HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 05-10-1988 BOES//
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW
MAY 10, 1988
The meeting of the Plymouth City Council, sitting as the Board of Review, was
called to order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on May 10, 1988.
PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasilinu, Zitur, Ricker, and Sisk, and
City Manager Willis, City AW;.essor Hovet, Appraisers Mauderer, Carroll,
Toy, and Bye, Assessment Technician Olsson, and City Cler'< Brandt
ABSENT: None
BOARD OF REVIEW
Mayor Schneider stated the purpose of the oeeting was to review the valuations #if
all real property within the City, to hear citizens who have complaints with
respect to their valuations, and for the Board of Review to make any adjustments
which they believe are warranted based upon their independent review. He stated
that th central question is not the level of property taxes nor the percentage of
Increase. The issue is the market value or classification of the property on
jnuary 2, 1988.
Assessor Bovet stated that notice of the meeting was published in the City's
official newspaper, the Plymouth Post, and notices were also posted within the
community, on the City's cable channel, and discussed at previous meetings. He
exp.la+,ned the procedure for the hearing ono pointed out that final determinations
would not be made trnight but at the meeting cP May 24.
City Assessor Hovet Introduced the appraisers on iiia staff. He uxplalned ghat
Plymouth is governed by the State on how to measure property valve miovew, .nt.
A Minnesota law states that an appeal must be made in person, by a representative,
or in writinj to the City before the value can be appealed to the County to
protect the individual's right to further appeal. NO stated he had 18 written
appeals which he would read intq the record later in the meeting.
Mayor Schneider opened the hearing at 7x40 p.me
Bruce Franz, 12465 50th Ave., P.I.D. 11.418-22-23-0038, stated his valuation was
and the reminder of his nolghborhood was In the S135}000-$146,000
range. He would like his how looked at again.
Harris Goldstein, 2710 Wolock lane, P.I.D. 23-139-22-43-0064, stated the
vat on of ,600 was at 100% of aaale price. He believes that the rest of
PI auth is at 94% and would like his value reduced accordingly.
P,enny_Ellert, 4085 Goldenrod Lane, P.T.D. 14-116-22-42-0085, cow4mred prices in
ehrneorfoodandfour -.d that her how is valued more in spite of the fact that
she paid less for it initia, .),% She would like it reeheeked.
I..`i
M•_11
S//
Board of Review
May 10, 19138
Page Two
Mary Lee, 14510 44th Ave., P.Y.D. 16 -118 -2? -l1-0016, stated her value was $2099000
and a real estate aq;jnt has told her It would sell between $190,040 and $200,000.
Hormts for sale in her neighborhood are dsk&ng less than her value.
Martina Eschenbur . 4105 Minnesati, Lane, P.I.O. 16-118-22-13-0073, purchased his
home farr5170,UW and it Is now valued at $173,000 which she believes is too
high. She would like it losered.
Kathleen Pederson, 988S 11yt Ave., P.I.Q. 24-118-22-14-0006, stated her home !s on
t e end of a cul-de-sac whish she feels should lower her value.
Patricia White, 3445 111ghway 101, P.I.flo
oe,sn t have"eaa problem wl,th the value of
The property has been agrlcultural since
would like to knew why.
19-118-22-12-0003 and 0004, stated she
the hsae, only with the classification.
1968 but was changed this year. She
Shoran Lee, 1105 Vagab.Aid Line, P.I.D. 31-118-22-21-0009, stated her
roo 511TOtW to $1349300. After converkiations with staff, they
10,000 but she doesn't feel this !s enough. The average increase in
In her neighborhood is S% and hers was 16.38X.
Linda banson,
reeve .uatl'on .
value went
reduced it
valuations
315 linnla Lane, P.I.D. 21-118-22-13-0016, submttted her request for
Deanna LeVaul:, 17205 C.R. 6, P.I.D. 29.118-22-33-0043, operates a pre-school at
tPi church., The church is not makial a profit, from her busiinessl it !s a
c•atmnity service. She asked if other businesses in the church were: being taxed.
Aaseasur Novat answered that other businesses are not being taxed because they .run
for such shorter periods of tiaei hers operates for 150 days per year. SlM1.ce
direction to start taxing these types of operations nows f om Hennepin County, he
suggCsted Ms. LaVault address her concerns to them.
djb LanvoAter, 1591S 46th 1ve., N.I.D. 06-118-2&1 .44-0010, Murch( ;pied his horse in
anus '.V, TTWi and the estimated market value is $21,000 aver the ;purchase prlcu.
He. would like It reviewed.
31m 01*tlo, 401.20 Minnesota Lane, P.I.D. 16-118-22-13-00680 stated h1 i concern is
w•,to the negatives which are not beitiq considered In determining value. HIS value
Is 98.39• oV what he paid for the home.
Robert Pratxr 1806 Yum Lan*, P.I.D. 29-119.22-41-0121, recently purchased his
r 01"
Fs
or conslderably less than the market value. It is being appraised at 17.5%
more • tan khat he palti Ia December, 1987.
aro Reinke, 14410 C.H. 6, P.I.D. 28-118.12-44-0005, stated the City will be
to ng part of his yard for the widening of C.R. 6 which will impact his value -
Ib asked that thlb be considered.
Assnssor Ibvet stated Mr. Reinke's property, alan4 with that of Mr. Brad Hagg,
14417 C.R. 6 and M.s- Bobby Etheridge, 14515 C.P. 6 will bE revlowed and reported
on.
Hs//
Word of Review
148,.1 10, 1996
Page Three
Al Coblirsch, 5505 Vlck3btirg lane, P.I.Do 05-118-22-44-00+3, pointed out that hos
va uatl;Was up to $150,000 from $144,000 and believes the deter torat toe: should
be more than the amount of the increase.
Skaar, 1105 Fverveen lane, P.I.D. 35-118-22-12-0035,
Poad, P.I.D.
paid 77,000 and her
valuation is $92,90-. She Questioned what comparables were tieing used.
ki NMA- a,.rd, 96,15 36th Ave., P.I.O. 24-118-22-11-0007 and 0006, owns a
ommerc a ng at, 36th Ave. and Kilmer Lane•. His value was 90% more than
last year,
Assessor H-jvet stated this subdivision has remained stable for a long tlnte.
Ma;ket value of comm rctal property was ralsed in pre%sous years and this parcel
was evidently missed# Now It's time to catch up.
TM Kroenke, 18525 6th Ave., P.I.Q. 31-118-22-31-0032, stated Hennepin County
lowered his value last year. His cancern is that 113 home is on a poor lot and
would like this taken into conaidecation.
Patrick Hallisa, 4465 Quantico Lane, P.I.D. 16-118-22-32-0009, stated he is
protest ng fast rear13 valuation tro court and would also like to protest this
year's.
Assessor Havet stated, because of Mr. Halasey's petition in court, thure is
nothing tf a City esus do on his appeal.
1.&rrj Derka, 11705 Bass Lake Poad, P.I.D. 02-118-2243-0024, stated the land value
Sas ncre"ed 44% to $59,000 and he would like an explanation.
@i t, 220 Forestview Lane, P.I.D. 35-114-22-43-00349 was told the computer
ato a mistake but he believes the value is still - oo highs lie wants staff to
look at his nsighborhood becaisse it is old and not vw.ry desirable+.
Peter tysid4il, 1005 C. Medicine Lake Boulevard, F.I.D. 24-118-22-32-0009, submitted
a letter rMquesting a review of KIs property.
Richard Meer, 14515 45th Place, P.I.D. 09-118-22.44-0012, stated his valuation
acease 07,700 over the 1987 value of $184,500. Several improvements were
made, but not enough tO JU 41 fy this increase.
Don Frale , 1469 Larch Lane, P.I.D. 26-118-22-43-0038, was concerned with the
value compared to the house next door which was identical when built. doth have
been added tit but his nelghbor's is on a more deairat,le lot.
3oan Schou, 1160 Evergreen Land, P.I.D. 35 -118 -:?-12-0024 stated the bank recently
app,--alseirthe home at: $90,000 and she believes the $98,600 frOM the My is too
h1yh.
Chris Perrino, 14460 40th Placa, P.I.D. 1.6-1:0-22-41-0022 and 0023, bought the
property at Via beginning of the year foe $97,500 and It's now valued at
1200200. He eheo*ed with others in the neighborhood and they have &menities his
home doesn't.
I/S I
board of Review
MAY 10, 1980
Page four
William Kir IPJ5ton't 4375 : thaea lane, Pal e0o 16 -118-22 t 1-00639 stated his valtse is
9.4% over last year's ar.d vwill like Jt reviewed.
Pan Brunk, 14535 13th Ave., P-1.0. 33-118.22-11-0038, statdd she dIdn't questlon
t va .re untll this year when she was told by a real estate agent she cotildn•t
get more than S84.000* the sat icet value Is 576.900.
Don Cri 250 Zachary Lane, P.I.D. 36 -116 -22 -3) -OWI; stated his value went
from , to $116,600. Ne pointed oast swan things whleh Beres wrong with the
property acid shou.,d be taken Into considerations
Me Septa^ 1.3510 Sunset trail, MrO. 34-II842-34-000.1, stated his pro0ew is
with t 7'lfacent property, the fact that the Coe rty has his loot site wr'onq, and
the deteri lrating ev.WitleR of his hose. H believes a value ,)f 573,300 would be
fair.
Assessor *vat read the eallow'leig navies atzd p. l .Do's tato the ,record as having
asked for market value or c143SIftea+'tion revieu: Janes Sentman, 1.2.510 Suytset
Trall, P.I.D. 34-118-22-34--.1011 Ucy Thr^heck, 2825 Holly Lane, P.I.D.
20-11842-32-007ij Patricia Cuppy 8 Thoaas DaI91013h, 4825 Orleans t -to, P.I.O.
12-116-22-42-0014: Myth -rest Roel Fstate, P.I.D. 36-116• .11'92? -01321,
36-118-.',243-0019, and 36--116-22-23.00211 Robert Putnam, 10813 45th Ave., P.1.0.
1241842-3240231 3olle A Mike Rowm, .x005 Kilaer lane, P.I.D. 24416-22-41-0040;
Michael Cratte, 1005 Berkshire Ave., P.I.1. 34-110-22-22-00151 Park Place, P.I.D.
21-118-2241-0003 and 0004, d1-116-22-114005 and 04061 Sharoti Braaten, 1175
Evergreen Lane, P.I.D. 35-118-22 12,00371 3ohn Qulles, 200 Zachary Lane. P.I.D.
3i -118-Z2-33-0008= Banner Engtneering, LS1 Corp., and Universal Circuits, P.I.D.
36-118-22-11-00261 27-118-241-13-0011, and 27-118-22-13-00071 Rose Klabuchor, 1315
Oakview Lam, P.T.D. 264-11842.33-110261 Gordon 8 Ferguson, 2915 Niagara Lane,
P.I.D. 21-118*22-31.0013 and 00131 3ean 8 ton Albrightson, 2860 Evergreen Lane,
P.'.D. 2341842-42-00011 Lee 8 Linda Larson, 331 Zinnia Lanni, P.I.D.
34-118-22.31-00221 Cynthia Coplen and Michael Roos, 3945 Harbor Lane, P.T.D.
64184241-OOM and 3aae3 Monteith, 2125 Carland Lane, P.I.D.
29-118-22-24-0027.
The Board of Review wis recessed at MO pone to be reconvened on Tuesday, Mato 24
at 7130 pea.
A ••.