Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 03-17-19860 ilsll A regular order by Chambers March 17, 11 i N U f E S REQXAR ,--*u tC1L MEET114G MAR01 1 i , 1986 meeting of the Plymouth City Mayor Schneider at 7:30 peas of the City Center at 3400 1966. 1;ounc t 1 to the Plymouth was cat -led to My Council Boulevard on PRESENT: Mayor Schneider, Councitmembers Vasi.11ou, Craln, Zitur and Sisk, City Manager Willis, Assistant Manager Bayles, Public Works Director Hooa,e, Planning Director Tremere, Park Director Alasak, City Attorney Thomson, and Clty Cl•,rk tlouk ABSENT: None CONSENY AGENDA NOTION was made by Counc l lmember l ss , seconded by rokly1c t imember Crain, to appri ve the eonsctnt agenda w Ah the deletion of items 6-F and 9-8. Motion car l: led. on a Roll Call vote, f ,ive ayes. MINUTES 110TION was made by Councl!memLer Stmt, :seconded by Counct lmember Crain, to adapt the minutes of the regular Council meeting of March 3, 1986 as submitted. Motion carried vn a Holl Call vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEAR I14CS Manager Wil.kls stated thl.i spec la i asse3sment s aqa ills t beh-.4ves it is appropriate the o.-lglnal value minus any in41 the assessment, gearing !s to consider relevying five tax forfeit parcels. He that thi: parcels be reassessed at sales proceeds dedicated to redue- Mayer ;chneider opened the public hearl.ig at 7:34 p.m. Bob Derus, 2942 Ard Lecaauusee e. f poor st assessment, and the he can develop it, lore Avr,,, stated he purchased two lots, but it conditlons, the amour: of the special cost to upgrade one parcel, he doesn't feral He asked that the ,!ssessment to reduced. CONSENT Item S MINUTES MUCTING 1946 Item 611- A",!",NDA REGULAR OF 11ARCH 3, PURL CC IMEARING -• SPECIAL ASSESSNINTS TAX F'ORF4 ! T PARCELS Item 7-A IP, S Regular Council Meeting March -179 1986 Page 59 y, J Patrick Schoenecker, 4218 Scott Terrace, asked that the assess- ments be reduced or Parcel 2, which he owns, also. The hearing was closed at 7s42 p.m., t NOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmem- ber Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-138 ADOPTING REASSESS- VINTS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON TAX FORFEIT LAND SALES in the amount of $84,660.77. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmember Crain, directing staff to negotiate the special assessment with the property owners. Jiscussion followed on whether special assessments were negoti- able and whether staff should be authorized to conduct negotia- tions. Councilmembers Sisk and Crain withdrew their motion. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Zitur, directing staff to meet with the two property owners and report back to the Assessment Committee. Motion carried, five ayes. Director Moore stated the hearing is to consider the storm sewer assessment for the Robert Middlemist 4th Addition. A petition signed by three property owners was presented requesting the improvements. Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- ber Vaslliou, to adopt RESOLUTION 40,, 86-139 ADOPTING ASSESS- MENTS, PROJECT N0. 566, ROBERT MIDDLEMIST 4TH ADDITION in the amount of $4,486.31. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Manager Willis stated the Council had previously estabiished Economic Development District No. 1 which was originally Intend- ed to capture tax increments for the purpose of providing fund- ing for the construction of the .interchange at C.R. 6 and I-494. This hearing is to consider establL.hing a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 1-3 within Economic Development Dis- trict No. 1. RESOLUTION N0. 86-138 TAX FORFEIT PARCELS Item 7-A PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT 566 MIDDLEMIST 4TH ADDN, Item 7-B RESOLUTION NO. 86-139 ADOPTING ASSESPENTr PROJECT 566 MIDDLEMIST 4TH ADDN, Item 7-P PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-3 Item 7-C Regular Council Meeting March 17, 1986 Page 60 Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. Councilmember Vasiliou asked if there was a down side to estab- lishing the district. Manager Willis answered that the only down side is the degree to which the Council feels the project will have a tendency to shift the tax burden to other taxpayers. He believes the Council should know that the interchange is required to facili• tate further development in the area. Steve A felbacher, Ehlers and Associates, bond counsel for the ty, stated that the plan is to create five districts and explained the tax increment debt service schedule which would be the most beneficial to the City. MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmem- ber Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-140 APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ESTABLISHING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-3 IN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Delores Nygren, 2735 Kilmer Lane, stated there are special cir- cumstances involved with this lot consolidation/division and strict code enforcement would deny her reasonable use of the land. The adjoining property to the south is park so there will not be more than three lots on the block. Councilmember Vasiliou spoke In favor of the request as it would not set a precedent because of the size and shape of the other lots In the neighborhood and It was needed to provide a resi- dence for a family member. Councilmember Crain agreed that the situation is unique but added that, if the Council approves this petition, the resolu- tion should include the reasons why it .is warranted. Councilmember Sisk also spoke in favor of the request because of the adjoining park and that neighbors approve of It. MOTION was made by Councilmember Vaslllou, seconded by Council - member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-141 APPROVING LOT CON- SOLIDATION, LOT DIVISION, AND VARIANCES FOR RICK RADECKI 86007). RESOLUTION NO. 86-140 APPROVING TIF DISTRIC 1-3 Item 7-C LOT CONSOLIDATION/ DIVISION 6 VARIANCE RICK RADECKI (86007) Item 8-A RESOLUTION N0, 86-141 CONSOLIDATION, VARIANCE RICK RADECKI (86007) Item 8-A r fl5ll Regular Council Narch 17, 1906 Page 61 Neeting NOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, seconded by Councilmember Zltur, to amend the-esolution by adding the reasons for approval as follows: Th!s is an abnormal lot arrangement, the density is considerably lower than normal, and that the property abuts park land. NOTION n made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Mayor Schneider, to amend the resolution to add that the resultant lot sizes and shapes are consistent with those in th%. immediate neighborhood. First motion to amend carried, five ayes. Second motion to amend carried, five ayes. Main motion as twice amended carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by C%)uncilmem- ber Vasillou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-142 SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT CONSOLIDATION, LOT DIVISION, AND VARIANCES FOR RICK RADECKI (86007) citing the reasons for the variance as stated In resolution No. 86-141. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. E1.11 Jensen, Suburban Engineering, representing Harrison Hills sve oper, stated that when decisions were made in the PUD to Include single family houses, they made an error In that the lot coverage; issue was not addressed. In 1984 the Council amended the PUD to allow some of the lots to have more lot coverage. Their current; request Is to allow that coverage for the remainder of their lots. CounclImember Vasiliou asked what would happen to the residents who already have built and now will be faced with larqer homes adjoining them and how the Council could deny similar requests If this were approved. Dave Peterson, petitioner, stated oatst eey awn, others have been would like to continue the project cesseully marketed to date. the request Includes only the purchased by builders. They with the type of houses suc- Mayor Schneider stated it would be difficult to deny another builder if this Is approved. Councilmember 51sk stated the Planning Commission recommended denial of this request because of the piecemeal nature of It and the continued changing of the PUD. RESOLUTION N0, 86-142 SETTING tOA6TTibNS LOT DTVTSION/CONSOLI- DATION, (86007) Item 8-A PUD AMENDMENT REQUEST HARRISON HILLS 86009) Item 8-B Regular cot asci l Mleet i ng March 17, 1986 Page 62' Mr. Jensen stated aqaIn that, if this scone request were made with the or„ginal petition, he believes it would have been granted and doesn't feel they should be penalized now. He doesn't believe the appearance of increased building denslty will be affected since the increase is In decks and porches. Mayor Schneider cautioned Mr. Jensen about assuming what would have been approved. He said that would have been one of the first PUD's to get such consideration. Mr. Peterson stated he believes the current market has gone to larger homes on smaller lots and the City should follow. All plans will be subjected to an archttectual committee who decides whether the house fits the neighborhood and whether It fits the lot. Councilmember Crain stated he believes 30% maximum coverage is extreme and represents a much larger .Increase than Indicated. MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councilmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-143 DENIAL OF REVISED RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HARRISON HILLS FOR DAVID PETERSON, HARRISON HILLS, INC. (86009) (RPUD 80-2). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Rev. Jon Strohschein, Pastor, Glory of Christ Lutheran Church, showed slides of ir property and pointed out some problems with the site if the guiding were to remain industrial Including the reguiding of the Hamel Lumber Company adjacent to the church's property. He doesn't want the classification of the property downgraded, but wants permission to build the church in the FRD district. It would be cost prohibitive for them to acquire an urban site 'n Plymouth. They feel the main issue Is whether a church can exist in an area not served by water and sewer. He presented figures showing that a church of this sire uses less water and thus generates less sewage flow than a single family house with four family members. Councilmember Crain stated that the City would not have to regulde to accommodate the Hamel Lumber Company as It is an existing use. The matter of inadequate roads will be taken care of by upgrading as development takes place. Councilmember Sisk confirmed with Rev. Strohschein that the zoning was not a consideration by the church In selecting the site. Rev. Strohscheln explained the church focused on access, visibility, and affordabllitly. Counclimember Sisk also confirmed with the Mayor that Informa- tion presented raw, versus last year, included the water usage and the concern about land affordability. RESOLUTION N0, 86-141 DENIAL OF 11PU15 AMENDMENT, HARRISON HILLS (86009) Item 8-8 ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND- MENT REQUEST, GLORY OF CHRIST CHURCH (86011) Item 8-C C7 0 Regular Council M mU ng Nueh 179 t986 Page 63 Dlscuss.lon followed on the toning, what the church considered, when purchasing the property, whether they could trade for another site, and the fact that this request was substantially the saw as that of November, 1985 which the Cojncll denied. Director Tresere stated a FRO is a holding sone for urtservlced land. It this request were approved the ordinance would. allow cherth-as in the FRD lrrespective of the underlying qulding un- less the zoning ordinance were changed to also require that the underlying guiding allowed churches. MOTION was made by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- ber Vasiliou, to refer the matter to the Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation on ordinance amendment language that would restrict the development of churches as con- dltlonal uses In the FRD district to locations where such devel- opment would be consistent with the underlying guiding. Attorney Thomson stated the state law has been interpreted to say that, if the zoning is Inconsistent with the guiding, the zoning preva.11s- The zooing regulations can be structured to allow churches only in specific areas and conditional use sl.in.- dards can be adopted as well which limit the physical aspects of the development. Rev. Strohichein stated they are flexible and their concern is that they be allowed to begin negotiations with those owners of the land which would be compatible with churches perhaps at other locations In the FRD district. Mayor Schneider stated he would like the Planning Commission to look at regulating the sire of churches In the FRD district and to define in the ordinance what a local or community church is as compared %Ith a regional church, MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, Crain, to amend the motion to Include Ing Commission also define local or regional church In the FRD district, seconded by Councllmember direction that the Plan%i- community church versus a Attorney Thomson stated a workable definition that could be add- ed to the ordinance might include types of uses, square footage, anO size of membership. Motion to amend carried, three ayes. Councllmember Ittur abstalned. CounctImember Vasillou voted nay. Main motion as once amended carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Councilmember Sisk voted nay. Regular Counc.1.1 lteet Ing lMrch 17, 1986 Page 64 M01 -ION was made by Counc l imember Sisk, seconded by ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION PIO. 86-144 APPROVING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR ST. MARY'S ADDITION FOR OF THE LAKE CHURCH (85119). Motton carried on a Rot1 Cail vote, five ayes. Counc,i lmem- F.INAL PLAT ST. PARY'S MOTION was made by Councilmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-145 SETTING CONDITI011S TO BE MET PRLOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR S'r. MARY'S AWITION FOR ST, MARY'S OF THE LAKE CHURCH (85119). MotloP, carried on a Roll Cali vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmemuer Sisk, seconded by Councllmem- ber Cra.ln, to adopt RESOLUTION PIC-. 86-146 APPROVING LOT C011501.I- UATION/DIVISION FOR TIPTOH CORPORATION FOR PLYMOUTH CREEK 2ND ADDITION ( 86021) (RPUO 80-1). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION %as made by Counc 1 imembe:r Sisk, seconded oy Counc i lnaem- btr Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 36-147 SETTING CONDITIONS TO 4E MET PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT CONSOLWle !ION/D[VISION FOR PLYMOUTH CREEK 2ND ADDITION (RPUD 80-1) FOR 11PTON CORPORA - T i ON (86021).. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes, tiob Burger, President of the Plymouth Development Council, stated t hol.asing plan represents a trerneneous step by the City in updating the Comprehensive: Plan and the Development Council concurs with and supports it. MOTION was mads by Councllmember Crain, seconded by ber Vaslllou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-148 AMENDING SIVE PLAN BY ADOPTION OF REVISED HOUSING ELEMENT, Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 86-144 FINAL PLAT i Drvamr- MEW CONTRACT, S T , MARY'S CHURCH (85119) Item 8-D"» RESOLUTION N0, 86-145 FINAL PLAT, ST, MARY'S CHURCH (85119) Item 8-D* RESOLUTION NO. 86-146 DIVISION, TIPTON CORP. PLYMOUTH CREEk' 2ND MOM Item 8-E* RESOiLUT ION NO. 86-147 LOT i_ONSOL IDATTON/ DIVISION, TIPTON CORP, 860' '1) Item 8-E» founcrilmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-148 COMPREHE N- A PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT Item 8-F MOTION was made b4 Counc^ 1 member Sisk, seconded by Coun,, l lmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-149 AUTHORIIINC RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE: GUARANTEE FOR STEVENS LEE ADD I T ! ON (83029)* Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmember, Sisk, secundeu by Coujic1lmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-150 APPROVitANG 1986 GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE APPLICATIONS. 0 Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes, RESOLUTION NO, 86-149 SITE PENF-MR?T GUARANTEE RELEASE STEVENS LEE (81029) Item 8-C* RESOLUTION NO,. 86-150 CARWEPTIAULT W. LICENSES Item I fit -11 Regu.Ide fotync t ! Murch 17, 1946 Paye 65 ftet Ing MOTION was made by Counc t lmember S,', sk se ofrdtd by C uncIl mew- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. $6-151 APPROVING 1986 CIGAR- ETTE LICENSE APDLECATI0915. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes, MOTION was made by Counc L Amamber. Sl sk, sevinded by Counea lmenr- ber Cratn, to adopt RESOLOTION N0. 86-152 CLING A PUFlL.1C HEAR- ING ON A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PRO. SECT PUnSUA:`IT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL. DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICl OF 1111 HEARENE for April 7, 1966 at 7:30 p.m. Matson :;arrled on a Roll Cal.1 vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-15.1I SUPPORTING THE t-RE;SI- OCNT'S COMMISSION ON AMERICANS OUTDOORS (13CAO), THE COMMISSION ON MINNESOTANS OUTDOORS (COMO) AND THE REQ I TAL IZAT ION OF MINNE- SOTA'S LOCAL AND RI"G ZONAL RECREATION CRAM T PROGRAMS, Motion earrled on a Roll Call vote, f lve ayes. MOTION was made by ber Crain, to adopt REPORT AND ORDERINC ITION , Counc t lmember Sisk, seconded h m®m- RESOLIITION NO, 86-154 RECEI4 (,„ 11,1 l- 7NWARY PROJE.0 T , STREET LIGHTING, TYW l L_ `lE , OPID '1, )D - Mot ion carried on a Ro L.l Cell votb, five ,lyes, MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmemnbe- r Crain, to adopt RELOLU110N NO. 86-155 RECEIVING PRELLM1INARY REPORT AND ORDERING PROJECT, STREET LIGHriNG, PARKERS I.AI<E FARM SECOND ADD.I T l OP! Motion carried on Roll Cell vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Counc; l (.member Sisk, seconded by Counc 1 laiem,- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 66-1'16 ORDERING PUBLIC HEAR- ING ON THE PROPOSED VACA f ION OF A POI -TION OF ORCHARD AVENUE WITH114 THE PLYMOUTH ORCHARDS ADDITION fur April 7, 1986 ac 7:30 Mution cart lent on a Roll Call vote, f lveb ayes. REPORF5 OF OFFICERS, BOARD -5 AND COMMISSIONS Mayor Schnelder stared he would like the Council to cons, tder the overall question of transleit produce merchants only unci discuss specifLc problem areas later, RESOLUTION N0, 86-151 1956 CIMME CTME Item 8-H-24 RESOLUTION NO, 86-1S2 IDRB F INANC INE: RFBIWST WILL IAM BIEDER Item 8-I RESOLUTION N©, SUPPORTING MST rS COMMISSION Olt AMF.RICAPIS OUTDOORS Item 8-3* RESOLUTION NO, 86-154 STREET LIGHTING TYRELL SECOND ADOPT, Iters 8-K-1* RESOLUTION NO, 86-155 STREET L (.CHT INC PARKERS LACE F"AHK SECOND ADDITION Item 8-1(-2* RESOLUTION NO, 86-156 STREET VACATION PLYMOUTH ORCHARDS ,DON. Item 8-L* DISCUSSION OF TRANSUENT MERCH:oNTS ISSUES Item 3-A I" I LJ solar Cqunctl N4rcb 1174 1! P&P 6i Owe tIOW9 01rector Tremero summartzed the Issues from the iebrrury Z4 Cowneai.l mceetlno. Staffh4S d,iseussed the issueit and made recom,.- meftda longi which he read from the March %, 1,980; staff Iaeme Councaimembe'r 1lasaltou stated the staff report makes progress and' asked how the, growers feet about it 3eanle G&Wette-r 1005 Highway 101, awiwe•red that she doesn't abyeO "moo econimendat tons and sel teirs car.ld mee: s tansfards sept by the Counc t .l. CounQxlaember Sisk pointed out that, because of the traffic which. cannot be accommodated to a reslftnttat area, most sites In residential areas would be precluded frOM suppoeting produce saleso Counc,llmeaher Yaslltou stated problems have arlson mritnly In residential areas and where produce has leen brouylnt in. Discussion foilowed on the number of parking ,-xices requlred on a sttg, what can5tttvtes safe Ingress and egreaas, enforcement of the regulations, and how to address compLtaints. Director Tremere suggested the Planning Commisttlor, hold a pubtle hearing to review standards and to make recoawatpidations» Mayor Schneider reviewed the recommendatic/ns 1A the staff memo. Direction for further review by staff avd the Ptanntnq Commis" sion was determined to inc.ludet define produce merchantl no licensing, but regulate, licluding requirement for an affidavit that the setter :as grown Us own produce and written p-3rmIS31011 from the landowne*• vihere U -e sate is scheduled; specti'le stan- dards for off street Location and parking and far- safe togrestt and, egress (address setb4cks but no requlrementb for ourbinq or paving); specify sign stan4!arcl3 with no signage ailowod in the R1,%A dlUrlct; and a.11ju use In At districts. Hip stated +staff anti they Planning eoxcioston should revtow code and ord.ln.incn provisions for transient merchants as well as tramsten;, produce merchants, Mayor Schneider slated his iwnce;n that staff recommended the dayeare guWdy be crut to zoro but the NRA increased it over last year's $16,500 to $20,0011. w Councl lmtmber Cra-In explataed that the rat P.onale: for this was that those re;;etving the assistance carr conts'nue to work and pay taxes lnstaad of being totally on aid. 0 CLIP; GRANT YFAR 411 It(rn 9-0 ADPL ICAT ION w 0 Reguie Council Moot.ing 14rch T70 1986 Page 67' MIM was made try Mayor Scohnelderg seconded by Cotmllmesber 7ltur, to adopt RESOLU'T.QUN NO* 84-157 AUYNOR,171 C SIM.IS51ON OF CITY OF PLYMQUTkf CRAM' 4b`)PLICAMOPI TO NENHEPIN COUNTY FOR INZLU- SION IN URBAN NENNEPa 14 COMY COMMUKI TY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AIPPLICA710" FOR FO W UNC YEAR X.11 o Ret tan carried on a Roll Call vote, f Aur ayes. Count Llmember Vasf. ttou voted fay. It,oup9er Willis stat:aed that the policy has been redrafted to reflect Councl l's recommendal lops 7ol t w ing dlscusston at the 06rch 3 Sheeting. Councllmembers made several ddditlonal changes. HOT ION was made by Counc i lmember Sisk, seconded by Counc t lmem- ber Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-158 APPROVING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 7 OPk'RATINC POLICIES 41D PROCEnURES. Mutton carried on 4 Roll Call vote, five ages. Ntinager W 11.111 roevords which a and when they rec° )rds as soon atated the report Indicates the naE«eQ of the e kept and those which are public or t133stfled ire destroyed. It Is the practice to destroy as allowable. Di:3cussion followed on various retention scheciles. 01:rectvr Moore reported that the cost assumptions for t.)e solid waste recycling program were updated to reflect a WWI program cast of $47,926, the City's share of which would he approxi- mately $19,500 whoeh is within the $20,000 budgeted and submit- ted a detailed cost outline. Tht City is on schedule and will begin collections the last week of April In all Out the rural areas of Plymouth. The Council reviewed the applications for the Bodrd of toning Adjustment and Appeals vdcanty and established the esti .,n.Lng of Mjr'ch ?.4 for interviews. Director Moore reported that at the public hearinq h.ld last month the Council ordered the instillation of street k`ghts In the Tawle ft1ddlemist Addition. The developer ob,j•cred to h4iving the lights turned on as he owns inost of this prorerty and It is vacam at this time. Four p-operty owners Agned a petition requesting the lights but do riot want to pay t.ne total cost. Sue Steffen, 4610 Plneviezw Lane, stated the neighbors Iael that 57ME ipr<operty owners should pay for the tights. RESOLU110H N09 86.157 MTW PC MIS OF C011C GRA147 APDL ICA1I0N FOJA FUNDING YEAR x I I Item 9-B CWWNEL 7 OPCRATING Poi. I Cir 8 PROCEDURES Item 9-C RESOLU i ION N09 86-156 CRAW 7 GIPTE _W w POL I C I E S d PROCEDURES Item 9-C RECttF',l_?S RETENTIONION PROCRAM Item 9-© SOLID WASTE: R! CYCL INC PROCRAM Item 9-E BOARD OF 100INC ADJUST- MENT & APPEALS VACANCY Item 9-F STREET LIGHTS TAMMIF MIDDLEatIST ADON. Item 9-C r1 a ma w ol, Ill etin, I,Mh tilt 111" Pao 66 0 04n.afpr Willis suuggeated statY scRecNle a pab,lle Aear.Dng at wMaks t xme- the CAucac l ,l can select .he dab a the I lght s. *14, 1. be turned one, NOTI011 was mde, by C04net.leaeober CraSn. Seconded by COunei;'%I be,r ?Atur, dlreating staff to move fOM4rd w,lth( ncheriW-169 a pub,,llc. hearing for street I lghta Int the Towle Ridd -melst Add -it tone lbt.lon carr led, f lve ayes . The meeting adjoorned at M25 a.ms city Rept.