HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 05-24-1982 SpecialMINUTES
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETl.NG
May 24, 1982
The speclal apetirtg of the Plymouth City Council was called to
order by Mayor Davenport at 7:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Bouleviird on May 24, 1982.
PRESENT: Mayor Davenport, Councllmembers Moen, Netls, Schneider
and Threinen, City Manager Willis, Assistant City
Ndtedger Boyles, Pldnner Trtemere, Engineer Aoore, Park
Director Blank, City Attorney Lefler and City Clerk
Houk.
A8SLNT: Norte
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION was made by Coutteilmember Moen, seconded by
Threinen, to approve the content agenda with the
Item 7-E.
Mutiion cdrried on a RU.II Cdll vote, five dyes.
MINUTES
Councilmember
addition of
MOTION was made by Counclkmember Moen, seconded by Couticilmembee
Threinen, to approve the minutes of the May 17 regular Course ll
meeting as submitted.
Motion cdrried oil d Roll Cdll vut.e, five dyes.
PRESENTATIONS
Ted Loken stated he is dtt account supervisor for an ddvertlsinq
firm, he hds worked lit the; md,•ketirtg dre.i for the last 12 yedrs
fold itis written d text book on the subject. He served oft the
Keep the 8dll Rolling" committee for Armstrong High Schuol.
He; summdrize,d the "sense of community" ds It exists in Plymouth
toddy. He has studied the problem at d def tr exi it ds d "lack of
dent i ty and d lack of unity ds 3 whole: commurt i t y . " The CdU:SeS
occlude: (1) lack of d fOCdl point In the City, (2) kick of d
sc:houl district, (3) pecipherdl development., (4) lmdge of tr
City ndme, (5) Idck of d doritttowri dreg, (6) geogrdphlcal 1;1, ,
dttd (7) incomplete; development,
AU d solution he recommetided the estdL1tshmeitt of .: tumber of
dsk forces, iiialudiny resedreh, pidrtnlitq, residettt rel.dt tans,
orpurdte reldtiotts, public reeldtlons, acid Ccunmutticdt lollr to
lr;plemrent flood) elements of Arty pldn developed. Mr. Lokwt ,is
olunteered t: chair the cummlttee.
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 4
MINUTES - REGULAR
MEETING OF MAY 17
Item S*
PRESENTATION - TED
LOKEN, "SENSE OF
COMMUNITI" STRATEGY
Item 6-A
Sleclal Council Meeting
Hey 24, 1982
Paige 133
The time table provides for the implementation of the pltt.i co
Wgin 3drruary, 1983.
CouncLimember Threinen asked about the costs Involved. Mr.
Lukeir drtswered that he hoped to implement the plan er,1.1s%ely on a
volunteer basis.
G1st;t.sn1on continued on how to find out what groups exist and
dre .jccLve Ln the Community at tie present time.
141. Lokeet stated the primary goal of the committee will be to
unite the resider ts with a "sense of community".
Public Safety Director Carlquist updated the Council on the
c & ime Prevention program lit Plymouth. He presented art
organizatlor al chart showing the makeup of the p.l.ymouth Crim
Prevention and Apprncenston Fund. He reviewed the direct'ot h•-
warrts the program to take and the areas volunteers have been
recruited to work in Including writing of d newsletter, special
projects, lldiso i duties, commurticdt ions, and the role of the
Ilu i tce DepdrLmertL In this.
Mdyor Udvenport asked If the mune of the program wasn't
cumbersume. He suggested maybe the worn "find" should be
changed to program d" fund Implies to some people the donation
of money.
Couitellmember Neils suggested drt article ort the program be pdri
of the: Plymouth on Ndrade In art upcoming issue.
PETITILWS, RL:QULST;: AND CO;4MUNICATIONS
Mdyur U.iveliport staled that this is not a public hearing;
br.ccruse of the time , roblems }ender which the developer Is
wurkli g, lhr staff requested that this final p.ldt/plan and
deNalopmea contract for "Misslon Oaks 1st Addition" be heard
Lunight.
Mdrtdger lK.1I is Stated that the Planning Commiss ioll completUi
Lheir ronslderdtlort of the request of the Mission Oaks
Pdrtnership for the Mission Ook3 project, phase 1. Resolutions
have: been recummendod for Council c:oitsiderdt tort which would
dppruve the firtdl pla'. and development, contract, site pldn, arid
dss.sssmcnts. There are cecommettded for Council considerat lort
16 c:ondltiurts dedliitq ei1th Nldnnirtg Commisslr ii Concerns over
elc.-mier,its of Lhe pidn which need to be addressed by the
do-.cloper. if the: COU11, 11 acts fdvordbly ort titese resolut.tons,
the detiel.opec woull be required to comply wtth the cortdit Ions
bkofore Lhe flrtdl pldL c:ouitl be filed dnd blil_Lding permits
lsasoed.
141cht rd Ze d11M. Mlrislon Odks developer, stdLed that he would be
the developer of this pro- ect through Baton Corpordt lore. Niton
would be a hirttter lit the Mission Oaks Pdrtitersh 1p deed would
mdndQe the project.
PRESENTATION - CHIEF
CARLOUMT, STATUS OF
CRIME PREVENTION
PROGRAM IN PLYMOUTH
Item 6-0
FINAL PLAT & SITE
PLAN - "MISSIO`I
OAKS IST ADDITION
RICHARD ZEODL IK
Item 7-A
This project was tabled kite Lit 1981 becdrtse the State couldn't
It uoitds to fined these types of low and moderate Income
developments. in feta"^udry 1982 the dnrrouncement teas made that
the bonds were sold and funds were available. Hr. Immediately
uee,or• to work with, the City on the project.
There are 26 units In proposed phase I and 46 in phase 11. The
MietneSPtid Housing Finaltce Agency has set d deadlines of June 1,
1992 to qe the project dpproved by the City or the fwtds will
go batik to the federdl government. He stated he cart handle all
16 conditions except the access to the project which hds been
the mai t con' .oversy. The question which hds arisen with
tlelgh.%ors is dcceC3 onto 41ut Ave. Mission Partnership has felt
Wdt the issue of 413t Ave. would be resolved, but riot as pdrt
of phase I development. They feel It would riot make sense
economkdlly to include the: road at this time. Mission
Pdrtrtershlp feels road developme tt should be tied to later
development tr`vii access would be more important. A decision by
the Council s,pporting the project Is needed to mdke the project
possible.
Mayor Ddvenport asked why the developer didn't consider an
de;ce;ss 41110 C.R. 9.
Mr. Zejd.;:<k d1tsi.e:ree; thdt decess onto C.R. 9 was pidnned
Initially ind tNtv dt.:cess points to the property were shown.
Stdff recimineisle:d that the trdffic circulation should be
internal to the RPUD onto 41st Ave. The concept of two access
politiLs eras rsut supported '.o dvold shortcutting through the
project. )"n aption of access to C.R. 9 only, per County design
requirements, was ltut pursued for economic redsons.
CoutwllmeOier Schneider asked If
an exesve r -lily onto C.R. 9 at
J.rapdwt Wju.:.v be ort the site pldtl.
the developer could live with
Goldenrod Ldne, and whdt the
1r. Zrjdllk described the curtditlons under which he could live
ur10 the C.R. 9 access requirement. He doesn't hdve d revised
Si' - a Nldtl rtodd) dt this t lme, however,
Councitmemtor Threirtert asked If Mr. Zejdllk pldrined to develop
phdse ti d.lso. Mr. Zejdlik drtswered he didn't k tow at this
1. !me .
CouikO1::.ember Theelrten asked if the exLelts1011 of 41st. Ave. to
Ldroh Ldrte would be part of phdse Il. Mr. Ze jd l lk drtswered he
d.dtt't h.dv.. dtty 1,1dns for developing beyond these ?6 units.
Councilmenitwr Threlnerl stated that i effect, this would be d 26
uttit c I-de-sdc.
Jue TlKim autt, 11705 41st, Ave. N.. Pre. idem of the Ht. ss lora
til3 1 . .17., stdteid dt Issue Is one mdI11 point: the problem of
dce.ass. (he preiimindry plan hdd dcccess onto 41st drtd C.R, 9t
with 41st Ave. tis be ext:ertded to Larch Lute. People were
ddv lsed that there should ltot he ons, concern because of Lie
dirt cit dcaess to C.R. 9, Now the a IImI11dt tart trf XCeSs to .;.R.
9 dttd ;ejdikocting it to 41st Ave. cottrerrts the neighbors. E.ve.n
IS 41st Av,). was compteted to C.N. 9 dt larch Ldne, they would
ytlll be runcerned with the traffic flow and circuldtlorl. He;
stdted he did not recdl.l thdt d trdf f Ic study was done on the
ImNdct of this prjpusdl.
Mr. Th-mpson sLd'ed he dpprecidtes r.he time constraints but if
the dr'-,css could 6e resolved there vauld be no opposition by the
H.O.A. He sugge:'•,1.d redirecting traffic to el imindte it. on 41st
Ave. dnd put i.t r r. C.N. 9 dt f..; f denraJ Lane. Ne present e+i e
act.4.tlun slatted by 180 hot rr,hotds In opposition to the
developmer. ds ,proposed. He ist:.ed that the Council Lo not
dpprove t.ne resr.luL ions.
Murty Shdpiro, 11160 40th Ave. N. slated the neighbors .are
ccarcerned (r;rduse they hdve ,to sillewdlks drtd the incredse !rt
Lrdffic wewil.d be d d-ertgee to the %-:s1deas. He *is concerned
that the rush to approve the project would ddverse!.y df feet t:he
entire: neighburhoud beCdUSt 01' ths: uncertdirety Of the completion
of 41st Ave.
Mdyoc Ddveteport stated thdt the Council wili evaluate the
Nrupusdl ori its merits drtd it was the Council's ,job to hear bath
kdes of the proposdl.
MR-• Zejdllk vo diced Chat if he redid the C.R. 9 access, the
rrv!sed Sit'. pldn would hdve to come bdck before the City
for review.
Cut.lnCP,member SeNteider asked if d revised site pldrt dnd
executed developme:etL corttrcwt could be presented before the
hdve
1 de.&a11n1-. Mr. Zejdllk drtswered he couldn't be re:ddy by then.
4e wculd, however, work wlth the SLdte Lo obLdln d tme
extertslon for funding, bdsead on City Counc'_1. dP1• ovdls.
Councllmember Schrtelder sty ea he wds concerned that the City
would be. .ippruving some,thlrtg they hdve nut seen.
At Lortte:y Lef ltr St.dLe;d LhdL the petit inner was suggesting that
Lf the Counc I l would approve the project with the access to
C.H. 9 subject Lu cuttdlLions includzng r•flunittdJ of e•evtsed site
pldrts, the Stdte might be wtillrtq to extend the deddl[ne.
Mr. Nompson sLdLed the H.O.A. would like sole iceuss to C.R. 9
drtd nu dCCVSS to 41SL iAve. They du riot Weilit dceeSS thrott:.Ih d
single fdmll;• died by d multi-fd-n[ly arra. Noy do not, be,.tevt4
tilts plan suhmiLLed Lu the: Courtcll Is the mos' v[dl;le.
Mdyur Odvenpurt st ..t e,d ht, UU'Ld i;,:; o siud i dece:ss from the
site, only dL C.C. 9, unt.11 41st. Ave. Is constructed to C.R. 9
dL Larch ldtte, lhell dCCess Lu be upe iced Lu 41;t Ave,
Courtc I ime;mber Ne t.ls stdLed that she I s d1;n coitoerned dbdut: the
question of the SLurdge provlstutts [n the pi -on oW submlLted
LhdL th, Storages its ouLll.ned is 111ddege1atc:.
Mr. Zejdllk itite;d t hdt. what, they hdve p 1 jnned is d treddy 50
sq, fl . dbove the mittlmum required by HUD. :xtetts ive dlscusston
e.tsued regdt•dirtg LidegUdcy 0' stordge:. Councllmember Nells
sLdWJ eft'ecitve storage for fdmlly living needs must he
dvd.t lab it:.
Special Council Meeting
May 24, 1982
Page 136
Counclimember Schneider stated the site Includes marry trees
which comp -'y with the minimum ata:ildrds required; he suggested
that the ' conditlorr that the d:;viloper document the number of
trees on 0o site be deleted.
i!UTiOH was made by Courrcl:member Neils, seconded by
Corrrclimember Moen, to approve tentatively the MIs ,ion Oaks ist
Addition acrd the Mission Oaks development for Mission Oaks
P4rtnership, subject to City review and apprnvdl of the revised
site plan when It has been redesigned to meet the direction that
access shall be o. -to C.R. 9 at uoldenrod Lane per the approval
of the City Eaginee', and the Hennepin County Highway Department;
that a driveway shall be projected at 41st Ave. N. but this
driveway shall not be used until 41st Ave. Is constructed to the
gest to C.R. 9 at Ldreh Ldr e, dyed until such time the only
access to this project shall be from C.R. 9. The revised site
N.I.arr shall also show the access to C.R. 9 for phase II; dyed
corrd.Itions 1 and 3 through 16 of the Planning Commission's
recom errdations apply.
MOTION was made by Councllmember Schneider, seconded by
Cous cilmembe!` Neils, to amwr d the motion that the access to 41st
Ave. be dt the west extreme of the exIstirrg berm In phase 1 acrd
that phase 11 wnuld also have access to 41st but only at the
redcssigned westerly driveway.
Discusslon continued Vrr the placement of the street through the
project.
The Mayor stated that this is a sense of the Council motion.
The flrrdl plan will he; sent to the Plam ing Commission for
specific al: ect lorrs.
Amendment to fttiorl passed, five ayes.
MOTION was node by
Cowrcllm:mber Nells, to
amendto in SW, -h a wiry
drive frwn 4,tzO Ave;. to
Cour cLlmember Schneider, seconded by
amend the mot Lon that the site plan be
to preclude a "straight shot" InternaL
C.R. 9.
Discussion foktowed en the placement of the proposed accesses of
phase 11.
Amendmer t to mot.orr passed, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Mayor
Udvenpuxt, to delete the: tollowing frrvr condition Vot "or a
survey verifying the exlstir g trees which meet the minimum site
did type of plantings as specified ire the Ldndsc.rpe Policy shall
bei s0mitted prior tQ Issuance of d Building Permit."
Mutivtk to dmend fa.11ed, two ayes. Cour c ll^iembers Moen, Neils,
acrd Tnrelnerr voted fray.
Speel al Co.wic ll Meeting
May 24, 1982
Pdge 137
Halii mot lcn is twice dmeitded passed, five ayes.
Mr. lejdlik stated he will hove the plan back to the Plannli+g
Commission d, quickly is possible.
MOTION was made by Cou icilmember Moen,
ThreLrten, t.o adopt ORDINANCE NO. 82-15
ORDINANCF NO. 80-9 ADOPTED JUNE 169
PLYMOUTH IONINI; OROIt1ANCE .
seconded by Councilme:mber
AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE
1980 AND KNOWN AS THE
Mot ion cdrrird o n a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Councllmefdier Sc.hnelder stated he objected to the gray a proposed
development qualifits ds a PUD simply on the basis of size under
current procedures. Pld1mcr Trenere stated that the criteela
for determining a PUD should be straightforward. Councilmember
Schneider stated he would like the Pldnning CommtSSton to deny
proposals If the developer overlooks `.he natural abaernities of
the Iditd dikd other PUD qudlifyl ng criteria. The portion of the
ordtliarnce pertaining to this will be discussed and empnasiznd dt
do upe:uming jolint meetl ng of the Pldnning ComInISSIoI) and
Council.
HOTIUN was made by Cocntciimember Moen, secoiidf!O by Councl:member
Threin:r;, to dOOpt kESOLUTION N0. 82-254 AUTHOR!LING THE
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $293409000 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE
BONU (WHITTAR INDUSTRIES, LTD, PROJECT) SERIES 1982 PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA S)ATUTES, CHAPTER 474.
Motion+ carried 011 d Roil Cdll vote, fivr' ayes.
HOYh1N wds indde by Councllmember Moen, seconded bu Councllmember
Thre: mein, .o ddupt RLSOLUTiON NO. 82-255 REAPPOINTING DAVID L.
PAUBA TO THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AID APPEALS ford term
to expire 3dilUdry 31, 1183.
Mot loin carr Led un d Holl. Cd? l votr, fl -,e dyes .
Me;:ION wds mdde by Councllmembt;r Moen, seconded by Councllmembrar
Thrc litc!%, to ddopL RESOLUTION NO. 82-256 AMENDING AMENDED
UEVEIUPMENi CONTRACT, NORTHWES* BUSINESS CAMPUS (80062) to
coinstract two c#:l-de-sdcs on Anndpo 115 Circle.
KoLlol. edoried on d Rosi rdll vote, five ayes.
REPORTS OF Oi-FICERS, ARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Mdye.r Odvo report stated he and the C I l y Manager will ue
discusslitg the Mdyur/Council dgelldd itexL Tue;;Idf morning. No
CL ton wds tdkeit.
Mdyor Udveoport sta ec: he doesn,i't think that the CI ty siunuld
dccepL the offer of Ndeclele AJvert lsicig Compdny to provide d
billbodrd for City use d.t the southedst yuddrdnt of 494 .ir,d
C.N. 9. The prupose:d sign would be: Ill vicldtloin of the City's
uurrenL sigin or0l(ldnee ds It doesn't iddreess three. -sided r,lilties
diKi would net a precedeitL for other Cumpdnles to r. equet.t tree.
sdMes.
ORDINANCE NO. 82-15
ORDINANCE
Item 7-Bf
RESOLUTIO4 N0.82-254
AUTHORIZING e.
OF i nRB, WF' I T TAR
INDUSTRIES
Item 7-C"
RESOLUTION N0.82-255
R P INTI DVI
PAU:%A TO BOARD OF
ZONING
Item 7-D•
RESOLUTION NO.82-256
AREMINC, DEVELOPMENT
CONTRACT, NORTHWEST
BUSINESS CAMPUS
80062 )
Itis ;-E",
RLVIEW DIRECTIVES &
MAYOR/CJUNDIL AGENDA
Item 8-A
VkL.:ELE PROPOSAL TC
DONATE BILLBOARD USI:
TO CITY
It("n 8-B
pr Special Council
Ndy 240 1962
Page 138
meeting
Ndegele made 00 rif fer ds d response to the C, lv is League's
looking for d sign to promote Muss i Plymouth.
l
NOTION *,As made by Couucllmember Threinesn, sentonded by Nrayor
Odvenport, to thdt k Nde9ele for 4helr offer and tell them that
the final decision will not be made until the recommendettons
from the "Sense of Community" project are received.
The Mayor stated there may be do drt•a within the City betker
silted for it three*sldud sign.
Idot loll carried, five dyes.
Ma ager Willis reported that last October the Council asked the
staff to put to1lether d policy for the selection of
consultants. They have put together two outlines which could be
used for this purpose. Under the First procedure the City
Mbiidger prepares d list of firms and negotiates a contract with
the top firm lit a 1,tst 0 three iur the project planned by the
City.
The second procedure differs lit that It seeks to establish a
Qx1r.e formal process fol- SeJeCtilig Consultants. For retained and
o igoing Consultants, a list of firms would be established which
dre deemed t,j ,bis eligible for Clty work. The selection of each
fi.tm for U clusiaoi lit the, matrix dnd for the specific project Is
mdde by the Council of subcommittee thereof. Occasional
co GulLd its are selected diter Interview with the City Council.
These firms neeu not be i icluded In the matrix.
Couitcllmembor threlneii stdtftd he liked procedure two ds It is
coi sisteni with the way the City has been working.
Discussion followed on the twro procedures.
Counullmember Motun stated she felt the policy should clarify the
dutles of a retdined c011sultdnt.
Winagkr W11115 s4dted he will work on procedure two to eapdrid oil
LL and bring a draft back to the Council.
Counclimember SchniiMer stated he still felt that the consmItdnt
for d project should make the preseiitatlon of the project to the
Council so he c:eni ynswer quest lops.
Mdlidget Willis st6,'ted he ho-lleves the consultant should be
dvdlltible to presceitt their reports to tete Council for quest loiis
dnd suggest ions. 4e suggested having all preliminary reports
cumlw to the Councll'preseitted by the coitsultdrdt liovo.lved.
NOTION wti9 made by Counellmember Schnelder) seconded by
Councilmember Nel.ls, that the c01151Jttnnt on any and all projects
present their own prellMindry reports directly to the Crunch.
POLICY ISSUES
RELATING TO
CONSULTANT SLLLCTIO14
POLICY
Item 8-C
Specldl Council Meeting
Mdy 249 19tQ
Page 139
Mut 1011 cdrr led, five dyes.
Tht Council received the 1981 f inarscial report and audit, it
wdfi provided at this time to allow Councllmembers time to review
It prior to the discussion scheduled for the Council meeting of
3une 7.
The Council reviewed the public improvement project status
report submitted by the City Engineer.
The ,review of the City Manager's response to the Kayor's mt:mo of
1/22J'82, Part IV wds deferred.
OTHER BUSINESS
Matldger Willis asked tf.yt the Council review the Plymouth park
ttnd ldI d trust pulley draft which will be discussed further at
the Coioicil meeting of 3utie 7. It will provide a means for
c lL ixeiis to dolldte perso11dl d11d real property to the community
for recredtlon purposes. Following Council adoption of the
policy, the staff will put together 1iubliclty items on this
subj-tct.
Mdlldger Willis seated that Wayne Stuart has resigned from the
Board of Io111ng Adjustmetlt olid Appeals. Ne submitted
dppitedtinlls from Moe residents Interest,A in being appointed
to the Hoard.
Couitellmember Neils Sugg:-ksted holdietq the appolrltmel,C a11d
checking to de-erml:le whethir these three are still interested
Ln the appolikLment, since dll three dppliedtlona dre from last
year.
Cuultellmember Threlrten sugges.ed
thr11 calling the dppllcdllt,s. If
still ltlterested, the Council c
meetirl,
raltkirlg the applicatiOlIS and
the ton rdnheii doplicanL is
III appoint him at its next
14; meeting wds dd jourrled -it 1 l t 10 p. n.
1981 AUDITED
FINANCIAL REPORT
It em d -D•
0
PROJECT STATUS
REPORT
Item 8-E
MAYOR'S MEMO OF 1/22
PART IV
Item 8-F
OTHER BUSINESS