HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 02-03-1986I
OS/J'
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 3, 1986
A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council
order by Mayor %chnelder at 7:30 p.m. in the
Chambers of the City Center at 3A00 Plymouth
February 3, 1986.
OATH OF OFFICE
was called to
City Council
Boulevard on
3udge Sheryl Rdmstad Hvass administered the Oath of Office to
Councilmember kobert litur.
PRESENT; Mayor Schneider, CounclAmembers V•:csi l iau, Crain, Zltur
and Slack, City Manager Willis, Nt I)I lc Works Director
Wore, Planning Director Trewre, Park Director Blank,
CILV Attorney 0;4 ler, and City Clark Houk
AffiWf t Hone
P.ESENTATIONS
Mayor Schn"lder presented a plaque to Herbert P. Lefler in honor
of his 2:th anniversay as c:ty attorney for Plymouth.
Mayor Schneider presented former payor Djvenport and former
Councllmember Neils with silver bowls in commemoration of their
years to service to the City.
CONSENT AGENDA
NOTION was made by Councl.lmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem-
ber Sisk, to approve the consent agenda with the deletion of
items 9-B and 9-.C.
Motion carrledon a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MINUTES
MOTION wos made by Counclimember Crain, seconded by Counultmem-
bes Sisk, to adopt the minutes of the special Council meeting of
aanudry 27, 1986 ds submitted.
Mb%',lon carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
OATH Or OFFICE
Item 3
PRESENTATIONS
Items S-A and B
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 3
MINUTES - SPECIAL.
MEETING OF JANUARY
27, 1986
Item 70
Regular Council Neeting
February 3, 1986
Page 22
PUBLIC POEARINGS
Director Woore stated the Council had previously ordered a hear-
t' ir;q on the proposed vacatlon of 4 street easement In Tract C,
Ii,#6,S. 811 ,Future Carlson Center 6th Addition), Notice of the
hedring was not published, however, and he requested the Council
re -order the hearing for February 24,
0
MOTION was made by Councllmember Vaslilou, seconded by Council -
member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-65 ORDERING PUBLIC HEAR-
ING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF STREET EASEMENT IN TRACT C.
R,L,i, 831 (FUTURE CARLSON CENTER 67H ADDITION). for February 24
at 7:33 p.m.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five jyes,
Director Moore stated the easements to be vacated have been
reOLdeed by other easements as part of a lot dlvtslon,
Mdyur Schneider ovened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m.
No one chose to speak dnd the hedring was closed at 8:01 P.M.
MOTION was made by Councllmernber Crain, seconded by Councilmem-
ber Zlt:r, to adapt RES00110N NO. 86-66 AUTHORIZING THE VACA-
TION OF UTILITY AND DRA1NAC: EASEMENTS ON THE COMMON LOT LINE OF
LOTS 2 AND 39 BLOCK 2, FE1":DALE NORTH ADDITION.
Mot ton carr ltd on a Roll Call vote, five ayts.
Oia.#.Lor Noore stated the project is for the proposed lnstalla-
Llon of strc,:t iighting n the Tdmmie Middlemist Addition. City
po,tcy is that if lights are installed, beneflttIng areas pay a
monthly charge, This project, would be for the installation ul
three lights d i ! ided by 25 lots which would awount to $1.51 per
month .%er lot. The majority of the lots are still vacant dnd
owned by the developer. Becausc the pet 1 i ton for street light-
ing was not sir ned Uy 100% of the property owners, d public
hearing to approve the improvement. is requi,.&d.
Mayor Schneluer opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m,
Mayor Schneider rig%ad d letter from Robert Middlemist, the devel-
oper, staLlr g his ob,le:cLion to the lnstalla_ton at this time and
suyyesting that next year, after more lots were developed, would
be more apprcpr idt.e.
Robert Middlemist, 4140
sL,rve where he can and
land. He doesn't WdOl..
the houses are In,
Xlmines Lane, staled he wants to cort-
doesn't see any reason to light vacant
tc, l:dy for lights until Lhe majority of
PUBLIC HEARING
EASEMEWT VACATION
CARLSON CENTER 61H
Item 8-A
RESOLUTION NO, 86-65
EASEMENT VACATION
CARLSON CENTER 6TH
Item 8-A
PUBLIC HEARING
UTILITY EASEMENTS
FERNDALE NORTH ACf)N,
Item 8-6
RESOLUTION N0. :6-66
UTTL I Y . _ EN i`9-
FERNDALE. NORM# WON.
Item 8-B
PUBLIC HEARING
STREET LI:;HTING
TAMMIE M DDLEMIST ADON,
Item 8-C
Regular Council Meeting,
February 3, 1986
Page 23
CuuncLi ember Sisk stated his concern with installing street
lights at this time when 20 of the lots are still vacant and
these future residents may not want lights.
Councllmember Crain stated his concern is that the four resi-
dents are in a very isolated area and are subject to safety
issues. He favors installing the lights now.
Councilmember Vasillou stated she believes lights are warranted
for safety concerns.
Couoicilmember Zitur stated that if lights are not installed at
ti the beginning of a project, Lt is difficult to get them in
later.
Mr. MLddlemist suggested the four homeowners pay the assessment
for the first year.
Director Moore stated that in the past each lot paid because of
equal benefit$
Attorney Lefler stated that Mr. Middlemist's suggestion would
be, In effect, making the determination that these four lots
were benefitting disproportionate to the rest of the lots. He
doesn't recommend levying an assessment on that basis. If these
four lots agreed and accepted the assessment In advance, he
could approve it.
Mayor Schneider closed the hearing at 8:18 p.m.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem-
ber Zltur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-67 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS, STREET LIGHTING, TAMMIE MIDDLEMIST
ADDITION.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Counellmember
Sisk voted nay.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Mayor
Schneider, directing staff to contact the property owners to
determine their willingness to accept the total assessment at
this time and report back to the Council.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Director Moore stated the hearing Is to consider construction of
utility and street improvements on 47th Avenue west of Tammle
Middelmist Addltlon. This past year the City's improvement pro-
ject Installed sanitary sewer and watermaln on 47th Ave. adja-
cent to the Tanmie Middlemist Addition. During the construction
of that project the City received a petition from the church and
the property owner on the corner requesting Lhat the improvement
be continued to serve their properties. Phis proposed Improve-
ment would Involve the Installation of saol.tary sewer, water -
main, and street. The improvement was requested by two of three
property owners.
RESOLUTION N0. 86-67
MDERING PROJECT
STREET LIGHTING
TAMMIE MIDDLEMIST ADDW,
Item 8-C
PUBLIC HEARING
47TH AVENUE
PROJECT NO. 609
Item 8-D
y"6,6 I= ular Cmincil Meeting
February 3, 1986
Page 24
I
El-
0
Mayor Schneider opened the public hearing at 6:25 p.me
Mayor Schneider read a letter from Robert Middlemist stating his
objection to the assessment.
Robert Middlemist, 4140 Ximines Lane, stated his concern that
the comp et on of his project not be held up until this project
is ready for the instaltation of the street and asked If his
assessment would be changed.
Director Moore stated this project would not change the assess.
ments for the Ta=le Mlddlemist Addition and doesn't believe
this would affect the paving of the Addition which Is scheduled
for this year. The Middlemist development Is not being assessed
for this proposed project.
Wayne Stroman, 12925 47th Ave., stated he objected to the full
proposal based on his financial burden and suggested that curb
and gutter would be unnecessary for them. He asked why this
proposed assessment is higher than the one received when the
original project was proposed.
Director Moore explained that the original estimate was based on
the cost of the improvements within the project which was under-
way at that time. The redsaA for the increase is that sanitary
sewer will be more costly because it has to be installed deeper
than in the original project.
Elmer Ala okl, 13025 47th Ave., pastor of
Church, stated his support of the project.
Plymouth Baptist
Ken Kestl, 13030 47th Ave., representing the church, stated that
the private sewer and wells they are presently using are insuf-
ficlent and they are having trouble with the well. The hill is
washing down and some improvement is needed so they f a%or the
street. The congregation is willing to pay for the pruj.ct and
recommends It.
Manager WF.Ils pointed out that the cost is only an estimate and
that, If the project goes forward, the costs will have to be re-
evaluated when the bids are received. The Special Assessment
Committee would have to look at the method of assessment before
recommending any project assessments.
Mayor Schneider closed the hearing at 8:48 p.m.
Councll:nember Sisk stated it appeared that the project should
proceed for the good of the majority. However, he belteves that
Mr. Stroman may not be fully aware of the assessment hearing and
appeal process.
Councllmember Vastllou stated she favored the project because of
the heavy use by the church.
E
F F
Nlegular Council Meeting
February j, 1986
Page tg
Attorney Lefler stated that the decision on assessments will be
made on the amount and degree of benef It when the assessment
roll is adopted.
Couneilmember Crain suggested an •assessment hearing be held
before awarding a contract :o the neighbors had a better under-
standing of the costs involved.
Manager Wlllls explained the process which the Council may
choose which would give the re.oidents a better Idea of what
their costs would be.
NOTION was made by Counclimember Vaslllou, seconded by Council.
member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 86-68 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 47TH AVENUE WEST OF
TANNIE MIOOLEMIST ADDITION, STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT N0. 609.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmer-
ber Vaslllou, to hold the assessment hearing prior to awarding a
contract.
Notion carried, five ayes.
PETITIONSi REQUESTS AND CONMAUNICATIONS
Director Tremere stated the request is the same as the one the
Council deferred for Special Assessment Committee review.
Director Moore stated this was reviewed by the Special Assess -
sent Committee In August and the developer vas Informed of the
results. The recommendation is that for this proposal, there
should be a 32 f t. wide street at a seven ton standard and the
developer Improve the street.
Lnuls Oberhauser, attorney for the owners, 1421 East Wayzata
Fiv ., state that If the developer would have to pay for a
street outside his development, he would prefer It be Harbor
Lane. He feels, however, to ask a developer to upgrade streets
outside his plat appears to be an excessive burden. Curb and
gutter Installation was also of concern to the developer.
Mayor Schneider stated the Assessment CominIttee did not have an
easy time decldlnq this. The only reason Harbor Lane needs up-
grading is because of the development and It would not be fair
to assess neighbors for a street they wouldn't need except for
the development.
Eleanor Ha en, an owner of the property, stated she has had the
ran or years and there has always been some problem with
proposed developments, either streets or the low land.
i
RESOLUTION N0. 86-68
47TH AVENUE
PROJECT N0. 609
Item 8-D
RPUO CONCEPT PLAN
gAMBUSH"
Item 9-A
C
Regutar Councl.l Meeting
February 3. 1986
Page 2,6
MOTION was mddr by "ouncLimember Crain. seconded by Councilmemm
ber Vasillou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-69 APPROVING RESIDEN-
TIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN AND PROJECT SIZE
WAIVER FOR AL GAZENDIN FOR "RAMBUSH" (85052) emending condition
07 to read ds follows: "Harbor Lane shall be Improved to a 32
ft. wide, seven ton 'Collector' street standard at the develo-
per's exoense."
Mot Loci cdrr Ied on d Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Director Tremere stated the variance Issue Is whether Opus
should be permit :ed multiple free standing signs versus the
ordLnonce stdnedrd of one business sign.
Robert Worthington, Opus Corporation, stated the proposal is for
d unlgoe L*)'9h_t__ec`h building Individually designed for the site.
The rea4nrl fir the different signage is that there will be Indl-
vldudl eatcdnces to the building dnd surveys show that tenants
want dr Identity unique to them. They would prefer the "clean"
drehLtecturdl look of putting the signs dt the entry, which they
would control, Lnstedd of on the building. There would be a
mdxlmum of 25 slyns lit externally. Opus will malntaln the
signs dnd provide a covenant that subsequent owners would do the
same.
MUTTON was made by Councllmember Vasillou, seconded by
member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-70 APPROVING
STUN FON OPUS CORPORATION (85125).
Motloii cdrrled on a Roll Cdll vote, five dyes.
MOTION ods made by Councllmember
member Sisk, to adopt NESOLUTIUN
AND St_ITINC CONJ1T1UNS FUR V[LINC
PORATION (85125).
RESOLUTION NO, 86-69
RPOD P PLAN
PROJECT SIZE WAIVER
RAMBUSH"
85052)
Item 9-A
OPUS CORPORATION
85125)
Item 9-B
Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-70
LOT DIV[ LOT DIVTKMT
OPUS CORP. (85125)
Item 9-8
Vas i L lou, secofuled by Council-
NO.
ouncLl-
NO. 86-71 APPROVING SITE PLAN
THE LOf DIVISION FOR OPUS COR -
Motion cdrrled on a Rall Call vote, five dyes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Vasillou, seconded by Councll-
member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-72 APPROVAL FOR SIGNAGE
PROGRAM AND VARIANCE I -OR OPUS CORPORATIIIN (85125).
Mol lon cdrr led ori d Roll Cali vote, five dyes.
MOTION was made by Counc:ilmember Sisk, seconded by Couitcllmember
Zitur, directing the Pldnning Commission to study and make d re-
commenddt[on dbuut allowing this type of slgrtdge In the Zoning
Ordinance fur similar uses.
Motion eder:ed, five dyers.
MOTION was made by Cowictlmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem-
ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-73 APPROVING PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR JOHN *ALURON FOR ELWELL, MILEY, AND QUINN ADDITION
85127).
Motion cdrried Oil d Roll Call vole, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO, 86-71
Sok PL W & KE- MRC
CONDITIONS, OPUS CORP.
85125)
Item 9-8
RESOLUTION NO. 86.12
APPROVTNC SIGNAGE
PROGRAM & VARIANCE.
OPUS CORP, (85125 )
Item 9-8
RESOLUTION N0, 86-73
PRELIMNARY PLAT
ELWELL, MILEY & QUINN
ADON. (85127)
Item 9 -Cy
Regular Counr. l l Meeting
February 3, '1986
Page: 27
MOTION was &&de by Counclimember Craln, seconded by Councltmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-74
ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-74 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR rW PLAT
9 ELWELL WLEY AND QUINN ADDITION FOR JOHN WALDRON (85127). ELIELLt MILEY b QUINN
ADON, (95127)
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item 9-C*
MOTION was made by Councllmember Crdln, secended by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-75
ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-75 SE.T71NG CONDITIONS TO BE
MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND NELATID TO FINAL. PLAT FOR ELWELL ELWELL, MILEY d QUINN
MILEY QUINN ADDITION FOR JOHN WALDRON (0127). ADON, (85127)
Item 9-C•
Motion cdrried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
McTION was made by Cceunr,ilmember Crali, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-76
bee Slsk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 86-76 APPROVING A SITE PLAN 91TE PLAAD C,U, .
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JIM DOMORACKI, FIRST EDITION COR- FIRST EDITION CORP,
PORATION (85128), (85128)
Item 9-0'•
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes.
Ulrector 1remere stated he had received a letter from a neighbor C.U.P. FOR McCOMBS-
stating neighbors no longer objected to the proposal and are KNUTSON ASSOC,
willing to try it f,)r six months. Copies of the January 27, Item 9-E
1986 letter Prom Mr. Joe Itmdn were distributed.
Grey Frank. McCombs -Knutson Assocldtest 1-.c.1, stated they agree
with a six munth trial end the area for overnight pdrking would
be changed s,) the aced on the cast side of the buk t.6ing.
Discussion followed about the drnoun'. of pdrking spaces devoted
to this. Mr. Frdnk stated tnree vehicles were typlcalty
Involved. Councllmember Crdln stated a limit should be set.
Mayor Schneider agreed,
MOTION wds m.!de by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Counctlmem- RESOLUTION NO, 86-77
ber Zitur, 1.o adopt RESOLUTIUN W. 86-77 APPROVING A CONDL110NAL APPROVINGC. .
USE PERMIT FOR KcCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 85134), sped- McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOC,
Eying that the maximum number of vehicles shall be five; chdng- 85134)
Ing condition No, i to provide for renewal in six months; and Item 9-E
chdnging condLtlori No. 4 to refer to the pldn attached to the
letter from Mr. Itmdn dated Janus ry 27, 1986.
Motion cdrel.ed on d Roll Call vote, four dyes. CounclI ,;moer
Vasilluu voted nay.
Councllmember Vasillou stdted she concurs with the Planning Com- C,U,P, AMENDMENT
misslon because of the precedent whloh would be set by reducloig 4850 ORLEANS LANE
the setback in d PUD. She sympathize: with the homeowner, but (85139)
there were considerations given to the developer dt the time of Item 94
development and the homeowner should have known this,
Jim Bonney, 4650 Orleans Ldne, stdted he believes there Is d
precedent In the City alreddy dnd his request should be, const-
dered on Its own merits.
F
llagular Coantil lbet ing
iebruay 3, M
Page 20
Count imember Crain stated the precedeat Mr. Bonney refered to
doesn't apply, because it was a rear yard variance and the pro-
perty backed up onto a park and, therefore, was not comparable.
Ib stated the Council Is cons.lderlag the particular case. but
has concerns In general about reduced sldeyard setbacks.
Counclimember Zltur agreed.
N01I014 was made by Councl.tmember Vaslllft, seconded by Council. RESOLUTION N0. 86-78
member Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-78 DENIAL Of A CONDI- DENTAL UF Couepe
TIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A REDUCED SETBACK AT 4850 AMEKOMENT 4850 ORLEANS
ORLEANS LANE (85139). LANE (85139)
Iter 9-6
Obtlon cdrrled on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOTION was made by CouncLImember Crain, seconded by Councllmem-
ber Slsi:, to adopt ORDINANCE N0. 84-01 AMENDING THE CITU' CODE
REGARDING CHANGE OF STREET NAME IN SWAN LAKE ADDITION (NAGNOLIA
LANE TO NORWOOD LANE).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Director Tremere stated that last year the City was presented
with % PUD plan that Involved this property. In the course of
reviewing that plan, questions wvee raised by the neighbors and
the City with respect to certain characteristics of the land.
As a result of input from the neighbors, the developer undertook
an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). This is a docu-
ment to answer questions On the developm,nt which may impact the
environment. The developer prepared the document which has now
finished a 30 day review period by State agencies, the public,
and the Clty. The Cit) could make a "positive declaratlo;n"
which would require the preparation of an Environmental Imparst
Statement (EIS) or a "negative declaration" which finds there is
no need for an EIS, but di.rects the plans for the development
subject to conditions. A negative declaration Is recommended on
the basis that the EAW Is adequate.
Councilmember Vaslllou stated problems with three specific items
In the EAW. She takes exception with the findings In items 14,
25-A., and 27.
Counellmember Crain asked about the wetland location and that It
appears there is a portion of it under the high water mark. He
noted Item No. 18 and Item No. 16.
Director Moore stated that a small portion may be part of the
designated wetland but the DNR has not determined how far south
that, will extend.
0
ORDINANCE N0. 86-01
STREET RAW CMKr
SWAN LAKE ADDITION
Item 9-G*
LIETERNINATION OF
ADEQUACY OF EAW FOR IVY
PARK It
Item 9-k
R4 14r COWICI1 Ibeting
ra'iry
Pago 29
Olremt.or Tremere stated that 120 ft. is the ordinance alrolmum
lot depth and it is proposed that beyond thts point there would
net he any development allowed for those lots abutting the pro-
tReitod areas and he pointed out which lots could be affected.
a, K.` st Laughtneause, 8209 Pennsylvania Road, clarified that he
rep-re4sen s Ivy Park Corporation w.hIch is the owner of the north-
ern tlmo-thirds of the property. Enterprise Properties bought
the lAtad on contingency and has since withdrawn. Dane Carroll
is tht awner of the southern 9ne-third of the property. The EA9
has done what it was designed to do; gather Input from a variety
of partles. He has not with the neighbors and will probably
meet with them again to reach an agreement, covering all their
concerns, he has met with the Corps of Engineers who have come
up with a new grading arrangement which he believes will be
acceptable. He will be meeting with the DNR and proposes that
their requirements will be integrated with those of the City and
neighbors and develop a new preliminary plat.
Reyrrding the chain link fence, they plan to install appropriate
markings to keep the trees from being destroyed but he doesn't
agree with Wo fence because It would stop the movement of the
wildlife and destroy the scenery In the ielghborhood as well as
cost a lot of money. He proposes that, Instead of a 25 ft.
easement ptos an Easement for the wetland, one easement be given
to the State of Minnesota, or to tNe City, which would make this
Land the same as QNR protected wetland and no Improvements could
take place w.tthln It. They will only be grading one tat on the
west end of thu development and will use the best erosion con-
trol devices with the approval of the City.
Dane Carroll, 10715 48th Ave., stated he doesn't agree with the
fencee.intends to save the large trees but cannot savR
everything including the brush and small trees.
Ldrry Lleder, 4840 Union Terrace Lane, stated the neighbors
p rRecate" he EAW but are still concerned with same matters.
They want a reasonable decision based on clear cut evidence
which has not yet, been fully submitted. They are as ktng for an
EIS which they believe Is necessary. He distributed copies of
his remarks to the CounclL and cited concerns with tiA ens Nos.
149 17-A, 199 25-A, and 25-6. He added that neighbors were not
opposed to development bi.tt were concerned that all data be pro-
vided and be accurate.
Helen Rusten, 18420 8th Ave. stated her longstanding interest in
e preservatlon of wildlife and wetlands. She stated she
favors a wetldnd ordinance to protect the City and sutivnitted
example ordinances from two other cities.
Don Wlsdorf, 4830 Union Terrace Lane, stated he feels strongly
that Eif is required as a result of questions and conrllets
raised by the EAW. He cited twelve items he feels must be
addressed to assure the project does not negatively impact the
environment. He reviewed the Items with an overhead projection.
Regular Courwil Pketino
February 1, M6
Page 30
MOTION was made by Couti'cl ImemDer Masi t tou, seconded. by Count t l-
maobor Crain, calling for an EIS based upon review of the CAIN
dated December , 1985.
Counellmember Crain stated his concern aDuut re"I ring an EIS
which would cover many issues with which the Council has no con-
cern.
Director Tremere stated that the Council could deflne the issue
or issues by defining the scope of an EIS. Direction could be
given to staff to come back with a draft scoping statement.
Attorney Lefler stated that deferring the decision un;.,tt next
week and directing staff to come back with a list of Items that
the ordinances would protect and those It will not would be an
appropriate decision.
Mr. Laughinghouse stated he doesn't favor an EIS an It could
cost between $25,000 and $50,000 and a partial EIS would still
cost a lot, especially time. He suggested waiting for a staff
report.
Councllmembers Vaslllou and Crain withdrew their motion.
NOTION was aside by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem.
ber Z.ltur, deferring determination of adequacy of the EAW and
directing staff to prepare a draft EIS scoping document for pte.
sentation to the Council at the February 10 meeting with a r -3-
v lsed draft negative declaration resolution reflecting sugges-
tions made at this meeting and with an Indication of those con-
cerns that can be addressed by In-place City or other applicable
leas dnd requlations.
Mayor Schneider suggested any meeting between the neighbors and
the developer should be attended by staff. He raised coicerns
that there should be a single development contract for d single
PUD. Extensive discussion followed with Mr. Laughinghouse who
questloved that.
Director Moore stated he has no knowledge of how the property
will be final platted or whether it will be as one plat with one
development contract.
Discussion followed on the PUD status
develop as an entity, perhaps In phases.
M,,1,14Lon carried, five ayes.
and how the land should
Counci!member Vasl1LOU asked why the eQsement we sn't received
before letting the contract,
Attorney Lefler answered that is not always the ease.
WE FF
Regular Council Neeting
February 3, 1986
Page 31
Discussion followed on why the changes were made and necessary.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Counclimem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-79
Der Mur, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-79 APPROVING CHANCE ORDER
N0. 3, SCHNIDT'S GARDENS UTILITIES, PROJECT NO. 427 in the SCHMID("; GARDENS
amount of $9,112.11. PROJECT IIG, 427
Itemr 9-I
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOTION was made by CounclImewber Crain. seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-80
Dec Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 86-80 ADOPTING ASSESSIENTS, ADOPTIFfG ASSESSMENTS
PROJECT NO. 605 SANITARY SEWER AND VVERMAIN AREA, ANNICK ACRES ANNICK ACRES
In the amount of $1,005.00. PROJECT NU. 605
Item 9-J*
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-81
ber Sisk, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS,
PROIECT N0, 606 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN LATERAL, ANNICK ANNICK ACRES
ACRES In the amount of $2,916.21. PROJECT N0. 606
Item 9-J•
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOT IUN was mane by CouncLimember Crain, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION NO. 86-82
or 513k, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-82 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ- G
INC EXECUTION OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT WITH HOUSING AND SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. HRA
Item 9-K•
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
The Council discussed the role of d Council Coordinating Repre.
sante eve.
MOTION was mddu. by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmem- RESOLUTION N0. 86-81
ber Vd3lllou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-83 APPOINTMENT TO NOUS- A 0 0
ING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY to be Couricilmember Dave Craln. Item 10-A
Motlun corrled on d Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by CuunclLmember VdsLLiou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO* 86-84
member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-84 DESIGNATING ALTER- DESIGNATIK ALMWE
NATE UIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AHTHORITY to be tiIrgll Schnelder. TO SUBURBAN RATE
AUTHORITY
Potion carried on d Roll Call vote, five ayes. Item 10-A
MOTION wds made by Councllmember Vaslllou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0. 86-6S
member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 9645 DESIGNATING DIRECTOR DESINAIWC DIRE OR
AND ALTERNATE OIRECTOR TO THE BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 6 ALTERNATE TO BASSETT
COMM(.'-OiION to be Fred Moore and "John Sweeney. CREEK COMMISSION
Item 10-A
0
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes.
Regular Council Meeting
February 3, 1986
Page 32
NOTION Was made by Counclimember Vasillou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-86
member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-86 DESIGNATING DIRECTOR DE5IGRXTI9rWMW 8
AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO THE ELM CREEK WATER CONSERVATION DIS- ALTERNATE TO ELM CREEK
TRICT to be Fred Moore and Vern Peterson. DISTRICT
Item 10-A
Motion carried on a Roll C41L vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmember RESOLUTION N0, 86-87
Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-87 DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVE DEi R"MM. TA -
AND ALTERNATE TO THE MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION to be 1IVE AND ALTERNATE TO
CounclLmember V43 MOu and Mdyor Schneider. MLC
Item 10-A
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
NOTION was made by Councllmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 86-88
member Crain, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 86-88 APPOINTING COUNCIL ApparNiT9 Mw
COORDINATING REPRESENTATIVES FOR 1986, 1986
Item 10-A
Motion carrled on o Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Schneider, secondv-d by Coueicilmember
Sisk, to appoint Councilmembers Crain and Vd31Llou to the Coun-
cll Special Assessment Committee.
Motion carred, five ayes.
Mayor Schneider stated that Plymouth has been slow in rdlsiny
Its park dedledtlon fees Ln the past.
Uirector Blank stated that the cash is designed to pay for
ddditlonal park .-aid and this money Is needed In order not to
Pall behind.
MUEION wds made by Councllmember Sisk, seconded by Councllmember
Zitur, to adopt HESOLUTLON NO. 86-89 SM ING PARK DEDICATION
FLLS FOR 1986.
Motion carried on d Poll Call \,ote, four ayes. Councllmember
Vasillou voted ndy.
Councllmember Vasillou stated her concern tnat other consultants
were too busy to bid on this project, that the bid is at the top
of the range, and she doesn't. favor awardLng a bid when only one
consultant responded.
Uirector Blank stated the City would prefer to work on a not -to -
exceed bdsi.s. In this case 8onestroo chose the higher amount
buL the project could come 1.,% for less.
Councllmember VdsILIou stated She could not support the bLd
ward with only one consultant respondtr g.
Councili.aewber Zltur agreed out stated he would like to proceed.
0
REVIEW OF PARK
DEDICATION FEES
Item 10-8
RESOLUTION NO. 86-89
SETTINC PARK TION
FEES FOR 1986
Item 10-8
CONSULTANT SELECTION
ZACHARY PARK BUILDW
Item 1J -C
11
11
vi I
Regular
February
Page 33
council meeting
3, 1986
NOTION was ma
ber Mur, to
SERVICES WITH
the dmount of
de by Counctimember SZsk, seconded by Counct mem-
adept RESOLUTION NO, 86.90 APPROVING CONSULTANT
DONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERL IK i ASSOCIATES, ENC. to
12,000.
Notion carried on a Roll Call
Vaslilou voted nay.
Manager WIllls listed the four
Council to remaln consistent
Policy and added that station
Ne stated he will put together
It to dry; f i refs the Counc l l
select the farms they wish to
RFPs.
vote,
steps
with
No. 1
four ayes. Counc t tamnbe r
neces3ary In order for the
the Consuitint
wlil also nued
a Request For Propos,
chooses. The Counci
interview from those
The meeting adjourned at 1:20 a.m.
Selection
remode l l ny.
ii and send
may then
submttt.ing
RESOLUTION N0.86-90
ZACHARY P:'1Aie BU ILilW:
Item 10•C
CONSULTANT SELECTION
FIRE STATION N0, 3
Item 10-D