Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 02-03-1986I OS/J' MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 3, 1986 A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council order by Mayor %chnelder at 7:30 p.m. in the Chambers of the City Center at 3A00 Plymouth February 3, 1986. OATH OF OFFICE was called to City Council Boulevard on 3udge Sheryl Rdmstad Hvass administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember kobert litur. PRESENT; Mayor Schneider, CounclAmembers V•:csi l iau, Crain, Zltur and Slack, City Manager Willis, Nt I)I lc Works Director Wore, Planning Director Trewre, Park Director Blank, CILV Attorney 0;4 ler, and City Clark Houk AffiWf t Hone P.ESENTATIONS Mayor Schn"lder presented a plaque to Herbert P. Lefler in honor of his 2:th anniversay as c:ty attorney for Plymouth. Mayor Schneider presented former payor Djvenport and former Councllmember Neils with silver bowls in commemoration of their years to service to the City. CONSENT AGENDA NOTION was made by Councl.lmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- ber Sisk, to approve the consent agenda with the deletion of items 9-B and 9-.C. Motion carrledon a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MINUTES MOTION wos made by Counclimember Crain, seconded by Counultmem- bes Sisk, to adopt the minutes of the special Council meeting of aanudry 27, 1986 ds submitted. Mb%',lon carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. OATH Or OFFICE Item 3 PRESENTATIONS Items S-A and B CONSENT AGENDA Item 3 MINUTES - SPECIAL. MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 1986 Item 70 Regular Council Neeting February 3, 1986 Page 22 PUBLIC POEARINGS Director Woore stated the Council had previously ordered a hear- t' ir;q on the proposed vacatlon of 4 street easement In Tract C, Ii,#6,S. 811 ,Future Carlson Center 6th Addition), Notice of the hedring was not published, however, and he requested the Council re -order the hearing for February 24, 0 MOTION was made by Councllmember Vaslilou, seconded by Council - member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-65 ORDERING PUBLIC HEAR- ING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF STREET EASEMENT IN TRACT C. R,L,i, 831 (FUTURE CARLSON CENTER 67H ADDITION). for February 24 at 7:33 p.m. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five jyes, Director Moore stated the easements to be vacated have been reOLdeed by other easements as part of a lot dlvtslon, Mdyur Schneider ovened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. No one chose to speak dnd the hedring was closed at 8:01 P.M. MOTION was made by Councllmernber Crain, seconded by Councilmem- ber Zlt:r, to adapt RES00110N NO. 86-66 AUTHORIZING THE VACA- TION OF UTILITY AND DRA1NAC: EASEMENTS ON THE COMMON LOT LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 39 BLOCK 2, FE1":DALE NORTH ADDITION. Mot ton carr ltd on a Roll Call vote, five ayts. Oia.#.Lor Noore stated the project is for the proposed lnstalla- Llon of strc,:t iighting n the Tdmmie Middlemist Addition. City po,tcy is that if lights are installed, beneflttIng areas pay a monthly charge, This project, would be for the installation ul three lights d i ! ided by 25 lots which would awount to $1.51 per month .%er lot. The majority of the lots are still vacant dnd owned by the developer. Becausc the pet 1 i ton for street light- ing was not sir ned Uy 100% of the property owners, d public hearing to approve the improvement. is requi,.&d. Mayor Schneluer opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m, Mayor Schneider rig%ad d letter from Robert Middlemist, the devel- oper, staLlr g his ob,le:cLion to the lnstalla_ton at this time and suyyesting that next year, after more lots were developed, would be more apprcpr idt.e. Robert Middlemist, 4140 sL,rve where he can and land. He doesn't WdOl.. the houses are In, Xlmines Lane, staled he wants to cort- doesn't see any reason to light vacant tc, l:dy for lights until Lhe majority of PUBLIC HEARING EASEMEWT VACATION CARLSON CENTER 61H Item 8-A RESOLUTION NO, 86-65 EASEMENT VACATION CARLSON CENTER 6TH Item 8-A PUBLIC HEARING UTILITY EASEMENTS FERNDALE NORTH ACf)N, Item 8-6 RESOLUTION N0. :6-66 UTTL I Y . _ EN i`9- FERNDALE. NORM# WON. Item 8-B PUBLIC HEARING STREET LI:;HTING TAMMIE M DDLEMIST ADON, Item 8-C Regular Council Meeting, February 3, 1986 Page 23 CuuncLi ember Sisk stated his concern with installing street lights at this time when 20 of the lots are still vacant and these future residents may not want lights. Councllmember Crain stated his concern is that the four resi- dents are in a very isolated area and are subject to safety issues. He favors installing the lights now. Councilmember Vasillou stated she believes lights are warranted for safety concerns. Couoicilmember Zitur stated that if lights are not installed at ti the beginning of a project, Lt is difficult to get them in later. Mr. MLddlemist suggested the four homeowners pay the assessment for the first year. Director Moore stated that in the past each lot paid because of equal benefit$ Attorney Lefler stated that Mr. Middlemist's suggestion would be, In effect, making the determination that these four lots were benefitting disproportionate to the rest of the lots. He doesn't recommend levying an assessment on that basis. If these four lots agreed and accepted the assessment In advance, he could approve it. Mayor Schneider closed the hearing at 8:18 p.m. MOTION was made by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- ber Zltur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-67 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS, STREET LIGHTING, TAMMIE MIDDLEMIST ADDITION. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Counellmember Sisk voted nay. MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Mayor Schneider, directing staff to contact the property owners to determine their willingness to accept the total assessment at this time and report back to the Council. Motion carried, five ayes. Director Moore stated the hearing Is to consider construction of utility and street improvements on 47th Avenue west of Tammle Middelmist Addltlon. This past year the City's improvement pro- ject Installed sanitary sewer and watermaln on 47th Ave. adja- cent to the Tanmie Middlemist Addition. During the construction of that project the City received a petition from the church and the property owner on the corner requesting Lhat the improvement be continued to serve their properties. Phis proposed Improve- ment would Involve the Installation of saol.tary sewer, water - main, and street. The improvement was requested by two of three property owners. RESOLUTION N0. 86-67 MDERING PROJECT STREET LIGHTING TAMMIE MIDDLEMIST ADDW, Item 8-C PUBLIC HEARING 47TH AVENUE PROJECT NO. 609 Item 8-D y"6,6 I= ular Cmincil Meeting February 3, 1986 Page 24 I El- 0 Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 6:25 p.me Mayor Schneider read a letter from Robert Middlemist stating his objection to the assessment. Robert Middlemist, 4140 Ximines Lane, stated his concern that the comp et on of his project not be held up until this project is ready for the instaltation of the street and asked If his assessment would be changed. Director Moore stated this project would not change the assess. ments for the Ta=le Mlddlemist Addition and doesn't believe this would affect the paving of the Addition which Is scheduled for this year. The Middlemist development Is not being assessed for this proposed project. Wayne Stroman, 12925 47th Ave., stated he objected to the full proposal based on his financial burden and suggested that curb and gutter would be unnecessary for them. He asked why this proposed assessment is higher than the one received when the original project was proposed. Director Moore explained that the original estimate was based on the cost of the improvements within the project which was under- way at that time. The redsaA for the increase is that sanitary sewer will be more costly because it has to be installed deeper than in the original project. Elmer Ala okl, 13025 47th Ave., pastor of Church, stated his support of the project. Plymouth Baptist Ken Kestl, 13030 47th Ave., representing the church, stated that the private sewer and wells they are presently using are insuf- ficlent and they are having trouble with the well. The hill is washing down and some improvement is needed so they f a%or the street. The congregation is willing to pay for the pruj.ct and recommends It. Manager WF.Ils pointed out that the cost is only an estimate and that, If the project goes forward, the costs will have to be re- evaluated when the bids are received. The Special Assessment Committee would have to look at the method of assessment before recommending any project assessments. Mayor Schneider closed the hearing at 8:48 p.m. Councll:nember Sisk stated it appeared that the project should proceed for the good of the majority. However, he belteves that Mr. Stroman may not be fully aware of the assessment hearing and appeal process. Councllmember Vastllou stated she favored the project because of the heavy use by the church. E F F Nlegular Council Meeting February j, 1986 Page tg Attorney Lefler stated that the decision on assessments will be made on the amount and degree of benef It when the assessment roll is adopted. Couneilmember Crain suggested an •assessment hearing be held before awarding a contract :o the neighbors had a better under- standing of the costs involved. Manager Wlllls explained the process which the Council may choose which would give the re.oidents a better Idea of what their costs would be. NOTION was made by Counclimember Vaslllou, seconded by Council. member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 86-68 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 47TH AVENUE WEST OF TANNIE MIOOLEMIST ADDITION, STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT N0. 609. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmer- ber Vaslllou, to hold the assessment hearing prior to awarding a contract. Notion carried, five ayes. PETITIONSi REQUESTS AND CONMAUNICATIONS Director Tremere stated the request is the same as the one the Council deferred for Special Assessment Committee review. Director Moore stated this was reviewed by the Special Assess - sent Committee In August and the developer vas Informed of the results. The recommendation is that for this proposal, there should be a 32 f t. wide street at a seven ton standard and the developer Improve the street. Lnuls Oberhauser, attorney for the owners, 1421 East Wayzata Fiv ., state that If the developer would have to pay for a street outside his development, he would prefer It be Harbor Lane. He feels, however, to ask a developer to upgrade streets outside his plat appears to be an excessive burden. Curb and gutter Installation was also of concern to the developer. Mayor Schneider stated the Assessment CominIttee did not have an easy time decldlnq this. The only reason Harbor Lane needs up- grading is because of the development and It would not be fair to assess neighbors for a street they wouldn't need except for the development. Eleanor Ha en, an owner of the property, stated she has had the ran or years and there has always been some problem with proposed developments, either streets or the low land. i RESOLUTION N0. 86-68 47TH AVENUE PROJECT N0. 609 Item 8-D RPUO CONCEPT PLAN gAMBUSH" Item 9-A C Regutar Councl.l Meeting February 3. 1986 Page 2,6 MOTION was mddr by "ouncLimember Crain. seconded by Councilmemm ber Vasillou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-69 APPROVING RESIDEN- TIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN AND PROJECT SIZE WAIVER FOR AL GAZENDIN FOR "RAMBUSH" (85052) emending condition 07 to read ds follows: "Harbor Lane shall be Improved to a 32 ft. wide, seven ton 'Collector' street standard at the develo- per's exoense." Mot Loci cdrr Ied on d Roll Call vote, five ayes. Director Tremere stated the variance Issue Is whether Opus should be permit :ed multiple free standing signs versus the ordLnonce stdnedrd of one business sign. Robert Worthington, Opus Corporation, stated the proposal is for d unlgoe L*)'9h_t__ec`h building Individually designed for the site. The rea4nrl fir the different signage is that there will be Indl- vldudl eatcdnces to the building dnd surveys show that tenants want dr Identity unique to them. They would prefer the "clean" drehLtecturdl look of putting the signs dt the entry, which they would control, Lnstedd of on the building. There would be a mdxlmum of 25 slyns lit externally. Opus will malntaln the signs dnd provide a covenant that subsequent owners would do the same. MUTTON was made by Councllmember Vasillou, seconded by member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-70 APPROVING STUN FON OPUS CORPORATION (85125). Motloii cdrrled on a Roll Cdll vote, five dyes. MOTION ods made by Councllmember member Sisk, to adopt NESOLUTIUN AND St_ITINC CONJ1T1UNS FUR V[LINC PORATION (85125). RESOLUTION NO, 86-69 RPOD P PLAN PROJECT SIZE WAIVER RAMBUSH" 85052) Item 9-A OPUS CORPORATION 85125) Item 9-B Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-70 LOT DIV[ LOT DIVTKMT OPUS CORP. (85125) Item 9-8 Vas i L lou, secofuled by Council- NO. ouncLl- NO. 86-71 APPROVING SITE PLAN THE LOf DIVISION FOR OPUS COR - Motion cdrrled on a Rall Call vote, five dyes. MOTION was made by Councllmember Vasillou, seconded by Councll- member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-72 APPROVAL FOR SIGNAGE PROGRAM AND VARIANCE I -OR OPUS CORPORATIIIN (85125). Mol lon cdrr led ori d Roll Cali vote, five dyes. MOTION was made by Counc:ilmember Sisk, seconded by Couitcllmember Zitur, directing the Pldnning Commission to study and make d re- commenddt[on dbuut allowing this type of slgrtdge In the Zoning Ordinance fur similar uses. Motion eder:ed, five dyers. MOTION was made by Cowictlmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-73 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR JOHN *ALURON FOR ELWELL, MILEY, AND QUINN ADDITION 85127). Motion cdrried Oil d Roll Call vole, five ayes. RESOLUTION NO, 86-71 Sok PL W & KE- MRC CONDITIONS, OPUS CORP. 85125) Item 9-8 RESOLUTION NO. 86.12 APPROVTNC SIGNAGE PROGRAM & VARIANCE. OPUS CORP, (85125 ) Item 9-8 RESOLUTION N0, 86-73 PRELIMNARY PLAT ELWELL, MILEY & QUINN ADON. (85127) Item 9 -Cy Regular Counr. l l Meeting February 3, '1986 Page: 27 MOTION was &&de by Counclimember Craln, seconded by Councltmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-74 ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-74 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR rW PLAT 9 ELWELL WLEY AND QUINN ADDITION FOR JOHN WALDRON (85127). ELIELLt MILEY b QUINN ADON, (95127) Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item 9-C* MOTION was made by Councllmember Crdln, secended by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-75 ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-75 SE.T71NG CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND NELATID TO FINAL. PLAT FOR ELWELL ELWELL, MILEY d QUINN MILEY QUINN ADDITION FOR JOHN WALDRON (0127). ADON, (85127) Item 9-C• Motion cdrried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. McTION was made by Cceunr,ilmember Crali, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-76 bee Slsk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-76 APPROVING A SITE PLAN 91TE PLAAD C,U, . AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JIM DOMORACKI, FIRST EDITION COR- FIRST EDITION CORP, PORATION (85128), (85128) Item 9-0'• Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes. Ulrector 1remere stated he had received a letter from a neighbor C.U.P. FOR McCOMBS- stating neighbors no longer objected to the proposal and are KNUTSON ASSOC, willing to try it f,)r six months. Copies of the January 27, Item 9-E 1986 letter Prom Mr. Joe Itmdn were distributed. Grey Frank. McCombs -Knutson Assocldtest 1-.c.1, stated they agree with a six munth trial end the area for overnight pdrking would be changed s,) the aced on the cast side of the buk t.6ing. Discussion followed about the drnoun'. of pdrking spaces devoted to this. Mr. Frdnk stated tnree vehicles were typlcalty Involved. Councllmember Crdln stated a limit should be set. Mayor Schneider agreed, MOTION wds m.!de by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Counctlmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-77 ber Zitur, 1.o adopt RESOLUTIUN W. 86-77 APPROVING A CONDL110NAL APPROVINGC. . USE PERMIT FOR KcCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 85134), sped- McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOC, Eying that the maximum number of vehicles shall be five; chdng- 85134) Ing condition No, i to provide for renewal in six months; and Item 9-E chdnging condLtlori No. 4 to refer to the pldn attached to the letter from Mr. Itmdn dated Janus ry 27, 1986. Motion cdrel.ed on d Roll Call vote, four dyes. CounclI ,;moer Vasilluu voted nay. Councllmember Vasillou stdted she concurs with the Planning Com- C,U,P, AMENDMENT misslon because of the precedent whloh would be set by reducloig 4850 ORLEANS LANE the setback in d PUD. She sympathize: with the homeowner, but (85139) there were considerations given to the developer dt the time of Item 94 development and the homeowner should have known this, Jim Bonney, 4650 Orleans Ldne, stdted he believes there Is d precedent In the City alreddy dnd his request should be, const- dered on Its own merits. F llagular Coantil lbet ing iebruay 3, M Page 20 Count imember Crain stated the precedeat Mr. Bonney refered to doesn't apply, because it was a rear yard variance and the pro- perty backed up onto a park and, therefore, was not comparable. Ib stated the Council Is cons.lderlag the particular case. but has concerns In general about reduced sldeyard setbacks. Counclimember Zltur agreed. N01I014 was made by Councl.tmember Vaslllft, seconded by Council. RESOLUTION N0. 86-78 member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-78 DENIAL Of A CONDI- DENTAL UF Couepe TIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A REDUCED SETBACK AT 4850 AMEKOMENT 4850 ORLEANS ORLEANS LANE (85139). LANE (85139) Iter 9-6 Obtlon cdrrled on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. NOTION was made by CouncLImember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- ber Slsi:, to adopt ORDINANCE N0. 84-01 AMENDING THE CITU' CODE REGARDING CHANGE OF STREET NAME IN SWAN LAKE ADDITION (NAGNOLIA LANE TO NORWOOD LANE). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Director Tremere stated that last year the City was presented with % PUD plan that Involved this property. In the course of reviewing that plan, questions wvee raised by the neighbors and the City with respect to certain characteristics of the land. As a result of input from the neighbors, the developer undertook an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). This is a docu- ment to answer questions On the developm,nt which may impact the environment. The developer prepared the document which has now finished a 30 day review period by State agencies, the public, and the Clty. The Cit) could make a "positive declaratlo;n" which would require the preparation of an Environmental Imparst Statement (EIS) or a "negative declaration" which finds there is no need for an EIS, but di.rects the plans for the development subject to conditions. A negative declaration Is recommended on the basis that the EAW Is adequate. Councilmember Vaslllou stated problems with three specific items In the EAW. She takes exception with the findings In items 14, 25-A., and 27. Counellmember Crain asked about the wetland location and that It appears there is a portion of it under the high water mark. He noted Item No. 18 and Item No. 16. Director Moore stated that a small portion may be part of the designated wetland but the DNR has not determined how far south that, will extend. 0 ORDINANCE N0. 86-01 STREET RAW CMKr SWAN LAKE ADDITION Item 9-G* LIETERNINATION OF ADEQUACY OF EAW FOR IVY PARK It Item 9-k R4 14r COWICI1 Ibeting ra'iry Pago 29 Olremt.or Tremere stated that 120 ft. is the ordinance alrolmum lot depth and it is proposed that beyond thts point there would net he any development allowed for those lots abutting the pro- tReitod areas and he pointed out which lots could be affected. a, K.` st Laughtneause, 8209 Pennsylvania Road, clarified that he rep-re4sen s Ivy Park Corporation w.hIch is the owner of the north- ern tlmo-thirds of the property. Enterprise Properties bought the lAtad on contingency and has since withdrawn. Dane Carroll is tht awner of the southern 9ne-third of the property. The EA9 has done what it was designed to do; gather Input from a variety of partles. He has not with the neighbors and will probably meet with them again to reach an agreement, covering all their concerns, he has met with the Corps of Engineers who have come up with a new grading arrangement which he believes will be acceptable. He will be meeting with the DNR and proposes that their requirements will be integrated with those of the City and neighbors and develop a new preliminary plat. Reyrrding the chain link fence, they plan to install appropriate markings to keep the trees from being destroyed but he doesn't agree with Wo fence because It would stop the movement of the wildlife and destroy the scenery In the ielghborhood as well as cost a lot of money. He proposes that, Instead of a 25 ft. easement ptos an Easement for the wetland, one easement be given to the State of Minnesota, or to tNe City, which would make this Land the same as QNR protected wetland and no Improvements could take place w.tthln It. They will only be grading one tat on the west end of thu development and will use the best erosion con- trol devices with the approval of the City. Dane Carroll, 10715 48th Ave., stated he doesn't agree with the fencee.intends to save the large trees but cannot savR everything including the brush and small trees. Ldrry Lleder, 4840 Union Terrace Lane, stated the neighbors p rRecate" he EAW but are still concerned with same matters. They want a reasonable decision based on clear cut evidence which has not yet, been fully submitted. They are as ktng for an EIS which they believe Is necessary. He distributed copies of his remarks to the CounclL and cited concerns with tiA ens Nos. 149 17-A, 199 25-A, and 25-6. He added that neighbors were not opposed to development bi.tt were concerned that all data be pro- vided and be accurate. Helen Rusten, 18420 8th Ave. stated her longstanding interest in e preservatlon of wildlife and wetlands. She stated she favors a wetldnd ordinance to protect the City and sutivnitted example ordinances from two other cities. Don Wlsdorf, 4830 Union Terrace Lane, stated he feels strongly that Eif is required as a result of questions and conrllets raised by the EAW. He cited twelve items he feels must be addressed to assure the project does not negatively impact the environment. He reviewed the Items with an overhead projection. Regular Courwil Pketino February 1, M6 Page 30 MOTION was made by Couti'cl ImemDer Masi t tou, seconded. by Count t l- maobor Crain, calling for an EIS based upon review of the CAIN dated December , 1985. Counellmember Crain stated his concern aDuut re"I ring an EIS which would cover many issues with which the Council has no con- cern. Director Tremere stated that the Council could deflne the issue or issues by defining the scope of an EIS. Direction could be given to staff to come back with a draft scoping statement. Attorney Lefler stated that deferring the decision un;.,tt next week and directing staff to come back with a list of Items that the ordinances would protect and those It will not would be an appropriate decision. Mr. Laughinghouse stated he doesn't favor an EIS an It could cost between $25,000 and $50,000 and a partial EIS would still cost a lot, especially time. He suggested waiting for a staff report. Councllmembers Vaslllou and Crain withdrew their motion. NOTION was aside by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem. ber Z.ltur, deferring determination of adequacy of the EAW and directing staff to prepare a draft EIS scoping document for pte. sentation to the Council at the February 10 meeting with a r -3- v lsed draft negative declaration resolution reflecting sugges- tions made at this meeting and with an Indication of those con- cerns that can be addressed by In-place City or other applicable leas dnd requlations. Mayor Schneider suggested any meeting between the neighbors and the developer should be attended by staff. He raised coicerns that there should be a single development contract for d single PUD. Extensive discussion followed with Mr. Laughinghouse who questloved that. Director Moore stated he has no knowledge of how the property will be final platted or whether it will be as one plat with one development contract. Discussion followed on the PUD status develop as an entity, perhaps In phases. M,,1,14Lon carried, five ayes. and how the land should Counci!member Vasl1LOU asked why the eQsement we sn't received before letting the contract, Attorney Lefler answered that is not always the ease. WE FF Regular Council Neeting February 3, 1986 Page 31 Discussion followed on why the changes were made and necessary. MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Counclimem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-79 Der Mur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-79 APPROVING CHANCE ORDER N0. 3, SCHNIDT'S GARDENS UTILITIES, PROJECT NO. 427 in the SCHMID("; GARDENS amount of $9,112.11. PROJECT IIG, 427 Itemr 9-I Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. NOTION was made by CounclImewber Crain. seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-80 Dec Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-80 ADOPTING ASSESSIENTS, ADOPTIFfG ASSESSMENTS PROJECT NO. 605 SANITARY SEWER AND VVERMAIN AREA, ANNICK ACRES ANNICK ACRES In the amount of $1,005.00. PROJECT NU. 605 Item 9-J* Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-81 ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS, PROIECT N0, 606 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN LATERAL, ANNICK ANNICK ACRES ACRES In the amount of $2,916.21. PROJECT N0. 606 Item 9-J• Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. NOT IUN was mane by CouncLimember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO. 86-82 or 513k, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-82 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ- G INC EXECUTION OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT WITH HOUSING AND SERVICES CONTRACT WITH REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. HRA Item 9-K• Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS The Council discussed the role of d Council Coordinating Repre. sante eve. MOTION was mddu. by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-81 ber Vd3lllou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-83 APPOINTMENT TO NOUS- A 0 0 ING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY to be Couricilmember Dave Craln. Item 10-A Motlun corrled on d Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by CuunclLmember VdsLLiou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO* 86-84 member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-84 DESIGNATING ALTER- DESIGNATIK ALMWE NATE UIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AHTHORITY to be tiIrgll Schnelder. TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Potion carried on d Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item 10-A MOTION wds made by Councllmember Vaslllou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0. 86-6S member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 9645 DESIGNATING DIRECTOR DESINAIWC DIRE OR AND ALTERNATE OIRECTOR TO THE BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 6 ALTERNATE TO BASSETT COMM(.'-OiION to be Fred Moore and "John Sweeney. CREEK COMMISSION Item 10-A 0 Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes. Regular Council Meeting February 3, 1986 Page 32 NOTION Was made by Counclimember Vasillou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-86 member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-86 DESIGNATING DIRECTOR DE5IGRXTI9rWMW 8 AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO THE ELM CREEK WATER CONSERVATION DIS- ALTERNATE TO ELM CREEK TRICT to be Fred Moore and Vern Peterson. DISTRICT Item 10-A Motion carried on a Roll C41L vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmember RESOLUTION N0, 86-87 Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-87 DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVE DEi R"MM. TA - AND ALTERNATE TO THE MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION to be 1IVE AND ALTERNATE TO CounclLmember V43 MOu and Mdyor Schneider. MLC Item 10-A Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. NOTION was made by Councllmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-88 member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-88 APPOINTING COUNCIL ApparNiT9 Mw COORDINATING REPRESENTATIVES FOR 1986, 1986 Item 10-A Motion carrled on o Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, secondv-d by Coueicilmember Sisk, to appoint Councilmembers Crain and Vd31Llou to the Coun- cll Special Assessment Committee. Motion carred, five ayes. Mayor Schneider stated that Plymouth has been slow in rdlsiny Its park dedledtlon fees Ln the past. Uirector Blank stated that the cash is designed to pay for ddditlonal park .-aid and this money Is needed In order not to Pall behind. MUEION wds made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmember Zitur, to adopt HESOLUTLON NO. 86-89 SM ING PARK DEDICATION FLLS FOR 1986. Motion carried on d Poll Call \,ote, four ayes. Councllmember Vasillou voted ndy. Councllmember Vasillou stated her concern tnat other consultants were too busy to bid on this project, that the bid is at the top of the range, and she doesn't. favor awardLng a bid when only one consultant responded. Uirector Blank stated the City would prefer to work on a not -to - exceed bdsi.s. In this case 8onestroo chose the higher amount buL the project could come 1.,% for less. Councllmember VdsILIou stated She could not support the bLd ward with only one consultant respondtr g. Councili.aewber Zltur agreed out stated he would like to proceed. 0 REVIEW OF PARK DEDICATION FEES Item 10-8 RESOLUTION NO. 86-89 SETTINC PARK TION FEES FOR 1986 Item 10-8 CONSULTANT SELECTION ZACHARY PARK BUILDW Item 1J -C 11 11 vi I Regular February Page 33 council meeting 3, 1986 NOTION was ma ber Mur, to SERVICES WITH the dmount of de by Counctimember SZsk, seconded by Counct mem- adept RESOLUTION NO, 86.90 APPROVING CONSULTANT DONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERL IK i ASSOCIATES, ENC. to 12,000. Notion carried on a Roll Call Vaslilou voted nay. Manager WIllls listed the four Council to remaln consistent Policy and added that station Ne stated he will put together It to dry; f i refs the Counc l l select the farms they wish to RFPs. vote, steps with No. 1 four ayes. Counc t tamnbe r neces3ary In order for the the Consuitint wlil also nued a Request For Propos, chooses. The Counci interview from those The meeting adjourned at 1:20 a.m. Selection remode l l ny. ii and send may then submttt.ing RESOLUTION N0.86-90 ZACHARY P:'1Aie BU ILilW: Item 10•C CONSULTANT SELECTION FIRE STATION N0, 3 Item 10-D