Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 07-27-1987 SpecialM I N U T F S SPVCIAL. COUNCIL MH TING JULY ?79 1987 A special meeting cf the Plymouth City Council was c..alled to order by Mayor Schneider at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Cham- bers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on Duly l7, 1987. PRESENT: Mayor Schn;bide r, Counc;tlmembers Crain (who arrived at 7:43 p.m.), Vasillnu, l_Ltur, and Sisk, Man,cger Willis, Planning Jirector lremere, Public Works Director Moore, Park OLrector Blank, Finance Director Hdhn, Dlrectoe Carlquist, City Attorney Thomson, and City Clerk Brandt ABSENT: hone CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Counc:llmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Litur, to adopt the consersL agenda with ,modifications to the minutes of the Duly ?0 meeting. MoLlon carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MINUTL-i MOTION was made by Coinclimember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to approve the minutes of the Regular Council meeting of Duly 20, 19F7 with modifications reflecting Counclimember's Sisk questior:s and comments regarding the organiteci colle:!tlon and recycling proposals. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. PWL1C NLARING Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Jun Hloom, 3223 Flaq Courtp slated she is taking care of the cleanup at 5140 Zachary Lane. She has the property owner's power of attorney. Attorney Thomson stated power of attorney m.;ans she has the pro- perty owner's permission to sign documents and take care of the situation. The property owner still hdS the responsibility of getting the nuisance problem resolved. The proposed resolution finds that this 13 a public nuisance and orders that the prn- pe:rty owner remove these items by August 10, CONSENT AGENDA Item 4 MINUTE'S - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DULY 20, 1997 Item S" PUBLIC NEARING - ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE Item 6-A is Speclal Council Meetlnq July 27, 1987 Pd qty ?15 Hs. Bloom stated a int of the cars have been removed and they are in the: process of removing Lhe hay and weeds dnd tdVinq cdre of the• lawn; this will be a total Clean tip. Attorney Thomson stated thdt 7n August 11, If the property were not cleined up, the City %ould order they ,fob completed dnd assess the costs against the property. Manager Willis stdted 1 e will provide the Council with a stdtuS report on August 3. There dppedrs to bed good fd lth effort being m.3de to clean the property. Ms. Bloom stated It Is her Intention to do d complete clean tip so they can rent the property i nt L 1 it Is sold. Councllmembeyr Crdin joined they meeting cit 7:43 p.m. Director CdrlquLsL stated ..he report lists 11 nuisances still on the property rhic:h should give Ms. Bloom somethinq to work on by August 10, Mayor Schneider closed the hearing dt 7:47 p.m. MUTION was made by Councilmember 71tur, secuetded by Councilme:m- ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 87-492 DIRECTING AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF A NUISANCE AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC SAFETY HAZARD BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO CONlPLLTL REQUIRE.0 CLEANUP AND ASSESS COSTS INCUDING EXPENSES AGAINST THE PROPERTY PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 2010 addtn.1 the folliwing to the eighth paragraph: "and all other items Identified In the police department's report which has been fur- nished to the property owner's representctive at the duly 27, 1987 Council meeting." Attorney Thomson stated the Council, by approving the resolu- tion, gives the City the authorlty to Clean up the property if they property owner doesn't. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, tour ayes. Councilmember Crain abstained. PL71TIONSo REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mdnajjer Willis stated that this item Inas referred to this meet- ing becau:ee or a question on the park easement at the July 20 meeting. Director thank has proposed a 30 ft. trail to the north of the cul-de-sac which has been included in the resolu- tion ds condition 014. Director Blank stated he is recommending an easement at this tiMt and, If the property to the north is developed a43 Indus- trial and the easement isn't oee:ded, It can be vacated. RESOLUTION N0. 87-44? Xff TFWM OF NUISA HEALTH 8 SAFETY HAZARD Item b -A bpi --%1-41 Council feet inq July 27. 1^67 Pdye i l.i MOTION was medes by Counr.11meTiber Sisk, se.. ;- 0ed by Councl Imr.mhor ORDINANCE NO. 47-16 1..itur, to adopt ORDINANCE 140. 87-;6 AMEN' 1NG THF I.ONINC OR01- AMENDIR 709INC COLA NANCE-. TO CLASF IF CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED AT 54TH 8:l`NUi AND !E.IONINC LAND NATHAN LAPEL TO R-3 (MF'DIUM DF.NSiTY MULTIPLE RFSIDc.ACF) DISfRirr PONDS 14ORTH AND I-1 (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT. (87058) ILen, 7-A Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes. NOTION was mac!" by Counci i member Sisk, seconded by Ccunci lmember RESOLUTION NO. 87-493 Litur, '-i adopt RF_SOLUTION NO. 87-451 SETTING CONRITION TO BE SETTINra COMIT MET PRIOR TO PUBL.ICAi lON JF ORDINANCE REZONING LANs LOCATED AT REIGNING LAND 54TH AVENUE AND NATHAP LANF FOR Gi ?IN.S HACKS S, NORTHWOOD 110muS, PONDS NORTH INC. 017f..)Sb) (S7058) Item 7-A Motion r.rrried on a Roll Call vote, five .ryes. MOTION was made by Councilmc!mber Sisk, seconded by rouncilme m., ter RESOLUTION NO. 67-494 J Itur, to adopt RLSOLUTIOY NO. 87-494 APPROVING F RFA IMINARY F..AT PRELIMINARY PLAT I— AND VARIANCE FOR DENNIS BACKFS, NORTHWOOP I ME:S, INC. F"R PONDS VARIANCE, PONDS NORTH NORTH (67058). (87058) Item 7-.A Motion carried oil a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was mace by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Couricilmember RESOLUTION N0, 97-495 Litur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 87-495 REDUCING DEVF:LOPM[:NT BOND, Bono Rnm= GLEN ECHO PONDS 2ND ADDITION (84066) to $0. GLEN ECHO PONDS 2ND 84066) Motion carried on .; Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 7-8* MOTION was made by Counclimember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember RESOLUTION N0. 87-496 Litur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 87-496 RCCEPTING BID, HIGHWAY 101 ACCEPTING BID AND FLRNEiR00K LANE TRAILS, PROJECT NO. 724 from Hardrives, Inc. HWY 101 8 FERNBROOK In the amount of $124,160.25. TRAILS, PROD, 724 Item 7-C'• Motlon carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, secrnded by Counctlmember ^ESOLUTION N0. 67-497 Litur, to adopt RLSOLUTION N0. 87-497 APPROVING TEMPORARY ON. MALT LIQUOR LICENSE. LICENSE Item 7-0* Motion carried on a Roll Tall rote, four ayes. MOTION waa made by Counciimember Sisk, seconded by Councllmember RESOLUTION N0. 87-498 11 tur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 87-498 DECLARING SURPLUS PRO- REFORVEYANCE Or T`Ar PERTYO R0- PERTY, RECONVEYING AND CONVEYING PORTIONS OF SAID PROPERTY AND FGRFEIT LAND APPROVING SALE OF SAME TO THE. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER THROUGH Item 7-E* PRIVATE. SALE, Muton carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. RLPORTS Of OFFICLKS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Director Mocre stated the Fernbrook project is slighty delayed PROJECT STATUS REPORT because the surcharging wisn't completed. however, grading dl1 item 8-A start today. The storm of last week set back work on the water tredLment plant by three to four days. Ire------------ -- --- - -- --- ---- — - -- - . _ -- - - -- ---- -- - - - -- - --- -- J Speclal Council Meeting July 27, 1987 Page 217 Mayor Schneider stated the proposal is to put cats under the same control as dogs. Counclimember Vasiliou noted that Minneapolis history Is thdt only 1 to 2% of cat owners retrieve their animals from the poind after they have been picked up which leaves the City to pay all the charges. She stated she doesn't know where Plymouth would get the personnel to handle the situation. Councilmember Sisk agreed but stated that the CSO's have told residents calling with cat complaints that they cannot do any- thing because the City doesn't have do ordirwnc : against cats. Mayor Schneider stated the City can address the problem under its nuisance ordinance. Councilmember VdSI11.oU stdted )l owners associations could police sure any Council can address the Irresponsible pet owners. ould b. helpful if the home - their own members. She !sn't war" between responsible and Councilmember 11tur stated the City needs to educate residents concerning nuisances and make use of the live traps. Plymouth on Parade should be used .is well .is in person visits to home- owners association meetings. Mdior Schneider suggested that CSO's tell residents when they complain Oat there is no cat control ordinance but the nuisance ordinance will cover the prohlem. It was the concensus of the Council that the nul!tdnce ordinance could cover the problem along with increased public education and CSU use of the ordinance. Councilmember Sisk stated that he can see the rationale with the pooper scooper" law, however, enforcement would be very dlfii- cult and costly. Couacilmember Crain stated these activities are a nuisai ce but enforcement will be difficult and expensive and the nuisance ordinance should address this along with publ[.. education of the problem and the law. Councilmember Sisk suggested that, if the nulsance u^-dinance doesn't cover this, tole language should be changed. Councllmember Zitur stated most of his calls are about dogs run- ning loose and believes educating the public to the law is the first step in the solution. Mayor Schneider pointed out that, if the "pooper scooper" ordl- nance were adopted, level of service would be expected by the public and the City cannot afford personnel to enforce it. CAT CONTRC± ORDINANCE Item d -H J Special Council Meeting July 27, 1987 Page 218 director Cariquist stated the nuisance ordinance already covers any unhealthy activities. Councilmember Crain suggested that Signs be posted in the parks stating what the leash law is. Councilmember Vasiliou stated it isn't right that dogs run free. Councilmember Sisk suggested having an officer patrol areas dur- ing heavy use to stop and educate people to the law. Discu -cion evAinued on .-giforcement, level of e:nflorcement, and how to educate the publiv. Director Blank stated Section )'5 of the City Code co -ers con- trol of animals in public areas stating that they must be leash- ed a1)1l are not allowed to defaCdte. Director Cariquist stated he will begin selective enforcement in they parks. Counctlmerrher Vaslllo,j stated she would categorize this as an awareness issue for the police department to re -enforce the ordinance with residents before beginning the fining process. Councilmember Crain stated the offenders are probably chronic and a period of enforcement might gest the word around. Mayor Schneider suygested giving warnlnas to people when they are caught violating the ordinance and toles that the City will begin enforcing it in a short tins,. Director Blank stated They have begun putting signs tip on the trails with the leash law on them because of the number of com plaints being received. The Council agreed to the warning process beginning in the parks with the ordinance being enforced after September 1. Councilmember Vasiliou stated It appeared that erosion control works well, however, the policy doesn't seem Lo be working. She noted that the same developers have to be called over and over to make them comply. Discussion followed on the problem of how to get developers to be more proactive and how the City can enforce the policy. Ulrector Tremere stated this Is not a Code enforcement matter but, rather, Is a poll. -y administration matter. Ulrector Moores stated one of the problam; is that the developers ary not monitoring builders It, the development areas well enul ih, however, the situation is much 1,Aproved over other years. He suggested one phone call to remind the deoveloper of the policy, then the fine. EROSION CONTROL Item 8-C I Special Council Meeting July 27, 1987 Page 219 Councilmember Sisk asked ford report of previous erosloii con- trol compliance when a developer comes to the Council with a new development proposal. MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded by Councilmem- ber VdsilioU, that the Mayor ;trite a letter to the developers and builders statlnq the Couicil's concerns. Motion failed, one aye. Mayor 'ichneider and Councilmembers Sisk, Vasiliou and Crain voted nay. Attorney Thomson stated a policy cannot carry a court imposed penalty such as a fire, however, a policy can he enforced and can charge penalty fees. DirLctor Moore stated this is part of the development contract and the money is taken out of the financial guarantee If the developer doesn't pay the clean up costs. Discussion followed about possible policy changes which would eStablish penalty fees. Attorney Thomson titated he believed the draft of the policy change should be sent to the developers for their information. Manager Willis stated the City should go after the tndivldual builders unless they cannot be determined, in which case we would go after the developer. Director Moore suggested a moratorium on all building in a develnpment until the streets are cleaned. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Counclimember titur, that a warning letter be sent to developers stating that the policy is to be strictly enforced and, on August 3, the Council will take this under consideration again; the Council may direct that building insoectlons will cease unless erosion control Is in place and streets are clean. Penalties after August 3 may be raised subject to the City Attorsiey's opinion. Motion carried, five ayes. Director Moore stated that the Pavement Management Study was begun last year when the city retained Short-t:lllott-Hendrickson to conduct the study with the goal of protecting the City's In- vestment In its streets. The study Is now completed. Dick Moore, Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, state.1 their study TnclU e 77a1 the streets in the City of which there are 206 miles. 25% show severe distress, 62% need routine maintenance, and 13% are in poor condition requiring either partial or total reconstruction. He recommended a two year program for the main- tenance of streets be undertaken at a total estimated coat for the improvements of approximately $3,000,000. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY Item 8-D 19 Special Council Meeting 3uly 27, 1957 Page 2?0 Uirector Moore summarized the study and the three proposed pro- grams with their estimated costs and the split be-tween the City's cost and that which is recorrmenied to be assessed to the homeowners. He is recommending that the consultants submit a proNosal and the Council consider an infrastructure replacement program. Councllmember Sisk stated this is an issue which must he addres- sed and believes the Council should get stdrtee' on it. He would not like L., aee the streets deteriorate any further. Discission follawed on the, priority areas and the cost of handl- ing each. Mayor Schneider stated he would like to see the yellow areas, those requirlr•g resurfacing, completed first before they deteri- orate further. Councllmember Sisk asked if the reconstruction would be to the standards being used by the City today. Director Moore answered that this wouldn't be an upgrading, simply replacement of existing streets. Councilmember Sisk asked how some reconstruction areas can be so low in priority. Director Moore answe[ed that, when streets are reconstructed, they would be to tw^nty year life at a 7 ton level and, if thl re is no curb and gutter clow, they would be without curb and gutter. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, to accept the report and direct staff to negotiate a contract with S.E.H. Motion carried, five ayes. Mayor Schneider stated his concern is with putting the City's priority on stopping the loss. MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Zitur, that the City Engineer revise the "Engineering Standards" to include the recommendations in the Pavement Management Study, present the revisions to the Development Council, and bring these revisions back to the City Council for consideration. Councilmember Stsk stated there are 206 mt!.es of street and the growth of the City could double this. The survey results show that some roads have deteriorated prematurely because of subsoil conditions. If the pity could require that road construction in certain areas reflect the soil coWltions, the City %juldn't be put in d position of having to replace roads prematurely and absorb the Costs because the rhad wasn't constructed right6 I Special Council Meeting July 27, 1987 Page 221 IS Uirector Moore stated there are engineering quidellnes which he can revise to incorporate the standards. These will be present- ed to the development council and then the Council for action. Mayor Schneldcr d1ded he would like to see a reicommendat !.on oti the imp ementation of the new specifications; who falls under the new standards and who falls Qnder the old. Motion carried, five ayes. Director Moore stated these proposed office revisions should provide enough space for office personnel for the next ten years. The overall estimate is W0,000-$150,000. He summariz- ed they plans. Discussion followed on cost, colors, and equipment needed, Councilmember IlLur stated lobby and how to attract assistance„ He would like lobby. his concern with the signage in the customers to tht right counter fc.- to see additional furniture in the Councilmember Vasllinu stated her concer that none of the Items were bid. Manager Wlltis stated it will be necessary to get 'aids If the is Item exceeds $15,000, however, speciflcations have not yet been established. Director Moore pointed out that no contractors have been awarded bids. Attorney Thomson stated he would like to take a closer look at the bidding requirements for this project with staff. He beli- eves the appropriate approach is to comply with the hiddlnct 1G. if appllcable. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Counot lmembt Crain, to accept the recommendation of staff to revise the City Center office building and Instruct the City Attorney to work with staff on putting together those items which are needed for bidding. Motion carried, four ayes. Councilmember Vaslliou abstained. The Council reviewed the status of claims against the City. Director Blank reported on what other cities do and that most do not allow private docks on public property. He summarized the four options. 0 CITY CF.NTUR OFFICE" REVISIONS ltrm 8-E INSURANCE CLAIMS Item 9•F PRIVATE DO','K % Ot,- PUBLIC PROPEL It Item 8-C Special Council Meetinq July ?7, 1987 Nage 2?2 Attorney ThamS011 addressed the options and the City's under each. Inere Is one rase in another city he Is where a private dock on public property Is an Issue•. exposure aware of Mayor Schneider noted that, If the property owner provides Insurance, the liability would have to be at $600,000 to rover the City's exposure. Attorney Thomson stated additional measures should be taken, such as requiring signs on the dock statinq that It is a private dock and warning about divinq. Lawrence Marofsk , who awns a dock on public park property a:i Wic; ne: ace, stated this park land Isn't used as oark at all and he would be willing to put up signs and a 01d1l. to keep people off the dick. He would increase his homeowners Insurat're or qet an umbrella policy to cover himself to the $600,000 levee 1. Councilmember Sisk stated he preferred option four whieh would permit the: rtsldents to keep existing docks If they insured the City. Councilmember l.itur stated he favored puttAng a top to dddlnq any mc,:e docks but would allow the Standinq doe-ks to stay. MOTION was mdde by Councilmember 7itur, seconded by Councllmem- ber Crain, that the three to five docks In question be allowed to stay until such time the prni:erty is sold by these owners and removed at that time. They will provide insurance and will mark the dock private and take appropriate precautions to let people know this Is private and prohibit all public use of the dock. Councilmember permission is lltur ":,toted over with. Mayor Schneider stdte:d h basis and not grandfather the land at some time. time with the permit fee, that when the property is sold this preferred an annual review or permit in these docks In case the City needed The City should be reimbursed for its Councilmember Crain stated he would not want to allow any more docks on active park property. Mr. Mjrofsky stated he wanted the City to address the difference between park and City owned prljperty. Counctimember Crain stated the purpose for limiting the permits to thRse owners Is to, over time, eliminate or correct the situ- ation. Councilmember VdsilioU stated she also favored option four, how- ever, by limiting this to these exiscinq docks it would exclude others who may be In the same situation In the future. Special Council Meeting July 27, 1987 Ndg0 ).T3 Manager Willis asked If the Council was concerned with the num- ber of boats which could be docked. Director Hldnk stated most of the docks have tao boats. He has more research to do to determine the exact numherr of docks on public park land. Mdyor Schneider suggested two bodts be the limit and a boat In- cludes anything lcensed by the Department of Natural Resources, Attorney Thom!.un stated the City would be part of any lawsuit Involving they ducks. The mdin concern should be with liability. Mayor Schneider sLaced he doesn't want the docks to be expanded i n any way . Attorney Thomsen staLed this would have to be in an ordinance form died he was reluc'Ant to draft It ton lght. MOTION to dmend was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Coun- cilmember Zitur, that ordinance ldnquage be drafted to Indicate thdt the Council is referring to those docks existing on July 1, 1987, for property owners across the street from park land and t`.at some kind of chain or sectirlLy device be used to preclude entrance onto the dock, and limiting the site and configuration of the dock to that existing on July 1, 1987. Motion Carried, five aye4. HUTION to emend was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Coun- cilmember Zitur, that this be an annual renewal showing evidence of all the foregoing and an annual fee be established. Attorney Thomson staled that since the Council is only address- ing existing ducks, they have the legal basis to ask the owners to remove them at any time. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Mur, to amend the proposed amendment and the annual fee be 25.00. Motion to amend the amendment carried, five dyes. Motion as once amended carried, five ayes. Main motion as twice amended carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council - member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. u7-499 RESCtNDINC POLICY NELATINC TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS TO HUNT OLER. Motion c:arrled on a Roll Cdll vote, f live ayes. 0 RESOLUTION N0. 87-499 RMINDING MUM' RELATING TO DEER HUNT Item 8-H p Spec; Lal rounci l Meet inq July ?7, 19N7 Poge ??4 MOTION was made by Cotinvi lme•mber Vdsl l tau, seconded by Cotrnvi l- mcmbe.r Crain, Lo adopt RI Sol UT ION NO. 47-500 RF V ISING CI TY COt;N- 11 N01.1 C)f MANUAL . Motion carr legit on .i Roll tillL vote, f :ve dyes. Attorney Thomson sumfildrited the rase on which the Supreme Court dtclsiun re!gdrdinq development moratoriums was based, the dif- 1'erenrtr between how d government vnt tty takes the property, the 5ig1lLf Ir.•inc fb of these to Plymouth, how the CILcould ose around the :ulinq, .end they difference h• •ween stagFd growth aui a mura- torlum. Uiret•tor Tromere showed examples of haw the present ordinance affects Lhu height and lurat ion of fences, they effects of they 19yomendment, and a proposed r.hanoe which the Planning Commis- sleiP: did not reconvwvnd. MOTION was nide by Coune t lmember ber Sisk, to .tdout ORUINANLI Nt). ORU t NANCE NO. .40-9 AUOPTt U JUNE AS Tilt_ PLYMOUTH ZONING ORUINANCI.. Crain, seconded by Counrilmem- h7-17 AMENOINC PORTIONS OF THE 169 19.SO AS AMF NDF U, AND KNOWN MOTION was math: by Counc 1 lmember l t torr, seconded by Mayor Schneider, to amend to add the fullowlrg: That corner lot front yard be defined d, the side of the tc.t towdrd which the house fdVeS the street and/or the Side of Lhe lot which the driveway exits onto the street; the alternative yard may have a 6 ft. high feance .es in <e side or rear yard, pro% (ded the fence due's not obstruct vision for pedestrians and m)tor vehicle oper- ators." Cuuncllmember IlLur stated he wanted this discussed by the Coun- cil as the Planninq Commission had revs-swed It. Ulre cLur Tremcre pointed ft. hlyh fences within hard. It dues address a seek pr lvae'y fencing. out that this amendment would allow 6 10 ft. to 13 ft of a neighbor's side concern of some corner lot owners who Motion to amend failed, five nays. Motion carried on a Roll Cal! vote, flive ayes. MOTION war, made by Councllmember Cram., seconded by Counc.ilmem- ber SL..k, to adopt ORDINANCE N0. 87-18 AMENDING PORTIONS OF- CHAPTLR V, PLANNING AND LAND USE. REGULATIONS, OF THE. PLYMOUTH CITY COUt SECTION 5000 SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING OF LAND. Motion c.arr144d on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. C, Rt'."i0l U T i :)N NO. V-500 POI ICY MANUAL Item R -1i RE PORT ON SUPRE MF COURT Ot C I S I ON l*VEt0PMENT MORATORIUM Item y-1 ORDINANCE NO, 87-17 AMFNDING ORDINANCE , Item H -J ORDINANCE N0. 87-18 PLANNING 8 LAND USE_ GUIDE REGULATIONS Item 8-J I SpeJc itit Coutic i t MeeL my July ?7, 1947 P.iyts ?,'S M(`TION wds m.ide• by Cueinvilrra•mhesr Crain seavondvel by Coon%'llmom- her Si sk , t o .idop t Flt till 'JT ION NO. %7 - 501 A11PR )V ! NC 71 t ; t141 _ AME NOME NTS 10 THE l AND U%f (;111111 Pt AN F l F MF NT 10 THE l' t TV' S C 0M - Rt HE NS 11 I PtA4. WLi(m ('drrled uri .1 Ral l r:.jl: .qt.e•, f ivt .lyerl. Coune!E imtsmber lEtur reported on the nr•rst Ings he hris •It.tersdesel ire thr PdSt month, flits insect lnq .idjuurnrd •iU I .n. 0 Ity lest RF Sul U T E l lh NO. WI -501 TF xTIJU 4E ROME, 5 J U 1 L AND tlSt CU 1 M Pi AN iiIMENT 1 t fam S-.) CCI1 KE PORTS E trim h -k