HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 08-26-1985 Specialny.
MINUTES
SPECIAL CUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 26, 1985
dial "
of
the
Plyirouth Citr Council was called to
or by yo Davenport at 7:40 pea* in the City Council
Ownbers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth %ulevard on August
26, l"s
PKKNTt Mayor llavenport, Counciimeobers Sehne:dee, Crain and
Vasillou, r Willis, Assistant Manager Ooyles,
Public Works Director Moore, Plannln7 Vrector
Tremere, Park and Recreation Director Blanc, City
Attorney Lefler, and City Clerk Nck*
ABSENT: Councilme ter Neils
CONSENTiT AQFMDA
NOTION was made by Couneiloeober Crain, seconded by
bet Schneider, to adopt the consent agenda with the
Items 6-8 and 6-E and the addition of item 6-F.
Notion carried on a Poll Call Grote, four ayes.
MIME MS
Counel lsew
deletion of
Ij MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmena-
bet Schneider to adopt the minutes of the regular Council meet -
Ing of August 19, 1985 as submitted.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, fair ayes.
PETITIOMM JESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Planner Treemre reported Aat the petition was before the
Council on AuUust 12 at winch time the Item Ras tabled after the
attorney for Mendota, Inc. indtcated that they had some concerns
with the road right-of»way dedieatlat being requested by the
City. The City Attorney hrs reviewed their concerns and dis-
cussed them with Bass Lake Development, pertnera in the MPUD.
Bass Lake Development is now asking that the Ciainoll act on
their revised petition for their portion alw:e so they can pro-
ceed with part of the residential developmenti portion of the
WU06 He pointed out that a 1975 agreawnt existed between the
City and Mendota, Inc% in which Nendw o atroad to provide future
right-ot-way easements for C.R. 1o,
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 4
MINJTES - REGULAR
MEETING OF AUGUST
19, 1985
Item 50
BASS LAKE ESTATES/
OUINWOOD COMMMERCItit
MMS FINAL PLAN/PLAT
8409t)
Item 6•A
Pape 270
01rector (bore showed it graphic of the Mendota, Inc. plat and
stated that In 1975 Mendota, Inc. had a request before the
Council to divide property !n this area. As part of the consid-
eration of that request the Cowell hada concerns with righteof-
say needs. At that point in time the Proposed plans for C.A. 10
were not completed and the final alignment was not known. An
agreement was prepared and executed which addressed three
parcels of land owned by Neadotas Inc. and stated that v at the
Use the City requested an *&%seem for C.R. 10, ftrdota, Inc.
would provide it. 2t refers to the: fact that the exot align -
went is net known but the Intention is to provide the rlgtt.of-
way. noir that the County has set the alignment of the roan, the
right-of-way is being requesteA In aonaunetion with the other
right-ofoway for C,RO i0 and for future C.R. 61.
Gob su er, Sass Lake Development, stated they have begun
gr ng in the area ands it they cannot get final plat approval,
they would be put into a "negative covenant" situation which
means he would be unable to draw money to pay the subcontrace.
ttors. They are ready to perform, as they sold they wr+uld,
iweluding dedication of all needed road right-of-way as they see
botWit in peoportion to the amount the City is requesting and
the size and character of their project. They are willing to
waive their right to subsequently seek compensation from the
City over the dedication.
Mayor Davenport asked if Mr. Hickock of Mendota, Inc. intends to
honor the 1975 agreement pertaining to granting of easemrent& for
C.R. 10.
S. 'Todd Rapip, attorney representing Eugene Hickok, stated he has
not seen the 1975 agreement and cannot respond until he has.
Eu enc Nldcolc, Mendota, Inc., stated that the dedication agree.
Ment n 1775 was in response to a request to subdivide a single
family area. He agreed to future road easements in order to get
the land south of C.R. 10 platted. Now he is reserving the
right to be paid for that dedicated land for this development
which is about four aures. He has improved portions of public
roads in this area including turn lanes from C.R. 10 onto his
property. The right -of -ray for C.R. 10 is more than the 1975
easesent agreement because of changes made In the alignment and
the requirement now includes C.R. 61 right -not -sways He will
stand behind the 1975 agTeement, but because of the changes in
the alignment, and the fact that they paid for Improvements
once, he believes there should be some compensation.
Councilaramber Schneider ,asked If Mr. Nickock redli:ed that if
the Bass Lake Estates development were severed from the MPWw
the Ouinwood Commercial development would have to stand on its
own and may not ba **lewed as a PUD?
y Page 271
l
1
lir.'Hiekook stated he thought the City wanted the entire proper-
ty plstuW of one time. Their plan would do this and they have
been cooperating with staff on It. They are proposing that the
Quinwood plat be approvrA as It is and they are willing to
transfer that road rightmof-way to the City reserving the right
under the law to*sue for compensation later. Ke is asking that
the entire WW be approved and that the question of compma-
tton for right -of -tray dedication be treated .rs a separate issue
and handled later.
Mayor Davenport stated that the City intends to retain the re-
quirement for dedication of right-of-way. If that is conditlon-
alited with Implied litigation, he favors the alternate where
the City goes forward with the final plat and development con-
tract for Bass lake Estates only. Then, if Mr. Hickock wants to
lttigatep he may do so. Once that issue is resolved they can
resubmit their request to develop the property. They should be
aware of the fact, however, that they will have to start the
process over again separately from the PUD it is now in. His
plat may stand on its own as a PUD or It may not.
Counallmember Schneider pointed out that the upgrading of C.A.
10 isn't planned until 1986 or 1989 and the City doesn't need
the rlght-of-way now.
Director Wore stated that Mendota, Inc. has not granted any
easements to dates the agreement is that, when the City request-
ed the easements for C.R. 10, they would give them.
Mr. Rapp clarified that the agreement between the City and
Mendota Indicates only that Mendota was agreeing to dedicate a
parcel not exceeding 54 feet for right-ot-way. Mr. Hickoek is
Willing to stand by that agreement,
He understands that this request for final plat approval is emu
sistent with the approved preliminary plat. He believes this
proves that It was an appropriate plat and the Justification for
denying the approval of the final plat now, appears to be based
on the Information that Mendota, Inc. intends to reserve its
right to receive just compensation for what it sees as a taking
of their land. If Mendota, Inc. were prepefed to give the out-
lots for right-of-way, would the Council approve the final plat?
Mayor Devenport suggested that a response to a conditional dedi-
Qation should be in the context of litigation.
Counailmember Schneider pointed out that resolution No. 85457
approved the preliminary plat with the understanding that
Mendota would dedicate the right -of -Nay needed for the construc-
tion of C.R. 10 and 61.
i
1
P .Lao _ i717i
r . lyra Rapp objected to the uwandittmml dedication of the right-
ofoway and asked that, It final plat approval is nat given,
would It be only because of the refusal of tisndota, Inc. to
dedicate the right•of-way. It there Is any other reason, he
Would lilac to know it. It the Council will not consider this,
he. oropposes that the Bass Lake Estates portion be approved in
ph"" so there Is an opportunity to explore alternatives to
llttgatlen.
Discussion continued on alternatives to approving the entire
WiD tonight.
Counel lmember Vdsl l lssu stated It raved be appropriate to approve
Bass Lake Estates and that this *wld negate the PUD for the
Quinwood patldn proposed by Nendota, Inc. The City was ready
to raft this approval lattiatly, but, because Nendota, Inc. has
conUtionail:ed their compliance with the development require
awns and canditiwss, this cannot be done*
NOTION was rade by Counallmember Vasiliou, seconded by Counell- RESOLUTION N0.45099
memUr Sohneider, to adopt RESOLUTION We 85-w629 APPROVING FINNAN r PLOW a Kv.
PLAT AND IR:1IEI,OPMENT CONTRACT FOR BAST LUKE ESTATES FOR BASS CONTRACT I BASS LAW
LAKE DEVELOPMENT, INC. (NPW 04) (8091) per revisions noted ESTATES (84091)
In the August 22, 1985 memorandur;. Item 6-A
Nlottsna carried ca a Roll Call vote, four ayea,.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Vast"tau, seeonded by Council• RESOLUTION .63w630
member Schne'der, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85430 SETTING CONDI- MYTIM GOMMUFM
TIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED 1*0 FINAL PLAT FOR FINAL PLAT, BASS
BASS LAM ESMTES FOR BASS LAKE DEMO PMENT, INC. (HPUD 65-1) LAKE ESTATES (8091)
44091) amending condition Ito. 7 to read= "Out lot F shall be Item daA
revises+ to reflect the removal of Outlot C of the proposed
Quln000d Commercial Center plat."
14DTION was made by Counellmember Schnelder, seconded by Council-
ime0or Crain, to amend to add the following as new condition
No. 8t "An agreement be executed between Bass Lake Development
and the City of Plymouth regarding releasing the City from cow-
pensation claims for any right.ot-way within the Bass Lake
Estates as approved by the City Attorseay%
Notion carried, twr ayes.
Notion as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
NOTION was made by Couneilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NNOoSS431
member Sehnelder, to adojK RESOLUTION N0. 85431 ADOPTING Mi MOWM"14
ASSESSMENTS, PRO-7ECT N0. SS3, SANITARY SEKR AREA, BASS LAKE SANITARY SEW
ESTATES ADDITION In the wmmt ct 5170780.00. MASS LAKE V RTES
PROSECT NO. %53
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 6-A
Ausust 26, t99t
Page 273
MOTION was made by Counciimember Schneider, seconded by Council -
member Crain; to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-631 DENYING FINAL PLAT
FOR QUINNOOO COMMERCIAL CENTER FOR MENDOTA, INC. (MRUO 85-1)
84091) on the basis that the proposed final plat is not consis-
tent with the approved preliminary plat or with the project pro-
posal submitted on February 22, 1945, relative to dedication of
necessary public road right-of-way.
Notion carried an a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
Counclimember Vaslliou stated she remo%ed this from the consent
agenda because of neightors who don't feel their questions were
answered at the Planning Commission,
Marion Bnhnsack, 330 Zinnia Lane, stated the proposed lots are
Mer t .an bite existing ones because they were rezoned to
allow this and they're wondering what their rights are. The 6th
Addition cantains duplexes and they .ire requesti.ig a couple of
units be removed and the extra land be split to make the abut-
ting lots larger. They want the Ctinctl to look at the existing
neighborhood and not just zoning regulations. She asked about
the development of the office distribution center plans which
the neighbors had not seen before.
Director Tremere stated the development of non-residential sites
is not before the Council, only the pldtt.ing. As time goes by,
the land will be subject to further platting and site plan
approval which may include the office distribution center.
There has been no change in the concept plan since the last pub-
lic hearing several years ago.
Director Moore stated a preliminary plat and general development
plan were approved by the Council which Involved all the land
Carlson owned on both sides of I-494. The drawing showing the
office distribution center was part of that plat. Carlsin
divided the parcels into several larger outlots on either Bide
of I-494. Every plat since has been a final plat. Until a plat
is 31tbmitted, the land remains an outlot.
Mayor Davenport stated that the office distribution is an allow-
able use and a public hearing would not be required` when they
request final approval.
Mrs. Bohnsaek stated they are aware that the City chose to
accept money in lieu of park dedication from Carlson and asked
that the City reconsider since the area does need a park geared
for small children.
Director Blank stated that this area does not qualify for a
neighborhood park as Sunset School is the designated park for
tl. area based upon ultimate development projections.
r
RESOLUTION N0.85-632
QUINWOOD COMMERCIAL
FOR MENDOTA, INC.
84091)
Item 6-A
moi i
Page 274
Mrs. 8ohnsack stated that a traffic :fight at G.R. 61 and 15
should be ioitalled. She understands that this is a lengthy
process which must meet certain criteria of the Caunty, but she
petitions, as does the neighborhood# that the City request one
for the intersection.
3ames Sentatan, 13510 C.R. 151p stated his concern that the neig;t-
SriOd not be notifled whan future development plans cam
before the Council. further, the notice* for this item were not
received in a timely wanner because of mailbox relocation.
Mayor Osrnenport stated that no legal notice would be given, but
the neighbors would be notltled It they regaest it.
Mr. Sentman petitioned the founell t4 reconsider the final plat
because of the inclusion of duplexes. Carlson is proposing 3.5
units per acre across the atreet from sites of 112 acre or more
which already exist. The neighbors already feel they have been
unfairly treated and want a reduction in dennity to 3.1 units as
originally proposed*
director lreaere stated
been and the proposed
This requires miniarum
posedo
this area is guided LA4 and always has
zoning is aonsistent with the guiding.
1`,000 square toot lots, which arepro-
Mrs, Seotman asked the Council to conslder this as a contiguous
neighborhood for planning pircposes and not disregard the extst-
ing homes. He also asked what type of berming and landscaping
were being proposed ouid if the storm sewer would take care of
the existing h(MU as well as the new ones.
Director Moore answered that the storm drainage of the area will
be in compliance with the City plans and requlrements. The
plans for this developmetot are available for review. Copies
were handed to Mar. Sentman by Manager W11113.
Mr. Sentman asked that traffic signals be installed for the pro%
tection of the children.
Councileember Vasiliou stared that if there are going to be 91
additional homes, it may :cake sense to have a park on the west
side of C.R. 61.
Director Blank stated the neighborhood parks are based on popu-
lation in an area dnd for plaotning purposes they dre using our-
ree projections supplied by the Planning Department. FRAC
look4d at the site dma decided that Sunset School would meet the
criteri i trn spite of C.R. 61. FRAC will review the decision if
the Coa.:eil directs them to.
I r
mage 275
i
0
Director Tremere stated that a large portl,2n of this lnuustrial
tend was reguided from multi•restdential, which substantially
redue" the need for a park in this area and focused the need on
the eastern side of the park area. It may be better to overcame
the impediment of C.R. 61 than to build another park because of
the predominant, industrial nature of the land around the neigh-
borhood.
Director Nice stented that the County has exact criteria which
most be met before they will install a signal and the intersec-
tion doesn't aeet these warrants at this time. He ---de.
the City use Its consultants to conduct a study on the proposed
traffic projection when the road is completed and based on
future traffic.
INION was Node by Counciloemher Vasiliou, seconded by Council -
member Schneider, authorising stiff to retain a traffic consul-
tant to conduct a traffic study based on vehicle and pedestelan
traffic projections at C.R. 61 and 15.
Notion carried, four ayes.
Discussion follmcs an alternatives ov bui:ding another park on
they east side of L.R. 61. Counctloember Vasiliou stat"d she
favored the traffic light because it would benefit both the cars
and the pedestrian crossings.
Counellmember Crain agreed that a park In this area Mould be the
wrong directlon and the traffic signal seemed appropriate.
Oiscussion on the question of density followed. Mayor Davenport
pointed out that it would be better for the neighbors it the
pond in the southwest catner remained in the industrial area of
the development so the neighbors would not be responsible for
the upkeep and the Council could require berming and landscap-
ing.
Director Moore pointed out that the frontage of the lots propos-
ed are in fact larger than those of the akiutting existing homes
and read the widths of the abutting parcels.
Couwilmember Vasiliou stated she did not approve of any de-
crease of units or In lot st=et
NOTION was made by Couneilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Cowicl1w
weber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 65»633 APPROVING FINAL
PLATO MNDITIO1K USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR
CARLSON SIXTH ADDITION FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES (85031) 1b
Motion carried on a Roll fall vote, four ayes.
RESOLUTION ND.85433
WE PUT, CUM"
DEV. CONTRACT FOR
CARLSON SIXTH ADDN.
85031)
Item 6-8
1. August 26' 1985
Page 276
NOTION was made by Councilmember Vasllinu, seconded by Council- RESOLL.4N N0,AS-634
i -ember Sehnetdor, to adopt RESOLUTION 65-634 SETTING CONI- !ZjON5
IONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR FINAL PLAT FOR
CARLSON SIXTH ADDITION FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES (850$1). CARLSON SIXTH ADON.
65031)
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Iterk 6-6
MOTION ryas made by Cuunei:&,%nber Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0.85-635
meober Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-635 ADOPTING ADOPTING IMSMW
ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT 40. 5569 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERNAIN AREA, SEWER "' WATERMAIN
CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ,ADDITION in the amount of $13.f,6s.00. CARLSON SIXTH ADDN.
Pk"C T N0. 556
Notion carriee. on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 64
NOTION vias wade by Councilmamber Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION N0.8S-636
ber Schneider, to adc;t RESOLUTION N0. 85-636 APPROVING FIPAL
PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 6TH MTRACT, WIND RIDGE
ADDITION FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (85049). AT BASS LAKE 6TH
ADON. (55049)
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 6,%C*
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Counc:lmem- RESOLUTION NOBS -637
ber Schneider, t;% adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-637 SETTING CONDITIONS
TO BE NET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PIAT FOR WIND FINAL PLAT, WIND
RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 6TH ADDITION FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUC- RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
TION COMPANY, IWC. (850491. 6TH ADDN. (85019)
Notion carried nn a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
Itew 6-C41
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION N0.8S-638
her Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-638 ADOPTING ASSESS- ADOPTING A3.
VENTS, PROJECT NO., 560, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERNAIK AREA, SEWER d WATERN41N
AEQUITRON ADDITION in the amount of 5109864.20. AEQUIiRON ADDITION
F303EC T N0. 560
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport Item 640
abstained.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NO M439
ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-639 APPROVING PRELINI-
NAR.' PLAT FOR AEQUITRON MEDICAL, INC. (85065). AEQUITRON MEDICAL
INS.'. (85065)
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Nayor Davenport Item 6-D*
abstained,
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NOoBS-64G
ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0a, 85-640 APPROVING FINAL
PLAT FOR AEQUI14ON FOR NEQUITRON, INC. (85065). AEOUITRON, INC.
85065)
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport Item 6-D*
abstained.
lkJ ,cavi %t ow.Val; •-w4 r.
ust 269 1985
Page 277
NOTION was made by Counctimember Crain, seconded by Counctimem-
ber Schnelde r, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-641 SETTING CONDITIONS
TO 6E NET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR
AEQUITRC:' FOR AEQUITRON, INC. (85065).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport
abstained.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by CounclImm.
ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-642 APPROVINC SITE
PLAN AND VARIANCES FOR AEQUITRON, INC. (85072).
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport
abstained.
Randall 3oh.n3on, Driveway E*sign, distributed a letter to the
o0unclI re9dr3ing delinquent bll:.s o! Minnesota Homebuilders
the president of which Is part of the Mission Partnership
developing Parkside Apartments,
Mayor Davenport stated this is irrelevant to the Council's con-
slderatlon of the request before it. They are being asked to
approve a alte plan for the Parkside Apartments. The financing
of the project would be Insured and guaranteed. Any daalings
with subcontraetors is not relevant to the matter of they pro-
ject. If the partnership meets the City's requirements, It can-
not legally act to deny the request.
Mr. Johnson asked for 30 days to present other evidence which he
knows the financial lenders don't have.
The Mayor stated agaln that If the partnership meets the City's
standards, It cannot legally withhold approval.
Attorney Lefler stated it is not the position of the Cl.y to be
involved i;i o U-115putc uctwccn d dCVC%Luycf aiid hts subcontrac-
tors.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem-
ber Vaslllou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-643 APPROVING FINAL
PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTNACi FOR PARKSIDE OF MEDICINE I.AKE
PARTNERSHIP FOR PARKSIDF. AT MEDICINE LAKE (RPUO 76-1) (A-338).
Motiin carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
MOTION was made by Counctimember Crain, seconded by Counellmem-
ber V43ILIOUl to adopt RESOLUTION Nk'*. 85-644 SETTING Ct1NDITiONS
TO EE MEI PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT AND
APPROVAL FOR REAFFIRMATION OF SITE PLAN FOR PARKSIDE Al MEDICINE
LAKE FOR PARKSIDE AT NEOICINE LAKE PARTNERSHIP (RPUD 76-1)
A-3)8).
Motion carried on 4 Roll Call vote, .our ayes.
RE.SOLU110H N0.85-641
F INAL PLAT
AEQUITROrt, INC.
95061)
Item 6-D•
RESOLUTION NO.85-642
AEOUITNON, INC.
85072)
Item 6-0*
RESOLUTION N0.85-643
CONTRACT, PARKSIDE
OF MEDICINE LAKE
A-339)
Item 6•E
RESOLUTION N0.85-644
SES
PARKSIDE Of MEDICINE
LAKE (R-338) •
Item 6-E
Page 276
MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem-
ber Vasil:our to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-645 ADOPTING ASSESS-
KNTS, P"XCT N0. 5589 SANITARY SEVER AND WATERMIAIN AREA, PARK•-
SIDF. AT MEDICINE LAKE ADDITION in the amount of $212,055.00.
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, tour ayes.
NOTIOMM rras anode by Counctlmember Crain, seconded bl Counellmem-
bar Vastl!ou, to adoFt RESOLUTION NO, 85-646 ADUP71MG ASSESS-
MLNTS, PROJECT Ww= 5S7, SANITARY SFNER '.ATERAL9 PARKSIDE AT
MEDICINE t4KE ADDITION in the amount of $?'69539.05.
Notion carried on a !loll Call vote, tour ayes.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Couneilmem-
bee Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85447 SETTING PMC
WARING DATE FOR 1986-87 CITY BUDGETS AND 198546 PROPOSED USE
WARING FOR FEDERAL. REVENUE SWIRING FJk MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16,
1985 at 7:30 p.m.
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
NOTION was made
ber Schnelder,
BURSEMENTS FOR
2,5689770.44.
by Counellmember Crain, seconded by Counellmem-
to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-648 APPROVING OIS-
PERIOD ENDING JULY 31, 1985 In the amount of
I Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council.
member Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-649 REQUEST FOR PAY-
AENT N0. 4 AND FINAL, 1984 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT In the
amount of $9,856.08 to Hardrives, Inc.
Notion carried on o Roll Call vote, tour ayes.
NOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council -
member Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 65-650 REQUEST FOR PAY-
MENT N0. 6 AND FINAL, 1964 UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT in the
amount of $14,779.32 to Ceca UtilIties, Inc.
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
Manager Mollis stated there are some communities which hsve
money left for Industrial development revenue bonding but they
all have many other cities in line asking for It. He believes
the chance of getting some is slight. There may be money avail-
able In the state pool when cities have to either use it or pay
the IS holding fee. He added the City will have the opportunity
to use its remaining funds. Noting there are two other appli-
cants for the remaining City tuna,, he stated there are no
guarantees that the first applicant will oe the one to receive
the money. The Council can provide bonding for tNe onplicant
they believe would be best for the City.
RESOLUTION NO.85-645
SEVER i VATERNAIN
PARKSIDE AT MEDICINE
LAKE, PROS,, 558
Item 6-E
RESOLUTION N0.85-646
SEVER LATERAL
PARKSIDE AT MEDICINE
LADE, PROD. 557
Item 6-E
RESOLUTION N0.85-647
Ef T INC -MING
BUOCETS A REVENUL
SNARING
Item 6-F•
RESOLUTION H0.85-648
VENTS FOR PERIOD
ENDING ?I 31 /85
Item 6-C+
RESOLUTION N0.85- L49
REQE*TFM P=Rr
N0. 4 AND FINAL
1984 STREET INP,
Item 6-H-1
RESOLUTION ND.85450
N0. 6 AND FINAL
1984 UTILITY IMP.
Item d-"-2
IDRB REQUEST
OGLE/SHEENY
Item 6-I
Hark Seca, representing Ogle/Sheehy, stated they intend to apply
or money from the state pool, however, they need preliminary
approval from the City which requires the holding of a public
hearing.
NOTION was made by Counetimember Schneider, seconded by Council -
member Yaslliou, :o adopt RESOLUTION NOv, 85451 CALLING FOR A
PUBLIC NEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES DEVEL-
OPHW PROZCT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL IMWSiTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE MUCATION OF A NOTICE OF THE
HEARING to be held September 169 1985 at 7130 p.m.
Notion carried on a Rall Call vote, four ayes.
LOTION was made by Couneilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmea-
ber Schnelder, to adopt RESOLUTION MIO. 85.652 APPROVING ADDI-
TIONAL TAXI CA® LICENSE FOR TOWN TAXI.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
IF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COHMISSIONS
Manager Millis stated that there are three alternate locations
for the installation of the Pike Lake interceptor across the
Tennant Co. property according to plan received from thew, all
of which are similar to past locations. The City is proposing
the trunk sewer engineering report previously prepared by
8one3troo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. be revised and
updated based on the three alternates.
Director Moore stated that Tennant, had acreed to provide accept-
able alternates in August which they now have done. A public
hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 28 by the Planning
Commission to consider the five year Capital Improvement Pro-
gram, of which the Pike Lake interceptor sewer connection is a
part. The commission's recommendation will tN.ar be before the
Council later for discussion and appro.al.
The Mayor stated that, if Tennant Co. is not willing to grant
the City an easement at no cost, he wants to know about it and
suggested inviting Tennant to a Council meeting to discuss the
miotter.
Disoussion oontinued On lennant's schedule for development,
whether they are trying to sell the land and the need for up-
dated Cost estimates for the three alternatives.
MOTION waw made by Couneilmember Schneider, seconded by Counctl-
meAer Cretn, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85453 ORDERING ANENDNENT
TO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT ON PIKE LAKE INTERCEPTOR
SEINER, PHASE Il, CITU tRONCT NO. 008.
Notia: earrieo on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
RESOLUTION M1OAS451
IORB REQUEST OF
OGLE/DENY PARTNER-
SHIP PR03ECT
Item 6-I
RESOLUTION 181.85452
TAXI LIMM
Item o-3*
PIKE LAKE
INTERCEPTOR REPORT
Item 7-B
RESOLUTION N0.85453
ENGINEERING REPORT
PIKE LAKE INTER-
CEPTOR SEWER
Item 7-8