Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 08-26-1985 Specialny. MINUTES SPECIAL CUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 26, 1985 dial " of the Plyirouth Citr Council was called to or by yo Davenport at 7:40 pea* in the City Council Ownbers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth %ulevard on August 26, l"s PKKNTt Mayor llavenport, Counciimeobers Sehne:dee, Crain and Vasillou, r Willis, Assistant Manager Ooyles, Public Works Director Moore, Plannln7 Vrector Tremere, Park and Recreation Director Blanc, City Attorney Lefler, and City Clerk Nck* ABSENT: Councilme ter Neils CONSENTiT AQFMDA NOTION was made by Couneiloeober Crain, seconded by bet Schneider, to adopt the consent agenda with the Items 6-8 and 6-E and the addition of item 6-F. Notion carried on a Poll Call Grote, four ayes. MIME MS Counel lsew deletion of Ij MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmena- bet Schneider to adopt the minutes of the regular Council meet - Ing of August 19, 1985 as submitted. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, fair ayes. PETITIOMM JESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Planner Treemre reported Aat the petition was before the Council on AuUust 12 at winch time the Item Ras tabled after the attorney for Mendota, Inc. indtcated that they had some concerns with the road right-of»way dedieatlat being requested by the City. The City Attorney hrs reviewed their concerns and dis- cussed them with Bass Lake Development, pertnera in the MPUD. Bass Lake Development is now asking that the Ciainoll act on their revised petition for their portion alw:e so they can pro- ceed with part of the residential developmenti portion of the WU06 He pointed out that a 1975 agreawnt existed between the City and Mendota, Inc% in which Nendw o atroad to provide future right-ot-way easements for C.R. 1o, CONSENT AGENDA Item 4 MINJTES - REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 19, 1985 Item 50 BASS LAKE ESTATES/ OUINWOOD COMMMERCItit MMS FINAL PLAN/PLAT 8409t) Item 6•A Pape 270 01rector (bore showed it graphic of the Mendota, Inc. plat and stated that In 1975 Mendota, Inc. had a request before the Council to divide property !n this area. As part of the consid- eration of that request the Cowell hada concerns with righteof- say needs. At that point in time the Proposed plans for C.A. 10 were not completed and the final alignment was not known. An agreement was prepared and executed which addressed three parcels of land owned by Neadotas Inc. and stated that v at the Use the City requested an *&%seem for C.R. 10, ftrdota, Inc. would provide it. 2t refers to the: fact that the exot align - went is net known but the Intention is to provide the rlgtt.of- way. noir that the County has set the alignment of the roan, the right-of-way is being requesteA In aonaunetion with the other right-ofoway for C,RO i0 and for future C.R. 61. Gob su er, Sass Lake Development, stated they have begun gr ng in the area ands it they cannot get final plat approval, they would be put into a "negative covenant" situation which means he would be unable to draw money to pay the subcontrace. ttors. They are ready to perform, as they sold they wr+uld, iweluding dedication of all needed road right-of-way as they see botWit in peoportion to the amount the City is requesting and the size and character of their project. They are willing to waive their right to subsequently seek compensation from the City over the dedication. Mayor Davenport asked if Mr. Hickock of Mendota, Inc. intends to honor the 1975 agreement pertaining to granting of easemrent& for C.R. 10. S. 'Todd Rapip, attorney representing Eugene Hickok, stated he has not seen the 1975 agreement and cannot respond until he has. Eu enc Nldcolc, Mendota, Inc., stated that the dedication agree. Ment n 1775 was in response to a request to subdivide a single family area. He agreed to future road easements in order to get the land south of C.R. 10 platted. Now he is reserving the right to be paid for that dedicated land for this development which is about four aures. He has improved portions of public roads in this area including turn lanes from C.R. 10 onto his property. The right -of -ray for C.R. 10 is more than the 1975 easesent agreement because of changes made In the alignment and the requirement now includes C.R. 61 right -not -sways He will stand behind the 1975 agTeement, but because of the changes in the alignment, and the fact that they paid for Improvements once, he believes there should be some compensation. Councilaramber Schneider ,asked If Mr. Nickock redli:ed that if the Bass Lake Estates development were severed from the MPWw the Ouinwood Commercial development would have to stand on its own and may not ba **lewed as a PUD? y Page 271 l 1 lir.'Hiekook stated he thought the City wanted the entire proper- ty plstuW of one time. Their plan would do this and they have been cooperating with staff on It. They are proposing that the Quinwood plat be approvrA as It is and they are willing to transfer that road rightmof-way to the City reserving the right under the law to*sue for compensation later. Ke is asking that the entire WW be approved and that the question of compma- tton for right -of -tray dedication be treated .rs a separate issue and handled later. Mayor Davenport stated that the City intends to retain the re- quirement for dedication of right-of-way. If that is conditlon- alited with Implied litigation, he favors the alternate where the City goes forward with the final plat and development con- tract for Bass lake Estates only. Then, if Mr. Hickock wants to lttigatep he may do so. Once that issue is resolved they can resubmit their request to develop the property. They should be aware of the fact, however, that they will have to start the process over again separately from the PUD it is now in. His plat may stand on its own as a PUD or It may not. Counallmember Schneider pointed out that the upgrading of C.A. 10 isn't planned until 1986 or 1989 and the City doesn't need the rlght-of-way now. Director Wore stated that Mendota, Inc. has not granted any easements to dates the agreement is that, when the City request- ed the easements for C.R. 10, they would give them. Mr. Rapp clarified that the agreement between the City and Mendota Indicates only that Mendota was agreeing to dedicate a parcel not exceeding 54 feet for right-ot-way. Mr. Hickoek is Willing to stand by that agreement, He understands that this request for final plat approval is emu sistent with the approved preliminary plat. He believes this proves that It was an appropriate plat and the Justification for denying the approval of the final plat now, appears to be based on the Information that Mendota, Inc. intends to reserve its right to receive just compensation for what it sees as a taking of their land. If Mendota, Inc. were prepefed to give the out- lots for right-of-way, would the Council approve the final plat? Mayor Devenport suggested that a response to a conditional dedi- Qation should be in the context of litigation. Counailmember Schneider pointed out that resolution No. 85457 approved the preliminary plat with the understanding that Mendota would dedicate the right -of -Nay needed for the construc- tion of C.R. 10 and 61. i 1 P .Lao _ i717i r . lyra Rapp objected to the uwandittmml dedication of the right- ofoway and asked that, It final plat approval is nat given, would It be only because of the refusal of tisndota, Inc. to dedicate the right•of-way. It there Is any other reason, he Would lilac to know it. It the Council will not consider this, he. oropposes that the Bass Lake Estates portion be approved in ph"" so there Is an opportunity to explore alternatives to llttgatlen. Discussion continued on alternatives to approving the entire WiD tonight. Counel lmember Vdsl l lssu stated It raved be appropriate to approve Bass Lake Estates and that this *wld negate the PUD for the Quinwood patldn proposed by Nendota, Inc. The City was ready to raft this approval lattiatly, but, because Nendota, Inc. has conUtionail:ed their compliance with the development require awns and canditiwss, this cannot be done* NOTION was rade by Counallmember Vasiliou, seconded by Counell- RESOLUTION N0.45099 memUr Sohneider, to adopt RESOLUTION We 85-w629 APPROVING FINNAN r PLOW a Kv. PLAT AND IR:1IEI,OPMENT CONTRACT FOR BAST LUKE ESTATES FOR BASS CONTRACT I BASS LAW LAKE DEVELOPMENT, INC. (NPW 04) (8091) per revisions noted ESTATES (84091) In the August 22, 1985 memorandur;. Item 6-A Nlottsna carried ca a Roll Call vote, four ayea,. NOTION was made by Councilmember Vast"tau, seeonded by Council• RESOLUTION .63w630 member Schne'der, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85430 SETTING CONDI- MYTIM GOMMUFM TIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED 1*0 FINAL PLAT FOR FINAL PLAT, BASS BASS LAM ESMTES FOR BASS LAKE DEMO PMENT, INC. (HPUD 65-1) LAKE ESTATES (8091) 44091) amending condition Ito. 7 to read= "Out lot F shall be Item daA revises+ to reflect the removal of Outlot C of the proposed Quln000d Commercial Center plat." 14DTION was made by Counellmember Schnelder, seconded by Council- ime0or Crain, to amend to add the following as new condition No. 8t "An agreement be executed between Bass Lake Development and the City of Plymouth regarding releasing the City from cow- pensation claims for any right.ot-way within the Bass Lake Estates as approved by the City Attorseay% Notion carried, twr ayes. Notion as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. NOTION was made by Couneilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NNOoSS431 member Sehnelder, to adojK RESOLUTION N0. 85431 ADOPTING Mi MOWM"14 ASSESSMENTS, PRO-7ECT N0. SS3, SANITARY SEKR AREA, BASS LAKE SANITARY SEW ESTATES ADDITION In the wmmt ct 5170780.00. MASS LAKE V RTES PROSECT NO. %53 Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 6-A Ausust 26, t99t Page 273 MOTION was made by Counciimember Schneider, seconded by Council - member Crain; to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-631 DENYING FINAL PLAT FOR QUINNOOO COMMERCIAL CENTER FOR MENDOTA, INC. (MRUO 85-1) 84091) on the basis that the proposed final plat is not consis- tent with the approved preliminary plat or with the project pro- posal submitted on February 22, 1945, relative to dedication of necessary public road right-of-way. Notion carried an a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Counclimember Vaslliou stated she remo%ed this from the consent agenda because of neightors who don't feel their questions were answered at the Planning Commission, Marion Bnhnsack, 330 Zinnia Lane, stated the proposed lots are Mer t .an bite existing ones because they were rezoned to allow this and they're wondering what their rights are. The 6th Addition cantains duplexes and they .ire requesti.ig a couple of units be removed and the extra land be split to make the abut- ting lots larger. They want the Ctinctl to look at the existing neighborhood and not just zoning regulations. She asked about the development of the office distribution center plans which the neighbors had not seen before. Director Tremere stated the development of non-residential sites is not before the Council, only the pldtt.ing. As time goes by, the land will be subject to further platting and site plan approval which may include the office distribution center. There has been no change in the concept plan since the last pub- lic hearing several years ago. Director Moore stated a preliminary plat and general development plan were approved by the Council which Involved all the land Carlson owned on both sides of I-494. The drawing showing the office distribution center was part of that plat. Carlsin divided the parcels into several larger outlots on either Bide of I-494. Every plat since has been a final plat. Until a plat is 31tbmitted, the land remains an outlot. Mayor Davenport stated that the office distribution is an allow- able use and a public hearing would not be required` when they request final approval. Mrs. Bohnsaek stated they are aware that the City chose to accept money in lieu of park dedication from Carlson and asked that the City reconsider since the area does need a park geared for small children. Director Blank stated that this area does not qualify for a neighborhood park as Sunset School is the designated park for tl. area based upon ultimate development projections. r RESOLUTION N0.85-632 QUINWOOD COMMERCIAL FOR MENDOTA, INC. 84091) Item 6-A moi i Page 274 Mrs. 8ohnsack stated that a traffic :fight at G.R. 61 and 15 should be ioitalled. She understands that this is a lengthy process which must meet certain criteria of the Caunty, but she petitions, as does the neighborhood# that the City request one for the intersection. 3ames Sentatan, 13510 C.R. 151p stated his concern that the neig;t- SriOd not be notifled whan future development plans cam before the Council. further, the notice* for this item were not received in a timely wanner because of mailbox relocation. Mayor Osrnenport stated that no legal notice would be given, but the neighbors would be notltled It they regaest it. Mr. Sentman petitioned the founell t4 reconsider the final plat because of the inclusion of duplexes. Carlson is proposing 3.5 units per acre across the atreet from sites of 112 acre or more which already exist. The neighbors already feel they have been unfairly treated and want a reduction in dennity to 3.1 units as originally proposed* director lreaere stated been and the proposed This requires miniarum posedo this area is guided LA4 and always has zoning is aonsistent with the guiding. 1`,000 square toot lots, which arepro- Mrs, Seotman asked the Council to conslder this as a contiguous neighborhood for planning pircposes and not disregard the extst- ing homes. He also asked what type of berming and landscaping were being proposed ouid if the storm sewer would take care of the existing h(MU as well as the new ones. Director Moore answered that the storm drainage of the area will be in compliance with the City plans and requlrements. The plans for this developmetot are available for review. Copies were handed to Mar. Sentman by Manager W11113. Mr. Sentman asked that traffic signals be installed for the pro% tection of the children. Councileember Vasiliou stared that if there are going to be 91 additional homes, it may :cake sense to have a park on the west side of C.R. 61. Director Blank stated the neighborhood parks are based on popu- lation in an area dnd for plaotning purposes they dre using our- ree projections supplied by the Planning Department. FRAC look4d at the site dma decided that Sunset School would meet the criteri i trn spite of C.R. 61. FRAC will review the decision if the Coa.:eil directs them to. I r mage 275 i 0 Director Tremere stated that a large portl,2n of this lnuustrial tend was reguided from multi•restdential, which substantially redue" the need for a park in this area and focused the need on the eastern side of the park area. It may be better to overcame the impediment of C.R. 61 than to build another park because of the predominant, industrial nature of the land around the neigh- borhood. Director Nice stented that the County has exact criteria which most be met before they will install a signal and the intersec- tion doesn't aeet these warrants at this time. He ---de. the City use Its consultants to conduct a study on the proposed traffic projection when the road is completed and based on future traffic. INION was Node by Counciloemher Vasiliou, seconded by Council - member Schneider, authorising stiff to retain a traffic consul- tant to conduct a traffic study based on vehicle and pedestelan traffic projections at C.R. 61 and 15. Notion carried, four ayes. Discussion follmcs an alternatives ov bui:ding another park on they east side of L.R. 61. Counctloember Vasiliou stat"d she favored the traffic light because it would benefit both the cars and the pedestrian crossings. Counellmember Crain agreed that a park In this area Mould be the wrong directlon and the traffic signal seemed appropriate. Oiscussion on the question of density followed. Mayor Davenport pointed out that it would be better for the neighbors it the pond in the southwest catner remained in the industrial area of the development so the neighbors would not be responsible for the upkeep and the Council could require berming and landscap- ing. Director Moore pointed out that the frontage of the lots propos- ed are in fact larger than those of the akiutting existing homes and read the widths of the abutting parcels. Couwilmember Vasiliou stated she did not approve of any de- crease of units or In lot st=et NOTION was made by Couneilmember Vasiliou, seconded by Cowicl1w weber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 65»633 APPROVING FINAL PLATO MNDITIO1K USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR CARLSON SIXTH ADDITION FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES (85031) 1b Motion carried on a Roll fall vote, four ayes. RESOLUTION ND.85433 WE PUT, CUM" DEV. CONTRACT FOR CARLSON SIXTH ADDN. 85031) Item 6-8 1. August 26' 1985 Page 276 NOTION was made by Councilmember Vasllinu, seconded by Council- RESOLL.4N N0,AS-634 i -ember Sehnetdor, to adopt RESOLUTION 65-634 SETTING CONI- !ZjON5 IONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR FINAL PLAT FOR CARLSON SIXTH ADDITION FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES (850$1). CARLSON SIXTH ADON. 65031) Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Iterk 6-6 MOTION ryas made by Cuunei:&,%nber Vasiliou, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0.85-635 meober Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-635 ADOPTING ADOPTING IMSMW ASSESSMENTS, PROJECT 40. 5569 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERNAIN AREA, SEWER "' WATERMAIN CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ,ADDITION in the amount of $13.f,6s.00. CARLSON SIXTH ADDN. Pk"C T N0. 556 Notion carriee. on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 64 NOTION vias wade by Councilmamber Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION N0.8S-636 ber Schneider, to adc;t RESOLUTION N0. 85-636 APPROVING FIPAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 6TH MTRACT, WIND RIDGE ADDITION FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (85049). AT BASS LAKE 6TH ADON. (55049) Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Item 6,%C* NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Counc:lmem- RESOLUTION NOBS -637 ber Schneider, t;% adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-637 SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE NET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PIAT FOR WIND FINAL PLAT, WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 6TH ADDITION FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUC- RIDGE AT BASS LAKE TION COMPANY, IWC. (850491. 6TH ADDN. (85019) Notion carried nn a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Itew 6-C41 NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION N0.8S-638 her Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-638 ADOPTING ASSESS- ADOPTING A3. VENTS, PROJECT NO., 560, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERNAIK AREA, SEWER d WATERN41N AEQUITRON ADDITION in the amount of 5109864.20. AEQUIiRON ADDITION F303EC T N0. 560 Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport Item 640 abstained. NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NO M439 ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-639 APPROVING PRELINI- NAR.' PLAT FOR AEQUITRON MEDICAL, INC. (85065). AEQUITRON MEDICAL INS.'. (85065) Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Nayor Davenport Item 6-D* abstained, NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- RESOLUTION NOoBS-64G ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0a, 85-640 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR AEQUI14ON FOR NEQUITRON, INC. (85065). AEOUITRON, INC. 85065) Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport Item 6-D* abstained. lkJ ,cavi %t ow.Val; •-w4 r. ust 269 1985 Page 277 NOTION was made by Counctimember Crain, seconded by Counctimem- ber Schnelde r, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-641 SETTING CONDITIONS TO 6E NET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT FOR AEQUITRC:' FOR AEQUITRON, INC. (85065). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport abstained. MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by CounclImm. ber Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-642 APPROVINC SITE PLAN AND VARIANCES FOR AEQUITRON, INC. (85072). Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes. Mayor Davenport abstained. Randall 3oh.n3on, Driveway E*sign, distributed a letter to the o0unclI re9dr3ing delinquent bll:.s o! Minnesota Homebuilders the president of which Is part of the Mission Partnership developing Parkside Apartments, Mayor Davenport stated this is irrelevant to the Council's con- slderatlon of the request before it. They are being asked to approve a alte plan for the Parkside Apartments. The financing of the project would be Insured and guaranteed. Any daalings with subcontraetors is not relevant to the matter of they pro- ject. If the partnership meets the City's requirements, It can- not legally act to deny the request. Mr. Johnson asked for 30 days to present other evidence which he knows the financial lenders don't have. The Mayor stated agaln that If the partnership meets the City's standards, It cannot legally withhold approval. Attorney Lefler stated it is not the position of the Cl.y to be involved i;i o U-115putc uctwccn d dCVC%Luycf aiid hts subcontrac- tors. NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- ber Vaslllou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-643 APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTNACi FOR PARKSIDE OF MEDICINE I.AKE PARTNERSHIP FOR PARKSIDF. AT MEDICINE LAKE (RPUO 76-1) (A-338). Motiin carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MOTION was made by Counctimember Crain, seconded by Counellmem- ber V43ILIOUl to adopt RESOLUTION Nk'*. 85-644 SETTING Ct1NDITiONS TO EE MEI PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO FINAL PLAT AND APPROVAL FOR REAFFIRMATION OF SITE PLAN FOR PARKSIDE Al MEDICINE LAKE FOR PARKSIDE AT NEOICINE LAKE PARTNERSHIP (RPUD 76-1) A-3)8). Motion carried on 4 Roll Call vote, .our ayes. RE.SOLU110H N0.85-641 F INAL PLAT AEQUITROrt, INC. 95061) Item 6-D• RESOLUTION NO.85-642 AEOUITNON, INC. 85072) Item 6-0* RESOLUTION N0.85-643 CONTRACT, PARKSIDE OF MEDICINE LAKE A-339) Item 6•E RESOLUTION N0.85-644 SES PARKSIDE Of MEDICINE LAKE (R-338) • Item 6-E Page 276 MOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmem- ber Vasil:our to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 85-645 ADOPTING ASSESS- KNTS, P"XCT N0. 5589 SANITARY SEVER AND WATERMIAIN AREA, PARK•- SIDF. AT MEDICINE LAKE ADDITION in the amount of $212,055.00. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, tour ayes. NOTIOMM rras anode by Counctlmember Crain, seconded bl Counellmem- bar Vastl!ou, to adoFt RESOLUTION NO, 85-646 ADUP71MG ASSESS- MLNTS, PROJECT Ww= 5S7, SANITARY SFNER '.ATERAL9 PARKSIDE AT MEDICINE t4KE ADDITION in the amount of $?'69539.05. Notion carried on a !loll Call vote, tour ayes. NOTION was made by Councilmember Crain, seconded by Couneilmem- bee Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85447 SETTING PMC WARING DATE FOR 1986-87 CITY BUDGETS AND 198546 PROPOSED USE WARING FOR FEDERAL. REVENUE SWIRING FJk MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. NOTION was made ber Schnelder, BURSEMENTS FOR 2,5689770.44. by Counellmember Crain, seconded by Counellmem- to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85-648 APPROVING OIS- PERIOD ENDING JULY 31, 1985 In the amount of I Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council. member Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 85-649 REQUEST FOR PAY- AENT N0. 4 AND FINAL, 1984 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT In the amount of $9,856.08 to Hardrives, Inc. Notion carried on o Roll Call vote, tour ayes. NOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council - member Vasiliou, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 65-650 REQUEST FOR PAY- MENT N0. 6 AND FINAL, 1964 UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT in the amount of $14,779.32 to Ceca UtilIties, Inc. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Manager Mollis stated there are some communities which hsve money left for Industrial development revenue bonding but they all have many other cities in line asking for It. He believes the chance of getting some is slight. There may be money avail- able In the state pool when cities have to either use it or pay the IS holding fee. He added the City will have the opportunity to use its remaining funds. Noting there are two other appli- cants for the remaining City tuna,, he stated there are no guarantees that the first applicant will oe the one to receive the money. The Council can provide bonding for tNe onplicant they believe would be best for the City. RESOLUTION NO.85-645 SEVER i VATERNAIN PARKSIDE AT MEDICINE LAKE, PROS,, 558 Item 6-E RESOLUTION N0.85-646 SEVER LATERAL PARKSIDE AT MEDICINE LADE, PROD. 557 Item 6-E RESOLUTION N0.85-647 Ef T INC -MING BUOCETS A REVENUL SNARING Item 6-F• RESOLUTION H0.85-648 VENTS FOR PERIOD ENDING ?I 31 /85 Item 6-C+ RESOLUTION N0.85- L49 REQE*TFM P=Rr N0. 4 AND FINAL 1984 STREET INP, Item 6-H-1 RESOLUTION ND.85450 N0. 6 AND FINAL 1984 UTILITY IMP. Item d-"-2 IDRB REQUEST OGLE/SHEENY Item 6-I Hark Seca, representing Ogle/Sheehy, stated they intend to apply or money from the state pool, however, they need preliminary approval from the City which requires the holding of a public hearing. NOTION was made by Counetimember Schneider, seconded by Council - member Yaslliou, :o adopt RESOLUTION NOv, 85451 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC NEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES DEVEL- OPHW PROZCT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL IMWSiTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AUTHORIZING THE MUCATION OF A NOTICE OF THE HEARING to be held September 169 1985 at 7130 p.m. Notion carried on a Rall Call vote, four ayes. LOTION was made by Couneilmember Crain, seconded by Councilmea- ber Schnelder, to adopt RESOLUTION MIO. 85.652 APPROVING ADDI- TIONAL TAXI CA® LICENSE FOR TOWN TAXI. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. IF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COHMISSIONS Manager Millis stated that there are three alternate locations for the installation of the Pike Lake interceptor across the Tennant Co. property according to plan received from thew, all of which are similar to past locations. The City is proposing the trunk sewer engineering report previously prepared by 8one3troo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. be revised and updated based on the three alternates. Director Moore stated that Tennant, had acreed to provide accept- able alternates in August which they now have done. A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 28 by the Planning Commission to consider the five year Capital Improvement Pro- gram, of which the Pike Lake interceptor sewer connection is a part. The commission's recommendation will tN.ar be before the Council later for discussion and appro.al. The Mayor stated that, if Tennant Co. is not willing to grant the City an easement at no cost, he wants to know about it and suggested inviting Tennant to a Council meeting to discuss the miotter. Disoussion oontinued On lennant's schedule for development, whether they are trying to sell the land and the need for up- dated Cost estimates for the three alternatives. MOTION waw made by Couneilmember Schneider, seconded by Counctl- meAer Cretn, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 85453 ORDERING ANENDNENT TO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT ON PIKE LAKE INTERCEPTOR SEINER, PHASE Il, CITU tRONCT NO. 008. Notia: earrieo on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. RESOLUTION M1OAS451 IORB REQUEST OF OGLE/DENY PARTNER- SHIP PR03ECT Item 6-I RESOLUTION 181.85452 TAXI LIMM Item o-3* PIKE LAKE INTERCEPTOR REPORT Item 7-B RESOLUTION N0.85453 ENGINEERING REPORT PIKE LAKE INTER- CEPTOR SEWER Item 7-8