HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 10-02-1989MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Octoher 2, 1989
The regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to
order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. In the Council Chambers of
the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on October 2, 1989.
PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilnrmbers Ricker, Sisk,
Vasillou, titur
AB'SEN1: None
STAFF PRESF.N1i City Manager !Allis, As4istant Manage; Boyles,
Public Works Director Moore, Com wnity
Development Director Tremere, Finance Director
Hahn, Public Safety Director Carlquist, City
Attorney Ihnmson, and City Clerk Rauenhorst
PRE'SEH TAT ION
Mike Trossen, Trossen Wright Architects, presented the results
of the analysis sf Fire Station No. 1 for renovation/expansion
of the existing structure or a new facility. He reviewed the
Program of Needs which was established through meetings w!th
public safety personnel and described the existing facility.
The existing apparatus room is too narrow for current vehicle
standards. The estimated cost of renovatinq /remodel inq the
existing factiity is $700,000. The estimated cost of ratinq the
existing facility and constructing a new one is S855,000. Mr.
Trossen stated that the $155,000 cost difference is not
significant given that the new facility would be more state-of-
the-art and consistent in quality with Fire Stations II and III.
Councilmember Sisk asked if all three stations i.eeded to be
similar in facilities.
Public Safety Director Cariquist stated it is not necessary that
the stations are identical; however, they will have many things
In common. Fer example, each station will aced meeting rooms,
office space, and an apparatusibay area. He stated there are
currently 60 paid volunteer fire fighters and described the
meeting room areas currently available at Stations II and III.
Councllmember Sisk suggested that perhaps meeting rooms could be
shared between stations.
Director Carlquist stated each station needs its own meettnq
space but the new facility option for Station No. I proposes
multi -functional rooms rather than separate areas for offices,
kitchen, meeting rooms, sleeping areas for xtandhy periods, etc.
r
F ire
Item
Station
4-A
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 265
Counctimember Ricker stated that when the Council toured Station
I approximately a year ago he was assured by the fire Chief that
the existing bay areas were adequate.
Mr. Trossen stated the on-site maneuvering of the larqer
equipment could be significantly improved.
Manager Willis stated the number of bays is proposed to remain
the same. The dimensions of the bays will be enlarged to permit
easier equipment maneuvering and work space around the existing
vehicles.
Councilmember Ricker questioned whether one shower stall for
women, as compared to four stalls for men, is sufficient for the
future of the department.
Manager Willis stated these types of items will be considered
during the design phase. He also noted that the site is
somewhat constrained and variances will like!v be needed with
either the renovation or new construction option.
M• 'sssen concluded that renovation of the existing facility
done but the result would be less than Ideal. He stated
c -instruction of a new building would be money well spent.
eCouncilmember Ricker asked if certain items could be cut from
the renovation option.
Mr. Trossen responded that none of the items could be deleted
entirely. The pricing estimates were established usinq medium
quality standards. In response to a question by rouncilmember
Vasiliou, Mr. Trossen stated he is confident the 15% contingency
estimates will be sufficif A to cover unexpected costs under
either option.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked if the proposal for Station I and
the existing Stations II and III would be inadequate in the
ruture if it were necessary to change to a full-time department.
Director Carlquist predicted that reconstructed Station I will
adequately accommodate the City for at least 5-10 years. Even
It the department was changed to full-time in the future, he
Jues not :support shifts of 24 hours as many departments
operate. Nei would support 8-1.our shifts which the current
facilities could accommodate.
0
Requiar Council Meetlny
October 2, 1989
age 266
is NOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by
Counctlmember Zltur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 8:-591 AUTHORIZING
PLANNING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A REPLACEMENT FACILITY FOR FIRE
STATION I ON THE FIRE STAITON I SITE UTILIZING Tlit. SERVICtvS OF
TROSSEN WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS.
Councl lmember Sisk stated the l i needs to have
opportunities to input Into tt.e: process before architecture)
drawings are completed.
Councilmember Vastf.au stated It Is appropriate for the Public
Safety Director and Fire Chief to determine what IA needed In a
new facility.
Maleager WL' Ills stated the next step In the pre,,•ess will be the
concept ptin phase.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items 8-9 (Interim ordinance for moratortum) and S -R (CDNG
Funding for Runaway Youth Program) ,sere, removed from the Consent
is
Agenda.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Zttur, seconded by
Councllme;mber Sisk, to adopt the Consent Ailenda as amended.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember V tur, seconded by
Counc i lmember Sisk, to approve the mintites of the September 25,
1989 Council meeting.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC Ht kR INCS
Mayor Schneider opened a puhlic heartnq at 803 p.m. on 1989
delinquent crater, sewer and street t lght lnq or annual j' reaet
lighting for unimproved parcels.
Kay W. Brown stated he owns rental property at 13940 36th Avenue
North. His tosnants vacated the property and diel not pay the
utility bills. He stated that he as the owner should not he
responsible for these bills, particularly since the City diel atot
notify him of the delinquent hills until the hearing or
RFSOLU110N N0, 89-591
AUTHORIZING PLANNI
FOR CONSTRUCTION nF A
RFPLACEMENT F IRF
STATION NO, I
Item 4-4
Consent Agenda
Item 5
Minutes
Item •6
Assessment FINarino on
19A9 Ile I 1 nquen t
Uttlltles
Item 7-,%-1
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 267
discontinue service to the tenants. He stated the
would not tell him when the tenants moved out whether
a delinquent bill.
City staff
there wtls
Attorney Thomson stated the law Is clear that the property orner
has the ultimate responsibility for payment of utility bills
against a parcel and unpaid bilis may be assesses+ by the City
against the property.
Manager Willis explained It is the City policy to annually
notify property owners of a public hearing and assess for
delinquent utility bills. The City does not discontinue utility
service because collection through a special assessment is
allowed by state law.
Mayor Schneider stated it is an option to have the utility bill
mailed to the owner rather the tenant.
Counctimember Ricker stated others have
problem; however, most landlords are aware
uttllty bills are paid before returning
ellaf:ts. He asked the Finance Director
dellnquen,y rate has increased.
experienced the same
of the law and ensure
security deposits to
If the City's utility
Finance Director HAhn stated the percentage of delinquent
utility bills remains constant.
No one else appeared for the hearing. The hearing was closed at
8:35 p.m.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Cnuncttmember
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89.592 ADOPTING ASSESSMENT 1989
DELINQUENT WATER, SEWER, STREET LIGHTING OR ANNUAL STREET
LIGHTING.
Motion carrtea on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider opened a hearinq at 8:36 p.m. on 1989 weed
eradication and destruction* w one appeared and the hearinq
was closed at 8:36 p.m.
NOIION was made by Councilmember Ricker, seconded by
Councilmember tltur, to adopt KSOLUTION N0. 89-593 ADOPTING
ASSLSSMENT, 1989 WLED ERADICATION AND DESTRUCTION, ROLLS 1 AND
2.
Motion carr:ed on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider opened a hearing at 9:37 p.m. on vacattun of
drainaye and utility easement alone the north propo,rty liae of
bLot 11, Block 4, Parker, Lakeside Second Addition. No one
appeared and the hearing was closed at 8:37 p.m.
RESOLUTION NO. R9-592
1999 DELINQUENT
UTTLITIES
Item 7-A-1
RESOLUTION NO. 89-593
1989 WEEf) FRADICATION
Item 7-A-2
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 268
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Counellmember
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-594 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION
OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, LOT 11 BLOCK 4 PARKERS
LAKESIDE SECOND ADDITION.
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five %yes.
MOTION was made by Counellmember Sisk, seconded by Counclimember
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-595 SETTING CONDITIONS TO DE
MET PRIOR TO FILING OF RESOLUTION N0. 89-594 VACATING TME:
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR LOT ll, BLOCK 4 PARKERS
LAKESIDE SECOND ADDITION.
Motion carrried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Manager Willis reviewed the City's special assessment
proced:ores, including the appeal process and policy for
deferment of special assessments against property of senior
citizens and disabled Individuals.
Mayor Schneider opened an assessment heartnq at A:44 p.m. on
Project No. 648, Prime WAst Business Park/Trenton Oaks and
Groves Office Park Area Phase I:.
Roy O'Donnell, 3207 Charles Lane, Mound, stated he Is one of the
owners of the Sun Valley Mobile Nome Park. Mr. O'Donnell
presented a fetter objecting to the assessment for the followinq
reasons: t ) The road is a detriment .ind not beneficial to the
Sun Valley Mobile Home Park; 2) The land has been previously
assessed for the watermaln and the previous owner4 paid the
assessment In 1965; 3) There has not been any monetary
consideration given for the detrimental effects of the roadway;
and 4) The developers of Groves Office Park were to pay the road
and utility costs. Mr. O'Donnell stated he has no complaints
about the construction quality of the road.
Mdnager Willis explained that part of the Groves Office Park
development included the use of tax increment; however, It was
never the intent that the developer was to pay road and utility
costs associated with the entire project.
No one else appeared for the heartnq. The !tearinq was closed at
852p.m.
MOTION wds made by Councllme%mber Sisk, seconded by Councllmember
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-596 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS,
PROXCT N0. 648, PRIME. WkST RUSINVSS NARK/TRENTON OAKS.
0
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five Ayes.
RESOLUTION N0. 0-594
VACATING STORR W
EASEMENT Ih PARKERS
LAKESIDE SECOND AIHIN.
Item 7-B
RESOLUTION 140. 89-595
SETTING CONDITIONS TO
BE MET PRIOR TO FILING
RESOLUTION N0. A9-594
Ttem 7-C
RESOLUTION N0. 89-596
Anon= Assrggmmr.
PROJE-CT NO. 6489 PR IMF
WI -Sr RUS INE SS
PARK/ TRENTON OAKS
Item 7-C
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 269
MOTION was made by Counclimember Sisk, seconded by Councilmemher
Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-597 ADOPTING 1SSF SSMENTS,
PROJECT N0. 6480 GROVES OFFICE PARK AREA • PHASE. IT.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider opened an assessment hearing at 9:53 p.me on
the 1989 Street Reconstruction Program, Project No. 901.
Director Moore described the project and assessment procedures.
He noted that 30% of the project cost Is proposed to be assessed
at an amount per lot of $795.66 over a five year period at 8%
Interest. The cost had originally been estimated to be SARO.
Nancy Olerdorf, 2110 Urbandale Lane, stated taxpayer:. should not
be assessed for this project. She asked if there was a limit on
the number of assessments that can be assessed against a given
lot, and stated that people are bring forced from their homes
due to high taxes. She stated the policy on senior citizen
assessment deferment should be publtelzod and rewritten to be
better understood by seniors.
Betty Ducan, 2415 Urbandale Line, stated she was Informed the
assess-:ents would be spread over ten years rather than five as
now proposed. She also stated she was assessed for storm sewer
from the Dunkirk Improvement. Ms. Dugan asked how long the
constrttctlon would he guaranteed and noted that the sort being
laid by the contractor will probably not live.
knglneerinq Technician Dan Campbell stated that at the project
Informational meeting possible terms for the assessments were
discussed but the definite perlod would be adopted by the
Council alony with the assessment amounts.
Manaqer Witsis stated the reconstructed ro.ids, If properly
malrtalned, &hoadd last. 20 years.
Director Moore stated the contractor is re sponsthle for the sod
for 30 days.
Counc l imembrr Vas 11 lou
stdtus of the sod on
hell: responslule.
No one else appedred.
r quested that staff report back on the
this project ds the contractor should hey
The hearinq was closed cit 9:07 p.m.
Councllmemher Rlc+er stated It is difficult for the Clty to know
In which hones senior cte,tzens reside 'n order to mike them
aware of the senior ettlien deferment option. He c,lated that if
Mrs. Dle.rdorf is aware of particular seniors nee-dinq asglstavive
REQ SOLIII ION NO. 99-597
ADOPTIRC ASSRSRRM,
PROSECT N0. 6489
CP7VES OFFICE PARK
Alit A - PNASF I I
Item 1-C
Assessment Hearinq on
1987 Street Recon-
stniction Project
Item 7-D
Regular Counctl Meeting
October 2, 19x9
Page 270
with the forms, she could forward the names to staff
will be contacted and asststTd. Councilmex6er Ricker
Schneider agreed that the policy could be rewritten
easier to understand*
and they
and Mayor
so it Is
NOTIJN was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-598 AOOPTINC
ASSESSMENTS, PR03LCY N0. 8019. 19A9 STRFET RECONSFRUCtION
PNOCRAM.
Councilmember Vasillou suggested that senior c1tiren groups
Could distributes the information on deferments.
Councilmember Sisk stated the Infrastructure Reserve Fund *cls
established for the purpose of paiylitq a portion (currently 70%)
of reconstruction costs. It was not Intended to prey 10K of
reconstruction project costs. If this was done now, amney would
not be available to assist with future rPconstructt#)n costs.
Until the fund was established, 100% of the oroject costs were
assesstd against the beetefIting properties.
Notion wis made by Cosine Ilmember R1.c.ker, seconded by
Counclimember Zltur, to call the question.
Notion carried, five ayes.
Mdin motion carried on a Roll Call vete, four ayes, Vasll ou
nay.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Vaslilou, to direct staff to re tse the policy re:latinq to
senior ultlren asyessnont deietsmenw. to make It easier to
understand.
NOT ION to dMinel wos made by Cour.cl tmember Sisk, seconded by
Counel Lmember 11tur, to Via.% . de other policies, ies, forms, and
communications distributed tb the public.
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Main =)tion a% once amended carried, rive ayes.
PETITIONS, RFgkkSTS AND COMNUNICATIONb
Stan Tikkanun, School District 284, presented a rjquest for aci
amendment to the Site Plat, and Conditlondl Use r,,-rmtt to allow
the elimination of screat4inq or rooftop units dt Plymouth Creek
Elementary School V.05). Ne staled that the ordinance appear%
to allow for t<<is ellminatt-in and Use building deslgn provides
visLIal and snunu screenlnq. The noise levels from the roottap
RESbLUT T(* NJ. V -W8
ADOPYINC ASWMHERM.
PROJECT N0. 801
1989 STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROCRAN
Item 7-n
I.S.Q. 284, Plymouth
Creek School, 4eque s t
for CUP (4801S)
item 8-4
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 271
equipment are noterceived to be a problem b the neighbors. P Y
The noise levels would not impact any adjacent residential area
because of the large school. site size. He introduced consultant
Bill Kroll, sound expert for the project.
Mr. Kroll explained the sound tests done to evaluate the
perceived noise level of the rooftop equipment. He stated the
rooftop equipment was running at maximum levels throughout ti•e
testing and a nolee problem was not perceived at the adjacent
property lines. We Kroll reported the most significant noise
level in his stud% was at Xene Lane and 41st Avenue; however the
noise was traced to the school boiler room and not the rooftop
units.
Mayor Schneider asked why rooftop screening was included at the
original site plan stage if it was not now intended to be
cc.istructed.
Steve Decoster, EOS ArcAltects, stated when the school district
applied for the original site plan approval and conditional use
permit, they had not finalized the site plan details for the
building. He stated the color, form, and placemer`. of the
rooftop equipment was carefully considered; the original design
was found to be prohibitively expensive.
Director Tremere stated staff's knowledge of the change in the
plans came near completion of the project when the petitioner
desired occupancy of the building. The plans approved by the
ouncil included screening of the rooftop equipment. The
ordinance provisions regarding the screening of rooftop
equipment on nonresidential structures adjacent to residential
zoned districts references both aesthetics and noise suppression
as the reasons for the required screening. These reasons may he
considered in addition to the MPCA noise standards. Director
Tremere noted one concern the Council may wish to consider is
the noise and visual effects on possible future multiple storied
adjacent residential buildings.
Cot!ncilmember Ricker asked if there is a way to delay a final
decisioin until the adjacent properties are developed and the
effect is known.
Councilmc:nber Zitur r.ored that the equipment may not pose a
noise prohlem now but could get louder as it ages.
Attorney Thomson stated the City could require, with school
district agreement, that if at some future time the City chose
to requirc the rooftop screening, it would he installed.
However, from a practical standpoint the Council may wish to
consider what it would do if there is nc.n-compliance.
R9gular Council Meriting
October 2, 1989
Page 272
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that this could be precedent
setting and asked if the Council is prepared to offer a similar
delay in requiring screeni;ig to any developer that requested It.
Councilmember Sisk asked what would trigger the screening
Installation at some future point - The number of complaints
received? A noise problem based on a certain number of
decibels?
Director Tremere stated the ordinance intent could be pres..--vsd
and the requested design flexibility could be allowed in that
the conditional use permit could require an annual review to
determine if there have been problems; and a hearing could be
scheduled if noise problems were detected that constituted a
violation of the ordinance conditicnal use standards.
Covincilmember Vasiliou expressed concern that this determination
Is subjective and it may u;; difficult to rocuire remedial
construction at a later time. She asked how the school district
would fund the screening equipment if it was required in the
future.
Mr. Tlkkanen stated they could accept an annual renewal
condition and the district would levy for the capital cost. He
stated the equipment will be well maintained so future increased
noise levels will not be a problem.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Iltur, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker, to adopt NESOLUTION NO. 89-599 APPROVING
AMENDED SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLYMOUTH CREEk
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (88035) with the addition of Condition No. 4:
The conditional use permit shall be reviewed annually and the
screening shall be installed if the City Council determines, in
Its sole discretion, that the screeninq of the rooftop equipment
Is needed.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote: Schneider, 71tur, Ricker
ayes; Sisk and Vasiliou nays.
Manager Willis reported that six bids for site gradinq and
utilities for the proposed community center project wero
received, with three of the bids below the cost estimate.
Atter review of anticipated total project costs, i• was
determined that the project exceeds the budget established
the Council. He recommended that all bids be rejected.
RESOLUTION N0. 99-599
PLAN AND CUP FOR
PLYMOUTH CREEK SCHOOL
88035)
Item A -A
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 273
MOTION was made b Councilmember Zy Iter, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-600 REJECTING
PID, PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY CENTER BID PACKAGE NO. 1 GRADING AND
SITE UTILITIES, CITY PROJECT NO, 901.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by
Councilmember Sisk, to
RPUD FINAL PLAT/PLAN
INC./WALLY ANDERSON FOR
Councilmember Zltur, seconded by
adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-601 APPROVING
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR ARADCO,
PARKVIEW RIDGE_ (88018) (RPUD 88-3).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember lltur, seconded byCouncilmemberSisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-602 SETTING
CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RFLATED TO RPUD
FINAL PLAT/PLAN FOR ARADCO, INC./WALLY ANDERSON FOR PARKVIEW
RIDGE (88018) (RPUD 83-3).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by
Councilmember Sisk, to
ASSESSMENTS PROJECT N0,
PARKVIEW RIDGE ADDITION.
0
Councilmember Zitur, secondee by
adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-603 ADOPTING
951 SANITARY SE WE R AND WATLRMAIN AVEA -
Motion carrled on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zttt r, seconded byCouncilmemberSisk, to adupt RESOLUTION NO. 89-604 APPROVING
FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR CRAIG SCHERRFR FOR SWAN
LAKE WEST LOCATED WEST OF WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE AT 44TH
AVENUE NORTH (8902:).
Tom Loucks, 8401 73rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, stdted the
petitioner is In agreement with the stafF report.
Motion carrled on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember litur, seconded by
Couitctlmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 89-605 SF-ITING
CONDITIONS TO HT_ ML T PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RULA 1 E D T O FINAL
PLAT FOR CRAIG SCHLRHF R FOR SWAN LAK,F WF S T LOCATED Wt S T OF Wt S T
MEDICINF LAKE DRIVE. AT 44TH AVENUE NORTH (890?5).
Motion carried on d Roll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-600
REJFCTIRC BIS,
COMMUNITY CENTER
GRADING AND UTILITIES
PROJECT N0, 90l
Item 8-H
RESOLUTION NO, 89-601
PLAT/PLAN AND
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
FOR PARKVIEW RIDGE
98018)
Item *8-C
RESOLUTION N0. 89-60?
SFrlrNc CONWTTWM
HE ME T PR IOR TO F IL INC
98018)
Item *8-C
RFSOLUTION NO, 89-603
AMPING ASSrSSMF,
FOh PARKVIEW RIDGE
PRnjFCT N0, 951
Item *8-C
RESOLUTION NO, 89-604
AMROVfNC
AND DF VE LOPME N T
CONTRACT FOR CRAIG
SCHERNER FOR SWAN LAKF
WEST (89025)
Item A -n
RESOLUTION NO. R9-605
E
lit ME I PRIOR TO F IL INC
990?5)
item 9-n
Regular Council Meeting
Octoker 2, 1989
Page 274
MOTION was made by
Councilmember Sisk, to
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT N0,
SWAN LAKE WEST ADDITION.
Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-606 ADOPTING
950 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN AREA -
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded byCouncilmemberSisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N04, 89-607 APPROVING
FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR JACK AND BETSY SWEDLUND
FOR NORTHFORK LOCATED NORTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION Or
COUNTY ROAD 9 AND VICKSBURG LANE (89016).
r'btlon carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Iitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-608 SFTTING
CONDITIONS TO HE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RFLATED TO FINAL
PLAT FOR JACK AND BETSY SWEDLUND FOR NORTHFORK LOCATED NORTN AND
WEST OF THE INTEPSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 9 AND VICKSBURG LANE.
89016).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made
Councilmember Sisk,
ASSESSMF NTS, PROJECT
NORTHFORK ADDITION.
by Councilmember Iltur, seconded by
to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 99-509 ADOPTING
N0, 9529 SANITARY SF_WER AND WATERMAIN AREA
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOIION was made by Councilmember Iitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 99-610 APPROVING
RES IDE NT IAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PLR14I T
AMENDMENT FOR KURT AND MADONNA BRATTAIN FOR CIMARRON PONDS (RI'UD
76-3) (89079).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Iitur, seconded by
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt k' -SOLUTION N0. R9-611 APPROVING
RLSIDLNTIAL PLANNkD UNIT DEVE.LJPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR [TRUCE AND KATHLE F N ANDERSON FOR CIMARRON PONDS
HPUD 7603) (89081).
Motion carried on d Roll Call vota, five ayes.
MOFION was made by Councilmember Iitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 49-61? AOTHORIITNG
RE.L1 kSE OF SITE Pi RF ORMANCE GUARAN TE. E FOR 0110 HOCK (87054),
IsMotion carried on a Roll Call vote, yfivea es.
RESOLUTION NO, R9-606
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SWAN LAKF WEST,
PROJECT N0, 950
Item A -n
RESOLUTION N0. 89-607
APPROVING FINAL PLAT -
IND DF VE LOPME N T
CONTRACT FOR SWFDLIIND
FOR NORTHFORD ADDN.
99016)
Item *4-F
RESOLUTION NO, 89-608
SETTTRU rONUTTORM
BF MET PRIOR TO FILING
09016)
Ttem *8-F
RESOLUTION NO, R9-609
FOR NORTHFORK, PROJFCT
NO, 95?
Item *8-T
RESOLUTION N0, 89-610
CONDITIONAL USE PE RM I T
FOR NRATTATN FOR
CIMARRON PONDS (89079)
Item *g -F
RESOLUTION NO, 89-611
CONDITIONAL USE PE RMI T
FOR ANDERSON FOR
C IMA14RON PONS ( 49041)
Item *4-G
RESOLUTION NO. 89-61'
1 \1\t r
GJARANTE F RF LE ASE FOR
OTTO BOCK (47054)
Item *R -FI -t
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Nage 275
NOTION was made by Councilmember
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION
RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
87090).
Zitur, seconded by
N0. 99-613 AUTHORIZING
FOR OPUS CORPORATION
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOTION was made by Councilmemher Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLOTION N0, 89-614 AUTHORIZING
RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARAPTLE FOR WELSH COMPANIES, INC.
88005).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0f, 99-615 AUTHORIZING
RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR POO FOOD STORES OF
MINNESOTA, INC. (86139).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-616 AUTHORIZING
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES
INC. (88056).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember litur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-617 AUTHORIZING
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR CROW-MINNETONKA/
PLYMOUTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (88095C).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RE.SOL1!TT, N
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
PLYMOUTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (880950).
I't-ur, seconded by
NJ. 89-618 AUTHORIZING
FOR CROW-MINNLTONKA/
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember litur, seconded by
Councllmt-tuber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTIOO N0, 89-619 AUTHORIIING
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR CROW-MINNETONKA/
PLYMOUTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (88131).
Motion carr ed in a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION N0. 89-613
GUARANTEE RFLEASE FOR
OPUS CORPORATION
87090)
Item *8-H-2
RESOLUTION N0. 89-614
GUARANTEE RELEASE FOR
WELSH COMPANIES
98005 )
Item *4-H-3
RESOLUTION N0, 89-615
SITE PFRFORMANCF
GUARANTEE RELEASE FOR
PDO FOOD STORES
86139)
tem r8 -H-4
RESOLUTION N0. 89-616
GUARANTEE REDUCTION
FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES
98056)
Item *8-I-1
RESOLUTION N0. 89-617
GUARANTEE. REDUCTION
FOR CROW-MINNETONKA/
PLYMOUTH LMTD.
PARTNERSHIP ( AA095C )
Item *8-I-2
RESOLUTION N0. 89-619
SITE PERFORMAW
GUARANTEE REDUCTION
FOR CROW-MINNETONKA/
PLYMOUTH LMTD.
PARTNERSHIP (gangsn)
Item *8-I-3
RESOLUTI9N NQ. A9-619
SITE PERFORHAW
GUARANTEE REDUCTION
FOR CROW-MINNE Tr'NK A/
PLYMOUTH LMTD.
PARTNERSHIP (AA131)
Item *8-I-4
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 276
MOTION was made by Councllmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NV, A9-620
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-620 AUTHORIZING SITE PERrORWARCE —
REDUCTION OF SITE PER0RMANCE GUARANTEE FOR ALJON TOOL, INC. GUARANTEE: REDUCTION
88111). FOR ALJON TOOL INC.
48111)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item *8-I-5
NOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by RESOLUTION N0. 89-621
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-621 AUTHORIZING SIIEPERF .F!
REDUCTION OF ,SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR DUNDEE NURSERY AND GUARANTEE REDUCTION
LANDSCAPING C014PANY 88119). FOR DUNDEE NURSERY
FOR MINTE R-WEISMAN
88119)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item *8-I-6
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by RESOLUTION N0. 89-622
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-622 AUTHORIZING SITE PERFORMANCE
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR MINTER-WEISMAN GUARANTEE. REDUCTION
COMPANY (89002). FOR MINTE R-WEISMAN
A9002 )
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item *8-1-7
MOTION was made by Councllmember lttur, seconded by RESOLUTION N0. 89-623
Counellnember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-623 DECLARING
ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDkRING PREPARATION OF REPORT, STREET ORDERING REPORT,
LIGHTING - PARKERS LIKE !NORTH 3RD ADDITION. STREET LIGHTING
iPARKERS LAKE NORTH 3RD
Potion carried on d Roll Call vote, five ayes. ADDN.
Item *8-J
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by RESOLUTION N0. 89-624
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 69-624 RECEIVING
REPORT AND ORDERING PROJECT - STREET LIGHTING, PARKERS LAKE ORDERING PROJECT,
NORTH 3RD ADDITION. STRF:E.T LIGHTING
PARKERS LAKE NORTH 3RD
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. ADDN.
Item *9-J
MOTION Was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 89-6?
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-625 AWARDING HID AWARDIRE BID FM
FOR STREET SWEEPER. STREET SWEEPER
Item *8-K
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Counctlmember Zltur, seconded by RESOLUTION N0. 89-626
Councilmembe Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-646 REDUCING AMMINE WFLOPHIRr
DEVELOPMENT BOND, CHEEKWOOD HILLS 2ND ADDITION (A-649). HOND, CREEKWOOD HILLS
ND ADDN (A-649)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item OR -L-1
Regular Coomcil Neeting
October 2, 1989
Page 277
MOTION was made b Councilmembery titur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-627 REDUCINC
DEVELOPMENT BOND, CREEKWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION (A-648).
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember 71tur, seconded byCouncilmemberSisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-628 REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND, GLEN ECHO PONDS (84008).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-629 REDUCING
DEVELOPMLNT BOND, ZACHARY HEIGHTS ADDITION (88042).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-630 REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND, PARKFRS LAKE CORPORA!E CENTER (88089).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Zitur, seconded by
Cot,ncllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-631 APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTI% Mf NI' FOR BIDS,
WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE TRUNK SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT N0. 905.
Motion curried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Counctlmember 71tur, seconded bl#
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-63? ADOPTING
ASSESSMENTS, DEFERREO LEVY 10058 AND LEVY 8961.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Jim Heil, EPIC U.S.A., recommended acgLlsitton of the Fujitsu
Focus 960 telephone switch with automatic call dl!ttrtbution and
voice mail system. Fujitsu was the lowest eespcnstble bidder.
Mr. Bell explained that the current system requiros replacement
for technological, rail volume, and reliability reasons.
Actival'inn of the new switch is expected in late Novemtet.
MOTION was made by Counctlemmber lltijr, seconded by
Counctlmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. i49-633 ALTHORIIINC
THE ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION OF T4. TELLCOMMUNICATIONE
SYSTEM INCLUDING AUTOMATIC CALL DISTRIBUTION, VOICE MESS'1CINC
AND TE.! LPHONE INSTRUMt.NTS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO, 89-6?7
REDUCING DEVIFLOPME'Ar
BOND, CREEKWOOD HILLS
3RD ADDN. (.A-648)
Item »A -L-2
RESOLUTION N0. A9-628
RF.DUCTK
AONI!, GLEN ECHO F)GwT1S
84008)
Item *S -L-3
RESOLUTION N0, R9-629
BOND, ZACHARY HEIGHTS
ADDN. (99042)
Item *8-L-4
RESOLUTION N0, R9-610
REDUCING
DEVrLOPHIEWO
ROW, PARKFRS LAKE
f ORPORA TE CF NTFR
89089)
Item *8-L-5
RESOLUTION N0. 89-F31
APPROVTNG PLANS XRT '
ORDERING ADVERT ISEMFNT
FOR BIDS FOR PROJE C T
N0, 905
Item 8-M
RESOLU11ON N0. 89-631
irW,,
1)EFERRE'D LEVY 10058
AND 4061
Item *A -H
RESOLUTION h0. 89-633
AWARD OF BIDS - Mr
TELE COMMUNICAT IONS
SYSTE M
Item H-0
Regular Cooincll Meeting
October 2, 1989
Page 278
MOTION was made by Councilmember 11tur, se--+nded by
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NJ. q9-634 APPOINTINC
3UDGES FOR THE ELECT I04 TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 79 1989.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Planning Director Tremere presented a proposed Interim ordinance
which woulJ establish a moratorium for the Comprehensive Plan
study areas which are being considered for possible chavige for a
period of six months. This will assure that no deve,opment or
changes are processed until the City has had an opport.mity to
review the consultants' reports and to consider the final
updated Comprehensive Plan and Clements. The majority of the
properties which would be included In the moratorium are not in
areas ready for development due to lack of sewer and water.
Such a moratorium is permitted by state law and would enable the
City to undertake the studies and to make the best planninq
declslons without the pressures of prospective developments.
Director Tremere stated if there is a developer who feels
adversely afrected by the moratorium, the developer could seek
an amendment to the ordinance during the six month period.
Mayor Schneider asked what process a developer would go through
to seek exemption from the moratorium.
Director Tremere stated a petition to amend the moratorium
ordinance would be considered directly by the City Council and
not by the Piannlnq Commission. The request would have to
substantlate why an amendment was necessary and why development
could not watt.
Hans Hagen, 23A Rice Street, appeared in opposition to the
proposed ordlnance. He stated the City should not stop the
development process and refuse to hear from the development
community regarding land use. The developers need to be heard
during the Comprehensive Plan update process. Mr. Haqen asked
what celterla would have to be met to o4tain an exemption from
the moratorium and stated the development community should be
aware of it before the ordinance Is adopted. He stated there Is
land In the study area where utilities are available
Immediately. This moratorium could put a hardship on developers
by delaying development for at least stx months and possibly
much longer. Mr. Hagen stated the staff, Plannlnq Commission,
and Council needs to listen to developers regardtnq the
economics of land use. The development community can contribute
valuabte information to the process and should not he shut out.
Counelimember
process or why
Sisk asked when develope-s were shut oia from the
the moratorium would affect develoE.er Input.
RESOLU!ION W0. 89-634
APPOINTING FLFCTW
3UM S
Item "A -P
Interim Ordinance
Establishinq
Moratorium relative to
Updatinq Comprehensive
Plan
Item 8-0
Regular Council Meeting
October 29 1989
Page 279
Mr. Hagen stated he has not been denied the opportunity togepPY
partielpate, but he has not had the opportunity to provide as
much input as he would like. He described the property in which
he has a current Interest and a definite purchase date.
Linda Fisher, Attorney for Trammell Crow, stated she is not in
Opposition to the interte ordinance. iramuell Crow concurs with
the Planning Cummissio,l regarding the proposed land use guide
plan changes involvinq their site which !s served. They are
marketing their site in anttelpatton of those changes. Ms.
Fisher encouraged the Council to act qutekly to complete the
process. She questioned the process !or seeking amendment to
the ordinance and the hardship criteria to be met.
Ken 8rtggs, Harsted Companies, supported Hans Hagen's comptents.
He stated the Council receives Important Information throuqh they
Sketch Plan process and It shotild be continued durinq the
moratorium. Input from developer- is necessary to the Council
and a six month moratorium could actually delay development of
certain parcels by as much as 1-2 years.
Dlrvctor Ircmure st..ted celterla could be developed for
ordinance amendment: consideratlei, such as: 1) Is sewer and water
currently available? 2) Has the parcel been subject to a
transportation analysis?
Councilmember Sisk noted It has been the Council intent to
complete the Comprehensive Plan amendments for ubmission to the
Metropolitan Council by approximately January 1. Developers
have had and will continue to have opportoinitles to make their
views known to the City Council.
Director Tremere explained that the Metropolitan Council will be
sent City -adopted amendments to determine if they are cons stent
with the Metropolitan Transportation and Sewer Plans. The
Metropolitan Council time could be as little as 10 and more than
60 days depending on their review requirements. Director
lremere also noted that developers can submit information to
staff for Informal review at any time. The miortitor tum wore ld riot
affect that. He stated It would be difficult for the Council to
continue consideration of Sketch Plans or other development
appllcatlons durinq the moratorium because Sketch Plans require
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and proposed
developments either comply or involve formal changes which Is
the reason the City Council Is studyinq the key plans relative
to the identified areas.
Attorney Thomson noted there Is nothtnq in the proposed
ordlndnce which *3uld prevent developers from providlnq
Input en the Comprehensive Plan dMendmrnt.s or ytudtese
Regular Council Meeting
October 2, 1959
Page 280
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Vaslllou, to table this Item to October 16 and to direct staff
to recommends 1) How Information from developers can be shared
with Planning Commission and Council, 2) The p ocess by which a
developer can request an ordinance amendment to be exempted from
the moratorium, 3) What criteria would be considered for
ordinance exemption.
Motion carried, four ayes, Sisk nay.
CouncIlmember Vasillou asked why the Northwest Hennepin Human
Services Agency request for City of Plymouth fundlnq for a
Runaway Youth Program remains at S5,000 when only one other city
has contributed. She noted that Plymouth has a runaway problem
and was concerned about usinq Plymouth's CDBG allocation to
attempt to solve a problem for 15 cities; 13 of which did not
contribute to the project.
Manager Millis stated that when the request for funds was made
by NWHHS, most cities had completed their CON public ~earinq
process.
Mark Hoff, Northwest Hennepin Human Sery
fund ralsing process was started too lal
hearings. Funds have be vn received ft
cities will Le approached for funding
encouraged Plymouth to be the First with
program*
ces, verified that the
b for most c1tle3 CORC
im private sources and
again next year. He
major fundlnq for this
Director Tremere stated this request !s responsive to Council
direction that eligible human service requeste. be considered
from CD13C funds rather than general fund. If the Council
desired, the funds could be reallocated throuqh a CWG hesrinq
process conducted by the HRA.
MOTION *as made by Councllmember tltur, seconded by
Cos ncllmnmber Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-635
RF C014ML NU ING APPROVAL OF $59000 OF YEAH XV COMMUNITY DE VE LOPMT. N T
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNPIL
FON THE RUNAWAY YOUTH INITIATIVE..
Councllmember 2itur noted the need for this service Is evident.
He stated, and the Council agreed, that the City will not look
favorably on a similar request for fundlnq next year unless
there is significant city particlpatlon from the service area
and the program !s proven.
Councilmembet Vasillou expressed doubt as to the number of
Plymouth rhildren that would be benefited by the study. The
petitioner should strive to demonstrate that.
CMG Fundtnq for NWHHS
Council Runaway Youth
Proqram
Item 8-R
Rt:SOLUTION N0. 89-635
APPROVAL Or 559omw
YEAR XV CDHC FUNDS )0
NWHHSC FOR RUNAWAY
YOUTH INITIATIVE
Item A -R
Regular Council Meeting
October 20 1989
Page 281
is Motion Aarrled on a Roll Call vote, Schneider, 11tur, Ricker
ayes; Sisk and Vastllou nays.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, ®OAROS AND COMMISSIONS
Councllmember Vasillou noted the PRBC minutes mentioned
anticipated improvements to change neighborhood parks to active
parks.
Manager Willis stated that any park improvements or this type
would be Included In the Capital Improvements Program, which the
Council would need to adopt.
Councilmember titu: corrected the Forum notes of September 25 to
Indicate that all Coun%:ilmembers "voted for" the process for the
comwunity center.
Councilmember littar noted the re31gnat ion o1 Judy '.aTour from
the Park and Recreatlen Advisory Conmmisslor and commended her
for her service. A plaque presentation will be done at a future
meeting.
Councilmember l.ltur reported that he r•-cently toured ,:he
northeast quadrant of the City and noted the va3t amou:tt of
property under development. He hoped that In the future road
and trails will be Installed before development occurs.
Councllmember Vastllou noted the Council has recflverd se.eral
letters from Mr. Coyne relat lioq to conee rns regarding a road,
trees, and berm. She asked If %toff has responded.
Manager Willis st-tLed
Mayor's responses the
seek to meet with him.
of any correspondence.
Mr. Coyne was not pleased with the
staff Is Investigat'nq further and will
The Co.inell will be provided with j eopy
the meeting was adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
Nt-lghbor000i Parks
Forum Notes on
Community Center
Restgnatlon of Judy
LaTour from °RAf
Observations on
Current Development
Coyne Correspondenro