 /3 14'OW A44 PERSONS BY TNM VHESWM; Thm P -55,=.I limhW 11*1iry mrpPlauen,owner. ofill, Pollmwlny dmdbw PmPsNs Iumn,i,k .akoP PROVIDENCE POINTE .T. DOC. NO. hlimcon, County Pf Fknnryin, io wkv Dwlnt A, THERESERVF,HculJin Cmmy. Nllmenpn Haem Mjia rampm heaprvryetl ane pknlme ru PROYIOS E PDINTEnd dom herehy amiamewIk Nbkk bx p WM wa Faleve Jm pMkroe Jrailume and eOley pwrPnfem id,l. We PIA • ( \ In wimess whee'eof eaW Prariaenu SS.LLC, olimiled liubillq m:paraien hmexwee Juapprnnmmbepl9mW by 3b P'gRolReer 4dr aaY of •"? ` G_1589'a9'5B'E 5822BBy.Y Rnvlemrn!!, L[.C.a limkma]IpbIIIN <nrpprmlon y h1 • ^ — —_ • - V c STATE Op N[HSN650TM1, COUNTY DFIIbMfEflN Jp B \ • \ rl1/ er Tbaroye)9o,kscikw m,wn%ameawldpeil,m:ar6a _mr of :91e.by'i5m 1. Cmlron, GwSerMa1'ofPrv+i:]aua3l. LLC. "s N a]imiwd LablliryenePmnupn Pn Mhalfofummryoranon -y 1 B \I 3 Notary Publ1453anr<Pin Cowrq. Muoraou xmcvanMWWvne I u7gggl.,{¢ I r 1 . \\ 4r \, 4 1 My CammiuknP phc I - + ly f ' ` a' ID,Id B. Pen—d,heroby,wiil t—W,plwwan prmmee by. erudcnq disec ngemviuon, upy l nnadmy LimnaN 4pM5urveyurin rhvsnmofNkim®WkMe • 1 awr'4•IP• / g8 J / \$ V1%" C , thio Dlat ie gemma npmuwipn aPlk bpupdmy rurvry,llu[ail maroemulnl amamne kpmekanranemfV deeiyesyW onikdm: aueall mo:p.rmb Jep:mW on lho Plyhcm ip' -j bwl Prwin b<wmakkr reLwilhin anayem; u lm,rawbouoealre and nm londa, as mslwe by lNlmemkas,m,riga sm;e so50k.snm s.ae pfunamenru,'laannlr pakp .• Sl''' r shown pnd Nneled on kha plus wW ellPWlkwap artahownantlkpNNW Pn thls Plat ` \I mf / p c9 !"/ : J NDRTId w I y` Dazed e',ie_aoY of '-014. 411 1. 1 I YEST ••Pr \ b ' _ '. DapM e. Pembmpn. uemnW 4masnry ' -. 74, NOnepaplP Lkmxr,ae0lNI ner sci,empeer _S '.fi. :,gyp • l `//„ n ^ srnTeovmmn>esoTA,toumY DFNexnePlN awl ` ' :\ $\ • 4, VS,:aa'0// °, 9 \ 'A Tnu imwmew wuacknewld bedmcme Joe ory of_ PIa,M Vavia o, Pwnb.ory Tlw•bwu rer mrkwdrq pysm mdwwrn lm:eer - 05" a `Po '}, p` •., i , a'o g0 \ ^ wIb1,9. TELRssevvEmmwmWV Na + BLO$C $3 $ \ / /5 {wa o [•. Ranh Jb Deyram Jm mea, sem. sa,1 1 if R,y a l r No1my FLblk.lknmpin C—q•Mlnmwu Nplmy Pnnmd Nana I 1 as LSiaaeSa-16'E __`•,ha } l euYMou*x,vannRSDTw I t 1) t4 '.; 8 II \' • y° "` Thisp9moYP11"DENCE MME —i pppmred zed xulmeeby o. CiN Cmp .rPlym Nlwwrnn ma ytyplae hm Mle eoe _de f o oealn Benny lnimnhunpipeseW ae l•U ?man LSFAa'JR.i• _ J Y , 91e orywgk.u:wd,lan rommpnW ens lewennKnannanaeru ep nm;aaianepr7mn.wrmaan>nauk unnaxWl way EnpinayeeankaQyW?r uXaaeruYe D a:m p.nm.n,err ul m, Ne..oa++ ^y. $'6 7 p...lnrd)0 dqv period hes etupud wiln.lmx:P eAaneh wumoe4o'W nwu.cGdau,u prwlJW by SIlnlxwm5wulrxSmlen SOSAl, SIsbAsol.., Pp 5.53 k 7 y 1Bmmmp6nuWlmnMciwnml o y I '— — — 1 La }R 1,.ti ._sibnb'.+e1s M.roe r CINOInm 1 N¢— 5 Y r TM1XPAYER5ERVICES DePA1LTN1&ti"f ->Sm- -{-W A ( ,.0 Tx•s" lg so P. LENNEFIN COVNTV,MINNESOTA Sn IeS.SE 1 y 'ti .` p 1 a DRnw.+DBAND I,,.,Y pk;N,rynPENIDwn,Rk,S: a " •4;ao..'''f'''` iy 1IFonbyevayJimlmepnYableln_»e pxnrYwn hnvc bun poie ror krd ecaibaicnlL's Plae DmW tllln daYor ` Ip aq J'y c ~ J, 4 ` 4 / 6 ale. 1 Mah Y, Chmin, xennJin ew gaWimr g f2 P` / .nom. A/ s\ • 1 ey Omuq SDRt+EYN NENNEPI.NN C0VCNL NTY. M1IINNPSOTA puysaa m M'uu uw Enwlm Srsainn]8)aS65(1969), Inie pill. l— --6Inu Willlnm P. Emwn. Nmncpin Cmmry Survrypc By: RE(r. T—ROPTITL IIFM1NEPLN CDL. T ,MINNESOTA Ihcmbyemiy Cwckh,-iO,i,pim,rPROVLlENCEPOLJfE ky,f ._u01e.m _a'ulurt NL Mnrtln aleCmnkk Ressurwel"Clka BY. DJury 4 SATHRE-6ERGOUIST, INC. 4 4qp ps+"d Page 5 e1I_—_1 L1 ___iI_ a NOY TDSCnL6 LUJ P[aYe rort'v, wlONendetl}avip lolluc unlmWmrec Wlu d,aW Mfx11P my: op rymnn r, : y • Page 5 II,I a nwlroM,NaInEL.m.Iro,.>,WLmR w,N.Iro I.,. e pgeet ilpm°mmp°umlel Va I.N Id, vY mm+INMn...se..mwulw„eiw .. upiel D. E.mnPm. wlll n.w..wlarn.w.1al+ma.awmil,em w no CsnNlwlm TlNlocNnlslPNXor P.I wooL MnN nam, Lv, TNEeox,NPnoa R" DPI ,e—Exa°T LDDATwN—wm— E,STING IITILpIES DEAGiELDMMENGNGWWM[NEAOREeE TGDe —1-1-111EFDRAWP,tD ALL DAAIAGES M -ND W OF 415 PAL -7 PYALTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL USTWO WMUTIES. 7 2 1 / m sGVP NI FEET oE5I5uEp I ND. BY pATE pEVYGILM6 9cD—.—DCV DISIHlDVI'ILN. — CDnNEYANDE G IXE.DY CERTIFY TNAT TWD PLW OR 6PELIPILATICN WPE rM,N PpOIECTN0. Df CAW IWWliD ____WwR—__ DUDAU CII DP—PRODMDTIS STR—PADX—C—CUT PREPARED DY ME OR DNGER MY WREST 9MPERYIGICN„NDTHATI [a° °.' _ RMD—E_Wo .1,I,I, REGSTEPEDPRDLESSIC SNGINEERUN¢ERTH6 TITLE SHEETm"I`° ----- SAIOMIIHORIrATI011LONSTIrDTESANILLEGITIMATE41HAND8XPLTENEW'PSATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. ttiftiis m'gATHNE-D,RQWI INC. DF—RESPDNSIUILI”. Imso¢rX°aooar<.Y lln Tr MN,s,.I IIQI ArE.aA MOUTH, i 6ralrT TifRRE rSYIiEFYL`6NR_-Ar 1HRE sERco ST.INt MSERIEi TME Ru;NT IC H -D MY uearclnv.TE L PROVIDENCE POINTEeSNIAuvne.PGNSISLP sow °AMAass oR L.—REs N ---- FROM ILl4aRNr,T nERGLALe,Pe.'° ANESOTA GATE oe— erts oirirnl _ RET,DJET Et:O:T NT, LKCNCMENt__ — e"R, L F.. NAOVfDENCE 55. LLC. ocmrm _ __ ___ ww uA rvo. 4TNo ", Q Page 6 nu DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Developer Installed InaproveMents) PROVIDENCE POINTE (2013115) AGREEMENT dated , 20, by and between the CITY OF PLYMOUTH, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and PROVIDENCE 55, LLC (the Developer"), 9. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Providence Pointe (referred to in this contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Outlot A, The Reserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the county recorder or registrar of titles within 180 days after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the city clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, and 3) the plat has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two years from the date of this contract, no amendments to the City's comprehensive plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this contract. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Plat Plan B — Tree Planting Plan Plan C — Infiltration Basin Planting Plan Plan D -- Title Sheet Plan E Street Plans Plan r Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plans Page 7 Plan G Storm Sewer Plans Plan H — Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plans Plan I -- Construction Details 6. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Streets B. Sanitary Sewer C. Watermain D. Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.) E. Grading and Erosion Control F. Sidewalks/Trails G. Street Lighting H. Underground Utilities I. Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs J. Landscaping Required by Section 21130.03 of the Zoning Ordinance K. Monuments Required by Minnesota Statutes L. Miscellaneous Facilities The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations and the City's engineering guidelines/standard detail specifications. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the city engineer or designee, The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide full-time field inspection personnel in order for the Developer's engineer to be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer's engineer shall provide for onsite project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his or her engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City IIall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. 7. ADMINISTRATION OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. The Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow to pay for the costs of administering the development contract. Administrative costs include but are not limited to preparation of the contract, city recording fees for documents required as part of the development, monitoring of 2— PAPlanning Applications1201312013 1 1 5 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DMevelopment Contract.doex Page 8 construction observation, consultation with the Developer and his/her engineer on status or problems regarding the project, plan review, coordination for testing, periodic and final inspections and acceptance, project monitoring and inspections during warranty periods, and processing requests for reduction or release of security, for all public improvements covered by the development contract. The cash escrow deposit shall be 19,393 (calculated at 4% of the estimated cost of proposed public improvements, as identified on page 12). If, at any time prior to completion of the development contract administration process, the balance in the cash escrow account is depleted to less than 10% of the originally required cash escrow amount, the Developer shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. Any balance remaining in the cash escrow account upon completion of the development contract administration process shall be returned to the developer after all claims and charges thereto have been deducted. 8. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Cormnission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 6 above. 9. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: Minnesota Department of Health for watermains andlor well abandonment National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for sanitary sewer and hazardous material removal and disposal Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for sanitary sewer connections Watershed permits City of Plymouth right-of-way permit, and building permits 10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by October 31, 2014, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. Final wear course placement will be allowed in a new housing development only after one freeze — thaw cycle and after a certificate of occupancy has been issued for 75% of the dwelling units. An inspection of the roadway will be performed by the city engineer or designee prior to wear course placement. From this inspection, any deficiencies or damage to the street, sidewalk and curb will be noted and will need to be corrected prior to the placement of the wear course. 11. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perforrn all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 12. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility construction, and street construction is restricted to access to the subdivision via Cheshire Lane. No construction traffic is permitted on other adjacent local streets. 3 -- P:IPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DC\Dcveloprnent Contract.docx Page 9 13. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan (Plan H). The plan shall conform to City of Plymouth standards. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with a record" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer indicating that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record" plan shall contain site grades and field verified elevations of the following; a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles; c) lot corner elevations and house pads; and d) top and bottom of retaining walls. All lots with house footings placed on fill must be monitored and constructed to meet or exceed FHA/HUD 790 specifications. The Developer must certify that this has been done correctly. Prior to City acceptance of the grading improvements and a full release of financial sureties, the Developer shall provide the City with final "record" plans, in accordance with the City's most recent Engineering Guidelines. 14. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the Erosion Control Plan (Plan H) shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's best management practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 14 days after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for up to 14 days unless authorized and approved by the city engineer in writing. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding standards. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc - anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense, The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten days, the City may draw down the security to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 15. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to ensure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. 4- PAPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DODevelopment Contiact.docx Page 10 The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from the Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for repairing damage in the development because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. The contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer. 16. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits; Contractor's certificate Engineer's certificate Land surveyor's certificate Developer's certificate The above affidavits shall certify that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this contract. Prior to City acceptance of public improvements and a full release of financial sureties, the Developer shall provide the City with final "record" plans, in accordance with the City's most recent Engineering Guidelines, Upon City receipt and verification of the affidavits, and upon receipt of "record" plans acceptable to the City, the city engineer will accept the completed public improvements. 17. PARK DEDICATION, The Developer shall pay a cash contribution of $97,500. in satisfaction of the City's park dedication requirements. The charge was calculated in accordance with Section 528 of the City's subdivision regulations. The cash fee shall be payable prior to the City's release of the signed final plat mylars. 18. WATERMAIN. This plat is subject to a trunk watermain special assessment under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment rate is adjusted annually. The 2013 rate is $3,942 per acre. If the development contract is signed by the Developer and City in 2014, the assessment amount is calculated as follows: 5.49 acres minus 0.00 acres of wetland = 5.49 acres x $3,942 per acre = $21,641.58. If the development contract is signed in another year, that year's per acre rate will be used in the calculation. The assessment will be divided evenly among the lots and blocks in the final plat. The assessment will be spread over five years at 2.78% interest on the unpaid balance. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this contract is signed by the City, The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the 5— PAPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe PP final PUD plan\DCOevelopment Contract.docx Page 11 assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A, 429,081. 19. SANITARY SEWER. This plat is subject to a trunk sanitary sewer special assessment under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment rate is adjusted annually. The 2013 rate is $1,062 per acre. If the development contract is signed by the Developer and City in 2014, the assessment amount is calculated as follows: 5.49 acres minus 0.00 acres of wetland — 5.49 acres x $1,062 per acre = $5,830.38. if the development contract is signed in another year, that year's per acre rate will be used in the calculation. The assessment will be divided evenly among the lots and blocks in the final plat. The charge will be spread over five years at 2.78% interest on the unpaid balance. The assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this contract is signed by the City. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. The Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081. 20. BUILDING PERMITS/CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and water and the MPCA permit has been issued. Prior to issuance of building permits, except those identified in item E of this section, curbing and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all public and private streets serving the subject lot. B. Prior to issuance of building permits, written certification of the grading for the block where the building is to be located must be provided to the City. C. Breach of the terms of this contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and the halting of all work in the plat. D. if building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the city engineer or designee. E. After the plat is recorded and written certification provided of the grading for the block where the building is to be located, a building permit for one model home will be issued on a lot acceptable to the building official after building permit review and approval. For this action, the developer shall indemnify the City and hold the City harmless from any resulting property damage, personal injury or death or costs incurred by the City, including reasonable attorney's fees, except for the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the City. No sewer and water connection permits will be issued until the streets needed for access to each model home have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and 6— PAPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD planIDC\Development Contract.docx Page 12 approved by the city engineer or designee. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until sewer and water service is provided to the model home. 21. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. Street name signs shall be installed by the Developer. The signs shall be placed at all intersections or at such other locations as determined by the city engineer or designee. All street name signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval. The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the city engineer and Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices MMUTCD). All signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the city engineer. 22. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS, A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting frorn plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this contract. This is a personal obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this contract within 30 days after receipt. Bills not paid within 30 days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 23. SPECIAL PROVISIONS, The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. The Developer shall post a $4,500.00 security for the final placement of all subdivision iron monuments. The security was calculated as follows: 45 irons at 100.00 per iron. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and 7— PAPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD p1an1DC\Deve1opme11t Contract.docx Page 13 street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. B. The Developer shall construct a City trail along Cheshire Lane, in the manner and location as prescribed by the City Parks Department. The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of grading and gravel base for the trail, but shall be reimbursed for asphalt pavement cost of the trail. Upon completion of the trail, the Developer may submit a detailed invoice showing the pavement cost for the trail. Upon City inspection and acceptance of the trail installation and receipt of the detailed invoice, the City shall reimburse the Developer for the trail costs excluding the related grading and gravel base costs. C. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City building official prior to installation of any subdivision identification signs. D. The Developer shall supply a complete set of the approved construction plans in an AutoCAD.DWG electronic file format before the preconstruction conference. E. The Developer shall include the "City of Plymouth's Standard Detail Specifications" (all applicable sections) in the contract documents of their improvement project. F. Other requirements: 1. Prior to recording the final plat, the Developer shall receive City approval of final construction plans. 2. Access is prohibited from Cheshire Parkway, Private Drive access is prohibited from Fernbrook Lane. 3. Floor elevations shall be a minimum of two feet higher than the I00 -year high water elevation for adjacent rain gardens. In addition, there must be a minimum of 18 inches of vertical freeboard from the lowest building opening where storm water can enter (door or window) and the emergency overland overflow route. 4. Development standards shall be as approved with the PUD General Plan. Side yard setbacks for this development shall be eight feet to living space and six feet to garage space. 5. Impervious surface area coverage for the development shall not exceed 25 percent. 6. Prior to release of the final plat for recording, the following items shall be addressed: a. Add proposed impervious surface area coverage amount for the overall development to the notes section of the title sheet. b. Revise the drainage and utility easements on the final plat for Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 1, along the rear lot lines to six feet as opposed to ten feet. c. Provide revisions to the hIOA documents for the development that removes any language regarding tot -lot equipment located within the property and include language addressing the Following: 1) snow removal 2) maintenance for common elements including the sidewalk along Fernbrook Lane. d. A maintenance agreement is required for all rain gardens. 8— PAPlanning npplications12013120131 15 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DMevelopment ContraU.doex Page 14 7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall: a. File and record the final plat with Hennepin County. b. Submit a certified survey for each lot indicating a minimum of two front yard trees to be planted and identify impervious surface calculations. 8. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat and all easements and agreements are filed and recorded with Hennepin County and proof of recording is submitted to the city. 24. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any pant of it. B. Building peri -nits are required for retaining walls 48 inches in height or higher. Additionally, a fence shall be installed at the top of retaining walls that exceed four feet in height. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the building official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. C. The developer shall submit appropriate legal documents regarding homeowner association documents, covenants and restrictions, as reviewed by the city attorney for consistency with the City's official controls and conditions of approval shall be filed with the final plat, if the documents are not consistent with the City's official controls and conditions of approval, the documents shall be amended to make them consistent prior to recording the final plat and homeowner association documents. D. The Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until 6 months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of there. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of 1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given 30 days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this contract. 9— PAPlanning Applications12013120131 1 5 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DClDeveiopment Contract.docx Page 15 F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this contract. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision regulations, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. IF the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 25, DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for pennission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 26. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit or maintain a letter of credit for 25% of the amount of the original cost of the following improvements: 10— PAPlanning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plaiAMDevelopment Contract.docx Page 16 A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for utilities including public sanitary sewer, stone sewer, and water mains shall be 2 years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be 1 year from the date of final written City acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one growing season following installation. PAPlanning 1151S Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plan\DODevelopment Contract.docx Page 17 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public and private improvements, and construction of all public and private improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in a format acceptable to the City, fiom a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and letter of credit ("security") for $550,461. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: 1) Developer installed public improvements. City to own and maintain after development completed. 2) Private. Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain after development completed. 3) In addition to this line item, a $700 refundable cash deposit will be collected with each permit for a new home to guarantee the planting of two fi•ont yard trees on each lot as shown on the Tree Planting Plan, This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the city manager. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been 12- P:1Planning Applications12013120131 1 5 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD planIDC\Development Contract.doex Page 18 ESTIMATE D COSTS Developer ITEM Installed Private (2) Total 1) Street Construction: 282,447 282,447 Sanitary Sewer System: 46,544 46,544 Watermain System: 62,580 62,580 Storm Sewer System: 39,700 39,700 Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod: 4,910 4,910 Retaining Walls: 3,000 3,000 Rain Garden/Filtration Areas 1,2, & 3: 18,000 18,000 Street and Traffic Control Signs: 1,140 1,140 Sidewalk Improvements: 9,750 9,750 Trail Improvements: 17,640 17,640 Landscaping (3): 13,850 13,850 Street Lighting: 5,625 5,625 Setting Iron Monuments: 4,500 4,500 SUB -"T'OT'AL: 448,911 60,775 509,686 Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts (8%): 35,913 4,862 40,775 TOTAL: 484,824 65,637 55501461 1) Developer installed public improvements. City to own and maintain after development completed. 2) Private. Property owner and/or property owner's association to maintain after development completed. 3) In addition to this line item, a $700 refundable cash deposit will be collected with each permit for a new home to guarantee the planting of two fi•ont yard trees on each lot as shown on the Tree Planting Plan, This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the city manager. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been 12- P:1Planning Applications12013120131 1 5 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD planIDC\Development Contract.doex Page 18 installed; (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied; (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City; (5) a warranty security is provided; and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval: Park Dedication $97,500 Erosion Control Cash Deposit (Refundable) $1,000 Administration of Development Contract Escrow $19,393 TOTAL, CASH REQUIREMENTS LEVIED: $117,893 29. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Providence 55, LLC 6102 Olson Memorial Hwy. Golden Valley, MN 55422 The Developer shall notify the City within five days of a change of address. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the city manager, or mailed'to the City by certified mail in care of the city manager at the following address: Plymouth City Hall 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 13— P:1Planning Applications1201312013115 Providence Pointe FP Final PUD plarMODevelopment Contract.docx Page 19 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR PROVIDENCE 55, LLC, FOR "PROVIDENCE POINTE" FOR 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF 56T" AVENUE AND CHESHIRE PARKWAY 2013115-F) WHEREAS, Providence 55, LLC, has requested approval of a final plat and development contract to allow a subdivision containing 15 single-family lots on the roughly 5.49 -acre site presently legally described as follows: Outlot A, The Reserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, city staff has prepared a development contract covering the improvements related to said plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Providence 55, LLC for a final plat for Providence Pointe; and FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat be approved, and that upon prior execution of the development contract by the developer, the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the city; and FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to recording of, and related to said plat: 1. A final plat is approved for the creation of 15 single-family lots, in accordance with the application, plat and plans received by the city on December 18, 2013, and January 17, 2014 except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. A temporary construction access shall be constructed from Cheshire Parkway to the site provided the project is constructed before Cheshire Lane is extended; no construction parking on Fernbrook Lane is allowed. All construction vehicles shall access the site via this temporary access while this access is open. Any damaged curb or bituminous shall be replaced. 3. Access is prohibited from Cheshire Parkway. Driveway access is prohibited from Fernbrook Lane. Page 20 4. Adjacent paved streets shall be kept free of mud, sand, and silt as a result of construction. 5. Floor elevations shall be a minimum of two feet higher than the 100 -year high water elevation for adjacent rain gardens. In addition, there must be a minimum of 18 inches of vertical freeboard from the lowest building opening where storm water can enter (door or window) and the emergency overland overflow route. 6. Development standards shall be as approved with the PUD General Plan. Side yard setbacks for this development shall be eight feet to living space and six feet to garage space; no variances are approved or implied. 7. Impervious surface area coverage for the development shall not exceed 25 percent. 8. Prior to release of the final plat for recording, the following items shall be addressed: a. The Developer shall receive City approval of final construction plans. b. Add proposed impervious surface area coverage amount for the overall development to the notes section of the title sheet. c. Revise the drainage and utility easements on the final plat for Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 1, to six feet as opposed to ten feet as shown. d. Provide revisions to the HOA documents for the development that removes any language regarding tot -lot equipment located within the property and include language addressing the following: 1) snow removal 2) maintenance for common elements including the sidewalk along Fernbrook Lane. e. The applicant shall execute a Development Contract for the public and private improvements, and shall submit the required financial guarantees and fees. f. The required park dedication fee shall be paid, in accordance with the dedication ordinance in effect at the time of filing of the final plat. g. A maintenance agreement is required for all rain gardens. 9. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall: a. File and record the final plat with Hennepin County. b. Submit a certified survey for each lot indicating a minimum of two front yard trees to be planted and identify impervious surface calculations. 10. Standard conditions: a. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat and all easements and agreements are filed and recorded with Hennepin County and proof of recording is submitted to the city. b. Any signage shall require separate permits and shall comply with the city's signage regulations. c. Retaining wall permits shall be obtained prior to any construction on the site. Separate building permits are required for retaining walls 48 inches in height or higher. Page 21 Additionally, a fence shall be installed at the top of retaining walls that exceed four feet in height. d. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense. e. This approval shall expire two years after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has recorded the final plat, or unless the applicant, with the consent of the property owner, has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 512 of City Code. ADOPTED on January 28, 2014. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 28, 2014, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this 28th day of January, 2014. City Clerk Page 22 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS TRUNK SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN PROVIDENCE POINT (2013115) WHEREAS, the City has received a Waiver of Assessment Hearing from the property owner of Providence Point waiving their right to special assessment hearings for trunk sanitary sewer and water main and all other appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2015, and shall bear interest at the rate of 2.78% per annum from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2015. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Department, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution and the Developer may at any time thereafter pay the City of Plymouth Finance Department the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 29 or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Finance Director to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. 5. The total cost of the improvement assessed by this resolution is $27,471.96 ADOPTED by the City Council on January 28, 2014. Page 23 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 28, 2014, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this 28th day of January, 2014. City Clerk Page 24 City & Plymouth Adding Q} aNty to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 28, 2014 Agenda 6.18Number: To: Dave Callister, Administrative Services Director Prepared by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Luke Fischer, Administrative Services Director Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.19 of the Item: City Code regarding Water and Sewer Area and Connection (REC) Charges 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt ordinance amending section 1015.19 of the City Code increasing rate fees for water and sanitary sewer area and connection (REC) charges. 2. BACKGROUND: The Utility Trunk Fund (expansion) was created to track the cost of adding water and sewer mains to new developments and assist in evaluating whether the incoming revenue from new development was adequate to cover the related expenses. In 2010, staff completed a Utility Trunk Fund analysis to ensure rates were sufficient to support the expansion of the water and sewer utilities to undeveloped areas. As a result of the analysis, staff recommended increasing rates annually by 3.8% through 2015 at which time new development is planned to level out and the financial demands on the Utility Trunk fund are reduced. The rates would be increased to the following: Water Area $4,092 Sewer Area $1,102 Water Connection REC $1,190 Sewer Connection REC $ 464 Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance increasing the rates for 2014. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: 2010 Utility Trunk Fund Analysis Ordinance Page 1 C Plymouth Adding Quality to Life Utility Trunk Fund Analysis December 2010 Prepared By: Finance Division Page 2 Introduction This analysis was done to update the financial projections for the trunk expansion fund and ensure the following: 1. Rates are sufficient to support the expansion of the water and sewer utilities to undeveloped areas. 2. Revenue sources are restricted to new users going forward. 3. An adequate cash balance is maintained to cover fluctuations in revenue and expenses. Background The Utility Trunk Fund (expansion) was created to track the cost of adding water and sewer mains to new developments and assist in evaluating whether the incoming revenue from new development was adequate to cover the related expenses. In 2005, an analysis was presented to the City Council to update the water and sewer area charges and connection fees to ensure that costs associated with new water and sewer infrastructure were supported by the rate structure. This analysis was requested to reevaluate the rates and update the assumptions based on the most current data available. Interest rates, project forecasts, growth rates, and inflationary factors were adjusted to reflect the most current economic conditions. As part of the utility enterprise fund group, many of the same considerations should be made for rates related to expansion activity as those for the ongoing operations and replacement, such as: 1) Rates are sufficient to cover expansion of infrastructure 2) Adequate cash balances are maintained for cash flow and contingencies 3) Allocate costs appropriately to those that use the system 4) Complement the city's economic development goals Assumptions The following are the significant assumptions made in this analysis: 1) Adjusted 2010 figures to reflect estimated actual. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan could not have anticipated the poor economy and decline in growth in the development plan. a) Lowered the estimated 380 connections in 2010 to 190 due to economy. b) Spread remaining 190 connections to 2011 and 2012, 95 connections each year. c) 2010 revenue and expenses adjusted to reflect the reduced growth. 2) Growth new residential connections based on Table 3-3 of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. a) 2011-2012, adjusted to account for 215 connections per year (adjusted by 95 per year to capture the 2010 shortage). Page 3 b) 2013-2015, adjusted to account for 120 new connections per year. c) 2016-2020, adjusted to account for 149 new connections per year. d) 2021-2025, adjusted to account for 122 new connections per year. 3) Expenses a) Capital — 2011 through 2015 obtained from approved Capital Improvement Plan CIP). b) Capital beyond 2015 and all other expenses projected to increase 3.8% annually based on the published Construction Cost Index by American City and County Magazine). 4) Proposed transfer of $5.5 million from the Utility Trunk (replacement) Fund to obtain an adequate cash flow. 5) Rates — 3.8% annual increase, beginning in 2011, to keep up with anticipated inflation. 6) Water Treatment Plant — matches the CIP with the third plant proposed for construction in the last year of the CIP. The 2011-2015 CIP was referenced for this study, as well as the city's 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The CIP for trunk expansion is provided in Appendix D, along with projected needs beyond the CIP timeframe. Overview and Recommendations The city receives two types of revenues from new growth, Area Charges and Connection Fees (REC Fees). The revenue generated by new construction is intended to provide funding for the expansion of utility services to new developments. Expansion may include the addition of water and or sanitary sewer mains as well as facilities or the upgrade of facilities to accommodate growth. These charges allocate the cost of the improvements to those who will derive benefit. Water and Sanitary Sewer Area Charges are based on the land area associated with the development, and are charged at a rate designated per acre. Residential Equivalency Connection Fees (REC Fees) for water and sanitary sewer are based on the number of units added to the new development. Water and sanitary sewer connection fees are based on the number of Residential Equivalency Units (REU) assigned to their usage. An REU is defined as the use of 225 gallons per day, the equivalent of a typical single-family dwelling. Based on the 2011-2015 CIP and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Area Charges are expected to generate approximately $535,000 in 2010 and $143,000 in 2011. REC Fees should raise approximately $235,000 and $318,000, respectively. Expenses related to capital projects for utility expansion are estimated at $2,420,000 in 2010 and $1,590,000 in 2011. Appendix D shows a summary of the planned expansion -related capital projects through 2025. Currently, the Utility Trunk Funds are comprised of two components (trunk expansion and trunk replacement). In order to allow the Utility Trunk Fund (expansion) to positively cash flow, we recommend a one-time transfer of $5.5 million from Utility Trunk (replacement) to the Utility Trunk (expansion) as indicated in the analysis. At conclusion of development, this amount can be transferred back to Water and Sanitary Sewer Funds. In order to keep up with the expenses of new development, we also recommend annual rate increases of 3.8% to the Area Charges and REC Fees for both water and sewer for a minimum of Page 4 five years, at which time new development is planned to level out and the financial demands on the Utility Trunk Fund (expansion) are reduced. The biggest variable in this study is whether a third water treatment plant will be needed. The current study assumes construction of the plant in 2015. Proposed Increases 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sewer Area 950 986 1,024 1,062 1,103 1,145 Water Area 3,525 3,659 3,798 3,942 4,092 4,248 Sewer REC 400 415 431 447 464 482 Water REC 1,025 1,064 1,104 1,146 1,190 1,235 Note: Area charges are per acre and connection (REQ charges are per REU. With such large disparities between these revenue streams and the related capital costs, we plan to review the rates annually. Cash Reserves We recommend that the cash balance of the Utility Trunk Fund be maintained at 75% of the following year's expected capital expenditures as defined by approved CIP and the Comprehensive Plan. If the recommendations in this report are followed, the trend for the estimated cash balance in comparison to the recommended target reserve should stay positive, as shown in the following graph: 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 rl N M 1Z3' Ln l0 r M M O ci N M -ZT M ri -- r1 ri -- ci ri 1-1 —1 N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Estimated Cash Balance Recommended Target Reserve If growth matches the Comprehensive Plan, there will be very little development beyond 2019; the demand for expansion will dissipate as the city nears ultimate development, leaving the fund with a reserve. We recommend this balance be maintained until which time there is no longer a need for expansion projects. Any excess at the time of ultimate development may be transferred to the Water & Sanitary Sewer Funds. Page 5 Summary The Trunk Funds (expansion and replacement) are a part of the Water and Sanitary Sewer Utility Funds. The funds are combined and reported as an Enterprise Fund in the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). As an Enterprise Fund, the charges for services should be designed to cover the costs of operations. The City Council had elected to charge utility expansion projects to new developments, therefore funding the projects by those users that derive the benefit. In order to support the intentions of the City Council, a one-time transfer of $5.5 million to the Trunk Fund (expansion) is suggested in 2011 for cash flow purposes. The transfer will ensure fund sustainability for the construction of the planned new water treatment plant. Also included is a 3.8% annual increase to the Water and Sanitary Sewer Area Charges and REC Fees through 2015. Appendix A Cash flow Projections Appendix B Water Revenue Projections — Current and Proposed Appendix C Sewer Revenue Projections — Current and Proposed Appendix D Water and Sewer Expense Projections Page 6 This page intentionally left blank Page 7 City of Plymouth Utility Trunk Expansion Cashflow Interest Rate 1.00% 1. , 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Current Rates (with recommended transfer) Beginning Cash 1,887,301 (59,847) 4,638,453 5,280,120 5,883,525 6,732,663 98,956 623,447 1,388,606 1,769,529 2,616,212 2,653,702 3,601,431 4,550,629 4,690,152 5,620,405 Revenue Sewer Area 41,937 88,311 133,358 156,106 178,114 163,290 150,367 137,853 143,798 149,568 155,163 149,275 143,551 137,991 132,595 127,364 Water Area 155,609 327,679 494,830 579,237 660,896 605,891 557,939 511,507 533,568 554,977 575,735 553,887 532,648 512,018 491,997 472,586 Sewer REC 75,980 86,136 86,136 48,136 48,136 48,136 59,544 59,544 59,544 59,544 59,544 48,876 48,876 48,876 48,876 48,876 Water REC 180,453 .204,573 204,573 114,323 114,323 114,323 141,417 141,417 141,417 141,417 141,417 116,081 116,081 116,081 116,081 116,081 Interest 18,873 81,602 92,769 105,602 117,670 134,653 2,969 18,703 41,658 53,086 78,486 79,611 108,043 136,519 140,705 168,612 Total Revenue 472,852 788,301 1,011,666 1,003,405 1,119,139 1,066,292 912,236 869,024 919,985 958,593 1,010,346 947,729 949,198 951,484 930,253 933,518 Expense Sewer 250,000 300,000 100,000 180,000 - 100,000 212,634 103,866 - 111,909 246,844 - - - - 699,875 Water 2,170,000 1,290,000 270,000 220,000 270,000 7,600,000 175,110 - 539,062 - 726,012 - - 811,962 - 1,137,296 Total Expense 2,420,000 1,590,000 370,000 400,000 270,000 7,700,000 387,745 103,866 539,062 111,909 972,855 811,962 1,837,171 Net Income (Loss) at Current Rates (1,947,148) (801,699) 641,666 603,405 849,139 (6,633,708) 524,491 765,159 380,923 846,683 37,490 947,729 949,198 139,522 930,253 (903,653) Proposed Rates (with recommended transfer) Beginning Cash 1,887,301 (59,847) 4,674,775 5,382,699 6,057,194 7,005,135 503,730 1,199,691 2,155,215 2,747,741 3,822,852 4,101,025 5,281,181 6,464,250 6,839,291 8,006,918 Revenue Sewer Area 41,937 90,117 138,797 164,537 190,578 180,841 172,588 162,994 172,236 180,230 186,971 179,876 172,978 166,279 159,777 153,473 Water Area 155,609 334,382 515,008 610,519 707,145 671,014 640,394 604,794 639,085 668,747 693,761 667,433 641,840 616,981 592,856 569,465 Sewer REC 75,980 89,409 92,807 53,835 55,880 58,004 71,750 71,750 71,750 71,750 71,750 58,896 58,896 58,896 58,896 58,896 Water REC 180,453 229,111 237,817 137,951 143,193 148,635 183,861 183,861 183,861 183,861 183,861 150,920 150,920 150,920 150,920 150,920 Interest 18,873 81,602 93,495 107,654 121,144 140,103 15,112 35,991 64,656 82,432 114,686 123,031 158,435 193,927 205,179 240,208 Total Revenue 472,852 824,622 1,077,924 1,074,496 1,217,940 1,198,596 1,083,705 1,059,390 1,131,588 1,187,020 1,251,028 1,180,155 1,183,069 1,187,003 1,167,627 1,172,961 Expense Sewer 250,000 300,000 100,000 180,000 - 100,000 212,634 103,866 - 111,909 246,844 - - - - 699,875 Water 2,170,000 1,290,000 270,000 220,000 270,000 7,600,000 175,110 - 539,062 - 726,012 - - 811,962 - 1,137,296 Total Expense 2,420,000 1,590,000 370,000 400,000 270,000 7,700,000 387,745 103,866 539,062 111,909 972,855 811,962 1,837,171 Net Income (Loss) at Proposed Rates (1,947,148) (765,378) 707,924 674,496 947,940 (6,501,404) 695,960 955,524 592,526 1,075,111 278,173 1,180,155 1,183,069 375,041 1,167,627 (664,210) Ending Cash Balances Transfer from Fund 412' 5,500,000 w/ Current Rates 1,887,301 (59,847) 4,638,453 5,280,120 5,883,525 6,732,663 98,956 623,447 1,388,606 1,769,529 2,616,212 2,653,702 3,601,431 4,550,629 4,690,152 5,620,405 4,716,752 w/ Proposed Rates 1,887,301 (59,847) 4,674,775 5,382,699 6,057,194 7,005,135 503,730 1,199,691 2,155,215 2,747,741 3,822,852 4,101,025 5,281,181 6,464,250 6,839,291 8,006,918 7,342,708 Recommended Reserve 75% Following Year's Capital 1,192,500 277,500 300,000 202,500 5,775,000 290,808 77,899 404,297 83,932 729,642 - - 608,971 - 1,377,878 - Excess/(Shortfall)-Current (1,252,347) 4,360,953 4,980,120 5,681,025 957,663 (191,853) 545,548 984,309 1,685,597 1,886,571 2,653,702 3,601,431 3,941,658 4,690,152 4,242,527 4,716,752 Excess/(Shortfall)-Proposed (1,252,347) 4,397,275 5,082,699 5,854,694 1,230,135 212,922 1,121,792 1,750,919 2,663,809 3,093,211 4,101,025 5,281,181 5,855,279 6,839,291 6,629,040 7,342,708 Transfer recommended as a result of Trunk Fund analysis Page 8 W N City of Plymouth Projected Water Revenues at Current Rates Area Charees Interest on Area Assessments 3.24% Current Area Charge 3,525 Per acre 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Principal 2010 133,915 133,915 133,915 133,915 133,915 669,574 Interest 2010 21,694 17,355 13,017 8,678 4,339 65,083 Principal 2011 151,815 151,815 151,815 151,815 151,815 759,074 Interest 2011 24,594 19,675 14,756 9,838 4,919 73,782 Principal 2012 151,815 151,815 151,815 151,815 151,815 759,074 Interest 2012 24,594 19,675 14,756 9,838 4,919 73,782 Principal 2013 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 424,199 Interest 2013 13,744 10,995 8,246 5,498 2,749 41,232 Principal 2014 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 424,199 Interest 2014 13,744 10,995 8,246 5,498 2,749 41,232 Principal 2015 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 84,840 424,199 Interest 2015 13,744 10,995 8,246 5,498 2,749 41,232 Principal 2016 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 524,732 Interest 2016 17,001 13,601 10,201 6,801 3,400 51,004 Principal 2017 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 524,732 Interest 2017 17,001 13,601 10,201 6,801 3,400 51,004 Principal 2018 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 524,732 Interest 2018 17,001 13,601 10,201 6,801 3,400 51,004 Principal 2019 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 524,732 Interest 2019 17,001 13,601 10,201 6,801 3,400 51,004 Principal 2020 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 104,946 524,732 Interest 2020 17,001 13,601 10,201 6,801 3,400 51,004 Principal 2021 86,144 86,144 86,144 86,144 86,144 430,720 Interest 2021 13,955 11,164 8,373 5,582 2,791 41,866 Principal 2022 86,144 86,144 86,144 86,144 344,576 Interest 2022 13,955 11,164 8,373 5,582 39,075 Principal 2023 86,144 86,144 86,144 258,432 Interest 2023 13,955 11,164 8,373 33,493 Principal 2024 86,144 86,144 172,288 Interest 2024 13,955 11,164 25,120 Principal 2025 86,144 86,144 Interest 2025 13,955 13,955 Total Area Charges 155,609 327,679 494,830 579,237 660,896 605,891 557,939 511,507 533,568 554,977 575,735 553,887 532,648 512,018 491,997 472,586 8,121,004 Connection Fees Current Connection Fee $950.00 Total Connection Fees 180,453 204,573 204,573 114,323 114,323 114,323 141,417 141,417 141,417 141,417 141,417 116,081 116,081 116,081 116,081 116,081 2,220,055 Total Area and Connection $ 336,061 $ 532,252 $ 699,403 $ 693,560 $ 775,219 $ 720,214 $ 699,356 $ 652,924 $ 674,985 $ 696,394 $ 717,152 $ 669,968 $ 648,728 $ 628,098 $ 608,078 $ 588,666 $ 10,341,059 Page 9 D m3Q X W N City of Plymouth Projected Water Revenue with Proposed Rate Increases Interest on Area Assessments 3.24% Rate Increase V 3.80% Area Charges 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Area Charges Assessed (Per REU) $ 3,525 $ 3,659 3,798 $ 3,942 $ 4,092 $ 4,248 4,248 4,248 $ 4,248 4,248 $ 4,248 4,248 4,248 4,248 $ 4,248 4,248 Principal 2010 133,915 133,915 133,915 133,915 133,915 669,574 Interest 2010 21,694 17,355 13,017 8,678 4,339 65,083 Principal 2011 157,584 157,584 157,584 157,584 157,584 787,918 Interest 2011 25,529 20,423 15,317 10,211 5,106 76,586 Principal 2012 163,572 163,572 163,572 163,572 163,572 817,859 Interest 2012 26,499 21,199 15,899 10,599 5,300 79,496 Principal 2013 94,884 94,884 94,884 94,884 94,884 474,418 Interest 2013 15,371 12,297 9,223 6,148 3,074 46,113 Principal 2014 98,489 98,489 98,489 98,489 98,489 492,446 Interest 2014 15,955 12,764 9,573 6,382 3,191 47,866 Principal 2015 102,232 102,232 102,232 102,232 102,232 511,159 Interest 2015 16,562 13,249 9,937 6,625 3,312 49,685 Principal 2016 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 632,301 Interest 2016 20,487 16,389 12,292 8,195 4,097 61,460 Principal 2017 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 632,301 Interest 2017 20,487 16,389 12,292 8,195 4,097 61,460 Principal 2018 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 632,301 Interest 2018 20,487 16,389 12,292 8,195 4,097 61,460 Principal 2019 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 632,301 Interest 2019 20,487 16,389 12,292 8,195 4,097 61,460 Principal 2020 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 126,460 632,301 Interest 2020 20,487 16,389 12,292 8,195 4,097 61,460 Principal 2021 103,803 103,803 103,803 103,803 103,803 519,017 Interest 2021 16,816 13,453 10,090 6,726 3,363 50,448 Principal 2022 103,803 103,803 103,803 103,803 415,214 Interest 2022 16,816 13,453 10,090 6,726 47,085 Principal 2023 103,803 103,803 103,803 311,410 Interest 2023 16,816 13,453 10,090 40,359 Principal 2024 103,803 103,803 207,607 Interest 2024 16,816 13,453 30,269 Principal 2025 103,803 103,803 Interest 2025 16,816 16,816 Total Area Charges 155,609 334,382 515,008 610,519 707,145 671,014 640,394 604,794 639,085 668,747 693,761 667,433 641,840 616,981 592,856 569,465 9,329,034 Connection Fees Connection Fee per REU) $ 950 $ 986 $ 1,024 $ 1,062 $ 1,103 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 Total Connection Fees 194,699 229,111 237,817 137,951 143,193 148,635 183,861 183,861 183,861 183,861 183,861 150,920 150,920 150,920 150,920 150,920 2,765,309 Total Area and Connection $ 350,308 $ 563,493 $ 752,825 $ 748,470 $ 850,338 $ 819,649 $ 824,254 $ 788,655 $ 822,946 $ 852,608 $ 877,621 $ 818,353 $ 792,760 $ 767,901 $ 743,776 $ 720,385 $ 12,094,343 Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index Page 10 D 5, m3Q X n N City of Plymouth Projected Sewer Revenues at Current Rates Area Charees Interest on Area Assessments 3.24% Current Area Charge 950 Per acre 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Principal 2010 36,091 36,091 36,091 36,091 36,091 180,453 Interest 2010 5,847 4,677 3,508 2,339 1,169 17,540 Principal 2011 40,915 40,915 40,915 40,915 40,915 204,573 Interest 2011 6,628 5,303 3,977 2,651 1,326 19,884 Principal 2012 40,915 40,915 40,915 40,915 40,915 204,573 Interest 2012 6,628 5,303 3,977 2,651 1,326 19,884 Principal 2013 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 114,323 Interest 2013 3,704 2,963 2,222 1,482 741 11,112 Principal 2014 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 114,323 Interest 2014 3,704 2,963 2,222 1,482 741 11,112 Principal 2015 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 22,865 114,323 Interest 2015 3,704 2,963 2,222 1,482 741 11,112 Principal 2016 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 141,417 Interest 2016 4,582 3,666 2,749 1,833 916 13,746 Principal 2017 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 141,417 Interest 2017 4,582 3,666 2,749 1,833 916 13,746 Principal 2018 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 141,417 Interest 2018 4,582 3,666 2,749 1,833 916 13,746 Principal 2019 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 141,417 Interest 2019 4,582 3,666 2,749 1,833 916 13,746 Principal 2020 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 28,283 141,417 Interest 2020 4,582 3,666 2,749 1,833 916 13,746 Principal 2021 23,216 23,216 23,216 23,216 23,216 116,081 Interest 2021 3,761 3,009 2,257 1,504 752 11,283 Principal 2022 23,216 23,216 23,216 23,216 92,864 Interest 2022 3,761 3,009 2,257 1,504 10,531 Principal 2023 23,216 23,216 23,216 69,648 Interest 2023 3,761 3,009 2,257 9,026 Principal 2024 23,216 23,216 46,432 Interest 2024 3,761 3,009 6,770 Principal 2025 23,216 23,216 Interest 2025 3,761 3,761 Total Area Charges 41,937 88,311 133,358 156,106 178,114 163,290 150,367 137,853 143,798 149,568 155,163 149,275 143,551 137,991 132,595 127,364 2,188,639 Connection Fees Current Connection Fee $400.00 Total Connection Fees 75,980 86,136 86,136 48,136 48,136 48,136 59,544 59,544 59,544 59,544 59,544 48,876 48,876 48,876 48,876 48,876 934,760 Total Area and Connection $ 117,917 $ 174,447 $ 219,494 $ 204,242 $ 226,250 $ 211,426 $ 209,911 $ 197,397 $ 203,342 $ 209,112 $ 214,707 $ 198,151 $ 192,427 $ 186,867 $ 181,471 $ 176,240 $3,123,399 Page 11 City of Plymouth Projected Sewer Revenue with Proposed Rate Increases Interest on Area Assessments 3.24% Rate Increase W 3.80% Area Charges 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Area Charges Assessed (Per REU) $ 950 $ 986 1,024 $ 1,062 $ 1,103 $ 1,145 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 1,145 $ 1,145 $ 1,145 1,145 Principal 2010 36,091 36,091 36,091 36,091 36,091 180,453 Interest 2010 5,847 4,677 3,508 2,339 1,169 17,540 Principal 2011 42,469 42,469 42,469 42,469 42,469 212,347 Interest 2011 6,880 5,504 4,128 2,752 1,376 20,640 Principal 2012 44,083 44,083 44,083 44,083 44,083 220,416 Interest 2012 7,141 5,713 4,285 2,857 1,428 21,424 Principal 2013 25,571 25,571 25,571 25,571 25,571 127,857 Interest 2013 4,143 3,314 2,486 1,657 829 12,428 Principal 2014 26,543 26,543 26,543 26,543 26,543 132,716 Interest 2014 4,300 3,440 2,580 1,720 860 12,900 Principal 2015 27,552 27,552 27,552 27,552 27,552 137,759 Interest 2015 4,463 3,571 2,678 1,785 893 13,390 Principal 2016 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 170,407 Interest 2016 5,521 4,417 3,313 2,208 1,104 16,564 Principal 2017 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 170,407 Interest 2017 5,521 4,417 3,313 2,208 1,104 16,564 Principal 2018 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 170,407 Interest 2018 5,521 4,417 3,313 2,208 1,104 16,564 Principal 2019 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 170,407 Interest 2019 5,521 4,417 3,313 2,208 1,104 16,564 Principal 2020 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 34,081 170,407 Interest 2020 5,521 4,417 3,313 2,208 1,104 16,564 Principal 2021 27,975 27,975 27,975 27,975 27,975 139,877 Interest 2021 4,532 3,626 2,719 1,813 906 13,596 Principal 2022 27,975 27,975 27,975 27,975 111,902 Interest 2022 4,532 3,626 2,719 1,813 12,690 Principal 2023 27,975 27,975 27,975 83,926 Interest 2023 4,532 3,626 2,719 10,877 Principal 2024 27,975 27,975 55,951 Interest 2024 4,532 3,626 8,158 Principal 2025 27,975 27,975 Interest 2025 4,532 4,532 Total Area Charges 41,937 90,117 138,797 164,537 190,578 180,841 172,588 162,994 172,236 180,230 186,971 179,876 172,978 166,279 159,777 153,473 2,514,208 Connection Fees Connection Fee per REU) $ 400 $ 415 $ 431 $ 447 $ 464 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 $ 482 Total Connection Fees 75,980 89,409 92,807 53,835 55,880 58,004 71,750 71,750 71,750 71,750 71,750 58,896 58,896 58,896 58,896 58,896 1,079,145 Total Area and Connection $ 117,917 $ 179,526 $ 231,603 $ 218,372 $ 246,458 $ 238,844 $ 244,339 $ 234,745 $ 243,986 $ 251,980 $ 258,721 $ 238,771 $ 231,874 $ 225,174 $ 218,672 $ 212,368 $ 3,593,353 Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index n 2 Page 12 City of Plymouth Trunk Fund Expenditures Inflation factored in for project costs beyond the 2011-2015 CIP document. Inflation already a consideration when preparing the Capital Improvement Program. 70 Inflation 3.80% New Inflated New Dev Development Year 2010 Cost Cost At Const' x Cost Sewer Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2010 250,000 250,000 250,000 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2011 100,000 100,000 100,000 Abandon Conor Meadows lift station 100.00% 2011 200,000 200,000 200,000 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2012 100,000 100,000 100,000 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2013 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ferndale North lift station generator 100.00% 2013 80,000 80,000 80,000 Greentree West lift station generator 100.00% 2015 100,000 100,000 100,000 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2016 170,000 212,634 212,634 Waterfront lift station generator 100.00% 2017 80,000 103,866 103,866 Bass Lake Plaza lift station generator 100.00% 2019 80,000 111,909 111,909 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2020 170,000 246,844 246,844 Trunk sewer oversizing 100.00% 2025 400,000 699,875 699,875 Total 1,830,000 2,305,128 2,305,128 Water Water main - Vicksburg - CR47/Schm Lk 100.00% 2010 750,000 750,000 750,000 Well #16 - Zachary well field 100.00% 2010 400,000 400,000 400,000 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2010 220,000 220,000 220,000 Well #17 100.00% 2010 800,000 800,000 800,000 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2011 220,000 220,000 220,000 Water main - Cheshire/Fernbrook to CR47 100.00% 2011 370,000 370,000 370,000 Well #17 100.00% 2011 700,000 700,000 700,000 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2012 270,000 270,000 270,000 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2013 220,000 220,000 220,000 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2014 270,000 270,000 270,000 New WTP, wells #18 & 19 100.00% 2015 7,600,000 7,600,000 7,600,000 Fire protection upgrades 100.00% 2016 140,000 175,110 175,110 Fire protection upgrades 100.00% 2018 400,000 539,062 539,062 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2020 300,000 435,607 435,607 Fire protection upgrades 100.00% 2020 200,000 290,405 290,405 Fire protection upgrades 100.00% 2023 500,000 811,962 811,962 Trunk water main oversizing 100.00% 2025 650,000 1,137,296 1,137,296 Total 14,010,000 15,209,442 15, 209,442 Inflation factored in for project costs beyond the 2011-2015 CIP document. Inflation already a consideration when preparing the Capital Improvement Program. 70 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N0. 2014 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PERMITS AND UTILITY FEES THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: 1015.19 a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) 1) Section 1015 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Water and Sanitary Sewer Permit Fees. Water and sanitary sewer permit fees are as follows: Residential Water Connection or Disconnection Commercial Water Connection or Disconnection Residential Sewer Connection or Disconnection Commercial/Industrial Sewer Connection or Disconnection Alteration or Repair of any Private Underground Sewer or Water System Commercial/Industrial Plan Review Fee for Inspection of Private Underground Utility Installation (when submittal documents are required) Water turn -off -/turn -on Charge 1) Scheduled during regular business hours 2) Unscheduled during regular business hours 3) Outside regular business hours Curb box adjustment: Residential Commercial Industrial, Commercial, Public and Institutional Property Private Fire Hydrant Inspection Fee Reinspection Fee Violation of Water Sprinkling Ban City Sewer Connection Charge (REC) 40 plus cost of meter 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum plus cost of meter 40 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum 100 40 80 160 35 70 35 per year each 15 100 for each day of violation of Section 720.41 447 $464 per unit Page 14 m) City Water Connection Charge (REC) Q' $1,190 per unit n) City Water Area Charge $3,942 $4,092 per acre o) City Sewer Area Charge Q' $1,103 per acre Ord. 94-20, 11/07/94; Ord. 96-32, 12/18/96; Ord. 98-7, 3/18/98; Ord. 99-27, 11/02/99; Ord. 2005-35, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-27,1111312007; Ord. 2009-01, 12/13/2009; Ord. 2011-02,112512011; Ord. 2012- 03, 1/24/2012) Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 15 rp)City of Agenda 6.1 9PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 28, 2014 1. ACTION REQUESTED: To: Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by: Mike Goldstein, Police Chief Reviewed by: Dave Callister, City Manager Approve Utilization of the Houston -Galveston Area Item: Council (HGAC) Purchasing Consortium for Purchase of Police Department Equipment Adopt resolution approving utilization of the Houston -Galveston Area Council (HGAC) purchasing consortium for the purchase of Police Department equipment and apparatus. 2. BACKGROUND: Periodically, the City purchases capitol items such as vehicles through a predetermined and established joint and cooperative purchasing agreement(s). The City of Plymouth is empowered to make purchases under such cooperative purchasing arrangements and may purchase from these contract without otherwise rebidding or receiving quotations. Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota are two examples of joint and cooperative purchasing agreements. The Houston -Galveston Area Council (HGAC) is a unit of local government and a political subdivision of the State of Texas. The HGAC Buy Program is over 30 years old and specializes in capital intensive products and services and has pre -established and competitive purchasing contracts with manufactures and suppliers. Appropriate council approval will be sought if the HGAC is authorized for use. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: There are no annual membership dues or entry fees required to purchase through the HGAC program as such there is no budget impact. 4. ATTACHMENTS: HGAC Contract Resolution Page 1 ffGA,CB,u INTERLOCAL CONTRACT ILC THE SALARY PURCHAd,H6 SaiUT,®H FOR COOPERATIVE PURCHASING No.: Pennanent Number assigned by H-GAC THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT ("Contract"), made and entered into pursuant to the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code (the "Act"), by and between the Houston -Galveston Area Council, hereinafter referred to as "H -GAC," having its principal place of business at 3555 Timmons Lane, Suite 120, Houston, Texas 77027, and * a local government, a state agency, or a non-profit corporation created and operated to provide one or more governmental functions and services, hereinafter referred to as "End User," having its principal place of business at * WITNESSETH WHEREAS, H -GAC is a regional planning commission and political subdivision of the State of Texas operating under Chapter 391, Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, H -GAC is authorized to contract with eligible entities to perform governmental functions and services, including the purchase of goods and services; and WHEREAS, in reliance on such authority, H -GAC has instituted a cooperative purchasing program under which it contracts with eligible entities under the Act; and WHEREAS, End User has represented that it is an eligible entity under the Act, that its governing body has authorized this Contract on Date), and that it desires to contract with H -GAC on the terms set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE, H -GAC and the End User do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1: LEGAL AUTHORITY The End User represents and warrants to H -GAC that (1) it is eligible to contract with H -GAC under the Act because it is one of the following: a local government, as defined in the Act (a county, a municipality, a special district, or other political subdivision of the State of Texas or any other state), or a combination of two or more of those entities, a state agency (an agency of the State of Texas as defined in Section 771.002 of the Texas Government Code, or a similar agency of another state), or a non-profit corporation created and operated to provide one or more governmental functions and services, and (2) it possesses adequate legal authority to enter into this Contract. ARTICLE 2: APPLICABLE LAWS H -GAC and the End User agree to conduct all activities under this Contract in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, and ordinances and laws in effect or promulgated during the term of this Contract. ARTICLE 3: WHOLE AGREEMENT This Contract and any attachments, as provided herein, constitute the complete contract between the parties hereto, and supersede any and all oral and written agreements between the parties relating to matters herein. ARTICLE 4: PERFORMANCE PERIOD The period of this Contract shall be for the balance of the fiscal year of the End User, which began * and ends * . This Contract shall thereafter automatically be renewed annually for each succeeding fiscal year, provided that such renewal shall not have the effect of extending the period in which the End User may make any payment due an H - GAC contractor beyond the fiscal year in which such obligation was incurred under this Contract. ARTICLE 5: SCOPE OF SERVICES The End User appoints H -GAC its true and lawful purchasing agent for the purchase of certain products and services through the IFI - GAC Cooperative Purchasing Program. End User will access the Program through HGACBuy.eom and by submission of any duly executed purchase order, in the form prescribed by H -GAC to a contractor having a valid contract with H -GAC. All purchases hereunder shall be in accordance with specifications and contract terms and pricing established by H -GAC. Ownership (title) to products purchased through H -GAC shall transfer directly from the contractor to the End User. over) Page 2 ARTICLE 6: PAYMENTS H -GAC will confirm each order and issue notice to contractor to proceed. Upon delivery of goods or services purchased, and presentation of a properly documented invoice, the End User shall promptly, and in any case within thirty (30) days, pay H-GAC's contractor the full amount of the 'invoice. All payments for goods or services will be made from current revenues available to the paying party. In no event shall H -GAC have any financial liability to the End User for any goods or services End User procures from an H - GAC contractor. ARTICLE 7: CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS This Contract may be amended only by a written amendment executed by both parties, except that any alternations, additions, or deletions to the terms of this Contract which are required by changes in Federal and State law or regulations are automatically incorporated into this Contract without written amendment hereto and shall become effective on the date designated by such law or regulation. H -GAC reserves the right to make changes in the scope of products and services offered through the H -GAC Cooperative Purchasing Program to be performed hereunder. ARTICLE 8: TERMINATION PROCEDURES H -GAC or the End User may cancel this Contract at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice by certified mail to the other party to this Contract. The obligations of the End User; including its obligation to pay H-GAC's contractor for all costs incurred under this Contract prior to such notice shall survive such cancellation, as well as any other obligation incurred under this Contract, until performed or discharged by the End User. ARTICLE 9: SEVERABILITY All parties agree that should any provision of this Contract be determined to be invalid or unenforceable, such determination shall not affect any other term of this Contract, which shall continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE 10: FORCE MAJEURE To the extent that either party to this Contract shall be wholly or partially prevented from the performance within the term specified of any obligation or duty placed on such party by reason of or through strikes, stoppage of labor, riot, fire, flood, acts of war, insurrection, accident, order of any court, act of God, or specific cause reasonably beyond the party's control and not attributable to its neglect or nonfeasance, in such event, the time for the performance of such obligation or duty shall be suspended until such disability to perform is removed; provided, however, force majeure shall not excuse an obligation solely to pay funds. Determination of force majeure shall rest solely with H -GAC. ARTICLE 11: VENUE Disputes between procuring party and Vendor are to be resolved in accord with the law and venue rules of the State of purchase. THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED IN TWO ORIGINALS BY THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: Name of End User (local government, agency, or non profit corporation) Mailing Address City State ZIP Code Signature of chief elected or appointed official Typed Name & Title of Signatory Date Houston -Galveston Area Council 3555 Tia pons Lane, Suite 120, Houston, TX 77027 By: Attest: Date: Denotes requiredfields Executive Director Manager rev. 6/2010 Page 3 Request for Information To expedite service, please complete the following blanks relevant to your agency's administrative/elective personnel and return the completed form to H -GAC Cooperative Purchasin Program P.O. Sox 22777 Houston TIS 77227-2777. Name of End User Agency: County Name: Municipality / County /District / etc) Mailing Address: Street Address/P. O. Box) (City) (State) (ZIP Code) Main Telephone Number: (_) - FAX Number: ( Physical Address: Street Address, if different from mailing address) (City) (State) (ZIP Code) Web Site Address: Authorized Official: Mailing Address: City) Official Contact: Mailing Address: City) City manager /Executive Director / etc) Street Address/P. O. Box) State) Purchasing Agent/Auditor etc.) Street Address/P.O. Box) State) ZIP Code) ZIP Code) Official Contact: Public Works Director/Police Chief etc.) Mailing Address: Street Address/P.O. Box) City) (State) (ZIP Code) Official Contact: EMS Director/Fire Chief etc) Mailing Address: Street Address/P. O. Box) City) (State) (ZIP Code) Title: Ph No.: ( Fx No.. () E -Mail Address: Title: Ph No.: Fx No.. ) Email Address: Title: Ph No.: () Fx No.. ( Email Address: Title: Ph No.: Fx No.. () Email Address: Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE USE OF THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL (HGAC) PURCHASING CONSORTIUM FOR THE PURCHASE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS WHEREAS, The City of Plymouth is empowered to make purchases under cooperative purchasing arrangements and may purchase from these contracts without otherwise rebidding or receiving quotations; and WHEREAS, The HGAC has pre -established and competitive purchasing contracts with manufactures and suppliers; and WHEREAS, The use of cooperative purchasing consortiums provides an economical advantage for the purchase of police equipment and apparatus. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that it should and hereby does authorize the Mayor and City Manager to approve for staff to consider and if appropriate utilize the Houston -Galveston Area Council (HGAC) purchasing consortium for the purchase of police department equipment and apparatus. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 5 rp) City of Agenda 6.20PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Mike Goldstein, Police Chief January 28, 2014 Reviewed by: Dave Callister, City Manager Approve Purchase of Armored Vehicle with the City of Maple Item: Grove through the Houston -Galveston Area Purchasing Consortium 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving purchase of Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle with the City of Maple Grove through the Houston -Galveston Area Purchasing Consortium. 2. BACKGROUND: On April 30, 2013, staff conducted a presentation to the City Council regarding the police department's desire to procure an armored vehicle for use in critical incidents necessitating ballistic protection. As such, over the course of several years, the police department researched the available armored vehicle options and learned of the Oshkosk TPV, which due to its size and functionality, offers a significant advantage over the other manufacturers' products. The associated functions were highlighted in a report to the Council and were explained at the study session and subsequent budget work sessions Due to the ongoing collaboration with the city of Maple Grove Police Department (MGPD), staff invited their organization to consider making a cooperative purchase between the two jurisdictions. After each city completed its due diligence including all approved budgeting considerations, an agreement was reached for a joint purchase. The Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle is listed as part of the approved Houston -Galveston Area Purchasing Consortium; therefore, the purchase will be made through this service. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The initial cost for the Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle was $270,000. The sum was to be split 50150 with the city of Maple Grove. In accordance, the City Council approved $90,000 in the 2014 budget for this cooperative purchase with an additional $50,000 approve to be spent out of the police department's Resource Planning Fund (DEA Fund). Page 1 However, the cost of the vehicle has been lowered to $175,000 by the manufacturer due to the fact that this model is being discontinued. The vehicle being purchased is a demonstration model with low miles and in excellent condition with a full and guaranteed warranty. The total cost, which includes some after market alterations will be $180,000 and will be split 50150 between the two cities. As such, $45,000 of the 2014 budgeted funds along with $45,000 from the Resource Planning Fund will be spent to cover the City's portion of the purchase. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Armored Vehicle Staff Report from April 30, 2013 Manufacture's Specifications from the Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle Resolution Page 2 MEMO PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447-1482 DATE: April 17, 2013 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager THROUGH: Mike Goldstein, Police Chief FROM: Chris Kuklok, Sergeant and SWAT Team Leader SUBJECT: Armored Police Vehicle Proposal For the past several years the tactical teams for both Plymouth and Maple Grove Police Departments have conducted mutual aid assists for each other during, police tactical emergencies. These events include conducting arrests of barricaded/armed subjects, responding to and containing suicidal/armed subjects, as well as serving high-risk search warrants for weapons and narcotics in support of our respective drug task forces. Generally, our teams are activated when a situation has deteriorated to the point where the risk to the general public and the officers is great. The internal and external expectations for the police department are to provide a proactive and timely response to critical events whether it be a natural disaster, active shooter, hostage situation or other tactical emergency where lives are in peril and seconds count. An appropriate police response to these events should include an armored vehicle that can accomplish many different tasks in an emergency. That said, an equipment deficiency that our two police departments have identified is the lack of a practical, effective armored vehicle from which our officers can safely deploy. Such a vehicle would allow personnel to safely, properly and quickly contain a volatile situation to secure our citizens' and officers' safety alike. Positioning officers quickly in close proximity to a dangerous and unstable situation is paramount in gathering needed intelligence, to evacuate affected citizens and to carry out myriad tactical maneuvers. The use of an armored vehicle to facilitate such activities allows officers to dramatically reduce the risk to those impacted by the event and to those who are called to resolve it. A typical armored vehicle has inherent navigational challenges due to their general size and weight. Through significant research, personnel have discovered an armored vehicle: the Tactical Protector Vehicle (TPV) made by the Oshkosh Defense Corporation that overcomes Page 3 several typical hindrances (off -pavement maneuvering and tight turning radiuses) that our department has experienced by using other available regional armored vehicles. Through a collaborative effort both Plymouth and Maple Grove would equally share the associated vehicle costs much like the arrangement we have established with the new firearms range. With proper maintenance, the vehicle's expected life is 30 years; as such we will add the TPV to the replacement schedule. While this asset would be available to police personnel in both cities on a 24/7 basis, it would also be a regional tool for mutual aid assistance. No other agency in the metropolitan area has an armored vehicle like the TPV. Oshkosh Defense has two options regarding potential financing for the TPV armored vehicle. The vehicle can be purchased outright or there is a five or seven year lease option. The total purchase cost is $27,000, which would be equally divided between the two cities. The lease to own options (including interest) would cost each city $29,468.77 per year under the five year plan, or $21,721.61 per year for the seven year option after Nvhich the armored vehicle would be owned by the two cities. Attached you will find a background report, photographs, pricing information and other supporting documentation. Page 4 PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447-1482 DATE: March 29, 2013 TO: Captain Craig Lindman FROM: Sergeant Chris Kuklok SUBJECT: Collaboration Proposal with Maple Grove PD to Obtain an Armored Vehicle As you know, Plymouth PD SWAT along with our sister team Maple Grove PD ERU, have attempted to advance and improve our responses to tactical emergencies in our respective cities for about two decades. Through progress in training and equipment procurement we have been fairly successful in this endeavor. Since joining the team 15 years ago, I have seen first-hand how important exceptional training and first-rate equipment are in the middle of a tactical police emergency. This includes planned, high-risk search warrants our teams are asked to serve, as well as barricaded subjects/suspects we are tasked to resolve. Looking over the past 15 years at the operations our teams have collectively conducted, we continue to evolve and develop as tactical teams, yet there has been a noticeable gap in our teams' safe response to such operations. Our teams' ability to quickly, decisively, and effectively get in and contain the situation has been our "Achilles Heel" if you will. Gaining control of the exterior of any structure help confines a suspect's movements, helps stabilize the surrounding buildings for safe evacuation, and dissuades a suspect from breaking the inner perimeter, thus entering the public domain. Obviously, the sooner we gain control, the safer it is for all involved. Part of gaining that control involves getting in close, particularly if our intent is to be a blocking vehicle so the situation does not go mobile. Obtaining a visual of what is going on inside a structure by looking thru windows and/or doors offers the team and the Command Post valuable intelligence to make proper and safer tactical decisions as the situation evolves. Currently, our stand-off distances (inner perimeter) and approach avenues are directly related to how much available natural or manmade cover there is in relation to the structure in question. Having no control over this leaves us at a distinct disadvantage. This can be safely and easily accomplished with an armored vehicle. In the past we have used Maple Grove PD's "Peace Keeper" for such missions. Without getting into particulars, that vehicle is 30 years old and does not offer acceptable ballistic protection and is not mechanically reliable. I believe you have seen and experienced this first-hand. This has led us to call upon another agency (Edina PD) for an "updated" armored vehicle that is Page 5 specifically configured for the SWAT work operations we conduct. On most occasions it has proved very useful in minimizing risk to tactical personnel on the scene. On other occasions (03- 30-07), it proved untrustworthy in its off-road (a wet/soft front yard) capabilities, becoming a huge distraction and nullifying its important mission it was called upon to complete. This leads to the question of Plymouth & Maple Grove PD's response choices in such incidents where an annored vehicle is absolutely necessary to minimize risk to those involved. The first and perhaps most important issue is the response time it takes an armored vehicle to get onscene and in place to make a difference. We all know the tempo of the suspect's behavior will force the police to react. According to research, in the early stages of a tactical event, getting an annored vehicle on the scene effectively starts to "box" the armed suspect in, forcing him/them to re -think their situation. It might even be a command presence "force multiplier" to get a barricaded violent felon to submit to arrest peacefully, which our most desired outcome. Using the vehicle to safely approach a structure to deploy a team or shore up perimeter positions through an open area are not the only valuable uses. Having an armored vehicle on -scene (most likely in the driveway) during the initial stage of high risk operation helps w/announcements (via loudspeaker) and strategic lighting (spotlights) if needed, both of which now would have to be in a marked/unarmored squad car putting the officer at risk. The armored vehicle also allows for safer alternatives for specific tactical deployments of chemical munitions, less lethal projectiles, barricade breaching, and even deployment of our team's robot via ports strategically placed throughout the vehicle. As part of regional emergency planning & preparation there are other events that an armored vehicle may be considered necessary, not just by us, but perhaps by other agencies in a collaborative, mutual -aid effort. Natural disaster response, terrorist/WMD-related events, active shooter(s), and citizen/officer rescues are potential deployment opportunities. There are approximately seven "updated" armored vehicles in the metro area: East Metro SWAT BearCat), St. Paul PD (BearCat), Washington County SO (BearCat), Rosemount PD (BearCat), Anoka County SO (BearCat), Edina PD (BearCat), and Hennepin County SO (Bear). With response time being an issue, I would submit that Plymouth/Maple Grove and the western suburbs are under -represented in this category; the problem becomes even more obvious as you travel west from the metro (Wright County to St. Cloud). Once the determination has been made an armored vehicle is required, it is needed now. We should not operate under the assumption only one armored vehicle is necessary at a scene. If feasible, tandem use of two such vehicles would allow officers to safely accomplish multiple missions and further gives us tactical options. Example: one vehicle blocks the suspect vehicle while another is used for perimeter operations personnel tasks. With proper training of patrol personnel our respective departments' patrol response to a quickly evolving, dangerous tactical situation can be more rapid. Our respective team leaders from SWAT/ERU would be responsible for training all sworn personnel regarding the armored vehicle's use (particularly a downed citizen/officer rescue situation) and deployment procedures if no SWAT/ERU members are available to do so. We would also push out the training to other local metro area tactical teams if they displayed an interest. Page 6 Minor logistical items such as storage and vehicle maintenance, graphics, etc. would also be worked out between the two cities. At this point I would advise that the vehicle would be stored and maintained in Plymouth PD's garage, being inspected monthly. This is obviously open for further discussion. While the total cost of $275,000 as researched w/options cannot be minimized, the dividends are significant during these "high risk, low frequency" events. Outside of an outright purchase, there are two leasing options — a five year and a seven year plan. The lease to own option would cost each city $29,468.77 per year under the five year plan, or $21,721.61 per year for the seven year option after which the armored vehicle would be owned by the two cities. In conclusion, the benefits of such a vehicle provide time for tactical teams (and incident commanders) to properly evaluate, react, or modify (if needed) our response to fluid situations. To do this we need to get into close proximity to the threat. In addition we have to be assured our inner perimeter cannot be breached under any circumstances. Currently we find ourselves positioning our inner perimeter positions based on what is there (available and proper cover) when the situation begins. In some circumstances we have to rely on our tactical officers to be fleet of foot" (wearing full tactical gear) when maneuvering from one piece of cover to the next through open areas in order to fill any gaps that we have in an inner perimeter. Having an armored vehicle that can maneuver safely within the inner perimeter to strategically drop off officers where needed helps us contain the situation we otherwise wouldn't be able to do. With that being said there is also the real possibility of an elevated command presence that could very well end a typical barricaded subject scenario without injury. An armored vehicle gives us a solid tactical posture that bodes well towards a safe resolution to the incident. Lastly, I will briefly explain some of the research I have completed thus far on annored vehicles. As mentioned above, there are departments that have recently (w/in last 10 years) purchased such vehicles like BearCats through Lenco, which is a company based out on the East Coast that do have limitations: off -pavement and with size (being too large/heavy). I have developed a preliminary working relationship with Oshkosh Defense (based out of Oshkosh, WI) in regards to their armored vehicle the TPV (Tactical Protector Vehicle). The TPV appears to fit Plymouth Maple Grove PD's typical mission profiles. Furthermore, its off -pavement capabilities and relative compactness (can still comfortably hold nine fully geared -up operators & their equipment inside) compared to that of a Bearcat and offer more tactical options on a scene. The TPV also is more attractive in regards to price as well. I hope the above information is helpful in spelling out a clear indication of the advantages such a vehicle would give our cities. Please advise if there is any thing at this point I can do to further the potential process. Thank you for taking the time to consider this proposal. Supplemental Detailed Background Information: Below are some recent and past tactical emergencies/incidents where vehicle armor was not available, not called for, was delayed, or could have been supplemented. Elevated armor Page 7 onscene would have been used for increased officer and citizen safety (evacuations) and/or enhanced suspect/situation containinent: 06-6480 assist NVdDTF w/high risk search warrant on 4980 Garland Court #H 06-19707 high risk search warrant in Maple Grove 10878 Zopki Way 05-15-06 assisted 6500 w/a VIP detail (Vice Presidential visit) 12-13-06 possible hostage/barricade situation 1805 Co. Rd. 101 03-12-07 1749 Magnolia Lane barricaded subject 03-30-07 4260 Quaker Lane suicidal bank robber/home invasion (BearCat stuck) 04-I2-07 assist VOTF w/high risk search warrant 04-21-07 16444 72"d Place barricaded subject (subject escaped inner perimeter via garage) 07-104396 assisted 8100 w/banicaded subject 01-17-08 assisted 6400 w/barricaded subject 01-31-08 assisted Richfield SIU w/high risk search warrant 3255 Minnesota Lane 05-28-09 13805 53`d Ave assist NWDTF w/high risk search warrant 10-21-10 assist ICE agents w/high risk search warrant 3660 Lancaster Lane #21 11-21-10 assist 7200 w/search warrant i 10 Glenhaven (BearCat borrowed -took out fence) 12-19-10 assist 6200 w/barricade (BearCat onscene) 02-16-11 barricaded subject 2721 Upland Ct. (BearCat borrowed) 10-06-11 1945 Lanewood Lane possible suicidal/barricaded male 10-17-11 assisted 3200 w/home invasion/barricaded subjects 7006 Halifax In addition, there are three incidents in the past 7 maths (Sept. 2012 -March 2013) in Maple Grove/Plymouth where armored vehicles were used (or borrowed) to help resolve the incident: 09-04-12 Plymouth PD SWAT assisted Maple Grove PD ERU w/a barricaded gunman 15030 76`!' Pl. This steiruned from a domestic violence w/shots fired situation, PPD case# 12039682. Maple Grove PD formulated an entry plan, PPD SWAT maintained perimeter positions. Eventually Edina PD's BearCat arrived onscene and was staged in the front yard of the residence. Within minittes of arrival, and from that elevated (safe) vantage point (not able to be safely accomplished by tactical officers on foot); officers inside the armored vehicle were able to visually see through a front picture window. Inside they saw a male who appeared to be down on the kitchen floor, not moving. They continued to maintain a visual on him as an entry plan was developed based on this information. This valuable intel allowed the teams to make a safer and quicker) entry, as well as facilitate the deployment of a robot to find/confirm the male DOA from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. Had an armored vehicle not been an option -both teams would most likely spent many more hours (risk) onscene and perhaps would have had to consider more drastic tactics that involve property damage (potentially introducing chemical munitions, etc.) simply because we did not have the crucial intel regarding the suspect's location and condition inside the residence. O1-18-13 PPD (case#13003527) assisted 5800 ERU w/a barricaded suicidal subject. Plymouth PD, along w/Minneapolis PD Bomb Squad, supported Maple Grove PD w/perimeter and eventual entry. The despondent male (armed w/a 12 gauge shotgun) was eventually found & successfully negotiated to surrender inside his bedroom. Maple Grove PD's "PeaceKeeper" was used to block the closed garage to deter a vehicle exit/pursuit. Hennepin County's Page 8 PeaceKeeper" was also used to attempt PA negotiations from the driveway. The County's PeaceKeeper" severely overheated immediately onscene in the driveway, basically becoming ineffective. The lack of spotlights on either of the armored vehicles was a further frustration since neither could be strategically positioned to properly light up darkened windows of the residence. In low light deployments it is crucial for exterior windows to be properly lit up. This increases perimeter officer safety and allows our marksmen a clear picture. Cold weather also started to become a factor for perimeter teams during this event. PFD case# 1300477, 418 Zachary Lane. Maple Grove ERU assisted Plymouth PD SWAT w/a barricaded suicidal juvenile w/access to guns. Maple Grove assisted w/perimeter supplement/replacement as well as outbuilding clearing on the property. Eventual house entry was made w/K9 & robot. Male was found deceased in main level bathroom. Having an armored vehicle onscene (Edina's BearCat) proved valuable/necessary yet again as it was used to: block the vehicles that were parked in the driveway, light up the exterior of the residence doors/windows) on two sides, establish PA announcements/hailing, provide better cover for perimeter officers (and neighbors) since it cut down potential firing angles, and last but not least- wann up the cold perimeter officers since cold weather was a factor again. In addition to the above/recent tactical activity our cities have seen there are other applications that it could be used that were not discussed previously. Many departments have successfully used them when they have a barricaded suspect/subject in a vehicle that is stationary. Instead of having a significant stand-off distance between the subject and officers, the armored vehicle can be used to get up close for better Intel, if a second armored vehicle is onscene/available, they can be used to "box in" the vehicle to further prevent it from leaving and effectively cut off any potential firing angles outside the vehicle the suspect may have. If you do not have (elevated) vehicle armor onscene (or they show up late), there is potential of risk of that issue being assessed and questioned after the event if things go wrong. Since the initial date of this proposal (07-19-12) there have been several high profile mass shootings in the United States: the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Sikh Temple Shooting in Oak Creek, WI, the Sandyhook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, CT, and the Accent Signage shooting in Minneapolis to name a few. The frequency of these events is not fading. Their occurrences know no geographic boundaries related to urban, suburban or rural jurisdictions. Our collective law enforcement/first responder response to such events is being tested. While the mere possession of an armored vehicle in any agency will most likely not prevent the first few rounds being fired by the "typical" active shooter suspect, it will absolutely help our departments' reaction to such an incident if (for whatever reason) the initial officers do not locate/neutralize the threat. We cannot assume there will always be just one shooter/suspect. There are also possibilities of suspects barricading themselves somewhere within the building; escaping to a nearby building if forced to do so by responding officers, fleeing the building to escape somewhere else; or otherwise attacking/ambushing first responders and citizens alike later in the event, such as when we are conducting triage/evacuation procedures (so called secondary attacks"). There are several other recent national incidents that deserve our attention. On O 1-01-12 a United States Park Ranger died while waiting for 90+ minutes to be rescued after being shot. Page 9 The area she was in was considered the "kill zone" where the suspect was able to keep other responding officers at bay due to his firing angles w/a rifle. In December 2012, first responders were ambushed in Webster, NY where a suspect opened fire on responding firefighters who thought they were going to a "typical" house fire call. The suspect ended up killing two firefighters and injuring others. There is dramatic radio audio of firefighters who are shot, pleading with their dispatchers for evacuation/medical assistance that law enforcernent/medical personnel could not provide until an armored vehicle showed up or other officers could eventually flank/engage the suspect. In that case an armored vehicle was also used to srrfelk, evacuate around 30 citizens from the affected area. Evacuation of affected residents during a tactical emergency cannot be underestimated. Sheltering in place may not be the safest option for residents or by their own accord they may want to get out of the area but cannot safely do so due to potential angles of fire from the subject residence/location. This will allow us (and them) the option to safely get out of the area without having to use teams of operators (sometime repeatedly) trying to shield them on foot, this process can be tricky and very slow depending on the number of people and how large the (open) area of danger is to move them through is. Open areas/ground are consistently our areas of concern during these types of events. Another recent example of the use of an armored vehicle was when officers in Tyler, TX responded to arrest a wanted felon. In that scenario the suspect opened fire on tactical officers who were inside the armored vehicle, it sustained 35 rounds from an AK -47 with none of the rounds penetrating. The suspect was eventually shot by a sniper which ended the ordeal. This particular situation was a house set back on a long driveway. Officers needed a way to approach to try to safely hail him on a PA to negotiate, as well as safely deploy officers within range of dealing with the suspect in the residence. We have a number of houses in both cities, of which this could apply. Just simply having a method of getting close enough to the suspect to even begin a resolution process bodes well for a peaceful conclusion. Both cities also have a variety of large businesses with equally large warehouse areas in which workplace violence could erupt. Having an armored truck could be essential in even getting inside the building. In a large warehouse -type building it could potentially drive around inside with a team in it trying to locate and engage the suspect either over PA or physically. It could drive to downed/pinned citizens or officers and evacuate them without forcing teams to run back and forth constantly in which exhaustion would quickly set in, not to mention the inherent dangerousness of it considering all the places a suspect could hide from floor level to high up. As mentioned earlier, an armored vehicle also allows your teams to come up with better/safer deployment options for specialized equipment to include: throw phones, chemical munitions, robotics, and even get your negotiators in closer for PA "negotiations" if we find ourselves in a situation where the subject has no phone available. If need be they can also give you superior options if the situation necessitates breaching of doors or windows since a typical breaching team can use it as (moving) cover. It also stands taller and would be a potential platform for a second story entry as opposed to sending officers up a ladder, if the situation required it. Page 10 In order to maximize the tactical use of such a vehicle we would need to consider the deployment limitations/capabilities of it being successfully maneuvered off-road/off-curb on rough terrain. This vehicle's operation will not be hindered by inclement weather or poor road conditions (ice/snow/mud), including natural disasters, where your typical police vehicle will be negated. if we had injured people that could not be accessed by ambulance or other emergency vehicles due to streets being blocked by debris, this vehicle can help mitigate that problem. In addition, the number of doors (two versus four) allows better ingress/egress from the vehicle. This allows teams to address threats from multiple angles during a downed officer/citizen operation if required. As expected, a vehicle of this nature will require specialized training for each sworn officer from each department in order for us to maximize its capabilities and cut down response times. This would include a full vehicle and options orientation as well as driving it through a designated driving evolution to include a mock officer/citizen rescue and evacuation. For more specialized SWAT training we would host and bring in vehicle -specific tactical training offered by the NTOA, Security Solutions International, or FTF Tactics. This could include inviting other departments that have armored vehicles for collaborative and tandem use on a tactical emergency. Other subject matter areas that would be covered: proper/safe mounting/dismounting of officers and injured people (using litters), inner perimeter operations, blocking vehicle operations, vehicle assaults, less lethal deployment, robot deployment, winch operations, off-road considerations/limitations, and perhaps VIP details, to name just a few. Myself and Sergeants Reed, Wills and Keller would be responsible for coming up w/a lesson plan as well as a timeline to push the training to our sworn personnel within 1 year of receiving the vehicle. I envision this to be a 2-4 hour training block for starters. The addition of a specialized vehicle to a fleet also requires a discussion about parts and ongoing maintenance. The Oshkosh Defense TPV's chassis is based on a Ford F-550 Super Duty commercial chassis, which city mechanics are most likely to have experience and familiarity with. In addition, the chassis warranty (36 months/36,000 miles), the power train warranty (60 months/60,000 miles), as well as a bumper to bumper warranty (12 months) would be delivered through Clary's Safety Fquipment located in Rochester, MN. A trip to the manufacturer in Oshkosh, WI would also be needed to test drive their vehicle (they have a track/"proving ground" for that purpose), and further in-person inspection of their product & its available options. In regards to options: I had an opportunity to speak w/the Special Operations Lieutenant with the Fond du Loc County WI Sheriff's department on 03-21-13. Their department took possession of an Oshkosh Defense annored vehicle after the death of a Fond du Loc Police Officer and critical shooting of another during a man with a gun call. We discussed at length the vehicle's advantages over a typical Lenco BearCat. With his familiarity of both (neighboring Winnebago County WI has a BearCat) he was able to share his opinion that the Oshkosh vehicle is superior in a sense that it allows you better options based on it's compact size (including shorter length/width/height), lower gross vehicle weight, superior off-road capabilities, and well engineered options. I could provide and list a more detailed synopsis of exactly what options we should strongly consider when asked to do so. Again, this would require myself and Sergeants Reed, Wills, and Keller to discuss and finalize. Page 11 I am also currently working on getting a "demo" version of the vehicle to be brought here for a few days. The purpose being that we could all get a chance to see the vehicle up close. Depending on their demo versions availability, this may or may not happen. Regardless, an in depth trip out to Oshkosh Defense for a tour and demo for myself and others would be required if approved. Our response and emphasis to this challenge has to be focused on getting the appropriate reliable equipment onseene quickly to gain control of a venue and/or limit suspect access to escape into the general public early on in the event. As mentioned earlier, law enforcement can learn a lot from our fellow first responders in the Fire Department regarding what specialized vehicles that make a difference when they are brought to bear during an unpredictable emergency/tactical event we are expected to contain and/or resolve. We do not have to go about this alone. There are others in the region that we can collaborate with and help. Whether it be an assist to Minneapolis PD or western Hennepin County law enforcement agencies, Maple Grove & Plymouth are centrally located in the County to help respond within minutes as opposed to hours, particularly when time is of the essence. The bottom line is that we would have officers properly trained and capable of getting this piece of equipment to the crisis site early. Furthermore, having a shared vehicle will help to integrate our two teams and departments to a level of proficiency that most part time suburban teams and agencies do not get to a chance to obtain. Page 12 Page 13 PRICING INFORMATION: Total vehicle cost is $275,000 equipped with the below listed researched and chosen options: Seating for 9 tactical officers (driver, co-driver in the front, 7 officers seated in the rear -3 on rear facing bucket seats, 4 on fold up bench seats that are on each side) Rear controlled HVAC Heated windshield Power inverter Rear storage area/locker Custom center console for a squad radio to be mounted Back-up camera system w/monitor Run flat tires Deployable skip round shields Heated exterior side mirrors Intervox two-way communication system Front mounted winch Rear step Whelan LINZ6 LED side flashers (red/blue) Whelan 180 siren/PA speaker w/mic and controller Code 3 RX 2700 CC LED front Iight bars w/side alley lights. Located in the two front roof corners (pair) (red) Code 3 RX 2700 CC LED front light bars w/side alley lights. Located in the two rear roof corners (pair) (red) Spot light (go -light), roof mounted, remote control, right front Spot light (go light), roof mounted, remote control, left rear Standard ram assembly (stored and secured by sections on vehicle exterior) Window rock guards (removable for cleaning) Rhino lining (to protect paint finish on doors) Rear mounted ladder Non-slip roof coating Standard brush guard Flat black exterior paint, flat gray interior paint Standard engine component & fuel tank armor Standard exterior grab handles on side and rear See attached Appendix for further Pricing/payment information break down based on $275,000: 5 year lease =$58,937.53 each year ($29,468.77 each department, each year), total interest 19,687.65 275,000+19,687.65=$294,687.65 (Interest rate of 2.76%) 7 year lease=$43,443.22 each year ($21,721.61 each department, each year), total interest 29,102.54 $275,000+29,102.54=$304,102.54 (Interest rate of 2.88%) Page 14 SALES ORGANIZATION: LESSEE: TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: EQUIPMENT COST: CUSTOMER DOWNPAYMENT: TRADE-IN: DELIVERY TIME: PAYMENT MODE: FIRST PAYMENT DUE DATE: LEASE COMMENCEMENT DATE: Oshkosh Plymouth, MN 1) Oshkosh TPV 275,000.00 0.00 0.00 Standard Annual In Arrears 1 Year After Lease Commencement Upon contract signing with Oshkosh March 21, 2013 Term Number of Payments Payment Amount 5 Years 5 Annual 58,937.53 7 Years 7 Annual 43,443.22 There are no documentation or closing costs associated with the completion of this financing. NOTE: All lease documents must be fully executed within 14 days of the date of this proposal. Failure to receive completed documents may after the final payment schedule due to changes in rates and/or discounts. PERFORMANCE BOND: To utilize the prepay program, a performance bond is required. The cost for this performance bond shall be the responsibility of Lessee with payments made directly to Pierce Manufacturing or financed by Oshkosh Capital as part of the transaction. TYPE OF FINANCING: Tax-exempt Lease Purchase Agreement with a $1.00 buy out option at end of lease term. Said agreement shall be a net lease arrangement whereby lessee is responsible for all costs of operation, maintenance, insurance, and taxes. BANK QUALIFICATION: This proposal assumes that the lessee will not be issuing more than $10 million in tax-exempt debt this calendar year. Furthermore, it is assumed that the lessee will designate this Issue as a qualified tax-exempt obligation per the tax act of 1986. LEGAL TITLE: Legal title to the equipment during the lease term shall vest in the lessee, with Oshkosh Capital perfecting a first security interest AUTHORIZED SIGNORS: The lessee's governing board shall provide Oshkosh Capital with its resolution or ordinance authorizing this agreement and shall designate the individual(s) to execute all necessary documents used therein. LEGAL OPINION: The lessee's counsel shall fumish Oshkosh Capital with an opinion covering this transaction and the documents used herein. This opinion shall be in a form and substance satisfactory to Oshkosh Capital. This proposal will be valid for fourteen (14) days from the above date and is subject to final credit approval by Oshkosh Capital and approval of the lease documents in Oshkosh Capital's sole discretion. To render a credit decision, lessee shall provide Oshkosh Capital with their most recent two years' audited financial statements, copy of their most recent interim financial statement, and current budget. Accepted by: Proposal submitted by: AI:rt Lessee Date Oshkosh Capital OSHKOSH ` CARITAL' h Oshkosh Capital, 155 E. Broad St., Locator 1134-113230-05-7, Columbus, Ohl 43215 Phone: (800)820-9041, ext. 21 Fax: (800)678-0602 Page 15 Comparing Key Attributes: Oshkosh Defense Tactical Protector Vehicle Us. Lenco BearCat Attribute TPV BearCat Summary Oshkosh Defense Lightweight composite armor system for e Lenco offers a Kevlar blanket for skip The TPV from Oshkosh Defense benefits from a long Engineering NIJ IV protection and light weight. (See rounds, requiring an officer to exit the history of engineering and building extreme duty Ballistic Protection below) safety of the vehicle to manually protected trucks for military organizations around the Expertise based on Electrically deployed skip plates. No install the blanket world. Oshkosh Corporation is a $66 organization with a Long History of equal in the industry. Provides NIJ IV Lenco utilizes an unmodified Ford a very large and competent engineering capability. Armored Military skip protection deployed from inside the F550 chassis for the BearCat Vehicles Designed vehicle by the driver or co -drive from the and Built safety of the vehicle Oshkosh -engineered high compliance trailing arm rear suspension with tuned spring/shock/sway bar system for unmatched performance on broken roads, off road, and in high speed maneuvers. (See Mobility and Maneuverability below) Ability to configure the vehicle to meet your specific mission requirements (See Configured to ..... below) Mobility and Designed, from its inception, as a high BearCat requires addition of the G3 The TPV provides unmatched mobility and Maneuverability speed, highly mobile vehicle with high package to provide offroad capability maneuverability with its Oshkosh -engineered high level of crew protection onto an otherwise standard, full length compliance trailing arm suspension replacing the Ford No "add-on" modifications or expensive Ford F550 chassis leaf spring system. offroad kits required Standard Ford leaf spring rear Shortened chassis with 116" wheelbase suspension The shorter wheelbase significantly reduces turning offers 42' curb -to -curb turning diameter Good offroad capability but still large circle. 10 feet shorter than the BearCat and heavy for high speed offroad High compliance Oshkosh -designed operation, tight or confined areas and Its lightweight composite armor system reduces vehicle trailing arm rear suspension system the most difficult terrain weight, reducing suspension loads, and greatly 80MPH top speed (75MPH continuous 70MPH published top speed improving offroad ride and mobility rating with run flat tires) Ford automatic transmission with Ford automatic transmission with selectable 2- or 4 -wheel drive selectable 2- or 4 -wheel drive Page 16 Ability to Take the e The TPV is compact, measuring only Built on a full length Ford F550 chassis, TPV offers a unique capability to take your tactical team in Team "In Close" 200" long -- over 4' shorter than the the BearCat is over 250" long, 96" wide close. BearCat and 107" high — a large tactical truck It is only 85" wide allowing use down Larger and significantly heavier than No need to deploy at the curb. Turn into narrow alleys, alleys and driveways the TPV, it's operations in close down driveways, past closely -spaced houses, or into It is only 95" to the roof, enhancing its quarters are limited by its dimensions buildings. ability to operate indoors for parking and large turning circle garage and stadium missions Confidently roll over muddy fields or watered lawns. Its light 7T curb weight improves Operate from within the TPV to gain control. operational capability over lawns or muddy terrain Multiple large ballistic windows and a one piece ballistic windshield offer enhanced situational awareness and enhances in -vehicle operation capability Ballistic Protection NIJ IV Crew Protection using a combat- mil spec 46100 high hardness Both TPV and BearCat provide full NIJ IV crew protection. proven Military Grade Composite Armor ballistic steel Both offer armored engine bay protection. design by Oshkosh Defense NIJ IV ballistic protection, but heavy Available engine compartment Full length chassis with this effective BearCat uses an older, ballistic steel -only armor system, protection including hood, grill, wheel but heavy ballistic protection package which, while effective, is heavy. wells and light pans can result in an overweight front axle, Advanced composite armor, with an severely impacting vehicle mobility and TPV uses an engineered, battle -proven composite armor Oshkosh Defense design proven to front axle reliability system resulting in equivalent protection at lighter weight, protect soldiers and citizens in their enhancing vehicle mobility and reducing_ chassis load armored military vehicles worldwide Composite armor is lighter than its ballistic equivalent plain steel armor, reducing TPV weight, adding to vehicle suspension performance and reducing front axle weight load Complete After- Complete bumper -to -bumper service Local Ford dealer for Ford -related Oshkosh Defense is the only provider of armored tactical market Vehicle provided by a local Oshkosh dealer with service items (power train, suspension) vehicles sold for U. S. law enforcement service with a Service fixed -base and heavy call -out service Factory service for all other (body, nationwide network of trained service professionals. Dealer responsible for entire vehicle. armor, glass, accessories, interior) in Clarey's, in Rochester, MN, has delivered and serviced Coordinates Ford -related service activity. Pittsfield, MA Pierce Fire and Emergency trucks, Frontline mobile You make one call. Our dealer does the command centers, JerrDan recovery vehicles and other rest. heavy commercial and municipal vehicles for decades. They are your one-stop provider of service for the entire TPV. Page 17 Customer: Plymouth, MN Police Dept 101[fli'VIn 01f jN Country: USA LJ y-JLJlJLf1J1.Jl1lJ Dealer: N/A Salesperson: George Mansfield DEFENSE PM Approval: Date: Required Delivery Date: TBI Currency: US Quantity: 1_ Quote/Order Date; 11l Engineering Application Approval: Kevin Schueller Date: 4 -Nov -13 Vehicle Specifications Performance Characteristics Ford F-550 Super Duty commercial chassis - Underbody Ground Clearance: 15" 13 Valve SOHC EFI modular V70 Gas engine Vertical Obstacle/Stop Climb: up to 14" Horsepower: 302HP @ 4750 RPM Curb -to -Curb Turning Circle Diameter: 41.9 fl. Torque: 457 Ib. -fl. @ 3250 RPM Wall -lo -Wall Turning Circle Diameter: 42,611. TomShift® Heavy -Duty 6-sueed Seloct5hifl" Automatic Transmission Uphill/Downhill Gradient Capability: 60% Part-time 4 -Wheel Drive Static Side Slope: 39% Manual Shift On Slop (MSQS) 4x4 System Approach angle: 38° 2 -Speed Transfer Case (2.72/1.00:1) Departure angle: 30° Manual Locking Hubs Maximum vehicle sustained speed: 75 mph (lire rating) 4.86:1 Limited Slip rear differential 0 to 60 mph: <_ 19 sec @ CW Brakes - 4 -wheel Disc Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) Steering - Power Steering Wheel - vinyl with till and telescoping steering column Vehicle Dimensions Length: 200 in. Wdth: 86 In. _ Height (VCW): 96 In. Wheelbase: 116 in. Track: 74 in. Gross Vehicle Weight Raling WR): (GV19,500 ins, Curb Weight (CW) with NIJ Level IV protectlow 13,816 flus. Payload Capacity with NIJ Level IV protection: 5,664 lbs. Gross Combined Weight (GCW): 26,000 lbs. (Includes Trailer) Heavy-duty Front Axle with 7500 to load rating Trailing Arm Rear Suspension with Coll Springs Sillsiein Shook Absorhers Michelin XDE 2+ 285170R19.5 tires (4). Single rearwheels. Fuel Capacity: 40 U.S- oallon dual tank wl lockinu qas cap In -Dash Air Conditioning, Healing, and Defrost Windshield Wipers- interval control Two-way Auxiliary Ventilation System FMVSS/CMVSS, EPA. and CARS compliant Electrical & Lighting Package Dual -beam Halogen Headlamps All interior and exterior lighting LED (except headlamps/turn signals) Lighting system has "Blackout" Capability Ceiling mounted Interior Lighting: Dual Red/White LED Two (2) Adjustable Map lights, Front Console Light Bar Prep Package Back-up Calor Camera and Monilorwith one-way microphone Back-up Alarm 155 Amp Heavy -Duty Alternator 750 CCA, 78 AH Battery Auxiliary 12v Electrical System 12V Alternator with dual batteries and disconnect Can be combined with Ford system for emergency start AM/FM Stereo with dimial clock and two speakers Monahan Provisions for Antennas (4) Manuals & Warranty TPV - Ford Operator's Manual TPV - Oshkosh Operator's Manual Overall Vehicle Warranty: 12 months/12,000 miles Body Configuration Five door vehicle configuration with Escape Hatch Two side doors street side, hinged (onward Two side doors curb side, hinged forward Single rear door with hold back _ Roof escape hatch Ten window configuration, replaceable Single -piece Windshield, no tint band Front side doors single window each door Rear side doors two windows each door top window and bottom sniper window Rear side wall window each rear quarter wall Rear door single window Nine Gun Ports Side door gun pops below all windows 2.6" wide x 5.3" tall (6) Rear door gun pod below window 2.6" wide x 5.3" tall (1) Rear side wall gun ports below windows 4.6" wide x 6.5" tall (2) Exterior Handrails around all side doors and rear door Manual Keyed Standard Locks and Combat Locks Driver and co-driver cloth bucket seats, floor mounted Manually Adjustable 8 -way with 3 -paint seat belts Grated Side Steps (2), 8"W x 58 1/21- Ground clearance: 16.5" 4 Heavy-duty Tow Provisions: (2) Front (2) Rear Manual Adjust Side View Mirrors (2) Standard Paint: Charcoal Grey, Flat (interior and exterior) Ballistic Protection (NIJ Level IV) Ballistic Protection for: Crew Compartment Front Fenders Critical Engine Compartment Components (Batteries, ECU, and ABS) Additional Bullets: Multi -hit 7.82 x 51mm NATO M-80 ammunition 5.56x45mm (.223 Caliber) Including penetrator (Ml 9315S 109 Rounds) AK 47 AP & ,308 AP 7.62 x 54R B32 API (Dragunev) . 50 Caliber Ball TZZ 50 Caliber APM2 Armored floor to provide STANAG Level I blast protection 1 of 2 Page 1 1§312014 0001 Facto A— Ilre - Michelin XDE 2+ 285/70819.5 Non -run 71st 0002 Facto Run Flal Tire s stem a rade all four tires. 1 0003 Facto S are the with Run flat. Michelin XDE 2+ 285170R19,5 tiro 0004 Factory Rear mounted spare lire rack, (Compatible with standard and run flat tires.) Cannot be usedwithladderoption0102. Recovery clto.s 0010 1 Factory 19,500 to Rentable winch capable of both front and rear mounting in 2" receiver Protection Options - 0020 Foolery Skip plate. Drop down ballistic protection from projectiles fired at ground level beneath theTPVandprotecttheundercariaacomponents. Cannot be used with 0021. 1 0021 Factory V-shaped Blast Shield. Provides protection from underbody blast munitions up to STANAGlevel2. Cannot be used with 0020. Requires seating options 0032 and 0033. 0022 Factory Engine Protection Including armored hood, radiator protection, and wheel well protection. Cannot be combined with 0023, 1 0023 Factory NIJ Level IV combination ballistic radiator protection and push bar to provide capability to pushobstructionswiththeTPV. Cannot be combined with 0022. 0024Factory Standard -duty Brush Guard to protect front grill and headlights with front push pads and towhooks, No ballisticprotection) 0026 Ram Assembly 0026A Factory Front mountable manual bettering ram with manual elevation adjustment and gat plate attachment 1 00268 Factory CS Gas deployment nozzle attachment with dash mounted dispersion switch for use with0026A. 0027 Factory Rock guards side and rear windows 0028 Facloty Fuel Cap Cover over looking as ca non -ballistic 0029 Factory Fuel Tank Protection 0029A Factory Ballistic Fuel Tank Protection to NIJ Level III 002.98 Factory Ballistic Fuel Tank Protection to NIJ Level III. This option should be selected if getting 0020SkipPlateProtection. Ssatin q tions_ - 0030 Factory Seoond row bucket seats, floor mounted, toward facing. Complete with 3 -point safety bells. Not corrarratfible with o tions 0031 11 Passen ars 0031 Factory Second row rear -facing seals, flip -up seats. Complete with lap belts. Not compatible withctions0030 & 0033. 3 Passen ars 1 0032 Factory Front row suspended seals for increased blast protection. Complete with 5 -paint belts. Re laces standard bucket seats. Only available with 0021.2 Possen ars 1 of 2 Page 1 1§312014 0033 Factory Second row suspended seats for Increased blast protection. Complete with 5 -point belts. Onlyavailablewith0021. Not compatible with options 0030 & 0031.2 Passengers) 0034 Facto Rear outboard fold -up um seat left. Includes 4- oint safety belts. 2 Passen ers 1 0035 Factory Rear outboard fold -up um seat fight. Includes 4 -point safety bells. 2 Passengers)1 0036Factary Two (2) Censer Aisle Sents, flip -up seal. Complete with lap belts. Not compatlhle with option00312Passenars Other interior Options 0040 Facto Auxiliaryuxilia Rear Heating VentIlating and Air Condil System 1 0041 Factory Stretcher Transport 0041A Faclory Single Stretcher Transport Package (Designed to hold (1) Talon II 90C Collapsible HandleLifter/Stretcher 0041E Facloil Talon II 90C Collapsible Handle Stretcher 1 0042 Factory RearStorage Locker. Located on driver -side rear wall. Exterior dimensions 30"H x 10.1"W x 10.1"D. Interior dimensions 28"H x 0.1"W x 9.8"D. Locker includes (2) Adjustgblo height shelves. 0043 Factory Rear Stowage Box. Located In rear corner of passenger side of vehicle. Detail to follow. 0044 Factory Radio delete 1 0045 aclory I Flre extinguisher wall mounted on rear p assen er side Eloatrtc IS ste tons 0052Factory 1700W Invader: Converts 12v buck power to 110v for ability to charge items In the vehicle without havinp to be lu ed Info a round source C Sb ' a d 0a "e i0 t o 0060 Factory Whelan Model LINZ61- LED Side Flashers Color selection on separate form 0061 Factory Wil Headlight Flashers 0063 Factory Whalen 180 watt Siren Speaker & Controller - 1 0064 Factory Center Instrument Panel. Must lx selected if any of the followlnq options are selected: 0060, 0061 0067 0968 0069A or 00698. 0065 Factory Intervox Two -Way Communication System 0066 Factory High Intensity Headlam s. Replaces standard halogen lights, 0067 Factory Code 3® 2100 Series with X LED Front light bars with side alley lights. Located in the two front 1 0068 Factory Code 3® 21 o0 Series with X LED Rear light bars with side alley lights. Located in the two rear 1 0069 Sot li hts roof mounted remote controlled. g069A Facto S of li his roof mounted remote control right front. 1 p069B Factory Sol lights, roof mounted remote control tell rear 1 0070 Roof mounted FUR® Infrared camera for thermal image detection. Front center location. 1 0071 Facto Can color dome ILIUM Re laces standard Red/While dome lamp with Cyan/White 0072 Factory Fronl Lighting Harness. Must be selected If any of the following options are selected: 0060, 0061 or 0063 1 D:P:i }Na bar`P tions 0080 Facto Power healed side mirrors 2 1 0081 Facto Heated windshield. 1 0082 Factory En Ine Block Heater lHatelf, t0nnot.and W0400119<O tions 0090 Factory Adjustable Height Gunner Platform. Platform dimensions 31" x 17". Manually adjustable with 4availablePositionsupto13". 1 0091 Factory Rotating armored hatch with firing Part, Replaces standard emernency hatch. 0092 Factory Low Profile Sniper Turret no inlle . Replaces standard emergency hatch. 0093Faclory Gunnor Protection Kit (GPK) with MG pintle (military style). Replaces standard emergencyhatch. UU98 Paclary Gunner Prolocllon Kit (GPK) with MG pintle (military style) and Overhead Protection. Ra laces slandmot emer enc hatch. 0094 Foolery Mag Clip Holders (8) mounted in four positions around the turret/hatch opening. The clips holdmost5,56mmf.223 ammunition magazines. 0095 Factory Weapon Mounts (2). One. located on front driver door. One located on front passenger door. For use with MK Carbine or equivalent weapon. 0096 Factory Weapon Mount (1) In rear passenger side of vehicle. Available only when both options 0043and0052areselected. 0097 Factory Gunner Platform, Non -Adjustable. Folding for two heigh positions, Bulli -In StorageComanments. Access O tions 0100 Facto k ilch latform with foldin sla .. Maunts rota fmaL&, near. 2" receiver.. 1 0101 Factory Stationary High Clearance Side Slops (2) - Narrower than the standard side steps. Located within the vehicle width. 4 118"W x 64 7/8"L. Ground clearance: 22 1/4". Replaces standard e ssidest. 0102 Facto Rear mounted ladder. Cannot be used with spare lire rack 0004. safe) release re 'd 1 0103 Facto Non--p—q--q- safe/ release re 'd Paintt0valigg Options - 0110 Exterior Paint Color Selection Of 10A Factory Charcoal Grey, Black, Green, or Tan Grey 0111 Paint Finish 0111A F Clary Flat Finish 1 01118 Factory Gloss Finish 0112 Dealer Custom Letterin IDecais 0113 Factory Rhino Coating Exterior "Belt4ine" Down 0114 Factory Rhino Coating, Interior Floor in Front and Rear. HotrdvppV Manuals 0120 Factory TPV Oshkosh Maintainer Manual 0121 Factory TPV Oshkosh Parts Manual I Customer Specific Ofellens Delivery Cl ar`e Base Vehicle Price $0.00 Options Total$0.00 Tactical Protector Vehicle with Optional $175,000:00 2 oft Dealer Marin 0.00% Dealer to Select) Page 19 1/13/2014 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE PURCHASE OF THE OSHKOSH TPV ARMORED VEHICLE WITH THE CITY OF MAPLE GROVE THROUGH THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL (HGAC) PURCHASING CONSORTIUM WHEREAS, The City of Plymouth Police Department in conjunction with the City of Maple Grove Police Department have identified a need to procure an armored vehicle to assist its personnel in critical incidents requiring ballistic protection; and WHEREAS, The Plymouth Police Department has identified through extensive research a unique armored vehicle best suited for a suburban environment; the Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle; and WHEREAS, The City Council has appropriated funds through the 2014 budget process for this purchase; and WHEREAS, The Houston -Galveston Area Council has pre -established and competitive purchasing contracts with manufactures including Oshkosh Defense Manufacturer; and WHEREAS, The aggregate cost of $180,000 for the vehicle will be split 50150 with the City of Maple Grove. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA to approve the purchase of the Oshkosh TPV Armored Vehicle for $90,000 from the General and Resource Planning Funds. APPROVED this 28th day of January, 2014. Page 20 1C;ty of Agenda 7 . O 1PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Dave Callister, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk January 28, 2014 Review by: Luke Fischer, Administrative Services Director On Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor License Applications for Item: Storm LLC (Patrick Bechtel), d/b/a Ketsana's Thai Restaurant, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct a public hearing, and unless information is received to the contrary, adopt the attached resolution approving the on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor licenses for Storm LLC, d/b/a Ketsana's Thai Restaurant, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205, for the license period through January 31, 2015. 2. BACKGROUND: The City has received an application for an on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor license from Storm LLC, d/b/a Ketsana's Thai Restaurant, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205. This business was formerly known as Ketsana's Thai and served liquor, but is now under new ownership. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: All fees have been paid and certificates of insurance provided. The license application has been investigated by the Police Department and they have found no reason to deny the license. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Notice of Hearing Map and List of Property Owners within 500' of Location Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH NOTICE OF HEARING WINE AND ON—SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR STORM LLC, D/B/A KETSANA'S THAI, 16605 COUNTY ROAD 24, SUITE 205 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plymouth City Council will conduct a hearing on the wine and on—sale 3.2 malt liquor license applications from Storm LLC, D/B/A Ketsana's Thai, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205, on Tuesday, January 28, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. All persons wishing to address the Council regarding this application will be heard at that time. Sandra R. Engdahl City Clerk 763-509-5080 Page 2 J r. 00 N r Q y r4 tR+. d ap r..: ueMi ._ N 16605 Co Rd 24 W+ E Subject Property 0 s 350 Feet F 500footbuffer ID January 2014 City of Plyplo u It h THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED IWTH ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCL 2011822120007 2011822120010 2011822210021 WEST GLEN DEVELOPMENT I LLC PLYMOUTH STATION LLC ROBBINS PARTNERSHIP 3600 HOLLY LANE N #100 941 HILLWIND RD NE #300 2585 BROCKTON LA N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 FRIDLEY MN 55432 MEDINA MN 55391 2011822210025 M P NORMAN LLC 4982 COMSTOCK LANE N PLYMOUTH MN 55446 2011822210026 PLYMOUTH STATION LLC 941 HILLWIND RD NE #300 FRIDLEY MN 55432 2011822210027 MARVIN DEVELOPMENT III LLC 985 DECATUR AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2014 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 LIQUOR LICENSES FOR STORm LLC, D/B/A KETSANA'S THAI RESTAURANT 16605 COUNTY ROAD 24, SUITE 205 WHEREAS, the City has received an applications for on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor licenses from Storm LLC, d/b/a Ketsana's Thai Restaurant, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205; and WHEREAS, the applicant has paid all fees and provided all required insurance certificates; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing and finds no reason to deny the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor licenses are hereby approved for Storm LLC, d/b/a Ketsana's Thai Restaurant, 16605 County Road 24, Suite 205. The liquor license is issued for the period through January 31, 2015. Approved this 28th day of January 2014. Page 5