HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 09-25-1989MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
September 25, 1989
tol.lowli%y the Forum, the regular meeting of the Plymouth City
Council was called to order by Mayor Schneider at 7:34 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth
Boulevard on September 25, 1989.
PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Ricker, Vasiltou,
Zitur, Sisk (left the meeting at 9:15 p.m.)
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Willis, Assistant Manager Boyles,
Public Works Director Moore, Community
Development Director Tremere, Attorney Thomson,
and City Clerk Rauenhorst
PRESENTATION
Mayor Schneider ;gated DNR representatives will he at French Identification of
Regional Park at 7:00 p.m. on September 28 to assist residents Eurasian Milfoll
In Identifying the Eurasian milfoil weed, which has been found Item 4
In Medicine Lake.
Addresses were randomly chosen for the "That's Not Trash, It's Recycl+nq ContestCash" recyclinq contest. Item 4
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 8-X (Health and Dental Insurance Program), Itcm 8-U Conseo;L Agenda
Exercise equipment for Fire Station Iii) and Items 8-L-1, Item 5
8-L-2, 8-L-3 (Adoption of assessments) were removed from the
Consent Agenda at the request of Larry Geyerman, 10400 49th
Avenue North.
NOTION was made by Councllmember Zitur, seconded by
Counclimember Sisk, to adopt the Consent Agenda as amended.
Motion carried on a Roll. Call vote, five ayes.
City Manager Willis stated that Trammell Crow has withdrawn Its
request for a fire lane variance (Item G).
MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember
Rlckar, to remove Item G from the agenda per the petitioner's
request.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember 71tur, seconded by Minutes
Councllmember Sisk, to approve the minutes of the September 11, Item *h
1989 reg:llar council meeting.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 251
PUBLIC HEARINGS
City Manager Willis summarized the public improvement hearing
process for Projects No. 944 and 947. The Council scheduled
public improvement hearings after receiving petitions for the
projects, and ordering and receivAng Preliminary Engineering
Reports. Notices were published In the Plymouth Post and
written notice was mailed to each property owner In the Improve-
ment area, as required by law.
Director Moore stated proposed Project No. 944 is .he Improve-
ment of Minnesota Lane from 9th Avenue to 300 feet north of 9th
Avenue. The proposed project includes installation of a 32 foot
wide street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, and an
eight foot wide trail. This Is currently an unimproved street
right-of-way that provides access co four homes, and a future
fifth lot resulting from a recent lot division.
Manager Willis stated the estimated project cost is S39,695.
The majority of the cost would be assessed to the henefitinq
properties, with the City payiiig the trail construction cost.
The estimated assessment per lot is S7,533.60. Manager Willis
explained the assessment hearing process which would occur if
the project is approved and constructed.
N_ -or Schneider opened a public improvement hearinq at 7:53
p.m. on Project No. 944, tmprovements on Minnesota Lac,* from 9Lh
Avenue north 300 feet.
Roger Matti, 925 Minnesota Lane, pre.eented a petition signed by
all property owners abutting the Improvement in opposition to
the project. Mr. Matti stated he has been assessed for var!ous
storm sewer projects over the years and objected to paytnq for
additional storm sewer construr%tion.
Mayor Schneider eiplained that properties can be assessed for
more than one storm sewer project when henefit is received.
Councilmember Sisk asked why some abutting property owners
petitioned for the Improvement and now are in oppo.,ition to It.
Director Moore stared ont. condition of a recent lot di0slon
approval by the Council for Mr. Matti was that ..r petition $or
these improvements Lo serve the new lot. The division has been
completed Ond a house :s ander construction.
Mr. Md1tt stated ..hat he Iran petitioned for the Improvement, but
only because It was required as part of his lot divtsiot,
action. He also stated his opposition to curb and gutter
nstallat7; hecause very lew streets in his area currently have
It. '
Pub] to
Hearing
Project Noe
Item 7--A
Improvement
944
I
0
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 252
Mark Rochford, 945 Minnesota lane, stated he is owner of the lot
created through the lot division action. He, would like to see
the street blacktopped, but noted the surrounding streets do not
have curb and gutter. Mr. Rochford stated the City's share of
the project cost should be greater because ptiople will use the
road to get; to the trail.
Councilmember
an alternative
reconstruction
Sisk asked
to concrete
project*
whether asphalt curb
as previously was done in
would be
the street
Director Moore recommended concrete curb and gutter as the cost
of concrete rather than asphalt is approximately $440 greater
per lot, which is not a substantial portion of the total
proposed assessment. There are also maintenance anJ aesthetic
advantages to concrete: curb and gutter.
Kevin Aplin, 950 Minnesota Lane, stated he moved to his home in
July and would not be able to pay the estimated assessment for
the project. He is opposed to the project.
No one else appeared for the hearing. Mayor Schneider closed
the hearing at. 8:15 p.m.
MOTION was made by
Councilmember Ricker,
DETERMINATION NOT TO
MINNESOTA LANE STREET,
Councilmember
to adopt
PROCEED WITH
STORM SEWER AND
Vasillou, seconded by
RESOLUTION N0, 89-551
CITY PROJECT N0. 944,
TRAIL IMPROVFNENTS.
Councilm,%,nher Sisk asked If there was a disadvantage to the City
In not proceeding with the project.
Director Moore stated there is additional maintenance cost of
gravel rather than asphalt street surfacing, Inadequate
drainage, and use of drive'vays for to-•ninq around due to no
cul-de-sac as was propo -it+ .i the project. He was unaware of
any drainage problem:. ; > severe as to be a potential liability
to the City.
Courtclimember Vasiliou noted that residents could petition for
the improvements again in the future.
Mayor Schneider stated a logical time for this Improvement may
be when 9th Avenue Is reconstructed.
Motion carried on a Poll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 0-551
DETERMINATION NOT TO
PROCEED WITH PROJECT
N0. 944
Item 7-A
s
U
Reqular Council Meeting
Septemb--r 25, 1989
Page 253
Director Moore explained proposed Project No. 947, improvements
to 9th Avenuc from Ranchvlew Lane east to Shenandoah Lane and
Ranchview Lane from 9th Avenue to 7th Avenue. The project
Includes Installation of 32 foot wide streets with concrete curb
and gutter, and storm sewer. Total estimated project cost to be
assessed Is $849482, with an additional estimated City portion
Of S:4,2186 The estimated assessment per lot is $5,564.13,
except one lot which receives only storm sewer benefit and Is
estimated at $1,020.
Mayor Schneider opened the publ.'c Improvement hearing at 8:26
Pam*
Roger Rausch, 715 Ranchview Lane, asked questions relating to
drainage and why concrete curb Is proposed when the only other
concrete curb In the area is on Vicksburg Lane. He stated that
a Ranchview Lane improvement project was proposed 10-15 years
ago but was delayed until stich time as the street near Ranchview
School was straightened. Mr. RiAusch statsud he is in favor of a
surfaced street$
Councllmember Sisk noted that development of four lots to the
northerly end of the Improvement area is the catalyst for the
project. Without the development, the project would not have
been initiated. He suggested that consideration should be given
to whether the developer should Incur a greater portion of the
project cost. Counalimember Sisk asked how this situation is
different from the Hons Hagen development in which asphalt curt,,
rather than concrete, was recently allowed.
Director Moore stated that impro%,ements In the Hans Hagen
development were a reconstruction. I,, this area there is no
existing street to access the four new lots and Ranchview Lane
Is gravel.
Greg Bohnert, 845 Ranchview Lane, asked why any curb was
necessary. He stated he Is in favor of asphalt street surface.
Mayor Schneider explained It is necessary for drainage
purposes. He noted that when reconstruct. i is done In the
future In the rest of the neighborhood, the type of curb chosen
In this project will likely set precedent.
Ken Weller, 15335 9th
project. His access is
and the Improvement
develorment.
Avenue North, stated opposition to the
currently from 9th avenue and Shenandoah
Is unnecessary, except to the new
Public Improvement
Hearing, Project 947
Item 7-B
t
is
11
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 254
Kevin Kuschle, 15500 9th Avenue North, stated he has had
experience with both concrete and asphalt curb and recommended
concrete. He stated he is aware that the curb type chosen for
this project will likely be contlnjed in adjalcent areas.
Councilmember Vasilioao expressed copcern that the Council
previously allowed asphalt curb in the reconstruction project
and now may require concrete curb for this neighborhood.
Several property owners indicated they were in favor of concrete
curb and gutter after hearing of the maintenance and aesthetic
advantages over asphalt.
Mayor Schneider closed the public hearing at 8:50 p.m.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-552 ORDERING
IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 9TH
AVEMUE AND RANCHVIEW LANE STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS,
CITY PROJECT N0., 947.
91rector Moore indicated that the resolution includes
Installation of concrete curb and gutter. He recommended
concrete because it Is more permanent and it is difficult to
maintain drainage with bituminous surfacing.
Councilmemher Sisk again stated that the developer should be
Incurring a greater portion of the project cost.
MOTION to amend the main motion was made by Mayor Schneider,
seconded by Councllmember Sisk, that the Special Assessment
Committee be directed to consider the proposed assessments for
Project No. 947 prior to the Development Contract for the
IGiechle Addition coming before the Council.
Councllmember Ricker asked what specifically the Special
Assessment Committee was being asked to do.
Mayor Schneider stated the Committee could consider whether the
estimated assessments are appropriate given the benefit derived
from the project.
Manager Willis noted that how assessments are spread is part of
the assessment hearinq process. A manner of assigning a greater
portion of estimated project cost to the developer is through
the Development Contract.
RESOLUTION N0. 89-557
ORDERING _RMT
AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS,
PROJECT 947
Item 7-8
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 255
Mayor Schneider stated that the developer
signing the Development Contract whet?%er
greater share of the assessments than is
Attorney Thomson stated it is
of the improvement project
contained In the Development
to Ito
should be zaare before
he will be assigned a
now proposed*
legal to assign a greater portion
cost to the developer if it Is
Cuntract and the developer agrees
Motion to amend carried, five ayes.
Main moti:,n as once amended carried on a
ayes.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
MOTION was
Councilmember
AMENDED SITE
PIONEER HOUSE
made by
Sisk, to
PLAN AND
89070).
Roll Call vote, five
Councilmember IItur, seconded by
adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-553 APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HAIELDF_N
Motion carried on a Roll Cdll vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. R9-553
APPROVINC tom_
USE PERMIT AND AMENnFn
SITE PLAN FOR N.AlFLDFN
FOUNDATION (89070)
Item *8-A
NOTION was made by Councilmember titur, seconded by PESOLUTION N0. 89-554
Counci:memher Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-554 APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TO OPERATr A USI` PERMIT FOR TRUCK
TEMPORARY GARBAGE (RUCK ROUTING STATION (89074). ROUTING STATION
89074)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item *R -R
Norm Behlmer, 2020 Archer Lane, appeared representing Susan
Tippets and Mae Louise Hepokoski, petitioners for a lot division
and variance located at 2320 Larch Lane (149054). Mr. behlmer
requested that payment of park aedication fees be waived until
sale of the lot.
Manager Willis explained that it is the City's practice to
require payment of park dedication fees when the division is
made.
Mrs behlmer stated the petitioner has agreed to pay the cost of
street Improvements abutting the property to t)e lot line and
for a cul-de-sac to serve the lot. There is a 16.S foot
easement on the front of the property. He stated concern with
respect to the size of the lot given the required setbacks. He
asked whether the setback would be from the existing front lot
line or from the 16..`1 foot easement line.
0
Lot nivision and
Variance for
Tippets/Hepokoski
89054)
Item R -C
r
U
is
0
Regular Council Meeting
September 250 1989
Fage 256
Director Tremere stated setbacks are ordinarily measured from
the property line. The ordinance also states that It, clue to an
official action of the City, such an now where an easeme..t is
granted, and a known future right -of -?Ay line or equivalent is
established, setbacks must be from that right--of-way lint.
In response to a question from Mayor Schneider, Mr. 8ehlmer
stated he has no particular objection to setting the house back
further on the lot. He is just concerned that the lot will have
less buildable area.
Manager Willis recommended that the street lmprovemene be a
condition of this approval.
Director Moore noted the proposed resolution states the owner
would be responsible for street and watermoln improvements.
Attorney Thomson recommended that Item 138 of the tngineer's
Memorandum be amended to provide that Kirkwood Lane construction
shall be the responsibility of Lhe owner, rather than the
developer.
Director Moore recommended that lanquage be amended in Items 13A
and 138 of the Engineer's Memorandum to 44selete the provision "or
the developer may petition the City to do the work." He also
suggested that Item 13A be amended to s{,ecify the owner is
responsible for installation and cost of fire hydrant
relocation, and Item 13C be deleted.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councllmember
Iitur, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-555 APPROVING LOT nIVIS10N FOR
MAE LOUIS[ HEPOKOSKI (89054).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, foue ayes. Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Mawr Schneider, seconded by Councllmemher
Iitur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-556 SETTING CONDITIONS TO HE
MET PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT DIVISION FOR MAF LOUISE
HLPOKOSKI adding the conaiLlon that approval is subject to
compliance with the Fngineer's memorandum, Incorporatinq the
charges recommended by the City Attorney and D'rect.or Moore.
89054).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
RF_SOLUTION NO. 89-555
APPROVIRG LOT IMI N
FON TIPPFTS/HFROKOSKI
99054)
Item ,q -C
RESOLUTION NO. 89-554
MTING CONDITTONS TO
NF MFf PRIOR TO FILING
99054)
Item 9-C
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 257
MOTION was made by Councllmember 71tur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 89-SS7
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-557 APPROVyNC LOT APPROVINC LOT nTVT.MN
DIVISION FOR PAIR AND GLADYS KARINIENI (89071). FOR KARTNIFMI (99071)
Notion carried oti a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Item "A -D
NOTION was made by Councilmember lltur, seconded by RFSOLUTION N0, R9 -55A
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-55A .5 TTINGSETTING COMITTONO
CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OR AND REGARDING LOT RE MFT PRIOR TO FILTNC
DIVISION FOR PAUL AND GLADYS KARINIEMI (89071). (89071)
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Item •q-0
MOTION was made by Councilmember Iltur, seconded by RE SOLtIrION NO, 89-559
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-559 APPROVI4C LOT APPROVING LOT nrVTITMN
DIVISION FOR K 8 0 CONSTRUCTION (89072). FOR K 3 0 CONSTRUCTION
9907?)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item •84
NOTION was made by Councilmember Iltur, seconded by RFSOLUTION NO, A9 -w
Councllmember Sisk; to adopt RESOLUTION N0,, 19-560 SErf[NC 0
C014DIII014S TO BE MLI PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RLGARDING LOT BE MITT PRIOR TO FILING
DIVISION FOR K 8 D CONSTRUCTION (9907..21, (1907?)
Notion carried on a F1011 Call vote, five ayes.
Item •A -f
RFSOLUTION NO. 89-561
MOTION was made by Councllmember lltur, seconded byT
Councllmember Slsk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 89-561 APPROVING LCr D111ISION /CONSOLIDATION
DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION FOR TRAMMFLL CROW FOR PROPERTY LOCATF'T) FOR rRAMMFLI.. CROW
EAST OF XENIUM LANE AND NORTH OF SIXTH .AVENUE NORTH (89070. (19073)
Item *S -F
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes,
MOTION was made by Councilmember litur, seconded by RESOLUTION NO. 89-56?
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RFSOLUr10W N0. 19-562 SFTriNC sMinc nNnTTrnN1; TO
CONDITIONS TO HL ML r PRIOR r0 FILING OF AND RE.CARD INC LO r NF Mt r PRIOR rO F IL INC
DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION FOR TRAMMFLL. CROW (99073). 99073)
Item *9-F
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember l l tijr, seconded by RESOLUTION N% A9-54;1
Coustellmemmber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-561 APPROVING 1TNC`-7.STM "7N
Silt. PLAN FOR BUILDING F" FOR rRAMMLLI. CROW (99073), fnR nolLnINC F F()R
TRAMMFLL CRO'w ( 89071)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ,ayes. Item '9-F
The request of Trammell Crow for a fire lane vartance for Regriesk for Fire (tine
Carlson Center Distribution Park BLtldlnq F was reeved from the Variance for Trammell
agenda at the request of the petitioner durinq consideration of Crow - WtthArawn
the Consent Agenda,
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 258
MOTION was made by Councllmember lltur, seconded by
C.wncilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-564 APPROVING
FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR RICHARD NLSLUND FOR
TRENTON OAKS" LOCATEJ NORTH OF ILATH AVENUE %ND ONF BLOCK EAST
OF SOUTH SHORE DRIVE (87069).
Motion carried on a Rall Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Iltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-565 SEITING
CONDITIONS TO BE MET PhIOR TO FILING OF AND RELAIEn TO FINAL
PLAN FOR RICHARD NE SLUND FOR "TRENTON OAKS" LOCATE 6 NORTH OF
TENTH AVENUE. NORTH AND ONE BLOCK EAST OF SOUTH SRORF DRIVE
87069).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOIION was made by Cnunctlmember lltur seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-566 ADOPTING
ASSEGSMENTS, PROJECT N0. 949, SANITARY SFWER AND WATERMAIN AREA
TRENTON OAKS.
Motion carried on a Rcll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was me de by Counctlmember 11ttir, seconded by
Coun.:llmember Sisk, to adopt RLSOLUIION N0. 89-567 APPROVING
SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RICHARD NFSLUND FOR
TRINTON OAKS" LOCATED NORTH OF IENTH AVENUE NORTH AND ONE BLOCK
t 1ST OF SOUTH SHORE DRIVE (87069)o
motion carried oti a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember lltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RLSOLUTION N0. 99-568 AUTHORIZING
RWASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FG -4 1501 PARTNERSHIP
9713?).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote•, five ayes.
NOIION was made by Councilmember
Courcilmember Sisk, to adopt RFSOLUTION
RELEASE Of SITE PE RFORMANCt GUARANIEL
COL014HOUSL ( 88068) .
lltur, seconded by
NO. 49-569 AUTHOR Il ING
FOR DARYL HORNFMAN FOR
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember llttir, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUI[ON NO. 89-570 AUTHORIIINC
Rt LF ASI OF Slit PE RFORMANCt GUARANTY. E FOR HURQ R KING
CORPORATION (8500)).
Not 1011 carried on a ,loll Call vote, four -yes, Sisk abstalneel.
I
RFSOLUTIOtl N0. 89-564
APPROMC MAL ^LT
AND DEVFLOI MENT
romTRACT FOR RICHAPn
NESLUND FOR TRENTON
OWS (87069)
ILew, *8-H
RESOLUTION NO. A9 -56S
SETTM
BF MET PN IOR TO F IL ING
87069)
Item *8-H
RFSOLUT ION N0. 89-3(1
l,
PROJECT NO, 949
Item *8-H
IESOLUTION N0, R9-567
AND CONDITIONAL I ISF
Pl.RMI T FOR TRENTON
OAKS (87069)
Item *9-H
RE SOLUT ION N0, 89-564
GUARANTFF FOR l5oi
PARTNI RSHIP ( 971 T; )
Item *9-1-1
RE SOL11T ION NO. 49-S69
RFFLFA• `TZ-
Gl1ARANTt l` FOR 111RY1_
RORNE MAN (R .m8 )
Item *4-1-
93
RE SOLIi l ION N0. 89 - 5', i
TN Rt`T',L
GUAR AN T t t OR 111 IR(A k
KING (85001)
Item *4-I-1
Regular Coimcil Meeting
September 25, ;989
Page 259
N9N TION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Couvv,limember 'isk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-571 AUTHORIZING
REDUUTON OF SITE IrNFORMANrE GUARANTEE FOR UNITED PROPERTIES
DEVELOPMCNT COMPANY FOR HICI.S CONCRETE SITE ( 88089) .
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ay s.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-572 AUTHORIZING
REDUCTION OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR RONALD OECHA FOR PDI
88009).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
V mager Willis reported that bids were received for r' % West
Medicin•: Lake Drive Trail lml.rovement, Project 931. The low ble
was 48% above the final engineer's estimate. He recommended
thy: all bids be refected and the project be rebid in the
spring.
MOTI01 wai made by Councilmember Vasiliuu, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. A9-573 REJECTING
BID, WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE TRAIL, CITY PROJECT NO. 931.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
Larry Geyerman, 10400 49th Avenue North, asked if Projects 813,
815, and 817 were new construction or reconstruction, and what
por;,lon of the assessments were the City shart.
Manager Willis slated the
The projects will be
properties, except Project
financing%
projects are for new construction.
100% assessed to the benefiting
1115 whitih also Includes tax increment
MOTION was made by Councllmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Vasilloo, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-574 ADOPTING
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT NO. 8139 STREET AND UTILITIES - ??Nn
AVENUE/STEE.PLECHASI. 5TH ADDITION.
Motion carried on a Rn.i Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent,
MOTION was made by Councilmember A tur, seconded by
Councilmember Vasilloti, to adopt RFSOLUTTON N0. A° 575 AnOPTINC
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT NO. 8150 REVERE LANE STREET AND UTILITIFS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk al)sent..
RESOLUTION N0. 89-571
REDUCT ON IN AL
GUARANTEE FOR UNITED
PROPERTIES (88099)
Item *8-3-1
RESOLUTION NO, R9-57
REDUCTION OF FINANCIAL
GUARANTEE FOR RONALD
JECHA FOR PDI (88009)
Item *8-3-?
RESOLUTION N0. 89-573
IR Jt-%- 1 LIRA 1141/0 1 1111
WEST MEnICINF LAKF
DRIVE TRAIL,
PROJECT 931
Item 8-K
RESOLUTION NO. 89-574
ADOPTING S _SSE . ,
PROJF C T NO. 813
Item A -L-1
RFSOLUTWN 140. A9-575
AMPTTRE S ,,
PROJECT NO. X415
Item R -L-?
U
Regular Council Meeting
ScNtember 25, 1989
Page 260
40TION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Counclimember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-576 ADOPTING
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT N0, 8179 STRFET AND UTILITIES - D1JNKIR1(
MEADOWS ADDITION.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-577 ADOPTING
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT N0, 834, MOONEY LAKE - SANITARY SEWER.
Notion ^,arried on a Rot' Call vote, five ayes*
fii1'10N was made by ^ounclimember Ricker, seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-578 REQUEST
FOR PAYMENT N0. 1 AND FINAL, 1989 SEAL COAT PROGRAM.
Motion carried on a Roll Call VkItE, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Councilliember 71tur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RES%ILUTION NO. 89-579 RECEIVING
AMENDED REPORT AND ORDER REVISED PL%NS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WF -ST
MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE TRUNK S.ANIVARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT N0, 905.
0 Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Counctlmembe" Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 99-580 APPROVING
CHANGE ORDER N0. 2, WELL N0. 10 - WATERMf 1N, CITY PROJECT ,VO.
814.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zittir, seconded by
Councllmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 39-:)81 APPROVIN
CHANGE ORDER N0. 5, 10141 AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II, CITY
PROJECT N0. 648.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Couneilmember ltt.ur, , rnnded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 99 -5;1? R1 f)IICING
DEVFLOPMENT BOND, HOULDLR RIDGE ADDITICH (881?4).
Motion carried on a Roll fill vote, five dyFs.
0
RESOLUTION N0, 89-576
I.'v' r ay.V IJVLJJI IL 1 1 J,
PRnJECT N0, 817
Item 8-L-3
RESOLUTION N0, 89-577
ADOPTING ASS SSM N S,
PROJECT N0, 834
Item *8-L-4
RESOLUTION NO, 89-578
FINALA M FOR 1989
TEAL COAT PROGRAM
Item 8-M
RESOLUTION NO, 89-579
RFPORT ANS ORnFR P1.ANS
AND SPEC:''ICATIONS,
WEST MEDICINE. LAKF
DRIVF. TRUNK SANITARv
SFWER AND WATFRMAIN
PROJECT N0. 901
Item 4 9-N
RESOLUTION NO, 89-580
APPROVING CHANGE Wn
N0. ?, WELL NO. 10
PROJECT NO. 814
Item *8-0
RESOLUTION NO, 89-5AI
APPROVING CHAMgs. OR R
NO. 5, S.J. GROVES
AREA PHASE 11, PROJE C T
N0. 648
Item *8-P
RESOLUTION NO. 89-582
RF norINC r
BOND, HOULOE.R R IPCf
AnDN. (881,'4)
Item *8-0
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 261
is MOTION was made by Councilmember Zltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-583 APPROVING
LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPTION FOR WEST MEDICINE LAKE COMMUNITY CLUA.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-584 APPROVING
DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING AUGUST 31, :989.
MoLion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Manager Willis recommended adoption of resolutions adoptinq the
proposed 1990 City budgets, approving proposed 1989 property tax
levies, and setting October 16 as the public hearing on the
proposed 1990 Budgets and proposed tax levies in order to comply
with the Commissioner of Revenue's procedures and Truth in
Taxation provisions of the 1988 tax bill.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Z1tur, seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 49 -SAS ADOPTING
PROPOSED 1990 BUDGETS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Cour ilmember Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-586 PROPOSfO
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1990.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by
Councilmember 1'asiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 89-597 SITTING
PUBLIC HEARING FOR 1990 CITY BUDGEIS.
Motlin carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
Larry Geyerman, 10400 49th Avenue North, stated his opposition
to the purchase of exercise equipment for Fire Station III. He
believed this is a duplication nf services that will already be
available at the Community Center and fire fighters should he
encouraged to be members there.
The Council supported the need for equipment at the Fire Station
for convenience and availability to the fire fighters.
Mayor Schneider stated it is money well spent to keep the City's
vilunteer fire fivhters physically fit.
RESOLUTION NO, 89-5A3
EXEMPTION FOR WEST
MEDICINE LAKE
COMMUNITY CLUB
Ttem *8-R
RESOLUTION N0, 89-5R4
DISBURSEMENTS FOR
PERIOD FNDING 8-31-89
Item *h-)
RESOLUTION N0, 89-5A5
ADOPTING PR i "n
Rum IS
Item A -T-1
RESOLUTION NO, 99-594
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES
FOR TAXFS PAYARLF IN
1990
Item A -T-?
RESOLUTION N0, A9-587
SETTING PUALTC G
FOR 1990 BUDGETS
Item A -T-3
Exercise Equipment for
Fire Station III
Item 8-U
J
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 262
Councilmember Vasiliou noted that purchase of this egijlpment was
discussed at a budget study session and the Council wa% Informed
the equipment Is needed and will be used by all fire fighters,
not just those stationed at Fire Station III. If the equipment
Is not sufficiently used at Station III, it will be moved to
another location.
MOTION was made by Counctlmember Ricker, seconded by Mayor
Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 89-586 AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF A SELECTERIZED WEIGHT TRAINING MACHINE FON FIRE
STATION III.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
The Council considered possible name changes for County Road 9
as proposed by the Building Official. Director Tremere provided
a map Indicating various sections of the; roa 1. The Mayor said
segments A and B should be named "Old Rockford Road", and
Segmcnts C and D are proposed as "Rockford Road". That would
retain the historical value of this road and would resolve the
current address problems.
Councilmember Vasillou noted this Is conslstent with the request
of the Historical Society to retain street names of historical
significance in the City.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Counctlmember
Zltur, to establish a public hearing for Octoher 16 on the
proposed name changes for County Road 9, with direction to staff
to notify all owners affected by the proposed chane as well as
the Historical Society.
Motton carrted, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Counctlmember Zltur, seconded by
Councilmember Sisk, to adopt RLSOL.UTION N0. 99-589 APPROVING
APPRAISALS FOR EMINENT DOMAIN PROCELDINGS, CITY PR07ECT N0. 91?.
MoLlon carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Larry Geyerman, 10400 49th Avenue North, stated his opposittun
to the Council receiving reimbursement for health and dental
Insurance benefits provided by a carrier other than regular City
Insurance covegrage.
Attorney Thomson stated reimbursement of benefits In this manner
Is a legal expenditure.
Councilmember Ricker stated this is not a new Item but rather
equalizes benefits so all Counclimembers are treated the same.
RESOLUTION NO, 89-59R
ACOUTSITION OF
EXERCISE FOUIPMENT FOR
FIRE STATION III
Item 8-U
Street Name Chanqes
for Countv Road 9
RESOLUTION NO, R9 -5A9
FOR EMINENT DOMAIN,
PR()JL C T 912
Ttem "9-b
Regular Council Meeting
September 25, 1989
Page 263
Councilmea+ber Vasiliou stated she brought to the Council's
attention that she was receiving a lesser amoint than the other
members and this action will resolve that inequality. She
stated that she intends to request retroactive benefit
reimbursement since she was treated differently than the other
members for the last 1 112 years.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, secondedby
Councilmember Vasillou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 89-590
HEALTH/DENTAL INSURANCE PROGRAM.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, Sisk absent.
MOTION was made by Counciinember Vasillou, seconded by
Counci.lmember Ricker, to receive the report on Residential Care
Facilities.
Notion carried, four ayes, Sisk absent.
The Council reviewed the Project Status Report.
Councilmember Vasillou questioned the status of the 1989
Reconstruction Project.
Director Moore responded that all affected property owners have
received notice of the assessment hearing scheduled for C-:tober
2. The estimated assessment at the time of the improvement
hearing was $880 per lot. The final assessment Is approximately
800 per lot.
Director Moore reported that balllny has been discontlniied on
Project No. 909, Well No. 11, because it appears the hard
limestone above the Gordan saoidstone cavity is breakinq down.
Construction of Well No. 12 is continuing, althouqh sandstone
problems have been encountered in that project as well.
Councilmember Vasiliou noted the lead problems from sandblasting
water towers that have recently occurred in other cities.
Director Moor" stated that recent paintinq. ar,d all pabitinq in
the future, has been done with non -lead based paint.
Councilmember Vasillou presented a recent newspaper article
Indicating that church services are held at the Plymouth Creek
Elementary School. She noted this is a second use and asked
whether the use is appropriate or if a conditlonal use permit is
needed. Staff should check and report back.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:18 p.m.
1 /
v f
v er
RESOLUTION N0. 89-590
HEALTHIDENTAL
INSURANCE PROGRAM
Item 8-W
Report on Residential
Care Facilities
Item 9-A
Project Status Report
Item 9-A
Plymouth Creek School